Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bindig, Todd S . Human Life Review ; New York 35.3 (Summer 2009): 64-74.
ABSTRACT
[...] the abortion is not only immoral, but also impractical. [...] we ought neither to hold nor to defend the position
that abortion is generally morally wrong but ought to be allowed in the case of a pregnancy resulting from a sexual
assault.
FULL TEXT
On the controversial issue of the moral permissibility of abortion, we find three basic points of view: 1) Abortion is
morally unproblematic and access to it should not be limited in any way. 2) Abortion is generally morally wrong but
ought to be allowed in some "special cases." 3) Abortion is always morally wrong and never ought to be permitted.
Though it gets prolific support from the "mainstream" news and entertainment media as well as the current
administration of the federal government, the first view is actually the least widely held (to my knowledge, to date
none of the major American pollsters have ever shown more than 10 percent support for it). The vast majority of
Americans hold the view that abortion is, generally speaking, at the very least morally problematic if not outright
morally wrong. Of the two remaining views, the majority falls into the category of those who hold the position that
abortion is generally morally wrong but ought to be allowed in some "special cases."
Of the "special cases," one that is asserted most commonly, and most passionately, is that of a pregnancy that
results from a sexual assault. The intuition that, though abortion is generally morally wrong, it is conditionally
allowable in the case of a pregnancy resulting from a rape seems to result from some version of the following
reasoning: 1) Rape is one of the most traumatic events an individual can experience. 2) We ought to do anything
possible to assuage the suffering of rape victims. 3) If the victim has become pregnant as a result of the rape, this
will generally add to the victim's trauma. Therefore 4) we ought to allow the victim to terminate this unwanted
pregnancy if she believes that this will help her get over the trauma of the rape more quickly. This view is so widely
accepted that any argument against it is interpreted as heartless and irrationally extremist. In the 2008
presidential election, Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was repeatedly criticized for wanting to
"force women to carry their rapist's baby," and this in no small way contributed to the negative arguments made
against her.
The aim of this paper is to address directly the question of the permissibility of abortion in the event of a
pregnancy resulting from a sexual assault. I shall not be discussing the general moral permissibility of abortion,
but rather shall be speaking directly to the majority position that abortion is generally morally wrong but
conditionally allowable in the event of a pregnancy resulting from a sexual assault. I shall be arguing, first, that if
abortion is morally wrong on the grounds that it harms the pre-born child, the way in which this child came into
existence and the fact that the mother did not consent to and does not want the pregnancy does not make this
harm allowable. I shall then argue that, even if it were the case that the sexual assault would make the abortion
conditionally permissible, the impact of abortion on the sexualassault victim is, contrary to general intuitions,
actually extremely negative; and therefore, if it is our goal to help relieve her suffering, we ought not allow her to
undergo this procedure. I shall conclude that the argument that abortion is generally morally wrong but ought to be
allowed in the case of a pregnancy resulting from sexual assault, though appealing for emotional reasons, is
"Helene":
The negative feelings resulting from the rape were not eliminated by the abortion. Nothing was solved; instead, the
grief was now doubled. . . . Abortion does not help or solve a problem - it only compounds and creates another
trauma for the already grieving victim by taking away the one thing that can bring joy.23
The pages of the four books I mentioned near me beginning of this paper (Victims and Victors; Aborted Women,
Silent No More; Forbidden Grief; and Women Exploited) are filled with similar testimonies.
It is no wonder, then, that the suicide rates of sexual-assault victims who have become pregnant and had a
subsequent abortion are so high. In one study, these women were found "three times more likely to commit suicide
within a year of their abortions than women in the general population, and more than six times more likely than the
women who carried their pregnancies to term."24 Sandra Mahkorn, a rape counselor with decades of experience,
argues that "encouraging abortion as a 'solution' to a rape pregnancy is in fact counterproductive, because
abortion only serves to reinforce negative attitudes."25 Mahkorn had the following things to say about pregnancy
resulting from sexual assault:
The belief that pregnancy following rape will emotionally and psychologically devastate the victim reflects the
common misconception that women are helpless creatures who must be protected from the harsh realities of the
world. . . . Pregnancy need not impede the victim's resolution of the trauma. . . . While on the surface this
"suggestion" may appear acceptable and even "humane" to many, the victim is dealt another disservice. Such
NOTES
1 . Bindig, Todd S., Identity, Potential and Design: How They Impact the Debate over the Morality of Abortion,
Saarbriicken, Germany. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, 2008; and Bindig, "Death, Killing and Personal Identity," American
Theological Inquiry 2, no.l (January 2009): 121-132.
2. Victims and Victors: Speaking out about their Pregnancies, Abortions and Children Resulting from Sexual
Assault, eds. Reardon, Makimaa, and Sobie, Springfield, 111.: Acorn Books, 2000.
3. Reardon, David C, Aborted Women, Silent No More: Twenty Women Share their Personal Journeys from the
Tragedy of Abortion to Restored Wholeness, Springfield, 111.: Acorn Books, 1987.
4. Burke, Theresa, Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion, Springfield, 111.: Acorn Books, 2002.
5. Ervin, Paula, Women Exploited: the Other Victims of Abortion, Huntington, Ind.: Our Sunday Visitor, Inc., 1985.
6. Davis, Michael, "Foetuses, Famous Violinists and the Right to Continued Aid," Philosophical Quarterly 33 (19S6),
268.
7. Found in: Thompson, Judith Jarvis, "A Defense of Abortion," reprinted in The Problem of Abortion 3rd ed., eds.
Dwyer and Feinberg, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997.
8. Davis, 268.
9. Ibid.
10. Lee, Patrick, Abortion and Unborn Human Life, Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press,
1996, 121.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid., 120.
13. This example is based on Unger's "Bob's Bugatti" example, found in: Unger, Peter, Living High and Letting Die:
Our Illusion of Innocence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, 136.
14. Lee, 118.
15. Ibid., 110.
16. Hursthouse, Rosalind, Beginning Lives, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988, 201-2.
17. Ibid., 202.
18. Lee, 123-4.
19. Burke, 164-5.
20. Burke, 164.
21. Reardon, Makimaa, and Sobie, 57.
22. Ibid., 62.
23. Ibid., 68-9.
24. Burke, 46.
25. Reardon, 195-6.
26. Mahkorn, Sandra K. "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," in The Psychological Aspects of Abortion ed. D. Mall and
W.F. Watts, Washington D.C.: University Publications of America, 1979 (p. 65).
27. Detrimental Effects of Abortion: An Annotated Bibliography with Commentary, 3rd ed., ed. Thomas Strahan,
Springfield, 111.: Acorn Books, 2001.
28. Reardon, Makimaa, and Sobie, 40-1.
AuthorAffiliation
Todd S. Bindig, Ph.D, has published essays in Linacre Quarterly, New Blackfriars, and American Theological Inquiry,
as well as his first book: Identity, Potential and Design: How they Impact the Debate over the Morality of Abortion.
DETAILS
Volume: 35
Issue: 3
Pages: 64-74
Number of pages: 11
ISSN: 00979783