Judges V JWG V FINAL USDC VA DC Complaint Aug Sept 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OF THE EASTERN DIVISION

ALEXANDRIA
Janice Wolk Grenadier
15 W. Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
Pro Se CASE No. 1:17 cv -
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
V DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
Virginia and the United States Constitutional Rights
Chief Judge Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith
Federal Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S Code
USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia
1981 &1983, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 242, Rico and
Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act 18
600 Granby Street U.S.C 1961 1968 and under the Bill of Rights the 4
Norfolk, VA 23510 Freedoms: speech, worship, want, freedom of fear
Judge Leonie M. Brinkema Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III

Judge Gerald Bruce Lee Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buchanan
Judge Liam O'Grady Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson
Judge Anthony J. Trenga Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis
Senior Judge James C. Cacheris Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff
Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton Magistrate Judge T. Rawles Jones, Jr.
Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse

401 Courthouse Square
Alexandria, VA 22314
Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory Judge Barbara Milano Keenan

Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III Judge James A. Wynn, Jr.
Judge Paul V. Niemeyer Judge Albert Diaz
Judge Diana Gribbon Motz Judge Henry F. Floyd
Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. Judge Stephanie D. Thacker
Judge Robert B. King Judge Pamela A. Harris
Judge Dennis W. Shedd Senior Judge Clyde H. Hamilton
Judge Allyson K. Duncan Senior Judge Andre M. Davis
Judge G. Steven Agee
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Lewis F. Powell Jr. Courthouse & Annex
1100 East Main Street, Suite 501
Richmond, VA 23219
Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth

District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan Senior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
District Judge James E. Boasberg Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton
District Judge Amy Berman Jackson Senior Judge Richard J. Leon
District Judge Rudolph Contreras Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
USDC of the District of Columbia

333 Constitution Avenue N.W.
1
Washington D.C. 20001
Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse and William B. Bryant Annex
333 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001
Judge Brian Kenney

Judge Stephen Mitchell
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Alexandria
200 S. Washington St.
Alexandria, VA 22314-5405
John and or Jane Doe 1 100

Defendants all Public Servants, individually and in his or her official capacity as a Federal Judge an
Officer of the Court
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Judicial Complaint against
The United States District Court of Virginia Alexandria Judges
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
The United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judges
The United District Court of The District of Columbia Appeals Court Judges
That the Secrecy of the JUDGES CLUB is a Mafia style Club that is funded by the Government,
Elected Officials and Lawyers through their Salary, Benefits et al, Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, a
Weekend Getaway, Friendship, Sex, and other tips for personal and or financial gain
The perfect example of this as reported is Justice Scalia who passed in Texas after flying out on Air Force
2 with Dick Cheney, the trip paid for by lawyers / friends who had two cases in front of him. The
Supreme Court has approx. 10,000 cases a year filed and takes approx. 80 cases. It is also reported this
was done 144 times and is a pattern and practice with the Justices.
The 2nd Example is the United States of Americas people will pay for the past United States District
Court of the District of Columbia Chief Justice Richard Roberts for the rest of his life for RAPING A 16
year old VICTIM
The 3rd Example is Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser who the State of Virginia will pay her retirement as she
works full time as a lawyer after letting Michael Gardner, found guilty of molesting young girls, but a
good fund raiser for the Democrats out of jail. The Appeals Court of Virginia denied him a new trial,
while the Supreme Court agreed to a new trial and let him out of jail to await the trial. He then
attempted to hire a HITMAN to KILL THE YOUNG GIRLS. After FBI had a private meeting with the
Virginia Legislature Chief Justice Cynthia Kinser retired early
The 4th and maybe one of the worst Cash for Kids in Pennsylvania where one mother STOOD UP
and STATED NO MORE. The Judge is in jail and using any type of excuse ie technical error to try
and get out of jail.
That Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States of America stated: 'My job is
Judge Posner The basic thing is that most judges regard these people (pro se) as kind of trash not worth the time of a federal judge
2
to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat' Judges and justices are servants of the law, not the other way
around. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don't make the rules; they apply them. The role of an umpire and a
judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules. But it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a
ball game to see the umpire. Judges have to have the humility to recognize that they operate within a system of
precedent, shaped by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath. And judges have to have the
modesty to be open in the decisional process to the considered views of their colleagues on the bench.
Further 9/14/2017 An Exit Interview With Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit , Judicial
Provocateur - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/11/us/politics/judge-richard-posner-retirement.html
https: POLITICS An Exit Interview With Richard Posner, Judicial Provocateur - Sidebar By ADAM LIPTAK SEPT. 11,
2017 States:
The immediate reason for his retirement was less abstract, he said. He had become concerned with the plight
of litigants who represented themselves in civil cases, often filing handwritten appeals. Their grievances were
real, he said, but the legal system was treating them impatiently, dismissing their cases over technical matters.
These were almost always people of poor education and often of quite low level of intelligence, he said. I
gradually began to realize that this wasnt right, what we were doing.
In the Seventh Circuit, Judge Posner said, staff lawyers rather than judges assessed appeals from such
litigants, and the court generally rubber-stamped the lawyers recommendations. Judge Posner offered to help.
I wanted to review all the staff attorney memos before they went to the panel of judges, he said. Id sit down
with the staff attorney, go over his memo. Id make whatever editorial suggestions or editorial commands
that I thought necessary. It would be good education for staff attorneys, and it would be very good for the
litigants without lawyers. I had the approval of the director of the staff attorney program, Judge Posner said,
but the judges, my colleagues, all 11 of them, turned it down and refused to give me any significant role. I
was very frustrated by that.
Judge Posner further stated about those who need help and or pro se:
The basic thing is that most judges regard these people (pro se) as kind of trash not worth the time
of a federal judge EXHIBIT 3
The appearance all Justice is by a Social HIERACHY, and only for the friends or those that have the
CA$H / MONEY can get Justice I could go on page after page of stories of Corruption by the JUDGES
supported by those around them.
This one X-WIFE of the Son of a Judge Plaintiff JANICE WOLK GRENADIER STATES: NO MORE
We the American People are not TRASH as Judge Posner expressed that is what we are thought of.
COMES NOW Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier (JWG) reserves the right to amend
Complaint and add additional Parties per FRCP Rule 15. Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier complains against the
captioned Defendants as follows: to seek relief for the violation of State and Federal Constitutional Rights,
Federal Constitutional rights under Title 42 U.S Code 1981 &1983, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242, Rico and
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act 18 U.S.C 1961 1968 and under the Bill of Rights the
Four Basic Freedoms are being Violated: 1. Freedom of speech 2. Freedom of worship 3. Freedom from
want 4. Freedom from fear Janice Wolk Grenadier lives in FEAR every day of her life.
Plaintiff files this suit for the knowledgeable malicious intend to COVER UP for the
3
criminal spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman her accomplice Ericka
Grenadier Lewis her husband Timberlake Lewis and David Mark Grenadier to steal Real Estate and monies
from Sonia Grenadier and Janice Wolk Grenadier.
That IN OR AROUND December of 2013 Janice Wolk Grenadier CAME TO the Federal
Courts for help. That Janice Wolk Grenadier lives every day in FEAR for her life from Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and her GANG (widow to Judge Albert Grenadier
and Jerome Heckman founder of Keller Heckman and 1st cousin to Judge Albert Grenadier) of Law Firm
Grenadier Starace Duffett & Levi PC, David Mark Grenadier, Timberlake and Erika Ely Grenadier Lewis of
California. All benefiting financial from the thefts of Real Estate and Money from Plaintiff Janice Wolk
Grenadier.
The Judges hold the gateway to Justice have denied all Justice acting as the Juries
REQUESTED INSTEAD ruling in SECRECY and hiding in chambers, ruling from there Desks instead of
the Bench as required by the Oath of Office that they took. Janice Wolk Grenadier under the following Cases
has been denied every Motion for an OPEN Court hearing, AS STATED BY Judge Posner she has been treated
like TRASH.
CASES
All documents in all Cases filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern Division Alexandria, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, the District Court of the District of Columbia, the Appeals Court of the
District of Columbia, the Eastern Division of the Bankruptcy Court Alexandria and the Supreme Court
of the United States of America should be considered Evidence against the above defendants.
Date Court Case No Description
10-20-2011 USDC of Virginia 1:11-cv-01136 GBL - JFA Rico, Civil Rights, Tampering with the Grand Jury by
the Commonwealth Attorney in the City of Alexandria
Defendants: Ed Semonian, Randy Sengel, Judge Donald
Haddock, Judge J. Howe Brown, Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Ely Grenadier Heckman, Grenadier Anderson Starace
Duffett and Keisler PC, James McCauley VSB, Edward
Davis VSB
01-31-2014 USDC of District of 1:14-cv-00162 UNA LLM Loretta Lax Miller - Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Columbia Grenadier Heckmans GANG Hate Crime
2-19-2014 USDC of DC Appeals 14-7020 1:14 cv- 00162
Court
07-29-2013 USDC of District of 1;13-cv-01152 UNA Spring Street : Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Equity
Columbia Trustees, BWW Law Group, Equity Trustees, Lawyer
Howard Bierman, OCWEN
09-13-2013 USDC of DC Appeals 13-7142 Spring Street denial Moved to USDC of VA where
Court JWG knew she could never get a fair trial
10-23-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:14 cv- 01400 TSE - 440 CIVIL RIGHTS - In Re: Janice Wolk Grenadier Ill
Alexandria TCB take care Petitioner though next of friend George
McDermott who is also a Victim of Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and her gang as JWG has been illegally jailed
and being held in Solitary Confinement
4
07-02-2014 USDC of Virginia 1:14-cv-00827 LMB-TCB Spring Street Stayed as of September 29, 2016 in the
Alexandria 4th Circuit under an En Banc accepted
Fair Debt Collection - Wells Fargo, Bank of America,
Equity Trustees, BWW Law Group, Equity Trustees,
Lawyer Howard Bierman, OCWEN
4th Circuit Court of Appeals 15-01169 1:14-cv-00827 LMB-TCB
11-03-2015 USDC of District of 1:15 mc- 01540 UNA Move of Case CL1500 3661 COA due to Corruption
Columbia Divorce Lawyer IEG brought case against JWG to
collect illegally gotten legal fees and to force a sale on her
home. Judge James Clark owned by all his friends gave
her the power to do such which put JWG into
Bankruptcy agaon
6-20-2016 USDC of DC Court of 15-7154 for 1:15 mc- 01540
Appeals 1:15 mc- 01540
11-12-2015 USDC of Virginia 1:15-cv- 01497 GBL IDD Rico & Racketeering Stayed as of September 29, 2016
Alexandria the 4th Circuit under an En Banc accepted
USA, Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Alexandria,
Grenadier Starace Duffett Kieser & Levi PC,
DiMuroGinsberg, Michael Weiser Esq,
12-07-2016 4th Circuit Court of Appeals 16-1022 Enbanc denied by all
USDC of Virginia 16-13028 BFK Bankruptcy filing hearing held after hours Transcript is
Bankruptcy Court Docket No.
USDC of Virginia 16-01190 BFK Conversion Suit of Real Estate Bankruptcy Under 16
Bankruptcy Court 13028 BFK by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman -
11-04-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16-cv- 01396 AJT-MSN Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria
11-04-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16-cv-01397 AJT-MSN Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria
11-16-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv-01436 AJT - Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria MSN
11-17-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv- 01437 AJT - Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria MSN
11-23-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv- 01462 LO JFA Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria
11-23-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv- 1461 (CMH) Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria (IDD)
07-25-2017 4th Circuit Appeals Court 17-1540 1:16-cv- 1461 CMH IDD
11-18-2016 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv 01448 GBL Bankruptcy Appeal
TCB
07-25-2017 4th Circuit Appeals Court 17-1710 JWG 1:16 cv 01448 GBL TCB
07-25-2017 4th Circuit Appeals Court 17-1710 IEG 1:16 cv 01448 GBL TCB
11-30-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:16 cv- 01482 LMB - Bankruptcy Appeal
Alexandria TCB
05-16-2016 Supreme Court of the 15-7950 For Constitutional Rights Writ of Mandamus
United States of America Fourth Circuit
USDC of VA 1:14 cv- 827 LMB / TCB
5
02-08-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:17-cv-00166 TSE - MSN Relator Suit against FBI, DOJ, City of Alexandria, State
Alexandria of Virginia
03-15-2017 4th Circuit Court of Appeals 17-1335
03-09-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:17 cv- 00280 CMH - Judge James Clark of the City of Alexandria VA
Alexandria JFA injunctive Relief
07-10-2017 4th Circuit Court of Appeals 17-807 1:17-cv-00280 CMH -JFA
07-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:17 cv- 819 CMH - JFA Conversion of Real Estate by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Ely Grenadier Heckman, Grenadier Starace Duffett &
Levi PC, Erika Lewis, Timberlake Lewis, David
Grenadier, DiMuro Ginsberg, Michael Weiser, Troutman
Sanders, Parker Simon & Kokolis, LLC, Alps Insurance
O8-2017 USDC of Virginia 1:17 cv- 00825 CMH JFA Spring Street : OCWEN, McCabe Weisberg &
JFA has been replaced with Conway LLC , Surety Trustees, Abby Moynihan,
IDD Troutman Sanders and S. Moshin Reza For: illegal
harassment & Violation of Collection laws et al That
appearance is Wells Fargo and OCWEN are ignoring that
we are in Court and have shopped for another Law Firm to
foreclose while the case has not been adjudicated That
the other Case had Judge Brinkema who had a Financial
Conflict
That the Judges Colluded in a Rico and Racketeering fashion to protect one of their own they
will do what ever it takes with Retaliation and Retribution to KILL the opposing side with
Knowledgeable malicious intend which is what they did to Plaintiff
JURISDICTION
1. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the following statutes:
a. Federal Question Jurisdiction: Title 28 United States Code 1331;

b. Federal Regulation of Commerce Jurisdiction: Title 28 United States Code 1337;
c. Federal Supplemental Jurisdiction: Title 28 U.S.C. 1367(a);
d. Federal Declaratory Judgment Act of 1946: Title 28 United States Code 2201-2202;
e. Federal Supplemental Jurisdiction: Title 28 United States Code 1367(a)- (b);
f. Section 1964(a) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (RICO) Title 18 United
States Code 1964(a), (b), (c), and (d);
g. RICO 18 U.S.C. 1965(a), (b), and (d); and
h. Rules 57 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and
i. The general legal and equitable powers of this Court.
2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) as one or more Defendants are located or reside in this
District, and a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs Claims occurred in
this District.
PARTIES
3. Janice Wolk Grenadier Plaintiff, The x-wife of the son of a Judges, many Judges were at my wedding
party and other events I attended. Have first hand knowledge of the purchase of Justice by the elite with
Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, Sex, a weekend getaway, business and financial tips. Blackballed by the Old
Boys Network and the Judges Club. Civil Rights victim of the Defendants. Divorced in 2000 without
a property settlement.
6
4. Chief Judge Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia
Walter E. Hoffman United States Courthouse Several letters of the corruption and bias in the courts
was sent to her and ignored.
5. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Had a personal Bias, and adjoined the
other judges in Black Balling Plaintiff from any Justice. She had lost 60% of her portfolio in the banking
crisis and brought it into the court room with her. Allowed lawyers to not answer the complaint and when
Plaintiff (after giving extra time and notice) filed for a Default Judgment Brinkema put the Judgment on
Plaintiff. HOW DOES A PLAINIFF DEFAULT on there own Complaint? Only to have the 4 th Circuit
EMPOWER such Corruption.
6. Judge Gerald Bruce Lee USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria In debt to Judge Donald
Kent for empowering his career
7. Judge Liam O'Grady USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
8. Judge Anthony J. Trenga USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
9. Senior Judge James C. Cacheris USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
10. Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria Justice Delayed is
Justice Denied, when he has taken over 50 days to decide on IFP. When he throw Case against Judge Clark,
and Conversion of Real Estate against Ilona et al her GANG. That Judge Hiltons Nonsensical Orders show
his BIAs and collusion to COVER UP and protect the others in the Judiciary. Further in his Orders he
uses no real legal law. He states in Complaint alleges an incoherent series of civil rights and other
violations against her by various public servants individually and in their official capacity not one
defendant was a public official or servant. He has stated clearly that the want of Justice against one of
his friends is Frivolous and that Plaintiff fails to state a claim which is nonsensical as Plaintiff after filing
always asked a person who has graduated from law school if all claims are stated appropriately. . Judge
Hilton was not asked to be my JURY he was expected to act as an UMPIRE as Judge Richard Roberts has
stated clearly all Judges should act.
11. Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria -
12. Magistrate Judge Theresa C. Buchanan - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
13. Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
14. Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
15. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
16. Magistrate Judge T. Rawles Jones Jr - USDC of Eastern Division of Virginia Alexandria
1. All Judges were empowered by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals with the knowledge
they would support any and all ORDERS against Plaintiff as well as deny and ignore all Judicial
Complaints. Further they colluded in: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic, Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of
Plaintiff to prevent Due Process, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules
of the Supreme courts, Violation of the Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws. Aided and
Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the
thefts from Plaintiff.
17. Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

18. Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
19. Judge Paul V. Niemeyer - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
20. Judge Diana Gribbon Motz - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
21. Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
7
22. Judge Robert B. King - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
23. Judge Dennis W. Shedd - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
24. Judge Allyson K. Duncan - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
25. Judge G. Steven Agee - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
26. Judge Barbara Milano Keenan - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
27. Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
28. Judge Albert Diaz - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
29. Judge Henry F. Floyd - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
30. Judge Stephanie D. Thacker - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
31. Judge Pamela A. Harris - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
32. Senior Judge Clyde H. Hamilton - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
33. Senior Judge Andre M. Davis - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
The Fourth Circuit Judges denied all appeals, all stays and all En Bancs, all requests for a
Grand Jury and or Special Grand Jury for Plaintiff to present evidence. Further empowering the USDC of
Virginia Judges to act in collusion as they would protect them. Further denying all Complaints against the above
Judges. When asked to recuse all denied. The appellate judges in their complicity, have become Accessories
After the Fact. They have Obstructed Justice, Dereliction of Duty, Malfeasance and Misfeasance. Aided and
Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts
from Plaintiff
34. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell USDC of the District of Columbia

35. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan - USDC of the District of Columbia
36. District Judge James E. Boasberg - USDC of the District of Columbia
37. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson- USDC of the District of Columbia
38. District Judge Rudolph Contreras- USDC of the District of Columbia
39. Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth - USDC of the District of Columbia
40. Senior Judge Ellen S. Huvelle - USDC of the District of Columbia
41. Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton- USDC of the District of Columbia
42. Senior Judge Richard J. Leon- USDC of the District of Columbia
43. Senior Judge Rosemary M. Collyer- USDC of the District of Columbia
All Judges were empowered by the USDC of the District of Columba Court of Appeals with
the knowledge they would support any and all ORDERS against Plaintiff as well as deny and ignore all Judicial
Complaints. That the Court would review documents of Plaintiff and mail them back to Plaintiff after being
stamped into the recorded appropriately. The Clerk of Court would then erase them from the record to protect the
Judge et al. Further: Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, Discrimination for Religious, Social, Economic,
Hierarch, Gang Type Behavior Similar to the Klue Klux Klan, Slander of Plaintiff to prevent Due Process,
Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Violating the Law and the Rules of the Supreme courts, Violation of the
Judicial Cannons, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, TREASON, Title 18 U.S. Code 241 & 242; Title 42
U.S. Code 1981 & 1983 and other laws
44. Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND USDC of the District of Columba Appeals Court and others not
listed Personally signed two appeals knowing when he did that Plaintiff Janice would go to JAIL
ILLEGALLY.
8
The USDC of the District of Columbia Appeals Court Judges denied all appeals, all stays and
all En Bancs, all requests for a Grand Jury and or Special Grand Jury for Plaintiff to present evidence. Further
empowering the USDC of the District of Columbia Judges to act in collusion as they would protect them. Further
denying all Complaints against the above Judges. When asked to recuse all denied. The appellate judges in their
complicity, have become Accessories After the Fact. They have Obstructed Justice, Dereliction of Duty,
Malfeasance and Misfeasance. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer
Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
45. Judge Brian Kenney- Bankruptcy Court Acted in collusion of the USDC of Virginia Federal Judges to
help COVER UP the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman all acts and actions were
knowledgeable malicious with the personal attempt to help his friends the Judiciary.
46. Judge Stephen Mitchell- Retired Judge Bankruptcy Court Allowed the lying of lawyers and raped me of
all my assists for Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and he knew what he was doing.
The documents and Orders show that.
That all hearings asked for by Plaintiff they were denied. The only hearing heard in the
Bankruptcy was requested by the Trustee Thomas Gorman the Transcript of such hearing can be seen at Case
No. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff. When asked to recuse they denied. The bankruptcy judges in their
complicity, have become Accessories After the Fact. They have Obstructed Justice, Dereliction of Duty,
Malfeasance and Misfeasance. Denying a Grand Jury or Special Grand Jury to investigate. The DOJ Joesph.
47. DEFENDANT JOHN DOE - unknown actors for or of the above defendants
48. DEFENDANT JANE DOE - unknown actors for or of the above defendants
PLAINTIFF WAS DENIED ANY AND ALL REQUESTED OPEN COURT

HEARINGS FROM ALL DEFENDANTS IN ALL CASES LISTED
OTHER PARTIES NOT NAMED BUT, WITH KNOWLEDABLE MALICIOUS ACTS AND
ACTIONS USED THERE POWER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE COVER UP
49. ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN (IEG) Experienced a Divorce Lawyer since 1967. Acted as lawyer
to Janice Wolk Grenadier, manipulating money and Real Estate from JWG and others. Widow to Judge
Albert Grenadier and Jerome Heckman Alberts 1st cousin. That the evidence and documents will show as
a lawyer through her law firm stole money, real estate and Herman Grenadiers body from his grave. Will
further show through evidence her believe that she is above the law and HATES Catholics, with the help of
the Judiciary, Government and Elected Officials because of whom she has been married to, and men that are
in LOVE with her that will Cover Up her criminal schemes, acts and actions is above the law to date. The
evidence will show a criminal spree since on or around November of 1983 with the forging of Sonia
Grenadier (mother to Judge Albert Grenadier and Aunt to Jerome Heckman) on an Amended Trustee
Agreement. EXHIBIT 1 and then the illegal Liquidation Agreement done by a lawyer not licensed in
Virginia EXHIBIT 2 Liquidation Agreement
50. . GRENADIER, STARCE, DUFFET & LEVI P.C. - Employer of several lawyers who conspired to harm
Janice. That ignored their responsibilities per the Professional Code of Ethics Aided and Abetted the thefts
of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from
Plaintiff
51. Jerome Jerry Heckman 3RD Husband to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Hackman, 1st Cousin to
Albert Grenadier Colluded with Divorce Lawyer Ilona to steal from Sonia Grenadier Heckman on or
9
around February 14, 1986. Known fact Judge Albert Grenadier HATED Jerry, Knew of the thefts of
Sonia Grenadier and colluded with Ilona to steal from JWG.. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
52. Keller Heckman - Founder Jerome Heckman 3rd wife to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman Law
Firm was aware of the criminal activity and turned the cheek and by all appearance used their influence to
empower the corruption and COVER UP. The Judges were close to this firm and or the activities in this
firm. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
53. ERIKA ELY LEWIS Daughter to Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman, Married to Timberlake
Lewis. Took ownership of GIC through a Liquidation Agreement done by a lawyer not licensed in Virginia
and without JWG signature Exhibit shows Real Estate and other business with IEG. Aided and Abetted the
thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from
Plaintiff
54. TIMBERLAKE LEWIS Husband to Erika Ely Lewis, partner it appears to several businesses including
Real Estate with IEG and Erika. That the appearance is that money from properties by law and by right
owned by JWG due to being divorced without a property settlement help to purchase other properties in
California et al. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
55. DAVID MARK GRENADIER - Ex-Husband to Janice Wolk Grenadier. Divorced in June of 2000 with no
property settlement agreement. Conspired with his mother Ilona to manipulate and steal from JWG starting
in December of 1986. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer
56. ANDREA GRENADIER Sister to David colluded with IEG for money and favor. Aided and Abetted the
Plaintiff
57. ROBIN / RACHAEL GRENADER Sister to David, colluded with IEG and her other gang members for
favor and money, pasted rumors around and HATED JWG and her girls for being Catholic and kind.
Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
58. BRIAN GRENADIER Sheriff and brother to David, Andrea and Robin / Rachael Grenadier. Aided and
thefts from Plaintiff
59. DR. ROBIN ELY Sister to Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman and Diane Ely Epstein. Aided and Abetted the
Plaintiff
60. DIANE ELY EPSTEIN - Sister to Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman and Dr. Robin Ely. Aided and Abetted the
Plaintiff
61. LORRETTA LAX MILLER aka MUGGY CAT Ran for President of the United States, Hates
Catholics Colluded with Ilona in many Blogs and Radio programs libel and slandering JWG and others.
Colluded with Andrea, Robin and others to harm JWG and her girls. .
62. YOAV KATZ Katz & Co. P.A. CPA to IEG. Ignored all subpoenas and all Judge allowed it to protect
more information on IEG coming out. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by
Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
63. FAGLESON SCHONBERGER PAYNE DEICHMEISTER & ARUTHER LAW FIRM aka
FAGELSON SCHONBERGER BILOWITZ & GRENADIER (Albert Grenadier) Aided and Abetted
the forgery of Sonia Grenadier and the thefts from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman
64. DIMURO GINSBERG - Employer of several lawyers who conspired to harm Janice. That ignored their
responsibilities per the Professional Code of Ethics Attorneys Ben DiMuro, Andrea Mosley, Judge John
Tran, Hillary Collyer (now Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson the question never answered is her mother
or relative Judge Rosemary Collyer), Ben Dimuro in April of 1989 met with JW and her then husband David
to discuss a fire that he was representing GIC/Monroe Ave partnership for the overage on the insurance.
10
Wrote threatening letter that JWG was trying to Extort money from Ilona ~ Money that Ilona owed JWG
from malicious manipulation, and stealing it from JWG. That he used his power to manipulate an
investigation by the Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel who after JWG corporates with the Police
declared JWG innocent and that she was only going after monies and Real Estate owed to her by right and by
Virginia and Federal Law. Past President of the Virginia State Bar VSB President-elect Bernard J. DiMuro
and his wife, Sandy, have designated 10% of their estate to the Virginia Law Foundation. DiMuro is the first
Virginia attorney to make a gift of this kind to the VLF, according to VLF Executive Director Sharon Tatum.
DiMuro said he wanted to make a law-related donation to an entity with the ability to administer the funds
effectively. A Big part of the Old Boys Network and through Collusion and Power has kept everyone in
check to protect his paying client Ilona Lied in Respondents Joint Motion to Dismiss Petition for Appeal
Dated Feb 2, 2011 in the Supreme Court of Virginia on Page 2 Paragraph 2 ~ Here, Petitioner has failed to
ensure that the record contains either transcripts or a written statement of facts.
Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
65. MICHEAL WEISER, ESQ Lied in Court, Lied in Court Documents Colluded with his very close and
good friend Judge James Clark. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
66. TROUTMAN SANDERS aka MAYS & VALINTINE - Employer of several lawyers who conspired to
harm Janice. That ignored their responsibilities per the Professional Code of Ethics Mislead and STOLE /
SWINDLED $30,000. From JWG. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by
67. PARKER, SIMON & KOKOLIS, LLC - Employer of several lawyers who conspired to harm Janice. That
ignored their responsibilities per the Professional Code of Ethics
68. Rich Rosenthal Brinefield Manitta Dzubin & Kroger - Lawyer Lana Manitta
69. WECHELER, SELZER & GURICTCH, CHARTERED - Lawyer Neil Gurvictch admitted to doing
Liquidation Agreement for Divorce Lawyer IEG and not being licensed in Virginia. GIC is or was a Co. in
Virginia with all Virginia Real Estate. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by
70. Kermit Rosenberg Esq. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce
71. Judge Robert Mayer Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer
72. Stonewall Title Knowingly settled Stolen Property from Sonia Grenadier. Aided and Abetted the thefts of
Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
73. Roy Zimmerman Esq (deceased) Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by
74. McCABE WEISBERG & CONWAY LLP Lawyer Abby Moynihan appears to be past employee of
either DiMuroGinsberg or Grenadier Starace Duffett & Levi Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
75. WADE GRIMES FRIEDMAN SUTTER & LEISCHNER PLLC - FOSTER F.B. FRIEDMAN
COMMISSIONER IN CHANCERY - Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by
76. SUROVELL ISAACES PETERSEN & LEVY PLC - LILY A. SAFFER Aided and Abetted the thefts
Plaintiff
77. ALPS INSURANCE Insurance Co.by all appearance to the above attorneys. The only Insurance Co. that
the VSB (Virginia State Bar) has on their website. Has ignored all attempts by JWG to collect on the
malpractice of above lawyers. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce
11
78. Reed Smith - Ann Schmidt in the Bankruptcy Court in a Chapter 7 Judge Stephen Mitchell forced me into
without my consent. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer
79. The City of Alexandria City Attorney James Bank, Megan Roberts, George McAndrews, Corine Parks
Paralegal, Ms. Gerry, Ms. Christa Brown
80. The City of Alexandria Sheriffs Sheriff Dana Lawhorne, Lt Rea and Captain Williams with many others
from when JWG was illegally jailed and tortured held in Solitary Confinement for 14 days till 5 pm on
Election Day to prevent the corruption being exposed with the collusion of Senator Mark Warner.
81. Sheriff of Prince William County Sheriff Glendell Hill et al
82. The City of Alexandria Police - Chief Earl L. Cook, Chief Mike Brown, M. Vaccaco, P. Taylor, Detective
Charles Pak, Julie Goble
83. The City of Alexandria Clerk of Court Ed Semonian
84. Clerk of Court Angela D. Caesar United States Federal Court
85. Clerk of Court Patricia L. Harrington Supreme Court of Virginia
86. Clerk of Court Prince William County Michele B. McQugg
87. The City of Alexandria Commonwealth Attorneys Ret Randy Sengel and now Bryan Porter who have
STATED to the City of Alexandria Police NEVER take a police report from JWG. Aided and Abetted the
Plaintiff
88. The City of Alexandria City Mayor and City Council Mayor Allison Silberberg, John T. Chapman,
Timothy R. Lovain, Redella S. Del Pepper, Paul C. Smedberg, Justin Wilson.
89. Human Rights office of Alexandria Miladis C. Martinez and many others
90. Human Rights office of the State of Virginia
91. Department of Community & Human Services: Jonathan Teumer
92. The Virginia State Bar Edward Davis, James Michael McCauley Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
93. Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC) Donald Curry He is my friend do not bother sending
in a complaint to JWG in regard to Judge James McGrath - Katherine Baldwin Burnett. Aided and Abetted
the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts
from Plaintiff
94. The Circuit Court Judges of Virginia Chief Judge Donald Haddock, Chief Judge Lisa Kemler, Judge
Nolan Dawkins, Judge James Clark, Judge James Fortkort (Attorney Arbitration and Mediation Inc), Judge J.
Howe Brown, Judge James McGrath (Judicial Solutions), Judge Richard Bowen Potter (Tampered with the
Grand Jury with the help of Commonwealth Attorney Randy Sengel), Chief Judge Mary Grace OBrien
(Prince William County), Judge Carroll A. Weimer Jr. (Prince William County), Aided and Abetted the
Plaintiff
95. City of Alexandria Magistrate: George F. Ball Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her
Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
96. The McCammon Group John McCammon, Judge Donald Kent Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
97. Judicial Solutions Judge James McGrath and all other Judges in this group were aware of IEG criminal
spree. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
98. The Appeals Court of Virginia Chief Judge Glen A. Huff, Judge Robert J. Humphreys, Judge D. Arthur
Kelsey, Judge William G. Petty, Judge Randolph A. Beales, Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr, Judge. Stephen R.
McCullough, Judge Teresa M. Chafin, Judge Marla Graff Decker, Judge Sam W. Coleman III, Judge
Roesmarie Annunziata, Judge Rudolph Bumgardner III, Judge Jean Harrison Clements, Judge James W.
Haley. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
12
99. The Supreme Court of Virginia Chief Justice Leroy Rountree Hassell Sr. Chief Judge Supreme Court
Justice Cynthia Kinser, Chief Judge Supreme Court Donald W. Lemons, Judge S. Bernard Goodwyn, Judge
LeRoy F. Millette Jr,. Judge William C. Mims, Judge Elizabeth A. McClanahan, Judge Cleo E. Powell,
Judge Charles S. Russel, Judge Elizabeth B. Lacy, Judge Lawrence L. Koontz Jr. and all others and
STAFF. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her
Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
100. The Virginia Legislature Patsy Ticer, the Senate and House Courts of Justice, Adam Ebbin and
Mark Levine et al. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer
Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff. Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier
from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
101. MARTHA KENT x-wife of Judge Kent SET Up to State to me Just like me and my family
you are no longer one of them you can not win this you need to walk away
102. The Governor of Virginia Terry McAuliffe his staff: Brian Moran, Jake Rubenstein Aided and
103. Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, - his staff: Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
104. Senators of Virginia Mark Warner and Tim Kaine and their staff - Aided and Abetted the thefts
Plaintiff
105. Congressman of Virginia Don Beyer, Bob Goodlatte and others Aided and Abetted the thefts of
Sonia Grenadier from her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
106. The FBI James Comey, Marcus Wilson and many others Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia
107. The Department of Justice: Eric Holder Aided and Abetted the thefts of Sonia Grenadier from
her Trust by Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and the thefts from Plaintiff
108. Bankruptcy Department of Justice - Joseph A.Guzinski, Trustee Thomas P. Gorman, U.S. Trustee
W. Clarkson McDow Jr. are aware of and actively Covering Up the Bankruptcy Fraud by Divorce
Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and Judge Brian Kenney and Trustees Aided and Abetted the thefts
Plaintiff Case No. 16 13028 Transcripts of hearing after Court hours and after all had left the court
Transcript from hearing shows Collusion to Cover Up the criminal acts and actions of the Defendants,
Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman and others, Transcripts can be found Docket No. 110 Case No.
16- 13028
109. BANKS: Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co., Citicorp, Aided and
INTRODUCTION
110. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above paragraphs
111. That on September 12, 2007 Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer founding partner of Grenadier,
Anderson, Starace, Buffett& Keiser PC, widow to Judge Albert Grenadier of the City of Alexandria and his
1st cousin Jerome Heckman, founding partner of Keller Heckman an International law firm LIED IN
COURT.
13
112. The Slippery Slope of the Judicial Misconduct, Criminal Misconduct, and Discrimination for
Religious, Social, Economic and Hierarchy, the Gang type behavior similar to the Kul Klux Klan the
Collusion of the Defendants began to cover up the Lies, the attempt to harm Plaintiff and her girls
American Born Citizens through drugs and rape, to Slander Plaintiff, to prevent Due Process.
113. The purpose of the COVER UP is the Old Boys Network and the Judiciary is to
prevent one of their own Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman from being held accountable for the
following::
114. Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court,
Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for
great personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability,
malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like activity mirror image to
the Klue Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict of interest related to the
practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious,
Political, Social, United state Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary
Duties, Violating RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against
rights, and 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of
Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3.
Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Judicial Misconduct; Criminal Misconduct; Mail Fraud;
Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang activity; Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et
al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith for a corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to
follow the law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors; Violation of Procedural Rules; Violation of Due
Process; uttering, etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will and can be proven with letters,
documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.
115. This case started out a domestic issue, T0DAY THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE, the right of
access to the courts to a pro se litigant without having their life threatened and being Jailed by the
Collusion, Racketeering of the Judicial Community.
116. That the Judicial Community polices itself, that Plaintiff has gone through all channels for help, to be
turned away. That there is no check and balances with the Judiciary, the Government and with the Elected
Officials as they are all acting in collusion.
117. The Judicial Community has created a smoke and mirrors of Immunity that they have tried to force
on the American people, to believe that they are above the law and cannot be held responsible for their
actions in the court room. This is untrue. That the immunity is lost for actions that are for personnel gain,
that are willful acts that are and were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless.
14
That Discrimination is color blind that there is discrimination for social, economic and hierarch that exists in
the Judicial Community to protect one of their own. Those cases across this Great Country Judges and the
Judicial Community are being held accountable for their actions as Judges going to jail for Obstruction of
Justice and many other Criminal Acts and Actions that are considered TREASON et al.
118. Judges do not have absolute judicial immunity, they have limited judicial immunity.
119. The Judges violated Plaintiffs rights Under the Color of Law in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 242
and Rule 3 Of the Criminal Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by denying a Grand Jury or Special Grand
Jury to investigate which Plaintiff requested on several occasions.
120. The Judges / Defendants have taken upon themselves the role of Judge, Jury and Executioner
of Plaintiff.
121. The Judges in denying in all cases any open court hearings requested by Plaintiff knowledgeable
acts and actions were illegal against Plaintiffs Constitutional rights to be heard by her peers in the form of a
Jury of Plaintiff peers. Violating her right to a Trial by Jury and Due Process.
122. That the Court of Appellate Judges in their complicity, have become Accessories After the Fact.
They have engaged in Obstruction of Justice, Dereliction of Duty, Malfeasance and Misfeasance.
123. "Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements. Recognizing
this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro se complaints liberally and to apply
a more flexible standard in determining the sufficiency of a pro se complaint than they would in reviewing a
pleading submitted by counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66
L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d
652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872 F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order
to justify the dismissal of a pro se complaint, it must be " 'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set
of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. at 521, 92
S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).
BACKGROUND
124. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs
125. Divorce Lawyer Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman would start a crime spree on or
around November 1983 with the forgery of Sonia Grenadiers name on a Amended Trust Agreement.
that would continue through today in the Sale of Real Estate in or around 2014
126. On or around February 14th of 1986 The Scheme and the Artifice of Divorce Lawyer Ilona
Grenadier Heckman and David Grenadier the lies and deception would begin.
127. Janice met Defendants David, Ilona and Erika around March of 1985. That Janice was naive and in
many ways very easily manipulated by David and Ilona. At the time she met David she was still filling the
15
effects of having not finished college due to her apartment being broken into and raped, and a failed
marriage.
128. That David and Ilona started their manipulation with knowledgeable intend around February 14,
1986 with lies and then monies in December of 1986.
129. That the first lie that Janice can recall was February 14, 1986. Ilona was very specific having just
married Jerome (Jerry) Heckman the 1st cousin to Judge Albert Grenadier whom had just passed March of
1985. Ilona stated and was so excited how Jerry had added her to his will. Janice found this odd, but in or
around April of 2014 Plaintiff learn that what Jerry had done that day was give up his rights to a
property Ilona had stolen from Sonia Grenadier and taken a portion of a $521.000. Pay off for the sale
of a portion of the property.
130. That David and Ilona started a Real Estate Partnership called GIC in or around 1985 that Janice
started contributions thru loans, advice along with a partnership call Bellefonte Ave on or around December
of 1986.
131. That David and Janice would marry in September of 1988 which in or around 1997 Janice would
learn that David never loved her and that he and Ilona had used her, manipulated her and she was no longer
needed. That the talk of Divorce between Ilona and David by all appearance started in or around 1993 with a
Ilona then putting everything into a Trust that she would control. Janices monies flowed into the
properties through 2000.
132. That in or around March of 1990 Janice would learn that money had been stolen out of a Trust
Account of Sonia Grenadier through the Grenadier Law firm.
133. That Lawyer Ilona would tell Janice she is to speak to no one about this. Everything goes through
her, that she will handle everything as an attorney through Grenadier Law. The slippery slope, the
manipulation of the fear as Ilona made it clear to Janice who was pregnant and just had a miscarriage that if
she spoke about this to anyone that David would go to jail and be raped repeatedly and that my child would
being visiting him in jail. Ilona knew of my rape and used it to manipulate and to protect herself from being
found out.
134. Janice was with knowledgeable and malicious intend manipulated by Ilona into believing that it was
David who stole the money. That in or around May of 2008 - Ilona would admit to Janice that David
did not steal the money which only left Ilona - Which the slippery slope of the Criminal Acts, the
Knowledgeable intend of the extreme Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman would go for money started
to unravel, that the :TRUTH supposedly your best defense would all of a sudden have no meaning to
the Judiciary in Virginia and Washington DC. The thefts with the help of the
135. Ilonas criminal spree began in or around November of 1983 with the Forgery of Sonia Grenadiers
name on an Amendment to her Trust giving Ilona Grenadier access once Judge Albert Grenadier died. The
COVER UP to protect one of their own began in or around 1990 with the help of Fagelson et al law firm and
16
Mays & Valentine aka Troutman Sanders.
136. Then on or around September 3rd of 1997 that on an unexpected cab ride to the airport as David
was suppose to drive Janice to the airport and was late, Janice was outside waiting and not in her home.
Janice had called him to find out where he was David started yelling at Janice and saying a cab was on the
way. Janice can presume now his disappointment the money it appears he and Ilona spent to have Janice
killed has come back to haunt them. When Janice got in the cab and the driver could hear David yelling he
said to Janice hang up the phone, hang up the phone if you dont hang up the phone I will pull over and hang
it up for you. Janice hung up the phone, the driver than said we can take care of that for $5,000.00 you
dont have it then $2,000 we can work it out. Janice was handed a phone number, Janice tossed it in the
trash can thinking it had been a set up Janice now believes with out question it was to be a hit and today
she was to be dead. Janice has never been questioned by the City of Alexandria Police or the FBI even
though she has reached out several times with her information. Through Commonwealth Attorney Brian
Porter & Sheriff Lawhorene (who had Plaintiff tortured in jail) That in February / March of 1998 Nancy
Dunning who would open her front door in 2003 came to Janice on different occasions to check on her
safety. The question now arises was Nancy aware of the outcome that was meant for Janice in September of
1997.
137. That the above is important because where Janice lives in a circle around Janice their have been 5
Five known Murder type hits Dr. Rixsey, John Doe, Nancy Dunning ( Nancy came to Janices home
twice to check on Janice, now believed Nancy knew more and was from what Nancy said afraid of what
could happen and maybe knew what was going to happen to her) Ron Kirby and Ruth Ann Lodato. That all
five have strong connections to the Old Boys Network. That the appearance and with the Facts Janice knows
that the people who have been charged and found guilty of these charges of murder and the reason behind
them was fabricated to protect the Old Boys Network of Virginia. That further situations / evidence will
show that throughout Northern Virginia hit men are hired and it is a pattern and practice of the Old Boys
Network in Virginia to either have someone killed or to Bully them till they commit Suicide. That now we
also have the blood of Senators and others on the hands of he City of Alexandria Who is safe in this City?
138. November 1997 That Lawyer Ilona in collusion with David Grenadier, Andrea Grenadier, Robin
Grenadier passed a rumor around that caused David Grenadier to pull a gun in the home with Janices girls in
the home.
139. That on or around November 17, 1997 David, Ilona and Erika would sign a Liquidation agreement of
several properties that are all owned in Virginia and a Virginia Partnership done by Lawyer not licensed or
never has been licensed to act as a lawyer in Virginia. Ilona being a divorce lawyer knew the law and
acted criminally as she had done with the Sonia Grenadier Estate for personal financial gain using her law
firm and POWER of the men she married to manipulate / Scheme / Scam those that were not as strong or did
not know the law or who would ignore the law for her. Exhibit 2
17
140. That in or around June of 2000 David and Janice were divorced with out a property settlement.
Virginia law is clear and Divorce lawyer Ilona Grenadier her profession for over 45 years did this with
knowledgeable intend in filings to the Bankruptcy Court in Virginia everything unless agreed
differently in writing in a Settlement Agreement is split 50 / 50.
STATEMENT OF FACT
140.141. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations above and all paragraphs
141.142. That Plaintiff came to the Federal Court System is still trying to get Justice in the State of Virginia.
142.143. That Chief Judge Donald Haddock from 2007 till today in the Circuit Court System of Virginia
insures for his LOVE LOVE LOVE he declared to me he has for Ilona in 2008 will never lose in court.
Judge Haddock in Judges chambers stated You will never win this, I LOVE Ilona Judge Haddock then
went on to do what ever it took PERSONALLY choosing Judges to ensure Ilona would win in court no
matter what evidence was presented, or what crimes she had committed.
143.144. Ilona lied in court, lied in court documents as a pattern and practice and it is ignored.
144.145. Ilonas lawyers lied in court, lied in court documents as a pattern and practice and it is ignored. Up to
and including the Supreme Court of Virginia
145.146. Plaintiffs first case filed in the USDC of the Eastern Division of Virginia Plaintiff realized the
connections of all the Judges to Judge Donald Kent from the McCammon Group. That Judge Donald Kent
by all appearance past Judge in the Circuit Court of Alexandria, then President of the Richmond Law of
School is head of the Old Boys Network
146.147. Judge Donald Kent and Judge Donald Haddock are best friends
147.148. Judge Donald Kent then through Janices State Senator Patsy Ticer conspired and set Janice up with
his x-wife Martha Kent who stated; Me and My family cannot get a fair trial either, you cannot win this
you are no longer one of them (x-wife of Judge Donald Kent best friend to Judge Donald Haddock) The
Dockets shows it would at times take the Judges in the City of Alexandria over 2 months to find a Judge
who would rule in favor of Ilona an attorney lying in court, lying in court documents, theft of funds through
her law firm the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her girls, bullying and threatening Plaintiff, involved
in forgery, hate of Catholics / Christians, gang like activity mirror imaging the Klue Klux Klan,
148.149. Not once has Plaintiff lost because she does not have the Law on her side, it is because of
discrimination religious / social / economic / social hierarchy by the Defendants to protect one
of their own.
149.150. Judge Donald Haddock retired and keeps his fingers in this case through Judge James Clark whom
he personally made certain got the position as well as acting retired judge.
150.151. That since 2000 in Bankruptcy Court any and all hearings requested by Plaintiff has been denied.
That all hearings in Bankruptcy requested by others and docketed by others are always heard,
18
151.152. NO NOT ONE Motion or case has had an open Court Hearing in the USDC of the Eastern
Division of Virginia, The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, The USDC of the District of Columbia or the District
of Columbia Appeals Court.
152.153. That Filed, Stamped into the Record Documents have been mailed back to Plaintiff.
153.154. That Motions for Restraining Orders when Plaintiffs life was threatened were ignored
154.155. That the Federal Court Judges have acted in Collusion with the State Court Judges and many
others to deny all JUSTICE in a knowledgeable malicious Rico and Racketeering type fashion.
155.156. The Neutrality requirement helps to guarantee that life, liberty or property will not be taken on the
basis of an erroneous or distorted conception of the facts or the law. This is applicable by Article VI of the
Untied States Constitution and Stone v. Powell 428 US 465, 483, n. 35, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 40 L. Ed 2d 1067
(1976) That State courts and Federal Courts have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties
and to uphold federal law.
156.157. That the Defendants / Judges have deliberately violated Plaintiffs liberties and has wantonly refused
to provide due process and equal protection in a manner consistent with that which is needed for full, fair,
impartial hearings.
157.158. The United States constitution guarantees an unbiased Judge who will always provide litigants with
full protection of ALL RIGHTS, That all Defendants behavior has been unethical and or illegal conduct or
conduct that gives Plaintiff good reason to believe the above Defendants have in case acted maliciously and
the acts and actions have prevented the defendants to act in a fair and impartial manner.
158.159. All the defendants have ignored all Judicial Canons which require a Judge to uphold and promote the
independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of
impropriety. A Judge shall perform the duties of the office impartially, competently and diligently.
159.160. That the Judges are ruling from the Secrecy of their Chambers and acting as Juries from their
Chambers. To protect one of their own.
160.161. The only open Court Hearing in the Bankruptcy was requested by the Trustee Thomas P Gorman
who removed his in rem and commented on the directness and honesty of Plaintiff Stating in the
Transcript of Hearing held after hours, and after all others had left the courthouse on October 13, 2016. Page
3 partial lines 13 20 To the debtors credit , and this is one of the reasons I am softening my request, - a
lot of times, when I ask that, I cant get straight answers of debtors: they tell me I might have some income,
Ive got this, Ive got that this debtor was candid. Shes not running and hiding from that.
161.162. Another reason Im backing down on the in rem relief and this goes not just to this case, but other
cases, where I make similar requests at a certain point, I dont know that I should be carrying the secured
creditors water.. Page 5 partial lines 5-9
162.163. But, theyre not hear (meaning Wells Fargo) They have taken no action in this case, to my
knowledge theyre not here asking. So Ive withdrawn my request for in rem relief. Page 5 partial lines 15 17
19
163.164. Trustee / Licensed Lawyer Mr. Gorman page 13 lines 19 25 and page 14 line 1 STATES: And
your Honor, especially with her being pro se I dont want to get in the way, but weve gone way beyond
background, way beyond anything relevant to the issue at hand, which is wheter shes eligible for 13 and
whether were proceeding in good faith. I think this is beyond background. And were not talking about
allegations of judicial misconduct, and its talking about the Commonwealth Attorney. This is getting a little
far afield for this particular
164.165. The court allowed all submissions into the Record for proof of Discrimination against Plaintiff
making it the responsibility of Judge Kenney and Trustee Thomas Gorman to report the Criminal acts and
actions of others. Instead with the knowledge entered into the record in Bankruptcy Case No. 16-13028
Judge Kenney decided to further the COVER UP of the Criminal Acts and Actions of the Defendants.
165.166. The Transcript can be found in the record under Case No. 16-13028 BFK Docket No 110. in the
United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) Bankruptcy Fraud will be seen
166.167. This Transcript will show the depth of the Collusion and Corruption of the above Defendants and
others listed as Other Parties involved in the Cover Up.
167.168. That documents filed in all cases will show Plaintiff was denied open court hearings.
168.169. That Judges were asked to recuse due to the appearance of Bias and refused.
169.170. That Plaintiff requested a Default Judgment in Case No. 1:14 cv- 00827 LMB TCB Due to
Lawyer Howard Bierman and BWW Law Group not answering the complaint, which was not only denied
but, a Default ad Judgment was put on Plaintiff. How does a Plaintiff Default on there own Complaint?
170.171. That Plaintiff did not respond to Bankruptcy schedule and all Judges put a Default Judgment against
Plaintiff - the documents will show the complete BIAS by the Defendants.
171.172. That Defendants have shown Favoritism and Cronyism to protect Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier
Heckman, the Judiciary, Government and the Elected Official of Virginia and many others.
172.173. By all appearance after ex-parte communications, the Judges took away the basic liberties of
Plaintiff. Plaintiff will and can show in past cases that the Defendants are prejudice against Plaintiff. Which
is a Fraud on the Court Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court,
he/she is engaged in fraud upon the court. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir.
1985),
173.174. The law is clear reviewing a pro-se pleading, it is prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally
construing the allegations set out in the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes
of action. See, e.g. Harrison v. U.S. Postal Services 840 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (4th Cir. 1988). The factual
allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party. Davis v. City of Portsmouth,
579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742 F .2d 1448 (4th Cir. 1984)
174.175. Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon the court,
the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect. Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d
20
Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked
collaterally. Affirmed
175.176. That Judges had a personal relationship with Divorce Lawyer Ilona and refused to recuse. Instead
acted in a knowledgeable malicious and criminal way to Cover Up the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer
Ilona Grenadier Heckman which is supported by Exhibits 1 against Sonia Grenadier and Exhibit 2 against
176.177. Exhibit 3 supports the allegation against the Judges.
CLAIMS
177.178. Plaintiff incorporates in all CLAIMS 1 - 7 by reference the allegations of above and all
paragraphs
Claim 1 - Breach of Contract Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Breach of Contractual Duty
of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, - Consumer Protection Act - Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Unjust
Enrichment/Constructive Trust
By virtue of the facts stated above, defendants have violated their contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing.
Plaintiff has paid fees to these courts or has been granted IFP and not received Due Process.
178.179. The above defendants and defendants representatives breached their contractual duty of good faith
and fair dealing when Judges ruled in Favoritism and Cronyism. When Judges did not have Jurisdiction and
chose friends/other Judges who would not follow the rules but would rules as told. When Judges Tampered
with the evidence, Mail Fraud, Obstruction of Justice
179.180. That the above Defendants and State of Virginia and the Federal Government Breach of Contract
includes not limited to their involvement being disingenuous in documents filed with the courts and Orders.
The documents will speak for themselves, the defendants were aware of these breaches as lawyers and
Judges.
180.181. Plaintiff through implied covenant of good faith and Fair Dealing continued to follow the Rules of
the Courts. The State of Virginia and Federal Court was paid for serves in the Court that were denied
Plaintiff because she was Catholic and or not one of them.. The discrimination and segregation among
white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.
That even though Plaintiff did not pay fees in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia
Plaintiff was rightfully granted IFP statues after being denied access to the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Virginia, was still to be treated equally as if Plaintiff had. That the United States
Constitution et al calls for Blind Justice / Equal Justice to all, not to just those with money.
181.182. The defendants flagrantly violated their Fiduciary responsibility to the Judicial System and
Plaintiff to deal in Good Faith while Plaintiff continued to deal in Good Faith. The actions will be
proven factually by Orders, Letters, Documents filed in the court and other. That the constitutional Right of
Due Process has been denied time and time again to Plaintiff.
182.183. The State of Virginia and the United States District Courts had a Fiduciary Duty to insure the rights
and safety of Plaintiff in the and through the Court system. Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements
which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has THE TRUTH which is an absolute defense .
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case
New York Time Co. v. Sullivan radically changed the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you
21
needed to prove that the information was wholly and patently false or that it was published with reckless
disregard of whether it was false or not
183.184. Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of
law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133,
136 (1955) Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States
Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judges, lawyers,
elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of or one of them.
184.185. The right of access to the courts is basic to our system of government, and it is well established
today that it is one of the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. In Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio
Railroad, 207 U.S. 142, 28 S.Ct. 34, 52 L.Ed. 143 (1907), The right to sue and defend in the courts is the
alternative of force. In an organized society it is the right conservative of all other rights, and lies at the
foundation of orderly government. It is one of the highest and most essential privileges of citizenship, and
must be allowed by each state to the citizens of all other states to the precise extent that it is allowed to its
own citizens. Equality of treatment in this respect is not left to depend upon comity between the states, but is
granted and protected by the Federal Constitution.207 U.S. at 148, 28 S.Ct. at 35 (citations omitted). It is
clear that the Court viewed the right of access to the courts as one of the privileges and immunities accorded
citizens under article 4 of the Constitution and the fourteenth amendment
Claim 2 - Violation Title 42 1983 Civil Rights Statue - Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 241 & 245
185.186. Defendants used unfair/unconscionable means to try and intimated and scare Plaintiff and her girls
They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would have in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show
that Plaintiff can prove each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek relief for the violation of
a persons Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 1983 it allows Plaintiff to her rights contained in
the United States Constitution as defined by Federal Law.
186.187. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18
USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws are
colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach,
Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.
187.188. Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boys Network / Judicial
Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the Husband
to Defendant Ilona a lawyer ( also wife to Jerry Heckman Keller Heckman International Law firm, 1st cousin
to Judge Albert Grenadier) who has also intervened into Defendants Divorce. That the discrimination and
segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member of one that is considered by others
inferior to the other.
188.189. Interference with the right of access to the courts gives rise to a claim for relief under section
1983. Sigafus v. Brown, 416 F.2d 105 (7th Cir.1969) (destruction by jail guards of legal papers necessary for
appeal supports claim for damages under Sec. 1983); McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d at 6 ("Of what avail is it
to the individual to arm him with a panoply of constitutional rights if, when he seeks to vindicate them, the
court room can be hermetically sealed against him by a functionary who, by refusal or neglect, impedes the
filing of his papers?"); Crews v. Petrosky, 509 F.Supp. at 1204 ("An allegation that a clerk of state court has
negligently delayed the filing of a petition for appeal, and that the delay has interfered with an individual's
right of access to the courts, may state a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.").
189.190. Failing to protect the Civil Rights of Plaintiff by ignoring Due Process, showing favoritism to the
Defendants and Defendants attorneys because of who they are part of the Old Boys Network of Virginia or
22
other. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States
Supreme Court against discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judges, lawyers,
elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of their race.
190.191. The Plaintiff respectfully had asked and was denied that the Court (DC Court) clarify the order that
denies the Plaintiffs Response under FRCP 60(a) (b) That the Plaintiff has a right to respond to documents
that are submitted into the record by Defendants especially when they are disingenuous, discriminatory and
add to the collusion of the Defendants and the Judicial Community to slander Plaintiff. That this denial
deprives the plaintiff of her rights, and to preserve the obligations of The District Court for the District of
Columbia under the United States Constitution and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all applicable
statutes that apply to civil rights of this individual Plaintiff so that this denial can be preserved for the record
and appellate review.
191.192. That these two e-mails with many others to come out at trial shows the religious HATE involved
here: That Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion That this is
a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws are colorblind Fact the case which the Supreme Court upheld hate
crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.
With the involvement of Defendants Mother this e-mail was sent:
From:LeahLax1234@aol.com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM
To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com
you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN
THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE YOUR
BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU STUPID
GOY.YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL.

NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING LIES! BLAMING ALL
JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON

EASY STREET. WELL GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY
MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS
SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT AFTER A
JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD TALKING TO FOR
MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE
HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.
YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI! YOU
23
HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED!
something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman

Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is over
From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com> Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:39 AM
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
Claim 3 - Common Law Fraud12 U.S.C 1972 - Constructive Fraud Fraud on the Court
192.193. On several occasions Plaintiff asked the courts to review and asked for a Special Grand Jury to look
into the allocations of misconduct. Plaintiff was to go in front of the Grand Jury with her witnesss But,
instead was kidnapped in a different Court Room and Grand Jury was dismissed prior to her being allowed
into ask for the Special Grand Jury. In the City of Alexandria Va by Judge James Potter and Commonwealth
Attorney Randy Sengel.
193.194. The defendants were deceptive of material misrepresentations of past and existing facts and
remained silent when a duty to speak existed. The defendants actions were Arbitrary and Capricious
absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the choices made, made choices that were not
in accordance with the law.
194.195. Justice is supposed to be blind. In Bullock v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not
fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a
member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his
judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted." But not
only are trial judges required to be fair and impartial, they must also 'satisfy the appearance of justice and
this includes all Defendants. The trial judge's 'appearance,' or conduct and behavior, appearance of bias
alone is grounds for reversal even if the trial judge is, in fact, completely impartial. Whenever any officer of
the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in fraud upon the court. In
Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985),
Claim 4 - Negligence the negligent infliction of emotional distress; the intentional infliction of emotional
distress
195.196. The defendants had a legal duty to use reasonable care to protect Plaintiff. That statements posted
on the internet about Plaintiff, and what others wrote about Plaintiff in Orders show they did not do this.
That several lies about Plaintiff and others were posted and ignored by Defendents.. They have done this to
ruin Plaintiffs reputation and should be held legally accountable for the responsibility of their actions. The
defendants malicious actions caused great emotional distress to Plaintiff. By the Commonwealth Attorneys
orders of the City of Alexandria police to never take a complaint from Plaintiff? Ignored by the Defendants.
Plaintiff has been harmed by the false statements which are considered defamatory that Plaintiff has
THE TRUTH which is an absolute defense . The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was
24
designed to protect Freedom of the press. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan radically changed
the nature of libel law by establishing a suit for libel you needed to prove that the information was wholly
and patently false or that it was published with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. Plaintiff
has been put into an unfair and dangerous position to protect herself and her girls. The actions of the actors
aka Defendants to cause this emotional distress were malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton,
or grossly reckless.
196.197. That Plaintiff has been forever harmed by the blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that these
courts endorsed by ignoring the request to have it removed. Plaintiff cannot get work nor can Plaintiff get
funding for her Family Friendly Product.
Claim 5 - Civil Conspiracy , Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with Evidence, Mail Fraud, Slander and
Liable 18 USC 241 & 242
197.198. If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person in any State
Territory, Commonwealth, or District in the free exercise of enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him by the Constitution or laws of the United States
198.199. The Collusion of the Defendants actions show collusion to harm Plaintiff and was done with
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions. Defendants Civil
Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that Plaintiff has a protected characteristic which will be proven as to
why Plaintiff was sought out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants to
deny any rights to protect the Criminal Spree of Divorce Lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman as shown in
Exhibit 1 & 2.. Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional
distress.
199.200. Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE That
when United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Beryll A. Howell, Judge Boasberg &
Circuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth and evidence to prove that Loretta
Lax Miller and others had lied in documents submitted to courts and that Ilona Grenadier Heckman had
stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and Plaintiff and her girls.
200.201. It is illegal for two or more persons (ie; court officers or any defendant)to conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in
any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure
him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of
persons, to the equal protection of the laws... Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 102, 91 S.Ct. 1790, 1798,
29 L.Ed.2d 338 (1971) and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985(2) (1976). Also See Kush v. Rutledge, U.S. 103 S.Ct. 1483,
1485, 75 L.Ed.2d 413 (1983).
201.202. Congress requires that a federal court frame its orders so that those who must obey them will know
what the court intends to require and what it means to forbid. Id. (quoting Intl Longshoremens Assn, 389
U.S. at 76). The Supreme Court has observed that this requirement is especially vital in cases concerning
the validity of duly enacted statutes. Id. The Judges and the clerk and these courts are circumventing the rule
and law that a document is accepted for filing when it is file stamped and docketed. the courts refusal to
docket the Plaintiffs pleadings is illegitimate and purposely biased. See: Ayala, 126 Ill Dec 413, 531 N.E.2d
25
at 1043 (stating that a court clerk may refuse to accept a document unless the fee is paid, but where the clerk
has accepted the document for filing without the fee, file stamps it and assigns a docket number, the court
nevertheless acquires jurisdiction). That this has happened in the USDC of Eastern Division (Alexandria) and
the USDC of the District of Columbia).
202.203. That several Judges and courts and the clerks refusal to docket the Plaintiffs pleadings are a
violation of the Plaintiffs Constitutional rights based on these facts. The contours of this right must be
sufficiently clear that an officer of the court would understand that what he is doing violates that right Elder
v. Holloway, 510 U.S. 510, 514, 114 S.Ct. 1019, 127 L.Ed.2d 344 (1994) (quoting Harlow, 457 U.S. at 806,
102 S.Ct. 2727)
203.204. The Defendants have violated, 18 USC 242 Civil Rights and Deprivation of Constitution Right,
246, 231 Civil Disorder, 245, 249 Hate Crimes, 373 Conspiracy, Solicitation to commit a crime of
violence, 401 Contempt, Power of the court, 402 Contempts constituting crimes, 1001Fraud and false
statements, 1021 Title and Records, 1028 Fraud and related activity in connection with identification
documents, authentication features, and information, 1349, Mail Fraud and other Fraud Offenses, Attempt
and conspiracy 1365, Malicious Mischief, Tampering with consumer products (a) whoever, with reckless
disregard for the risk that another person will be placed in danger of death or bodily injury and under
circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to such risk tampers with any consume. 1506, Obstruction
of Justice, theft or alteration of record or process, false bail Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters,
falsifies, or otherwise avoids any records, writ, process or other proceeding in any court of the United States
whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect: or Whoever acknowledges, or
procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any
other person not privy or consenting the same
1512, Obstruction of Justice Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant:
1513, Obstruction of Justice Retaliating against a witness, victim or an informant
1514, Obstruction of Justice Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness:
1519, Obstruction of Justice Destruction, alteration or falsification of records in Federal investigation and
bankruptcy, 1621, Perjury, 1622, Subornation of Perjury
1623, False declarations before grand jury or court, 1924, Unauthorized removal and retention of classified
documents or material, 1957, Racketeering - Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from
specified unlawful activity
1959, Racketeering Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity, 1968, Civil investigative demand, 2071,
Records and Reports Concealment removal or mutilation generally, 2076. Whoever, being a clerk of a district
court of the United States, willfully refuses or neglects to make or forward any report, corticated, statement or
document as required by law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
204.205. When Divorce Lawyer and or others hired or as a favor Mark / Michael Stuart to drug Plaintiff
and get inappropriate pictures, or rape one of Plaintiffs daughters, or plant drugs on one of Plaintiffs
Daughters or in the home of Plaintiff and her girls in the November / December 2012 time frame. When
Defendants in collusion or ignored the threat:
Through Ilona Grenadier Heckman and her best friend Loretta Lax Miller aka
26
Muggy Cat aka Billy Sullivan Presidential Candidate for 2016 there blog -
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014

outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her
anti-American pro-Satan values. Email us at
muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's
address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't
forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify
and sactify the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ
and the mother of the vessel of Satan. We will have
a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not
look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to
stone.
JW Grenadier aka Janice Wolk Grenadier
Sunday, January 5, 2014
Janice Wolk Grenadier supports the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton
Not only is Janice Wolk Grenadier a traitor to the American people by being a card carrying Commie Pinko but she is
also supporting the Anti Christs Obama and Hillary Clinton. Yes we said it here, Anti Christs meaning plural. Why is
Janice doing this? Because they are not only going to let her keep her hairy vag but they are going to give her the
chance to grow a penis as well. Well penises. Yes, Janice Wolk Grenadier will have 6 penises all over her body
including one over her vagina. The other 5 will be as so: one in the palm of each hand, one on the bootom of each
foot and one right where a tramp stamp would be on her back. That way when Janice Wolk Grenadier dies, she can
go to Allah's heaven and have her 72 virgins. These 72 virgins will be a mix of males and females that she can rape
with all of her penises and then the next morning at sun up they become virgins again. We have figured it out that
the fetal body of little Joshua that Janice keeps in the basement of her home is going to be the vessel for the Dark
Lord Satan himself to resurrect in a human body to carry out the apocolypse. That way, Janie Wolk Grenadier is
guaranteed her 6 penises.
Proof she supports the Anti Christ is in her letters she has posted and her other posts of Hillary's and Obama's
27
support defending both on everything Loretta Lax Miller fought against including the ObamaCare and Islamic
Terrorism which Obama and Hillary support. Janice is for the destruction of the Catholic Church's values of having
Nuns despense birthcontroll pills. Janice supports this by supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Husein
Obama. Everything Obama stands for is to destroy American Family Values and Janice has no values and worships
Satan.
We at Muggy Cat take the religious stand that Janice is the Anti Christ and does not beleive in God and the wonders
God has done on this Earth. Maybe Janice should move to sin city Las Vegas and sell her soul as well as her fugly
body on the strip since she is whoring for Satan.
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of

Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-
Satan values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk
Grenadier's address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't
forget to bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify
the land of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the
vessel of Satan. We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of
soul but do not look her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to
stone.
205.206. THESE ARE THE THREATS OF Loretta Lax Miller aka Leah Lax aka Muggy Cat aka Billy
Sullivan That the Defendants allowed MANY MORE CAN BE READ AND FOUND IN UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA - Civil Action No. 14-0162 - That the
Judicial Community is desperate in the cover up of the collusion to protect Ilona Grenadier Heckman is
obvious to a lay man.
206.207. U.S. Code Title 28 Part I Chapter 21 455 28 U.S. Code 455 - Disqualification of
justice, judge, or magistrate judge Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 -
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE That when United States District Court of the District of Columbia Judge
Beryll A. Howell & Circuit Court Judge Clark stole the documents they Obstructed the Truth and evidence to
prove that Loretta Lax Miller had lied in documents submitted to this court and that Ilona Grenadier
Heckman had stolen the money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust and that she owed Plaintiff the money
Plaintiff claimed. 18 U.S. Code 1506 - Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail
207.208. Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ,
process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made
void, or does not take effect; or Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court,
any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same
28
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both (U.S. Code Title 18 Part
I Chapter 73 1512 Title 18 U .S. Code 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. -
U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1513 - 18 U.S. Code 1513 - Retaliating against a witness,
victim, or an informant - That Judge Beryl A. Howell retaliated by her Order of May 30, 2014 denying
Amended Complaint - U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1514 - 18 U.S. Code 1514 - Civil
action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness - That Judge Beryl A. Howell, and others has
empowered Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman to further harass and Slander Plaintiff as is being done in
the new Blog by Loretta Miller as seen further down under Parties by Loretta Millers Blog LorettaMiller -
U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1512 - U.S. Code 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim,
or an informant.
208.209. Slander Deformation and Libel that when United States Judge Gerald Lee and all others said that
Plaintiffs filings were Frivolous he was saying it was Frivolous for Plaintiff to expect a Judge that was not
tainted or that Plaintiff to expect attorneys to speak the truth That when Judge Walton and others said
Plaintiff was rambling and did not make sense was giving other Judges and the attorneys the ammunition to
slander Plaintiff further to try and make Plaintiff to look stupid and incompetent. Several Slanderous and
Hate Crime type Statements have been published, spoken and included in documents submitted in the courts
by Defendants and lawyers. The Collusion and the pattern cannot be denied.
Claim 6 - The Four Basic Freedoms Guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution
209.210. Plaintiff will prove a violation of Plaintiffs Bill of Rights the Four Basic freedoms are being
Violated - The Four Freedoms: 1. Freedom of speech 2. Freedom of worship 3. Freedom from want 4.
Freedom from fear
210.211. Plaintiff will show the actions of the Defendants were actions that were willful acts were malicious,
violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless. That the defendants were acting under the color
of State and Federal law. That the Constitutional Rights of due process are factual allegations that will be
proven through documents, letters, e-mails and actions of defendants and others. That defendants are
knowledgeable and aware of the threats from Divorce lawyer Ilonas and her GANG.
211.212. The Constitution of the United States a fundamental, guarantee that all legal proceedings will
be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard before the
government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law
shall not be unreasonable, Arbitrary, or capricious. The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found
in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of government from
arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property.
The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived
of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This amendment restricts the powers of the federal
government and applies only to actions by it. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,
ratified in 1868, declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law" ( 1). This clause limits the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government.
212.213. The right of access to the courts is contained within the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause,
the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregory v.
Nunn, 895 F.2d 413, 415 n. 2 (7th Cir.1990)
213.214. Noting that its decisions have grounded the right of access to the courts in the Article IV Privileges
and Immunities Clause, the First Amendment, and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments, see id. At 415 n. 12, 122 S.Ct. 2179, an access to court claim seeks to eliminate systemic
official action [that] frustrates a plaintiff in preparing and filing suits at the present time. Id. At 413, 122
29
S.Ct. 2179.
214.215. The Supreme Court also has held that the First Amendment right to petition the government includes
the right to file other civil actions in court that have a reasonable basis in law or fact. See McDonald v.
Smith, 472 U.S. 479, 484, 105 S.Ct. 2787, 86 L.Ed.2d 384 (1985) Bill Johnsons Rests., Inc. v. NLRB, 461
U.S. 731, 741, 103 S.Ct. 2161, 76 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983) ([T]he right of access to the courts is an aspect of the
First Amendment right to petition the Government for redress of ances.); California Motor Transp. Co. v.
Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 510, 92 S.Ct. 609, 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972) (The right of access to the
courts is indeed but one aspect of the right of petition.); see also Monsky v. Moraghan, 127 F.3d 243, 246
(2d Cir.1997) (It is well established that all persons enjoy a constitutional right of access to the courts.)
215.216. Federal courts have long recognized that the pleadings of a pro se litigant must be construed
liberally and held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Erickson, 551
U.S. at 94 (citation omitted) If the denial of the court is due to omission or a technical mistake, the clerk by
LCvR 5.4 (g) is required to request the party re-file.
216.217. The standard for a right of access to the courts claim, whether treated under the First
Amendment as part of the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances or as a procedural
due process claim, should require that the plaintiff allege and prove that the states judicial process does not
provide fair procedures to remedy the wrong alleged. Proof of the lack of adequate state remedies is required
by Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984), and Vicory v. Walton, 721 F.2d
1062 (6th Cir.1983), in procedural due process cases and should be required in judicial access cases.
217.218. Every person who, under color of any statutesubjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the
United Statesto the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and
laws, shall be liable to the part injured in an action of law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress
Claim 7 - Judicial Cannons and the Rules of Professional Conduct
218.219. No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at
defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the
law, and are bound to obey it. Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at
220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)
219.220. Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution
and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well. State
courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold
federal law. Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)
220.221. Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against
that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply
with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction,
and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
221.222. A judge shall not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the judge's
judicial conduct or judgment. A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private
interests of the judge or others; nor shall a judge convey or permit others to convey the impression that
they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge shall not testify as a character witness.
222.223. CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Canon1 A Judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Canon 2 A Judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all of the Judges activities.
Canon 3 A Judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.
30
223.224. Disciplinary Responsibilities:
A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has
committed a violation of the Judicial Canons should take appropriate action. A judge having
knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of these Canons that raises a substantial
question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the Judicial Inquiry and Review
Commission
A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer
has committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take appropriate
action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of
Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects should inform the Virginia State Bar.
The legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions also
have been granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is unique in this
respect because of the close relationship between the profession and the processes of
government and law enforcement. This connection is manifested in the fact that
ultimate authority over the legal profession is vested largely in the courts.
224.225. You cant change the Truth - The Truth is the actions of the Judges, Under Illinois and Federal
law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon the court, the orders and judgment of that
court are void, of no legal force or effect. Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured
by fraud is null and void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked collaterally. Affirmed
225.226. THIS IS NOT A DOMESTIC ISSUE THIS IS AN AMERICAN ISSUE FAIRNESS IN THE
COURTS That Plaintiff has followed the Law, followed the Rules to be Discriminated by all Defendants.
The Judicial system has an incestuous relationship that has created a privileged class, a violation of
Blind / Equal Justice for all.
RELIEF REQUESTED
226.227. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs
227.228. Wherefore this court should be aware Plaintiff takes very serious all allocations. That Plaintiff has
only included Defendants who have gone out of their way to harm Plaintiff, putting it in writing where
Plaintiff can easily show documents that show the intensions of the Defendant was disingenuous, that with
legal knowledge of the corruption of the Judicial system believed they could get away with the criminal
behavior doing a favor for one of their own. That each Defendant has signed and filed with the courts
documents that are disingenuous with the criminal intent to harm Plaintiff.
228.229. The Defendants should be held to a higher standard, that actions are reprehensible and
criminal. The protected Privilege and Immunity is lost when the Defendants did not have Jurisdiction
due to Fraud, Discrimination where one favors one citizen over another, an egregious form of
Judicial Discrimination. That the fundamental right to a fair trial is what we send our your men and
women into war for. That the Liberties we Brag to other countries about, the above defendants have
made a Mockery of, and is an embarrassment to this great country. That this court to uphold the
integrity of the United States Judicial System, the United States Constitution and the Laws and the
Rules of the Supreme Court must act swiftly and harshly with the above Defendants, a strong
message must be sent to the Judicial community as was stated by Judge Posner of criminal behavior
of Judges attached in Exhibit 3. The courts should award the Plaintiff the following:
229.230. A Special Grand Jury is immediately enacted to investigate the Criminal Actions of
Defendants.
31
230.231. That a Restraining order is immediately issued for the protection of Plaintiff and her
daughters against Defendant Ilona Grenadier Heckman who has targeted and used retaliation with
her gang like behavior with the assistance of Defendants to prevent being held accountable for her
Criminal Actions. Including Defendants actions and collusion of Hacking into Plaintiffs
computers, phones and other electronics.
231.232. Issue injunctive relief commanding a further, detailed forensic investigation into the
collusion, or racketeering of the named Defendants above, building on FBI files and investigation.
232.233. That Plaintiff and her girls receive $3, million dollars for each year of the Collusion of the
Defendants actions which show a conspiracy to harm Plaintiff and her girls, which was done with
malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless intentions. Defendants
Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations abuse of process,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with
jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
233.234. That Plaintiff be made whole for the Real Estate ownership and other actions Defendant
Ilona Grenadier Heckman has stolen from Plaintiff that the other Defendants with their actions
prevented Plaintiff from collecting such monies and real estate.
234.235. Issue declaratory relief as this Court deems appropriate and just
235.236. Issue other relief as this Court deems appropriate and just.
236.237. Award plaintiff her costs of litigation.in all cases
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs

Plaintiff demands a Jury Trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Along
with the hearing to be filmed by a Camera man of the choosing of Plaintiff Janice.
I, Janice Wolk Grenadier, am the Plaintiff in this action. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that each of
said allegations is true and correct.
Date: October 2, 2017 Respectfully submitted,
/S/_____________________________
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Telephone (202) 368-7178
Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com
CERTIFICATION: I declare under penalty and perjury: That No attorney has prepared or assisted in the
preparation of this document. Janice Wolk Grenadier - Name of Pro Se Party.
_______________________________
October 2, 2017
32

Judges V JWG V FINAL USDC VA DC Complaint Aug Sept 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Judges V JWG V FINAL USDC VA DC Complaint Aug Sept 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DIVISION

Judge Leonie M. Brinkema Senior Judge T.S. Ellis, III

Albert V. Bryan U.S. Courthouse

Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory Judge Barbara Milano Keenan

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth

USDC of the District of Columbia

Chief Judge: MERRICK B. GARLAND

Judge Brian Kenney

John and or Jane Doe 1 100

Date Court Case No Description

07-10-2017 4th Circuit Court of Appeals 17-807 1:17-cv-00280 CMH -JFA

1. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the following statutes:

a. Federal Question Jurisdiction: Title 28 United States Code 1331;

17. Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory - Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

34. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell USDC of the District of Columbia

PLAINTIFF WAS DENIED ANY AND ALL REQUESTED OPEN COURT

110. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above paragraphs

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM

GOY.YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL.

JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON

YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING NAZI! YOU

something more scarier I contacted Ilona Ely Freedman

1512, Obstruction of Justice Tampering with a witness, victim or an informant:

1513, Obstruction of Justice Retaliating against a witness, victim or an informant

1514, Obstruction of Justice Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness:

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014

We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014 outside of

Claim 7 - Judicial Cannons and the Rules of Professional Conduct

Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations of above and all paragraphs

Date: October 2, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

You might also like