You are on page 1of 7

Article

pubs.acs.org/EF

Fluidization Characteristics of a Pulsing Dense-Phase GasSolid


Fluidized Bed for High-Density Separation of Fine Anthracite
Liang Dong,*,, Enhui Zhou, Luhui Cai, Chenlong Duan, Yuemin Zhao,*, and Zhenfu Luo

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology and School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of
Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, Peoples Republic of China

ABSTRACT: Coal is one of the most important primary energy sources worldwide that requires an economic, eective, and
clean preparation method. As the shortage of water resources increases, the wet beneciation technology became questionable.
The air dense medium uidized bed (ADMFB) is a good alternative for dry coal beneciation processes that require no water. In
this account, a pulsating air ow was introduced into the ADMFB system to generate a pulsing dense-phase gassolid uidized
bed (PDGFB). The eects of the pulsating air ow on the minimum uidization velocity, stability of the bed density, and motion
of the heavy medium were investigated. The pulsating air ow is shown to reduce the minimum of the uidization velocity,
modify the stability of the bed density, and regularize the motion of the heavy medium. Fine anthracite of 6 + 1 mm size is
cleaned using PDGFB at elevated separation densities with a true value of 2.03 g/cm3 and probable error (E) of 0.09 g/cm3. In
comparison to vibrated uidized beds, PDGFB has no mechanical vibration and, hence, is advantageous in terms of the
mechanical structure, easy operation, and susceptibility to lower failure.

1. INTRODUCTION with 6.35 + 4, 4.00 + 2, and 2.00 + 1 mm, respectively.


Nowadays, resources, energy, environment, and harmony Zhao et al.16,17 suggested a vibrated gas-uidized bed with the
between human and nature are the most serious problems all autogenous medium for separation of ne coal particles.
over the world. Energy constitutes the basis for the develop- Probable errors of 0.19 and 0.175 g/cm3 were obtained for coal
ment of the national economy. In 2013, coal accounted for with 6 + 3 and 3 + 1 mm size fraction. Weitkaemper and
30.1% of all primary energy consumption, which is the highest Boylu18,19 used an AKAFLOW method to separate coal of 2
rate ever observed since the 1970s, according to the statistical mm in size and noticed that the separation eciency is close to
review of the world energy from BP Global. During the the shaking table and spiral concentrator. Finally, Fan and
utilization of coal, massive pollutants could be discharged into Song2022 proposed a magnetically stabilized gassolid uid-
the environment. This causes air pollution and water ized-bed-exerting magnetic eld around an ADMFB. For high-
contamination, which, in turn, threaten human health. and low-density separations, the recorded probable errors were
As the most economic and eective method for clean 0.085 and 0.075 g/cm3, respectively.
utilization of coal, coal preparation can remove most gangue In this study, we replaced the continuous air ow in ADMFB
and pyrite from it as well as reduce ash and sulfur contents. with an active pulsating air ow to generate a pulsing dense-
This should raise the combustion eciency and decrease the phase gassolid uidized bed (PDGFB).2325 A vibrational
emission of dust, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxide. Wet energy is introduced into the uidized bed using the vibration
beneciation technologies that require larger amounts of water of the pulsating air ow. With this novel design, the pulsating
during the cleaning process are popular in coal preparation air ow is expected to reduce the minimum uidization
plants. However, as the shortage of water resources becomes a velocity, modify the motion of heavy medium, decrease bubble
global issue, wet beneciation technologies cannot meet the size, and enhance the stability of the bed density. At elevated
demand of large-scale coal processing and upgrading. Ecient separation densities, ne anthracite with 6 + 1 mm size
dry beneciation technologies without water are required fraction could eciently be cleaned.
urgently. Industrial application of the dry beneciation
technology based on an air dense medium uidized bed 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
(ADMFB)18 is ecient for coal separation with +6 mm in A schematic representation of the experimental system is shown in
size.912 However, separation of coal with 6 mm in size is still Figure 1, including an air supply unit, a ow control unit, an active
challenging and deserves further investigation. pulsating air ow generator, and a uidized-bed separator. Active
The vibrational energy was introduced into the ADMFB to pulsating air ow is generated using a buttery driven by an electric
modify the uidization quality by adding a vibrated uidized motor. The pulsation frequency corresponding to the rotating speed of
bed.13 Generation and growth of bubbles can be controlled to the motor can be controlled by an inverter. In the uidized bed,
allow coal with 6 + 0.5 mm to be cleaned with a probable Geldart-B-type26 magnetic powders were used as the heavy medium,
error (E) of 0.07 g/cm3. Galvin et al.14,15 proposed a reux with the static bed height set to 100 mm. The properties of the
classier, in which magnetic powders or silica sands are used as
heavy mediums. By the motor vibrations and compressed air, a Received: June 15, 2016
uidized bed with homogeneous density is formed. This Revised: July 25, 2016
induced probable errors of 0.07, 0.13, and 0.23 g/cm3 for coal Published: August 5, 2016

2016 American Chemical Society 7180 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468


Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setup.

magnetic powders are listed in Table 1, and size distribution is listed in oat-and-sink test analyzes are shown in Figure 3. The ve washability
Figure 2. The particle mean diameter is 232 m, and the bulk density curves are indexed as , , , , and , which represent cumulative oat,

Table 1. Properties of the Heavy Medium


mean
true density bulk density diameter
name (kg/cm3) (kg/cm3) (m) type
magnetic 4600 2350 232 Geldart B
powder

Figure 3. Washability curves of anthracite.

characteristic ash, cumulative sink, relative density, and near density,


Figure 2. Size distribution of the heavy medium. respectively.

is 2350 kg/m3. The pulsating air ow generates a uidized bed with a 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
suitable density. The coal particles fed into the bed segregate according 3.1. Eect of the Pulsating Air Flow on the Minimum
to dierences in the density between the coal particles and the Fluidization Velocity. The transition process from the xed
uidized bed. The low-density particles oat on top of the bed, while
those with higher densities sink into the bottom, hence making the bed into the uidized bed induces a critical uidized gas
separation process easier. velocity, namely, minimum uidization velocity. If the operating
Anthracite is a type of coal that has the highest degree of gas velocity is superior to the critical uidized gas velocity, the
metamorphism, with low porosity and high true density. It is usually particles can be uidized. In contrast, the status of the particles
used in a number of setups, including coal injected into the blast is consistent with the xed bed. In the present study, the
furnace, gas making, and raw materials of aloxite, acticarbon, and pressure drop of PDGFB is tested through the decrease in the
electrodes. Before using anthracite, the ash content, which is useless, operating gas velocity. The data of pressure drop as a function
needs to be reduced and gangue in raw coal should be discharged. of the operating gas velocity were then collected and analyzed
Coal preparation is the most eective method for discharging gangue by linear tting for both the xed and uidized beds. The
and improving coal quality. The elevated density of anthracite requires
high-density separation processing that may achieve a separation minimum uidization velocity is obtained from the gas velocity
density of 2.3 g/cm3 when ADMFB is employed. at the crossover point of the two tting lines.
Fine anthracite of 6 + 1 mm size fraction is used in this study with The pressure drop at various operating gas velocities for both
a true density of 1.98 g/cm3, an apparent density of 1.92 g/cm3, and a systems ADMFB and PDGFB is shown in Figure 4. The
raw coal ash content of 21.90%. The washability data obtained using minimum uidization velocity obtained with ADMFB is 12.3
7181 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468
Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

Figure 4. Bed pressure drop versus gas velocity (a, continuous gas ow; b, f = 0.87 Hz; c, f = 1.75 Hz; d, f = 2.62 Hz; e, f = 3.49 Hz; f, f = 4.36 Hz; g, f
= 5.24 Hz; and h, f = 6.11 Hz).

cm/s, and that for PDGFB obviously decreased as a result of intermittently. As the time interval at both the xed and
the pulsating air ow. Also, it could be seen that the minimum uidized beds becomes long, the eect of the pulsating air ow
uidization velocity is related to the gas pulsation frequency (f). turns unnoticeable. As a result, the vibration intensity of the
The eect of f on the minimum uidization velocity is pulsating air ow rose when f is incremented. This makes the
illustrated in Figure 5. It will be noted that, as f increases, the particles easy to uidize, which induces an obvious decline in
minimum uidization velocity decreases during the initial stages the minimum uidization velocity. As a result of the
and then rises when f > 4.36 Hz. At low f values, the PDGFB compressibility of air and inertia of the particles, larger f values
could be seen as a continuous uidized bed uidized induce almost no eect of the pulsating air ow on the
7182 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468
Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

conditions of N = 1.25 or 4 < f < 5 Hz, a minimum value of


standard deviation could be observed for the bed density. The
eect of f on the stability of the bed density looks similar to that
of the minimum uidization velocity described above. At low f,
the plug ow is obviously the dominant phenomenon and
height of the uidized bed seriously uctuates, inducing
signicant changes in the average bed density.
At low gas velocities, the moderate bed expansion makes the
bed height easily aected by the pulsating air ow. Elevated gas
velocities generate larger bubbles in the bed if compared to
those formed at lower gas velocities. The movement of the
large bubbles from the bed bottom to the free surface could
aect the bed density, which could lower the standard deviation
and elevate the stability of bed density. For optimal operation,
the uidization number should be set to 1.25 and the gas
pulsation frequency should be set to around 45 Hz. As a
result, in the remaining study, N was selected as 1.25 and f was
Figure 5. Minimum uidization velocity versus gas pulsation velocity. selected as 4.36 Hz.
3.3. Eect of the Pulsating Air Flow on the Particle
uidization. The obtained data of PDGFB look similar to that Motion. The PDGFB is a dense-phase uidized bed; there are
of ADMFB, where the minimum uidization velocity has a large amounts of ne particles in the bed. The particle motion
rising tendency when f > 4.36 Hz. cannot be imaged in experiments. Bubbles in the bed cannot be
3.2. Eect of the Pulsating Air Flow on the Bed observed as well. Therefore, the particle motion and bubble
Density. Coal fed into the PDGFB system is separated characteristics in the PDGFB cannot be investigated using the
according to dierences in the density between coal and the experimental method. The computational particle uid
uidized bed. Therefore, the stability of the bed density is the dynamics (CPFD) method was used for the study of the
main factor inuencing the separation eciency of coal. For gassolid uidized bed.27,28 In this study, the numerical
PDGFB, the stability of the bed density could be aected by the simulations for the PDGFB were conducted. The size
pulsating air ow characteristics, such as the gas velocity and distribution of heavy medium was the same as data shown in
the gas pulsation frequency. Here, the mass of the heavy Figure 2. The model of the uidized bed was built according to
medium in PDGFB is a constant, and uctuations in the bed the actual size. The main mathematical or physical models were
height (h) are measured by a high-speed camera that allowed as follows:2729
for calculation of the volume of the uidized bed. As a result, The continuity equation for the uid can be expressed as
both the average bed density and the standard deviation values follows:
could be estimated. The latter could be employed to evaluate
the stability of the bed density. The eects of gas velocity (f f ) + (f f u f ) = 0
t (1)
(using the uidization number in this study, which is the ratio
of the operating gas velocity to the minimum uidization where uf is the uid velocity, f is the uid volume fraction, and
velocity) and pulsation frequency on the standard deviation of f is the uid density.
the bed density are shown in Figure 6. The momentum conservation equation for the uid can be
As both the gas velocity and pulsation frequency increased, expressed as follows:
the standard deviation of the bed density tends to reduce

during the initial stages, followed by an augmentation. At the (f f u f ) + (f f u f u f ) = p F + f f g + f f
t
(2)
where p is the uid pressure, f is the macrostress tensor, and F
is the exchange rate of a unit volume of uid and particle.
The acceleration model for particles can be expressed as
follows:
du 1 1
= D(u f u p) p + g p
dt p pp (3)
where up is the particle velocity, p is the particle density, and p
is the particle normal stress.
The drag model is chosen as the energy-minimization
multiscale (EMMS/matrix) model,30,31 which can be described
as follows:
g 2
= (p g )[fd (1 g)(ad g ) + fd (g gd)
Uslip
Figure 6. Eects of the gas velocity and pulsation frequency on the
(a i g ) + (1 fd )(1 gf )(a f g ) (4)
stability of the bed density.

7183 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468


Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

where Uslip = guslip, where Uslip is the supercial slip velocity obtained using the CPFD method. In ADMFB, the motion of
and uslip is the real slip velocity, fd is the dense-phase volume the heavy medium looks mixed and disorganized and the arrow
fraction, is the unit drag coecient, a is an inertial term, g is diagram clearly depicts certain amounts of larger size bubbles in
the voidage, and subscripts d, f, and i represent the dense phase, the bed. On the hand, the pulsating air ow in PDGFB
dilute phase, and macroscale phase, respectively. regularizes the motion of the heavy medium without forming
The volume fraction of the particles during one pulsation bubbles in the bed. The regular motion of the particles
period is depicted in Figure 7, where vmax represents the indicates that the misplaced phenomenon is reduced.
3.4. High-Density Separation of Anthracite. The
PDGFB system is employed for separation of ne anthracite
particles of 6 + 1 mm size fraction that is fed into the bed.
After separation, the air ow was suddenly cut o and the
uidized bed became a xed bed divided into ve sublayers
following the height direction. Anthracite was separated from
the heavy media through size screening to obtain ve sub-
simples. The particle size and ash content in the ve sub-
samples were analyzed, and the results are shown in Figure 9.

Figure 7. Volume fraction of the particles during one pulsation period.

maximum velocity of the pulsating air ow. In one pulsation


period, at least one dilute-phase zone could be seen, which
moves regularly from the bed bottom to the surface. The dilute-
phase zone represents the major area where the particles
segregate according to their densities. Thus, the separation
process occurs at any moment, and it is entirely independent of
the gas velocity.
There is a misplaced phenomenon in the coal separation
process, where the low-density oats are misplaced into high-
density tailings or simply tailings are misplaced into the oats,
which could reduce the separation eciency. In PDGFB, the
misplaced phenomenon is mainly caused by the motion of both
the heavy media and bubbles. Figure 8 depicts arrow diagrams
Figure 9. Size distribution of anthracite in PDGFB.
of the particle velocity in both the ADMFB and PDGFB

Almost no size segregation for anthracite in the PDGFB system


is noticeable, and anthracite with size fractions of 6 + 4, 4 +
3, 3 + 2, and 2 + 1 mm are uniformly distributed in the bed.
However, the ash content of anthracite signicantly increased in
the direction from the bed surface to the bottom (Figure 10).
This indicates that the density segregation is achieved and
anthracite is separated according to the density.
During the process, anthracite particles of 60100 mm in the
direction of the bed height were collected as clean coal. Those
of 2060 mm were gathered as middlings, and the others were
tailings. The yield and ash content of the three resulting
products are listed in Table 2. The oat-and-sink tests were
conducted for clean coal, middlings, and tailings, and the
partition curves are presented in Figure 11. At low separation
density of 1.81 g/cm3, the probable error was found to be 0.16
g/cm3, and at high separation density of 2.03 g/cm3, E was
recorded as 0.09 g/cm3. The separation results using a
traditional ADMFB are shown in Figure 12. The probable
errors, E values, are 0.175 and 0.105 g/cm3 for low- and high-
density separations, respectively. The smaller the value of E, the
better the separation eciency. Therefore, the separation
eciency was increased, acted by the active pulsation air ow.
Figure 8. Arrow diagrams of the particle velocity in both systems,
ADMFB and PDGFB (a-1, front view of ADMFB; a-2, vertical view of
4. CONCLUSION
ADMFB; b-1, front view of PDGFB; and b-2, vertical view of A pulsating air ow was introduced into the ADMFB system to
PDGFB). generate a PDGFB suitable for high-density separation for ne
7184 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468
Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

Figure 10. Ash content of anthracite at dierent bed heights.

Table 2. Ash Content and Yield of Products


product ash content (%) yield (%)
clean coal 14.25 43.51
middlings 24.21 49.79
tailings 54.34 6.70

Figure 12. Partition curves for the traditional ADMFB.

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
*Telephone: +86-516-83590092. E-mail: dong_liang2008@
126.com.
Figure 11. Partition curves for the PDGFB.
*Telephone: +86-516-83590092. E-mail: ymzhao_paper@126.
com.
Notes
anthracite particles. The pulsating air ow signicantly reduced The authors declare no competing nancial interest.


the minimum uidization of the heavy medium when compared
to that of ADMFB. A gas pulsation frequency of 4.36 Hz ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
induced the lowest value of the minimum uidization velocity. This work was nancially supported by the Natural Science
As both the gas velocity and pulsation frequency increased, the Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160266), the China
stability of the bed density raised during the initial stages, Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M591962), the Na-
followed by a decline. At the uidization number of 1.25 and a tional Natural Science Foundation of China (U1508210), and a
gas pulsating frequency of 45 Hz, the obtained uctuations in fund from the Priority Academic Program Development of
the standard deviation of the bed density were minimal. CPFD Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.


showed that the motion of the heavy medium in PDGFB is
regular without forming larger bubbles in the bed. Fine REFERENCES
anthracites of 6 + 1 mm size fraction were, hence, separated (1) Prusti, P.; Sahu, A.; Biswal, S. Prediction of the position of coal
according to their densities without any inuence from the size particles in an air dense medium fluidized bed system. Int. J. Min. Sci.
of the segregation phenomenon. The recorded lower and Technol. 2015, 25, 421427.
higher separation densities are 1.81 and 2.03 g/cm3, and the (2) Azimi, E.; Karimipour, S.; Xu, Z.; Szymanski, J.; Gupta, R.
corresponding probable errors are 0.16 and 0.09 g/cm3, Statistical analysis of coal beneficiation performance in a continuous air
respectively. dense medium fluidized bed separator. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2015, 1.

7185 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468


Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186
Energy & Fuels Article

(3) Sahu, A.; Tripathy, A.; Biswal, S. Study on particle dynamics in (23) Dong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Z.;
different cross sectional shapes of air dense medium fluidized bed Jiang, H.; Yang, X.; Duan, C.; Zhang, B. Deash and desulfurization of
separator. Fuel 2013, 111, 472477. fine coal using a gas-vibro fluidized bed. Fuel 2015, 155, 5562.
(4) Oshitani, J.; Ohnishi, M.; Yoshida, M.; Franks, G.; Kubo, Y.; (24) Dong, L.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, L.; Zhao, J.; Luo, Z.; Liu, Q.; Duan, C.
Nakatsukasa, S. Dry separation of particulate iron ore using density- Characteristics of pressure fluctuations and fine coal preparation in
segregation in a gassolid fluidized bed. Adv. Powder Technol. 2013, gas-vibro fluidized bed. Particuology 2015, 21, 146153.
24, 554559. (25) Dong, L.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Duan, C.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.;
(5) Mohanta, S.; Rao, C.; Daram, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Meikap, B. Air Zhang, B. A model for predicting bubble rise velocity in a pulsed gas
dense medium fluidized bed for dry beneficiation of coal: solid fluidized bed. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2013, 23, 227230.
Technological challenges for future. Part. Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 16 (26) Geldart, D. Types of gas fluidization. Powder Technol. 1973, 7,
27. 285292.
(6) Mohanta, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Meikap, B. Optimization process of (27) Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Wang, P.; Lu, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wei,
an air dense medium fluidized bed separator for treating high-ash non- L.; Zhang, M. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a
coking Indian coal. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2013, 34, 240 circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal, part IDetermination of
248. modeling parameters. Powder Technol. 2014, 253, 814821.
(7) Lv, B.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, W. Effect of (28) Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Wang, P.; Lu, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wei,
the secondary air distribution layer on separation density in a dense- L.; Zhang, M. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a
phase gassolid fluidized bed. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 969 circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal Part II: Investigation of solids
circulation. Powder Technol. 2014, 253, 822828.
973.
(29) Snider, D.; Clark, S.; ORourke, P. EulerianLagrangian method
(8) Wang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Huang, G.; Ren, B. Effect of agitation on the
for three-dimensional thermal reacting flow with application to coal
characteristics of air dense medium fluidization. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol.
gasifiers. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 12851295.
2016, 26, 383387.
(30) Lu, B.; Wang, W.; Li, J. Searching for a mesh-independent sub-
(9) Zhao, Y.; Li, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, B.; Dong, L.; Liang, C.; Duan, C.
grid model for CFD simulation of gassolid riser flows. Chem. Eng. Sci.
Industrial application of modularized dry coal beneficiation technique 2009, 64, 34373447.
based on a novel air dense medium fluidized bed. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. (31) Li, J.; Ge, W.; Wang, W.; Yang, N.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; He, X.;
2016, 1. Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Kwauk, M. Partial Realization of the EMMS
(10) Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Song, S.; Li, G.; Sheng, C. Utilizing Paradigm. From Multiscale Modeling to Meso-Science: A Chemical
an air-dense medium fluidized bed dry separating system for preparing Engineering Perspective; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp 185260,
a low-ash coal. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2014, 34, 285295. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35189-1_6.
(11) Zhao, Y.; Li, G.; Luo, Z.; Liang, C.; Tang, L.; Chen, Z.; Xing, H.
Modularized dry coal beneficiation technique based on gassolid
fluidized bed. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2011, 18, 374380.
(12) Zhao, Y.; Li, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, B.; Dong, L. Theory of
modularized dry coal beneficiation and its application based on an air
dense medium fluidized bed. J. China Coal Soc. 2014, 39, 15661571
(in Chinese).
(13) Luo, Z.; Fan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Tao, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Z. Density-
dependent separation of dry fine coal in a vibrated fluidized bed.
Powder Technol. 2008, 187, 119123.
(14) Macpherson, S.; Iveson, S.; Galvin, K. Density based separations
in the Reflux Classifier with an airsand densemedium and vibration.
Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 7482.
(15) Iveson, S.; Mason, M.; Galvin, K. Gravity Separation and
desliming of fine coal: Pilot-plant study using Reflux Classifiers in
series. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2014, 34, 239259.
(16) Yang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Song, S.; Duan, C.; Dong, L. Fine
coal dry cleaning using a vibrated gas-fluidized bed. Fuel Process.
Technol. 2013, 106, 338343.
(17) Yang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Song, S.; Chen, Z. Fine coal dry
beneficiation using autogenous medium in a vibrated fluidized bed. Int.
J. Miner. Process. 2013, 125, 8691.
(18) Weitkaemper, L.; Wotruba, H. Eective dry density
beneciation of ne coal using a new developed uidized bed
separator. Proceedings of the International Coal Preparation Congress;
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Sept 610, 2010.
(19) Boylu, F.; Cinku, K.; Cetinel, T.; Guven, O.; Yalcin, N.; Celik,
M. Dry processing of 4 mm coal nes through air jig and
aerodynamic separator. Proceedings of the XV Balkan Mineral Processing
Congress; Sozopol, Bulgaria, June 1216, 2013.
(20) Song, S.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Tang, L.; Yang, X. Fine coal particles
separation by airsolid magnetic fluidization. J. China Coal Soc. 2012,
37, 15861590 (in Chinese).
(21) Fan, M.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z.; Guan, Y.; Li, B.
Fundamentals of a magnetically stabilized fluidized bed for coal
separation. Powder Technol. 2002, 123, 208211.
(22) Fan, M.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, Z. Fine coal (61 mm)
separation in magnetically stabilized fluidized beds. Int. J. Miner.
Process. 2001, 63, 225232.

7186 DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01468


Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 71807186

You might also like