Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPROACH
INTRODUCTION
In the early grades children learn that certain letter make certain familiar sound
which they repeat in unison and separately until they can almost do it in their sleep.
Our school has a great number of non readers. Out of 98 pupils in Grades I and
II last school year 2010- 2011, only 29 are independent readers,40 are in the
instructional and 29 belongs to the frustration level.
A pupil who struggles in decoding words must be taught how to break word s into
sentences. A central focus of remedial phonics instruction involves teaching pupils to
break down words into their component sounds called phoneme and the corresponding
letter that represent the sound. With practice they learn to decode words by sounding
out the letter. Encoding is the reverse process .Pupils break words into their component
sounds and put them into written form.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
What is the performance of non-readers before and after the remedial lessons in
reading using the phonetic approach?
1. Implement the Phonetic approach to non-readers for Grades one and two pupils
2. Evaluate the strategy used by the teachers who are handling remedial classes in
Grades one and two.
3. Compare the performance of non readers before and after the remedial lessons
in reading using the phonetic approach.
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
The teacher plays a major role in the development of the childs skills and
attitudes toward reading, the teacher is not powerful enough to make a child a good
reader, but his expertise becomes a strong point in facilitating the reading process of
pupils.
1. Words are to be read accurately but words are never an end in themselves. John
Van Der Brink (2004).
2. If a parent is concerned about a childs reading difficulty in the first grade, that
child has a right to be evaluated the dont worry attitude that sometimes still
prevails in the education community is anticipated.
Jill Laureen (2000).
3. If a pupil shows signs of learning problems especially in reading a professional
cognitive skills evaluation should be the next step. This kind of assessment
utilizes testing methods to identify specific areas of concern. Mitchell (2002).
4. The net effect: A decline in the number of slow and non readers in schools in all
municipalities. We are not a nation of readers; we are a nation of story tellers.
Juan Miguel Luz (June7 2007).
5. Every child should be given a chance by which reading instruction could be best
delivered by qualified and prepared teachers so that they will learn to read and to
become successful
Dechant (1991) quoted by Valdez (2004).
6. There is evidence that one-to-one tutoring is the most powerful force of
instruction Wasic (2003). To begin with small group instruction and move to one-
to-one tutoring for pupils who are slow in progress could be efficient Salvin
(2001).
7. Learning to read would not become successful unless that child is ready Valdez
(2004).
8. The teaching of beginning reading is of supreme importance and must be
purposeful, strategic, and grounded in the methods proven effective
Fitz Simon (2008).
9. Teachers who have never studied reading but just base their practices from
intuition, on incidental learning, and on how they think they were taught to read
before, greatly influence the teaching of reading in our school
Elliot and Anderson (2005).
10. A clear understanding of the reading process is a great contribution to success of
pupils in the learning to read to be able to learn
Sloan et.al (2006).
This action research was designed for the non-readers. These learners need a
close contact with their teachers for their lesson as they need to master each letter
sound. If the beginning reader doesnt given enough time to do exercises for the
mastery of the letter sounds, then he will not be able to read and cannot establish a
strong foundation to become a good reader.
METHODOLOGY
Phonetic approach is where children learn the sound of certain letters, and when
they see those letters in combination, they learn to blend those letters and this forms a
word. As they become comfortable forming that word, they learn to think about its
meaning and so decoding leads to thought or real meaning.
DATA GATHERING/RESPONDENTS
The setting will be on the classroom. The participants are Grade one and two
pupils under Mr. Antonio L. Alboroto, Grade 1 Daisy adviser, Mrs. Merlinda C. Timoteo,
Grade 2 adviser and Mrs. Luzminda T. Macario, Grade 1 Rose adviser (Researcher).
This will be noted by our new head teacher Mrs. Sharon Mae A. Bongocan.
INTERVENTIONS
The following reading interventions implemented in our school are anchored on the
objectives and targets of the division ECARP.
INTERVENTION WHEN WHERE Implementation Process Mechanics
Implemented Implemented
1. LEA Whole Year Class Based The child is encouraged to express his
Language Round thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The
Experience language experience approach
Approach emphasize that the child own ideas are
worth expressing. They are not only
worth saying, they are also worth writing
down and being read by the child the
teacher and other classmates.
Examples of activities include fieldtrips,
guess speakers, friends, myself,
birthday parties, movies, weather, and
hobbies. After a motivational experience
and oral discussion, the teacher records
the story exactly as it is said by its child.
As the children dictate the story, the
teacher writes each word repeating the
word aloud as he writes. Following each
sentence, the teacher reads the whole
sentence to the group. Using his hand
to underline the word being read.
2. PAIRED Whole Year Class Based
READING Round
This is an activity shared by two
readers, one stronger than the other. It
works best with pupils who are
experiencing difficulty with decoding
and general fluency. It is done five
times per week. Ten to twenty minutes
per session. Allowing the pupils to
choose the material to read. Let the sit
side by side in a comfortable quite
place, so both readers can easily view
it. Begin reading together. Adjust
intonation and rate to pupils level of
proficiency. Read with distinct and
expressive voice. The pupils should
follow the text with a finger as he reads.
If a pupil makes an error, wait to see if
3.DEAR Whole Year Class Based he corrects it. If he doesnt, the teacher
DROP Round will pronounce the word and have pupils
EVERYTHING repeat it. Praise pupils effort.
AND READ
The researcher used the Philippine Reading Inventory Manual by the Department of
Education to determine the reading ability level of pupils. This will also served as the
basis as to who will be the recipients of the remedial instruction. The table below shows
the results of PHIL IRI Pretest S.Y. 2010-2011 and S.Y. 2011-2012.
SUMMARY
Lack of phonemic awareness will cause a reading failure. Teachers must be aware of
the appropriate strategies which will be effective in the teaching of non-readers. It is
also the positive attitudes of both teachers and pupils towards reading that will enable
the pupils to read.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Every teacher must motivate their pupils to develop reading habits and love for
reading.
2. Every pupil must be identified on their reading level.
3. A yearly school based training of teachers in teaching reading.
4. To enhance the development of school library.
5. To talk with parents to minimize absences in the class.
6. To have supplementary reading materials in the class.
7. To award the reading teacher with exemplary performance.
REFERENCES
John Van Der Brink (2007) Teaching Reading a Phonetic or Whole Language
Approach.
Juan Miguel Luz (June 7, 2007) A Nation of Non Readers- Philippine Center for
Investigative.
Anderson, Neil (2003) Mcgraw Hill Practical English Language Teaching Series.
Surfing the internet