Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Students computers
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following Australian Professional Standards for
Teachers. Only standards directly addressed in Designing Teaching & Learning that are
relevant to this assignment have been included. However, this does not mean the other
standards are irrelevant to lesson planning and evaluation more generally.
1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
12345
Comments: There are no particular strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander students. However, the lesson takes into consideration several learning methods
suitable for different types of learners
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full
range of abilities
12345
Comments:
There is no differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the
full range of activities
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model
elements.
Evaluation score refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
12345
Comments: The task requires sustained focus on key concepts and ideas and requires
clear articulation of the relationships between and among concepts. Learners are required
to remember types of texts and to critically analyse two speeches and to develop their
communication skills to write texts that inform, persuade and engage
1.5 Metalanguage
12345
Comments: This learning program requires learners to make substantial reference to
language and how it works. For instance they are required to develop strong communication
skills so that they can develop their own speeches in order to inform, persuade, and engage.
2.2 Engagement
12345
Comments: Most of the lesson is engaging, as it requires learners active participation. For
instance learners are actively involved throughout the lesson
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
12345
Comments: Learners background knowledge is elicited, is connected to the substance of
the task, and includes connection to out-of-school background knowledge. The learning
tasks require students to remember different types of texts already learned.
3.4 Inclusivity
12345
Comments: Inclusivity is not specifically mentioned in the lesson plan at all.
3.5 Connectedness
12345
Comments: Group and class discussions attempts to connect classroom learning with real
life examples. Furthermore, the class activity and the homework contribute for discussions
in the connectedness framework.
3.6 Narrative
12345
Comments: Two examples of speeches are reviewed and analyzed individually and in
groups.
Student: Complete
the quiz to the best
of their ability.
2 Give the answers to Teacher: Reads the student
the learners so that answers
mins they can mark their
own quizzes so they Student: Mark their
can self asses their own work and self
knowledge asses their
knowledge.
5 Provide students Teacher: Explains student
with a short amount whats the activity is
mins of time to research about and guides the
Martin Luther King jr. students.
and other influencing
personality of their Student: Do online
choice, so that they research using the
can share their provided computers.
findings with the (can work in pairs if
class. not enough
computers).
Student: present
their speeches in
front of the class
12 Facilitate a class Teacher: takes notes students
discussion where and gives feedback
mins students share what to students.
they liked about the
speeches presented Students: present
by their class mates their speeches in
and reflections about front of class
the effectives of
speeches
5 Get students to Teacher: Teachers
complete a short ask students to
mins quiz to asses their complete a short
learning about the quiz to asses their
most critical learning.
elements of an
engaging, Student: Complete
persuasive and the quiz to best of
informative speech. their ability.
Reflection
This assignment was very helpful because modifying this lesson plan developed my critical
and analytical skills.
In modifying this lesson plan I realised how important is to set learning expectations clear at
the beginning of the lesson so learners can self-assess their progress and also how
important is for the teacher to assess learners progress at the end of the lesson plan so that
constant improvements can be made to the lesson plan. While the original lesson plan was
comprehensive it was missing some important elements such as setting clear expectations
and the assessment of learners progress. I also wanted to modify the learner plan in a way
so learners can have more control over the content they are studying.
To do that I chose to give learners the flexibility to choose a well known personality and
watch one of their speeches so that they can reflect and share with their findings with the
class. The purpose of this is to motivate learners participation and engagement by allowing
them to research and analyse a personality of their choice. In addition, this also helps to
develop learners general culture and critical thinking skills by being exposed to several
different speeches and contextual backgrounds.
On the other hand, I also modified the learning plan so learners will have the opportunity to
prepare a short five minutes speech about any topic they are passionate about and to
encourage them to participate by presenting the speech in front of their class.
Overall, I have found this assignment a lot more challenging than I originally thought I would,
but in completing this lesson plan, I think I have more of an idea of what is needed to
construct a valuable lesson for when I am teaching and it has also allowed me.
Academic Justification
While the original lesson plan was comprehensive and had some very strong points, it can
be improved with regards to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers and the
NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide. The main weakness of the lesson plan was that it
does not provide students with clear expectations of whats expected of them and the
second main weakness is that students learning is not being assessed. (Australian Institute
for Teaching and School Leadership, 2017)
Australian Professional Standards 4.2, 4.4, 5.1, and 5.2 are addressed by setting up clear
expectations about whats required of students. Furthermore, these standards are also
addressed by asking students to complete two quizzes. One before starting the lesson, to
evaluate their knowledge and another quiz at the end of the session to assess students
learning progress. (Education NSW, 2016) In addition, standard 4.2 is addressed by giving
clear instructions to students about WHS rules and regulations and by showing them what
the procedure is in case of an emergency, exits are clearly showed and a meeting point is
established to that everybody knows what to do in the unlikely case of an emergency. (NSW
Department of Education and Training, 2007)
The NSW QTM Classroom practice guide is also addressed in points 1.2, 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 and
2.6. For instance, engagement is improved by allowing students to select their own learning
material, also students are more engaged as they are asked to actively participate and get
involved with the tasks. By allowing some degree of flexibility, critical thinking and
engagement are improved. Finally, by setting clear expectations and assessments, the
instructor and learners can evaluate their progress and this is positive as it contributes to
continuously improve the learning plan. (Thompson & Harbaugh, 2012)
By adding two examinations at the beginning and the end of the program students can better
assess their knowledge and this is positive, as learners can know whether they are being
successful in their learning and the teacher can also make a more accurate judgment about
the progress of students. Overall, the changes made to the learning plan were positive and
improve the lesson plan as it includes WHS, learners expectations and assessment
instruments. (Ingvarson, 2014)
References
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Teacher Standards.
Retrieved August 2, 2017, from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
Education NSW. (2016). Aboriginal Education Policy | Policy library [HTML]. Retrieved July
26, 2017, from https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/policies/aboriginal-
education-and-training-policy
Ingvarson, L. (2014). Why we dont have the worlds best, or most respected, teachers.
Retrieved August 2, 2017, from http://theconversation.com/why-we-dont-have-the-
worlds-best-or-most-respected-teachers-29204
NSW Department of Education and Training. (2007). Teacher guide - Quality teaching.
Retrieved August 2, 2017, from http://lrrpublic.cli.det.nsw.edu.au/lrrSecure/Sites/
Web/fire_challenge/fire_challenge/fch_content/teach_04.htm
Thompson, G., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2012). The Effects of NAPLAN: Teacher perceptions of
the impact of NAPLAN on pedagogy and curriculumi. Retrieved from https://
eprints.qut.edu.au/86167/1/86167.pdf