You are on page 1of 1

Integrative Review: Disinfectant Caps and CLABSI

Ashley Morris, Senior BSN Student


Chris-Tenna Perkins, PhD, RN, ANP, CNE
Bon Secours Memorial College of Nursing

Introduction Results Conclusion


The purpose of this integrative review is to examine
current literature regarding alcohol disinfectant caps Emphasis on the importance of proper
Alcohol Wipe Vs Disinfectant Cap
versus other methods in reducing central line associated and consistent disinfection of central
bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. >40% decrease in rate of CLABSI per
lines to reduce the rate of CLABSIs.
30,100 estimated CLABSI occur in the US each year 1,000 central line days with
implementation of cap (Merrill, 2014) Additional research to evaluate patient
1 in 4 of these patients will die (22,000) people each
year A multi-phase study revealed (Wright, 2013) outcomes after disinfectant cap
33-45% hubs are contaminated with normal patient use Decrease in number of bacteria implementation needs to be performed.
$12,378 estimate increased cost a single CLABSI P1=12.7% (wipe) Re-evaluation of current guidelines
P2= 5.5% (cap) (p =.002)
Decrease in organism density from the CDC may be necessary to
PICO Question P1=4 CFU/mL (wipe) reduce the risk of CLABSI in patients
P2=1 CFU/mL (cap) receiving multiple blood and/or lipid
Is the infection rate in hospitalized patients with central
(p =.009)
lines reduced by utilizing alcohol disinfectant caps versus infusions.
other practices/methods? Systematic review revealed CLABSI
reduction rates as high as 61% with Education should be implemented and
the use of disinfectant caps (CI 95%) integration of products such as
(Moureau & Flynn, 2015) disinfectant caps can reduce human
factors that contribute to CLABSIs.

Methods Needleless Connector Change


CDC recommends changing needleless
Method: Integrative Review connectors every 24 hours when blood
Database: PubMed or lipids are infused; however..
Search Terms: disinfectant cap, scrub the hub, A multi-phase study found that CLABSI References
needleless connector, passive disinfectant, rates increased from 0.41 and 0.03 per
qualitative and central line, and catheter related 1,000 central line days to 3.56 following Merrill, K., Sumner, S., Linford, L., Taylor, C., & Macintosh, C. (2014). Impact
of universal disinfectant cap implementation on central line-associated
infection and qualitative the CDC recommendation (p=.003) bloodstream infections. American Journal of Infection Control, 42(2014), 1274-
(Sandora et al, 2014) 1277.doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.008
Yielded: 209 articles Morrison, T. (2012). Qualitative analysis of central and midline care in the
medical/surgical setting. Clinical Nurse Specialist, November/December, 323-
Inclusion Criteria 328. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e31826e3f2a.
Published between 2010-2015 Moureau, N., Flynn, J. (2015). Disinfection of needleless connector hubs:
Clinical evidence systematic review. Nursing Research and Practice, Volume
English language, Peer-reviewed articles 2015, 1-20. doi: 10.1155/2015/796762

Relevance: disinfectant caps versus scrub the hub, Nursing Perspective and Research Triangle Institute for Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Analysis report: Estimating the incremental costs of hospital-acquired
effectiveness of changing needleless connectors, Compliance conditions (HACs). 2012. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-
and nursing perspective of central line care I dont scrub the hub for 15 ServicePayment/HospitalAcqCond/index.html.
Sandora, T., Graham, D., Conway, M., Dodson, B., Potter-Bynoe, G.,
Results seconds, and I know of no nurse that Margossian, S. (2014). Impact of needleless connector change frequency on

Four quantitative and one qualitative research does (Morrison, 2012) central line associated bloodstream infection rate. American Journal of Infection
Control, 42 (2014), 485-489. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.022
articles Hub disinfection compliance is only Wright, M., Tropp, J., Schora, D., Dillon-Grant, M., Peterson, K., Boehm,
38.7%, leaving 61% of line access S.,Peterson, L. (2013). Continuous passive disinfection of catheter hubs
prevents contamination and bloodstream infection. American Journal of
without disinfection prior to use Infection Control, 41 (2013), 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.030
(Moureau & Flynn, 2015)

You might also like