Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Labitag Page 1 of 30
I. DEFINITION OF PROPERTY 10. Contract for public works and servitudes and
other real rights over immovable property
Art 420 The following are things of public dominion: c. Private Property of Private Persons
(1) Those intended for public use, such as roads, Art 425 Property of private ownership,
canals, rivers, torrents, ports and bridges, besides the patrimonial property of the
constructed by the State, banks, shores, State, provinces, cities and
roadsteads and other of similar character municipalities, consists of all property
(2) Those which belong to the State, without being belonging to private persons, either
for public use, and are intended for some public individually or collectively.
service or for the development of national wealth
TANTOCO v MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ()
Art 421 All other property of the State, which is not of the ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE v CITY OF ZAMBOANGA ()
character stated in the preceding article, is patrimonial SALAS v JARENCIO ()
property CEBU ACETYLENE v BERCILLES ()
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN MIGUEL v FERNANDEZ ()
Art 422 Property of public dominion, when no longer GOVERNMENT v CABANGIS ()
intended for public use or public service, shall form part of CHAVEZ v PEA AMARI (2002)
the patrimonial property of the State. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (2003)
Art 424 Property for public use, in the provinces, cities, and 4. Effect and Significance of Classification of Property
municipalities, consists of the provincial roads, city streets, as Property of Public Dominion
municipal streets, the squares, fountains, public waters,
promenades and public works for public service paid for by a. Property is outside the commerce of
said provinces, cities, or municipalities. man
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 4 of 30
But subject to the restrictions imposed by: subdivisions, and by chance thereof shall be
o Law allowed to the finder. If the finder is a trespasser,
o Rights of others he shall not be entitled to any share of the
Scialoja: It is a relation in private law by virtue of treasure.
which is a thing (or property right) pertaining to If the things found be of interest to science or the
one person is completely subjected to his will in arts, the State may acquire them at their just
everything not prohibited by public law or the price, which shall be divided in conformity with
concurrence with the rights of another the rule stated.
o Sir actually prefers this definition
Art 439 By treasure is understood, for legal
B. Bundle of Rights included in Ownership purposes, any hidden and unknown deposit of
money, jewelry, or other precious objects, the
lawful ownership of which does not appear.
Art 429 The owner or lawful possessor of a thing has the
right to exclude any person from the enjoyment and 5. Right to space and subsoil
disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may use such force as Art 437
may be reasonably necessary to repel or prevent an actual
or threatened unlawful physical invasion or usurpation of 6. Right to accession
his property. Art 440 The ownership of property gives the right
by accession to:
Jus Utendi right to use and enjoy the property o Everything which is produced thereby
without destroying its substance (accession discreta)
Jus Abutendi right to use and enjoy by o Incorporated or attached thereto, either
consuming the thing by its use naturally or artificially (accession
Jus Fruendi right to receive the fruits continua)
Jus Disponendi right to dispose or the power of
the owner to alienate, encumber, transform and 7. Right to recover possession and/or ownership (jus
even destroy the thing owned vindicandi)
Jus Vindicandi right to recover a thing
a. Available actions to Recover
Possession/Ownership
C. Other Specific Rights found in the Civil Code
i. For immovable property
1) Accion reivindicatoria - recovery of dominion of
1. Right to exclude; self-help; Doctrine of Self-help property as owner; main issue is ownership not merely
Art 429 see above possession.
ELEMENTS OF SELF-HELP 2) Accion publiciana - plenary action to recover
possession when owner is dispossessed by any other
2. Right to enclose or fence means than the grounds for instituting a forcible entry
Art 430 Every owner may enclose of fence his land and unlawful detainer case.
or tenements by means of walls, ditches, live or 3) Forcible entry - used by person deprived of possession
dead hedges, or by any other means without through Force, Intimidation, Strategy, Threat or Stealth
detriment to servitudes consisted thereon. (FISTS)
4) Unlawful detainer - used by lessor/person having legal
3. Right to receive just compensation in case of right over property when lessee/person withholding
expropriation property refuses to surrender possession of property
Art 435 No person shall be deprived of his after expiration of lease/right to hold property
property except by competent authority and for (physical possession, 1 year from the last date of
public use and always upon just compensation. demand to vacate the premises)
5) Writ of possession
4. Right to hidden treasure 6) Writ of injunction
Art 438 Hidden treasure belongs to the owner of
the land, buiding or other property on which it is HILARIO v SALVADOR (2005)
found. SAMPAYANG v CA (2005)
Nevertheless, when the discovery is made on the SANTOS v AYON (2005)
property of another, OR of the State or any of its GANILA v CA (2005)
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 6 of 30
ROSS RICA SALES CENTER v SPS. ONG (2005) same, if the interference is necessary to avert an
PERALTA-LABRADOR v BUARIN (2005) imminent danger and threatened damage,
compared to the damage arising to the owner
ii. For movable property from the interference is much greater. The owner
1) Replevin may demand from the person benefited
indemnity for the damage to him
b. Requisites for recovery Act in state of
Art 434 In an action to recover, the necessity
property must be identified, and the Art 2191 Proprietors shall also be responsible for
plaintiff must rely on the strength of his damages caused:
title and not on the weakness of the (1) By the explosion of machinery which has not
defendants claim. been taken care of with due diligence, and
the inflammation of explosive substances
i. Identify the property which have not been kept in a safe and
SERINA v CABALLERO (2004) adequate place
(2) By excessive smoke, which may be harmful to
ii. Prove his right of ownership persons or property
rely on the strength of his (3) By the falling of trees situated at or near
evidence not on the weakness highways or lanes, if not caused by force
of defendants majeure
PEREZ v MENDOZA (1975) (4) By emanations from tubes, canals, sewers or
DIZON v CA (1993) deposits of infectious matter, constructed
without precautions suitable to the place
D. Limitations of Real Right of Ownership
Art 670 Distances for windows, apertures,
balconies or other similar projection which afford
1. General Limitation direct and oblique views
a. Police power salus populi suprema est Art 677 Constructions near fortified places or
lex fortresses
Art 436 When any property is Art 678 Building of aqueduct, well, sewer, furnace,
condemned or seized by competent chimney, stable, depository of corrosive
authority in the interest of health, safety substances, machinery or factory
or security, the owner thereof shall not Art 679 Planting of trees near a tenement
be entitled to compensation, UNLESS he Art 649 Easement of right of way
can show that such condemnation or Art 652 Acquisition of piece of land without right
seizure is unjustified. of way
b. Taxation Art 637 Receipt of lower estates of waters which
c. Eminent domain naturally descend from higher estates
Art 435 Art 676 Easement of drainage
Art 644 Limitations on the imposition of easement
2. Specific Limitation of aqueduct
a. Legal servitudes Art 684-687 Lateral and subjacent support
b. Limitations imposed by party
transmitting the property US v CAUSBY ( )
i. By contract or last will or donation LUNOD v MENESES ( )
ii. Stipulation on inalienability
III. RIGHTS OF ACCESSION
3. Limitation from scattered provisions of CC
A. Concept
Art 431 The owner of a thing cannot make use
thereof in such manner as to injure the rights of a Art 440 The ownership of property gives the right by
third person. accession to everything which is produced thereby, or
Sis utere tuo ut which is incorporated or attached thereto, either
alienum no laedas naturally or artificially.
Art 432 The owner of a thing has no right to
prohibit the interference of another with the DEFINITIONS OF ACCESSION
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 7 of 30
c. Civil rents of lands and buildings, and certain kinds of - Retains possession without
incomes obtained from the land or building itself paying rental
- Not entitled to fruits; his
BACHRACH v SEIFERT ( ) rights are the same as an
BACHRACH v TALISAY ( ) antichretic creditor
1. Artificial or Industrial Building, Planting, Sowing ii. Rights of BPS in bad faith
Art 452 The
a. Owner is BPS using material of another (LO-BPS and Art 443 The
OM)
Art 447 The LO who makes thereon, personally or Landowner in bad faith but BPS in good faith
through another, plantings constructions, or works Art 454
with the materials of another, shall pay their value and Art 447
if he acted in bad faith, he shall also be obliged to the Reason for adverting to rule in Art 447
reparation of the damages. The OM shall have the right
to remove them only in case he can do so without c. BPS builds, plants or sows on anothers land with
injury to the work constructed, or without the materials owned by 3rd persons
plantings, constructions or work being destroyed. Art 455 The
However, if the LO acted in bad faith, the OM may
remove them in any event, with a right to be N.B.: Good faith does not exclude negligence
indemnified for damages. Art 456 The
REPUBLIC v CA ( ) 3. Specification
GRANDE v CA ( )
MENESES ( ) IV. QUIETING OF TITLE
b. Avulsion
A. Differences between Action to Quiet Title and Action:
Art 459 Whenever the current of a river, creek or
torrent segregates from an estate on its bank a known
portion of land and transfers it to another estate, the Action to Quiet Title Action to Remove a Cloud
owner of the land to which the segregated portion Substantially an action for Procure the cancellation,
belonged retains ownership of it, provided that he the purpose of putting an delivery of, release of an
removes the same within 2 years. end to vexatious litigation in instrument, encumbrance or
respect to the property claim constituting a claim on
NAVARRO ( ) involved the plaintiffs title and which
may be used to injure or vex
c. Change of Course of River him in the enjoyment of his
Art 461 The title
Art 462 The
Plaintiff asserts his own Plaintiff not only declares his
Art 463 The
estate and declares own title but also avers the
generally that defendant source and nature of the
BAES v CA ( )
claims some estate in the defendants claim, points out
BINALAY v MANALO
land, without defining it and its defect, and prays that it
avers that the claim is be declared void
d. Formation of Islands
without foundation and
Art 461 The
calls on the defendant to set
Art 462 The
forth the nature of his claim
Art 463 The
so that it may be
Art 464 The
determined by decree
Art 465 The
See PD 1067
Action to Quiet Title Action to Prevent a Cloud
Relief is granted if the
3. Reverse Accession
threatened or anticipated
Art 120, FC The
cloud is one which if it
Art 321, CC The
existed, would be removed by
suit to quit title
Over Movables
Cloud on a title an outstanding instrument,
1. Conjunction and Adjunction record, claim, incumbrance or proceeding which is
actually invalid or inoperative, but which may
a. Inclusion or Engraftment nevertheless impair or affect injuriously the title
to the property.
b. Soldadura or Soldering It must have a prima facie appearance of validity
i. Plumbatura different metals or legal efficacy.
ii. Ferruminatio same metal
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 10 of 30
Cloud on a title must have a semblance of validity The right of common dominion which two or more
which appears in some legal form but which is in persons have a spiritual part (or ideal portion) or a
fact unfounded. thing which is not physically divided.
Invalidity or inoperativeness must be proven by an
extrinsic evidence. B. Characteristics of co-ownership
1. There is a cloud on title to real property or any interest D. Differences between Co-ownership and Partnership
to real property.
Art 476 Whenever there is a cloud on title to real
property OR any interest therein, by reason of any Co-ownership Partnership
instrument, record, claim, encumbrance, or proceeding
which is apparently valid or effective but is in truth and
in fact invalid, ineffective, voidable or unenforceable, GATCHALIAN v COLLECTOR ( )
and may be prejudicial to said title, an action may be
brought to remove such cloud or to quiet the title. E. Source of Co-ownership
An action may also be brought to prevent a cloud from
being cast upon title to real property or any interest
therein. 1. Law
2. Plaintiff has legal or equitable title to or interest in the
subject/real property. i. Cohabitation
3. Instrument record claim, etc must be valid and binding Art 147, FC
on its face, but in truth and in fact, invalid, ineffective, Art 148, FC
voidable or unenforceable. Art 90
4. Plaintiff must return benefits received from defendant.
ii. Purchase
TITONG v CA (1998) Art 1452
CO-OWNERSHIP v. Chance
Art 472
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 11 of 30
RESUENA v CA (2005)
SIARI VALLEY ESTATE v LUCASAN () ACABAL v ACABAL (2005)
MARIANO v CA ()
VERDAD v CA () I. Special rules on co-ownership of different stories of a
house as differentiated from provisions of
8. To ask for partition Condominium Law (Act No. 4726)
Art 494
9. Other cases where legal right of redemption is given 3. Rights and obligations of Condominium owner
Art 1621
Art 1622 SUNSENT VIEW CONDOMINIUM v JUDGE CAMPOS (1981)
v. When partition would render the thing 2. Intention to possess (animus possidendi)
unserviceable (but the thing may be sold
and co-owners divide the proceeds) C. Degrees of Holding of Possession
Art 494
Action for partition will fail if
acquisitive prescription has set 1. Mere holding or possession without title whatsoever
in and in violation of the right of the owner
E.g. possession of a thief/robber or a usurper of land
b. Effect of partition
Art 1091 2. Possession with a juridical title, but not that of
Art 543 ownership
Art 1092 E.g. possession of tenant, depository agent, bailee,
Art 1093 trustee, lessee, antichretic creditor.
Art 499 This degree of possession will never ripen into full
Art 500 ownership as long as there is no repudiation of
Art 501 concept under which property is held.
c. Right of creditors of individual co-owners 3. Possession with a just title or title sufficient to transfer
Art 497 ownership, but not from the true owner
E.g. possession of a vendee from vendor who pretends
d. Procedure for partition to be the owner
Rule 69, Rules of Court This degree of possession ripens into full
ownership by lapse of time.
VI. POSSESSION
4. Possession with a just title from the true owner
The delivery of possession transfers ownership,
A. Definition and Concept and strictly speaking, is the jus possidendi.
D. Cases of Possession
POSSESSION
Is the holding of a thing OR the enjoyment of a
right, whether by material occupation or by the 1. Possession for oneself or possession exercised in ones
fact that the thing or the right is subjected to the own name and possession in the name of another
action of our will Art 524
It is a real right independent of and apart from
ownership i.e. the right of possession (jus 2. Possession in the concept of an owner and possession
possessionis) as distinguished from the right to in the concept of a mere holder with the ownership
possess (jus possidendi) belonging to another
Art 525
In case of conflicting possession, preference is given to: 4. Possession of movable acquired in good faith (in
a. Present possessor or actual possessor concept of owner) is equivalent to title
b. If there are 2 or more possessors, the one longer Art 559
in possession Possessor has actual title which is defeasible only
c. If dates of possession are the same, the one who by true owner
presents a title One who has lost a movable or has been
d. If all conditions are equal, the thing shall be unlawfully deprived thereof may recover it but
placed in judicial deposit pending determination without reimbursement
of possession or ownership through proper EXCEPT: If possessor acquired it at a public sale
proceedings
1. In general, every possessor has a right to be respected 1. Possession may by lapse of time ripen into full
in his possession; if disturbed therein, possessor has ownership, subject to certain exceptions.
right to be protected in or restored to said possession
Art 539 2. Presumption of just title and cannot be obliged to
show or prove it
a. Actions to recover possession Art 541
EXCEPTION: Art 1131
i. Accion interdictal or Summary proceedings
forcible entry and unlawful detainer 3. Possessor may bring all actions necessary to protect his
- Plaintiff may ask for writ of preliminary possession except accion reivindicatoria
mandatory injunction
- Within 10 days from the filing of 4. May employ self-help under Art 429
complaint in forcible entry
Art 539 5. Possessor may ask for inscription of such real right of
possession in the Registry of Property
YU v HONRADO ( )
6. Has rights to fruits and reimbursements for expenses
ii. Accion publiciana based on superior right of (assuming he is a possessor in good faith)
possession, not ownership
7. Upon recovery of possession which he has been
iii. Accion reivindicatoria recovery of unlawfully deprived, may demand fruits and damages
ownership, including the right to possess
8. Generally, he can do on the things possessed
iv. Action for replevin possession or ownership everything that the law authorizes the owner to do
for movable property until he is ousted by the one who has a better right
b. Lawful possessor can employ self-help 9. Possession in good faith and possession in bad faith
Art 429 Art 528
Mistake upon a doubtful or difficult
question of law as a basis of good faith
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 16 of 30
CORDERO v CABRAL ( )
VII. USUFRUCT
3. Of enjoyment of possession in the same character in
which possession was acquired until contrary is
A. Concept
proved
Art 529
Art 562
4. Of non-interruption of possession in favor of present
possessor who proves possession at a previous time USUFRUCT
until the contrary is proved Is a real right, temporary in character that
Art 554 authorizes the holder to enjoy all the advantages
Art 1120 derived from a normal exploitation of anothers
Art 1121 property, according to its destination or purpose,
Art 1122 and imposes an obligation of restoring at the time
Art 1123 specified, either the thing itself or its equivalent.
Art 1124
B. Historical Considerations
5. Of continuous possession or non-interruption of
possession of which he was wrongfully deprived for all
purposes favorable to him C. Characteristics of Usufruct
Art 561
6. Other presumptions with respect to specific properties D. Usufruct Distinguished from Lease; from Servitude
of property rights
Art 566
2. By person enjoying the right of usufruct Art 436
Fruits pending at the beginning of usufruct
a. Simple Art 567
b. Multiple Civil fruits
i. Simultaneous Art 569
ii. Succession Art 588
Limitation on successive usufruct
Art 756 b. Right to lease the thing
Art 863 Art 572
Art 869 Limitations
Liability of usufructuary
3. By object of usufruct Art 590
Exceptions to right of leasing the thing
a. Rights
Art 574 FABIE v DAVID ()
b. Things
i. Normal c. Right to improve the thing
ii. Abnormal, irregular or quasi-usufruct Art 579
b. To give a bond for the faithful performance of e. To notify owner of any act detrimental to
duties as usufructuary ownership
Art 601
i. No bond are required in the following:
1) No prejudice would result f. To shoulder the costs of litigation re usufruct
Art 585 Art 602
2) Usufruct is reserved by donor
Art 584 g. To answer for fault or negligence of alienee, lessee
3) Title constituting usufruct excused or agent of usufructuary
usufructuary Art 590
4) If usufructuary takes possession
under a caucion juratoria 3. At the time of termination of the usufruct
ii. Effect of filing a bond a. To deliver the thing in usufruct to the owner in the
Art 588 condition in which he has received it, after
undertaking ordinary repairs
iii. Effect of failure to give bond EXCEPTION: abnormal usufruct
Art 586
Art 599 I. Special Cases of Usufruct
11. It is a right constituted over an immovable by nature a. Legal, whether for public use or for the interest of
(land and buildings), not over immovables. private persons
Art 634
12. It limits the servient owners right of ownership for the b. Voluntary
benefit of the dominant estate Right of limited use,
but no right to possess servient estate. Being an 3. As to its exercise
abnormal limitation of ownership, it cannot be Art 615
presumed.
a. Continuous
13. It creates a relation between tenements. b. Discontinuous
14. It cannot consists in requiring the owner of the 4. As indication of its existence
servient estate to do an act (servitus in faciendo Art 615
consistere nequit or servitudes may not impose
positive acts) unless the act is accessory to a praedial a. Apparent
servitude (obligation propter rem) b. Non-apparent
15. Generally, it may consist in the owner of the dominant 5. By the object or obligation imposed
estate demanding that the owner of the servient Art 616
estate refrain from doing something (servitus in non
faciendo), or that the latter permit that something be a. Positive
done over the servient property (servitus in patendo), b. Negative
but not in the right to demand that the owner of the Prescription starts to run from service of
servient estate to do something (servitus in faciendo) notarial prohibition
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 21 of 30
2. Non-user for 10 years 2. Private legal easements provided for by the New Civil
a. Computation of the period Code
i. Discontinuous easements counted
from the day they ceased to be used a) Those established for the use of water or
ii. Continuous easements counted easements relating to waters
from the day an act adverse to the
exercise took place 1) Natural drainage of waters
b. The use by a co-owner of the dominant estate Art 637
bars prescription with respect to the others
Art 633 ONGSIAKO v ONGSIAKO ()
c. Servitudes not yet exercised cannot be
extinguished by non-use 2) Easements on lands along riverbanks
Art 638
3. Extinguishment by impossibility of use See Water Code
Art 649
H. Legal Easements Art 650
Art 651
Art 652
1. Law governing legal easements Art 653
Art 654
a. For public easements Art 655
i. Special laws and regulations relating Art 656
thereto Art 657
1) PD 1067 Water Code
2) PD 705 Forestry Reform Code QUIMEN v CA (1996)
ii. Provisions of Chapter 2, Title VII, Book II CHAN v CA ()
of CC (Legal Easements) LA VISTA ASSN v CA (1997)
VDA. DE BELTAZAr v CA ()
b. For private legal easements SPS. DELA CRUZ v RAMISCAL (2005)
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 23 of 30
Intellectual creation
REQUISITES:
(1) Pre-existence of right in estate of grantor Intellectual Property Code (RA 8293)
(2) Just cause or title for the transmission
(3) Intention (of both grantor and grantee) Intellectual Property Rights (IPR):
(4) Capacity (to transmit and to acquire) a. Copyright & related rights
(5) An act giving it outward form, physically, b. Trademarks & service marks
symbolically or legally c. Geographic indications
d. Industrial designs
LEGAL MAXIM: Non nudis pactis, sed traditione, dominia e. Patents
rerum transferentur (Not by mere agreement, but by f. Topographies of integrated circuits
delivery, is ownership transferred.) g. Rights of performers, producers of sound
recordings & broadcasting orgs
KINDS OF TRADITION h. Protection of undisclosed information
b. Real tradition i. Laws repealed by the IPC
c. Constructive tradition Sec 239 All acts and part of acts inconsistent with
i. Symbolical delivery Intellectual Property Code, particularly:
ii. Delivery of public PD 49 Intellectual
instrument Property Decree,
iii. Traditio longamanu including PD 285 as
iv. Traditio brevi manu amended
v. Traditio constitutum RA 165, as amended
possessorium Patent Law
vi. Quasi-tradition RA 166, as amended
vii. Tradition by operation Arts 188 and 189 of
of law the RPC
Occupation
DONATION
b. Mortis causa
Art 728
c. Propter nuptias Who may not give or receive donations
Art 82, FC
Art 87, FC
Art 735
2. As to cause or consideration Art 737
a. Simple Art 738
b. Remuneratory Art 741
c. Onerous imposes a burden inferior to the Art 742
value of property donated
i. Improper burden equal in
Who may give or receive donations
value to property donated
ii. Sub-modo or modal E.g.
imposes a prestation upon
Art 736
donee as to how property
Art 739
donated will be applied
Art 1027
Art 882
Art 1032
iii. Mixed donations negotium
Art 740
mixtum cum donatione e.g. sale
Art 743
for price lower than value of
Art 744
property
6. Distinction between donation mortis causa and 3. Rules in Art 748 and Art 749 not applicable to:
donation inter vivos a. Onerous donations
a. What is important is the time of transfer of b. Modal donations
ownership even if transfer of property c. Mortis causa donations
donated may be subject to a condition or a d. Donations propter nuptias
term
b. Importance of classification validity and
revocation of donation What may be donated
b. PROVIDED, that no person may give or 3. Donor not obliged to warrant things donated,
receive, by way of donation, more than he EXCEPT in onerous donations in which case donor
may give or receive by will is liable for eviction up to the extent of burden
Art 752 Art 754
Also, reserves property sufficient to pay 4. Donor is liable for eviction or hidden defects in
donors debts contracted before donation, case of bad faith on his part
otherwise, donation is in fraud of creditors Art 754
Art 759
Art 1387 5. In donations propter nuptias, donor must release
property donated from mortgages and other
encumbrances, unless contrary has been
2. If donation exceeds the disposable or free portion of stipulated
his estate, donation is inofficious Art 131, CC
Art 727
Art 1183 YULO AND SONS v ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN
PABLO (2005)
Art 762
A. Revocation distinguished from reduction of donations Art 764 Par 2
Art 767
Revocation Reduction
4. Effect as to fruits
1. Inofficiousness of donation
Art 752 LEASE
Art 771
Art 773
Art 911
A. General characteristics of every lease
Art 912
e. Lessor not obliged to answer for mere act of 13. Useful improvements in good faith made by lessee
trespass by a 3rd person Art 1678
Art 1664
14. Special provisions for leases of rural lands
9. Grounds for ejectment of lessee by lessor Art 1680
Art 1673 Art 1681
Art 1682
Note the grounds under the House Rental Law. Art 1683
QUERY: Are they still effective? Art 1684
Art 1685
10. Right to ask for writ of preliminary mandatory
injunction in unlawful detainer cases 15. Special provisions for leases of urban lands
Art 1674 Art 1686
Art 539, Par 2 Art 1687
Art 1688
11. Implied extension of lease
Art 1670
Art 1682
PROPERTY Prof. Labitag Page 30 of 30