Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research
17 August 2017
V.Vijayalakshmi
Communication
Assertiveness,
Listening, Non- Conflict
Verbal Body Management
Language
People Skills
Social Intelligence
At the end of this session
Building a
The challenges
resourceful state
Think Pair Share
Acceptance/ Synopsis
rejection
Problem Proposal
Identification, Defense Submission
Dept./
Other
Admin
Faculty
Staff
Understanding Your Advisor
TYPE 1
TYPE 3
A Variety of Roles
(Brown and Atkins, 1988)
Supervisor Scholar
Guru Shishya
Master Servant
Guide Explorer
Project manager Team worker
Auditor Client
Friend Friend
Colleague Colleague
Teacher Pupil
Expert Novice
Editor Author
Counselor Client
Director Follower
a common typology
survey: scholars
Survey Research Scholars Perspective
Good communication
Willingness to share
knowledge
Mutual Patience No ego
Respect Different! As simple as that
Discipline
Ability to accept mistake
Humility Non- Difference in the style of
judgmental working
Difficulty in Communication
Comparisons / Competition
among Peers
Communicating
Impractical Deadlines
clearly &
Stress from Workload
honestly
The ideal image of a guide
a continuum from wonderful
is up-to-date in your field; meets with you regularly; engages his or her mind
with your intentions, detailed, constructive and sometimes tough feedback on
your drafts; helps you set realistic timelines; consoles and encourages you when
you are lost, constructively critical, good-humoured, punctual;
helps you get in touch with other people (students and academics) who are
working on related topics; circulates information about what's going on in your
field (talks, visitors, conferences); helps you prepare for your defence, fair but
supportive
Ref: http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/faqs/help-for-graduate-students/supervisors
to not that wonderful
is rarely around (frequently out of the country), generally late and in a hurry,
keeps you waiting; distracted, non- responsive
makes comments that are either very generalized or very picky, or irrelevant;
fits your work into a rigid or preconceived plan that fits with what he/she is
interested in , contributes little or nothing to co-authored papers and always
insists on his or her name coming first (or even leaves off your name)
offers no support (or even turns on you) in committee meetings and your
defence
Ref: http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/faqs/help-for-graduate-students/supervisors
Survey Research Scholars Perspective
Good communication
Willingness to share
knowledge
Mutual Patience No ego
Respect
Different! As simple as that
Discipline
Ability to accept mistake
Humility Non-
judgmental Difference in the style of
working
Difficulty in Communication
Comparisons / Competition
Communicating among Peers
clearly & Impractical Deadlines
honestly Stress from Workload
Mismatch in expectations
What supervisors expect of their doctoral
students (Phillips and Pugh, 2005)
Students to be excited
Independent with their work & fun Follow the advice
to be with
Honest when
reporting research Regular meetings Not be oversensitive
progress
Produce close to
Accept challenges
perfection
What doctoral students expect of their
supervisors (Phillips and Pugh, 2005)
support encourage
involvement guide with open
in research encouragement discussion of
activities ideas
be
available/prepared
for meetings
An Effective Meeting with your Advisor
be
be on time, prepared!
notify in
advance if
canceling, fix short
up next reminder of
meeting context
clarify
listen intently
deliverables
Asking for Feedback
Am I making enough Do you think that I am
use of the learning managing to get enough
opportunities work done in the time
available? between our meetings?
How do you
think we might
work together
more
effectively?
some weapons
What personal qualities will enhance
Inter(Intra)personal Harmony?
Empathy Respect & trust
Expansiveness
TRANSPARENCY
Want the
draft EOD Sure.
Oh God!
How is it
possible!
Reporting
Frequency,
Attendance Level of and Aspect of
duration of
patterns preparation feedback quality
meetings
practices
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE
What events require your emotional balance to the most?
Problem
identification
Compre
teaching , grading
many
ongoing
projects,
duties
Step into their shoes
writing
proposals Empathy
other research
scholars. research
Significant Others
How can you make others trust you? Goto
person
The Advisor team
Social side is important too! - Participating in
others successes, functions, seminars
Sharing knowledge conferences, best
practice
A good word goes a long way!
What will help?
A HEALTHY DOSE
OF HUMOR!
Using Humor
Free will to Change!!!
Think of 3 learnings of importance to you from this session.
Two responses (behaviors) you would want to do differently
Cryer, P. 2000. The Research Students Guide to Success. Open University Press, Buckingham.
Dietz A.J. (Ton), Jonathan D. Jansen, Ahmed A Wadee, 2006, Effective PhD Supervision and Mentorship. A
Workbook based on experiences from South Africa and the Netherlands, Pretoria and Amsterdam: Unisa
Press and Rozenberg Publishers (133 pp)
Finn, J. 2003 Getting a PhD: An Action Plan to Help Manage your Research, your Supervisor, and your
Project, Routledge, London.
Granovetter, M. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
Phillips, E. M. and Pugh, D. S. 2005. How to get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and their Supervisors.
McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
Medawar, P.A. 1981. Advice to a Young Scientist. Harper Collins, New York.
http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/faqs/help-for-graduate-students/supervisors
The Window
A young
couple moves
into a new
neighborhood.
. .
Every time her
neighbor would
hang her wash to
dry, the young
woman would make
the same
comments.
.
About one month later, the woman was surprised to see a
nice clean wash on the line and said to her husband:
.
The husband said:
I got up early this morning and
cleaned our windows!
.
And so it is with life:
What we see when
watching others,
depends on the purity
of the window
through which we
look.
Before we give any
criticism, it might be a
good idea to check our
state of mind and ask
ourselves if we are
ready to see the good
rather than to be
looking for something
in the person we are
about to judge.
.
. This is about
challenging our mental
model
we dont see things as they