Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pembimbing
dr. Masitah Wilya,
Sp.M
Program Pendidikan
Profesi Dokter
Fakultas Kedokteran
dan Kesehatan
Universitas
Muhammadiyah
Jakarta
2017
IJMS
Vol 39, No 2, Supplement March 2014 Original Article
Correspondence:
Seyed Hamid Reza Jahadi Hosseini, MD;
Department of Ophthalmology,
Khalili Hospital,
Khalili St., Shiraz, Iran
Tel: +98 711 2302830
Fax: +98 711 2302830 Email:
jahadih@sums.ac.ir Received: Abstract
23 December 2012
Revised: 5 March 2013
Background: We sought to determine the efficacy of topical tranexamic
Accepted: 7 April 2013 acid (5%) in the management of traumatic hyphema. Methods: Thirty
eyes with gross traumatic hyphema were enrolled in this study. The
patients were treated with tranexamic acid (5%) eye drop every 6 hours
for 5 days. The main outcome measures were best corrected visual
acuity (BCVA), Intra-ocular pressure (IOP), day of clot absorption, and
rate of rebleeding. These parameters were evaluated daily for 4 days
and thereafter at the 8th and 14th days after treatment. The patients
were also compared with two historical control groups of patients (80
eyes) with traumatic hyphema; the first control group was treated with
oral placebo and the other group was treated with oral tranexamic acid
at our department.
Result: Prior to treatment, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle
of resolution (logMAR) BCVA was 0.590.62. BCVA was increased to
0.080.14 at day 14 (P<0.001) and the mean IOP before treatment
was 13.73.9 mm Hg, which was reduced to 11.41.8 mm Hg at day
14 (P=0.004). Rebleeding occurred in one (3.3%) patient on the 4 th
day post treatment. Comparison between the case group and the
other two historical control groups with respect to the rebleeding rate
demonstrated statistically significant differences between the case
group and the first control group (P=0.008) but no statistically
significant differences between the case group and the second
control group (P=0.25).
Conclusion: Topical tranexamic acid seems promising in the
management of traumatic hyphema. However, the small sample
size of the present study precludes the conclusion that topical
tranexamic acid can replace the oral tranexamic acid.
Please cite this article as: Jahadi Hosseini SHR, Khalili MR, Motallebi M. Comparison
between Topical and Oral Tranexamic Acid in Management of Traumatic Hyphema.
Iran J Med Sci. 2014;39(2):178-183.
180
Iran J Med Sci Supplement March 2014; Vol 39
No 2
Topical tranexamic acid in hyphema
Table 3: Mean age, IOP,* hyphema, clearance, and day of rebleeding in the oral placebo and topical tranexamic acid groups
Variable Oral placebo Topical tranexamic acid t test (p)
(historical control group 1) (case group)
(n=80) (n=30)
mean (SD) range mean (SD) range
Age (y/o) 14.8 (10.7) 3-58 27.4 (10.6) 8-48 0.001
IOP (mm Hg) before 18 (9.2) 3-48 13.7 (3.9) 8-28 0.001
treatment
IOP (mm Hg) after 12.1 (6.8) 3-26 11.4 (18) 9-16 0.05
treatment
Hyphema clearance (day) 3.7 (1.6) 1-8 4.1 (1.7) 2-8 0.20
Day of rebleeding 3.8 (1.0) 2-6 4 4 0.001
*Intra-ocular pressure
Table 4: Sex, laterality, hyphema level, and rebleeding in the oral and topical tranexamic acid groups
Variable Systemic tranexamic acid Topical tranexamic acid (case Chi-square (p)
(historical control group 2) group)
(n=80) [no.(%)] (n=30) [no.(%)]
Sex (male) 63 (79) 24 (80) 0.912
Eye (right) 39 (49) 18 (60) 0.003
Grade 1 hyphema 62 (77.5) 22 (73.3) 0.067
Grade 2 hyphema 13 (16.25) 5 (16.7) 0.960
Grades 3 and 4 hyphema 5 (6.25) 3 (10) 0.502
Rebleeding 8 (10) 1 (3.3) 0.254
Table 5: Mean age, IOP,* hyphema clearance, and day of rebleeding in the oral and topical tranexamic acid groups
Variable Systemic tranexamic acid
Topical tranexamic acid (case group)
(historical control group 2)
t test (p)
(n=80) (n=30)
mean (SD) range mean (SD) range
Age (y/o) 14.9 (12.6) 1-65 27.4 (10.6) 8-48 0.001
IOP (mm Hg) before
17.8 (6) 9-36 13.7 (3.9) 8-28 0.001
treatment
IOP (mm Hg) after
10.5 (4.3) 9-17 11.4 (18) 9-16 0.013
treatment
Hyphema clearance (day) 4 (2.2) 1-11 4.1 (1.7) 2-8 0.07
Day of rebleeding 3.4 (0.7) 2-4 4 4 0.001
*Intra-ocular pressure
treated with oral placebo at our department (26/80)]
therapeutic concentrations, which may result
demonstrated statistically significant differences. In in drug intolerance because of serious side
contrast, comparison (power for the chi-squared effects. Local or organ-specific administration
test of 54.8%) of the rates of rebleeding between of the drug is desirable because of the potential
the case group and the second historical control to reduce or eliminate systemic toxicities and
group [comprising 80 patients with hyphema to improve therapeutic efficacy. The eye is
treated with oral tranexamic acid at our department one of the most ideal sites in the human body
(8/80)] demonstrated no statistically significant for direct drug delivery because the intraocular
differences.10 Although topical tranexamic acid structures are relatively easy to access. Be that
was shown to be effective in the management of as it may, they are isolated from the systemic
traumatic hyphema, it cannot be a certain substitute circulation by bloodocular barriers. These
for oral tranexamic acid due to the small number barriers minimize systemic absorption and side
of cases. effects.15 To justify the topical administration of
Oral administration is a major route of tranexamic acid, an important question is whether
drug administration; nevertheless, the orally fibrinolysis occurs at the aqueous or vascular side
administered drugs must reach the intraocular of the clot. Topical tranexamic acid may be an
tissue and fluids through the blood circulation. attractive alternative to systemic delivery in the
Moreover, due to bloodocular barriers, treatment of traumatic hyphema, but the efficacy
large amounts of the drug and frequent of topical treatment has been questioned. The
administrations are required to maintain answer to this question determines whether
Judul:
Comparison between Topical and Oral Tranexamic Acid in Management of Traumatic
Hyphema
Latar belakang:
Hi
fema adalah perdarahan di dalam bilik mata depan.
Penyebab terseringnya adalah trauma.
Komplikasi yang paling banyak terjadi adalah rebleeding (< 5%) pada 25 hari
setelah cedera.
Komplikasi ini berhubungan dengan kejadian glaukoma, atrofi N. II, kekeruhan
kornea, ambliopia dan sinekia posterior/anterior mungkin memerlukan intervensi
St
udi menyebutkan pemberian antifibrinolitik sistemik menurunkan angka kejadian
reebeleding pada hipema traumatik.
Be
berapa obat anti fibrinolitik adalah asam tranexamat dan asam aminokaproik.
As
am tranexamat 8-10x lebih poten.
Tujuan Penelitian:
Di
ketahuinya keamanan dan efektivitas Asam Traneksamat topikal (5%) pada
manajemen pasien dengan hifema traumatik
Metodologi:
Ju
mlah subjek yang di beri asam tranexamat topical 30 orang dan placebo 80 orang
W
aktu dan tempat penelitian tidak dijelaskan
Kriteria Inklusi:
Telah dilakukan pemeriksaan oftalmologi umum
Bersedia diikutsertakan dalam penelitian
Kriteria Eksklusi:
Usia < 7 tahun
Wanita hamil dan menyusui
Pasien yang didiagnosis hifema mikroskopik, cedera pada segmen posterior.
Ada riwayat DM, hipertensi, gangguan pembekuan,
Sedang dalam terapi antikoagulan
Adanya riwayat pembedahan pada mata
Alur penelitian:
Subjek Penelitian BCVA, pupil, TIO, Bed rest posisi 30 derajat dan pelindung
Slitlamp mata
Hasil Penelitian:
Karakteristik Subjek
Variabel
Pe
mberian obat oral harus mencapai jaringan intaokular melalui vaskularisasi, dengan
adanya barrier pada okular, dibutuhkan jumlah obat dan frekuensi pemberian yang
cukup besar agar konsentrasi terapetik pada okular dapat tercapai.
Pe
mberian obat secara lokal atau langsung organ spesifik diharapkan dapat menurunkan
dan mengeliminasi toksisitas sistemik dan peningkatan efikasi terapi.