You are on page 1of 3

Dutertes tirade against international institution

Dutertes unprecedented way of governing the country resulted to get the notice of

International Association whereas the Philippines is tangled on its affiliation. The Presidents

defiance act towards the International body instigated more tension and created side by side

reports that circulated around the world delineating how Duterte administrate the way he wanted

to the Philippines. KI1 and KI2 as being part of the media practitioners discoursed the issue of

Duterte and the former US President Barack Obama of the allegedly profanities of the

Philippine President against him, but it was indistinct to everyone if Dutertes either pointing out

the curse to the US President or it is just his way of expression. Next occurrence that KI1

deliberated is when President Rodrigo Duterte called out United Nations (UN) as Inutile and

even treated the organization to withdraw the membership of the Philippines from it, and gave

European Union a middle finger gesture, which is presented on the V1.2, 0:18-0:21. It is when

the international institutions, the EU and the UN with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

interfered Dutertes campaign on War on Drugs thats depriving individual right. The V1.2,

0:18-21 accurately exhibited on how the president gives a vicious term with the UN Secretary-

General Ban Ki-moon for obstructing his anti-drug campaign.

The Presidents lack of solemnity in his statements

If someones do not know how to distinguish President Dutertes playful act, then he can

either mislead him, or he will get a bunch surprise of criticisms from his avid supporters. Media

these days are often regarded as biased because they are exposing the presidents confidential

deeds toward his way of ruling the country, which is their primary job, to disseminate factual

information. The media was once commanded by the presidents administration to use their
creative imagination in interpreting Dutertes remarks and asked them not to take it literally on

what was the president is saying, and instead use it to identify whether the president is joking or

not. On the other hand, KI1, specified that it is hard to tell whether the president is serious or

not, and there was even a time he said, that the president likes to tell an anecdotes during his

speeches and there was a time that the president said that he talked to God. But after several days

of the release of the news information, Duterte withdraw his statement that he talked to God

during his flight from an official trip in Japan to Manila in October, 2016. He even teased the

Media for being foolish of believing his joke which can be shown on V1.4, 0:56- 1:31.

Corresponds to KI1s shared case in point, FB1 gave another instance that requires medias

creative imagination , she cited the time where President Duterte catcalled one of the

journalists during his press conference, and it resulted to gain various views and opinions from

the Press. However, KI1 articulated that whatever Duterte says is official, most especially when

he delivers it publicly.

Disturbing death counts of Dutertes campaign on War on Drugs


Its quite alarming to hear or see about the numerous killings of alleged drug suspects and

persons involved or even the innocent victims of the presidents primary campaign of fighting

against drugs thats putrefying the country. Although the campaign aims a good intention for the

betterment of the country, the implementation seemed to be immoral. As being the watchdogs of

the society, the journalists are tied up to report and disseminate the current issues in and outside

the country. The said killings earned up multiple considerations all over the world that expound

the spitefulness of the Philippine authority in terms of the human rights violation. The result of

occurrence stimulates the current administration to put the blame on the media for ostensibly

disseminating erroneous number of data of the drug slayings in the country. The current
administration is imputing the media and its correspondents for exposing the current situation of

the side by side killings that allegedly giving it exaggerated interpretations that could tarnish

their reputation to the public. However, the media are merely doing their responsibility to inform

the people of the present thing happenings in the place that they are living.

You might also like