Professional Documents
Culture Documents
112
F I N A L R E P O R T
P r o j e c t No. C-4123
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
WATER RESOURCES CENTER
25 35 Hydrosys terns L a b o r a t o r y
Urbana, I l l i n o i s 61801
Augus t 19 76
ABSTRACT
Yen, Ben Chie, Wenzel, J r . , Harry G . , Mays, Larry W . , and Tang, Wilson H.
ADVANCED METHODOLOGIES FOR DESIGN OF STORM SEWER SYSTEMS I
F i n a l Report t o O f f i c e of Water Research and Technology, Department of t h e
I n t e r i o r , Washington, D . C . , Research Report No. 112, Water Resources
C e n t e r , U n i v e r s i t y of I l l i n o i s , Urbana, I l l i n o i s , August 1976, xiv+224 pp.
KEYWORDS--cost/cost analysisldesign-hydraulics/*drainage systems/dynamic
programming/effluents-waste w a t e r / f l o o d damage/flood r o u t i n g / h y d r a u l i c
d e s i g n / h y d r a u l i c s /hydrograph r o u t i n g / m a t h e m a t i c a l models /methodology/
o p e r a t i o n s research/*optimization/probability analysis/*risks/safety-factor/
*sewers/sewer systems/*storm d r a i n s l s t o r m r u n o f f / s y s t e m s a n a l y s i s / u n c e r t a i n -
t i e s /*urban drainage/*urban runoff
FOREWORD
lems i n t h e Department of C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g of t h e U n i v e r s i t y of I l l i n o i s
u s e f u l i n s o l v i n g urban w a t e r problems.
The r e s e a r c h s t u d y d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s r e p o r t i s p a r t of an on-
d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s was re-examined.
The r e s e a r c h p r o d u c t s of t h i s p r o j e c t a r e t h e r e s u l t of a team
U n i v e r s i t y , who c o n t r i b u t e d t o t h e s t u d y e i t h e r through t h e i r p a r t i c i p a t i o n
p r o j e c t a r e l i s t e d i n Appendix G. The a u t h o r s a r e g r a t e f u l t o P r o f e s s o r
iii
advice concerning operations research. Appreciation is a l s o expressed f o r
p a t i e n t , p a i n s t a k i n g typing e f f o r t s throughout t h e p r o j e c t .
A c o n t i n u o u s phase of t h i s r e s e a r c h program i s c u r r e n t l y i n pro-
new t e c h n o l o g i e s a s w e l l .
CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xii
CHAPTER
.
1 INTRODUCTION .......................
2 . DESIGN PHILOSOPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Systemoptimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Uncertainties andRisks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Sewer F l o w R o u t i n g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4. C o n s t r a i n t s and Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3. ......................
Example I1
8.3.1. ...........
Sewer System D e s c r i p t i o n
8.3.2. ..............
Example I1 R e s u l t s
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPEND1CES
A. .....
Values of Cumulative Normal D i s t r i b u t i o n Function
B. ............
Model E r r o r f o r t h e R a t i o n a l Formula
C. ..........
S t a t i s t i c s of Five Simple D i s t r i b u t i o n s
D. .....
Computer Program L i s t i n g f o r Design Models A and C
E. Computer Program L i s t i n g f o r Design Models B-1, B.2.
B-3. and D .........................
F. ....................
Project Publications
G. .....................
P r o j e c t Personnel
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure
4.9. C o n n e c t i v i t y of S t a t e s a t Manhole J u n c t i o n s f o r
S e r i a l Approach .....................
4.10. Trace-Back a t L a s t Two S t a g e s of a Sewer System . . . . .
viii
Page
8.2. D e f i n i t i o n o f I n f l o w Hydrograph P a r a m e t e r s . . . . . . . .
8.8. Example I1 I s o n o d a l L i n e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIST OF TABLES
Page
TABLE
A = area
A = f u l l p i p e flow a r e a
f
B = water s u r f a c e width
CD = e x p e c t e d damage c o s t
,
C = installation cost
I
Cm = manhole c o s t
C = pipe cost
P
c = celerity
d = pipe diameter
E = elevation
E = a c c e p t a b l e e r r o r (Eq. 4 . 4 )
r
F = f u n c t i o n ; a l s o , cumulative c o s t f u n c t i o n
f = Weisbach r e s i s t a n c e c o e f f i c i e n t I
G = function
g = gravitational acceleration
I = inflow
i = r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y ; a l s o an i n d e x
i = referrence r a i n f a l l intensity
0
j =anindex
L = l e n g t h of sewer
xii
M = number of manholes on i s o n o d a l l i n e n
n
m = an exponent ( E q . 5.21)
m = manhole on i s o n o d a l l i n e n
n
N = number of s t a g e s i n PDDP p r o c e d u r e s ; a l s o , number
n = Manning's roughness f a c t o r ; a l s o , s t a g e
P = probability
Q = discharge
Q C = sewer c a p a c i t y
Qf = f u l l pipe flow r a t e
QL = a r e f e r e n c e d i s c h a r g e
Qo = d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e
Q = peak d i s c h a r g e
P
R = hydraulic radius
r = return f o r stage n
n
r = c o e f f i c i e n t of c o r r e l a t i o n
ij
S = slope; also, s t a t e
Sf = f r i c t i o n s l o p e
S = ith state
i
S = input s t a t e
n
-
S = output s t a t e
n
S = sewer s l o p e
0
SF = s a f e t y f a c t o r
s = storage
t = d u r a t i o n of r a i n f a l l
d
xiii
t = sewer flow t r a v e l time
f
V = flow v e l o c i t y
X = i n f l o w weight f a c t o r i n E q . 6.10
x = d i s t a n c e along t h e sewer; a l s o , a v a r i a b l e
. .
z = e l e v a t i o n of i n v e r t
a = a factor or a coefficient
A = increment
As = s t a t e increment
6 = c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n
A = correction factor
v = kinematic v i s c o s i t y
-c = time
= cumulative s t a n d a r d normal p r o b a b i l i t y d i s t r i b u t i o n
= c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n
xiv
C h a p t e r 1. INTRODUCTION
environment i s an a d e q u a t e and p r o p e r l y f u n c t i o n i n g s t o r m w a t e r d r a i n a g e
system. E s t i m a t e s from v a r i o u s s o u r c e s a l l i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e t o t a l c o s t
i n t a n g i b l e l o S s e s due t o i n a d e q u a t e o r i m p r o p e r d r a i n a g e of s t o r m w a t e r .
D e s p i t e t h e l a r g e amount o f money i n v o l v e d i n u r b a n s t o r m w a t e r d r a i n a g e ,
and c o n t r a r y t o t h e g e n e r a l b e l i e f of t h e p u b l i c , t h e p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e
t e c h n o l o g i c a l t o o l s a r e n o t b e i n g a p p l i e d t o t h i s problem e x c e p t i n
w i d e l y c r i t i c i z e d r a t i o n a l method and t h e r e i s v e r y l i t t l e p o s t e v a l u a t i o n
From an e n g i n e e r i n g v i e w p o i n t t h e d r a i n a g e problem c a n b e d i v i d e d
e f f o r t h a s been d e v o t e d i n r e c e n t y e a r s t o r u n o f f p r e d i c t i o n i n u r b a n a r e a s ,
state-of-the-art of t h i s a s p e c t of u r b a n d r a i n a g e h a s b e e n r e p o r t e d by
Chow and Yen (1976), James F. MacLaren, L t d . (19 75) Y Heeps and Mein (1974) ,
B r a n d s t e t t e r (1974) and McPherson (1975). However, d e s p i t e t h e e x i s t e n c e
of s u c h t e c h n i q u e s t h e y are n o t b e i n g e x t e n s i v e l y u s e d . P a r t of t h e
c o n c e r n i n g which model i s e c o n o m i c a l l y a n d / o r t e c h n i c a l l y a p p r o p r i a t e f o r
a specific situation.
1
The second a s p e c t o f t h e d r a i n a g e problem, d e s i g n methodology,
j u n c t i o n w i t h o t h e r p o l l u t i o n c o n t r o l f a c i l i t i e s s u c h as t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s
l a n d s u r f a c e d r a i n a g e s y s t e m from r e c e i v i n g t h e w a t e r ( p r e c i p i t a t i o n ) t o
t o p e r f o r m a s e a r c h f o r a minimum c o s t combination of p i p e s i z e s , s l o p e s
c o s t and t h e damage c o s t i n t h e e v e n t t h a t t h e c a p a c i t y of t h e s y s t e m i s
d r a i n a g e d e s i g n work.
Another d e s i g n a s p e c t t h a t i s u s u a l l y g i v e n s u p e r f i c i a l a t t e n t i o n
i s t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n of u n c e r t a i n t i e s . Conventional. t e c h n i q u e s b e g i n w i t h
t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of a r e t u r n p e r i o d t o b e u s e d i n s e l e c t i n g a " d e s i g n
r e t u r n p e r i o d a s assumed f o r t h e r a i n f a l l . F u r t h e r m o r e , no a d d i t i o n a l con-
u n c e r t a i n t y i n any d e s i g n p r o c e d u r e and t h e p r o b a b i l i t y o f e x c e e d i n g t h e
c a p a c i t y o f t h e s y s t e m s h o u l d i n c l u d e a l l of them. Chapter 5 of t h i s
r e p o r t p r e s e n t s a n approach f o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r u n c e r t a i n t i e s and t h u s h a s
e n t l y and f l o o d r o u t i n g t e c h n i q u e s p r o v i d e a more r e a l i s t i c p i c t u r e of t h e
peak f l o w s . S e v e r a l r o u t i n g t e c h n i q u e s h a v e been e v a l u a t e d a s d e s c r i b e d
i n C h a p t e r 6 and i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t h e d e s i g n models.
d e s i g n methodology i s c o n c e r n e d , b u t i t i s b e l i e v e d t h a t t h e i r c o n s i d e r a -
r e a l i s t i c a l l y and a c c u r a t e l y t h e p e r t i n e n t h y d r o l o g i c , h y d r a u l i c , con-
c o n s i d e r i n g n o t s o l e l y t h e sewer system i t s e l f b u t a l s o t h e d r a i n a g e
To i n c l u d e t h e s u r f a c y d r a i n a g e system, t r e a t m e n t system, r e c e i v i n g w a t e r
computer c a p a b i l i t y . To c o n s i d e r s i m u l t a n e o u s l y a l l t h e s e systems f o r
t a s k t h a t h a s y e t t o b e attempted. A s a f i r s t s t e p towards t h i s g e n e r a l
g o a l , i t i s worthwhile t o f i r s t d e f i n e t h e philosophy f o r o p t i m a l d e s i g n
2.1. System O p t i m i z a t i o n
following:
i n c l u d i n g n o t j u s t t h e sewers b u t a l s o manholes, j u n c t i o n s ,
and o t h e r a u x i l i a r y f a c i l i t i k such a s d e t e n t i o n r e s e r v o i r s ,
4
(b) The o b j e c t i v e of o p t i m i z a t i o n i s t o produce a d e s i g n of t h e
e n t i r e sewer system p r o v i d i n g t h e b e s t , b e n e f i t - c o s t
r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h i n t h e p h y s i c a l , economical, s o c i a l , and
only t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t b u t a l s o o t h e r c o s t s such a s
sewer s l o p e s and l a y o u t .
t h e corresponding r i s k l e v e l s f o r t h e sewers t h a t a r e w i t h i n t h e s p e c i f i e d
a c c e p t a b l e maximum r i s k l e v e l s f o r t h e p r o j e c t . I n t h e design a t l e a s t t h e
f o l l o w i n g u n c e r t a i n t i e s should be accounted f o r :
f u t u r e f l o o d s more s e v e r e t h a n t h e d e s i g n i n l e t hydrographs,
and t h e u n c e r t a i n t y on t h e f u t u r e change of t h e p h y s i c a l
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e d r a i n a g e b a s i n .
(b) Hydraulic u n c e r t a i n t i e s - These i n c l u d e t h e u n c e r t a i n t i e s i n
t h e m a t h e m a t i c a l s i m u l a t i o n model i n d e s c r i b i n g t h e f l o w i n
t h e s e w e r s and t h r o u g h t h e j u n c t i o n s . Particularly, i f
s i m p l e f l o w f o r m u l a s s u c h a s Manning's f o r m u l a and t h e
B e r n o u l l i e q u a t i o n are u s e d , t h e u n c e r t a i n t i e s i n u s i n g t h e s e
f o r m u l a s t o d e s c r i b e u n s t e a d y f l o w , u p s t r e a m and downstream
b a c k w a t e r e f f e c t s , sewer s u r c h a r g e s , and j u n c t i o n l o s s e s
sewer p i p e r o u g h n e s s w i t h t i m e s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d .
t h e q u a l i t y c o n t r o l of t h e m a t e r i a l s u s e d i n t h e sewer
s y s t e m , s u c h a s t h e d i a m e t e r , s t r a i g h t n e s s , and u n i f o r m i t y
of s u r f a c e roughness of t h e s e w e r p i p e s .
i n t h e a c c u r a c y i n l a y i n g t h e s e w e r p i p e s , s e t t l e m e n t of
t h e b e d d i n g s o i l , and sewer d e f l e c t i o n u n d e r l o a d .
and i n f l a t i o n r a t e s .
t h e d e s i g n r e t u r n p e r i o d , o r , more r a t i o n a l l y , t h e a c c e p t a b l e
T h e o r e t i c a l l y , a r e l i a b l e h y d r a u l i c r o u t i n g method s h o u l d b e u s e d
t h e p i p e i s n o t f l o w i n g f u l l and u n d e r p r e s s u r e , and s u b j e c t t o b a c k w a t e r
e q u a t i o n s f o r s e w e r s and j u n c t i o n s a c c o u n t i n g f o r f l o w u n s t e a d i n e s s and
on a l a r g e d i g i t a l computer. I t i s most u n l i k e l y t h a t s u c h a s o p h i s t i c a t e d
r o u t i n g scheme can b e i n c o r p o r a t e d w i t h i n a n o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o c e d u r e t o
h y d r a u l i c d e s i g n of s e w e r s w i t h o u t a c c o u n t i n g f o r u n c e r t a i n t i e s and c o s t
o p t i m i z a t i o n , t h e s o p h i s t i c a t e d r o u t i n g scheme u s i n g t h e f u l l dynamic
o n l y f o r t h e f i n a l c h e c k i n g of t h e h y d r a u l i c a c c u r a c y of t h e d e s i g n . They
f o r m u l a f o r sewer f l o w w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e t i m e s h i f t i n g o f t h e h y d r o g r a p h s
o r a n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave a p p r o x i m a t i o n u s u a l l y g i v e a c c e p t a b l e d e s i g n s
w i t h c o n s i d e r a b l e s a v i n g s i n computer t i m e . I n a d d i t i o n , a modified
1 9 6 9 ) , a l s o g i v e r e s u l t s c l o s e t o t h o s e g i v e n by t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c
It i s d i f f i c u l t t o e s t a b l i s h a p r i o r i which, i f any, r o u t i n g
i d e a l r o u t i n g method f o r t h e o p t i m a l d e s i g n s h o u l d be t h e one t h a t g i v i n g
s u f f i c i e n t a c c u r a c y y e t n o t r e q u i r i n g e x c e s s i v e computer t i m e and c a p a c i t y .
I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e above c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , a d e s i g n methodology
s i g n models i n t h i s s t u d y a r e a s f o l l o w s :
(a) F r e e - s u r f a c e flow e x i s t s f o r t h e d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e s o r
t h a t pumping s t a t i o n s and p r e s s u r i z e d s e w e r s a r e n o t
considered.
s m a l l e r t h a n 8 i n . i n d i a m e t e r c a n b e c a r r i e d by street
s i z e s i n i n c h e s a r e 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 , from 1 5 t o 30 w i t h a 3 i n .
d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e and s a t i s f i e s a l l t h e a p p r o p r i a t e
constraints.
s u s c e p t i b l e t o f r o s t , d r a i n b a s e m e n t s , and a l l o w s u f f i c i e n t
c u s h i o n i n g t o p r e v e n t b r e a k a g e due t o ground s u r f a c e l o a d i n g .
T h e r e f o r e , minimum c o v e r d e p t h s must b e s p e c i f i e d .
e l e v a t i o n of t h e u p s t r e a m sewer i s no l o w e r t h a n t h a t of t h e
downstream sewer.
(f) To p r e v e n t o r r e d u c e permanant d e p o s i t i o n i n t h e s e w e r s , a
minimum p e r m i s s i b l e f l o w v e l o c i t y a t d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e o r a t
b a r e l y f u l l - p i p e g r a v i t y flow i s s p e c i f i e d . A minimum
full-conduit f l o w v e l o c i t y o f 2 f p s i s r e q u i r e d o r recommended
by most h e a l t h d e p a r t m e n t s .
(g) To p r e v e n t o c c u r r e n c e of s c o u r and o t h e r u n d e s i r a b l e e f f e c t s
of h i g h v e l o c i t y flow, a maximum p e r m i s s i b l e f l o w v e l o c i t y i s
v e l o c i t y can be c o n s i d e r a b l y h i g h e r .
s m a l l e r t h a n any of t h e upstream s e w e r s a t t h a t j u n c t i o n .
g r a p h s o r peak d i s c h a r g e s .
Furthermore, f o r t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n models, t h e f o l l o w i n g a d d i t i o n a l
a s s u m p t i o n s a r e made:
downst ream.
(b) No n e g a t i v e s l o p e i s a l l o w e d f o r any s e w e r s i n t h e d e n d r i t i c
network.
(d) Presumably t h e c o s t f u n c t i o n f o r i n s t a l l a t i o n v a r i e s w i t h
(1969) i s a d o p t e d i n t h i s s t u d y . The p i p e i n s t a l l a t i o n
c o s t i n d o l l a r s p e r l i n e a r f o o t of s e w e r , C i s
P
i n which d i s sewer d i a m e t e r i n f e e t and H i s t h e sewer i n v e r t
sewer i s computed a s t h e a v e r a g e o f t h e i n v e r t d e p t h s a t t h e
a manhole,
m
' ' in dollars is
d e t e r m i n e d by t h e l o w e s t i n v e r t of t h e sewers j o i n i n g t h e man-
hole.
C h a p t e r 3. REVIEW OF EXISTING SEWER DESIGN METHODS
d e s i g n models i s g i v e n i n t h i s c h a p t e r .
s y s t e m l a y o u t i s p r e d e t e r m i n e d and t h e s e w e r s l o p e g e n e r a l l y i s assumed t o
f o l l o w t h e ground s l o p e o r i s s p e c i f i e d . The b a s i c d e s i g n c o n c e p t i s t o
d e t e r m i n e t h e minimum sewer s i z e t h a t h a s a c a p a c i t y t o c a r r y t h e d e s i g n
d i s c h a r g e under f u l l p i p e g r a v i t y f l o w c o n d i t i o n s .
The d e s i g n models c o n s i d e r e d h e r e a r e t h o s e h a v i n g a b u i l t - i n
d e s i g n methods" a r e a c t u a l l y f l o w s i m u l a t i o n o r p r e d i c t i o n methods t o
d i r e c t d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f sewer s i z e s . Hence, t h e y a r e n o t r e g a r d e d h e r e i n
d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e i s o b t a i n e d by a d d i n g t h e h y d r o g r a p h s o r peak f l o w s from
t h e upstream sewers w i t h o r w i t h o u t c o n s i d e r i n g l a g e f f e c t s . The r e q u i r e d
a v a i l a b l e p i p e s i z e t h a t i s e q u a l t o o r g r e a t e r than t h e r e q u i r e d s i z e . No
consequently t h e s o l u t i o n i s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y unique.
conservation i s w r i t t e n as
TABLE 3.1. Summary of Sewer H y d r a u l i c Design Models
Rational Inlet No r o u t i n g , time Continuity No Cascading .Sewer d i a m e t e r s and Yen and Sevuk
hydrographs l a g of hydro- equation design discharges (1975)
graphs
Chicago Inlet ' Storage routing Continuity No Cascading Sewer d i a m e t e r s and Tholin and
Hydrograph hydrographs o r time-of f s e t equation d e s i g n hydrographs K e i f e r (1960) ;
w without routing Yen and Sevuk
G,
(1975)
TRRL Inlet Reservoir routing Continuity No Cascading Sewer d i a m e t e r s and Watkins (1963)
hydrographs lagged by time equation b a s i n runoff hydro-
of t r a v e l graph
ILLUDAS Inlet Reservoir routing Continuity No Cascading Sewer d i a m e t e r s and Ters t r i e p and
hydrographs lagged by time equation d e s i g n hydrographs S t a l l (1974)
of t r a v e l
Kinematic Inlet Nonlinear kine- Continuity Upstream Cascading Sewer d i a m e t e r s , Yen .and Sevuk
Wave hydrographs m a t i c wave and only d i s c h a r g e hydrographs (1975)
routing dynami c and depth
equations
EPA SWMM Inlet Improved non- Continuity Upstream Cascading Sewer d i a m e t e r s , Metcalf & Eddy
hydrographs l i n e a r kinematic equation and d e s i g n hydrographs e t a l . (1971);
wave r o u t i n g partial and flow v e l o c i t i e s Huber e t a l .
downstream (19 75)
ISS Inlet Dynamic wave C o n t i n u i t y Both up- Y-segment Sewer d i a m e t e r s and Yen and Sevuk
hydrographs ( S t . Venant eqs .) and dynamic s t r e a m and sequence d i s c h a r g e , d e p t h and (1975) ; Sevuk
routing equations downstream v e l o c i t y graphs e t a l . (1973)
i n which I i s t h e i n f l o w r a t e i n t o t h e s e w e r ; Q i s t h e o u t f l o w r a t e a t t h e
e x i t of t h e s e w e r ; s i s t h e s t o r a g e of w a t e r i n t h e s e w e r ; t i s t i m e ; and
t h e time i n t e r v a l , A t , b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d .
sewer.
The s e w e r d e s i g n p r o c e d u r e f o r t h i s method i s e s s e n t i a l l y t h e
, i s e v a l u a t e d f o r a s e w e r , i t s d i a m e t e r c a n b e d e t e r m i n e d by u s i n g
P
E q . 3.1.
t h e f u l l p i p e f l o w v e l o c i t y computed by u s i n g t h e Darcy-Weisbach f o r m u l a
i n which g i s t h e g r a v i t a t i o n a l a c c e l e r a t i o n ; R i s t h e h y d r a u l i c r a d i u s ,
Sf
i s t h e f r i c t i o n s l o p e , and t h e Weisbach r e s i s t a n c e c o e f f i c i e n t f i s g i v e n
by t h e Colebrook-White formula
Darcy-Weisbach formula
i n which d i s i n f t and Q i n c f s .
P
The i n f l o w hydrograph f o r a sewer i s r o u t e d u s i n g t h e c o n t i n u i t y
u s e o f t h e r e c e s s i o n p a r t of r e c o r d e d r u n o f f hydrograph t o e s t a b l i s h t h e
Manning ' s n a r e e q u i v a l e n t .
3.1.4. I l l i n o i s Urban Drainage Area S i m u l a t o r (ILLUDAS)
w i t h i t s s t o r a g e r o u t i n g scheme.
s o l v e d n u m e r i c a l l y w i t h i n i t i a l and u p s t r e a m c o n d i t i o n s s p e c i f i e d . No
d e s i g n model u s i n g a f o u r - p o i n t n o n c e n t r a l i m p l i c i t f i n i t e - d i f f e r e n c e
i n which s = s t o r a g e i n t h e manhole o r j u n c t i o n ; Q . = s u r f a c e i n f l o w i n t o
3
t h e j u n c t i o n ; s u b s c r i p t s 1 and 2 r e p r e s e n t t h e i n f l o w s e w e r s ; and s u b s c r i p t
3 i n d i c a t e s t h e o u t f l o w sewer from t h e j u n c t i o n . I f t h e s t o r a g e of t h e
t o zero.
18
d i f f e r e n c e form, u s i n g t h e x-t p l a n e shown i n Fig. 3.2 w i t h Ax = L = sewer
length, as follows
d i f f e r e n c e scheme.
S i n c e no downstream boundary c o n d i t i o n i s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e s o l u -
i n Fig. 3 . 2 , t h e f r i c t i o n s l o p e f o r Q is
f
The u s e o f Eq. 3 . 1 1 t o e s t i m a t e Q p a r t i a l l y accounts f o r the
f
downstream b a c k w a t e r e f f e c t a t some l a t e r time s t e p s . Nonetheless, since
t h e downstream boundary c o n d i t i o n i s n o t t r u l y a c c o u n t e d f o r , i t i s
f o r which t h e b a c k w a t e r e f f e c t i s s e v e r e , t h e w a t e r s u r f a c e i s assumed a s
h o r i z o n t a l from t h e s t o r a g e e l e m e n t g o i n g backward u n t i l i t i n t e r c e p t s t h e
h i g h v e l o c i t y s u p e r c r i t i c a l f l o w , t h e f l o o d may s i m p l y b e t r a n s l a t e d t h r o u g h
s n a l l and t h e sewer i s c i r c u l a r i n c r b s s s e c t i o n , t h e g u t t e r f l o w r o u t i n g
In SWMM l a r g e j u n c t i o n s w i t h s i g n i f i c a n t s t o r a g e c a p a c i t y and
rcuting. No dynamic e q u a t i o n i s c o n s i d e r e d e x c e p t f o r t h e c a s e s w i t h w e i r
I n t h e d e s i g n v e r s i o n , s m a l l d i a m e t e r s a r e f i r s t assumed f o r t h e
T h i s s m a l l e s t commercial p i p e g i v i n g f r e e - s u r f a c e f l o w i s t h u s a d o p t e d a s
t h e sewer s i z e . The s e w e r s a r e d e s i g n e d f o l l o w i n g a d o w ~ l s t r e a nc a s c a d i n g
model c o n s i d e r i n g t h e u n s t e a d y and b a c k w a t e r e f f e c t s i n t h e s e w e r s a s w e l l
Time, t
a s t h e e f f e c t s of j u n c t i o n s and manholes. The model. can b e used f o r
d e s i g n of sewer s i z e s a s w e l l a s f l o w p r e d i c t i o n . Only t h e d e s i g n o p t i o n
is discussed here.
The t i m e - v a r y i n g s t o r m r u n o f f i n g r a v i t y - f l o w s e w e r s can b e
1973a,b)
d e p t h above i n v e r t of t h e f l o w i n t h e s e w e r , r e s p e c t i v e l y ; V = ? / A is the
of Sf c a n b e e v a l u a t e d by u s i n g e i t h e r Darcy-Weisbach's formula or
coefficient f .
i s needed i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e j u n c t i o n c o n t i n u i t y e q u a t i o n ( E q . 3 . 9 ) . The
dynamic e q u a t i o n f o r a j u n c t i o n i s f o r m u l a t e d by c o n s i d e r i n g t h e c o n t i n u i t y
of t h e w a t e r s u r f a c e a t t h e j u n c t i o n . Thus, a t a p o i n t - t y p e j u n c t i o n w i t h
negligible storage
i n which z i s t h e e l e v a t i o n of t h e sewer i n v e r t above a r e f e r e n c e h o r i z o n t a l
t r e a t e d as d i r e c t i n f l o w s , i . e . , a s Q j i n Eq. 3.9.
n u m e r i c a l l y w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e i n i t i a l and boundary c o n d i t i o n s on a l a r g e
d i g i t a l computer u s i n g a f i r s t - o r d e r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s method t o g e t h e r w i t h
23
when i t occurs. It i s a l s o t h e o n l y model t h a t determines t h e sewer dia-
3 . 2 . Design O p t i m i z a t i o n Models
d u r i n g t h e p a s t q u a r t e r of a c e n t u r y , i t i s l o g i c a l t h a t a t t e m p t s would b e
m i z a t i o n f o r d e s i g n of sewer system l a y o u t ; ( c ) o p t i m i z a t i o n f o r d e s i g n of
Most of t h e models r e p o r t e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e f o r l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n
l a y o u t s a t i s f y i n g c o n v e n t i o n a l d e s i g n c o n s t r a i n t s and assumptions. In
t h i s model t h e o b j e c t i v e i s t o minimize
2
COST = 1 ( C ~ T + C ~ X ~ + C ~ ) L ~ Cd(Ei
+ - E.) 1 (3.16)
commercial P l manholes J
s i z e pipes
subject t o
i n which C C and C . a r e c o s t c o e f f i c i e n t s of m a t e r i a l s , e x c a v a t i o n ,
p' cx' 0 J
l a y i n g t h e p i p e i n p l a c e , and manholes, r e s p e c t i v e l y ; di, Xi, and Soi a r e
Ei
- E . i s t h e drop i n p i p e e l e v a t i o n between t h e manholes;
J
z is i n v e r t
i
depth; z i s t h e minimum cover d e p t h ; V. d e n o t e s sewer flow v e l o c i t y ; Q is
C 1 i
flow r a t e ; n i s Manning's roughness f a c t o r , K i s a c o n s t a n t which depends
, Bollmd Yonlinear M m snd depth Size and in- RIA Warming's D i m are, wn- Nonlinear Suggest a rcmdom search as means of
(1966) separable pro- of sewers f o r v e r t eleva- formula tinuoua and s e l e c t i n g commercial pipe sizes.
8 r d 8 given layout t i o n of pipes rounded up t o
c-rcial sizes
Zepp and Dynmic pro- Mam and depth Yes Linear and Based on Voorheea .model, s e l e c t the
Leary g r d n g of severs, nonlinear least-cost a l t e r n a t i v e f o r each
(1969) location of succeeding l i n k and c a r r i e s t h a t
pumps f o r given single a l t e r n a t i v e foruard a~ the
layout opthal.
DeiniDger Linear pro- Diam and i n v e r t S i r e md invert NIA Manning s ' No Linear Limited t o nonbrcmching systems.
(1970) graming elevations of elevation of fonoula Sow constraints a r e nonlinear which
severs f o r
given layout
pipes
imations .
a r e linearized by successive approx-
lkredith Dgnadc pro- Mam and depth Drop in eleva- Invert Ihrming's Yes Linear and l o r nonbranching a y a t c a only. Two
(1971) sr- of s-rs for t i o n across elevations formula nonlinear, can approachen of handling mauholcs:
given layouts pipe incorporate all pipen conmeting t o apnholc a r e
other f o r m of a t the same elevation, o r relaxa- .
cost function tion of t h i s elevation conatralnt.
Dajmi Convex separ- Dim and depth Tro decision U /A Uanuing's D i m a r e contin- Quadratic Use equations f o r cost of excava-
and able pro- of sewern f o r variables: formula uoua then uae tion and pipe component developed
kmmz11 g r d n g cmd given layout sum and dif- Bolland's random by multiple regrassion.
(1971) random ference of sanpling approach
sawling upstream and to s e l e c t c o w
dwnstream merciai s i z a s
invert eleva-
tions of
sewers
llerritt Dynamic pro- Mam and depth Pipe mizen and Pipe sizen Manning ' a Yes Any form of Two hydraulic m d e l s : (a) conven-
ad gr-8 of sewers and e x i s t i n g in- and invert fo m l a cost function t i o n a l Ikinning's formula f o r which
Bogan p u q stations v e r t elevation elevations limiting slopes a r e s e t by f u l l -
(1973) f o r given a t a mauhole pipe flow conditions. (b) kuming's
layout f o d a i n which specified maximum
and minimum velocities a r e met a t
- actual depths f o r design f l w r a t e s .
TABLE 3 . 2 . (Continued)
Consideration of
Optirization Variables Sewer flow c-ercial pipe Form of
Cddel technique Design Decision State hydraulics diameters c o s t function Remarks
Dajlml -vex separ- Mam and depth Ilanning' s Yen Piecevise Three model formulations a r e given.
and a b l e mixed of sewers f o r formula linearization F i r s t i s Dajani and &muell's and
aaSit i n t e g e r prc- given layout of Dajani and other two a r e Dajani and Hnait's
(1974) g r d - GBaaell's formulated f o r f u l l p i p e flow and
f 1971) c o s t p a r t i a l pipe f l w .
functions
Froise, D y n J c pro- Diam and deptb Pipe s i z e s . Invert Kinematic Yea Any form of Extension of t h e e a r l i e r model by
Burges, g r m of severs, slopes, l i f t elevations wave o r coat function kkrritt and Bogan (1973). In
and pump s t a t i o n stations, d y n d c wave routing uniform f l w i s a s s m d a t
routing entrance and e x i t of each pipe.
Bogan capacities, s t o r a g e vol-
(1975) l i f t heights, m s , and using Darcy-
r etention n a d n u m dis- Yeisbach
basin con- charges formula f o r
figurations pipe design
and volums
kg-. Dynamic pro- Mam and depth Upstream m d Invert Manning's Yes Any form of Considers main and l o c a l pipes. i.e.
Shamir gr-ng of sewers and dametream eleva- formula and c o s t function t h e upstream end e i t h e r connects o r
and layout to a i n v e r t eleva- tions, Powroy 'a doesn't connect t o a manhole. Opti-
Spivak very l i m i t e d t i o n s and connect- formula mization of layout determines whether
(1973) extent drainage ivity each pipe i s l o c a l or main.
directions
Battelle Dynamic p r w Sewer d i m . Pipe s i z e s , N /A tionlinear Yea Intended f o r optimum design and con-
Borth- g r d n g regulators, storage sizes. tinematic t r o l of metropolitan wastewater
weat Labs fmdified trea-nt regulator wave routing management s y s t e m , primarily f o r .
(Brand- gradient p l a n t s , and sizea by character- simulation of major sewer systenm
stetter, tedmique) storage i s t i c method components, such as trunk and
Bogel, facilities for i n t e r c e p t o r s , treatment p l a n t s .
a d given layout
Cearlock, and sewer
1973) elopes
WlT Linear pro- Optimal oper- Pipe s i z e s , NlA Nonlinear Yes Linear The m d e l is designed t o be used
&lrshen gr-ng a t i n g policy, s t o r a g e tank kinematic wave i n t e r a c t i v e l y v i t h EPA SWlM which
and
Ilarb
1974)
. sever d i m .
storage tank
sizes w d
sizes, t r e a t -
aent plant
s i z e s , eod
routing determines major arena of flooding
and magnitudes and q u a n t i t i e s of
o v e r f l w f o r use on combined s w e r
treamnt f lor -mts systems t o screen c o n t r o l a l t e r -
plant s i z e s natives and choose t h e l e a s t
expensive combination s a t h a t t h e r e
a r e no overflows o r excessive
l o c a l flooding.
The g e n e r a l i z e d s u b s c r i p t s i and j r e f e r t o u p s t r e a m and downstream l o c a -
p i p e s i z e s and t h e i r i n v e r t e l e v a t i o n s . The p r o b l e m i s a r r a n g e d i n s u c h a
o b j e c t i v e f u n c t i o n i s n o n l i n e a r and s e p a r a b l e . The d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e i n a
g i v e n p i p e i s c o n s i d e r e d a s c o n s t a n t and t h e d i a m e t e r i s computed by u s i n g
are c o n s i d e r e d as c o n t i n u o u s v a r i a b l e s a r e a r b i t r a r i l y r o u n d e d up t o
c o m e r c i a l l y a v a i l a b l e s i z e s ; a p r o c e s s t h a t may r e s u l t i n a n o n - o p t i n a l
o f l o c a t i n g t h e b e s t s o l u t i o n h a v i n g commercial p i p e d i a m e t e r s .
r a n g e p l a n n i n g t o o l t o e s t i m a t e t h e p r e s e n t wo,rth o f i n v e s t m e n t a s s o c i a t e d
w i t h i n s t a l l i n g and m a i n t a i n i n g a s e w e r s y s t e m o r s u b s y s t e m s t o s e r v e a
gramming a l g o r i t h m t o d e t e r m i n e o p t i m a l s i z e s , s l o p e s and i n v e r t e l e v a t i o n s
( t r e e ) , t h e s u b t r e e c o s t o f a l l n o d e s f o r f e a s i b l e e l e v a t i o n s and p i p e
s i z e s are d e f i n e d b y t h e f u n c t i o n a l e q u a t i o n
w h e r e t . ( d , z ) i s t h e o p t i m a l s u b t r e e c o s t of node j a t d e p t h z and p i p e
J \
s i z e d ; I . i s node j ' s s e t o f c o n n e c t i n g n o d e s ; k i s an i n d e x of f e a s i b l e
J
d e p t h - p i p e s i z e c o m b i n a t i o n s ; K . i s t h e s e t of f e a s i b l e d e p t h - p i p e s i z e
1
e a c h p i p e i n t h e s y s t e m ; l o c a t i o n s o f pumps; and t o t a l p r e s e n t w o r t h of t h e
i n c o r p o r a t e s a l i m i t e d o p t i m i z a t i o n procedure i n t h a t i t s e l e c t s t h e least
Cost a l t e r n a t i v e f o r e a c h s u c c e e d i n g p i p e d u r i n g t h e d e s i g n and c a r r i e s t h a t
t r a n s f o r m e d i n t o l i n e a r c o n s t r a i n t s by s u c c e s s i v e a p p r o x i m a t i o n s .
same e l e v a t i o n as t h e i n v e r t a t t h e e n t r a n c e of t h e i n f l o w sewer j o i n i n g
d e c i s i o n a t e a c h s t a g e r e p r e s e n t s t h e d r o p i n e l e v a t i o n between t h e two
s t a g e o p t i m i z a t i o n from u p s t r e a m t o downstream i s s t a t e d as
more r e a l i s t i c a p p r o a c h , t h e r e t u r n i s t h e c o s t of i n s t a l l a t i o n of e i t h e r
t h e p i p e o r t h e manhole. A comparison of t h e s e a p p r o a c h e s u s i n g a c o s t
designs.
Another a p p l i c a t i o n of dynamic p r o g r a m i n g t o t h e o p t i m a l d e s i g n
t h e s t a g e s a r e manholes; t h e s t a t e v a r i a b l e s a r e p i p e s i z e s and i n v e r t
e l e v a t i o n s ; and t h e d e c i s i o n v a r i a b l e s a r e t h e p i p e s i z e s and t h e e x i s t i n g
s t a g e r e c u r s i v e o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o c e d e s from t h e u p s t r e a m t o t h e d o w n s t r e a m
S i m i l a r t o t h e o t h e r d y n a i i c programming a p p l i c a t i o n s , t h i s mcdel c c n s i d e r s
commercial p i p e s i z e s .
f u n c t i o n was formulated a s
p i p e i n t h e sewer network. It i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o n o t e t h a t t h e d i a m e t e r
h a s been e l i m i n a t e d a s a d e c i s i o n v a r i a b l e because of r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r t h e
approach t o s e l e c t commercially a v a i l a b l e s i z e s .
s i x sets o f p i e c e w i s e a p p r o x i m a t i o n c o n s t r a i n t s f o r e a c h p i p e i n t h e sewer
These c o n s t r a i n t s c o m p l e t e t h e f o r m u l a t i o n a s a c o n v e x - s e p a r a b l e , mixed-
i n t e g e r programming problem, h a v i n g t h e c o n t i n u o u s v a r i a b l e s of e x c a v a t i o n
d e p t h s and i n t e g e r v a r i a b l e s w i t h a t o t a l of 1 4 c o n s t r a i n t s f o r e a c h p i p e
d e a l s w i t h d i s c r e t e commercial p i p e s i z e f o r p a r t i a l l y f i l l e d p i p e flow.
f u l l and p a r t i a l l y f i l l e d f l o w s i n commercial s i z e p i p e s .
s t a g e of t h e s y s t e m t h e s t a t e v a r i a b l e s a r e t h e h y d r o g r a p h s , s t o r a g e
t i o n c o s t s . The c o n t r o l o p t i o n s o r v a r i a b l e s a r e maximum d i s c h a r g e s , p i p e
o n l y c o n s i d e r e d a t o n e s p e c i f i c s l o p e f o r e a c h s t a t e and f o r e a c h q u a n t i z e d
f l o w i n g f u l l a t t h e maximum d i s c h a r g e , o r , i f t h i s d e c i s i o n v i o l a t e s t h e
s t a t i o n s a t t h e upstream j u n c t i o n a r e s e l e c t e d . When t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n
each p i p e .
sewer network.
Simultaneous o p t i m a l d e s i g n of t h e s i z e s , s l o p e s and l a y o u t of
s t u d i e s have r e c e n t l y been r e p o r t e d on l i m i t e d s c o p e s o f t h e s i m u l t a n e o u s
t o d e t e r m i n e t h e f i n a l l a y o u t and t h e sewer d i a m e t e r s t o a l i m i t e d e x t e n t .
The sewer s l o p e i s i m p l i c i t l y i n c l u d e d by r e s t r i c t i n g i t w i t h i n a
diameter.
The o b j e c t i v e f u n c t i o n i s s t a t e d a s
s t a g e s by i s o n o d a l l i n e s ( c a l l e d d r a i n a g e l i n e s by Argaman e t a l . , 1973)
dynamic programming o p t i m i z a t i o n i s
i n which F
* (H
n+l
) i s t h e minimum c o s t of t h e system from i s o n o d a l l i n e s
n+l
.EC n+l
1 t o n + l ; fi[H:,H , ~ ( i , n + l ) l i s t h e c o s t of t h e c h e a p e s t f e a s i b l e p i p e s
of node i on i s o n o d a l l i n e n ; and T ( i , n + l ) i s t h e v e c t o r of c o n n e c t i v i t y
a c h i e v e o p t i m i z a t i o n c o n s i d e r i n g n o t o n l y t h e sewers i n t h e system b u t
a l s o o t h e r components i n t h e o v e r a l l u r b a n d r a i n a g e s y s t e m , a c o n c e p t t h a t
h a s b e e n d i s c u s s e d a t t h e b e g i n n i n g of C h a p t e r 2. understandably, because
t h e s e l e c t e d subsystems o f t h e o v e r a l l u r b a n d r a i n a g e s y s t e m and d e s i g n
o n l y f o r t h e d i a m e t e r of t h e s e w e r s . A group o f r e s e a r c h e r s a t B a t t e l l e
, d i s p o s a l s y s t e m s , p r i m a r i l y f o r s i m u l a t i o n o f major s y s t e m components s u c h
a s sewer t r u n k s , i n t e r c e p t o r s , and t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f
a u t o m a t i c o p e r a t i o n a l c o n t r o l of s t o r m w a t e r r u n o f f . For design s t u d i e s
w i t h g i v e n l a y o u t and sewer s l o p e s , s i z e s of s e w e r s , o v e r f l o w s t o r a g e
f a c i l i t i e s , t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s , and o v e r f l o w t r e a t m e n t f a c i l i t i e s a r e computed
t h r o u g h s e w e r s u s i n g t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s method a p p l i e d t o n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c
wave e q u a t i o n s . Downstream f l o w c o n t r o l , b a c k w a t e r , f l o w r e v e r s a l , j u n c t i o n
which d e s c r i b e s c o l l e c t i v e l y i n s u f f i c i e n t d e t a i l t h e model as u s e d f o r
s e w e r s , d e t e n t i o n s t o r a g e d e v i c e s , and s p e c i a l s t o r m w a t e r t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s .
The o b j e c t i v e i s t o s e a r c h f o r t h e l e a s t - c o s t s o l u t i o n w i t h n o o v e r f l o w s o r
excessive l o c a l flooding. O p t i m i z a t i o n i s pursued t h r o u g h a s c r e e n i n g
t h e sewer s i z e s t h a t s a t i s f y t h e o b j e c t i v e f u n c t i o n and s p e c i f i e d c o n s t r a i n t s .
discussed. However, t h e r e i s no p u b l i s h e d r e c o r d t o i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e s e
t i o n model f o r d e t e r m i n a t i o n of sewer d i a m e t e r s .
C l e a r l y , t h e sewer s i z e d e s i g n models w i t h c o n j u n c t i v e o p t i m i z a t i o n
w i t h o t h e r d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s , as w e l l as t h e o p t i m a l d e s i g n models f o r l a y -
c o n s i d e r a b l e r e s e a r c h e f f o r t i s needed f o r p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n .
Chapter 4. APPLICATION OF OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
I n t h i s c h a p t e r t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n techniques adopted t o o b t a i n t h e
instead.
e l e v a t i o n s of t h e sewer, t h e d e s i g n v a r i a b l e s can b e c o n s i d e r e d a s t h e
p o i n t s w i t h i n t h e d r a i n a g e b a s i n w i t h t h e network l a y o u t connecting t h e s e
d i g i t a l manipulation.
a r e f l e x i b l e enough t o h a n d l e d e s i g n c o n s t r a i n t s and
design information.
These p r i n c i p a l t a s k s must b e c o n s i d e r e d c o n j u n c t i v e l y t o a r r i v e a t a
s o l u t i o n scheme t h a t can b e c o n s t r u c t e d e f f i c i e n t l y and used t o d e s i g n l a r g e
s c a l e sewer networks.
systems, which a r e t o p o l o g i c a l l y c h a r a c t e r i z e d by
begins ;
l a y o u t f o r t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n procedures w i l l be d i s c u s s e d i n S e c t i o n s 4 . 3 and
j u n c t i o n s , manholes and i n l e t s i n a d d i t i o n t o o t h e r r e g u l a t i n g o r o p e r a t i o n a l
a t t h e p r e s e n t s t a g e t h e s e s p e c i a l d e v i c e s a r e n o t considered i n t h e
o p t i m i z a t i o n scheme.
The b a s i c o p t i m i z a t i o n t e c h n i q u e used t o develop t h e s t o r m sewer
second model i s g i v e n i n t h i s c h a p t e r .
As a p r e l u d e t o t h e f o l l o w i n g d i s c u s s i o n of a p p l i c a t i o n s of DDDP
t o t h e d e s i g n of l e a s t - c o s t sewer systems, i t i s d e s i r a b l e t o d e f i n e t h e
t h e i r c o u n t e r p a r t s i n sewer systems.
f o r t h e n o n s e r i a l approach a s t a g e i s a sewer p i p e ( l i n k ) o r
from t h e o u t l e t of t h e system.
analogous t o t h e crown e l e v a t i o n s of t h e p i p e o r p i p e s , t h e
i n p u t s t a t e S f o r a s t a g e i s t h e crown e l e v a t i o n of
n
t h e upstream end of t h e s t a g e , and t h e o u t p u t s t a t e is
n
t h e crown e l e v a t i o n of t h e downstream end of t h e s t a g e .
s t a t e by t h e d e c i s i o n v a r i a b l e g i v e n by
any s t a g e n , Sn 2 S
-.
n
I t should be remarked h e r e t h a t c o n v e n t i o n a l l y i n sewer design t h e
I n f a c t sometimes t h i s i s t h e s o u r c e of e r r o r i n c o n s t r u c t i o n a s t h e t r e n c h
p o i n t e d o u t by Yen e t a l . (1974), a l i g n i n g t h e c e n t e r l i n e s of t h e j o i n i n g
adopted as t h e s t a t e i n t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n .
41
4.2. S e l e c t i o n and D e s c r i p t i o n of Optimization Technique - DDDP
b i l i t y of DP a p p r o a c l ~ e st o h a n d l e v a r i o u s forms of c o s t f u n c t i o n s , d e s i g n
a r e d i f f i c u l t i e s i n o b t a i n i n g an o p t i m a l s o l u t i o n w i t h o u t a c o n s i d e r a b l e
number of s t a t e v a r i a b l e s and t h e l e v e l of d i s c r e t i z a t i o n of t h e s t a t e
mainly due t o t h e l e v e l of d i s c r e t i z a t i o n of t h e s t a t e v a r i a b l e r e q u i r e d i n
DP t o o b t a i n e q u i v a l e n t r e s u l t s u s i n g DDDP .
DDDP i s d e f i n e d by H e i d a r i (1970) and H e i d a r i e t a l . (1971) a s an
II
i t e r a t i v e t e c h n i q u e i n which t h e r e c u r s i v e e q u a t i o n of dynamic programming
s o l v e d through i t e r a t i o n s of t r i a l s t a t e s and d e c i s i o n s t o f i n d t h e o p t i m a l
r e t u r n s (minimum c o s t ) f o r a system s u b j e c t t o t h e c o n s t r a i n t s t h a t t h e
t r i a l s t a t e s and d e c i s i o n s s h o u l d b e w i t h i n t h e r e s p e c t i v e a d m i s s i b l e domain
of t h e s t a t e and d e c i s i o n s p a c e s .
u s e i t t o compute t h e t r i a l p o l i c y ( i . e . , a t r i a l s e t of d e c i s i o n s o r drops
S e v e r a l crown e l e v a t i o n s i n t h e neighborhood of a t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y
c o r r i d o r f o r a p i p e c o n n e c t i o n w i t h f i v e s t a t e s ( l a t t i c e p o i n t s ) a t b o t h ends
I t i s a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e crown e l e v a t i o n s must f a l l w i t h i n t h e a d m i s s i b l e
c r i t e r i a , t h e s t a t e s p a c e of t h e c o r r i d o r i s s h i f t e d down m a i n t a i n i n g t h e
s y s t e m o r p r e f e r a b l y by o t h e r more r e s t r i c t i v e c o n s t r a i n t s s u c h a s t h a t imposed
p i p e d i a m e t e r s a t i s f y i n g t h e c o n s t r a i n t s on f l o w , v e l o c i t y , and p r e c e d i n g
45
To Fig. 4.5 o r 4 . 8
d i a m e t e r e q u a l t o t h e l a r g e s t of t h e upstream p i p e d i a m e t e r s i s c o n s i d e r e d
first. I f t h e p i p e i s f u l l o r i f t h e v e l o c i t y exceeds t h e a l l o w a b l e
v e r s e l y , i f t h e a l l o w a b l e minimum v e l o c i t y c o n s t r a i n t i s v i o l a t e d , t h e sewer
s l o p e i s t o o s m a l l and f o r t h e c u r r e n t o u t p u t s t a t e t h e n e x t i n p u t s t a t e i s
t h e i n p u t s t a t e k. Thus, t h e r e c u r s i v e f u n c t i o n through s t a t e j of s t a g e n ,
= )0.
t h e cumulative c o s t upstream of t h e c u r r e n t connections ; and F ~ ( S ~
b a s i s f o r f u r t h e r comparison.
T h i s procedure i s r e p e a t e d u n t i l a l l t h e f e a s i b l e i n p u t s t a t e s
and t h e a s s o c i a t e d c o s t s f o r s t a t e j a r e s t o r e d f o r l a t e r use i n t h e
47
s t a t e j of t h e c u r r e n t s t a g e h a s been e s t a b l i s h e d , t h e n e x t o u t p u t s t a t e
T h i s a l g o r i t h m c o n t i n u e s downstream s t a g e by s t a g e u n t i l t h e DDDP
t o t a l system c o s t Fie No f u r t h e r i t e r a t i o n s w i t h t h i s s i z e of c o r r i d o r s
tolerance. A t t h i s p o i n t i n t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o c e d u r e , t h e v a l u e of A is
S
When t h e r a t i o i s e q u a l t o o r s m a l l e r t h a n a s p e c i f i e d v a l u e Er9 t h e i n c r e -
sewer system t r a j e c t o r i e s
s e l e c t i o n of t h e i n i t i a l v a l u e s of A can s i g n i f i c a n t l y improve t h e
S
e f f i c i e n c y of t h e DDDP.
i t e r a t i o n t o d e t e r m i n e t h e minimum c o s t crown e l e v a t i o n s s t a r t s a t t h e
downstream e l e v a t i o n of t h e l a s t s t a g e of t h e system t h a t g i v e s t h e l e a s t
3 i s n o t f i x e d b u t r e s t r i c t e d w i t h i n a c e r t a i n r a n g e of e l e v a t i o n s , which
N
d e f i n e s t h e s t a t e s p a c e boundary f o r t h e l a s t s t a g e . Consequently, o n l y
t h o s e e l e v a t i o n s of t h e l a s t s t a g e t h a t f a l l w i t h i n t h i s r a n g e a r e
c o n n e c t i o n h a v i n g a s p e c i f i e d e l e v a t i o n f o r i t s o u t p u t s t a t e and s e t t i n g t h e
c o s t f o r t h i s imaginary s t a g e e q u a l t o z e r o .
Because o f i d e n t i c a l e l e v a t i o n s a t t h e s e c u t s , t h e o u t p u t e l e v a t i o n s of t h e
A flow c h a r t showing t h e l o g i c f o r t h e n o n s e r i a l o p t i m i z a t i o n
There a r e s e v e r a l l i m i t a t i o n s f o r t h i s n o n s e r i a l o p t i m i z a t i o n
Consider s t a g e n on main
Perform DP computations f o r t h i s s t a g e
w i t h i n c o r r i d o r , see Fig. 4 . 2
Manhole s t a g e I
I Yes
V
To Fig. 4 . 3
S t o r i n g t h e i n f o r m a t i o n f o r t h e v a r i o u s l e v e l s o f b r a n c h i n g , c o n n e c t i o n s of
b r a n c h e s t o o t h e r b r a n c h e s o r t o t h e main, e t c . which a r e n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e
s u r f a c e e l e v a t i o n s , e l e v a t i o n s o f t h e t r a j e c t o r i e s , d e s i g n f l o w s , e t c . must
a l l b e s t o r e d i n r e f e r e n c e t o t h e i r l o c a t i o n s i n t h e system. These i n p u t
manhole s t a g e on t h e b r a n c h .
e x e c u t i o n time i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n c r e a s e d b e c a u s e o f t h e t i m e r e q u i r e d t o
r e t r i e v e information i n a r r a y s . A l l o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n e x c e p t t h a t needed
f o r t h e DDDP s t a g e c o n s i d e r e d i n t h e computation c o u l d b e s t o r e d on d i s c s
o r t a p e s ; however, t h i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n c r e a s e s computer t i m e .
The t h i r d l i m i t a t i o n is t h e d i f f i c u l t y i n programming. It i s
s y s t e m i s o p t i m i z e d o v e r a l s o r e s u l t s i n programming d i f f i c u l t i e s . Finally,
l i m i t a t i o n o f t h i s approach.
d e s c r i b e d below.
4.4. S e r i a l O p t i m i z a t i o n Approach
form s u i t a b l e f o r d i g i t a l m a n i p u l a t i o n i n t h e DDDP p r o c e d u r e .
used t h r o u g h o u t t h i s r e p o r t . An a r b i t r a r y s t a g e n i n c l u d e s a l l t h e p i p e s
let
system. T h i s c o n c e p t of s t a g e s i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 4.6 f o r a s i m p l e
s t r u c t e d s t a r t i n g a t t h e o u t l e t of t h e s y s t e m and p r o c e e d i n g u p s t r e a m , b u t
a r e numbered i n t h e r e v e r s e o r d e r , b e g i n n i n g a t t h e u p s t r e a m end of t h e
The l a y o u t d e s c r i p t i o n f o r t h e d i g i t a l m a n i p u l a t i o n i s accomplished
a r b i t r a r y s t a g e n i s d e f i n e d b y a v e c t o r of c o n n e c t i v i t y between manholes on
TNI
a t any s t a g e n can b e d e f i n e d a s i n c l u d i n g a l l c o n n e c t i o n s (Tm
n ymn+l
f o r mn 1 , 2 , . . . , M n a n d m n + l = 1 , 2 , . . . , Mn+l) , w h e r e M n a n d M n + l a r e t h e t o t a l
!
number of manholes on INL n and n + l , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
I
?
each manhole mn a l o n g INL n. The n o t a t i o n f o r t h e i n p u t s t a t e v e c t o r a t
manhole m on INL n i s Sm , i . e . , t h e t o t a l s t a t e v e c t o r f o r INL n h a s
n
I n
1 mn = 1 , 2 , ...,
M sets o f crown e l e v a t i o n s where M i s t h e number of manholes
n n
on INL n. For e a c h p o s s i b l e p i p e c o n s i d e r e d a t t h e s t a g e , t h e i n p u t states
L
I n o t h e r words, f o r t h e n o n s e r i a l approach t h e i n p u t s t a t e v e c t o r f o r s t a g e
i
n i s d e f i n e d by a s e t of crown e l e v a t i o n s a t t h e u p s t r e a m end of t h e p i p e ;
[ w h e r e a s , f o r t h e s e r i a l approach t h e i n p u t s t a t e v e c t o r c o n s i s t s of a s e t
1 represented f o r each s t a g e a s
t o the input s t a t e s .
It should be p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e o u t p u t s t a t e v e c t o r f o r a down-
a manhole on t h e downstream i s o n o d a l l i n e .
each p i p e c o n n e c t i o n i n t h e s t a g e . The p i p e d i a m e t e r s a l s o i n v o l v e a
r a t e i s a f u n c t i o n of t h e l a y o u t , s l o p e , and p i p e d i a m e t e r .
The t o t a l d e c i s i o n v e c t o r r e p r e s e n t s a l l p o s s i b l e d r o p s i n crown e l e v a t i o n s
from a l l of t h e M manholes on INL n t o t h e Mn+l manholes o n INL n+l s o t h a t
n
the t o t a l vector is D
rn
. I n m a t r i x form t h e t o t a l v e c t o r f o r each s t a g e
n 'mn+l
n can b e r e p r e s e n t e d a s
s p e c i f i c a l l y , i n t h e s e r i a l approach f o r a p o s s i b l e p i p e c o n n e c t i o n between
h o l e s r e p r e s e n t a connection. I f t h e r e i s no connection ( i . e . ,
T = 01,
m,mn+l
t h e n t h e n e x t upstream manhole m +1 i s c o n s i d e r e d f o r t h e downstream manhole
n
m Also, i f t h e r e i s no connection and t h i s i s t h e l a s t upstream manhole
n+l '
(m = M ) , t h e n t h e n e x t downstream manhole m
n n n+l
+ 1 and t h e f i r s t upstream
(i.e., T = 1) a t stage n is
m
n smn+l
- ) = Min [ r , D ) + F (S 11 (4.8)
n' "rn m "-1 mn-l,mn
nsmn+l D
mn smn+l
mnsmn+l (Smn'mn+l nymn+l
a l l t h e connections can b e r e p r e s e n t e d a s
F,(;~) = in 1 in [ 1:m , Dm )
n m n + ~(Smn mn+l n~ ~ n + l
Im D
m
n 'mn+l
I
t o t h e crown e l e v a t i o n on t h e downstream s i d e ( f e a s i b l e s t a t e s ) . A s e t of
j u n c t i o n of p i p e s .
_ _ _ _ - - - - -
Downstream s t a t e s which
a r e upstream s t a t e s f o r
n e x t DDDP s t a g e .
Downstream s t a t e s o f
p i p e connected t o
u p s t r e a m man
Manhole m
n+l
F i g . 4.9. C o n n e c t i v i t y o f S t a t e s a t Manhole J u n c t i o n s f o r S e r i a l
Approach
procedure i s r e p e a t e d f o r each o f t h e s t a t e s on t h e downstream s i d e of t h e
t h e succeeding s t a g e .
w i t h each of t h e f e a s i b l e o u t p u t s t a t e s of t h e l a s t s t a g e a r e e s t a b l i s h e d ,
T
m
, i s checked t o s e e i f t h e s e two manholes r e p r e s e n t a connection of
n 'mn+l
t h e system l a y o u t . I f t h e s e manholes do n o t r e p r e s e n t a c o n n e c t i o n of
T h i s procedure i s r e p e a t e d f o r each c o n n e c t i o n of t h e l a y o u t a t t h e
used a s t h e t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y f o r t h e n e x t i t e r a t i o n of t h e a l g o r i t h m .
A s d i s c u s s e d i n S e c t i o n 4.3, t h e r e a r e s e v e r a l major l i m i t a t i o n s
t h e m a t r i x of c o n n e c t i v i t y T
m
, which i s a s i m p l e r and more g e n e r a l
n~ ~ n + l
method of s t o r i n g t h e r e q u i r e d i n ormation than i s employed i n t h e non-
A f u r t h e r advantage i s t h e e a s e of d e f i n i n g t h e system f o r t h e
branching a r e considered.
Chapter 5. CONSIDERATIONS OF RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
h y d r a u l i c u n c e r t a i n t i e s , u n c e r t a i n t i e s due t o c o n s t r u c t i o n and m a t e r i a l s ,
t o i n c o r p o r a t e t h e e f f e c t of u n c e r t a i n t i e s t o sewer design.
i n which
By u s i n g t h e f i r s t o r d e r approximation of t h e ~ a ~ l o r s' es r i e s expansion (Ang
and
-
i n which 5C, QL and "c, "L a r e t h e mean v a l u e s and c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n
t h e q u a n t i t y w i t h i n t h e p a r e n t h e s i s i s e v a l u a t e d a t t h e mean v a l u e s of t h e
Z t o b e normally d i s t r i b u t e d , t h e r i s k i s
1
. (GL/CC)
Risk = $[-2
2 1/21
('QL + "c)
sewer i s i n c a p a b l e of conveying t h e e n t i r e s t o r m r u n o f f , r e s u l t i n g i n p r o p e r t y
t i o n of f a i l u r e a s g i v e n i n E q . 5 . 1 e s s e n t i a l l y f o l l o w s t h e concept of t h e
p r o p e r t y damage t y p e f a i l u r e . It i s most u n l i k e l y t h a t a c a t a s t r o p h i c t y p e
n e c e s s a r y , t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of c a t a s t r o p h i c t y p e f a i l u r e c a n a l s o b e s i m i l a r l y
e v a l u a t e d through a n a p p r o p r i a t e m o d i f i c a t i o n of Q i n E q . 5.1.
C
5.1.2. A n a l y s i s of Component U n c e r t a i n t i e s
Q i s p r e d i c t e d by a m a t h e m a t i c a l model G which is a f u n c t i o n o f v a r i a b l e s
x
1
to x
j
. To a c c o u n t f o r any e r r o r i n t h e p r e d i c t i o n as a r e s u l t of t h e
v a r i a t i o n 52 i s i n t r o d u c e d , such t h a t Q i s e x p r e s s e d as
X
Q = XG(xl,x2 ,....xJ. )
By a p p l y i n g t h e f i r s t o r d e r approximation f o r Q ,
and
i n which r
ij
i s t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of c o r r e l a t i o n between x
i
and x
j
.
Assuming
be defined as
of t h e d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e Q and sewer c a p a c i t y Q
L C depends on t h e formulas used
t o compute Q and Q To i n t r o d u c e t h e methodology and f o r t h e s a k e of
L C*
b r e v i t y and c l a r i t y , t h e Manning formula i s a d o p t e d t o e v a l u a t e t h e sewer
c a p a c i t y , and t h e r a t i o n a l method i s a d o p t e d t o e v a l u a t e t h e d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e .
The r e a d e r s h o u l d n o t i n t e r p r e t t h i s a d o p t i o n as an endorsement of t h e r a t i o n a l
formula.
5.2.1. U n c e r t a i n t i e s i n Design D i s c h a r g e
mentioned e a r l i e r , t h e r a t i o n a l f o r m u l a i s a d o p t e d as an example f o r t h e s a k e
of s i m p l i c i t y and c l a r i t y ; o t h e r methods c o u l d a l s o b e u s e d i f d e s i r e d .
I f t h e r a t i o n a l f o r m u l a , Q = CiA, i s u s e d , where C i s t h e r u n o f f
c o e f f i c i e n t , i i s t h e r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y and A i s t h e d r a i n a g e b a s i n a r e a ,
i n which i i s t h e r e f e r e n c e r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y c o n v e n t i o n a l l y used t o
0
compute t h e d i s c h a r g e f o r t h e d e s i g n r e t u r n p e r i o d . The b a r r e p r e s e n t s ,
a s b e f o r e , t h e mean v a l u e of t h e v a r i a b l e .
The v a l u e of i n Eq. 5.7, which i s t h e e x p e c t e d v a l u e of t h e
L
maximum d i s c h a r g e d u r i n g t h e T y e a r e x p e c t e d s e r v i c e l i f e of t h e sewer, can
a l s o b e e s t i m a t e d u s i n g t h e r a t i o n a l formula. However, s i n c e t h e r a t i o n a l
ob t a i n s
T yr.
i n which
and
QC'
am, ", " "
Xm a c c o u n t s f o r t h e approximation a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e Manning f o r m u l a ,
and a r e t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s of v a r i a t i o n of Q
c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r , s l o p e , d i a m e t e r and r o u g h n e s s , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
cY
t h e model
5.3. P r o c e d u r e t o E s t a b l i s h Risk-Safety F a c t o r R e l a t i o n s h i p
The b a s i c p r o c e d u r e t o e s t a b l i s h t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s f o r
For t h e d r a i n h g e b a s i n o r l o c a t i o n where t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r r e -
l a t i o n s h i p s are t o b e es t a b l i s h e d , t h e s u g g e s t e d p r o c e d u r e i s as f o l l o w s .
(a) S e l e c t t h e a p p r o p r i a t e models t o compute t h e sewer c a p a c i t y
and d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e .
(b) Perform an a n a l y s i s of u n c e r t a i n t i e s on t h e r a i n f a l l i n -
tensity. T h i s i n v o l v e s a s s e s s m e n t of u n c e r t a i n t i e s due
t o r e t u r n p e r i o d , d u r a t i o n , l i m i t e d r a i n f a l l r e c o r d and
r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y f o r t h e e v a l u a t i o n of Q i n Eq. 5.13
0
and a mean i n t e n s i t y , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of
v a r i a t i o n f o r t h e e s t i m a t i o n of and fi Alternatively,
L QL
75
i f i n p u t i s t h e sewer i n f l o w hydrograph, perform an
a n a l y s i s o f u n c e r t a i n t i e s on t h e hydrograph.
(c) Perform an a n a l y s i s of u n c e r t a i n t i e s f o r t h e d e s i g n
discharge. T h i s i n v o l v e s an assessment o f f a c t o r s , i n
t h i s s t e p i n v o l v e s t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e mean and c o e f f i -
c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n f o r each of t h e component f a c t o r s a f f e c -
r e t u r n p e r i o d which i s s e l e c t e d a s e q u a l t o t h e expected
s e r v i c e l i f e o f t h e sewer.
perform an a n a l y s i s o f u n c e r t a i n t i e s f o r t h e sewer c a p a c i t y .
This i n v o l v e s an a n a l y s i s of t h e u n c e r t a i n t i e s i n t h e p i p e
s i z e , roughness, s t r a i g h t n e s s , c o n s t r u c t i o n r e l i a b i l i t y such
and c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n f o r t h e f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g t h e
and 5.20) f o r t h e p i p e s i z e c o n s i d e r e d .
curve.
(h) Repeat s t e p s ( d ) t o ( f ) f o r a d i f f e r e n t p i p e s i z e . This
w i l l g i v e a n o t h e r p o i n t on t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r curve.
Repeating t h i s p r o c e d u r e f o r o t h e r p i p e s i z e s w i l l g i v e
a d d i t i o n a l p o i n t s t o p l o t t h e curve f o r t h e s e l e c t e d
r a i n f a l l d u r a t i o n and d e s i g n p e r i o d .
(i) Repeat s t e p s ( c ) t o ( h ) f o r d i f f e r e n t r a i n f a l l d u r a t i o n s
h a v i n g t h e same d e s i g n p e r i o d . The r e s u l t s w i l l g i v e c u r v e s
t h e e f f e c t of r a i n f a l l d u r a t i o n i s u s u a l l y s m a l l and t h e
p o i n t s h a v i n g d i f f e r e n t d u r a t i o n s b u t t h e same d e s i k n p e r i o d
can b e r e p r e s e n t e d by a s i n g l e curve.
(j) Repeat s t e p s ( c ) t o ( i ) f o r d i f f e r e n t d e s i g n p e r i o d s , t h e
r e s u l t s w i l l complete t h e s e t of r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r curves
f o r d i f f e r e n t expected sewer s e r v i c e l i f e p e r i o d s .
I n view of t h e amount of r e p e t i t i v e c c m p u t a t i o n s i n v o l v e d t o e s t a b -
a r e b e s t done on a d i g i t a l computer.
To i l l u s t r a t e t h e c o m p u t a t i o n a l d e t a i l s i n t h e p r o c e s s of d e v e l -
o p i n g t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s , a d r a i n a g e b a s i n of 1 0 a c i n s i z e l o -
formula.
5.4.1. A n a l y s i s of U n c e r t a i n t i e s i n R a i n f a l l I n t e n s i t y
The u n c e r t a i n t y i n r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y v a r i e s w i t h t h e d e s i g n
t i o n 5 . 2 1 r e p r e s e n t s t h e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e a n n u a l maximum
point r a i n f a l l intensity, i
a
. A t Urbana, b a s e d on t h e d a t a from H e r s h f i e l d
and t h e r e f o r e t h e r e i s an u n c e r t a i n t y i n i t s s p e c i f i c a t i o n due t o a f i n i t e
l e n g t h of r e c o r d . S i n c e t h e r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y whose d i s t r i b u t i o n i s b e i n g
c o n s i d e r e d c o n s i s t s of t h e l a r g e s t v a l u e s of t h e r e c d r d w h e t h e r t h e a n n u a l
maximum s e r i e s o r a n n u a l exceedance s e r i e s i s u s e d , i t i s r e a s o n a b l e t o
yields
The c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n of i ( a c c o u n t i n g o n l y f o r t h e e f f e c t of d e s i g n
T
p e r i o d T) i s 6
iT
= har(iT)/ qe Heaney (1971) showed t h a t V a r ( i T ) P- Var(i).
Therefore,
c o n c e n t r a t i o n assumption i s d i s c o u n t e d , t h e r e s t i l l e x i s t s a p r e d i c t i o n
by Eq. 5.21,
-
The e f f e c t of e r r o r i n d u r a t i o n t on t h e r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y iTcan be
d
o b t a i n e d through f i r s t o r d e r a n a l y s i s on and t h e n a d j u s t e d by a f a c t o r
a
- -
i / i y i e l d i n g t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n ,
a T 6id, as
i n which 6 i s t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n . o f t h e d u r a t i o n . For t h e
d
Urbana bas i n ,
t h e average r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y t e n d s t o d e c r e a s e w i t h i n c r e a s i n g s i z e of
of y e a r s of r a i n f a l l r e c o r d a v a i l a b l e t o e s t a b l i s h t h e v a l u e s i n t h e A t l a s
( H e r s h f i e l d , 1963), s t a t i s t i c a l u n c e r t a i n t i e s e x i s t i n t h e e s t i m a t i o n
of i
a
i s approximately e q u a l t o 6
ia
/& where N i s t h e number of y e a r s of
r e c o r d and 6
ia
i s t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n of i
a
. The corresponding
Interpolation - A v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n f o r t h e example i s i n a d e q u a t e f o r a
d e t a i l e d p r o b a b i l i s t i c a n a l y s i s of t h e u n c e r t a i n t i e s due t o t h e s e e r r o r s .
Hence, t h e g r o s s u n c e r t a i n t y i n t h i s group i s s u b j e c t i v e l y e s t i m a t e d t o b e
6 = 0.054.
ie
c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n
Besides t h e r a i n f a l l i n t e n s i t y , t h e r e a r e o t h e r f a c t o r s c o n t r i b u t i n g
r a t i o n a l f o r m u l a i s computed from
c o n s i d e r t h a t t h e r e i s no u n c e r t a i n t y i n C so that a i s t h e o n l y con-
j j
tributor. T h i s a p p r o a c h i s h i g h l y i m p r a c t i c a l s i n c e C i s d i f f i c u l t t o de-
t e r m i n e p r e c i s e l y and e v e n f o r a p a r t i c u l a r l o c a t i o n C depends on r a i n f a l l
i n t e n s i t y and t i m e . A l s o , f o r a g i v e n l o c a t i o n t h e v a l u e of C changes w i t h
s e a s o n a l v a r i a t i o n a n d a l t e r n a t i o n of l a n d u s e . The t h i r d way i s t o a l l o w
f o r u n c e r t a i n t i e s i n b o t h C , and a
J j
. T h i s i s p e r h a p s t h e most common
approach as i n p r a c t i c e a d r a i n a g e b a s i n i s o f t e n s u b d i v i d e d i n t o c e r t a i n
p r e c i s e l y , t h e p e r c e n t a g e s o f areas f o r r o o f s a n d b u i l d i n g s , r o a d s , d r i v e w a y s ,
of area and C u s e d f o r e a c h c a t e g o r y . As t h e t h i r d a p p r o a c h i s s u i t a b l e
a p p l y i n g a f i r s t - o r d e r a n a l y s i s t o E q . 5.32,
TABLE 5.1. Component E r r o r s f o r Runoff C o e f f i c i e n t s
Driveways and
Surf a c e sidewalks Roofs Streets
Range of C
* 0.75-0.85 0.75-0.95 0.70-0.95
j
i/
V a r i a b i l i t y of C
j
Prediction error
.
////In terms o f c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n , assume C v a r i e s uniformly
w i t h i n t h e middle t h i r d of t h e r a n g e , s e e ~ ~ ~ e a Cd fi oxr formulas
2
**s2Cj = (variability) + (prediction error)
Although t h e a ' s a r e somewhat dependent because they s h o u l d add up t o u n i t y ,
j
s t a t i s t i c a l independence among a l l C . ' s and a 's a r e assumed h e r e f o r s i m -
J j
p l i c i t y . B e s i d e s , t h e e f f e c t of dependence among a ' s w i l l diminish a s .j
j
becomes l a r g e . Suppose t h e d r a i n a g e b a s i n c o n s i d e r e d i s a h i g h l y developed
c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n of X C, i , and A c a l c u l a t e d a s d e s c r i b e d above,
LJ
t h e t o t a l u n c e r t a i n t y i n t h e d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e , i2 can b e computed u s i n g
QL'
Eq. 5.16. Correspondingly, and Q can b e computed u s i n g Eq. 5.15 and
L 0
-
Eq. 5.14. The computed v a l u e s of Q QL and i2 a r e 26.0 c f s , 28.1 c f s
0 , QL
and 0.281, r e s p e c t i v e l y , f o r t h e 10-ac Urbana b a s i n f o r 10-yr d e s i g n p e r i o d
and 30 min d u r a t i o n .
S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s a r e used t o g e t h e r w i t h r e a l i s t i c a l l y s p e c i f i e d i n i t i a l ,
ponding c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n fi = 0.0553.
n
u s i n g t h e formula g i v e n i n Appendix C,
Od
= 0.578 ( 6 1 - 59)/(61 + 59)
n o t uncommon f o r f l a t l a n d a s i n c e n t r a l I l l i n o i s . Assuming an e r r o r of
am = 0'11.
!
I 5.4.3.5. T o t a l U n c e r t a i n t y i n Sewer Capacity - With t h e v a l u e s of mean and
c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n f o r X S , d, and n e v a l u a t e d f o r a 5 - f t d i a m e t e r
m'
c o n c r e t e p i p e i n Urbana, t h e sewer c a p a c i t y and t h e a s s o c i a t e d t o t a l un-
1 p e r i o d and f o r a 5 - f t d i a m e t e r c o n c r e t e sewer p i p e ,
Eq. 5.13. T h i s p a i r of v a l u e s c o n s t i t u t e s p o i n t A on t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r
To o b t a i n o t h e r p o i n t s f o r t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s , t h e above
p r o c e d u r e i s f i r s t r e p e a t e d f o r d i f f e r e n t p i p e s i z e s , keeping o t h e r condi-
t h e e f f e c t of d u r a t i o n a p p e a r s t o b e s m a l l , t h e risk-SF r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r a
solid line.
Coef. of n2 2 2
+ "c)
Parameter M e an Variation
2 2
Coef. of an2 /n2 an + "c)2
Parame t e r Me an Variation
w
I-'.
OQ
P
I-'.
V1
7;
I
cn
P,
t-h
n,
rt
CC
I-'
0
I
'4
H
I-'
C'
P
I-'.
I/)
-
Safety Factor = Qc/Q,
Y
P,
0
t-t
0
Y
i?
I-'
P,
=r.
P,
t-t
H
I-'
I-'
P
P.
m
i s s u g g e s t e d t h a t t h e r e p e t i t i v e computations i n v o l v e d b e b e s t done on
a d i g i t a l computer.
c o n t r o l f a c t o r i s t h e l e v e l of p r o t e c t i o n s o u g h t e x p r e s s e d as chance of
p o i n t i s b e s t i l l u s t r a t e d by an example.
Suppose t h e s i z e of t h e s e w e r i s t o b e d e t e r m i n e d f o r t h e Urbana
b a s i n a l l o w i n g a r i s k of f a i l u r e of 2% f o r t h e 10-yr e x p e c t e d p e r i o d of
is 1.9. To d e t e r m i n e Q from t h e r a t i o n a l f o r m u l a as i s c o n v e n t i o n a l l y
0
e q u a l t o t h e t i m e of c o n c e n t r a t i o n . V a r i o u s f o r m u l a s and g r a p h s h a v e b e e n
p r o p o s e d t o estimate t h e t i m e of c o n c e n t r a t i o n and a l l h a v e s e v e r e l i m i t a -
e v a l u a t e d as
Accordingly, <
C
= SF x Qo = 1.9 x 29.9 = 56.9 cfs. The d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e
i s adopted.
expected l i f e , t h e r i s k i s h i g h e r than t h a t of 2% of t h e o r i g i n a l d e s i g n ,
(SF), ( Q C / ~ o ) a- qob
-=
(SF)b (QC /qolb Qoa
50-yr period.
Chapter 6. HYDRAULIC CONSIDERATIONS
P r e c i s e m a t h e m a t i c a l s i m u l a t i o n of s u c h u n s t e a d y f l o w s i n a network i s
6.1. Theore t i c a l C o n s i d e r a t i o n s
Unsteady g r a v i t y f l o w s i n sewers c a n b e r e p r e s e n t e d m a t h e m a t i c a l l y
by a p a i r o f q u a s i - l i n e a r h y p e r b o l i c p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n s c a l l e d
t h e S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s :
i n which Q is. t h e d i s c h a r g e ; t i s t i m e ; x i s t h e d i s t a n c e a l o n g t h e s e w e r ;
n o r m a l t o x ) of t h e f l o w , r e s p e c t i v e l y ; 8 i s t h e a n g l e between t h e sewer
as t h e y a p p e a r , t h e S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s a r e n o t e x a c t b u t p r o v i d e a good
s t r e a m c o n d i t i o n i s unknown s i n c e i t depends on t h e f l o w c o n d i t i o n s i n t h e
s p e c i f i c application. A g e n e r a l d i s c u s s i o n of t h e s e approximations i s
p r e s e n t e d , followed by a d e t a i l e d p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e r o u t i n g a n a l y s i s
S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s .
6.2. Routing Methods
The S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s d e s c r i b e m a t h e m a t i c a l l y t h e p r o p a g a t i o n
Because of t h e d i f f i c u l t i e s i n s o l v i n g t h e S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s v a r i o u s
Diffusion-Wave Approximation
Dynamic-Wave Model
,
6.2.1. Steady Flow Approximations
b e used w i t h i n p u t s c o n s i s t i n g of e i t h e r i n l e t c a t c h b a s i n hydrographs o r
a r e simply added t o g e t h e r g i v i n g no c o n s i d e r a t i o n t o t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n
A c o n s i d e r a b l e improvement on t h e above v e r s i o n i s t o c o n s i d e r
graph w i t h o u t any d i s t o r t i o n by
just-full g r a v i t y p i p e flow
o r t h e Darcy-Weisbach f o r m u l a (Eq. 5 . 1 7 ) , o r b y
i n which Q i s t h e peak d i s c h a r g e .
Use of Eq. 6 . 6 i s p r e f e r r e d b e c a u s e i t
P
g i v e s a smaller v a l u e of V and h e n c e i s c l o s e r t o t h e a v e r a g e v e l o c i t y t h a n
t o t h e manhole d i r e c t i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h u s i n g a common t i m e s c a l e a c c o r d i n g
h y d r o g r a p h s o f two i n f l o w i n g s e w e r s t o produce t h e i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h f o r
i n s i g n i f i c a n t s t o r a g e capacity is i l l u s t r a t e d f o r s i m p l i c i t y . Since t h e
g r a p h s h i f t i n g as w e l l as t h e n o t i m e l a g v e r s i o n o f t h e s t e a d y f l o w method
t h e e f f e c t of s e w e r s t o r a g e i s c o m p l e t e l y i g n o r e d .
Time, rnin
Outflow h y d r o g r a p h s of s e w e r s
Time, min
I n f l o w hydrograph f o r sewer 3
B a s i c a l l y , t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave r o u t i n g method u t i l i z e s
o r t h e Darcy-Weisbach formula
s o l u t i o n of t h e p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n . This s i m p l i f i c a t i o n permits
backwater e f f e c t f o r s u b c r i t i c a l flows.
Even w i t h o u t s e r i o u s b a c k w a t e r e f f e c t s , t h e a c c u r a c y and a p p l i c -
a b i l i t y o f t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave a p p r o x i m a t i o n depends on t h e
s o l u t i o n schemes h a v e b e e n proposed t o s o l v e t h e h y p e r b o l i c p a r t i a l
c e n t r a l , i m p l i c i t scheme a r e s u p e r i o r t o o t h e r f i n i t e d i f f e r e n c e schemes i n
s o l v i n g u n s t e a d y open c h a n n e l f l o w problems i n c l u d i n g f l o w i n s e w e r s .
F r e a d (1974) a l s o s u g g e s t s t h e u s e o f t h e f o u r - p o i n t n o n c e n t r a l i m p l i c i t
r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n t h e c o m p u t a t i o n s r e s u l t i n g i n s a v i n g s i n computer time.
T h e o r e t i c a l l y , t h e r e i s no wave a t t e n u a t i o n f o r n o n l i n e a r k i n e -
m a t i c models b e c a u s e t h e a t t e n u a t i o n mechanism i s e l i m i n a t e d by n e g l e c t i n g
some t y p e of f i n i t e d i f f e r e n c e s o l u t i o n scheme i s u s e d , n u m e r i c a l e r r o r s
a p p a r e n t a t t e n u a t i o n whereas a f i n e r g r i d r e d u c e s t h e n u m e r i c a l e r r o r and
hence t h e a t t e n u a t i o n e f f e c t .
S e v e r a l v a r i a t i o n s o f t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave r o u t i n g
a t r a d i t i o n a l l i n e a r h y d r o l o g i c s t o r a g e r o u t i n g method i s u s e d i n c h a n n e l
x = ( i + l ) A x and t = ( j + l ) A t as
i n which
modified d i f f u s i o n e q u a t i o n i f
and
of a p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n , p e r m i t t i n g t h e e n t i r e hydrograph t o be
o b t a i n e d a t s u c c e s s i v e c r o s s s e c t i o n s i n s t e a d of s o l v i n g f o r t h e flow o v e r
similar d e s i g n s w i t h l e s s computer r e q u i r e m e n t s t h a n t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c
I n t h e n o t i m e l a g v e r s i o n of t h e s t e a d y f l o w method t h e peak d i s -
are s i m p l y added t o g i v e t h e d e s i g n d i s c h a r g e f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g s e w e r s .
A s d i s c u s s e d i n S e c t i o n 6.2.1, t h i s method i s t h e s i m p l e s t b u t t h e l e a s t
t h i s method i s i n c l u d e d i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y b e c a u s e of i t s s i - m p l i c i t y and
b e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n of sewer s y s t e m s .
6.3.2. Hydrograph Time Lag Method
sewer i s s h i f t e d w i t h o u t d i s t o r t i o n by t h e sewer f l o w t i m e t e s t i m a t e d by
f
Eq. 6.4 t o produce t h e sewer o u t f l o w hydrograph. The sewer f l o w v e l o c i t y i s
t h e i n f l o w hydrograph.
T h e o r e t i c a l l y , s h i f t i n g of h y d r o g r a p h s a c c o u n t s f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y
b e c a u s e a c o n s t a n t t i m e i n c r e m e n t i s used i n t h e n u m e r i c a l s p e c i f i c a t i o n s
A t , a n u m e r i c a l a t t e n u a t i o n may b e i n t r o d u c e d .
and
i
i s t h e c o n t i n u i t y r e l a t i o n s h i p , , Eq. 3.9.
E q u a t i o n s 6 . 1 and 6.16 a r e s o l v e d n u m e r i c a l l y u s i n g a f o u r - p o i n t ,
i n t h e downstream d i r e c t i o n . W i t h i n e a c h sewer t h e f l o w f o r t h e e n t i r e
step. Noting t h a t
Eq. 6 . 1 c a n b e r e w r i t t e n as
For p a r t i a l l y f i l l e d c i r c u l a r p i p e s ,
and using Manning's formula (Eq. 6.16)
- -0.196 s l / 2 d 5 / 3 ( 1 s i n a 213 [ 5
- 1 sin@
2 +
- @
n o @ )
sin - - (7 - 111 (6.21)
sin -
2
and
f o u r - p o i n t forward d i f f e r e n c e e q u a t i o h
This e q u a t i o n i s n o n l i n e a r o n l y w i t h . r e s p e c t t o t h e unknown flow d e p t h
i t e r a t i o n method.
6.13) i n s t e a d of a p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l ( o r f i n i t e d i f f e r e n c e ) e q u a t i o n .
u s i n g Eq. 6 . 1 1 w i t h t h e c e l e r i t y c e v a l u a t e d by
c = -aQ (6.28a)
aA
o r f o r a p a r t i a l l y f i l l e d p i p e u s i n g Manning's formula
sin @
I--
c = - 0.196 s1/2 d 2 / 3 ( 1 - s i n Q,
n o
-
Q, - 1 - cos@ Q, I
t h e c o n t i n u i t y r e l a t i o n s h i p , Eq. 3.9.
s o l u t i o n i s o b t a i n e d o v e r t h e e n t i r e time p e r i o d a t a flow c r o s s s e c t i o n
I n s o l v i n g f o r t h e hydrograph a t a c r o s s s e c t i o n of a s e w e r , t h e computa-
h a s been s t o r e d a t e v e r y A t t i m e i n c r e m e n t , i s now p a r a b o l i c a l l y i n t e r p o l a t e d
2
t o every A t and s t o r e d f o r f u t u r e comput-at-fons. Tn u s i n g Eq. 6.13 t o
1
compute t h e d i s c h a r g e: : :Q f o r c r o s s s e c t i o n ( i + l ) Ax a t s p e c i f i e d time tj+l,
graph w i t h d i s c h a r g e v a l u e s a t A t a p a r t are t h e n p a r a b o l i c a l l y i n t e r p o l a t e d
1
t o y i e l d values at A t a p a r t and s t o r e d . Obviously, t h e computational
2
j+l
a c c u r a c y c a n b e improved i f a i s computed as t h e a v e r a g e v a l u e s of a' a
i i
and a' i n s t e a d of merely t h e l a s t . However, s u c h a v e r a g i n g would con-
i+l
s i d e r a b l y i n c r e a s e t h e computation t i m e and i s n o t a d o p t e d a t t h e p r e s e n t
s t a g e f o r t h i s stbdy.
C h a p t e r 7. DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN MODELS
I n p2evious c h a p t e r s d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n s have b e e n g i v e n of t h e
o p t i m i z a t i o n t e c h n i q u e , t h e r i s k and u n c e r t a i n t y c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , and t h e
v a r i o u s h y d r a u l i c models. The p u r p o s e of t h i s c h a p t e r i s t o b r i n g t o g e t h e r
t h e s e c o n c e p t s t o d e v e l o p t h e v a r i o u s l e a s t - c o s t sewer s y s t e m d e s i g n models
f o u n d a t i o n f o r e a c h of t h e s e d e s i g n models i n c o r p o r a t i n g v a r i o u s t y p e s of
p r e s e n t s e a c h of t h e s e models and d i s c u s s e s t h e i n t e r a c t i o n of t h e o p t i m i z a -
i n C h a p t e r 8.
Routing Risk
Model Procedure Analysis
Designation Used Incorporated
A None No
B-3 Muskingum-Cunge No
C None Yes
7.1.1. Model A - No R o u t i n g
110
u s i n g ~ a n n i n g ' s f o r m u l a f o r f u l l - p i p e f l o w (Eq. 3.1) t o s e l e c t t h e smallest
commercial p i p e d i a m e t e r s a t i s f y i n g t h e c o n s t r a i n t s on f l o w , v e l o c i t y , and
p r e c e d i n g ( i m m e d i a t e l y upstream) sewer d i a m e t e r s , e t c . ( g i v e n i n C h a p t e r 2 ) .
d i v i d e d by t h e p i p e l e n g t h , i . e . , f o r t h e c o n n e c t i o n of manholes mn and m
n+l
t h e s l o p e , So, i s
n e c t i n g u p s t r e a m s e w e r s p l u s t h e d i r e c t i n f l o w f o r t h e manhole m a t t h e
n
u p s t r e a m e n d of t h e sewer b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d .
The i n p u t p a r a m e t e r s f o r o p t i m i z a t i o n c o n s i s t of t h e i n i t i a l t r i a l
t r a j e c t o r y , t h e number of l a t t i c e p d i n t s N and t h e i n i t i a l s t a t e i n c r e m e n t
P
As t o s e t up t h e i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r , t h e r e d u c t i o n rate o f As f o r s u c c e s s i v e
i t e r a t i o n s , and t h e a c c e p t a b l e e r r o r f o r t h e t o t a l s y s t e m c o s t which
.
d e t e r m i n e s t h e minimum a l l o w a b l e s t a t e s p a c e i n c r e m e n t As . S e l e c t i o n of
min
t h e s e i n p u t p a r a m e t e r s w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d i n d e t a i l i n C h a p t e r 8. The i n p u t
f o r t h e h y d r a u l i c s component i n c l u d e s ~ a n n i n g ' sr o u g h n e s s f a c t o r n , a l l o w a b l e
gram i s l i s t e d i n Appendix D.
e x p l a i n e d below.
The DDDP c o m p u t a t i o n s o f t h e s e r i a l a p p r o a c h a t e a c h s t a g e of t h e
a few m o d i f i c a t i o n s f o r e a c h r o u t i n g t e c h n i q u e . When a r o u t i n g p r o c e d u r e i s
i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n , t h e r e i s an i n p u t hydrograph a s s o c i a t e d
w i t h e a c h i n p u t s t a t e k ( u p s t r e a m crown e l e v a t i o n ) f o r e a c h p i p e c o n n e c t i o n
at a stage. For a s e w e r h a v i n g n o o t h e r p i p e s c o n n e c t e d t o i t s u p s t r e a m
manhole t h e i n f l o w hydrograph a s s o c i a t e d w i t h e a c h s t a t e a t t h e u p s t r e a m
l i s h e d f o r e a c h s t a t e a t a manhole m by a d d i n g t h e i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h s
n
a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e c o n n e c t i n g u p s t r e a m s t a t e a t t h e manhole ( i . e . , with t h e
u p s t r e a m manhole.
s t a t e s a r e t h e n used i n t h e DDDP c o m p u t a t i o n as t h e d e s i g n i n f l o w s . As
i n f l o w a s s o c i a t e d w i t h e a c h i n p u t s t a t e and s a t i s f i e s t h e d e s i g n c o n s t r a i n t s .
Q
manhole
Upstream crown e l e v a t i o n
(input s t a t e s k) a t
manhole f o r s t a g e n
----_
---
Kepresent c o n n e c t i o n
of s t a t e s a t manhole
Downs t ream
crown e l e v a t i o n s
f o r upstream
s t a g e n-1
I
Manhole m
n
I n f l o w hydrograph f o r each i n p u t s t a t e k t o s t a g e n
s t a t e t h a t h a s a c o n n e c t i o n t o t h e o u t p u t s t a t e j i s r o u t e d through t h e
s e r v e a s t h e r e s p e c t i v e i n f l o w hydrographs f o r t h e downstream c o n n e c t i n g p i p e
Appendix E.
I+Um ~ ' '%d
f OL
I
sqdel2olpLq urealasdn a ~ y ~ a a d s aaqa
l mo13
y aaeas anduy qsea 103 s m I j u y yead auylalaaaa
tI
G ~ = ' + ~ r n pue 1 ,
~ + pue
u
I
u s a u y ~Tepouosy
m
Lq pauyjap u a % e ~ lsa p y s u o
t
t h r e e hydrograph r o u t i n g t e c h n i q u e s u t i l i z e d i s h y d r o g r a p h t i m e l a g g i n g d i s -
t e c h n i q u e p r o v i d e s r a t h e r good r e s u l t s when a h i g h l e v e l of a c c u r a c y i s n o t
The r e q u i r e d i n p u t d a t a f o r Model B - 1 i n c l u d e s t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n
f u r t h e r d i s c u s s e d i n C h a p t e r 8.
t e c h n i q u e t h a t i s u s e d t o f o r m u l a t e d e s i g n Model B-2 i s t h e n o n l i n e a r
i n t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o c e d u r e t h e s e w e r p i p e s f o r t h e downstream s t a g e s h a v e
p o i n t n o n c e n t r a l i m p l i c i t f i n i t e - d i f f e r e n c e scheme d i s c u s s e d i n S e c t i o n 6 . 3 . 3
Compute v e l o c i t y assuming p i p e
I i s f l o w i n g f u l l f o r t h e peak I
inflow using Eq. 6.6
+
II Compute s h i f t i n g t i m e , t f , f o r
i n f l o w hydrograph (Eq. 6.4) 1
S h i f t t h e i n f l o w hydrograph by t h e
computed t i m e t
To F i g . 7.2
Compute i n i t i a l condi t i a n s
d e f i n e d by i n i t i a l b a s e f l o w -1
Advance t o n e x t time s t e p ,
t = t + A t I
$
From t h e i n f l o w hydrograph compute
flow c o n d i t i o n s a t upstream
boundary s t a t i o n
$.
Compute flow c o n d i t i o n s
a t i n t e r i o r s t a t i o n s and a t
downstream s t a t i o n
Consider n e x t
l a r g e r com-
mercial pipe
diameter
Ir
flow d e p t h computed
Yes
A
To Fig. 7.2
d.
The i n p u t s f o r t h i s d e s i g n model i n c l u d e i n a d d i t i o n t o t h o s e f o r
increment Ax
max
. For example, i f Axmax i s s e t a t 400 f t and t h e p i p e i s
difference grid.
t e c h n i q u e i s used i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n t e c h n i q u e t o formu-
e x c e p t t h a t a A t f o r t h e computational procedure i s n o t r e q u i r e d . As f o r
a b l e maximum l e n g t h of p i p e s e c t i o n , Ax t h a t i s t o b e used i n t h e r o u t i n g
max '
of flow through each p i p e . However t h e p i p e s e c t i o n s a r e t r e a t e d i n a
t o t h e n e x t downstream s e c t i o n of t h e p i p e . This p r o c e d u r e c o n t i n u e s i n a
$
I I
Compute d e p t h , h , of flow which s a t i s f i e s Manning's
1
j
formula f o r Qi+l a t p r e v i o u s time u s i n g ~ e w t o n ' s
I
i t e r a t i o n method and compute corresponding c e n t r a l
I I
I a n g l e , @; and w i d t h , B y of flow I
Compute t h e c e l e r i t y , c - aA
2
Solve f o r a = KQ/S~(AX)B
I -
Determine d i s c h a r g e s a t t h e ~ r e v i o u ss t a t i o n 1
j and QY1 by l i n e a r i n t e r p o l a t i o n
I
Solve f o:r : Q u s i n g Eq. 6.13
To F i g . 7.2
A d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e c o n c e p t s r e q u i r e d i n c o n s i d e r i n g r i s k s
a risk-based d e s i g n model a c c o u n t s f o r t h e c o s t i n t e r a c t i o n s o f t h e v a r i o u s
components of sewer systems i n o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n a t r a d e o f f between t h e
t h e hydrograph t i m e l a g r o u t i n g component t o a c c o u n t f o r t h e t i m e s h i f t i n g
i n S e c t i o n 7.2.3.
b i l i t y of o c c u r r e n c e of t h e s u r f a c e r u n o f f e x c e e d i n g t h e c a p a c i t y of a p i p e
s y s t e m d u r i n g t h e e x p e c t e d s e r v i c e l i f e of t h e p r o j e c t , i . e . t h e p r o b a b i l i t y
an o p t i m i z a t i o n t e c h n i q u e , t h e c o s t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h f a i l u r e o f t h e sewer
t o t a l c o s t minimized.
w i t h t h e a r e a d r a i n e d by a s p e c i f i c sewer i n t h e e v e n t t h a t i t s c a p a c i t y i s
c o n n e c t i n g manholes m and m
n n+l '
i n which (C )
F mn ,m n + l i s t h e a s s e s s e d damage v a l u e i n t h e e v e n t of P(QL > QC)
due t o i n s u f f i c i e n t c a p a c i t y of t h e s e w e r o f d i a m e t e r d. The a s s e s s e d damage
t u d e s of t h e f l o o d i n g a s w e l l a s t h e t i m e o f o c c u r r e n c e s of f l o o d i n g d u r i n g
i n g f l o o d damages i n a l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n model s o t h a t t h e e f f e c t of t h i s
which i s done i n C h a p t e r 8.
i n t h e d e s i g n model i s o n l y a f i r s t s t e p . A s e c o n d p h a s e of t h i s s t u d y , OWRT
p r o c e d u r e f o r i n c o r p o r a t i n g r i s k s i n t o t h e d e s i g n model.
The r i s k - b a s e d l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n model w i t h o u t r o u t i n g h a s b e e n
e s s e n t i a l l y t h a t shown i n F i g . 4 . 3 w i t h t h e DP c o m p u t a t i o n s shown i n F i g .
7.6. The major d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e DP c o m p u t a t i o n s w i t h and w i t h o u t t h e r i s k
n e n t , f o r e a c h d i a m e t e r c o n s i d e r e d f o r a f e a s i b l e s e t of s t a t e s t h e r e i s a n
i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t t o g e t h e r w i t h a c o r r e s p o n d i n g e x p e c t e d f l o o d damage c o s t .
I
I The d e c i s i o n v a r i a b l e s i n c l u d e t h e d r o p i n crown e l e v a t i o n a c r o s s
i
t h e p i p e and t h e d i a m e t e r o f t h e p i p e . 'For e a c h p o s s i b l e ( f e a s i b l e ) drop
i n crown e l e v a t i o n , a d i a m e t e r of t h e p i p e i s s e l e c t e d which p r o v i d e s t h e
minimum t o t a l e x p e c t e d c o s t f o r t h e p a r t i c u l a r d r o p b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d . In
g e n e r a l , t h e c o s t o f i n s t a l l i n g a s e w e r p i p e of a s p e c i f i e d m a t e r i a l depends
on t h e p i p e s i z e and d e p t h of e x c a v a t i o n , i . e . , i n terms o f t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n
c a p a c i t y of t h e p i p e o r t h e s l o p e and d i a m e t e r which i n t u r n i s r e l a t e d t o
r e c u r s i v e e q u a t i o n s (Eqs. 4 . 7 and 4 . 8 ) , is
I A f l o w c h a r t showing t h e r i s k c o m p u t a t i o n s t o d e t e r m i n e t h e d i a m e t e r f o r
+
Store cumulative expected cost, installation cost, damage cost
I sewer diameter, and k for state j I
Yes
Yes
To Fig. 4.8
124
u s i n g Eq. 6.5 and checked t o s e e t h a t i t s a t i s f i e s t h e v e l o c i t y c o n s t r a i n t s .
I f t h e minimum v e l o c i t y c o n s t r a i n t i s n o t s a t i s f i e d t h i s i s t h e l a s t
d i a m e t e r c o n s i d e r e d f o r t h i s p i p e e l e v a t i o n drop. C o n t r a r i l y , i f t h e maxi-
mum v e l o c i t y c o n s t r a i n t i s n o t s a t i s f i e d t h e n e x t l a r g e r commercial p i p e
A c c o r d i n g l y t h e r i s k i s d e t e r m i n e d from t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s
c o n s i d e r i n g s u c c e s s i v e l y l a r g e r d i a m e t e r s t h a t s a t i s f y t h e c o n s t r a i n t s on
f l o w , v e l o c i t y , and p r e c e d i n g (upstream) d i a m e t e r s u n t i l t h e s a f e t y f a c t o r
i s g r e a t e r t h a n 6* o r t h e l a r g e s t commercially p i p e s i z e c o n s i d e r e d . The
c o m p u t a t i o n a l p r o c e d u r e t h e n r e t u r n s t o t h e DP computations ( F i g . 7.6)
once a d i a m e t e r i s s e l e c t e d .
d e s i g n f o r a n a c c e p t a b l e maximum r i s k l e v e l , i . e . , e a c h sewer p i p e f o r a
ground s u r f a c e e l e v a t i o n s , d e s i g n i n f l o w s f o r e a c h manhole, p i p e l e n g t h s ,
*A s a f e t y f a c t o r of 6 h a s b e e n a r b i t r a r i l y s e l e c t e d b e c a u s e t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n
c o s t f o r t h e p i p e would b e s o h i g h t h a t t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g d i a m e t e r would
n e v e r r e s u l t i n t h e minimum t o t a l e x p e c t e d c o s t .
S e t pipe cost
-
I Compute
- From F i g . 7.6
S e l e c t commercial p i p e d i a m e t e r s a t -
i s f y i n g upstream d i a m e t e r c o n s t r a i n t
6,
and v e l o c i t y using1
Manning's f o r m u l a , Eq. 3.1 u i t h qC
c Computc s a f e t y f a c t o r , SF ijC/~O
I
Consider n c x t l a r g e r
commercial d i a m e t e r
+
Compute i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t of p i p e i n c l u d i n g u p s t r e a m
manhole m f o r s t a t e k
I
I
I D e t e m i n e r i s k from r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r (
I relationship
I
t
(compute expected damagc c o s t f o r
I ' t h e connection I
Icornpute cumulative e:pected cost
I j , apply r e c u r s i v e e q u a t i o n , Eg. 4.8 (
c o s t and a s s o c i a t e d r i s k and
d i a m e t e r wit11 c u r r e n t v a l u e e
f o r n e x t comparison
h a v i n g minimum cunlu-
l a t i v c expected c o s t
TO Pig. 7 . 6
Model C c a n b e e x t e n d e d t o i n c l u d e t h e hydrograph t i m e l a g r o u t i n g
a t e a c h s t a g e i s shown i n F i g . 7.2 w i t h t h e DP c o m p u t a t i o n s u s i n g r i s k as
The p u r p o s e of t h i s c h a p t e r i s t o d e m o n s t r a t e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n s o f
t h e l e a . s t c o s t s e w e r s y s t e m d e s i g n models d e s c r i b e d i n t h e p r e v i o u s c h a p t e r .
I n o r d e r t o p r o v i d e g u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e s e l e c t i o n o f t h e models and a n
v a r i o u s models.
8.1. Model I n p u t P a r a m e t e r s
As d e s c r i b e d i n C h a p t e r 7 , e a c h of t h e models employs a n o p t i m i z a -
t o a c e r t a i n e x t e n t , t h e r e s u l t s and t h e c o m p u t a t i o n a l e f f i c i e n c y depend on
t h i s input data.
o p t i m i z a t i o n d e c i s i o n p a r a m e t e r s a f f e c t i n g t h i s p r o c e d u r e a r e l i s t e d as
follows . ,
of a sewer.
(b) , which i s t h e d i s t a n c e
The i n i t i a l s t a t e i n c r e m e n t , A
s1
between p o s s i b l e crown e l e v a t i o n s a t e a c h e n d of a sewer
t i o n of t h e c o r r i d o r s w i t h i n t h e s t a t e s p a c e ( r a n g e of
p o s s i b l e crown e l e v a t i o n s ) f o r t h e f i r s t i t e r a t i o n .
(d) The r e d u c t i o n r a t e of t h e s t a t e i n c r e m e n t As f o r s u c c e s s i v e
i t e r a t i o n s which d e t e r m i n e s t h e c o r r i d o r w i d t h f o r subse-
quent i t e r a t i o n s .
The n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave r o u t i n g p r o c e d u r e r e q u i r e s t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n o f
hydrograph t i m e l a g r o u t i n g r e q u i r e s n o a d d i t i o n a l i n p u t d e c i s i o n p a r a m e t e r
specifications .
The r i s k component r e q u i r e s an a n a l y s i s o f u n c e r t a i n t i e s as
The c o n s t r a i n t s p e r t i n e n t t o t h e d e s i g n models a r e d i s c u s s e d i n
8.2. Example I
s p e c i f i e d crown e l e v a t i o n s a t v a r i o u s l o c a t i o n s a r e g i v e n i n T a b l e 8.1.
t h e s i t u a t i o n where e l e v a t i o n c o n s t r a i n t s e x i s t a t a r b i t r a r y p o i n t s i n
\
respectively.
129
i
i
1
TABLE 8.1. Example I Layout Data
Downstream
The i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h s a t t h e manholes a r e assumed t o b e s y m m e t r i c a l
f o r d e v e l o p i n g t h e s e i n f l o w hydrographs. The r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s
i l l u s t r a t e t h e i r s e n s i t i v i t y t o t h e various i n p u t parameters.
8.2.2. O p t i m i z a t i o n Component P a r a m e t e r S e n s i t i v i t y
e f f e c t s of t h e s e p a r a m e t e r s on t h e minimum c o s t d e s i g n , t h e Example I
v a l u e s f o r t h e s e p a r a m e t e r s i t must f i r s t b e r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h e y a r e
i n t e r d e p e n d e n t i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e i r e f f e c t on t h e f i n a l d e s i g n and t h e
c o r r i d o r w i d t h i s chosen i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h an i n i t i a l t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y
which i s f a r from t h e o p t i m a l r e g i o n , a d d i t i o n a l i t e r a t i o n s a r e r e q u i r e d
t o move t h e t r a j e c t o r y i n t o t h e o p t i m a l o r n e a r - o p t i m a l r e g i o n . It i s
a l s o p o s s i b l e u n d e r s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s t h a t t h e model s o l u t i o n converges
The c o r r i d o r w i d t h , t h e number o f l a t t i c e p o i n t s of t h e c o r r i d o r ,
Time t
F i g . 8.2. D e f i n i t i o n of I n f l o w Hydrograph P a r a m e t e r s
b e t t e r t h e i n i t i a l t r a j e c t o r y t h e smaller t h e r e q u i r e d number of l a t t i c e
p o i n t s and t h e i n i t i a l s t a t e i n c r e m e n t s , o r s i m p l y , t h e smaller t h e i n i t i a l
c r e a s i n g t h e r e d u c t i o n rate of t h e s t a t e i n c r e m e n t A a t each i t e r a t i o n ;
S
o p t i m a l r e g i o n t h u s n o t p r o v i d i n g t h e minimum c o s t d e s i g n . Choosing a
l a r g e i n i t i a l s t a t e i n c r e m e n t and a l a r g e r e d u c t i o n r a t e of A may b e
S
s u l t i n g i n a l a r g e i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r w i d t h , u n n e c e s s a r y c o m p u t a t i o n s are
performed i n r e g i o n s o f t h e s t a t e s p a c e f a r from t h e o p t i m a l .
of As i s 1 / 2 . A l s o , i n s t e a d of c o n t i n u o u s l y r e d u c i n g As u n t i l a minimum
s p e c i f i e d i n c r e m e n t i s r e a c h e d , t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o c e d u r e i s recommended:
a f t e r s e v e r a l s u c c e s s i v e r e d u c t i o n s of A a t t h e r a t e of 1 / 2 (e.g., after
s
f i v e i t e r a t i o n s ) , t h e n t h e s i z e of A i s i n c r e a s e d by some m u l t i p l e of i t s
s
c u r r e n t value. For t h e remaining i t e r a t i o n s A i s reduced a t a r a t e of 112
S
t h a t f o r As t o b e reduced a f t e r an i t e r a t i o n , t h e c o s t c r i t e r i o n , E q . 4.4,
t h e s t a t e increment, A t o a v a l u e of 2 o r 3 times i t s p r e s e n t v a l u e i s
s'
most s a t i s f a c t o r y . This procedure h a s r e s u l t e d i n good convergence t o a
minimum c o s t s o l u t i o n .
p a r a l l e l t o t h e ground s u r f a c e s l o p e s . Choosing i n i t i a l t r i a l t r a j e c t o r i e s
depth s o t h a t t h e top of t h e c o r r i d o r e i t h e r f o l l o w s o r i s c l o s e t o t h e
each manhole i s
m i z a t i o n component computes t h e e l e v a t i o n of t h e t o p of t h e i n i t i a l
c o r r i d o r b a s e d on t h e p r e s c r i b e d v a l u e s of 5 ,N
mn P
and As .
If this
1
e l e v a t i o n exceeds E
d min
t h e v a l u e of 5m i s lowered by an i n t e g e r m u l t i -
n
p l i e r of As such t h a t t h e e n t i r e i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r i s below E
d min'
1
I n o r d e r t o e v a l u a t e t h e s e n s i t i v i t y of t h e i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r
w i d t h and t h e number of l a t t i c e p o i n t s w i t h i n t h e c o r r i d o r t o d e s i g n s f o r
t h e Example I s y s t e m , t h e r e s u l t s o f i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s and computer execu-
points, N , e q u a l t o 3, 5 , 7, and 9. It s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t f o r t h e r u n s
P
with N = 3 and 5, t h e maximum i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r w i d t h s a r e l i m i t e d . This
P
is because f o r A 2 6 f t t h e r e e x i s t s i n t h e s y s t e m a t least one c o r r i d o r
S
1
which cannot s a t i s f y a l l of t h e d e s i g n cons t r a i n ts w i t h i n ' t h e f e a s i b l e s e t
of states.
I n o b s e r v i n g t h e t r e n d s o f t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t shown i n F i g .
c o r r i d o r w i d t h i s l e s s t h a n t h e a v e r a g e drop of e l e v a t i o n o f t h e s e w e r s .
p u t e d system i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s i s due p a r t l y t o t h e f a c t t h a t d i s c r e t e
and A
computed i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s v a r y randomly f o r t h e v a l u e s of N
P S1
number of l a t t i c e p o i n t s u s e d w i t h i n t h e c o r r i d o r i s d e t e r m i n e d by
137
'44 P!M JoP! 1103 ID! +!ul
Initial Corridor Width
Nominal Sewer Drop
0
Number of L a t t i c e
Points Within Lattice
I 2 3
mainly on t h e number of l a t t i c e p o i n t s f o r i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r w i d t h s g r e a t e r
t h a n t h e n o m i n a l s e w e r d r o p , and f o r t h e example, a v e r a g e s a b o u t 1 . 2 s e c p e r
l a t t i c e point. I t can a l s o b e o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e e x e c u t i o n t i m e t e n d s t o
i n c r e a s e s l i g h t l y w i t h i n c r e a s i n g i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r width. Thus, i t c a n b e
i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r G i d t h of two t o f i v e t i m e s t h e n o m i n a l sewer d r o p w i t h 3 t o
p o i n t s merely i n c r e a s e s , e x e c u t i o n t i m e w i t h o u t s i g n i f i c a n t improvement i n
t h e v a l u e of i n i t i a l s t a t e i n c r e m e n t , A , can b e d e t e r m i n e d a c c o r d i n g l y .
S
1
Of c o u r s e i t s h o u l d b e r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h e d e s i g n c o n s t r a i n t s w i l l h a v e some
e f f e c t b u t t h o s e u s e d i n t h 2 s example a r e t y p t c a l .
I n o r d e r t o v e r i f y t h e above c o n c l u s i o n on s e n s i t i v i t y t o tile o p t i -
m i z a t i o n i n p u t p a r a m e t e r s f o r more s o p h i s t i c a t e d l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n models,
i n T a b l e 7 . 1 i n c o r p o r a t i n g t h e r i s k component, a g a i n u s i n g 7 l a t t i c e p o i n t s ,
and f o r a d e s i g n s e r v i c e p e r i o d of 25 y e a r s . The r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r c u r v e s
l a t t i c e p o i n t s i n forming t h e c o r r i d o r (and h e n c e t h e m a g n i t u d e of t h e
s t a t - e i n c r e m e n t ) a p p l y t o t h e more s o p h i s t i c a t e d l e a s t - c o s t s y s t e m de-
s i g n models a s w e l l .
However, a s shown i n F i g . 8 . 5 , t h e f l u c t u a t i o n of t h e s y s t e m
f l u c t u a t i o n s make i t l e s s c e r t a i n t h a t u s i n g a s e l e c t e d p a i r of i n i t i a l
c o r r i d o r w i d t h and number of l a t t i c e p o i n t s t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e s e l e c t e d
i n i t i a l t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y would p r o d u c e a d e s i g n t h a t i s r e a s o n a b l y c l o s e
t o t h e g l o b a l optimum. A c t u a l l y , a c a r e f u l e x a m i n a t i o n of t h e r e s u l t i n g
change i s p a r t i c u l a r l y n o t i c e a b l e i f t h e sewer s i z e i s g r e a t e r t h a n 30 i n . ,
g l o b a l optimum.
Total Execution
23,229 551,842
21,183 551,610
21,071 551,450
24,307 560,194
21,342 551,512
21,071 551,450
21,315 551,526
24,253 560,340
21,649 551,471
21,410 551,518
8.2.3. Comparison of Example I R e s u l t s Using V a r i o u s Design Models
s e w e r s y s t e m d e s i g n e d by u s i n g t h e v a r i o u s models l i s t e d i n T a b l e 7 . 1 have
always p r o d u c e d e s i g n s w i t h a c o n s i d e r a b l e l o w e r t o t a l c o s t t h a n t h e cor-
r e s p o n d i n g models w i t h o u t r o u t i n g . T h i s r e s u l t i s e x p e c t e d i n view of t h e
d i s c u s s i o n p r e s e n t e d i n S e c t i o n 6.3. The r o u t i n g p r o c e d u r e c a n p h a s e t h e
i s less t h a n t h e sum of t h e i r i n d i v i d u a l p e a k s .
t h e l e a s t c o s t d e s i g n s h o u l d b e checked h y d r a u l i c a l l y (when e c o n o m i c a l l y
f u n c t i o n of t h e s y s t e m s i z e and i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h s . T h e r e f o r e i t would b e
m i s l e a d i n g t o q u a n t i t a t i v e l y d i s c u s s c o s t s a v i n g s as a f u n c t i o n of d e s i g n
t a i n e d by u s i n g an i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r w i d t h o f 6 f t w i t h 7 l a t t i c e p o i n t s t o
form t h e c o r r i d o r s .
t h e h y d r a u l i c d e s i g n of s e w e r s i z e s u s i n g t h e same i n f l o w h y d r o g r a p h s , i t
k i n e m a t i c wave r o u t i n g s , a l l t h e s e w e r s i n t h e l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n s a r e e q u a l
t h e s e w e r s i n t h e elcample h y d r a u l i c d e s i g n a r e g e n e r a l l y b u r i e d d e e p e r u n d e r
t h e ground s u r f a c e , c l e a r l y t h e t o t a l c o s t o f t h e s e w e r s y s t e m i s lower f o r
t h e h y d r a u l i c d e s i g n s are n o t g i v e n h e r e b e c a u s e a f a i r comparison c a n n o t
o f c e r t a i n s e w e r s whereas i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y o n l y t h e crown e l e v a t i o n s
s l o p e of t h e s e w e r s r e s u l t i n g i n l a r g e r d i a m e t e r s and h e n c e i n c r e a s i n g t h e
d r a u l i c model.
TABLE 8.8. Least-Cost Designs of Example I Sewer
System w i t h o u t C o n s i d e r i n g R i s k s
Upstream
Crown E l e v a t i o n s
Isonodal Upstream Downstream Sewer Sewer
Line Manhole Manhole Upstream Downstream Slope Diameter
I f t fr in. I
Design Using Model A
Upstream
Isonodal
Line
Upstream
Manh o l e
Downstream
Manhole I
Grown E l e v a t i o n s
Upstream
I
I Downstream
I1 Sewer
Slope
Sewer
Diameter
Upstream
Isonodal
Lint?
Upstream
Manhole
Downstream
Manhole
S Upstream
Using Damage S c a l e A
Downstream
sewer
Slope
Sewer
Diameter
in.
Using Damage S c a l e B
6 1 1 393.81 388.63 0.00393 42
5 1 1 397.60 393.81 0.00313 42
4 1 1 402.69 399.69 0.00300 36
2 1 403.50 400.44 0.00747 36
3 1 1 403.80 402.69 0.00159 30
2 1 406.25 402.75 0.00437 27
3 2 405.80 403.81 0.00523 36
4 2 407.70 403.88 0.01301 21 .
2 1 1 409.30 404.63 0.01461 21
2 2 , 409.50 406.25 0.00542 18
3 2 408.10 406.25 0.00411 24
4 3 410.45 405.81 0.01288 24
5 3 413.40 407.63 0.01255 21
1 1 4 413.20 410.45 0.00539 24
Using Damage S c a l e C
6 1 1 393.44 387.38 0.00459 42
5 1 1 397.60 393.44 0.00344 42
4 1 1 403.00 399.63 0.0033 7 30
2 1 403.50 400.44 0.00747 30
3 1 1 403.80 403.00 0.00114 27
2 1 406.57 403.81 0.00345 24
3 2 405.80 404.13 0.00441 30
4 2 407.70 404.31 0.01152 18
2 1 1 409.30 405.63 0.01148 18
2 2 409.50 406.70 0.00467 18
3 . 2 408.10 406.57 0.00339 21
4 3 410.63 406.69 0.01094 21
5 3 413.40 408.06 0.01160 18
1 1 4 413.20 410.63 0.00505 21
A s can b e s e e n from T a b l e 8 . 8 , w j t h r a r e e x c e p t i o n s , t h e sewer
s i z e s f o r Model A w i t h o u t r o u t i n g a r e e q u a l o r g r e a t e r t h a n t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g
p r o v i d e s t h e f i r s t models t o i n c o r p o r a t e t h e r i s k component i n t o a l e a s t -
c o s t d e s i g n , i t i s o f c o n s i d e r a b l e i n t e r e s t t o examine t h e e f f e c t o f r i s k s
i n t h e s y s t e m assuming a d e s i g n s e r v i c e l i f e o f 25 y e a r s f o r each o f t h e
t h e r i s k component i n t h e o p t i m i z a t i o n p r o c e d u r e , t h e i m p l i c i t r i s k f o r
e a c h s e w e r a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n s can b e c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g
f o r m u l a , Eq. 5 . 1 8 , w i t h S = S
0
. The s a f e t y f a c t o r i s t h e n computed a s
-
QC/Qo w i t h Q
0
-
- Qp
. S u b s e q u e n t l y t h e r i s k i s o b t a i n e d t h r o u g h t h e 25-yr
d i f f e r e n t , t h e computed r i s k s w i l l a l s o v a r y .
6 1 1 0.617 0.619 0.615 0.609 0.0192 0.264 0.617 0.0155 0.619 0.619
5 1 1 0.612 0.615 0.618 0.610 0.0367 0.612 0.612 0.0328 0.617 0.615
2 1 0.603 0.609 0.615 0.611 0.0177 0.050 0.603 0.0047 0.039 0.609
3 1 1 0.618 0.610 0.617 0.617 0.0055 0.085 0.619 0.0034 0.070 0.610
2 1 0.610 0.608 0.610 0.605 0.0116 0.103 0.610 0.0052 0.052 0.608
3 2 0.615 0.611 0.617 0.604 0.0151 0.022 0.615 0.0095 0.023 0.611
4 2 0.617 0.617 0.617 0.617 0.0041 0.059 0.617 .0.0041 0.059 0.617
2 1 1 0.619 0.619 0.619 0.619 0.0024 0.037 0.619 0.0024 0.037 0.619
2 2 0.614 0.163 0.614 0.614 0.0037 0.112 0.163 0.0029 0.095 0.163
3 2 0.617 0.617 0.617 0.617 0.0102 0.093 0.617 0.0069 0.069 0.617
4 3 0.615 0.616 0.616 0.611 0.0037 0.071 0.615 0.0032 0.057 0.816
5 3 0.614 0.614 0.614 0.614 0.0047 0.068 0.614 0.0047 0.068 0.617
1 1 4 0.619 0.618 0.618 0.618 0.0083 0.113 0.618 0.0074 0.113 0.618
Average 0.615 0.582 0.616 0.613 0.0110 0.140 0.582 0.0076 0.140 0.582
s c a l e , i f t h e e x p e c t e d sewer l i f e i s 50 y r i n s t e a d of 25 y r (used i n T a b l e s
h i g h e r i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s t o o f f s e t t h e i n c r e a s e i n e x p e c t e d damage c o s t s .
r e s p e c t i v e l y , t h e g e n e r a l e f f e c t of i n c l u d i n g t h e r i s k component i n d e s i g n i s
t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s ) t o o f f s e t t h e e x p e c t e d damage c o s t s , s o t h a t t h e t o t a l
s c a l e C a r e i d e n t i c a l t o t h o s e o f t h e Model A d e s i g n , w i t h t h e a v e r a g e r i s k
b e i n g s l i g h t l y lower.
To d e s i g n a s e w e r s y s tem f o r a g i v e n d r a i n a g e a r e a t o s e r v e f o r
an e x p e c t e d p e r i o d , t h e h i g h e r t h e a s s e s s e d damage v a l u e s ( e . g. , Scale A
f o r Model C i n Table 8 . 1 1 ) , t h e s m a l l e r i s t h e r i s k of t h e l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n .
c o s t s f o r Model C o r D d e s i g n s l i s t e d i n T a b l e 8.12 u s i n g t h e t h r e e d i f f e r e n t
TABLE 8.12. Cost Comparison f o r Example I Designs
A s s e s s e d Damage S c a l e
Model Cost A B C
A t o S c a l e C , b o t h t h e i n s t a l l a t i o d and t h e t o t a l c o s t s d e c r e a s e . Theore-
t i c a l l y , t h e e x p e c t e d damage c o s t s h o u l d a l s o b e d e c r e a s i n g m o n o t o n i c a l l y
if t h e p i p e s i z e s were c o n t i n u o u s . C o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , t h e e x p e c t e d damage
t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t f o r t h e Model A d e s i g n i s e q u i v a l e n t t o t h e c a s e of
c o s t f o r Model A d e s i g n s h o u l d b e s l i g h t l y l e s s t h a n t h a t f o r Model C u s i n g
a s s e s s e d damage s c a l e C. However, a s shown i n T a b l e 8.12, t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n
r e a s o n of t h i s d i s c r e p a n c y i s t h a t DDDP does n o t g u a r a n t e e g l o b a l o p t i m a l i t y ;
v a l u e g i v e n i n T a b l e 8.12.
T a b l e 8.12 a l s o i l l u s t r a t e s t h e d i s a d v a n t a g e of n o t a o n s i d e r i f i g
25-yr d e s i g n s e r v i c e p e r i o d t h e e x p e c t e d damage c o s t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e
s e r v i c e l i f e i s long.
8.3. Example I1
To f u r t h e r i l l u s t r a t e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e d e s i g n models a n o t h e r
t o many e n g i n e e r s i n v o l v e d i n s t o r m d r a i n a g e d e s i g n .
The l a y o u t of t h e Example I1 s e w e r s y s t e m i s r e p r o d u c e d i n F i g .
w i t h t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g manhole n o t a t i o n u s e d i n F i g . 8.7.
The i n p u t d a t a f o r t h e s e w e r s y s t e m r e q u i r e d by t h e d e s i g n models
1
i
1
I
l
:
I
I
. .
1
I
1 ::
t
1. .:
I
I
I "
I
I
j
!
I
! ~
i . .
1 :
1 :
I
I
\ ,
I
i
c
I
~
j
< ,
TABLE 8.13. Example I1 Sewer System I n p u t Data
i s c o n s i d e r a b l y smaller t h a n t h e i n i t i a l c o r r i d o r w i d t h u s e d . The r e d u c t i o n
rate of As i s 112.
e v e r , a minimum d i a m e t e r of 12 i n . i n s t e a d of 8 i n . i s used s i n c e t h i s c o n s t r a i n t
f o r t h e a s s e s s e d damage c o s t i n s t e a d o f a s c a l e t h a t v a r i e s w i t h sewer l e n g t h
f o r Example I.
8.3.2. Example I1 R e s u l t s
Upstream
Crown E l e v a t i o n s
Isonodal Upstream Downstream I Sewer Sewer
Line Manho l e Manhole Downstream Slope Diameter
f t in.
Design Using Model A
- -
, SL800'0
SL600'0
SLLOO'O
SL900'0
99L00'0
SZSOO'O
00800'0
Z9E000
SLLOO'O
6TZOO'O
00900'0
SL800'0
SL600'0
SLLOO'O
SL'7OO'O
05900'0
SZSOO '0
00800'0
t16EOO'O
SLLOO'O
9EZ000
OSSOO'O
SL800'0
SL 600'0
SLLOO'O
SL900'0
OS900'0
szsoo '0
00800'0
8LE00'0
SLL00'0
'7EZOO'O
00900 '0
TABLE 8.15. Least-Cost Designs of Example I1 Sewer System Considering
Risks
Upstream
Crown E l e v a t i o n s
Isonodal Upstream Downstream I Sewer Sewer
Line Manhole Manhole Upstream Downstream Slope Diameter
ft ft in.
Design Using Model C
Upstream
Isonodal
Line
Upstream
Manhole
Downstream
Manhole
/
I
Crown E l e v a t i o n s
Upstream Downstream
Sewer
Slope
Sever
Diameter
t h e Model C and D d e s i g n s t h e a s s e s s e d damage v a 1 u e . i ~$10,000 f o r e a c h sewer
c u r v e d e v e l o p e d i n S e c t i o n 5 , 4 f o r Urbana, I l l i n o i s i s d i r e c t l y a p p l i c a b l e t o
t h i s example w i t h o u t a d j u s t m e n t . The r i s k s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e d e s i g n s u s i n g
t h e s i x l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n models as w e l l a s t h e r a t i o n a l method d e s i g n a r e g i v e n
i n T a b l e 8 . 1 7 are u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e e x p e c t e d damage c o s t s f o r t h e d e s i g n s
C o n s i d e r i n g i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t s o n l y , i t i s a g a i n s e e n from T a b l e
i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t of t h e ASCE d e s i g n w i t h t h o s e f o r Models A o r B y i t i s
s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t t h e t o t a l c o s t s and r i s k s ( T a b l e 8.17) a r e a l s o l o w e r
p r o d u c e s a d e s i g n w i t h a 24% c o s t s a v i n g s o v e r t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l p r o c e d u r e
164
TABLE 8.18. Cost Comparison f o r Example I1 Designs
Execution Cost
Time $
Model Se c Installation Damage Total
The e f f e c t of t h e r i s k component i n d e s i g n i s a l s o s e e n by t h e
r i s k component depends on t h i s v a l u e a s w e l l a s on t h e s e r v i c e l i f e of
t h e design p r o c e s s i s i l l u s t r a t e d .
A c t u a l l y t h e d i a m e t e r s of t h e sewers a r e i d e n t i c a l f o r d e s i g n s u s i n g
from IM, 4, r e s u l t i n g i n a h i g h e r i n s t a l l a t i o n c o s t .
I n t h i s example t h e hydrograph t i m e l a g r o u t i n g method used i n
Model B-1 r e s u l t e d i n t h e l o w e s t t o t a l c o s t d e s i g n as w e l l a s t h e l o w e s t
b e c a u s e o f i t s r e l a t i v e l y s h o r t computer e x e c u t i o n t i m e .
Chapter 9 . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o a s e t of l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n models f o r d e t e r m i n i n g t h e
ming (DDDP) as t h e b a s i s f o r f l e x i b l e l e a s t - c o s t d e s i g n
models. .
(b) The i n c l u s i o n of r i s k a n a l y s i s i n t h e d e s i g n p r o c e d u r e .
of t h e t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t .
(d) The u s e of f l o o d r o u t i n g p r o c e d u r e s t o a c c o u n t f o r a t t e n u a -
t i o n and l a g o f i n - s y s t e m h y d r o g r a p h s .
9.1. Conclusions
t h e t r a d i t i o n a l methods f o r d e s i g n of s e w e r s y s t e m s c a n b e developed.
approach f o r o p t i m i z a t i o n b u t t h e y i n c o r p o r a t e d i f f e r e n t f a c t o r s i n
particular situation.
i n Chapter 4 provides an e f f i c i e n t b a s i c t o o l f o r a l e a s t -
c o s t d e s i g n model f o r d e s i g n of s e w s r s y s t e m s . The d e s i g n
r e s u l t s i n c l u d e t h e crown e l e v a t i o n s and s l o p e i n a d d i t i o n
t o t h e diameter of t h e sewers.
(b) It i s p o s s i b l e t o a n a l y z e t h e u n c e r t a i n t i e s i n v o l v e d i n
of t h e r i s k o r p r o b a b i l i t y of e x c e e d i n g t h e c a p a c i t y of a
sewer. S u b s e q u e n t l y , t h e r i s k can b e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t h e
d e s i g n of t h e s e w e r s . T h i s i s accomplisiled t h r o u g h t h e
e s t a b l i s l ~ m e n tof t h e r i s k - s a f e t y f a c t o r r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r
(c) By i n c o r p o r a t i n g t h e r i s k s i n t h e d e s i g n , t h e e n g i n e e r no
l o n g e r n e e d s t o a r b i t r a r i l y choose t h e d e s i g n r e t u r n p e r i o d .
I n s t e a d , t h e e x p e c t e d s e r v i c e l i f e of t h e p r o j e c t i s f i r s t
d u c e a d e s i g n t h a t g i v e s t h e l o w e s t t o t a l c o s t , and t h e
r e s u l t w i l l a l s o s p e c i f y t h e r i s k s of t h e s e w e r s f o r t h i s
design w i t h s p e c i f i e d expected s e r v i c e l i f e t o g e t h e r w i t h
maximum a c c e p t a b l e r i s k of f a i l u r e d u r i n g t h i s p e r i o d .
(d) PJith t h e r i s k s of f a i l u r e e v a l u a t e d , i t i s p o s s i h l e t o
i n c l u d e e x p e c t e d f l o o d damages a s p a r t of t h e t o t a l system
a s an i n i t i a l s t e p t h e r e c o g n i t i o n t h a t f l o o d damage c o s t s a r e
a n i m p o r t a n t c o n s i d e r a t i o r i and t h e r e f o r e must b e i n c l u d e d a s
p a r t o f t h e t o t a l system c o s t .
(e) I n c o r p o r a t i o n of f l o o d r o u t i n g i n t o t h e d e s i g n models
r u n o f f peaks i s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y c o n s e r v a t i v e y e t r e s u l t s
i n e x p e n s i v e d e s i g n s w i t h o u t r e d u c i n g t h e o v e r a l l r i s k as
t h e hydrograph t i m e l a g p r o c e d u r e d e s c r i b e d i n S e c t i o n
t i o n t i m e and p r o v i d e s r e a s o n a b l e r e s u l t s . However, i n
e i t h e r t h e n o n l i n e a r k i n e m a t i c wave o r Muskingum-Cunge
p r o c e d u r e s may b e u s e d , w i t h t h e l a t t e r p r e f e r r e d . More
s o p h i s t i c a t e d r o u t i n g t e c h n i q u e s s u c h as s o l v i n g t h e
S t . Venant e q u a t i o n s do n o t a p p e a r p r a c t i c a l f o r u s e i n
l e a s t-cos t d e s i g n a o d e l s b e c a u s e of t h e i r e x t e n s i v e com-
p u t e r requirements .
(f) S i n c e DDDP does n o t g u a r a n t e e a g l o b a l optimum, t o a
t h e l o c a t i o n o f t h e i n i t i a l t r f a l t r a j e c t o r y , t h e w i d t h of
number o f l a t t i c e p o i n t s w i t h i n t h e c o r r i d o r ( o r t h e i n i t i a l
s t a t e i n c r e m e n t w i t h i n t h e c o r r i d o r ) , and t h e r e d u c t i o n rate
of t h e s t a t e increment d u r i n g i t e r a t i o n s . '3ased on t h e
e x p e r i e n c e o b t a i n e d i n t h i s r e s e a r c h p r o j e c z - , i t h a s been found
t h a t t h e c l o s e r t h e presupposed i n i t i a l t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y i s
t o t h e t r u e o p t i m a l t r a j e c t o r y , the? b e t t e r t h e r e s u l t e d d e s i g n .
b e c a u s e t h e y a r e l a r g e r and b u r i e d d e e p e r t h a n t h e upstream
o n e s , c o n s e q u e n t l y o f t e n i t i s advantageous f o r t h e down-
s t r e a m s e w e r s t o u s e an i n i t i a l t r i a l t r a j e c t o r y w i t h
s t e e p e r s l o p e s t h a n ground s l o p e s . The p r e f e r r e d i n i t i a l
c o r r i d o r w i d t h i s two t o f i v e t i m e s t h e a v e a g e e l e v a t i o n
drop of t h e s e w e r s . I n a d d i t i o n t h e u s e of 5 o r 7 l a t t i c e
p o i n t s t o g e t h e r w i t h a r e d u c t i o n r a t e of t h e s t a t e i n c r e -
a f i r s t s t e p towards t h e g o a l of o p t i m a l d e s i g n f o r e n t i r e u r b a n d r a i n a g e
models on t h e b a s i s of e x p e r i e n c e g a i n e d t h r o u g h e x t e n s i v e f i e ! d a p p l i c a -
u s e r e q u i r e s a r e c o g n i t i o n of t h e s e v e r a l c o n c e p t s i n v o l v e d i n sewer
s j r s t e n Ccsign i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l ones s o t h a : f u l l a d v a n t a g e
i t i s f i i l l y r e a l i z e d t h a t t h e r e i s an u r g e n t n e e d f o r t h e development of
s u l t s of t h i s s t u d y \:an b e a c h i e v e d . T h i s manual s h o u l d 1 r o v i d e a c l e a r
171
g u i d e t o t h e u s e of t h e v a r i o u s models s o a s t o make i t a s e a s y a s p o s s i b l e
f o r t h e d e s i g n e n g i n e e r s t o o b t a i n r e s u l t s w i t h a minimum amount of e f f o r t
and i n v e s tmen t of t i m e .
Among t h e numerous p o s s i b l e f u t u r e s t u d i e s a s a r e s u l t of t h i s
i n v e s t i g a t i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g d e s e r v e immediate a t t e n t i o n .
t h e s e w e r s , and e n g i n e e r s o f t e n do have a l i m i t e d d e g r e e of
freedom i n s e l e c t i n g t h e l a y o u t , i t i s d e s i r a b l e t o i n c l u d e
a d e s i g n model w i t h o u t c o n s i d e r i n g t h e r i s k s and r o u t i n g
h a s been developed u n d e r t h e p a r t i a l s u p p o r t of t h i s
t o , i n c l u d e r o u t i n g and r i s k c a n s i d e r a t i o n i s b e i n g i n v e s t i -
gated.
g r a p h s must h e i n d e p e n d e n t l y developed. It i s d e s i r a b l e t o
h a v e an o p t i o n a l p r o c e d u r e f o r g e n e r a t i n g them; i . e . , a
t h e o p t i o n of p r o v i d i n g h i s own h y d r o g r a p h s o r u t i l i z i n g
t h e h y d r o l o g i c model.
(c) I n t h i s s t u d y t h e e f f e c t s of t h e h y d r a u l i c s and c o s t s of
a l l a p p u r t e n a n c e s and s p e c i a l s t r u c t u r e s i n a sewer s y s t e m
example, i n - l i n e d e t e n t i o n r e s e r v o i r s a r e r e c e i v i n g i n c r e a s e d
a t t e n t i o n and t h e r e i s a n e e d t o c o n s i d e r t h e i r e f f e c t i v e n e s s
and u s e i n d e s i g n .
(d) The e f f e c t i v e n e s s of t h e l e a s t - c o s t design b v i o u s l y depends
a n a l y s i s of t h e s c a t t e r e d d a t a a p p e a r e d i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e
t r a c t o r s s h o u l d b e c a r r i e d o u t t o p r o v i d e such f u n c t i o n s .
c a p a c i t y i s an i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e l e a s t -
w e l l d e f i n e d manner. T h i s t a s k i s b e i n g u n d e r t a k e n under
research project .
(f) I n t h i s s t u d y t h e r i s k component h a s b e e n i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t h e
t h e r i s k component i n t h e d e s i g n models u s i n g o t h e r h y d r a u l i c
routing techniques.
Decome an i n f l u e n t i a l f a c t o r . Therefore, i n c l u s i o n of t h e s e
c o s t s i n t h e d e s i g n models s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d .
REFERENCES
F r e a d , D. L . , "Numerical P r o p e r t i e s of I m p l i c i t Four-Point F i n i t e D i f f e r e n c e
E q u a t i o n s o f Unsteady low," NOAA Tech. Memo NWS HYDRO-18, U.S.
N a t i o n a l Weather S e r v i c e , Mar. 19 74.
.,
Mays, L. W and Wenzel,, Ii. G. , "A S e r i a l DDDP Approach f o r Optimal Design
of M u l t i - l e v e l Branching Storm Sewer Sys t e m s ," t o b e p u b l i s h e d i n
Water Resources R e s e a r c h , Apr. 1977.
Avenue d r a i n a g e b a s i n f o r f o u r i n d e p e n d e n t r a i n s t o r m s as f o l l o w s :
A c c o r d i n g l y , comparing t h e r a t i o n a l f o r m u l a t o t h e r e c o r d e d d a t a , t h e mean
l i a b i l i t y o f t h e r a t i o n a l method, i t f o l l o w s t h a t f o r t h e r a t i o n a l method
-
AL = 1 . 0 3 and c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n = (0.205+0.153)/2 = 0.176. However,
o v e r , t h e computed c o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n a c t u a l l y a c c o u n t s f o r more t h a n
C o e f f i c i e n t of v a r i a t i o n
b-a
6 = 0.578 -
b+a
b-a
6 = ' 0 . 4 0 8 --
b+a
Ax
a b
-
x = 0 . 3 3 3 (a+2b) 6 = 0.707 b-a
-
2b+a
b-a
6 = 0.707f-
b+2a
A
INPUTD
Reads i n p u t
(design) d a t a
Determines d e s i g n
flows i n each
manholes f o r
SATCON
Defines connection
\ of s t a t e s a c r o s s
Inanholes I
TRCBAK
Traceback r o u t i n e
f o r each i t e r a t i o n
o f DDDP
~*C******O********************b***********O*************************
+*01911*+++111***++**1IL************L*L***************************
*
WELCVINOL~MNUIJI I N O E X E 5 OF K ELFVAT 1UhS FRUM Ul>MNSrWEAfl*
M A ~ ~ U L ~ C R E L F V A T I ( ; N J T O U P S ~ K ~ A 6M
M A : r t l J L E H N U U N I ~ I ~ N [ , U A LL l h E IUJL. .
OIAYIKOLIHNUSJI ARL T l i i P I P E U I A H E I L U S .
FUNC(JsMUU.HNU1 A R E TtlE C O S T S A T b L k " I S T R E A I d E L E V A T I t I N J FOR
C C h N E C T I L t * T t 1 M N D F t O q U P S T R E A M WAR+iOLL MNU.
Q THIS I S C. C ~ I P U L A ~ I V L sur LF C O S T S FUK ALL
UPSTREAV CU:ihtCTlhl; P I P E S AND YANttLLES.
TCNINOLIHNU,MNOI I S T H k V t . C T u F CF C i J N . ~ t C T I V I T Y F U U N D A F T k R
O P T I ~ ~ I L A T I O N C V E R T H S~ E u t K t d t ~ h c f iA~ F T ~ H
EACH I l t H & T I U N .
f HJTUJJINDL+I .MNU.JJI I S T H E IldCCK O F UPSTREAM E L E V A T l G h S *
:
J A C R U S S TtiE MAlvHCLE q h D Oh I S U -
NCIDAL L l h t N I ) L + I T H A T R E F E R S Ti)
U P S T H E A N H A N H U L E PkU C h L I R A I I i A G E
:
L L l N i hOL.
F C U P I J J t M A N l ARE T h E UPSTHEAM ( A T HANHGLE MAN1 L O S T S FOR
C k U W N E L t k A l l C h S ;J.
*********:*
,.OSP,lNt NWRI
...... . .
NWH!T = 0
- -
UV 0.2
CALL IhPUTO
CALL FLCW
bIRITE61.13001
N D L T l = NOLT - I
+ + b * E + * b b 1 b * + O * P * * L 1 * * ~ * * * * b i L * * ~ * L ~ ~ ~ t
VARY I T E u P T l n N UF OODP O P T I P I L A T I O ~ Y
~~+*C*+**OCL*=***L+II********IE~**I**I~~
uu 500 I T E ~ = l . I O
I F 1 1TER E 5 1 OSTATE = * *OSTATE
IF(,OSTA~E.~L~ . U S M I N I GU T ? 5 1 0
CAI <T..C"
UU 4 U U h U L ' l r N U L 1 I
CALL PIPCLh(td3LrELHtITERl
I F I N O L . E L . h O L T I l 60 T O 4 1 0
CALL SATCLhlNULI
C.CnhT 1 h l l F
.
*+********4*****D********~****b**L***L********
C A L L TQACEBACK T C F l l i D W l h l Y U H C 3 S T D E S I G N
*+*****~****~***EI*~*L**o*E**LIII***o**I***~o*
C A L L TRCBAKI TLb5T. ITEX)
I F 1 I T E R . 0 - 1 1 LL I C 4 4 0
*****L*,bb00****8*l******.**.Ob*.**..***.*****************E**** .- - - .- -
T C O S T = MlNlf'U~i C U S T L F T H t S Y S T F Y U t 5-.-
C P I T E h l A TI; C d A H G t O S T A T t F b R T H t h i X T IT E R A I I - C & .
1 b h tuu T h l S ITER.
*
8 T C- S- T = Y ~ P ~ I M I I W CI:FT
I,ciAfI Gir-.
C F T H F <-.-.
-.
VCTFH -.. ---.-... -..
n F c I r N &ria . T d k P R E V I L I U S *
* cDwnC
= R E L A T l V t C H A h G E I N C O S T A L L U k E O FOP S J C C E S S I V E
'TLDA'l(lhS 6 t F h U k OSTATF IS f~b4Al2C.Fll-
C G h i 1 nruc
C O h T 1N U E
FOPMAT61HII
STCP
ba1=HW 0 3 L 0 0
4 fOO!L'9~~11?Jfl
(1-NIP'LJ = fld I 1 3'4 N l i l
INlNW W
I l f l N ' l = Y P51 0 0
fOCCL'9l3118'4
SOOL9'1131IU~
3CN l !VD3
4PUI I V n J 16-50
3PY II N 1 3 nsno
fN'IYIHPSd1d:W'V !Ofl99'1)311dR 6500
0 9 9 0 1 0'7 I 1 3V tHLV'IY)1)41 8530
ONH11=d 7 9 9 9 0 1 SO0
llNW'I=t4 5 1 9 0 0 9500
f i + l r ) u N = OYH 5500
f I Y I V I 1 = flYW 01590
I I Y ' I M f00S9'91311Ukl eg00
1 + IY = IIY ZSOO
l l l O N a l = l Y OOL 30 1500
l35f9'7131lMY OCOO
3PU IIF133 6530
3PU IIN113 U300
fI'NI3N10'fI1N)A3l39'I'Y 100C9*9)q11M* 1f00
NVAal=I cZ9 30 9300
1h')t:C' VVH 5300
I l O Y ' l = ' I 0 5 9 Ofl ff39
f00b9'r~)311M'4 e3d0
XWHA'UV'NIUAn3'7lVl50 f7f'19'91311MY 7300
ItJVW'IlOV'P313Y 17'lC9'917118Y 1COO
10719'413118Y 0f00
3
3
3
or C
OOf
+
+ '1ON 3 N 1 1 lVaqYfl51 Nfl IlNW 3 l O U Y 7 d UV3WlCdn
0 H11M $ K 0 1 1 3 3 N N 3 3 3 l Q l S S U d j? AVHWV 3 r l 5 1 l 3 V W ' f I N ~ ~ l f l V
33:jUfIS W7H4 S M O l j N I 31111~VVH 3 H l 3HV fNVW"10FI13tJ
1ON 3 N 1 1 l V f l 7 Y C I S I N n 5 1 N
fl W
e 3 x 7 ?~Y #~ 0 1 ~ I Y WW ~ I H ~ 4 1 ~ q3 d l1d 3 8 ~ f n ~ w ' l nl ~~ i d l
1ON q Y I 1 lV(17NTSI N 1 NVY 3 l O H h V H i f l
+ 3 0 1 5 WV3MlSVqflO I V f S N 0 1 1 V A 3 1 3 N Y P H 3 1 S l N l n d
+ 3 3 1 1 1 V l 3 1 C 0 I J 3 y 1 4fl q N 9 I l V A 3 1 3 3 H 1 3MV ( N V W ' l f l N l f l I # A
1-10N 3 N 1 1 l V i l l N 7 5 1
r M n nNW 7lflHNIW H V 3 H I S d f l 0 1 S133NND3 I V H L
+SON 3 N I l l V O 0 h P S I " 7 ONH 3 l f l Y Y V H j n ' I f l l S
+WV?HISdfl 3HP NO f S Y 3 1 1 V A 3 1 3 N " f l H 3 I S l K l f l d
r 3 3 1 1 1 V l 3 l f l O l W 3 W I 3 7 S N 0 1 1 Y A 3 1 3 7 U I qWV f O V d ' f l Y d ' l O N l d n k A
1flN 7 N I l l V O O V l S 1
f NO NVH 310HNVH 1V S Y C l I I V A 3 1 3 ClblfllH9 3 H l 3UV 14VH'lOY I A 3 1
* d l H S N 3 l l V l 7 H 81'1 3 V 3 A I ' I i V S
- Y ~ l N 3 H I NO4 S I N V I C h ' 7 3 2HV 2V17V ' 1 ~ 1 ~' 7 1 ~ q d l l '1VHdlV
1ON 3 Y I l l V O f l ' d f l S 1 N! S 7 l f l H V V h -17 H3VUflV 3W1 5 1 f l U N l t 4 H
11-LIFYI q v l i n s w v 1 \ daco 43
IJ'JUWIIV 3bI1, ' S l N I l l V O i l N 0 S I 3fl HqPAPU 1 V l r l 3H1 5 1 L l O N
SWflU1HHfl7 ' I S I l g V I < 4 9 1 31711VVl.' U3V 3 I V
( S l N ! n d 7 3 l l l V l l S N f l I I V A q l 3 Sh!Mn.tI) 41 n4PWflR 7 r ( l 5 1 A 3 1 3 N
N O I l V 7 l ~ l l d i 7 TIIL d f l l S fll t l H 7 l l W 3 4111 5 1 51111
S N n l I V A 3 1 1 YMQH7 N13M130 3 7 V t l < l O d Q b I l t 1 l K l H 1 5 1 N I H < l l
- 4 d l d l 4 3 V I YO4 Hld7fl W34n9 WflWlUlW 7 4 1 C I h l P A ! l 3
IlflHNVW V I V Z k D 1 1 V A 3 1 4 NqnH3 N3qYL2(1 I 7 F ! F I C I ( I 1 Y I S I J I V I C O
3 d l d V N 1 0 3 1 r O l l V A113'111A 3 1 R I < < I Y U I d H i l d l X V J l H 1 5 1 XVWA
H013V3 S S ? N H ~ S ~ . P~ V~ I N N V ~ 5 1 NV
Y S l U S7Ofl13N1 C =
nsrn nN z = ~ N ~ I I V N ) I S ~ i~u n w MI SI I ~ O O H
eooo
1000
9nnn
5000
Cnno
rnOo
z000
ZSOO
?SO0
- ..
+****~*~99**0*l*9*+*t*Q*b**OIb*4*~*h*O9*~e~*****8****4*8******~
. OSOO
+ VVU 4 0 ' l Y 3 k V = l t J l S d l l
e ) I 0 4 1 7 V d S 3 1 V l S 3 N I 3 3 O = l Y 7 1 r l 7 N Y q u 3 9 h 1 3 3 3HV Z N 3 1 1 1 A 3 1 3
+ V W ? ~ YH ~ I ~ a 3 M 9 U V H ? ~ ' I ~ I ' : v w r l 5 V 0 1 1 3 3 1 . V 7 7 ~ 1 ~ 1 I S S l l ~d O J
Y 3 3 H ? D l t 1 - l 1 I V I 4 V I l 1 7 0 1 N 3 S 1 d V 4 W I 5 4 ' l N'J 5 7 1 7 H N V H ANVA
I + ~ 3 r= 3 r
3 3 N Y ' l 3 N N = B n P P OZS 0 0
n = ar
0 roo
1 I00
9100
5100
%I00
E roo
2100
1100
0100
6003
BOO0
1000
9000
so00
fOOO
Eon0
2000
** C n H t ' l l l t CRllnN t L t b ' A 1 I ~ h S ('N IIIJSIHLAM S l u t UF MANIiflLL
MAh FO* T H t P ~ J S b l t l L t C C ~ N ; C ~ I L ~ kRhjM U P S l H t A M MANHULE
*
I U h U ) Ilh NUL-1.
~ * * @ * @ * * * * + + * * L * ~ ~ ? O O O * * L * * * O * ~ * * * * * L * O O * * * * * * * * ~ * * * B * * * * * * *
kLI(I1) ELVP'tJPlhrUL .MNUrPAh) '
560
J.
ZQ -
FfLL E L S 1 A l l N h U L ~ N k L t V ~ h ~ ~ t L t ~ T A T C , E L ~ I O q L L H ~ ~ L M A X U ~ h D L ~ M A N ~
0
DO 5 6 0 KK=2 h E L E V -
I F ( E L H ( 1 tKK1. L C .EL+( L q K K - 1 1 1 J E U KK 1 - -
I F 1 JEC. EQ .O) bhJ TO 5 9 0
I F ( J E 0 . L F . J F J l 4 h ) tlYMUPIh9LlMNUqMAN) r ELHI~,NNEL*JEQ)
I F l ? L O . L k . J L E H N l iC TO 5 9 0
JE 0
DO 2 7 0 J J U U a N Y E L t N N E E
JE JE * 1
XJE = JE
I F I J E O . NE m J J J C ) GOpTO 5 7 0
ELVPUPlhDLlM*UeMAN)
GO TO 5 7 5
ELkI1,NLLEVl XJ -
CONTlhUE
CON1 1 NUC
CLNT INUE
CONTINUE
CON11 NU
4??I!22S*************************************
***************v*****************************
RETURN
ElvD
.
* e : + * l ~ O * 8 ~ $ * L ~ ~ L l l d * O * I ~ I * * 1 1 ) B * O * I I I * * * * * $ * ~ ? @ * ~ 4 ~ ~ I ~ I $ ~
I f l N l r ' I = O'JW COZ 7 0
~ 8 8 1 6 * 1 0 U ~ L O ~ I I L * ~ t * * * 8 ~ * ( 1 ~ O t ~ I ? f 1 * $ 1 b I O 8 * * 8 E ~ ~ ~ ~ $ * * * * ~ : 8 8 ~
+ 1 l N 27'415 Y 3 4 4'411 l V [ l r l Y L S I H'I3wJSI'"lO F.3 5 3 1 3 l i N V d AHVA 9
8 * 4 + ~ ~ 0 0 * B * ~ * * l * l ~ U I * * I * ~ t * * 6 * * * B * I ~ O * * O * * * * ~ * ~ 1 ~ * ~ * t ~ ~ 8 D ~ ~
q n u l 1un7 scoo
3E00
COO
ZEOO
IEOO
ocoo
6200
BZOO
L ZOO
9200
5203
+ZOO
EZOO
2200
1200
0 203
6 100
8103
LIOO
9100
S 100
'r100
El00
0 1 IN14 2100
1100
0100
6030
enoo
LO09
9003
SO00
90 0 0
coo0
H R V 'N ZOO0
2930
1 BOO
OF30
6LOO
BL30
-~ -
z = onvii
I + 1ON = V l O N
(OVVH'T~lflVIflJidA13 = OIWl3
O - (ONVH'14lCNlOIWAl3 = (CVVW l + l O ~ l I O I H A 1 3
3nN IJ N 3 3 OSC
oo? 01 09 ( 0 - 3~ - ( n 3 3 . i 3 r * n v v h 1 i + i ~ ~) r r o l r ~ l j ~
A 3 1 3 N ' l = Y 3 3 H 3 r OSE 0 0
3flNI I N 3 3 OOE
1 a ~ v ~ ~ r r 1 d n ~ ~ ~ r r ~ ? s (rn ~o 73q 1~q v1 3n1 1*nnn ~ v ~
OOF n l 03 t z m 11 ' I r n n N l d r
062
ORZ
OOZ
L SO0
9500
5 'roo
'rf 0 0
CSOO
LSOO
1 'roo
ou j~j n
Y33H30 = I W # l d f l V l O I t Y Y l d f l V l 3 ' 'H33430lj1
s s 0 1 os t o - o - 3 3 ! : r r , d n v r n , j l
~ Z l l I d f l ~ ' j P Z h ' l - 1 3 N ) ~=~- Y ~ 3O3 H 3 0
09 0 1 09 ID -3 dnrljl
1 n g ~ d n z d ~~ 1 3r ~r ~ l = r ndfIP
A313Ybl=X!d 0 9 3 0
001 = V3Mll
Od O d 0 9 10 - 0 3 ' B n U ~ ' d f i Z d ' 1 - l O b l l l 4 1
N Y N U ~ I = ~ ~ OL Z ~ 00
0 = NX41I
1 1 - 1 3 Y l Y 4 = NVNH
2.4 0 1 7 3 11: 0 3 ' 7 O N l J 1
0'0 IllXld~VlO
A313N8 1-31> 0 s 0 0
+O+L~9b*~~t+49~~++**9*4*O*********b****4******Q*d*~*3*~~~5~~*~~*~@
a 3>0UNVh S l d f l 1V 3 3 1 3 k V 1 3 W V 3 M l t d f l I S 3 9 H V l N 3 A 0 3 3 8 Oh 3kll'lON
a+8rat6+U4d+**1~a+**(i89*1B*******b**eb~****Q*4e**eU~~*~**UO~Qa*+*~
tnvdaiov)lS3uva = r ~ r iIC 3 3 -WOOW)JI 200
fflhhe1ONlHl1dld l d l d 2200
I h l d f l l l ( ! Y3ISV3d10 1200
1 6 ' Z l ~ 1 3NSISY3NIO 0200
~ ~ a s 1 0 ~ ~ s n s ~Y J InS V 1 ~ A I~
O ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~1 333 ~ v ~
1 G 1 6 l d f l 3 j N31SY3WIO 8I00
I S 6 5 ' 3 1 I 1 Z+H3931NI L 100
16 ' 5 ' 0 1 l P r 0 1 r N 2 9 U 3 3 3 1 N I 9100
~ O I ) N W ~ ~ S l 'd ~I l d~AOl 3P
' 15'01 l @ I Y A 1 3 ' 1 ~ ' O lA 3 N!llSN3UIO 5100
1 5 ' 0 T l 3 1 3 d l d ' I S ' C ' 4 I J h : n i N31SN3WIO *TOO
t6bS'9TlHV10~lh'S'011A31j~ Z * u 3 3 3 1 N 1 I00
I S a 3 1l J ~ 1 3 ' l C ' 0 1 l Y l l d l d NOISN3H13 2'100
Z V 1 3 i l ' T V l 3 Z ' Z V H d l V ' I V H A l V /ZIVaWV/YJWd33 II 0 0
1301W / O I V 3 8 d / Y 3 U d ? 3 0100
SYSI H6IS3dV0/bV3dVIt43h'dO3 6000
d!l33/RV38V/Y3~d03 8090
rr31rd/9V3YI/N3Wd33 LOO0
N W ' Q ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ' O I W A ~ ~ ' A ~ ~ ~ ~ / S V ~ ~ V / N 9O0 W 9 0~ O ~
313AId'3Ynj/b~;~~/~3~433 5000
UV1C6A313d/EV3dV/Y3Wd33 5000
I'jN13'Wlld1d/ZV3YV/Y3WdD3 EOOO
II~IPN'NIWS~~N d AI 0 3 ' 1 1 0 h l B 3 1 V 1 5 0 ' X ~ 4 A ' Y V ' A 3 1 3 N / I V 3 U ~ / ~ ' 3 h d 0 3 ZOO0
da+ltb++++0ea*0e++*UO4*4d*****b*t****Q*****U*~***+~**~b1b:~~~@b~a~
a 1 3 d I d 3H1 S S W 3 V U911VA313 N1 d 7 h 3 1 V 7 1 5 1 3 3 3 H3V3 H331SYD3 9 1
e a o o r n ~ n 3 31.11 NI 1 - s ~ q 3 7n1r3n3 # V ? V l S N 9 3 3 l ~ ~ I V I S ~ n d l n o341 ~ Y I
a l e S A 3 1 3 YPI3W3 d V 3 M l S d f l l S 3 1 V l S 1 7 d N I 3 H I S31klVn 3 k l l l l O M d f l S S I H I
a+a++a+++ta~++04tO+a~9P~dB*4*~~*~****tLO***+******b~~ba4aau~*a~+a~
IH13'13NY'OIW13'flNW'flNY'lOR;ldPYOl3 3NIln018flS
2900
5903
E900
2900
1900
0900
6500
OSOO