Non Aging Comments

Keri Renee Griffin 4 years ago
oh damn
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
newsy97 4 years ago
Like we don't have enough people on this planet, now we'll all live to 150.
51
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist newsy97 2 years ago
All of the MOST energy and resource depleting people too!
ReplyShare
Avatar
boneblinkz 4 years ago
"If we could identify the gene and then at young adulthood we could silence the
expression of developmental inertia, find an off-switch, when you do that, there is
perfect homeostasis and you are biologically immortal."
This is awesome. Medical science needs to get there ASAP.

7
ReplyShare
Avatar
Henry Major boneblinkz 4 years ago
You know that this article is utterly wrong, right?
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
boneblinkz Henry Major 4 years ago
I'm just fantasizing about the idea of finding a way to draw a line in the sand at
some deliberate point in the maturation process of the human body and have it stay
there. But, obviously, I don't know anything about developmental biology. Like most
science articles written for ABC news, this is designed to get you all excited
about something before adding the caveat that it probably isn't possible. They
accomplished that goal because I'm totally down with this idea, so don't feel
obligated to launch into a description of morphogenesis or whatever just to rain on
my parade. :)
7
ReplyShare
Avatar
Ben boneblinkz 4 years ago
Jesus, think what professional sports would be like! Imagine if Calvin Johnson
stayed 25 forever...They'd be cutting guys with talent just beneath his after a
while.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
boneblinkz Ben 4 years ago
Megatron will never age or degrade in performance, as a Lions fan I simply refuse
to accept that possibility.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist boneblinkz 4 years ago
Aging and death are GOOD and NATURAL processes of life...
Life regenerates after death.

Death is as important a part of life as sleep is for the end of an active day.
Mankind needs to realize this ASAP!
Anything less is foolishness.

1
ReplyShare
Avatar
davej 4 years ago
It seems strange that we have several cases but the oldest is under 40. Why?
12
ReplyShare
Avatar
Henry Major davej 4 years ago
Because they still age and die, they just aren't developing properly.
25
ReplyShare
Avatar
Captain Murphy davej 4 years ago
I agree, it is dumb for the writers of the article to try and manipulate readers
into thinking they re actually immortal.
25
ReplyShare
Avatar
Kaiyl_kariashi davej 4 years ago
That ultimately depends. The negative side of aging is a result of cells breaking
down over time and being unable to perfectly replicate each other. If their
telomeres are intact or even regenerating, that does in fact mean biological
immortality or at least significantly delayed onset of aging.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Mike Rogers 4 years ago
Oh good. A new breed hormone driven 20 year olds that never die running around
reproducing with each other creating others just like them. Just what the planet
needs. HEY SCIENCE - quit playing God - JUST STOP.
27
ReplyShare
Avatar
Weirdo Mike Rogers 4 years ago
Then tell god to stop mutating genes, will ya?
28
ReplyShare
Avatar
David Penn Weirdo 4 years ago
it's not god, it's hereditary passing of toxin created RNA to offspring, " god
didn't do this, We did" -I am Legend.
13
ReplyShare
Avatar
Lisahh4 Mike Rogers 4 years ago
People like you said the same thiing about vaccines.
45
ReplyShare
Avatar
weezilla Mike Rogers 4 years ago
1) If something like this is able to be attained (it's just a matter of when--
there's no stopping it as technology advances), then most people will agree to put
strict regulations on it. Anyhow, as for your "quit playing God" comment--you have
to realize that science has made all kinds of things better for us. Fortunately and
sometimes unfortunately, there's no stopping scientific progress. Not to say that
in some maniacal sense... Anyhow, unless you want to convince everyone to stop all
scientific progress, even if we aren't researching stuff like this, at some point
it will be too easy with our technology to research the 'forbidden' stuff and it's
going to happen. I'm sure of this.
2) Remember, people will age mentally (once fully developed). I doubt you would
have everyone who's 40 years old in a 20 year old body making hoards of dumb
decisions.
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
TeeBeeSanford weezilla 4 years ago
"I doubt you would have everyone who's 40 years old in a 20 year old body making
hoards of dumb decisions." Why? We have lots of people who are 40 years old in 40
year old bodies making hoards of dumb decisions now...why would that change? LOL
28
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist weezilla 4 years ago
"you have to realize that science has made all kinds of things better for us."
Not quite - it's just enabled a certain way of life that includes widespread drug
addiction, rape and all sorts of inhumane activity.
Or very way of making a living is destructive to us and the environment.
Our science has brought us to the very edge of self destruction.
Our lack of spiritual development makes our own self destruction a very real
possibility!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
weezilla Reverend Atheist 4 years ago
Please see: "Fortunately and sometimes unfortunately, there's no stopping
scientific progress."
I did not say it did not make some things worse for us in some respects. I even
acknowledged it. You're very right it has brought us to the edge of destruction.
But, as long as we encourage good will, science has just as much capacity to do
good as it does evil.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Reverend Atheist 2 years ago
Previous to that it was STARVATION, if not disease or predators... to say nothing
of NATURAL catastrophes.
Solve one problem, create a new one!
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Our science has brought us to the very edge of self destruction."
We've ALWAYS been at "the very edge of self destruction".
Science has HELPED to make our existence more secure.

Our own HUMANITY is what may destroy us, regardless of the method...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Deathstalker Mike Rogers 4 years ago
You can only play God when you create life from nothing. Until then we are just
trying to have better lives. If we can stop the aging process this will be the
greatest science discovery ever made.
I hope it happens but I highly doubt it which mean me you and everyone else will
get to experience the horror of losing our health. Hair, eyes, ears and teeth among
other things. This is the horror of death, father time etc.
If we ever find a way to increase our life time significantly yes over population
will be a problem but then terraforming Mars will no longer be something that is
cool but become a necessity.
19
ReplyShare
Avatar
David Penn Deathstalker 4 years ago
the only way this will happen will be to upload our souls onto quantum computers
then have remote controlled robotic bodies
5
ReplyShare
Avatar
boneblinkz David Penn 4 years ago
Which also sounds totally awesome.
19
ReplyShare
Avatar
Donald-Irredeemable deplorable David Penn 4 years ago
Thank you Sheldon Cooper
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Deathstalker 4 years ago
The "best" scientific discoveries (in health) are unaffordable!
ReplyShare
Avatar
boneblinkz Mike Rogers 4 years ago
HEY SCIENCE - strip me from my delicate flesh and make me into a GOD.
12
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist boneblinkz 2 years ago
DEATH will do that for you - you will NOT exist, as does ANY god!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Moderate213 Mike Rogers 4 years ago
Seriously, science - cut it out. Stop curing diseases; God sent those diseases to
kill people. And quit caring for accident victims; you're standing in the way of
God's plan. And enough with the improving-our-day-to-day-lives. Comforts like
heating and air conditioning are just playing God with the environment. Stop it
already, science!
62
ReplyShare
Avatar
Jim Moderate213 4 years ago
You cant stop the path of science if god created everything don't you think if he
wants to stop it he will? this is our path as humans to evolve we dint say that
when we where cave men did we say lets not make weapons and hunt with our hands so
we will stay to the path of god no we said we have to live we are in this here and
now and we have to survive the best way we can.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Steven Lin Mike Rogers 4 years ago
If you have ever been to the doctors and eaten anything from a supermarket I think
you just failed.
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Mike Rogers 4 years ago
Smart beats stoopid ANY day of the week!
ReplyShare
Avatar
RShaw Mike Rogers 4 years ago
Ha ha ha, a bunch got offended by being told they're annoying.
ReplyShare
Avatar
idontwantot 4 years ago
May Allah grant them total health and happiness, fulfilment and joy! We must all
work to end oppression and work towards helping these children as well!
30
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist idontwantot 2 years ago
HOPE AGAINST HOPE!
You may as well pray to The Easter Bunny!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Michael Miller 4 years ago
be cool to pick an age and stay that age. i wouldnt mind being 21 forever.
50
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Michael Miller 4 years ago
You and me both Michael! ;)
13
ReplyShare
Avatar
mr13 Michael Miller 4 years ago
really wait till your 30 and look back and realise how dumb a 21 yr old really is
compaired to some one with a life time of experances you will see sonny
14
ReplyShare
Avatar
King_Oberon mr13 4 years ago
That's life experience, not age.
8
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist King_Oberon 4 years ago
It costs you TIME to get experience - that means AGING!!,
5
ReplyShare
Avatar
King_Oberon Reverend Atheist 4 years ago
Semantics. I was addressing mr13's lack of understanding of biological immortality.
One does not need to age physically to experience life and gain wisdom. The
experiences we do have that are directly related to physical ageing beyond 20 are
not positive ones.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que King_Oberon 4 years ago
"One does not need to age physically to experience life and gain wisdom."
We basically disagree on this particular statement!

2
ReplyShare
Avatar
LlarryLLama Fuh Que 4 years ago
Nix nix Fuh Que..time does give you wisdom and experience
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que LlarryLLama 4 years ago
Actually I was saying the AGING PROCESS "gives" you wisdom, this by you realizing
that you are wearing down and WILL die one day.
Time doesn't really "give" you w&e, but it does OFFER it to you.
My original point is that the PRICE of experience that leads to wisdom is TIME,
which translates into AGING and that they BOTH "give" you opportunity to gain
wisdom and experience.
That Aging itself stimulates wisdom and is inseparable from TIME...
But it's ultimately up to the person after all imho...
Some folx will NEVER learn!

5
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Fuh Que 4 years ago
For one, you have no proof of this theory. Sure, it can be assumed that someone
will regret not enjoying life as they are young, but that is true for anything you
take for granted, so with your logic, this wisdom will be gained from other manors
as well, not just physically aging. So, one can conclude that you do not need to
physically age to gain it's wisdom.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Guest 4 years ago
It's obvious to ANYONE who ages.
If you NEVER aged, you'd have no reason to change your behavior.
It's because we WILL die that we treasure our existence.
Wisdom is merely recognizing the consequences of stupidness.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Reverend Atheist 4 years ago
See, you are generalizing everyone. I do not believe everyone, even the wise,
treasures our existence, most do perhaps, but it is an opinion that is not
consistent with everyone. Like I said, this wisdom can be gained from other things
we "treasure", but you can not see that. If you become paralyzed, you will begin to
treasure your life before the accident. If you become blind, you will treasure the
movies and art you took for granted before. This can either build someone's
character or destroy it. There are plenty of young people who are MUCH wiser than
someone who is elderly. You keep relating wisdom to physical age, which is
extremely flawed. You can even take it a step further. People these days can only
live to be about 120 maximum if they are super lucky. This allows them to see ALOT
in the world, which adds to their experience and wisdom. Now, if you were immortal,
had the body for a 25 year old, and have been alive for 1000 years, it can be
assumed that you would have MUCH more experience and potentially wisdom (from the
experiences) than someone who is appropriately aged physically, and has only lived
75 years. Your logic is flawed.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Wow, you must have missed the point of the entire article. We are discussing
PHYSICAL aging. If you can stay 21 forever, you will gain more experience than
someone who is 30 (and who ages), as you will live longer.
ReplyShare
Avatar
And the basis for this SILLY ASSUMPTION is...?
ReplyShare
Avatar
I assume when you said assumption, you were referring to my statement on experience
gaining, correct? There is not much of a physical difference between one who is 21
vs 30, comparatively to someone who is 70, but you can assume a 30 year old has
more life experience than one who is 21, because he has been ALIVE LONGER, not that
he is physically older. Experience is gained from tests, trials, and interactions
with the world. It has nothing to do with the physical age, except for gaining
higher level of understanding, which we pretty much hit our potential in our
twenties. The more you study something, the more you learn, the only factor their
is work and the amount of time required to gain the knowledge, not how old you are.
Now, today, we often see wisdom in, for example, an older doctor compared to a
resident, but that is because we assume he has had more experience. I hope I did
not confuse you, as this is pretty basic logic. There is no basis, just like there
is no basis for time travel. The only basis might be comparing an older person who
has been isolated from the world to a younger person who has been in the middle of
it. The only reason the younger person knows more is because of experience.
ReplyShare
Avatar
1. I wish you would develop the wisdom of BREVITY!
2. By the time a person is 30 they are MUCH more aware of their mortality - which
demands wisdom!
3. "The more you study something"? Wisdom has virtually nothing to do with study or
even gained knowledge. Now the PROCESS of gaining knowledge often yields WISDOM
greater than the knowledge or ANY experience gained.
DUMB ANIMALS get experience and knowledge - is that wisdom a 2 year old trained
animal?
4. Knowing more is NOT wisdom but wisdom can be gained in the PURSUIT of knowing
more - but even a dancing bear is not what I'd call possessing more wisdom than a
wild one! CERTAINLY not because he "learned" how to dance and has "experience"
performing in a circus!
LUDICROUS!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que mr13 4 years ago
Wait till you're 60!
I think we continue to learn (wisdom) until senility starts to set in.
Of course, our techno-learning skills fade as life learned wisdom develops!

3
ReplyShare
Avatar
deupty derp mr13 4 years ago
You're pretty dumb still!
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Jeremy Chante Reese mr13 4 years ago
Maturity Isn't at 21, I would say 25 is complete maturity.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Jeremy Chante Reese 4 years ago
25?
Guess again!
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
You mature until decline (senility) takes over.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Michael Miller 4 years ago
It'd be REALLY "cool" to understand the truth of life and death...
ReplyShare
Avatar
You think? I never would have thought anyone would be interested in those subject.
It's the first I have ever heard about there being a truth of life and death. It's
a shame there are not current political controversy over them, as well as years of
pondering based around these as well. What a shame.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
TurtleMan 4 years ago
Missing I think are the mental capabilities of these non aging people.
79
ReplyShare
Avatar
Will 4 years ago
Not growing is different from not aging. If one of these individuals both does not
grow and does not show signs of aging (wrinkles, osteoporosis, etc.), then we can
start wondering if they hold the key to immortality. Seeing as there is not a case
of one of these people older than 40 mentioned here, I think that may be a little
far-fetched.
126
ReplyShare
Avatar
Crystian Will 4 years ago
Highly doubtful, these people show serious signs of retardation. If the brain
cannot grow and learn like a normal person, then the cost of that would be
devastation. I rather be mortal with a sane mind than immortal. Besides we don't
need the growing population to get EVEN bigger, otherwise we'd be looking like that
movie Elysum.
49
ReplyShare
Avatar
Kaiyl_kariashi Crystian 4 years ago
That's the point though. Their development is retarded because of their gene
disorder. If they could find what's causing it, and develop a means to apply it to
people who have already reached physical maturity, they could freeze the aging
process, with none of the side effects, while avoiding the developmental diseases
of old age in process.
That's what they're going for.

70
ReplyShare
Avatar
Shinashi Kaiyl_kariashi 4 years ago
For real, it seemed like the point went way over a lot of people's heads.
29
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Shinashi 4 years ago
Not surprising considering the commenter above you is an advocate for a smaller
population.
9
ReplyShare
Avatar
Zeroed Out Guest 4 years ago
Yeah, but you do realize what would happen if we stopped aging and kept
reproducing, right? We can't even feed everyone now ... just wait until we hit 15
billion people. The results may be catastrophic.
12
ReplyShare
Avatar
Edward Zeroed Out 4 years ago
"Tuck Everlasting" by Natalie Babbit explains just that.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Zeroed Out 4 years ago
How hard is this for folx to realize? We ALREADY have a means of rejuvenation -
birth, growth, decline, death... REBIRTH!!
Life is ALREADY a blessed experience - ALL of it... Good AND bad!
The shortcoming lies within...

4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Tu Ja Zeroed Out 4 years ago
Wrong...yes WE as human beings do have the capability to feed EVERYONE. There is
absolutely enough food to go around in this world, the real culprit is GREED. There
are corporations out there and entities who horde their resources and even destroy
excess to maintain profitability. PLEEEEASE do your research. Anyone who ever says
that we can't feed everyone is either ignorant or lying to you.
16
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Tu Ja 4 years ago
We "can" but obviously we "CAN'T"!
The same "greed" that now enables us to feed the world is the same greed that keeps
us from actually doing so!
UNTIL we solve this dilemma we CAN NOT feed the world!
And until we actually CAN, in the REAL world, there's simply NO justification for
the expense of trying to find a way to INCREASE the world's population!!
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
LlarryLLama Zeroed Out 4 years ago
we couldn't reproduce because we would never enter puberty and become sexually
mature.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest LlarryLLama 4 years ago
I think the article was referring to the decline in ageing.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Liz Catland Kaiyl_kariashi 4 years ago
If they do that, there's a 50% chance something may go wrong, and wreak havoc on us
all. Or, like Crystian said, the population may grow too big, and humans will run
out of resources.
8
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Liz Catland 4 years ago
100% chance!
But for dealing with trauma and communicable diseases, our medical technology has
serious flaws that make it a highly undesirable option.
The BEST medical therapy has given us is the importance of sterility/washing our
hands and eating well.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Not sure about your last statement. "The best...given us is the importantance of
sterility...and eating well"? really? Sterility is only beneficial when putting
something in your body, any other time is unnecessary, and potentially harmful. Our
bodies have natural barriers that daily bathing and washing destroys. I would say
medicine has provided MUCH more important things than cleanliness, such as
vaccines, transplants, CPR, etc.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Medical operations were routinely endangered because docs were UNAWARE of the
importance of washing our hands - to rid build up of BACTERIA, regardless of
"putting something in your body" or not!
How many deaths from e.coli could have been avoided in generations b4 simply
WASHING YOUR HANDS b4 eating?
To say nothing of washing your food prep tools!
THIS is the main benefit western physiology has given the world.
Note: this is PHYSIOLOGY not medicine!
CPR too is PHYSIOLOGY not medicine!
... ...
Medicine and surgery have been proven to be the MOST dangerous therapies in the
world!
Deaths from these "therapies" is worse in number and degree than the illnesses they
claim to cure!
... ...
Every culture develops healing science that works for the challenges THEY face.
Western drug therapy works for the problems in the western world - and the problems
they export to more low tech societies.
... ...
No one health therapy or culture is superior to all - they have to be evaluated
based on the challenges the culture faces and how these problems are caused.
... ...
Our sole dependence on surgery and drug therapy has produced an obese, frail, drug
addicted populace
... ...
Drug and surgery therapies are not superior, just an option to consider for certain
situations...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Wow, ok. Every point you used in response to my comment WAS an instance where you
WERE putting something IN YOUR BODY, which I clearly stated. Eating food, surgery,
are examples of your body being exposed to the elements. And yes, Biomedicine and
Surgery IS superior in most cases (as far as the anatomy goes).If you are diagnosed
with bone cancer, are you just going to take some penicillin and hope it resolves
itself? NO, if you want to live, they will need to remove the infected portion of
the bone. All cleanliness does is prevent infection when our bodies are exposed.
There is NO NEED for people to bathe everyday unless they have a medical condition
requiring it. Now, I do bathe daily because society requires it. If you lack
hygiene, you will be discriminated against, but that is a different topic.
-----------
When the term medicine, or medical is used in my statement, it is not referring to
just drugs. It is used to refer to the techniques and science used to treat the
human body, which includes chemistry, biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, and
others. Please pay attention. CPR is part of medicine.
-------
Also, I hope you realize E. Coli is only dangerous to humans when they have not
been exposed to the particular strain, relating to the geographical region. E. Coli
is a natural flora found in our guts, which help with digesting our food.
--------
Please show me studies where surgery and drugs are linked to obesity. Obesity is
commonly caused by the large portions Americans eat, as well as the fast food
restaurants which make it much easier to find a quick meal on the go. which is not
even medically related. The reason why only some of the population may be
considered frail is due to the fact they were suppose to die, but our advanced
medicine saved them, as well as lack of hardship other 3rd world countries have to
endur,..which brings me back to YOUR point on E. Coli which CONTRADICTS your
statement on a frail society. First you state a medical practice of cleanliness
could have saved many from prior infections in the past, now you are saying surgery
and drugs have made a weak society. You need to develop a clear line of thought and
logic in your arguments. Also, many of your points of causes are related to the
culture's society, not medicine.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Again, you basically do NOT know what you are talking about.
Medicine is DRUGS and ONLY drugs!
Physiology is "the study of" the human body...
Making up your own definitions for words may work in your fundamentalist church,
but not in the pure and EDUCATED world of SCIENCE!
Try reading a dictionary b4 discussing things with your superiors...!
ReplyShare
Avatar
You say I do not know, yet I am the one posting facts.
Physiology is not just the study of the human body, but nice try with the
definition. It is the study of the FUNCTIONS of the human body. Anatomy is the
study of the structure, which is why they go very well together as subjects.
I do not make up definitions. Medicine is a very broad subject, and covers many
areas. The practice of MEDICINE often involves surgery. Last time I checked Medical
Doctors use surgery as a choice to cure some diseases.
So, based on your logic, those of the third world do not suffer disease, cancer,
illness unless the first world interacts with them? Yes, I completely see how that
is logical. Again, America compared to,..lets say, Haiti, or India, America has
much higher standards of health, and the average longevity of Americans is much
longer. But, I must be wrong, because cancer and disease only exists in America,
right?
Again, you are making assumptions that I am a fundamentalist( and that I would
waste my time with religion) , probably because you have no where else to go with
your discussion. From your syntax, and vocabulary used, it would seem you are
younger, and probably female. Superior's? I didn't realize you were my boss?
ReplyShare
Avatar
re:"So, based on your logic, those of the third world do not suffer disease,
cancer, illness unless the first world interacts with them?"
Again you just can't keep up can you?
... ...
I NEVER said "third world countries" - though YES, they suffer these things MUCH
less than we do!
I said "PRIMAL SOCIETIES" - do you even know what these societies ARE?
AND "third world countries" have been interacting for QUITE a while - that's why we
have the NERVE to call them "third world"! (And its also why they have just about
ALL of the problems they DO have!!)
... ...
PRIMAL SOCIETIES are NOT suffering from smallpox, cancer, AIDS, etc. Not without
contact from the west.
The Native American population lost nearly 95% of its population from DISEASES that
the Europeans brought with them.
... ...
There was NO smallpox in America until the early European explorers brought it
here.
Now, tell me WHICH primal society suffers from AIDS Cancer or Smallpox that was NOT
imported (by OUR direct or environmenal impact!?
(Here's a clue - NONE!)
ReplyShare
Avatar
Where are you getting this information from? We have the nerve to call them third
world, because that is what they are, just like I have the nerve to call Felis
Domesticus a cat, crazy hu? True, if we have not been in direct contact with a
society, they will not have our diseases naturally, but we also will not have
theirs. Its basic geography, and I am glad you understand,..something. No, there
was no small pox in America, but there was also no Syphilis in Europe. Modern
medicine can cure Syphilis which many native Americans died from. Tell me how
modern medicine would have not use in that situation? Being an Atheist, I would
think you would realize chanting to the sky around a fire does nothing to cure a
disease, but perhaps I am wrong. You keep saying modern medicine (western medicine)
makes the US weak, yet we have lower mortality rates than other countries and a
longer longevity (even compared to primitive cultures), I wonder why that is.
Primitive cultures have their share of diseases too, and no they are not free from
suffering. People have to suffer before an immunity is gained, until they strains
evolve. What you are arguing is not western medicine, it is logistics and how our
people have spread across the world carrying their viruses and diseases others are
not immune to. In this case you are right, BUT there is nothing you can do about
it, so get over it. I'm discussing the affects of medicine and the study of human
health on the population, not logistics and traveling.
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Modern medicine can cure Syphilis which many native Americans died from."
LOL!!!
Syphilis was IMPORTED by your enamored "first world" culture!

Ditto SMALL POX and I believe Cholera - this is why I PREVIOUSLY STATED: 95% of Nat
Ams were WIPED OUT BY DISEASES!
When imported - THERE WAS NO CURE for these diseases!!!

(Though arriving immigrants had built up immunities to some degree - having
survived the plague and other diseases Nat Ams were completely geographically cut
off from.)
There was no cure because "modern medicine" had not yet DISCOVERED that bacteria
existed!
DISCOVERING that bacteria existed resulted in "modern medicine" realizing (get
ready!):
THE IMPORTANCE OF WASHING ONE'S HANDS!!!
See how it works!?!
This is why I said that EVERYTHING you have presented in response is IRRELEVANT!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Please follow your logic, even if you can't follow mine. You keep saying that
modern medicine has made human health worse, and giving examples such as primal
cultures....I give you an example where modern medicine could have helped a primal
culture.
Syphilis was transported from other countries to America? WRONG

Washing hands will prevent Syphilis? WRONG
2 points you just stated (which your entire comment was supported by) are
incorrect.
Syphilis was an American Disease, just like other continents hand their native
disease, yes even primal societies.
Washing hands will do very little to prevent Syphilis, as it is spread by body

fluids, most commonly (you ready?)..SEX with an infected person. Last time I
checked, no amount of washing, (of any kind) will prevent STDs, yes, not even your
beloved hand washing. That's where other sanitation practices come in.
Please do your homework.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Silly boy!
SHOW WHERE I SAID WASHING HANDS PREVENTS SYPHILIS!
... ...
Go right ahead. I'll wait... and wait, and wait, and wait, and wait...
... ...
Go ahead... I'M WAITING!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
"You keep saying that modern medicine has made human health worse,"
ALSO: Show where I made THIS irrelevant STOOPID comment...
... ...
Go ahead, I'm waiting, and waiting, and waiting....
U know the drill!
ReplyShare
Avatar
You are really PITIFUL at this point: You have to MAKE UP COMMENTS I DIDN'T EVEN
SAY!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
"The practice of MEDICINE often involves surgery."
Your ignorance is simply ASTOUNDING!
... ...
Surgery is NOT practiced WITHOUT drugs (MEDICINE!)
Surgery is merely an outgrowth of MEDICAL therapy!
... ...
I KNOW what I'm talking about...
YOU obviously DON'T!
ReplyShare
Avatar
So, what you are saying is, surgery is related to the medical field? Now you're
coming around. About time too. I also love how you focus on one little aspect to
distract from the original point.
ReplyShare
Avatar
If this comment made any SENSE, I'd reply to it..
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Again, you are making assumptions that I am a fundamentalist"
Yes, you mirror their "logic" and complete mis/dis-information strategies!
i.e. MAKING UP DEFINITIONS! Not knowing what you are talking about... Absence of
factual support.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Actually, I do not mirror "their logic", and you are guilty of placing prejudices,
which very shallow. And no, I did not make up any definitions. The field of
medicine encompasses many subjects. Again, you keep saying I don't know what I'm
talking about, yet you have no support.
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Superior's? I didn't realize you were my boss?"
No, just SUPERIOR, in that I know what I am talking about and you don't!
Stick to your area of expertise and make me a SLURPEE!
ReplyShare
Avatar
This comment was deleted.
Avatar
Guest Guest 4 years ago
Ok, I will stop you right there. not EVERYTHING "goes" into the human body, that is
why we have protective layers. I was referring to when those boundaries are
compromised from cuts or surgery. Our skin is naturally/slightly acidic (due to
sweat and sebum) which prevents the growth of harmful bacteria. Other bacteria that
DO live on our skin are considered normal flora, which compete with the bad guys.
When you wash, you destroy this barrier, so over washing IS possible. I would
continue, but you definitely would not get the point. "Sunshine" only carries
energy, no pathogens. With your logic, everyone should be walking around with masks
on. Antiseptic practices are good, but are also easily over used, and are not a
cure all as you are stating. Next time I fall and break my leg, I will make sure
just to wash it off from your far superior medical advice.
And, again, you continue to call me ignorant, yet you have not posted any facts.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Avatar
Ok, I see now. And I apologize for not following. For a minute I thought our entire
body was covered in skin, ("which Your skin - the bodies LARGEST organ is not made
of plastic!") you were referring to in your previous comment. BUT, now I realize
only your hands are capable of carrying pathogens and no the rest of your body.
Surgeons do wear scrubs, and a mask, correct? I was discussing the entire subject
of cleanliness, not just washing your hands ( I hope you can see that now). Also,
it is just an opinion that it is the "greatest achievement in medicine". There are
MANY things washing of the hands can not prevent or cure.
You may want to look up sarcasm to help you with the above statement.
Also, you might want to look at what you said earlier... " The BEST medical therapy
has given us is the importance of sterility/washing our hands and eating well" I
believe sterility does not only involve hand washing as you stated above. Sterility
can include daily bathing, hand washing, hygiene, etc. as well as the removal of
debris/pathogens from other objects.
You say I strayed from the topic, which I did not. You are the one who continuously
is jumping around. You hit on several points, cancer, skin, western medicine,
primal cultures, mass tragedies, which I was responding to, and you expect me to
only reply about hand washing?
ReplyShare
Avatar
Drivel is not sarcasm!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Silly one, I did NOT say washing hands was a cure all!!
ONCE AGAIN:
Medical Science's greatest achievement was discovering the IMPORTANCE of washing
one's hands.
Agree or not... everything, EVERYTHING else you presented was irrelevant.
i.e. "Importance" does not mean bathing every day!
Importance also does NOT relate to skin layers or hosted bacteria.
i.e. EVERYTHING else you mentioned!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Actually it does relate to skin layers and other bacteria as they are a very
important defense.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Actually, I agree with Bob. The only thing I read that was correct in your
statement is that skin is the largest organ in/on your body. All you are doing is
posting opinions and delivering insults.
Why must you appear so hateful?
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Biomedicine and Surgery IS superior in most cases (as far as the anatomy
goes).If you are diagnosed with bone cancer, are you just going to take
some penicillin and hope it resolves itself? NO, if you want to live,
they will need to remove the infected portion of the bone."
No my ignorant friend...
Cancer is a result of OUR western way of life - primal societies aren't suffering
from cancer, heart disease, AIDS, and the like.
They have NO NEED for "advanced medical technology"!
They don't have car accidents, mass shootings, modern day warfare, etc., so they
don't need trauma wards!
They don't live in HUGE cities with populations from all across the globe, so they
don't suffer Plague, Smallpox and Cholera - not until the "advanced" western
society brings it to their jungle door...
In short, our "advanced" western meds are a match ONLY for the problems created by
our "advanced" western culture!
Get EDUCATED on these things!
ReplyShare
Avatar
You do realize cancer is not caused by western culture, right? It is caused by
uncontrolled cell growth, perhaps from drugs, and other commodities which first
world countries value, but those who suffer in third world countries STILL
experience cancer, most do not survive. I'm sorry, but I have facts on my side.
Many more die from disease in third world countries than those in first world due
to advanced medical technology and other practices. Just look up the average
expected longevity compared to the US.
ReplyShare
Avatar
The massive problems of cancer, YES!
OUR society has taken a naturally occurring problem - for which our bodies HAVE a
cure and making it MUCH worse...
So yes, TODAY'S CANCER EPIDEMIC is a result of OUR western "first world" culture!
This should probably be my signature line, chatting w/u:

THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES ARE NOT PRIMAL SOCIETIES!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
WASHING YOUR HANDS, is not bathing!
ReplyShare
Avatar
AHHH!
Here's where your IRRELEVANCY began!!!
"The importance of" does NOT mean daily bathing, and does NOT relate (is
IRRELEVANT) to "natural barriers"...
EVERYTHING else you post seems to stem from these basic IRRELAVANT statements!
ReplyShare
Avatar
How is it irrelevant when you DO wash your self, you are also destroying a natural
barrier? I would say that IS related to hand washing, as hand washing is used to
protect from pathogens, yet it can also destroy natural barrier.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Silly "guest".
You wouldn't know ANY of this without FIRST knowing about BACTERIA - which taught
us... (get ready!):
THE IMPORTANCE OF WASHING OUR HANDS!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Alas, yelling is the only way to penetrate your DENSE cranium:
The discovery of bacteria was medicine's PRIME achievement - ALL modern "cures"
stem from this ONE achievement and taught us: THE IMPORTANCE OF WASHING OUR
HANDS!!!
OTHERWISE MODERN MEDICAL SCIENCE IS OVERRATED!!

It is a good fit ONLY for the dangers of our culture - and the diseases we give the
WORLD!
PRIMAL SOCIETIES DO NOT HAVE OUR PROBLEMS AND THUS DO NOT NEED OUR SOLUTIONS!
THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES ARE NOT PRIMAL SOCITIES!

They are disadvantaged MODERN societies negatively affected by their interaction
with and position in western culture
ReplyShare
Avatar
"I would say medicine has provided MUCH more important things than cleanliness,
such as vaccines, transplants, CPR, etc."
Also... ALL of these things (except CPR - Physiology) are a DIRECT RESULT of
discovering BACTERIA - teaching us the importance of WASHING ONE'S HANDS!!
Discovering bacteria is to "modern medicine" like the discovery of FIRE was to

modern man... EVERY significant tech discovery was but a RESULT of discovering
fire!
Washing hands is important because - we touch things and interact PRIMARILY with
our hands!
This is why when some doctors enter an AIDS patient's room, for example - who's
compromised immunity system will host MANY other diseases as well, THEY KEEP THEIR
HANDS IN THEIR POCKETS... so they won't touch ANYTHING inadvertently.
THE IMPORTANCE OF WASHING ONE'S HANDS!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Boomer2012 Kaiyl_kariashi 4 years ago
We can't afford social security now. This won't happen. Unless you raise the
retirement age to 240.
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
SiRnonymous Kaiyl_kariashi 4 years ago
Wow, it's truly sad, we find a very "slight" and feasibly testable theory on how to
"create" our own form of a "fountain of youth" or the "secret to immortality"
though yet all you people can do is argue about it's politics, population control,
and the limitation of yourselves/humanity?
Fine by all means keep limiting yourself and the people among you, while others
will find the "key" to "never aging"/"immortality" then use it for themselves
instead of releasing it to you or even letting you know about it.
Face it, if you don't ever want anything great for the people or yourselves that's
fine keep the people as dumb as possible they don't care because then you'll all
eventually be nothing other then brainless cattle for harvesting or manipulation,
"when needed."
Just like Kaiyl_kariashi said:
"That's the point though. Their development is retarded because of their gene
disorder. If they could find what's causing it, and develop a means to apply it to
people who have already reached physical maturity, they could freeze the aging
process, with none of the side effects, while avoiding the developmental diseases
of old age in process.
That's what they're going for."
Now that there's a possibility that this can be done, watch at how they will NOW
start hiding all the future results from you as to the fact that when they find how
to do this and actually make it possible for "certain people" to become
immortal/stop aging you will never see the light of day of such information nor
will you be given this special treatment.
Imagine who would get such a treatment and what that plays out for the future.
Meaning the more greedy people are the more the ones that can stay alive "forever"
will eventually snuff out the lives of those who cannot live for that long.
This research is a great thing, but it's also great to know as well.
Worst thing to ever happen is if the day they figure out it's possible to be done
and then from that point on they just either say: "Nope it's not possible" or they
just end up hiding any information related to this research forever while they will
continue to use it and research further on.
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
Pablo SiRnonymous 4 years ago
You don't really believe that do you? This will be ONLY for a very super rich
group. That's just a fact. These people do not care about the rest of us. They
demonstrate that with their actions.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Pablo 4 years ago
That was SiRnonymous's point. "the res of us"? Since when did the rest of us care
of about "these people"? It's a 2 way street, only difference is they are brave
enough to search of the power.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist SiRnonymous 4 years ago
EVERY idea and pursuit is not worthy of merit!
And it's TRULY small minded to label everyone as "dumb as possible" because they
don't agree with you!
Life is quite fine the way it is, sickness, misfortune, DEATH and all.
It's up to US to learn what life is all about...
Therein lies our immortality!

2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Again, everything you said is YOUR opinion. Why should you control what someone
else can do?
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Kaiyl_kariashi 4 years ago
The track record for med tech is highly overrated!
We have changed NO basic feature of life and it's obvious we NEVER will!
The best med tech has done is to enable us to deal with the types of trauma and
disease peculiar to our way of life.
PHYSIOLOGY has taught us the importance of bacteria and functions of the human body
While med tech has certainly aided this process our MEDICAL therapy leaves much to
be desired imho - compared to how intensively it's hyped!
Drugs cause one problem after another, requiring ANOTHER drug to counteract.
Anti-biotics wind up creating stronger bacteria.
And quite frankly, many lives "saved" could be more easily and efficiently replaced
via human reproduction - and yes, letting the diseased human pass.
As for sum total life gained and bodies actually healed, considering the ENTIRETY
of modern civilization, med-tech only barely comes out ahead...
AND that's ONLY because of the HUGE population of 1st, 2d and 3rd world countries!!
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Najeeb Shah Will 2 years ago
there is asome 38 year old man trapped in a boys body , no aging signs
ReplyShare
Avatar
Henry Major 4 years ago
Biologically speaking, no children age. What this child is doing is "not maturing".
9
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Henry Major 4 years ago
How, "biologically speaking", does one live one day after another without aging??
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Henry Major Reverend Atheist 4 years ago
Aging is a process in which tissue damage is not repaired completely. Prior to
sexual maturity, no aging of cells is apparent. Once a person reaches the age at
which most people have reproduced, they will begin to show signs of aging. In this
girl's case, even though she is not growing, by the time she reaches 40, she will
have signs of aging; wrinkles, impaired circulation, pre-cancerous cells, etc.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que Henry Major 4 years ago
"Apparent" yes... But the clock is obviously ticking! There's no aging without
growth, no death without birth.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Henry Major 2 years ago
The sun SETS, only because it rises!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Captain Murphy 4 years ago
O please, she will die eventually.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
twinkie1cat 4 years ago
I hope the parents have her in school with a good special education teacher who
will help her develop whatever potential she has. She might be a lot smarter than
you think.
15
ReplyShare
Avatar
Deathstalker 4 years ago
I hope it happens but I highly doubt it will which mean me you and
everyone else will get to experience the horror of losing our health.
Hair, eyes, ears and teeth among other things. This is the horror of
death, father time and gravity.
If we ever find a way to increase our life time significantly yes

over population will be a problem but then terraforming Mars will no
longer be something that is cool but become a necessity.
We can live on the moon and Mars we can live in other places outside of our planet
the galaxy and the universe is a very big place.
If we can figure out a way to slow our aging process significantly or permanently
then this is a wonderful time to be alive and not something to fear. We will just
have to step it up getting out into our solar system will no longer just be a hobby
but a necessity for the human race. We can do it! So stop the fear mongering.
4
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Deathstalker 4 years ago
MOST of the universe is uninhabitable to INCLUDE Mars and the moon!!!
If we can't find a way to live on THIS planet, we will NOT be able to live on
another one!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Kathleen King 4 years ago
Mary, me too! Poor child. Likewise those other two. What if the good doctor
succeeds -- can anyone really face a world crowded with perpetual twenty-year-olds?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with maturity except that lack of maturity fears
becoming adult.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
ideaguy42 4 years ago
God didn't say "stop playing God." He told mankind to have dominion over creation
and said that in the future:
I will rejoice in Jerusalem and be glad in my people;
no more shall be heard in it the sound of weeping and the cry of distress.
20 No more shall there be in it an infant who lives but a few days,
or an old man who does not fill out his days,
for the young man shall die a hundred years old,
and the sinner a hundred years old shall be accursed.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
abigchocoholic ideaguy42 4 years ago
ah, that wasn't God. That was a handful of primitive Jews who wrote that. Rife with
errors and ignorant ideas. Just what you'd expect from men 3000 years ago.
15
ReplyShare
Avatar
Heinrich Myersen 4 years ago
Does anyone else think of X-men mutants when they saw the video?
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
abigchocoholic 4 years ago
not making much sense to me. All cells die and new ones are made. It's that copying
process that causes us to age. The copies just get worse over time. How is her
copying able to remain perfect?
The copying companies want to know.

1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Robert Huffman abigchocoholic 4 years ago
Bro this is not the "Asgard" on "Stargate" and these people are not clones. They
are saying that if they can find the off switch they can stop the process which
means they would need to halt the shortening of the Telomeres (which degrade each
time copied) so that copy's can keep being made through cell division. Cell
division in itself does not automatically mean degradation...
ReplyShare
Avatar
PoppaCharlie 4 years ago
Fascinating.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
14ghz 4 years ago
This is the opposite of another condition Progeria where people age much quicker
than normal.
16
ReplyShare
Avatar
tacr 4 years ago
something gets us all sooner or later. our death might be by an accident, a
disease, or murdered by someone.
12
ReplyShare
Avatar
Mastercow tacr 4 years ago
Or Space Whales
25
ReplyShare
Avatar
SantanaNyla-aka-Dawn 4 years ago
Yeah, I was anorexic as a preteen and teen, as a result people tell me that I look
far younger than my real age-but I did suffer some heart damage due to the
condition.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Bad Boy 4 years ago
Not only are they not aging, they are not progressing mentally it seems. They are
living a life of hell and not even knowing it.
54
ReplyShare
Avatar
eric Bad Boy 4 years ago
Totally agree with you ..this is actually very sad .
17
ReplyShare
Avatar
symon Bad Boy 4 years ago
If they don't know they're living in hell, then it's not hell for them.
13
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que symon 4 years ago
That's a problem with the very CONCEPTS of heaven and hell - you're DEAD, so how
can you "know" anything? How can you experience the joys of heaven or the
sufferings of hell?
...
I've never seen a dead body wince from pain...
5
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Bad Boy 4 years ago
No, it is only hell to you. They do not know any better. Its similar as if you said
that life must have been terrible hundreds of years ago, lacking our modern age.
They could not even fathom life today.
ReplyShare
Avatar
The "simple life" you describe here, would be ideal for a simple minded person...
(Is that YOU?!?)
By YOUR misguided logic, life would "seem better" if you were DEAD!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Actually, no. There is no way to draw that conclusion from my statement. Just
because someone is mentally retarded, does not mean their life is worse off than
someone who is not. Only reason we see it that way is because we only see what they
don't have, and can't imagine life without it, but they probably can't understand
life with it. Simple logic here, kid.
ReplyShare
Avatar
ok
ReplyShare
Avatar
Ken Watanabe 4 years ago
They are still aging! Just not growing!
42
ReplyShare
Avatar
Fuh Que Ken Watanabe 4 years ago
Eggzackly!
The "growth" phase is cut short - like a premature baby who's birth phase is
interrupted...
They will still grow old ONE day, and the die!
5
ReplyShare
Avatar
beencensured 4 years ago
ugly babies.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
WritersWithCats 4 years ago
My God. Do you realize she won't get out from under her parents' roof until she's
175 at this rate...?
11
ReplyShare
Avatar
Theresa 4 years ago
So you alter the genes, then what happens when someone reproduces? The genes may
end up altered on the child as well, which could cause the fetus to not develop
properly. I think there is a lot of resurch that needs to be done before taking
this into our own hands.
ReplyShare
Avatar
The_Mick Theresa 4 years ago
No, Teresa, they're not talking about altering genes. Some genes have on and off
switches that kick-them into and out of action. The genes that make us grow and
mature are turned on when we're fetuses and then never turn off - so we keep
changing past maturity and age. Somehow, they've turned off for these people. If we
could find the trigger than turns off those genes, we'd simply stop aging -
theoretically. There would still be problems with increasing cancer as you get
older and some other problems, but theoretically your skin would stay young if you
took care of it, you wouldn't get arthritis, your eyes would stay sharp, etc.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Brian Odom 4 years ago
The ARE aging; they are simply not maturing.
23
ReplyShare
Avatar
The_Mick 4 years ago
I wish they'd go into more detail. What's happening to the telomeres on their
chromosomes? Are they shortening? If so then there is an off-switch still in
effect.
ReplyShare
Avatar
George Allegro 4 years ago
Since we tend to hear about scientific advances, we tend to remember intellectual
freedom while forgetting about the freedom to do things.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Brian Willis 4 years ago
most likely childhood vaccines did this. as its a cocktail of poison, contains
adjuvants which makes the body turn on itself...which leads to things like diabetes
as the body attacks the pancreas. Also causing allergys to various things. vaccines
contain mercury which stunts the brains, which likely is what triggered this childs
part of the brain which pumps out the chemicals that tell the body to grow. and of
course vaccines contain sv-40 (google it) which is cells from monkey kidneys added
in to create cancer, which is what leads to leukemia and other cancers. . vaccines
are all about keeping you sick so the medical industry can keep you coming back
wiping out your money. And also eugenics.....population control. So yeah this
"syndrome" (scapegoat term to take the blame off the deadly vaccines) is most
likely from the vaccines. So this family is likely spending a ton of $ on trying to
figure out what happened meanwhile big pharma is rubbing their hands together and
smiling all the way to their 3rd vacation home.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
deekoo Brian Willis 4 years ago
The number of childhood vaccinations received have gone up in recent years; cancer
rates have gone down in recent years. Whoever told you that vaccines are a net
cause cancer was a liar or a fool. Possibly both.
Vaccines lead to lower medical spending than contagious diseases do. Since Big
Pharma's profit margin comes from medical spending, whether you're buying polio
vaccine or an iron lung, it is in the pharmcorps' financial interests to preserve
reservoirs of contagious diseases and to preferentially market treatments *after*
you get sick rather than preventative measures. Whoever told you that Big Pharma
wants vaccines specifically to make you sick was a liar or a fool. Possibly both.
Vaccines significantly reduce deaths in early childhood and increase longevity. The
people trying to convince the gullible to avoid vaccinations to preserve their
childrens' lives are liars or fools. It's quite clever of them to claim vaccines
are a murderous eugenics plot, though - it enables them to get people who would
normally oppose a plan to cull African children to vigorously support it.
7
ReplyShare
Avatar
Brian Willis deekoo 4 years ago
Sorry bubba a fact is a fact. you can listen to the lying doctors all you want and
hear happy tales of how it will fix you but if you want to know the real deal read
the ingredient list on any vaccine...they even print it right their on their
official webpages. It does contain mercury, given a fancy name of "thimerasol"
mercury is a fact known as one of the most toxic substances in the human
body...gasoline in the human body is safer. The medical kill industry even admits
its in there but says it poses no danger.
jeffery dahmer would say his butcher knives and crock pot poses no danger. Ted
bundy would say his rope in his car posed no danger. sorry but im not gonna listen
to scum that admit poison but then say its good for you. You want cancer buddy? get
a shot. you want shingles? go get a shingles vaccine it will give you
shingles....jeez people can be so stupid. you got depression? go get prescibed a
drug that on the label says it increases depression and makes you want to kill
yourself. But hey im the guy thats wrong. i should listen to the very people who do
the poison.
ReplyShare
Avatar
deekoo Brian Willis 4 years ago
How dangerous mercury (or any element) is varies depending on the compound it's in.
Sodium explodes on contact with liquid water. Chlorine gas can kill you in a few
breaths at concentrations less than 1%. Table salt is made of explosive sodium and
poisonous chlorine. If you put table salt in water, it dissolves harmlessly instead
of exploding. Flourine gas will set *water* on fire; flouride toothpaste slightly
strengthens your teeth.
Not all vaccines contain thimerasol - it was phased out as a result of anti-mercury
paranoia. In spite of the fact that usage was scaled back, no health benefits were
observed. Antivax paranoia has led to a large number of unvaccinated children in
developed countries; if your claim that vaccines were harmful were not a lie, then
we should be able to see for ourselves that unvaccinated children are healthier and
grow up to be healthier adults. We do not see that effect. Most studies show no
benefit from being unvaccinated; one showed slightly reduced mental ability among
unvaccinated children.
I have the shingles virus *permanently integrated into my body*. Why? Well, because
I caught it naturally, the way the antivax kooks think everyone should. If I want
shingles, all I need to do is be one of the unlucky group to have symptomatic
reactivation - no vaccine needed. I've had a fair number of shots - possibly not as
many as I should have, but enough. No cancer so far. And, again, if vaccines cause
cancer, why is cancer declining? Or are you simply going to insist that the
observable universe is a hoax because it doesn't match up to the tales you're told
by men making tens of thousands of dollars peddling conspiracy stories?
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
WaitWut Brian Willis 4 years ago
Did you hear that? Alex Jones is calling for you!
Personally, I'll listen to the doctors At least when they write something, I can
tell they went to school.
You should also know that the Anti-Vax Queen Jenny McCarthy is wrong. I know she is
because she admitted her child never had autism, it a misdiagnosis.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Brian Willis 4 years ago
Try listening "to the very people who do the" EDUCATING!!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Brian Willis 4 years ago
Thinking an INCREDIBLY stoopid thought doesn't make it "likely"...
ReplyShare
Avatar
KTINA 4 years ago
Typical. Lets see how we can prevent getting old at the expense of the sick. Why
not focus on trying to help the little girl instead of making a profit.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Compile KTINA 4 years ago
Lets see sink time and resource to search for a cure to an extremely rare genetic
disease that wouldn't really be able to help her anyway. Or learn from it and it
can hopefully lead to helping millions of people that will eventually suffer from
diseases related to aging... Parkinson, Alzheimer etc. Seems pretty self
explanatory to me.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Melanie Davidson 4 years ago
They just have unclassified cases of mental and physical handicap. It's not anti-
aging.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Nicole 4 years ago
What about Brooke Greenberg?
ReplyShare
Avatar
Michael Scott 4 years ago
lol
ReplyShare
Avatar
LIT 4 years ago
For such a serious issue, I found the intense and tension building soundtrack to be
inappropriate, like the creators of the article and video cared more about getting
views than these sick people.
6
ReplyShare
Avatar
Del LIT 4 years ago
I only read the articles, NOT watch the video at all and I agree with you.
Sometimes diseases are so "inconceivable" that you don't know they had ever
existed. My hope is for "Humanity" to prevail and evolve to a kinder people... -
--- I find the topic serious too, maybe someone reading this will learn how to be
more compassionate... maybe?
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
sweet_sue_ohio1 4 years ago
I have seen Brook Greenberg on TV. I say May God Bless ALL special needs children
and their families/ caregivers.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Bobbs 4 years ago
They look... really off. Rather than blessed with no aging, it looks more like
they're cursed unable to mature. Just look at their bones, their skin, their body
structure, etc. It's like a disease. I hope they get it treated rather than be used
as experiments to satisfy those doctors' egos.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
namimani Bobbs 4 years ago
It has nothing to do with the doctor's egos. How will they cure her if they don't
know what's causing her illness?
ReplyShare
Avatar
WaitWut namimani 4 years ago
This guy doesn't want to cure her, his life work has been immortality. He told the
parents it was for a cure only after they mentioned they were Catholic.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
On the outside, she looks young. But as she gets older, her organs will suffer the
same fate as everyone else's.
Looking young is not the same as being young (or living forever).
ReplyShare
Avatar
namimani Guest 4 years ago
Did you read the article?
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Me 4 years ago
She isn't aging...But is she really living? I don't see that as a desirable state.
ReplyShare
Avatar
guy 4 years ago
THIS LOOKS MORE LIKE BIRTH DEFECTS than anything else
Sad
ReplyShare
Avatar
Thomas Bodetti 4 years ago
This is hype, back in 1990 I saw a case like this and it has nothing to do with
aging but everything to do with a genetic issue, the subject of the case study in
1990 is still alive today but has grown to be an almost full grown man, along with
wrinkles, ect, his state of mind never changed from that shown of the girl in the
video.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Thomas 4 years ago
Can someone tell me the name of the soundtrack at the the beginning?
ReplyShare
Avatar
victorpavlovic 4 years ago
Vaccines affect gene expression, mercury given to pregnant woman via the flu
vaccine is a known mutagen and must be closely looked examined.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Dog Star 4 years ago
This isn't immortality or the start of immortality its just a genetic disorder.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Harrison2253 4 years ago
There is no such thing as immortality in a human body
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Lynn Terry 4 years ago
Probably some type of microcephaly.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
As a scientist it still amazes me how some of my fellow researchers can have such a
simplistic view of biology, or the world, in general. It is unlikely you can "turn
off" aging. Everything in the Universe, technically, ages until it dies--even
fundamental subatomic units of matter, such as the proton have a set lifespan.
Biological aging is not a driving force in and of itself, but rather a consequence
of more fundamental phenomenon--all of which are guided by the unidirectional arrow
of time.
Now, this is not to say we cannot "slow down" the aging process, but more
importantly, with the advancements in regenerative medicine, it is likely that
human beings in the future will replace organs, tissues, and even cells as needed,
becoming "virtually" immortal and not really needing to "slow down" any natural
process (cancer cells do this, but in an uncontrolled, disorganized way). Future
advancements,probably many centuries away, will likely bring about a completely
non-organic being which can "think" and "feel" without the need for any actual
physical parts.
ReplyShare
Avatar
GmailIsDown Guest 4 years ago
i think as a scientist you need to be more open
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Desht 4 years ago
I could care less about finding the "key for immortality" from this. It's just so
sad for these families.
10
ReplyShare
Avatar
sayno2wmma 4 years ago
Alien-Human Hybrids?
ReplyShare
Avatar
Dave 4 years ago
Do you people realize that we can fit the entire human population shoulder to
shoulder in a space the size of texas? I'm game for immortality.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Blasthoff Dave 4 years ago
OK, go ahead and do that, just leave the rest of the world outside Texas to me.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
WaitWut Dave 4 years ago
And what do we eat? Where do we work to make the money to buy it? Are you down with
population control, or can we all have hundreds of kids?
Immortality would end up a toy for the rich. Nothing else is sustainable at our
current technology. That said, I for one, have no desire to go to war for water in
the Koch brothers name.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist WaitWut 2 years ago
All the very WORST people would live forever!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Dave 4 years ago
No you couldn't!!
Many people can't stand or walk, can't leave a sterile environment, are criminally
insane or too inconvenienced by the trip!
If you got that many people in one place many would die from suffocation - and the
flatulent STENCH would be unbearable!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Bill Cosby 4 years ago
Yeah, a newborn baby with teeth.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Candigal88 4 years ago
I don't want to live forever. That means I would have to work longer.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Joel-B 4 years ago
Aside from all the BS here, may God bless each and everyone of them... And their
families also...
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Hache 4 years ago
The brain constantly adjusts to the demands that we and the environment place on
it. It's a form of growth and development that takes place in our bodies. If we use
these people as a guide, applying a 'miracle' cure for aging might negatively
affect the neuroplasticity of the brain.
ReplyShare
Avatar
mr13 4 years ago
sure its sounds great but realise she still has to be cared for hand and foot its
no diffrent than being 100 yrs old or being a baby some one else has to help you do
every thing even change your diapers i my self dont want to live for ever if i have
to have others do everything for me what happens when mom gets to old to care for
her sure the girl lives on but who is going to care for her when every one she
knows eventually dies of old age she just keeps living kind of sad really if you
think about it humans are not suppose to live for ever if we did the whole planet
would be a waste land by now oh wait we dont live for ever and the planet is
allready a waste land hmm
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
tgr3042 4 years ago
The greatest scientific discovery would NOT be finding the "fountain of youth", but
in finding compassion and love for one another, where people help each other and
work to benefit humanity, NOT hurting one another and putting each other down,
whilst constantly trying to "get ahead"!!
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist tgr3042 4 years ago
Heaven on earth!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist tgr3042 2 years ago
That's not SCIENCE!
ReplyShare
Avatar
mr13 4 years ago
she will eventually die of cancer this is why we age in the first place because our
bodys fight off cancer all the time and in doing so the cells age if they did not
then cancer would run rampant and you would die any way its a fine ballance that
our bodys hold so to age is to live and not to age will eventually make your cells
cancerous
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
heartprivacy mr13 4 years ago
Punctuation is your friend.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
what a beautiful baby
ReplyShare
Avatar
justin 4 years ago
As much as I would like to be young forever, I fear what would happen to our world
if we all could live forever... there is only so much space and resources.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
GmailIsDown justin 4 years ago
rich, highly educated people live forever and stop reproducing. poor people
reproduce and eventually slaughter all the rich people. and the cycle repeats.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Avatar
GmailIsDown Guest 4 years ago
no i'm just being realistic
ReplyShare
Avatar
rightmind 4 years ago
Becoming biologically immortal... sounds good at first that is until the gene
therapy screws up our minds. Ladies and gentlemen I present to you: Rise of the
Zombies featuring billions of people who just wanted to live longer.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Andrew Schiavo 4 years ago
that's so sad. bless that family.
ReplyShare
Avatar
S. Austin Evano 4 years ago
I don't mind getting older, I just don't want to look it, And I sure don't want to
live forever. Life is hard enough as it is....
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
Where i can watch the rest of the video?
ReplyShare
Avatar
Rob 4 years ago
id rather age then be as miserable as they are just look at thier faces
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
mladenm 4 years ago
If you don't age at 50 or more that would be something.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Ciera Samoa 4 years ago
no.God did not design anyone with immortality.Nor do I believe He left it within
our means to be able to do so.She and the others have defective genes,and they will
die eventually,just like everyone else.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
kab2rb 4 years ago
There is one woman I know of in carehome setting who is older then 40 but still an
infant. Her parents are long gone. Worse then then the girl parents let public
know.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Julian Axworthy 4 years ago
I am sure they will one day find a way to reverse the aging gene in the human body.
I am just as sure that it would be developed as a daily drug input that would only
be accessible to the rich. Of course this would play havoc with the social security
system too
ReplyShare
Avatar
October Fest 4 years ago
Amazing!!
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Ebo 4 years ago
Great Commercial! Lousy news article.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest Ebo 4 years ago
Then don't ever download Adblock Plus. Then you'll miss all the commercials.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
dieselrockman 4 years ago
I have it. I'm 27. Finally. Kids will inherit the earth.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Sis Delish 4 years ago
Do these people die?
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
truthisgood Sis Delish 4 years ago
Yes, after however much "existence" nature lets them have. The little girl who is
the main subject of this is blind and will never speak.
ReplyShare
Avatar
trololololololol 4 years ago
They should just put her out of her (and her parents) misery
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
King_Oberon 4 years ago
I'm unsure of the article's credibility, but if there is any truth to this, it
would make sense that one of the reason we age might be due to the body's need to
mature. Man takes 18-21 years to mature. Biology has served its purpose and doesn't
engineer a stop sign, genetically speaking. So he ages and gets eaten by a lion.
But the thing is, we have long since gone past hunter gatherer needs and I for one
am stupefied at how people scoff at scientific interests like this and except
things the way they are just because.
I am no geneticist but if you recall the bioluminescent gene that's been making the
rounds in rabbits/monkeys and plants as of late. That gene serves a very simple
purpose. As far as I know, all it does is make whatever it's part of glow.
Scientists in this scenario may just be able to say ok body, stop ageing at 20. I
think there may be other age related factors that need fixing, but this is
definitely a step in the right direction.
I'm cool with another 1000 years for now. Lets revisit this on the 999th for a
stretch goal.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
obbop 4 years ago
I wonder how the "Bible thumpers" will explain those folks?
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Michail Iakovidis 4 years ago
Immortality would be a curse in our still primitive civilization. We need seriously
to overcome our political, economical, religious issues before something like this.
Otherwise it would become a dystopia like in Sci-fi films "In Time" or "Elysium".
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
If a gene merely needs to be shut off why has no animal evolved an ability to shut
it off when fully developed?
It seems to be fanciful thinking. But keep in mind the complexity of the human
body. Assuming the body can manage to be perfect and not degrade over time sounds a
bit far fetched.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
"Assuming the body can manage to be perfect and not degrade over time sounds a bit
far fetched."
The idea is to DIE so that "better" humans can emerge and develop!
ReplyShare
Avatar
blackfridaydealslive 4 years ago
With current advancement in Medical field we are close to unravel the mystery of
Progeria.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Pablo 4 years ago
Immortality for who? Why the super rich of course. The everyday joe will NEVER see
any benefit.
ReplyShare
Avatar
truthisgood Pablo 4 years ago
There is no "off switch" but there is the potential to put some truly monstrous new
"things" in the gene pool. I mean, look at that 8-year old girl. So very sad.
ReplyShare
Avatar
LlarryLLama 4 years ago
They still age and grow old, but they never grow physically. Its the opposite of
another disease that causes children to age rapidly called "progeria", which is
almost as rare.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
jin choung 4 years ago
neat. i've always believed that since we had "progeria", there had to be some
mechanism that controls aging and with that, the potential to stop aging. these
kids prove the point. it's unfortunate that they were born with the condition - i
suppose it's like kirsten dunst's character in interview with a vampire - ageless
but frozen at immaturity but they could hold the key to inducing a halt to aging
later in life.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
dipr 4 years ago
That is in fact the goal of humanity: immortality, and in good health.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Average Joe Bodybuilder dipr 4 years ago
that is not the goal of humanity. it might be your goal, but don't call it
humanities goal. no one can ever live forever. no one has, no one ever will. it
might be possible to extend life, it is not possible to make life perpetual.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Average Joe Bodybuilder 4 years ago
I am sure everyone knows that this is a disorder, a genetic disorder. As with most
genetic disorders, you have the obvious symptoms, and then there are the not so
obvious ones. So while she might age more slowly, I would love to see research done
on what other ailments she might be suffering.
To age gracefully, youngly and with good health. Lifestyle is the most important
factor. It is a must to change one's diet from the standard american one, to
something that entails a lot of raw vegetables, vegetable juices, fresh fruits, and
a moderate amount of protein. Exercise that entails a lot of walking is necessary.
Strength training is also necessary. It is also necessary to pray or meditate for
several minutes at a time, and several times a day. This is the secret to the
healthy, youthful, aware and intelligent golden years. I love God. I pray that He
loves me as well.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
StevenNewsom Average Joe Bodybuilder 4 years ago
Seems this girls development is on hold.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Ulf Larsen 4 years ago
If we live for longer times and if we will always be young, certainly will not
continue to multiply in same rate, because nothing will hurry us, no more. We could
make long-term plans to expand our habitat, and we will discover new sources of
energy and food preserving the nature in same time. Human excesses appear mainly
because the life is too short. So called fear of negative consequences of eternal
youth are just crap, illogical and a symptom of a great lack in imagination.
12
ReplyShare
Avatar
truthisgood Ulf Larsen 4 years ago
If we live for longer times, we will be eviler and more reckless than we are now.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
StevenNewsom truthisgood 4 years ago
I am reminded of immortals in fiction, and how they get bored, and do most immoral
things.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist StevenNewsom 2 years ago
Check THE TWILIGHT ZONE episode called THE ESCAPE CLAUSE.
The protagonist was "granted" immortality by the devil (bwha ha ha ha!!!).
He was RECKLESS! Jumping down elevator shafts, getting run over by trains, shot,
stabbed etc.
He finally committed murder to sample The Electric Chair!
Surviving that he was given a life sentence, no parole!
He then called on the devil to exercise his ESCAPE CLAUS and was promptly given a
heart attack and granted the death he so desperately desired!
Yeah, I know you'd do it all different - but at least ONE point is that death CAN
be a welcome thing!
I'd gladly die to protect my child...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Ulf Larsen 4 years ago
ZERO basis in evidence, logic or human psychology...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Little Mitchy 4 years ago
Not growing IS different from aging. Aging is caused when cells begin to die and
are not replaced. Every time a cell is damaged by free radicals and must divide to
continue, the TELEMERE in the cell becomes shorter. Once the TELOMERE for the cell
is used up... The cell dies. When the cell dies... you age. Stop the TELOMERE'S
from getting shorter... Stop your cells dying permanently... And you have just
achieved near immortality. My sources are my own scientific investigations in life
extension.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
StevenNewsom Little Mitchy 4 years ago
Research has been done on that, when you "Stop the TELOMERE'S from getting shorter"
you almost always inevitably end up with cancer.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Little Mitchy StevenNewsom 4 years ago
Well, there you have it folks. Your darned if you do and your darned if you don't.
As JJ would say... "Meeesah gonna die?"
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist StevenNewsom 2 years ago
And become WISER in the process!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Little Mitchy 2 years ago
"Aging is caused when cells begin to die and are not replaced."
Not quite.
Those are the EFFECTS of aging, as are maturity and wisdom...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Matt 4 years ago
First, I would like to remind many of
those who mention Earth's growing population that those growths are in Third
World countries. In many developed countries, such as Japan and parts of Europe,
population is declining. The quest for biological immortality has been ongoing
since the dawn of mankind. And any society that could stop aging could easy fix
the other the problem that humanity face such as pollution, disease etc.
9
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Matt 4 years ago
" And any society that could stop aging could easy fixthe other the problem that
humanity face such as pollution, disease etc."
So you can COUNT on those problems CONTINUING indefinitely...!!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist Matt 2 years ago
"And any society that could stop aging could easy fixthe other the problem that
humanity face such as pollution, disease etc."
1. There's no proof of that - NONE! You just THINK that's the case.
2. "The quest for biological immortality has been ongoingsince the dawn of
mankind."
NO PROOF again! No doubt it was at least many generations b4 people realized they
MUST die... And just WHEN did mankind originate - did apes go to sleep one night
and wake up human???
Now, WHEN did they realize they were undoubtedly die?
"Animals" don't realize this, only humans - I was taught in Anthropology...
3. Disease and death are GOOD things - people would NEVER change otherwise!
You would fight any battle with no thought of consequence - travel any journey,
live in any climate.
Not all pursuits are worthy of the personal expense...
4. We need to learn how to live BETTER, not longer...
ReplyShare
Avatar
Guest 4 years ago
Live forever? Why? How? "Hey, I'm 145 years old and not even thinking of retiring!
What do you mean I'm being put out to pasture? Well, I always have Social Security
and Medicare! What do you mean they went bankrupt?"
ReplyShare
Avatar
Piercing 4 years ago
They don't talk about mental state. Are these people's brain ok? I mean, if you
have a 10 y.o. body but have 32 y.o. you have absorbed lot's of knowledege, unless
they have a brain impairment.
2
ReplyShare
Avatar
Sebastian Piercing 3 years ago
Did you watch the video? They have the mental age of babies too, they don't talk.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Bob Dobalina 4 years ago
I am 151 years old. Was born in 1862.
ReplyShare
Avatar
jay 4 years ago
i have seen someone else with this same disease
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Loretta Nug 4 years ago
Who wants to live like "the fountain of youth" when as they get older they look
more abnormal. I wouldn't want to live that way
ReplyShare
Avatar
Michael Sanders 4 years ago
Wow! Do the doctors working on these cases really believe that the
people mentioned aren't aging?! Their external features and/or their
brain may not be developing the way normal development occurs for most
people. But, they ARE aging. It's just happening at a molecular level.
Over time, skin will lose elasticity, wrinkles and gray hair may show,
bones will become fragile, sickness will set in and visible signs of
aging will be quite evident. It's hard to believe that some
gerontologists are actually ignorant enough to believe that mutated
genes, which cause said abnormalities, are really signs of immortality.
This article is proof that sheepskins don't guarantee common sense. Sad!
ReplyShare
Avatar
Gear Mentation Michael Sanders 4 years ago
You don't know that. Give some proof.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Grumpy0ldMan 4 years ago
If this lady is right about her god having a plan, he is a pretty lousy planner.
3
ReplyShare
Avatar
Reverend Atheist 4 years ago
The search for immortality (not simply living longer) is as foolish as the search
for a diet pill!
We ALREADY have the answer to controlling weight but simply will NOT eat less and
exercise more!!
Life is a WONDERFUL experience just as it is - with aging and death.
We simply will not accept life for what it is and enjoy the TOTAL experience.
These are examples of the raw FOOLISHNESS of our "advanced" way of life!
ReplyShare
Avatar
April 4 years ago
TurtleMan, I agree. Can these individuals speak? What is their IQ? The video says
that the 16th year old girl has the mind of a 9 year old. I have heard that
individuals suffering from this condition are deaf and mute. I think this condition
might just show humanity that we were not meant to live forever. Our bodies aren't
indestructible. We wear out! If anything, we should be looking at robotic
augmentation, not "turning off the aging gene."
ReplyShare
Avatar
Sebastian April 3 years ago
He said nine months not nine years
ReplyShare
Avatar
Shreekant 3 years ago
Be a normal human as you now and then stop aging - i.e. the gain. Otherwise
anything is possible - from medical, genetic or growth disorder.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Nathan Rogers 3 years ago
What a bunch of stupid ignorant fools...
"We're god-fearing people, we're catholic, we believe in the process of life--
growing old--and death.. If studying gabby means finding a fountain of youth, we'll
have no place in it"
Oh, but we're trying to find a cure for alzheimers.
"Oh if that's case, we're on board-- we'll put our beliefs aside and everything
else"
Perhaps only stupid people are the people god provides a special gift.
ReplyShare
Avatar
Timmy Suckmeister 2 years ago
Except for my awesome goatee, I have the body and intellect of a 9 year old female
television personality. I wear a diaper by the way. Change me? Oh come on! It'll be
an experience that you can tell your grandchildren about one day.
1
ReplyShare
Avatar
Abel Sele Barberian 2 years ago
I want to be used as a guinea pig in an experiment about the slow growth,an
experiment that I will say what is to be done
ReplyShare
Avatar
Nicole 2 years ago
Richard Walker & ABC News, I am a 43 year old lady who only ages gradually. I would
like to meet Richard Walker to find out why I don't age much. People say I am only
between ages of 17 and 25 max. When I was 20 I looked 9 etc. Please can someone
help me to find out why I hardly ageing please. I have had a chronic insomnia
condition for 26 years, with other health issues. I would love to know what is
behind me not aging. Please help. N from UK
ReplyShare
Avatar
mtbf 2 years ago
Jeffery his mom is sick in the head. She enjoys her man baby...no not making the
best of it...she likes the attention and pushing him changing diapers.... big
question when she does who else will. Not finding out til he is sick dumb move.
The Brazilian girl story I's different they are poor and the tabby girl needs to be
in a family with less kids how selfish to have so many and all the attention has to
be split up.

Non Aging Comments

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Non Aging Comments

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Keri Renee Griffin 4 years ago

This is awesome. Medical science needs to get there ASAP.

Life regenerates after death.

Mankind needs to realize this ASAP!

Anything less is foolishness.

Our science has brought us to the very edge of self destruction.

Solve one problem, create a new one!

Science has HELPED to make our existence more secure.

You may as well pray to The Easter Bunny!

We basically disagree on this particular statement!

That Aging itself stimulates wisdom and is inseparable from TIME...

But it's ultimately up to the person after all imho...

Some folx will NEVER learn!

I think we continue to learn (wisdom) until senility starts to set in.

Of course, our techno-learning skills fade as life learned wisdom develops!

That's what they're going for.

Life is ALREADY a blessed experience - ALL of it... Good AND bad!

The shortcoming lies within...

UNTIL we solve this dilemma we CAN NOT feed the world!

Physiology is "the study of" the human body...

Try reading a dictionary b4 discussing things with your superiors...!

Syphilis was IMPORTED by your enamored "first world" culture!

When imported - THERE WAS NO CURE for these diseases!!!

See how it works!?!

Syphilis was transported from other countries to America? WRONG

Washing hands will do very little to prevent Syphilis, as it is spread by body

Please do your homework.

i.e. "Importance" does not mean bathing every day!

Importance also does NOT relate to skin layers or hosted bacteria.

i.e. EVERYTHING else you mentioned!

Get EDUCATED on these things!

This should probably be my signature line, chatting w/u:

OTHERWISE MODERN MEDICAL SCIENCE IS OVERRATED!!

THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES ARE NOT PRIMAL SOCITIES!

Discovering bacteria is to "modern medicine" like the discovery of FIRE was to

Just like Kaiyl_kariashi said:

That's what they're going for."

Therein lies our immortality!

Anti-biotics wind up creating stronger bacteria.

If we ever find a way to increase our life time significantly yes

The copying companies want to know.

He finally committed murder to sample The Electric Chair!

Surviving that he was given a life sentence, no parole!

I'd gladly die to protect my child...

So you can COUNT on those problems CONTINUING indefinitely...!!

"Animals" don't realize this, only humans - I was taught in Anthropology...

4. We need to learn how to live BETTER, not longer...

Life is a WONDERFUL experience just as it is - with aging and death.

You might also like