A STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIAL ON MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS

Direction: Please evaluate this Strategic Intervention Material Entitled MITOSIS AND
MEIOSIS honestly. Rest assured that your answers will be kept confidential by the
researcher. Write also for your comments and suggestions for more improvement of this
SIM.
Please indicate your answers by putting check () the following responses for
every category:

4 Strongly Agree
3 Agree
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree

CRITERIA 4 3 2 1
Title Card
The title was short and catchy.
Attractive and appealing to the eye of the students.
Title was enticing to the students to use it.
Title was significantly related to the competency being
measured.
Guide Card
Attracts the reader significantly.
Words used were simple and easily be understood.
Sentences were grammatically correct.
Guide title and statements were enticing to the students.
Least learned competency is clearly stated.
Activity Cards
Activities were appropriately designed to the level of the
students.
Activities were paralleled to the least learned competency
and sub-tasks.
Activities were designed to measure to its truest objectives.
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
students.
Assessment Cards
Assessments were appropriately designed to the level of the
students.
Assessments were paralleled to the least learned
competency and sub-tasks.
Assessments were designed to measure to its truest
objectives.
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
students.
Enrichment Cards
Enrichments were appropriately designed to the level of the
students.
Enrichments were paralleled to the least learned competency
and sub-tasks.
Enrichments were designed to measure to its truest
objectives.
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the
students.
Reference Card
 Needed and important details were fully discussed.
Language used were simple and easily be understood by the
students.
Information were mainly content the subject and very relevant
to the competency being measured.
Answer's key was stipulated for quick reference of the
students for the correcting their answers.

Comments and Suggestions:

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________

________________________________
Evaluators Signature Over Printed Name
 RESULT OF THE EVALUATION AND VALIDATION OF THE MITOSIS AND
MEIOSIS (A STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIAL)
IN TEACHING MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS

CRITERIA Mean Interpretation

Title Card
The title was short and catchy. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Attractive and appealing to the eye of the students. 3.8 Strongly Agree
Title was enticing to the students to use it. 3.8 Strongly Agree
Title was significantly related to the competency being measured. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Guide Card
Attracts the reader significantly. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Words used were simple and easily be understood. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Sentences were grammatically correct. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Least learned competency is clearly stated. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Activity Cards
Activities were appropriately designed to the level of the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Activities were paralleled to the least learned competency and sub-
tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Activities were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Assessment Cards
Assessments were appropriately designed to the level of the
students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Assessments were paralleled to the least learned competency and
sub-tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Assessments were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Enrichment Cards
Enrichments were appropriately designed to the level of the
students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Enrichments were paralleled to the least learned competency and
sub-tasks. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Enrichments were designed to measure to its truest objectives. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Directions were clearly stated and understandable to the students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Reference Card
Needed and important details were fully discussed. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Language used were simple and easily be understood by the
students. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Information were mainly content the subject and very relevant to
the competency being measured. 4.0 Strongly Agree
Answer's key was stipulated for quick reference of the students for
the correcting their answers. 4.0 Strongly Agree

Legend:

INTERPRETATION SCALE
3.1 4.0 Strongly Agree 1.1 2.0 Disagree
2.1 3.0 Agree 0.1 1.0 Strongly Disagree