You are on page 1of 18

Using Health Information

Technology to Improve Quality


of Care in New York City

Brent Stackhouse, Executive Director


Primary Care Information Project
NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
March 12, 2013

Primary Care
Information Project 1
Agenda

Primary Care Information Project (PCIP)

PCIP Quality Improvement

PCIP Population Health Analysis

Lessons Learned

Primary Care
Information Project 2
2005: Palm Pilots are the wave of the future!

PALM PILOTS !
800+ distributed to improve:
Disease Management
Quality of care
Ongoing education and training
Emergency Preparedness
Remote access to the HAN during
emergencies

Primary Care
Information Project 3
Primary Care Information Project

PCIP, a bureau of NYC DOHMH, was founded by


Mayor Bloomberg in 2005

Mission
Improve the quality of care in medically
underserved areas through health information
technology (HIT)

Success
Over 9,055 providers receiving EHR and
Meaningful Use assistance
1,118 small practices
75 community health centers
26 hospitals & outpatient clinics

Primary Care
Information Project 4
PCIP Programs Today

NYC DOHMH: PRIMARY CARE INFORMATION PROJECT

EHR Adoption & Quality Pay for Quality & Public Health
Meaningful Use Improvement Research Monitoring
Federal Regional Practice Program Public Health
Extension Consulting Evaluation and Informatics/
Center Group Planning Development
Outreach Clinical Quality Healthcare
Specialists Quality
Implementation
Billing Consulting Information
Training Network
Diabetes
Registry

Primary Care
Information Project 5
EHR Adoption Technical Assistance

Go Improved
Outreach Implementation live Meaningful Use
Outcomes

Provider Project Standard Coordinated,


education management documentation patient-cantered
care
Budgeting Workflow redesign Customized clinical
alerts
Vendor selection Staff preparation
Quality measures

Privacy & security


of patient data

Health information
exchange

Primary Care
Information Project 6
Impact of Technical Assistance

Primary Care Source: Andrew M. Ryan, Tara F. Bishop, Sarah Shih and Lawrence P. Casalino. Small Physician Practices In
Information Project 7
New York Needed Sustained Help To Realize Gains In Quality From Use Of Electronic Health Records. Health
Affairs, 32, no.1 (2013):53-62
Data Collection and Analytics

Data type Method Practice Provider


level level

Quality Monthly transmissions of the PCIP-defined quality measures from X X


Measures eClinicalWorks practices
Utilization Monthly transmissions of PCIP-defined utilization measures from X X
measures eClinicalWorks practices

Meaningful Monthly transmissions of meaningful use metrics from X X


Use eClinicalWorks practices Meaningful Use Adoption and Quality
measures dashboards
Procedure Monthly transmission of aggregate CPT counts X X
data
Syndromic Daily transmissions of ILI and GI from eClinicalWorks practices on X
Surveillance days the practice operates
Hub data Daily transmissions in response to specific queries X

Salient data Medicaid claims X X

SHIN-NY Healthcare data from NYC facilities connected to a Regional X


(Pending) Health Information Organization (RHIO)

Primary Care
Information Project 8
The Hub Query Model of Data Collection

By borough, zip code, gender, age,


Send messages diagnosis, vital signs, medications, etc
Pull Data NO patient level data
3000 providers We can pull data/ask questions of the
3,000,000 patients EHRs such as:

EHR
How many patients in each borough have
EHR
practice
practice
1
EHR
practice
high blood pressure (or asthma, or) ?
500 2
EHR EHR
practice
499
practice
3
What % of women in the Bronx over the
age of 65 with diabetes have controlled
blood sugars?
EHR EHR
practice practice
4
Hub

EHR
practice
EHR
practice
What % of New Yorkers by zip code are
10 5
obese?
EHR EHR
practice practice
9 6
EHR EHR
practice practice
8 7

Primary Care
Information Project 9
Operationalizing Data

Assessment We help providers adopt


and implement EHRs
Over 9,055 providers
receiving EHR and
Meaningful Use CHCs Hospitals Practices
assistance

Practices send health care


quality data to us directly
from their EHR

Aggregate Data Hub


Daily & monthly data transmissions
PCIP Uses of Data
Quality Utilization Meaningful Population Syndromic
Assurance measures data Use Health data surveillance
We analyze that data
Data analysis for program evaluation Public Health
Feedback to providers monitoring
shared w/
Policy Pay for Performance programs
external DOH
Development Public Health monitoring PH Partners We develop and implement
Data-driven resource allocation programs to improve health
Shared w/ internal DOH PH Partners care quality for NYC

Primary Care
Information Project 10
Feeding Data Back to Providers Quality-of-care
measurement

10 EHR Use Measures


What % are
eprescribing

10 Quality-of-care measures
Diabetes control
Flu-like Blood pressure control
Illness Smoking status
Mammography

Recommendations
Flu-like illness

Primary Care
Information Project 11
Impact of Provider Dashboards

Introduction of dashboards led to overall improvement across measures displayed on the


dashboard
Providers that reach out to PCIP for help improve their performance more quickly
Improvement across all quality measures was observed for low and higher performing
practices
In 2012, PCIP developed special edition dashboards focused on Immunization (sent to 639
providers) and Sexual Health (sent to 897 providers), delivered Take Care New York
dashboards to an average of 750 providers per month, and developed a Meaningful Use-
focused dashboard, which is currently being piloted with 145 providers.

On The Dashboard
Smoking Status Quit Intervention BP Control Cholesterol Screening
100%
100% 100% 100%

50% 50%
50% 50%

0% 0% 0%
0%
Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct
Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct
'09 '10 '10 '11 '11 '09 '10 '10 '11 '11 '09 '10 '10 '11 '11
'09 '10 '10 '11 '11

HbA1c Testing HIV Screening Sexual History


Breast Cancer Screening
100%
100% 100%
100%
50% 50% 50%
50%
0% 0%
Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct 0%
0%
'09 '10 '10 '11 '11 '09 '10 '10 '11 '11 Oct Mar Oct Mar Oct
Oct '09 Mar '10 Oct '10 Mar '11 Oct '11
'09 '10 '10 '11 '11

= at/above benchmark/average at time of first DB

Primary Care
Information Project 12
Influencing Policy (BMI Analysis)

Primary Care
Information Project 13
Using Health IT for Public Health Alerts (Metronidazole Recall)

Distributed patient specific alert accessible via CDSS right pane.

Primary Care
Information Project 14
Overall Progress - Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services Across 56
Practices

46.3
A1c Screening* 62.4

65.5
Body Mass Index recorded* 78.3

45.9
Blood Pressure Control* 55.0

45.6
Aspirin Therapy*
53.2

77.4
Smoking Status recorded* 83.9

27.8
Breast Cancer Screening*
32.3

20.5
Influenza Vaccination* 24.0

76.6
Cholesterol Control 77.9

31.3
Smoking Cessation Intervention
31.0

31.3
A1c Control 30.4 *p<.05

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0

Pre EHR Upgrade


% eligble patients recieving CPS Post EHR Upgrade

Primary Care
Information Project 15
Overall Progress in PCIP 2 year trend

80
74.8
% Average Practice Performance Rate

70 66.7

58.4 64.1
60 59.6
55.3 57.7

50
48.9 46.2
46.4
40
35.0

30
29.30

20
Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11
T1 T2 T3

Antithrombotic Tx BP Control in HTN Hemoglobin A1c Testing Smoking Cess Intervention

Time Antithrombotic Blood pressure Hemoglobin A1c Smoking Cessation


therapy control Testing Intervention
Oct 2009 (T1) 58.4 55.3 46.4 29.3
Oct 2010 (T2) 66.7 58.5 50.6 34.5
Oct 2011 (T3) 74.8 64.1 57.7 46.2
Difference between T1 and T2 8.3* 3.1 4.2 5.2
Difference between T2 and T3 8.1* 5.5* 7.1* 11.7*
Difference between T1 and T3 16.4** 8.8* 11.3* 16.9**
*: p<0.05; **: p<0.001

Primary Care
Information Project 16
Lessons Learned and Policy Obstacles

o Being first has advantages but also requires a lot of work, and lessons learned the hard way
o EHR vendor collaboration easy but provider interest was limited
o Locally hosted servers require regular maintenance and result in data transmission
issues, but are preferable when broadband access is limited
o Tablets better for patient engagement
o Lab Company buy-in essential for small practice integration and compendium updating

o Obstacles
o Health information exchange functionality in systems not standardized federally
o Payers not incentivized to subsidize adoption although main beneficiary
o Diversity of payer population reduces interest in supporting practices directly
o Quality Measures are a moving target
o HEDIS/QARR, PQRS, Meaningful Use

Primary Care
Information Project 17
Learning Collaboration

o Large practice learning collaborative

o NYC REACH Resource Library

o NYC REACH wiki: http://nycreach.org/reach_wiki/index.php/Main_Page

o Regional Extension Center Health Information Technology Resource Center


(HITRC)

o www.HealthITxChange.org

Primary Care
Information Project 18

You might also like