Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mental health outcomes for survivors of critical congenital heart abstract
disease (CHD) remain under-investigated. We sought to examine psychiatric disorders and
psychosocial functioning in adolescents with single ventricle CHD and to explore whether
patient-related risk factors predict dysfunction.
METHODS: This cohort study recruited 156 adolescents with single ventricle CHD who
underwent the Fontan procedure and 111 healthy referents. Participants underwent
comprehensive psychiatric evaluation including a clinician-rated psychiatric interview and
parent- and self-report ratings of anxiety, disruptive behavior, including attention-deficit/
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and depressive symptoms. Risk factors for dysfunction
included IQ, medical characteristics, and concurrent brain abnormalities.
RESULTS: Adolescents with single ventricle CHD had higher rates of lifetime psychiatric
diagnosis compared with referents (CHD: 65%, referent: 22%; P < .001). Specifically, they
had higher rates of lifetime anxiety disorder and ADHD (P < .001 each). The CHD group
scored lower on the primary psychosocial functioning measure, the Childrens Global
Assessment Scale, than referents (CHD median [interquartile range]: 62 [5466], referent:
85 [7390]; P < .001). The CHD group scored worse on measures of anxiety, disruptive
behavior, and depressive symptoms. Genetic comorbidity did not impact most psychiatric
outcomes. Risk factors for anxiety disorder, ADHD, and lower psychosocial functioning
included lower birth weight, longer duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, lower
intellectual functioning, and male gender.
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with single ventricle CHD display a high risk of psychiatric
morbidity, particularly anxiety disorders and ADHD. Early identification of psychiatric
symptoms is critical to the management of patients with CHD.
NIH
TABLE 2 Operative and Medical History Characteristics of Adolescents With Single Ventricle CHD
Variable All (n = 156) No Genetic Abnormalities Genetic Abnormalities P
(n = 91) (n = 65)
Median (Range) or %
Operative characteristics
Age at operation 30 d 78 82 72 .17
Status at rst operation
Open procedure 59 65 51 .10
Duration of DHCA, if open, min 42 (0107) 45.5 (0107) 35 (070) .54
Duration of total support, if open, min 121 (43325) 124 (43325) 112 (45160) .01
Medical history
Norwood procedure 40 48 29 .02
Total number of operations .07
1 or 2 18 15 22
3 64 71 54
4 or 5 18 13 25
Total number of operative complications .67
0 15 18 12
15 67 65 71
6 17 18 17
Total number of catheterizations .57
1 or 2 11 11 11
35 69 71 65
6 21 18 25
Total number of catheterization complications .17
0 49 46 54
1 or 2 40 46 32
3 10 8 14
Seizure 15 12 18 .36
Any neurologic eventa 25 19 34 .04
Current ADHD treatment medication 10 10 9 >.99
Current other psychotropic medication 8 5 12 .15
History of any psychotropic medication 24 20 31 .13
P values were determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fishers exact test for categorical variables.
a Includes stroke, seizure, choreoathetosis, and meningitis.
disorders. Clinician ratings of with at least 1 lifetime psychiatric Adolescence is a key developmental
psychosocial dysfunction and diagnosis was higher in our cohort period for neuropsychiatric
psychiatric symptom severity were (35% d-TGA17 and 22% mixed changes36 and, for physically
higher in the CHD cohort than in CHD20 vs 65% single ventricle CHD). ill youth, is an opportunity for
referents. Furthermore, 85% of In adults with mixed CHD lesions, intervention before they transition
patients scored in the pathologic nearly 50% met diagnostic criteria to adult health care.3,37 The higher
range on the CGAS, indicating for a least 1 lifetime mood or anxiety prevalence of psychiatric disorders
substantial functioning difficulties in disorder, of whom 40% had never in our cohort has the potential to
different environments (eg, at home, received any psychiatric treatment.19 negatively influence their ability
at school, with peers). Compared with other CHD types, to assume responsibility for their
Similar to previous studies in which patients with single ventricle medical care, with potential life-
parents report greater frequencies CHD may be exposed to increased threating consequences.37 Whereas
of somatic, social, attention, and neurologic risks, which may affect neurodevelopmental outcomes are
internalizing difficulties,3335 our their long-term mental health status. generally better for CHD cohorts
cohort reported more anxiety and Their limited physical competence without genetic comorbidities,3
ADHD symptoms compared with relative to other CHD cohorts could the risk of psychiatric dysfunction
referents. Compared with previous further contribute to this heightened appears equally elevated in our
d-TGA17 and mixed types of CHD20 vulnerability by increasing the risk of cohort regardless of genetic
studies, the proportion of adolescents social isolation. abnormalities. Our findings suggest
that, given the high risk of psychiatric TABLE 5 Risk Factors of K-SADS-PL Lifetime Anxiety Disorder Diagnosis, ADHD Diagnosis, and CGAS
dysfunction, all patients with single Score in Adolescents With Single Ventricle CHD (n = 156)
ventricle CHD should be screened Outcome Risk Factor OR (95% CI) P
for psychiatric vulnerabilities in
K-SADS-PL lifetime diagnosis
childhood, and those at risk should Anxiety disorder Genetic abnormalities 1.2 (0.6 to 2.6) .64
be referred for treatment. Special Birth wt, per kg 0.45 (0.24 to 0.84) .01
attention to adolescent risk-taking Duration of DHCA, per min 1.01 (1.00 to 1.03) .04
behaviors (eg, substance abuse) ADHD Genetic abnormalities 1.0 (0.5 to 2.2) .90
Male 2.3 (1.1 to 4.8) .03
that might compromise their long-
Full-scale IQ, combineda 0.97 (0.95 to 0.99) .01
term cardiac prognosis is highly (95% CI)
recommended.37 CGAS score Genetic abnormalities 3.3 (6.0 to 0.5) .02
Age at assessment, per y 1.10 (0.42 to 1.79) .002
Regarding patient-related risk Full-scale IQ, combineda 0.19 (0.11 to 0.27) <.001
Age at operation 30 d 3.6 (6.8 to 0.4) .03
factors, our findings were in
accordance with previous evidence P values were determined by logistic regression for K-SADS-PL diagnoses and linear regression for CGAS scores. All
models were adjusted for family social status and genetic abnormalities. Coefcients for the intercept and family social
suggesting that few operative status are not shown. CI, condence interval; OR, odds ratio.
variables are correlated with a Models also included adjustment for type of full-scale IQ assessment.
REFERENCES
1. Loffredo CA. Epidemiology of 2. Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu and age distribution. Circulation.
cardiovascular malformations: R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital 2007;115(2):163172
prevalence and risk factors. Am J Med heart disease in the general 3. Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW,
Genet. 2000;97(4):319325 population: changing prevalence et al; American Heart Association
8. Hansen E, Poole TA, Nguyen V, et al. persistence of depressive symptoms in 30. Conners CK. Conners Rating Scales
Prevalence of ADHD symptoms in adolescents with CHD. Cardiol Young. Revised: Users Manual. North
patients with congenital heart disease. 2015;1:18 Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems;
Pediatr Int. 2012;54(6):838843 19. Kovacs AH, Saidi AS, Kuhl EA, et al. 1997
9. Gaynor JW, Ittenbach RF, Gerdes M, Depression and anxiety in adult 31. Kovacs M. Childrens Depression
et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes congenital heart disease: predictors Inventory: Technical Manual. North
in preschool survivors of the Fontan and prevalence. Int J Cardiol. Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems;
procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137(2):158164 1992
2014;147(4):12761282, discussion 20. Freitas IR, Castro M, Sarmento SL, 32. Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Wolnger RD.
12821283.e5 et al. A cohort study on psychosocial Multiple Comparisons and Multiple
10. Cassidy AR, White MT, DeMaso DR, adjustment and psychopathology in Tests Using SAS, 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS
Newburger JW, Bellinger DC. Executive adolescents and young adults with Institute; 2011
function in children and adolescents congenital heart disease. BMJ Open.
33. DeMaso DR, Rao SN, Hirshberg JS,
with critical cyanotic congenital heart 2013;3(1):e001138
Ibeziako PI. Heart disease. In: Shaw RJ,
disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 21. Evans AC; Brain Development DeMaso DR, eds. Textbook of Pediatric
2015;21(1):3449 Cooperative Group. The NIH MRI Psychosomatic Medicine. Washington,
11. Calderon J, Jambaqu I, Bonnet study of normal brain development. DC: American Psychiatric Publishing;
D, Angeard N. Executive functions Neuroimage. 2006;30(1):184202 2010:319328
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
/content/139/3/e20162241.full.html