Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The concrete floor slab system shown below is for an intermediate floor to be designed considering partition weight
= 20 psf, and unfactored live load = 40 psf. Flat plate concrete floor system does not use beams between columns or
drop panels and it is usually suited for lightly loaded floors with short spans typically for residential and hotel
buildings. The lateral loads are independently resisted by shear walls. The two design procedures shown in ACI 318-
14: Direct Design Method (DDM) and the Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) are illustrated in detail in this example.
The hand solution from EFM is also used for a detailed comparison with the analysis and design results of the
engineering software program spSlab.
Version: Jan-27-2017
Contents
1. Preliminary Member Sizing .....................................................................................................................................1
2. Two-Way Slab Analysis and Design ........................................................................................................................4
2.1. Direct Design Method (DDM) ..........................................................................................................................4
2.1.1. Direct design method limitations ............................................................................................................4
2.1.2. Design moments .....................................................................................................................................4
2.1.3. Flexural reinforcement requirements......................................................................................................5
2.1.4. Factored moments in columns ................................................................................................................8
2.2. Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) .....................................................................................................................8
2.2.1. Equivalent frame method limitations .....................................................................................................9
2.2.2. Frame members of equivalent frame ......................................................................................................9
2.2.3. Equivalent frame analysis .................................................................................................................... 11
2.2.4. Design moments ................................................................................................................................... 13
2.2.5. Distribution of design moments ........................................................................................................... 13
2.2.6. Flexural reinforcement requirements.................................................................................................... 14
2.2.7. Column design moments ...................................................................................................................... 17
3. Design of Interior, Edge, and Corner Columns ...................................................................................................... 19
3.1. Determination of factored loads ...................................................................................................................... 20
3.2. Column Capacity Diagram (Axial-Moment Interaction Diagram) ................................................................. 21
4. Two-Way Slab Shear Strength ............................................................................................................................... 25
4.1. One-Way (Beam action) Shear Strength ......................................................................................................... 25
4.2. Two-Way (Punching) Shear Strength ............................................................................................................. 26
5. Two-Way Slab Deflection Control (Serviceability Requirements) ........................................................................ 29
5.1. Immediate (Instantaneous) Deflections ........................................................................................................... 30
5.2. Time-Dependent (Long-Term) Deflections (lt) ............................................................................................. 39
6. Computer Program Solution ................................................................................................................................... 40
7. Summary and Comparison of Two-Way Slab Design Results ............................................................................... 60
8. Comparison of Two-Way Slab Analysis and Design Methods .............................................................................. 62
Version: Jan-27-2017
Code
Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14)
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10)
International Code Council, 2012 International Building Code, Washington, D.C., 2012
Reference
Notes on ACI 318-11 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, Twelfth Edition, 2013 Portland
Cement Association, Example 20.1
Concrete Floor Systems (Guide to Estimating and Economizing), Second Edition, 2002 David A. Fanella
Simplified Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Fourth Edition, 2011 Mahmoud E. Kamara and Lawrence
C. Novak
Design Data
Superimposed Dead Load, SDL =20 psf for framed partitions, wood studs plaster 2 sides
ASCE/SEI 7-10 (Table C3-1)
Live Load, LL = 40 psf for Residential floors ASCE/SEI 7-10 (Table 4-1)
fy = 60,000 psi
Solution
In this example deflection will be calculated and checked to satisfy project deflection limits. Minimum
member thickness and depths from ACI 318-14 will be used for preliminary sizing.
Using ACI 318-14 minimum slab thickness for two-way construction without interior beams in Table 8.3.1.1.
l n 200
Exterior Panels: h 6.67 in. ACI 318-14 (Table 8.3.1.1)
30 30
But not less than 5 in. ACI 318-14 (8.3.1.1(a))
l n 200
Interior Panels: h 6.06 in. ACI 318-14 (Table 8.3.1.1)
33 33
But not less than 5 in. ACI 318-14 (8.3.1.1(a))
1
Where ln = length of clear span in the long direction = 216 16 = 200 in.
Try 7 in. slab for all panels (self-weight = 87.5 psf)
Where:
cclear = 3/4 in. for # 4 steel bar ACI 318-14 (Table 20.6.1.3.1)
Check the adequacy of slab thickness for beam action (one-way shear) ACI 318-14 (22.5)
at an interior column:
Consider a 12-in. wide strip. The critical section for one-way shear is located at a distance d, from the face
of support (see Figure 3)
18 16 5.75 12
Tributary area for one-way shear is ATributary [( ) ( )( )] ( ) 7.854 ft2
2 2 12 12 12
Vu q u ATributary 0.193 7.854 1.5 kips
2
5.75
Vc 0.75 2 1.0 4000 12 6.6 kips Vu
1000
Slab thickness of 7 in. is adequate for one-way shear.
c. Slab shear strength two-way shear
Check the adequacy of slab thickness for punching shear (two-way shear) at an interior column (Figure 4):
16 5.75 2
Tributary (18 14) ( ) 248.7 ft2
Tributary area for two-way shear is A
12
Vu q u ATributary 0.193 248.7 48.0 kips
Figure 3 Critical Section for One-Way Figure 4 Critical Section for Two-Way
Shear Shear
d. Column dimensions - axial load
P 0.80 P 0.80 (0.85 f ' ( A A ) f A ) (For square interior column) ACI 318-14 (22.4.2)
n o c g st y st
P 0.80 (0.85(6000)(16 16 0) 0) 1,044,480 lb 1,044 kips
n
P 0.65 1,044 679 kips P 48.6 kips
n u
Column dimensions of 16 in. x 16 in. are adequate for axial load.
3
2. Two-Way Slab Analysis and Design
ACI 318 states that a slab system shall be designed by any procedure satisfying equilibrium and geometric
compatibility, provided that strength and serviceability criteria are satisfied. Distinction of two-systems from
one-way systems is given by ACI 318-14 (R8.10.2.3 & R8.3.1.2).
ACI 318 permits the use of Direct Design Method (DDM) and Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) for the gravity
load analysis of orthogonal frames and is applicable to flat plates, flat slabs, and slabs with beams. The following
sections outline the solution per DDM, EFM, and spSlab software respectively.
Two-way slabs satisfying the limits in ACI 318-14 (8.10.2) are permitted to be designed in accordance with
the DDM.
Loads are uniformly distributed over the entire panel ACI 318-14 (8.10.2.5)
Service live-to-dead load ratio of 0.37 < 2.0 ACI 318-14 (8.10.2.6)
Slab system is without beams and this requirement is not applicable ACI 318-14 (8.10.2.7)
Since all the criteria are met, Direct Design Method can be utilized.
qu 2 n 2 0.193 14 16.67 2
Mo 93.6 ft-kips ACI 318-14 (8.10.3.2)
8 8
b. Distribute the total factored moment, M o , in an interior and end span: ACI 318-14 (8.10.4)
4
c. Calculate the column strip moments. ACI 318-14 (8.10.5)
That portion of negative and positive total design strip moments not resisted by column strips shall be
proportionally assigned to corresponding two half-middle strips.
ACI 318-14 (8.10.6.1)
a. Determine flexural reinforcement required for column and middle strips at all critical sections
The following calculation is for the exterior span exterior negative location of the column strip.
M u 24.3 ft-kips
To determine the area of steel, assumptions have to be made whether the section is tension or
compression controlled, and regarding the distance between the resultant compression and tension forces
along the slab section (jd). In this example, tension-controlled section will be assumed so the reduction
factor is equal to 0.9, and jd will be taken equal to 0.95d. The assumptions will be verified once the
Column strip width, b 14 12 / 2 84 in.
Mu 24.3 12000
As 0.99 in2
f y jd 0.9 60000 0.95 5.75
5
Asf y 0.99 60000
a 0.208 in
0.85f 'c b 0.85 4000 84
a 0.208
c 0.244 in
1 0.85
0.003 0.003
t ( )d t 0.003 ( ) 5.75 0.003 0.0676 0.005
c 0.244
Mu 24.3 12000
As 0.96 in2
f y (d a / 2) 0.9 60000 (5.75 0.208 / 2)
Based on the procedure outlined above, values for all span locations are given in Table 3.
b. Calculate additional slab reinforcement at columns for moment transfer between slab and column
The factored slab moment resisted by the column ( f M u ) shall be assumed to be transferred by
flexure. Concentration of reinforcement over the column by closer spacing or additional reinforcement
shall be used to resist this moment. The fraction of slab moment not calculated to be resisted by flexure
shall be assumed to be resisted by eccentricity of shear. ACI 318-14 (8.4.2.3)
6
Where
1
f ACI 318-14 (8.4.2.3.2)
1 (2 / 3) b1 / b 2
b1 Dimension of the critical section b o measured in the direction of the span for which moments are
determined in ACI 318, Chapter 8 (see Figure 5).
b 2 Dimension of the critical section b o measured in the direction perpendicular to b1 in ACI 318,
Chapter 8 (see Figure 5).
Table 4 - Additional Slab Reinforcement required for moment transfer between slab and column (DDM)
Effective slab As reqd As prov. For
Mu* f Mu d Addl
Span Location f width, bb within bb flexure within bb
(ft-kips) (ft-kips) (in.) Reinf.
(in.) (in2) (in2)
End Span
Exterior Negative 24.3 0.62 15.1 37 5.75 0.6 0.53 1-#4
Column Strip
Interior Negative 0.0 0.60 0.0 37 5.75 0.0 0.97 -
*Mu is taken at the centerline of the support in Equivalent Frame Method solution.
7
2.1.4. Factored moments in columns
a. Interior columns:
2
2
M u 0.07 [( qDu 0.5 qLu ) 2 n qDu ' 2 ' n ' ] ACI 318-14 (8.10.7.2)
16
2
16
2
M u 0.07 (129 0.5 64) 14 18 129 18 14 17.75 ft-kips
12 12
With the same column size and length above and below the slab,
17.75
M column 8.87 ft-kips
2
b. Exterior Columns:
Total exterior negative moment from slab must be transferred directly to the column: Mu 24.3 ft-
kips. With the same column size and length above and below the slab,
24.3
M column 12.15 ft-kips
2
The moments determined above are combined with the factored axial loads (for each story) for design
of column sections as shown later in this example.
EFM is the most comprehensive and detailed procedure provided by the ACI 318 for the analysis and design
of two-way slab systems where the structure is modeled by a series of equivalent frames (interior and exterior)
on column lines taken longitudinally and transversely through the building.
The equivalent frame consists of three parts:
1) Horizontal slab-beam strip, including any beams spanning in the direction of the frame. Different values
of moment of inertia along the axis of slab-beams should be taken into account where the gross moment
of inertia at any cross section outside of joints or column capitals shall be taken, and the moment of
inertia of the slab-beam at the face of the column, bracket or capital divide by the quantity (1-c2/l2)2 shall
be assumed for the calculation of the moment of inertia of slab-beams from the center of the column to
the face of the column, bracket or capital. ACI 318-14 (8.11.3)
2) Columns or other vertical supporting members, extending above and below the slab. Different values
of moment of inertia along the axis of columns should be taken into account where the moment of inertia
of columns from top and bottom of the slab-beam at a joint shall be assumed to be infinite, and the gross
cross section of the concrete is permitted to be used to determine the moment of inertia of columns at
any cross section outside of joints or column capitals. ACI 318-14 (8.11.4)
3) Elements of the structure (Torsional members) that provide moment transfer between the horizontal and
vertical members. These elements shall be assumed to have a constant cross section throughout their
8
length consisting of the greatest of the following: (1) portion of slab having a width equal to that of the
column, bracket, or capital in the direction of the span for which moments are being determined, (2)
portion of slab specified in (1) plus that part of the transverse beam above and below the slab for
monolithic or fully composite construction, (3) the transverse beam includes that portion of slab on each
side of the beam extending a distance equal to the projection of the beam above or below the slab,
whichever is greater, but not greater than four times the slab thickness. ACI 318-14 (8.11.5)
c N1 16 cN 2 16
0.07 , 0.1
1 (18 12) 2 (14 12)
For cF1 cF2 , stiffness factors, k NF k FN 4.13 PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table A1)
E I E I
Thus, K sb k NF cs s 4.13 cs s PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table A1)
1 1
3 4802 6
K sb 4.13 3834 10 352 10 in.-lb
216
3 3
h 168 (7)
where, Is s 4802 in4
12 12
1.5 1.5 3
Ecs wc 33 fc 150 33 4000 3834 10 psi ACI 318-14 (19.2.2.1.a)
9
Carry-over factor COF 0.509 PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table A1)
t H
H 9 ft 108 in., H c 101 in., a 1, 1.07
tb Hc
4.74E cc Ic
Kc PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table A7)
c
3 5461 6
K c 4.74 4696 10 1125.5 10 in.-lb
108
c 4 (16) 4 4
Where Ic 5461 in.
12 12
1.5 1.5 3
Ecc wc 33 fc 150 33 6000 4696 10 psi ACI 318-14 (19.2.2.1.a)
c 9 ft 108 in.
9E cs C
Kt ACI 318-14 (R.8.11.5)
c
[ 2 (1 2 ) 3 ]
2
3
9 3834 10 1325 6
Kt 367 10 in.-lb
3
168(0.905)
x x3y
Where C (1 0.63 )( ) ACI 318-14 (Eq. 8.10.5.2b)
y 3
7 16
C (1 0.63 )(7 3 ) 1325 in4.
16 3
c 2 16 in., and 2 14 ft 168 in.
10
d. Equivalent column stiffness K ec .
K c Kt
K ec
K c Kt
( 2 1125.5)( 2 367) 6
K ec 10
[( 2 1125.5) ( 2 367)]
Figure 6 - Torsional Member
6
K ec 553.7 10 in.-lb
column, and K c is for the upper and lower columns at the slab-
beam joint of an intermediate floor.
At interior joint,
352
DF 0.280
(352 352 553.7)
L 40 3
0.37
D (87.5 20) 4
11
Factored dead load q Du 1.2(87.5 20) 129 psf
2
0.0841 (0.193 14) 18 73.8 ft-kips
b. Moment distribution. Computations are shown in Table 5. Counterclockwise rotational moments acting on
the member ends are taken as positive. Positive span moments are determined from the following equation:
(M uL M uR )
M u (midspan) M o
2
Where M o is the moment at the midspan for a simple beam.
When the end moments are not equal, the maximum moment in the span does not occur at the midspan, but
its value is close to that midspan for this example.
Joint 1 2 3 4
Member 1-2 2-1 2-3 3-2 3-4 4-3
DF 0.389 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.280 0.389
COF 0.509 0.509 0.509 0.509 0.509 0.509
FEM +73.8 -73.8 +73.8 -73.8 +73.8 -73.8
Dist -28.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7
CO 0.0 -14.6 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0
Dist 0.0 4.1 4.1 -4.1 -4.1 0.0
CO 2.1 0.0 -2.1 2.1 0.0 -2.1
Dist -0.8 0.6 0.6 -0.6 -0.6 0.8
CO 0.3 -0.4 -0.3 0.3 0.4 -0.3
Dist -0.1 0.2 0.2 -0.2 -.02 0.1
CO 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.1 -0.1
Dist 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neg. M 46.6 -84.0 76.2 -76.2 84.0 -46.6
M at
44.1 33.2 44.1
midspan
12
2.2.4. Design moments
Positive and negative factored moments for the slab system in the direction of analysis are plotted in Figure
9. The negative moments used for design are taken at the faces of supports (rectangle section or equivalent
rectangle for circular or polygon sections) but not at distances greater than 0.175 1 from the centers of
supports. ACI 318-14 (8.11.6.1)
16 in.
0.67 ft 0.175 18 3.2 ft (use face of support location)
12 2
Figure 9 - Positive and Negative Design Moments for Slab-Beam (All Spans Loaded with Full Factored Live Load)
13
If the slab system analyzed using EFM within the limitations of ACI 318-14 (8.10.2), it is permitted by the
ACI code to reduce the calculated moments obtained from EFM in such proportion that the absolute sum of
the positive and average negative design moments need not exceed the value obtained from the following
equation:
q u 2 n 2 (16.67) 2
Mo 0.193 14 93.9 ft-kips ACI 318-14 (Eq. 8.10.3.2)
8 8
(32.3 67.0)
End spans: 44.1 93.8 ft-kips
2
(60.8 60.8)
Interior span: 33.2 94 ft-kips
2
The total design moments from the Equivalent Frame Method yield a static moment equal to that given by
the Direct Design Method and no appreciable reduction can be realized.
After the negative and positive moments have been determined for the slab-beam strip, the ACI code permits
the distribution of the moments at critical sections to the column strips, beams (if any), and middle strips in
accordance with the DDM.
The flexural reinforcement calculation for the column strip of end span exterior negative location is
provided below.
M u 32.3 ft-kips
14
To determine the area of steel, assumptions have to be made whether the section is tension or compression
controlled, and regarding the distance between the resultant compression and tension forces along the slab
section (jd). In this example, tension-controlled section will be assumed so the reduction factor is equal to
0.9, and jd will be taken equal to 0.95d. The assumptions will be verified once the area of steel in finalized.
Column strip width, b 14 12 / 2 84 in.
Mu 32.3 12000
As 1.31 in.2
f y jd 0.9 60000 0.95 5.75
a 0.276
c 0.325 in.
1 0.85
0.003 0.003
t ( )d t 0.003 ( ) 5.75 0.003 0.0501 0.005
c 0.325
Mu 32.3 12000
As 1.28 in.2
f y (d a / 2) 0.9 60000 (5.75 0.276 / 2)
Based on the procedure outlined above, values for all span locations are given in Table 7.
15
Table 7 - Required Slab Reinforcement for Flexure [Equivalent Frame Method (EFM)]
Mu b* d ** As Reqd for Min As Reinforcement As Prov. for
Span Location
(ft-kips) (in.) (in.) flexure (in2) (in2) Provided flexure (in2)
End Span
Exterior Negative 32.3 84 5.75 1.28 1.06 7-#4 1.4
Column
Positive 26.5 84 5.75 1.04 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Strip
Interior Negative 50.3 84 5.75 2.02 1.06 11-#4 2.2
Exterior Negative 0 84 5.75 0 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Middle
Positive 17.7 84 5.75 0.69 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Strip
Interior Negative 16.7 84 5.75 0.65 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Interior Span
Column
Positive 19.9 84 5.75 0.78 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Strip
Middle
Positive 13.2 84 5.75 0.51 1.06 6-#4 1.2
Strip
b. Calculate additional slab reinforcement at columns for moment transfer between slab and column by
flexure
The factored slab moment resisted by the column ( f M u ) shall be assumed to be transferred by flexure.
Concentration of reinforcement over the column by closer spacing or additional reinforcement shall be used
to resist this moment. The fraction of slab moment not calculated to be resisted by flexure shall be assumed
to be resisted by eccentricity of shear. ACI 318-14 (8.4.2.3)
Where
1
f ACI 318-14 (8.4.2.3.2)
1 (2 / 3) b1 / b 2
b1 Dimension of the critical section b o measured in the direction of the span for which moments are
determined in ACI 318, Chapter 8 (see Figure 5).
b 2 Dimension of the critical section b o measured in the direction perpendicular to b1 in ACI 318,
Chapter 8 (see Figure 5).
16
Table 8 - Additional Slab Reinforcement required for moment transfer between slab and column (EFM)
Effective slab As reqd As prov. For
Mu* f Mu d Addl
Span Location f width, bb within bb flexure within bb
(ft-kips) (ft-kips) (in.) Reinf.
(in.) (in2) (in2)
End Span
Exterior Negative 46.6 0.60 28.9 37 5.75 1.17 0.62 3-#4
Column Strip
Interior Negative 7.8 0.60 4.7 37 5.75 0.18 0.97 -
*Mu is taken at the centerline of the support in Equivalent Frame Method solution.
The unbalanced moment from the slab-beams at the supports of the equivalent frame are distributed to the
support columns above and below the slab-beam in proportion to the relative stiffness of the support
columns. Referring to Figure 9, the unbalanced moment at joints 1 and 2 are:
The stiffness and carry-over factors of the actual columns and the distribution of the unbalanced slab
moments (Msc) to the exterior and interior columns are shown in Figure 10a.
17
Figure 10a - Column Moments (Unbalanced Moments from Slab-Beam)
In summary:
Mcol,Exterior= 22.08 ft-kips
Mcol,Interior = 3.66 ft-kips
The moments determined above are combined with the factored axial loads (for each story) and factored
moments in the transverse direction for design of column sections. Figure 10b shows the moment diagrams
in the longitudinal and transverse direction for the interior and exterior equivalent frames. Following the
previous procedure, the moment values at the face of interior, exterior, and corner columns from the
unbalanced moment values can be obtained. These values are shown in the following table.
18
Figure 10b Moment Diagrams (kips-ft)
This section includes the design of interior, edge, and corner columns using spColumn software. The preliminary
dimensions for these columns were calculated previously in section one. The reduction of live load per ASCE
7-10 will be ignored in this example. However, the detailed procedure to calculate the reduced live loads is
explained in the wide-Module Joist System example.
19
3.1. Determination of factored loads
The factored loads are then input into spColumn to construct the axial load moment interaction diagram.
20
3.2. Column Capacity Diagram (Axial-Moment Interaction Diagram)
21
Edge Column (Column #2):
22
Edge Column (Column #3):
23
Corner Column (Column #4):
24
4. Two-Way Slab Shear Strength
Shear strength of the slab in the vicinity of columns/supports includes an evaluation of one-way shear (beam
action) and two-way shear (punching) in accordance with ACI 318 Chapter 22.
One-way shear is critical at a distance d from the face of the column as shown in Figure 3. Figure 11 shows the
factored shear forces (Vu) at the critical sections around each column. In members without shear reinforcement,
the design shear capacity of the section equals to the design shear capacity of the concrete:
Where:
'
Vc 2 f c bw d ACI 318-14 (Eq. 22.5.5.1)
4000
Vc 0.75 2 1.0 (14 12) 5.75 91.64 kips
1000
Because Vc Vu at all the critical sections, the slab has adequate one-way shear strength.
Figure 11 One-way shear at critical sections (at distance d from the face of the supporting column)
25
4.2. Two-Way (Punching) Shear Strength
ACI 318-14 (22.6)
Two-way shear is critical on a rectangular section located at d/2 away from the face of the column as shown
in Figure 5.
a. Exterior column:
The factored shear force (Vu) in the critical section is computed as the reaction at the centroid of the critical
section minus the self-weight and any superimposed surface dead and live load acting within the critical
section (d/2 away from column face).
Vu 22.2 0.193
21.72 18.88 21.65 kips
144
The factored unbalanced moment used for shear transfer, M unb, is computed as the sum of the joint moments
to the left and right. Moment of the vertical reaction with respect to the centroid of the critical section is also
taken into account.
18.88 5.99 16 / 2
M unb 46.6 21.65( ) 37.8 kips-ft
12
For the exterior column in Figure 5, the location of the centroidal axis z-z is:
b d 3 db 3 2
1
J 2
c
1 bd
1 2
b1
c
b dc
AB 2 AB
2
12 12
26
V M c
vu u v unb AB ACI 318-14 (R.8.4.4.2.3)
b d J
o c
4 40 5.75
v c min4 1 4000 , 2 1 4000 , 2 1 4000
1 59.5
v c min 253 , 279.5 , 371 psi 253 psi
Since v c v at the critical section, the slab has adequate two-way shear strength at this joint.
u
b. Interior column:
For the interior column in Figure 5, the location of the centroidal axis z-z is:
b 21.75
c AB 1 10.88 in.
2 2
b d 3 db 3 2
1
J 2
c
1 bd
b1
1 2
c
AB
2
2b2 dc AB
12 12
27
b o 2 (16 5.75) 2 (16 5.75) 87 in.
V M c
vu u v unb AB ACI 318-14 (R.8.4.4.2.3)
b d J
o c
4 40 5.75
v c min4 1 4000 , 2 1 4000 , 2 1 4000
1 87
v c min 253 , 279.5 , 293.7 psi 253 psi
Since v c v at the critical section, the slab has adequate two-way shear strength at this joint.
u
c. Corner column:
In this example, interior equivalent frame strip was selected where it only have exterior and interior supports
(no corner supports are included in this strip). However, the two-way shear strength of corner supports usually
governs. Thus, the two-way shear strength for the corner column in this example will be checked for educational
purposes. Same procedure is used to find the reaction and factored unbalanced moment used for shear transfer
at the centroid of the critical section for the corner support for the exterior equivalent frame strip.
Vu 13.18 0.193
18.88 18.88 12.70 kips
144
18.88 4.72 16 / 2
M unb 25.75 12.70( ) 19.23 kips-ft
12
For the corner column in Figure 5, the location of the centroidal axis z-z is:
b d 3 db 3 2
1
J 1 bd
b1
1 2
c
AB
2
b2dc AB
c
12 12
28
18.88 5.753 5.75 18.883 18.88 5.99 18.88 5.75 4.722 8354 in.4
2
J 18.88 5.75
c 12 12 2
Where:
1
f ACI 318-14 (8.4.2.3.2)
1 ( 2 / 3) b1 / b2
1
f 0.600
1 ( 2 / 3) 18.88 / 18.88
V M c
vu u v unb AB ACI 318-14 (R.8.4.4.2.3)
b d J
o c
4 20 5.75
vc min4 1 4000 , 2 1 4000 , 2 1 4000
1 37.75
vc min 253 , 279.5 , 319.2 psi = 253 psi
Since v c v at the critical section, the slab has adequate two-way shear strength at this joint.
u
Since the slab thickness was selected based on the minimum slab thickness tables in ACI 318-14, the deflection
calculations are not required. However, the calculations of immediate and time-dependent deflections are covered
in this section for illustration and comparison with spSlab model results.
29
5.1. Immediate (Instantaneous) Deflections
The calculation of deflections for two-way slabs is challenging even if linear elastic behavior can be assumed.
Elastic analysis for three service load levels (D, D + Lsustained, D+LFull) is used to obtain immediate deflections
of the two-way slab in this example. However, other procedures may be used if they result in predictions of
deflection in reasonable agreement with the results of comprehensive tests. ACI 318-14 (24.2.3)
The effective moment of inertia (Ie) is used to account for the cracking effect on the flexural stiffness of the
slab. Ie for uncracked section (Mcr > Ma) is equal to Ig. When the section is cracked (Mcr < Ma), then the
following equation should be used:
M cr
3 M 3
Ie I 1 cr I I ACI 318-14 (Eq. 24.2.3.5a)
M g M cr g
a a
Where:
The values of the maximum moments for the three service load levels are calculated from structural analysis as
shown previously in this document. These moments are shown in Figure 12.
M = cracking moment.
cr
f I
r g 474.34 4802 1
M 54.23 kip-ft ACI 318-14 (Eq. 24.2.3.5b)
cr y 3.5 12 1000
t
f 7.5 f ' 7.5 1.0 4000 474.34 psi ACI 318-14 (Eq. 19.2.3.1)
r c
30
I = Moment of inertia of the gross uncracked concrete section
g
l h3 14 12 7 3
2
I 2 4802 in
g 12 12
h 7
y 3.5 in
t 2 2
I = moment of inertia of the cracked section transformed to concrete PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.2.2)
cr
The calculations shown below are for the design strip (frame strip). The values of these parameters for column
and middle strips are shown in Table 9.
As calculated previously, the exterior span frame strip near the interior support is reinforced with 17 #4 bars
located at 1.25 in. along the section from the top of the slab. Figure 13 shows all the parameters needed to
calculate the moment of inertia of the cracked section transformed to concrete.
1.5 1.5 3
Ecs wc 33 fc 150 33 4000 3834 10 psi ACI 318-14 (19.2.2.1.a)
E
n s 29000000 7.56 PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table 10-2)
E 3834000
cs
b 14 12
B 6.54 in.-1
7.56 17 0.2
PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table 10-2)
nA
s
b( kd )3 2
I nA ( d kd ) PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (Table 10-2)
cr 3 s
14 12 (1.18)3
7.56 17 0.2 5.75 1.18 629 in.4
2
I
cr 3
The effective moment of inertia procedure described in the Code is considered sufficiently accurate to estimate
deflections. The effective moment of inertia, Ie, was developed to provide a transition between the upper and
31
lower bounds of Ig and Icr as a function of the ratio Mcr/Ma. For conventionally reinforced (nonprestressed)
members, the effective moment of inertia, Ie, shall be calculated by Eq. (24.2.3.5a) unless obtained by a more
comprehensive analysis.
Ie shall be permitted to be taken as the value obtained from Eq. (24.2.3.5a) at midspan for simple and
continuous spans, and at the support for cantilevers. ACI 318-14 (24.2.3.7)
For continuous one-way slabs and beams. Ie shall be permitted to be taken as the average of values obtained
from Eq. (24.2.3.5a) for the critical positive and negative moment sections. ACI 318-14 (24.2.3.6)
For the exterior span (span with one end continuous) with service load level (D+LLfull):
3 M 3
M
I cr I 1 cr I , since M 54.23 kip-ft < M 64.17 kip-ft
e M g M cr cr a
a a
ACI 318-14 (24.2.3.5a)
Where I is the effective moment of inertia for the critical negative moment section (near the support).
e
3 54.23 3
54.23
1 629 3148 in.4
e 64.17
I 4802
64.17
I I 4802 in.4 , since M cr 54.23 kip-ft > M a 34.25 kip-ft
e g
Where I is the effective moment of inertia for the critical positive moment section (midspan).
e
Since midspan stiffness (including the effect of cracking) has a dominant effect on deflections, midspan
section is heavily represented in calculation of Ie and this is considered satisfactory in approximate deflection
calculations. The averaged effective moment of inertia (Ie,avg) is given by:
I e,avg 0.85 I 0.15 I PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.2.4(1))
e e
For the interior span (span with both ends continuous) with service load level (D+LLfull):
3 M 3
M
I
I
cr I 1 cr I , since M 54.23 kip-ft < M 58.27 kip-ft
e, l e, R M g M cr cr a
a a
ACI 318-14 (24.2.3.5a)
32
Where I and I are the effective moment of inertia for the critical negative moment sections near the
e, l e, R
left and right supports, respectively.
3 54.23 3
54.23
I 4802 1 629 3993 in.4
e 58.27 58.27
I I 4802 in.4 , since M cr 54.23 kip-ft > M a 25.34 kip-ft
e g
Where I is the effective moment of inertia for the critical positive moment section (midspan).
e
I e,avg 0.70 I
e
0.15 I I
e, l e, r
PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.2.4(2))
Table 9 provides a summary of the required parameters and calculated values needed for deflections for exterior
and interior equivalent frame. It also provides a summary of the same values for column strip and middle strip
to facilitate calculation of panel deflection.
Deflections in two-way slab systems shall be calculated taking into account size and shape of the panel,
conditions of support, and nature of restraints at the panel edges. For immediate deflections two-way slab
systems the midpanel deflection is computed as the sum of deflection at midspan of the column strip or column
line in one direction (cx or cy) and deflection at midspan of the middle strip in the orthogonal direction (mx
or my). Figure 14 shows the deflection computation for a rectangular panel. The average for panels that have
different properties in the two direction is calculated as follows:
33
cx my cy mx
PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 8)
2
To calculate each term of the previous equation, the following procedure should be used. Figure 15 shows the
procedure of calculating the term cx. same procedure can be used to find the other terms.
34
wl 4
frame, fixed PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 10)
384 E I
c frame, averaged
Where:
1.5 1.5 3
Ec wc 33 fc 150 33 4000 3834 10 psi ACI 318-14 (19.2.2.1.a)
I = The averaged effective moment of inertia (Ie,avg) for the frame strip for service dead load
frame, averaged
(1505)(18) 4 (12)3
frame, fixed 0.039 in.
384(3834 103 )( 4802)
I
frame, averaged
c, fixed LDF frame, fixed PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 11)
c I
c, g
Where LDFc is the load distribution factor for the column strip. The load distribution factor for the column
strip can be found from the following equation:
LDF LDF
LDF l R
LDF 2
c 2
And the load distribution factor for the middle strip can be found from the following equation:
LDF 1 LDF
m c
For the end span, LDF for exterior negative region (LDFL), interior negative region (LDFR), and positive
region (LDFL ) are 1.00, 0.75, and 0.60, respectively (From Table 6 of this document). Thus, the load
distribution factor for the column strip for the end span is given by:
1.0 0.75
0.6
LDF 2 0.738
c 2
I = The gross moment of inertia (Ig) for the column strip for service dead load = 2401 in.4
c, g
35
I
frame, averaged 4802
c, fixed LDF frame, fixed 0.738 0.039 0.057 in.
c I 2401
c, g
(M )
net , L frame
c,L PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 12)
K
ec
Where:
(M ) 26.3 kip ft = Net frame strip negative moment of the left support.
net , L frame
26.3 12 1000
c, L 0.0006 rad
553.7 106
I
c,L c , L
l g
PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 14)
8 I e
frame
Where:
Ig
= Gross moment of inertia-to-effective moment of inertia ratio for frame strip.
I
e frame
18 12 4802
c,L 0.0006 0.0161 in.
8 4802
(M )
net , R frame ( 46.76 42.47) 12 1000
c, R 0.00010 rad
K 553.7 106
ec
Where
36
I
l g
c,R c , R 18 12 4802
0.00010 0.0027 in.
8 I e 8 4802
frame
Where:
Following the same procedure, mx can be calculated for the middle strip. This procedure is repeated for the
equivalent frame in the orthogonal direction to obtain cy, and my for the end and middle spans for the other
load levels (D+LLsus and D+LLfull).
Assuming square panel, cx = cy= 0.076 in. and mx = my= 0.039 in. Then the total
cx my cy
2
mx
cx my cy mx 0.076 0.039 0.115 in.
37
Table 10 Immediate (Instantaneous) Deflections in the x-direction
D D
Span LDF frame-fixed, c-fixed, c1, c2, c1, c2, cx, LDF frame-fixed, m-fixed, m1, m2, m1, m2, mx,
in. in. rad rad in. in. in. in. in. rad rad in. in. in.
Ext 0.738 0.0386 0.0570 0.00059 0.00010 0.0161 0.0027 0.076 0.262 0.0386 0.0202 0.00059 0.00010 0.0161 0.0027 0.039
Int 0.675 0.0386 0.0521 -0.00010 -0.00010 -0.0027 -0.0027 0.047 0.325 0.0386 0.0251 -0.00010 -0.00010 -0.0027 -0.0027 0.020
D+LLsus D+LLsus
Span LDF frame-fixed, c-fixed, c1, c2, c1, c2, cx, LDF frame-fixed, m-fixed, m1, m2, m1, m2, mx,
in. in. rad rad in. in. in. in. in. rad rad in. in. in.
Ext 0.738 0.0386 0.0570 0.00059 0.00010 0.0161 0.0027 0.076 0.262 0.0386 0.0202 0.00059 0.00010 0.0161 0.0027 0.039
Int 0.675 0.0386 0.0521 -0.00010 -0.00010 -0.0027 -0.0027 0.047 0.325 0.0386 0.0251 -0.00010 -0.00010 -0.0027 -0.0027 0.020
D+LLfull D+LLfull
Span LDF frame-fixed, c-fixed, c1, c2, c1, c2, cx, LDF frame-fixed, m-fixed, m1, m2, m1, m2, mx,
in. in. rad rad in. in. in. in. in. rad rad in. in. in.
Ext 0.738 0.0559 0.0825 0.00082 0.00014 0.02333 0.00388 0.110 0.262 0.0559 0.0293 0.00082 0.00014 0.02333 0.00388 0.017
Int 0.675 0.0558 0.0753 -0.00014 -0.00014 -0.00387 -0.00387 0.068 0.325 0.0558 0.0363 -0.00014 -0.00014 -0.00387 -0.00387 0.009
LL LL
Span LDF cx, LDF mx,
in. in.
Ext 0.738 0.034 0.262 0.017
38
From the analysis in the transverse direction the deflection values below are obtained:
my
cy
For DL+LLsust loading case:
my
cy
For DL+LLfull loading case:
my
cy
These values for the x-direction are shown in Table 10. Then, the total midpanel deflection is calculated by
combining the contributions of the column and middle strip deflections from the X and Y directions:
cx my cy mx PCA Notes on ACI 318-11 (9.5.3.4 Eq. 8)
2
(total ) ( sust ) Inst (1 ) [(total ) Inst ( sust ) Inst ] CSA A23.3-04 (N9.8.2.5)
lt
Where:
ACI 318-14 (24.2.4.1.1)
1 50 '
39
( ) Total immediate (instantaneous) deflection, in.
total Inst
= 2, consider the sustained load duration to be 60 months or more. ACI 318-14 (Table 24.2.4.1.3)
' = 0, conservatively.
2
2
1 50 0
spSlab program utilizes the Equivalent Frame Method described and illustrated in details here for modeling,
analysis and design of two-way concrete floor slab systems. spSlab uses the exact geometry and boundary
conditions provided as input to perform an elastic stiffness (matrix) analysis of the equivalent frame taking into
account the torsional stiffness of the slabs framing into the column. It also takes into account the complications
introduced by a large number of parameters such as vertical and torsional stiffness of transverse beams, the
stiffening effect of drop panels, column capitals, and effective contribution of columns above and below the floor
slab using the of equivalent column concept (ACI 318-14 (R8.11.4)).
spSlab Program models the equivalent frame as a design strip. The design strip is, then, separated by spSlab into
column and middle strips. The program calculates the internal forces (Shear Force & Bending Moment), moment
and shear capacity vs. demand diagrams for column and middle strips, instantaneous and long-term deflection
results, and required flexural reinforcement for column and middle strips. The graphical and text results are
provided below for both input and output of the spSlab model.
40
X
Y
Z
CASE/PATTERN: Live/All
CASE: Dead
87.5 lb/ft2 87.5 lb/ft2 87.5 lb/ft2 87.5 lb/ft2 87.5 lb/ft2
CASE: SELF
1.80
-1.80
-22.26
-24.32
-26.38
-30.0
-90.0
-83.94 -83.94
-76.24 -76.24
-46.90 -46.90
Moment Diagram - k-ft
LEGEND:
-0.60 -0.60 Envelope
33.17
44.78 44.78
90.0
90.0
90.0
Column Strip Moment Capacity - k-ft
LEGEND:
Envelope Curve
19.90 Capacity Curve
26.87 26.87
Support Centerline
Face of Support
Zone Limits
90.0
21.22 23.28
19.16
-21.22 -19.16
-23.28
LEGEND:
Envelope Curve
Capacity Curve
Support Centerline
Face of Support
-100.0 Critical Section
LEGEND:
Dead Load
Sustained Load
Live Load
Total Deflection
0.078
oooooo o o
oo oo oo oo
ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo
oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo
oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo
ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM)
=================================================================================================
spSlab v5.00 (TM)
A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of
Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems
Copyright 2003-2015, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC
All rights reserved
=================================================================================================
Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot
be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input
for processing by the spSlab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes
any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared
by the spSlab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spSlab error free the
program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for
analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly,
STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any
analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spSlab
program.
==================================================================================================================
[1] INPUT ECHO
==================================================================================================================
General Information
===================
File name: C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb
Project: Two-Way Flat Plate Floor
Frame: Interior Frame
Engineer: SP
Code: ACI 318-14
Reinforcement Database: ASTM A615
Mode: Design
Number of supports = 4 + Left cantilever + Right cantilever
Floor System: Two-Way
Material Properties
===================
Slabs|Beams Columns
------------ ------------
wc = 150 150 lb/ft3
f'c = 4 6 ksi
Ec = 3834.3 4696 ksi
fr = 0.47434 0.58095 ksi
Reinforcement Database
======================
Units: Db (in), Ab (in^2), Wb (lb/ft)
Size Db Ab Wb Size Db Ab Wb
---- -------- -------- -------- ---- -------- -------- --------
#3 0.38 0.11 0.38 #4 0.50 0.20 0.67
#5 0.63 0.31 1.04 #6 0.75 0.44 1.50
#7 0.88 0.60 2.04 #8 1.00 0.79 2.67
#9 1.13 1.00 3.40 #10 1.27 1.27 4.30
spSlab v5.00 StructurePoint 12-19-2016, 09:33:04 AM
Licensed to: StructurePoint, License ID: 66184-1055152-4-2C6B6-2C6B6
C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb Page 2
Span Data
=========
Slabs
-----
Units: L1, wL, wR, L2L, L2R (ft); t, Hmin (in)
Span Loc L1 t wL wR L2L L2R Hmin
---- ---- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1 Int 0.667 7.00 7.000 7.000 14.000 14.000 --- LC *i
2 Int 18.000 7.00 7.000 7.000 14.000 14.000 6.67
3 Int 18.000 7.00 7.000 7.000 14.000 14.000 6.06
4 Int 18.000 7.00 7.000 7.000 14.000 14.000 6.67
5 Int 0.667 7.00 7.000 7.000 14.000 14.000 --- RC *i
NOTES:
Deflection check required for panels where code-specified Hmin for two-way construction doesn't apply due to:
*i - cantilever end span (LC, RC) support condition
Support Data
============
Columns
-------
Units: c1a, c2a, c1b, c2b (in); Ha, Hb (ft)
Supp c1a c2a Ha c1b c2b Hb Red%
---- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----
1 16.00 16.00 9.000 16.00 16.00 9.000 100
2 16.00 16.00 9.000 16.00 16.00 9.000 100
3 16.00 16.00 9.000 16.00 16.00 9.000 100
4 16.00 16.00 9.000 16.00 16.00 9.000 100
Boundary Conditions
-------------------
Units: Kz (kip/in); Kry (kip-in/rad)
Supp Spring Kz Spring Kry Far End A Far End B
---- ------------ ------------ --------- ---------
1 0 0 Fixed Fixed
2 0 0 Fixed Fixed
3 0 0 Fixed Fixed
4 0 0 Fixed Fixed
Load Data
=========
Load Cases and Combinations
---------------------------
Case SELF Dead Live
Type DEAD DEAD LIVE
---- -------- -------- --------
U1 1.200 1.200 1.600
Area Loads
----------
Units: Wa (lb/ft2)
Case/Patt Span Wa
--------- ---- ------------
SELF 1 87.50
2 87.50
3 87.50
4 87.50
5 87.50
Dead 2 20.00
3 20.00
4 20.00
1 20.00
5 20.00
Live 2 40.00
3 40.00
4 40.00
1 40.00
5 40.00
Reinforcement Criteria
======================
Slabs and Ribs
--------------
_____Top bars___ __Bottom bars___
Min Max Min Max
------- ------- ------- -------
Bar Size #4 #4 #4 #4
Bar spacing 1.00 18.00 1.00 18.00 in
Reinf ratio 0.18 2.00 0.18 2.00 %
Cover 1.00 1.00 in
There is NOT more than 12 in of concrete below top bars.
Beams
-----
_____Top bars___ __Bottom bars___ ____Stirrups____
spSlab v5.00 StructurePoint 12-19-2016, 09:33:04 AM
Licensed to: StructurePoint, License ID: 66184-1055152-4-2C6B6-2C6B6
C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb Page 3
oooooo o o
oo oo oo oo
ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo
oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo
oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo
ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM)
=================================================================================================
spSlab v5.00 (TM)
A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of
Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems
Copyright 2003-2015, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC
All rights reserved
=================================================================================================
Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot
be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input
for processing by the spSlab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes
any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared
by the spSlab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spSlab error free the
program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for
analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly,
STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any
analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spSlab
program.
==================================================================================================================
[2] DESIGN RESULTS*
==================================================================================================================
*Unless otherwise noted, all results are in the direction of analysis only. Another analysis
in the perpendicular direction has to be carried out for two-way slab systems.
Top Reinforcement
=================
Units: Width (ft), Mmax (k-ft), Xmax (ft), As (in^2), Sp (in)
Span Strip Zone Width Mmax Xmax AsMin AsMax AsReq SpProv Bars
---- ------ ------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
1 Column Left 7.00 0.06 0.193 1.058 8.724 0.002 14.000 6-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.19 0.358 1.058 8.724 0.007 14.000 6-#4 *3
Right 7.00 0.43 0.550 1.058 8.724 0.016 12.000 7-#4 *3
Middle Left 7.00 0.00 0.000 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.00 0.275 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
Right 7.00 0.00 0.550 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
2 Column Left 7.00 32.66 0.667 1.058 8.724 1.293 12.000 7-#4
Midspan 7.00 0.00 9.000 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 7.00 50.21 17.333 1.058 8.724 2.015 7.636 11-#4
Middle Left 7.00 0.20 1.662 1.058 8.724 0.008 14.000 6-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.00 9.000 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 7.00 16.74 17.333 1.058 8.724 0.655 14.000 6-#4 *3
3 Column Left 7.00 45.47 0.667 1.058 8.724 1.818 7.636 11-#4
Midspan 7.00 0.00 9.000 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 7.00 45.47 17.333 1.058 8.724 1.818 7.636 11-#4
Middle Left 7.00 15.16 0.667 1.058 8.724 0.592 14.000 6-#4 *3
spSlab v5.00 StructurePoint 12-19-2016, 09:33:39 AM
Licensed to: StructurePoint, License ID: 66184-1055152-4-2C6B6-2C6B6
C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb Page 2
4 Column Left 7.00 50.22 0.667 1.058 8.724 2.015 7.636 11-#4
Midspan 7.00 0.00 9.000 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 7.00 32.66 17.333 1.058 8.724 1.293 12.000 7-#4
Middle Left 7.00 16.74 0.667 1.058 8.724 0.655 14.000 6-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.00 9.000 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Right 7.00 0.20 16.338 1.058 8.724 0.008 14.000 6-#4 *3
5 Column Left 7.00 0.43 0.117 1.058 8.724 0.016 12.000 7-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.19 0.309 1.058 8.724 0.007 14.000 6-#4 *3
Right 7.00 0.06 0.474 1.058 8.724 0.002 14.000 6-#4 *3
Middle Left 7.00 0.00 0.117 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
Midspan 7.00 0.00 0.392 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
Right 7.00 0.00 0.667 1.058 8.724 0.000 14.000 6-#4 *3
NOTES:
*3 - Design governed by minimum reinforcement.
2 Column 6-#4 6.17 1-#4 4.00 --- 6-#4 6.17 5-#4 4.00
Middle 6-#4 4.33 --- --- 6-#4 5.19 ---
3 Column 6-#4 6.17 5-#4 4.00 --- 6-#4 6.17 5-#4 4.00
Middle 6-#4 5.19 --- --- 6-#4 5.19 ---
4 Column 6-#4 6.17 5-#4 4.00 --- 6-#4 6.17 1-#4 4.00
Middle 6-#4 5.19 --- --- 6-#4 4.33 ---
2 Column 6-#4 12.00 1-#4 12.00 --- 6-#4 12.00 5-#4 12.00
Middle 6-#4 12.00 --- --- 6-#4 12.00 ---
3 Column 6-#4 12.00 5-#4 12.00 --- 6-#4 12.00 5-#4 12.00
Middle 6-#4 12.00 --- --- 6-#4 12.00 ---
4 Column 6-#4 12.00 5-#4 12.00 --- 6-#4 12.00 1-#4 12.00
Middle 6-#4 12.00 --- --- 6-#4 12.00 ---
Bottom Reinforcement
====================
Units: Width (ft), Mmax (k-ft), Xmax (ft), As (in^2), Sp (in)
Span Strip Width Mmax Xmax AsMin AsMax AsReq SpProv Bars
---- ------ -------- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
1 Column 7.00 0.00 0.275 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Middle 7.00 0.00 0.275 0.000 8.724 0.000 0.000 ---
Flexural Capacity
=================
Units: x (ft), As (in^2), PhiMn, Mu (k-ft)
_______________________Top___________________ ____________________Bottom___________________
Span Strip x AsTop PhiMn- Mu- Comb Pat Status AsBot PhiMn+ Mu+ Comb Pat Status
---- ------ ------- ----- --------- --------- ---- ---- --------- ----- --------- --------- ---- ---- ---------
1 Column 0.000 1.40 -35.30 0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.193 1.40 -35.30 -0.06 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.333 1.40 -35.30 -0.17 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.358 1.40 -35.30 -0.19 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.550 1.40 -35.30 -0.43 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.667 1.40 -35.30 -0.60 U1 All --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All ---
Middle 0.000 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.193 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.333 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.358 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.550 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.667 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All ---
2 Column 0.000 1.40 -35.30 -47.36 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.444 1.40 -35.30 -37.39 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 1.40 -35.30 -32.66 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
3.000 1.40 -35.30 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 4.62 U1 All OK
4.000 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 12.31 U1 All OK
5.167 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 19.23 U1 All OK
6.167 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 23.40 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 24.42 U1 All OK
8.129 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 26.87 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 26.40 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 18.24 U1 All OK
11.833 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 16.40 U1 All OK
12.833 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.76 U1 All OK
14.000 1.20 -30.37 -0.05 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
15.000 2.20 -54.64 -13.33 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
17.333 2.20 -54.64 -50.21 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
17.778 2.20 -54.64 -58.08 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
18.000 2.20 -54.64 -62.11 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
Middle 0.000 1.20 -30.37 0.47 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
1.662 1.20 -30.37 -0.20 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
3.333 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 4.91 U1 All OK
4.333 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.67 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 16.28 U1 All OK
8.129 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 17.91 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 17.60 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 12.16 U1 All OK
12.809 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 6.63 U1 All OK
spSlab v5.00 StructurePoint 12-19-2016, 09:33:39 AM
Licensed to: StructurePoint, License ID: 66184-1055152-4-2C6B6-2C6B6
C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb Page 4
3 Column 0.000 2.20 -54.64 -57.18 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 2.20 -54.64 -45.47 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
3.000 2.20 -54.64 -11.60 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
4.000 1.20 -30.37 -0.45 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
5.167 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 8.00 U1 All OK
6.167 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 13.40 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 14.84 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 19.90 U1 All OK
9.124 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 19.90 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 14.84 U1 All OK
11.833 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 13.40 U1 All OK
12.833 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 8.00 U1 All OK
14.000 1.20 -30.37 -0.45 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
15.000 2.20 -54.64 -11.60 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
17.333 2.20 -54.64 -45.47 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
18.000 2.20 -54.64 -57.18 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
Middle 0.000 1.20 -30.37 -19.06 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 1.20 -30.37 -15.16 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
4.191 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.77 U1 All OK
5.191 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 5.43 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.89 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 13.27 U1 All OK
9.124 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 13.27 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.89 U1 All OK
12.809 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 5.43 U1 All OK
13.809 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.77 U1 All OK
17.333 1.20 -30.37 -15.16 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
18.000 1.20 -30.37 -19.06 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
4 Column 0.000 2.20 -54.64 -62.11 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.222 2.20 -54.64 -58.08 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 2.20 -54.64 -50.22 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
3.000 2.20 -54.64 -13.34 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
4.000 1.20 -30.37 -0.06 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
5.167 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.76 U1 All OK
6.167 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 16.40 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 18.24 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 26.40 U1 All OK
9.871 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 26.87 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 24.42 U1 All OK
11.833 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 23.40 U1 All OK
12.833 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 19.23 U1 All OK
14.000 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 12.31 U1 All OK
15.000 1.40 -35.30 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 4.62 U1 All OK
17.333 1.40 -35.30 -32.66 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
17.556 1.40 -35.30 -37.39 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
18.000 1.40 -35.30 -47.36 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
Middle 0.000 1.20 -30.37 -21.82 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
0.667 1.20 -30.37 -16.74 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
4.191 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 1.14 U1 All OK
5.191 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 6.62 U1 All OK
6.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 12.16 U1 All OK
9.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 17.60 U1 All OK
9.871 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 17.91 U1 All OK
11.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 16.28 U1 All OK
13.667 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 9.67 U1 All OK
14.667 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 4.91 U1 All OK
16.338 1.20 -30.37 -0.20 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
17.333 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All OK
18.000 1.20 -30.37 0.47 U1 All --- 1.20 30.37 0.00 U1 All ---
5 Column 0.000 1.40 -35.30 -0.60 U1 All --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All ---
0.117 1.40 -35.30 -0.43 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.309 1.40 -35.30 -0.19 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.333 1.40 -35.30 -0.17 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.474 1.40 -35.30 -0.06 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.667 1.40 -35.30 0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
Middle 0.000 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All --- 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All ---
0.117 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.309 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.333 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.474 1.20 -30.37 -0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
0.667 1.20 -30.37 0.00 U1 All OK 0.00 0.00 0.00 U1 All OK
Material Takeoff
================
Reinforcement in the Direction of Analysis
------------------------------------------
Top Bars: 336.6 lb <=> 6.08 lb/ft <=> 0.435 lb/ft^2
Bottom Bars: 432.9 lb <=> 7.82 lb/ft <=> 0.559 lb/ft^2
Stirrups: 0.0 lb <=> 0.00 lb/ft <=> 0.000 lb/ft^2
Total Steel: 769.5 lb <=> 13.91 lb/ft <=> 0.993 lb/ft^2
Concrete: 451.9 ft^3 <=> 8.17 ft^3/ft <=> 0.583 ft^3/ft^2
spSlab v5.00 StructurePoint 12-19-2016, 09:34:21 AM
Licensed to: StructurePoint, License ID: 66184-1055152-4-2C6B6-2C6B6
C:\TSDA\TSDA-spSlab-Two-Way Flat Plate Floor.slb Page 1
oooooo o o
oo oo oo oo
ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo
oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo
oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo
ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo
o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo
ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM)
=================================================================================================
spSlab v5.00 (TM)
A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of
Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems
Copyright 2003-2015, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC
All rights reserved
=================================================================================================
Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot
be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input
for processing by the spSlab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes
any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared
by the spSlab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spSlab error free the
program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for
analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly,
STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any
analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spSlab
program.
==================================================================================================================
[3] DEFLECTION RESULTS
==================================================================================================================
Section Properties
==================
Frame Section Properties
------------------------
Units: Ig, Icr (in^4), Mcr (k-ft)
_______________M+ve_____________ _______________M-ve_____________
Span Zone Ig Icr Mcr Ig Icr Mcr
---- ------- ----------- ----------- -------- ----------- ----------- --------
1 Left 4802 0 54.23 4802 466 -54.23
Midspan 4802 0 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
Right 4802 0 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
2 Left 4802 466 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
Midspan 4802 466 54.23 4802 0 -54.23
Right 4802 466 54.23 4802 629 -54.23
3 Left 4802 466 54.23 4802 629 -54.23
Midspan 4802 466 54.23 4802 0 -54.23
Right 4802 466 54.23 4802 629 -54.23
4 Left 4802 466 54.23 4802 629 -54.23
Midspan 4802 466 54.23 4802 0 -54.23
Right 4802 466 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
5 Left 4802 0 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
Midspan 4802 0 54.23 4802 499 -54.23
Right 4802 0 54.23 4802 466 -54.23
NOTES: M+ve values are for positive moments (tension at bottom face).
M-ve values are for negative moments (tension at top face).
Units: Ig (in^4)
_______Column Strip_______ _______Middle Strip_______
Span Ig LDF Ratio Ig LDF Ratio
---- ------------ ------ ------ ------------ ------ ------
1 2401 0.800 1.600 2401 0.200 0.400
2 2401 0.738 1.475 2401 0.262 0.525
3 2401 0.675 1.350 2401 0.325 0.650
4 2401 0.738 1.475 2401 0.262 0.525
5 2401 0.800 1.600 2401 0.200 0.400
NOTES: Load distirubtion factor, LDL, averages moment distribution factors listed in [2] Design Results.
Ratio refers to proportion of strip to frame deflections under fix-end condtions.
Instantaneous Deflections
=========================
Extreme Instantaneous Frame Deflections and Corresponding Locations
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Units: Def (in), Loc (ft)
________________Live_______________ _________Total_________
Span Direction Value Dead Sustained Unsustained Total Sustained Dead+Live
---- --------- ----- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1 Down Def --- --- --- --- --- ---
Loc --- --- --- --- --- ---
Up Def -0.004 --- -0.002 -0.002 -0.004 -0.006
Loc 0.000 --- 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 Down Def 0.055 --- 0.023 0.023 0.055 0.078
Loc 8.378 --- 8.378 8.378 8.378 8.378
Up Def --- --- --- --- --- ---
Loc --- --- --- --- --- ---
3 Down Def 0.032 --- 0.014 0.014 0.032 0.046
Loc 8.876 --- 8.876 8.876 8.876 8.876
Up Def -0.000 --- -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000
Loc 0.444 --- 0.444 0.444 0.444 0.444
4 Down Def 0.055 --- 0.023 0.023 0.055 0.078
Loc 9.622 --- 9.622 9.622 9.622 9.622
Up Def --- --- --- --- --- ---
Loc --- --- --- --- --- ---
5 Down Def --- --- --- --- --- ---
Loc --- --- --- --- --- ---
Up Def -0.004 --- -0.002 -0.002 -0.004 -0.006
Loc 0.667 --- 0.667 0.667 0.667 0.667
Long-term Deflections
=====================
Long-term Column Strip Deflection Factors
-----------------------------------------
Time dependant factor for sustained loads = 2.000
Units: Astop, Asbot (in^2), b, d (in), Rho' (%), Lambda (-)
__________________M+ve__________________ __________________M-ve__________________
Span Zone Astop b d Rho' Lambda Asbot b d Rho' Lambda
---- ------- -------- -------- -------- ------ ------ -------- -------- -------- ------ ------
1 Right ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000 ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000
2 Midspan ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000 ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000
3 Midspan ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000 ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000
4 Midspan ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000 ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000
5 Left ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000 ---- ---- ---- 0.000 2.000
NOTES: Deflection multiplier, Lambda, depends on moment sign at sustained load level and Rho' in given zone.
Rho' is assumed zero because Compression Reinforcement option is NOT selected in Solve Options.
NOTES: Deflection multiplier, Lambda, depends on moment sign at sustained load level and Rho' in given zone.
Rho' is assumed zero because Compression Reinforcement option is NOT selected in Solve Options.
NOTES: Incremental deflections due to creep and shrinkage (cs) based on sustained load level values.
Incremental deflections after partitions are installed can be estimated by deflections due to:
- creep and shrinkage plus unsustained live load (cs+lu), if live load applied before partitions,
- creep and shrinkage plus live load (cs+l), if live load applied after partitions.
Total deflections consist of dead, live, and creep and shrinkage deflections.
NOTES: Incremental deflections due to creep and shrinkage (cs) based on sustained load level values.
Incremental deflections after partitions are installed can be estimated by deflections due to:
- creep and shrinkage plus unsustained live load (cs+lu), if live load applied before partitions,
- creep and shrinkage plus live load (cs+l), if live load applied after partitions.
Total deflections consist of dead, live, and creep and shrinkage deflections.
7. Summary and Comparison of Two-Way Slab Design Results
Table 12 - Comparison of Moments obtained from Hand (EFM) and spSlab Solution
Hand (EFM) spSlab
Exterior Span
*
Exterior Negative 32.20 32.66
Column Strip Positive 26.50 26.87
*
Interior Negative 50.30 50.21
*
Exterior Negative 0.00 0.20
Middle Strip Positive 17.70 17.91
*
Interior Negative 16.70 16.74
Interior Span
*
Interior Negative 45.60 45.47
Column Strip
Positive 19.90 19.90
*
Interior Negative 15.20 15.16
Middle Strip
Positive 13.20 13.27
*
negative moments are taken at the faces of supports
60
Table 14 - Comparison of One-Way (Beam Action) Shear Check Results Using Hand and spSlab Solution
Vu , kips xu* , in. Vc, kips
Span
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 23.3 23.3 1.15 1.15 91.64 91.64
Interior 21.2 21.2 16.85 16.85 91.64 91.64
*
xu calculated from the centerline of the left column for each span
Table 15 - Comparison of Two-Way (Punching) Shear Check Results Using Hand and spSlab Solution
b1, in. b2, in. bo, in. Ac, in.2 Vu, kips vu, psi
Support
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 18.88 18.88 21.75 21.75 59.5 59.5 342.00 342.13 21.65 22.79 63.3 66.6
Interior 21.75 21.75 21.75 21.75 87 87 500.00 500.25 50.07 50.07 100.1 100.1
cAB, in. Jc, in.4 v Munb, kips-ft vu, psi vc, psi
Support
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 5.99 5.99 14109 14110 0.383 0.383 37.8 37.2 137.0 139.2 189.7 189.7
Interior 10.88 10.88 40131 40131 0.400 0.400 -7.8 -7.7 110.2 110.1 189.7 189.7
Table 16 - Comparison of Immediate Deflection Results Using Hand and spSlab Solution (in.)
Column Strip
D D+LLsus D+LLfull LL
Span
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 0.076 0.072 0.076 0.072 0.110 0.103 0.034 0.031
Interior 0.047 0.045 0.047 0.045 0.068 0.064 0.021 0.019
Middle Strip
D D+LLsus D+LLfull LL
Span
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 0.039 0.038 0.039 0.038 0.056 0.054 0.017 0.016
Interior 0.020 0.019 0.020 0.019 0.029 0.027 0.009 0.008
Table 17 - Comparison of Time-Dependent Deflection Results Using Hand and spSlab Solution
Column Strip
cs, in. total, in.
Span
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 2.0 2.0 0.152 0.145 0.261 0.248
Interior 2.0 2.0 0.095 0.089 0.162 0.153
Middle Strip
cs, in. total, in.
Span
Hand spSlab Hand spSlab Hand spSlab
Exterior 2.0 2.0 0.078 0.076 0.134 0.129
61
Interior 2.0 2.0 0.041 0.038 0.069 0.065
In all of the hand calculations illustrated above, the results are in close or exact agreement with the automated
analysis and design results obtained from the spSlab model. Excerpts of spSlab graphical and text output are given
below for illustration.
A slab system can be analyzed and designed by any procedure satisfying equilibrium and geometric compatibility.
Three established methods are widely used. The requirements for two of them are described in detail in ACI 318-
14 Chapter 8 (8.2.1).
Direct Design Method (DDM) is an approximate method and is applicable to flat plate concrete floor systems that
meet the stringent requirements of ACI 318-14 (8.10.2). In many projects, however, these requirements limit the
usability of the Direct Design Method significantly.
The Equivalent Frame Method (EFM) does not have the limitations of Direct Design Method. It requires more
accurate analysis methods that, depending on the size and geometry can prove to be long, tedious, and time-
consuming.
StucturePoints spSlab software program solution utilizes the Equivalent Frame Method to automate the process
providing considerable time-savings in the analysis and design of two-way slab systems as compared to hand
solutions using DDM or EFM.
Finite Element Method (FEM) is another method for analyzing reinforced concrete slabs, particularly useful for
irregular slab systems with variable thicknesses, openings, and other features not permissible in DDM or EFM.
Many reputable commercial FEM analysis software packages are available on the market today such as spMats.
Using FEM requires critical understanding of the relationship between the actual behavior of the structure and
the numerical simulation since this method is an approximate numerical method. The method is based on several
assumptions and the operator has a great deal of decisions to make while setting up the model and applying loads
and boundary conditions. The results obtained from FEM models should be verified to confirm their suitability
for design and detailing of concrete structures.
The following table shows a general comparison between the DDM, EFM and FEM. This table covers general
limitations, drawbacks, advantages, and cost-time efficiency of each method where it helps the engineer in
deciding which method to use based on the project complexity, schedule, and budget.
62
Applicable
Concrete Slab Analysis Method
ACI
Limitations/Applicability
318-14 DDM EFM FEM
Provision (Hand) (Hand//spSlab) (spMats)
Minimum of three continuous spans in each
8.10.2.1
direction
Successive span lengths measured center-to-
8.10.2.2 center of supports in each direction shall not
differ by more than one-third the longer span
Panels shall be rectangular, with ratio of
8.10.2.3 longer to shorter panel dimensions, measured
center-to-center supports, not exceed 2.
Column offset shall not exceed 10% of the
8.10.2.4 span in direction of offset from either axis
between centerlines of successive columns
63