Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*Correspondence for
packing machine and detail description of equipment parts like
Author: unwinding station, forming station, sealing station, heating station,
cooling station, feeder, lidding material and labeling through
* Dr. P. Ramasubramaniyan,
packaging. It also covers the details of packaging importance and its
Professor, Department of
Pharmaceutics, Sankaralingam types.
Bhuvaneswari College of Keywords: Equipment, Qualification, Blister Packing Machine,
Pharmacy, Sivakasi, Tamil Packaging.
Nadu, INDIA.
ramskit@yahoo.com
INTRODUCTION
Equipment
The collective analytical measurement instruments, in conjunction with firmware, assembled
to perform a mechanical process. In a computerized system, the equipment is controlled by
the computer system. The computer collects measurement data from the equipment. A device
or collection of components that perform a process to produce the result. ([1])
Qualification
1. Action of proving that any premises, systems and items of equipment work correctly and
actually lead to the expected results. The meaning of the word validation is sometimes
www.wjpps.com 4698
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
History of Validation
The concept of validation was first proposed by two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
officials, Ted Byers and Bud Loftus, in the mid 1970s in order to improve the quality of
pharmaceuticals. ([3]) It was proposed in direct response to several problems in the sterility of
large volume parenteral market. The first validation activities were focused on the processes
involved in making these products, but quickly spread to associated processes including
environmental control, media fill, equipment sanitization and purified water production. The
concept of validation was first developed for equipment and processes and derived from the
engineering practices used in delivery of large pieces of equipment that would be
manufactured, tested, delivered and accepted according to a contract. ([4] The use of validation
spread to other areas of industry after several large-scale problems highlighted the potential
risks in the design of products. ([5])
www.wjpps.com 4699
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Ideally, the requirements should be independent from the suppliers product and express the
customer needs without addressing specific design solutions. ([7])
URS Scope
User Requirement Specifications (URS) Scope includes but is not limited to;
Level-1, full details of end user operability.
Level-2, full details of functionality.
Level-3, software functionality interface.
A full description of the required system performance.
Performance criteria, critical parameters and operating range.
Cleaning and maintenance requirements.
Appropriate regulatory requirements.
Documentation requirements.
www.wjpps.com 4700
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Training requirements.
All none industry standard testing that may be required. ([8])
These requirements must all be satisfied before the IQ can be completed and the qualification
process is allowed to progress to the execution of the Operational Qualification.
www.wjpps.com 4701
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Before installation
Obtain manufacturer's recommendations for installation site requirements.
Check the site for the fulfillment of the manufacturer's recommendations (utilities such as
electricity, water and gases plus environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature,
vibration level and dust). Allow sufficient shelf space for the equipment itself, related
SOP's, operating manuals, logbooks and software. ([11])
www.wjpps.com 4702
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
maintenance requirements. It should permit a formal "release" of the facilities, systems and
equipment. ([15])
Typical tests in the OQ include the following:
Alarm tests
Behavior of the system after energy breakdown
Accuracy of filling lines
Transportation speed in a sterilization tunnel
Temperature distribution in an autoclave
Performance of a washing machine, accuracy of a weighing system([16])
Performance Qualification
PQ demonstrates that a balance or instrument consistently performs according to a
specification appropriate to its routine use.
Performance Qualification (PQ) is the process of demonstrating that an instrument
consistently performs according to a specification appropriate to its routine use. The test
frequency is much higher than for OQ. Another difference is that PQ should always be
performed under conditions that are similar to routine sample analysis PQ should be
performed on a daily (or at least a weekly) basis, or whenever the instrument is used.
The test frequency depends not only on the stability of the equipment but also on everything
in the system that may contribute to the analysis results.
www.wjpps.com 4703
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Complex connected systems (e.g., filling line, BPI production line; performance
parameters) ([18])
Requalification
Requalification is the repetition of the qualification effort or a selected portion of it. ([19])
Packing
Packaging is defined as the collection of different components which surround the
pharmaceutical product from the time of production until its use.
Background
Two basic types of pharmaceutical blister packages exist. In one variety the cavity is
constructed of clear, thermoformed plastic, and the lid is formed of clear plastic or a
combination of plastic, paper, and/or foil. The other type of package contains foil as an
essential component of both webs and its cavity is created by cold stretching. ([20])
Types of Packaging
1. Thermoforming
2. Cold forming
Importance of Packaging
Protects against all adverse external influences that can alter the properties of the
product.
Protects against biological contamination.
Protects against physical damage.
Carries the correct information and identification of the product.
Tamper evident / Child resistance/ Anti counterfeiting.
Functions of Packaging
1. Containment
-Not to leak, nor allow diffusion and permeation
-Strong enough to hold the contents during handling
2. Protection
-Light
-Moisture
-Oxygen
-Biological contamination
www.wjpps.com 4704
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
-Mechanical damage
-Counterfeiting
www.wjpps.com 4705
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Forming film
The forming film is the packaging component that receives the product in deep drawn
pockets. One key to package success is selecting the right plastic film for the blisters in terms
of its property type, grade, and thickness. Consideration must be given to the height and
weight of the product, sharp or pointed edges of the final package, and the impact resistance,
aging, migration, and cost of the film. The plastic also must be compatible with the product.
Factors influencing package production and speed of assembly must be taken into account,
including heat sealing properties and the ease of cutting and trimming formed blisters.
Lidding materials
The lidding material provides the base or main structural component upon which the final
blister package is built. It must be selected according to the size, shape, and weight of the
product as well as the style of the package to be produced. Lidding materials range in caliper
or thickness from 0.36 to 0.76 mm, but 0.460.61 mm is the most popular range. The surface
of the lidding material must be compatible with heat-seal coating process. Clay coatings are
added to the lidding material to enhance printing. Heat-sealing and printability are both
important considerations in blister packaging, and the lidding material must offer the best
workable compromise.
Printing inks
Printing inks provide graphics and aesthetic appeal. They can be applied to the lidding
material by letterpress, gravure, offset, flexographic, or silk-screen printing processes.
Printing inks must resist heat sealing temperatures as high as 300 C without showing any
discoloration or tackiness (blocking). In addition, they must sufficiently resist abrasion,
bending, and fading and must be safe for use with the intended product. Printing inks should
not contain excessive amounts of hydrocarbon lubricants, greases, oils, or release agents.
www.wjpps.com 4706
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Qualification tests should always precede production runs. Finally, printing inks must comply
with FDA recommendations.
Cold-formed foil/foil
Best known to Americans is the blister package made of a foil, film, paper, or multimaterial
backing that is adhered to a sheet of thermoformed plastic blisters. However, a less common
type of blister is the foil/foil lamination used for products that are particularly susceptible to
moisture and/or light. Unlike all-plastic blisters, these are not thermoformed but instead are
cold-pressed into shape. Products that require the highest degree of protection are packed in
an all-foil package. Cold-formable foil is finding favor because it is the only material that
provides a 100% barrier to moisture, oxygen, and light.
Detailed assembly
Blister packaging machines typically operate with intermittent motion. The seal is made
during the dwell time required for thermoforming. The essential parts and functions of an
intermittently operating packaging machine include the following:
www.wjpps.com 4707
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.wjpps.com 4708
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
METHODOLOGY
While installing the machine, the following parameters were observed and confirmed
www.wjpps.com 4709
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Operational Qualification
The machine was run as per the operating instructions for 30minutes with empty load and
observed the operation and recorded.
While machine was in operation, switch off the mains power supply.
After few minutes, the machine was restarted and the operation performance was
observed and the result was recorded.
During the operation of equipment, the temperature was controlled or adjusted to 1100 c
to 1600c to form the blister cavities and then adjusted to 1400 c to 3400 c for sealing the
lidding material. Then the operation was observed. The result of operational qualification
was noted.
While operating the machine, the following tests are to be carried out:
Safety features;
Alarm tests;
Behavior of the system after energy breakdown;
Accuracy of filling lines;
Continuity of Operation;
Power Failure Recovery Study;
Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical /Control panel;
Temperature Controller performance verification;
Operational Performance of ACG Pampac Blister Packing Machine and
Performance Verification of ACG Inspection system
Performance Qualification
During PQ, the temperature was adjusted from 1100C to 1600C for optimal forming
temperature study and finally the temperature was fixed.
www.wjpps.com 4710
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Later the temperature was adjusted to 1800C - 2400C to study the optimal sealing
temperature study and finally the temperature was fixed.
During performance of the machine, the following parameters were observed:
Defective tablets;
Missed tablets;
Black spots;
Machine speed;
Optimal forming temperature;
Optimal sealing temperature.
Design Qualification
For qualifying the Blister packing machine, the vendor manufactured and supplied the
machine as per the requirements of the user. The design qualification was satisfied.
Installation Qualification
i. Instrument specifications:
1. Equipment was installed as per drawing(s)/ manufacturers recommendation.
2. Equipment identification nameplate was visible.
3. Major components are securely assembled.
4. There was no physical damage.
5. Required electric connections and earthing connections are tightly grounded and done
properly.
6. Sufficient space was provided around the equipment/ system for servicing.
7. All moving parts were covered with suitable guard.
8. All utilities related to equipment are connected.
9. Parts were accessible for easy cleaning.
www.wjpps.com 4711
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
The following parameters are within the limits and it was observed that the installation of
the equipment was in proper manner.
Identified the Execution Team members.
Verified the Purchase order.
Verified the Manual, Drawing and Related documents.
Installation was verified.
Material of construction was verified.
Utilities were verified.
Verified the Lubricants.
Procedures were identified.
Installation checks specific to equipment were identified and carried out as per individual
test procedures.
Verified the Major component.
The details of each component were recorded and the supplied component was checked
and installed as per the User Requirement Specification / Manufacturers
recommendations. All are found correct. (Table No. 10).
Table No. 2: Basic Unit
www.wjpps.com 4712
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Up to 45 cycles per
Upto 45 cycles per minute
minute for PVC
for PVC
Forming cycles Up to 35 cycles per
Upto 35 cycles per minute
minute
For ALUMINIUM
For ALUMINIUM
Upto 9.5 meters per Up to 9.5 meters per
Forming Speed
minute minute
Operational Qualification
Operational qualification was carried out by the vendor under the supervision of machine
operator, validation person and the engineering person. The following parameters are
within the limits:
Alarm tests were good.
System after energy breakdown works properly.
Accuracy of filling lines was good.
Continuity of Operation was good.
Power Failure Recovery Study was good.
Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical /Control panel works
properly.
Temperature Controller performance verification was within the limit.
The safety feature testing was carried out by operating the equipment. The exercise
was repeated for 2 more times. All the safety features were tested and found in
compliance with the URS.
Table No. 3: Safety Features
Description of
Sr.
safety Method of Testing Acceptance Criteria
No.
features
Foil Consumed / take out the
Base Foil end Machine Stops at Zero
1. base foil manually during
sensor Position
machine is in operation
www.wjpps.com 4713
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Sensor for When sensor detects the joint The joint blister will
5.
Base foil Joint in the base foil get rejected at 450
Sensor for
When sensor detects the joint The joint blister will
6. Lidding foil
in the Lidding foil get rejected at 450
Joint
Critical Parameters
Some important critical parameters such as Continuity of Operation, Power Failure
Recovery Study, Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical/Control
panel, Temperature Controller performance verification, Operational Performance of ACG
Pampac Blister Packing Machine Model: B45 R and Performance Verification of ACG
Inspection System were performed and the results are presented.
Continuity of Operation
Machine ran for 30 minutes and found no abnormal noise or vibrations. Motor ran
continuously without tripping, motor/machine parts were not excessively heated up.
Hence continuity of operation with empty load for 30 minutes was found within the limits.
Performance Qualification
The following parameters are within the limits
Machine speed was verified.
Optimal forming temperature was good.
Optimal sealing temperature was good.
Black spots were identified and rejected.
Missed tablets were identified and rejected.
Defective tablets were identified and rejected.
www.wjpps.com 4714
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
forming and sealing of the blister as specified in protocols. The forming and sealing of the
blister was found satisfactory.
After completion of performance qualification we observed that the obtained results were
within the limits and found satisfactory.
SUMMARY
The design, installation, operational and performance qualification of ACG-PAMPAC
BLISTER PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R was performed as per the approved
qualification protocol.
During installation qualification, the material of construction of all product contact parts
were verified and certified as SS316L and its equivalent and the non contact parts were
certified for SS304 and its equivalent.
All the utilities are connected and found to be adequate. All the major components i.e.
Basic Unit, Base foil unwinding station, Heating station, Forming station, Linear indexing
station, Feeding station, Lidding foil unwinding station, Sealing station, Cooling station,
www.wjpps.com 4715
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Punching & Perforation station, Rotary pickup station, Web support assembly, Electrical
controls and other were identified, installed, checked and mounted properly during
installation qualification.
During operation qualification, all the accessories provided to the equipments were
calibrated and the results were found satisfactory.
Control panel components and function of each key/component of the panel against its
specified function was checked as per the operational instructions and the results were
found satisfactory.
Safety feature testing has been tested as per the procedure mentioned in the protocol and
all the results are within the limits.
The critical operating parameters such as
Verification of continuity of operation,
Power failure recovery study,
Verification temperature controllers,
Operation performance of Blister packing machine and
Verification of security, Recipe management functionalities were verified and found
correct.
All the observations during operational qualification were found satisfactory and were
within the limits.
As part of performance qualification, the machine was run with dummy tablets at 10
cycles/min, 20 cycles / min and 30 cycles / min and the quality of blisters were found
satisfactory.
CONCLUSION
All the results observed for individual qualification steps are found within the limits as per
the proposed protocols and the equipment was successfully qualified in compliance with
the URS, cGMP and FDA requirements.
The installation, operational and performance qualification of ACG-PAMPAC BLISTER
PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R was performed as per the approved protocol
No.GITPRIOP307 and GITPRPQP307 respectively. Hence the ACG-PAMPAC BLISTER
PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R can be released for routine use.
www.wjpps.com 4716
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
REFERENCE
1. P.A. Cloud, Validating a Laboratory Incubator, BioPharm 1997, 10(11), 3042.
2. P. Bedson, The Development and Application of Guidance on Equipment
Qualification of Analytical Instruments, Accred. Qual. Assur. 1996, 1(6), 265
274.
3. Agalloco,J."Validation: an unconventional review and reinvention". Validation: an
unconventional review and reinvention, 1995, 49 (4), pp. 175179.
4. Hoffmann, A., Kahny-Simonius, J., Plattner, M., Schmidli-Vckovski, V., &
Kronseder, C. 'Computer system validation: An overview of official requirements and
standards'. Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, 1998, vol. 72 (6), pp. 317325.
5. Leveson, N. G. & Turner, C. S. 'An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents',
Computer, 1993, 26 (7), pp. 1841.
6. FDA, Guidelines on General Principles of Process Validation, 1987.
7. Sandro De Caris, Marco Bellentani, Beny Fricano, Carlo Bestetti, Marco Silvestri and
Barbara Testoni. Risk-Based Equipment Qualification: A User/Supplier Cooperative
Approach, the official magazine of ISPE, 2007, 27 (3).
8. http://www.validation-online.net/user-requirements-specification.html
9. Maas & Peither AG GMP Publishing LOGFILE No. 8, 2011, pp. 1.
10. http://www.validationonline.net/installation-qualification.html.
11. Satyabrata Jena, K.Sravya, Arjun Goje, D. Narendra Prasad and Syed Sameer.
Equipment Qualification For RMG, FBD, Blender & Compression Machines- An
Overview, International Journal of Novel Drug Delivery Technology; 2011, 1 (3), pp.
191.
12. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,
2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 493.
13. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,
2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 457.
14. Satyabrata Jena, K.Sravya, Arjun Goje, D. Narendra Prasad and Syed
Sameer.Equipment Qualification for RMG, FBD, Blender & Compression Machines-
An Overview, International Journal of Novel Drug Delivery Technology; 2011, 1 (3),
pp. 192.
15. PDA, Validation of Computer-Related Systems, Technical Report No. 18, PDA J. Sci.
Technol. 1995, 49 (1), pp. S1S17.
16. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,
www.wjpps.com 4717
P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.wjpps.com 4718