Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Managing with Impact, we introduce basic management tools that we expect managers to use. However, weve seen
that its a lot of info at once with no follow-up. We need to build ability to recall and more opportunity to apply concepts.
HR partners have provided qualitative data, also engagement survey, also manager 360.
What are the core issues that we are hoping to see change if managers apply these management tools
effectively?
A number of themes were identified in employee surveys from Q1 and Q2 of this year (the Pulse employee engagement
survey and the Manager 360 survey). One very common theme is managers tendency to micro-manage, rather than
providing employees with autonomy and empowering them to make their own decisions. We would like to see managers
using the management tools they learn in Managing with Impact to develop and empower a high-performing workforce.
How will we know if our instruction is successful? What metric can we tie to this initiative?
Its a little tricky because this issue arose more from the qualitative comments from the surveys than from the hard data.
But we can seek to lower the number of comments that we see related to this issue in the next Pulse and Manager 360
surveys.
What manager tools should we focus on that are the most closely tied to the behaviors we want to change?
Steps for building an agreement
Performance management process
Performance feedback steps
Inquiry techniques
Steps for advocating an idea
Are there any additional people I should talk to gather their perspective?
Debbie Plager - Director of Talent Engagement
Brianna Bogan - Manager of HR Partners
Eric Yu - Director of Business Systems and Applications (sample audience member)
Mark Robustelli - Manager of Software Engineering (sample audience member)
Note:
Jen was able to share survey data and sample comments with Carissa Guillen but asked that it not be shared outside of
Relativity.