Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Could a sunny attitude protect us against flu, hypertension, and diabetes? A study
performed by Dr. Shonkoff and Dr. Richmond has shown the negative effects of toxic stress on
can cause increased heart rate, high blood pressure, and jump in stress hormones (Shonkoff).
However, negativity is only a half of the equation. Emotional vitality, characterized by a sense
of energy, positive well-being, and effective emotional regulation, has been hypothesized to
reduce the chances of heart disease (Kubzansky). Currently, there is no scientific evidence to
support the stated hypothesis. Perhaps health and happiness are not as intrinsically correlated as
many think they are. The equation for happiness may contain multiple other variables besides
health. In order to solve for the missing variables we must first understand what we mean by the
term happiness.
One could define happiness as a collage of experiences that bring above the emotions
which vary from content to extreme joy. The key word is the experience. By experiencing
events, such as revisiting a favorite dish or skydiving for the first time, our brain releases
serotonin, the happiness hormone, and forms long-term memories that will aid in the fabrication
of who we are in the future. Thus, the only correlation between health and happiness that can be
formulated is if health disables one from obtaining the desirable experiences. The variables
swiftly become forms of power which illustrate the capacity and the potential to hop over the
cracks on the road to happiness. As Russell Blackford states, Health is a form of power:
possession of good health can assist us to function and act more effectively than if we were
and provides a better understanding of a more realistic prospect of nurturing the experiences. The
list of forms of power goes on. Nonetheless, health does play a major role in determining
happiness. According to Dr. Kubzansky, anxiety and depression or happiness and optimism are
forged by nature and nurture; while a person is born with genetic predisposition there is still a lot
of room to maneuver (Kubzansky). The degree of manipulating of our cognitive and physical
states may be infringed or supported by our parents and society in which we reside. Whether
supreme health is needed to achieve happiness or not being unhealthy, such as avoiding stress, is
enough is all relative to the observer. By participating in the Honors Lecture Series I was able to
listen to great speakers and ponder about a multitude of different perspectives of just how much
health is needed to obtain happiness. The lecturers approaches relating health to happiness
The philosophical group focused on the theoretical approach to the subject. Dr. Phil
Oliver has proposed a pragmatic way of dealing with health. He defined pragmatism as a wishy-
washy, whatever works in a humanistic sense approach to health (Oliver). Pragmatists look at the
consequences with a goal to maximize peoples happiness and liberty. Theories are not definite;
it is very hard to draw a line between what exactly maximizes the health of the majority. And is
alright to forget about the minority? To conclude his lecture, Dr. Oliver gave three fundamental
reasons to never be unhappy: you were born, you are alive, and you have plenty to eat
(Oliver). Another lecturer, Dr. Ronnie Littlejohn focused on Daoistic lifestyle. His definition of
Daoism was effortless living of life in order to achieve oneness with the processes of the
universe without trying to control, help things alone, or untangle knots along the way
(Littlejohn). Everything is made of vital energy, known as Qi; this energy is transformed into
different things such as our mind and matter. Daoism emphasizes on achieving equilibrium. It is
somewhat of an idealistic view which focuses on transcendence. Even if increased health was a
byproduct of reaching equilibrium, Dr. Littlejohn agreed that Daoists are after being contempt
The historical group focused on how medicine was started and the ways it can be
improved based on the past experiences. Early approaches to treat illnesses were based on
assumptions made based on trial and error, religious, or superstitious beliefs, such as yawning
and clapping, using snake oils, and drinking arsenic. Dr. Troncarelli gave an intriguing lecture on
what harmony meant to Ancient Greeks, to whom medicine was both physiological and
psychological. They were one of the first societies to recognize how important gender,
geographical location, and access to nourishment were to development of a strong, healthy body.
As one of the most prominent figures in medicine, Hippocrates of Kos and Aristotle revolved
health around the balance of four humors: blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile
(Troncarelli). This was one of the earliest attempts of seeing how elements and body fluids affect
our health and perhaps the beginning of the western practice of medicine currently known as
allopathic medicine. Allopathic medicine is based around the use of pharmacologically active
agents or physical interventions to treat illnesses (AM). It uses a systematic way of curing
disease by asking questions of how and why the disease was there in the first place. In 1768, the
first allopathic medical school was established in Philadelphia (Woods). Between the time of the
first medical school and the middle of nineteenth century war has dictated the institution of
medicine. As Jeffrey Woods put it, War was an incubator for learning. A post-war period
marked the beginning of a capitalist-based medical industry, which has had incredible advances
in technological revolution such as the use of data mining on the population health. The future of
medicine will be the focus on keeping the patients out of the hospital and possible an
implementation of a reward system to those who choose healthier lifestyle habits (Woods).
While the lectures were all different in nature, I have learned that staying healthy takes a
holistic approach of satisfying mind, body, and spirit. I was able to bolster my hypothesis that
being healthy does not necessarily bring ultimate happiness. Nonetheless, it is important to be
healthy enough not to stall the acquisition of happiness. And how enough is defined is all
relative to the observer. A person might willingly sacrifice experiences for health that will
eventually lead to happiness and another person might choose to participate in the experiences at
the cost of health. Both personas will live a happy life. The path that is taken is based on
personal appraisal; moreover, the path chosen is predominantly dictated by the society in which
the person has been developing. A good contrast of the life choices can be seen by examining a
religious monk and a casual United States citizen. The monk will limit the engagement in a
multitude of diverse experiences, meditate for hours, and eat a healthy diet. His life choices will
be approved and glorified by his society, perhaps the other monks. The United States citizen is
brought up in a society that glorifies the acquisition of material goods, staying up all night, and
eating fast food. Even those who choose to stay healthy are constantly challenged by the
majority. Health and happiness are the biggest overlooked human virtues that are next to
impossible to be given a one, clear definition. It will always be relative to a specific group of
people with an inherent set of morals and beliefs. As the saying goes, everything is relative only
vodka is absolute.
Works Cited
Shonkoff, Jack. Preventing Toxic Stress in Children. Project-Syndicate (2009). Web. 17 April
2014.
Kubzansky, L.D. Emotional Vitality and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: Benefits of Healthy
2014.
Blackford, Russell. Humanity Enhanced: Genetic Choice and the Challenge for Liberal
Troncarelli, Fabio. Health as Happiness of the Body and Happiness as Health of the Soul in
Classical and Late Antique Thought. Middle Tennessee State Unviersity. Murfreesboro,
Woods, Jeffrey. Health and Happiness: Reducing Stress. Middle Tennessee State University.