You are on page 1of 132

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
BOOKS

Agarwal, K.L. (1986). A study of effect of parental encouragement upon the edu-
cational development of the students. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.). Fourth survey of
research in education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Alexander, B.(1990). A study of the relationship of critical thinking, science apti-
tude and socio-economic status to the science achievement of second year
P.U.C. students. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Anderson, R.D. (1970). Developing Children's thinking through science.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice Hail.
Atkin, J.M. Process in science Education. Elementary Education in the seven-
ties; Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bandyopadhyay, J. (1984). Environmental influence, academic achievement and
scientific aptitude as determinants of adolescents attitude towards science
stream. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).Fourth survey of research in education, New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Baskaran, K. (1991).Achievement motivation, attitude towards problem-solving
and achievement in mathematics of standard X students in Devakottai edu-
cational district . Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Bernel, J.D. (1969). Science in history. Harmonds worth, Penguin books.
Best, J.W. and Kahn, J.V. (1992). Research in education. New Delhi: Prentice
Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
Bhagirath, G.S. (1978). Correlates of Academic achivement as perceived by the
teachers and students of High Schools. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The third suruey of
research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Bhargava, M.A. (1981).A critical study of attitude of adolescents towards Gandhian
philosophy and its relationship with intelligence, socio-economic status and
achievement, In In Buch,M.B.(Ed.)Fourth Survey of Research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Bhargava, S.N.L. (1983). A study of some cognitive processes in science learning
with reference to physics for students of higher secondary classes. In Buch,
M.B. (Ed.)
Fourth survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Bhusari, C.V. (1988).Intelligence of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes students
and its correlation with their scholastic achievement in Vidarbha. Fifth
Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T. and Madaus, G.F. (Eds.) (1971). Handbook on for-
mative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: Mc
Graw Hill.
Boom, B.S. (1968). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook 1: cogni-
tive domain. New York : David Mckay company, Inc.
Brown, F.G.(1970). Principles of educational and psychological testing. Illinois:
The Dryden Press Inc.
Bruner, J.S. (1962).Process of education. Cambridge: Mass. Harvard.
Carin, A.A. & Sund, Robert, B. (1970). Teaching modern science. Columbus,
Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company. A Bell & Howell Company.
Chaganlal, N.M. (1992). A study of the value, adjustment, attitude towards teach-
ing profession and academic achievement of teachers children as compared
to non-teachers children. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Chikkara, (1985).To study the effectiveness of different strategies of teaching
on achievement in mathematics in relation to intelligence, sex and person-
ality, In Buch,M.B.(Ed.) Third Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Chopra, S. L. (1982).A study of some non-intellectual correlates of academic achieve-
ment. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The third survey of research in Education, New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.

Comber, L.C. and Keeves, J.P. (1973).Science education in nineteen countries-


an empirical study. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Conant, J. (1951). Science and common sense New Haven : Yale University
Press.

Conant, J. (1952). Modern science and modern man. New York : Columbia Uni-
versity Press.

Cronbach, L.J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper


and Brothers, Publishers.

Croxton, W.C. (1937). Science in the Elementary school, New York: Mc Graw-
Hall Book Company, Inc.

Dani, D.N. (1984). Scientific attitude and cognitive styles of higher secondary stu-
dents. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).Fourth survey of research in education, New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1991.

Darchin, P. (1989). A study of science achievement, science attitude and problem


solving ability among the secondary school students in the Aizawl. Fifth
Suruey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Desai, S.D. (1979). A study of classroom ethos, pupils' motivation and academic
achievement. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.)Third Survey of Research in Education,
New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.

Devenesan, P.P. (1990).Socio-economic status, achievement motivation, and scho-


lastic achievement of higher secondary students in Pasumpon Thevar
Thirumagan District. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T.. 1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Devi, U.A. (1990). Pupil's academic achievement in relation to their intelligence,
neurotism and locus of control. Fifth Survey of Research in Education.
New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Diwan, D.K. (1991). A study of the predictors of academic achievement of student


teachers in terms of aptitude, attitude, participation, and human values.
Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Dubey, K.K. (1992). A study of the scientific temper and its measurement. Fifth
Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1997.

Ebel, R.L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. Englewood Cliffs,


N.J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Edwards, A.L. (1957).Technique of attitude scale construction. Appleton - Cen-


tury - crofts Inc.

Fitzpatrick, F. (1960).Policies for science education. New York: Bureau of Publi-


cations, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Fox, D.J. (1969). The research process in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston.

Gagne, R.M. (1977). Conditions of learning. New York: Rinehart and Winston.

Gagne, R.M. (1985). Conditions of learning. New York: Rinehart and Winston.

Ganguli,B.B. (1978). Experience in developing instructional material for inte-


grated science curriculum. Bangkok: Unesco Regional Office for Educa-
tion in Asia and Ocenta Publication.
Garg, C. (1992). A study of family relations, socio- economic status, intelligence
and adjustment of failed high school students. Fifth Survey of Research in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Garrett, H.E. (1981).Statistics in psychology and education. Bombay: Vakil,


Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd. .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Ghosh, G.P. (1988). A study of the achievement of the students in chemistry and
finding relationship with some of its determinants. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.).
Fourth survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T. ,1991.
Ghosh, S. (1989).A critical study of scientific attitude and aptitude of the students
and determination of some determinants of scientific attitude. Fifth Survey
of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Ghosh,G.P. (1985). A study of the achievement of the students in chemistry and
finding relationship with some of its determinants. In Buch, M.B. (Ed).Fourth
survey of research in education, N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Gh0sh.S. (1986). A critical study of scientific attitude and aptitude of the students
and determination of some determinants of scientific aptitude. In Buch,
M.B. (Ed.)Fourth survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Good,C.V. (Ed.).(1973).Dictionary of education. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book
Company.
Gourikutty, A.J. (1992). A study of certain ability correlates of secondary school
mathematics achievement measured using Bloom's taxonomy (cognitive
domain). Fifth survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,
1997.
Grewal, A. (1988).Developing, validating and testing the efficacy of self- learning
process based material for the development of some integrated processes
in science.Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,
1997.
Guilford, J.P. and Fruchter, Benjamin (1982).Fundamental statistics in psychol-
ogy and education. New york: Mc Graw Hill International Book com-
pany.
Haq, N. (1988).A study of certain personality correlates of over-under-achieve-
ment in different school subjects. Fifth Survey of Research in Education.
New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Harikrishnan, M. (1992). A study of academic achievement of the students of the
higher secondary stage in relation to achievement motivation and socio
economic status. New Delhi: Fifth Survey of Research in Education.
N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.
Haris, K. (1979). Education and knowledge. The structured misinterpretation
of reality. London: Routledge & Keyan Paul.
Harlen, Wynne, (1989).Recent developments in primay and lower secondary school
science. Layton, David (Ed.) Innovations in science and technology edu-
cation, New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd..
Hirunval, A. (1980). A study of pupils' self concept, academic motivation, class-
room climate and academic performance. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).Third Sur-
vey of Research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Hurd, P. and Gallagher, J.J., (1969).New directions in elementary science teach-
ing Betmount: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc..
Hurd, Paul Dehart, (1969).New directions in teaching secondary school science:
Chicago: Rand Mc Nally and Co..
Indira, (1991). A study of the relation of social class, religion, family size, and birth
order to academic achievement of high school students. Fifth Survey of
Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Jain, S. (1983).Concept formation as a function of verbal intelligence and achieve-
ment motivation. In In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Fourth survey of Research in
Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Jain, S.S. (1981). A study of the impact of reading on the achievement of pupils of
class VII in different school subjects. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Third survey of
Research in Education, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Jain, Shika, (1991).Child rearing practices, adolescence' cognitive ability and achieve-
ment. Fifth survey of educational research, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Jha, V. (1970). An investigation into some factors related to achievement in
science by students in secondary schools. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.).Third Suruey
of Research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Joseph,T.T. (1979). A study of some predictors of achievement in chemistry at the
Predegree level. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Third Survey of Research in Educa-
tion, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Joshi, P.K. (1989). Acquisition of chemistry concepts as related to the variables of
educational environment . Fifth survey of educational research, New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.
Joshi, R.R. (1983). An investigation in to the interest of higher secondary school
going pupils in the context of some psycho-socio variables, In Buch, M.B.
(Ed.). Third Survey of Research in Education, New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Kaile, N.S. (1988).Intelligence and creativity as predictors of school as the achieve-
ment in mother tongue and foreign language at different levels of socio-
economic status. In Buch.M.B.(Ed.), Fifth Survey of Research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Kar, D.K. (1990). A study of relationship between attitude towards and achieve-
ment in general science of class IX students of Cuttack City. In
Buch.M.B.(Ed.), Fifth Suruey of research in education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Karl Pearson. (1937). The grammar of science. J.M.Dent and sons Ltd..
Kaur, P. (1992).Effect of nondirective teaching on some selected personality char-
acteristics and academic achievement in mother - tongue and foreign lan-
guage at different levels of socio-economic status. Fifth Survey of Re-
search in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Khalwania, N.S. (1986). Effectiveness of concept based science curriculum in de-
veloping cognitive structures and acquisition of process skills among high
school students. In Buch, M.B (Ed.),Fourth survey of research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
~ l o f e r L.E.
, (197 1). Evaluation of learning in science. Bloom,B.S. et.al(Eds). A
handbook on formative and summative eualuation. New York: Mc Graw
Hill..
Kochhar, S.K. (1993).Educational and vocational guidance in secondary schools.-
New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, Pvt. Ltd..
Kodeswara, N.M. (1991).A comparative study of the characteristics of high achiev-
ers and low achievers in reading to class VIII pupils with special reference
to school and home factors. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Kolwadkar, V. (1980). Study of gifted children in relation to their personality vari-
ables, level of adjustment and scholastic achievement. Fifth Survey of
Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. 1997.
Krech, D. and Crutchfield, R.S. (1975). Theory and problems of social psychol-
ogy. New Delhi: Tata Mc- Graw -Hill Publishing Company Ltd..
Kulshreshtha, P.K. (1992).The effect of school environment on adjustment, study
habits and achievement of high-school students. Fifth Survey of Research
in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. 1997.
Kulshreshtha, R. (1983).Value orientations, interests and attitudes as correlates of
selfconcept among male and female adolescents. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.).Fourth
survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Kumar, R. (1989). Children's curiosity, intelligence and scholastic achievement.
Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Kumar, S. (1985). A comparative study of the interests, needs and adjustment
problems of gifted and average children. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Fourth sur-
vey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Kumari, Sudha, (1982).A study of intelligence, achievement, adjustment and socio-
economic patterns of different seismometric groups of Adolescents . In In
Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Fourth survey of Research in education. N.C.E.R.T.,
1991.
Malviya, D.S. (1991).A study of attitude towards science and interest in science of
school going adolescents. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.

Ma~dila,S.S. (1988).Attitudes of secondary stage students towards science cur-


riculum and its relationship with achievement motivation. Fifth Survey of
Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Mazumdar, A. (1992). A study of the relationship between attitude towards and
achievement in English of standard IX students in Guwahati City. Fifth
Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1997.
Medawar, P.B. (1969). Induction and intuition and scientific thought. London:
Methuen.
Mehna, V.H. (1986).An investigation in to some factors affecting academic achieve-
ment in science of standard IX students of Greater Bombay. In
Buch,M.B.(Ed.). Fourth survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T.,
1991.

Menon, G.S. (1990). A study of the relationship among certain environmental fac-
tors, personality characteristics and school performance of standard I stu-
dents. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,
1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Menon, S.B. (1986). The study of a system of science education in the perspective
of the process of science inquiry. In Buch,M.B.(Ed.).Fourth survey of Re-
search in Education. N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Menon, S.K. (1972). A comparative study of personality characteristics of over-
achievers and underachievers of high ability. In Buch,M.B.(Ed.).Third Sur-
vey of Research in Education, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Michalis, J.U. et. al. (1967).New designs for the elementary school curriculum.
New York: Mc - Graw-Hall Book Company.
Mishra, A.A. (1982). Study of performance discrepancy of science teachers and its
effect upon the achievement of students in science. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The
third survey of research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.
Mishra, K.S. (1982), Effect of children's perception of home and school environ-
ments on their scientific creativity. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Third survey of
research in education, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Mishra, S.P. (1978). A comparative study of high and low achievers in science,
commerce and arts on creativity, Intelligence and Anxiety. In Buch, M.B.
(Ed.). Third Survey of Research in education, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Misra, R.M. (1986).A study of the role of hypotheses in problem-solving in relation
to personality traits, intelligence and SES of 11 school going children. In
Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Fourth survey of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T.,
1991.
Mukhopadhya, D.K. (1989).Identification of school climate and study of its effect
on the scholastic achievement and development of certain personality char-
acteristics of students of secondary schools. Fifth Survey of Research in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Muthumanickam, R. (1992). A study of academic achievement of students of higher
secondary commerce group in relation to their reasoning ability, socio-

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
economic status, and interest in commerce. Fifth Suruey of Research in
Education. N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Nagpal, R. (1979). A study of non-intellectual characteristics of over - and under
achieving engineering students. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The third survey of
research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1988.
Nair, V.P. (1997). A comparative study of certain cognitive, affective, and social
variables which discriminate between high-creative and low-creative under-
achievers in seconday school science. Fifth Survey of Research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Narmata, (1992).The relationship of personality traits, situational stress and anxi-
ety factors to student achievement. Fifth Survey of Research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.
Nata rajan, R. (1992). School organizational climate and its relation to job satisfac-
tion of teachers and the achievement of pupils. Fifth Survey of Research
in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Nedelsky, L. (1965).Science Teaching and Testing. New York: Harcourt, Brace
and World, Inc..
Nelliappan, N.O. (1992). A study of scientific attitude and interests among higher
secondary biology students in relation to their learning environment. Fifth
Suruey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Obiedat, A.A. (1992). A study of mathematics achievement of grade XI1 students
on GSCE in Irbid, Jordan in relation to their gender, intelligence, math-
ematical thinking and socio-economic status. Fifth Suruey of Research in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Obourn, E.S. (1960).An analysis and checklist on the problem solving objective, in
Burden H. William(Ed.),Education for effective training. Appleton cen-
tury crofts Inc..

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Ohja, K.T. (197Q).A study of correlationship between socio-economic status and
achievement of high school boys. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.). Third Survey of
Research in education, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Phalachandra, 9 . (1989).An analytical study of some correlates in the acquisition
of science concepts in school children. Fifth Survey of Research in Educa-
tion. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Piaget, Jean, (1963).Psychology of Intelligence. Paterson, N.J. Little fields Adams
& Co..
Popper, K.R. (1958).The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London.
Raju, Santhamma (1982). A study of the interaction of the cognitive and affective
outcomes in secondary school biology. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.).FourthSurvey
of Research in Education. N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Ram, R. (1992).Study of intelligence, socio-economic status, achievement motiva-
tion nd academic achievement with reference to pupils' behavior in class-
room. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.).Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.
Ramesh, (1984). Development of objective based science curriculum and to study
its efficacy in the acquisition of process skills among high school students.ln
In Buch, M.B.(Ed.). Fourth survey of Research in Education
N.C.E.R.T.,1991.
Rao, D.B. (1990).A comparative study of scientific attitude, scientific aptitude and
achievement in Biology at secondary school level. Fifth Survey of Re-
search in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Rawat, D.S. (1970). Measurement, evaluation and statistics in education.New
Delhi: New Raj Book Depot.
Ray, P. (1990).A study of students' attitude towards studies and health as related to
their scholastic achievement. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Reddy, R.I.V. (1991).Academic adjustment in relation to scholastic achievement of
secondary school pupils. A longitudinal study. Fifth Survey of Research in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.

Roy, P. and Dighe, A. (1977). Factors affecting comprehension and retention of


selected SITE programmes, council for social development, New Delhi. In
Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The third survey of research in Education, New delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1988.

Royal Society, (1986).A proposal of reduced content for a co-ordinated Science


curriculum to age 16. London: The Royal Society.

Sahay, N. (1991).Familial correlates of academic achievement in rural Hindu school


students. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.
,1997.

Salunke, R.B. (1979). A study of the home environment, socio-economic status


and economic management in relation to the academic achievement of the
first year college students of M.S.University, Baroda. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).
Third survey of Research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1988.

Sam, U.K. (1992). The teaching of general science and the development of scien-
tific attitude in secondary school students in relation to achievement in gen-
eral science. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.
,1997.

Saucier, W.A. (1958).Theory and Practice in the Elementary School. New York:
The Mac Millan Company.

Saxena, A.K. (1988).Emerging perspectives in physics education. New Delhi:


Mittel Publications.

Screen, P. (1986 b). Warwick process science, Southampton: Ashford Press.

Selmes, I. (1978). Improving study Skills, London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
268

Sen Bharat, K. (1992).An investigation in to the personality make-up, intelligence


and study habit of high and low achievers. Fifth survey of Resrearch in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T. ,1997.
Sharma, A. (1989). Personal and social factors affecting the success and retention
of girls in science. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Sharma, K. (1981).Some socio-economic characteristics and intellectual abilities
of high school students. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).Fourth survey of Research in
Education. New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1991.
Sharma, R.C. (1990). Modern science teaching. Delhi: Dhanpat Rai &Sons.
Sharma, S. (1982). A study of intellectual factors and academic achievement in
arts, science and commerce course at higher secondary stage. In Buch,
M.B.(Ed.). Third survey of research in education, New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
Shashidhar, B. (1981). A study of the relationship between a few school vari-
ables and the achievement of scheduled caste students studying second-
ary schools of Karnataka. Doctoral dissertation, Banglore University.
Shashilatha, (1997).Prediction of academic achievement. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.)The
third survey of research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.
Shivappa, D. (1980).Factors affecting the academic of high school pupils. Doc-
toral dissertation, Karnataka University.
Siddiqui, B.B. (1979). Effects of achievement motivation and personality on aca-
demic success. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).Third Survey of Research in Educa-
tion, N.C.E.R.T.,1988.

Singh, K. (1982). A study of creative thinking of high school students of


Himachalpradesh in relation to some cognitive, a n d non-cognitive
variables. Doctoral dissertation, Himachal Pradesh University.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Singh, L.M and Venkatachalam, R. (1976). Socio-economic environment and per-
formance under trimester system. In Buch, M.B. (Ed.) The third survey of
research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.
Singh, M. (1989). A study of achievement in english in relation to intelligence,
interest, socio-economic status and facilities available for learning the lan-
guage at high-school stage. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New
Delhi: N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Soman, K. (1996). Educational measurement and evaluation. Calicut: Gautam
Publications.
Srivastava, K.K. (1978). The effects of family anxieties on educational achieve-
ments of adolescent girl students (13 to 18)of the district of Basti. Doc-
toral dissertation, Gorakhpur University.
Srivastava, N. (1980).Intelligence, interest, adjustment and family status as predic-
tors of educational attainment of high school students. In Buch, M.B.(Ed.).
Third Survey of Research in Education, New Delhi: N.C.E.R.T.,1988.
The Columbia encyclopaedia (1963).
-Thier, Herbert D. (1973). Teaching elementary school science a laboratory ap-
proach. New De1hi:Sterling Publishers Pvt . Ltd.
Thilagavathi, T. (1990). Academic achievement in relation to intelligence, creativ-
ity, and anxiety. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T., 1997.
Thrivedi, S. (1988).Scholastic achievement of adolescent children of working and
non-working methods. Fifth Survey of Research in Education. New Delhi:
N.C.E.R.T.,1997.
Tripathi, B.K. (1978).A study of relationship between personality patterns and
social acceptance, classroom behauiour and academic achievement .Doc-
toral dissertation, Rajastan University.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Twiss,O.R. (1917).Science Teaching. New York:The Macmillan Unesco , (1969-
70). New trends of integrated science teaching. Vol.1
UNESCO (1993).New Trends in Chemistry teaching. New Delhi: Sterling Pub-
lishers Pvt. Ltd..
UNESCO Hand book for science Teachers (1980).
UNESCO Source book for Science in the Primary School 1992.
Vaidya, N . (1971).The impact science teaching. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH. Pub-
lishing Co. .
Verma, R.P.S. (1977). A study of school learning as a function of socio-emo-
tional climate o f the class. Doctoral dissertation, Rajastan University.
Victer, Edward and Lerner, M.S. (1971).Readings in science education for the
elementary school. New York:The Macmillan Company.
Victer, Edward. Present programs and Major curriculum Developments in El-
ementary School Science - A antique. elementary education in the sev-
enties; implication for theory and Practice.London: Holt Rinechart &
Winston, Inc..
vijayalal(hmi,J . (1980). Academic achievement and socio -economic status as
predictors of creative talent. Doctoral dissertation, Kerala University.
Walter,(1964).Teaching science in today's secondary schools. New Delhi: Prentice
Hall of India Pvt. Ltd..
Willington,Jerry (Ed.)(1990).Skills and processes is science education. London
& New York: Routledge.

Woolnough, B.E. (1995).Practical work in science. Cambridge University Press.

Zacharia, T . (1977).Impact of attitude and interest on achievement o f second-


a r y school pupils in social studies. Doctoral dissertation, Kerala University.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
DOCUMENTS
AAAS Commission on Science Education (1971) The M A S Project: Science-A
Process Approach victor E & Lemer, M.S.(Eds.) Readings in Science
Education f o r the Elementary School. New York:The Macmillan
Company, Collier Macmillan Ltd..
AAAS Miscellaneous Publications no. 63.6. National Committee on Science
Education standards and Assessment draft 1994..
Cooper, D. (1986).The GCSE and Chemistry, Chemistry in Britain, May.
COPES (1971). The Conceptually Oriented Programme in Elementary Science.
DES (1985a). Science 5-16: A state ment of policy. London: H & MSO.
DES (1985b) General Certificate of Secondary Education - The National crite-
ria science, London: HMDO.
ESS: The Elementary Science Study,(l971).EducationDevelopment Centre :

ILEA , (1987). Science in process, Ten units and teachers guide, London:
Heinemann.
Karplus, R. & Thirt,H.N.(1971).SCIS: The Science Curriculum Improvement study.
MINNEMAST (1971). MINNEMAST: The minnesota Mathematics and Science
Teaching project.
Murphy, P. and Gott, R. (1984). The Assessment of frame work for science at
ages 13 and 15. London: Assessment of Performance UnitDepartment
of Education and Science.
National Committee on Science Education standards and Assessment draft 1994.
National Policy On Education (1986). New Delhi: Ministery of human resource
development, Government of India .

National Policy On Education (1992). New Delhi: Ministery of human resource


development, Government of India .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
NCC (National Curriculum Council) (1991).Science Explorations. York: National
Curriculum Council.
NCERT (1982). Integrated science curriculum an introduction. New Delhi.
NCERT (1987). Integrated science curriculum an introduction.
New Delhi.
Nuffield - 11-13 (1986). How scientists work, how science is used, Teachers'
guides 1 and 2. London: Longman.
Screen,P.(1986b). Warwick Process Science, Southampton: Ashford Press.
SSCR (1987).Better science: Making it happen ,London: Heinemann/ASE.
SSCR (1987). Better science: Twelve curriculum guides, London: Heinemand
ASE.
The Conceptually Oriented Programme Project (1969). New York:
The Scottish Education Department Consultative Committee (1969). Science for
general education.
Trends and Problems in Science and Technology Education in Asia. A report of a
regional meeting. Singapore July 1976.
qpiwsity.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
JOURNALS
Adey, P.S. and Harlen,W. (1986).A piagetian analysis of process skill test items.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 23, 8, 707-726.
Aiello -Nicosia, M.L. et.al. (1984).The relationship between science process abilities
of teachers and science achievements of students; an experimental study.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 21, 8, 853-857.
Ajeh, 0 .A. (1991). The home effects on academic acheivement New Frontiers in
Education. 21,3.
Alaimo, (1979).Reported in Butts, David P. A summary of research in education -
1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.

Amino, (1980).As reported in socialization, personality, and academic achievement


in gifted children School Review. 1957, 65, 388-414.
Baker, D.R. and Piburn, M.D. (1988). Learning to think: a major factor in the
decline in attitude toward science. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.

Banu, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.


Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Beall, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.
Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Berger, C.P. (1982).Attainment of skill in using scientific process. Instrumentation,
methodology and analysis. Journal of research in science Teaching. 19,3,
249-260.
Bhargava, S.N.L. (1986).A study of the measuring process in science in relation to
certain cognitive and social variables. Journal of the Institute of Educational
Research, 10,4-7.
Biard, W.E. et. al. (1989). Correlations of student performance in the science
olympiad. the test of integrated process skills and other variables. Reports
-Descriptive, ERIC. 1982-1991.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Bridgeman, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science education -
1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Bridgeman, Dorothy J. et. al. (1985). Relationships of attitude toward science and
family environment Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Brown, W.R. (1997).The effect of process skill instruction on performance of pre-
service elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
14,1,83-87.
In Buch, P.M.
et. al. (1979). "A study of self concept, intelligence and achievement
of tenth grade students".Journal of Educational Research and Extension.
16, 2.
Button, G. E. (1991).Audio-tutorial biology, andragogy and self esteem relationships
among dependent and independent variables among dependent and
independent variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 53, 2.
Butts, David P. (1981). A summary of research in education - 1979. Science
Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Canon and Simpson, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science
education - 1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Chadha, N.K. and Chadna, S. (1990). Creativity, intelligence and scholastic
achievement: a residual study. Indian Educational Review. 25, 3, 81-85.
Champagne, A.B.and Kopfer, E.L. (1981).Structuring process skills and the solution
of verbal problems involving science concepts. Science Education. 65,5,
493-513.
Chen, Lang - Chuan (1994).Dissertation Abstracts International. 55, 7, January
1995.
Clarke, R.M.(1986)Student's approaches to learning in an innovative medical school:
a cross-sectional study. The British Journal of Educational Psychology
56.309-321.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Cobern, W.W. et. al. (1990). A logico-structural world view analysis of the
interrelationship between science interest, gender and concept of nature.
Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.

Linda W. and Piper, Martha K. (1983).A study of the perceptual orientation


~rgw
of community college students and their attitude toward science as they
relate to science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
20, 6, 537-541.
Curry, Ellen Rose (1995).Matching chemistry instructional methods with perceptual
learning style preferences of eleventh grade women: effects on attitude and
achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 55, 9.
Davis and Flower, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in
education - 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Debaz, Theodera Petros, (1995). The meta-analysis of the relationship between
students characteristicsachievements and attitudes toward science'. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching. 56, 1, 152-154.
Dimit, Claudia F. (1990).Student attitude toward science and the affecting personal,
home and school environment variables. Dissertation
abstractslnternational 51, 4, October 1990.
Dodd, Jennifer and Elliott, H.G. (1988).Elementary teacher attitudes toward science
and science teaching as they relate to student test performance in science
content and process skills. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Doran, R.L. (1995).Science laboratory skills among grade 9 students in Western
Australia.
Ebenezer, J.V. and Zoller, U. (1993).Grade 10 students' perceptions of and attitude
toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching. 30, 2, 175-186.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
2

Edison, Sandra P. (1992).The use of micro-computer graphics and alpha numERK


modes of data presentation with students' process skills and conceptual
understanding of genetics. Dissertation abstractsln ternational53,11, May.
1993.
Ekeocha, E.O. (1986). Correlates of science achievement. A study of U.S. 5th
grade students. Dissertation abstractslnternational, 47,6, Dec. 1986.
Finely, F.N. (1982).An empirical determination of concepts contributing to successful
performance of science process: A study of mineral classification. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching. 19,8,689-696.
Fraser, A.P. (1990).Determinants of science achievement at the elementary level
in a minority population. Speeches/ Meeting papers, ERIC. 1982.1991.
Fraser, B.J. (1981). Inquiry skill proficiency and socio-economic status. School
science and Mathematics, 8 1 , l .
Friend, (1985).Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.
Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Gabel. D.L. and Rubba, P.A. (1977). The effect of early teaching and training
experience on physics achievement, attitude toward science and science
teaching, and process skill proficiency. Science Education. 61, 4.
Gallagher, J.J. (1987). Reported in a summary of research in science education -
1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Ganguly, M. (1989). Socio-economic status and scholastic achievement. Indian
Educational Review. 2, 1,84-94.
Germann, P.J. (1989).'Directed inquiry approach to learning science process skills
treatment effects and aptitude treatment interactions. Journal of Research
in science Teaching 26, 3, 237-250.
Germann, P.J. and Aram, R.J. (1996). Student Performance on the Science
Process of recording data, Analysing data, Drawing conclusions, and

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 3 3 , 7 , 773-
798
Germann, P.J.et. al. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the
responses of seventh -grade students to the science process skills of designing
experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33, 1, 79-99.
Germann, Paul J. (1994).Testing a Model of Science Process skill Acquisition: an
interaction with parents education, preferred language gender, science
attitude, cognitive development academic ability and biology knowledge.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 31, 9, 1003-1021.
Giddings, Geoffrey and Waldrip, Bruce, (1993). Teaching practices, science
laboratory learning environment and attitudes in South Pacific secondary
schools. ERIC. 1992-1995.
Goldstein, Shirma P. (1986).The gifted chid: an investigation of science achievement
with respect to spatial ability, science interest, curiosity, level of giftedness
and sex of the child. Dissertation Abstracts International. 47, 5, 1678.
Gooding, C.T. et. al. (1987).Transactional analysis of the person - environmental
interactions in high school biology and chemistry courses over a school
year. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Gurumurti,C. and Gangoli, S.G. (1989).A study of the effectiveness of open ended
experiments in developing laboratory skills. Bulletin of I.A.P.T. 16,9.247-
251.
Hagenln Buch, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in
education - 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
HagenIn Buch, (1980). As reported in socialization, personality, and academic
achievement in gifted children School Review. 1957, 65, 388-414
Haggard, E.A.(1957).Socialization, personality, and academic achievement in gifted
children School Review. 1 9 5 7 , 6 5 , 388-414.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Hamil, Jessie Burnelte Wolf (1994).An analytical assessment of process skill
proficiencies and problem solving perceptions of pre-service elementay
science teachers. Dissertation abstractsInternational55, 11, May 1995,
PP. 3465.
Hamrick, L. and Harty, H. (1987).Influence of resequencing general science content
on the science achievement, attitudes toward science and interest in science
of sixth grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 24, 1,
15-25.
Harty, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.
Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Harty, Harold et. al. (1986). Exploring relationship among four science teaching -
learning affective attributes of sixth grade students. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 23, 1,51-60.
Hasan, (1985). Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.
Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Haukoos, G.D. and Chandayet, P. (1988).A cross - cultural study of attitude
towards science and related influential factors. Reports-Research, ERIC.
1982-1991.
Helmandellar, Curtis Ben (1992). What can parents affect high-school student
performance by what they do at home?. Dissertation abstractslnternational
53, 3, Sept.1992.
Hertel, Barbara Lee, (1986).A comparison of children learning science with parents
Vs peer partners. Dissertation Abstracts International 4 7 , 0 6 , Dec.1986.
Hodson, Derck, (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum.
Science Education, 72, (I),19-40.
Hooda, C.R. and Paul, R.H. (1986).Effect of class room learning situations on the
attainment of objectives of science education in secondary schools. Journal
of Research in Science Education. 24, 2, Oct. 1987.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Huang, Wauchu, (1991). Concept mapping and chemistry achievement, integrated
science process skills, logical thinking abilities and gender at teachers' college
in Taiwan. Dissertation abstractslnternational. 52,3.
Hurd,Paul Dehart(1969).New Directions in Teaching Secondary School Science:
Chicago: Rand Mc Nally and Co.
Hykle, Jacqueline Ann (1994).Interrelationship among cognitive controls, gender,
science content achievement and science process skills. Dissertation
abstractslnternational 55, 9, March 1995.
Hynd, Cynthia et. al: (1994).Learning counterintutive physics concepts, the effects
of text and educational environment. Reading Research Report, ERIC.
1992-1995.
Iverson, Barbara, K. and Walberg, H.J. (1982). Home environment and school
learning: a qualitative synthesis. Journal of Experimental Education, 50,
3.
James and Smith, (1985). Reported in a summay of research in science education
- 1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
James, A.H. and Pafford, W.N. (1983). The relationship between academic
achievement in science and father's occupation. Science Education 57, 1,
37-41.
Jegede, 0 . J. et. al. (1989). Differences in socio-cultural environment perceptions
associated with gender in science classrooms. Reports-Research, ERIC.
1982-1991.
Johnson, B.K. and Vitale, P. (1988). A factor analytic study of attitudes of gifted
secondary students toward science. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Khouy, Ghada A. and Voss, Burton E. (1985). Factors influencing high school
students science environment patterns, academic abilities, parental influence
and attitudes toward science. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991. '-
,'

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Kistha, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. A summary of research in education -
1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Kobella .T.R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education: Science
education. 72, 2, 115-126.
Kok-Auntoh and Brain, E. Woolnaugh (1994). Science process skills: are they
generalisable? Research in Science and Technological education. 12.
Kulshrestha, A. and Jain S.C. (1989). A study of relationship between the
classification skills and intelligence of adolescent pupils. Indian Psychological
Review - Monthly Journal of India. 34,5,6,7,. 38-44.

Kyle, Jr. et. al. (1985). What research says: science through discovery: students
love It. Science and Children. 23, 2, 39-41.
Lattart, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in education -
1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Lazarowitz and Lazarowitz, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of
research in education - 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Lee, Tien-Ying (1993). Comparisons of cognitive development, science process
skills and attitude towardes science among secondary school science pre-
service teachers with different science back grounds. Science Education
5. Issue Sept. 1993.

Leonard, W.H. (1989). A review of research on science laboratory instruction at


the college level. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Lin, Frann S. (1992). Trend analysis and prediction of students' science attitude
and achievement in Thaiwan, republic of China. Dissertation Abstracts
International. 53, 9, March 1993.
Lock, Roger (1992).Gender and practical skill performance in science. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching. 29,3,227-241.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Lubber, (1985)Reported in a summary of research in science education - 1985.
Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Macbeth, D.R. (1974). The extent to which pupils manipulate materials and
attainment of process skills in elementary school science. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching. 11, 1,45-51.
Mason, Cheryl Lynn (1986). Student attitudes toward science and science related
careers. An investigation of the efficacy of a high school biology teachers'
intervention program. Dissertation Abstracts International. 47, 6, Dec.
1986.
Mason, Thomas, (1990). An investigation of the relative effectiveness of teacher-
initiated versus student -initiated junior high school science projects.
Dissertations Abstracts International. 51,lO.
Mathews, P.E. et. al. (1992). A study of the logical thinking skills and integrated
process skills of junior high school students in North Carolina and Japan.
Science Education. 76,2,211-222.
Mc Cain. D. E. (1992). Examining two science instructional approaches: process
approach and text book. Dissertation abstracts International. 53, 7, Jan.
1993.
Mc Donald and Harold, Jack (1991). Selected student characteristics and science
achievement in a mid sized secondary school. Dissertation
abstractslnternational. 52, 3, Sept. 1991.
Mc Duffie,(1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in education
- 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
MC Duffie, (1980). As reported in socialization, personality, and academic
achievement in gifted children School Review. 1957, 65, 388-414.
Mc Nay, Margaret and Melville, K.W. (1993).Childrens' skill in making predictions
and their understanding of what prediction means: a developmental study.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30,6, 561-578.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Mestre, T.P. et . al. (1993). Promoting skilled problem solving behavior among
beginning physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
30,3, 303-316.

Micik, J.M. (1986). Science achievement in AmERICan school, a case study.


Dissertation abstractslnternational, 47,6 Dec. 1986..
Millar, R.H. and Wynne, B.E. (1988).Public understanding of science: from contents
to processes. International Journal of Science Education 10,4.

Misra, A.K. (1987). On Science and science Education. School Science 21,4,21-
27.
Morrell, P.D. (1992). An examination of students' attitudes toward school and
classroom science. Dissertation Abstracts International. .53, 6, Dec.
1992.
Napier, J.C., Riley, J. (1985).Relationship between affective determinates and
achievement in science for seventeen year old. Journal of research in
science and Technology, 22,4, 365-383.
Narchi, Ahmad, (1990). 'Influence of parents, past science experiences, loccus of
control, self actualization, and gender on high school students' attitude
towards science, science achievement, and commitment to college majoring
in science and non-science. Dissertation abstractslnternational. 52, 3,
871. Sept. 1991.
Nay, M.A. et. al. (1971).A Process approach to teaching science. Science Education
53, 2.
Okebukola, P.A. and Ogunniyi, M.B. (1984). Co-operative, competitive and
individulistic science laboratory interaction patterns effects on students'
achievement and acqusition of practical skills. Journal of Research science
Teaching 21,9, 875-883.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Oliver, J. and Simpson, R.D. (1988). Influence of attitude toward science,
achievement motivation and science self concept on achievement in science:
alongitudinal study: Science Education. 72, 3, 143-155.
Pachaury, A.P. (1990). On process-based science instenction. School Science 2 8 , l .
Padilla, M.J. (1983).The relationship between science process skill and formal
thinking abilities. Journal of Research in science Teaching. 20,3, 239-
246.

Pappelis, C.K. et.al (1980).Can instruction improve science process skills of


premedical and pre-dental students. Journal of Research in science
teaching. 1 1 25-29.
Paul, et. al. (1988).Development of the attitude towards science in school assessment
and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and
attitude towards science in school. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching. 25, 8.
Paulose. P.J. (1993).Process outcomes in learning of physics of university entrants:
the role of manifest anxiety in combination with sex and residence of
subjects. Experiments in Education 21, 66-73.
Piburn, M. (1993). Evidence from meta-analysis for an expertise model of
achievement in science. ERIC. 1992-1995.
Piburn, M.and Sidlik,L. (1992). An investigation of projective measures of attitude
toward science. ERIC. 1992-1995.
Pope - M.and Gilbert, J. (1993). Personal experience and the construction of
knowledge in science. Science Education. 67, 1993.
Prakash, J.B. (1994). Students' attitude towards science: the impact of different
educational practices. Journal of Indian Education. 19, 50-56.
Punch, K. F & Rennie, L.J. (1989). Clarification of the direction of the affect -

achievement relationship in science. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Rachelson, S. (1977) A question of balance: a wholistic view on scientific inquiry.
Science Education 61,1,109-115.
Radford, D.L. (1988). Integrating process skills instruction in to the traditional science
curriculum. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Rakow, S.J . (1985).Prediction of the science inquiry skills of seventteen year olds:
a test of the model of educational productivity. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 22, 4, 289-302.
Reddy, C.A. (1981). Interrelationship between organizational climate of sec-
ondary schools, socio-economicstatus of students, students perception of
rewarding behaviour and their academic achievement. Doctoral Disserta-
tion, Osmania University.
Rakow, Steven J. (1984). Predictors of science inquiry knowledge. Reports-
Research, ERIC. 1982-1991.
Raven. J.R. and Calvey, H. (1977).Achievement on a test of piaget's operative
comprehension as a function of a process-oriented elementary school science
program. Science Education. 61,2,154-166.
Roth, W.M. and Roy C.A. (1993). The development of science process skills in
authentic contexts. Journal of Research in science Teaching. 30,2, 127-
152.
Sanchez, K.et.al. (1986).A study of factors aff ecthg student performance in communiQ
college gened chemistry course. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982.1991.

Sanders and Young, (1985).Reported in a summary of research in science education


- 1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.
Schemesh, Michael. (1990). Gender-related differences in reasoning skills and
learning interests of junior high school students. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 27, 1. 27-37.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Schibeci, R.A. and Riley, J.P. (1986). Influence of students background and
perceptions on science attitudes and achievement. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching. 23, 3, 177-187.
Schibetl, Renato et. al. (1986). Effects of dassroom environment on science attitudes: a
crossdural replication in Indonesia. Speeches/meeting papers, ERIC, 1982-
1991.
Screen, P. (1986 a) The warwick process science project. School Science Review
68,242.
Shah, J.H. (1990). A study of relationship among intelligence, self concept and
academic achievement of pupils of std X of semi urban and rural areas of
Sihore Taluk. Experiments in Education. 18, 4,104-110.
Shaw, E.L. & Doan R.L. (1990). An investigation of the differences in attitude and
achievement between male and female second and fifth grade science
students. Reports - Research, ERIC, 1982-1991.
Shepardson, D.P. (1990).The relationships between problem solving phase, student
interactions, and thinking skills among middle school students taught with
in the SSCS problem-solving structural model. Dissertation Abstracts
International. 51,9,3033.
Sibia, A. (1989). Degree of prediction of achievement by field dependence, test
anxiety and intelligence in females. Indian Educational Review. 24, 3,
116-124.
Sidlik, L. and Piburn, M. (1993).Enablement, alienation and attitude toward science
in middle school classrooms. ERIC, 1992-1995.
Simpson, (1987) Suspect Psychology. Times educational supplement 3, April.
Sinclair, Anne & Good, Ronald, (1991).Effects of prediction activities on instructional
outcomes in high school genetics. Reports -Research, ERIC, 1982-1991.
Siripunkaw, P. (1990).Variables involved in physics problem solving by tenth graders
in Thailand. Dissertation Abstracts International. 51,9,3033.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
286

Sivadasan, K.R. (1987). Effect of classroom learning situations on the attainment


of objectives of science education in secondary schools. Journal of Research
in Science Education. 24, 2, Oct. 1987.
Sneider et. al. (1979).Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in education
- 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
s&ng,J.and Black, P.J. (1991).The effects of task contexts on pupils' performance
in science process skills. International Journal of science education
13,1,49-57.
Subrahmaniam, E.V. and Kulandaivel, K. (1973).An investigation of students' ability
to draw inference from science experiments. Journal of Educational
Research and Extension. 10,1, 46-48.
Sundararajan, S. and Rajasekhar, S. (1993). Higher secondary students physics
classroom climate and their scientific interests. Experiments in Education.
21, 8, 201.
Tamir, P. and Amir, R. (1987). Relationships among laboratory process skills in
biology: Journal of Research in science teaching. 24,2,137-144.

Tamir, Pinchas, (1991). Factors associated with the acquisition of functional


knowledge and understanding of science. Research in Science and
Technological Education. 9, 1.
Taylor, G. (1988).Hands on science. Speeches/meeting papers, ERIC. 1982-
1991.
Thampuratti, Girijadevi. N.R. (1995).Socio-economic status of creative high
achievers and creative low achievers in mathematics. Experiments in
Education. 23, 5, 91-97.
Thejovathi, K. (1995).A study of the environmental factors affecting the acquisition
of english language skills at the high school stage in Guntur district.
Experiments in Education. 23, 5, 88-92.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
287

Tobin, K.G. and Capie, W. (1982). Relationship between formal reasoning ability,
locus of control, academic engagement an integrate process skill
achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 19, 2, 113-121.
Tobin, Kenneth (1986). Student task involvement and achievement in process-
oriented science activities. Science Education 70, 1,61-72.
Tomera, A.N. (1974).Relation of science process of observation and comparison
in junour high school students. Science Education. 58,2, 185-193.
Tomera, Audrey N. (1974). Transfer and relation of the transfer of the science
process observations and comparison in junior high school students. Science
Education. 58,2, 195-205.
Tunhikorn, Bupphachart P. (1986). Attitudes toward and achievement in science
of secondary students in Kasetsart demonstration school, Bangkok,
Thailand. Dissertation Abstracts International. 47, 5, Nov. 1986.
Umachithra, J. et. al. (1993). Psycho- socio educational factors of scheduled caste
students in higher secondary schools. Journal of Educational Research
and Extension. 30, 2.
Vasanthi, R. (1994). Interest of school students in mathematics. Experiments in
Education 25, 4, 76-82.
Wagganer, (1985).Reported in a summary of research in science education -

1985. Science Education. 71, 3, June 1987.

Waldrip, Bruce and Giddings, Geoftrey, (1993).Educational productivity and science


education within a developing country. ERIC. 1992-1995.
Walkosz - Margeret and Yeany, R H. (1984).Effects of lab instruction emphasizing
process skills on achievement of college students having different cognitive
development levels. Reports-Research, ERIC. 1982.1991.
Walten, J.J. and English, L.D. (1995).Childrens application of simultaneous and
successive processing in inductive and deductive reasoning problem.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Implications or developing scientific reasoning skills: Journal of Research
in Science teaching. 32,7,699-714.
Wareing, (1979). Reported in Butts, David P. a summary of research in education
- 1979. Science Education. 65, 4, 337-465.
Wasi,M.(1991).New Trends in Science education-A few guidelines. School Science
9,3.
Wenham, Martin, (1993). The nature and role of hypotheses in school science
Investigations. Inter national Journal of Science Education. 15,2.
teaching learning environment in a student-central
Wilkison,W.J.et.al.(1988).The
physics class room. Reports- Research ERIC. 1982-1991.
Wilson, J.T. (1974).Processof scientific inquiry. A model for teaching and learning
science. Science Education 58,l.
Yeany, et.al. (1986).Analyzing heirarchieal relationships among modes of cognitive
reasoning and integrated science process skills Journal of Research in
Science Education. 2, 4.
Yeany, R.H et. al. (1986). Analysing hierarchical relationships among modes of
cognitive reasoning and integrated science process skills. Journal of
Research in science Teaching. 23, 4, 277-291.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
DISSERTATIONS

Acharyulu, S.T.V.G. (1978). A study of the relationship among creative think-


ing, intelligence, a n d school achievement. Unpublished doctoral disser-
tation, Utkal university.

Anantha Raman, P. A. (1996).The influence of intelligence a n d approaches to


learning on process outcomes in biology of secondary school pupils.
Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation. School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma
Gandhi University.
Andrew, K.A. (1980). Construction of a group test to evaluate secondary
school pupils skill in scientific process. Unpublished master's dissertation.
University of Kerala, Trivandrum.
Aruna, N.S. (1981).A study of the Factors influencing the achievement of stan-
dard V11students belonging to scheduled castes a n d scheduled tribes, whose
medium of instructions is Kannada, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Mysore
University.
Chaudhari, V.P,$Jain (1975). Factors contributing to Academic under achieve-
ment, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nagpur University.
Contractor, B.M. (1977). Educational attaintment a s a function of certain vari-
ables. Doctoral dissertation, Gujarath University.

Desai, S.D. (1979). A study of class room Ethos, pupils motivation a n d Aca-
demic achivement, doctoral dissertation, M.S. University, Buroda.
Dhami, G. S. (1974). Intelligence, emotional maturity,and socio-economic sta-
tus as factors indicating of success in scholastic achievement. Doctoral
dissertation, Punjab university.
Gandhi, P. (1982). Academic Achievement in relation to Achievement motive,
Affiliation motive a n d Power motive. Doctoral dissertation, Banaras Hindu
University, U.P..

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
290

Ghuman, M.S. (1976).A study of aptitudes, personality traits and achievement


motivation of academic over achievers and under achievers. Doctoral dis-
sertation, Rajastan State University.
Gopinadh, B. (1996).An inquiry in to the causes of under achievement and
over achievement of secondary school pupils in Kanjirappally educational
district in social studies based on their intelligence and some selected non
lntellectual variables. Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation. School of Pedagogi-
cal Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University.
Goswami, P.K. (1978).A study of the self concept of the adolsements and its
relationship with scholastic achievement and adjustment. Doctoral disser-
tation, Agra University.
Goswami, R. (1982).An enquiry into reading interests of the pupils of standard
VIIl to X in relation to intelligence, SES (socio economic status) and aca-
demic achievement. Doctoral dissertation, M.S University, Baroda.

Hirunval, A. (1980).A study of pupils self concept, academic motivation, class-


room climate and academic performance. Doctoral dissertation, M.S Uni-
versity, Baroda.
Homchaudhuri, S . (1980).An analytical study of correlates of academic perfor-
mance of college students (Tribal)of Mizoram. Doctoral dissertation, M.S
University, Baroda.
Iyer, K.K. (1977).Some factors related to under achieuement in mathematics o f
secondary school students. Doctoral dissertation, Kerala University.
Jain, D.K. (1979) Astudy of significant correlates of High Schools failures in
Mathematics and English with special reference to Jammu Diuision. DOC-
toral dissertation, Jammu University.
Jha,V. (1970).An investigation in to same factors related to achieuement in
secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Patna university.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
29 1

John, G.D. (1995). Science interest as correlate of science achievement. Un-


published M.Ed. dissertation, School Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi
University.
John, Gracy, P. (1995).Science interest as a correlate of science achievement.
Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation. Mahatma Gandhi University.
John, Susan (1996). The influence of study habits and attitude on achievement
in mathematics of secondary school pupils. Unpublished M.Ed. disserta-
tion, School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University.
Joshi, S.P. (1981).A study of verbal creativity in Marathi Language in relation
to achievement in Marathi and environmental factors of the students as
well as teaching in High Schools. Doctoral dissertation, Bombay University.
Khanna, M. (1980). A study of the relationship between students socio eco-
nomic background and their academic achievement at junior High Schools
Level. Doctoral dissertation, Kanpur University.
Kulshresshata, L. (1981).A study of certain factors related to differential a pat-
terns of achievement among bright students. Doctoral dissertation, Agra
University.
Kumar, A. (1981). The relationship between personality and mental ability
variables and achievement through programmed instructional styles. Doc-
toral dissertation, Aligarh Muslim University.
Kumari, S.K. (1996).Identification of select cognitive and affective variables as
predictors of mathematics achievement of secondary school pupils. Un-
published M.Ed. dissertation. Mahatma Gandhi University.
Lalithamma, K.N.(1973).Some factors affecting achievement of secondary school
pupils in mathema tics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kerala.
Lobo, I. (1991). Effect of developing science process skills among pre-service
secondary school teachers on their class room behaviour. Unpublished Ph.D
thesis, University of Mysore.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Makhija, G.K. (1973). Interaction among values, interests and intelligence and
its impact on scholastic achievement. Doctoral dissertation, Agra Univer-
sity.

Menon, P.A. (1980).A study of creativity in English language of students of the


Higher Secondary level in some English medium schools in Delhi in rela-
tion to their intelligence, achievement and language abilities. Doctoral dis-
sertation, Delhi University.

Mishra, K.S. (1982). Effect of childrens' perception of home and school envi-
ronments on their scientific creativity. Doctoral dissertation, Rajastan Uni-
versity

Mishra, S.P. (1978).A comparative study of high and low achievers in science,
commerce and arts on creativity, intelligence and anxiety. Doctoral dis-
sertation, Rajastan University.

Mohammed, S. (1996).Influence of parental education and occupation on pupil's


achievement based on selected mathematical outcomes at lower primary
level. Unpublished M.Ed. dissertion, School of Pedagogical Sciences, Ma-
hatma Gandhi University.

Nair, A.S. (1971).A Non-verbal group test of intelligence for secondary schools.
Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, University of Kerala.

Nair, P.B. (1995). The interactive effects of some select cognitive and socio-
familial variables on science achievement of secondary school pupils of
Kerala. Unpublished M.M. dissertation, School of Pedagogical sciences. M.G.
University.

Naseema, C. (1989). Effect of intelligence and science learning approach on


achievement in physics of secondary school pupils. Unpublished masters'
dissertation University of Calicut ..

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
293

Paulose, P.J. (1987). The influence of certain personality variables, sex and
residence on process outcomes in physics of university entrants. Unpub-
lished doctoral Dissertation, University of Kerala Trivandrum.

Rajalakshmi, N . (1995).A study on the combined effects of home environment


and socio- economic status on achievement in biology of secondary school
pupils of Kerala. Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation, Mahatma Gandhi Univer-
sity.

Rao, D.G. (1965).A study of some factors related to scholastic achievement.


Doctoral Dissertation, University o f Delhi, 1965.

Sajikumari, K. (1996).Identification of select cognitive and affective variables of


predictors o f mathematics achievement o f secondary school pupils. Un-
published M.Ed. dissertation,School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi
University.

Sara, S . T . (1995).The influence of examination anxiety and intelligence on


problem solving ability of secondary school students in mathematices.
Unpublished M.Ed. dissertion, School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma
Gandhi University.

Sebastian, P.J. (1993).A survey o f selected inquiry skills among standard nine
students of Managalore city corporation. Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation.
StAnn's College of Education. Managalore.

Seetha, B.C. (1975).An inquiry in to the psychological and social factors affect-
ing achieuemen t. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bangalore university.

Shafeena, S. (1995).Home learning environment and socio-economic status as


correlates of mathematices achievement of secondary school pupils. Un-
published M.Ed. dissertion, School o f Pedagogical Science, Mahatma Gandhi
University.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Sharma S. Rajaram. (1994).Effectiveness of an instructional programme in the
development of process skills among elementary school children. Unpub-
lished Ph.D. thesis University of Mysore.

Sunil Kumar, P. (1996). Identification of select cognitive variables as predictors


in biology achievement of secondary school pupils of Kerala. Unpublished
M.Ed. dissertation, School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Uni-
versity.
Suresh, K.P. (1991).Identification of certail sociological, cognitive and environ-
mental variables related to process outcomes in secondary school biology.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calicut.
Susmitha, P.S. (1995).The influence of select cognitive and socio-familial vari-
ables on process outcomes in physics of secondary school pupils. Unpub-
lished M.Ed. dissertation, School of Pedagogical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi
University, Kottayam.
Varghese, P.J. (1989). 'Affective correlates of Process outcomes in Biology'.
Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation. UniversiG of Calicut.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TOOLS
Nair, A. S. (1976). The Kerala Socio-economic scale and manual.
Nair, A. S. (1986).The Kerala university non- verbal group test of intelligence
Suresh, K. P. (1988) Science Learning Environment Inventory.
Suresh, K. P. (1988). Home Environment inventory for Science Learning. Depart-
ment of Education, University of Calicut.
Suresh, K. P. and Joseph, Celene. (1996).Scale of Attitude towards Science learing.
Kottayam: School of Pedagogical Science, M . G. University.
Suresh, K. P. and Joseph, Celene. (1996). Science Learning Interest Inventory.
Kottayam: School of Pedagogical Science, M . G. University.
Suresh, K. P. and Joseph, Celene. (1996). Test of Process Outcomes in Physics.
Kottayam: School of Pedagogical Sciences, M . G. University.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDICES

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX I
ITEM ANALYSIS DATA OF THE TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
TEST 1

TEST I1

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST 111

TEST IV

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST VI

'R' denotes rejected items; 'A' denotes accepted items; 'SA' denotes the serial arrangement of itcms

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX 11

MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY


School Of Pedagogical Sciences
TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
(DRAFT FORM)

(Suresh K.P. & Joseph, C. 1996)

2 m m m s a 3 o u l a 6)3Q03a d 3 ~ ~ m l m qmlom
lo a, b, c, d q m l omsuogsimlwlml
m l o n ~ 633am3
. Qd~Jmlrn~ mmlau3w
o 2mmo &m~dlslm~&. mmlm~amoslogmmmsail3
mlXlma od3~~rnrmolrni amam m m l w ~ m m o m m ~ o l mmm~mrmm7m~
~m m 3 o q w ~ m@&32mlm%
'X' msau320 gSh&.
m l m d m o j o ~ s ~ 3 ~ o g 'X's dlnmo
~ m lomg3wm3ommd
~ & m 3 & mmtmjm3gd
mm16 mmmlmj q g i o n ' (am2 odolw rmrndm~mo)mma7m~&wpcmmlw3m m3monrii 'x'
lilnmo g s ~ & a u ~odaiim3lma
o rnmlw3mlo.
dmlam~co&d'Start' q m j doau~arm3d2 m m o m m s w ~ 2 0 g q m ~m@,@oalmp,w~o
d
'Stop' q o n l dowlam13d 2mmo q q m a m n n l mldml&aulo o d a y p . 2mnnmmd ~ @ q m l a @ @ l
mocm&o ~ m m m s a 3 m l oa d 3 ~ ~ m s a 3 o u dmlam3co&orn
lo mlmlo& ngl&hnmmo.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
- a w p w~c s~s ~ m aTWW O P ~ C U U ( U I P W C W W ~PWW S O P ~ OCU~PW
ocru @PnocauuPSP@3
owtv p a P s l w F ~ w s r u o ww c s c u s w w o w LracmawLswp wcFo
im~SPa3scslra~moa55PmwPw~moPrucusw~ocruPaw w P m 3 oPim~raccnow ~ s w pPww (p
p c a u u @ pmomcorw b c s ~ w r c w o ~ m ~ auuPwcw3
ru?
wcnooPw~arup ~ w p r a c sracs~Wwocusa~wancwru?uuTsEcsoPru P w ~ wp ~ w i m u c w(e
-o w p n ~ ~l C S S L . WP W~ P S E ~ ~ U C W P~ ~C ~ ~W ~O ~P ~ L ~ I J C
Puu~wp ~ w r a a ~ a r u c r a o tomcuscw
a Eruo p ~ 5 w ~ sb cws ~ w s lPaw mPmrae3 mcso~w (E
. p c a u u @ pmamm
uuPw~cncmo~1 scs~ma p L w m L m uuPwcacl%a w c s m m c u s w p w m scsPm~mto (p
.cCU9cauu@ * c w c s P ~ a c s w c w ~ w p ~@ram
~1
CU9wpwm scsPm~mtspLaw ~ c l w o P w o wp L w r a a m o r a pLwcnmowcssm ~ S c a o( 3
y 9 c a u u @ oPw~msowPcao@p c m ~ w o wp~Swan~w w
P8m ~ S C Om~ o ~ omrucs (q
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
-0wpru1 ocsslruB .PWPRDERIPam omlruw
wa,m PwwruTwcm p~cs s
gncrwo?wcst~pyvmpPim Pow w g ~ oo h ~ c oPwPo3 (L
. p c a w & PwPw1o
~S~cswcyaTru
wcsuns@ wcmsrammmrufe wPw~cncimoru1oPrurorascnPmw otwraea~vw(p)
a) n1mml68 m l m ~ & m w l a a md~3 s p m u 3 mwmrm768 i d ~ ~ 3 c n l m imamloc$
m
m 2 o m m " qnnm36ni.
b) m$ygmloq a3map m & g j m l d ~ d a w ~ u j l m pme~n11o n d a m o m @ m o m w3w9
m16)6Kml q m m 3 6 n i .
c) a @ m l d m l m ~ & m d a a & d ~ s j mm u 3 n ~ w m l d~ d o a c ~ c o l m i m ma m l o c $
olmawmi ng)mm36ni.
d) momm"l 2 9 & r n 3 m l a ~ s m 3 & ajmlwamo
~ osalicna& &rml&os ng)mom m ~ 3 ~ 1
m i m i qmm36ni.
12) a 3 m ~m9mo o d w m o m d a a ~ f l m & & m ~ m l w l ~ l m l mgma & t ; j s l & o m d i d a d m l
m p r m a d marjno a&u3mpnlg(. gnils a m id6mo-
a) m 3 w ~m9m0 o d 6 m o m d a a 3 d dm9&mmrm7m~daw3cnlgom,om~o&3~qmnn36ni.
b) ~ 3 a u p i i o 4rn13ml~)jo o m g ( l o 4 i d a d m m o m m1~(09mImjnnommomng)mm36ni.
C) n I 3 w p l 0 4 m m 3 m l c u ~ m n n l d~ e ~ & i s lo&
m g l l o 4 Ldm6mrno ng)mom m s m i m )
qmm3m-.
d) mmiiomloi mmmlmsd amj rn3cujrno mn1mjm3am3 q m m 3 6 n i .
13) a a e ~ o o a o j ~mlaaum21&
m w a m a m m l & @ mldmn1ylmlm)m~2 a u d m ~ d a s m m l a 3 a r i , .
gals o m ~ d d m o -

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
%lJ.lPwlwpw(lr, p1mw
IUW1uscwcs~wcwfsFcs6~e 0 w a 1 ~ 1~aw f t a p c ~ r n t m p~swmcma
~ru scsPmLra@p~mm(p
.PuuPw~wpwLlupLmw r u m wcwcsPw
W P S ~ 0 6 F oowaru1a ~wfCvruewwlonu~ ~ f t a mars p c pl&mmcms
~ scsPm~ra~,Fp~nom (3
.PuuPw~mgprc0qJcCru
&cs~wem~ c w c s P w c w P ~ F c s w ~ m w p p0cF~ p a
~ 9~ raw~wem tncFamcst~l r a f i g ~ ~ (q w
.?uu?sF(sKr=csocuswla ~wPYvrocscsw~m, ylaw p c w a f w u u
P s ~ C ~ W ~ O W ~ 0Fp(ta S~N~~
~ C R L ~Ta(91OW g 3 C O P C W ~ ? ' ( P C S U ~ ~ & C R U lF31.F~ltD~ (e
Lowmcw Eltacma oPrutlwalw5 ocwla~m
c w @ .fcwPasiru racscruopcw p c m l w a a ~rucsp~ms~wwwPtarua @@iwPm i r a ~ ~ w i m m (s
.p3cwcsPww
? w ~ F ~ o u porawrawru1
ru @cs~wrata
KSPmttl?~
pw ~cnuotw~nora p~wrata F c w o (3
~cwcsPocwPslworamrawrul wcnoaPmlraem p l w r a t a p p c m o p p c w (q
~cwcsPwuutmoPworarclsrawrul wcwaPmlraem w l ~ r a t a-mpcru~ap p c w (e
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST 111 -
1) domouowo, nun&3mlmglm8 m l m l m ~ a m l o 4 2 w m c u ~ s0 s l n l m a j ~
m m l a l ~
m m o o m m p l d dolm~&w3wlm~m maad
~ . cmmmly Mmmo m3ov c d d m j m ~m . lm
210s maTj)~mnwmmlm8ng)m3mri man16 euammlg oilrummlor~$Luacrwwm3w dmlnlml?

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
~ W
L ~ Y scsfSwPramPw Z
om& swPS(cPPraePw I
L W P ~ L ~ W~CWPSF;OWCTCQITTU P w p ~ w
pcmacsmwsm W ~ ~ C O C p~
~im
W
r u u u f m o ~secw p ~ m s ~ c u ~ w c u s w ~ , .P~cucmfm~w
mru p c w s c u Q J X J D ~ ~ ~ W L ~~
Pmcw
~ o u u Y w PElo~wcmtseSpm8
~o~ wlanwo ~~mclmoru?GwPra6,?w(u,cW ~nwl5Pworaoonu Tmrs (11
P ' L (P P 'E (3 P 'z (q Z ' L (e
owrcTru &cs&omrapa uutm~swpc3scwcs!p5 p L w w 1 c P ' V
00pcYW 0pULW.cPWCul R ~ L ~ ? & c w ~ ~ L F . " C
' 6~
amce b e ~ w w m c mno~wPscmcs(~uw .Z
I ~ Bowsrau
J w
suswap~cuLmcmwLono p r u w p ~ w c u s w ~GS (L
0ELraru b e ~ w o l uuP3scwe~05
c ~ amps (p
3. m3&hPl&mm mlmd

13) mlm&& 63DJ ~ & 3 d o ~ & B ; m j


QQld01)Jo d ~ & ? m j o6302 ~ d m ) j m Jm)mllmlmJm)j.
o mmlld
mila"lnjavj0 aminnj mlomjau~o m 3 r n o nuolmm3om eald d m 9 m m o rns
m r m ~ e r m ' ~ & ~ o m 'w
~ so &
mm o s ~ g s n ir n l m d d mru~ml\3mogs~mnn3d &vlavj&f

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST N -
1) cm3flrd mmj s"ldp3 d m o u 3 m am1 sosajoloa s a a m l d a a u l ~ l y ~ l m ~ c m%am1
~~1o,
04 dmlem3colyeg3d dmm3m a w l g l m j m ~ l o mi j q m 3 w l m ~ msaamlmgloi m j q
m m 1 &mj.g m l d mlmi m m ~ m ~ m l m 3 w ~ m m i ?
a) saao m g a~au&n36ni

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Q mlm@ 11 mornwl- cd~8~mu m3ov
8 d o w p m3hodca~omr~r@w3mm3mlw~z!gcm3
mu.am1 a 3 ~ 1 o a&gjl&& m d 8 w l o 4 a m m m o w m p l ~dolml&w3wlmlmi. m9ml
w & m l @ mlmi m~m~rrjmmow o i m m ~ l &a1;1rn6mlrncam&mmd mml@ & j ~ l w s l m ~
amnu8 mmLiooaaadm~m3rdng)sjm mmwo m m d cmmogs~ml.q m o 320 m?. mdmp
ag3d mafioo a&u8m3rd am2 o m m 4 j o q m o 160 m9. mwlrnlmcg3& 0.5 ommm& 8100
640 m9. mwloimagtl3d 2 o m m 4 l o 8jmo 960 m9. rQr@wlm~mag3d mmwo 3 ommojlJa
~ommJ&mJ.

9) drnqwmnoao a()mlo m ~ m m wml m m m l ~ m m m


czllwmlm8 g3 n R a m m u 8 m l m d
@mi mlwrmm7d i & m " l d m ~ o ?
a) o~mo(m7) cmdno a&dmsm8 (b) oj@o(m9.) m d o o a&&msrd
ng)sim mmwo ng)spm mmavo
(om) (om)
160 0.5 960 3
320 1 640 2
640 2 320 1
960 3 160 5
C) (m9.1
R J ~ O cmdnoo&&m3m8 (d) 8200 (m9.) ~ r a d 8 0a&u8&03&
~g)s~wmrnwo q s p m mmwo
(om.) (om.)
320 1 640 2
160 0.5 960 3
960 3 160 0.5
640 2 320 1

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
qrno (a?.) q m o (rn9.)

.~

b) cmm700 m m r n l y qrnalo cmmVooa&&m3omspm mmwajo amd rmam~d~nnrmmlem


6ni.
c) m d o o a&&mod q s ~ m mmwo ojmo & ~ s ~ m m r n p v r &
n l p~ w > m ~ .
d) mm7no o & & m 3 o m s ~ mmmwo cmsr;lormm70r$ 2ynnow ~ ~ ~ ~ l y l r n l m ~ r m ~ .

m3c9jhPlhmm mlm& esio~ahmlooj gwrsjmmlem m~cmwlylrnlm~mj ng)m mlm


mmo cmrnlw3cm3 ng)mi &?a drnlocm~wlm~&w~wlrn~m~. trwa&mlona 9a&m3&
40" mwlrn~mog3& m3&d9&rnmmlrn& 0.1 ml. el. / o m m d w ~ o 50c m8 0.2 al.
eil / o o u m d n u ~ 6~o a c - m8 0.25 al. eil. / o m m d w j ~7 0 ' ~- m8 0.4 ml. el. 1
o m m d n o ~ o80C - m8 0.55 al.eV ~ m m d w j om o m o n ) &mi.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
em1 maudmj a 3 ~ l o a&isla&, @ ~ a & m l o 4 mwmSlmm~rrumlaJ ~ 0 3 m a n d g m l m ~
m3apm n?\mlau~momm~olrij dolm~&au3aulm~m~. d a l m d rmaplwlos8 30 om.rn7.
smmm)= om1 m&mpimmlor$ d~omlos8mlmi som.m9, lo om. m"l, 15 om.mI, 20
OW.^?, 25 om.m9, q m l 2avmm91os8 r n m l o & 3 d m a d aam ~e119rnd22m~rr~lmmd
2 m 3 m l . m&mpimo ~ s e ~ o o & 3 m ~ d o
s g
a .o rruplmm2lm3 mlmi mmlau3aul 420
a m & !dm&l~,num3!am0 1s om.ml, 15 onu.a"l 12 om.m7, 9 om.a?, 6 om.a9, ne)m9
rma&am~los8 drisilyl.

-------- I,.
,?t
.t,
\.\, \..,
.
G

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST-V
1) illjmjc6m mmmlm illm7m~mo8mom pwmmlm3mlmi m 3 o ~ & m l ~ 3e3mo
& om rudm]
mu8 mowloam3n8 &lqm& rrumwoms~mpnmlooj &ammo a3avplomg tddlomoco
m3srri q m i om2lwlm3n8 a ~ i l l j opdlmm3au d m 9 w m o a
m 7
?

a) mom illj"mmj@ oqnu~&s&u41mmm9wmlm8 m p m a ill&m~&.mill pmp3om


spmlrm mmwo m l ( p 9 w l m p .
b) mcm c l l ~ 3 n j m m oqouj&~&o@s~rmai
j~ am5 cm~orru3aur m o a m ~ omop3 o o ~ ~ o l x l o o
Q@J cmlm~mm~olwla~o w & m ~ & . mru m3om3rm~o2 m ~ & 3 o m s ~ moumaua
~ m mlm9
wlm]&.
(cru~drn:o o ~ ~ o l & a o gmlmjm
~d m~olauloer p*&m3& mmm'lw g&m$rulornm3o8
pauCamw3wlmlm~o.)

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
d) mjmjni(m q 3 n j m m 2 1 2 2 o n e ) m j a s & o g s i d mlu l u 3 w p i l d m ~ o m ~ a 6 m ~ d h .
6 3 ~ a o 3 m ~2or n ~ & 3 o m s p o ) mmmwo m l r n l m l m ~ & .

4) 03@ai, ern2 o d d m l m 8 sosajrnm pdam9m8 ggscg3u3 mmi pdae13dmlmamld r u g


N 2 m m 3 a I l &dh36mogcjb. odfamlwlooj a s C I , mmh x a m l a l s a g 3 s h dml01)03al
~ X U W O ~ ~ ~ @ m a~d ~2 9J ~~7 1~4r~~n.s xJ ~ aNl o a~ j2 9 - n o mrnlaau3 a
m 5 drnlam3col
m3d nglm~dm9mmm36ni mlmu3 mlda@mlml&?

~ l d mlod a3arn3milwi0 a j m j m j m drnlmia


b) earn m a i g r n i m m3wi s o q ~ o ~ a pdwo
21m8 eaarn3 oddcrulm8 01dmb&. od&mla]&u3 x a a ~ ~ ~ l m a r m m 7 ~ 0 .g)~m
1 . ; I nuliml
o&36m~&2le13& 0 1 2 m l r n l m ~ m o m dmlrn9mlm~&.
C) eam a e I i g r n 2 s m s a j s o s a j o ~ d h o 2 s ~ de ~ a r n 3 m l a i oa j m j r r j m tr33adhmu3 m10
rdim1a. earn drnllulm8 m a e ~ a m 3 m l a i o633arn3 o d d m l m 8 wrdimi&, o d & m l a ~ a u 3
.g)~mnul~cnlaaih36m~&sleI3ania 2 m l r n l m ~ m o c m m imlrn4mlm~&.
d) earn a a J g m i s m3ai soqjoj&o2qmni, m a w l d q m j m j m m2ald x a o mlo
@mi&. eacm3 s06r#lai0 ap~mim
drnla~a2lm8e3orn3 o d d m l a l s ~ & o. d d m l a i
&21oa m2Cij drnlam3colm~a.

5) was mdgo ~ 9 olm&2lai03 mpjm3ani q m ~ d m " m 3 a md r n l a m 3 ~ 1 m i a 3 &mlm


m ~ m d l m p m n~g. l q drnlm6mm3ani m l m @ m ~ c a m mlmu3 l mlda@mlm~a?
a) m l e j l m d c q a & n n l m i l o j s m&rngt~mmllgoad ~ o m l m mlmi 8 earn 2 w m m l d w m n l
o&36ml r313mmd g s i a . m&rngtplmmld x a o m l o & m p . o1~rnm2le1josd p a m
& m ~ r u m ~~ma c w r n a u 3moalm8 d m l m 1 m m&amd in~rnmajo011926.
b) m & r n g ~ m m l m 8& ~ o oo ~ ~ r n m um3a l o s m ~ m 1 a l o s a u ~ m ~gwg1s m l m ~ a m ~ ~p 1d a0o mlo
@ m p .eaaw3rnaau3 mowlm8 d m l m j m m&amd m~rnmmjoo d a y i a .
C) m & r n g ~ m m l o o jd ~ o m l m 8 m l dmjmjni(m 2aurnm2lm8 o 1 ~ m m u 3 2 m 3 m i a ma
m i l d p d a o mloymlmjcmmo xacu3rn&u3 mowlm8 d m l m p n m & a m u 3 m3rnmmj0
Odayph.
d) a j m j m j m 2 a v r n m 2 ~ g 9rnm] m & r n ~ ~ ~ m m o 2 m sm~lmd8, d~omrm7m~oumIdm~wl
earn paurnmle120 ma~mlm8a 3 d o ~ c n a m 3 Sa d d m i earn 2aurnmrmlaj0 o1~rnmu3ssp,.
mhrng3Lmo xe100&3m2 mloymlm~acmo4lopdaw3rnmoaulm3 d m l m j m m a a m u 3
m3mmmjo o d a y p .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
d) mlmj sosa~oj&21m8seiomqmrJi m@,ojommlm3 5 ml. eil. dmoU3mei3wmlw~0cam3m
ommlm3 5 m1.al. 2 9 eJ3wmlaujo m~nn3mommlm35 ml.al. ~oou3gjei3wmlmrjoa i z l m
a d m l w m l m ~ s m m oml~mlmmmlonjmj32ma & 3 m j a .
7) q m j 0 i j m d n ~ d r m o m 2 j o sm3d1wml&~oumlm& mjml\rdmm~aulmlmjoq m mlcnmmo

b) & & m j m a mmj ~ ~~m3rpj2dow3cnl4 002 m a ~ m l o n a3mo j mmlm3 m3aua mlomjnn


mlmjm~rmjom3wjmlogmlrn~ammm~o &36mj&.
C) m 3 w p l o d m e m m a l m j o m3wj m l o y majmjo mmj o u ~ & m m w j s ~ m ~ ~ l o n j
s m j m 2 j & 2 l a ~ omy2 m j a m o odpyjh.
d) o u ~ & m m w j s am2 ~m3@onj mmj m$j&2lajo aem ruj32m0 m 3 w ~m i 0 4 m a ~ m j
ad m 4 m p m o o d g j & .
9) d i s j m mmi d o a d m a m m i m do-~donawjrnmlwm6mmldmjm3d qsjm
do3drmomlm8 mlmi m s m j m m l e a 6 a 6 m3da ~ d m n n l m j oE.J . l d r r h 3 m m om2lal
m3O3 sdlmm3au d m 7 m m o q 6 f
a) mmj o s ~ j ~ m j & @ l m saomsjrmai
3 60" 2~&m3ruloamjmmjmomd~s3mlaumlm~
a m m o mmj o s m j j 7 j ~ m j ~ ~ l o a sa ja oo & g j l m e i d m l 2?~&mmjmj3ouo mlm'laml
&A&.
b) mmJ m7moi&o2s2rmai am16 40C- 200 Lm30 s a m j o mmomammlm3 80"-
a j 220~ 00330 s a m j o q s j d m m mmlm3 & p j l m a d m l ~ m , l m j s m m od m l m m
29&m3d c m m o g s j m j h .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
a1 gmjrmi & r m 1 0 & 3 ~da m&&mlwlaio ruajgmlaimAm oinoaulmlatbua 2m3.301
m d d m i d mmlmj&.ca3~n~n0wlmjau8 cou~g~a~aumlmlm8mjml, c m 3 g ~ n l a l o
m m l d ng)Lmmmwo mmlmlm8mpnj n@mim l o ? m l m j a .
bl mcm ma$mlwllma gmjrmi &mlo&3& d m ruajgmla~mo~nOwlmj&d2 m 3 m l
m m l d m i d mmolmjes. corru3ga3aumbld o~noavlmladmiml, eou3gnolal0 mmld
ng):mmmwo mmlmlm8m~miorumlmlmlmlmla.

dl acm ma$mlwjo rujmjrrjm rumlgrulmjm m m j & ~ m m o ~ s p o p mrua2icm3cm3


,.
mlmlo mQadmlm3d & ~ l w ~gmirm~od3slau~os
m e3mo a 3 m p .

bl m e o s m j ~ m j & o g s j m "mmld iooaCaim s a w l o mcplm8 ong)wio mloaiimia.


m l d m mmwmlmjem&to mmj o s ~ j ~ m ~ a ~ l oaaamlmd a w ~ odmlem3wlm)a.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
.wP6~cso T m a m c a oEtraru scsP&~t6~mPw ~ w P a a 3owcm
S ~
rucw 0 m ~ r u w w w c s u s 3gnwS~mPw~ ( D C Z J L swPt6wPocta .wPwPsmcsrata ~Paacsru
~ a P w w~oawamcsusm09mmcsruPwru p ~ u u wcwTs@ gnwfocta Psusm BTmmm3 maw (q
. w P w ~ r n ~ morucs~w
~w b c s ~ w w o ~ m ~bcswPapru
aw~ cwPw~m~wPsscwa~wpracs (p
'wPw~wbm~w
O W C Z J ~ ~O L ~ ~ O ~ b ~ cL s C~ m ~ W
~ ~ V
aPPpW) ~L W L ~ C ~ ~ L W Q I ~maam ~cw~ww~w~ (3 r a o
. w 9 w ~ m w ~ w l wpa~ w c r a s w oancww1Tmtno F~mcmaw3oPwpracs cmacw (q
.wPw
~ m ~ m owram
~ w c w T w c w P w ~ w w o ~ m ~gncFaw aw~ . w P w ~ wt w p w a a n r u P a s a
p p r a e pcwcsPi5~~~1,m~w swtra~wprawo w o ~ m ~ b(9~ruPapru o ~ l Paw ?3StwPsw (e
~ o P 6 ~ o a n ~ c wg~namn~ wwmcanaLmp
TaW pctco~oi5~m~a p~mca, mcsruw .&sra ~Twpracswparul~ru Pmw ~Twpracscutarulocu, Pmw
gnwfwpracs Psusm w o P w ow- Cpwprabw owru~vPaw u u P m ~ a c m o T c m aoancw@w ((n
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
.PwPwLsLEL5~ ~cwomLmanswPww gnmcarlpru gncwoPwpm~!u .I
~ P w ~ m cswcmormpnl
ru gn~ruaPwcm~w1~wcpn
w P w ~ m ~ w t s c wewcw
w (S
.PwPw~mcmo~w p~p w P w p w oraruswlwww pruPefm omca b c s ~ ~ f w p r(qc
.?wPw~cncmoPtw~(~iw
Pwww oramw7wo~swmcmTanrucw~wwra~SPwpru wrufmtm omca b w ~ r u P a p(e~
.B~cwP&~ru swcw
O M X ~CWO?~V&?F S W ~ J L ~ ~ C P ~
miCWRW0W -w?SWB@~IU@
~ ~ ~ R~ L)C ~ L ~ C UPPIWW '5
.PwPw~scrsgnLWWW(9
pcSocmo swira~mPw~upsscmo w P w ~ m ~ F ~ mTsu9cwwgnw~ww
p~w P~~ma p~PIY,wpw
(h
~ ~ w P w c ~ ~ L P I Y , u w P ~ c c ~ o VWLW ~U
I ~ L W ~ L S W Y @ F P CWPWLWLWPSCQB scsc~ (E
. P w ? w ~ m ~ R ~ m a wwmlv
nlW wlw
PO- mPwmo~w~w1 wPm~wru
p w s ~ wP w ~ w ~ ~ W w c w ~ o ofiPrarc
p n c w bwlraelw
~~ (p
.Puu?wlm~P;~man?@m ,
cowlrucmpd w ~ m w o l o ofifraw bcslrae~w (3
.PWPWL~LP;L~WWJE c ~ c s ~ r ~
S w b c s ~ w a n c ww
~ 1t w ~ w w y wy ~ p~wTmtcu,
w cmocrs (p
pw oo~wo?mbcs~ruPwpru
.oPw~mcwpcruPw~ww~rnu oo~wmcmT~cmoPwpm,oPcu~ruPwprucoocrs ( 3
.Pwt6rrw ocusm~m@mofmswuoso~wcB8csm ww~ecawo~wb w ~ m c w wo b P w p r c cmocrs (q
.PwP6~csoPmwPwLfilra
ou~w~ o?Sunso~wcB8csm
7 oPmwP6~wo(~gm~m@m oo~wb w ~ w c w wofruPwpro cmocw (e
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
09 0091
Of oooz
ss OOP L
SE 009
01 ooz
p ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Om~W ~9N 3POW ( ~ s w001m3
) bcs~wramp
.PcwPwp~a6csca g n w w r u ~
E~~ a m w aora~ocwworutow cwPwloru PE~oPwwcs~racwlmis5 (6
.PcwPscw oatvtupem OmCawLmCw Pmw I ( O P ~ P W L T U O ~ ~ ( D O C ~ ~ ~.z
aw (q
oramcuswpw& p i w a gnw(01cwa b c s l w r n ~ ~ c wmu
g ~ ~ ~ w ~ g n w ( a TscsPSwouupcvru
y 3 oraw~wpwm )cwa OmamwLru (e
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX 111

MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY


School Of Pedagogical Sciences
TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
(FINAL FORM)
(Suresh K.P. & Joseph, C. 1996)

m l m d m o j o msau32ogsjmlw 'X' lilnmo o m ~ 3 w m 3 o m m&~m 3 & mmdm3Qd


m m l 6 minlmd ~ J Q J O 'a ' (em2 o d o l w mmlim).mo) mmmimgdhwio mmlau3a m3rncn6 'x'
l i l n m ~gsdaa20 olimim3d mmlau3mho.
dmlem3ul&d 'Start' n g ) q d o w ~ e r m 3 d2mmo msau3@ogs2m3& ~ m o i i l m ~ & a ; o
'Stop' *mi nloaui~mc3cd2 m m o 0@9)cmionm)m l d m ) & q o od0$))&. 2 m m m v a n g ) q m l m ~ l
memnslo 2 m m m s e r 3 m ~ oed3ojmset~mdodmlcm3(u&orn mlmlo& q e L l m m o .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
~ocusacwmcmTecmaPww oPru8wa~aS
ocruccau@ .Papr=cs ~PmwPw~mlr praa~man~v@la& w t m w ~PmwPw~wrurul p p w a
o b ~ m c m l w a nPmcru wcEsm~wcsllsPmacrwmlor=cs ~suscwcs~r=thuPScmo
~mcraluulru
mcmhuPw~mscsPmanma
bcslapm,awwaPwlaFrucs qutraw Paw FolwPmcru p ~ w r a w r u 1 (s
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
.BSSPuuPm~rnw~ ~ c m f w ~ m c m a r ~ P
mua )n~u~ w
:moPw QUcruPwpo~wowrucul wLmcslap "~cwcsPaaclaaPs1w o E l Q l w F w p J w w (p
.15i3PuuPrnl6w ~CwLmcmorJlP w l a w
a a r a w w o P w p c w p o ~ c uowcprucwl p ~ m c s l o pyc%vcs?amcruoPupo 6 p w w ~ a w w(3
'(USCEQ
arcssru
wwwlru w P w ~ s P w P r ap w p c c o ~ a a c a u u ~ l m 3 p c a p a 8 ~ c s ~ w r n ~(qw c ~
~~caarupmwLru
.c~Pw~sPwPF~raro (ow y c ~ c s P a u u P w l a r ~ w P ~ ar0Src
c n r ornbwcr~ (e
~ ~ C W L U ~ ~ocusarcw
~ C Wb @e ~ a .PuuPmru
a ~suswo~mcmo~:
orawwaPs?q w c m a r w ~ s t w~JXW~IJUCTY P ~ m c r n a ~cSs l a p ~ L S W ~ V ~wT pmV 3: (6
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
P'Z (P P'L ( 3 E'L ( q 5'1 (e
L ~ Y W W u
& c s ~ ~ u l c rUOPWL~LF~L~ 09ruco1 p
omcarnu &OLWTP~UCU~ E
~Ql\"9@m
scsPswPrasPW z
O O m
S S C S P ~ ~ P I ~1 ~ P W
jWPCDL69 ~ C W ~ S ~ C S?W@IUW WC~( LUP) C
~( ~' S
~OTWUW S ~ UW O C ( W ( ~ @ pD)LRC
m w P m o ~6 w c a p ~ ~ ~ s ~ w ~ w c u sTPtlwcmPm~EOo w ~ m r y p c w s w g n u a s c l l s w ~ m r up c u ,
~ c w w P w ~ c r P= F ~ o P w m o F p m Zv ~ m ( ~ o~ aL c n c m a ~ P S ~ P r a 6 P w ~n uw~ L~ S Po m
~ c w Tm~9 (I
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
P 'z ( P P 'f ( 3 P 'z (q Z ' L (e
oaycrru b e l w r a p l uuPml6w pcf6scwepG ( o l w a l c ~.p
o ~ p c 8 i UopWlWsP~CCCC O ~ W ~ ~ C'E ~ ~ ~ R ) ~
OQICO b e l w w r u c ~ 1
m l w f e c m w ~ r u w.z
~spwmcsremPra~wwrucU1bcslwPapru .I
~wPwrsFcsrL9aooJXlR91w
w1wPmP5cwo p c S w u w ! p 1 w ~cBacsWQQllmwuoPw~QI1wPscwe 6eca .ruurw1a
luoa o f r u a l c ~ofwfecmcslruw Pas FOLU) owrucO1 oPruPopru Pms o P w c a 1 p o l ~ l pPws
(scpWEWlU) L R D L ~ c ~ , ( ~La)Wl(O
' . ~ P ? ~ P ~ ~w ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ c I u ~ w ~ L N c ~ ~ c ( ~ cORl ) W~ Ow pLm)lWLWpm (6
TEST IV -

4) -95) -20 a d 3 ~ ~ m um3ov8 06b35jrmm10lmjm) m 3 n n d m ~ o mmcu3mrnomlwnavj~


03015. m3&hPl&mm mlo& trx~n1&mTOno4 pdrn3Mrnm m,~maulglmlmjmj ng)mmlm
mmo mmlw3am3 ng)mi 4 e 1 dmlam3wlmj&m3wlmjmj. inz~ni&mlo+ 29&rn3d 40C
q,wlmjmag3u8 m 3 & d 7 & m m mlmm" 0.1 r n l . e j ) . / o m m d ~ ) j 50c-
~ mtl 0.2ml.d./
ommdnujo 6oCmtl 0.25rnl.al/ommd~)j0 70C -m8 0.4 ml.efl./omm&wj~ 80C - mtl
0.55 ml.aV o m m d o u j ~m o a m m j &mi.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
8) om2 ~31ggloa&jsl&@ mniiomlo4 ammmowm~ol-;i d o l m ~ & w 3 w l m ~ mmlm?a& ~.
mlm3mlmi m~mj"i(mm3wnlmmslm3 01x4 mmmmmmu8 mmlm .a,~~lwslm~aou3d
msnj~oa & d m j m 3 d ng)s~mnnmmwo mmd omsuogsjml. ojmo 320 m9. mwlm~mc$3@
mdcza a&@m3d I o o u m q ~ oq m o 160 m9. (819wlm~meg30a0.5 ooum4do q m o 640 a?.
m w l m ~ m o g 3 ~2 3ommojjo q m o 960 m9. ~ w l m j m e g 3 dmmwo 3 ommmjja3ommi
&mJ.

a) s ~ m o(a9.1 mblLi00 a & d m ~ d (b) ojmo (m9.1 mslrino a&@m3d


ng)sim mmwo q s i m mmwo
(om.) (om.)
160 0.5 960 3
320 1 640 2
640 2 320 1
960 3 160 5

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
C) R ; ~ O (rn7.j ud-3oo~ohdmm? (dj oimo (my.) mmUoo~&d&3d
n6)simm)mwo n6)sim mmma
(om.) (om).)
320 1 640 2
160 0.5 960 3
960 3 160 0.5
640 2 320 1
9) ,,dm, am2 a i g l m ~ o sN 3 6 ~ 3 ( 0 & n~mm8~~gmImdcmn910 a d g l m l d da~nnlee13
m l o a . m3rn1~300mlo6m~onmlmlsm,lm8rmarud namd meho 2 a u d m l . rmaag3d
a ~ g l m ~ ~ l enPlvjm
a r n ~x a m l o a g emmm a d n u l a . ~mlm8mlmim m ~ m ~ m l m ~ m ~ o n c s i !
a) a),glmlm8 m3aui m l o m I ~ ~ m 3 a u l m ~ o n ~ .
b) ,,om& 2 w 6 r n l w e y 3 u 3 qgIau1om w3wj d~ocmmjahsrmj.
C) d p ~ m m ~i 4~ 33w p ~i o eq r u c n n n ~m~a~h ~ m m N
i Q x ~a m i o q ~ m m n ~ p
rm~eJ~rn3m7.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST V -
I)
m j o m mmmlmrmm7m8 o a g l m l m ~ mong)cri, 2m~&3omsjmjmmmwo mmm"l
a l o m ~ ~ m w l g l m l m jnmg)m~ 29~00 mmlw3ommi o m 2 l m 3 d a g a j o mmPw3*J
m3w d 0 9 m m c r n 6 7
a) mom n l \ 3 d m m ~ mong)nu~&~aUa mmm"lmlm8 m l o m ~a6mta. m m 2m@3om
s j m ~ mmmwo m l m 9 m l m ~ & .
b) mcm a j 3 2 m m l m o n g ) m ~ a s & o 2 s j m -mmi m ~ o n u 3 wm a m l o mogd o o i n o l ~ l a o
~6 gmlmjm mplwlap a6dfs)jdh. m a a3603mjo 2 m j & 3 o m s ~ m ~ mmwo m dm1
mlmja.
dl mjmjmjm r u ~ 3 d m m s l s so n g ) m ~ a s & o s s ~ mmml
6 nnjom3m m a m ~ mag6 o
o ~ n o l ~ l c o ggmlmpn
d m p l w l a p a 6 m p m3am3m& 2 m ~ a 3 o m s ~ m pmmwo
m mlml
m1mp.
dl a j m j m j m a j 3 d m m 2 ~ 2 2ong)mjas&o2s2m6 m a a3wlmlm8 m l o m j a 6 m p ~
a3am3mio 2mj&ih3omqm~mmmwo m l m l m l m ~ & .
( m p m : oo~nolxlaogdgmlmjm m ~ d m l e a29&rn3ti( mmm9m ~ & m 3 m l o m
m3Ua 2w6mm3wlmlm~o)
2) ajmjrr3m wmmim mmjmjmuB mom 2wmmrm7dmlmi m 3 a ~ 6 m l s 3 m 8moo a , j o r n acri,m~
m u 8 m o w l o a m 3 0 3 a ~ s j m m 8mmwoms~mjmmloc$ &3mmo a 3 w p ~ l o c $idmlcm3w
m3m" ng)mi om21wlm3d a g m 1 0 zdlmmaw d m ' l m m o a d ?
a1 mmj m ~ m a m ~ 3o m w a l o m j n o s l a & ~ v a l a lm s g m l m ~ e m m oapm8 o d o s m i me167
9301 d s l m ~ a m . p ~ a ~m o3 m w a ~ om s l m ~ l o a m 3 o m s ~ m mmwo ~m mlm7ml
m&i.,
b) N 3 a j m9mo o=~&mam1 m j n o s l a m j ' ~ a l 6 3mjmajo m ~ m a v m l ogS m r a s y m l m p m ~ w ~
mjnoslampm8 o d o s m i meJa993wl dlslm~&. m j a a l m l o m~mwcmmlm~o mag mag
o m m 3 O 3 m a m j m 3 w numwo mlm"l1mla.
C) m ~ a a m p 3 m w a ~ ecm0 aajgmjm m m i g3mj &19~~&210~?1Slm6 msgmlm~cmmo
odo5jmi ' p &~pai&Ua ~ m a &993wl dlslm~a.m ~ @ m 3 m l q m o slm~loam3m3
amjm3w mmwo mlm"l1m~a
dl m m j a3mi ablwallma m m j m i a a l a s l o m m i m ~ m w m s j o r n s ~ map 3ma mrasgml
mjammo m a & 9 w m l dlslm~a.e3cm3m10 m s l m s l o a m 3 O 3 ng)s~m~m mmoo
mlnilmlmj&.
3) m j r q r r j m i n ~ a a m 2 ~ oal&3mmlm&
s m~~mjcr3mm3omm om ~ 2lwlm3mjm~a~m
ng)ga~oa21mm3w dm"lmcrnmi?
a1 m o m a d 3 o a w ~ mmlmj cm3wlalocij s j ~ m 2 & 0 2 s ~ mm6n j c m m l m 8 m3m8m0hn32~0
mmomammlm8 $!~lnuolmjo mjm3rnommlm8 e a a a i o ng)s~mj&. g m mmj a g s d m 3 m l m 8
d ) s 3 m p . g a w l o a ~ ~ ~ m & m l m g l o2cw$ d d d m l e m ~ w l m p .
b) n ? \ m j d m aaJgrnJmmimJ omawldou? s j l m ~ a o 2 s p r 6mml63 ~ m 8 ~ ~ h n 3 9 ~ 0
mm3mcmmlm8 $QlmnlmJompmmcmdm8 a a a a ) o ng)sp=oja. g m am2 m3s6sru3mlma
a42 d ~ s 3 m ~p3aa a. mlm~loc$z w d y d m l c m o u i l m ~ a .
c ) mam a a ) g m l s s mjml em3milaloloui sjlmjaslm8 morn%, m~m8mahn3Ua,a l m o l d
q m l a mlod ajml\cri,m p ~ & r n ~ ~ o a m m m a lqs3mp, wo l r 3 3 ~ d h m l ~ )dm1
d
Cm3wlm~a.
d) a j m j m j m a a & j m i m mlmi am3wlalolovi s j l m l a s l m 8 m o m w m ~ m 8 m c h n 3 ~almr 3,
fld ng)Ma m l o g m a ajmjmJmjmOodm%!Io o a ~ ~ ? d f s ) ~ m ~dJ53m>&. 1wo mmom
m m a m 3 d m m ~ a n l m j a 15 . mlmlglm~cmm~ 1~3m&mlmdd m l a m ~ w l m p .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
. V P W C . OCU~C ~S C ~ P ~ L S C T Y C ~ P W P Q ~ OPCDL~YP ~ C O L W ~ Q Q W ODPWLU
c a o c w a p r u w .wPwPs3cs~laswcwPsuscm SSPmPruFkru copCaBru oPmlaPwm aaw (p
.vP(uscw o%& soPSw~~thuP5cmcs uuPffi~6wp c w
~wpw@aoPw~uocaacw.wPwPsScswwcw Pracw SSPmPruFPnw oPmlaYwGm apCaCru ( 3
. ~ P ~ L s L P P I UPuomcsPffi~6w
S~ p c w l w p w m 3csw
~~thutSca;cs w1& o P w ~ w w c wccmacw .wPwPs3cswaucw Pracw SSPnlm~aPwQsrap (q
.wPw~sl~Psusw a%@ scsP~wplrwPScmcsuoPffil6w p c w ~ w p w @ a
oPw~wcoocw caacw .wPwPsScswcoocw SSPmPwEPraru apCaBru oPmlco?w@a was ( e
~ w P w P s ~ c s a w cO sU L ~ F W L ~ ~ P mcm(YLEra
cPrullW w c w t m c w a t a ~PuomcscsusaPmmum ~fficmPruFPrarubcs~cowp l w w b c s ~ w m c w .L
. ' E D ? ~ F c ~O?DOQICW
~ ~ u n s r a w~ ~ l oP w l plaocwacmraes
a ~ crsuanoPw~coFolwP~~~cwcsorax oalcFawu
VCPPSW @macro c l r a ~ w a a 3cm3w p p r c a scwomcspcrc ~ c ~ ~ w 8o?ratwmm?t arn asr9
~ m c m ~ ~ r n n u i c o l w upluors
c r ~ '~PsScs~lascw~c~cmwa Pw c
m Si3PGmamZ o(u)Y(YYw (p
.wP6~(9
oCmaacw g o w r a w w u o P w ~ a p ~ n o o awwacmrax owanaPwlaFo~worax p ~ m
r u w s w P w c ~ wwcmcruZ p ~ f k 1 ~ 9 ~ 1copBcoPru
ffiS p ~ w w ~ w o c bcslwa?cFcmwa
ru ((3
.vP&~cs oY0cocmcco wmrawem ccofw~a~ go~moawwcmraea . w P w p
o ~ worax c ~ w @ P w ~ c o ~fficmPmscslrulwPmscs~ruem
5@ gnuosucro oaPw p l w a l c F ~ c m w w(q
~ w P 6 ~ coCsmwcmcco w m r a v w u o P w l a ~ w l m o a pnwcmcmnx uoParuPwp
waoP~ scstra~Smacru,wPwpo1w orax ea)~oalcFcmwo.wPsiB w w a c r v P m c v c s
L W @ ~a r ~ w a m Z a38 "uo~ww ~ w o bcstwcolcFbvcoc ~ SSPra~m~aYw6m qsus~ra~nu( e
6 ~ ? ~ l ~ f i 0Wp l~wL W L w r u a P w p w ~ wnpcm(usmLap f w w . P u o t w ~ o ~ m : ~ ~
~ L W p c r u P ~ p c a n @wrucaprul
~@~ W@ n~cmCraP~ oPral3van~vc&& obpm wrucw: .9
~ w P w ~ w & c mwucarw ~w b c s ~ w m o ~ w t a bcs1wPapru
~y1 (~~Pwla~wPsscwa~rw (pp r a ~
.wPw~wpl(o
crucarw bcs~wmolm~cnr~u: bcs~rurcorpruuoPw~cm~mcra~wcmto acssrc Puo~wppwpracs (3
.W?WL~V/W:'P)~ p1wcrasw ?a@oancw~7CcmtnoF l m c m a ~ ?opwpracs t ccmacw (q
.wPw
LWLUL~ o w r a ~ u o i w c s u s ? w ~ w w o ~ w ~pncFamco~: . w P w ~ wU)wpmamruPcn,sc?a
p p r a o ~ c w c s P F ~ w ~ ,scslra~wpracs
a~w o m o ~ w l a r u@~cs~rufapru
l Paw B P w f s a a (e
20P6~csanpcr~~an w w l w wmcanoLcmru
Yd b
. p c r z ~ ~ o f ; ~w ~~ twl wa mcsruem 6 l a m oPhu~uracswxru?~ru Pcmw oPrwpracscoe3ru:ow Pas9
'~wPhupracsP m cm w o P w oww P w p r a ~ worwru~oPcmw uoPa~mcmcuYruc~rn8 oancw@a .s
d.9ePm p ~ s w ~ w m c l a
rap r u m 0wanaPw~aPt~muru wqPra?w p~Sw?m~ffiw:csaucma SSPralm~aPw@araw (p
.wPwPm p ~ m ~ w m c r a P F c hr;~mum
u~ Pdw
v ~ m r u m.~~PwcsusZ pnwCm~m~1cs SSPFqmcma~~PSElas~ycrao rap plno~coYw@mrap ((3
.vPwLFWlp~wPuowcsPuuPwp~w~wco ~mmnuw1w7cRu
QQILUI~JB oLraL~iFcnua '~wPmgnwPm~ffi~1cs pLno~wnocra6co@ .wPw~momsw l w WLUW
1wcsusG gnwPm~m~lcs SSfmPraLwFPrarurap msuscwcs~rww ?RuP~S ~ ~ L ~ ~ L @ P v a019
Q W (q
'UPPWLW@I~U) ~~
UO& ? U U P W ~ L W L C J Roffi~(wO:@WLOQW
oLraLw6crwa'1wPm pLmlwmcraPFcnu:, @nwPm~mou1oucraa.wPwtmum p t w W L W Q ~
~wcsusZ ~~wPr~~mw:csBfmPraLwEPrarc oPra~mtaYw6mrap p c w c s ~ w vPnoPcm3 (e
lpac~CxcmstweJB
ctrue'w +cmuLswLcmw Ca@ g~~~i(0ruuoPw~a~wYscw~9 60c0 pcruPwtmcmalcm Puo&
ccusecalcmw owcmPww uo@ P P U o w ~ a ~ S ~ c s ~mcaPru%p~wp~ruraap:
m~w ~ ~ ~ (*
r a ~
8 . t ~ m ~ & m l o Oma m mdgom m13w9mlm30' ng)m mmjm3mo mmlcw3 mmj dmlcm3
wlm3rd ~ o o m j ommjcw3aajm3w d m ~ a m m c m d ?
a) mjml\m7m pwmmj- mmj a o o j & o 2 s p 6 m m w l d s a o m l o d m ~ & aa3flo4 . ms?
awmmi K c i s 3 w l a ~ o sm 3 ~ 3 w 3 m o~ 9 m&jmls&&
l Sbm3616)j&. &jm12&2ps majgo
m~mmmjoo d a y p .
b) mem 2wmmjg.9 mml aa3oj&cd ng)sjm6 mmld mmjmomwjo mm3mommld d&@
momwjo aaaomsjmp. =301&2jos ~ f i a ~ l ~ 3 U&~mls&d 36 2m~~mmmlw m3mo
womo 29mj&. &2ml2&2psmajgo m3mmmjo o d a y p .
C) mmj a 3 6 s a o o & 3 m j m l o d m p . s 3 6 l o 4 m s l m s l & &jml2&& 2 m ~ & m m m l w o
Keis3wlajes p ~ ~ m j & &~ml2&&
. m s l m s l & mlm" mlmlw p w m m ~ l o a m j o m 3 &
m m w ~ o sm a j g o m3mmmjo o d a y p .

a) mom c d 3 o a w j s mmj slmj&cd ng)sjmj&.om2 slmlomj 2dmlmao & o j m d3wo


dp8wmjo mm~memmlolgna2dmlmao o m ~ g m dim1 o mlmjmogs~mnn7wm~m3m".
m m l a j o a a a o mlod p & m 3 c ; i cmmogsjrmm7 o u ~ m j i d & ~ m m l mmiml&.
& 15 mlml
91mj e m a o mmleawjo p-&m3nl m 2 m p .
b) mom o d 3 o a w j m mmj slmj&cd ~g)sjmj&. mmj slmloo$ pdmlmao & o j m d 3 w 0
d & ~ ~ l w mmm3mcmmlo4
jo pdmlmao o m s y 3 a u o d ~ m mlm~mogs~mlaum~m361ri.
l
mmjslmj&~lajo d i q a a~a o ng)spmi 29&marii m2m~&. 15 mlmlplmjcmao nPlmjo
29&m3rii cma2mp.
C) m m j o s w j ~ m ~ &ng)s~mj&.
& mmlo(a djoo & o j m &sa3mio&3& od3mlwj&.
m m l a j o a a a o mlod m ~ m j i ~ l & 3 m m mmiml&.
l & j o g o u m w m l m ~ c m ~m
omj
o s w & m j & 2 l o a w ~ oa a a m l o 4 p & m 3 r i i mlmqdfiyjlmjdh.

a) odrmjo gmjrmjo o&3mU mldmnly msni wjc6mnm"noj&o2sjm~&.mmmi1oa3mj


29&m3d 200C wloerm~mmjmomd~s3mlwmlmjomaomm1oq m&pld J S 3
m3m wjvmodnu7ooj ap,&pnlwjm3wl m3mmmjo o d a y p .
b) 50 o ~ . m ?m. 9 s m j s c m d m mmj odrmj&mlwjo m m j gmlrmj &rmlwjo ng)sjmj&
mmow, 200C g~&m3mloamjmmjmom d ~ s 3 m l w m l m ~ c m &m 0 m w ~ o sm92o
&36mJ&.
c ) mjmjcnjm m92mj- mmj odrmj &Wlwjo m m j gmjrmj6adauomqcmui m m w ~ o smyso
msm~da.200C 2 ~ & m ~ m l o a m j m m j m o m m e w d ~ s 3 m l w m l m j e m a oN 9 m ~ o
m m w ~ o sm990 &3mj&.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
6) ~ s l ~ l m a l l o m m j odl go l m j m mmj domouowo emmml.ly mlmmmu8 030'9 cddmjonj.
crS111~~1oolj 2 ~ m o( m E l ) omj ~ d & o2 m 3 w m l m d
200 10
800 35
1400 55
2000 70
2600 80

~ m l mlmi
d m l m d ~ o m 3 6 nmm@a3mjm6?
i
a) ~lhnwmmado3drmam2jos ~ClD3jm&ihoam@nld m&d&6mmao 2&.
b) b3em dl33dCbIlnnil04 mClD3~0&dm m l d m&d&msluao 2 d .
c) alrd~wmmod o ~ d m m 2 j o so n ~ ~ ~ m ~ u 8 m
al&d&lmjmd.
mnl~
d) nomaulmo nm~drmamu8mmlmlma al&d&lm~m,j.
8. omj 6 n 1 a ~ daaml&m3aul ~ ~ m l a l d g l ~ ~ m jdp3d~ilwcg3u?
e m & ~ 40C magmloo$
mj3njm0 18 ml. all~odo50C d 230 ml. m ~ o , j a6O"C fd 320 ml. eJIi)ojo m o m m &
~mj.
@mildmlmj mmrplaam3mpm ou3m3mjmmlo ng)06!
a) runlmmd@mld2..s&m3d a d m l m ~ c r m ~ ~ 3m3cn&mloolj aj3dmo ( ~ d m l m ~ m ~ .
nmj
b) 2~&m3ale1,jm3&jm m j m p ~ ~
aj3njmomm
a rrm~wlm~mlgd.
c ) nd90 mlmm3wlmjm3d ajhk6mm1ldmjdw3mo amjmlg.
d) omj ~ 3 m & m l 0 429&m3d, mdqo, n1j3njm0 fgm m m l d mmumlgd.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
' ~ u 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ UX91N
l n O W 7 ~
b e l ~ ~ c w rcul o>~ w ~ m w ypwl w plwCmfw pw oolw o ~ m ~ c s L r u f ~cmscs
p r u (p
'ofwlmcno wcrutw~owbruoo~wrmcmT&acmafww ofw~rufu~wru cmacs (s
.?uufE~cs
o w Q i l ( n W ofa~csmolwcB80m wcpcs~6cmcsolwb e l a c a w ofrufapru coacw (q
~PuuPE~cs 0fmwPw~Flra
mlarul oPsmo~wcB8csm~ P m w f K ~
o wea ) l ( n @ w oolw b c s l o c a w ~1frufaprucoacw (e
iocwcralt%wm p@ ~ Q D W ~ W
Pwlw w1aS .PcloPsF;cpwcw ofra~wolwP;ruofawma ocncal~too h ~ ~ o ww l w pocw
Pus . p c a ~ o p
~ P r a i w o i wfFmm QD~FW ~ cw
~ m X h p r uowcraa mfmP8b fwfmw (01
.fclofwlco
cmaru?aram L W W 3 wcruPwpofw o X h p 1 ~ ~ 1 p l r u r aoam~a1r u l w > a r obcpcslwwrucm (p
~fuuPwlwpwlru
i ~ c s w f a p r uuoPsF;cswpru w ~ w r a a l m ~ c r a a p~~wa>clcaua
a racslwma~a)rucra$s(3
.PcloPw1wpw@m
&9(9(p?@pIU UU~SFC~W~IC plW~O1QIPCm3t3QDWa>CtWCa, E I O l W i 3 U l W F ' C K 3 3 8 3 (q
.!cwPwlcncmaru> orammwru% ora~a (e
j p W craaTwcmcw uuPrucwcralt%wm PWQDWLW Pwiw p i m r u a
.PclofE~cs of~wfwslwlup9crucpcsp l w r a a ~ o r u c r a a aLFIW ~ P m w f r u c ~ a ~ wPwcra
fm
sw ~ c r w a P w p r cw ~ ~ r a a ~ m r u c r a aopfam ~ ~ kofwcrasw
w w p w a o w w w Pms .s
~ P ~ P ~ p l w ora~lmrucraas
l m c ~ wcpcsloupfio u u f w p r u wpmraqmrucraaw ' Z
.Puufw~orrmsw~ ~ l w F f smcsSrc @ sc41ralwraqm~~craos p n w ~ w c ~r m7 ~ o ~ralF
w '1
a)~
~ w f w ~ m c p n o l QDWTQFPCOU UOPCDO~USCSCCn, (6
APPENDIX N
TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
RESPONSE SHEET

Name : MaleIFemale

School : Division: Class No.

TEST ll TEST III

TEST lV TEST V TEST VI

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX V
TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
SCORING KEY

TEST 1 TEST m
Qn. No. Answer

TEST v

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX V1
PERCENTILE NORMS OF THE TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS

Score in the Test of Process


Precentile level
Outcomes in Physics
PI0 15

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX W
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
Scool of Pedagogical Sciences
TEST OF PROCESS OUTCOMES IN PHYSICS
(English translation)
(Suresh & Joseph, 1996)
Instructions:
In this test there are six subtests. For each item in this test, four answers
a,b,c,d are given. Out of which only one answer is correct. Answers should be
marked on the response sheet separately given to you
In the response sheet, letters a, b, c, and d are marked against each option.
Find the correct answer and mark 'X' in the column below the correct answer.
If the answer marked by you is found to be wrong, draw a square 0around
it and mark 'X' in the proper place.
When the invigilator says 'start', start marking the answer, and when he says
'stop', stop marking. After the test, response sheet and test booklet are to be
returned to the invigilator.
If you have any doubt regarding answering the test the invigilator will help
you in giving necessary clarifications.
e.g. a cosmonaut who is far away from the earth experiences darkness around
him. The most suitable reason for this is
a) there is no chance for the reflection of light since the space is vacuum.
b) space absorbs light rays
c) the cosmonaut is far away from the sun
d) there is no source of light in the space.

Answer

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST I
1) When a small glass sphere and a stone are rolled on a smooth surface, the
stone stops abruptly after moving a short distance while the glass sphere
covers a longer distance.
Here the problem is -
a) whether the glass sphere is lighter than the stone?
b) whether the surface area of the glass sphere is greater than that of the
stone?
C) to what degree the smooth surface of the glass sphere influences friction
when compared to the influence of the rough surface of the stone?
d) how the density of the glass sphere differs from that of the stone?
2) The weight of a stone immersed in water is found to be lesser than its actual
weight when it is measured using a spring balance. Here the problem is -

a) whether spring balance shows lesser weight for the object than its actual
weight?
b) water exerts an upward force on a body which is immersed in it.
c) whether the parts of the stone in touch with water get dissolved in it?
d) whether there was any possibility for the overflow of water when the
stone was immersed in it?
When telegraph wires are laid, sufficient sag is given. The problem here is -
-
a) whether the loose wires have more capacity for propagation?
b) which metal is used for making the telegraph wires?
c) how thermal conductivity and electric conductivity of telegraph wires
are related?
d) how the difference in atmospheric temperature affects telegraph wires?
4) Sound is not heard when an electric bell is operated inside an evacuated bell
jar. The problem here is -.
a) why the evacuated bell jar is used for the experiment?
b) how the presence of air influences the working of the bell?
c) how the electric bell operates in the absence of air ?
d) whether sound needs a media for its propagation?
5) When a compound bar of steel and copper is heated the bar bends with
copper outside. The problem here is -.
a) how much the temperature of the compound bar rises when it is heated?
b) the proportion of steel and copper used in the construction of the
compound bar affects the bending

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
c) how the rate of expansion of steel and copper differs?
d) how the heat resistant powers of steel and copper differ?
6 ) A person cannot see anything clearly for some time, when he entire a dark
room from bright light. Here the problem is
a) how the bright light affects the sight?
b) how the bright light affects the iris?
c) how the iris responds to the changes in the brightness of light?
d) how the brightness of light influences the deficiencies of the eye?
7) Mountaineers suffer from nose bleeding at high altitudes. Here the problem
is -.
a) how the changes in the atmospheric pressure at high altitudes affect
living things?
b) how the weather at high altitudes affects mountaineers?
c) how different the atmospheric temperature is from that of sea level?
d) how the humidity at higher altitudes differs from that at sea level?
8) Reservoirs in the hydro-electric power stations are built in high places. The
problem here is -.
a) what is the function of reservoirs in hydroelectric power stations?
b) how far the height of water flow is related to the quantity of electricity
produced?
c) how far the capacity of reservoirs is related to the quantity of electricity
produced?
d) which are the factors, that influence the quantity of electricity produced?
9) A coin placed at the bottom of a trough filled with water seems to be raised
from its actual position. The problem here is -.
a) what the nature of image formed is when rays from the coin falls on
the eye lens?
b) how the depth of the water in the trough affects the formation of image?
c) to what height the coin appears to be raised when it is observed from
above?
d) how the optical densities of air and water influence the position of the
image?
10) A tin cane filled with steam become misshapen on cooling. The problem
here is -.
a) how the temperature of tin cane influences its shape?
b) whether the change in pressure inside the tin cane on the liqudification
of steam is lesser than atmospheric pressure?
c) how the atmospheric temperature influences the shape of the tin cane?
d) how much pressure is exerted by steam on the tin cane?

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST I1
1) When rails are laid, a small gap is left between consecutive rails. What is the
most suitable reason for this?
a) the possibility of expansion of the rails with the increase in atmospheric
temperature.
b) the possibility of expansion of the rails due to the pressure
c) to resist the great speed of the train.
d) to aid the acceleration of the train.
2) An athlete runs a little distance before a long jump. Suggest the reason for
this?
a) inorder to utilise the inertia of rest gained through running.
b) inorder to utilise the inertia of motion gained through running.
c) inorder to increase his confidence through running.
d) inorder to stimulate his muscles through running
3) Eventhough, gases have freedom to move, air remains in the earth's
atmosphere. Suggest the most suitable reason for this?
a) gases are not attracted towards space.
b) atmospheric gases repel each other
c) atmospheric gases attract each other
d) earth attracts the gases
4) A green leaf appears to be dark in red light. What is the most suitable reason
for this?
a) all substance appear to be dark in red light
b) the leaf absorbs red light and doesnot reflect other colours
C) leaf absorbs and reflects red light
d) red l i-~ h is
t so feeble that the leaf can't be seen
5) When an inflated balloon placed on the smooth surface of a table, was pricked
with a pin, air gushed out and the balloon moved in the opposite direction.
The most suitable reason for this may be
a) the air gushed out through the hole with a high velocity.
b) the weight of the balloon decreased and motion became easy.
c) the smooth surface of the table made the balloon friction free.
d) the air gushing out exerted force on the balloon in the opposite direction.
6) When we troad on mud, our legs get immersed in it. But when we stand on
wooden plank over it the plank doesn't get immersed. The reason for this
may be
a) when we stand on the wooden plank the force exerted on the mud is
less.
b) since the area of the wooden plank is greater than of the feet, the
pressure exerted on the mud is more.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
c)since the area of the wooden plank is greater than that of the feet, the
pressure exerted on the mud is less.
d) when we tread on the plank, the force exerted on the mud is more.
7 ) When a peacock feather is rubbed in between the pages of a book it spreads
like a fan. The most suitable reason for this may be
(a) static electricity is induced in the feather since the humidity is vapourised
by the heat produced in the feather
(b) with the rise in temperature the humidity in the feather vapourises and
thereby its volume increases.
(c) the static electricity induced in the hairs of feather has the same charge
and they repel.
(d) the static electricity induced in the hairs of feather is of opposite charges
and they repel.
8) If a cardboard boat with a piece of soap attached to its hind end, is placed
on water it moves in random direction. The most suitable reason for this
may be.
a) surface tension decreases when cardboard dissolves in water
b) surface tension of water near the boat increases when soap dissolves in
water.
c) surface tension of water near the boat increases when soap dissolves in
water.
d) surface tension of water near the boat decreases when soap dissolves
in water.
9) More force is needed to drink through a straw at high altitudes.
The reason for this may be.
a) it is difficult to suck the drink because it is too cold
b) it is difficult to suck the drink because it is too hot.
c) since the atmospheric pressure is low, the liquid exerts only a slight
force in order to fill the straw.
d) The high amount of atmospheric pressure can exert less force, which
is not enough to fill the straw with drink.
10) People like to wear light coloured dresses in summer. The reason for this
may be
a) light coloured dresses reflect more heat
b) light coloured dresses absorb more heat than others
c) more heat penetrates through light coloured dresses.
d) light coloured dresses absorb humidity.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
1) A group of students decided to experiment and study capillary rise using
glass tubes. Which of the following factors can they vary during the
experiments.
1) radius of the tubes
2) shapes of the tubes
3) nature of the liquid
4) shape of the container of the liquid
a) 1 2 b) 1 , 3 c) 1 , 4 d) 2 , 4
2. You are given a cylindrical tin vessel and nail in order to prove that liquid
pressure operates equally towards all directions. In this experiment which
factor will you keep constant?
a) direction of the stream
b) the size of the tin cane
c) the height of the holes
d) the distance at which the stream falls on the floor.
3. Sheela assumes that the rate of vapourisation depends on the nature of the
liquid. Which of the following factors are to be obsewed by her in order to
test her assumption.
1. density of the liquids
2. volume of the container
3. rate of vapourisation
4. temperature
5. pressure
answers: a) 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 b) 1, 2 , 3, 4
c) 1, 2, 3, 5 d) 1, 3, 4 , 5
4) Pupils study the time taken by bodies of light weight and heavy weight to
reach the ground from a height. Which of the factors given below influence
the time of fall.
a) presence of air
b) weight of the body
c) height from which the body falls
d) weather
5) Some pupils were studying the power felt on different parts of a bar magnet.
They obsewed the number of pins attracted at different parts of the magnet.
Which are the information that should be included in the data collected.
a) the distance of each point in the magnet from the centre and the num-
ber of pins that each point can attract .
b) shape of each magnet and the number of pins that can be attracted by
them

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
c) the weight of each magnet and the number of pins that can be at-
tracted by them
d) the distance to a point outside the magnet from the magnetic centre
and the number of pins that can be attracted at that point.
Questions 6 to 8 are based on the situations given below:
Bobby and his friends were placing ice cubes in water and measuring their
heights above the surface level of water.
6 ) In this experiment, which of the factors given below has to be changed?
a) height of the icecubes
b) surface area of water
c) temperature of water
d) size of the container of water
7 ) Which factor that should be kept constant, in this experiment?
a) height of the icecubes
b) volume of the icecubes
c) temperature of water
d) surface area of water
8) Which factor is subjected to change because of the changes in the heights of
icecubes.
a) height of the ice cubes above the surface of water
b) temperature of water
c) density of water
d) surface area of water
9. Suppose you desire to prove Archimedes principle. You are given a spring
balance, a body, and a filled overflow bottle. Which of the following
observations will you record in your note book.
a) loss of weight of the body in liquid
b) weight of the outflowing liquid
c) volume of the outflowing liquid
d) volume of the liquid that can be filled in the container
Ans: a) 1,2 b) 2 , 4 C) 3,4) d) 2,4
10) Which of the following factors given below can be overlooked in a study of
strength of magnet.
a) size of the magnet
b) material of the magnet
C) number o f lines of flux
d) the attractive force exerted by magnet on magnetic substances.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST IV
1) When a flask is heated gradually after fitting a balloon tightly over its mouth,
the balloon gets inflated. From this it can be inferred that,
a) the air inside the flask expanded when heated.
b) the flask and the balloon are arranged air tight.
C) the volume of flask decreases when heated.
d) there are small drops of water in the flask.

2) It is difficult to pull out the cap of a pen with an oily hand:


The infrence, which can be drawn from this is
a) oil helps to decrease the friction between the hand and the cap of the
pen.
b) oil helps to increase the friction between the hand and the cap of the
pen.
c) tightly fitted cap become loose with the presence of oil
d) oil facilitate thes movement of the hand

3) Beena was pouring a cold drink into a tumbler. After a second drops of
water appeared on the outerside of the tumbler. From this it can be inferred
that
a) the drops of water has come from the drink inside
b) water drops have leaked out
c) water drops were formed by the liquidification of vapour in the sur-
roundings.
d) if the temperature of the atmosphere is higher, there will be more
drops of water.

Questions 4 and 5 are based on the situation given below:


Sheela was checking the accuracy of the inference that rate of evaporation
depends on the temperature of the liquid. It was found that when the
temperature of the liquid was 40" C, the rate of evaporation was 0 . 1 ml/s,
and at 50 C, the rate of evaporation was 0 . 2 ml/s, at 70" C, it was 0 . 4 ml/
s and at 80 C it was 0.55 ml/s.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
4) In which table do you find these data arranged in such a way that the inference
can be most clearly drawn.
a) Temperature Rate of evaporation
(OC) ml/s
40 0.1
50 0.2
60 0.25
70 0.4
80 0.55
b) Temperature Rate of evaporation
(OC) ml/s
40 0.1
50 0.2
80 0.55
70 0.4
60 0.25
c) Temperature Rate of evaporation
("1 ml/s
70 0.55
80 0.4
60 0.25
50 0.2
40 0.1
d) Temperature Rate of evaporation
("C) ml/s
60 0.25
50 0.2
40 0.1
80 0.55
70 0.4
5) From the data collected above, what inference can be drawn ?
a) as temperature increases, rate of evaporation decreases
b) as temperature increases, rate of evaporation increases
c) rate of evaporation is unaffected by the temperature of the liquid
d) rate of evaporation depends on the nature of the liquid.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
6) Mohan found that the level of water inside a tumbler is same before and after
dissolving a teaspoon full of sugar in it. The inference which can be drawn
from this is
a) water is a good solvent
b) sugar reacts with water
C) the tumbler is expended due to heat produced during the dissolving of
sugar.
d) the sugar molecules were accommodated in the vacant spaces between
water molecules.
7) Eventhough atmosphere exerts force downwards, we do not experience it. It
can be inferred from this that
a) atmospheric pressure is exerted on our body in equal amounts froms
all sides.
b) the pressure with in our body is greater than the atmospheric pressure.
c) atmospheric pressure does not influence human beings
d) the pressure of the atmosphere is so low that it can be neglected.
8) Students in a class were studying the velocity of light. They recorded the
time taken to hear the sound produced by striking together two wooden
strips at different distances from the observer. When the distances were 320
m, 1 6 0 m, 640 m, and 960 m, the time taken to hear the sound were i s ,
.5s, 2s, and 3s respectively. How will you arrange this data in such a way
that the result is communicated most clearly.
a) distance (m) time taken to here the sound (s)
160 0.5
320 1
640 2
960 3
b) distance (m) time taken to here the sound (s)
960 3
640 2
320 1
160 0.5
C) distance (m) time taken to here the sound (s)
320 1
160 0.5
960 3
640 2

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
d) distance (m) time taken to here the sound (s)
640 2
960 3
160 0.5
320 1
9) Sheena filled half of a bottle with water using a funnel.While filling the
remanining space in the bottle, she raised the funnel a little and then the
speed of water falling into the bottle increased. The inference which can be
drawn from this is
a) bottle was filled with air
b) the air in the bottle went out when the funnel was raised
c) the speed of the outgoing air and the speed of the incoming water are
equal
d) the mouth of the bottle and the end of the funnel is closed by water.
10) Students in a science class were studying the change in liquid pressure with
the change in depth. On a tincan of 30 crns height, five identical holes were
made which were of 5 crns, 1 0 crns, 15cms, 20 crns and 2 5 crns heights
from the base of the can. When the can was filled with water it gushed out
through each pore and hit the ground at distances 18 crns, 15 crns, 1 2 crns,
9 crns, and 6 crns respectively. From this it can be inferred that

-------
.- - -- - ----
-- -- +:..:*'
.--,--
.---
-----
-
- ---- --
- - ------- - -
- - - - - :=--,
1 I,\,
--..I,
\\\

----
---
,

-------- ---
---------- - - - -- -
-==--\,*.
I:,
I,''.,,
-*'
\
- -------- . ' : : , i l
------- 1,s
\,\
*.A,!I
V.X.
\, \-
y.,

a) liquid pressure increases as depth of the liquid increases.


b) liquid pressure decreases as depth of the liquid increases
c) there is no relationship between height of the liquid column and liquid,
pressure.
d) liquid pressure changes according to the nature of the liquid.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST V
1) Which of the following is the most suitable test to prove the assumption that
the time taken to melt ice in atmosphere depends on the atmospheric
temperature.
a) Keep ice cubes of same volume in open atmosphere and observe the
time taken by each ice cube to melt.
b) Take two ice cubes of the same volume and keep one in open atmo-
sphere and the other in a room where a fridge is kept. Observe the
time taken by each to melt.
C) Take ice cubes of different volumes. Keep them in a room, where a
fridge is kept. Observe the time taken by each to melt.
d) Keep ice cubes of different volumes in open atmosphere and observe
the time taken by them to melt.
(hint: The temperature in the room where fridge is kept will be greater than
the atmospheric temperature).
2) Which of the following experiment is the best to prove that resistance of air
is the reason why a heavy body reaches the ground before a light body,
eventhough they are dropped from the same height.
a) Place a coin and a feather inside a glass tube and close it. Invert the
tube suddenly. Measure the time taken by the coin and by the feather
to reach the bottom.
b) Place a coin and a feather inside an evacuated glass tube and inivert it
suddenly. Count the time taken by each to reach the bottom.
c) Take a coin inside a glass tube and a feather in another similar glass
tube. Close the tubes and invert them suddenly. Count the time taken
by the coin and the feather to reach the bottom.
d) Place five coins and five feathers inside a glass tube. Close the tube and
invert it suddenly. Observe the time taken by each to reach the bottom.
3) Select the most simplest experiment to prove that the rate of expansion is
different for different liquids
a) Take 3 similar boiling tubes and pour alcohol in the first tube, glycerin
in the second, and water in the third tube. Heat them in a water bath.
Observe the rise in liquid levels.
b) Take 3 boiling tubes of different sizes and pour alcohol in the first,
glycerin in the second, and water in the third tube. Heat them in a
water bath. Observe the rise in liquid levels.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
c) Take three boiling tubes of same size and fill the first with kerosene,
the second with alcohol, and the third with glycerin. Heat them so as to
reach at different temperatures. Observe the rise in liquid levels.
d) Take three boiling tubes of different size. Fill them with kerosene, alco-
hol, and glycerin and heat them so as to reach at different tempera-
tures. Cool it and observe the liquid level after fifteen minutes.
4) Which of the following experiments is most suitable to test the inference that
surface tension is related to surface area.
a) Make frames of different sizes and shapes using iron wire. Tie thread
on it. Dip the frames in soap water and note how long the soap films
remain in the frames.
b) Make frames of different sizes by using iron wire and tie thread on it.
Dip them in soap solution and observe how long the soap films remain
in the thread.
C) Make frames of different shapes with different metals. Attach thread
on them and dip them in soap solution.
d) Attach threads to metal frames of different shapes and dip them in
different types of liquids.
5) Sheela got two lenses- one convex and concave - on a cloudy day. Which
test you will recommend for her to distinguish between them.
a) Move the lens to the left while observing the image of a near by object.
b) Focus sunlight on a paper using each lens.
c) Observe the nature of the image of an object which is far from the lens.
d) Observe the nature of the image of an object which is near to the lens.
6) Neena wants to test the statement, liquid pressure exerts in all directions
equally. Which test would you suggest for her?
a) Make holes using a nail at same height from the base on a cylindrical
tin cane. Fill the tin cane with water. Compare the distance at which
the streams of water coming out of the can hit the ground.
b) Make some holes in a tin cane here and there. Fill the can with
water.Compare the distances from the can to the falling place of water
streams.
c) Make holes at different height from the base of the can. Fill it with
water and compare the distances at which the streams of water fall on
the ground.
d) Take two tin canes of different heights. Make holes in one near the
base and in the other, near the brim. Fill them with water. Compare
the distance at which the water streams fall on the ground.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
7) Select the simplest experiment to test whether there is any relationship
between the power of the magnet and its size
a) Take magnets of same shape and different sizes. Find the number of
pins, which can be attracted by each magnet.
b) Take four magnets of different shapes. Find the number of pins, which
can be attracted by each magnet.
C) Take four magnets of different sizes and shapes. Find the number of
pins, which can be attracted by each of them.
d) Take two magnets of same size and different shapes. Find the weight
of the iron powder than can be attracted by each.
8) Which is the most suitable experiment to test the inference that the depth of
the liquid may influence pressure.
a) Fill water in two jars of different heights. Make bubbles at its bottom by
blowing through a straw. Compare the sizes of the bubbles.
b) Take two jars of same size. Pour water in one of them up to the brim
and fill half of the other half. Blow slowly such that bubbles arise. Com-
pare the sizes of the bubbles.
c) Fill a jar with water. Make bubbles at its bottom by blowing through a
straw. Compare the sizes of the bubbles at different heights from the
bottom to the top.
d) Compare the size of the bubbles at the bottom of a lake with their size
when they reach the surface.
9) Dark and rough plains absorb heat more speedy than white and smooth
plains. Suggest a suitable experiment to prove this.
a) Take two tins of the same size. Paint one black. The other should be
polished and painted white. Fill them with water. Note the tempera-
tures and expose to sunlight. Measure the temperatures after 15 min-
utes.
b) Take two tins of the same size. Paint one black. The other should be
polished and painted white. Fill them with hot water and note their
temperatures. Measure the temperatures after 15 minutes.
c) Take two test tubes. Cover one of them with black paper. Fill both of
them with water and expose to sunlight. After some time measure
their temperatures.
d) Take two test tubes. Cover one of them with paper. Take hot water in
both of them. After sometimes measure the temperature of water in
both of them.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
10) Which is the most suitable experiment to test the inference, that rates of
thermal expansion for different substances are different.
a) Take two compound bars made of iron and copper. Heat one of them
upto 200C. Compare its length with the other.
b) Take a copper wire and a steel wire of 50cms length each. Heat them
till the temperatures rise upto 200 OC. Measure their length.
c) Take an iron wire and copper wire of different lengths, heat them upto
200 OC and measure their length again.
d) Heat two wires of the same length and different radius upto 200C and
then measure their length.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
TEST VI
1) A meduim is necessary for the propagation of sound. When meteorites collide,
in the outer space no sound will be heard even in the surroundings. The
inference that can be drawn from this is -
a) sound is feeble
b) the frequency of sound is less than the hearing limit.
c) there is no medium in the outer space to propagate sound.
d) the dust particles in the outer space do not vibrate due to sound.
2) Prakash rolled a small glassy sphere through the floor. When he hit behind
it with another glassy sphere, its speed increased, when he hit with another,
from the opposite directions its speed decreased. We can infer from this that
a) if a force is applied on a body along the direction of motion, speed
increases and if the force is applied in the opposite direction, its speed
decreases.
b) if a force is applied along the direction of motion its speed decreases,
and if the force is applied in the opposite direction, its speed increases.
c) the direction of force does not affect the motion
d) the friction applied against motion decreases its speed
3) Some scientific experiences of interest are given below:
1) Before throwing the ball, the bowler makes a run up.
2) Before a long jump, an athlete makes a run up.
3) Even when a boy riding on a bicycle stops pedaling, the bicycle moves
forward some distance.
From this it can be understood that;
a) moving bodies have inertia of rest
b) moving bodies have inertia of motion
c) moving bodies have a tendency to reach a state of rest
d) inertia of rest helps to overcome friction
4) What do you understand from the situations given below:
1) A circus performer rides a motor cycle inside an iron globe
2) When a bucket containing water is kept revolving at a high speed in a
vertical circle, the water does not fall down.
a) the weight of the body is used to provide the centripetal force needed
for keeping it revolving
b) the weight of the body is used to supply the centrifugal force necessary
for keeping it revolving.
c) the gravitational force is not being exerted on the body.
d) the moving body is not experiencing weight

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
5) Take three tumblers, and fill three fourth of each with water. Mark the level
of water in them. Put a tea spoon of sodium chloride in the first, sugar in the
second, and washing soda in the tumbler and stir well. No difference in the
levels of the water can be seen. What can you infer from this?
a) when a substance is dissolves in the water, the volume of the solution
increases
b) when a substance is dissolves in the water, the volume of the solution
decreases
c) there are vacant spaces in between the water molecules
d) when a substance is dissolved in water its temperature decreases
6) The data collected by a group studying about thunder and lightning are given
below:
The attitude of the place (feet) Lightning occurrence per year
200 10
800 35
1400 55
2000 70
2600 80
What will be the number of lightining per year which occur at an altitude of
3200 feet?
a) 88
b) 8 0
c) 7 5
d) 55
7) Read carefully the scientific experiences given below:
1) When we perspire, our dresses get glued to our body
2) A person counting currency notes often wets his fingers to make sure
that no two notes remain stick together, and thereby left uncounted.
3) We find water drops attached to the sides of a tumbler, when it is taken
out after dipping in water.
What can you infer from this?
a) There is force of attraction between molecules of the different sub-
stances
b) There is force of attraction between molecules of the same substance
c) There is force of repulsion between molecules of different kinds
d) There is force of repulsion between molecules of the same substance
8) When a partially inflated balloon was heated to 40C, its volume was 18ml,
at 50C, the volume was 230ml and at 60C, the volume was found to be
320ml. What can you generalise from these given data

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
a) Volume of a gas increases when temperature increases at a constant
pressure
b) Volume is not affected by the change in temperature
c) At constant pressure, there will be no change in the volume
d) There is no relation between temperature, volume, and pressure of a
body
9) Scrutinise the situations qiven
- below:
1) Some insects move easily on the surface of the water
2) A razor blade placed on the surface of water is supported by it
3) When a wet paper and a needle are placed on the surface of water, the
paper sinks and the needle flats. The general principle that can be
inferred from this is
a) water exerts buoyant force
b) the molecules at the water surface attract the objects placed on it
c) the molecules at the water surface repel the objects placed on it
d) the free surface of water exerts force to decrease its surface area
10) The world surrounding us is full of colours. An apple is red, an orange is
yellow, and leaves are green. What can you conclude from this?
a) all bodies absorb their own colours and reflect all the other colours
b) all bodies absorb all colours except their own
C) each body can adapt suitable colours
d) the colour of each body depends on the heat it received from the sun.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX VlII
ITEM ANALYSIS DATA OF THE SCALE OF ATlTlUDE TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING

'R' denotes rejected items; 'A' denotes accepted items; 'SA' denotes the serial arrangement of items

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX IX
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
School Of Pedagogical Sciences
ATTITUDE SCALE TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING
(DRAFT FORM)

m m l m l m ~ m wdmowrnamoS m l m d m a m m a . a m o a l d ~ ~ m ~ o m(Strongly
~ld
Agree) 'SA'mjos djg~rnoml emj agsmo am(a;&j&.

(Agree,! ' A ' a ~ o sdJ~jrn3mIemj w ~ m . w m 6 m ~ & .


e~mlldbrnoml aauo~lm~cm~ocu8~bId

socnl&rnoml a l a a o a ~ & ~ m j o a ~ 1
(Disagree)
d 'D' mjos djg~rnoml a~m.mm&mj&.
mamango a l a m o a 1 m p n ~ o a z ~ , l d(Strongly Disagree) 'SD'mp5 dj~jrnoml m&m.
mmazimp.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX X
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
School Of Pedagogical Sciences
SCALE OF AlTITUDETOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING
(FINAL FORM)
(Suresh, K.P. &Joseph, C. 1996)

mmlmlmjm, ~nldm3cumaw3Smlmu8 m a m w g o aau3edlmlmjomeald (Strongly Agree)


'SA' aujos d~gim3aulam2 cu&mocurn&mi&.
e3cDlshrn3aul a w 3 x l m j m ~ o c u & l d(Agree) 'A' a l e s dlglrn3aul amj m ~ m mm@iim~&.
o
a a u 3 x l a ~ 3culaav3xlag3 am3mjcmlo#&ld (Undesided) 'U' mloq q g ~ r n m cuamo
l cum
&mi&.
~3rnlam3wln l l a w 3 x l m l m l o ~ ~ a (Disagree)
ld 'D' q o s djgdm3aul c u ~ m oc u m w m ~ a .
(Strongly Disagree) 'SD' aujos q g ~ r n 3 dc u ~ m oa m
m a m a u g o mlaw3xlm~m~6~cu&1@6
&mi&.

'SD' a j o s djgjmawl m ~ m mrnglmlm~mmi


o mmlmlmlrm ~doiim3mmcw3Sm a m w g o
culaau3xlmjm~e(umi m ~ d l g l m l m l .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
m@m&om g m~mmdou130m9&rnlm~
mwdm? domo e29mlmnil~wmlm~mmjrn~w
ni3d q o m cru-o~wlmpna

m m d m j oijod091jG38 %31)3jdbd 4m)J ni10(Dm@3Jo 6391~3m~mm36nj


m~l&3rn~o.
In@m3@9d&rn3w
o d 3 ~ j m dmwdm? ~ 3 m ~ ~ m&d&&rn3m~m,i.
p o 2
m3m"~mmrm3rn~os
mlmrnmmu8 ornlma~oo m ~ 3 o l g .
oumrdm? domo n i j m l m ~ ~ ~ mounn3wlmjm~.
o m

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XI
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
Scool of Pedagogical Sciences
SCALE OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING
(English translation)
(Suresh & Joseph, 1996)
Directions
Given below are some statements related to science and the learning of
science. Read carefully each of the statements and mark your response in the
appropriate column in the response sheet separately given to you. If you strongly
agree to the given statements please encircle 'SA', if you partially agree encircle
'A', if you have no agreement and disagreement to the given statement encircle
'U' if you partially disagree encircle 'D' and if strongly disagree encircle 'SD'.
e.g. It is not wrong to do other advisable matters in science classes.

The circle on SD indicates the strong this agreement to the statement.


Please enter your response freely and frankly. Expect your co-operation

(1) In science classes one is compelled to learn many things which are not useful
in everyday life.
(2) Science students should attain the skill in conducting experiments.
(3) Experiments are not necessary to learn facts, theories, laws and principles of
science.
(4) All science teachers possess punctuality, discipline and an orderly life.
(5) Scientists waste public money in the name of research
(6) 1 am happy about the new scientific discoveries
(7) Scientists are not interested in the welfare of the society,
(8) Science classes provide scope for many interesting activities.
(9) The learning activities in science make me frightened.
(10) Science classes help me to internalise many good qualities needed to lead a
successful life.
(11) It is better to avoid special classes in science at any cost
(12) Thought provoking questions make science classes lively and interesting
(13) Conclusions drawn by scientists will never be wrong

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
(14) Learning of science contributes for personality development.
(15) Scientists in general lack in practical knowledge.
(16) Scientists are people ardently conduct researches to unearth laws of nature.
(17) 1 do not know why science is given so much importance in schools.
(18) Eventhough the results of observation go against expectations, they are not
to be overlooked.
(19) 1 cannot justify scientists spending their lives for the sake of research
endeavours.
(20) Setbacks during the course of experiments are not stumbling blocks in my
way.
(21) Scientists generally are not much patriotic.
(22) There should be a science club in every school.
(23) 1 wonder why people are crazy after different science based courses
(24) Like other people, scientists also have human cosiderations.
(25) Scientists do not give any importance to human relations.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XI1
PERCENTILE NORMS OF THE SCALES OF A m D E
TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING

Precentile level Score on the sacle of


Attitude towards Science Learning
PI0 62.0
P20 74.0
P30 79.0
P40 80.0
P50 85.0
P60 88.0
P70 95.0
P80 100
P90 109

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XDI
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
School Of Pedagogical Sciences
SCENCE LEARNING INTEREST INVENTORY
(DRAFT FORM)
(Suresh, K.P & Joseph, C . 1996)

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
22) A om3mrr8 oumn3mo amslw ou3Rnlmja~mm3m~os
a&mlacdr u ~ a u l m p n ~ .
B m3m)nnla ~ d 3 w 3 q r n ~l ~l n ~ l a m m
o 2w l a m l g i s d ~ m " m a m dr u 3 w l m ~ m ) .

25) A mjgjooj mimoo d a m m l a m m l o n j ~ d a w w ~ m digid3sia21lmamlmio


cd aommrm~on~.
B a r u ~ ~ l a m o ~ l o o osm"l1enjw~o
jw~o ~ d 3 m m l am l a m m ~ l o wo u ~ x ~ 1 m j o o r u x ~ m j m u 8
&omm~m~.
C xm3wldmj0, x m m a o s d l m ~ ~ 9 m l a l rnom~eamrmm7ajo
a~o w m ~ o l wm3gmu8 a05113
mimi.
26) A m ~ m m s i g l o o m3m$a
j mldmnlm~on~.
B U.N.O. sups idm9amrm7ooj imlm3m m ) d o 2rn3m~m~

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XN
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
School Of Pedagogical Sciences
SCENCE LEARNING INTEREST INVENTORY
(FINAL FORM)
(Suresh, K.P & Joseph, C. 1996)

3) A s r n 3 a s c 1 d r u ~ n n m m 2 ~ o~sl r M ( oa ~ m m c dmlm"l1mpni
B ~ o i 5 a m u 3 f i&2l & 3 m j m j .
C oulmlm & 3 6 m p ~ .

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
19) A a l a l w a r r j m ~ m s j o sx a m l o a emmnnjso ma2m1m).
B a l d w m3xjmsps ammwsmwloa, mm~mnmmlwmmcd d o l m i m ~ .
C maw32 hoilmwloa mjmm jdamm&u3 d o l m p n l .

25) A snI&lm3&30~ OJ3flmwB2JCJS dlLm63Bd cUWUml~@37@&6lNo 26TT33mJm72.


B a a ~ & m 3 & j s m 2 ~ om3&jsdm3&&2)os
s dljmmcd emrmml~m & m o 2 r n 3 m i m ~ .
C alalw m ~ x ~ m 2 l o
qyng&cd
a cmrmmlaj @37@&mo
~m3m2m2.

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XV
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
Scool of Pedagogical Sciences
SCIENCE LEARNING INTEREST INVENTORY
(English translation)
(Suresh & Joseph, 1996)
Directions
Given below are some learning experiences to assess the interest of students
towards science subjects. Each learning experience contains three activities. Please
mark the symbol 'X' against the column in the response sheet separately given to
you by fixing the most preferred activity as far as you are concerned.

1. A Writes articles on science


B Writes articles on society and social issues
C Writes short stories
2. Vacation
A Prepares models of science appliances using waste materials
B Learns painting
C Constructs gardens
3. A Observes the various parts of motor vehicles
B Watches football matches
C Watches films
4. A Listens talks on laser rays by eminent scientists
B Listens light music
C Listens talks on the new trends in industry
5. A Identifies the planets and galaxies in the sky at s t a y night
B Enjoys the beauty of the nature in full moon night
C Writes poems about full moon night
6. What would you like to become in future?
A Writer
B Film personnel
C Researcher
7. A Participates in science quiz
B Takes part in art festivals
C Completes cross words
8. A Conducts intewiew with the cricketers
B Conducts intewiew with scientists of international repute
C Conducts intewiew with leading artists

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Collects literary books
Collects historical texts
Collects books on science
Evaluates Doordarsan telecasts on science
Evaluates cultural programmes in Doordarsan
Evaluates serials telecast by Doordarsan
Collects the pictures of adventurers who had set foot in moon
Collects photos of world famous artists
Collects the photos of national leaders
Tests the PH value of different kinds of juice
Measure the distance between places with the help of map
Visits art galleries of reputed painters
Participates in demonstrations ensuring social justice
Participates in cultural progrmmes
Participates in discussion on science
Participates in agricultural and horticultural shows
Participates in science exhibitions
Participates in sports competitions
Participates actively in school literary forum
Participates actively in science clubs
Participates in school debates clubs
Collects and studies the specialties of leaves and flowers of plants
Collects coins of various countries
Collects the beautiful literary pieces of renowned literary figures in the
world
Prepares electrical magnet
Prepares the models of parliaments
Prepares models with the help of geometrical figures
Solves mathematical problems
Solves science problems with the help of formula
Finds out the answers of riddles
Measures the loss of weight of various things in water
Studies the comparative laws of the constitutions of various countries
Studies the new trends in Malayalam poetry
Observes the life-cycle of a butterfly
Catches fish with hook
Observes the behavioural patterns of persons

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
21. A Prepares a model of solar stove
B Prepares the three dimensional model of the symbol of the UNO
C Prepares the statue of Mahatma Gandhi
22. A Formulates public opinion to solve social crisis
B Gives leadership in literary programmes
C Introduces the inspiring history of the inventions of great scientists
23. A Collects the information and pictures of literary personalities
B Collects pictures of world religious leaders
C Collects information and pictures of scientists
24. In the notice board of the classroom
A Exhibits the news and pictures of new inventions in the field of science
B Exhibits the extracts from the speeches of notable national leaders
C Exhibits certain puzzling questions
25. A Prepares an album of the pictures of spaceships
B Prepares an album of the pictures of the flags of various countries
C Collects stamps and prepares an album

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XVI
ITEM ANALYSIS DATA OF THE SCIENCE LEARNING INTEREST INVENTORY

'R' denotes rejected items; 'A' denotes accepted items; 'SA' denotes the serial arrangement of items

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XW
PERCENTILE NORMS OF THE SCIENCE LEARNING INTEREST INVENTORY

Precentile level Score on the Science


Learning Interest Inventory
PI0 3.0
P20 5.0
P30 7.0
P40 8.0
P50 9.0
P60 10.0
P70 12.0
P80 14.0
P90 18.0

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX xwI
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES
GENERAL DATA SHEET
mldcgmmcd
~ O doavjm
Y a d 3 o j m u 3 1 u b w 3 d ~ @ g(1o130U14 2 m m o n g ) ~ ~ a n n m l ng)v~mj&.
sd 2m
own& 0&3sjmls~~lsm
uomlav3au
" 2mmmlernml0m uoml cmasw3&to ( J )~ s J & .
1) a d 6 ............................................................................ ~ d & g l / o d d & ...............................................
~ ~ I

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XIX
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
HOME ENVIRONMENT INVENTORY FOR SCIENCE LEARNING

(Suresh, K.P. 1988)

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
m l m o 2 & j v m l m m 3 m j ~ m m l & w m 2 l o aa d 3 o j m d & 9mm0m&mmnmodm~o
m m l o a m g o m m d m ~ ocnmolwlo~~Im3 mlm2jos flslmj djQjd3sjmjs ml~j3mrm
mom mm9dl~7yolw~m3d mlmos aidmlglm3ojams

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
APPENDIX XX
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
SCIENCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT INVENTORY

(Suresh, K.P. 1988)

4 m ~ r 6 i m% 3 ~ ~ & 2 1 mcoj3d&am3<
& m l m d momavmu8 2 m w l m 3 o ~ c m 3 ?

7 mnn0nol&2lm3wl m l m d m 3 d ~ m m l n 9 1 w m o 2 g g ld d ~ & u 8m s m 3 o l a m 3 ?
8 m 3 m i i m 3 m j ~ d & m ~ m ~mwll m d m ~ m i ~ m m l & a u m o 2 gd~d1 y & d m s m 3 o ~ a m 3 ?

lo & 3 d m ~ o l d &m l m d m3djrmmln91aum~~m3aul


m m u o g s ~ d u 8 m m d2 m w l m 3 o l a m 3 1

12 uo3mUim3nu~ad&dm m p ( I ) & R D ~m
~ lom~d umlwo
~ odg3ojam3?

14 m3d~mmln91wm~l& dm7wmmd m s m o r d m R o ~ w & n 3 w2 d & m m m s ~ o sm3m&


& 3 m l d m d ~ I W 2Om 3 m 3 r d m l m d ~ m n l m 3 o j c m 3 ?

Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam
Lczusafocwlcuscw oYarupca imcm
aru~cax~Pru
@I1SwYacwwo oPmscsPmlmpcToln, cmocs p w ~ c Y m c a 1 p c a nscsPswlw
Prepared by BeeHive Digital Concepts Cochin for Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam

You might also like