Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXAMINERS GUIDE
The course examiner who marks the Assessments is expected to use their experience and judgment as
certified auditors and experienced trainers bound by the ISC Code of Conduct. The marking
examiner is to give due consideration to logical argued solutions that may not conform precisely
to the typical solution and other answers may be acceptable.
Assessment Criteria
The participants are allowed to refer to the AS 4801/OHSAS 18001 standard and
course notes.
ASSESSMENT 1
Time: 45 minutes
Objective:
To identify hazards, assess the risks and evaluate the effectiveness of the control measures in
the context of applicable legal requirements in a chemical store located within a paper
manufacturing company.
Site:
This store contains various flammable & toxic chemical substances in drums. Both
manual handling and forklifts are used for transportation of Drums. Activities involve
receiving, storage and issuing of drums to production on a daily basis.
Task: Using the format provided, for each activity as detailed (Receiving, Storage and
Issuance to production), complete the following:
Receiving:
1.Mix up of flammable and toxic 1. May cause fire, emergency situation 1. Separation of chemicals from those that reacts from each other ;
substance due to leakage. training of personnel involved in this operation.
2. Transfer of substance from the 2. Injury to the employees, exposure or toxic 2. Use of Personal protective Equipment, Trained personnel. Additional
delivery van to receiving area. substance, flammable substance may trigger fire inspection, Use of check sheet to ensure necessary steps are taken
before the commencement of transfer.
3. Damage or corrosion of container 3. Spillage, fire, exposure to human, 3. Periodic visual inspection using a check sheet ; kept in a protected
storage; May provide external protection on its container using rubber
etc. Availability of MSDS
4. exposure or inhalation to such 4. May cause health and safety problem 4. Use of PPEs ; Stored in a separate area from employees; Use of
substances exhaust in order to lessen accumulation of chemicals. Testing if
applicable.
Storage:
1. Inappropriate storage conditions 1. May trigger fire and emergency condition 1. Room temperature or condition as flammable substance may require
adequate ventilation. Monitoring of temperature requirement.
2. accumulation or presence of hazardous 2. Respiratory or health problem, fire and 2. Exhaust fan in order to lessen accumulation of fumes, gases; proper
and flammable substance emergency situation ventilation. Monitoring and testing as appropriate.
3. inappropriate location where presence 3. Fire and emergency situation 3. Rehabilitation or use of appropriate storage area for chemicals; use
of potential sparks, electricity tripping of anti static bulb; regular inspection on electrical wires. (Electrical
may be adjacent to the substance as well testing and tagging)
as exposure to human
4. spillage due to corrosion or accident 4. safety, fire and emergency situation 4. First in first out system; regular inspection be made on the container;
use of plastic containers or appropriate container to prevent corrosion;
elastic paint against slippery on the floor.
5. Access to storage area by personnel 5. Safety and health 5. Use of PPEs; only authorized and trained personnel be allowed
being exposed thereto inside the storage area; Use monitoring equipment prior to entering the
area. Availability of MSDS
Issuance to production 1. Accidental spillage that may cause injury to 1. Training on manual transfer; only authorized personnel may be
1. Manual handling exposure to chemicals allowed to manually transfer chemicals; Designate the route of transfer
to minimize potential accident.
2. Injury due to its normal operation such as over 2. Designate a route of forklift operation that employees be aware of its
2. Forklift operation running, bumps etc. designation; Only trained and qualified personnel may be allowed to
use the forklift
3. Slips and fall 3. Regular maintenance of the forklift; Visual inspection on its route if
3. Oil spillage from the forklift there were presence of oil.
4. Respiratory or health problem, fire and 4. Use of PPEs; use of exhaust fan ; enough consumption of chemicals
4. exposure to the flammable and toxic emergency situation. be delivered to the production area. Employees awareness to its
substance. exposure.
5. Endangered employees health and safety due to 5. Post the health and safety policy; Post safety and health precautions
5. Failure to communicate the effects of lack of information. in the strategic location to be reminded of their health and safety;
each chemical reactivity upon exposure Monitor the records of training made to cover those that were not
to humans. trained. Availability of MSDS
6. Slips and fall, health and safety 6. Inspection on its container; qualified and trained personnel be
6.Accidental spillage inside production allowed to move the chemicals inside the production
area
ASSESSMENT 2
Time : 30 minutes
Score : 10 Marks ( Acceptable score 80%)
Your task: To submit an individual report for the following incident investigation.
The following incident has taken place in a factory. Review the information and evidence
gathered during the investigation and determine the immediate causes and root cause
(which may include both the management system and organizational elements) that
resulted in the incident.
If any of the information is inadequate and you believe it could be a possible cause of the
accident, include it in the root cause column and highlight it. Include what additional
evidence you would need to gather.
1. Use the format (Table 1) provided for your reporting. Include the proposed corrective
actions needed in order to prevent the incident from recurring.
(6 Marks)
2. In addition, also identify any other two non conformances of the current management
system related to AS/NZS 4801 in Table 2
( 4 Marks)
Incident:
At 14:00hrs, a factory worker operating a stamping press got her fingers caught between
the stamping press tools. The operator next to her noticed the accident but did not know
what to do. It took more than 20 minutes before someone could apply first aid to her and
contact the emergency services.
At the time of the accident, the operator was on overtime duty. She had been working for
the previous 4 days consecutively for an average of 1.5 hours of overtime per day.
The two-hand switch for operating the press had been disengaged to allow her to feed
the parts into the press by hand while operating the press by a foot pedal. 2 out of 5
machines in that department have the same machine alterations. According to the
operator, this was done 2 weeks prior to the accident by the maintenance department to
overcome the problem with securing larger parts during the stamping operation.
While interviewing another operator, it was highlighted that there had been similar
incidents of near misses/hits in the days prior to the accident. The process of reporting
involves filling in a complicated 2-page form (which staff members are reluctant to
complete) or reporting the incident directly to the supervisor. Since, past experience has
The supervisor in the department claims that he is not aware of the modification made to
the machine and believes that this was modified by the operators to achieve the incentive
offered by top management for meeting productivity targets. Maintenance records
indicated that time was spent working on the machines 2 weeks ago but the maintenance
staff member responsible was not available at the time of investigation. The relevant
drawings for the machines do not show any changes made to the machines.
Records of general safety training showed that all staff had been provided with a general
safety awareness session. However the need for the two-hand switch has not been
included in the safety awareness or communication sessions.
A general risk assessment for all the activities in the company was conducted by the
safety committee, however, no specific job safety analysis was conducted involving the
relevant staff from each operation and machine.
There were no first aid trained staff personnel covering the overtime operation.
The current OHS Policy is 5 years old when the press operation was not part of the
existing business.
While the safety committee was tasked to ensure legal compliance, it is unclear who is
responsible for the updating and communication of legal requirements to those concerned.
There is no specific person appointed formally to be responsible for the management
system.
There is currently no objective or plan set for improving existing safety procedures or
practices. No commitment has been made by the top management in the policy towards
continual improvement.
2. No investigation/report generated for the accident and near 4.5.2 2. Provide a system by creating a procedure to define responsibility
misses days prior to the incident. and authority for investigating accident, incident and the like.
Records must also be kept.
3. There was no audit made based on OHS. 4.5.4 3. Train personnel and conduct internal audit to monitor the progress
and effectively of the operation in general.
4. Agenda and records of management meeting does not 4.6 4. Necessary information such as items from safety committee should
include any items from the safety committee. be included in the management review. Agenda should be clearly
stipulated and evidenced through its record.
5. No clear indication what the reporting structure for the 4.4.1 5. There should be a clear distinction of individual roles and
safety committee. responsibility and authority. Who is to report to whom and up to what
extend should a person act in his own behalf.
6. Relevant drawings for the machines shows no changes 4.4.5 6. In case where there authorized changes made such as on drawings,
made. current version must be is expected to be available.
7. The need for the two hand switch has not been included in 4.4.2 7. All those activities that has an impact on health and safety should
the safety awareness or communication sessions. conduct awareness and communication. Hazard analysis should be
conducted to determine areas where there should be necessary
training be done to minimize if not to eliminate accidents or injuries.
8. No specific job safety analysis was conducted involving 4.4.6 8. There should be safety analysis to be conducted in order to identify
relevant staff from each operation and machine. those operation and activities associated with risk where control
measures needs to be applied.
12. No specific person appointed formally to be responsible for 4.4.1 12. There should be a specific person(s) responsible for
the management system. implementing the management system. It is expected that
member of top management be the management representative.
13. No current objectives or plan set for improving existing 4.3.3 The organization should set a current objectives or plan in order
safety procedure or practices to improve their existing safety practices. This will be the basis
to determine if they are improving.
14. No commitment in the policy by top management to 4.2 There should be a commitment in the policy especially by the
continual improvement top management where he has the power to control the
company towards the direction of continual improvement. It is
one essential element of the standard.
Time : 60 minutes
Score 20: Acceptable 80%
Q1 Identify at least one scientific method for risk assessment for the identified hazard?
(1Mark) (Must be correct)
Answer: FMEA (Failure Modes and Effect analysis), HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study),
5X5 method, Tie Bar or Line Risk assessment tool.
Q3 Using 5X5 method, for the any two hazards identified, assess the risk and control the risk using
hierarchy of risk control. (4 Marks) (Minimum acceptable 2 Marks)
Scenario: NMB Company is a paint manufacturing company. This involves the use of hazardous
chemicals. MSDS reveals that some of the chemicals require special handling and storage conditions
because of its effect on health and safety of the user.
Chemical Usage: The production is using large quantity of the chemicals. The chemical is transported on a
daily basis from the chemical storage to the production area. Evidence verified indicated 3 of the 50
production operators suffered from the irritation or occupational asthma due to exposure to such chemicals.
Handling: Records reveals that there were 2 accidents (Slips) and 1 near miss occurred in the past 3 months
when transporting the chemicals to the production area. The cause of accident was the oil spill on the floor
occurred during maintenance on the machine. The Transported slipped on the floor where oil spill has
occurred. The victim requires first aid attention on these accidents. These accident results to chemical
spillage 100 meters away where combustible materials are being stored.
Answer:
Hazards Risk Severity Risk Code Hierarchy of Risk Control and Proposed
identified Involved (Conseq (highest risk Actions
(Likelihoo uence) code is the
d) highest risk
involved)
Chemical use 5 4 or 3 20 or 15 Urgent/Planned
1. Find an alternative that is more chemical
friendly for use.
2. Improve the exhaust system to minimize
exposure.
3. Conduct training, awareness seminar to be
aware of its use.
4. Provide PPEs to all user.
5.Regular Health check ups
Slipping on 5 4 to 2 20 , 15, 10 Urgent/Planned
the floor 1. Improve the area by providing non slippery
floor
2. Post several safety reminders before coming
to such area.
3. Re-routing to avoid slips in the area.
Regular inspection/safety checklist after
maintenance of the machines
Potential for 1 5 or 4 5 or 4 1. Isolate the combustible material.
fire due to 3. Regular safety inspection.
combustible
materials
Risk (Likelihood)
5 = Daily Occurrence or Very Likely to Occur/has occurred
4 = Weekly Occurrence or Probable
3 = Monthly Occurrence or Possible
2 = Quarterly Occurrence or Remote
1 = Annual Occurrence or Improbable
Severity (Consequence)
5 = Fatal outcome
4 = Major Injury (Reportable)
3 = Two Day Injury
2 = Minor Injury (first aid only)
1 = Accident or incident where no injury occurs.
5 10 15 20 25 Immediate
4 8 12 16 20 Urgent
Risk 3 6 9 12 15 Planned
2 4 6 8 10 None
1 2 3 4 5
Severity
Q4. Identify what can be the possible effect on personal safety if we had an omission on OHS for
Health Surveillance (4.5.1.2). What should be done to verify if it is accurate?
(2 Marks) (Must be correct)
Answer:
Possible effect in case of omission: Health hazard to Employees. The organization will not be able
to determine/identify any health changes that may be due to the occupational exposure to a hazard
by an Individual who might be affected by it.
Q6. Identify what are two (2) potential organizational barriers to the effective implementation of
an organizational OHS system . How might these be overcome?
(2 Marks) (Must be correct)
Answer: The potential organizational barriers that may arise against effective implementation of
the system are Man, Machine, method, money or material . Such barriers may be over come by
1. Man The organization may eliminate by conducting appropriate trainings to ensure all its
personnel are aware of the OHS system in place and helps to the effective implementation of
OHS.
2. Machine The organization should identify the machines, equipment that poses hazards to
health and safety of its employees and thereafter initiate necessary action such as providing
machine guarding, confinement, work permit system and other methods.
3. Method Some work instructions may need amendment where, records reveal health and
safety matters were being jeopardized. This may need further studies to find out the best
possible method of workmanship standard that may eliminate hazards on health and safety.
Once the method is identifed there should be proper implementation to be effective.
4. Materials Materials per se or items utilized by its employees, may on itself be a danger, it is
necessary to determine the chemical composition or the component being used if it poses
danger to the health and safety of the personnel being exposed to the materials.
5. Money Top management need to ensure sufficient financial resources to implement the
system.
Q7. Identify, at least two, the appropriate verification activities in an accident involving chemical
spillage (Forklift spears a 100L drum of sodium hydroxide) in an organization.
(2 Marks) (Must be correct)
Answer : Conduct an immediate investigation to determine the root cause.
Initiate necessary corrective and preventive action
Record any changes in the OHMS procedures and inform all interested parties any changes
being made.
Follow up actions shall be conducted after implementation to ensure the actions are
effectively implemented.
Q8. Identify two pieces of evidence that an organization might have and you would look as an
auditor, to satisfy the requirements of the clause 4.4.7 Emergency preparedness and response of
AS/NZS 4801/OHS 18001 (Must be correct)
( 2 Marks)
Answer:
Responsibility for control of emergency situations
Training in emergency procedures
Regular rehearsals of fire drill
Evidence of regular inspections of Emergency equipment exit signs and alarm system.
Essential legislative requirements
Q9 List at least 4 key Acts and related acts in Mining Industry for OHS in your state/country
(4 Marks) (Minimum acceptable 2 marks)
Answer: (The answer will be based on the location of the training course, as the regulations
change from one state to another and from one country to another.)
It is the responsibility of the examiner to forward applicable list of acts/legislations to HO, before
conducting the examination.
Q10 As an Auditor, what type of objective evidence (List at least two) are required in relation to
compliance with the legislative requirements for chemical handling.
(1Mark) (Must be correct)
Answer : Evidence of
Notification/registration with authorities and the associated emergency authority etc.
Compliance with regulatory requirements.
Availability of MSDS
ASSESSMENT 4
(0.5 Score for correct Clause and 0.5 score for correct Conforming/Non conforming status).
1 Score each for multiple choice.
The following 15 findings have been reported as a result of an audit of a paper manufacturing
plant. Determine the most applicable clause of AS/NZS 4801:2001 or OHSAS 18001:1999 that
apply to the following findings and indicate if it is conforming or non conforming finding.
Select the most suitable answer for each of the following questions: answer in red color