Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol.

17, 2017 74

University of New Mexico

More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft

Cubic Set
R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam
1
R. Anitha Cruz, Department of Mathematics Nirmala College for Women, Coimbatore, 641018, India, anithacruz@gmail.com
2
F.Nirmala Irudayam, Assistant Proffesor, Departmentof Mathematics, Nirmala College for Women, Coimbatore, 641018, India,
nirmalairudayam@ymail.com

Abstract:The P-union ,P-intersection, P-OR and P-AND
of neutrosophic soft cubic sets are introduced and their
related properties are investigated. We show that the P-
union and the P-intersection of two internal neutrosophic
soft cubic sets are also internal neutrosophic soft cubic
sets. The conditions for the P-union ( P-intersection ) of
two T-external (resp. I- external, F- external) neutrosophic
soft cubic sets to be T-external (resp. I- external, F-
external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets is also dealt with.
We provide conditions for the P-union ( P-intersection ) of
two T-external (resp. I- external, F- external) neutrosophic
soft cubic sets to be T-internal (resp. I- internal,F- internal)
neutrosophic soft cubic sets. Further the conditions for the
P-union (resp. P-intersection ) of two neutrosophic soft
cubic sets to be both T-external (resp. I- external, F-
external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets and T-external (resp.
I- external, F- external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets are
also framed.

Keywords: Cubic set, Neutrosophic cubic set, Neutrosophic soft cubic set, T-internal (resp. I- internal,F- internal) neutrosophic
soft cubic sets , T-external (resp. I- external, F- external) neutrosophic soft cubic set.

1 Introduction neutrosophic soft cubic sets to be T-internal (resp. I-

Florentine Smarandache[10,11] coined neutrosophic sets
and neutrosophic logic which extends the concept of the
classical sets, fuzzy sets and its extensions. In neutrosophic
set, indeterminacy is quantified explicity and truth-
membership, indeterminacy-membership and falsity
membership are independent. This assumption is very
important in many applications such as information fusion
in which we try to combine the data from different sensors.
Pabita Kumar Majii[18] had combined the Neutrosophic
set with soft sets and introduced a new mathematical
model Nuetrosophic soft set. Y. B. Jun et al[2].,
introduced a new notion, called a cubic set by using a
fuzzy set and an interval-valued fuzzy set, and investigated
several properties. Jun et al. [19] extended the concept of
cubic sets to the neutrosophic cubic sets. [1] introduced
neutrosophic soft cubic set and the notion of truth-internal
( indeterminacy-internal, falsity-internal) neutrosophic soft
cubic sets and truth-external ( indeterminacy-internal,
falsity-internal) neutrosophic soft cubic sets
As a continuation of the paper [1]We show that the P-
union and the P-intersection of T-internal (resp. I-
internal,F-internal) neutrosophic soft cubic sets are also T-
internal (resp. I-internal,F-internal) neutrosophic soft cubic
sets. We also provide conditions for the P-union ( P-
intersection ) of two T-external (resp. I- external,F-
external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets to be T-external
(resp. I- external,F- external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets.
We provide conditions for the P-union ( P-intersection )
of two T-external (resp. I- external,F- external)
internal,F- internal) neutrosophic soft cubic sets.
We provide conditions for the P-union (resp. P-
intersection ) of two NSCS to be both T-external (resp. I-
external,F- external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets and T-
external (resp. I- external,F- external) neutrosophic soft
cubic sets.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Definition: [5] Let E be a universe. Then a fuzzy set
over E is defined by X = { x (x) / x: x E }where x is
called membership function of X and defined by x : E
[0,1]. For each x E, the value x(x) represents the degree of
x belonging to the fuzzy set X.
2.2 Definition: [2] Let X be a non-empty set. By a cubic
set, we mean a structure
in which A is an interval valued fuzzy set (IVF) and is a
fuzzy set. It is denoted by .
2.3 Denition: [9]Let U be an initial universe set and E be
a set of parameters. Consider A E. Let P( U ) denotes the
set of all neutrosophic sets of U. The collection ( F, A ) is
termed to be the soft neutrosophic set over U, where F is a
mapping given by F : A P(U).
2.4 Definition : [4] Let X be an universe. Then a
neutrosophic (NS) set is an object having the form
= {< x : T(x),I(x),F(x) >: x X}
where the functions T, I, F : X ]0, 1+[ defines
respectively the degree of Truth, the degree of

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 75

indeterminacy, and the degree of Falsehood of the neutrosophic soft cubic set over U where P is a mapping
element x X to the set with the condition. given by P : A NC(U) .

0 T(x) + I(x) + F(x) 3+ 2.7 Definition: [1]
2.5 Definition : [7] Let X be a non-empty set. An interval Let X be an initial universe set. A neutrosophic soft cubic
neutrosophic set (INS) A in X is characterized by the set (P, A) in X is said to be
truth-membership function AT, the indeterminacy-
membership function AI and the falsity-membership truth-internal (briefly, T-internal) if the following
function AF. For each point x X, AT (x),AI (x),AF (x) inequality is valid
T T
[0,1]. ( x X , ei E ) ( Ae x e x Ae x ),
T
(2.1)
i i i
For two INS
indeterminacy-internal (briefly, I-internal) if the
A = {<x, [AT-(x), AT+(x)], [AI-(x), AI+(x) ], [AF-(x),
following inequality is valid
AF+(x)]>: x X} I I
and ( x X , ei E ) ( Ae ( x) e ( x) Ae ( x) ) , (2.2)
I
i i i
B = {<x, [BT-(x), BT+(x)], [BI-(x), BI+(x) ], [BF-(x), falsity-internal (briefly, F-internal) if the following
BF+(x)]>: x X} inequality is valid
Then, F F
~ B if and only if F

( x X , ei E ) ( Ae x e x Ae x ). (2.3)
1. A i i i

AT ( x) BT ( x) , AT ( x) BT ( x) If a neutrosophic soft cubic set in X satisfies (2.1),

AI ( x) BI ( x) , AI ( x) BI ( x) (2.2) and (2.3) we say that ( P, A) is an internal
AF ( x) BF ( x) , AF ( x) BF ( x) for all x X. neutrosophic soft cubic set in X .
2. A B if and only if 2.8 Definition: [1]

AT ( x) BT ( x) , AT ( x) BT ( x)
Let X be an initial universe set. A neutrosophic soft

AI ( x) BI ( x) , AI ( x) BI ( x) cubic set ( P, A) in X is said to be

AF ( x) BF ( x) , AF ( x) BF ( x) for all x X. truth-external (briefly, T -external) if the following
~ inequality is valid
3. AC { x, [ A-F (x), AF (x)],[A-I (x), AI (x)],[A-T (x), AT (x)] : x X } T T
( x X , ei E ) (e x ( Ae x , Ae x )),
T
(2.4)
i i i
indeterminacy-external (briefly, I -external) if the
~ B { x, [min {A - (x), B (x)} , min {A (x), B (x)}], following inequality is valid
A
( x X , ei E ) (eI x ( Ae I x , Ae I x )),
T T T T
4. (2.5)
[max{A-I (x), BI (x)}, max{AI (x), BI (x)}], i i i
falsity-external (briefly, F -external) if the following
[max{A-F (x), BF (x)}, max{AF (x), BF (x)}] : x X } inequality is valid
( x X , ei E ) (eF x ( Ae F x , Ae F x )). (2.6)
i i i
5. If a neutrosophic soft cubic set ( P, A) ) in X satisfies
~
A B { x, [max{A -T (x), BT (x)} , max {A T (x), BT (x)}] , (2.4), (2.5) and (2.6), we say that ( P, A) is an external
[min{A -I (x), BI (x)}, min{A I (x), BI (x)}], neutrosophic soft cubic set in X.
2.9 Definition [1]
[min{A -F (x), BF (x)}, min{A F (x), BF (x)}] : x X } Let
2.6 Definition: [1] (P, I) = { P(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I }
Let U be an initial universe set. Let NC(U) denote the i i

set of all neutrosophic cubic sets and E be the set of and

parameters. Let A E then (Q, J) = { Q(ei ) = Bi = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J }
i i
( P, A) { P(ei ) { x, Aei ( x), ei ( x) : x U } ei A E }
be two neutrosophic soft cubic sets in X. Let I
where Aei ( x) { x, AeT x , AeI x , AeF x / x U } is an
i i i and J be any two subsets of E (set of
interval neutrosophic set , parameters), then we have the following
ei ( x) { x, (e x , e x , e x / x U }
T I T
is a 1. (P, I) = (Q, J) if and only if the following
i i i
conditions are satisfied
neutrosophic set. The pair ( P, A) is termed to be the a) I = J and

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
76 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

b) P(ei ) = Q(ei ) for all ei I if {< x, max{ A I (x), BI (x)}, ( I I )(x) > : x X} ei I J ,
ei ei ei ei

and only if Aei ( x) Bei ( x) F (ei ) P G (ei ) =

F F

and ei ( x) ei ( x) for all {< x, max{ A F (x), B F (x)}, ( F F )(x) > : x X} e i I J .

ei ei ei ei

x X corresponding to 2.11 Definition: [1]

each ei I . Let ( F , I ) and (G , J ) be two neutrosophic soft cubic
2. (P, I) and (Q, J) are two neutrosophic soft sets (NSCS) in X where I and J are any subsets of
cubic set then we define and denote P- parameters set E.
order as (P, I) P (Q, J) if and only if Then we define P-intersection of neutrosophic soft cubic
set as ( F , I ) p (G, J ) ( H , C) where C I J ,
the following conditions are satisfied
c) I J and H (ei ) = F (ei ) P G(ei )
d) P(ei ) P Q(ei ) for all ei I H ( ei ) = F (ei ) P G(ei ) and ei I J . Here
if and only if Aei ( x) Bei ( x) F (ei ) P G(ei ) is defined as
and ei ( x) ei ( x) for all F (ei ) P G (ei ) = H (ei ) =
x X corresponding to each {< x, min{ A e (x), B e (x) }, ( e e )(x) > : x X} e i I J
i i i i

ei I . .
3. (P, I) and (Q, J) are two neutrosophic where A e (x), B e (x) represent interval neutrosophic sets.
i i
soft cubic set then we define and de- Hence
note P- order as (P, I) R (Q, J) if and F T (ei ) P GT (ei )

only if the following conditions are sat- {< x, min{ A T (x), BT (x) }, ( T T ) (x) > : x X} ei I J ,
ei ei ei ei
isfied
F (ei ) P G (ei )
I I
e) I J and
{< x, min{ A I (x), BI (x) }, ( I I )(x) > : x X} ei I J ,
f) P(ei ) R Q(ei ) for all ei I ei ei ei ei

if and only if
Aei ( x) Bei ( x) F F (ei ) P G F (ei )
and ei ( x) ei ( x) for all {< x, min{ A F (x), B F (x) }, ( F F ) (x) > : x X} e i I J
ei ei ei ei

x X corresponding to
each ei I .
3 More On P-union And P-intersection Of Neutrosoph-
2.10 Definition: [1]
ic Soft Cubic Set
Let (F , I ) and (G, J ) be two neutrosophic soft cubic sets
(NSCS) in X where I and J are any two subsets of the Defintion: 3.1
parameteric set E. Then we define P-union of Let
neutrosophic soft cubic set as ( F , I ) p (G, J ) ( H , C ) (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i
where C I J (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
F (ei ) if ei I J i i
H ( ei ) = neutrososphic soft cubic set (NSCS) in X. Then
G (ei ) if ei J I
F (e ) G (e ) if ei I J [1] P-OR is denoted by ( F , I ) p (G, J ) and de-
i P i

where F (ei ) P G (ei ) is defined as fined as ( F , I ) p (G, J ) ( H , I J ) where

F (ei ) P G(ei )
H (i , i ) F (i ) P G( i ) for all (i , i ) I J .
{< x, max{ A e (x), B e (x) }, ( e e )(x) > : x X} e i I J
i i i i
where A e (x), B e (x) represent interval neutrosophic sets. [2] P-AND is denoted by ( F , I ) p (G, J ) and de-
i i
Hence fined as ( F , I ) p (G, J ) ( H , I J ) where
F T (ei ) P GT (ei ) =
H (i , i ) F (i ) P G( i ) for all (i , i ) I J .
{< x, max{ A T (x), BT (x)}, ( T T ) (x) > : x X} ei I J ,
ei ei ei ei

F I (ei ) P G I (ei )

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 77

Example: 3.2 (F, I) c = {( F(ei ))c = {< x, A c c

ei (x), ei (x) > : x X} ei I }.
Let X = {x1, x2,x3} be initial universe and E = {e1, e2}
parameters set. Let (F, I) be a neutrosophic soft cubic set (F, I) c
over X and defined as
{< x, [1 AeT ,1 AeT ],[1 Ae I ,1 Ae I ],[1 Ae F ,1 Ae F ] ,
> x X} e I .
i i i i i i
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i 1 e ,1 e ,1 e
T I F
i
i i i
X F(e1) F(e2)
Example:3.4
<Ae1(x), e1(x) > <Ae2(x), e2(x) > Let X = {x1, x2} be initial universe and E = {e1, e2}
x [0.5,0.6][0.6,0. [0.4,0. [0.3,0.6][0.2,0. [0.3,0.
parameters set. Let (F, I) be a neutrosophic soft cubic set
1 7][0.5,0.6] 5,0.6] 7][0.2,0.4] 4,0.4]
x [0.4,0.5][0.7,0. [0.5,0. [0.3,0.5][0.6,0. [0.4,0. over X and defined as
2 8][0.2,0.3] 6,0.6] 8][0.2,0.6] 7,0.5] (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I }
i i
x [0.2,0.3][0.2,0. [0.3,0. [0.4,0.7][0.2,0. [0.5,0.
X F(e1) F(e2)
3 3][0.3,0.5] 4,0.6] 5][0.3,0.6] 6,0.6]
< Ae1(x), < Ae2(x),
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } e1(x) > e2(x) >
i i

X G(e1) G(e2) x [0.3,0.5][0.1,0. [0.6,0. [0.4,0.6][0.5,0. [0.5,0.

<Be1(x), e1(x) > < Ae2(x), e2(x) > 1 4][0.5,0.8] 5.0.7] 7][0.6,0.9] 4,0.4]
x [0.7,0.9][0.3,0 [0.7,0. [0.4,0.7][0.1,0 [0.5,0. x [0.6,0.8][0.4,0. [0.7,0. [0.2,0.4][0.4,0. [0.3,0.
1 .5][0.3,0.4] 4,0.6] .3][0.1,0.2] 2,0.2] 2 7][0.4,0.7] 5,0.3] 7][0.3,0.6] 7,0.8]
x [0.5,0.6][0.3,0 [0.6,0. [0.4,0.6][0.4,0 [0.6,0. Then
c c c c
2 .7][0.1,0.2] 4,0.2] .7][0.2,0.5] 5,0.4] (F, I) = {( F(ei )) = {< x, A e (x), e (x) > : x X} e i I }
x [0.3,0.4][0.1,0 [0.5,0. [0.5,0.8][0.1,0 [0.7,0. i i
3 .2][0.2,0.4] 3,0.5] .4][0.1,0.4] 3,0.4] is defined as.
I J) X Fc (e1) Fc (e2)
P-OR is denoted by ( H , ( F , I ) p (G, J )
< Ac e1(x), < Ac e1(x),
where e1(x) >
c
c e1(x) >
I J {(e1 , e1 ), (e1 , e2 ), (e2 , e1 ), (e2 , e2 )}is defined x [0.5,0.7][0.6,0.9 [0.4,0. [0.4,0.6][0.3,0. [0.5,0.
X H(e1,e1) H(e1,e2) H(e2,e1) H(e2,e2) 1 ][0.2,0.5] 5,0.3] 5][0.1,0.4] 6,0.6]
F(e1) F(e1) F(e2) F(e2) x [0.2,0.4][0.3,0.6 [0.3,0. [0.6,0.8][0.3,0. [0.7,0.
G(e1) G(e2) G(e1) G(e1) 2 ][[0.3,0.6] 5,0.7] 6][0.4.0.7] 3,0.2]
[0.7,0.9 [0.7 [0.5,0.6 [0.5 [0.7,0.9 [0.7 [0.4,00. [0.5
x
1
][0.6,0. ,0.5 ][0.6,0. ,0.5 ][0.3,0. ,0.4 7][0.2,0. ,0.4 Proposition :3.5
7][0.5,0 ,0.6 7][0.5,0 ,0.6 5][0.3,0 ,0.5 7][0.2,0. ,0.4 Let X be initial universe and I, J, L and S subsets of
.6] ] .6] ] .4] ] 4] ] parametric set E. Then for any neutrosophic soft cubic
x [0.5,0.6 [0.. [0.4,0.6 [[0. [0.5,0.6 [0.. [0.4,0.6] [0.6 sets , , , the
][0.7,0. 6,0. ][0.7,0. 6,0. ][0.6,0. 6,0. [0.6,0.8] ,0.7 following properties hold
2
8][0.2,0 6,0. 8][0.2,0 6,0. 8][0.2,0 7,0. [0.2,0.6] ,0.5 (1) if .
.3] 6] .5] 6] .6] 5] ]
(2) if P then c c
.
x [0.3,0.4 [0.5 [0.5,0.8 [0.7 [0.4,0.7 [0.5 [0.5,0.8] [0.7
(3) if P and P C then P P .
3
][0.2,0. ,0.4 ][0.2,0. ,0.4 ][0.2,05 ,0.6 [0.2,0.5] ,0.6
(4) if P and P then P P .
3][0.3,0 ,0.6 3][0.3,0 ,0.6 ][0.3,06 ,0.6 [0.3,0.6] ,0.6
(5) if P and P then P P P and
.5] ] .5] ] ] ] ]
P P P .
Proof: Proof is straight forward
Definition:3.3 Theorem:3.6 Let (F, I) be a neutrosophic soft cubic set
The complement of a neutrosophic soft cubic set over X.
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } is (1) If (F, I) is an internal neutrosophic soft cubic set, then
i i
C (F, I) c is also an internal
denoted by (F, I) and dened as
neutrosophic soft cubic set (INSCS).
C c c c
(F, I) = {( (F, I) = (F , I) } , where F : I NC ( X ) (2) If (F, I) is an external neutrosophic soft cubic set, then
and (F, I) c is also an external Neutrosophic soft cubic set (ENSCS).
Fc (ei ) (F(ei ))c for all ei I
(F(ei ))c (as ( ei ) ei )

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
78 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

Proof.
(1) Given 1 eI x 1 Ae I x or 1 Ae I x 1 eI x ,
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } i i i i
i i
1 eF x 1 Ae F x or 1 Ae F x 1 eF x ,
is an INSCS this implies i i i i

Ae x e x Ae x ,
T T T for all ei I and for all x X.
i i i Thus 1 Te x (1 AeT x ,1 AeT x ) ,
I I I i i i
Ae ( x) e ( x) Ae ( x) ,
i i i 1 eI x (1 Ae I x ,1 Ae I x ) ,
i i i
F
i
F
Ae x e x Ae
i
F
i
x , 1 e
F
i
x (1 F
Ae
i
x ,1 Ae F
i
x )
for all ei I and for all x X. Hence (F, I) is an ENSCS .
thisimplies
1 AeT x 1 Te x 1 AeT x ,
Theorem: 3.7
i i i Let
1 Ae ( x) 1 e ( x) 1 Ae I ( x) ,
I I (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, A e (x), e (x) > : x X} e i I } an
i i
i i i
d
1 Ae x 1 e x 1 Ae x
F F F
i i i (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J }
i i
for all ei I and for all x X. be internal nuetrosophic cubic soft sets. Then,
(1) (F, I) p (G , J ) is an INSCS
Hence (F, I) c is an INSCS .
(2) (F, I) p (G , J ) is an INSCS
Proof:
(2) Given (1) Since (F, I) and (G, J) are internal neutrosophic
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } is soft cubic sets. So for (F, I) we have
i i
an ENSCS this implies AeT x Te x AeT x ,
i i i
Te x ( AeT x , AeT x ) ,
Ae I ( x) eI ( x) Ae I ( x) , Ae x e x Ae x
F F F
i i i
I I i i i i i i
e x ( Ae x , Ae x )
I
for all ei I and for all x X.
i i i
F
i

e x ( Ae x , Ae F x
F
i

i
) Also for (G, J) we BeT x eT x BeT x ,
i i i
for all ei I and for all x X. Be I ( x) eI ( x) I
Be ( x) , Be F x eFi x BeiF x
Te x ( AeT x , AeT x )
i i i i
Since & for all ei J and for all x X. Then we have
i i i

0 AeT
i
x x 1 ,
AeT
i
max{ AeT x , BeT x } ( T T )( x ) max{ AeT x , B eT x },
i i ei ei i i

eI x ( Ae I x , Ae I x & max{ Ae I x , B e I x }
i i
( I
ei
I
ei
)( x ) max{ Ae I x , B e I x },
i i
i i i

0 Ae I x Ae I x 1 , max{ Ae F x , Be F x } ( F F )( x ) max{ Ae F x , Be F x },
i i ei ei i i
i i

eF
i
i i

x ( Ae F x , Ae F x ) & for all ei I J and for all x X. .

0 F
F
Ae x Ae x 1 Now by definition of P-union of (F, I) and (G, J) , we have
i i
(F, I) p (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C and
So we have
T T F (e i ) if e I J
e x Ae x or Ae x e x ,
T T
i i i i
H (e i ) G (e i ) if e J I
eI x Ae I x or Ae I x eI x , F (e ) G (e )
i i i i
i p i if e I J
eF x Ae F x or Ae F x eF x
i i i i
this implies if ei I J , then F (ei ) p G(ei ) is defined as
1 Te x 1 AeT x or 1 AeT x 1 Te x , F (ei ) p G(ei ) = H (e i ) =
i i i i
x, max{Ae ( x), Be ( x)},(e
i i i
ei )(x), x X , ei I J .

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 79

where (G, J)* = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } res

i i
F (e i ) p G (e i )
T T

pectively.
x, max{A T
ei
( x), B Te ( x)}, (ei ei ) T ( x), x X , ei I J ,
i

F (ei ) p G (ei )
I I

x, max{A (x), B (x)},(
I
ei
I
ei ei ei ) I ( x), x X , ei I J , Theorem 3.9
For two ENSCSs
F F (ei ) p G F (ei ) (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i
x, max{A (x), B F
ei
F
ei
( x)}, (ei ei ) F ( x), x X , ei I J . (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } in
i i
Thus (F, I) p (G, J ) is an INSCS if ei I J . X , if (F, I)* and(G, J )* are INSCS in X then
If ei I J or ei J I then the result is trivial. (F, I) P (G, J ) is an INSCS in X.
Hence (F, I) p (G, J ) is an INSCS in all cases. Proof:
Since
(2) Since (F, I) p (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i
and H (ei ) F (ei ) p G(ei ) . If (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } are
i i
ei I J then F (ei ) p G(ei ) is defined as ENSCS.
H ( ei ) F ( ei ) p G ( ei )
. Also Then for (F, I) we have Te x ( AeT x , AeT x ) ,
x, min {Ae ( x), Be ( x)},(e ei ) ( x) x X , e I J i i i

eI x ( Ae I x
, Ae I x ) e x F
x F
x )
i i i

given that (F, I) and (G, J) are INSCS. , F

( Ae , Ae
i i i i i i
So far we have for all ei I and for all x X and (G, J) we have
AeT x Te x AeT x , Ae I ( x) eI ( x) Ae I ( x) , eT x ( BeT x , BeT x ) , eI x ( Be I x , Be I x ) ,
i i i i i i i i i i i i
Ae F
i
x eF
i
x Ae F
i
x eF x ( Be F x , Be F x )
i i i
for all ei I and for all x X. for all ei J and for all x X. Also given that
And for (G, J) we have BeT
i
x eT
i

x BeT
i
x , (F, I)* = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i
Be I ( x) eI ( x) Be I ( x) , Be F x eF x Be F x (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J} are
*
i i i i i i i i
for all ei J and for all x X.
INSCS so this implies AeT x eTi x AeiT x ,
min{ AeT x , BeT x } ( T T )( x ) min{ AeT x , BeT x }, i
i i ei ei i i
Ae I ( x) eI ( x) Ae I ( x) , Ae F x eFi x Aei F x
min{ Ae I x , Be I x } ( I I )( x ) min{ Ae I x , Bei I x } i i i i
i i ei ei i
for all ei I and for all x X. And
min{ Ae F x , Be F x } ( F F )( x) min{ Ae F x , Be F x }
i i ei ei i i
BeT x Te x BeT x
for all ei I J and for all x X. i i i

Hence (F, I) p (G, J ) is an INSCS .

I
Be ( x) eI ( x) Be I ( x) , Be F x eF x Be F x .
i i i i i i

Definition: 3.8 for all ei J and for all x X. Since (F, I) and (G, J)
Given two neutrosophic (NSCS) soft cubic sets * *
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and are ENSCS and (F, I) and (G , J ) are INSCS. Thus by
i i definition of ENSCS and INSCS all the possibilities are
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } , if under
i i
we interchange and , 1) (a1) Te x AeT x eT x AeT x
i i i i
Then the new neutrosophic soft cubic set (NSCS) are (a2) I
e
i
x I
Ae
i
x e
I
i
I
x Ae x
i

denoted and defined as
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
* (a3) e
F
i
x F
Ae
i
x eF
i
x Ae F x
i

i i
(b1) eT
i
x T
Be
i
x e
T
i
T
x Be x
i

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
80 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

(b2) eI x Be I x eI x Be I x F I (e i ) P G I (e i )
i i i i

(b3)
eF x Be F x eF x Be F x
x, max{ Aei ( x), B ei ( x)}, ( e e ( x), x X , ei I J
I I I I
i i i i

2) (a1)
AeT x eT x AeT x Te x i i
i i i i ,
(a2)
I
i
I
i
I
Ae x e x Ae x e x
i

I
i
F F (ei ) P G F (ei )
(a3) F
F
Ae x e x Ae x eF x
F

x, max{ A ei ( x), B ei ( x)}, ( e e ( x), x X , ei I J
F F F F
i i i i

(b1) T
T
Be x e x Be x e x
T
T
i i
i i i i for all ei I J and for all x X.
(b2) I

i
I
i
I
Be x e x Be x e x
i

I
i
.
Case: 1
(b3)
i i
i

Be F x eF x Be F x eF x
i
If H (ei ) F (ei ) that is if ei I J

3) (a1)
Te x AeT x eT x AeT x then from (1)(a1) and (2)(a1) , we have
i i i i Te x AeT x and Te x AeT x
(a2) I

i
I
i

e x Ae x e x Ae x
I
i

I
i
i i
for all ei I and for all x X.
i i

(a3) F
F

e x Ae x e x Ae F x
F
Thus
AeT x Te x AeT x ,
i i i i

(b1) T

i i
T
Be x e x Be x e x
T
i

T
i
i i i
for all ei I J and for all x X.
(b2) I

i
I
i
I
Be x e x Be x e x
i

I
i
Similarly we can prove for (1)(a2) , (2)(a2) and (1)(a3) ,
(b3)
Be F x eF x Be F x eF x (2)(a3).
Ae I x eI x Ae I x and
i i i i
Thus
4) (a2)
AeT x eT x AeT x Te x i i i

Ae F x eF x Ae F x ,
i i i i

(a2)
I
I
Ae x e x Ae x e x
I

I
i i i
i i i i
for all ei I J and for all x X.
(a2) F

i
F

i
F
Ae x e x Ae x eF x
i
i
Case: 2
(b1) T
T

e x Be x e x Be x
T

T
If H (ei ) G(ei ) that is if ei J I then from (1)(b1)
i i i i
and (2)(b1) , we have
(b2) I

i
I
i

e x Be x e x Be x
I
i

I
i
e x Be x and eT x BeT x
T T
i i i i
(b2)
i i
i

eF x Be F x eF x Be F x
i
for all ei I and for all x X. Thus
Since P-union of (F, I) and (G, J) is denoted and defined as BeT x eT x BeT x ,
i i i
(F, I) P (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C and for all ei J - I and for all x X. Similarly we can
F (e i ) if e I J prove for (1)(b2) and (2)(b2) and (1)(b3) and (2)(b3). Thus
Be I x eI x Be I x and
H (e i ) G (ei ) if e J I i i i
F (e ) G (e ) if e I J
i P i
F
Be
i
x eF
i
x Be F
i
x ,
if ei I J , then F (ei ) R G(ei ) is defined as for all ei J I and for all x X.
F (ei ) P G(ei ) = H (e i ) = Case: 3
x, max{Ae ( x), Be ( x)},(e
i i i
ei )(x), x X , ei I J If H (ei ) F (ei ) P G(ei ) that is if ei I J , then
where from (1)(a1) and (1)(b1) , we have
F T (ei ) P GT (ei ) Ae x e x Ae x for all ei I and for all x X.
T T T
i i i
and

x, max{ Aei ( x), B ei ( x)}, ( e
T T T
T )( x), x X , ei I J B T x T x B T x for all e J and for all x X.
i ei
ei ei ei i

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 81

Hence (i) eT x ( BeT x , BeT x ) , eI x ( Be I x , Be I x ) ,

ei I J then i i i i i i

eF x ( Be F x , Be F x ) for all ei J and for all x X.

max{ AeT x , BeT x } T T ( x) max{ AeT x , BeT x } .
i i i
i i
ei ei i i
eT x ( AeT x , AeT x ) , eI x ( Ae I x , Ae I x ) ,
i i i i i i
Similarly we can prove (1)(a2) , (1)(b2) and (1)(a3),
(1)(b3) . e
F
i
x F
( Ae
i
x F
, Ae
i
x )
Thus for all ei I and for all x X.

max{Ae I x I
, Be x } I I ( x) max{Ae I x , Be I x } Te x ( BeT x , BeT x ) , eI x ( Be I x , Be I x ) ,
i i
ie ei i i i i i i i i

e
F
x F
( Be x F
, Be x ) for all ei J and for all x X
, max{ Ae F x , Be F x } F F ( x) max{ Ae F x , Be F x } i i i
i i
ei ei i i
respectively.
. Thus we have
Thus in all the three cases (F, I) P (G, J ) is an INSCS in T
T ( x) { max{ AeT x , BeT x }, max{ Ae T x , Be T x }} ,
e
X. i ei i i i i

I
Theorem: 3.10 I ( x) { max{ Ae I x , Be I x }, max{ Ae I x , Be I x }},
e
For two ENSCSs i ei i i i i

(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and F

F ( x ) { max{ Ae F x , Be F x } , max{ Ae F x , Be F x }}
i i e ei
i i i i i
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } in
i i for all ei I J and for all x X. Thus we have
X if
e e ( x) max{ Ae x , Be x }
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
*
i i i i
i i
for all ei I J and for all x X. Also since
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } are
*
i i
(F, I) P (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C and
INSCS in X then (F, I) P (G, J ) is an INSCS in X.
F (e i ) if e I J
Proof: By similar way to Theorem 3.9 we can obtain the
result. H (e i ) G (ei ) if e J I
F (e ) G (e ) if e I J
Theorem: 3.11 i p i

Let
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and if e I J , then F (ei ) p G(ei ) is defined as
i i
F (ei ) p G(ei ) = H (e i ) =
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
i i x, max{Ae ( x), Be ( x)},(e
i i i
ei )(x), x X , ei I J .
ENSCSs in X such that
where
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
*
i i F T (ei ) p GT (ei )
(G, J)* = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
T
( x), x X , ei I J
i i
x, max{ Aei ( x), B ei ( x)},
T T T
ENSCS in X. Then P-union of (F, I) and (G, J) is an
ei ei
ENSCS in X.
Proof:
Since (F, I) , (G, J) , (F, I)* and(G, J )* are ENSCS so by F I (e i ) p G I (e i )
definition of an external soft cubic set for (F, I) ,
I
I
x, max{ A ei ( x), B ei ( x)}, ( x), x X , ei I J
(G, J) , (F, I)* and(G, J )* we have I I

ei ei
e x ( Ae x , Ae x ) , e x ( Ae x , Ae x ) ,
T T T I I I
i i i i i i

e
F
i
x F
( Ae
i
x F
, Ae
i
x ) ,
for all ei I and for all x X.

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
82 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

F F (ei ) p G F (ei ) For each e I J ,

Take
F F
x, max{Aei ( x), B ei ( x)}, ( x), x X , ei I J ei min max{AeT x , BeT x }, max{AeT x , BeT x } and
F F T
i
e e i i i i i

eTi max { min{ AT x , B T x }, min{ AT x , B T x }

By definition of an external soft cubic set ei ei ei ei
(F, I) P (G, J ) is an ENSCS in X. .
Then ei is one of AeT x , B T x , AeT x , BeT x .
T
Example: 3.12 i ei i i
Let (P, I ) and (Q, J ) be neutrosophic soft cubic sets in X T
where Now we consider ei = AT x or AT x only, as the
ei ei
(P, I) = P(e1 )
= {< x, [0.3,0.5],[0.2,0.5],[0.5,0.7], 0.8,0.3,0.4 > e1 I }
remaining cases are similar to this one.
If eTi = AeT x then
, i
(Q, J) = Q(e1 )
= {< x, [0.7,0.9][0.6,0.8][0.4,0.7], 0.4,0.7,0.3 > e1 J }
T T T eTi =
Be x Be x AT x Ae x and so
i i ei i
for all x X
T
Then (P, I ) and (Q, J ) are T-external neutrosophic cubic Bei x
sets in X and (P, I) P (Q, J ) = T T
B T x (Aei Bei ) ( x) (Aei Bei ) ( x) =
T T
( P, I ) (Q, J ) P Q(e1 ) thus
ei
{< x, [0.3,0.5][0.2,0.5],[0.4,0.7], 0.4,0.3,0.3 > e1 I J }
for all x X . (P, I) P (Q, J ) is not an T-external = ei
T
Te eT (x) .
BeT x
neutrosophic cubic set since i i i
T T x
e1 e

= 0.4 (0.3,0.5) =
AT BT 1 x , AT BT x T T T T
Hence e e (x) (Aei Bei ) ( x) , ( Aei Bei ) ( x)
T T
e1

e1 e1 e1
i i
From the above example it is clear that P-intersection of T- .
If ei = AT x , then BeT x AeT x BeT x
external neutrosophic soft cubic sets may not be an T- T
external neutrosophic soft cubic set. We provide a ei i i i
condition for the P-intersection of T-external (resp. I-
and so ei = max{AeT x , BeT x } .
T
external and F-external) neutrosophic soft cubic sets to be i i
T-external (resp. I-external and F-external) neutrosophic
Assume that ei = AT x then BeT x AT x
T
soft cubic set.
ei i ei

Theorem: 3.13 T T
e e (x) AeT x BeT x .
Let i i i i
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, A e (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i So from this we can write BeT x AeT x
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be i i
i i T T
T- ENSCSs in X such that e e (x) AeT x B T x or
i i i ei

max { min{A T x , B T x } , min{A T x , B T x },

T
BeT x Te eT (x) =
ei ei ei ei
AeT x AeT x B T x .
T
( x )
ei ei
min max{Ae x , Be x } , max{Ae x , Be x }
T T T T

i i i i i e i
i i i i
T T
(3.7) For this case BeT x AT x (x)
for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. i ei ie ei

Ae x Be x it is contradiction to the fact that
T T
Then (F, I) P (G, J ) is also an T- ENSCS. i i
Proof (F, I) and (G, J) are T-ENSCS.
Consider (F, I) P (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C
T T T
where H (ei ) = F (ei ) p G(ei ) is defined as
For the case Be x AT x e e (x) =
i ei i i
F (ei ) p G(ei ) = H (ei ) T T
AeT x BeT x we have e e (x)
= x, min{ Aei ( x), Bei ( x)}, (ei ei )(x), x X , ei I J . i i i i

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 83

Theorem : 3.15

(A T
ei
BeTi ) ( x) , ATei BeTi ) ( x) because Te eT (x) =
i i
Let
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i

AeT x = (ATei BeTi ) ( x) . Again assume that eTi = (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
i i i

BeT x then
F- ENSCSs in X such that
AeT x BeT x
i i i min max{ A F x , B F x } , max{ A F x , B F x },
T T F F ei e i ei ei
e e (x) AT x B T x . From this we can e e ( x)
i i
i i ei ei max { min{ A F x , B F x } , min{ A F x , B F x }
e i e i e i e i
write AeT x BeT x
i i ..(3.9)
T T for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. Then
e e (x) AeT x BeT x or AT x B T x
i i i i e i e i (F, I) P (G, J ) is also an F- ENSCS.
Proof : By similar way to Theorem 3.13, we can obtain the
Te eT (x) = AeT x B T x . For this case result
i i i e i Corallary:3.16
T T Let
AeT x BeT x e e (x ) AeT x BeT x
i i i i i i (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i
it is contradiction to the fact that (F, I) and (G, J) are T-
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
ENSCS. And if we take the case AT x B T x i i
e e i i ENSCSs in X. Then P-intersection (F, I) P (G, J ) is also
T T
e e (x) = AT x BeT x , we get have an ENSCS in X when the conditions (3.7), (3.8)and (3.9)
i i ei i are valid.
T T
e e (x)
i i
(AT
ei BeTi ) ( x) , ATei BeTi ) ( x) Theorem: 3.17
If neutrosophic soft cubic set
T
T (x) = AT x = (ATe BeT ) ( x) . (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
because ei ei ei i i
i i
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } in
Hence in all the cases (F, I) P (G, J ) is an T-ENSCS in i i
X. X satisfy the following condition

min max{AT x , B T x } , max{AT x , B T x }
Theorem: 3.14 ei ei ei ei

Te eT(x )
Let i i
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i max{ min{AeT x , BeT x }, min{AeT x , BeT x } .(11.1)
i i i i
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be then the (F, I) P (G, J ) is both
i i
I- ENSCSs in X such that an T-Internal Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set and T-External

min max{ A I x , B I x }, max{ A I x , B I x }, Soft Neutrosophic Cubic Set
I I ei ei ei ei in X.
e e ( x)
i i (F, I) P (G, J ) ( H , C )
max { min{ A x , B x }, min{ A x , B x }
I I I I Proof: Consider where
e i e i e i ei
I J C where H (e i ) = F (ei ) p G(ei ) is
(3.8)
defined as
for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. Then F (ei ) P G(ei ) = H (ei ) =
(F, I) P (G, J ) is also an I ENSCS {< x, min{ Ae (x), Be (x)}, ( e e )(x) > : x X} ei I J }
i i i i
Proof: where
By similar way to Theorem 3.13, we can obtain the result.

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
84 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

F T (ei ) P GT (ei ) = (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } in

i i
{< x, min{ A T (x), BT (x)}, ( T T )(x) > : x X} ei I X
J} satisfy the following condition
ei ei ei ei

.For each ei I J Take min max{A I x , B I x } , max{A I x , B I x }
ei ei ei ei

min max{AT x , B T x }, max{AT x , B T x } and
T
e eI eI(x )
i
ei ei ei ei i i

e max{ min{AT x , B T x }, min{AT x , B T x } .
T
Then
i
ei ei ei ei
T T T T T
max{ min{Ae I x , Be I x } , min{Ae I x , Be I x } .(11.2)
e is one of Ae x , Be x , Ae x , Be x . Now we i i i i
i i i i i
T T
then the (F, I) P (G, J ) is both
consider ei = AT x , or Ae x only, as the remaining
e i i an I-internal neutrosophic soft cubic set and an I-external
cases are similar to this one. If T
ei = AT x then
soft neutrosophic cubic set
ei in X.

BeT x BeT x T
Ae x , and so ei =
T T
Ae x , Theorem :3.19
i i i i If neutrosophic soft cubic set
T T (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
BeT x this implies A T x = ei = e e (x) =
I
i i
i ei i i
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } in
BeT x . B T x B T x = X
i i
eTi = Thus satisfy the following condition
i ei ei

T min max{ A F x , B F x }, max{ A F x , B F x }
T (x) = AT x A T x , which implies ei ei ei ei
ie e i ei ei

F F (x)
T T
BeT x = ( A ei Bei ) ( x) . ei ei
T
e e (x) =
T
that
i i i
max { min{ A F x , B F x } , min{ A F x , B F x }
T T T
T
Hence e e (x) (Aei Bei ) ( x) , ( Aei Bei ) ( x)
i i
T T
ei e i ei e i
.(11.3)then the (F, I) P (G, J ) is both
T
and (ATei BeTi ) ( x ) T (x ) ( A Tei BeTi ) ( x) . an F-internal neutrosophic soft cubic set and an F-external
ei ei
soft neutrosophic cubic set
If = A T x then BeT x A T x BeT x ,
eT in X.
ei
i i ei i Corollary:3.20
Let
T T T
and so e e (x) = A T x = ( A ei Bei ) ( x ) .
T
i i ei
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i

T T (G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } be

Hence e e (x) i i
i i NSCSs in X. Then P-intersection (F, I) P (G, J ) is also
(ATei BeTi ) ( x) , ( ATei BeTi ) ( x) and an ENSCS and an INSCS in X when the conditions (11.1),
(11.2)and (11.3) are valid.
(ATei BeTi ) ( x) Te eT (x) ( ATei BeTi ) ( x) .
i i The following example shows that the P-union of T-
Consequently we note that (F, I) P (G, J ) is both external neutrosophic soft cubic sets may not be an T-
external neutrosophic soft cubic set.
T-internal neutrosophic soft cubic set and T-external soft
neutrosophic cubic set in X. Example 3.21. Let (P, I ) and (Q, J ) be neutrosophic soft
Similarly we have the following theorems cubic sets in X where
Theorem 3.18
(P, I) = P(e1 ) = {< x, [0.3,0.5],[0.2,0.5],[0.5,0.7], 0.8,0.3,0.4 > e1 I }
If neutrosophic soft cubic set
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and ,
(Q, J) = Q(e1) = {< x, [0.7,0.9][0.6,0.8][0.4,0.7], 0.4,0.7,0.3 > e1 J}
i i

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017 85

= AT x or AeT x , only as the remaining

Then (P, I ) and (Q, J ) are T-external neutrosophic cubic
sets in X and ( P, I ) (Q, J ) P Q (e1 ) consider eT ei
i i
{< x, [0.7,0.9][0.6,0.8],[0.5,0.7], 0.8,0.7,0.4 > } cases are similar to this one.
( P, I ) p (Q, J ) is not an T-external neutrosophic cubic
set in X since If eT = AeT x then
T T x = 0.8 (0.7,0.9) =
i
i
e1 e2
BeT x BeT x A T x AeT x , and so ei =
T

AT B T x , AT B T x i i ei i
e1 e1
e
1 e1
.
We consider a condition for the P-union of T-external
BeT x (ATei BeTi ) ( x) = AT x = ei
T
(resp. I-external and F-external) neutrosophic soft cubic .Thus
i ei
sets to be T-external (resp. I-external and F-external)
T T
T T (x ) . e e (x)
neutrosophic soft cubic set. Hence
ie e i i i
Theorem 3.22
Let (A T
ei
BeTi ) ( x) , ATei BeTi ) ( x) . If eTi = AeT x ,
i
then
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
i i BeT x AeT x BeT x and so eTi =
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be i i i
i i T
max{Ae x , Be x } . Assume that ei = AT x then
T T
T- ENSCSs in X such that i i ei

max { min{A T x , B T x } , min{A T x , B T x }, T T
T T
( x )
ei ei ei ei BeT x AT x e e (x) AT x
ei ei i ei i i ei
min max{Ae x , Be x } , max{Ae x , Be x }
T T T T

..(12.1)
i i i i
BeT x . So from this we can write
i
for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. Then T T
BeT x AeT x e e (x)
(F, I) P (G, J ) is also an T- ENSCS. i i i i

A T x BeT x BeT x AT x =
Proof:
or
Consider (F, I) P (G, J ) ( H , C ) where I J C and ei i i ei

F (e i ) if e I J T T
e e (x) AeT x BeT x .
H (e i ) G (e i ) if e J I i i i i
F (e ) G (e ) if e I J
i p i For the case BeT x AeT x
i i
where H (ei ) = F (ei ) p G(ei ) is defined as
T T
F (ei ) p G(ei ) = H (e i ) = e e (x) AT x B T x it is contradiction to
i i ei ei
x, max{Ae ( x), Be ( x)},(e
i i i
ei )(x), x X , ei I J , the fact that (F, I) and (G, J) are T-ENSCS. For the case
where T T
F T (ei ) p G T (ei ) BeT x AeT x = e e (x)
i i i i
x, max{A (x), B (x)},(
T
ei
T
ei
T
ei eT )( x), x X , ei I J ,
i
AeT x B T x we have
T T
e e (x)
If e I J , i ei i i

i
T T
(Aei Bei ) ( x) , Aei Bei ) ( x)
T T
because
eTi min max{ A x , B x } , max{ A x , B x }
T T T T
ei e i ei ei T
(A ei BeTi ) ( x) = A T x = T T (x) .
and ei ei ei
eTi max { min{ AT x , B T x }, min{ AT x , B T x } Again assume that T = BT x then T
ei ei ei ei ei ei Ae x
i
eTi is
BeT x e e (x ) AeT x BeT x , so from
Then one of T T
i i
AeT x , Be x , ei Ae x , Be x .
T T T T i i i
Now we
i i i i

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
86 Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017

this we can write AeT x BeT x Corollary:3.25

i i Let
T T (F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and
e e (x) AeT x BeT x or AT x BeT x i i
i i i i e i i
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
T T
i i
= e e (x) AeT x BeT x . For this case ENSCSs in X. Then (F, I) P (G, J ) is also an ENSCS in
i i i i
X when the conditions (12.1), (12.2)and (12.3) are valid.

AeT x Te eT (x) AeT x BeT x
BeT x
i i i i i i References
it is contradiction to the fact that (F, I) and (G, J) are T- [1] R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam,
ENSCS. And if we take the case AT x B T x = Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set, International Journal of
ei ei
Mathematics Trends and Technology, 46 (2) (2017),
T T 88-94.
e e (x) AeT x BeT x , we get have
i i i i [2] Y.B. Jun, C.S. Kim and K.O. Yang, Cubic sets,
Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics 4(3)
T T
e e (x) (2012), 8398.
i i [3] Turksen,Interval valued fuzzy sets based on
(A T
ei
BeTi ) ( x) , ATei BeTi ) ( x) because (ATei BeTi ) ( x) normal forms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, (1968),
pp. 191210.
T T [4] F. Smarandache, A Unifying Field in Logics.
= B T x = e e (x) . If ei I J or ei J I ,then
ei i i Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Logic,
we have trivial result. Hence (F, I) P (G, J ) is an T- Rehoboth: American Research Press, 1999.
ENSCS in X. [5] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Inform. Control 8 (1965),
Similarly we have the following theorems 338353.
[6] I. B. Turksen, Interval-valued strict preference with
Theorem:3.23 Zadeh triples, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78 (1996) 183
Let 195.
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, A e (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and [7] H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Q. Zhangand, R.
i i
Sunderraman, Interval Neutrosophic Sets and logic:
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be Theory and Applictionsin Computing, Hexis;
i i
T- ENSCSs in X such that Neutrosophic book series, No. 5, 2005.
[8] D. Molodtsov , Soft Set TheoryFirst Results,
max { min{A T x , B T x } , min{A T x , B T x },
T T ei ei ei ei Computers and Mathematics with Application, 37
( x ) (1999) 1931.
ei min max{A T x , B T x } , max{A T x , B T x }
ei
ei ei ei ei [9] Pabitra Kumar Maji, Neutrosophic soft set
..(12.2) Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics 5
for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. Then (2013), 157168.
(F, I) P (G, J ) is also an T- ENSCS. [10] F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set, a
generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Inter. J.
Theorem :3.24 Pu Bre Appl. Math. 24 (2005) 287297.
Let
[11] F. Smarandache, Neutrosophy and Neutrosophic
(F, I) = { F(ei ) = {< x, Ae (x), e (x) > : x X} ei I } and Logic, First International Conference on Neutrosophy,
i i
Neutrosophy Logic, Set, Probability and Statistics,
(G, J) = { G(ei ) = {< x, Be (x), e (x) > : x X} ei J } be
i i University of New Mexico, Gallup, NM 87301, USA
T- ENSCSs in X such that (2002).

max { min{A T x , B T x } , min{A T x , B T x }, [12] L. J. Kohout, W. Bandler, Fuzzy interval
T ei ei ei ei
ei
T
( x )
ei inference utilizing the checklist paradigm and

min max{Ae x , Be x } , max{Ae x , Be x }
T T T T
i i i i BKrelational products, in: R.B. Kearfort et al. (Eds.),
..(12.3) Applications of Interval Computations, Kluwer,
for all ei I and for all ei J and for all x X. Then Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 291335.
(F, I) P (G, J ) is also an T- ENSCS. [13] R. Sambuc, Functions -Flous, Application a
laide au Diagnostic en Pathologie Thyroidienne, These
de Doctorat en Medecine, Marseille, 1975.

R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 2017
[14] I. B. Turksen, Interval-valued fuzzy sets and
compensatory AND, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 51
(1992) 295307.
[15] L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable
and its application to approximate reasoning-I, Inform.
Sci. 8 (1975) 199249.
[16] P. K. Maji , R. Biswas ans A. R. Roy, Fuzzy soft
sets, Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, Vol. 9, no. 3,
2001, pp. 589-602,
[17] P.K.Maji, R. Biswas ans A.R.Roy, Intuitionistic
Fuzzy soft sets, The journal of fuzzy Mathematics,
Vol 9, (3)(2001), 677 692.
[18] Pabitra Kumar Maji, Neutrosophic soft set,
Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics,
Volume 5, No.1,(2013).,157-168.
[19] Jun YB, Smarandache F, KimCS (2017) Neutros-
ophic cubic sets. New Mathematics and Natural
Computation 13:41-54.
[20] Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., & Sangaiah, A.
K. (2017). Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group decision
making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic
numbers. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and
Humanized Computing.
[21] Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Hussien, A. N.,
& Sangaiah, A. K. (2017). A novel group decision-
making model based on triangular neutrosophic
numbers. Soft Computing, 1-15. http://doi.org/
10.1007/s00500-017-2758-5
[22] F. Smarandache, M. Ali, Neutrosophic Triplet as
extension of Matter Plasma, Unmatter Plasma, and
Antimatter Plasma, 69th Annual Gaseous Electronics
Conference, Bochum, Germany, Veranstaltung-
szentrum & Audimax, Ruhr-Universitat, October 10-
14, 2016.
R. Anitha Cruz and F. Nirmala Irudayam. More On P-Union and P-Intersection of Neutrosophic Soft Cubic Set
87
[23] F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic Perspectives:
Triplets, Duplets, Multisets, Hybrid Operators, Modal
Logic, Hedge Algebras. And Applications. Pons
Editions, Bruxelles, 325 p., 2017.
[24] Topal, S. and ner, T. Contrastings on Textual
Entailmentness and Algorithms of Syllogistic Logics,
Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Volume 2, Number
4, April 2015, pp 185-189.
[25] Topal S. An Object- Oriented Approach to
Counter-Model Constructions in A Fragment of
Natural Language, BEU Journal of Science, 4(2), 103-
111, 2015.
[26] Topal, S. A Syllogistic Fragment of English with
Ditransitive Verbs in Formal Semantics, Journal of
Logic, Mathematics and Linguistics in Applied
Sciences, Vol 1, No 1, 2016.
[27] Topal, S. and Smaradache, F. A Lattice-Theoretic
Look: A Negated Approach to Adjectival (Intersective,
Neutrosophic and Private) Phrases. The 2017 IEEE
International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent
SysTems and Applications (INISTA 2017); (accepted
for publication).
[28] Ta, F. and Topal, S. Bezier Curve Modeling for
Neutrosophic Data Problem. Neutrosophic Sets and
Systems, Vol 16, pp. 3-5, 2017.
[29] Topal, S. Equivalential Structures for Binary and
Ternary Syllogistics, Journal of Logic, Language and
Information, Springer, 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s10849-
017-9260-4
Received: August 1, 2017. Accepted: August 21, 2017.