Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
The structural function of the main cables in suspension bridges is to transfer the
tension load, derived by supporting the roadway, to the towers. The main cables are
composed of thousands of high strength parallel steel wires with a diameter of
approximately 5 mm bundled together in strands either built in situ or prefabricated.
These strands are then compacted and tightened together and eventually the cross
section of the cable becomes semi-circular. The wires in pristine conditions have a
strength ranging from 1570 MPa to 1800 MPa. However with aging, fatigue loading,
and harsh environmental conditions, the wires strength reduces significantly (Shi et
al., 2007). Field observations of aging suspension bridges indicate serious distress of
cable wires. Many wires are corroded and even broken, jeopardizing the safety of the
entire bridge. Moreover field surveys performed by Suzumura and Nakumura (2004)
have indicated that the corrosion level varies according to the wire positions inside
the cable. Current inspection procedures rely on visual observations which are
considered unreliable and expensive. Today the biggest challenge suspension bridge
owner authorities face is to estimate the current and remaining safety of a main cable
in order to help them decide whether it is necessary to provide immediate
maintenance or rehabilitation (or even replacement) of such cables.
In order to provide an accurate assessment of the cable's remaining strength, it
is critical to model the load transfer mechanism between wires and the corrosion
uncertainty within the cable. One of the most important structural characteristics of
suspension bridges is the high internal redundancy of its main cables. If a wire breaks,
the load carried by that wire is redistributed to the unbroken wires: Montoya et al.
(2012) showed through some numerical examples that, in the vicinity of the break,
the neighboring wires take most of the load burden while, at some distance away
from the break, the broken wire recovers fully or partially its load carrying capacity
due to friction. The overall carrying capacity of the cable decreases as individual
wires start to break and, as the number of broken wires increases, it might reach a
point that corresponds to the complete failure of the cable.
The objective of this paper is to introduce a methodology that determines the
safety of an existing cable by estimating the failure load of a suspension bridge main
cable. This is accomplished through the Monte Carlo Simulation by generating a
number of realizations of the cables strength within a FE model.
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Cable's model: (a) cross sectional and (b) longitudinal views.
(a) (b)
Figure 2. (a) Load transfer mechanism between a broken and an unbroken wire and
(b) an equivalent finite element model
This implies that the one dimensional, decoupled random field approach cannot
simulate homogeneous-like corrosion in small regions within the cross section of the
cable.
(a) (b)
Figure 3. (a) Elasto-plastic behavior of the spring (green) elements to account for
friction induced by the clamps (b) and cables FE model.
section. The distribution of the wire strength corresponds well with the conditions
observed in the visual inspections of the cable.
PARALLEL COMPUTING
Due to the overall number of equations of the model, parallelization of the problem is
essential to facilitate the stochastic analysis that determines the effect of corrosion-
related uncertainties on the cable's failure load. The mesh, composed of truss and
spring elements, is independent of the realization; while the material property that
determines the wire breaks (RTS) in each wire changes for each run according to the
stochastic representation. The simulation methodology is illustrated in the flow chart
of Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1
1. Read Input Files. Store general finite element information.
2. Loop1 over each Monte Carlo realization.
A. Set the displacement vector and force vector to zero. u=0, F=0.
B. Generate the wire corroded strengths
a. Loop2 over each displacement increment (20 steps through the
displacement controlled method).
i. Loop3 for convergence of Nonlinear Problem
1. Solve Linear Equations
ii. End Loop3
iii. Increase displacement of the cable , +1 = +
b.End Loop2
3. End Loop1
RESULTS
The failure load of the cable is obtained through a Monte Carlo Simulation
(MCS) with 1000 realizations. The cable is loaded using the displacement controlled
approach for twenty steps at increments of u=0.2298 cm. The clamps are assumed
to be sufficiently tightened to provide full recovery after one cable band. Figures 5
shows a sample step for a run of the model. The force-displacement plot (Figure 5a)
compares the response of the cable to the response of a cable in perfect conditions.
The cross-sectional plot (Figure 5b) is at the critical section along the cables length
where the greatest number of broken wires is found for this run. A cluster of broken
wires (dark blue wires indicating zero stress) with random pattern is formed at the
bottom sector. A highly stressed (orange section) region surrounds this cluster of
broken wires.
(a) (b)
Figure 5. Sample Step of a Realization: (a) Force-Displacement Curve of the cable
and (b) Longitudinal Stresses (MPa) in the 9061 wires.
Load redistribution allows the cable to carry the new load level with an
uneven distribution among wires. Eventually, the cable fails in a domino like pattern
in which the failure of weak wires causes other less weak wires to fail at the same
external load. The load is kept constant for each of the 1000 realizations, but the cable
fails at a different load as shown in Figure 6(a). The response of the system is
nonlinear for each realization; the stiffness of the overall cable significantly decreases
after the breaks. The corrosion-related uncertainties play a major effect on the
breaking load of the cable, as significant scattering is observed in the failure load. The
histogram for the breaking load is illustrated in Figure 6(b).
CONCLUSIONS
Reliable assessment of the cable's remaining capacity is needed by bridge
authorities in order to make important decisions regarding maintenance and
rehabilitation of main cables in suspension bridges. The proposed methodology
provides an estimation of the distribution of the failure load, which may help
preventing an unexpected failure. This approach is the first one incorporating a finite
element analysis within a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the performance of
main cables. This method accounts for the correlation of the cable's strength along its
length and within the cross section. The proposed formulation is capable of capturing
the nonlinear behavior of the cables strength as wires break, starting from the most
corroded areas in the cables cross-section (usually the bottom sector).
(a) (b)
Figure 6. 1000 realizations: (a) Force-displacement curve and (b) histogram
REFERENCES
Boussinesq, J. (1885). Appications des potentials a l'tude de l'quilibre et du
mouvement des solides lastiques.Gauthier-Villars.
Brigham, E.O. (1988). The Fast Fourier Transform and its Applications. Prentice
Hall, New Jersey.
Gronquist Bridsall Steinman, Boynton and Columbia University, 1998. Williamsburg
Bridge cable investigation program: Final report. Submitted to the New York
State Dept of Transp. and New York City Dept. of Transportation, New York.
Mateo, J., Deodatis, G. and Billington, D. (1994) . Safety analysis of suspension
bridge cables:Williamsburg bridge. ASCE-Journal of Structural Engineering,
120(11):3197-3211.
Montoya, A., Waisman, H. and Betti, R. (2012). A simplified contact-friction
methodology for modeling wire breaks in parallel wire strands. Computers
and Structures, 100-101:39-53.
Shi, Y., Deodatis, G. and Betti, R. (2007). Random field-based approach for
strength evaluation of suspension bridge cables. ASCE-Journal of Structural
Engineering, 133(12):1690-1699.
Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis, G. (1996). Simulation of multi-dimensional gaussian
stochastic fields by spectral representation. Applied Mechanics Rev.,
49(1):29-52.
Shinozuka, M. and Jan, C. M. (1972) . Digital simulation of random processes and
its applications. J. Sound and Vibration, 25, 111128.
Suzumura, K. and Nakamura, S. (2004). Environmental factors affecting corrosion
of galvanized steel wires. ASCE-Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,
16(1):1-7.
Waisman, H., Montoya, A., Betti, R. and Noyan, I.C. (2011). Load transfer and
recovery length in parallel wires of suspension bridge cables. ASCE-Journal
of Engineering Mechanics, 137(227).
Wriggers, P. (2006). Computational contact mechanics. 2nd edition, Springer,
Heidelberg.