Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary eries. Gravity drainage is the main production mechanism in the gas-
Free-fall gravity drainage (FFGD) is the main production mecha- invaded zone of naturally fractured oil reservoirs. Warren and Root
nism in the gas-invaded zone of fractured reservoirs. The gravity (1963) assumed that matrix blocks occupy the same physical space
and capillary forces are two major forces that control the produc- as the fracture network and no interaction exists between the matrix
tion performance of a fractured system under an FFGD mecha- blocks. This is called the single-block concept, which assumes that
nism. Gravity force acts as a driving force to remove oil from the the matrix blocks drain independently so that the performance of a
matrix block whereas the resistive capillary force tends to keep stack of blocks is equal to the performance of a single block multi-
oil inside the matrix. In this study, a series of experiments was plied by the number of individual blocks. In reality, there exists some
performed to study the effects of the geometrical characteristics degree of block-to-block interaction in the stack of matrix blocks,
of the fracture and matrix on the oil-production rate under an and gravity-drainage performance is heavily affected by reinfiltration
FFGD mechanism by use of a glass micromodel. The oil-recovery that must be accounted for to have a reliable prediction of the reser-
factor (RF) was also obtained for a single matrix block by use of voir performance (Saidi 1987). For gas/oil gravity drainage in frac-
different patterns. Results from the experiments show that differ- tured reservoirs, the drained oil from upper blocks does not generally
ent flow regimes occur during the production life of a single ma- flow through the surrounding fracture network and may be reinfil-
trix block under a FFGD mechanism. The fluid flow is controlled trated into the lower matrix block(s). Reinfiltration affects the rate of
by the capillary-dominated regime at the early stage and late time oil production by gravity drainage and the phase distribution of oil
of production life, whereas it shows a stabilized bulk flow under a and gas in the matrix blocks. Blocks in a stack under this type of
gravity-dominated regime is exhibited at other times. Experimen- block-to-block interaction show a drainage performance as a func-
tal results revealed that for a narrow fracture opening, fracture tion of time that differs considerably from that of a stack of isolated
capillary pressure has a form similar to that of the matrix block. blocks (Fung 1991; Firoozabadi and Ishimoto 1994; Sajjadian et al.
Also, it was observed that the oil-production rate and RF of the 1998). The other interaction phenomenon is the consequence of ma-
matrix block decreased as the permeability ratio between two trix/matrix connection and/or fracture capillary pressure that is called
media (matrix block and fracture) increased. Lower production capillary continuity. This makes hydraulic continuity partially or
rate is achieved in larger-fracture-spacing micromodels. In addi- completely between isolated matrix blocks and increases the ulti-
tion, wider vertical fractures lead to an early breakthrough of gas mate oil recovery of fractured reservoirs by gravity drainage. (Horie
et al. 1988; Labastie 1990; Stones et al. 1992).
in bottom horizontal fracture that makes up the main portion of
The glass micromodel provides insight into the pore-scale
oil traps in the matrix block, and this reduces the RF. Results
interplay of various aspects of transport phenomena and gives
from this study show that in a heterogeneous layered matrix
the opportunity to discover yet unrecognized process and to
block, both the drainage rate and RF decrease in comparison with
enhance the understanding of existing theories and assumptions
a homogeneous matrix block. Finally, a multiple linear-regression
(Wilson 1994). The first etched-glass network was made by Mat-
analysis was performed to understand the dimensionless groups
tax and Kyte (1961). Davis and Jones (1968) significantly
affecting the RF of the FFGD process. It was found that the Bond
improved it later by using the photo-etching technique. Despite
number cannot truly describe the process and other parameters
their limitation to 2D models, visual observations of multiphase
such as the fracture-/matrix-permeability ratio; fracture spacing
flow in porous media can provide valuable information to enhance
and fracture opening should also be considered.
our understanding of pore-scale transport phenomena. These mod-
els were used by several authors for the study of multiphase-flow
Introduction displacements and production mechanisms (Chatzis and Dullien
1983; Lenormand et al. 1983; Danesh et al. 1987; Nguyen et al.
Gravity drainage is defined as a recovery process in which gravity
2002; Sohrabi et al. 2004, 2008).
acts as the main driving force and in which gas replaces the voi-
With glass micromodels, significant insights into the flow
dage volume (Hagoort 1980). The literature review (Schechter
mechanisms were obtained in fractured systems. Haghighi et al.
and Guo 1996) suggests that there are three distinct categories of
(1994) experimentally studied the impact of steam- and hot-
the gravity-drainage processes: (1) forced gravity drainage by gas
water-injection rate on immiscible displacement of oil in a hori-
injection at controlled flow rates, (2) centrifuge-simulated gravity
zontal fractured system. They introduced a critical capillary num-
drainage (not occurring in natural systems), and (3) FFGD occur-
ber Nc such that for Nc larger than this critical value the
ring in a variety of cases. In an FFGD mechanism, the gravity
displacing phase can invade the matrix block. van Dijke et al.
force helps the oil production against the capillary force that
(2004, 2006) investigated the behavior of the three-phase immis-
resists the oil displacement by gas. Viscous force does not con-
cible water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in nonfractured
tribute to this process because of very low fluid velocity. Oil pro-
micromodels. Rangel-German and Kovscek. (2006) studied the
duction under the FFGD process continues until capillary force
transfer mechanisms between matrix and fracture for a two-phase
balances the gravity force.
system by use of micromodels. They found that the rate of water
Field reports (King et al. 1970) and laboratory experiments
uptake from a fracture into an unsaturated matrix and the pore-
(Hagoort 1980; Darvish et al. 2006; Karimaie and Torster 2008)
level pattern of water infiltration depend critically on the rate of
have shown that gravity drainage can result in very high oil recov-
water infiltration through fractures. Soudmand-asli et al. (2007)
carried out experiments with etched-glass micromodels to investi-
Copyright V
C 2014 Society of Petroleum Engineers gate the microbial-improved-oil recovery process in fractured po-
Original SPE manuscript received for review 5 October 2013. Revised manuscript received
rous media. They showed that the microbial-oil-recovery
for review 10 May 2014. Paper (SPE 171555) peer approved 9 June 2014. efficiency with biosurfactant-producing bacteria in the fractured
Experimental Facilities
Micromodels. The micromodels are generally classified into two
major types. The first type is produced on the basis of a real pore
structure obtained from a thin-section image. They have more-
complicated pore structures that are often used for qualitative
experiments. The other type is constructed on the basis of geomet-
rical parameters of porous media such as pore-size/throat-size dis-
tribution, aspect ratio, and coordinate number. In this study, on the
basis of the second approach, several patterns with different pore
structures and fracture geometrical factors were etched onto the
surface of a glass plate. Matrix porous media are surrounded by lat-
eral fractures at each side to incorporate the effects of fracture/ma-
trix interaction. This model is conceptually similar to the single-
matrix-block configuration proposed by Van Golf-Racht (1982).
The patterns of the synthetic porous media are generated with
R
CorelDRAWV software. A schematic of the model and a magnified
picture of the pore/throat pattern are shown in Fig. 1. The fractured
porous patterns are etched on the glass surface with a laser beam. A
microdepth measurement apparatus (Mitutoyo No.3109F) was
used to determine pore/throat depth along the matrix block. The
collected data show that the patterns have uniform depth with a
minor deviation of approximately 5 to 8%. In addition, the stage of
removing glass powder from the pattern surface may change the
original size of pore width. Hence, a scanning-electron-microscope
Fig. 1Schematic of the glass micromodel and matrix pattern. image was used to determine the pore/throat-width distribution.
This observation revealed that the pore/throat width has remained
porous media is higher than that of the nonfractured media. uniform with a very narrow distribution. These data are necessary
Mashayekhizadeh et al. (2011) studied the effects of fracture aper- to specify the capillary pressure of matrix block. Also, the etching
ture and inclination angle on the stability of liquid bridges and the depth of the fracture is measured to calculate its permeability.
shape of the gas/liquid front in the micromodel fractured systems After etching the porous pattern, a second optically flat glass
under FFGD. Dehghan et al. (2012) used micromodels to investi- plate was then placed over the first, covering the etched pattern
gate the fracture-network effects on sweep efficiency during the and thus creating an enclosed pore space. These two plates were
WAG-injection process. They concluded that the lower gas-injec- then attached together under a thermal process called fusing. In
tion rate demonstrates more-stable behavior for water displace- this step, the system is heated up to 7508C gradually and then left
ment and leads to lower residual oil in the matrix block. to be cooled down slowly to the ambient temperature to give a
There are few studies, if any, to reveal experimentally the completely sealed set of flow area. This second plate, the cover
impact of the geometrical characteristics of the fracture on oil- plate, has an inlet hole and an outlet hole drilled at either end,
production rate of matrix block and its RF under the FFGD mech- allowing fluid to be displaced through the network of pores. It is
anism. In this study, several fractured micromodel systems were worth mentioning that larger micromodels are difficult to make
designed to study the oil-recovery mechanism of a single matrix because of limitations on oven sizes and problems with keeping
block during FFGD. Although the results will not be directly ap- the surface flat enough to ensure good sealing between two plates.
plicable to real reservoirs, one can use them for better understand- Therefore, to minimize the favorable matrix block height, the rel-
ing and verifying the flow transport and pore-scale events during ative size of the pore was somehow larger than the field scale. A
the FFGD mechanism. Also, these visual observations enable us summary of the characteristics of the micromodels that were used
to investigate the role of capillary pressure in narrow fracture in this study is given in Table 1.
openings. In addition, we investigated the effect of matrix and Matrix Permeability. The matrix permeability is determined
fracture characteristics on the oil RF during the FFGD mecha- with Darcys law. A separate matrix-network model with the
nism. These characteristics include fracture permeability, fracture same dimension of the matrices used in the fractured model was
spacing, fracture width, and matrix layering. Multiple linear- constructed and placed horizontally. Then, colored distilled water
regression analysis was applied considering the dimensionless with methylene blue was injected through it. The pressure-drop/
groups affecting the RF of matrix block such as the Bond number, flow-rate response (Dullien 1992) was measured during injection
the permeability ratio, and the fracture spacing. for several constant rates.
Matrix Porosity. The results of the microdepth measurement where d and h are the interfacial tension between phases and the
show that the etched depth of the pores in the micromodel is relatively rock/fluid contact angle, respectively. The combination of Eqs. 1
uniform; hence, the areal porosity of matrix is equal to the ratio of col- and 3 gives
" #
ored area to the total area of fully saturated matrix block. This ratio is Vfree 1 2dcosh 2dcosh 2
obtained as approximately 48% with image-analysis software. f Pc ; P c ; r2pc p exp :
2prpc 2rpc Pc Pc
Matrix Capillary Pressure. This parameter is of great impor-
tance because it controls the ultimate RF of the drainage process. 4
In this study, the capillary pressure of the matrix block was
obtained from the pore-size distribution of the matrix block. On The fraction-free PV that is occupied with the nonwetting
the basis of physical dimensional analysis, pore/throat size of the phase can be determined by integrating Eq. 4 from zero to any
matrix block can be represented by a normal probability-distribu- interested capillary pressure, as follows:
tion function, as follows: 2dcosh
Pc
matrix (Van Golf-Racht 1982). The absolute permeability of the Oil-Recovery Mechanism. At the outset of the experiments, it
fractures is calculated by considering them as capillary tubes with was observed that gas invaded the side fractures because of its
the hydraulic-diameter (Dh) concept (Haghighi et al. 1994), as lower resistance to flow and there was no gas entering into the
matrix block. This causes a difference between the liquid height
D2h in fracture and matrix, which is the characteristic behavior of
kff ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
32 gravity drainage in fractured porous media. At the time when the
liquid level in the fracture is low enough such that the driving
where gravity force Dqghm hf overrides the entry capillary pres-
4Ac sure, liquid drainage would start in the matrix. The liquids height
Dh ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 in matrix block (hm) and fracture (hf) was measured from the bot-
P tom face of matrix block, as shown in Fig. 4. After the airs en-
where Ac and P are the cross-sectional area and the wetted perim- trance into the matrix block, liquid drainage occurs from matrix
eter open to flow, respectively. The hydraulic diameter of micro- and fractures simultaneously. Fig. 5 shows the variations of liquid
fractures used in this study with rectangular cross sections equals height in fractures and matrix as well as their difference over
approximately twice the etching depth. Hence, the fracture perme- time. The height difference reaches a local maximum at which
ability is controlled with the smallest dimension. liquid drainage from matrix begins. The liquid-height difference
[hmhf] presents a minor fluctuating behavior caused by liquid
Fluids System. For the experiments reported here, normal dec- exchange between matrix block and fracture system. The figure
ane (n-C10) was dyed with Sudan red and was used as oil (wetting shows a repeated cycle (stop and start) behavior of oil production
phase). The viscosity and density of colored n-C10 were measured from the matrix block. The capillary and gravity forces are the
with a Stabinger viscometer (SVM 3000) at atmospheric pressure main interacting parameters affecting multiphase-fluid flow in
and 20 C. Air was used as the gas phase in all tests. Physical FFGD tests, in the absence of viscous forces. The dimensionless
properties of test fluids are listed in Table 3. Bond number (NBo), which expresses the importance of body
forces (i.e., gravitational force) compared with the resistive capil-
Pump and Optical System. A very accurate low-injection-rate lary force of any particular system, is defined as
pump (Quizix pump), between 105 and 102 cm3/min, was used
to control the fluid flow through the micromodel. The micromodel DPgravity
NBo : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
was cleaned before each run with another washing pump (Eldex DPmatrixcapillary
pump). The washing pump had three containers for distilled
water, alcohol, and toluene as cleaning fluids. In all micromodel The driving gravity force is defined as
experiments, the required information is achieved by visual obser-
vation. Thus, a high-resolution digital camera (Cannon model DPgravity DqgLeff ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
D50) was used to capture and record the images of fluid displace-
ment in the micromodel at different stages of the test. where Dq is the density difference of fluids, g is the gravitational
constant, and Leff is the effective characteristic length. For this
special case, the effective characteristic length is the elevation dif-
Experimental Setup and Procedure
ference of gas/liquid-interface positions in matrix and vertical
The setup was composed of a micromodel holder that was placed fracture (hmhf). If the pore network of matrix block is considered
into a steel vessel containing visible widows, a camera interfaced as capillary tubes with rectangular cross section, its critical entry
to a computer for recording photos, and a high-accuracy, low-rate pressure is defined by the Lenormand equation:
pump. A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3.
All the experiments were performed at room conditions (20 C, 1 d 1 1
atm). The following steps were taken to prepare micromodels Pc d cosh; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Rt x y
before beginning the tests: First, the micromodel was cleaned with
toluene and then with deionized water. In the second step, the where x and y are the width and depth of the pore channel, respec-
micromodel was saturated with red n-C10 at a very low injection tively, and h is the wetting-phase contact angle. Substituting Eqs. 13
rate. The micromodel was then oriented vertically, and both end and 12 into Eq. 11 gives the following form of the Bond number:
= Valve
= Fluid Line
Outlet
Gas Cylinder
1.0
0.9
Fracture-liquid height (hf)
0.8 gravitational-force head (hmhf)
Matrix-liquid height (hm)
0.7
hf,hm and (hmhf)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (seconds) x 10000
Fig. 5The gas/liquid-interface position in the matrix block (hm) and the side fracture (hf) and the difference between them (hmhf)
during the FFGD process. (Typically for Model C).
1
these two media. For these sets of experiments that were performed
at atmospheric pressure, there was no noticeable intrinsic pressure
0.9 gradient between the two media. However, the pressure difference
between matrix and fracture can be considered as the difference of
0.8 gas/liquid-interface positions in the fracture and the matrix at any
Saturation (fraction)
0.7 time. Fig. 9 shows that the height difference of gas/liquid interface
in matrix and side fracture hm hf during the FFGD test for both
0.6 Experimental Data models has approximately the same value. However, the magni-
Region 1
Region 2 tude of the flow-pressure gradient (Dp/Dx) of a large-fracture-spac-
0.6
Region 3 ing model is small as a result of the larger interval between matrix
0.4 and side fracture. This leads to a weak liquid-flow communication
between matrix and fractures. Fig. 10 shows the quality of gas/liq-
0.3 uid interface at two different times. In these experiments, the
breakthrough time corresponds to the moment at which gas invades
0.2
the lower horizontal fracture and appears in the outlet port. Image-
0.1 analysis
results show that the matrix normalized drainage rate,
q q dSo
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 qn , of the small-fracture-spacing mi-
x 105 Vp Am e u dt
Time (seconds)
cromodel is 4.772106 (1/sec). It is obviously larger than that of
another model with 1.721106 (1/sec). These experimental find-
Fig. 6The production behavior of matrix block during FFGD
process. ings confirm that using the 1D approach for a large-fracture-spac-
ing system considerably overestimates gravity-drainage rate and
yields misleading results.
Results and Discussion
This section describes the results of the FFGD tests in etched Effect of Fracture Width. To observe the effect of fracture
micromodels. In each case, the microscopic displacement mecha- width, Micromodels C and D were used. The matrix pattern and
nisms and the quantitative amount of oil-drainage rate and its RF block height of both models were identical, but they had different
for matrix block were analyzed and compared. The present study widths of side fractures. The fracture width of Model D is 2 mm,
focuses on trapping on the matrix-block level in fractured reser- which is approximately three times larger than that of another
voirs. Therefore, the effect of capillary trapping by water films model. The drainage rate of the side fracture is defined as
was ignored. Image-analysis technique is used to quantify satura-
tion and liquid height in the two media: matrix block and side dV f dSo Vf dSoAf Hf dso
qof Af Hf ; . . . . . 17
fractures. dt dt dt dt
Effect of Fracture Spacing. To investigate the effect of fracture where Af is the cross-sectional area of the fracture, Hf is the frac-
spacing (the ratio of distance between two adjacent fractures to ma- ture height, and dsdto is the rate of the fractures saturation that was
trix-block height) on FFGD performance, Micromodels A and B determined with image analysis. The fracture cross-sectional area
with different fracture spacings of 0.3 and 0.59 were used. The is the product of fracture width and etched depth, e. Both models
results are illustrated in Fig. 8. Experimental results show that the have the same etching depths so that the fracture permeability
oil RF increases as the fracture-spacing/matrix-block-height ratio (Kf) remains constant. Experimental results show that the frac-
decreases. Visual observations reveal that besides the liquid tures drainage rate of the wide-fracture micromodel increases,
drained from matrix caused by gravitational force, there is also but its increment rate is not directly proportional to the width of
liquid-flow communication between matrix and side fractures. fracture, as shown in Fig. 11. On the other hand, the mass balance
According to Darcys law, the liquid-transfer rate from matrix to of a control volume perpendicular to the cross-sectional area of
fracture is directly proportional to the pressure gradient between each side fracture can be expressed as
8 *103 Model C
5
Capillary pressure (atm)
2
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Wetting phase saturation (fraction)
60
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (seconds) x 10000
0.6
0.5
0.4
hmhf (Dimensionless)
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (seconds) x 10000
Fig. 9Comparison of difference between the gas/liquid-contact locations in matrix and in fracture at two different fracture
spacings.
14
Fracture's oil volume vs. time (2 mm)
10
6
y = 2E05x + 10
R 2= 0.910
4
y = 1E05x + 3.569
R 2= 0.901
2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
x 10000
Time (seconds)
1
Gas/liquid interface level in matrix block (Dimensionless)
Fracture width = 2 mm
0.9
Fracture width = 0.7 mm
0.8
0.7
0.6
y =2E06x + 1.025
0.5
y =3E06x + 1.030
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
x 10000
Time (seconds)
Fig. 12Comparison of rate of change of the matrix liquid height at two different fracture widths.
80
Kf/Km = 3.61 (Model D)
Kf/Km = 22.49 (Model E)
70 Kf/Km = 57.83 (Model F)
Kf/Km = 19.28 (Model G)
60
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (seconds) x 10000
interdependency of capillary pressure and the permeability of the interaction. Dimensionless numbers are commonly used for the
media, as follows: upscaling procedure applied to the experimental results. Bond
number (NBo), the ratio of gravitational force to capillary force, is
d cosh the main dimensionless group for the analysis of the FFGD pro-
Pc p JSw ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
K=u cess. When the viscous force is not negligible and has an impor-
tant effect, other dimensionless numbers, such as the capillary
where J (Sw) is known as the J-function. On the basis of this equa- number, should be considered too. The FFGD process occurs in
tion, the low-permeability layer has a higher retention capillary the absence of the viscous force; therefore, only the Bond number
force. The oil-saturation profile for the multilayer matrix block, as was considered. This dimensionless number, based on matrix per-
shown in Fig. 14, demonstrates that oil tends to accumulate in the meability, is defined as
vicinity of the low-permeability to high-permeability layer. More-
over, in a multilayer system, the low-permeability layer resists DqgKm
NBo ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
downward movement of the oil phase under gravity drainage. dgo
This behavior decreases the drainage rate of the matrix block
compared with the homogeneous matrix block. These two phe- where Dq is the density difference between two fluids, g is the accel-
nomena (oil trapping in low-permeability layer and reduction of eration as a result of gravity, Km is the matrix permeability, and dgo is
the matrix drainage rate) cause the RF of the matrix block in the the surface tension. On the basis of the experiments performed, the
multilayer system to decrease, as shown in Fig. 15. f
fracture spacing s and permeability ratio between two media
H
Kf
Oil-Recovery Prediction. Oil-production rate and its RF for the were recognized as the other dimensionless numbers that have
Km
matrix block under an FFGD mechanism depend on the physical great effect on the RF. Multiple regression is a proper data-analysis
properties of the matrix block and fluids. They are also affected method whenever a quantitative dependent variable is to be examined
by the characteristics of the side fractures and the matrix/fracture in relationship to more than one predictor variable. To perform the
10
9 High-permeable Layer
8
Low-permeable Layer
7
Height (cm)
6
Low-permeable Layer
4
t = 12.8875 hr
3
t = 16.5517 hr
2 t = 40.4906 hr
t = 53.5214 hr
1 t = 66.6147 hr
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Oil Saturation
100
90
Single-layer matrix block
Multilayer matrix block
80
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (seconds) x 10000
multiple linear-regression analysis and to determine the dependency of data is caused either by the deviation of each predicted data value
of a dimensionless response variable on a particular dimensionless from its group mean value (i.e., regression) or by the deviation of
variable, scatter plots should be prepared. Such plots will illustrate the each predicted value from its observed value (i.e., residuals). The
absolute effect of each of the predictor variables [Bond number, frac- sum of these two sources of deviations would be expressed as the
ture spacing, and (Kf /Km)] on the dimensionless response variable. total source of deviations. For each of these three sources of devia-
Figs. 16 through 18 are crossplots showing the effects of different tions, five measures of variance (i.e., Columns 2 through 6) could be
dimensionless groups on the matrix-block RF. To present the function described as follows. Degrees of freedom (DF) can be considered as
in a linear form regardless of increasing and decreasing trends, the the number of correlation coefficients, N, with respect to the number
natural-logarithm term contributes in some of the terms. These figures of regressed variables used in each particular model; sum of the
show that the RF decreases linearly with an increase of fracture spac- squares (SS) is a measure of variance for each particular regression
K analysis that is defined as summation of the squared deviations;
ing and the natural logarithm of f . The RF also increases linearly
Km mean squares (MS) corrects the SS for the DF; F-test (F) is a var-
with an increase of the natural logarithm of Bond number. The fol- iance-related statistical parameter that compares two models that are
lowing multivariable regressing form of the RF is obtained: different from each other by one or more regressed variables (if the F
fs Kf value is greater than a standard tabulated value, the more-complex
RF a b cln dlnNBo : . . . . . . . . . . 21 equation would be considered significant); P-value is the probability
H Km
of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one that was
Table 4 shows the correlation coefficients that are based on the actually observed. The significance of P-value means that you would
regression analysis, standard errors, and lower and upper limits of reject your null hypothesis. By default, the significance level is set at
the coefficients. The suitability of the multivariable-regression anal- 0.05, and the observed P-value of the proposed correlation is equal
ysis was checked by the ANOVA (analysis of variance) table. The to 0.0039, which is less than it. Therefore, all the considered parame-
relevant ANOVA table for the RF is shown in Table 5. This includes ters in multivariable linear-regression analysis and their attributed
the relevant data for each of three sources of deviation consisting of effects are important and cannot be ignored to simplify the related
regression, residuals, and total. The source of variation of each type statistical analysis.
100
90
80
Recovery Factor (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.308 0.31 0.312 0.314 0.316 0.318 0.32 0.322 0.324
Fracture spacing (Fs /H )
100
90
80
70
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.00E+00 5.00E05 1.00E04 1.50E04 2.00E04 2.50E04 3.00E04 3.50E04
Bond number (Dimensionless)
Fig. 17Impact of the Bond number on the production performance of the matrix block.
80
70
60
Recovery Factor (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
ln (Kf /Km)
Conclusions ses of the results, the main conclusions of this study can be item-
This study illustrates the applicability of the micromodel experi- ized as follows:
ments for the fundamental understanding of the FFGD process Experimental results showed that the oil production from the
and the role of fracture geometrical characteristics on oil recovery matrix block in the fractured porous media during the FFGD
from the matrix block. On the basis of the observations and analy- process consists of three distinct flow regimes; at the outset of
the experiments, the oil production is very slow because of the
infinitesimal pressure drop between fracture and matrix block
and controlled by the capillary-dominated regime. This is
TABLE 4COEFFICIENTS OF THE MULTIPLE-REGRESSION
MODEL OF THE RF
Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Houston, Texas, 47 Octo- Sohrabi, M., Tehrani, D.H., Danesh, A. et al. 2004. Visualization of Oil
ber. SPE-2972-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2972-MS. Recovery by Water-Alternating Gas Injection Using High-Pressure
Labastie, A. 1990. Capillary Continuity Between Blocks of a Fractured Micromodels. SPE J. 9 (3): 290301. SPE-89000-PA. http://dx.doi.
Reservoir. Presented at the 65th SPE Annual Technical Conference org/10.2118/89000-PA.
and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2326 September. SPE- Soudmand-asli, A., Ayatollahi, S.S, Mohabatkar, H. et al. 2007. The In-
20515-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20515-MS. Situ Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery in Fractured Porous Media. J.
Lenormand, R., Zarcone, C. and Sarr, A. 1983. Mechanisms of the dis- Petrol. Sci. Eng. 58: 161172.
placement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary ducts. J. Stones, E.J., Mardsen, S.S., and Zimmerman, S.A. 1992. Gravity-Induced
Fluid Mech. 135: 337353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002211208300 Drainage From Fractured Porous Media. Presented at the Western Re-
3110 gional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, 30 March1 April. SPE-
Mashayekhizadeh, V., Ghazanfari, M.H., Kharrat, R. et al. 2011. Pore- 24042-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24042-MS.
Level Observation of Free Gravity Drainage of Oil in Fractured Porous van Dijke, M.I.J., Sorbie, K.S., Sohrabi, M. et al. 2004. Three-Phase Flow
Media. Transp. Porous Media 87 (2): 561584. WAG Processes in Mixed-Wet Porous Media: Pore-Scale Network
Mattax, C.C. and, Kyte, J.R. 1961. Ever See Water Flood? Oil Gas J. 59:115. Simulations and Comparison With Water-Wet Micromodel Experi-
Nguyen, Q.P., Thissen, M., and Zitha, P.L.J. 2002. Effect of Trapped Foam ment. SPE J. 9 (1): 5766. SPE-87822-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/
on Gas Tracer Diffusion in a Visual Microflow Model. Presented at the 87822-PA.
SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1317 van Dijke, M.I.J., Sorbie, K.S., Sohrabi, M. et al. 2006. Pore-Scale Model-
April. SPE-75208-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75208-MS. ing of Three-Phase Flow in Mixed-Wet Porous Media: Multiple Dis-
Rangel-German, E.R. and Kovscek, A.R. 2006. A Micromodel Investiga- placement Chains. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 52: 7186.
tion of Two-Phase Matrix-Fracture Transfer Mechanisms. Water Van Golf-Racht, T.D. 1982. Fundamentals of Fractured Reservoir Engi-
Resour. Res. 42 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003918. neering. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
Saidi, A.M. 1987. Reservoir Engineering of Fractured Reservoirs: Funda- Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J. 1963. The Behavior of Naturally Fractured
mental and Practical Aspects. Paris, France: TOTAL. Reservoirs. SPE J. 3 (3): 245255. SPE-426-PA. http://dx.doi.org/
Sajjadian, V.A., Danesh, A., and Tehrani, D.H. 1998. Laboratory Studies 10.2118/426-PA.
of Gravity Drainage Mechanism in Fractured Carbonate Reservoir- Wilson, J.L. 1994. Visualization of Flow and Transport at the Pore Level.
Capillary Continuity. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petro- In Transport and Reactive Processes in Aquifers: Proceedings of the
leum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPE-49497-MS. International Symposium, Zurich, 1115 April, ed. Th. Dracos and
http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/49497-MS. F. Stauffer. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CRC Press.
Sajjadian, V.A., Danesh, A., and Tehrani, D.H. 1999. Laboratory Studies
of Gravity Drainage Mechanism in Fractured Carbonate Reservoir-
Reinfiltration. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Pe- Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam is a PhD degree candidate in pe-
troleum engineering at the University of Tehran. He holds a BS
troleum Engineering Conference, Caracas, Venezuela, 2123 April. degree in petroleum engineering from Petroleum University of
SPE-54003-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54003-MS. Technology, Iran, and an MSc degree in chemical engineer-
Schechter, D.S. and Guo, B. 1996. Mathematical Modeling of Gravity ing from Amir Kabir University of Technology, Iran.
Drainage After Gas Injection Into Fractured Reservoirs. Presented at
the 1996 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium Tulsa, Oklahoma, Mohammad Reza Rasaei holds a PhD degree in chemical and
petroleum engineering focused in the area of reservoir engi-
2224 April. SPE-35170-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35170-MS. neering. He is currently an assistant professor of petroleum en-
Sohrabi, M., Danesh, A., and Jamiolahmady, M. 2008. Visualization of gineering at the University of Tehran, Iran. Rasaeis research
Residual Oil Recovery by Near-Miscible Gas and SWAG Injection interest focuses on fluid flow in porous media and naturally-
Using High-Pressure Micromodels. Trans. Porous Media 74 (2): fractured-reservoir studies. He has supervised more than 40
239257. MSc degree and PhD degree students.