Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ELEMENTS
By
Department of Engineering
Institute of Environmental Studies and Research
Ain Shams University
2010
APPROVAL SHEET
Name Signature
2010
USE OF PALM MIDRIBS AS STRUCTURAL
ELEMENTS
By
A Thesis
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of The Requirement for the Master Degree
In
Environmental Science
Department of Engineering
Prof. Dr.
ABDEL WAHAB ABOU EL-ENIEN
Emeritus Professor of RC Structures,
Ain Shams University
Prof. Dr.
HAMED IBRAHIM EL-MOUSLY
Emeritus Professor in Design & Production Department,
Ain Shams University
Prof. Dr.
ELSAYED ABDEL RAOUF ABDEL KADER
Professor of Properties and Strength of Materials,
Ain Shams University
2010
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is extremely grateful to Allah for without his mercy and help
this work would not have been accomplished.
I
ABSTRACT
Many countries, especially in the Far East, have substituted many
materials in various fields with local environment-friendly materials
achieving coherence with the environment and economical gain by
reducing imports. Most of these materials, if not all, are agricultural
residues or main crops. In the field of construction, materials like
bamboo and residuals like rice straw and rice husk have many
contributions in this field, especially bamboo, it has a significant
contribution in this field. In our nation, Islamic and Arabic Nation,
bamboo is not such dominant. Yet, we have another material that is most
dominant and resembles the bamboo to a certain extent. It is the Date
Palm Leaves Midribs (DPLM). The aim of this thesis is to study the
feasibility of using DPLM as a structural element.
II
connection to determine its behavior and strength. Twenty specimens for
single DPLM bolted connection at different spacing and bolt number
were tested. Sixty specimens for double DPLM bolted connection, where
it was decided that at least two DPLM will be used in truss, at different
spacing and bolt number were tested.
IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT I
ABSTRACT II
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES X
LIST OF FIGURES XIII
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 GENERAL 1
1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES 1
1.3 OUTLINE OF THESIS 2
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2.1 INTRODUCTION 4
2.2 STRAW BALE 6
2.2.1 Method of construction in Nebraska style 8
2.2.2 Plastering 8
2.2.3 Cost efficiency 9
2.3 RICE HUSK 13
2.3.1 Preparations of Rice Husk Ash 14
2.3.2 Effect of RHA on fresh concrete properties 15
2.3.2.1 Initial flow 15
2.3.2.2 Rate of flow loss 16
2.3.3 Mechanical properties of OPC/RHA 16
concrete
2.3.4 Durability of reinforced concrete 17
incorporating RHA
2.4 BAMBOO 17
2.4.1 Harvesting, storage and drying 18
2.4.2 Preservation 20
V
2.4.3 Coatings 22
2.4.4 Sampling and selection 22
2.4.5 Testing 23
2.4.6 Mechanical properties 23
2.4.7 Connections and joinery 27
2.4.8 Bamboo structures 34
2.5 TIMBER 38
2.5.1 Timber availability 38
2.5.2 Timber preservation 38
2.5.3 Timber mechanical properties 41
2.5.4 Timber joinery 43
2.6 DATE PALM LEAVES MIDRIBS 46
2.6.1 DPLM availability 47
2.6.2 DPLM mechanical properties 47
2.6.3 DPLM preservation and coating 52
2.6.4 DPLM dimension stability 52
2.6.5 Examples of industrial utilization of DPLM 53
2.6.5.1 Arabesque from palm midribs 53
2.6.5.2 DPLM in blockboard 53
2.6.5.3 DPLM in particleboard 54
2.6.5.4 Lumber-like product from DPLM 54
2.6.6 Use of DPLM for concrete roof 54
reinforcement
2.6.7 DPLM space truss 56
2.6.7.1 DPLM space truss model 56
2.6.7.2 DPLM joinery 56
2.6.7.3 Testing of truss member under 57
compression
2.6.7.4 Testing of DPLM truss 57
2.6.7.5 Economical study of the DPLM truss 58
2.6.7.6 Commentary on the work of Hassan 58
3 DPLM MECHANICAL PROPERTIES 61
3.1 INTRODUCTION 61
3.2 TESTING PROCEDURE 64
3.2.1 Testing of DPLM under tension 64
3.2.2 Testing of DPLM under bending 71
VI
3.2.3 Testing of DPLM under compression 72
3.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 73
3.3.1 Tensile strength 73
3.3.1.1 Tensile strength using bolted 73
connection
3.3.1.2 Tensile strength using epoxy 77
3.3.1.3 Tensile strength using U-Shaped 79
bolts
3.3.1.4 Tensile strength using the testing 80
machine model SHIMADZU
3.3.2 Bending strength 82
3.3.3 Compressive strength 83
3.4 CONCLUSION 86
3.5SELECTING THE APPROPRIATE STRUCTUR- 86
AL SYSTEM FOR THE DPLM
VII
4.2.2.2 Bond strength between epoxy and 94
DPLM inner part
4.2.2.3 Bond strength between polyester and 96
DPLM external layer
4.2.2.4 Bond strength between Megalatex 98
and DPLM external layer
4.2.2.5 Strength of single DPLM bolted 99
connection
4.2.2.6 Strength of double DPLM bolted 99
connection
4.3 CHOOSING THE DPLM CONNECTION 101
4.4 INVESTIGATION OF THE DPLM BOLTED 105
JOINT
4.4.1 Single DPLM bolted connection testing 106
procedure
4.4.2 Double DPLM bolted connection testing 110
procedure
4.4.3 Results and Discussion 113
5 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM FOR TESTING DPLM 124
TRUSSES
5.1 INTRODUCTION 124
5.2 STRUCTURAL MODELING OF TRUSSES 126
5.3 CONSTRUCTION OF DPLM TRUSSES 127
5.3.1 Truss1 & Truss2 127
5.3.2 Truss3 134
5.3.3 Truss4 and Truss5 142
5.4 TESTING PROCEDURES FOR DPLM TRUSSES 146
5.4.1 Truss1 148
5.4.2 Truss2 & Truss3 151
5.4.3 Truss4 and Truss5 156
5.5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 157
5.5.1 Truss1 157
VIII
5.5.2 Truss2 159
5.5.3 Truss3 164
5.5.4 Truss4 169
5.5.5 Truss5 171
5.6 ECONOMICAL AND FEASIBILITY STUDY OF 174
TRUSS2 AND TRUSS3
5.6.1 Truss2 174
5.6.2 Truss3 176
6 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND 180
RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 SUMMARY 180
6.2 CONCLUSIONS 180
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER 184
STUDIES
7 REFERENCES 186
APPENDIX 193
IX
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Tension test results using bolted connection- 74
(Shear strength)
Tension test results using bolted connection- 74
3.2 (Bearing strength)
XI
4.7 Group I connection parameters 107
4.8 Group II connection parameters 108
4.9 Group III connection parameters 111
4.10 Group IV connection parameters 111
4.11 Shear strength results of Group I & II 117
connections
4.12 shear strength results of Group III & IV 118
connection using 6mm bolts
4.13 shear strength results of Group III & IV 119
connection using 8mm bolts
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Deflection values obtained from Truss1 testing 158
5.2 Deflection and strain values obtained from 160
Truss2 testing
5.3 Deflection and strain values obtained from 167
Truss3 testing
5.4 Deflection and strain values obtained from 170
Truss4 testing
5.5 Deflection and strain values obtained from 173
Truss5 testing
5.6 Material and labors cost of Truss2 175
5.7 Material and labors cost of Truss3 177
5.8 Comparison between Truss2, Truss3 and 179
Hassan space truss
XII
LIST OF FIGURES
XIII
2.17 Photos of some bamboo structures 36
2.18 Photos of various bamboo connections 37
2.19 Photos of some timber structures 45
2.20 Mosque roof covered with DPLM tied together 46
2.21 Photomicrograph showing a complete vascular 48
bundle
2.22 Cross section in the DPLM showing the DPLM 49
three zones
2.23 Elevation of Concrete Vault reinforced using 55
DPLM
2.24 DPLM space truss made by Hassan (2001) 60
2.25 DPLM space truss joint 60
CHAPTER 3
3.1 DPLM cross-sections at different portions of 62
DPLM
Area of DPLM corresponding to maximum 63
3.2 circle diameter contained in DPLM section
XIV
3.8 View of VEB Werkstoffprfmaschinen 71
Leipzig" 5 tons capacity testing machine, used
in bending test
3.9 Schematic arrangement of DPLM specimen in 71
bending test
3.10 View of load cell testing machine used in 72
compression test
3.11 Shear, splitting, failure of specimen A 75
3.12 Bearing failure of specimen B 76
3.13 DPLM slippage and removal of part of external 78
layer
3.14 DPLM slippage from epoxy 78
3.15 Failure of the U-shaped DPLM tension specimen 79
3.16 Failure of tension specimen tested in 81
SHIMADZU testing machine
3.17 Pattern of failure in the DPLM bending 83
specimen
3.18 Pattern of failure in the DPLM compression 85
specimen
CHAPTER 4
4.1 Toothed DPLM in epoxy, polyester, or 90
Megalatex mortar test specimens
4.2 Epoxy - DPLM inner part specimen 90
4.3 Double DPLM bolted connection 93
4.4 Removal of part of DPLM in epoxy-DPLM 95
inner part specimen
4.5 Sketch magnifying the coarse groove lines in the 95
epoxy-DPLM inner part specimen
4.6 DPLM slippage and polyester fracture in 97
DPLM-polyester specimen
XV
4.7 DPLM slippage from polyester and removal of 97
part of DPLM in DPLM-Polyester Specimen
4.8 Slippage of DPLM in DPLM-Megalatex 98
Specimen
4.9 Splitting of DPLM in the double DPLM bolted 101
connection
4.10 Typical connection detail for Group I and Group 107
II bolted connections
4.11 Group I connection pattern 108
4.12 Group II connection pattern 109
4.13 Group III Connection pattern 112
4.14 Group IV Connection pattern 113
4.15 Relation between the connection length and 121
shear strength
4.16 Relation between the connection length and 121
shear strength (excluding long and close to end
connections)
4.17 Relation between spacing and shear strength for 122
a connection length of 10cm
4.18 Relation between spacing and shear strength for 122
a connection length of 15cm
XVI
5.5 View of Truss1&2 top chord DPLM members 132
tightened by a plastic wire
5.6 View of sample connections of Truss1&2 133
5.7 Truss3 in the testing machine 135
5.8 3d-schematic drawing for Truss3 136
5.9 Truss3 elevation, plans and sections 137
5.10 Folding of Truss3 139
5.11 Connection between vertical, diagonal and 140
bottom chord in Truss3
XVII
5.22 View of Truss1 between the steel frames at 151
midspan
5.23 Test setup for Truss2&3 152
5.24 View of Truss2&3 between the steel frames at 153
midspan
5.25 Strain gauge glued to the DPLM 154
5.26 Reinforcement of the compression members in 155
Truss3 to resist buckling
5.27 Truss4&5 test setup 156
5.28 Twisting of Truss1 at the support due to the 157
bending of the steel plate
5.29 Twisting of Truss2 at support 161
5.30 Failure of the vertical member connection at 161
support due to the twisting of Truss2
XVIII
5.38 Severe deflection of Truss4 169
5.39 Twisting of Truss5 171
5.40 Diagonal Failure in Truss5 172
XIX
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
The environmental issue is becoming more and more a persisting
issue. A trend is growing to change every material- if feasible- with an
environment-friendly and renewable material. This will lead to less
consumption of non-renewable materials, already at the edge of
depletion, less pollution and reservation of the non-renewable resources
for the next generations and thus achieving sustainable development. In
the field of construction many agricultural materials and agricultural
residues are being used in construction. Bamboo is used in sheds,
canopies, house roofs and even bridges. The rice husk is used in concrete
and straw bale in cottages, villas and buildings. The aim of the thesis is to
use an agricultural material that is available in large quantities in Egypt
in the field of construction. One of these materials is the Date Palm
Leaves Midrib (DPLM), which results from date palm tree pruning. The
DPLM mechanical properties resemble that of the wood and even higher
if considering the outer layer. Thus, its use in construction is promising.
Therefore, this thesis aims to study the feasibility of using the DPLM as a
structural element.
1
Chapter 1
3
Chapter 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Chapter 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The environmental issue is becoming more and more a persisting
issue. Many countries have taken huge steps to adequately modify the
daily life of their individuals to become more environment-friendly. Most
of these steps are: conserving non-renewable sources, adhering to the
principle of sustainable development and using environment-friendly
materials. Countries, such as India and China, have condemned cutting of
old forests, and other countries have taken regulations that for each tree
cut another tree has to be planted (Tree-Urban Forest Management,
2009). In the field of construction environment-friendly materials, such
as bamboo and straw, are used in construction instead of the traditional
building materials. The use of these materials makes buildings more
coherent and rhythmic with the environment. In the field of construction
there are three main materials used: wood, concrete and steel.
America production of straw is about 200 million tons per year, which
are not properly used or just wasted away (U.S. Department of Energy,
2003). Therefore, a trend evolved to try using straw material in
construction.
The mortar straw bale is very simple; it is just like the ordinary
bricks in which the bales are joined together by mortar not less than 25
mm thickness. This style was tested in Canada and took the approval of
the building code (Information guide to straw bale building, 2001). Most
of the American straw bale building code specifies that for the load
bearing walls the maximum load should not exceed 0.19kg/cm2
(Interpretations and Applications of building codes and Regulations #98-
8,1998), though the straw bale wall could stand stress of 4.8kg/cm2
(Information guide to straw bale building, 2001).
7
Chapter 2
2.2.2 Plastering
Plastering is lime or cement plastering. No isolation is made
between straw and plastering so that the wall can be breathable; that is to
allow moisture in and out. A wire mesh could be used as an interface
between the bale and plaster to hold the plaster. (Information guide to
straw bale building, 2001).
8
Chapter 2
9
Chapter 2
10
Chapter 2
Wall plate
Polythene or metal
strap
150x50mm cross-
Cladding beams
M12 threaded
Half lap joint
12mm cladding
12mm cladding Compression post
Gap between compression post and roof beam to allow for compression
Fig. 2.2 Straw bale connecting elements (Information guide to straw
bale building, 2001)
11
Chapter 2
Plywood
Nebraska style
Light weight
Fig. 2.4 Cross section in straw bale wall built by Nebraska style &
Light weight framing (Information guide to straw bale building, 2001)
12
Chapter 2
The rice plant is one of the plants that are able to absorb silica
from earth and store it in its structure. It contains high concentrations of
silica that when burnt in temperature of 500 to 700oC results in producing
amorphous ash with a porous structure which can be used in concrete.
Many studies were made to investigate the use Of RHA with concrete
and the effect of RHA on mechanical properties. But on the contrary a
fewer investigations were made on the effect of RHA on fresh Concrete
properties (Zahran, 2003). The following sections will present studies
made on RHA concrete.
2.4 BAMBOO
For countries growing bamboo, bamboo is considered a very
promising green construction material in terms of sustainability, low
energy consumption, low cost, and environmental friendliness. Bamboo
from the structural point of view is considered a very adequate material
in construction due to its mechanical properties. Yet, despite the various
qualifications of bamboo, the use of bamboo in construction is not widely
spread. This is mainly due to two main reasons. First, in many regions
where bamboo is grown, using bamboo in construction is related only to
poor man home. Therefore, in south East Asia, bamboo is used in
construction as a last source of building material, Meaning, that
manipulating bamboo in construction is highly affected by the traditions,
17
Chapter 2
culture, and moral concepts of man. The second reason is that engineers
like to use materials that are fully predictable in behavior and extensively
have been in use and experience, such as concrete, steel and timber. In
fact, many people who have been using bamboo in the field of
construction, based on traditions in the way of building rather than
technical methods, have been producing many critical mistakes (Janssen,
1981). But since there are a foregoing trend all around the global to use
green materials and substitute polluting and non-renewable resources,
materials like bamboo will be a valuable material in construction.
shoots and maintain the power of the rhizomes. The age of bamboo best
used in building is between two to five years. Bamboo is best cultivated
in dry seasons so that the moisture content is minimum, or cool seasons,
where insects are inactive; moisture attracts insects. The branches should
be carefully removed to prevent damaging the outer skin of the cane.
Storage should be horizontal and frequently supported to prevent
sagging. Storage should be away from moisture and sun. Fig. 2.5 shows
the storing of bamboo culms. There are two processes of drying: the first
one is done in frames, and it lasts between 6-12 weeks, and the second is
oven drying, which takes about 2-3 weeks. Yet, some species do not
tolerate oven drying and might develop cracks (Bamboo as a building
material, 2002).
19
Chapter 2
2.4.2 Preservation
There are five ways of preservation:
1) Smoking: the bamboo is fumigated using its own leaves and
branches making the culms inedible for the insects. The idea is
preventing the tar from condensing on the culms and instead perforates in
a gaseous state inside the culms tissues. The culms should be holed to
allow the smoke entering inside (Conbam.de, 2002). Fig. 2.6 shows
bamboo fumigator.
20
Chapter 2
3) Heating: the culms are heated to 150C giving more resistance to the
outer layer from insects. The disadvantage of these methods is that cracks
might develop and culms might burst in the heat.
4) Boiling: it takes about 50-60 minutes of cooking bamboo to remove
starch and carbohydrates.
5) Impregnation coating: using water with Borax.
All these methods prevent the insect from entering from outside
by changing the outside and reducing the starch. To protect culms from
inside, the diaphragms of the bamboo is pierced as shown in Fig. 2.8. To
prevent fungi, moisture must be kept away. The life time of unpreserved
bamboo is about 2.5 years and that of the preserved is 10 years
(Conbam.de, 2002).
21
Chapter 2
2.4.3 Coatings
Lime sludge, lime and cow dung, rangoon oil, and a cream of wax
(wood care) with tar dissolved in paraffin, are all types of used coatings.
This is an ancient recipe from Lebanon. With this paint the bamboo
culms develop a very attractive dark brown patina. The painting
procedure must be repeated regularly according to sunlight and driving
rain load. (Conbam.de, 2002)
2.4.5 Testing
Testing is done to determine the following main properties for the
design bases: bending strength, modulus of elasticity, tensile strength
parallel to the grain, compressive strength parallel to the grain, and shear
strength. Moisture content, shrinkage and mass per volume should also
be determined. Testing has proved that there is a great fluctuation in
strength results in case of different diameters, nodes, ages and humidity,
even if the tests are done on the same species (Mechanical properties of
bamboo, 2002).
2.4.6 Mechanical properties
The outer layer of the bamboo is the hardest, in which extremely
stiff fibers are lined longitudinally and parallel. Theses fibers are
responsible for the bamboo strength. In the thinner-walled bamboo, the
ratio of the outer layer, responsible for the strength, to the total area of
the cross section is larger than that of the thicker-walled bamboo. Thus,
the strength (force/Area) in the thinner-bamboo is larger than that in the
thicker-walled bamboo. In fact, there is a certain range of diameter above
and below which, its strength decreases. The external layer, which is
formed mainly of these fibers, has a strength in tension of 40KN/cm2. As
a comparison, timber has a strength of 5KN/cm2 and steel37 has
36KN/cm2. The external layer consists 40% of the wall thickness
(Ghavami, 2001). In compression and bending fracture happens
longitudinally due to the tangential stresses (Mechanical properties of
bamboo, 2002).
Fig. 2.9 shows fracture due to bending and compression in bamboo.
Tables 2.1 to 2.10 give the values of mechanical properties of bamboo
and their variation with the culm diameter. The researcher doubts the
23
Chapter 2
values of bending strength given in Table 2.3 as they arent logic and
contradicts with those given in Tables 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10. Also the author
did not mention the culm wall thickness in these tables but he mentioned
that the wall thickness should range from 15mm to 20mm.
24
Chapter 2
25
Chapter 2
26
Chapter 2
27
Chapter 2
increases the area at the end, which reduces stress concentrations. He also
used steel plates that are glued by epoxy and Portland cement to wood
plug, so that different bamboo members can be connected together. Fig.
2.15 shows connection suggested by Arce-Villalobos (1993). The main
principle of the system is to take the forces out from inside the culm,
distributing contact stresses over as much area as needed. In order to
achieve this, a cylindrical piece of wood is glued to the culm internally.
The first gain comes from the presence of the piece of wood, it changes
the internal distribution of stresses because of the enlarged net second
moment of area in the region of the connection. Obviously, the bamboo
thickness is small compared to the diameter of the total cross-section thus
the bond strength required and designed to the shear flow is minimum.
The culm is slotted to control the cracking during the insertion of wood
cylinder into culm as shown in the Fig. 2.15. Also, the culm has to be
cleaned from inside. This can be done using sandpaper wrapped around a
hand driller. After this, the steel plate C is introduced in the slot of the
wood cylinder and glued to it with a mixture of epoxy and Portland
cement. The plate is projected, so that its outer extreme can be adapted
for different applications, as shown in the details D and E.
29
Chapter 2
Sisal Lashes
Bolts
Two steel
plates
Fig. 2.11 Clamping the bamboo culms between two pieces of wood or
steel by bolts (Arce-Villalobos, 1993)
Dowels
Tie A
Split Reinforcment
Culm
Tie Tie
Dowel
Section A-A
Tie
A
31
Chapter 2
Wood
pieces
Steel dowels
Steel fittings
``
Fig. 2.13 Bamboo joint proposed by duff using aluminum
and steel fittings (Arce-Villalobos, 1993)
32
Chapter 2
33
Chapter 2
34
Chapter 2
35
Chapter 2
Bamboo structure, water and air caf located southern Binh Doung
province (Vietnews, 2009)
36
Chapter 2
37
Chapter 2
2.5 TIMBER
Timber is perhaps one of the first materials used by mankind in
building. It has been used from windows and flooring of buildings to
heavy framing and heavy traffic bridges (Miller, 1999). Timber as a
building material is retreating back against concrete and steel. Moreover,
the regulations for using wood is very restrictive: it requires that for
every tree cut another tree is to be planted, which makes getting timber
difficult (Tree-Urban Forest Management, 2009). In addition, the
regulations for manufacturing of wood and preserving are also restrictive,
which raises the timber price. Yet, from environmental point of view,
especially from the point of energy consumption, timber is superior over
steel and concrete. Fig. 2.19 shows examples of some timber structures.
38
Chapter 2
Preservation process
There are two kind of applying preservative: pressure process and
non pressure process.
In the pressure process wood logs are entered into cell where preservative
is entered under pressure for a certain period of time until the desired
amount of preservative is absorbed (Ibech, 1999).
Wood preservatives
Wood preservatives can be divided into two general classes:
(1) oilbrone preservatives, such as creosote and petroleum solutions of
pentachlorophenol and (2) waterborne preservatives that are applied as
water solutions. Many different chemicals are in each of these classes,
and each has differing effectiveness in various exposure conditions. The
three exposure categories for preservatives are (1) ground contact (high
decay hazard that needs a heavy-duty preservative), (2) aboveground
contact (low decay hazard that does not usually require pressure
treatment), and (3) marine exposure (high decay hazard that needs a
heavy-duty preservative or possibly dual treatment) (Ibech, 1999).
a. oilbrone preservatives:
Wood does not swell from treatment with preservative oils, but it
may shrink if it loses moisture during the treating process. Creosote and
solutions with heavy less volatile petroleum oils often help protect wood
from weathering, but may adversely influence its cleanliness, odor, color,
paint ability, and fire performance. Volatile oils or solvents with oilborne
preservatives, if removed after treatment, leave the wood cleaner than do
the heavy oils, but may not provide as much protection. Wood, treated
with some preservative oils, can be glued satisfactorily, although special
40
Chapter 2
b. Waterborne preservatives:
Waterborne preservatives are often used when cleanliness and
paint ability of the treated wood are required. Several formulations
involving combinations of copper, chromium, and arsenic have shown
high resistance to leaching and very good performance in service.
Waterborne preservatives are included in specifications for items such as
lumber, timber, posts, building foundations, poles, and piling.
Waterborne preservatives leave the wood surface comparatively clean,
paintable, and free from objectionable odor (Ibech, 1999).
edge should be supported with the knot near the top- compression zone,
rather than the bottom, tension zone (Green, Winandy, and Kretschmann,
1999). The direction of grains is not always coinciding with the main
standard axes. Instead, an inclination might occur due to the nature of
growth of tree or the way of cut of the wood product. This leads to a
reduction of the strength of wood according to the angle of grain
inclination (Green, Winandy, and Kretschmann, 1999).
42
Chapter 2
nails, spikes, staples, drift bolts, wood screws and lag screws. The
withdrawal resistance depends mainly on wood density, connector
diameter and depth of penetration. Also, whether the connector is driven
perpendicular or parallel to the grains affect the withdrawal strength. In
general, withdrawal in the direction perpendicular to the fibers is higher
than that in parallel direction (Soltis, 1999). The shape of the nail or
screw helps increasing the withdrawal resistance. For example the
withdrawal resistance of the spiral or helically threaded nails is higher
than that of the smooth wire nail. The lateral resistance depends on the
wood density, spacing between connectors and diameter of the connector
(Soltis, 1999). Several modes of failure have been assumed to predict the
lateral resistance of the connection. It is preferred that connectors are
applied perpendicular to grain whatever the angle of the applied load
(Soltis, 1999).
to remove the extractives and to expose the pores, in which the adhesive
will fill. Care must be taken when preparing the wood surface, so that not
to damage the surface (Vick, 1999).
Timber truss with all its members connected using steel plates and bolts
(americanpoleandtimber.com, 2009)
45
Chapter 2
DPLM
Rope to tie DPLM
46
Chapter 2
47
Chapter 2
48
Chapter 2
Periphery layer
Transition Zone
Core Zone
Fig. 2.22: Cross section in the DPLM showing the DPLM three zones
(Megahed, 1995)
49
Chapter 2
Tests made on the DPLM were done on the core part of DPLM
and the external fibers separately. No tests were done on the DPLM as a
whole to determine its mechanical properties, except the compression
strength and modulus of elasticity reported by Abdel-Azim (1992).
50
Chapter 2
51
Chapter 2
52
Chapter 2
53
Chapter 2
sand cement mortar of 50mm thickness was poured on the DPLM vault.
The vault was tested under a vertical load of 200kg/m2 and a
concentrated load of 130kg at the top of vault. The deflection measured
after 30 minutes was found to be 0.4mm. The vault was also tested under
horizontal load of 80kg/m2, which represents a wind pressure, and sway
was found after 30 minutes to be 0.2mm. the author reported that all
deflections disappeared after the removal of load indicating elastic strains
and the results, as commented by the author, were very promising.
PLASTER
1500TO2000
DPLM
MORTER
BEARINGWALL
DPLM
1800
500
3000
56
Chapter 2
59
Chapter 2
60
Chapter 3
DPLM MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES
Chapter 3
3.1 INTRODUCTION
As previously mentioned the purpose of this thesis is to use the
DPLM in its natural form as a structural unit. Three main issues are
necessary to be identified for adequate usage of DPLM as structural
element. First, is estimating the strength of the DPLM as whole in its natural
form without cutting. Second, is finding the suitable connection for the
DPLM units. And third, is finding adequate structural system for the DPLM
to be used in
The DPLM bending and axial strength will affect the choice of
suitable structural system. More important is the connection between the
DPLM. Actually the connection will have the most significant effect on
choosing suitable structural system. This is due to the complexity of joining
the irregular shape of the DPLM.
61
Chapter 3
Fig. 3.2 depending upon the largest circle diameter contained in the DPLM
cross section.
62
Chapter 3
63
Chapter 3
thickness 12mm, fastened with 2 bolts spaced 10cm. The average thickness
was measured as the smaller width of the DPLM. Test specimens are
shown in Fig. 3.5. All specimens failed in shear and not in tension.
Steel bar
Upper vice
grips
Lower vice
grips
65
Chapter 3
DPLM Steel
Bolt pipe Steel
hole plate
66
Chapter 3
DPLM
BOLT DPLM
Steel Plate Steel Tube
P P
DPLM
BOLT DPLM
Steel Plate Steel Tube
P P
BOLT
BOLT DPLM
Steel Plate Steel Tube
P P
Another attempt for tension test was performed using epoxy. Three
specimens were sawn as mentioned previously with length of 60cm and
thicknesses of 1.6 to 2cm. These specimens were first cleaned using a wire
brush and sand paper to remove the waxy layer on the surface. The DPLM
was then inserted in a hollow steel box35x35mm to a length of 20cm. epoxy
(SIKADUR100) was mixed and then poured inside the steel box. Due to the
high viscous form of epoxy, it was difficult to be poured. Instead, a trowel
67
Chapter 3
was used to insert the epoxy inside the steel box. Another experiment was
made using a toothed DPLM. The DPLM was grooved at interval to let the
epoxy enter the grooves and thus increasing the bond. The results of the
different experiment were similar. Most of the modes of failure were
slippage between the DPLM and epoxy.
Because the results of the U-shaped tension test were not logic, as
the strength of the whole DPLM was less than that of the inner zone,
another set of tests were performed in a different machine type, shown in
Fig. 3.7. The new set of specimens needed no special connection to be held
in the machine vice grips as the machine is characterized by having vice
grip able to hold the DPLM without additional accessories. The machine
used is SHIMADZU of capacity 20tons. All specimens failed in tension.
The specimens were tested in Shoubra faculty of engineering, laboratory of
Mechanical Engineering Department.
68
Chapter 3
U-Shaped bolt
DPLM
U-Shaped bolt
Section showing
Elevation showing the machine vices U-shaped bolt
gripping the DPLM U-shaped bolt gripping DPLM
specimen
69
Chapter 3
DPLM tensile
test specimen
Handles controlling
the vice grips to grip
the specimen
70
Chapter 3
Fig. 3.10 View of load cell testing machine used in compression test
72
Chapter 3
73
Chapter 3
Shear = P/ (L x T)
Where:
L: Length of connection (from the farthest bolt to the DPLM end), as
shown in Fig. 3.5
T: DPLM thickness
Table 3.1 Tension test results using bolted connection- (Shear strength
results)
Bolt Spacing Length DPLM
NO of diameter Thickness
Shear
bet (L) Force
Specimen bolts (d) (T) Strength
Bolts (cm) (kg)
(N) (cm) (cm) (kg/cm2)
(cm)
A 9 0.4 2.5 22.5 1.5 1800 53
B 2 0.4 10 20 1.4 800 29
C 1 0.4 10 10 1.4 440 31
bearing = P/ (N x d x T)
Where:
N: No of bolts
d: Bolt diameter
T: DPLM thickness
74
Chapter 3
75
Chapter 3
Line of failure
Line of failure
DPLM test specimen
76
Chapter 3
77
Chapter 3
DPLM
Epoxy
Slippage
DPLM
Epoxy
78
Chapter 3
Tearing of DPLM
Splitting of the
DPLM due to the
movement of the
U-shaped bolt
during testing
79
Chapter 3
80
Chapter 3
Location where
fibers are cut due
Location where the to vice grip
vices gripped the
DPLM
Fracture
due to
tension
failure
Location where
fibers are cut due to
vice grip
82
Chapter 3
Fracture of external
Tension side
fibers
Local compression
failure
Compression side
84
Chapter 3
Longitudinal fracture
Splitting of some
compression specimens
85
Chapter 3
3.4 CONCLUSION
The Values of tensile, compression and bending strength for the
DPLM as whole, in its natural form, have shown an increase of 39, 47 and
51% respectively higher than the corresponding values for the inner zone
only. This indicates that the outer layer contributes considerably to the
DPLM strength. The obtained tensile strength does not represent the DPLM
actual tensile strength. This is because the vice grips of the testing machine
cuts through the outer layer fibers during the testing leading to fast failure of
the DPLM. The actual strength of the DPLM is not the sole criterion that
will govern the design of the DPLM structure. It is the connection that most
properly will govern the structural design because of its weakness and
complexity.
the DPLM requires a special adapted connection to fit the DPLM. For
example, a beam of 6 meters length, which is a typical beam length, will
need three groups of DPLM each of length two meters connected together to
reach the 6 meters length. Moreover, the beam cross-section will require
that the DPLM to be arranged and connected rigidly to take the form of the
cross-section. Typically, this connection will require the transmitting of
shear flow and flexure stresses, which is a complicated connection. Due to
the complexity of such connection, the use of DPLM as a beam is excluded.
On the other hand, truss structures have simple joinery where short length
members are joined together to form the whole truss with the required span
using connections transmitting axial forces only. Moreover, in truss
members, the DPLM will be only axially loaded; therefore, the effect of
transversal strains will be minimal. Therefore, truss structures will be the
most feasible structure for DPLM.
87
Chapter 4
EXPERIMENTAL
PROGRAM
FOR
TESTING DPLM JOINARY
Chapter 4
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The DPLM joinery is the most difficult point in the subject of
DPLM trusses. As has been shown in the tension test, many attempts
were made to grip/connect the DPLM to the testing machine vices. Also
in the space truss made by Hassan (2001), joints were expensive and the
DPLM units were subject to slippage from the joints. Therefore, the aim
of this chapter is to find a suitable joinery for the DPLM that is simple
and inexpensive and in rhythm with the DPLM. This will be achieved by
conducting exploratory experiment on various types of connection, from
which, a suitable joinery will be chosen. Then comprehensive tests will
be conducted on the chosen joint to study its strength and behavior.
The experimental program presented in this chapter is designed as
following:
Performing exploratory tests on different types of joinery
to chose the adequate joinery,
Then performing a set of tests on the chosen joinery to
estimate the factors affecting the joint strength and
behavior
Experiments were performed in the Faculty of Engineering, Ain-Shams
University, Engineering Consultant Centre, Properties and Testing of
Materials-Research centre. The kind of DPLM used was air-dried Balady
species from Bany Swief governorate. The machine used in tests is VEB
Werkstoffprfmaschinen Leipzig" 20tons capacity. Specimens were
88
Chapter 4
sawn from the middle portion of the DPLM. The area used in calculation
was the actual area of the DPLM cross-section.
4.2.1.2 Testing bond between epoxy and the DPLM inner part
The aim of this test is to evaluate the bond strength between the
inner part of the DPLM and epoxy. Three specimens were sawn with the
length of 50cm and thicknesses of 1, 1.2 and 1.3 cm from the middle
portion of three DPLM. A Horizontal groove of 4mm thickness along the
longitudinal axis of the DPLM was made with the required length, as
shown in Fig. 4.2. Then a steel plate of thickness 2mm and width of
60mm was soaked in epoxy and then inserted into the DPLM groove. It
was observed, during the insertion of the steel plate, that most of the
epoxy material residualed at the edge of DPLM. Steel plates were griped
into the testing machine and the specimen was tested under tension.
89
Chapter 4
Epoxy Epoxy
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate DPLM Steel Plate
90
Chapter 4
91
Chapter 4
necessary because an attempt was made earlier to drill the DPLM and
steel plates separately and then fasten the bolts, but it wasnt accurate.
The holes in the DPLM and steel plates were not concurrent. This
connection depends on the shear strength of the DPLM.
P P
DPLM DPLM
SECTION 1-1
94
Chapter 4
Steel plate
DPLM
DPLM removed part
Groove
Epoxy
Fig. 4.5 Sketch magnifying the coarse groove lines in the epoxy-
DPLM inner part specimen
95
Chapter 4
Table 4.2 Bond strength between polyester and DPLM external layer
Length
Circumfere- Contact
Thickness inside
Specime nce Area Force Strength
(T) DPLM
n ID (C) LxC (kg) (kg/cm2)
(cm) (L)
(cm) (cm2 )
(cm)
2 1 4.9 20 98 1078 11
8 1.2 6 20 120 1300 11
A 1.3 6 20 120 1440 12
Avg. 11
96
Chapter 4
Fractured polyester
97
Chapter 4
98
Chapter 4
99
Chapter 4
Shear = P/ (L x T)
Where:
P: Force obtained from tests
L: Length of connection: from the farthest bolt to the DPLM
edge, as shown in Fig. 4.9.
T: Summation of the two DPLM thicknesses
Table 4.4 Double DPLM bolted connection Shear strength
bolt Spacing Length DPLM
NO of diameter Thickness
bet (L) Force Strength
Specimen bolts (d)
Bolts (cm) (T) (kg) (kg/cm2)
(N) (cm) (cm)
(cm)
A 5 0.6 5 25 3.5 3100 35.4
B 5 0.6 5 25 3.2 2300 28.8
Avg 32.4
bearing = P/ (N x d x T)
Where:
P: Force obtained from tests
N: No of bolts
D: Bolt diameter
T: Summation of the two DPLM thicknesses
Table 4.5 Double DPLM bolted connection Bearing strength
bolt Spacing Length DPLM
NO of diameter Thickness Force
Specime bet Bolts (L) Strength
bolts (d)
n (cm) (cm) (T) (kg) (kg/cm2)
(N) (cm) (cm)
A 5 0.6 5 25 3.5 3100 295
B 5 0.6 5 25 3.2 2300 239
Avg 267
100
Chapter 4
Connection length
101
Chapter 4
102
Chapter 4
103
Chapter 4
104
Chapter 4
105
Chapter 4
paragraphs will present the testing program of single and double DPLM
bolted connections
Table 4.7 and Fig. 4.11 shows Group I connection pattern and Table 4.8
and Fig. 4.12 shows Group II connection pattern.
Fig. 4.10 Typical connection detail for Group I and Group II bolted
connections
107
Chapter 4
P P 1@2.5
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolt
P P 1@5
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolt
P P 1@10
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolt
P P 1@15
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolt
P P 1@20
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolt
108
Chapter 4
2A
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
2B
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
2C
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
3A
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
3B
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
3C
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
4A
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
4B
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
5A
Steel Plate
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts Steel Plate
P
DPLM
P
6A
Steel Plate Bolts
109
Chapter 4
110
Chapter 4
111
Chapter 4
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
1
Steel Plate
DPLM DPLM
SECTION 1-1
112
Chapter 4
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
1
P P
DPLM
Steel Plate Bolts
DPLM DPLM
SECTION 1-1
almost equal to the variation, reported earlier (28 to 45 kg/cm2), for the
DPLM specimens. This gives the confidence in the obtained shear
strength results.
117
Chapter 4
6 1 5 5 3.4 720 1 42
6 1 5 5 3.1 510 1 33
6 1 5 5 3.6 610 1 34
bolt
6 1 5 5 3.1 690 1 45 rupture
bolt
6 1 5 5 2.9 630 1 43 rupture
AVG 36
6 1 10 10 2 635 1 32
bolt
6 1 10 10 2 735 1 37 rupture
bolt
6 1 10 10 3.6 610 1 17 rupture
bolt
6 1 10 10 3.1 690 1 22 rupture
bolt
6 1 10 10 2.9 630 1 22 rupture
AVG 32
118
Chapter 4
6 2 5 10 4 1100 1 28
6 2 5 10 3.1 900 1 29
6 2 5 10 3.6 1280 1 36
6 2 5 10 3.6 580 1 16
6 2 5 10 2.2 1300 1 59
AVG 33
6 2 10 20 3.1 1600 1 26 x
6 2 10 20 3.7 1300 1 18 x
6 2 10 20 4.2 1250 1 15 x
6 2 10 20 3.9 1500 1 19 x
6 2 10 20 3.6 1250 1 17 x
AVG 19
mean 34
X indicates value is not included in the mean value
8 1 5 5 3 130 9
8 1 5 5 2.7 600 44
8 1 5 5 3.7 710 38
8 1 5 5 3.6 910 51
8 1 5 5 3.4 810 48
AVG 38
119
Chapter 4
8 2 5 10 3.5 1850 53
8 2 5 10 3.3 1280 39
8 2 5 10 3.7 1220 33
8 2 5 10 3.6 1240 34
8 2 5 10 4.3 1450 34
AVG 39
6 2 10 20 3.1 1600 26 x
6 2 10 20 3.7 1300 18 x
6 2 10 20 4.2 1250 15 x
6 2 10 20 3.9 1500 19 x
6 2 10 20 3.6 1250 17 x
AVG 19
mean* 33
X indicates value is not included in the mean value
120
Chapter 4
Fig. 4.15 Relation between the connection length and shear strength
Fig. 4.16 Relation between the connection length and shear strength
(excluding long and close to end connections)
121
Chapter 4
122
Chapter 4
123
Chapter 5
EXPERIMENTAL
PROGRAM
FOR
TESTING DPLM TRUSSES
Chapter 5
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The experimental work described in this chapter is designed to
study the behavior of the DPLM trusses as structural elements. The types
of joints were studied also in this research in chapter four. Five types of
trusses were tested. All trusses have the same span and height. Trusses
were chosen to have a span of three meters and a depth of half meter - to
resemble a typical room width and also to be fit in the testing machine-.
Fig. 5.1 shows the elevations of the five trusses.
Truss1 is an N-truss with its span divided into four equal panels.
All its members consist of two DPLM connected together by 2mm steel
plate and 6mm diameter steel bolts grade 8.8. Truss2 is exactly the same
as Truss1 but the steel plates are 6mm. Truss3 is also an N-truss with its
span divided into four equal panels and all its members consist of two
DPLMs connected together by 8mm diameter steel rods only. Truss4 is a
traditional handcraft Vierendeel truss using the traditional methods of the
crate artisans. It is simply a joinery of the DPLM crates used in carrying
bread. Truss5 is the same as Truss4 but with additional diagonals.
124
Chapter 5
from the middle portion of the DPLM. Trusses were tested in a testing
machine equipped with1000kg-load cell.
125
Chapter 5
126
Chapter 5
before, each member of the truss consists of two DPLM making the truss
width almost 4cm. The connection is made of steel plates of thickness
2mm and 2 bolts 6mm diameter grade 8.8 spaced 2cm. This choice was
made to reduce the size of steel plate and thus reaching the most
economic truss. The truss is an N-truss of depth half meter and of 3
meters span divided into four equal panels with all its diagonals in
tension under gravity loads. The truss has its vertical DPLM of
length33cm, diagonal DPLM of 66cm and chord DPLM of 71cm joined
together to lengthen the truss span. Fig. 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 show the
detailed drawing of Truss1. For each member of the top chord, the two
DPLM were tightened together by a plastic wire to make them act
together and to reduce the buckling effect as shown in Fig. 5.5. For the
vertical members, the DPLM were connected together by a bolt at middle
of the member. Truss2 is exactly constructed as Truss1 but the steel
plates used were 6mm. Fig. 5.6 shows a photograph of sample
connections for the trusses. Since the trusses were constructed in a
workshop away from the test center, trusses were built into two parts so
that it can be easily transported inside a car and reassembled in the test
center. During the mobility of Truss1 it was very subtle to lateral
vibration indicating a very low out of plan stiffness. Also, Truss2 has
shown during mobility lateral vibration and low out of plan stiffness, yet
it was stiffer than Truss1.
128
Chapter 5
129
Chapter 5
131
Chapter 5
Plastic wire
132
Chapter 5
133
Chapter 5
5.3.2 Truss3
Truss3 resembles Truss1 in the structural system. Truss3 is 3.0
meters span divided into four equal panels with all its diagonals in
tension under gravity loads and of 0.5 meter depth as shown in Fig. 5.7,
5.8 and 5.9. Two DPLM are used in each truss member and joined
together by steel rods 8mm in diameter. The distance from the rod to the
end of any connected DPLM is 7cm, as shown in Fig. 5.9. Each chord
consists of two lines of DPLM spaced apart from each other by a distance
of about 6cm at the truss ends to a distance of about 9cm at midspan. The
DPLM in each line are arranged in staggered manner and overlapping
each other in a distance of 15cm to lengthen the truss span. The spacing
between each line constituting the chord is enough to let the verticals and
diagonals to be installed within. A spacer, which is a piece of DPLM, is
used to adjust spacing between members as shown in Fig. 5.11 and 5.13.
The truss has its vertical DPLMs of length65cm, diagonal DPLM of
106cm, and chord DPLMs of 90cm joined together to lengthen the truss
span. Truss width ranges from 10cm at the truss ends to 16cm at
midspan. The truss was constructed into two halves so that it can be
transported. Simply, Truss3 can be folded and unfolded, as shown in Fig
5.10, so it can be easily transported. Truss3 has shown an obvious out of
plan stiffness, where no vibration is sensed during its mobility.
134
Chapter 5
135
Chapter 5
136
Chapter 5
137
Chapter 5
138
Chapter 5
139
Chapter 5
Vertical DPLM
Spacer to adjust the
distance between
members
Diagonal DPLM
Steel rod
140
Chapter 5
141
Chapter 5
obvious that they were very fragile. Yet, they were tested to estimate the
maximum load they can carry.
(Lap) no
verticals
Verticals
(Lap) no
verticals
25cm lap
143
Chapter 5
144
Chapter 5
Sides C
Side A
Diagonals
145
Chapter 5
Figure 5.17: Steel frames used to prevent the DPLM trusses from
twisting and buckling
146
Chapter 5
Fig. 5.18: Elevation of the DPLM truss between the steel frames
147
Chapter 5
5.4.1 Truss1
The DPLM truss is erected on the testing machine beams and the
steel frames are inserted at the right and left side of the DPLM truss. The
steel frames are brought close to the DPLM, and then fastened by bolts
until each frame just touches the DPLM truss.
Truss1 was testing under a load cell of 1000kg with an increment
of 10kg. The truss was loaded by two concentrated load P/2 on the top
chord at joints2&4 (each at 75cm from support at the top chord), where P
is the load from the load cell. Two deflectometers were fixed under
joint7, (75cm from support at the bottom chord), and joint8 at midspan.
Fig. 5.19 shows the test setup for Truss1. Fig. 5.20, 5.21 and 5.21 show
the installation of deflectometers and the truss in the testing machine.
During the mobility of Truss1 the truss was very subtle to lateral
vibration indicating very low out of plan stiffness.
148
Chapter 5
149
Chapter 5
Stee frames
150
Chapter 5
where P is the load from the load cell. Two deflectometers were installed,
one under Joint7 (at 75cm from support at bottom chord), and the other at
joint8 at midspan. Two strain gauges where glued to the two DPLM of
the bottom chord at midspan, as shown in Fig.5.25. During the testing of
Truss3, all the members of the top chord suffered obvious inplan, shown
in Fig. 5.34, at load P of 340kg. Therefore, the test stopped and the load
released and all the top chord and vertical members were reinforced. The
reinforcement was two DPLM added to the aforementioned truss
members and fastened by plastic wires as shown in Fig. 5.26. During the
mobility of Truss2 the truss was subtle to lateral vibration indicating low
out of plan stiffness, yet it was stiffer than Truss1. On the other hand,
Truss3 showed an obvious out of plan stiffness and integrity.
152
Chapter 5
Truss3
153
Chapter 5
Strain gauges
154
155
Chapter 5
156
Chapter 5
Fig. 5.28: Twisting of Truss1 at the support due to the bending of the
steel plate
157
Chapter 5
158
Chapter 5
5.5.2 Truss2
To exclude the effect of bending of the thin steel plates in Truss1,
another truss was made using steel plate 6mm thickness, which withstood
a load of 440kg until failure. Though Truss2 showed a higher out of plan
stiffness than the first one, but it was still vibrating laterally indicating
low out of plane stiffness. The truss failed at the vertical and bottom
chord connections at support, Joint10, as shown in fig. 5.29, 5.30 and
5.31, due to out of plan strains though it was restraints by the steel frames
at 30cm from the ends. The lateral strains evolved, causing the failure of
the joint, which could perhaps be contributed to the small natural
curvatures of the DPLM members which led to lateral bending. A
structural analysis is performed to get deflections and the axial forces in
the middle DPLM corresponding to the applied load. The maximum axial
force was found to be 450kg in the top chord corresponding to P of
440kg. The theoretical deflection was 7.6cm which is close to 6.5cm
obtained from test, which also verifies the axial modulus of elasticity
previously calculated in chapter one from Hassans work (2001). Table
5.2 gives loads, deflections, and strains value obtained from testing of
Truss2. Strains were ploted versus the stress in the bottom chord
members. The stress was calculated using the area of the DPLM as 1.76
cm2 which corresponds to 1.5cm diameter DPLM. From strain2 values it
was clear that it was corrupted. Therefore, its plotting was not reported.
Fig. 5.32 and 5.33 plots the analytical and actual deflections against total
load (P) and the best fit stress-strain curve respectively.
159
Chapter 5
Table 5.2 Deflection and strain values obtained from Truss2 testing
Load Deflect- Deflect- Strain in Strain in Remarks
(kg) ion ion bottom bottom
(mm) @ (mm) chord @ chord @
joint7 @ DPLM other
Joint8 (x10-3) DPLM
(midspan) (x10-3)
20 0.03 0.04 -2 -2
40 0.09 0.19 -5 -2
60 0.65 0.74 12 -5
80 1.32 1.63 26 -8
100 2.35 2.84 40 -11
120 3.53 3.15 54 -17
140 4.42 5.52 74 -2
160 5.52 7.11 98 0
180 6.42 9.28 128 0
200 8.12 11.21 158 8
220 9.95 13.56 200 10
240 13.52 16.71 229 18
260 15.75 19.02 260 18
280 17.9 21.62 307 22
300 20.76 23.86 354 20
320 24.5 32.06 361 24
340 32.28 37.36 380 27
360 37.97 42.52 386 30
380 41.74 46.71 424 15
400 48.74 53.79 543 239
420 52.74 57.89 640 274
Failure in
joint10 @
support
due to out
of plan
440 58.99 65.58 790 300 strains
160
Chapter 5
162
Chapter 5
Analytical deflection
Actual deflection
Fig. 5.32: Plot of the analytical and the actual deflection against load
(P) for Truss2
Strian1
163
Chapter 5
5.5.3 Truss3
Truss3 withstood 340kg until inplan buckling of all the top chord
members as shown in Fig. 5.34. The test was stopped and the load was
released to reinforce the compression members. When the load was
released the truss returned back to its initial shape, indicating that the
deflections and buckling were elastic. Buckling appeared in Truss3 and
not in Truss1&2, because each DPLM of the top chord member were
separate while in Truss1&2 they were tightened by the plastic wires.
After reinforcing the compression members and restarting the test of the
truss, it withstood 400kg until failure. Failure occurred at joint2 (second
panel point in the top chord) as shown in Fig. 5.35. The joint twisted
laterally and failed at location of bolts. The maximum deflection
measured at midspan was 4.3cm while the theoretical was 6.7cm. Truss3
showed an obvious out of plan stiffness, where no vibration were sensed
while it mobility. This is due to the larger spacing between DPLM that
comprise the truss members. Table 5.3 gives loads, deflections, and
strains value obtained from testing of Truss3. Fig. 5.36 and 5.37 plots the
analytical and actual deflections against total load (P) and the best fit
stress-strain curve respectively. The only disadvantage, from the
researcher point of view, is that the truss requires wittiness from the labor
to decide which member in the truss should be installed first. This is
because the truss has to be installed in a specific order so that members
can fit. As a matter of fact, a detailed drawing for the truss, as shown
previously in Fig. 5.9, showing the position of the members should be
provided for the fabrication of the truss.
164
Chapter 5
In-plan bucking
166
Chapter 5
Table 5.3 Deflection and strain values obtained from Truss3 testing
Load Deflection Deflection Strain in Strain in Remarks
(kg) (mm) (mm) bottom bottom
@point 7 @point 8 chord @ chord @
(75cm (Midspan) DPLM other
-3
from the (x10 ) DPLM
end of the (x10-3)
truss)
20 0.62 0.72 11 14
40 1.36 1.51 15 18
60 2.34 1.69 23 25
80 3.41 4.03 31 31
100 4.16 4.33 38 29
120 6.5 8.26 38 32
140 7.86 9.95 49 36
160 9.61 12.32 43 39
180 10.89 13.92 53 47
200 12.11 17.57 45 43
220 14.79 18.84 42 51
240 15.93 20.27 49 56
260 18.24 23.05 43 51
280 19.08 25.34 55 58
300 21.49 27 34 41
320 23.55 31.05 40 49
340 25.29 34.27 34 55 In-plan
buckling of
all
members of
top chord
360 27.61 36.05 29 44
380 29.08 38.2 31 44
Failure of
joint2 due
to joint
400 32.35 43.51 32 44 movement
out of plan
167
Chapter 5
Fig. 5.36: Plot of the analytical and actual deflections against load (P)
for Truss3
Strain1
Strain2
168
Chapter 5
5.5.4 Truss4
Truss4 withstood 170kg until failure. The actual location of
failure could not be located, but the failure was noticed by the sound of
fracture of the DPLM. Maximum deflection measured was 15cm at
midspan. The theoretical deflection was 125cm, which has no relation
with the actual deflection. Yet, the deflections were very severe and
obvious as seen in Fig. 5.38. Table 5.4 gives loads, deflections, and strain
values obtained from Truss4 testing. Due to the large deflections and
more important the fragility of this truss, it was disqualified to be used as
a structural element.
169
Chapter 5
Table 5.4 Deflection and strain values obtained from Truss4 testing
Load Deflection Deflection Strain in Strain in
(kg) (mm) (mm) bottom bottom
@point 1 @point 2 chord @ chord @
(Midspan) DPLM other
(x10-3) DPLM
(x10-3)
10 2 2.93 0 0
20 3.07 5.21 1 -9
30 7.01 8.78 9 -12
40 11.51 14.78 2 -25
50 17.62 21.09 19 -24
60 26.42 31.37 12 -47
70 27.02 38.09 4 -61
80 33.58 42.98 20 -61
90 42.58 51.98 57 -60
100 48.97 57.95 70 -63
110 52.31 60.24 92 -6
120 53.47 61.4 100 3
130 52 62 129 35
140 59.12 71.95 137 48
150 73.3 89.75 175 84
160 94.64 113.85 188 111
170 116.27 148.65 196 121
170
Chapter 5
5.5.5 Truss5
Truss5 withstood 240kg until failure. Failure was in the
connection between the first diagonal and the bottom chord as shown in
Fig. 5.40. Also, twisting was observed as shown in Fig. 5.39. The
maximum deflection measured was 4.5cm at midspan. The theoretical
deflection was 60cm, which has no relation with the actual deflections.
Moreover, the fragility of the truss disqualifies it to be used as a
structural element. Table 5.5 gives loads, deflections, and strain values
obtained from Truss5 testing.
171
Chapter 5
172
Chapter 5
Table 5.5 Deflection and strain values obtained from Truss5 testing
Load Deflection Deflection Strain in Strain in
(kg) (mm) (mm) bottom bottom
@point 1 @point 2 at chord @ chord @
(Midspan) DPLM other
(x10-3) DPLM
(x10-3)
10 0.5 1.51 89 18
20 0.99 2.44 120 32
30 2.75 3.54 152 51
40 3.3 5.59 204 80
50 4.28 6.39 231 85
60 5.87 8.89 277 106
70 8 11.89 329 123
80 11 15.89 341 119
90 13.5 17.89 390 132
100 14.5 18.79 406 140
110 14.85 21.34 437 155
120 15.85 21.59 450 160
130 16.85 21.89 460 188
140 21.35 23.04 485 202
150 22.1 24.04 502 204
160 23.35 25.27 525 220
170 24.75 26.69 550 252
180 26.05 29.34 602 272
190 27.95 33.64 653 288
200 29.35 34.64 696 299
210 31 36 755 345
220 33 38 814 391
230 36 39 873 437
240 37.35 42.64 932 483
173
Chapter 5
5.6.1 Truss2
Truss2 as shown previously is made of DPLM members joined by
steel plates and bolts. The construction of this truss took 4 days in
manufacturing and required labor experienced in working with steel, who
are expensive. And moreover, using steel elements even in such small
quantities in DPLM trusses is considered expensive and odd. One big
disadvantage of Truss2 is its low out of plan stiffness. To overcome this
problem, more than two DPLM units should be used for each member or
the spacing between DPLMs members should be increased. The truss
cost items are given in Table 5.6. The truss cost/m2 can be calculated as
following:
174
Chapter 5
175
Chapter 5
Since the cost given is for the truss only and does not include the
cost of bracings and purlins, an increase of 30% should be added to
estimate a representative cost per meter squared.
Cost/meter squared = 224*1.3 L.E. / (span 3.00m X spacing 0.85)=
114L.E./m2. This cost is estimated according to the serviceability limit
state which will govern the design of truss. The estimated cost/meter
squared, excluding labors cost (e.g., self-reliant building), equals
63L.E./m2
As a comparison, for an area of 1mx1m to be covered by Steel (not
including columns) 10kg steel is required. One kg of steel equals 75L.E.
this means steel structure will cost 75L.E/meter squared.
5.6.2 Truss3
Truss3 as shown previously has all its members joined by 8mm
steel rods only. The construction of this truss did not require labors
skilled with steel handling and fabricating. Truss3 was superior over all
the other trusses by its high stiffness in out of plane, low cost, and low
deflection. Truss3 took 3 days in manufacturing. The truss cost/m2 can be
calculated as following:
Finding the maximum allowable distributed load per meter:
Truss3 withstood a total load P=400kg divided on 3 joints
Weight/m' (approx.) = 133kg (load on joint) / 0.75(spacing
between joints) =177kg/m'
Finding the maximum allowable distributed load per meter
corresponding to allowable deflection:
Maximum deflection from test = 45mm under Load P =
400kg or 177kg/m
176
Chapter 5
Since the cost given is for the truss only and does not include the
cost of bracings and purlins, an increase of 30% should be added to
estimate a representative cost per meter squared.
Cost/meter squared = 88*1.3 L.E. / (span 3.00m X spacing 1.1m)=
34L.E./m2. This cost is estimated according to the serviceability limit
state which will govern the design of the truss. . The estimated
177
Chapter 5
It is obvious from the truss testing results and the feasibility study
that Truss3 is much superior over Truss2. Also, the economical study
shows that the DPLM structure, Truss3, will cost half to one eighth
(excluding the labor cost) that of the steel structure. It should be noted, as
given in Tables 5.6 & 5.7, that the labor cost is very exaggerated, in
Truss3 about six times the material cost. The price was exaggerated
because it was given for the construction of one unit, and more important
the dealing with a new material required time for achieving sense to deal
with it, as cited by the labor. A more reasonable price would have led to a
significant reduction in cost.
This means that the truss still has much reserved strength, but due to the
out of plan strains the truss failed.
179
Chapter 6
SUMMARY,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Chapter 6
6.1 SUMMARY
The aim of this thesis is to study the feasibility of using the Date
Palm Leaves Midribs (DPLM) as a structural element and to find a
suitable structural system for the DPLM to be used in. The researcher in
this study has performed experimental tests on the DPLM in its natural
shape to determine its mechanical properties. This is because all the
mechanical properties and testes preformed on the DPLM were on the
outer layer and inner part separately. The mechanical properties of the
DPLM as a whole were not yet determined. After the determination of
the mechanical properties, various exploratory tests were performed on
different types of joints, glued and bolted joints, to determine the most
suitable and feasible joinery. Consequently, a comprehensive set of tests
were performed on the chosen joint to determine its behavior and
strength. Later, five types of trusses have been constructed and tested.
Three trusses simulate the commonly used steel trusses and two are a
modification of the traditional work of crates artisans. All Trusses have a
span of 3meters and a depth of half meter, to resemble a typical room
width and also to fit in the testing machine.
6.2 CONCLUSIONS
1. The DPLM should be used in its natural shape as a structural
element without the removal of the external layer to maintain its
high strength and stiffness and save the cost of cutting.
180
Chapter 6
2. The best structural system suitable for the DPLM is the truss
system, where the DPLM members are axially loaded only. This
is because of two reasons. First, the DPLM structure is composed
of all its fibrovascular bundles, responsible for strength, arranged
in the longitudinal direction without any cross-linking. Thus, any
transverse strains that evolve from bending will be transferred
through the binding material, leading to quick failure of the
DPLM. The second is the complexity of joining the DPLM
irregular shape. This dictates the use of simple connections,
which exist in truss system rather than beams.
181
Chapter 6
182
Chapter 6
cost and weak out of plan stiffness. Truss3 is seen to be the most
appropriate to be used in construction because of its low cost and
high out of plane stiffness. Truss3 cost was about 35L.E/m2
considering labor cost, and 5L.E/m2 considering material cost
only. This represents about half to one eighth that of steel
respectively.
7. In the DPLM truss testing, the trusses failed due to out of plan
strains. The load at which they failed is much below the estimated
load of failure. That is about 70% of the joint capacity. It was
estimated that the truss will fail due to shear in the joinery, since
the joinery is the weakest part in the truss. This dictates that a
better bracing should be provided if the failure load to be
increased.
183
Chapter 6
10. In the field of light constructions like shed and canopy, where
steel is the most common material, DPLM will be more cost-
effective and more environment-friendly. As a comparison, steel
covering cost is 75L.E./m2, while that of DPLM is 35L.E./m2,
which is about half that of steel. If material cost is considered
only (e.g., in self-reliant building of houses), then the steel
covering cost is 45L.E./m2, while that of DPLM is 5.1L.E./m2,
which is much cheaper: one eighth that of the steel.
184
Chapter 6
185
REFERENCES
References
REFERENCES
186
References
187
References
191
References
Appendix 1
A worked example of designing a DPLM bolted connection
6.1 SUMMARY
Design a DPLM bolted connection where the DPLM member
consists of two DPLM with an average total thickness of 2cm and the
axial force in the member equals to 1000kg
Solution:
Upon the recommendation in chapter 6 use:
Bolt diameter = 8mm
Bolt spacing = 5cm
Maximum bolt spacing = 10cm
Minimum spacing = 3 x bolt diameter (ECP, 2008)
193
Appendix 1
194
, , ,
)
( .
( .
. :
,
: }
.
(
: -
) , (
( .
:
. /
. /
-
. /
-
/ /
/ / / /
:
:
. /
, -
. /
. /
-
. /