You are on page 1of 12

SPED 743

Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

Team Members (Initials):


1. ___JK____________________________
2. _____MO__________________________
3. _____RW_______________________
4. _____CP__________________________

Coach or Instructor: ____Royer____________________________

Step 5: Testing the Intervention

Directions: Complete step give, see notes in RED.


Note:
1. *Shaded rows are not required for SPED 743, but are recommended as regular practices.
2. You may elect to proceed further in the process and withdrawal (B2), or withdrawal and
reintroduce the intervention (A2-B2) as time permits.

Check when Item


completed
x Implement Intervention

x Collect Treatment Integrity data daily (teacher perspective) with IOA for
25% of sessions (outside team observer).
(Posted)

x Collect Min of 5 data points (behavior measurement same behavior and


measurement system as baseline) with 25% IOA [Report as number of
sessions, % of sessions, and actual IOA %]
(Posted)

X How many intervention data points did your collect?


(Posted)
5_ data points

x How many intervention data points included IOA?


(Posted)
_2_ pts with
IOA
What was your IOA for intervention?
100 % (Posted)
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

x Graph your intervention data.


(Post for coaches review and for support for deciding when to withdrawal
the intervention)

Withdrawal of the intervention with at least 3 data points (1 IOA)*Note


phase change decisions for each phase are guided by student
performance on variables measured
(Posted)

Complete Treatment Integrity Form


(daily by interventionist [teacher] 25% IOA)
(Posted)

Graph withdrawal data


(Post for coaches review)

Reintroduce the intervention.

Collect Treatment Integrity data daily (teacher perspective) with IOA for
25% of sessions (outside team observer).
(Posted)

Collect Min of 3 data points (behavior measurement same behavior and


measurement system throughout all phases) with 25% IOA [Report as
number of sessions, % of sessions, and actual IOA %]
(Posted)

Plan for follow up data collection to assess maintenance. HO 6 and 6.1


(Posted)
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

x Work with your coaches to complete behavior intervention plan and graphed
data to share with teacher and parents
(Posted)

x Conduct final check of ethical considerations HO 14


(Posted)

x After reviewing final graph, assess POST social validity. HO 12.2 Teacher
and HO 13.2 Student
(Posted)

x Complete and turn this checklist into your coach.

Suggested Readings
1. In the Beyond Behavior Special Issues, read the method, results, and discussion section
of articles 2-4 to see how the intervention was designed, implemented, and evaluated

2. Read the following chapters in

Umbreit, J., Ferro, J., Liaupsin, C., & Lane, K. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment
and function-based intervention: An effective, practical approach. Upper Saddle River,
N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
a. Chapter 10 to learn how to test the intervention
b. Chapter 13 to learn how to monitor the intervention and analyze intervention outcomes

Step 5 Tips:
1. Be sure you use an experimental design to make certain you can actually demonstrate a
function relation between the introduction of the intervention and changes in student
performance.

2. Phase changes are determine by examining data (e.g., stability, level, and trend) and are
not determined by the amount of time a student spends in each phase.

3. Phase changes should not occur before or after breaks in the school year calendar.

4. Be certain to collect treatment integrity data with each introduction of the intervention.
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

5. The post-intervention social validity measures are completed by stakeholders after the
intervention has been tested and the outcomes (e.g., graph and other data) have been shared with
and explained to the stakeholders.

6. When you complete HO 6.1, remember it will be used by the current and future teachers.
Be certain to include a blank copy of the treatment integrity form for future use as well as a
completed graph showing the complete intervention outcomes.

Observations

Observation #1

Student: BO Observer: M. Odom

Setting: Home Date: 8/10/16

Behavior: B.O. seeks attention from sibling by invading personal space (laying on top of, pulling, etc.)
and by teasing her with personal items (unattended toys belonging to the sibling, blanket belonging to
the sibling).

Start: 6:05pm Stop: 6:15pm

10min: 30-s intervals

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- - - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - + - -

+ = occurrence

-= nonoccurrence Summary: Behavior occurred during 3/20 = 15% of the intervals

Observation #2

Student: BO Observer: M. Odom

Setting: Home Date: 8/12/16

Behavior: B.O. seeks attention from sibling by invading personal space (laying on top of, pulling, etc.)
and by teasing her with personal items (unattended toys belonging to the sibling, blanket belonging to
the sibling).
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

Start: 6:55pm Stop: 7:05pm

10min: 30-s intervals

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- - - - - + + - - - - - - - - - - - - -

+ = occurrence

-= nonoccurrence Summary: Behavior occurred during 2/20 = 10% of the intervals

Observation #3

Student: BO Observer: M. Odom

Setting: Home Date: 8/14/16

Behavior: B.O. seeks attention from sibling by invading personal space (laying on top of, pulling, etc.)
and by teasing her with personal items (unattended toys belonging to the sibling, blanket belonging to
the sibling).

Start: 6:00pm Stop: 6:10pm

10min: 30-s intervals

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

+ = occurrence

-= nonoccurrence Summary: Behavior occurred during 1/20 = 5% of the intervals

Observation #4

Student: BO Observer: (1) M.Odom & (2) A.Odom

Setting: Home Date: 8/16/16


SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

Behavior: B.O. seeks attention from sibling by invading personal space (laying on top of, pulling, etc.)
and by teasing her with personal items (unattended toys belonging to the sibling, blanket belonging to
the sibling).

Start: 6:23pm Stop: 6:33pm

10min: 30-s intervals

Observer 1:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - -

Observer 2:

+=
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- - - - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - -
occurrence

-= nonoccurrence Summary: Behaviors occurred during 2/20 = 10% of the intervals

IOA: 20/20 x 100 = 100%

Observation #5

Student: BO Observer: (1) M.Odom & (2) A.Odom

Setting: Home Date: 8/17/16

Behavior: B.O. seeks attention from sibling by invading personal space (laying on top of, pulling, etc.)
and by teasing her with personal items (unattended toys belonging to the sibling, blanket belonging to
the sibling).

Start: 6:13pm Stop: 6:23pm

10min: 30-s intervals

Observer 1:
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - -

Observer 2:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - -

+ = occurrence

-= nonoccurrence Summary: Behaviors occurred during 2/20 = 10% of the intervals

IOA: 20/20 x 100 = 100%

Graphed Data
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

HO 14 Ethics Checklist

Ethical Consideration Explain how each consideration was


addressed in the FBA and BIP

Is the intervention warranted? Yes. The target behavior interferes with B.O. s
ability to engage in cooperative play with her
(Does the target behavior interfere with the sister.
individuals ability to learn new skills, to
participate in activities, or does it diminish
potential for community integration?)

Was the student interviewed and results Yes. The student was interviewed so that we
considered in designing the BIP? Why or why can develop a meaningful intervention.
not?

Were the interventions selected Yes. We taught the replacement behavior and
systematically? What Method did you use? improved the environment.

Did the interventions follow from the FBA? Yes. We thoroughly understood the function of
Explain the behavior before agreeing to an
intervention.

Did the intervention include a replacement Yes, the replacement behavior was to ask to
behavior to increase a positive skill? What is join in play rather than pull her sister away
the replacement behavior and how is it from activities. It builds positive
connected to the FBA? What skill does it communication skills.
build?

Does the intervention address problems in the No. The behavior is not occurring in the
classroom environment? Why or why not? classroom environment.

Does the intervention target a socially Yes. It is socially acceptable to understand that
significant goal? What is it? Why do you think individuals are not always going to respond to
its socially significant? your approaches positively. The replacement
behavior teaches her how to cope with the
rebuttal in a positive manner.
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

Does the procedure stigmatize the student No.


socially?

Does the intervention provide opportunities Yes. She has the opportunity to do the
for the student to make choices? Explain. replacement behavior to receive positive
reinforcement.

Does the intervention include an aversive or No.


restrictive procedure? Explain.

Were incentives selected based on the Yes. The student had a need to gain access to
students wants and needs? Explain. attention, we took this into consideration
when planning the intervention.

Did you address the integrity of Yes. The intervention was routinely performed
implementation (i.e., treatment integrity)? by parent each instance the data was collected.
Explain.

Was there systematic and scheduled review of Yes.


the data?

If the target behavior did not improve, was N/A


additional information collected to assist with
revision? Describe how the decision was made
to continue or change the BIP.

Was the plan revised in a timely manner? N/A


SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

12.2 Post Intervention

Adapted Version of the Intervention Rating Profile-15


The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information that will aid in the selection of future classroom
interventions. These interventions will be used by teachers of children with identified needs. Please circle the
number which best describes your agreement or disagreement with each statement.

Strongly Disagree Slightly Slightly Agree Strongly


disagree disagree agree agree

1. This was an acceptable 1 2 3 4 5 6


intervention for the childs
needs.

2. Most teachers would find 1 2 3 4 5 6


this intervention appropriate
for children with similar
needs.

3. This intervention proved 1 2 3 4 5 6


effective in supporting the
childs needs.

4. I would suggest the use of 1 2 3 4 5 6


this intervention to other
teachers.

5. The childs needs were 1 2 3 4 5 6


severe enough to warrant use
of this intervention.

6. Most teachers would find 1 2 3 4 5 6


this intervention suitable for
the needs of this child.

7. I would be willing to use 1 2 3 4 5 6


this intervention in the
classroom setting.

8. This intervention did not 1 2 3 4 5 6


result in negative side effects
for the child.
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

9. This intervention would be 1 2 3 4 5 6


appropriate for a variety of
children.

10. This intervention was 1 2 3 4 5 6


consistent with those I have
used in classroom settings.

11. The intervention was a fair 1 2 3 4 5 6


way to handle the childs
needs.

12. This intervention was 1 2 3 4 5 6


reasonable for the needs of the
child.

13. I liked the procedures used 1 2 3 4 5 6


in this intervention.

14. This intervention was a 1 2 3 4 5 6


good way to handle this
childs needs.

15. Overall, this intervention 1 2 3 4 5 6


was beneficial for the child.
Comments:
SPED 743
Completion Checklist
Step 5: Testing the Intervention
Team Number ___6__

13.2 POST

Adapted Version of the Childrens Intervention Rating Profile


I agree I do not agree

1. The program we will use sounds fair. X

2. I think my parent will be too harsh on me. X

3. Being in this program may cause problems with my sister. X

4. There are better ways to teach me. X

5. This program will help other kids, too. X

6. I think I will like being in this program. X

7. I think being in this program will help me do better in school. X


Comments: _B.O. really enjoyed the alternative attention of help parent with dinner
preparation. She stated that she felt like she was making big girl choices and doing a
good job. She also stated that it was important to be a good listener to other peoples
feelings when you ask them something.

You might also like