Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brenton Smith
This is a theore,cal ques,on which will generate more than one answer. Here is the
background, and you will have to decide for yourself.
The idea was based on the simple no,on that the employee had made
only one-half the contribu,ons used to fund his benet (the other half
having been paid by the employer). Since in private pensions, benets in
excess of the employee's own contribu,ons are taxable, one could argue
that 50% of Social Security benets should be subject to taxa,on.
~ hNps://www.ssa.gov/history/taxa,onoQenets.html
In 1993, SSA's Oce of the Chief Actuary es;mated that the payroll tax
contribu;ons of current and future workers would equal less than 15 percent
of the present value of their life;me benets (Goss 1993).
~hNps://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/issuepapers/ip2015-02.html
In other words, Social Security was a good deal in 1993. The problem with this approach is that
this ra,o changes over ,me, and varies person to person. In this case, the people who pay the
tax generally pay a lot more than 15 percent for their future benets.
~hNps://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/issuepapers/ip2015-02.html
In my opinion
Social Security benets are old-age insurance. As such, taxing seniors benets makes about as
much sense as paying taxes on an insurance check that one receives for an auto wreck. That
insurance money tends to pay for the unexpected cost of repairing the car. Social Security
checks pays for the costs that are incurred simply by living in old-age. This is not a situa,on
where the seniors are making money.