You are on page 1of 14

1

2017
ECONOMIC FREEDOM
SCORECARD
POLICIES THAT PROMOTE SCORECARD GRADING
ECONOMIC FREEDOM In determining the percentage for each
Our 2017 Legislative Agenda is based on score, one point is awarded for a vote
promoting the principles of economic in favor of a bill we support or against
freedom. In short, economic freedom is a bill we oppose. Likewise, one point
Dear Concerned the freedom to choose how to produce, is deducted for a vote in favor of a bill
Taxpayer, sell and use your own resources, while we oppose, and for a vote against a bill
respecting others rights to do the same. we favor. Committee and floor votes
Welcome to the Americans for A more economically free government both count, however the last action
ProsperityColorado 2017 Legislative has low taxes, a limited scope and size of taken by the legislator is the one
Scorecard. government, government spending thats counted. We also award one point for
under control, eliminates unnecessary prime sponsorship of a bill we support
As one of 36 AFP state chapters with regulations, protects individual rights and and deduct one point for prime
over 2.75 million activists nationwide, AFP-CO is home to over 127,000 prefers free markets over cronyism. States sponsorship of a bill we oppose.
Colorado activists and a strong base of local donors. Together, we work with more economic freedom experience
hard to preserve a free market economy that leads to economic freedom greater economic growth, which leads to GRADING SCALE
and prosperity for all Coloradans. more prosperity for its citizens. A+ - 100%
A - 90%-99%
There are many important issues facing Colorado. With those in AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY *Champion of Economic Freedom 90%
mind, we created seven public policy priorities to focus on for the BUDGET COLORADO 2017 or above
2017 legislative session. The purpose of this Scorecard is to hold LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD B - 80%-89%
elected officials accountable and recognize those who vote in line The bills that appear on the 2017 AFP-CO C - 70%-79%
with economic freedom principles. Scorecard include those that relate to our D - 60%-69%
Budget Colorado Public Policy Agenda. In F - 59% or Below
As you go through the Scorecard, I hope youll join us in celebrating addition, we have included bills that fit our
legislators that are our Champions of Economic Freedom! vision of economic freedom and opportunity
described at AmericansforProsperity.com.
Sincerely,

THIS YEARS LEGISLATIVE


PRIORITIES:
Jesse Mallory 1. Uphold the Taxpayers Bill of Rights
State Director (TABOR)
Americans for Prosperity-Colorado
2. Stop Special Favors in Workforce
Development

3. Reform Construction Defects Litigation


4. Promote School Choice
5. Reprioritize Budget Spending TABLE OF CONTENTS
Champions of Freedom ............................ 3
6. Protect the Energy Sector and Senate Abbreviated Scores ..................... 4
Ratepayers House Abbreviated Scores ...................... 5
Senate Votes ............................................. 6-7
7. Reduce Regulations that Hinder House Votes ............................................. 8-10
Business Development Scorecard Bill Summaries .................. 11-13
3

CHAMPIONS OF
ECONOMIC FREEDOM
LEGISLATOR GRADE SCORE LEGISLATOR GRADE SCORE

Senator Cooke A+ 100.00% Representative McKean A 91.67%

Senator Hill A 91.67% Representative Neville P. A+ 100.00%

Senator Marble A 95.45% Representative Nordberg A 92.31%

Senator Neville T. A+ 100.00% Representative Ransom A+ 100.00%

Senator Scott A 90.00% Representative Saine A+ 100.00%

Senator Smallwood A 95.24% Representative Van Winkle A 92.86%

Senator Tate A 91.67% Representative Williams D. A 94.12%

Representative Beckman A 91.67% Representative Wist A+ 100.00%

Representative Lundeen A 91.67%


4
SENATE ABBREVIATED SCORES

FINAL FINAL
SENATOR 2017 SENATOR 2017
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
Aguilar F 33.33% Kefalas F 41.18%

Baumgardner B 85.00% Kerr F 30.43%

Cooke A+ 100.00% Lambert B 89.47%

Coram C 73.68% Lundberg B 85.00%

Court F 32.00% Marble A 95.45%

Crowder C 72.22% Martinez Humenik B 82.35%


Donovan F 36.84% Merrifield F 33.33%
Fenberg F 23.81% Moreno F 38.10%
Fields F 47.06% Neville T. A+ 100.00%
Garcia F 33.33% Priola B 80.00%
Gardner C 75.00% Scott A 90.00%
Grantham C 72.22% Smallwood A 95.24%
Guzman F 36.84% Sonnenberg B 87.50%
Hill A 91.67% Tate A 91.67%
Holbert B 88.24% Todd F 35.29%
Jahn F 50.00% Williams A. F 47.37%
Jones F 22.22% Zenzinger F 47.37%
Kagan F 38.89%
5
HOUSE ABBREVIATED SCORES

FINAL FINAL FINAL


REPRESENTATIVE 2017 REPRESNTATIVE 2017 REPRESENTATIVE 2017
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
Arndt F 23.08% Hooton F 15.79% Rankin B 83.33%

Becker J. C 76.92% Humphrey B 89.47% Ransom A+ 100.00%

Becker K. F 25.00% Jackson F 23.08% Rosenthal F 35.71%

Beckman A 91.67% Kennedy F 42.86% Saine A+ 100.00%

Benavidez F 20.00% Kraft-Tharp F 23.08% Salazar F 25.00%

Bridges F 23.08% Landgraf D 69.23% Sias B 80.00%

Buck B 85.71% Lawrence D 69.23% Singer F 27.27%

Buckner F 33.33% Lebsock F 27.27% Thurlow D 60.00%

Carver C 78.57% Lee F 30.77% Valdez F 25.00%

Catlin D 61.54% Leonard B 85.00% Van Winkle A 92.86%

Coleman F 30.77% Lewis C 75.00% Weissman F 15.79%

Covarrubias C 78.57% Liston C 72.73% Willett C 75.00%

Danielson F 30.77% Lontine F 21.05% Williams D. A 94.12%


Duran F 38.46% Lundeen A 91.67% Wilson D 69.23%
Esgar F 28.57% McKean A 91.67% Winter F 23.08%
Everett B 84.62% McLachlan F 28.57% Wist A+ 100.00%

Exum F 23.08% Melton F 17.65% Young F 33.33%

Foote F 28.57% Michaelson Jenet F 38.46%

Garnett F 28.57% Mitsch Bush F 30.77%

Ginal F 25.00% Navarro B 85.71%

Gray F 40.00% Neville P. A+ 100.00%

Hamner F 33.33% Nordberg A 92.31%

Hansen F 30.77% Pabon F 53.33%

Herod F 42.86% Pettersen F 28.57%


6
SENATE VOTES

HB17-1090

HB17-1094
HB17-1068
HB17-1057

HB17-1256

HB17-1242

HB17-1375
HB17-1041

SB17-004
SB17-009

HB17-1124
SB17-003
HB17-1187

SB17-043
SB17-045
SB17-042

SB17-065
SB17-039
SB17-029

SB17-055

SB17-067
SB17-023
SB17-022

SB17-057

SB17-075

SB17-267
SB17-001
HB17-1115

SB17-061
SB17-188

SB17-156

Lifetime
SB17-113

Current
District

Score

Score
Senator

Aguilar, Irene 32 NV NV - - - - - - - - - NV - - - NV - 33.33% 43.17%

Baumgardner, Randy 8 NV - - - - - - - - - - - 85.00% 86.50%

Cooke, John 13 NV - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00% 91.00%

Coram, Don 6 NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 73.68% 79.84%

Court, Lois 31 NV - - - - - - 32.00% 41.00%

Crowder, Larry 35 NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72.22% 67.61%

Donovan, Kerry 5 NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 36.84% 41.92%

Fenberg, Stephen 18 - - - - - - - - - - - 23.81% 23.81%

Fields, Rhonda 29 NV - NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 47.06% 43.03%

Garcia, Leroy 3 NV - - - - - - - - - - 33.33% 32.67%

Gardner, Bob 12 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - 75.00% 75.00%

Grantham, Kevin 2 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 72.22% 72.11%

Guzman, Lucia 34 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - 36.84% 38.42%

Hill, Owen 10 NV NV - - - - - - 91.67% 87.83%

Holbert, Chris 30 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88.24% 90.62%

Jahn, Cheri 20 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - 50.00% 47.50%

Jones, Matt 17 NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22.22% 26.11%

Kagan, Daniel 26 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 38.89% 44.44%

Kefalas, John 14 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41.18% 37.09%

Kerr, Andy 22 NV NV - - - NV - - - 30.43% 30.22%

Lambert, Kent 9 NV NV - - - - - - - - NA - - 89.47% 84.74%

Lundberg, Kevin 15 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - 85.00% 84.50%

Marble, Vicki 23 - - - - - - - - - - 95.45% 89.23%

Martinez Humenik, Beth 24 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82.35% 83.18%

Merrifield, Michael 11 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - - 33.33% 29.67%

AFP Position: PRO | CON


7
SENATE VOTES

HB17-1090

HB17-1094
HB17-1068
HB17-1057

HB17-1256

HB17-1242

HB17-1375
HB17-1041

SB17-004
SB17-009

HB17-1124
SB17-003
HB17-1187

SB17-043
SB17-045
SB17-042

SB17-065
SB17-039
SB17-029

SB17-055

SB17-067
SB17-023
SB17-022

SB17-057

SB17-075

SB17-267
SB17-001
HB17-1115

SB17-061
SB17-188

SB17-156

Lifetime
SB17-113

Current
District

Score

Score
Senator

Moreno, Dominick 21 NV NV - - - - - - - - - 38.10% 33.55%

Neville, Tim 16 NV NV - - - - 100.00% 101.50%

Priola, Kevin 25 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - 80.00% 82.50%

Scott, Ray 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - 90.00% 84.50%

Smallwood, Jim 4 NV NV - - - - - - - - - 95.24% 95.24%

Sonnenberg, Jerry 1 - - - - - - - - 87.50% 90.75%

Tate, Jack 27 NV NV - - - NV - - 91.67% 77.33%

Todd, Nancy 28 NV NV - - - - - - - - - NA - NA - 35.29% 36.65%

Williams, Angela 33 NV NV - NV - - - - - - - - - 47.37% 50.18%

Zenzinger, Rachel 19 NV NV - - - - - - - - - - - 47.37% 47.37%

AFP Position: PRO | CON


8
HOUSE VOTES

HB17-1090

HB17-1094
HB17-1068
HB17-1063
HB17-1057

HB17-1256

HB17-1242

HB17-1375
HB17-1041

SB17-004
SB17-009

HB17-1124
SB17-003
HB17-1187

SB17-043

SB17-045

SB17-065
SB17-039
SB17-029

SB17-055

SB17-067

SB17-075

SB17-267
SB17-001
HB17-1115

SB17-061

SB17-156

Lifetime
SB17-113

Current
District

Score

Score
Representative

Arndt, Jeni James 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23.08% 32.04%

Becker, Jon 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76.92% 88.46%

Becker, KC 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.00% 34.50%

Beckman, Susan 38 - - - - - - - - - - - - NV - - - 91.67% 91.67%

Benavidez, Adrienne 32 - - - - - - - - 20.00% 20.00%

Bridges, Jeff 3 - - - - - - - - - NV - - - - - 23.08% 23.08%

Buck, Perry 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85.71% 99.36%

Buckner, Janet 40 - - NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33.33% 34.67%

Carver, Terri 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78.57% 78.79%

Catlin, Marc 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61.54% 61.54%

Coleman, James 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.77% 30.77%

Covarrubias, Phil 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78.57% 78.57%

Danielson, Jessie 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.77% 34.38%

Duran, Crisanta 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38.46% 31.73%

Esgar, Daneya 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28.57% 27.29%

Everett, Justin 22 NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84.62% 88.81%

Exum, Tony 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23.08% 23.08%

Foote, Mike 12 - - - - - - - 28.57% 31.79%

Garnett, Alec 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28.57% 40.29%

Ginal, Joann 52 - - - - - - - NV - - - - - - - - 25.00% 27.50%

Gray, Matt 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40.00% 40.00%

Hamner, Millie 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33.33% 32.67%

Hansen, Chris 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.77% 30.77%

Herod, Leslie 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42.86% 42.86%

Hooton, Edie 10 - - - - - - - - - 15.79% 15.79%

Humphrey, Stephen 48 - - - - - - - - - 89.47% 90.74%

AFP Position: PRO | CON


9
HOUSE VOTES

HB17-1090

HB17-1094
HB17-1068
HB17-1063
HB17-1057

HB17-1256

HB17-1242

HB17-1375
HB17-1041

SB17-004
SB17-009

HB17-1124
SB17-003
HB17-1187

SB17-043

SB17-045

SB17-065
SB17-039
SB17-029

SB17-055

SB17-067

SB17-075

SB17-267
SB17-001
HB17-1115

SB17-061

SB17-156

Lifetime
SB17-113

Current
District

Score

Score
Representative

Jackson, Dominique 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23.08% 23.08%

Kennedy, Chris 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42.86% 42.86%

Kraft-Tharp, Tracy 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23.08% 24.04%

Landgraf, Lois 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69.23% 84.62%

Lawrence, Polly 39 NA - - - - - - - NV - - - - - - 69.23% 84.50%

Lebsock, Steve 34 NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.27% 29.14%

Lee, Pete 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.77% 34.88%

Leonard, Timothy 25 - - - - - - - - 85.00% 87.00%

Lewis, Kimmi 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75.00% 75.00%

Liston, Larry 16 NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72.73% 72.73%

Lontine, Susan 1 - - - - - - - - - 21.05% 27.03%

Lundeen, Paul 19 - - - - - - - - - - NV - - - - - 91.67% 95.83%

McKean, Hugh 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91.67% 91.67%

McLachlan, Barbara 59 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28.57% 28.57%

Melton, Jovan 41 - - NV - - - - - - - 17.65% 20.82%

Michaelson Jenet, Dafna 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38.46% 38.46%

Mitsch Bush, Diane 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30.77% 31.88%

Navarro, Clarice 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85.71% 92.86%

Neville, Patrick 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00% 100.00%

Nordberg, Dan 14 - - - - - - - - - NV - - - - - 92.31% 96.15%

Pabon, Dan 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53.33% 45.17%

Pettersen, Brittany 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28.57% 32.79%

Rankin, Bob 57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 83.33% 78.67%

Ransom, Kim 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00% 102.50%

Rosenthal, Paul 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35.71% 32.36%

Saine, Lori 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00% 100.00%

AFP Position: PRO | CON


10
HOUSE VOTES

HB17-1090

HB17-1094
HB17-1068
HB17-1063
HB17-1057

HB17-1256

HB17-1242

HB17-1375
HB17-1041

SB17-004
SB17-009

HB17-1124
SB17-003
HB17-1187

SB17-043

SB17-045

SB17-065
SB17-039
SB17-029

SB17-055

SB17-067

SB17-075

SB17-267
SB17-001
HB17-1115

SB17-061

SB17-156

Lifetime
SB17-113

Current
District

Score

Score
Representative

Salazar, Joseph 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.00% 24.00%

Sias, Lang 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80.00% 87.50%

Singer, Jonathan 11 NV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.27% 31.64%

Thurlow, Dan 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60.00% 74.00%

Valdez, Donald 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25.00% 25.00%

Van Winkle, Kevin 43 - - - - - - - - - NV NV - - - 92.86% 93.43%

Weissman, Mike 36 - - - - - - - - - 15.79% 15.79%

Willett, Yeulin 54 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75.00% 87.50%

Williams, Dave 15 - - - - - - - NV - - NV 94.12% 94.12%

Wilson, James 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69.23% 78.12%

Winter, Faith 35 - - - - - - NV - - - - - - - - 23.08% 30.04%

Wist, Cole 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100.00% 88.50%

Young, Dave 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33.33% 32.67%

AFP Position: PRO | CON


11
SCORECARD BILL SUMMARIES

Below please find the Scorecard bill summaries, SB17-3- Repeal of the Colorado Health SB17-23- Register Athlete Agents
which have been marked according to whether or Benefit Exchange
not we support or oppose them. The bill would have enacted the Revised Uniform
The bill would have repealed the Colorado Health Athlete Agents Act (2015), drafted by the National
HB17-1063- Increase in Business Personal Property Benefit Exchange Act effective January 1, 2018, Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State
Tax Exemption allowing the exchange to continue for one year Laws. The revised act would have established new
for the purpose of winding up its affairs. The bill provisions for registration and registration renewal
This bill proposed increasing the exemption from also required the board of the Exchange, on the for sports agents, to be administered by the
business personal property taxes from less than last day of the wind-up period, to transfer any secretary of state. The revised act would have been
$7,300 of personal property to less than $50,000. unencumbered money that remains in the exchange subject to sunset review in 2026.
If it had passed, businesses with less than $50,000 to the state treasurer, who would then have
of business personal property would not have been transferred the money to the general fund. SB17-29- Funding for Full Day Kindergarten
required to submit a schedule to the county assessor.
SB17-4- Access to Providers for Medicaid Concerning increasing the funding for preschool
SB17-9- Increase in Business Personal Property Recipients through twelfth grade public education, and
Tax Exemption increasing the funding for full-day kindergarten,
Under current law, recipients of services under the requiring the secretary of state to submit a ballot
If passed, this bill would have increased the per- Colorado medical assistance program (Medicaid) question to authorize the state to retain and
schedule exemption of business personal property are not responsible for the cost of services by a spend for preschool through twelfth grade public
from $7,300 to $10,000 for the next two property medical provider. They are also not responsible education any state revenues above the excess
tax years, and then adjusted the amount for for the cost remaining after payment by Medicaid state revenues cap approved by the voters in 2005.
inflation for subsequent property tax cycles. or another private insurer, regardless of whether
the medical provider is enrolled in the Medicaid SB17-39- Education Income Tax Credits for
HB17-1068- Prevailing Wage for CDOT Public program unless the medical services provided Nonpublic School
Private Partnerships are non-reimbursable by Medicaid. If passed, this
bill would have amended the statute so that the The bill would have established a private school
This bill mandates the Colorado Department of prohibition on charging Medicaid recipients for tuition income tax credit allowing any taxpayer
Transportation only consider proposals for public- medical services would apply only if the medical to claim a credit when the taxpayer enrolls a
private initiatives that pay prevailing wages for provider was enrolled in Medicaid. dependent qualified child in a private school.
construction labor.
SB17-22- Rural Economic Advancement Of SB17-42- Repeal Local Government Internet
SB17-1- Regulatory Relief Act Colorado Towns Service Voter Approval

The bill proposed enacting the Regulatory Relief This bill concerned the coordination of economic The bill would have repealed restrictions on the
Act of 2017, and required relevant state agencies assistance for rural communities experiencing provision of cable television, telecommunications
to give small businesses a period of time to cure certain significant economic events that have service or high-speed internet access by a local
a first-time minor violation of a rule instead of led to substantial job loss in those communities, government, including providing these services
enforcing the rule by imposing a fine. authorizing the department of local affairs to without first seeking voter approval.
coordinate nonmonetary assistance and award
grant money to assist rural communities with job
creation or retention.

AFP Position: PRO | CON


12
SCORECARD BILL SUMMARIES

HB17-1090- Advanced Industry Investment Tax


SB17-43- Transportation Network Company SB17-61- Equalized Funding Charter School
Credit Extension
Drivers Medical Certificate Not Required Operating Costs*
Advanced Industry Investment Tax Credit Extension
The bill would have eliminated the requirement The bill requires a school district to distribute This bill extends and expands the Advanced
for a medical certificate for persons who drive for revenue it receives from ongoing local property tax Industry tax credit for an additional five years. The
transportation network companies. mill levies equally, on a per-student basis, to the total maximum amount of credits allowed per
school district charter schools. calendar year is increased to $ 1.5 million.
SB17-45- Construction Defect Claim Allocation of
Defense Costs SB17-65- Transparency in Direct Pay Health Care HB17-1124- Local Government Liable Fracking Ban
Prices Oil and Gas Moratorium
If passed, this bill required the equitable allocation
of the costs of defending a construction defect This bill required that health care providers disclose The bill specified that a local government that
claim, requiring the court to apportion the costs of the charges they impose for common health care bans hydraulic fracturing of an oil and gas well is
defense, including reasonable attorney fees, among services when payment is made directly rather than liable to the mineral interest owner for the value
all insurers with a duty to defend. by a third party. of the mineral interest. It also specified that a
local government that enacts a moratorium must
SB17-55- Prohibit Discrimination Labor Union SB17-67- Strip Accountability in School Testing compensate oil and gas operators, mineral lessees
Participation (Right-to-Work) and royalty owners for all costs, damages and losses
Current law relating to performance evaluations of fair market value associated with the moratorium.
The bill prohibited an employer from requiring any for teachers and principals (educator evaluations)
person, as a condition of employment, to become includes a requirement that at least 50 percent HB17-1115- Direct Primary Health Care Services
or remain a member of a labor organization to pay of an evaluation must be determined by the
dues, fees or other assessments to a labor or charity academic growth of the teachers students or the The bill established parameters under which an
organization or other third party in lieu of the labor students in the principals school. The bill eliminated agreement may be entered into between a direct
organization. Any agreement that violated these that requirement but grants school districts the primary health care provider and a patient for the
prohibitions or the rights of an employee is void. flexibility to continue to use student academic payment of a periodic fee and for a specified period
growth, in an amount not to exceed 20 percent, in of time, if the agreement is not the business of
SB17-57- Colorado Healthcare Affordability & educator evaluations. insurance or the practice of underwriting and does
Sustainability Enterprise not fall under regulation of the division of insurance.
SB17-75- Income Tax Deduction for Military
If passed, this bill would have created an enterprise Retirement Benefits HB17-1094- Telehealth Coverage Under Health
that is exempt from the requirements of section 20 Benefit Plans
of article X of The State Constitution and related The bill created an additional deduction under
statutory provisions to administer a fee-based which a person of any age may deduct a Under current law, health benefit plans are required
healthcare affordability and sustainability program percentage of military retirement benefits from his to cover health care services delivered to a covered
for hospitals. or her state income tax. person by a provider via telehealth in the same
manner that the plan covers health care services
delivered by a provider in person. The bill clarifies
a number of related items, such as the assertion
that a health plan cannot restrict or deny coverage
of telehealth services based on the communication
* SB17-061 was postponed indefinitely so that HB17-1375 could move through the process, technology or application used to deliver the
therefore House Education Committee members were not scored for this vote. telehealth services.

AFP Position: PRO | CON


13
SCORECARD BILL SUMMARIES

SB17-113- Cap Employer Contribution Rates For SB17-267- Sustainability of Rural Colorado and HB17-1256- Oil and Gas Facilities Distance from
PERA Public Employees Retirement Association Enterprising of Hospital Provider Fee School Property
Employers
In order to save rural hospitals, this bill reclassified The Colorado oil and gas conservation commission
This bill required that the total employer the hospital fee as an enterprise, including lowering requires oil and gas production facilities and wells to
contribution rates for public employees retirement the TABOR revenue limit by $200 million to offset be located at least 1,000 feet from school buildings
association employers in the 2018 calendar year the more than $800 million in additional tax money and other high occupancy buildings. This bill clarifies
would become the maximum total employer the state can retain after removal of the fee, raising that the minimum 1,000-foot distance from which
contribution rates for future calendar years. some Medicaid co-pays, providing a tax break for newly permitted production facilities and wells must
small businesses, and $30 million for rural schools, be located from any school applies to the school
SB17-156- Homeowners Association Construction to be funded by increasing the special sales tax property line and not the school building.
Defect Lawsuit Approval Timelines on retail marijuana to the maximum of 15 percent.
The bill also approved issuing $2 billion worth of SB17-188- Repeal Income Tax Credit Innovative
The bill stated that when the governing documents certificates, backed by mortgaging state buildings, Motor Vehicles
of a common interest community require mediation for transportation and other construction projects,
or arbitration of a construction defect claim and 25 percent of which must be used in rural areas of This bill repeals the income tax credits for
the requirement is later amended or removed, the state. innovative motor vehicles and innovative trucks
mediation or arbitration is still required for a for a designated period of time, requiring the
construction defect claim. HB17-1057- Interstate Physical Therapy state controller to credit an amount of tax revenue
Licensure Compact estimated to be retained by the repeal of the
HB17-1242- Sales Tax Increase for Transportation income tax credits to the highway users tax fund.
Funding Revenue This bill concerns the adoption of an interstate The bill requires the secretary of state to submit a
compact to allow persons authorized to practice ballot question, to be treated as a proposition, at
The bill required a ballot question to be submitted physical therapy in a state to obtain the privilege to the statewide election to be held in November 2017
to the voters of the state seeking approval for the practice physical therapy in other member states. requesting voter approval.
state to impose a 21 percent state sales tax increase,
$700 million per year, and to issue a specified HB17-1187- Change Excess State Revenues Cap HB17-1375- Distributing Mill Levy Override
amount of transportation revenue anticipation Growth Factor Revenue to Schools
notes (TRANs) for the purpose of funding specified
state transportation projects. This bill modifies the excess state revenues cap This bill requires school districts to distribute mill
established in 2005 as Referendum C by allowing levy revenue to meet the needs of students, create a
HB17-1041- Inform Students and Parents of an annual adjustment for an increase based on fund to provide equalizing money to institute charter
Education Leading to Jobs the average annual change of Colorado personal schools, and requires school districts and charter
income over the last five years, rather than schools to post a list of statutory waivers received.
In assisting a student and his or her parent in adjusting for inflation and population. Colorado
creating the ICAP, the public school must discuss personal income is the total personal income for
the skills and educational opportunities available Colorado as reported by a federal agency. As the
through military enlistment and is encouraged to modification may increase the amount that the
provide to the student information concerning the state retains and spends in a given fiscal year, the
military enlistment test. bill seeks voter approval for the change, as required
by TABOR.

AFP Position: PRO | CON


14

AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY.ORG

You might also like