You are on page 1of 38

The effect of Building Schools to

improve School Attendance


Aralin Aravindan
1
Our Agenda 2

The Main Literature Research Results and


Conclusion
Issue Review Design Analysis

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 3

67.2% 65.4% 68.9%

Percentage of children in Percentage of female Percentage of male


the last grade of primary children in the last grade children in the last grade
education in developing of primary education in of primary education in
countries. developing countries. developing countries.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 3

67.2% 98.9% 65.4% 68.9%

Percentage of children in Percentage of children in Percentage of female Percentage of male


the last grade of primary the last grade of primary children in the last grade children in the last grade
education in developing education in developed of primary education in of primary education in
countries. countries. developing countries. developing countries.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 3

67.2% 98.9% 65.4% 68.9%

Percentage of children in Percentage of children in Percentage of female Percentage of male


the last grade of primary the last grade of primary children in the last grade children in the last grade
education in developing education in developed of primary education in of primary education in
countries. countries. developing countries. developing countries.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 3

67.2% 98.9% 65.4% 68.9%

Percentage of children in Percentage of children in Percentage of female Percentage of male


the last grade of primary the last grade of primary children in the last grade children in the last grade
education in developing education in developed of primary education in of primary education in
countries. countries. developing countries. developing countries.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 4

Low Demand for Education Scarce educational Institutions

Conservative Beliefs Long Distance between schools and


homes

Gender Differentials Lack of gender-segregated


classrooms and sanitation facilities

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
The Main Issue 4

Low Demand for Education Scarce educational Institutions

Conservative Beliefs Long Distance between schools and


homes

Gender Differentials Lack of gender-segregated


classrooms and sanitation facilities

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Literature Review 5

School proximity is of great importance.

Increasing geographical proximity to schools have significant


effects on a childs school attendance and academic
performance.

Program was extremely effective on a girls school


participation rate.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 6

Burde and Linden

The Partnership for Advancing Community


Education in Afghanistan (PACE-A Program)
- To increase access to basic education for
children in underserved areas.

- Village based initiative to establish a primary


school in a borrowed building.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 7

Burde and Linden

Afghanistans National
Curriculum

Traditional Government Village Based


Schools Schools

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 8

Burde and Linden


Step 2
Five of these groups are randomly chosen to Step 4
receive a village based school a year before Two waves of surveys conducted
the rest of the group. in fall 2007 and spring 2008.

Step 1 Step 3 Step 5


Villages grouped into 12 Final sample consisted Assessment of
equally sized village of 11 village groups. villages.
groups.
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 8

Burde and Linden


Step 2
Five of these groups are randomly chosen to Step 4
receive a village based school a year before Two waves of surveys conducted
the rest of the group. in fall 2007 and spring 2008.

Step 1 Step 3 Step 5


Villages grouped into 12 Final sample consisted Assessment of
equally sized village of 11 village groups. villages.
groups.
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 8

Burde and Linden


Step 2
Five of these groups are randomly chosen to Step 4
receive a village based school a year before Two waves of surveys conducted
the rest of the group. in fall 2007 and spring 2008.

Step 1 Step 3 Step 5


Villages grouped into 12 Final sample consisted Assessment of
equally sized village of 11 village groups. villages.
groups.
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 8

Burde and Linden


Step 2
Five of these groups are randomly chosen to Step 4
receive a village based school a year before Two waves of surveys conducted
the rest of the group. in fall 2007 and spring 2008.

Step 1 Step 3 Step 5


Villages grouped into 12 Final sample consisted Assessment of
equally sized village of 11 village groups. villages.
groups.
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 8

Burde and Linden


Step 2
Five of these groups are randomly chosen to Step 4
receive a village based school a year before Two waves of surveys conducted
the rest of the group. in fall 2007 and spring 2008.

Step 1 Step 3 Step 5


Villages grouped into 12 Final sample consisted Assessment of
equally sized village of 11 village groups. villages.
groups.
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Research Design 9

Burde and Linden

Yi = 0 + 1Tk + 2xij + ijk

xij contains the


Yi is the outcome for child i, in sociodemographic
household j, and village group k. controls.
Tk indicates whether village
group k was selected for
treatment or not.
1 is the estimated treatment
effect between the treatment
and control group.

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 10

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 10

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
10

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 11

All Children Tested Children Control Correlations

Treatment Control Estimated Treatment Control Estimated Formal Total


average average difference average average difference enrollment score
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Years of 3.315 3.076 0.239 3.296 3.085 0.211 0.002 0.039***


education of (0.442) (0.446) (0.007) (0.006)
household
head

Distance to 2.91 3.163 -0.253 2.923 3.161 -0.238 -0.049 -0.074*


nearest (0.349) (0.355) (0.033) (0.035)
formal
school
(non-village
based
school)

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 12

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel A. Girls

Treatment 0.521*** 0.515*** 0.691*** 0.654*** 0.735*** 0.661***


(0.091) (0.082) (0.130) (0.123) (0.093) (0.090)

Observations 693 693 667 667 689 687

R2 0.34 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.17 0.38

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 12

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel A. Girls

Treatment 0.521*** 0.515*** 0.691*** 0.654*** 0.735*** 0.661***


(0.091) (0.082) (0.130) (0.123) (0.093) (0.090)

Observations 693 693 667 667 689 687

R2 0.34 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.17 0.38

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 12

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel A. Girls

Treatment 0.521*** 0.515*** 0.691*** 0.654*** 0.735*** 0.661***


(0.091) (0.082) (0.130) (0.123) (0.093) (0.090)

Observations 693 693 667 667 689 687

R2 0.34 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.17 0.38

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 12

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel A. Girls

Treatment 0.521*** 0.515*** 0.691*** 0.654*** 0.735*** 0.661***


(0.091) (0.082) (0.130) (0.123) (0.093) (0.090)

Observations 693 693 667 667 689 687

R2 0.34 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.17 0.38

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 13

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel B. Boys

Treatment 0.371*** 0.347*** 0.424*** 0.400*** 0.380** 0.413***

Observations 797 797 707 707 712 709

R2 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.4 0.04 0.41

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 13

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel B. Boys

Treatment 0.371*** 0.347*** 0.424*** 0.400*** 0.380** 0.413***

Observations 797 797 707 707 712 709

R2 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.4 0.04 0.41

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 13

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel B. Boys

Treatment 0.371*** 0.347*** 0.424*** 0.400*** 0.380** 0.413***

Observations 797 797 707 707 712 709

R2 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.4 0.04 0.41

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 13

Gender Differentials
Formal Enrollment Fall 2007 test Spring 2008 test

No controls Controls No controls Controls No controls Controls


(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7)

Panel B. Boys

Treatment 0.371*** 0.347*** 0.424*** 0.400*** 0.380** 0.413***

Observations 797 797 707 707 712 709

R2 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.4 0.04 0.41

Demographic No Yes No Yes No Yes


Controls

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 14

Gender Differentials

All Children Tested Children Control Correlations

Treatment Control Estimated Treatment Control Estimated Formal Total


average average difference average average difference enrollment score
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Girl 0.474 0.455 0.02 0.495 0.475 0.02 -2.09** -0.687***


(0.020) (0.021) (0.079) (0.100)

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 14

Gender Differentials

All Children Tested Children Control Correlations

Treatment Control Estimated Treatment Control Estimated Formal Total


average average difference average average difference enrollment score
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Girl 0.474 0.455 0.02 0.495 0.475 0.02 -2.09** -0.687***


(0.020) (0.021) (0.079) (0.100)

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 14

Gender Differentials

All Children Tested Children Control Correlations

Treatment Control Estimated Treatment Control Estimated Formal Total


average average difference average average difference enrollment score
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Girl 0.474 0.455 0.02 0.495 0.475 0.02 -2.09** -0.687***


(0.020) (0.021) (0.079) (0.100)

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 15

Discussion

Household Demands
Traditions, Customs and Social Norms

Opportunity Costs of Female Enrolment


Higher opportunity costs as compared to boys

Distance to school
A more significant deterrent to girls than to boys

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 15

Discussion

Household Demands
Traditions, Customs and Social Norms

Opportunity Costs of Female Enrolment


Higher opportunity costs as compared to boys

Distance to school
A more significant deterrent to girls than to boys

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Results and Analysis 15

Discussion

Household Demands
Traditions, Customs and Social Norms

Opportunity Costs of Female Enrolment


Higher opportunity costs as compared to boys

Distance to school
A more significant deterrent to girls than to boys

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
Conclusion 16

Different education How research was


settings in developing carried out and
and developed world empirical data

MAIN ISSUE LITERATURE REVIEW RESEARCH DESIGN RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Building more schools Results and


increases ones access Discussion over
to education gender differentials in
education

FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com
THANK
YOU!
37
DISCUSSION
TIME
FGST freegoogleslidestemplates.com

You might also like