Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. William Shakespeare: Sonnets XVIII, CXXX, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Macbeth, A
Midsummer Nights Dream
2. Daniel Defoe: Robinson Crusoe
3. Jonathan Swift: Gullivers Travels
4. John Keats: Poems
5. Jane Austen: Pride and Prejudice
6. Charles Dickens: Great Expectations, David Copperfield
7. Lewis Carroll: Alices Adventures in Wonderland
8. Thomas Hardy: Tess of the DUrbervilles
9. Nathaniel Hawthorne: The Scarlet Letter
10. Walt Whitman: Leaves of Grass
11. Emily Dickinson: Poems
12. Mark Twain: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
13. Herman Melville: Moby Dick
14. Henry James: The Portrait of a Lady
15. Joseph Conrad: Heart of Darkness, Lord Jim
16. James Joyce: Ulysses, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
17. G. B. Shaw: Caesar and Cleopatra, Pygmalion
18. Virginia Woolf: Mrs Dalloway
19. F. S. Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby
20. Ernest Hemingway: The Old Man and the Sea
21. William Faulkner: The Sound and the Fury
22. T.S. Eliot: Waste Land
23. William Golding: Lord of the Flies
24. Forster, E.M.: A Passage to India
25. Fowles, John: The French Lieutenants Woman, The Magus
26. Poe, Edgar Allan: The Tell-Tale Heart
27. Vonnegut, Jr., Kurt: Slaughterhouse - Five (or The Childrens Crusade)
1.W. SHAKESPEARE HAMLET
CONTEXT
William Shakespeares father, John Shakespeare, moved to the idyllic town of Stratford-
upon-Avon in the mid-sixteenth century, where he became a successful landowner,
moneylender, wool and agricultural goods dealer, and glover. In 1557, he married Mary
Arden. John Shakespeare lived during a time when the middle class was growing and became
increasingly wealthy, thus allowing its members more freedoms and luxuries, and a stronger
voice in the local government. He took advantage of the opportunities afforded him through
this social growth, and in 1557 became a member of the Stratford Council, an event that
marked the beginning of an illustrious political career. By 1561 he was elected one of the
towns fourteen burgesses, and served successively as constable, one of two chamberlains,
and alderman. In these positions, he administered borough property and revenues. In 1567 he
was made bailiff, the highest elected office in Stratford the equivalent of a modern-day
mayor.
The town records indicate that William Shakespeare was John and Marys third child. His
birth is unregistered, but legend places it on April 23, 1564, partially because April 23 is the
day on which he died 52 years later. In any event, his baptism was registered with the town on
April 26, 1564. Not much is known about his childhood, although it is safe to assume that he
attended the local grammar school, the Kings New School, which was staffed with a faculty
that held Oxford degrees, and whose curriculum included mathematics, natural sciences, Latin
language and rhetoric, logic, Christian ethics, and classical literature. He did not attend a
university, but this was not unusual at the time, since university education was reserved for
prospective clergymen and was not considered a particularly mind-opening experience.
However, the education he received in grammar school was excellent, as evidenced by the
numerous classical and literary references in his plays. His early works especially drew on
such Greek and Roman greats as Seneca and Plautus. More impressive than his formal
education is the wealth of general knowledge exhibited in his works, from a working
knowledge of many professions to a vocabulary far greater than any other English writer.
In 1582, at age eighteen, William Shakespeare married 26-year-old Anne Hathaway.
Their first daughter, Susanna, was baptized only six months later, which has given rise to
much speculation concerning the circumstances surrounding their marriage. In 1585 Anne
bore twins, baptized Hamnet and Judith Shakespeare. Hamnet died at the young age of eleven,
by which time Shakespeare was already a successful playwright. Around 1589, Shakespeare
wrote his first play, Henry VI, Part 1. Sometime between his marriage and writing this play he
and his wife moved to London, where he pursued a career as a playwright and actor.
Although many records of Shakespeares life as a citizen of Stratford, including marriage
and birth certificates, are extant, very little information exists about his life as a young
playwright. Legend characterizes Shakespeare as a roguish young scrapper who was once
forced to flee London under sketchy circumstances. However the little written information
we have of his early years does not confirm this. Young Will was not an immediate and
universal success; the earliest written record of Shakespeares life in London comes from a
statement by rival playwright Robert Greene, who calls Shakespeare an upstart crow
[who] supposes he is as well able to bombast out a blank verse as the best of you hardly
high praise.
With Henry VI, The Comedy of Errors, and Titus Andronicus under his belt, Shakespeare
was, by 1590, a popular playwright, but 1593 marked a major leap forward in his career. By
the end of that year he garnered a prominent patron in the Earl of Southampton, and his Venus
and Adonis was published. It remains one of the first of his known works to be printed, and
was a huge success. Next came The Rape of Lucrece. Shakespeare had made his mark as a
poet, and most scholars agree that the majority of Shakespeares sonnets were probably
written in the 1590s.
In 1594 Shakespeare returned to the theater and became a charter member of the Lord
Chamberlains Men, a group of actors who changed their name to the Kings Men when
James I ascended the throne. By 1598 he was the principal comedian for the troupe, and by
1603 he was principal tragedian. He remained associated with the organization until his
death. At this time, acting and playwriting were not considered noble professions, but
successful and prosperous actors were relatively respected. Shakespeare was very successful
and made quite a bit of money, which he invested in Stratford real estate. In fact, in 1597 he
purchased the second largest house in Stratford, the New Place, for his parents. In 1596
Shakespeare applied for a coat of arms for his family, in effect making himself a gentleman,
and his daughters married successfully and wealthily.
The same year he joined the Lord Chamberlains Men, Shakespeare penned Romeo and
Juliet, along with Loves Labours Lost, The Taming of the Shrew, and several other plays.
Two of his greatest tragedies, Hamlet and Julius Caesar, followed in 1600 (or thereabout),
and the opening decade of the seventeenth century witnessed the debut performances of many
of his celebrated works: Richard III in 1601, Othello in 1604 or 1605, Antony and Cleopatra
in 1606 or 1607, and King Lear in 1608. The last play of his performed was probably King
Henry VIII, in either 1612 or 1613.
William Shakespeare lived until 1616, and his wife Anna died in 1623 at the age of 67.
He was buried in the chancel of his church at Stratford. The lines above his tomb (allegedly
written by Shakespeare himself) read:
Good friend, for Jesus sake forbear
To dig the dust enclosed here.
Blessed be the man that spares these stones
And cursed be he that moves my bones.
ABOUT HAMLET:
Hamlet was likely written in 1600, but the date of composition is uncertain. Most scholars feel
that the play came after Julius Caesar, which is alluded to 3.2.93 by Polonius. The first
reference to the play is by a printer named James Roberts, who entered the play into the
Stationers Register on July 26, 1602. The first known edition is in a quarto dated 1603, but
printed by Nicholas Ling and John Trundell. This text is only 2200 lines long, making it one
of the shorter versions of the play, as well as one of the inferior copies. Many scholars believe
this version to have been reconstructed from memory alone, probably by one or two of the
actors in Shakespeares company. The next edition, in 1604, seems to have used
Shakespeares handwritten draft, and is significantly larger and more comprehensive. The
third main edition is that of the First Folio in 1623. This version of the play seems to have
used the promptbook as its source, and thus more accurately portrays the play as
Shakespeares audience would have seen it. Due to discrepancies in the 1604 and 1623 texts,
many modern editors have conflated the two versions into a unified text.
The narrative behind Hamlet derives from the legendary story of Hamlet (Amleth) recounted
in the Danish History from the twelfth century, a Latin text by Saxo the Grammarian. This
version was later adapted into French by Francois de Belleforest in 1570. An unscrupulous
Feng kills his brother Horwendil and merries his brothers wife Gerutha. Horwendils and
Geruthas son Amleth, although still young, decides to avenge his fathers murder. He
pretends to be a fool in order to avoid suspicion, a strategy which works. With his mothers
active support, Amleth succeeds in killing Feng. He is then proclaimed King of Denmark.
There is no uncertainty in this story, although Belleforets version claims that Gerutha and
Feng are having an affair. In fact, in this version the murder of Horwendil is quite public, and
Amleths actions are considered to be a duty rather than a moral sin.
This version of Hamlet is likely what Shakespeare knew, along with another play done in
1589 in which a ghost apparently calls out, Hamlet, revenge!. However, this other play
from 1589 is largely lost, and scholars cannot agree on what parts of it Shakespeare may have
adopted or not, or if it even existed. Assuming it did exist, most scholars attribute it to
Thomas Kyd, author of The Spanish Tragedy in 1587. The Spanish Tragedy includes many of
the elements that Hamlet has, such as a ghost seeking revenge, a secret crime, a play-within-a-
play, a tortured hero who feigns madness, and a heroine who goes mad and commits suicide.
This play is focused on revenge, and actually precipitated the genre of revenge plays of which
Hamlet is a part.
The revenge play that Hamlet falls into includes five typical assumptions. Revenge must
be on an individual level against some insult or wrong. Second, the individual may not have
recourse to traditional means of punishment, such as courts, because of the power of the
person or persons against whom revenge will be enacted. Third, the lust for revenge is an
internal desire, which can only be satisfied by personally carrying out the revenge. Fourth, the
revenge must make the intended victim aware of why the revenge is being carried out. Lastly,
revenge is a universal decree that supercedes any particular religious doctrine, including
Christianity.
Hamlet is a play a questions. Unresolved questions are constantly being asked, about
whether the gost of Old Hamlet is friendly or a demon, or whether Ophelia commits suicide or
dies accidentally. The first act sets the scene for the rest of the play, What art thou (1.1.45),
Is it not like the king? (1.1.57), What does this mean, my lord? (1.4.8). The inability to
know the truth and to act on it is encapsulated in Hamlet himself, who is constantly seeking
the answers to his questions throughout the play. This sense of constant questioning is
perhaps best epitomized in the opening line, Whos there? (1.1.1).
Hamlet as a character remains tantalizingly difficult to interpret. The German poet Johann
Wolfgang von Goethe described him as a poet, a sensitive man who is too weak to deal with
the political pressures of Denmark. The twentieth century has had Sigmund Freud, who
viewed Hamlet in terms of an Oedipus complex, a sexual desire for his mother. This complex
is associated with the wish to kill his father and sleep with his mother. Freud points out that
Hamlets uncle has usurped his fathers rightful place, and therefore has replaced his father as
the man who must die. However, Freud is careful to note that Hamlet represents modern man
precisely because he does not kill Claudius in order to sleep with his mother, but rather kills
him to revenge his mothers death. Political interpretations of Hamlet also abound, in which
Hamlet hides the spirit of political resistance, or represents a challenge to a corrupt regime.
Stephen Greenblatt, the editor of the Norton Edition of Shakespeare, views these interpretive
attempts of Hamlet as mirrors for the interpretation in the play itself. Polonius attributes
Hamlets madness to his rejection by Ophelia, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern feel Hamlet
suffers from ambition, a desire to succeed his father on the elective throne of Denmark.
Hamlets madness is itself doubtful at times, Hamlet claims to pretending. Claudius doubts
his nephews madness, but at the same time Hamlets melancholy nature is clearly expressed
in the beginning by his continued mourning for his father. In Shakespeares time excessive
melancholy was often associated with forms of madness, and so Hamlet, already exhibiting
bouts of melancholy, makes himself a natural candidate for madness.
The soliloguies are dramatically rhetorical speeches of self-reflection. These have already
been seen in the characters of Brutus in Julius Caesar and Prince Hal in Henry IV, Part. 1
Hamlet is a culmination of these characters, capable of far more complexity and
psychological introspection. Indeed, in order to allow Hamlet to bring his mind to full
expression, Shakespeare allegedly introduced over 600 new words into the English language
in this play alone.
SHORT SUMMARY: Hamlet starts with soldiers changing the guard outside of Elsinore
Castle in Denmark. The new guards have brought along a scholar named Horatio because they
claim to have seen a ghost. Horatio is skeptical of their story until the ghost actually appears.
He then tries to speak to it, but the ghost remains silent until it stalks away.
Horatio tells the guards that the ghost was dressed the same way Old Hamlet (the former King
of Denmark and Hamlets father) was dressed when he defeated King Fortinbras of Norway.
He further tells them that young Fortinbras, the son, has gathered together an army to attack
Denmark. At this point the ghost reappears and Horatio again begs it to speak to him. The
ghost seems about to say something but at that moment a cock crows and the ghost vanishes.
The guards and Horatio decide to tell Hamlet what they have seen.
King Claudius, who is Hamlets uncle and who assumed the throne after Hamlets father
died, is in the castle. He has recently married Queen Gertrude, who is Hamlets mother and
the widow to Old Hamlet. Claudius is worried about the fact that young Fortinbras has raised
an army against Denmark, and so he sends out messengers to the uncle of young Fortinbras
asking him to stop his nephew. Claudius, then turns to Laertes, the son of Polonius, and asks
him why he requested an audience. Laertes asks the king for permission to return to France,
which he is granted.
Claudius finally turns his attention to Hamlet, who is standing in black robes of mourning
for his father. He tells Hamlet that it is unnatural for a man to mourn for such a long period of
time. Queen Gertrude agrees, and asks Hamlet to wear normal clothes again. Both the king
and queen then beg Hamlet to stay with them at the castle rather than return to his studies in
Wittenberg. Hamlet agrees to stay, and both his mother and his uncle rush out of tha palace to
celebrate their new wedding.
Horatio arrives with the guards and tells Hamlet that they have seen his fathers ghost. Hamlet
is extremely interested in this, and informs them that he will join them for the watch that
night.
Laertes is finishing his packing and is also giving his sister Ophelia some brotherly advice
before h leaves. He warns her to watch out for Hamlet whom he has seen wooing her. Laertes
tell Ophelia to ignore Hamlets overtures towards her until he is made king, at which point if
he still wants to marry her then she should consent. Polonius arrives and orders his son to
hurry up and get to the ship. Polonius then gives Laertes some fatherly advice, telling him to
behave himself in France. Laertes departs, leaving Ophelia with Polonius. Polonius then turns
to her and asks what has been going on between her and Hamlet. She tells him that Hamlet
has professed his love to her, but Polonius only laughs and calls her ignorant. He then orders
her to avoid Hamlet and to not believe his protestantions of love. Ophelia promises to obey
her father.
Hamlet, Horatio and a guard meet outside to see whether the ghost will appear. It soon arrives
and silently beckons Hamlet to follow it. Hamlet pushes away Horatio, who is trying to hold
him back, and runs after the ghost. The guard tells Horatio that they had better follow Hamlet
and make sure he is alright.
The ghost finally stops and turns to Hamlet. He tells Hamlet that he is the ghost of Old
Hamlet, who has come to tell his son the truth about how he died. He tells Hamlet that he was
sitting in the garden one day, asleep in his chair, when Claudius came up to him and poured
poison into his ear. He was killed immediately, and because he was not allowed to confess his
sins, he is now suffering in Purgatory. The ghost of Old Hamlet then orders his son to seek
revenge for this foul crime before departing.
Hamlet is confused about whether to believe the ghost or not, but he makes Horatio and the
guard swear to never reveal what they have seen. He decides that he will pretend to be mad in
order to fool Claudius and Gertrude until he is able to know whether Claudius really killed his
father or not.
Polonius sends his servant Reynaldo to France in order to spy on Laertes. He order Reynaldo
to ask the other Danes what sort of reputation Laertes has in order to make sure his son is
behaving. Reynaldo promises to do this and leaves for France. Ophelia enters looking
extremely frightened and informs her father that Hamlet has gone mad. She tells him that
Hamlet entered the room where she was sewing and took her wrist. After starting into her
eyes for a long while he walked out of the room without ever taking his eyes off of her.
Polonius concludes that Hamlet must have gone mad because he ordered Ophelia to reject
Hamlets affections.
Claudius and Gertrude have invited two friends of Hamlet to come and spy on Hamlet. They
are aware that Hamlet is acting strangely and want the friends to figure out what the problem
is. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, eager to please King Claudius, agree to try and find out
what is wrong with Hamlet. They leave, and Polonius enters with news that the messengers
are back from Norway. Claudius tells him to bring the messengers in.
The messengers inform Claudius that after they arrived, the uncle of Fortinbras sent his
nephew a summons. Young Fortinbras obeyed, and the uncle chastised him for attempting to
attack Denmark. Fortinbras apologized for his behavior and received an annual allowance
from his uncle as a token of goodwill. Further, the uncle gave Fortinbras permission to attack
Poland. Since Fortinbras would have to march through Denmark in order to reach Poland, the
uncle sent Claudius a letter asking for safe passage. Claudius, overjoyed by this news, assents
to give permission.
Polonius then tells him that he knows the reason for Hamlets madness. He reads Claudius
and Gertrude one of the letters Hamlet sent to Ophelia in which Hamlet professes his love for
her. Claudius is not entirely convinced, and so he and Polonius agree to set up a meeting
between Hamlet and Ophelia that they will be able to spy on.
Hamlet enters the room and cuts their plotting short. Polonius asks the king and queen to
leave him alone with their son, to which they assent. Polonius then tries to talk to Hamlet,
who, feigning madness, calls him a fishmonger and asks him if he has a daughter. Hamlet
continues to insult Polonius until Polonius finally gives up in frustration.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern arrive and Hamlet recognizes them. He greets them warmly
and asks what brings them to Denmark. They only give an ambiguous answer, from which
Hamlet infers that Claudius asked them to come. Hamlet then reveals to them that he has been
very melancholic lately, and gives that as the reason he has been acting mad. They try to cheer
him up by telling him some actors arrived with them on their ship. Hamlet is overjoyed to
hear this news, and he immediately goes to find the actors.
He succeeds in finding the players and asks them to perform a speech from Dido and Aeneas
for him. One of them agrees and performs the part where Priam, the father of Aeneas, is
killed. He then continues with the part where Hecuba, Priams wife, sees her husband being
murdered and lets out a cry that rouses even the gods. Hamlet tells him it is enough when
Polonius begs the actor to stop. He then asks the actors if they can perform the murder of
Gonzago as well some extra lines that he will write for them. They agree and leave to rehearse
their parts. Hamlet meanwhile has compared the murder of Priam to his own fathers murder
and has become outraged with Claudius, whom he hopes to reveal as the murderer through the
play that he asked the actors to perform that night.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern tell Claudius and Gertrude that they really do not know what
the matter with Hamlet is. They can only say that he seems distracted, but that arrival of the
actors made him happier. Polonius then tells Claudius that Hamlet is putting on a play that
night and requested that they attend. Claudius agrees to go.
Polonius hears Hamlet coming and he and Claudius quickly made Ophelia stand in clear view
while they hide themselves. Hamlet enters and gives his To be or not to be; that is the
question (3.1.58) speech. He stops when he sees Ophelia and goes over to speak with her.
Hamlet rudely tells her that he never loved her and orders her to go to a nunnery. After he
leaves, Claudius tells Polonius that Hamlet does not seem to be mad because of Ophelia, but
Polonius still believes that she is the real reason for his melancholic madness.
Hamlet puts on a play called The Mousetrap for Claudius and Gertrude, as well as other
attendants in the castle. The play involves a king who is murdered by his nephew while
sleeping in the garden. As the nephew pours poison into the kings ears, King Claudius
becomes so outraged that he stands up, thereby forcing the play to end. He orders light to be
shown on him and talks angrily out of the room.
Hamlet is delighted by this and is convinced that the ghost was telling the truth. Horatio
agrees with him. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern then arrive and tell Hamlet that his mother
wants to see him in her private chambers immediately. Polonius soon arrives with the same
news. Hamlet sends them all away and plans to reveal what he knows to his mother in order to
see if she was part of the plot to kill his father.
Claudius overcome with emotion, prays to heaven to forgive him his sin. He admits to
committing the murder of his brother. Hamlet enters silently with his sword and is about to
kill Claudius when he realizes that Claudius is praying. Since that would mean that Claudius
would absolved of his sins if he died right then, Hamlet stops and decides to wait until he can
kill Claudius when his soul may be as damned and black as hell (3.3.94-95).
Hamlet then goes to see his mother. He immediately insults her for having married Claudius
so soon after his fathers death. She gets scared and calls for help, causing Polonius (who is
hidden behind a curtain spying on them) to make a sound. Hamlet pulls out his dagger and
kills Polonius through the curtain, but he is disappointed when her realizes it is not the king.
Hamlet then shows his mother two pictures of both Claudius and Old Hamlet, comparing
them for her. She is almost at the point where she believes him when the ghost appears and
Hamlet starts to speak to it. Gertrude, unable to see the ghost, concludes that Hamlet must be
truly mad and starts to agree with everything he says in order to get him out of her room.
Claudius, once Gertrude tells him what has happened, orders Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to
prepare to take Hamlet with them in England. He then orders the body of Polonius to be found
since Hamlet has hidden it. Hamlet eventually reveals the location of the body and then leaves
the castle that night.
While traveling away from Elsinore, Hamlet encounters Fortinbras army. Fortinbras has just
send Claudius a message telling him that the Norwegian army is there and requesting safe
passage. Hamlet asks one of the captains what part of Poland they are attacking. The captain
refuses to reveal the exact location, and there remains the possibility that Denmark is the true
target, although this is not revealed in the play.
Ophelia has meanwhile gone mad at the death of her father. Horatio tries to take care of her,
but finally asks Gertrude to help him. Claudius and Gertrude order Horatio to keep an eye on
her. Soon thereafter Laertes arrives with a mob. He has returned from France once he learned
of Polonius death and is intent on killing the murderer of his father. Claudius calms him
down and tells him that Hamlet is the murderer, and since Hamlet has been sent to England
there is no one there to kill. Laertes then sees Ophelia, who fails to recognize him and instead
gives him a flower.
Hamlet send letters back to Denmark. He tells Horatio that the ship was attacked by pirates
and that he managed to escape in the process by joining the pirates for a short while as their
prisoner. He also tells Horatio that he sent Rosencrantz and Guildenstern on to England, but
that he will be returning shortly. Claudius also receives a letter from Hamlet informing hm
that Hamlet will soon return home. Claudius immediately plots a way to kill Hamlet by
having Laertes fight him in a fencing match. Laertes decides to put poison on the tip of his
rapier so that any small scratch will kill Hamlet, and Claudius tells him he will also poison a
cup of wine and give it to Hamlet as a backup measure. At that moment Gertrude enters and
tells the men that Ophelia has drowned herself in a brook. She and Claudius follow Laertes,
who is once more grief-stricken.
Hamlet and Horatio come across two gravediggers who are digging a fresh grave. They are
engaged in wordplay until one of the men sends the other away to fetch him some liquor.
Hamlet watches as the remaining man tosses up skulls and signs while he works. He finally
approaches the man and asks who the one skull belonged to. The gravedigger tells him it was
Yoricks, a court fool whom Hamlet knew from his youth. Hamlet is shaken by the skull and
ponders the fact that all of them return to the earth. He and Horatio are forced to run and hide
when Laertes, Claudius and Gertrude arrive with the coffin.
They place the coffin into the ground , but the priest refuses to say any prayers for the dead
because Ophelia committed suicide rather than die a natural death. Laertes argues with him,
but finally gives up and jumps into the grave in grief. Hamlet, when he realizes who is dead,
comes out of hiding and also jumps into the grave. Laertes grabs him by the throat and
Claudius is forced to order the other men to intervene and separate them.
Back in the castle Hamlet tells Horatio that before he go off the ship he stole the letters
Claudius had given to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. The letters asked the English king to kill
Hamlet. Hamlet, furious at this betrayal, wrote new letters in which he asked the king to kill
the messengers, namely Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
A lord named Osric enters the room and informs Hamlet that Laertes has challenged hm to a
fencing match. Claudius has bet Laertes that he cannot defeat Hamlet by more than three hits
during twelve engagements. Hamlet agrees to the dual even though Horatio tells him he
cannot win. They enter the match room, and Claudius announces that if Hamlet scores a hit
during the first, second, or third bout, then he will drop a valuable pearl into a cup of wine and
give it to Hamlet.
Laertes and Hamlet choose their foils and proceed to fight. . Hamlet scores a hit which Osric
upholds, and Claudius drops his pearl into some wine which he offers to Hamlet. Hamlet,
excited by the match, refuses to drink it and asks for the next round. They fight again, and
Hamlet wins the next hit as well. Gertrude, thrilled at how well her son is fighting, takes the
cup of wine from Claudius and drinks it to celebrate Hamlets hit. Claudius turns pale when
he realizes that she has drunk the poisoned wine, but he says nothing.
They fight again, and Laertes slashes Hamlet out of turn with his poisoned foil, causing
Hamlet to bleed. Hamlet is infuriated and attacks him viciously, causing him to drop the foil.
Hamlet gets both rapiers and accidentally tosses his rapier over to Laertes. He then slashes
Laertes with the poisoned foil, drawing blodd as well. They stop fighting when they realize
that Queen Gertrude is lying on the ground.
Gertrude realizes that she has been poisoned and tells Hamlet that it was the drink. She dies,
and Laertes tells Hamlet that he too is going to die from the poisoned tip. Hamlet, even more
furious than before, slashes Claudius with the poisoned tip. He then takes the wine chalice and
forces the poison into Claudius mouth until Claudius falls dead into the ground. Laertes is
also on the ground at this point and he forgives Hamlet for killing Polonius before he too dies.
Hamlet sees Horatio about to drink the remaining poisoned wine and orders him to stop. He
tells Horatio that only he can tell the people what really happened and thus reveal the truth.
Osric comes in at that moment and informs them that Fortinbras and some ambassadors from
England have arrived. Hamlets final words are to give Fortinbras his vote to become the next
King of Denmark.
Fortinbras arrived and looks over the scene of dead bodies. The ambassadors also enter the
room and inform Horatio that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have been put to death. Horatio
asks Fortinbras to order the bodies placed in the public view so that he can tell the people
what happened. Fortinbras final act is to order his soldiers to give Hamlet a military salute by
firing their guns.
SHAKESPEARES SONNETS
Shakespeares sonnets comprise 154 poemes in sonnet form that were published in 1609 but
likely written over the course of several years. Evidence for their existence long preceding
publication comes from a reference in Francis Meres 1598 Palladis Tamia, Wits Treasury,
where his allusion to Shakespeares sugred Sonnets among his private friends might
indicate that the poet preferred not to make these works public. It is unclear whether the 1609
publication, at the hands of a certain Thomas Thorpe, was from an authorized manuscript of
Shakespeares; it is possible that the sonnets were published without the authors consent,
perhaps even without his knowledge.
This is but one of the mysteries of Shakespeares sonnets. Another, which continues to spur
debate among literary scholars today, is the identity of the publications dedicatee, the
collections onlie begetter, a Mr. W.H. Speculation largely vacillates between two main
candidates: Mr. William Herbert, third Earl of Pembroke; and Mr. Henry Wriothesley, third
Earl of Southampton. Both possible are tenable, as both were men of means and literary
interest enough to be patrons to Shakespeare. In fact the poet dedicated other works to each:
his First Folio to Herbert and his Venus and Adonis and Lucrece to Wriothesley. Those who
favor one man or the other draw on circumstantial evidence concerning his life and character,
such as the amicable terms on which Shakespeare is known to have been with Wriothesley, or
events in Herberts life that may be intimated in the exploits of the sonnets fair lord.
The fair lord is one of three recurring characters in the sonnets, together with the dark and the
rival poet. The real-world referents of these persons are yet another locus of controversy.
Some critics suggest that the fair lord and the collections dedicatee are one and the same,
while others disagree. Still others question the autobiographical nature of the sonnets, arguing
that there is no hard proof that their content is anything but fictional.
These mysteries and others, including the ordering of the sonnets, the date of their
composition, and seeming deviations from the otherwise rigid format (one sonnet has 15 lines,
another only 12; sonnets 153 and a154 do not fit well in the sequence), have generated an
abundance of scholarly criticism over the years, and the dialogues they provoke remain highly
contentious to this day.
The 1609 publication of Shakespeares sonnets is today referred to as the Quarto and
remains the authoritative source for modern editions.
MAJOR THEMES
The Ravages of Time: Shakespeares sonnets open with an earnest plea from the narrator to
the fair lord, begging him to bear his child so that his beauty might be preserved for posterity.
In sonnet 2, the poet writes, When forty winters shall besiege thy brow / And dig deep
trenches in thy beautys field How much more praise deserved thy beautys use / If thou
couldst answer This fair child of mine / Shall sum my count and make my old excuse /
Proving his beauty by succession thine! The poet is lamenting the ravages of time and its
detrimental effects on the fair lords beauty, seeking to combat the inevitable by pushing the
fair lord to bequeath his exquisiteness unto a chlid. By sonnet 18 the poet appears to have
abandoned this solution in favor of another: his verse. So long as men can breathe or eyes
can see / So long lives this and this gives life to thee. But the ravages of time return to haunt
the narrator: in sonnet 90, the poet characterizes time as a dimension of suffering, urging the
fair lord to break with him if ever, now; Give not a windy night a rainy morrow, he
writes, pleading with him to end the desperation of hopeful unrequited love. The theme
resurfaces throughout the sonnets in the narrators various descriptions of himself as an aging
man: But when my glass shows me myself indeed / Beated and choppd with tannd
antiquity (sonnet 62); And wherefore say not I that I am old? (sonnet138). It has also been
suggested that the poet implies that he is balding in sonnet 73, where he writes, That time of
year thou mayst in me hold / when yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang / Upon those
boughs ; such an interpretation fits well with the idea that Shakespeare is in fact the
narrator of the sonnets, as extant portraits of Shakespeare show the poet to have been balding
in his later years.
Platonic Love vs. Carnal Lust: The divide between the fair lord sonnets and the dark lady
sonnets is also a divide between two forms of interpersonal attraction. While the narrator of
the sonnets is clearly infatuated with both the fair lord and the dark lady, the language he used
to describe these infatuations shows them to be of disparate natures. The lack of explicit
sexual imagery in the fair lord sonnets has led most scholars to characterize this infatuation as
an example of Platonic love, i.e., a form of amorous affection bereft of any sexual element.
Meanwhile, the dark lady sonnets are replete with sexual imagery, implying an attraction
based largely on carnal lust. The poet seems to glorify the former while condemning the
latter; his heart is at odds with his libido. If we take the angel of sonnet 144 to be the
narrators fair lord, we see this contrast clearly: To win me soon to hell, my female evil /
Tempteth my better angel from my side / And would corrupt my saint to be a devil / Wooing
his purity with her foul pride. It might be argued that this very incompatibility between the
two distresses the narrator most as he learns of their affair.
Selfishness and Greed: The themes of selfishness and greed are prevalent throughout the
sonnets as a whole, emerging most perceptibility in the narrators hypocritical expectation of
faithfulness from the fair lord and the dark lady. The poet seems at times to advance a double
standard on the issue of faithfulness: he is unfaithful himself, yet he condemns, is even
surprised by, the unfaithfulness of others. The rival poet sonnets (79-86), for example, capture
the poets jealousy of his fair lords having another admirer; dark lady sonnets 133-134 and
144 do the same, and they may even include a reference to an affair between her and the fair
lord that perhaps was alluded to previously in sonnets 40-42. (For this reason and other, it is
sometimes suggested that the ordering of the sonnets does not wholly parallel the actual
chronology of the events they describe.) Although the narrator does indeed chastise himself
for his own unfaithfulness, perhaps in reference to his wife, his distress at the unfaithfulness
of those with whom he himself has been unfaithful makes him out as a wanting to have his
cake and eat it too.
Self-Deprecations and Inadequacy: Self-deprecatory language frequently appears regarding
the poets various inadequacies, in particular his ability to keep his fair lords interest. In
sonnet 76 the poet basically calls himself a bore. He begins, Why is my verse so barren of
new pride / So far from variation or quick change? His expressions of inadequacy reach a
pinnacle in the rival poet sonnets, where they transform into pathetic outburst of jealousy. In
sonnet 80 we read, But since your worth, wide as the ocean is / The humble as the proudest
sail doth bear / My saucy bark inferior far to his / On your broad main doth willfully appear;
in sonnet 84, Who is it that says most? Which can say more / Than this rich praise, that you
alone are you? The poets self-deprecation continues as he blames himself for much of that
which he disapproves of both in the fair lord and in the dark lady. He himself is the cause of
their abandoning him; his will is inadequate for resisting the temptations of Love.
Homoerotic Desire:
Although a fair number of scholars argue that the sonnets do not reflect any intimation of
homosexual desire whatsoever on the part of the narrator, others find sonnets 1-126 rife with
homoerotic undertonesat times appearing as explicit expressions of the narrators love for
the fair lord. In sonnet 20, for example, the poet expressly laments the fact that Nature
fashioned the fair lord with male genitalia (she prickd thee out). In sonnet 29, the narrator
bemoans his oucast state, perhaps a direct reference to a homoerotic desire he fears cannot
be accepted by society. Still, just as it is intellectually necessary to confront the idea that
homoerotic desire is prevalent to some extent in the sonnets, it is incumbent on readers not to
let the imagination go astray.
Scholars who accept that homoerotic undertones are present in the sonnets are, nevertheless,
divided regarding what this desire really means. Unlike the sonnets featuring the dark lady
(127-154), the fair lord sonnets contain no explicit reference to sexual desire; even if the
narrator lusts for the fair lord, it is debatable whether this lust has as its goal any act of sexual
consummation.
Financial Bondage:
Throughout the sonnets there is considerable imagery of financial debt and obligation,
bondage and transaction. Many scholars are convinced that the fair lord is not only the objects
of the poets affection but also his financial benefactor. Such speculation has led to the
identification of the fair lord with the begetter of the sonnets, Mr. W.H. Although this
argument is difficult to prove, it certainly has its merits.
In sonnet 4, financial imagery is ubiquitous: unthrifty, spend, bequest, lend, frank,
niggard, profitless, usurer, sum, and audit, and more. Sonnet 79 likewise includes
aid, numbers, robs, pays, lends, stole, afford, and owes. Support for the
hypothesis that the dark lady of the sonnets was in fact a prostitute comes in part from sonnet
134, where the language includes mortgaged, forfeit, bond, statute, usurer, sue,
debtor, and pays, although it could also be arguing d that the narrator is merely describing
the dark lady as a whore out of jealousy of her affair with the fair lord.
Color Symbolism: This theme emerges most palpably in the dark lady sonnets, where the
poets repeated use of the color black to describe the dark ladys features, both physical and
intangible, ascribes her with the evilness or otherness that the color has often symbolized in
the Western mentality. However, color imagery is present in the fair lord sonnets as well,
especially in conjunction with the theme of passing time. In sonnet 12, for example, the poet
draws a parallel between the aging of nature with the aging of human life, opposing the
violet and summers green with the silver and white of age. Note, though, that the
opposition here is not between black and white, as might be expected, but rather between
color and absence of color, the latter of which is a product of passing time. The poet dreads
both the passing of time as well as the sinfulness of his dark lady, and it is conceivable that
the goal of his symbolism is to represent that which he fears by that which is without color.
This argument is complicated, however, by sonnet 99, where purple, red, and white
appear to take on more convoluted roles. Still, it is possible to find consistencies in the poets
use of color symbolism: all three instances of yellow (in sonnet 17, 73, and 104) are used in
the context of passing time, while green is largely symbolic of youth (such as in sonnet 63).
SHORT SUMMARY
The sonnets are traditionally divided into two majors groups: the fair lord sonnet (1-126) and
tha dark lady sonnets (124-154). The fair lord sonnets explore the narrators consuming
infatuation with a young and beautiful man, while the dark lady sonnets engage his lustful
desire for a woman who is not his wife. The narrator is tormented as he struggles to reconcile
the uncontrollable urges of his heart with his minds better judgment, all the while in a
desperate race against time.
The sonnets begin with the narrators petition to the fair lord, exhorting him to preserve his
beauty for future generations by passing it on to a child. This theme is developed until sonnet
18, where the narrator abandons it in favor of an alternative plan to eternalize the fair lords
beauty in his verse. But it is not long before the narrators mellifluous depictions of the fair
lords beauty are replaced with the haunting lament of unrequited love. The narrator grows
increasingly enamored with the fair lord eventually becoming emotionally dependent upon
him and plagued by the inability to win his heart. The narrator is further distressed by the
incessant passing of time, and he fears the detriment time inevitably will bring to the fair
lords youthful beauty.
The narrators emotions fluctuate between love and anger, envy and greed. We find poignant
examples of the narrators jealousy in the rival poet sonnets (79-86), where the fair lords
attention has been caught by another. The narrators fragile psyche collapses in bouts of self-
deprecation as he agonizes over the thought of forever losing the object of his affection. In
sonnet 87, the narrator bids the fair lord farewell but his heartache long persists.
The reminder of the fair lord sonnets are characterized by the vicissitudes of the narrators
emotional well-being. After his parting with the fair lord in sonnet 87, the narrator grows
introspective, waxing philosophical as he begins to probe the very fabric of love. Throughout
these developments we are made privy to the narrators mounting apprehension that this time
is running short. Finally, in sonnet 126, his love matured and yet still beautiful, the narrator
points out that the fair lord too will one day meet his doom.
The following sonnet (127) begins the dark lady sequence, the group of sonnets dealing with
the narrators irresistible attraction to a dark and beautiful woman. Here the allure is not of
love but of lust, and the narrator is torn between his hunger for the woman and his disgust at
the sinfulness of carnal desire.
The dark lady is described as freely promiscuous, the epitome of lustful endeavor. Drawn by
and at the same time repelled by her darkness, the narrator once again reverts to meditative
mind-wandering to cope with his situation. In the end, the narrators lust is expressed as an
incurable disease, a burning sensation than can only be quenched if temporarily, by the eyes
of the dark lady.
SONNET 18
The speaker opens the poem with a question addressed to the beloved: Shall I compare thee
to a summers day? The next eleven lines are devoted to such a comparison. In line 2 , the
speaker stipulates what mainly differentiates the young man from the summers day: he is
more lovely and more temperate. Summers days tend toward extremes: they are shaken by
rough winds; in them, the sun (the eye of heaven) often shines too hot, or too dim. And
summer is fleeting: its date is too short, and it leads to the withering of autumn, as every fair
from fair sometime declines. The final quatrain of the sonnet tells how the beloved differs
from the summer in that respect: his beauty will last forever (Thy eternal summer shall not
fade...) and never die. In the couplet, the speaker explains how the beloveds beauty will
accomplish this feat, and not perish because it is preserved in the poem, which will last
forever; it will live as long as men can breathe or eyes can see.
SONNET 130
This sonnet compares the speakers lover to a number of other beautiesand never in the
lovers favor. Her eyes are nothing like the sun, her lips are less red than coral; compared to
white snow, her breasts are dun-colored, and her hairs are like black wires on her head. In the
second quatrain, the speaker says he has seen roses separated by color (damasked) into red
and white, but he sees no such roses in his mistresss cheeks; and he says the breath that
reeks from his mistress is less delightful than perfume. In the third quatrain, he admits that,
though he loves her voice, music hath a far more pleasing sound, and that, though he has
never seen a goddess, his mistressunlike goddesseswalks on the ground. In the couplet,
however, the speaker declares that, by heavn, he thinks his love as rare and valuable As
any she belied with false comparethat is, any love in which false comparisons were
invoked to describe the loved ones beauty.
Commentary
This sonnet, one of Shakespeares most famous, plays an elaborate joke on the conventions of
love poetry common to Shakespeares day, and it is so well-conceived that the joke remains
funny today. Most sonnet sequences in Elizabethan England were modeled after that of
Petrarch. Petrarchs famous sonnet sequence was written as a series of love poems to an
idealized and idolized mistress named Laura. In the sonnets, Petrarch praises her beauty, her
worth, and her perfection using an extraordinary variety of metaphors based largely on natural
beauties. In Shakespeares day, these metaphors had already become cliche (as, indeed, they
still are today), but they were still the accepted technique for writing love poetry. The result
was that poems tended to make highly idealizing comparisons between nature and the poets
lover that were, if taken literally, completely ridiculous. My mistress eyes are like the sun;
her lips are red as coral; her cheeks are like roses, her breasts are white as snow, her voice is
like music, she is a goddess.
In many ways, Shakespeares sonnets subvert and reverse the conventions of the Petrarchan
love sequence: the idealizing love poems, for instance, are written not to a perfect woman but
to an admittedly imperfect man, and the love poems to the dark lady are anything but
idealizing (My love is as a fever, longing still / For that which longer nurseth the disease is
hardly a Petrarchan conceit.) Sonnet 130 mocks the typical Petrarchan metaphors by
presenting a speaker who seems to take them at face value, and somewhat bemusedly, decides
to tell the truth. Your mistress eyes are like the sun? Thats strangemy mistress eyes
arent at all like the sun. Your mistress breath smells like perfume? My mistress breath reeks
compared to perfume. In the couplet, then, the speaker shows his full intent, which is to insist
that love does not need these conceits in order to be real; and women do not need to look like
flowers or the sun in order to be beautiful.
The rhetorical structure of Sonnet 130 is important to its effect. In the first quatrain, the
speaker spends one line on each comparison between his mistress and something else (the
sun, coral, snow, and wiresthe one positive thing in the whole poem some part of his
mistress is like. In the second and third quatrains, he expands the descriptions to occupy two
lines each, so that roses/cheeks, perfume/breath, music/voice, and goddess/mistress each
receive a pair of unrhymed lines. This creates the effect of an expanding and developing
argument, and neatly prevents the poemwhich does, after all, rely on a single kind of joke
for its first twelve linesfrom becoming stagnant.
MACBETH
The most influential writer in all of English literature, William Shakespeare was born in 1564
to a successful middle-class glove-maker in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. Shakespeare
attended grammar school, but his formal education proceeded no further. In 1582 he married
an older woman, Anne Hathaway, and had three children with her. Around 1590 he left his
family behind and traveled to London to work as an actor and playwright. Public and critical
acclaim quickly followed, and Shakespeare eventually became the most popular playwright in
England and part-owner of the Globe Theater. His career bridged the reigns of Elizabeth I
(ruled 15581603) and James I (ruled 16031625), and he was a favorite of both monarchs.
Indeed, James granted Shakespeares company the greatest possible compliment by bestowing
upon its members the title of Kings Men. Wealthy and renowned, Shakespeare retired to
Stratford and died in 1616 at the age of fifty-two. At the time of Shakespeares death, literary
luminaries such as Ben Jonson hailed his works as timeless.
Shakespeares works were collected and printed in various editions in the century following
his death, and by the early eighteenth century his reputation as the greatest poet ever to write
in English was well established. The unprecedented admiration garnered by his works led to a
fierce curiosity about Shakespeares life, but the dearth of biographical information has left
many details of Shakespeares personal history shrouded in mystery. Some people have
concluded from this fact and from Shakespeares modest education that Shakespeares plays
were actually written by someone elseFrancis Bacon and the Earl of Oxford are the two
most popular candidatesbut the support for this claim is overwhelmingly circumstantial,
and the theory is not taken seriously by many scholars.
In the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, Shakespeare must be viewed as the author
of the thirty-seven plays and 154 sonnets that bear his name. The legacy of this body of work
is immense. A number of Shakespeares plays seem to have transcended even the category of
brilliance, becoming so influential as to affect profoundly the course of Western literature and
culture ever after.
Shakespeares shortest and bloodiest tragedy, Macbeth tells the story of a brave Scottish
general (Macbeth) who receives a prophecy from a trio of sinister witches that one day he will
become King of Scotland. Consumed with ambitious thoughts and spurred to action by his
wife, Macbeth murders King Duncan and seizes the throne for himself. He begins his reign
racked with guilt and fear and soon becomes a tyrannical ruler, as he is forced to commit
more and more murders to protect himself from enmity and suspicion. The bloodbath swiftly
propels Macbeth and Lady Macbeth to arrogance, madness, and death.
Macbeth was most likely written in 1606, early in the reign of James I, who had been James
VI of Scotland before he succeeded to the English throne in 1603. James was a patron of
Shakespeares acting company, and of all the plays Shakespeare wrote under Jamess
reign, Macbeth most clearly reflects the playwrights close relationship with the sovereign. In
focusing on Macbeth, a figure from Scottish history, Shakespeare paid homage to his kings
Scottish lineage. Additionally, the witches prophecy that Banquo will found a line of kings is
a clear nod to Jamess familys claim to have descended from the historical Banquo. In a
larger sense, the theme of bad versus good kingship, embodied by Macbeth and Duncan,
respectively, would have resonated at the royal court, where James was busy developing his
English version of the theory of divine right.
Macbeth is not Shakespeares most complex play, but it is certainly one of his most powerful
and emotionally intense. Whereas Shakespeares other major tragedies, such
as Hamlet and Othello,fastidiously explore the intellectual predicaments faced by their
subjects and the fine nuances of their subjects characters, Macbethtumbles madly from its
opening to its conclusion. It is a sharp, jagged sketch of theme and character; as such, it has
shocked and fascinated audiences for nearly four hundred years.
Macbeth - Macbeth is a Scottish general and the thane of Glamis who is led to wicked
thoughts by the prophecies of the three witches, especially after their prophecy that he will be
made thane of Cawdor comes true. Macbeth is a brave soldier and a powerful man, but he is
not a virtuous one. He is easily tempted into murder to fulfill his ambitions to the throne, and
once he commits his first crime and is crowned King of Scotland, he embarks on further
atrocities with increasing ease. Ultimately, Macbeth proves himself better suited to the
battlefield than to political intrigue, because he lacks the skills necessary to rule without being
a tyrant. His response to every problem is violence and murder. Unlike Shakespeares great
villains, such as Iago in Othello and Richard III in Richard III, Macbeth is never comfortable
in his role as a criminal. He is unable to bear the psychological consequences of his atrocities.
Lady Macbeth - Macbeths wife, a deeply ambitious woman who lusts for power and
position. Early in the play she seems to be the stronger and more ruthless of the two, as she
urges her husband to kill Duncan and seize the crown. After the bloodshed begins, however,
Lady Macbeth falls victim to guilt and madness to an even greater degree than her husband.
Her conscience affects her to such an extent that she eventually commits suicide.
Interestingly, she and Macbeth are presented as being deeply in love, and many of Lady
Macbeths speeches imply that her influence over her husband is primarily sexual. Their joint
alienation from the world, occasioned by their partnership in crime, seems to strengthen the
attachment that they feel to each another.
The Three Witches - Three black and midnight hags who plot mischief against Macbeth
using charms, spells, and prophecies. Their predictions prompt him to murder Duncan, to
order the deaths of Banquo and his son, and to blindly believe in his own immortality. The
play leaves the witches true identity unclearaside from the fact that they are servants of
Hecate, we know little about their place in the cosmos. In some ways they resemble the
mythological Fates, who impersonally weave the threads of human destiny. They clearly take
a perverse delight in using their knowledge of the future to toy with and destroy human
beings.
The main theme of Macbeththe destruction wrought when ambition goes unchecked by
moral constraintsfinds its most powerful expression in the plays two main characters.
Macbeth is a courageous Scottish general who is not naturally inclined to commit evil deeds,
yet he deeply desires power and advancement. He kills Duncan against his better judgment
and afterward stews in guilt and paranoia. Toward the end of the play he descends into a kind
of frantic, boastful madness. Lady Macbeth, on the other hand, pursues her goals with greater
determination, yet she is less capable of withstanding the repercussions of her immoral acts.
One of Shakespeares most forcefully drawn female characters, she spurs her husband
mercilessly to kill Duncan and urges him to be strong in the murders aftermath, but she is
eventually driven to distraction by the effect of Macbeths repeated bloodshed on her
conscience. In each case, ambitionhelped, of course, by the malign prophecies of the
witchesis what drives the couple to ever more terrible atrocities. The problem, the play
suggests, is that once one decides to use violence to further ones quest for power, it is
difficult to stop. There are always potential threats to the throneBanquo, Fleance,
Macduffand it is always tempting to use violent means to dispose of them.
Characters in Macbethfrequently dwell on issues of gender. Lady Macbeth manipulates
her husband by questioning his manhood, wishes that she herself could be unsexed, and
does not contradict Macbeth when he says that a woman like her should give birth only to
boys. In the same manner that Lady Macbeth goads her husband on to murder, Macbeth
provokes the murderers he hires to kill Banquo by questioning their manhood. Such acts show
that both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth equate masculinity with naked aggression, and
whenever they converse about manhood, violence soon follows. Their understanding of
manhood allows the political order depicted in the play to descend into chaos.
At the same time, however, the audience cannot help noticing that women are also
sources of violence and evil. The witches prophecies spark Macbeths ambitions and then
encourage his violent behavior; Lady Macbeth provides the brains and the will behind her
husbands plotting; and the only divine being to appear is Hecate, the goddess of witchcraft.
Arguably, Macbeth traces the root of chaos and evil to women, which has led some critics to
argue that this is Shakespeares most misogynistic play. While the male characters are just as
violent and prone to evil as the women, the aggression of the female characters is more
striking because it goes against prevailing expectations of how women ought to behave. Lady
Macbeths behavior certainly shows that women can be as ambitious and cruel as men.
Whether because of the constraints of her society or because she is not fearless enough to kill,
Lady Macbeth relies on deception and manipulation rather than violence to achieve her ends.
Ultimately, the play does put forth a revised and less destructive definition of manhood. In
the scene where Macduff learns of the murders of his wife and child, Malcolm consoles him
by encouraging him to take the news in manly fashion, by seeking revenge upon Macbeth.
Macduff shows the young heir apparent that he has a mistaken understanding of masculinity.
To Malcolms suggestion, Dispute it like a man, Macduff replies, I shall do so. But I must
also feel it as a man (4.3.221223). At the end of the play, Siward receives news of his sons
death rather complacently. Malcolm responds: Hes worth more sorrow [than you have
expressed] / And that Ill spend for him (5.11.1617). Malcolms comment shows that he has
learned the lesson Macduff gave him on the sentient nature of true masculinity. It also
suggests that, with Malcolms coronation, order will be restored to the Kingdom of Scotland.
Visions and hallucinations recur throughout the play and serve as reminders of Macbeth
and Lady Macbeths joint culpability for the growing body count. When he is about to kill
Duncan, Macbeth sees a dagger floating in the air. Covered with blood and pointed toward the
kings chamber, the dagger represents the bloody course on which Macbeth is about to
embark. Later, he sees Banquos ghost sitting in a chair at a feast, pricking his conscience by
mutely reminding him that he murdered his former friend. The seemingly hardheaded Lady
Macbeth also eventually gives way to visions, as she sleepwalks and believes that her hands
are stained with blood that cannot be washed away by any amount of water. In each case, it is
ambiguous whether the vision is real or purely hallucinatory; but, in both cases, the Macbeths
read them uniformly as supernatural signs of their guilt.
Context
In his short life, John Keats wrote some of the most beautiful and enduring poems in the
English language. Among his greatest achievements is his sequence of six lyric odes, written
between March and September 1819astonishingly, when Keats was only twenty-four years
old. Keatss poetic achievement is made all the more miraculous by the age at which it ended:
He died barely a year after finishing the ode To Autumn, in February 1821.
Keats was born in 1795 to a lower-middle-class family in London. When he was still young,
he lost both his parents. His mother succumbed to tuberculosis, the disease that eventually
killed Keats himself. When he was fifteen, Keats entered into a medical apprenticeship, and
eventually he went to medical school. But by the time he turned twenty, he abandoned his
medical training to devote himself wholly to poetry. He published his first book of poems
in 1817; they drew savage critical attacks from an influential magazine, and his second book
attracted comparatively little notice when it appeared the next year. Keatss brother Tom died
of tuberculosis in December 1818, and Keats moved in with a friend in Hampstead.
In Hampstead, he fell in love with a young girl named Fanny Brawne. During this time, Keats
began to experience the extraordinary creative inspiration that enabled him to write, at a
frantic rate, all his best poems in the time before he died. His health and his finances declined
sharply, and he set off for Italy in the summer of1820, hoping the warmer climate might
restore his health. He never returned home. His death brought to an untimely end one of the
most extraordinary poetic careers of the nineteenth centuryindeed, one of the most
extraordinary poetic careers of all time. Keats never achieved widespread recognition for his
work in his own life (his bitter request for his tombstone: Here lies one whose name was writ
on water), but he was sustained by a deep inner confidence in his own ability. Shortly before
his death, he remarked that he believed he would be among the English poets when he had
died.
Keats was one of the most important figures of early nineteenth-century Romanticism, a
movement that espoused the sanctity of emotion and imagination, and privileged the beauty of
the natural world. Many of the ideas and themes evident in Keatss great odes are
quintessentially Romantic concerns: the beauty of nature, the relation between imagination
and creativity, the response of the passions to beauty and suffering, and the transience of
human life in time. The sumptuous sensory language in which the odes are written, their
idealistic concern for beauty and truth, and their expressive agony in the face of death are all
Romantic preoccupationsthough at the same time, they are all uniquely Keatss.
Taken together, the odes do not exactly tell a storythere is no unifying plot and no
recurring charactersand there is little evidence that Keats intended them to stand together as
a single work of art. Nevertheless, the extraordinary number of suggestive interrelations
between them is impossible to ignore. The odes explore and develop the same themes, partake
of many of the same approaches and images, and, ordered in a certain way, exhibit an
unmistakable psychological development. This is not to say that the poems do not stand on
their ownthey do, magnificently; one of the greatest felicities of the sequence is that it can
be entered at any point, viewed wholly or partially from any perspective, and still prove
moving and rewarding to read. There has been a great deal of critical debate over how to treat
the voices that speak the poemsare they meant to be read as though a single person speaks
them all, or did Keats invent a different person for each ode?
There is no right answer to the question, but it is possible that the question itself is wrong: The
consciousness at work in each of the odes is unmistakably Keatss own. Of course, the poems
are not explicitly autobiographical (it is unlikely that all the events really happened to Keats),
but given their sincerity and their shared frame of thematic reference, there is no reason to
think that they do not come from the same part of Keatss mindthat is to say, that they are
not all told by the same part of Keatss reflected self. In that sense, there is no harm in treating
the odes a sequence of utterances told in the same voice. The psychological progress from
Ode on Indolence to To Autumn is intimately personal, and a great deal of that intimacy
is lost if one begins to imagine that the odes are spoken by a sequence of fictional characters.
When you think of the speaker of these poems, think of Keats as he would have imagined
himself while writing them. As you trace the speakers trajectory from the numb drowsiness
of Indolence to the quiet wisdom of Autumn, try to hear the voice develop and change
under the guidance of Keatss extraordinary language.
Themes
The Inevitability of Death
Even before his diagnosis of terminal tuberculosis, Keats focused on death and its
inevitability in his work. For Keats, small, slow acts of death occurred every day, and he
chronicled these small mortal occurrences. The end of a lovers embrace, the images on an
ancient urn, the reaping of grain in autumnall of these are not only symbols of death, but
instances of it. Examples of great beauty and art also caused Keats to ponder mortality, as in
On Seeing the Elgin Marbles (1817). As a writer, Keats hoped he would live long enough to
achieve his poetic dream of becoming as great as Shakespeare or John Milton: in Sleep and
Poetry (1817), Keats outlined a plan of poetic achievement that required him to read poetry
for a decade in order to understandand surpassthe work of his predecessors. Hovering
near this dream, however, was a morbid sense that death might intervene and terminate his
projects; he expresses these concerns in the mournful 1818 sonnet When I have fears that I
may cease to be.
The Contemplation of Beauty
In his poetry, Keats proposed the contemplation of beauty as a way of delaying the
inevitability of death. Although we must die eventually, we can choose to spend our time
alive in aesthetic revelry, looking at beautiful objects and landscapes. Keatss speakers
contemplate urns (Ode on a Grecian Urn), books (On First Looking into Chapmans
Homer [1816], On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again [1818]), birds (Ode to a
Nightingale), and stars (Bright star, would I were stedfast as thou art [1819]). Unlike
mortal beings, beautiful things will never die but will keep demonstrating their beauty for all
time. Keats explores this idea in the first book of Endymion (1818). The speaker in Ode on a
Grecian Urn envies the immortality of the lute players and trees inscribed on the ancient
vessel because they shall never cease playing their songs, nor will they ever shed their leaves.
He reassures young lovers by telling them that even though they shall never catch their
mistresses, these women shall always stay beautiful. The people on the urn, unlike the
speaker, shall never stop having experiences. They shall remain permanently depicted while
the speaker changes, grows old, and eventually dies.
Motifs
Departures and Reveries
In many of Keatss poems, the speaker leaves the real world to explore a transcendent,
mythical, or aesthetic realm. At the end of the poem, the speaker returns to his ordinary life
transformed in some way and armed with a new understanding. Often the appearance or
contemplation of a beautiful object makes the departure possible. The ability to get lost in a
reverie, to depart conscious life for imaginative life without wondering about plausibility or
rationality, is part of Keatss concept of negative capability. In Bright star, would I were
stedfast as thou art, the speaker imagines a state of sweet unrest (12) in which he will
remain half-conscious on his lovers breast forever. As speakers depart this world for an
imaginative world, they have experiences and insights that they can then impart into poetry
once theyve returned to conscious life. Keats explored the relationship between visions and
poetry in Ode to Psyche and Ode to a Nightingale.
The Five Senses and Art
Keats imagined that the five senses loosely corresponded to and connected with various types
of art. The speaker in Ode on a Grecian Urn describes the pictures depicted on the urn,
including lovers chasing one another, musicians playing instruments, and a virginal maiden
holding still. All the figures remain motionless, held fast and permanent by their depiction on
the sides of the urn, and they cannot touch one another, even though we can touch them by
holding the vessel. Although the poem associates sight and sound, because we see the
musicians playing, we cannot hear the music. Similarly, the speaker in On First Looking into
Chapmans Homer compares hearing Homers words to pure serene (7) air so that reading,
or seeing, becomes associating with breathing, or smelling. In Ode to a Nightingale, the
speaker longs for a drink of crystal-clear water or wine so that he might adequately describe
the sounds of the bird singing nearby. Each of the five senses must be involved in worthwhile
experiences, which, in turn, lead to the production of worthwhile art.
The Disappearance of the Poet and the Speaker
In Keatss theory of negative capability, the poet disappears from the workthat is, the work
itself chronicles an experience in such a way that the reader recognizes and responds to the
experience without requiring the intervention or explanation of the poet. Keatss speakers
become so enraptured with an object that they erase themselves and their thoughts from their
depiction of that object. In essence, the speaker/poet becomes melded to and indistinguishable
from the object being described. For instance, the speaker of Ode on a Grecian Urn
describes the scenes on the urn for several stanzas until the famous conclusion about beauty
and truth, which is enclosed in quotation marks. Since the poems publication in 1820, critics
have theorized about who speaks these lines, whether the poet, the speaker, the urn, or one or
all the figures on the urn. The erasure of the speaker and the poet is so complete in this
particular poem that the quoted lines are jarring and troubling.
Symbols
Music and Musicians
Music and musicians appear throughout Keatss work as symbols of poetry and poets. In
Ode on a Grecian Urn, for instance, the speaker describes musicians playing their pipes.
Although we cannot literally hear their music, by using our imaginations, we can imagine and
thus hear music. The speaker of To Autumn reassures us that the season of fall, like spring,
has songs to sing. Fall, the season of changing leaves and decay, is as worthy of poetry as
spring, the season of flowers and rejuvenation. Ode to a Nightingale uses the birds music
to contrast the mortality of humans with the immortality of art. Caught up in beautiful
birdsong, the speaker imagines himself capable of using poetry to join the bird in the forest.
The beauty of the birds music represents the ecstatic, imaginative possibilities of poetry. As
mortal beings who will eventually die, we can delay death through the timelessness of music,
poetry, and other types of art.
Nature
Like his fellow romantic poets, Keats found in nature endless sources of poetic inspiration,
and he described the natural world with precision and care. Observing elements of nature
allowed Keats, Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Shelley, among others, to create extended
meditations and thoughtful odes about aspects of the human condition. For example, in Ode
to a Nightingale, hearing the birds song causes the speaker to ruminate on the immortality
of art and the mortality of humans. The speaker of Ode on Melancholy compares a bout of
depression to a weeping cloud (12), then goes on to list specific flowers that are linked to
sadness. He finds in nature apt images for his psychological state. In Ode to Psyche, the
speaker mines the night sky to find ways to worship the Roman goddess Psyche as a muse: a
star becomes an amorous glow-worm (27), and the moon rests amid a background of dark
blue. Keats not only uses nature as a springboard from which to ponder, but he also discovers
in nature similes, symbols, and metaphors for the spiritual and emotional states he seeks to
describe.
The Ancient World
Keats had an enduring interest in antiquity and the ancient world. His longer poems, such
as The Fall of Hyperion or Lamia, often take place in a mythical world not unlike that of
classical antiquity. He borrowed figures from ancient mythology to populate poems, such as
Ode to Psyche and To Homer (1818). For Keats, ancient myth and antique objects, such
as the Grecian urn, have a permanence and solidity that contrasts with the fleeting, temporary
nature of life. In ancient cultures, Keats saw the possibility of permanent artistic achievement:
if an urn still spoke to someone several centuries after its creation, there was hope that a poem
or artistic object from Keatss time might continue to speak to readers or observers after the
death of Keats or another writer or creator. This achievement was one of Keatss great hopes.
In an 1818 letter to his brother George, Keats quietly prophesied: I think I shall be among the
English poets after my death.
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE published in 1813, is Jane Austens earliest work, and in some
sense also one of her most mature works. Austen began writing the novel in 1796 at the age of
twenty-one, under the title First Impressions. The original version of the novel was probably
in the form of an exchange of letters. Austens father had offered the manuscript for
publication in 1797, but the publishing company refused to even consider it. Shortly after
completing First Impressions, Austen began writing Sense and Sensibility, which was not
published until 1811. She also wrote some minor works during that time, which were later
expanded into full novels. Between 1810 and 1812 Pride and Prejudice was rewritten for
publication. While the original ideas of the novel come from a girls of 21, the final version
has the literary and thematic maturity of a thirty-five years old woman who has spent years
painstakingly drafting and revising, as is the pattern with all Austens works. Pride and
Prejudice is usually considered to be the most popular of Austens novels.
Pride: As said in the words of Mary at the beginning of the novel, human nature is
particularly prone to [pride] (Volume I, Chapter 5). In the novel, pride prevents the
characters from seeing the truth of a situation and from achieving happiness in life. Pride is
one of the main barriers that creates an obstacle to Elizabeth and Darcys marriage. Darcys
pride in his position in society leads him initially to scorn anyone outside of his own social
circle. Elizabeths vanity clouds her judgment, making her prone to think ill of Darcy and to
think well of Wickham. In the end, Elizabeths rebukes of Darcy help him to realize his fault
and to change accordingly, as demonstrated in his genuinely friendly treatment of the
Gardiners, whom he previously would have scorned because of their low social class. Darcys
letters shows Elizabeth that her judgments were wrong and she realizes that they were based
on vanity, not on reason.
Prejudice: Pride and prejudice are intimately related in the novel. As critic, A. Walton Litz
comments, in Pride and Prejudice one cannot equate Darcy with Pride, or Elizabeth with
Prejudice; Darcys pride of place is founded on social prejudice, while Elizabeths initial
prejudice against him is rooted in pride of her own quick perceptions. Darcy, having been
brought up in such a way that he began to scorn all those outside his own social circle, must
overcome his prejudice in order to see that Elizabeth would be a good wife for him and to win
Elizabeths heart. The overcoming of his prejudice is demonstrated when he treats the
Gardiners with great civility. The Gardiners are a much lower class than Darcy, because Mr.
Darcy is a lawyer and must practice a trade to earn a living, rather living off of the interest of
an estate as gentlemen do. From the beginning of the novel Elizabeth prides herself on her
keen ability for perception. Yet this supposed ability is often lacking, as in Elizabeths
judgments of Darcy and Wickham.
Family: Austen portrays the family as primarily responsible for the intellectual and moral
education of children. Mr. and Mrs. Bennets failure to provide this education for their
daughters leads to the utter shamelessness, foolishness, frivolity, and immorality of Lydia.
Elizabeth and Jan have managed to develop virtue and strong characters in spite of the
negligence of their parents, perhaps through the help of their studies and the good influence of
Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner, who are the only relatives in the novel that take a serious concern in
the girls well-being and provide sound guidance. Elizabeth and Jane are constantly forced to
put up with the foolishness and poor judgment of their mother and the sarcastic indifference
of their father. Even when Elizabeth advises her father not to allow Lydia to go to Brighton,
he ignores the advice because he thinks it would too difficult to deal with Lydias
complaining. The result is the scandal of Lydias elopement with Wickham.
Women and Marriage: Austen is critical of the gender injustice present in19th century English
society,. The novel demonstrates how such as Charlotte need to marry men they are not in
love with simply in order to gain financial security. The entailment of the Longbourn estate is
an extreme hardship of the Bennet family, and is quite obviously unjust. The entailment of
Mr. Bennets estate leaves his daughters in a poor financial situation which both requires them
to marry and makes it more difficult to marry well. Clearly, Austen believes that women are
at least as intelligent and capable as men, and considers their inferior status in society to be
unjust. She herself went against convention by remaining single and earning a living through
her novels. In her personal letters Austen advises friends only to marry for love. Through the
plot of the novel it is clear that Austen wants to show how Elizabeth is able to be happy for
refusing to marry for financial purposes and only marrying a man whom she truly loves and
esteems.
Class: Considerations of class are omnipresent in the novel. The novel does not put forth an
egalitarian ideology or call for the leveling of all social classes, yet it does criticize an over-
emphasis on class. Darcys inordinate pride is based on his extreme class-consciousness. Yet
eventually he sees that factors other than wealth determine who truly belongs in the
aristocracy. While those such as Miss Bingley and Mrs. Hurst, who are born into the
aristocracy, are idle, mean-spirited and annoying, Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner are not members of
the aristocracy in terms of wealth or birth but are natural aristocrats by virtue of their
intelligence, good-breeding and virtue. The comic formality of Mr. Collins and his obsequious
relationship with Lady Catherine serve as a satire class consciousness and social formalities.
In the end, the verdict on class differences is moderate. As critic Samuel Kliger notes, It the
conclusion of the novel makes it clear that Elizabeth accepts class relationship as valid, it
becomes equally clear that Darcy, through Elizabeths genius for treating all people with
respect for their natural dignity, is reminded that institutions are not an end in themselves but
are intended to serve the end of human happiness.
Individual and Society: The novel portrays a world in which society takes an interest in the
private virtue of its members. When Lydia elopes with Wickham, therefore, it is scandal to
the whole society and an injury to entire Bennet family. Darcy considers his failure to expose
the wickedness of Wickhams character to be a breach of his social duty because if
Wickhams true character had been known others would not have been so easily deceived by
him. While Austen is critical of societys ability to judge properly, as demonstrated especially
in their judgments of Wickham and Darcy, she does believe that society has a crucial role in
promoting virtue. Austen has a profound sense that individuals are social beings and that their
happiness is found through relationships with others. According to critic Richard Simpson,
Austen has a thorough consciousness that man is a social being, and that apart from society
there is not even the individual.
Virtue: Austens novels unite Aristotelian and Christian conceptions of virtue. She sees
human life as purposeful and believes that human beings must guide their appetites and
desires through their use of reason. Elizabeths folly in her misjudgments of Darcy and
Wickham is that her vanity has prevented her from reasoning objectively. Lydia seems almost
completely devoid of virtue because she has never trained herself to discipline her passions or
formed her judgment such that she is capable of making sound moral decisions. Human
happiness is found by living a life in accordance with human dignity, which is a life in
accordance with virtue. Self-knowledge has a central place in the acquisition of virtue, as it is
a prerequisite for moral improvement. Darcy and Elizabeth are only freed of their pride and
prejudice when their dealings with one another help them to see their faults and spur them to
improve.
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE is set primarily in the country of Hertfordshire, about 50 miles
outside of London. The novel opens at with a conversation at Longbourn, the Bennets estate,
about the arrival of Mr. Bingley, a single man with large fortune, to Netherfield Park, a
nearby estate. Mrs. Bennet, whose obsession is to find husbands for her daughters, sees Mr.
Bingley as a potential suitor. Mr. and Mrs. Bennet have five children: Jane, Elizabeth, Mary,
Kitty, and Lydia.
The Bennets first acquaintance with Mr. Bingley and his companions is at the Meryton Ball.
Mr. Bingley takes a living to Jane and is judged by the townspeople to be perfectly amiable
and agreeable. Mr. Bingleys friend Mr. Darcy, however, snubs Elizabeth and is considered to
be proud and disagreeable because of his reserve and his refusal to dance. Bingleys sisters
are judged to be amiable by Jane but Elizabeth finds them to be arrogant.
After further interactions, it becomes evident that Jane and Bingley have a preference for one
another, although Bingleys partiality is more obvious than Janes because she is universally
cheerful and amiable. Charlotte Lucas, a close friend of Elizabeth with more pragmatic views
on marriage, recommends that Jane make her regard for Bingley more obvious. At the same
time, Mr. Darcy begins to admire Elizabeth, captivated by her fine eyes and lively wit.
When Jane is invited for dinner at Netherfield, Mrs. Bennet refuses to provide her with a
carriage, hopping that because it is supposed to rain Jane will be forced to spend the night.
However, because Jane gets caught in the rain, she falls ill and is forced to stay at Netherfield
until she recovers. Upon hearing that Jane is ill, Elizabeth walks to Netherfield in order to go
nurse her sister. Miss Bingley and Mrs. Hurst (Bingleys sister) are scandalized that Elizabeth
walked so far alone in the mud. Seeing that Jane would like Elizabeth to stay ith her,
Bingleys sisters invite Elizabeth to remain at Netherfield until Jane recovers.
During her stay at Netherfield, Elizabeth increasingly gains the admiration of Mr. Darcy. She
is blind to his partiality, however, and continues to think him a most proud and haughty man
because of the judgment she made of him when he snubbed her at the ball. Miss Bingley, who
is obviously trying to gain the admiration of Mr. Darcy, is extremely jealous of Elizabeth and
tries to prevent Mr. Darcy from admiring her by making rude references to the poor manners
of Elizabeths mother and younger sisters and to her lower class relatives. When Mrs. Bennet
and her younger daughters come to visit Jane, Elizabeth is mortified by their foolishness and
complete lack of manners. Bingleys admiration for Jane continues unabated and is evident in
his genuine solicitude for her recovery. After Jane recovers, she returns home with Elizabeth.
A militia regiment is stationed at the nearby town of Meryton, where Mrs. Bennets sister
Mrs. Phillips lives. Mrs. Phillips is just as foolish as Mrs. Bennet. Lydia and Kitty love to go
to Meryton to visit their aunt and socialize with the militias officers.
Mr. Collins, a cousin of Mr. Bennet who is in line to inherit Longbourn because the estate has
been entailed away from the female line, writes a letter stating his intention to visit. When he
arrives, he makes it clear that he hopes to find a suitable wife among the Miss Bennet. Mr.
Collins is a clergyman, and his patroness, Lady Catherine de Bourgh (who is also Darcys
aunt), has suggested that he find a wife, and he hops to lessen the hardship of the entailment
by marrying one of Mr. Bennets daughter. Mr. Collins is a silly man who speaks in long,
pompous speeches and always has an air of solemn formality.
When the Miss Bennet and Mr. Collins go for a walk to Meryton, they are introduced to an
officer in the regiment named Mr. Wickham. They also run into Mr. Darcy, and when Darcy
and Wickham meet both seem to be extremely uncomfortable. Mr. Wickham immediately
shows a partiality for Elizabeth and they speak at length. Wickham tells Elizabeth that the
reason for the mutual embarrassment when he and Darcy met is that Darcys father had
promised that Wickham, his godson, should be given a good living after his death, but that
Darcy had failed to fulfill his fathers dying wishes and had left Wickham to support himself.
Elizabeth, already predisposed to think badly of Darcy, does not question Wickhams account.
When Elizabeth tells Jane Wickhams story, Jane refuses think badly of either Wickham or
Darcy and assumes there must be some misunderstanding.
As promised, Bingley hosts a ball at Netherfield. He and Jane stay together the whole
evening, and their mutual attachment becomes increasingly obvious. Mrs. Bennet speaks of
their marriage as imminent over dinner, within earshot of Mr. Bingleys friend Mr. Darcy.
Darcy asks Elizabeth to dance with her and she inadvertently accepts. She does not enjoy it
and cannot understand why he asked her. Mr. Collins pays particularly close attention to
Elizabeth at the ball, and even reserves the first two dances with her.
The next day Mr. Collins proposes to Elizabeth. She refuses him, and after a while Mr.
Collins comes to understand that her refusal is sincere, not just a trick of female coquetry.
Mrs. Bennet is extremely angry at Elizabeth for not accepting, but Mr. Bennet is glad. Mr.
Collins shifts his attention to Elizabeths friend Charlotte Lucas. He proposes to Charlotte and
she accepts. Elizabeth is disappointed in her friend for agreeing to marry such a silly man
simply to obtain financial security.
Bingley goes to London for business and shortly after he leaves his sisters and Darcy go to
London as well. He had planned to return quickly to Netherfield, but Caroline Bingley writes
to Jane and tells her that Bingley will almost definitely not return for about six months.
Caroline also tells Jane that the family hopes Bingley will marry Darcys young sister
Georgiana and unite the fortunes of the two families. Jane is heartbroken, thinking that
Bingley must not really be attached to her. Elizabeth thinks that Darcy and Bingleys sisters
somehow managed to convince Bingley to stay in London rather than returning to Netherfield
to propose to Jane.
Mr. and Mrs. Gardiner, Elizabeths aunt and uncle, come to Longbourn to visit. They invite
Jane to come and spend some time with them in London, hoping that the time away will help
to cheer her up. Elizabeth also hopes that Jane will run into Bingley while in London. Mrs.
Gardiner, after observing Elizabeth and Wickham together, warns Elizabeth against the
imprudence of a marriage to Wickham because of his poor financial situation, and advises
Elizabeth not to encourage his attentions so much.
While in London Jane is treated very rudely by Caroline Bingley and comes to realize that she
is not a sincere friend. She assumes that Mr. Bingley knows she is in London, and decides that
he must no longer be partial to her since she does not hear from him at all.
Wickham suddenly transfers his attention from Elizabeth to Miss King, who has recently
acquired 10.000 pounds from an inheritance.
Along with Sir William Lucas and Maria Lucas (Charlottes father and younger sister)
Elizabeth goes to visit Charlotte (now Mrs. Collins) at her new home in Kent. On their way
they stop to see the Gardiners. Upon hearing of Wickhams change of affections, Mrs.
Gardiner is critical, but Elizabeth defends him.
While staying with the Collinses, Elizabeth and the others are often invited to dine at Rosings,
the large estate of Mr. Collins patroness Lady Catherine. Lady Catherine is completely
arrogant and domineering. After Elizabeth has been at the Parsonage for a fortnight, Mr.
Darcy and his cousin Colonel Fitzwilliam visit Rosings. Elizabeth and Colonel Fitzwilliam
get along very well. Darcy also seems to be paying a lot of attention to Elizabeth, and often
visits her and Charlotte at the Parsonage along with Colonel Fitzwilliam. He also purposely
meets her very frequently on her usual walking route through the park.
While walking one day with Elizabeth, Colonel Fitzwilliam tells Elizabeth how Darcy
recently saved a close friend from an imprudent marriage. Elizabeth concludes from this
comment that it must have been Darcys advice which convinced Bingley not to propose Jane.
She becomes so angry and upset that she gets a terrible headache and decides not to go to
Rosings for dinner. While she is alone at the Parsonage, Darcy pays a visit. He tells her that in
spite of all his efforts to avoid it because of her low family connections, he has fallen in love
with her and wants to marry her. Elizabeth is shocked. She rudely refuses and rebukes him for
the ungentlemanlike manner in which he proposed, as well as for preventing the marriage of
Bingley and Jane and for ill-treating Wickham. Darcy is shocked because he had assumed she
would accept.
The next day Darcy finds Elizabeth and hands her a letter then quickly leaves. The letter
contains an explanation of his reasons for advising Bingley not to marry Jane and for his
actions toward Wickham. He had prevented Bingley from proposing to Jane because it did not
seem to him that Jane was truly attached to Bingley. Wickham was Darcys father god-son.
Before his death, Darcys father had asked Darcy to provide Wickham with a living if
Wickham were to decide to enter the clergy. Wickham, however, did not want to enter the
clergy. He asked Darcy for 3.000 pounds, purportedly for law school, and agreed not to ask
for any more. Darcy gave Wickham the money and he squandered it all on dissolute living,
then came back and told Darcy he would like to enter the clergy if he could have the living
promised to him. Darcy refused. Later, with the help of her governess Miss Younge,
Wickham got Darcys younger sister Georgiana to fall in love with him and agree to an
elopement, in order to revenge himself on Mr. Darcy and get Miss Darcys fortune.
Fortunately, Darcy found out and intervened at the last minute.
After reading these explanations in the letter Elizabeths first reaction is disbelief, but after
reflecting upon and slowly rereading the letter, she begins to see that Darcy is telling the truth
and that she was only inclined to believe Wickhams story because he had flattered her with
his attentions, while she was inclined to think ill of Darcy because he had wounded her pride
on their first meeting.
Soon afterwards, Elizabeth returns home from her stay with the Collinses and Jane returns
from her stay with the Gardiners. When they return their mother and sisters are upset because
the regiment stationed in Meryton will soon be leaving, depriving them of most of their
amusement. Lydia receives an offer from Mrs. Forster, Colonel Fortsters wife, to accompany
her to Brighton, where the regiment will be going. Elizabeth advises her father not to allow
Lydia to go, thinking that such a trip could lead to serious misconduct on Lydias part because
of the flirtatiousness and frivolity of her character and her complete lack of a sense of
propriety. However, Mr. Bennet does not heed Elizabeths advice.
Elizabeth goes on vacation with the Gardiners. Their first stop is in the area of Pemberley, Mr.
Darcys estate. The Gardiners want to take a tour, and having found out that Mr. Darcy is
away, Elizabeth agrees. During their tour of the estate the housekeeper tells them about how
kind and good-natured Darcy is. Elizabeth is impressed by this praise, and also thinks of how
amazing it would be to be the mistress of such an estate. During their tour of the gardens
Elizabeth and the Gardiners run into Mr. Darcy, who has returned early from his trip. Darcy is
extremely cordial to both Elizabeth and the Gardiners and tells Elizabeth that he wants her to
meet his sister Georgiana as soon as she arrives.
Darcy and Georgiana pay a visit to Elizabeth and the Gardiners at their inn on the very
morning of Georgianas arrival. Bingley comes to visit as well. It is clear that he still has a
regard for Jane. Mrs. Gardiner and Elizabeth return their civilities by calling at Pemberley to
visit Georgiana. Miss Bingley and Mrs. Hurst are there as well, and they thinly conceal their
displeasure at seeing Elizabeth.
One morning Elizabeth receives a letter from Jane announcing that Lydia has eloped with
Wickham, and that they fear Wickham does not actually intend to marry her. Jane asks
Elizabeth to return home immediately. Darcy comes to the door just after Elizabeth has
received the news. She explains to him what has happened. He feels partially to blame for not
having exposed Wickhams character publicly.
Elizabeth and the Gardiners depart for Longbourn immediately. Mrs. Bennet is in hysterics
and the entire burden of keeping the household together in this moment of crisis has fallen on
Janes shoulders. They find out from Colonel Forster that Wickham has over 1.000 pounds of
gambling debts and nearly that much owed to merchants. The next day Mr. Gardiner goes to
join Mr. Bennet in London to help him search for Lydia. After many days of fruitless searches
Mr. Bennet returns home and leaves the search in Mr. Gardiners hands.
Soon a letter arrives from Mr. Gardiner explaining that Lydia and Wickham have been found
and that Wickham will marry Lydia if Mr. Bennet provides her with her equal share of his
wealth. T Knowing that, with his debts, Wickham would never have agreed to marry Lydia
for so little money, Mr. Bennet thinks that Mr. Gardiner must have paid off Wickhams debts
for him.
After their marriage Lydia and Wickham come to visit Longbourn. Lydia is completely
shameless and not the least bit remorseful for her conduct. Mrs. Bennet is very happy to have
one of her daughters married.
Elizbeth hears from Lydia that Darcy was present at the wedding. She writes to her aunt to
ask her why he was there. She responds explaining that it was Darcy who had found Lydia
and Wickham and who had negotiated with Wickham to get him to marry her. Mrs. Gardiner
thinks that Darcy did this out of love for Elizabeth.
Bingley and Mr. Darcy return to Netherfield Park. They call at Longbourn frequently. After
several days Bingley proposes to Jane. She accepts and all are very happy. In the meantime
Darcy has gone on a short business trip to London. While he is gone Lady Catherine comes to
Longbourne and asks to speak with Elizabeth. Lady Catherine tells Elizabeth that she has
heard Darcy is going to propose to her and attempts to forbid Elizabeth to accept the proposal.
Elizabeth refuses to make any promises. Lady Catherine leaves in a huff.
Darcy returns from his business trip. While he and Elizabeth are walking he tells her that his
affection for her is the same as when he last proposed, and asks her if her disposition toward
him has changed. She says that it has, and that she would be happy to accept his proposal.
They speak about how they have been changed since the last proposal. Darcy realized he had
been wrong to act so proudly and place so much emphasis on class differences. Elizabeth
realized that she had been wrong to judge Darcy prematurely and to allow her judgment to be
affected by her vanity.
Both couples marry. Elizabeth and Darcy go to live in Pemberley. Jane and Bingley, after
living in Netherfield for a year, decide to move to an estate near Pemberley. Kitty begins to
spend most of her time with her two sisters, and her education and character begin to improve.
Mary remains at home keeping her mother company. Mr. Bennet is very happy that his two
oldest daughters have married so happily. Mrs. Bennet is glad that her daughters have married
so prosperously.
Charles Dickens was born on February 7, 1812, and spent the first ten years of his life in
Kent, a marshy region by the sea in the east of England. Dickens was the second of eight
children. His father, John Dickens, was a kind and likable man, but his financial
irresponsibility placed him in enormous debt and caused tremendous strain on his family.
When Charles was ten, his family moved to London. Two years later, his father was arrested
and thrown in debtors prison. Dickenss mother moved into the prison with seven of her
children. Only Charles lived outside the prison in order to earn money for the struggling
family. He worked with other children for three months pasting labels on bottles in a blacking
warehouse, where the substance people used to make boots black was manufactured. His
experiences at this warehouse inspired passages in David Copperfield.
After an inheritance gave John Dickens enough money to free himself from his debt and from
prison, Charles attended school for two years at Wellington House Academy. He became a
law clerk, then a newspaper reporter, and finally a novelist. His first novel, The Pickwick
Papers (1837), met with huge popular success. Dickens was a literary celebrity throughout
England for the rest of his life.
In 1849, Dickens began to write David Copperfield, a novel based on his early life
experiences. Like Dickens, David works as a child, pasting labels onto bottles. David also
becomes first a law clerk, then a reporter, and finally a successful novelist. Mr. Micawber is a
satirical version of Dickenss father, a likable man who can never scrape together the money
he needs. Many of the secondary characters spring from Dickenss experiences as a young
man in financial distress in London.
In later years, Dickens called David Copperfield his favourite child, and many critics
consider the novel to be one of his best depictions of childhood. Dickenss other works
include Oliver Twist (18371839), Nicholas Nickelby (18381839), and A Christmas
Carol (1843). Perhaps his best known novel, Great Expectations (18601861) shares many
thematic similarities with David Copperfield. Dickens died in Kent on June 9, 1870, at the age
of fifty-eight.
David Copperfield is set in early Victorian England against a backdrop of great social change.
The Industrial Revolution of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries had
transformed the social landscape and enabled capitalists and manufacturers to amass huge
fortunes. Although the Industrial Revolution increased social mobility, the gap between rich
and poor remained wide. London, a teeming mass of humanity lit by gas lamps at night and
darkened by sooty clouds from smokestacks during the day, rose in dark contrast to Britains
sparsely populated rural areas. More and more people moved from the country to the city in
search of the opportunities that technological innovation promised. But this migration
overpopulated the already crowded cities, and poverty, disease, hazardous factory conditions,
and ramshackle housing became widespread. Dickens acutely observed these phenomena of
the Industrial Revolution and used them as the canvas on which he painted David
Copperfield and his other urban novels.
About the book
Now a grown man, David Copperfield tells the story of his youth. As a young boy, he lives
happily with his mother and his nurse, Peggotty. His father died before he was born. During
Davids early childhood, his mother marries the violent Mr. Murdstone, who brings his strict
sister, Miss Murdstone, into the house. The Murdstones treat David cruelly, and David bites
Mr. Murdstones hand during one beating. The Murdstones send David away to school.
Peggotty takes David to visit her family in Yarmouth, where David meets Peggottys brother,
Mr. Peggotty, and his two adopted children, Ham and Little Emly. Mr. Peggottys family
lives in a boat turned upside downa space they share with Mrs. Gummidge, the widowed
wife of Mr. Peggottys brother. After this visit, David attends school at Salem House, which is
run by a man named Mr. Creakle. David befriends and idolizes an egotistical young man
named James Steerforth. David also befriends Tommy Traddles, an unfortunate, fat young
boy who is beaten more than the others.
Davids mother dies, and David returns home, where the Murdstones neglect him. He works
at Mr. Murdstones wine-bottling business and moves in with Mr. Micawber, who
mismanages his finances. When Mr. Micawber leaves London to escape his creditors, David
decides to search for his fathers sister, Miss Betsey Trotwoodhis only living relative. He
walks a long distance to Miss Betseys home, and she takes him in on the advice of her
mentally unstable friend, Mr. Dick.
Miss Betsey sends David to a school run by a man named Doctor Strong. David moves in
with Mr. Wickfield and his daughter, Agnes, while he attends school. Agnes and David
become best friends. Among Wickfields boarders is Uriah Heep, a snakelike young man who
often involves himself in matters that are none of his business. David graduates and goes to
Yarmouth to visit Peggotty, who is now married to Mr. Barkis, the carrier. David reflects on
what profession he should pursue.
On his way to Yarmouth, David encounters James Steerforth, and they take a detour to visit
Steerforths mother. They arrive in Yarmouth, where Steerforth and the Peggottys become
fond of one another. When they return from Yarmouth, Miss Betsey persuades David to
pursue a career as a proctor, a kind of lawyer. David apprentices himself at the London firm
of Spenlow and Jorkins and takes up lodgings with a woman named Mrs. Crupp. Mr. Spenlow
invites David to his house for a weekend. There, David meets Spenlows daughter, Dora, and
quickly falls in love with her.
In London, David is reunited with Tommy Traddles and Mr. Micawber. Word reaches David,
through Steerforth, that Mr. Barkis is terminally ill. David journeys to Yarmouth to visit
Peggotty in her hour of need. Little Emly and Ham, now engaged, are to be married upon Mr.
Barkiss death. David, however, finds Little Emly upset over her impending marriage. When
Mr. Barkis dies, Little Emly runs off with Steerforth, who she believes will make her a lady.
Mr. Peggotty is devastated but vows to find Little Emly and bring her home.
Miss Betsey visits London to inform David that her financial security has been ruined because
Mr. Wickfield has joined into a partnership with Uriah Heep. David, who has become
increasingly infatuated with Dora, vows to work as hard as he can to make their life together
possible. Mr. Spenlow, however, forbids Dora from marrying David. Mr. Spenlow dies in a
carriage accident that night, and Dora goes to live with her two aunts. Meanwhile, Uriah Heep
informs Doctor Strong that he suspects Doctor Strongs wife, Annie, of having an affair with
her young cousin, Jack Maldon.
Dora and David marry, and Dora proves a terrible housewife, incompetent in her chores.
David loves her anyway and is generally happy. Mr. Dick facilitates a reconciliation between
Doctor Strong and Annie, who was not, in fact, cheating on her husband. Miss Dartle, Mrs.
Steerforths ward, summons David and informs him that Steerforth has left Little Emly. Miss
Dartle adds that Steerforths servant, Littimer, has proposed to her and that Little Emly has
run away. David and Mr. Peggotty enlist the help of Little Emlys childhood friend Martha,
who locates Little Emly and brings Mr. Peggotty to her. Little Emly and Mr. Peggotty
decide to move to Australia, as do the Micawbers, who first save the day for Agnes and Miss
Betsey by exposing Uriah Heeps fraud against Mr. Wickfield.
A powerful storm hits Yarmouth and kills Ham while he attempts to rescue a shipwrecked
sailor. The sailor turns out to be Steerforth. Meanwhile, Dora falls ill and dies. David leaves
the country to travel abroad. His love for Agnes grows. When David returns, he and Agnes,
who has long harbored a secret love for him, get married and have several children. David
pursues his writing career with increasing commercial success.
About the characters
David Copperfield
Although David narrates his story as an adult, he relays the impressions he had from a
youthful point of view. We see how Davids perception of the world deepens as he comes of
age. We see Davids initial innocence in the contrast between his interpretation of events and
our own understanding of them. Although David is ignorant of Steerforths treachery, we are
aware from the moment we meet Steerforth that he doesnt deserve the adulation David feels
toward him. David doesnt understand why he hates Uriah or why he trusts a boy with a
donkey cart who steals his money and leaves him in the road, but we can sense Uriahs
devious nature and the boys treacherous intentions. In Davids first-person narration, Dickens
conveys the wisdom of the older man implicitly, through the eyes of a child.
Davids complex character allows for contradiction and development over the course of the
novel. Though David is trusting and kind, he also has moments of cruelty, like the scene in
which he intentionally distresses Mr. Dick by explaining Miss Betseys dire situation to him.
David also displays great tenderness, as in the moment when he realizes his love for Agnes
for the first time. David, especially as a young man in love, can be foolish and romantic. As
he grows up, however, he develops a more mature point of view and searches for a lover who
will challenge him and help him grow. David fully matures as an adult when he expresses the
sentiment that he values Agness calm tranquility over all else in his life.
Uriah Heep
Uriah serves a foil to David and contrasts Davids qualities of innocence and compassion with
his own corruption. Though Uriah is raised in a cruel environment similar to Davids, Uriahs
upbringing causes him to become bitter and vengeful rather than honest and hopeful.
Dickenss physical description of Uriah marks Uriah as a demonic character. He refers to
Uriahs movements as snakelike and gives Uriah red hair and red eyes. Uriah and David not
only have opposing characteristics but also operate at cross-purposes. For example, whereas
Uriah wishes to marry Agnes only in order to hurt David, Davids marriages are both
motivated by love. The frequent contrast between Uriahs and Davids sentiments emphasizes
Davids kindness and moral integrity.
While Davids character development is a process of increased self-understanding, Uriah
grows in his desire to exercise control over himself and other characters. As Uriah gains more
power over Mr. Wickfield, his sense of entitlement grows and he becomes more and more
power-hungry. The final scenes of the novel, in which Uriah praises his jail cell because it
helps him know what he should do, show Uriahs need to exert control even when he is a
helpless prisoner. But imprisonment does not redeem his evilif anything, it compounds his
flaws. To the end, Uriah plots strategies to increase his control. Because he deploys his
strategies to selfish purposes that bring harm to others, he stands out as the novels greatest
villain.
James Steerforth
Steerforth is a slick, egotistical, wealthy young man whose sense of self-importance
overwhelms all his opinions. Steerforth underscores the difference between what we
understand as readers and what David seesand fails to seein his youthful navet. David
takes Steerforths kindness for granted without analyzing his motives or detecting his
duplicity. When Steerforth befriends David at Salem House, David doesnt suspect that
Steerforth is simply trying to use David to make friends and gain status. Though Steerforth
belittles David from the moment they meet, David is incapable of conceiving that his new
friend might be taking advantage of him. Because Steerforths duplicity is so clear to us,
Davids lack of insight into Steerforths true intentions emphasizes his youthful innocence.
Steerforth likes David only because David worships him, and his final betrayal comes as a
surprise to David but not to us.
Conclusions
Like many of Dickenss other works, David Copperfield was originally published in serial
installments, small sections that appeared in magazines over the course of many months.
Dickens employs several methods to make the novel flow smoothly and to sustain his readers
interest over the novels publication period. First, he uses strong imagery to make each
characters physical appearance and qualities easy to remember. Uriah Heeps red hair, for
example, reminds us of his fiery personality, while Doras silly dog, Jip, reminds us of Doras
impetuous mannerisms. Also, the names Dickens gives his characters serve as keys to their
personalities. Agnes, for example, whose name is rooted in the Latin word for lamb, is
gentle and soft-spoken. Similarly, Miss Murdstone, whose name has a hard, metallic feel to it,
is mean and petty.
Dickens also holds his readers interest by making the novel suspenseful, particularly through
the use of foreshadowing. Because he was writing in installments and wanted to keep his
readership hooked, Dickens ended each section with a strong hint of what was to come in the
next section. By creating a number of intriguing plot strands involving various characters, he
generated a devoted readership that waited expectantly to see how these multiple subplots
would resolve themselves and how these familiar characters would end up. To contribute to
the intrigue of each section, Dickens focuses chiefly on plot elements rather than character
development or setting. As a result, David Copperfield is almost always lively and
energeticthe kind of story a reader would want to continue to reading over an extended
period of time.
Many of the characters in David Copperfield have foilssimilarly situated characters whose
characteristics contrast with, and thereby accentuate, those of other characters. One such pair
of foils is Agnes and Steerforth, who are both well situated in society. Whereas Agnes shows
complete devotion to her family and remains constant in her affections, Steerforth is ever-
shifting in his allegiances. In the end, Agness wholesome steadfastness gains her Davids
love, while Steerforths restless, misdirected energy brings him an untimely death. By placing
Agnes and Steerforth in close proximity in several places throughout the novelas, for
example, at the theater on the night of Davids dinner partyDickens implicitly contrasts the
two, creating an opposing pair that illuminates his view of good and evil. Similarly, Miss
Betsey and Miss Murdstone, both old ladies in a position of authority over David, represent
good and evil, respectively. Whereas Miss Betsey, for all her tough exterior, is caring and
loving toward David, Miss Murdstone treats him cruelly. In these and other pairs of characters
within the novel, the contrast between figures illustrates the contrast between good and evil
characteristics.
For Dickens, constancy of heart is a sign of single-mindedness, which is one of the most
positive characteristics a person can possess. The happiest characters in the novel are those
whose affection is unwavering. Chief among them is Agnes, whose quiet faith and calm love
sustain her through Uriahs attempts to seduce her and ruin her father. Agness devotion to
her father, which she exhibits throughout the novel, is evidence of her stability, as is her
persistent love for David. Her constant good eventually leads her to happiness, as she restores
her father to his previous glory and marries her true love.
Dora, by contrast, represents the flighty heart, whimsical and impulsive. She comes across as
childish because of her fickle desires, and her unhappiness in her marriage to David is the
direct result of this inconstancy. Although Dora loves David, her inability to control her
emotions prevents her from enjoying married life. The failure of David and Doras union,
contrasted with the success of David and Agness, conveys Dickenss belief that constancy
and fidelity of emotion are among the most important moral qualities.
The most significant element of Davids process of maturity is his learning to control his
emotions and keep a steady heart. Early in the novel, Davids emotions get the better of him.
As a boy, David bites Mr. Murdstones hand out of hatred. As a young man, he falls into
excesses of alcohol and infatuation, as we see in his dinner party with Steerforth and his
obsession over Dora. Before David can obtain true love, he must learn to curb these excesses
and master his own emotions. As he brings his heart under the control of his intellect, David
finally realizes his love for Agnes. By strongly believing in this love even though he does not
believe that she loves him, he ultimately wins her.
Growth into Adulthood: This theme is central to both books. Alices adventures parallel the
journey from childhood to adulthood. She comes into numerous new situations in which
adaptability is absolutely necessary for success. She shows marked progress throughout the
course of the book; in the beginning, she can barely maintain enough composure to keep
herself from crying. By the end of the novel, she is self-possessed and able to hold her own
against the most baffling Wonderland logic.
Size change: Closely connected to the above theme, size change is another recurring concept.
The dramatic changes in size hint at the radical changes the body undergoes during
adolescence. The key, once again, is adaptability. Alices size changes also bring about a
change in perspective, and she sees the world from a very different view. In the last trial
scene, her growth into a giant reflects her interior growth. She becomes a much stronger, self-
possessed person, able to speak out against the nonsensical proceedings of the trial.
Death: This theme is even more present in the second Alice book, Throughout the Looking
Glass. Alice frequently makes references to her own death without knowing it. Childhood is a
state of peril in Carrolls view: children are quite vulnerable, and the world presents many
dangers. Another aspect of death is its inevitability. Since the Alice books are at root about
change (the transition from childhood to adulthood, the passage of time), mortality is
inescapable as a theme. Death is the final step of this process of growth. While death is only
hinted at in the first book, the second book is saturated with references to mortality and
macabre humor.
Games / Learning the Rules: Every new encounter is something of a game for Alice; there
are rules to learn, and consequences for learning or not learning those rules. Games are a
constant part of life in Wonderland, from the Caucus race to the strange croquet match to the
fact that the royal court is a living deck of cards. And every new social encounter is like a
game, in that there are bizarre, apparently arbitrary rules that Alice has to master. Learning
the rules is a metaphor for the adaptations to new social situations that every child makes as
she grows older. Mastering each challenge, Alice grows wiser and more adaptable as time
goes on.
Tess of the dUrbervilles, like the other major works by Thomas Hardy, although technically
a nineteenth century work, anticipates the twentieth century in regard to the nature and
treatment of its subject matter. Tess of the dUrbervilles was the twelfth novel published by
Thomas Hardy. He began the novel in 1889 and it was originally serialized in the Graphic
after being rejected by several other periodicals from July to December in 1891. It was finally
published as a novel in December of 1891. The novel questions societys sexual mores by
compassionately portraying a heroine who is seduced by the son of her employer and ho thus
is not considered a pure and chaste woman by the rest of society. Upon its publication, Tess of
the dUrbervilles encountered brutally hostile reviews; although it is no considered a major
work of fiction, the poor reception of Tess and Jude the Obscure precipitated Thomas Hardys
transition from writing fiction to poetry. Nevertheless, the novel was commercially successful
and assured Hardys financial security.
Tess of the dUrbervilles deals with several significant contemporary subjects for Hardy,
including the struggles of religious belief that occurred during Hardys lifetime. Hardy was
largely influenced by the Oxford movement, a spiritual movement involving extremely
devout thinking and actions. Hardys family members were primarily orthodox Christians and
Hardy himself considered entering the clergy, as did many of his relatives. Yet Hardy
eventually abandoned his devout faith in God based on the scientific advances of his
contemporaries, including most prominently Darwins On the Origin of Species. Hardys own
religious experiences can thus be seen in the character of Angel Clare, who resists the
conservative religious beliefs of his parents to take a more religious and secular view of
philosophy.
The novel also reflects Hardys preoccupation with social class that continues through his
novel. Hardy had connection to both the working and the upper class, but felt that he belonged
to neither. This is reflected in the pessimism contained in Tess of the dUrbervilles toward the
chances for Tess to ascend in society and angels precarious position as neither a member of
the upper class nor a working person equivalent to his fellow milkers at Talbothays. Again,
like Angel Clare, Thomas Hardy found himself torn between different social spheres with
which he could not fully align himself. Tess of the dUrbervilles reflects that divide.
SHORT SUMMARY
Tess of the dUrbervilles begins with the chance meeting between Parson Tringham and John
Durbeyfield. The parson addresses the impoverished Durbeyfield as Sir John, and remarks
that he has just learned that the Durbeyfields are descended from the dUrbervilles, a family
once renowned in England. Alhough Parson Tringham mentions this only to note how the
mighty have fallen, John Durbeyfield rejoices over the news. Durbeyfield arrives at home
during the May Day dance, in which his daughter Tess dances. During this celebration, Tess
happens to meet three brothers: Felix, Cuthbert and Angel Clare. Angel does not dance with
Tess, but takes note of her as the most striking of the girls. When Tess arrives at home, she
learns that her father is at the tavern celebrating the news of his esteemed family connections.
Since John must awake early to deliver bees, Tess sends her mother to get her father, then her
brother Abraham, and finally goes to the tavern herself when none of them return.
At the tavern, John Durbeyfield reveals that he has a grand plan to send his daughter to claim
kinship with the remaining dUrbervilles, and thus make her eligible to marry a gentleman.
The next morning, John Durbeyfield is too ill to undertake his journey, thus Tess and
Abraham deliver the bees. During their travels the carriage wrecks and their horse is killed.
Since the family has no source of income without their horse, Tess agrees to go to the home of
the Stoke-dUrbervilles to claim kinship. There she meets Alec dUrberville, who shows her
the estate and prepares to kiss her. Tess returns home and later receives a letter from Mrs.
Stoke-dUrberville, who offers Tess employment tending to her chickens. When Alec comes
to take Tess to the dUrberville estate, Joan thinks that he may marry Tess. On the way to the
dUrberville estate at Trantridge, Alec drives the carriage recklessly and tells Tess to grasp
him around the waist. He persists, and when Tess refuses him he calls her an artful hussy and
rather sensitive for a cottage girl.
When Tess meets Mrs. Stoke-dUrberville, she learns that the blind woman has no knowledge
that Tess is a relative. Tess becomes more accustomed to Alec, despite his continual
propositions to her. She finds Alec hiding behind the curtains while Tess whistles to the
bullfinches in his mothers bedroom.
During a weekend visit to Chaseborough, Tess travels with several other girls. Among these
girls are Car and Nancy Darch, nicknamed the Queen of Spades and the Queen of Diamonds.
Car carries a wicker basket with groceries on her head, and finds that a stream of treacle drips
from this basket down her back. While all of the girls laugh at Car, she only notices that Tess
is laughing and confronts her. Car appears ready to fight Tess when Alec dUrberville arrives
and takes her away. As Alec whisks Tess off, Cars mother remarks that Tess has gotten out
the frying pan and into the fire.
On the journey home, Alec asks Tess why she dislikes when he kisses her, and she replies that
she does not love him and in fact is sometimes angered by him. When Tess learns that Alec
has prolonged the ride home, she decides to walk home herself. Alec asks her to wait while he
ascertains their precise location, and returns to find Tess, who has fallen asleep. Alec has sex
with Tess.
Several weeks later, Tess returns home. Tess tells Alec that she hates herself for her weakness
and will never love him. While at home, Tess admits to her mother what happened and asks
her why she did not warn Tess about the danger than men pose. Rumors abound concerning
Tesss return to the village of Marlott. In fact Tess is pregnant and has bears the child month
later. However, the child becomes gravely ill before she has had baptized. Without the
opportunity to call a minister, Tess baptizes the baby herself with the name Sorrow before it
dies. When Tess meets the parson the next day, he agrees that the baby had been properly
baptized, but refuses to give Sorrow a Christian burial until she convinces him otherwise.
Tess leaves Marlott once again to work at Talbothays dairy, where she works for Richard
Crick and find that Angel Clare, whom she vaguely remembers, now works at the dairy. The
other milkmaids (Izz Huett, Retty Priddle, Marian) tell Tess that Angel is there to learn
milking and that, since he is a parsons son, rarely notices the girls. Although his brothers are
each clergymen and he was expected to be as well, Angel did not attend college because of
philosophical and religious differences with his father and established church doctrine. He
works at Talbothays to study the workings of a dairy in preparation for owning a farm himself
one day.
Angel grows fond of Tess, and begins arranging the cows so that she may milk the ones that
are her favorites. However, Tess learns from Dairyman Crick that Angel has scorn for
members of nobles families, even those whose families have fallen from prominence. Tess
realizes that the three other milkmaids are attracted to Tess, but they know that Angel prefers
Tess. When Tess overhears the three milkmaids discussing this, she feels jealousy at the
others attraction for Angel, and begins to believe that, as a working woman, she is more
suited to be a farmers wife than a woman of equal rank as Angel. Still, Tess retreats from
Angels affections until he finally declares his love for her.
Angel visits his home in Emminster, where he discusses the possibility of marriage with his
parents. While visiting his family, Angel realizes how life at Talbothays had changed him.
Although his parents suggest that Angel marry a local girl, Mercy Chant, angel suggests that
he should marry a woman with practical talents. His parents only consent when they feel
certain that the woman is an unimpeachable Christian. When Angel returns from Emminster,
he proposes to Tess, who rejects him without giving him a reason. Although he persists, she
finally admits that she is a dUrberville, thus a member of the type of family that he despises.
When Angel remains unfazed by this news, she agrees to marry him.
Tess writes to her mother to ask whether she should admit the entirety of her past to Angel,
but her mother assures her that she should not. Tess remains nervous concerning her impeding
marriage, attempting to postpone the date and forgetting to make important wedding plans.
While in town with angel, Tess sees a man who recognizes her from TRantridge and remarks
on her questionable reputation. Angel defends her honor, but Tess realizes that she must tell
him about her past with Alec dUrberville. Tess writes Angel a letter and slips it under his
doorway. The next morning Angel behaves normally. It is only on the day of her wedding that
Tess finds that the letter slid under the carpet and Angel thus never found it.
After Angel and Tess marry, they go to Wellbridge for their honeymoon and remain at a home
once owned by the dUrbervilles. Tess learns from Jonathan Kail, who delivers a wedding gift
from the Cricks, that the girl at Talbothays have suffered greatly since Angel and Tess left.
On their wedding night, Angel and Tess vow to tell one another their faults. Angel admits that
he had a short affair with a stranger in London, while Tess admits about Alec dUrberville.
After telling Angel her story, Tess begs for forgiveness, but he claims that forgiveness is
irrelevant, for she was one person and is now another woman in the same shape. She vows to
do anything he asks and to die if h would so desire, but he claims that there is discordance
between her current self-sacrifice and past self-preservation. Although he claims to forgive
her, Angel still questions whether or not he still loves her. Angels obstinate nature blocks his
acceptance of Tesss faults on principle, and he remains with Tess only to avoid scandal until
he tells her that they should separate.
That night, Angel begins sleepwalking and carries Tess out of their home and across the
nearby river to the local cemetery, where he places her in a coffin. She leads him back to bed
without waking him, and the next morning he seems to remember nothing of the event. Angel
tells Tess that he will go away from her and she should not come to him, but may write if she
is ill or needs anything.
Tess returns home, where her family remains impoverished and Tess had no place to stay.
When Tess receives a letter from Angel telling her that he has gone to the north of England to
look for a farm, Tess uses this as an excuse to leave Marlott.
Angel visits his parents and tells them nothing about his separation, but they sense that some
difficulty has occurred in his marriage. Angel decides to go to Brazil to look for a farm,
although he realizes that he has treated Tess poorly. Before leaving for Brazil, Angel sees Izz
Huett and proposes that she accompany him to Brazil. When he asks her whether she loves
him as much as Tess does, Izz replies that nobody could love him more than Tess does,
because Tess would give up her life for Angel. Angel realizes his foolishness and tells Izz that
her answer saved him from great folly.
Tess journeys to Flintcomb-Ash, where she will join Marian at a different farm. On her way
to the farm, Tess finds the man from TRantridge who identified her when she was with Angel,
and he demands an apology for allowing Angel to wrongfully defend her honor. Tess hides
from him, and after she is propositioned by young men in a nearby in the next morning, she
clips off her eyebrows to make herself less unattractive.
Tess works as a swede-hacker at Flintcomb-Ash, a barren and rough place. Marian believes
that Tess has been abused and thinks Angel may be to blame, but Tess refuses to allow
Marian to mention Angels name in such a derogatory manner. Izz Huet and Retty Priddle
join Marian and Tess at Flintcomb-Ash, and Tess learns that the man who insulted her is the
owner of the farm where she works. Car and Nancy Darch work at this farm as well, although
neither recognize Tess. Since the conditions at Flintcomb-Ash are so arduous, Tess visits
Emminster to ask the Clares for assistance, but does not approach them when she overhears
Felix and Cuthbert Clare discussing how disreputable Angels new wife must be. While
returning to Flintcomb-Ash, Tess learns that a noted preacher is nearby: Alec dUrberville.
When Tess confronts Alec, he claims that he has a newfound duty to save others and feels that
he must save Tess. Still, he seems to blame Tess for her tempting Alec to sin, and makes her
swear never to tempt him again. Alec begins to visit Tess frequently, despite her overt
suspicion and dislike for him, and even asks her to marry him and accompany him to Africa
where he plans to be a missionary. Tess refuses and admits to Alec that she is already married,
but Alec derides the idea that her marriage is secure and attempts to refute Tesss religious
views. Alec accuses Tess once more of tempting him, and blames her for his backsliding from
Christianity. Alec soon disavows his faith and loses the adornments of it, returning to his
more fashionable ways and giving up preaching. When Alec tells Tess that she should leave
her husband, she slaps him and then refuses to back down when Alec appears ready to return
her blow. She tells Alec that she will not cry if he hits her, because she will always be his
victim.
Alec soon tries a different tactic to get Tess to submit to him; he attempts to dominate her by
exerting financial superiority. Alec offers to support her family, but only as a means to make
Tess and her family dependent. Tess returns home to Marlott when she learns that her mother
may be dying and her father is quite ill, but soon after her return her father dies instead, while
her mother recovers. After the death of John Durbeyfield, the family loses their home and
must find accommodations elsewhere. They move to Kingsbere, where the dUrberville
family tomb is located. Although Alec offers to support the Durbeyfields, Tess refuses, even
when he offers a guarantee in writing that he would continue to support them no matter the
relationship between Tess and himself. When the Durbeyfields reach Kingsbere, they find no
room at the inn where they scheduled to stay, and thus must remain in the church near the
dUrberville family vault.
Angel Clare returns home from Brazil, weak and sickly, and finds the letter from Tess in
which she claims that she will try to forget him. Angel writes to her home at Marlott to search
for her, but only later finds out that the Durbeyfields are no longer at Marlott and that Joan
does not know where her daughter is. Angel decides to search for Tess, and eventually finds
her mother, who reluctantly admits to Angel that Tess is at Sandbourne, a thriving village
nearby.
Angel finds Tess at an inn at Sandbourne, where she has been living a comfortable life with
Alec dUrberville. Tess tells Angel that it is too late, and that Alec convinced her that he
would never return. Tess admits that she hates Alec now, for he lied to her about Angel. After
Angel leaves, Tess returns to her room and begins to sob. Alec finds her, and after a heated
argument Tess stabs Alec in the heart, killing him.
As the dejected Angel leaves town, he finds Tess following him. She admits that she has
killed Alec, and the two continue along together to escape. They remain at a deserted mansion
before continuing northward to find a boat out of England. They rest at Stonehenge; there
Tess, who realizes that she will inevitably be captured, asks Angel to marry her sister, Liza-
Lu, after she is gone. As Tess sleeps a party of men surrounds Angel and Tess to capture her
and arrest her for Alecs murder. Tess is executed for her crime, while Angel does her bidding
and presumably marries Liza-Lu.
The Scarlet Letter was an immediately success and allowed Hawthorne to devote himself to
his writing. He left Salem for a temporary residence in Lenox, a small town the Berkshires,
where he completed the romance The House of the Seven Gables in 1851. While in Lenox,
Hawthorne became acquainted with Herman Melville and became a major proponent of
Melvilles work, but their friendship became strained. Hawthornes subsequent novels, The
Blithedale Romance, based on his years of communal living at Brook Farm, and the romance
The Marble Faun, were both considered disappointments. Hawthorne supported himself
through another political post, the consulship in Liverpool, which he was given for writing a
campaign biography for Franklin Pierce.
Hawthorne passed away on May 19, 1864 in Plymouth, New Hampshire after a long period of
illness in which he suffered severe bouts of dementa. Emerson described his life with the
words painful solitude. Hawthorne maintained a strong friendship with Franklin Pierce, but
otherwise had few intimates and little engagement with any sort of social life. His works
remain for their treatment of guilt and the complexities of moral choices.
The novel opens with Hester being led to the scaffold where she is to be publicly shamed for
having committed adultery. Hester is forced to wear the letter A on her gown all the times.
She has stitched a large scarlet A onto her dress with gold thread, giving the letter an air of
elegance.
Hester carries Pearl, her daughter, with her. On the scaffold she if asked to reveal the name of
Pearls father, but she refuses. In the crowd Hester recognizes her husband from Amsterdam,
Roger Chillingworth.
Chillingworth visits Hester after she is returned to the prison. He tells her that he will find out
who the man was, and that he will read the truth on the mans heart. He then forces her to
promise never to reveal his true identity.
Hester moves into a cottage bordering the woods. She and Pearl live there in relative solitude.
Hester earns her money by doing stitchwork for local dignitaries, but often spends her time
helping the poor and sick. Pearl grows up to be wild, in the sense that she refuses to obey her
mother.
Roger Chillingworth earns a reputation as being a good physician. He uses his reputation to
get transferred into the same home as Arthur Dimmesdale, an ailing minister. Chillingworth
eventually discovers that Dimmesdale is the true father of Pearl, at which point he spends his
every moment trying to torment the minister.
One night Dimmesdale is so overcome with shame about hiding his secret that he walks to the
scaffold where Hester was publicly humiliated. He stands on the scaffold and imagines the
whole town watching him with a letter emblazoned on his chest. While standing there, Hester
and Pearl arrive. He asks them to stand with him, which they do. Pearl then asks him to stand
with her the next day at noon.
When a meteor illuminates the three people standing on the scaffold, they see Roger
Chillingworth watching them. Dimmesdale tells Hester that he is terrified of Chillingworth,
who offers to take Dimmesdale home. Hester realizes that Chillingworth is slowly killing
Dimmesdale, and that she has to help him.
A few weeks later Hester sees Chillingworth picking herbs in the woods. She tells him that
she is going to reveal the fact that he is her husband to Dimmesdale. He tells her that
Providence is now in charge of their fates, and that she may do as she sees fit.
Hester takes Pearl into the woods where they wait for Dimmesdale to arrive. He is surprised
to see them, but confesses to Hester that he is desperate for a friend who knows his secret. She
comforts him and tells him Chillingworths true identity. He is furious, but allows her to
convince him that they should run away together. He finally agrees, and returns to town with
more energy than he has ever shown before.
Hester finds a ship which will carry all three of them, and it works out that the ship is due to
sail the day after Dimmesdale gives his Election Sermon. However, during the day of the
sermon, Chillingworth gets the ships captain to agree to take him on boards as well. Hester
does not know how to get out of this dilemma.
Dimmesdale gives his Election Sermon, and it receives the highest accolades of any preaching
he has ever performed. He then unexpectedly walks to the scaffold and stands on it, in full
view of the gathered masses. Dimmesdale calls Hester and Pearl to come to him.
Chillingworth tries to stop him, but Dimmesdale laughs and tells him that he cannot win.
Hester and Pearl join Dimmesdale on the scaffold. Dimmesdale then tells the people that he is
also a sinner like Hester, and that he should have assumed his rightful place by her side over
seven years earlier. He then rips open his shirt to reveal a scarlet letter on his flesh.
Dimemsdale falls to his knees and dies while on the scaffold.
Hester and Pearl leave the town for a while, and several years later Hester returns. No one
hears from Pearl again, but it is assumed that she gets married and has children in Europe.
Hester never removes her scarlet letter, and when she passes away she is buried in Kings
Chapel.
Summary
The Custom House is largely an autobiographical sketch describing Hawthornes life as an
administrator of the Salem Custom House. It was written to enlarge the overall size of The
Scarlet Letter, since Hawthorne deemed the story too short to print by itself. It also serves as
an excellent essay on society during Hawthornes times, and allows Hawthorne to pretend to
have discovered The Scarlet Letter in the Custom House.
Hawthorne was granted the position of chief executive officer of the Customs House through
the Presidents commission. His analysis of the place is harsh and critical. He describes his
staff as a bunch of tottering old men who rarely rise out of their chairs, and who spend each
day sleeping or talking softly to one another. Hawthorne tells the reader that he could not
bring himself to fire any of them, and so after he assumed leadership things stayed the same.
Hawthorne describes the town of Salem as a port city which failed to mature into a major
harbor. The streets and buildings are dilapidated, the townspeople very sober and old, and
grass grows between the cobblestones. The custom House serves the small ship traffic which
goes through the port, but is usually a quiet place requiring only minimal amounts of work.
The connection between Salem and the Puritans is made early on in the text. Hawthornes
family originally settled in Salem, and he is a direct descendent of several notable ancestors.
He describes his ancestors as severe Puritans decked out in black robes, laying harsh
judgment upon people who strayed from their faith. When discussing his ancestors,
Hawthorne is both reverent and mocking, jokingly wondering how an idler such as him could
have born from such noble lineage.
Much of the story then deals with long descriptions of the various men with whom he worked
in the Custom House. General Miller, the Collector, is the oldest inhabitant, a man who had
maintained a stellar career in the military, but who has chosen to work in the Custom House
for the remainder of his years. The other man described by Hawthorne is the Inspector.
Hawthorne writes that the job was created by the mans father decades earlier, and that he has
held the position ever since. The Inspector is the most light-hearted of the workers, constantly
laughing and talking in spite of his age.
The upstairs of the Custom House was designed to accommodate a large movement of goods
through the port, and is in ill-repair since it soon became extraneous. Hawthorne says that the
large upstairs hall was used to store documents, and it is that he finds an unusual package. The
package contains some fabric with a faded letter A imprinted in the cloth, and some papers
describing the entire story behind the letter. This is the story that Hawthorne claims is the
basis for The Scarlet Letter.
Three years after taking his job as Surveyor, General Taylor was elected President of the
United States, and Hawthorne received notice of his termination. Hawthorne remarks that he
is lucky to have been let go, since it allowed him the time to write out the entire story of The
Scarlet Letter. He finishes the Custom House with a description of his life since leaving his
job as Surveyor, and comments that, it may be, however that the great-grandchildren of
the present race may sometimes think kindly of the scribbler of bygone days .
10. Walt Whitman: Leaves of Grass
Walt Whitman was born in 1819 on Long Island (the Paumanok of many of his poems).
During his early years he trained as a printer, then became a teacher, and finally a journalist
and editor. He was less than successful; his stridently radical views made him unpopular with
readers. After an 1848 sojourn in the South, which introduced him to some of the variety of
his country, he returned to New York and began to write poetry.
In 1855 he self-published the first edition of Leaves of Grass,which at the time consisted of
only twelve poems. The volume was widely ignored, with one significant exception. Ralph
Waldo Emerson wrote him a congratulatory letter, in which he offered his greet[ings]... at
the beginning of a great career. Whitman promptly published another edition of Leaves of
Grass, expanding it by some twenty poems and appending the letter from Emerson, much to
the latters discomfort. 1860 saw another edition of a now much larger Leavescontaining
some 156 poemswhich was issued by a trade publisher.
At the outset of the Civil War Whitman volunteered as a nurse in army hospitals; he also
wrote dispatches as a correspondent for the New York Times. The war inspired a great deal of
poetry, which was published in 1865 as Drum Taps. Drum Taps was then incorporated into an
1867 edition of Leaves of Grass, as was another volume of wartime poetry, Sequel, which
included the poems written on Lincolns assassination.
Whitmans wartime work led to a job with the Department of the Interior, but he was soon
fired when his supervisor learned that he had written the racy poems ofLeaves of Grass. The
failure of Reconstruction led him to write the best known of his prose works, Democratic
Vistas, which, as its title implies, argues for the maintenance of democratic ideals. This
volume came out in 1871, as did yet another edition of Leaves of Grass, expanded to include
more poems. The 1871 edition was reprinted in 1876 for the centennial. Several other prose
works followed, then a further expanded version of Leaves of Grass, in 1881.
Whitmans health had been shaky since the mid-1870s, and by 1891 it was clear he was
dying. He therefore prepared his so-called Deathbed edition of Leaves of Grass, which
contained two appendices of old-age poems as well as a review essay in which he tries to
justify his life and work. The Deathbed Edition came out in 1892; Whitman died that year.
Whitmans lifetime saw both the Civil War and the rise of the United States as a commercial
and political power. He witnessed both the apex and the abolition of slavery. His poetry is
thus centered on ideas of democracy, equality, and brotherhood. In response to Americas
new position in the world, Whitman also tried to develop a poetry that was uniquely
American, that both surpassed and broke the mold of its predecessors. Leaves of Grass, with
its multiple editions and public controversies, set the pattern for the modern, public artist, and
Whitman, with his journalistic endeavors on the side, made the most of his role as celebrity
and artist.
Whitmans poetry is democratic in both its subject matter and its language. As the great lists
that make up a large part of Whitmans poetry show, anythingand anyoneis fair game for
a poem. Whitman is concerned with cataloguing the new America he sees growing around
him. Just as America is far different politically and practically from its European counterparts,
so too must American poetry distinguish itself from previous models. Thus we see Whitman
breaking new ground in both subject matter and diction.
In a way, though, Whitman is not so unique. His preference for the quotidian links him with
both Dante, who was the first to write poetry in a vernacular language, and with Wordsworth,
who famously stated that poetry should aim to speak in the language of ordinary men.
Unlike Wordsworth, however, Whitman does not romanticize the proletariat or the peasant.
Instead he takes as his model himself. The stated mission of his poetry was, in his words, to
make [a]n attempt to put aPerson, a human being (myself, in the latter half of the 19th
century, in America) freely, fully, and truly on record. A truly democratic poetry, for
Whitman, is one that, using a common language, is able to cross the gap between the self and
another individual, to effect a sympathetic exchange of experiences.
This leads to a distinct blurring of the boundaries between the self and the world and between
public and private. Whitman prefers spaces and situationslike journeys, the out-of-doors,
citiesthat allow for ambiguity in these respects. Thus we see poems like Song of the Open
Road and Crossing Brooklyn Ferry, where the poet claims to be able to enter into the
heads of others. Exploration becomes not just a trope but a mode of existence.
For Whitman, spiritual communion depends on physical contact, or at least proximity. The
body is the vessel that enables the soul to experience the world. Therefore the body is
something to be worshipped and given a certain primacy. Eroticism, particularly
homoeroticism, figures significantly in Whitmans poetry. This is something that got him in
no small amount of trouble during his lifetime. The erotic interchange of his poetry, though, is
meant to symbolize the intense but always incomplete connection between individuals.
Having sex is the closest two people can come to being one merged individual, but the
boundaries of the body always prevent a complete union. The affection Whitman shows for
the bodies of others, both men and women, comes out of his appreciation for the linkage
between the body and the soul and the communion that can come through physical contact.
He also has great respect for the reproductive and generative powers of the body, which
mirror the intellects generation of poetry.
The Civil War diminished Whitmans faith in democratic sympathy. While the cause of the
war nominally furthered brotherhood and equality, the war itself was a quagmire of killing.
Reconstruction, which began to fail almost immediately after it was begun, further
disappointed Whitman. His later poetry, which displays a marked insecurity about the place of
poetry and the place of emotion in general (see in particular When Lilacs Last in the
Dooryard Bloomd), is darker and more isolated.
Whitmans style remains consistent throughout, however. The poetic structures he employs
are unconventional but reflect his democratic ideals. Lists are a way for him to bring together
a wide variety of items without imposing a hierarchy on them. Perception, rather than
analysis, is the basis for this kind of poetry, which uses few metaphors or other kinds of
symbolic language. Anecdotes are another favored device. By transmitting a story, often one
he has gotten from another individual, Whitman hopes to give his readers a sympathetic
experience, which will allow them to incorporate the anecdote into their own history. The
kind of language Whitman uses sometimes supports and sometimes seems to contradict his
philosophy. He often uses obscure, foreign, or invented words. This, however, is not meant to
be intellectually elitist but is instead meant to signify Whitmans status as a unique individual.
Democracy does not necessarily mean sameness. The difficulty of some of his language also
mirrors the necessary imperfection of connections between individuals: no matter how hard
we try, we can never completely understand each other. Whitman largely avoids rhyme
schemes and other traditional poetic devices. He does, however, use meter in masterful and
innovative ways, often to mimic natural speech. In these ways, he is able to demonstrate that
he has mastered traditional poetry but is no longer subservient to it, just as democracy has
ended the subservience of the individual.
Themes
Democracy As a Way of Life
Whitman envisioned democracy not just as a political system but as a way of experiencing the
world. In the early nineteenth century, people still harbored many doubts about whether the
United States could survive as a country and about whether democracy could thrive as a
political system. To allay those fears and to praise democracy, Whitman tried to be
democratic in both life and poetry. He imagined democracy as a way of interpersonal
interaction and as a way for individuals to integrate their beliefs into their everyday lives.
Song of Myself notes that democracy must include all individuals equally, or else it will
fail.
In his poetry, Whitman widened the possibilities of poetic diction by including slang,
colloquialisms, and regional dialects, rather than employing the stiff, erudite language so
often found in nineteenth-century verse. Similarly, he broadened the possibilities of subject
matter by describing myriad people and places. Like William Wordsworth, Whitman believed
that everyday life and everyday people were fit subjects for poetry. Although much of
Whitmans work does not explicitly discuss politics, most of it implicitly deals with
democracy: it describes communities of people coming together, and it imagines many voices
pouring into a unified whole. For Whitman, democracy was an idea that could and should
permeate the world beyond politics, making itself felt in the ways we think, speak, work,
fight, and even make art.
The Cycle of Growth and Death
Whitmans poetry reflects the vitality and growth of the early United States. During the
nineteenth century, America expanded at a tremendous rate, and its growth and potential
seemed limitless. But sectionalism and the violence of the Civil War threatened to break apart
and destroy the boundless possibilities of the United States. As a way of dealing with both the
population growth and the massive deaths during the Civil War, Whitman focused on the life
cycles of individuals: people are born, they age and reproduce, and they die. Such poems as
When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomd imagine death as an integral part of life.
The speaker of When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomd realizes that flowers die in the
winter, but they rebloom in the springtime, and he vows to mourn his fallen friends every year
just as new buds are appearing. Describing the life cycle of nature helped Whitman
contextualize the severe injuries and trauma he witnessed during the Civil Warlinking death
to life helped give the deaths of so many soldiers meaning.
The Beauty of the Individual
Throughout his poetry, Whitman praised the individual. He imagined a democratic nation as a
unified whole composed of unique but equal individuals. Song of Myself opens in a
triumphant paean to the individual: I celebrate myself, and sing myself (1). Elsewhere the
speaker of that exuberant poem identifies himself as Walt Whitman and claims that, through
him, the voices of many will speak. In this way, many individuals make up the individual
democracy, a single entity composed of myriad parts. Every voice and every part will carry
the same weight within the single democracyand thus every voice and every individual is
equally beautiful. Despite this pluralist view, Whitman still singled out specific individuals
for praise in his poetry, particularly Abraham Lincoln. In 1865 , Lincoln was assassinated,
and Whitman began composing several elegies, including O Captain! My Captain!
Although all individuals were beautiful and worthy of praise, some individuals merited their
own poems because of their contributions to society and democracy.
Motifs
Lists
Whitman filled his poetry with long lists. Often a sentence will be broken into many clauses,
separated by commas, and each clause will describe some scene, person, or object. These lists
create a sense of expansiveness in the poem, as they mirror the growth of the United States.
Also, these lists layer images atop one another to reflect the diversity of American landscapes
and people. In Song of Myself, for example, the speaker lists several adjectives to describe
Walt Whitman in section24 . The speaker uses multiple adjectives to demonstrate the
complexity of the individual: true individuals cannot be described using just one or two
words. Later in this section, the speaker also lists the different types of voices who speak
through Whitman. Lists are another way of demonstrating democracy in action: in lists, all
items possess equal weight, and no item is more important than another item in the list. In a
democracy, all individuals possess equal weight, and no individual is more important than
another.
The Human Body
Whitmans poetry revels in its depictions of the human body and the bodys capacity for
physical contact. The speaker of Song of Myself claims that copulation is no more rank to
me than death is (521 ) to demonstrate the naturalness of taking pleasure in the bodys
physical possibilities. With physical contact comes spiritual communion: two touching bodies
form one individual unit of togetherness. Several poems praise the bodies of both women and
men, describing them at work, at play, and interacting. The speaker of I Sing the Body
Electric (1855 ) boldly praises the perfection of the human form and worships the body
because the body houses the soul. This free expression of sexuality horrified some of
Whitmans early readers, and Whitman was fired from his job at the Indian Bureau
in 1 8 6 5 because the secretary of the interior found Leaves of Grassoffensive. Whitmans
unabashed praise of the male form has led many critics to argue that he was homosexual or
bisexual, but the repressive culture of the nineteenth century prevented him from truly
expressing those feelings in his work.
Rhythm and Incantation
Many of Whitmans poems rely on rhythm and repetition to create a captivating, spellbinding
quality of incantation. Often, Whitman begins several lines in a row with the same word or
phrase, a literary device called anaphora. For example, the first four lines of When I Heard
the Learnd Astronomer (1865 ) each begin with the word when. The long lines of such
poems as Song of Myself and When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomd force readers to
inhale several bits of text without pausing for breath, and this breathlessness contributes to the
incantatory quality of the poems. Generally, the anaphora and the rhythm transform the poems
into celebratory chants, and the joyous form and structure reflect the joyousness of the poetic
content. Elsewhere, however, the repetition and rhythm contribute to an elegiac tone, as in O
Captain! My Captain! This poem uses short lines and words, such as heart and father, to
mournfully incant an elegy for the assassinated Abraham Lincoln.
Symbols
Plants
Throughout Whitmans poetry, plant life symbolizes both growth and multiplicity. Rapid,
regular plant growth also stands in for the rapid, regular expansion of the population of the
United States. In When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomd, Whitman uses flowers,
bushes, wheat, trees, and other plant life to signify the possibilities of regeneration and re-
growth after death. As the speaker mourns the loss of Lincoln, he drops a lilac spray onto the
coffin; the act of laying a flower on the coffin not only honors the person who has died but
lends death a measure of dignity and respect. The title Leaves of Grass highlights another of
Whitmans themes: the beauty of the individual. Each leaf or blade of grass possesses its own
distinct beauty, and together the blades form a beautiful unified whole, an idea Whitman
explores in the sixth section of Song of Myself. Multiple leaves of grass thus symbolize
democracy, another instance of a beautiful whole composed of individual parts. In 1860 ,
Whitman published an edition of Leaves of Grass that included a number of poems
celebrating love between men. He titled this section The Calamus Poems, after the phallic
calamus plant.
The Self
Whitmans interest in the self ties into his praise of the individual. Whitman links the self to
the conception of poetry throughout his work, envisioning the self as the birthplace of poetry.
Most of his poems are spoken from the first person, using the pronoun I. The speaker of
Whitmans most famous poem, Song of Myself, even assumes the name Walt Whitman, but
nevertheless the speaker remains a fictional creation employed by the poet Whitman.
Although Whitman borrows from his own autobiography for some of the speakers
experiences, he also borrows many experiences from popular works of art, music, and
literature. Repeatedly the speaker of this poem exclaims that he contains everything and
everyone, which is a way for Whitman to reimagine the boundary between the self and the
world. By imaging a person capable of carrying the entire world within him, Whitman can
create an elaborate analogy about the ideal democracy, which would, like the self, be capable
of containing the whole world.
The novel Moby Dick was the sixth novel published by Herman Melville, a landmark of
American literature that mixed a number of literary styles including a fictional adventure
story, historical detail and even scientific discussion. The story of the voyage whaling ship
Pequod, the novel draws at least partially from the experiences of its author while a sailor and
a harpooner on whaling ships before settling in New England as a writer.
The title character of Moby Dick was inspired by an article in Knickerbocker magazine in
May 1839 entitled Mocha Dick: or the White Whale of the Pacific. The author of this
article, Jeremiah Reynolds, detailed the capture of a giant sperm whale legendary among
whalers for its vicious attacks on ships. The whale was named as such after the Mocca
Islands, the area where the whale was commonly sighted (Dick was used simply because it
was a common male name). The origin of the Moby of the novels title has never been
conclusively determined.
The first publication of Moby Dick was in London in October of 1851. Entitled The Whale,
the novel was published in three volumes and was censored for some of its political and moral
content. The British publisher of the novel, Richard Bentley, inadvertently left out the
Epilogue to the novel, leading many critics to wonder how the tale could be told in the first
person by Ishmael, when the final chapter witnesses the sinking of the Pequod with
presumably no survivors.
The first American publication of the novel came the following month. The American version
of the novel, published by Harper & Brothers, although fixing the narrative error of the British
version through the inclusion of the epilogue, was poorly received by critics and readers who
expected a romantic high seas adventure akin to Melvilles first success. The reputation of the
novel floundered for many years, and it was only after Melvilles death that it became
considered one of the major novels in American literature.
Context
Henry James was born in New York City in 1843 and was raised in Manhattan. James's
father, a prominent intellectual and social theorist, traveled a great deal to Geneva, Paris, and
London, so Henry and his brother, William, accompanied him and virtually grew up in those
locations as well. As a child, James was shy, delicate, and had a difficult time mixing with
other boyshis brother, who was much more active, called him a sissy. William James, of
course, went on to become a great American philosopher, while Henry became one of the
nation's preeminent novelists.
The James family moved to Boston when Henry was a teenager, and Henry briefly attended
Harvard Law School. But he soon dropped out in order to concentrate on his writing. He
found success early and often: William Dean Howells, the editor of theAtlantic
Monthly, befriended the young writer, and by his mid- twenties James was considered one of
the most skilled writers in America. In novels such as The American, The
Europeans, and Daisy Miller, James perfected a unique brand of psychological realism, taking
as his primary subject the social maneuverings of the upper classes, particularly the situation
of Americans living in Europe. For James, America represented optimism and innocence,
while Europe represented decadence and social sophistication; James himself moved to
Europe early on in his professional career and was naturalized as a British citizen in 1915 to
protest America's failure to enter World War I.
Throughout his career, James earned criticism for the slow pacing and uneventful plotting of
his novels, as well as for his elliptical technique, in which many of a work's important scenes
are not narrated, but only implied by later scenes. But as a stylist James earned consistent
admiration; he is often considered to be a "writer's writer," and his prose is remarkable for its
elegance of balance, clarity, and precision.
First written in the 1880s and extensively revised in 1908, The Portrait of a Lady is often
considered to be James's greatest achievement. In it, he explored many of his most
characteristic themes, including the conflict between American individualism and European
social custom and the situation of Americans in Europe. It also includes many of his most
memorable characters, including the lady of the novel's title, Isabel Archer, the indomitable
Mrs. Touchett, the wise and funny Ralph Touchett, the fast-talking Henrietta Stackpole, and
the sinister villains, Gilbert Osmond and Madame Merle.
While he was a dedicated observer of human beings in society, James was a socially distant
man who formed few close friendships. He never married and openly claimed to practice
celibacy. Perhaps this gave him time to write: in four decades of his writing career, he
produced nearly 100 books, including such classics as The Golden Bowl, The Wings of the
Dove, and the immortal ghost story "The Turn of the Screw." He died on February 28, 1916,
shortly after receiving the English Order of Merit for his dedication to the British cause in
World War I.
Isabel Archer is a woman in her early twenties who comes from a genteel family in Albany,
New York, in the late 1860s. Her mother died when she was a young girl, and her father
raised her in a haphazard manner, allowing her to educate herself and encouraging her
independence. As a result, the adult Isabel is widely read, imaginative, confident in her own
mind, and slightly narcissistic; she has the reputation in Albany for being a formidable
intellect, and as a result she often seems intimidating to men. She has had few suitors, but one
of them is Caspar Goodwood, the powerful, charismatic son of a wealthy Boston mill owner.
Isabel is drawn to Caspar, but her commitment to her independence makes her fear him as
well, for she feels that to marry him would be to sacrifice her freedom.
Shortly after Isabel's father dies, she receives a visit from her indomitable aunt, Mrs.
Touchett, an American who lives in Europe. Mrs. Touchett offers to take Isabel on a trip to
Europe, and Isabel eagerly agrees, telling Caspar that she cannot tell him whether she wishes
to marry him until she has had at least a year to travel in Europe with her aunt. Isabel and
Mrs. Touchett leave for England, where Mrs. Touchett's estranged husband is a powerful
banker. Isabel makes a strong impression on everyone at Mr. Touchett's county manor of
Gardencourt: her cousin Ralph, slowly dying of a lung disorder, becomes deeply devoted to
her, and the Touchetts' aristocratic neighbor Lord Warburton falls in love with her. Warburton
proposes, but Isabel declines; though she fears that she is passing up a great social opportunity
by not marrying Warburton, she still believes that marriage would damage her treasured
independence. As a result, she pledges to accomplish something wonderful with her life,
something that will justify her decision to reject Warburton.
Isabel's friend Henrietta Stackpole, an American journalist, believes that Europe is changing
Isabel, slowly eroding her American values and replacing them with romantic idealism.
Henrietta comes to Gardencourt and secretly arranges for Caspar Goodwood to meet Isabel in
London. Goodwood again presses Isabel to marry him; this time, she tells him she needs at
least two years before she can answer him, and she promises him nothing. She is thrilled to
have exercised her independence so forcefully. Mr. Touchett's health declines, and Ralph
convinces him that when he dies, he should leave half his wealth to Isabel: this will protect
her independence and ensure that she will never have to marry for money. Mr. Touchett
agrees shortly before he dies. Isabel is left with a large fortune for the first time in her life.
Her inheritance piques the interest of Madame Merle, Mrs. Touchett's polished, elegant
friend; Madame Merle begins to lavish attention on Isabel, and the two women become close
friends.
Isabel travels to Florence with Mrs. Touchett and Madame Merle; Merle introduces Isabel to a
man named Gilbert Osmond, a man of no social standing or wealth, but whom Merle
describes as one of the finest gentlemen in Europe, wholly devoted to art and aesthetics.
Osmond's daughter Pansy is being brought up in a convent; his wife is dead. In secret,
Osmond and Merle have a mysterious relationship; Merle is attempting to manipulate Isabel
into marrying Osmond so that he will have access to her fortune. Osmond is pleased to marry
Isabel, not only for her money, but also because she makes a fine addition to his collection of
art objects.
Everyone in Isabel's world disapproves of Osmond, especially Ralph, but Isabel chooses to
marry him anyway. She has a child the year after they are married, but the boy dies six
months after he is born. Three years into their marriage, Isabel and Osmond have come to
despise one another; they live with Pansy in a palazzo in Rome, where Osmond treats Isabel
as barely a member of the family: to him, she is a social hostess and a source of wealth, and
he is annoyed by her independence and her insistence on having her own opinions. Isabel
chafes against Osmond's arrogance, his selfishness, and his sinister desire to crush her
individuality, but she does not consider leaving him. For all her commitment to her
independence, Isabel is also committed to her social duty, and when she married Osmond, she
did so with the intention of transforming herself into a good wife.
A young American art collector who lives in Paris, Edward Rosier, comes to Rome and falls
in love with Pansy; Pansy returns his feelings. But Osmond is insistent that Pansy should
marry a nobleman, and he says that Rosier is neither rich nor highborn enough. Matters grow
complicated when Lord Warburton arrives on the scene and begins to court Pansy. Warburton
is still in love with Isabel and wants to marry Pansy solely to get closer to her. But Osmond
desperately wants to see Pansy married to Warburton. Isabel is torn about whether to fulfill
her duty to her husband and help him arrange the match between Warburton and Pansy, or to
fulfill the impulse of her conscience and discourage Warburton, while helping Pansy find a
way to marry Rosier.
At a ball one night, Isabel shows Warburton the dejected-looking Rosier and explains that this
is the man who is in love with Pansy. Guiltily, Warburton admits that he is not in love with
Pansy; he quietly arranges to leave Rome. Osmond is furious with Isabel, convinced that she
is plotting intentionally to humiliate him. Madame Merle is also furious with her, confronting
her with shocking impropriety and demanding brazenly to know what she did to Warburton.
Isabel has realized that there is something mysterious about Madame Merle's relationship with
her husband; now, she suddenly realizes that Merle is his lover.
At this time, Ralph is rapidly deteriorating, and Isabel receives word that he is dying. She
longs to travel to England to be with him, but Osmond forbids it. Now Isabel must struggle to
decide whether to obey his command and remain true to her marriage vows or to disregard
him and hurry to her cousin's bedside. Encouraging her to go, Osmond's sister, the Countess
Gemini, tells her that there is still more to Merle and Osmond's relationship. Merle is Pansy's
mother; Pansy was born out of wedlock. Osmond's wife died at about the same time, so Merle
and Osmond spread the story that she died in childbirth. Pansy was placed in a convent to be
raised, and she does not know that Merle is her real mother. Isabel is shocked and disgusted
by her husband's atrocious behaviorshe even feels sorry for Merle for falling under his
spellso she decides to follow her heart and travel to England.
After Ralph's death, Isabel struggles to decide whether to return to her husband or not. She
promised Pansy that she would return to Rome, and her commitment to social propriety
impels her to go back and honor her marriage. But her independent spirit urges her to flee
from Osmond and find happiness elsewhere. Caspar Goodwood appears at the funeral, and
afterwards, he asks Isabel to run away with him and forget about her husband. The next day,
unable to find her, Goodwood asks Henrietta where she has gone. Henrietta quietly tells him
that Isabel has returned to Rome, unable to break away from her marriage to Gilbert Osmond.
About the characters
Isabel Archer - The novel's protagonist, the Lady of the title. Isabel is a young woman from
Albany, New York, who travels to Europe with her aunt, Mrs. Touchett. Isabel's experiences
in Europeshe is wooed by an English lord, inherits a fortune, and falls prey to a villainous
scheme to marry her to the sinister Gilbert Osmondforce her to confront the conflict
between her desire for personal independence and her commitment to social propriety. Isabel
is the main focus of Portrait of a Lady, and most of the thematic exploration of the novel
occurs through her actions, thoughts, and experiences. Ultimately, Isabel chooses to remain in
her miserable marriage to Osmond rather than to violate custom by leaving him and searching
for a happier life.
Gilbert Osmond - A cruel, narcissistic gentleman of no particular social standing or wealth,
who seduces Isabel and marries her for her money. An art collector, Osmond poses as a
disinterested aesthete, but in reality he is desperate for the recognition and admiration of those
around him. He treats everyone who loves him as simply an object to be used to fulfill his
desires; he bases his daughter Pansy's upbringing on the idea that she should be unswervingly
subservient to him, and he even treats his longtime lover Madame Merle as a mere tool.
Isabel's marriage to Osmond forces her to confront the conflict between her desire for
independence and the painful social proprieties that force her to remain in her marriage.
Madame Merle - An accomplished, graceful, and manipulative woman, Madame Merle is a
popular lady who does not have a husband or a fortune. Motivated by her love for Gilbert
Osmond, Merle manipulates Isabel into marrying Osmond, delivering Isabel's fortune into his
hands and ruining Isabel's life in the process. Unbeknownst to either Isabel or Pansy, Merle is
not only Osmond's lover, but she is also Pansy's mother, a fact that was covered up after
Pansy's birth. Pansy was raised to believe that her mother died in childbirth.
Ralph Touchett - Isabel's wise, funny cousin, who is ill with lung disease throughout the
entire novel, which ends shortly after his death. Ralph loves life, but he is kept from
participating in it vigorously by his ailment; as a result, he acts as a dedicated spectator,
resolving to live vicariously through his beloved cousin Isabel. It is Ralph who convinces Mr.
Touchett to leave Isabel her fortune, and it is Ralph who is the staunchest advocate of Isabel
remaining independent. Ralph serves as the moral center of Portrait of a Lady: his opinions
about other characters are always accurate, and he serves as a kind of moral barometer for the
reader, who can tell immediately whether a character is good or evil by Ralph's response to
that character.
Lord Warburton - An aristocratic neighbor of the Touchetts who falls in love with Isabel
during her first visit to Gardencourt. Warburton remains in love with Isabel even after she
rejects his proposal and later tries to marry Pansy simply to bring himself closer to Isabel's
life.
Caspar Goodwood - The son of a prominent Boston mill owner, Isabel's most dedicated
suitor in America. Goodwood's charisma, simplicity, capability, and lack of sophistication
make him the book's purest symbol of James's conception of America.
Henrietta Stackpole - Isabel's fiercely independent friend, a feminist journalist who does not
believe that women need men in order to be happy. Like Caspar, Henrietta is a symbol of
America's democratic values throughout he book. After Isabel leaves for Europe, Henrietta
fights a losing battle to keep her true to her American outlook, constantly encouraging her to
marry Caspar Goodwood. At the end of the book, Henrietta disappoints Isabel by giving up
her independence in order to marry Mr. Bantling.
Mrs. Touchett - Isabel's aunt. Mrs. Touchett is an indomitable, independent old woman who
first brings Isabel to Europe. The wife of Mr. Touchett and the mother of Ralph, Mrs.
Touchett is separated from her husband, residing in Florence while he stays at Gardencourt.
After Isabel inherits her fortune and falls under the sway of Merle and Osmond, Mrs.
Touchett's importance in her life gradually declines.
Pansy Osmond - Gilbert Osmond's placid, submissive daughter, raised in a convent to
guarantee her obedience and docility. Pansy believes that her mother died in childbirth; in
reality, her mother is Osmond's longtime lover, Madame Merle. When Isabel becomes Pansy's
stepmother, she learns to love the girl; Pansy is a large part of the reason why Isabel chooses
to return to Rome at the end of the novel, when she could escape her miserable marriage by
remaining in England.
Edward Rosier - A hapless American art collector who lives in Paris, Rosier falls in love with
Pansy Osmond and does his best to win Osmond's permission to marry her. But though he
sells his art collection and appeals to Madame Merle, Isabel, and the Countess Gemini, Rosier
is unable to change Gilbert's mind that Pansy should marry a high-born, wealthy nobleman,
not an obscure American with little money and no social standing to speak of.
Mr. Touchett - An elderly American banker who has made his life and his vast fortune in
England who is Ralph's father and the proprietor of Gardencourt. Before Mr. Touchett dies,
Ralph convinces him to leave half his fortune to his niece Isabel, which will enable her to
preserve her independence and avoid having to marry for money.
Mr. Bantling - The game Englishman who acts as Henrietta's escort across Europe,
eventually persuading her to marry him at the end of the novel.
Countess Gemini - Osmond's vapid sister, who covers up her own marital infidelities by
gossipping constantly about the affairs of other married women. The Countess seems to have
a good heart, however, opposing Merle's scheme to marry Osmond and Isabel and eventually
revealing to Isabel the truth of Merle's relationship to Osmond and Pansy's parentage.
Conclusions
The Portrait of a Lady explores the conflict between the individual and society by examining
the life of Isabel Archer, a young American woman who must choose between her
independent spirit and the demands of social convention. After professing and longing to be
an independent woman, autonomous and answerable only to herself, Isabel falls in love with
and marries the sinister Gilbert Osmond, who wants her only for her money and who treats
her as an object, almost as part of his art collection. Isabel must then decide whether to honor
her marriage vows and preserve social propriety or to leave her miserable marriage and
escape to a happier, more independent life, possibly with her American suitor Caspar
Goodwood. In the end, after the death of her cousin Ralph, the staunchest advocate of her
independence, Isabel chooses to return to Osmond and maintain her marriage. She is
motivated partly by a sense of social duty, partly by a sense of pride, and partly by the love of
her stepdaughter, Pansy, the daughter of Osmond and his manipulative lover Madame Merle.
As the title of the novel indicates, Isabel is the principal character of the book, and the main
focus of the novel is on presenting, explaining, and developing her character. James is one of
America's great psychological realists, and he uses all his creative powers to ensure that
Isabel's conflict is the natural product of a believable mind, and not merely an abstract
philosophical consideration. In brief, Isabel's independence of spirit is largely a result of her
childhood, when she was generally neglected by her father and allowed to read any book in
her grandmother's library; in this way, she supervised her own haphazard education and
allowed her mind to develop without discipline or order. Her natural intelligence has always
ensured that she is at least as quick as anyone around her, and in Albany, New York, she has
the reputation of being a formidable intellect.
After she travels to England with her aunt, Mrs. Touchett, however, it becomes clear that
Isabel has a woefully unstructured imagination, as well as a romantic streak that suits her
position as an optimistic, innocent American. (For James, throughoutPortrait of a
Lady, America is a place of individualism and navet, while Europe is a place of
sophistication, convention, and decadence.) Isabel often considers her life as though it were a
novel. She also has a tendency to think about herself obsessively and has a vast faith in her
own moral strengthin fact, recognizing that she has never faced hardship, Isabel actually
wishes that she might be made to suffer, so that she could prove her ability to overcome
suffering without betraying her principles.
When Isabel moves to England, her cousin Ralph is so taken with her spirit of independence
that he convinces his dying father to leave half his fortune to Isabel. This is intended to
prevent her from ever having to marry for money, but ironically it attracts the treachery of the
novel's villains, Madame Merle and Gilbert Osmond. They conspire to convince Isabel to
marry Osmond in order to gain access to her wealth. Her marriage to Osmond effectively
stifles Isabel's independent spirit, as her husband treats her as an object and tries to force her
to share his opinions and abandon her own.
This is the thematic background of Portrait of a Lady, and James skillfully intertwines the
novel's psychological and thematic elements. Isabel's downfall with Osmond, for instance,
enables the book's most trenchant exploration of the conflict between her desire to conform to
social convention and her fiercely independent mind. It is also perfectly explained by the
elements of Isabel's character: her haphazard upbringing has led her to long for stability and
safety, even if they mean a loss of independence, and her active imagination enables her to
create an illusory picture of Osmond, which she believes in more than the real thing, at least
until she is married to him. Once she marries Osmond, Isabel's pride in her moral strength
makes it impossible for her to consider leaving him: she once longed for hardship, and now
that she has found it, it would be hypocritical for her to surrender to it by violating social
custom and abandoning her husband.
In the same way that James unites his psychological and thematic subjects, he also intertwines
the novel's settings with its themes. Set almost entirely among a group of American
expatriates living in Europe in the 1860s and 70s, the book relies on a kind of moral
geography, in which America represents innocence, individualism, and capability; Europe
represents decadence, sophistication, and social convention; and England represents the best
mix of the two. Isabel moves from America to England to continental Europe, and at each
stage she comes to mirror her surroundings, gradually losing a bit of independence with each
move. Eventually she lives in Rome, the historic heart of continental Europe, and it is here
that she endures her greatest hardship with Gilbert Osmond.
Narratively, James uses many of his most characteristic techniques in Portrait of a Lady. In
addition to his polished, elegant prose and his sedate, slow pacing, he utilizes a favorite
technique of skipping over some of the novel's main events in telling the story. Instead of
narrating moments such as Isabel's wedding with Osmond, James skips over them, relating
that they have happened only after the fact, in peripheral conversations. This literary
technique is known as ellipses. In the novel, James most often uses his elliptical technique in
scenes when Isabel chooses to value social custom over her independenceher acceptance of
Gilbert's proposal, their wedding, her decision to return to Rome after briefly leaving for
Ralph's funeral at the end of the novel. James uses this method to create the sense that, in
these moments, Isabel is no longer accessible to the reader; in a sense, by choosing to be with
Gilbert Osmond, Isabel is lost.
SHORT SUMMARY
There is a group of men aboard an English ship that is sitting on the Thames. The group
includes a Lawyer, an Accountant, a Company Director/Captain, and a man without a specific
profession called Marlow. The narrator appears to be another unnamed guest on the ship.
While they are loitering about, waiting for the wind to pick up that they might resume their
voyage, Marlow begins t speak about London and Europe as some of the darkest places on
earth. The narrator and other guests do not seem to regard him with much respect. Marlow is a
stationary man, very unusual for a seaman. He is not understood because he does not fit into a
neat category in the same manner that the others do. He mentions colonization, and says that
the taking of the earth is not something to examine too closely because it is atrocious. He thn
moves into narration of a life experience in Africa, which forced him to become a fresh water
sailor and gave him a terrible glimpse of colonization. With the exception of two or three
small paragraphs, perspective shifts as Marlow becomes the main narrator.
He has always had a passion for travel and exploration. Maps are a small obsession of his.
Marlow decides he wants nothing more than to be the skipper of a steamship that travels up
and down the river in Africa. His aunt has a connection in the Administration Department of a
seafaring / exploration company that gathers ivory, and manages to get Marlow an
appointment <he is replacing a captain who was killed in a skirmish with the natives. When
Marlow arrives at the company office, the atmosphere is extremely dim and forboding. He
feels as if everyone is looking at him pityingly. The doctor who performs his physical asks if
there is a history of insanity in Marlows family, and tells him that nothing could persuade
him to attend the Company down in the Congo. This puzzles Marlow, but he does not think
much of it. The next day he embarks on a one month journey to the primary Company station.
The African shores that he observes look anything but welcoming. They are dark and rather
desolate, in spite of the flurry of human activity around them. When he arrives, Marlow learns
that a company member recently committed suicide. There are multitudes of chain-gang
types, who all look at him with vacant expressions in their eyes. A young boy approaches
Marlow, looking very empty. Marlow can do nothing else but offer him some ship biscuits.
He is very relieved to leave the boy behind as he comes across a very well-dressed man who
is his exact picture of respectability and elegance. They introduce themselves <he is the Chief
Accountant of the Company. Marlow befriends this man, and frequently sends time in his hut
when he is going over the accounts. After ten days of observing the Chief Accountants ill
temper, Marlow departs for his 200 mile journey into the interior of the Congo, where he will
work for a station run by a mythic man named Kurtz.
The journey is arduous. Marlow crosses many paths, deserted dwellings, and black men who
are working. They are never describes as humans. Most often, everyone refers to them in
animalistic terms. Marlow finally arrives at a secondary station, where he meets the Manager,
who for now will oversee his work. It is a strange meeting. The manager smiles in a manner
that is very discomfiting. The ship that Marlow is supposed to sail is currently broken. While
they await the delivery of rivets that is needed to fix it, Marlow spends his time on more
mundane tasks. He frequently hears the name Kurtz around the station. Clearly everyone
knows him. It is rumored that he is ill. Soon the entire crew will depart for a trip to Kurtzs
station.
The Managers uncle arrives with his on expedition. Marlow overhears them saying that they
would like to see Kurtz and his assistant hanged so that their station could be eliminated as
ivory competition. After a day of exploring the expedition has lost all of their animals.
Marlow sets out for Kurtzs station with the Pilgrims, the cannibal crew, and the Manager.
About eight miles from their destination, they stop for the night. There is talk of an
approaching attack. Rumor has it that Kurtz might have been killed in a previous one. Some
of the pilgrims go ashore to investigate. The whirring sound of arrows is heard. An attack is
underway. The pilgrims shoot back from the ship with rifles. The helmsman of the ship is
killed, as is a native ashore. Marlow supposes that Kurtz has perished in the attack. This
upsets him greatly <over the course of his travelling, inexplicably he has really looked
forward to meeting this man. Marlow shares Kurtzs background: an English education, a
woman at home waiting for him. In spite of Marlows disappointment, the ship presses
onward. A little ways down the river the crew spots Kurtzs station, which they had supposed
was lost. They meet a Russian man who resembles a harlequin. He says that Kurtz is alive but
somewhat ill. The natives do not want Kurtz to leave because he has expanded their minds.
Kurtz does not want to leave because he has essentially become part of the tribe.
After talking for a while with the Russian, Marlow has a very clear picture of the man who
has become his obsession. Finally he has the chance to talk to Kurtz, who is ill and on his
deathbed. The natives surround his hut until he tells them to leave. While on watch, Marlow
dozes off, and realizes that Kurtz is gone. He chases him and finds Kurtz in the forest. He
does not want to leave the station because his plans have not been fully realized. Marlow
manages to take him back to his bed. Kurtz entrusts Marlow with all of his old files and
papers. Among these is a photograph of his sweetheart. The Russian escapes before the
Manager and others cam imprison him. The steamboat departs the next day. Kurtz dies
onboard a few days later, with Marlow having attended him until the end.
Marlow returns to England, but the memory of his friend haunts him. He manages to find the
woman from the picture, and he pays her a visit. She talks at length about his wonderful
personal qualities and about how guilty she feels that she was not with him at the last. Marlow
lies and says that her name was the last word spoken by Kurtz <the actual truth is too dark.
Analysis Part I:
The logical point from which to begin analyzing this story is by applying the title to the novel.
Darkness is a problematic word with several meanings. It is initially referred to in the
context of maps <places of darkness have been colored in; therefore they have been settled by
explores and colonialists. The idea of a map is an important symbol. They are guides, records
of exploration. They have dual purposes in that they unlock mysteries by laying out the
geography of unknown lands and they create more mystery by inspiring curiosity about
unknown lands on and off the map. The river is another important symbol. Always moving,
not very predictable, the gateway to a wider world, it is an excellent metaphor for Marlows
life. Marlow says as a child he had a passion for maps, for the glories of exploration.
Although this description seems very positive, it sounds ominous. The tone is of one who
recalls childhood notions with bitterness and regret. The reader can extrapolate these ideas
simply by taking into account the first description of Marlow. The sallow skin and sunken
cheeks do not portray him as a healthy or happy. He has had the chance to explore, and
apparently the experience has ruined him in some respect. This is Conrads way of arranging
the overall structure of the novel. The audience understands that it is to be a recollection, a
tale that will account for Marlows presently shaky, impenetrable state. The author is also
presupposing knowledge of colonialism. The bitterness of Marlows recollection
demonstrates Conrads own strong bias against colonialism, which he wants to impart to the
reader. The imagery of light and dark very clearly corresponds to the tension that is arranged
between civilization and savagery. The Thames River is called a gateway to civilization
because it connects to the civilized city of London. It is important to note that the city is
always described in stark contrast to its dark surroundings, which may be water or land, they
are so amorphous.
The vivid language of maps becomes more interesting when we consider that the word
darkness still retains its traditional meaning of evil and dread. The fact that Marlow applies
the concept of darkness to conquered territories once again indicates his negative view of
colonialism. He clearly states that colonists are only exploiting the weakness of others. Their
spreading over the world is no more noble than other types of violence and thievery. On the
map, places that are blank and devoid of outside interference are apparently the most
desirable. Darkness has another application <a color of skin. Much of this chapter is spent
discussing Marlows primary encounters with and observations of the natives of the African
Congo. The darkness of their skin is always mentioned. At first glance, Marlow describes
them as mostly black and naked, moving about like ants. While in the shade, dark things
seem to stir feebly. There is absolutely no differentiation between dark animals and dark
people. Even the rags worn by the native people are described as tails. The constant
dehumanization of black people is almost obsessive on the authors part. He is looking to
build a very closed-minded picture of the colonists. Black shapes crouch on the ground,
creatures walk on all fours to get a drink from the river. They are called shadows:
reflections of humans, but not substantial enough to be real. Marlow observes the piece of
white string on a young man, and he is taken aback by how much the whiteness stands out
against the darkness. He cannot seem to conceive of mixing black and white.
As ignorant as Marlows perceptions may appear to our modern reading, it is crucial to realize
that even before he experiences the African jungle, he exists in a class of his own, separate
from everyone else. It is not accidental that he is the only person on the Thames boat who is
named <all the others are presented as titles of their occupation. He is distinct from them
because he has no category that fits him. He is a man who does not represents his class
because he crosses boundaries. His reaction to the African natives may not be sensitive by our
modern standards, but he is more kindly than the other officers at the stations. The chief
accountant dismisses the cries of a dying black man as annoying. Clearly he has no respect for
the lives of the Africans. The offering of a biscuit to the young boy with the white string is a
nice gesture with deeper meaning. It appears to be somewhat considerate, but it is also
degrading. Marlow does this because he can think of nothing else to do as he looks into the
boys vacant eyes. The action is analogous to giving a dog some meat, that he might be
content and retreat back into his corner. Marlow means well, but he is definitely a product of
the society in which he was raised. Immediately following the encounter with the young boy,
he meets the chief accountant who is perfectly attired with collar, cuffs, jacket, and all the
rest. He refers to him as amazing and a miracle. We observe at this moment the
distinctions between savagery and civilization, at least through Marlows narrow definitions.
The diction demonstrates a type of hero worship for this man. His starched collars and cuffs
are achievements of character, and Marlow respects him on this basis. Taking account the
colonialism factor, however, creates bitter irony <to the author, those who look the most
civilized in this novel are actually the most savage. Indeed, the institution of colonialism is
referred to as a flabby, pretending, weak-eyed devil. Everything it touches turns sour <the
station is an administrative nightmare, and decaying machinery lies everywhere. Marlow
takes this as an indication of poor work ethic, which he despises. For this reason he is drawn
to the blustering accountant, who is a hard worker if nothing else. The natives are the most
affected people, and Marlow in his own bumbling way tries to relate to them.
The sense of time throughout the chapter is highly controlled. Conrad purposely glides certain
events while he examines others in minute detail. He does this in order to build suspicion
about the place to which Marlow has committed himself. Notice that he painstakingly
describes precursor events such as the doctors visit and all conversations that involve the
unseen character Kurtz. Thus begins Marlows consuming obsession with this man. At the
moment, it is more or less inactive, and does not inspire fear. Perfectly placed leading
questions such as the one about a history of family insanity have the desired effect of alerting
readers to a rather fishy situation. That Marlow ignores all of these warnings creates some
dramatic irony <it will take him longer to arrive at the conclusion which the reader has
already reached. One level of speech and communication in this novel exists in the fact that
Marlow is telling a story. His recollections have a hazy, dreamy quality. The narrative is
surely an examination of human spirit. As all stories are subjective, we have to question how
trustworthy both narrative speakers are. The outside narrator only refers to what Marlow says
and does <all others are ignored. There is a definite selection of fact that occurs. Marlows
perception of the African environment, which develop into a larger theme, illustrates this idea.
As far as Kurtz is concerned, there is incomplete communication <Marlow and the reader
know him, and yet not really. He obviously painted as a sinister character. People discuss him
in a hushed sense, always complimenting him. However, the fact that nobody has anything
negative to say about him is suspicious, as if they are all terribly anxious to stay on his good
side. The portrait in the brick maker / first agents room, of the blind woman holding a torch,
suggests the falling of Kurtz: that he has blindly traveled into a situation and become absorbed
in it, much as the woman is absorbed into the darkness of the painting (with the exception of a
torch <insufficient light). This preemptive warning is useful to keep in mind for the
subsequent chapters.
Analysis Part II:
It is important to see that even in this chaotic jungle, there exists a twisted sense of morality.
As the Manager and his uncle discuss Kurtz, they are willing to do anything that will get him
or his assistant the Russian hanged, that the trading field might be leveled to their advantage,
since anything can be done in this country. They both still retain a sense of law, but the
most base components of their personalities control all their intentions; therefore the civilized
law of the Europe continent is discarded for a more vigilante existence. The revealing of such
predatory nature points to the theme of instilled savagery. Modern novels such as Lord of the
Flies borrow much from Conrads piece. There is an integral connection between mind, body
and nature. Again, however, the lines between civilized and savage are blurred. These two
men propose a very savage solution to a seemingly civilized problem of economic
competition. The Congo has a metaphoric effect on the Europeans, Marlow observes the evil
uncle extend his short flipper of an arm for a gesture that seemed to beckon with a
dishonoring flourish before the sunlit face of the land a treacherous appeal to the lurking
death, to the hidden evil, to the profound darkness of its heart. There is one of the few
instances in which a white man is animalized. The land is a living entity, one which has the
potential to create evil. The proprieties observed by the Manager are all completely fake
<Marlow takes this as an illustration of his hollowness. Conrad is making a general
commentary on human nature. One of Marlows more personally distressing thoughts is the
realization that the monstrous tendencies of the black cannibals are not inhuman
tendencies <the white men possess them in a different form. The African land behaves as an
equalizer: in this setting, all that matters is wit and determination. It appears that living here
allows nature to perform a trick on the inhabitants of the land. While travelling Marlow
becomes somewhat delusional <river travel brings back the past, enlarges and distorts it until
it becomes an uncontrollable paranoia that he is being watched. The telling of the tale takes on
the tone of an epic quest that is larger than life. There is pregnant silence and a falling of the
senses. Marlow appears to be travelling deeply into his own mind. His fanatic interest in the
proper working of things is evident when he states that scraping a ship on the river bottom is
sinful. The religious language demonstrates a mounting kind of panic. This paranoia in turn
diminishes his sense of reality, leaving him searching for a sense of truth and stability. This in
part helps to explain his obsession with Kurtz. Behind the myth of this mysterious figure lies
a real, substantial person. He is the most logical entity on which Marlow can fixate. Being lost
in this manner, however, does not seem to be so terrible. The inferiority of the natives is a
thread that runs throughout the story. About the fireman on his ship, Marlow remarks he was
there below me to look at him was as edifying as seeing a dog in a parody of breeches.
The physical position of the body corresponds to a mental and social state. The author creates
a sense of what might be termed inherent inferiority of the blacks <in all possible aspects they
are subservient to the white man, and even seeing them wear pants amounts to no more than a
warped joke. The one time that a native actually speaks is when the ship approaches the
brush, right before attack, and all he has to say is that any prisoners should be given to the
crew as a meal. More than anything the comment is laughable. An attack is about to occur,
and this man is concerned about eating? It is Conrads underhanded means of demonstrating
the simplicity of the natives. The narrator cannot understand why the white men were not
eaten. He cannot credit the blacks with any intelligence beyond instinct. During the battle, one
native is shot, with Marlow and the Manager watching: I declare it looked as though he
would presently put to us some question in an understandable language, but he died without
uttering a sound. There is never any comprehension of blacks. They are always evaluated
and silenced before they can speak. Marlow does feel a real kinship to his savage crew,
which places him above all other whites. However, he has also has shortcomings <his
appreciation of the helmsman after he has died seems more appropriate to a machine than a
person.
The figure of Kurtz grows more enigmatic this chapter, and we return to the theme of voices
and communication. Communication fails when Marlow cannot decipher the book and when
the note has an incomplete warning. Marlows obsession with Kurtz has reached its height.
Talking to this has become the entire reason for Marlows passage through this jungle. The
fact that authoritative, unpleasant figures such as the Manager dislike Kurtz make the reader
more receptive to liking him. Notice that Marlow and Kurtz are the only two characters in the
entire story who are named. Everyone else is titled, detached and therefore dehumanized. This
is an effective means of drawing a relationship between the two characters before they even
meet. As soon as Marlow believes that Kurtz is dead, his presence begins to dominate him
more vividly <Marlow hears his voice, sees him in action. Kurtz is even stronger than death.
The reason Kurtz affects Marlow so deeply is that he has turned his back on his roots and
essentially become native. This demonstrates that there is much more to Marlows personality
that what appears. He is not the average European. The reader understands that we will
receive the most accurate portrait of Marlow through his interactions with Kurtz.
Analysis Part III:
The Russian says it best: I went a little farther Still I had gone so far that I dont know how
Ill ever get back. The Russian and Marlow are the same, both looking for epiphany and
enlightenment. This is the basic catchphrase of Conrads novel, and it gives us much insight
into the character of Kurtz. It is fascinating that he is the most powerful figure in the story,
even though he does not appear until the end. The author is setting forth a challenge <rather
than directly describing Kurtz, he provides various clues that we must piece together in order
to understand who Kurtz is. The first conversation that the Russian has with his mentor, about
everything in life, including love, points to a man who is sensitive and introspective. Kurtz
speaks in civil and savage tongues. His eloquence is his trump card, because it disguises his
darkness from sweet people like the Russian. The woman back in Europe who mourns for him
speaks of a generous heart, a noble mind and greatness. The impressions of these two people,
strongly contrast with the opinion of people such as the Manager, who say that Kurtz was
unethically gathering ivory by exploiting the locals. Marlow must stand in for the readers
perspective. From what he sees and reports, the reader realizes that indeed all accounts are
true. Yet Marlow does not see Kurtz as evil for his actions toward the natives because of the
idea of intentions. People such as the Manager truly care only about fulfilling an ivory quota
and becoming wealthy. While Kurtz is certainly consumed with his search for ivory (his face
and body are described in terms of this precious resource), Conrad does not provide any
evidence that he is concerned with the material aspects <his house and existence are
extremely simple, despite all of the ivory he has recovered. If money and fame were the only
important entities, he could have returned to England long ago. The Russian states that Kurtz
would lose himself among the people. The staked heads around his home demonstrate a
lack of restraint in the gratification of various lusts. They are necessary for a man with a
bog appetite. Apparently, the time in the African Congo has been a time of letting go for
Kurtz, a time in which passions and appetites become unbridled, and in which the past no
longer matters. Undeniably this is a type of sickness. The image of Kurtz on his deathbed,
opening his mouth wide, gives him a voracious aspect as if he wants to absorb and swallow
everything. His need to plan and consume, however, has consumed his mind and spirit. It is a
remarkable case of colonialism gone awry <the wilderness had found him out early, and had
taken on him a terrible vengeance for the fantastic invasion. Curiosity that leads to
exploration can also lead, more tragically, to a loss of self. Herein lies a sociopolitical
message that is not originally a part of you, lest it winds up controlling you.
Marlow does not condemn Kurtz because he pities him, sympathizes with his tortured
existence. This is the readers response as well. The moment when Marlow stands between
Kurtz and the horned, demonic-looking man is critical <this figure symbolizes the death and
darkness of Kurtz, and he only turns away from complete desolation because Marlow is there
to help him back. Marlows loyalty allies with Kurtz because his demons are much more evil
than those of, say, the Manager or the Pilgrims. He clearly needs help. Despite the sad
circumstances, however, there is an undercurrent of history that quietly says Kurtz deserves
what he gets. The devotion shown to him by the natives illustrates an almost reciprocal
relationship between them. While it is most likely that they help Kurtz without understanding
the material benefits behind the ivory, it is clear that Kurtz enjoys being a part of them as
much as they enjoy having him there. He is definitely the least biased character in the whole
book, which speaks highly for him in the eyes of a modern reader. Unfortunately, he loses
himself, detaches from everything earthly. Kurtzs soul has broken forbidden boundaries
because it only concentrated on itself. He dies painfully both because his obsessive tasks were
not complete, and because his soul has been sold. The horror he pronounces on his deathbed
is a judgment upon how he has lived his life. We can definitely see Kurtzs demise as a
possible end for Marlow if he had not left the Congo. As it was, the wilderness was certainly
creeping and merging into his psyche < there was a moment when he could not tell the
difference between a drum beat and his own heartbeat. He appears to have escaped in time.
Marlows lie at the end of story is both cruel and compassionate. While the woman is
comforted, she will have to continue believing in an illusion. She will never know what Kurtz
became. As Marlow states, the truth is too dark to tell. Truly, his terrible decline is in vain if
no one learns of it. This is completely the point of Marlows telling the tale the people aboard
the Thames river ship. The river, which once led to civilization, now leads into darkness.
James Joyce was born on February 2, 1882, in Dublin, Ireland, into a Catholic middle-class
family that would soon become poverty-stricken. Joyce went to Jesuit schools, followed by
University College, Dublin, where he began publishing essays. After graduating in 1902,
Joyce went to Paris with the intention of attending medical school. Soon afterward, however,
he abandoned medical studies and devoted all of his time to writing poetry, stories, and
theories of aesthetics. Joyce returned to Dublin the following year when his mother died. He
stayed in Dublin for another year, during which time he met his future wife, Nora Barnacle.
At this time, Joyce also began work on an autobiographical novel called Stephen Hero. Joyce
eventually gave up on Stephen Hero, but reworked much of the material into A Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man, which features the same autobiographical protagonist, Stephen
Dedalus, and tells the story of Joyces youth up to his 1902 departure for Paris.
Nora and Joyce left Dublin again in 1904, this time for good. They spent most of the next
eleven years living in Rome and Trieste, Italy, where Joyce taught English and he and Nora
had two children, Giorgio and Lucia. In 1907 Joyces first book of poems,Chamber
Music, was published in London. He published his book of short stories, Dubliners, in 1914,
the same year he published A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man in serial installments in
the London journal The Egoist.
Joyce began writing Ulysses in 1914, and when World War I broke out he moved his family
to Zurich, Switzerland, where he continued work on the novel. In Zurich, Joyces fortunes
finally improved as his talent attracted several wealthy patrons, including Harriet Shaw
Weaver. Portrait was published in book form in 1916, and Joyces play, Exiles, in 1918. Also
in 1918, the first episodes of Ulysses were published in serial form in The Little Review. In
1919, the Joyces moved to Paris, where Ulysses was published in book form in 1922. In 1923,
with his eyesight quickly diminishing, Joyce began working on what became Finnegans
Wake, published in 1939. Joyce died in 1941.
Joyce first conceived of Ulysses as a short story to be included in Dubliners, but decided
instead to publish it as a long novel, situated as a sort of sequel to A Portrait of the Artist as a
Young Man. Ulysses picks up Stephen Dedaluss life more than a year after
where Portrait leaves off. The novel introduces two new main characters, Leopold and Molly
Bloom, and takes place on a single day, June 16, 1904, in Dublin.
Ulysses strives to achieve a kind of realism unlike that of any novel before it by rendering the
thoughts and actions of its main characters both trivial and significantin a scattered and
fragmented form similar to the way thoughts, perceptions, and memories actually appear in
our minds. In Dubliners, Joyce had tried to give his stories a heightened sense of realism by
incorporating real people and places into them, and he pursues the same strategy on a massive
scale inUlysses. At the same time that Ulysses presents itself as a realistic novel, it also works
on a mythic level, by way of a series of parallels with Homers Odyssey.Stephen, Bloom, and
Molly correspond respectively to Telemachus, Ulysses, and Penelope, and each of the
eighteen episodes of the novel corresponds to an adventure from the Odyssey.
Ulysses has become particularly famous for Joyces stylistic innovations. In Portrait,Joyce
first attempted the technique of interior monologue, or stream-of-consciousness. He also
experimented with shifting stylethe narrative voice ofPortrait changes stylistically as
Stephen matures. In Ulysses, Joyce uses interior monologue extensively, and instead of
employing one narrative voice, Joyce radically shifts narrative style with each new episode of
the novel.
Joyces early work reveals the stylistic influence of Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen.
Joyce began reading Ibsen as a young man; his first publication was an article about a play of
Ibsens, which earned him a letter of appreciation from Ibsen himself. Ibsens plays provided
the young Joyce with a model of the realistic depiction of individuals stifled by conventional
moral values. Joyce imitated Ibsens naturalistic brand of realism in Dubliners, A Portrait of
the Artist as a Young Man, and especially in his play Exiles. Ulysses maintains Joyces
concern with realism but also introduces stylistic innovations similar to those of his Mo-
dernist contemporaries.Ulyssess multivoiced narration, textual self-consciousness, mythic
framework, and thematic focus on life in a modern metropolis situate it close to other main
texts of the Modernist movement, such as T. S. Eliots mythic poem The Waste Land (also
published in 1922) or Virginia Woolfs stream-of-consciousness novel, Mrs.
Dalloway (1925).
Though never working in collaboration, Joyce maintained correspondences with other
Modernist writers, including Samuel Beckett, and Ezra Pound, who helped find him a patron
and an income. Joyces final work, Finnegans Wake, is often seen as bridging the gap
between Modernism and postmodernism. A novel only in the loosest sense, Finnegans
Wake looks forward to postmodern texts in its playful celebration (rather than lamentation) of
the fragmentation of experience and the decentered nature of identity, as well as its attention
to the nontransparent qualities of language.
Like Eliot and many other Modernist writers, Joyce wrote in self-imposed exile in
cosmopolitan Europe. In spite of this fact, all of his work is strongly tied to Irish political and
cultural history, and Ulysses must also be seen in an Irish context. Joyces novel was written
during the years of the Irish bid for independence from Britain. After a bloody civil war, the
Irish Free State was officially formedduring the same year that Ulysses was published.
Even in 1904, Ireland had experienced the failure of several home rule bills that would have
granted the island a measure of political independence within Great Britain. The failure of
these bills is linked to the downfall of the Irish member of Parliament, Charles Stewart
Parnell, who was once referred to as Irelands Uncrowned King, and was publicly
persecuted by the Irish church and people in 1889 for conducting a long-term affair with a
married woman, Kitty OShea. Joyce saw this persecution as an hypocritical betrayal by the
Irish that ruined Irelands chances for a peaceful independence.
Accordingly, Ulysses depicts the Irish citizens of 1904, especially Stephen Dedalus, as
involved in tangled conceptions of their own Irishness, and complex relationships with
various authorities and institutions specific to their time and place: the British empire, Irish
nationalism, the Roman Catholic church, and the Irish Literary Revival.
The Quest for Paternity
At its most basic level, Ulysses is a book about Stephens search for a symbolic father and
Blooms search for a son. In this respect, the plot of Ulysses parallels Telemachuss search for
Odysseus, and vice versa, in The Odyssey. Blooms search for a son stems at least in part from
his need to reinforce his identity and heritage through progeny. Stephen already has a
biological father, Simon Dedalus, but considers him a father only in flesh. Stephen feels
that his own ability to mature and become a father himself (of art or children) is restricted by
Simons criticism and lack of understanding. Thus Stephens search involves finding a
symbolic father who will, in turn, allow Stephen himself to be a father. Both men, in truth, are
searching for paternity as a way to reinforce their own identities.
Stephen is more conscious of his quest for paternity than Bloom, and he mentally recurs to
several important motifs with which to understand paternity. Stephens thinking about the
Holy Trinity involves, on the one hand, Church doctrines that uphold the unity of the Father
and the Son and, on the other hand, the writings of heretics that challenge this doctrine by
arguing that God created the rest of the Trinity, concluding that each subsequent creation is
inherently different. Stephens second motif involves his Hamlet theory, which seeks to prove
that Shakespeare represented himself through the ghost-father in Hamlet, but alsothrough
his translation of his life into artbecame the father of his own father, of his life, and of all
his race. The Holy Trinity and Hamlet motifs reinforce our sense of Stephens and Blooms
parallel quests for paternity. These quests seem to end in Blooms kitchen, with Bloom
recognizing the future in Stephen and Stephen recognizing the past in Bloom. Though
united as father and son in this moment, the men will soon part ways, and their paternity
quests will undoubtedly continue, for Ulyssesdemonstrates that the quest for paternity is a
search for a lasting manifestation of self.
The Remorse of Conscience
The phrase agenbite of inwit, a religious term meaning remorse of conscience, comes to
Stephens mind again and again in Ulysses. Stephen associates the phrase with his guilt over
his mothers deathhe suspects that he may have killed her by refusing to kneel and pray at
her sickbed when she asked. The theme of remorse runs through Ulysses to address the
feelings associated with modern breaks with family and tradition. Bloom, too, has guilty
feelings about his father because he no longer observes certain traditions his father observed,
such as keeping kosher. Episode Fifteen, Circe, dramatizes this remorse as Blooms Sins
of the Past rise up and confront him one by one. Ulysses juxtaposes characters who
experience remorse with characters who do not, such as Buck Mulligan, who shamelessly
refers to Stephens mother as beastly dead, and Simon Dedalus, who mourns his late wife
but does not regret his treatment of her. Though remorse of conscience can have a repressive,
paralyzing effect, as in Stephens case, it is also vaguely positive. A self-conscious awareness
of the past, even the sins of the past, helps constitute an individual as an ethical being in the
present.
Compassion as Heroic
In nearly all senses, the notion of Leopold Bloom as an epic hero is laughablehis job,
talents, family relations, public relations, and private actions all suggest his utter ordinariness.
It is only Blooms extraordinary capacity for sympathy and compassion that allows him an
unironic heroism in the course of the novel. Blooms fluid ability to empathize with such a
wide variety of beingscats, birds, dogs, dead men, vicious men, blind men, old ladies, a
woman in labor, the poor, and so onis the modern-day equivalent to Odysseuss capacity to
adapt to a wide variety of challenges. Blooms compassion often dictates the course of his day
and the novel, as when he stops at the river Liffey to feed the gulls or at the hospital to check
on Mrs. Purefoy. There is a network of symbols in Ulysses that present Bloom as Irelands
savior, and his message is, at a basic level, to love. He is juxtaposed with Stephen, who
would also be Irelands savior but is lacking in compassion. Bloom returns home, faces
evidence of his cuckold status, and slays his competitionnot with arrows, but with a
refocused perspective that is available only through his fluid capacity for empathy.
Parallax, or the Need for Multiple Perspectives
Parallax is an astronomical term that Bloom encounters in his reading and that arises
repeatedly through the course of the novel. It refers to the difference of position of one object
when seen from two different vantage points. These differing viewpoints can be collated to
better approximate the position of the object. As a novel, Ulysses uses a similar tactic. Three
main charactersStephen, Bloom, and Mollyand a subset of narrative techniques that
affect our perception of events and characters combine to demonstrate the fallibility of one
single perspective. Our understanding of particular characters and events must be continually
revised as we consider further perspectives. The most obvious example is Mollys past love
life. Though we can construct a judgment of Molly as a loose woman from the testimonies of
various characters in the novelBloom, Lenehan, Dixon, and so onthis judgment must be
revised with the integration of Mollys own final testimony.
Motifs
Lightness and Darkness
The traditional associations of light with good and dark with bad are upended inUlysses, in
which the two protagonists are dressed in mourning black, and the more menacing characters
are associated with light and brightness. This reversal arises in part as a reaction to Mr.
Deasys anti-Semitic judgment that Jews have sinned against the light. Deasy himself is
associated with the brightness of coins, representing wealth without spirituality. Blazes
Boylan, Blooms nemesis, is associated with brightness through his name and his flashy
behavior, again suggesting surface without substance. Blooms and Stephens dark colors
suggest a variety of associations: Jewishness, anarchy, outsider/wanderer status. Furthermore,
Throwaway, the dark horse, wins the Gold Cup Horserace.
The Home Usurped
While Odysseus is away from Ithaca in The Odyssey, his household is usurped by would-be
suitors of his wife, Penelope. This motif translates directly to Ulysses and provides a
connection between Stephen and Bloom. Stephen pays the rent for the Martello tower, where
he, Buck, and Haines are staying. Bucks demand of the house key is thus a usurpation of
Stephens household rights, and Stephen recognizes this and refuses to return to the tower.
Stephen mentally dramatizes this usurpation as a replay of Claudiuss usurpation of Gertrude
and the throne inHamlet. Meanwhile, Blooms home has been usurped by Blazes Boylan, who
comes and goes at will and has sex with Molly in Blooms absence. Stephens and Blooms
lack of house keys throughout Ulysses symbolizes these usurpations.
The East
The motif of the East appears mainly in Blooms thoughts. For Bloom, the East is a place of
exoticism, representing the promise of a paradisiacal existence. Blooms hazy conception of
this faraway land arises from a network of connections: the planters companies (such as
Agendeth Netaim), which suggest newly fertile and potentially profitable homes; Zionist
movements for a homeland; Molly and her childhood in Gibraltar; narcotics; and erotics. For
Bloom and the reader, the East becomes the imaginative space where hopes can be realized.
The only place where Molly, Stephen, and Bloom all meet is in their parallel dreams of each
other the night before, dreams that seem to be set in an Eastern locale.
Symbols.
Plumtrees Potted Meat
In Episode Five, Bloom reads an ad in his newspaper: What is home without / Plumtrees
Potted Meat? / Incomplete. / With it an abode of bliss. Blooms conscious reaction is his
belief that the ad is poorly placeddirectly below the obituaries, suggesting an infelicitous
relation between dead bodies and potted meat. On a subconscious level, however, the figure
of Plumtrees Potted Meat comes to stand for Blooms anxieties about Boylans usurpation of
his wife and home. The image of meat inside a pot crudely suggests the sexual relation
between Boylan and Molly. The wording of the ad further suggests, less concretely, Blooms
masculine anxietieshe worries that he is not the head of an abode of bliss but rather a
servant in a home incomplete. The connection between Plumtrees meat and Blooms
anxieties about Mollys unhappiness and infidelity is driven home when Bloom finds crumbs
of the potted meat that Boylan and Molly shared earlier in his own bed.
The Gold Cup Horserace
The afternoons Gold Cup Horserace and the bets placed on it provide much of the public
drama in Ulysses, though it happens offstage. In Episode Five, Bantam Lyons mistakenly
thinks that Bloom has tipped him off to the horse Throwaway, the dark horse with a long-
shot chance. Throwaway does end up winning the race, notably ousting Sceptre, the horse
with the phallic name, on which Lenehan and Boylan have bet. This underdog victory
represents Blooms eventual unshowy triumph over Boylan, to win the Gold Cup of
Mollys heart.
Stephens Latin Quarter Hat
Stephen deliberately conceives of his Latin Quarter hat as a symbol. The Latin Quarter is a
student district in Paris, and Stephen hopes to suggest his exiled, anti-establishment status
while back in Ireland. He also refers to the hat as his Hamlet hat, tipping us off to the
intentional brooding and artistic connotations of the head gear. Yet Stephen cannot always
control his own hat as a symbol, especially in the eyes of others. Through the eyes of others, it
comes to signify Stephens mock priest-liness and provinciality.
Blooms Potato Talisman
In Episode Fifteen, Blooms potato functions like Odysseuss use of moly in Circes den
it serves to protect him from enchantment, enchantments to which Bloom succumbs when he
briefly gives it over to Zoe Higgins. The potato, old and shriveled now, is an heirloom from
Blooms mother, Ellen. As an organic product that is both fruit and root but is now shriveled,
it gestures toward Blooms anxieties about fertility and his family line. Most important,
however, is the potatos connection to IrelandBlooms potato talisman stands for his
frequently overlooked maternal Irish heritage.
MAJOR THEMES: Entrapment and Constraint: Stephen eventually comes to see Ireland
as a kind of trap, a restraint that will make it impossible for him to live and create. Three
major bonds threaten: family, nation, and the Church. Stephens family, increasingly destitute,
is a source of frustration and guilt. He can do nothing to help them, and the continued
ineptitude of his father exasperates Stephen. Though his father is an ardent nationalist,
Stephen has great anxieties about Irish politics. He finds the Irish people fickle and ultimately
disloyal; at one point, he says to a friend that the Irish have never had a great leader whom
they did not betray or abandon. He also rebels against the nature of activities like petition-
signing and protest; in his mind, these activities amount to an abdication of independence. At
the same time, he leaves Ireland hoping to forget the new conscience of his race.
Catholicism: The Church is perhaps the greatest constraint on Stephen, and merits its own
entry. The teachings of the Church run contrary to Stephens independent spirit and intellect.
His sensitivity to beauty and the human body are not at all suitable to the rigid Catholicism in
which he was raised. But the Church continues to exert some small hold on him. Although he
eventually becomes an unbeliever, he continues to have some fear that the Catholic Church
might be correct. Despite his fears, he eventually chooses to live independently and without
constraint, even if that decision sends him to hell.
Escape: Escape is the natural complement to the theme of Entrapment and Constraint. Joyce
depicts escape metaphorically by the books most important symbol and allusion: the
mythical artificer Dedalus. Dedalus is not at an Irish name; Joyce took the name from the
mythical inventor who escaped from his island prison by constructing wings and flying to his
freedom. Stephen, too will eventually escape from the island prison of Ireland.
Independence: Closely related to the above theme, Stephens move towards independence is
one of the central movements of the novel. When we first encounter Stephen as a young boy,
his athletic ineptitude and sensitive nature make him an easy target for bullies. He is a rather
shy and awkward boy. The contrast with the university student Stephen could not be greater.
The older Stephen is fiercely independent, willing to risk eternal damnation to pursue his
destiny. He is not cowed by anyone, and he will pursue live as an artist no matters what the
cost.
Beauty, Sensitivity, and Imagination: What begins as sensitivity and imagination in the child
Stephen eventually evolves into a near-obsessive contemplation of beauty and the mechanics
of art. Even as a child, young Stephen is a extraordinarily imaginative and sensitive boy.
Eventually, these strong but unarticulated feelings take shape as a passion for the arts. In
Chapter 5, Stephen has developed a theory of aesthetics that is quite sophisticated for a
university student; he thinks carefully and thoroughly about beauty and the power of art, and
knows that he can do nothing else but pursue the life of a poet and writer.
SHORT SUMMARY: Portrait of the artist as a young man takes place in Ireland at the turn
of the century. Young Stephen Dedalus comes from an Irish Catholic family; he is the oldest
of ten children, and his father is financially inept. Throughout the novel, the Dedalus family
makes a series of moves into increasingly dilapidated homes as their fortunes dwindle. His
mother is a devout Catholic. When Stephen is young, he and the other Dedalus children are
tutored by the governess Dante, a fanatically Catholic woman. Their Uncle Charles also lives
with the family. The book opens with stream of consciousness narrative filtered through a
childs perspective; there is sensual imagery, and words approximating baby talk. We leap
forward in time to see young Stephen beginning boarding school at Clongowes. He is very
young, terribly homesick, un-athletic and socially awkward. He is an easy target for bullies,
and one day he is pushed into a cesspool. He becomes ill from the filthy water, but he
remembers what his father told him and doesnt tell on the boy. That Christmas, he eats at the
adult table for the first time. A terrible argument erupts over politics, with John Casey and
Stephens father on one side and Dante on the other. Later that year, Stephen is unjustly hit by
a perfect. He complains to the rector, winning the praises of his peers.
Stephen is forced to withdraw from Clongowes because of his familys poverty. The family
moves to Blackrock, where Stephen takes long walks with Uncle Charles and goes on
imaginary adventures with boys from around the neighborhood. When Stephen is a bit older,
the family moves to Dublin, once again because of financial difficulties. He meets a girl
named Emma Clere, who is to be the object of his adoration right up until the end of the book.
His father, with a bit of charm, manages to get Stephen back to private school. He is to go to
Belvedere College, another institution run by the Jesuits.
Stephen comes into his own at Belvedere, a reluctant leader and a success at acting and essay
writing. Despite his position of leadership, he often feels quite isolated. He continues to be a
sensitive and imaginative young man, acting in school plays and winning essay contest. He is
also increasingly obsessed with sex: his fantasies grow more and more lurid. Finally, one
night he goes with a prostitute. It is his first sexual experience.
Going with prostitutes becomes a habit. Stephen enters a period of spiritual confession. He
considers his behavior sinful, but he feels oddly indifferent towards it. He cannot seem to stop
going to prostitutes, nor does he want to stop. But during the annual spiritual retreat al
Belvedere, he hears three fire sermons on the torments of hell. Stephen is terrified, and he
repents of his old behavior. He becomes almost fanatically religious.
After a time, this feeling passes. He becomes increasingly frustrated by Catholic doctrine.
When a rector suggests that he consider becoming a priest, Stephen realizes that it is not the
life for him. One day, while walking on the beach, he sees a beautiful girl. Her beauty hits
him with the force of spiritual revelation, and he no longer feels ashamed of admiring the
body. He will live life to the fullest.
The next time we see Stephen, he is a student at university. University has provided valuable
structure and new ideas to Stephen: in particular, he has had time to think about the works of
Aquinas and Aristotle on the subject of beauty. Stephen has developed his own theory of
aesthetics. He is increasingly preoccupied with beauty and art. Although he has no shortage of
friends, he feels isolated. He has come to regard Ireland as a trap, and he realizes that he must
escape the constraints of nation, family, and religion. He can only do that abroad. Stephen
imagines his escape as something parallel to the flight of Dedalus, he escaped from his prison
with wings crafted by his own genius. The book ends with Stephen leaving Ireland to pursue
the life of a writer.
Pygmalion
Context
Born in Dublin in 1856 to a middle-class Protestant family bearing pretensions to nobility
(Shaw's embarrassing alcoholic father claimed to be descended from Macduff, the slayer of
Macbeth), George Bernard Shaw grew tobecome what some consider the second greatest
English playwright, behind only Shakespeare. Others mostcertainly disagree with such an
assessment, but few question Shaw's immense talent or the play's that talentproduced. Shaw
died at the age of 94, a hypochondriac, socialist, anti-vaccinationist, semi-feminist
vegetarianwho believed in the Life Force and only wore wool. He left behind him a truly
massive corpus of work includingabout 60 plays, 5 novels, 3 volumes of music criticism, 4
volumes of dance and theatrical criticism, and heaps of social commentary, political theory,
and voluminous correspondence. And this list does not include the opinionsthat Shaw could
always be counted on to hold about any topic, and which this flamboyant public figure
wasalways most willing to share. Shaw's most lasting contribution is no doubt his plays, and it
has been said that "aday never passes without a performance of some Shaw play being given
somewhere in the world." One of Shaw's greatest contributions as a modern dramatist is
in establishing drama as serious literature, negotiatingpublication deals for his highly popular
plays so as to convince the public that the play was no less important thanthe novel. In that
way, he created the conditions for later playwrights to write seriously for the theater.Of all of
Shaw's plays, Pygmalion is without the doubt the most beloved and popularly received, if not
the most significant in literary terms. Several film versions have been made of the play, and it
has even been adapted intoa musical. In fact, writing the screenplay for the film version of
1938 helped Shaw to become the first and onlyman ever to win the much coveted Double: the
Nobel Prize for literature and an Academy Award. Shaw wrote the part of Eliza in Pygmalion
for the famous actress Mrs. Patrick Campbell, with whom Shaw was having aprominent affair
at the time that had set all of London abuzz. The aborted romance between Professor
Higginsand Eliza Doolittle reflects Shaw's own love life, which was always peppered with
enamored and beautifulwomen, with whom he flirted outrageously but with whom he almost
never had any further relations. For example,he had a long marriage to Charlotte Payne-
Townsend in which it is well known that he never touched her once.The fact that Shaw
was quietly a member of the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology, an organization
whose core members were young men agitating for homosexual liberation, might or might not
inform the way thatHiggins would rather focus his passions on literature or science than
on women. That Higgins was arepresentation of Pygmalion, the character from the famous
story of Ovid's Metamorphoses who is the veryembodiment of male love for the female form,
makes Higgins sexual disinterest all the more compelling. Shaw istoo consummate a
performer and too smooth in his self- presentation for us to neatly dissect his
sexualbackground; these lean biographical facts, however, do support the belief that Shaw
would have an interest inexploding the typical structures of standard fairy tales.
Summary
Two old gentlemen meet in the rain one night at Covent Garden. Professor Higgins is a
scientist of phonetics,and Colonel Pickering is a linguist of Indian dialects. The first bets the
other that he can, with his knowledge of phonetics, convince high London society that, in a
matter of months, he will be able to transform the cockneyspeaking Covent Garden flower
girl, Eliza Doolittle, into a woman as poised and well-spoken as a duchess. Thenext morning,
the girl appears at his laboratory on Wimpole Street to ask for speech lessons, offering to pay
ashilling, so that she may speak properly enough to work in a flower shop. Higgins makes
merciless fun of her, butis seduced by the idea of working his magic on her. Pickering goads
him on by agreeing to cover the costs of theexperiment if Higgins can pass Eliza off as a
duchess at an ambassador's garden party. The challenge is taken,and Higgins starts by having
his housekeeper bathe Eliza and give her new clothes. Then Eliza's father Alfred Doolittle
comes to demand the return of his daughter, though his real intention is to hit Higgins up for
somemoney. The professor, amused by Doolittle's unusual rhetoric, gives him five pounds.
On his way out, the dustman fails to recognize the now clean, pretty flower girl as
his daughter.
For a number of months, Higgins trains Eliza to speak properly. Two trials for Eliza follow.
The first occurs at Higgins' mother's home, where Eliza is introduced to the Eynsford Hills, a
trio of mother, daughter, and son. The son Freddy is very attracted to her, and further taken
with what he thinks is her affected "small talk" when she slips into cockney. Mrs. Higgins
worries that the experiment will lead to problems once it is ended, but Higgins and Pickering
are too absorbed in their game to take heed. A second trial, which takes place some months
later at an ambassador's party (and which is not actually staged), is a resounding success. The
wager is definitely won, but Higgins and Pickering are now bored with the project, which
causes Eliza to be hurt. She throws Higgins' slippers at him in a rage because she does not
know what is to become of her, thereby bewildering him. He suggests she marry somebody.
She returns him the hired jewelry, and he accuses her of ingratitude.
The following morning, Higgins rushes to his mother, in a panic because Eliza has run away.
On his tail is Eliza's father, now unhappily rich from the trust of a deceased millionaire who
took to heart Higgins' recommendation that Doolittle was England's "most original moralist."
Mrs. Higgins, who has been hiding Eliza upstairs all along, chides the two of them for playing
with the girl's affections. When she enters, Eliza thanks Pickering for always treating her like
a lady, but threatens Higgins that she will go work with his rival phonetician, Nepommuck.
The outraged Higgins cannot help but start to admire her. As Eliza leaves for her father's
wedding, Higgins shouts out a few errands for her to run, assuming that she will return to him
at Wimpole Street. Eliza, who has a lovelorn sweetheart in Freddy, and the wherewithal to
pass as a duchess, never makes it clear whether she will or not.
About the characters
Professor Henry Higgins - Henry Higgins is a professor of phonetics who plays Pygmalion
to Eliza Doolittle's Galatea. He is the author of Higgins' Universal Alphabet, believes in
concepts like visible speech, and uses all manner of recording and photographic material to
document his phonetic subjects, reducing people and their dialects into what he sees as readily
understandable units. He is an unconventional man, who goes in the opposite direction from
the rest of society in most matters. Indeed, he is impatient with high society, forgetful in his
public graces, and poorly considerate of normal social niceties--the only reason the world has
not turned against him is because he is at heart a good and harmless man. His biggest fault is
that he can be a bully.
Eliza Doolittle - "She is not at all a romantic figure." So is she introduced in Act I.
Everything about Eliza Doolittle seems to defy any conventional notions we might have about
the romantic heroine. When she is transformed from a sassy, smart-mouthed kerbstone flower
girl with deplorable English, to a (still sassy) regal figure fit to consort with nobility, it has
less to do with her innate qualities as a heroine than with the fairy-tale aspect of the
transformation myth itself. In other words, the character of Eliza Doolittle comes across as
being much more instrumental than fundamental. The real (re-)making of Eliza Doolittle
happens after the ambassador's party, when she decides to make a statement for her own
dignity against Higgins' insensitive treatment. This is when she becomes, not a duchess, but
an independent woman; and this explains why Higgins begins to see Eliza not as a mill
around his neck but as a creature worthy of his admiration.
Colonel Pickering - Colonel Pickering, the author of Spoken Sanskrit, is a match for Higgins
(although somewhat less obsessive) in his passion for phonetics. But where Higgins is a
boorish, careless bully, Pickering is always considerate and a genuinely gentleman. He says
little of note in the play, and appears most of all to be a civilized foil to Higgins' barefoot,
absentminded crazy professor. He helps in the Eliza Doolittle experiment by making a wager
of it, saying he will cover the costs of the experiment if Higgins does indeed make a
convincing duchess of her. However, while Higgins only manages to teach Eliza
pronunciations, it is Pickering's thoughtful treatment towards Eliza that teaches her to respect
herself.
Alfred Doolittle - Alfred Doolittle is Eliza's father, an elderly but vigorous dustman who has
had at least six wives and who "seems equally free from fear and conscience." When he learns
that his daughter has entered the home of Henry Higgins, he immediately pursues to see if he
can get some money out of the circumstance. His unique brand of rhetoric, an unembarrassed,
unhypocritical advocation of drink and pleasure (at other people's expense), is amusing to
Higgins. Through Higgins' joking recommendation, Doolittle becomes a richly endowed
lecturer to a moral reform society, transforming him from lowly dustman to a picture of
middle class morality--he becomes miserable. Throughout, Alfred is a scoundrel who is
willing to sell his daughter to make a few pounds, but he is one of the few unaffected
characters in the play, unmasked by appearance or language. Though scandalous, his speeches
are honest. At points, it even seems that he might be Shaw's voice piece of social criticism
(Alfred's proletariat status, given Shaw's socialist leanings, makes the prospect all the more
likely).
Mrs. Higgins - Professor Higgins' mother, Mrs. Higgins is a stately lady in her sixties who
sees the Eliza Doolittle experiment as idiocy, and Higgins and Pickering as senseless children.
She is the first and only character to have any qualms about the whole affair. When her
worries prove true, it is to her that all the characters turn. Because no woman can match up to
his mother, Higgins claims, he has no interest in dallying with them. To observe the mother of
Pygmalion (Higgins), who completely understands all of his failings and inadequacies, is a
good contrast to the mythic proportions to which Higgins builds himself in his self-
estimations as a scientist of phonetics and a creator of duchesses.
Freddy Eynsford Hill - Higgins' surmise that Freddy is a fool is probably accurate. In the
opening scene he is a spineless and resourceless lackey to his mother and sister. Later, he is
comically bowled over by Eliza, the half-baked duchess who still speaks cockney. He
becomes lovesick for Eliza, and courts her with letters. At the play's close, Freddy serves as a
young, viable marriage option for Eliza, making the possible path she will follow unclear to
the reader.
Conclusions
Pygmalion derives its name from the famous story in Ovid's Metamorphoses, in which
Pygmalion, disgusted by the loose and shameful lives of the women of his era, decides to live
alone and unmarried. With wondrous art, he creates a beautiful statue more perfect than any
living woman. The more he looks upon her, the more deeply he falls in love with her, until he
wishes that she were more than a statue. This statue is Galatea. Lovesick, Pygmalion goes to
the temple of the goddess Venus and prays that she give him a lover like his statue; Venus is
touched by his love and brings Galatea to life. When Pygmalion returns from Venus' temple
and kisses his statue, he is delighted to find that she is warm and soft to the touch--"The
maiden felt the kisses, blushed and, lifting her timid eyes up to the light, saw the sky and her
lover at the same time" (Frank Justus Miller, trans.).
Myths such as this are fine enough when studied through the lens of centuries and the buffer
of translations and editions, but what happens when one tries to translate such an allegory into
Victorian England? That is just what George Bernard Shaw does in his version of the
Pygmalion myth. In doing so, he exposes the inadequacy of myth and of romance in several
ways. For one, he deliberately twists the myth so that the play does not conclude as
euphorically or conveniently, hanging instead in unconventional ambiguity. Next, he mires
the story in the sordid and mundane whenever he gets a chance. Wherever he can, the
characters are seen to be belabored by the trivial details of life like napkins and neckties, and
of how one is going to find a taxi on a rainy night. These noisome details keep the story
grounded and decidedly less romantic. Finally, and most significantly, Shaw challenges the
possibly insidious assumptions that come with the Pygmalion myth, forcing us to ask the
following: Is the male artist the absolute and perfect being who has the power to create
woman in the image of his desires? Is the woman necessarily the inferior subject who sees her
lover as her sky? Can there only ever be sexual/romantic relations between a man and a
woman? Does beauty reflect virtue? Does the artist love his creation, or merely the art that
brought that creation into being?
Famous for writing "talky" plays in which barely anything other than witty repartee takes
center stage (plays that the most prominent critics of his day called non-plays), Shaw finds
in Pygmalion a way to turn the talk into action, by hinging the fairy tale outcome of the flower
girl on precisely how she talks. In this way, he draws our attention to his own art, and to his
ability to create, through the medium of speech, not only Pygmalion's Galatea, but Pygmalion
himself. More powerful than Pygmalion, on top of building up his creations, Shaw can take
them down as well by showing their faults and foibles. In this way, it is the playwright alone,
and not some divine will, who breathes life into his characters. While Ovid's Pygmalion may
be said to have idolized his Galatea, Shaw's relentless and humorous honesty humanizes these
archetypes, and in the process brings drama and art itself to a more contemporarily relevant
and human level.
William Faulkner was born in 1897 in New Albany, Mississippi, to a prominent Southern
family. A number of his ancestors were involved in the Mexican-American War, the Civil
War, and the Reconstruction, and were part of the local railroad industry and political scene.
Faulkner showed signs of artistic talent from a young age, but became bored with his classes
and never finished high school.
Faulkner grew up in the town of Oxford, Mississippi, and eventually returned there in his later
years and purchased his famous estate, Rowan Oak. Oxford and the surrounding area were
Faulkners inspiration for the fictional Yoknapatawpha County, Mississippi, and its town of
Jefferson. These locales became the setting for a number of his works. Faulkners
Yoknapatawpha novels include The Sound and the Fury (1929), As I Lay
Dying (1930),Light in August (1932), Absalom, Absalom! (1936), The Hamlet (1940), and Go
Down, Moses (1942), and they feature some of the same characters and locations.
Faulkner was particularly interested in the decline of the Deep South after the Civil War.
Many of his novels explore the deterioration of the Southern aristocracy after the destruction
of its wealth and way of life during the Civil War and Reconstruction. Faulkner populates
Yoknapatawpha County with the skeletons of old mansions and the ghosts of great men,
patriarchs and generals from the past whose aristocratic families fail to live up to their
historical greatness. Beneath the shadow of past grandeur, these families attempt to cling to
old Southern values, codes, and myths that are corrupted and out of place in the reality of the
modern world. The families in Faulkners novels are rife with failed sons, disgraced
daughters, and smoldering resentments between whites and blacks in the aftermath of
African-American slavery.
Faulkners reputation as one of the greatest novelists of the twentieth century is largely due to
his highly experimental style. Faulkner was a pioneer in literary modernism, dramatically
diverging from the forms and structures traditionally used in novels before his time. Faulkner
often employs stream of consciousness narrative, discards any notion of chronological order,
uses multiple narrators, shifts between the present and past tense, and tends toward impossibly
long and complex sentences. Not surprisingly, these stylistic innovations make some of
Faulkners novels incredibly challenging to the reader. However, these bold innovations
paved the way for countless future writers to continue to experiment with the possibilities of
the English language. For his efforts, Faulkner was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in
1949. He died in Mississippi in 1962.
First published in 1929, The Sound and the Fury is recognized as one of the most successfully
innovative and experimental American novels of its time, not to mention one of the most
challenging to interpret. The novel concerns the downfall of the Compsons, who have been a
prominent family in Jefferson, Mississippi, since before the Civil War. Faulkner represents
the human experience by portraying events and images subjectively, through several different
characters respective memories of childhood. The novels stream of consciousness style is
frequently very opaque, as events are often deliberately obscured and narrated out of order.
Despite its formidable complexity, The Sound and the Fury is an overpowering and deeply
moving novel. It is generally regarded as Faulkners most important and remarkable literary
work.
Attempting to apply traditional plot summary to The Sound and the Fury is difficult. At a
basic level, the novel is about the three Compson brothers obsessions with the their sister
Caddy, but this brief synopsis represents merely the surface of what the novel contains. A
story told in four chapters, by four different voices, and out of chronological order, The Sound
and the Fury requires intense concentration and patience to interpret and understand.
The first three chapters of the novel consist of the convoluted thoughts, voices, and memories
of the three Compson brothers, captured on three different days. The brothers are Benjy, a
severely retarded thirty-three-year-old man, speaking in April, 1928; Quentin, a young
Harvard student, speaking in June, 1910; and Jason, a bitter farm-supply store worker,
speaking again in April, 1928. Faulkner tells the fourth chapter in his own narrative voice, but
focuses on Dilsey, the Compson familys devoted Negro cook who has played a great part
in raising the children. Faulkner harnesses the brothers memories of their sister Caddy, using
a single symbolic moment to forecast the decline of the once prominent Compson family and
to examine the deterioration of the Southern aristocratic class since the Civil War.
The Compsons are one of several prominent names in the town of Jefferson, Mississippi.
Their ancestors helped settle the area and subsequently defended it during the Civil War.
Since the war, the Compsons have gradually seen their wealth, land, and status crumble away.
Mr. Compson is an alcoholic. Mrs. Compson is a self-absorbed hypochondriac who depends
almost entirely upon Dilsey to raise her four children. Quentin, the oldest child, is a sensitive
bundle of neuroses. Caddy is stubborn, but loving and compassionate. Jason has been difficult
and mean-spirited since birth and is largely spurned by the other children. Benjy is severely
mentally disabled, an idiot with no understanding of the concepts of time or morality. In the
absence of the self-absorbed Mrs. Compson, Caddy serves as a mother figure and symbol of
affection for Benjy and Quentin.
As the children grow older, however, Caddy begins to behave promiscuously, which torments
Quentin and sends Benjy into fits of moaning and crying. Quentin is preparing to go to
Harvard, and Mr. Compson sells a large portion of the family land to provide funds for the
tuition. Caddy loses her virginity and becomes pregnant. She is unable or unwilling to name
the father of the child, though it is likely Dalton Ames, a boy from town.
Caddys pregnancy leaves Quentin emotionally shattered. He attempts to claim false
responsibility for the pregnancy, lying to his father that he and Caddy have committed incest.
Mr. Compson is indifferent to Caddys promiscuity, dismissing Quentins story and telling his
son to leave early for the Northeast.
Attempting to cover up her indiscretions, Caddy quickly marries Herbert Head, a banker she
met in Indiana. Herbert promises Jason Compson a job in his bank. Herbert immediately
divorces Caddy and rescinds Jasons job offer when he realizes his wife is pregnant with
another mans child. Meanwhile, Quentin, still mired in despair over Caddys sin, commits
suicide by drowning himself in the Charles River just before the end of his first year at
Harvard.
The Compsons disown Caddy from the family, but take in her newborn daughter, Miss
Quentin. The task of raising Miss Quentin falls squarely on Dilseys shoulders. Mr. Compson
dies of alcoholism roughly a year after Quentins suicide. As the oldest surviving son, Jason
becomes the head of the Compson household. Bitterly employed at a menial job in the local
farm-supply store, Jason devises an ingenious scheme to steal the money Caddy sends to
support Miss Quentins upbringing.
Miss Quentin grows up to be an unhappy, rebellious, and promiscuous girl, constantly in
conflict with her overbearing and vicious uncle Jason. On Easter Sunday, 1928 , Miss
Quentin steals several thousand dollars from Jason and runs away with a man from a traveling
show. While Jason chases after Miss Quentin to no avail, Dilsey takes Benjy and the rest of
her family to Easter services at the local church.
The title of The Sound and the Fury refers to a line from William
Shakespeares Macbeth. Macbeth, a Scottish general and nobleman, learns of his wifes
suicide and feels that his life is crumbling into chaos. In addition to Faulkners title, we can
find several of the novels important motifs in Macbeths short soliloquy in Act V, scene v:
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle.
Lifes but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
(V.v.1827)
The Sound and the Fury literally begins as a tale / Told by an idiot, as the first chapter is
narrated by the mentally disabled Benjy. The novels central concerns include time, much like
Macbeths [t]omorrow, and tomorrow; death, recalling Macbeths dusty death; and
nothingness and disintegration, a clear reference to Macbeths lament that life [s]ignif[ies]
nothing. Additionally, Quentin is haunted by the sense that the Compson family has
disintegrated to a mere shadow of its former greatness.
In his soliloquy, Macbeth implies that life is but a shadow of the past and that a modern man,
like himself, is inadequately equipped and unable to achieve anything near the greatness of
the past. Faulkner reinterprets this idea, implying that if man does not choose to take his own
life, as Quentin does, the only alternatives are to become either a cynic and materialist like
Jason, or an idiot like Benjy, unable to see life as anything more than a meaningless series of
images, sounds, and memories.
E.M. FORSTER wrote A Passage to India in 1924, the last completed novel that he published
during his lifetime. The novel differs from Forsters other major works in its overt political
content, as opposed to the lighter tone and more subdued political subtext contained in works
such as Howards End and A Room With a View. The novel deals with the political occupation
of India by the British, a colonial domination that ended after the publication of Forsters text
and still during his lifetime.
The colonial occupation of India is significant in terms of the background of the novel. Britan
occupied an important place in political affairs in India since 1760, but did not secure control
over India for nearly a century. In August of 1858, during a period of violent revolt against
Britain by the Indians, the British Parliament passed the Government of India Act,
transferring political power from the East India Company to the crown. This established the
bureaucratic colonial system in India headed by a Council of India consisting initially of
fifteen Britons. Although Parliament and Queen Victoria maintained support for local princes,
Victoria added the title Empress of India to her regality. The typical attitude of Britons in
India was that they were undertaking the white mans burden, as put by Rudyard Kipling.
This was a system of aloof, condescending sovereignty in which the English bureaucracy did
not associate with the persons they ruled, and finds its expression in characters such as Ronny
Heaslop and Mr. McBryde in A Passage to India.
Indian nationalism began to foment around 1885 with the first meeting of the Indian National
Congress, and nationalism found expression in the Muslim community as well around the
beginning of the twentieth century. Reforms in Indias political system occurred with the
victory of the Liberal Party in 1906, culminating in the Indian Councils Act of 1909, but
nationalism continued to rise.
India took part in the First World War, assisting the British with the assumption that this help
would lead to political concession, but even with the promise after the war that Indians would
play an increased role in their own government, relations between the English and Indians did
not improve. After the war tension continued; in 1919 hundreds of Indians were massacred at
Amritsars Jallianwala Bagh during a protest. It is around this time that Mohandas
Karamchand Gandhi became a preeminent force in Indian politics, and it is also around this
time that forster would wrote A Passage to India. More than twenty years later, after a long
struggle, Parliament passed the Indian Independence Act in 1947, ordering the separation of
India and Pakistam and granting both nations their sovereignty.
SHORT SUMMARY
FORSTERs A Passage to India concerns the relations between the English and the native
population of India during the colonial period in which Britain ruled India. The novel take
place primarily in Chandrapore, a city along the Ganges River notable only for the nearby
Marabar caves. The main character of the novel is Dr. Aziz, a Moslem doctor in Chandrapore
and widower. After he is summoned to the Civil Surgeons home only to be promptly ignored,
Aziz visits a local Islamic temple where he meets Mrs. Moore, an elderly British woman
visiting her son, Mr. Heaslop, who is the City Magistrate. Although Aziz reprimands her for
not taking her shoes off in the temple before realizing she has in fact observed this rule, the
two soon find that they have much in common and he escorts her back to the club.
Back at the club, Mrs. Moore meets her companion, Adela Quested, who will likely marry her
son. Adela complains that they have seen nothing of India, but rather English customs
replicatd abroad. Although a few persons make racist statements about Indians, Mr. Turton,
the Collector, proposes having a Bridge Party (to bridge the gulf between east and west).
When Mrs. Moore tells her son, Ronny, about Aziz, he reprimands her for associating with
and Indian. Whn Mr. Turton issues the invitations to the Bridge Party, the invitees suspect
that this is a political move, for the Collector would not behave so cordially without a motive,
but accept the invitations despite the suspicion.
For Adela and Mrs. Moore, the Bridge Party is a failure, for only a select few of the English
guests behave well toward the Indians. Among these is Mr. Fielding, the schoolmaster at the
Government College, who suggests that Adela meet Aziz. Mrs. Moore scolds her son for
being impolite to the Indians, but Ronny Heaslop feels that he is not in India to be kind, for
there are more important things to do; this offends her sense of Christian charity.
Aziz accepts Fieldings invitation to tea with Adela, Mrs. Moore, and Professor Narayan
Godbole. During tea they discuss the Marabar Caves, while Fielding takes Mrs. Moore to see
the college. Ronny arrives to find Adela alone with Aziz and Godbole, and later chastises
Fielding for leaving an Englishwoman alone with two Indians. However, he reminds Ronny
that Adela is capable of making her own decisions. Aziz plans a picnic at the Marabar Caves
for Miss Quested and Mrs. Moore. Adela tells Ronny that she will not marry him, but he
nevertheless suggests that they take a car trip to see Chandrapore. The Nawab Bahadur, an
important local figure, agree to take them. During the trip, the car swerves into a tree and
Miss Derek, an Englishwoman passing by at the time, agrees to take them back to town.
However, she snubs the Nawab Bahadur and his chauffeur. Adela speaks to Ronny, and tells
him that she was foolish to say that they should not be married.
Both Aziz and Godbole fall sick after the party at Mr. Fieldings home, so Fielding visits Aziz
and they discuss the state of politics in India. Aziz shows Fielding a picture of his wife, a
significant event considering his Islamic background and an important demonstration of their
friendship.
Aziz plans the expedition to the Marabar Caves, considering every minute detail because he
does not which to offend the English ladies. During the day when they are to embark,
Mohammed Latif, a friend of Aziz, bribes Adelas searvant, Antony, not to go on the
expedition, for he serves as a spy for Ronny Heaslop. Although Aziz, Adela and Mrs. Moore
arrive to the train station on time, Fielding and Godbole miss the train because of Godboles
morning prayers. Adela and Aziz discuss her marriage, and she fears she will become a
narrow-minded Anglo-Indian such as the other wives of British officials. When they reach the
caves, a distinct echo in one of them frightens Mrs. Moore, who decides she must leave
immediately. The echo terrifies her, for it gives her the sense that the universe is chaotic and
has no order.
Aziz and Adela continue to explore the caves, and Adela realizes that she does not love
Ronny. However, she does not think that this is reason enough to break off her engagement.
Adela leaves Aziz, who goes into a cave to smoke, but when he exits he finds their guide
alone and asleep. Aziz search for Adela, but only finds her broken field glasses. Finally he
finds Fielding, who arrived at the cave in Miss Dereks care, but he does not know where
Adela is. When the group returns to Chandrapore, Aziz is arrested for assaulting Adela.
Fielding speaks to the Collector about the charge, and claims that Adela is mad and Aziz must
be innocent. The Collector feels that this is inevitable, for disaster always occurs when the
English and Indians interact socially. Fielding requests that he see Adela, but McBryde, the
police superintendent, denies this request. Fielding acts as Azizs advocate, explaining such
things as why Aziz would have the field glasses. Aziz hires as his lawyer Armitrao, a Hindu
who is notoriously anti-British. Godbole leaves Chandrapore to start a high school in Central
India.
The Anglo-Indians rally to Miss Questeds defense and call a meeting to discuss the trial.
Fielding attends, and makes the mistake of actually referring to her by name. The Collector
advises all to behave cautiously. When Ronny enters, Fielding does not stand as a sign of
respect. Mr. Turton demands an apology, but Fielding merely resigns from the club and
claims he will resign from his post if Aziz is found guilty.
Adela remains in the McBrydes bungalow, where the men are too respectful and the women
too sympathetic. She wishes to see Mrs. Moore, who kept away. Ronny tells her that Fielding
wrote her a letter to her pleading Azizs case. Adela admits to Ronny that she has made a
mistake and that Aziz is innocent. When Adela sees Mrs. Moore, she is morose and detached.
She knows that Aziz is innocent and tells Adela that directly. Mrs. Moore wishes to leave
India, and Ronny agrres, for she is doing no one any good by remaining. Lady Mellanby, the
wife of the Lieutenant-Governor, secures Mrs. Moore quick passage out of India.
During the trial, the Indians in the crowd jeer Adela for her appearance, and Mahmoud Ali,
one of Azizs lawyers, claims that Mrs. Moore was sent away because she would clear Azizs
name. When McBryde asks Adela whether Aziz followed her, she admits that she made a
mistake. Major Callendar attempts to stop the proceedings on medical grounds, but Mr. Das,
the judge, releases Aziz. After the trial, Adela leaves the courtroom alone as a riot foments.
Fielding finds her and escorts her to the college where she will be safe. Disaster is averted
only when Dr. Panna Lal, who was to testify for the prosecution, publicly apologizes to Aziz
and secures the release of Nureddin, a prisoner rumored to have been by the English.
At the college, Fielding asks Adela why she would make her charge, but she cannot give a
definite answer. He suggests that she was either assaulted by the guide or had a hallucination.
Adela seems to believe that she had a hallucination, for she thinks she had a hallucination of a
marriage when there was none. Fielding warns her that Aziz is very bitter. Ronny arrives and
tells them that his mother died at sea.
After a victory banquet for Aziz, he and Fielding discuss his future plans. Fielding implores
Aziz not to sue Adela, for it will show him to be a gentleman, but Aziz claims that he is fully
anti-British now. Fielding reminds Aziz what a momentous sacrifice Adela made, for now she
does not have the support nor friendship of the other English officials. Fielding tells Aziz that
Mrs. Moore is dead, but he does not believe him. The death of Mrs. Moore leads to suspicion
that Ronny had her killed for trying to defend Aziz. Although there was no wrongdoing in the
situation, Ronny nevertheless feels guilty for treating his mother so poorly. Adela decides to
leave India and not marry Ronny.
Fielding gains new respect for Adela for her humility and loyalty as he attempts to persuade
Aziz not to take action against Adela. Adela leaves India and vows to visit Mrs. Moores
other children (and Ronnys step-siblings) Stella and Ralph. Aziz hears rumors and begins to
suspect that Fielding had an affair with Adela. He believes these rumors out of his cynicism
concerning human nature. Because of this suspicion, the friendship between Aziz and
Fielding begins to cool, even after Fielding denies the affair to Aziz. Fielding himself leaves
Chandrapore to travel, while Aziz remains convinced that Fielding will marry Adela Quested.
Forster resumes the novel some time later in the town of Mau, where Godbole now works.
Godbole currently takes part in a Hindu birthing ceremony with Aziz, who now works in this
region. Fielding visits Mau; he has married, and Aziz assumes that his bride is Miss Quested.
Aziz stopped corresponding with Fielding when he received a letter which stated that Fielding
married someone Aziz knows. However, he did not marry Adela, as Aziz assumes, but rather
Mrs. Moore daughter, Stella. When Fielding meets with Aziz and clears up this
misunderstanding, Aziz remains angry, for he has assumed for such a long time that Fielding
married his enemy.
Nevertheless, Aziz goes to the guest house where Fielding stays and finds Ralph Moore there.
His anger at Fielding cools when Ralph invokes the memory of Mrs. Moore, and Aziz even
takes Ralph boating on the river so that they can observe the local Hindu ceremonies. Their
boat, however, crashes into one carrying Fielding and Stella. After this comical event, the ill
will between Aziz and Fielding fully dissipates. However, they realize that because of their
different cultures they cannot remain friends and part from one another cordially.
THE MAGUS
This thematically complex novel is equal parts psychological study and mystery thriller, using
the narrative structure of the latter as a framework for the former. It tells the story of a self-
centered young Briton, Nicholas Urfe, who, over the course of a magical summer in Greece,
discovers sometimes frightening truths about himself and about the nature of life. Vivid
imagery, dense language, and intriguingly layered characterizations thread, collide and
intertwine throughout the narrative until the reader, like Nicholas, is unsure of what's true and
what's fabricated by the characters. Only on the novel's very last page are protagonist and
reader alike assured that the carefully woven mystery is over ... and the free-flowing mystery
of life is now ready to begin.
The novel begins with Nicholas in England, where he embarks on what he believes will be
one of his customary manipulative and dismissive affairs with women. The object of his
"affections" this time is the vulnerable, sexually eager, and emotionally manipulative Alison,
equal parts victim and user herself. As their affair develops, Nicholas also pursues an
employment opportunity at a school in Greece, finding himself unexpectedly and inexplicably
drawn to both the job and the country. Once he gets the job, he contacts his predecessor, who
issues mysterious warnings about life on the island, but refuses to elaborate. As Nicholas
prepares to go to the island, intrigued and excited, he engineers what he believes will be a
clean break with Alison, but which she experiences as extremely painful.
Nicholas arrives in Greece, immediately falls in love with the landscape and in hate with the
school and its students. One day while exploring the island (Phraxos) upon which the school
is built, he discovers a mysterious villa and signs of human, particularly feminine, habitation.
After investigations of the villa and its inhabitants prove inconclusive, he returns to the villa
(Bourani) to continue his explorations, where he unexpectedly finds himself invited inside by
the tenant, the intriguing, enigmatic Maurice Conchis.
Over the course of several visits, Conchis draws Nicholas into an increasingly, and for
Nicholas troublingly, complex web of half truths, dramatic histories, romance, and tantalizing
sexuality. Several mysterious events involve the appearance of a beautiful young woman
named Lily, with whom Nicholas falls instantly, and deeply, in love. At first, Lily rebuffs his
advances but as more and more layers of Conchis' half-truths come into play, she becomes
more and more flirtatious, eventually confessing that she is not what she seems, that Conchis
is playing games with Nicholas and that she is prepared to break Conchis' manipulative rules
in order to be with him.
As Conchis tells Nicholas the dramatic story of his life, and as Nicholas falls more deeply in
love with the inscrutable Lily, events at Conchis' home (Bourani) take increasingly bizarre
turns, which finally result in Nicholas' being kidnapped, confronted by a exotically masked
and costumed tribunal and told that he has been the subject of a complex psychological
experiment. Conchis and Lily, as well as others Nicholas has encountered, turn out to have all
played key parts in the experiment, and at its conclusion tempt Nicholas with the option of
taking his revenge on them by punishing "Lily," the symbolic focus of his anger. Nicholas
realizes that this is, in fact, the point of the experiment - to see whether he can transcend his
feelings of anger and his desire for vengeance. He refuses to punish Lily and is then
abandoned to find his way back to England.
Back in London, Nicholas attempts to track down both Alison and Conchis' allies, having
little initial success in both but eventually discovering at least a degree of the truth. Eventually
he's led into a reunion with Alison, who turns out to have been involved in Conchis' games
and who, at first, refuses to get involved again with Nicholas. But as the result of everything
that's happened to him, Nicholas has realized that it's time to live a life of personal integrity
and attempts to force Alison to do the same. The novel concludes on the ambivalent note of
Nicholas striding firmly into his future, unsure of whether Alison will join him on the way.
The technique Fowles uses in The Magus gives it richness, complexity, and mystery, all of
which mirror its theme. The protagonist, Nicholas, has a rational, cynical view of life which
must be challenged. To do this, Conchis exposes Nicholas to the mysteries of the godgame,
which intrigue and challenge him. As the mysteries unfold, Nicholas tries to decipher their
meaning rationally and logically. So, too, does the reader. Each time Nicholas arrives at a
conclusion, which seems logical and sensible, the reader, too, is prone to believe it. Then
Conchis, the magus, unmasks the players and the logical answer proves false.
Using such a technique, Fowles brings the reader, along with Nicholas, to the truth behind the
masks: the need for Nicholas to choose truth by choosing life in a world of hazard. The novel
is written and narrated from the first person, subjective point of view, that of the protagonist,
Nicholas Urfe. The essential value of this point of view is that it puts the reader in the same
position as Nicholas, experiencing what he experiences and in much the same way - visceral,
immediate, and often unexpected. While the technique of first person narration is often
employed over a wide range of genres, its application here is particularly effective because
what Nicholas goes through over the course of the novel becomes increasingly extreme,
complicated and mysterious. As a result of this narrative choice, the reader goes through a
similar progression of intrigue, bewilderment, and quite probably frustration.
The Magus was the first novel Fowles wrote, although not the first he published. He wrote
and rewrote it for a dozen years before its publication in 1965. Still not happy with it, despite
its commercial and critical success, he reworked it again and the revised version was
published in 1977. Fowles's obsession with The Magus and his fascination with it have given
it what he calls "favored child" status. He still marvels from time to time that he could write
it. It is an important work for its autobiographical connections, its portrayal of the protagonist
trapped in a meaningless world who must learn to choose life and love, and its use of myth
and mystery to define what is lacking in the protagonist's life.
SUMMARY
The Magus is told from the point of view of Nicholas Urfe, who is bored with life. Having
attended Oxford and taught for a year at a public school, he decides to take a position as the
English teacher at the Lord Bryon School in Greece, on the island of Phraxos. Nicholas looks
up a former teacher there, and is warned to "Beware of the waiting-room," without
explanation. Nicholas is not deterred, but during the last few weeks before he leaves, he meets
Alison Kelly, an Australian girl who is about to begin training as an airline stewardess. They
are both sophisticated about sex and somewhat cynical, but each experiences some regret as
they go their separate ways.
During his first six months on Phraxos, Nicholas finds the school claustrophobic but the
island beautiful. He realizes that he cannot write good poetry and that he is having difficulty
forgetting Alison. In a funk, he visits a brothel in Athens and contracts a venereal disease. He
seriously contemplates suicide. The first of the novel's three parts ends at this point.
The mysteries begin as Nicholas goes swimming and someone leaves a book of poems,
evidently meant for him to find. As he looks in the woods nearby, he finds a gate to a villa
with a nearby sign Salle D'Attente, French for "waiting room." One of his colleagues at the
school explains that the villa is owned by a rich recluse named Maurice Conchis. Nicholas
decides to look him up and finds, inexplicably, that he is expected. After some conversation,
as Nicholas is leaving, he finds an old-fashioned glove on the path and surmises that someone
has been watching them.
Invited back for the next weekend, Nicholas is astonished by Conchis' collection of art and by
his claim to be psychic. After dinner, Conchis tells Nicholas about an episode in his boyhood
when he was fifteen and met a fourteen-year-old girl named Lily Montgomery, whose image
haunted him afterward. They were both musically inclined and fell in love, but in 1914, she
led him to feel that he ought to volunteer for the army. Conchis explains that he deserted at
the battle ofNeuve Chapelle, and offers Nicholas a chance to gamble with his own life by
rolling a die and promising that he will take a cyanide pill if the die comes up six. It does, but
Nicholas refuses to take the pill; Conchis seems to approve his decision, and reveals that the
die was loaded against the roller--as was World War I against the soldiers. That night, as
Nicholas is going to sleep, he hears voices singing a war song and smells a foul stench.
The next day Conchis encourages Nicholas to read a pamphlet by Robert Foulkes, written as
he was waiting to be hanged in 1677. Nicholas takes it with him on a walk, falls asleep, and
awakes to see a man in 17th-century dress staring at him from across a ravine. The man
disappears before Nicholas can reach him.
At dinner that night, Conchis tells of his wartime pretense to be on leave so that he could
return to England to visit Lily. As Nicholas retires, he hears a harpsichord accompanied by a
recorder, and investigates, to find Conchis and a beautiful girl dressed in Edwardian clothes,
but he declines to interrupt them.
The next weekend "Lily" joins them after dinner and speaks in the language of the early
1900s. Their conversation is interrupted when a horn sounds, a spotlight illuminates a nymph
who runs by, pursued by a satyr, and another woman seems to shoot the satyr with an arrow.
Nicholas is bewildered but decides that Conchis must be re-creating masques for his own
amusement. Lily refuses to explain, and Conchis talks in parables. He describes an attempt to
found a Society for Reason after the war, and he tells the story of a rich collector whose
mansion is burned by a resentful servant. Nicholas begins to fall in love with Lily, who
professes to be as mystified by what Conchis may be up to as Nicholas is. Conchis explains
that she is a schizophrenic whom he indulges by letting her manipulate men in the controlled
environment at Bourani, but that Nicholas must not believe what she tells him. For the
weekend's culminating experience, Conchis hypnotizes Nicholas, who experiences the
separateness of himself from everything else. Nicholas leaves eager to return for more
adventures.
Alison has invited Nicholas to Athens the next weekend. Nicholas finds the villa closed up, so
he meets her and falsely tells her that he is suffering from syphilis. They have an enjoyable
weekend climbing in the mountains, at the end of which, back in Athens, Nicholas confesses
his lie and tells her about Bourani and Lily. Alison is hurt, and gives him an ultimatum: She
will quit her job and join him on Phraxos, or she will leave him. When Nicholas hesitates, a
violent argument ensues, and she refuses to let him back in their hotel room.
When Nicholas returns to the villa, Conchis drops the pretense that Lily is a schizophrenic
and tells him that she and her twin sister are actresses named Julie and June, whom Conchis
has hired for a theatrical experiment. The first evening, Conchis tells Nicholas the story of
Henrik Nygaard, a blind madman who believes that he talks with God. Afterward, Nicholas
goes to a passionate rendezvous with Julie in the woods, where he is shocked to discover that
Julie has sent her twin sister instead. June explains that they feel like prisoners, always
watched by Conchis' black valet, Joe, repeatedly told to learn lines and to prepare for
improvisations, but never told what it all means. The next day the twins tell Nicholas their
backgrounds and show him documents to support their statements. After a day of being
shadowed by Joe, even while they are inside an empty chapel, the twins leave with Conchis
on his yacht, vowing to insist that he begin to be forthright with them all.
The next Wednesday the yacht returns, and Julie meets Nicholas at night to assure him that
there will be no more pretense of schizophrenia; however, Nicholas is to join the twins in the
improvisation the next weekend, after which all will be explained. Julie again avoids sex with
Nicholas, pleading her menstrual period. On his way back to school in the dark, Nicholas is
stopped by a patrol of soldiers in Nazi uniforms, who proceed to beat up a captured partisan.
To Nicholas's dismay, he receives a letter on Friday that he will not be welcome, after all, at
the villa that weekend.
Nicholas receives two letters the next Thursday, one from Julie indicating that Conchis has
told her that Nicholas was sick and the other from Alison's roommate telling Nicholas that
Alison has committed suicide. He does not reveal this to Conchis the next weekend, but
demands to know the truth. Conchis explains that he is experimenting with a new form of
theater, without audience, in which everyone is an actor.
Conchis continues the supposed story of his life with the narrative of the German occupation,
when he served as mayor of Phraxos. A crucial event, interpreted differently by different
characters in the novel, occurred after the killing of three Austrian soldiers by guerrillas.
Conchis was told that the lives of eighty villagers about to be executed in reprisal would be
spared if he would club the guerrilla leader to death; he refused, and took his place with the
hostages, but managed to survive the mass execution.
Conchis then explains that Julie is his mistress and that they are all about to leave. When
Nicholas tries to confront Julie, she disappears, playfully demonstrating one of their hiding
places in an old bunker. Inside, she denies what Conchis has said, but as she climbs out of the
bunker, she is grabbed and Nicholas locked in. When he gets out, he finds the villa shut up
and a skull and a doll hanging from a nearby tree. Nicholas does not know what to think and
returns to school.
Several nights later, June appears at the school in distress, concerned about Julie. She says
that they have lied to Nicholas and falsified documents about who they are. Nicholas explains
that their games have cost the life of Alison. She apologizes, and explains that Conchis is
really a psychiatrist doing research and that Julie is at his house in the village, to which June
offers to take Nicholas. When he arrives, Nicholas and Julie make passionate love, after
which she tells him that Julie is not really her name, and walks out. Three men walk in and
restrain Nicholas as they administer an injection that makes him lose consciousness.
Some days later, Nicholas revives, is dressed in ritual garb, and is taken to a chamber
decorated with symbols, where he is seated on a throne facing 12 figures in bizarre costumes.
As they unmask, they are introduced as psychiatrists, including the former Lily as Dr.
Vanessa Maxwell, who reads a clinical diagnosis of Nicholas's psychological problems. She is
then stripped to the waist and tied to a flogging frame, as Nicholas is handed a cat-o'-nine-
tails and invited to judge her--and the others--by choosing to flay her or not. He declines.
Then Nicholas is tied to the frame, to watch Lily and Joe make tender love in front of him.
Afterward, he is again made unconscious.
Nicholas awakens on the mainland, alone. He returns to the school and gets himself fired. He
goes back to the villa and searches for clues. Although he finds a typescript of a story about
how a prince learns to become a magician by accepting that life is full of illusion, Nicholas
goes on looking for expla- nations. The second part of the book ends with his discovery that
Alison is still alive, her supposed suicide evidently part of the charade.
In the last part, Nicholas continues his research. Nicholas finds no record of Conchis'
supposed credentials in psychology. He interviews one of his predecessors at the Lord Byron
School, now living as a monk in Italy, but the monk is not interested in helping Nicholas. He
finally succeeds in locating a house in which a Montgomery lived during World War I and the
inhabitant directs him to one of the Montgomery daughters, a Mrs. Lily de Seitas. At first, she
toys with Nicholas, but when he finds out that she has twin daughters of her own, she admits
that she is a friend of Conchis--and of Alison. Nicholas is angry, partly over her refusal to tell
him where Alison is, but he gradually overcomes his resentment and they meet again.
Nicholas begins to appreciate what has happened, and even declines to discuss it with his
immediate predecessor at the Lord Byron School. Finally, Alison appears when he least
expects her, and they have a confrontation in Regent's Park, where he at first imagines that
they are being watched from Cumberland Terrace. Nicholas issues her an ultimatum--"them
or me." She rejects the ultimatum, and Nicholas walks away from her. When she follows him,
he slaps her without understanding why. Then he realizes that they are unobserved and asks
forgiveness. The novel ends at that point, with their future relationship uncertain.
Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. was born in Indianapolis in 1922, a descendant of prominent German-
American families. His father was an architect and his mother was a noted beauty. Both spoke
German fluently but declined to teach Kurt the language in light of widespread anti-German
sentiment following World War I. Family money helped send Vonneguts two siblings to
private schools. The Great Depression hit hard in the 1930s, though, and the family placed
Kurt in public school while it moved to more modest accommodations. While in high school,
Vonnegut edited the schools daily newspaper. He attended college at Cornell for a little over
two years, with instructions from his father and brother to study chemistry, a subject at which
he did not excel. He also wrote for the Cornell Daily Sun. In 1943 he enlisted in the U.S.
Army. In 1944 his mother committed suicide, and Vonnegut was taken prisoner following the
Battle of the Bulge, in the Ardennes Forest of Belgium.
After the war, Vonnegut married and entered a masters degree program in anthropology at
the University of Chicago. He also worked as a reporter for the Chicago City News Bureau.
His masters thesis, titled Fluctuations Between Good and Evil in Simple Tales, was rejected.
He departed for Schenectady, New York, to take a job in public relations at a General Electric
research laboratory.
Vonnegut left GE in 1951 to devote himself full-time to writing. During the 1950s, Vonnegut
published short stories in national magazines. Player Piano, his first novel, appeared in
1952. Sirens of Titan was published in 1959, followed by Mother Night (1962), Cats
Cradle (1963), God Bless You, Mr. Rose-water (1965), and his most highly praised
work, Slaughterhouse-Five (1969). Vonnegut wrote prolifically until his death in 2007.
Slaughterhouse-Five treats one of the most horrific massacres in European historythe
World War II firebombing of Dresden, a city in eastern Germany, on February 13, 1945
with mock-serious humor and clear antiwar sentiment. More than 130,000 civilians died in
Dresden, roughly the same number of deaths that resulted from the Allied bombing raids on
Tokyo and from the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, both of which also occurred in
1945. Inhabitants of Dresden were incinerated or suffocated in a matter of hours as a firestorm
sucked up and consumed available oxygen. The scene on the ground was one of unimaginable
destruction.
The novel is based on Kurt Vonneguts own experience in World War II. In the novel, a
prisoner of war witnesses and survives the Allied forces firebombing of Dresden. Vonnegut,
like his protagonist Billy Pilgrim, emerged from a meat locker beneath a slaughter-house into
the moonscape of burned-out Dresden. His surviving captors put him to work finding,
burying, and burning bodies. His task continued until the Russians came and the war ended.
Vonnegut survived by chance, confined as a prisoner of war (POW) in a well-insulated meat
locker, and so missed the cataclysmic moment of attack, emerging the day after into the
charred ruins of a once-beautiful cityscape. Vonnegut has said that he always intended to
write about the experience but found himself incapable of doing so for more than twenty
years. Although he attempted to describe in simple terms what happened and to create a linear
narrative, this strategy never worked for him. Billy Pilgrims unhinged timeshifting, a
mechanism for dealing with the unfathomable aggression and mass destruction he witnesses,
is Vonneguts solution to the problem of telling an untellable tale.
Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five as a response to war. It is so short and jumbled and
jangled, he explains in Chapter 1, because there is nothing intelligent to say about a
massacre. The jumbled structure of the novel and the long delay between its conception and
completion serve as testaments to a very personal struggle with heart-wrenching material. But
the timing of the novels publication also deserves notice: in 1969, the United States was in
the midst of the dismal Vietnam War. Vonnegut was an outspoken pacifist and critic of the
conflict. Slaughterhouse-Five revolves around the willful incineration of 100,000 civilians, in
a city of extremely dubious military significance, during an arguably just war. Appearing
when it did, then, Slaughterhouse-Five made a forceful statement about the campaign in
Vietnam, a war in which incendiary technology was once more being employed against
nonmilitary targets in the name of a dubious cause.
About the book
Billy Pilgrim is born in 1922 and grows up in Ilium, New York. A funny-looking, weak
youth, he does reasonably well in high school, enrolls in night classes at the Ilium School of
Optometry, and is drafted into the army during World War II. He trains as a chaplains
assistant in South Carolina, where an umpire officiates during practice battles and announces
who survives and who dies before they all sit down to lunch together. Billys father dies in a
hunting accident shortly before Billy ships overseas to join an infantry regiment in
Luxembourg. Billy is thrown into the Battle of the Bulge in Belgium and is immediately taken
prisoner behind German lines. Just before his capture, he experiences his first incident of
timeshifting: he sees the entirety of his life, from beginning to end, in one sweep.
Billy is transported in a crowded railway boxcar to a POW camp in Germany. Upon his
arrival, he and the other privates are treated to a feast by a group of fellow prisoners, who are
English officers who were captured earlier in the war. Billy suffers a breakdown and gets a
shot of morphine that sends him time-tripping again. Soon he and the other Americans travel
onward to the beautiful city of Dresden, still relatively untouched by wartime privation. Here
the prisoners must work for their keep at various labors, including the manufacture of a
nutritional malt syrup. Their camp occupies a former slaughterhouse. One night, Allied forces
carpet bomb the city, then drop incendiary bombs to create a firestorm that sucks most of the
oxygen into the blaze, asphyxiating or incinerating roughly 130,000 people. Billy and his
fellow POWs survive in an airtight meat locker. They emerge to find a moonscape of
destruction, where they are forced to excavate corpses from the rubble. Several days later,
Russian forces capture the city, and Billys involvement in the war ends.
Billy returns to Ilium and finishes optometry school. He gets engaged to Valencia Merble, the
obese daughter of the schools founder. After a nervous breakdown, Billy commits himself to
a veterans hospital and receives shock treatments. During his stay in the mental ward, a
fellow patient introduces Billy to the science fiction novels of a writer named Kilgore Trout.
After his recuperation, Billy gets married. His wealthy father-in-law sets him up in the
optometry business, and Billy and Valencia raise two children and grow rich. Billy acquires
the trappings of the suburban American dream: a Cadillac, a stately home with modern
appliances, a bejeweled wife, and the presidency of the Lions Club. He is not aware of
keeping any secrets from himself, but at his eighteenth wedding anniversary party the sight of
a barbershop quartet makes him break down because, he realizes, it triggers a memory of
Dresden.
The night after his daughters wedding in 1967, as he later reveals on a radio talk show, Billy
is kidnapped by two-foot-high aliens who resemble upside-down toilet plungers, who he says
are called Tralfamadorians. They take him in their flying saucer to the planet Tralfamadore,
where they mate him with a movie actress named Montana Wildhack. She, like Billy, has
been brought from Earth to live under a transparent geodesic dome in a zoo where
Tralfamadorians can observe extraterrestrial curiosities. The Tralfamadorians explain to Billy
their perception of time, how its entire sweep exists for them simultaneously in the fourth
dimension. When someone dies, that person is simply dead at a particular time. Somewhere
else and at a different time he or she is alive and well. Tralfamadorians prefer to look at lifes
nicer moments.
When he returns to Earth, Billy initially says nothing of his experiences. In 1968, he gets on a
chartered plane to go to an optometry conference in Montreal. The plane crashes into a
mountain, and, among the optometrists, only Billy survives. A brain surgeon operates on him
in a Vermont hospital. On her way to visit him there, Valencia dies of accidental carbon
monoxide poisoning after crashing her car. Billys daughter places him under the care of a
nurse back home in Ilium. But he feels that the time is ripe to tell the world what he has
learned. Billy has foreseen this moment while time-tripping, and he knows that his message
will eventually be accepted. He sneaks off to New York City, where he goes on a radio talk
show. Shortly thereafter, he writes a letter to the local paper. His daughter is at her wits end
and does not know what to do with him. Billy makes a tape recording of his account of his
death, which he predicts will occur in 1976 after Chicago has been hydrogen-bombed by the
Chinese. He knows exactly how it will happen: a vengeful man he knew in the war will hire
someone to shoot him. Billy adds that he will experience the violet hum of death and then will
skip back to some other point in his life. He has seen it all many times.
The author narrates in both first and third person. The first-person sections are confined
mainly to the first and last chapters. The narration is omniscient: it reveals the thoughts and
motives of several characters, and provides details about their lives and some analysis of their
motivations. The narrator primarily follows Billy Pilgrim but also presents the point of view
of other characters whom Billy encounters. The narrators tone is familiar and ironic, and he
uncovers touches of dark humor and absurdity that do not diminish the lyrical and emotional
power of the material. His portrayal of Billy is intimate but ambivalent, and he occasionally
emphasizes the diction of reported speech (prefacing a passage with He says that or Billy
says) to draw a distinction between reality and Billys interpretation of events.
The novels random, skipping timeline presents an effective method of representing one
mans inability to live a normal life after experiencing modern warfare. The disjointed collage
of Billy Pilgrims life gets translated directly to the disjointed collage of the narrative. We
experience Billys life as he does, without suspense or logical order, randomly orbiting about
the firebombing of Dresden.
A traditional novel might start with a youthful Billy Pilgrim and follow him into old age or
with an elderly protagonist who flashes back on his life. Billy, however, adopts a
Tralfamadorian attitude because it is the only way he can make sense of the loose grip on time
he is left with after the war. In order to follow him, the narrative approximates the same
attitude. A Tralfamadorian novel, as discussed in Chapter 5, contains urgent, discrete
messages describing scenes and situations. The author of such a novel carefully chooses the
messages so that, when seen all at once, they form a profound image of life. Otherwise, there
is no obvious relationship among themthere is no beginning, middle, climax, or end.
Humans, of course, cannot perceive all the elements of a novel at the same time. We can only
approximate this effect like we approximate motion on filmwith quick snapshots shown in
rapid succession. Showing the snapshots in chronological order yields a traditional linear
narrative; shuffling them up yields the closest approximation of a Tralfamadorian whole.
Vonnegut entrusts his long-in-the-making Dresden book to a Tralfamadorian template in the
hopes that it will produce something profound and beautiful from the memories of a massacre.