Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Experimental and numerical studies on the ow and heat transfer characteristics for an innovative offset
Received 3 December 2013 strip ns compact heat exchangers were performed. First, ve n schemes were investigated with various
Accepted 24 January 2014 air ow velocities and a constant inlet steam pressure by experiments. The Reynolds number ranged from
Available online 17 February 2014
500 to 5000 at the air side. The experimental results indicated that the n pitch (Pf), n length (Lf) and n
bending distance (Cf) have a signicant inuence on thermal performance of ns. The Colburn factor j,
Keywords: friction factor f and point of transition were calculated from the experimental data. Then, the ther-
Compact heat exchanger
malhydraulic performances of the novel offset strip ns were analyzed numerically. The simulation
Offset strip n
Thermal entrance effect
results obtained are in agreement with experimental data. Based on these simulations, the maximum val-
Colburn factor ues for local Nu number are at the channel inlet which is due to the thermal entrance effect. The longi-
Friction factor tudinal vortexes near the n region will increase velocity gradient and reduce the thickness of boundary
layer to improve heat transfer. The main conclusion draws from this work will be helpful for future devel-
opment and design of a high-efciency heat exchangers involving offset strip n structures.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.050
0196-8904/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
288 H. Peng et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 80 (2014) 287297
Nomenclature
Numerical studies have also been used to present in offset strip 2. Experimental apparatus and method
n heat exchangers. Patankar et al. [18], Amano [19] and Suzuki
[20] presented 2D numerical models to predict thermalhydraulic 2.1. Experimental apparatus
characteristics for offset strip ns, and the effects of n thickness,
n height, n length and n pitch were analyzed. Xi et al. [21] and The experimental apparatus, schematically depicted in Fig. 1,
Shah et al. [22] performed an investigation with an array of offset comprises a CHE, an open air channel, a closed steam-water cycle
strip ns and reported the effects of n length and n thickness on and data acquisition system.
the friction factor and Colburn factor. Sparrow et al. [23] did The CHE set up in a cross-ow (Fig. 2) and made of aluminum
numerical analysis on a 3D offset strip-n heat exchanger. Carluc- which has high thermal conductivity and is low cost, and easily
cio and Starace [24] and Ismail et al. [25] developed a numerical processed. Of the many n geometries described earlier, a novel
model of offset strip ns to predict the thermo-uiddynamic per- offset strip ns (Fig. 3) are considered in the present study. This
formance in cross ow compact heat exchangers. Losier et al. [26] new n has a physical geometry dened by n height (Hf), n
determined the 3D effects of rounded n edges and geometric thickness (tf), n pitch (Pf), n length (Lf) and the n bending dis-
parameters on an offset strip-n heat exchangers overall perfor- tance (Cf). The n bending distance is a major new feature compare
mance. Kim et al. [27] established a numerical model of offset-strip with the traditional offset strip ns.
ns for various n geometries and working uids. The ow and In the present work, the n height (Hf) and the n thickness (tf)
thermal characteristics of offset-strip ns were investigated and are 9.5 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively. The n pitch (Pf), the n
general correlations of the offset-strip ns were derived. The most length (Lf) and the n bending distance (Cf) are varied as experi-
recent study, done by Saad et al. [28,29], presented a CFD model to mental parameters. This study involves 5 CHEs with two n
investigate the phases and pressure drop distribution in offset strip pitches, three n lengths and two n bending distances, illustrated
n units. in Table 1.
This paper investigates the heat transfer Colburn factor j and An open air channel has a centrifugal fan, a test unit CHE, a web-
the friction factor f characteristics of an innovative offset strip ns by section and a velocity measurement section. The cross section of
in compact heat exchangers (CHEs). Firstly, the effects of n pitch, the test unit is 300 mm 200 mm (height width). The centrifu-
n length and n bending distance on thermalhydraulic perfor- gal fan is driven by a frequency controlled engine, sucks the re-
mance of novel offset strip ns are presented with the Reynolds quired cooling air through the test unit, which allows for an air
number ranging from 500 to 5000 at the air side. Then, the ow ow rate of 10120 m3/min.
and heat transfer characteristics in novel offset strip ns were ana- The closed water-steam cycle has a boiler and the saturated
lyzed numerically. The simulation results of j and f factors were steam is generated and moves to the test unit CHE, where it con-
compared with the corresponding experimental data. Also the local denses by the cold air. Then, the condensed water is returned to
Nusselt number, temperature distribution and velocity vectors the boiler, thus completing a closed cycle.
were presented and discussed.
H. Peng et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 80 (2014) 287297 289
For data acquisition system, the air outlet and the steam inlet
Table 1
temperatures are measured by 17 pieces of type E thermocouples, Geometrical parameters of CHEs.
while the air inlet temperature is measured by Pt100 temperature
meter. These thermocouples are pre-calibrated and have an accu- No Hf (mm) tf (mm) Pf (mm) Lf (mm) Cf (mm)
racy of 0.1 K. The Pitot tube combined with a differential pressure 1 9.5 0.2 1.0 9.0 0.2
transducer is inserted to measure the air velocity, which has the 2 1.0 9.0 0.15
3 1.0 6.0 0.15
uncertainty of 1%. The condensed water ow rate and the pressure 4 1.0 3.0 0.15
drop at the air side are read by two differential pressure transduc- 5 1.5 9.0 0.15
ers, whose accuracy is 0.5%. The operating differential pressure
range is 020 kPa and 010 kPa, respectively. The measured data " #1=2
DR Xn
DX i 2
are obtained using a National Instrument cDAQ-9178 series data 1
acquisition system for further analysis. R i1
Xi
The relative uncertainty analysis is studied using the estimation
method. Given a variable R, which is a function of n independent where DXi are the absolute uncertainties of Xi. By using the above
variables Xi = {x1, x2, . . . , xn}. The relative uncertainty of R can be method, the relative errors for the Colburn factor j and friction
determined: factor f are 2.95% and 3.32% respectively.
290 H. Peng et al. / Energy Conversion and Management 80 (2014) 287297
In order to nd out the effects of air Reynolds number (Re), the The assumptions made in the numerical simulation are as fol-
n pitch (Pf), the n length (Lf) and the n bending distance (Cf) on lows [3032]: (a) the ow is stable and incompressible in the com-
the thermalhydraulic performance of the CHEs, a series of tests putational domain; (b) thermal radiation and nature convection
were carried out for the following conditions: are neglected; and (c) the thermophysical properties are tempera-
ture independent.
Range of Reynolds number: 500 < Re < 5000. The Reynolds number based on the n equivalent diameter
Air inlet temperature: ambient temperature. (De) varies from 500 to 5000 in the present study. At small values
Steam inlet pressure: 0.12 MPa. of Re, the ow is laminar, and a laminar model is adopted. As Re
increases, the turbulent model should be applied for the simula-
The ve CHEs used in the experiments are presented in Table 1. tion. The value of Re, at which the ow begin to deviate from
At the air side, the measurements of air ow rates and the tem- the laminar is dened as the point of transition. It is denoted
peratures at the inlet and outlet of the test unit give the total heat by ReC. A criterion to predict the ReC in the ow is described
ux: below.
Based on these approximations, the three-dimensional govern-
Q as mas cpas Dt as 2
ing equations of mass, momentum and energy in the main ow are
At the steam side, the heat ux is calculated from the following as follows:
relation: Mass:
For the solid area, the energy equation is: (4) The coupling boundary condition was adopted at the inter-
2 face
between uid and solid.
ks r T s 0 9 @T w @T l
kw kl 12
@n C @n C
3.3. 3D meshes
The CFD simulation was carried out using the Fluent 6.3.26 and
Gambit 2.3.16 in Think Station D30 with 32 GB RAM. The SIMPLE
The hexahedral mesh was used for the present simulations, as
algorithm and conjugate heat transfer were used to solve for the
illustrated in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5, the mesh consisted of two regions.
pressurevelocity eld and energy equation. The second-order up-
One region lied close to the wall region, and it was discretized with
wind calculation scheme was used for continuity, momentum and
a ne mesh, in order to decrease the temperature gradients at the
energy equations. The solutions were then considered converged
near-wall region. A second region between the ns and the wall
once residual values for the continuity and momentum equations
consisted of a coarse mesh due to the relatively uniform ow in
reached 103 and the energy equation reached 108.
those areas.
Only one test sample CHE was studied in the grid independence
study. Three different meshes were chosen: a coarse mesh with 4. Colburn factor and friction factor deduction
178,416 hexahedral cells, a normal mesh with 233,168 hexahedral
cells, and a ne mesh with 507,036 hexahedral cells. The difference The thermal performance of compact heat exchanger depends
in the results obtained from this study showed that there was no on the structure of geometric sizes and ow conditions. For a given
more than a 3% difference in the pressure proles between the ne set of conditions, Colburn factor j and a friction factor f are adopted
and normal meshes for the n channel, and there was an insignif- for the n performance evaluation.
icant difference in the pressure proles between the normal The Colburn factor j and a friction factor f are dened:
meshes and coarse meshes. So, a normal mesh was adopted
throughout the entire numerical model in order to save the j StPr2=3 13
computing time.
De 2
f DP 14
4L qu2
3.4. Boundary conditions and CFD approach
where the Prandtl number and Reynolds number are:
The boundary conditions were shown in Fig. 4: lc p
Pr 15
k
(1) At the inlet:
uDe
u uas;in ; T T as;in 10 Re 16
m
(2) A pressure outlet boundary was used at the outlet of the
2Hf tf Pf t f
model. De 17
(3) A non-slip boundary condition was used at the solid walls Hf t f Pf t f
and the standard wall functions were used to predict the The Stanton number can be evaluated by solving Eq. (18):
wall-bounded turbulent ow for Re > ReC.
qw
St 18
T w constant 11 cp GT m T w
References
[30] Korichi A, Oufer L, Polidori G. Heat transfer enhancement in self-sustained [32] Zhang LW, Balachandar S, Tafti DK, Najjar FM. Heat transfer enhancement
oscillatory ow in a grooved channel with oblique plates. Int J Heat Mass mechanisms in inline and staggered parallel-plate n heat exchangers. Int J
Transfer 2009;52:113848. Heat Mass Transfer 1997;40:230725.
[31] Hajmohammadi MR, Salimpour MR, Saber M, Campo A. Detailed analysis for [33] Launder BE, Shima N. 2nd-Moment closure for the near-wall sublayer-
the cooling performance enhancement of a heat source under a thick plate. development and application. AIAA J 1989;27:131925.
Energy Convers Manage 2013;76:691700.