Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 1-1
British Imperial or units or fps system are based on feet, pound and second, and are
less technically consistent, because of the double use of the pound as a unit of mass and
force. However, the use of British units is a kind of standard practice in the aeronautical
world, due to the predominance of USA. For example, it is very usual to find:
Aircraft speeds expressed in knots.
Altitudes expressed in feet.
- Flight Levels defined in hundreds of feet: FL = h(ft) / 100.
Climb rates expressed in fpm (feet/minute).
Pressures expressed in lb/ft2 or lb/inch2 (pounds per square foot or square inch).
Aircraft weight (instead of mass) expressed in pounds (lb):
- Denomination MTOW (Max Take-Off Weight) instead of MTOM.
- Denomination OEW (Operating Empty Weight) instead of OEM.
Thrust expressed in pounds (lb).
Power expressed in brake-horsepower (bhp).
Therefore in aircraft design it is necessary to manage data expressed in any of the existing
systems of units. A good practice is to calculate in SI, making previous conversions from
British units to the adequate SI units. For example, dealing with a thrust or a weight given
in pounds, it is convenient to transform it to Newtons, prior to any calculation.
So, the weight must be calculated in proper force units (N) by multiplying the mass by the
gravity constant, g = 9.80665 m/s2. Note that one point is the relation between N and kg
while other point is the relation between mass and weight of a body in a 1g gravitational
field:
1 N = 1 kg 1 m/s2
The weight exerted by 1 kg mass is 1 kg 9.80665 m/s2 = 9.80665 N
In British units, both mass and weight are usually expressed in pounds (lb). Sometimes,
these magnitudes are denoted as pound-mass (lbm) and pound-force (lbf) respectively.
For instance, the maximum take-off weight of a Boeing B787-9 is 557000 lb, which can be
understood either as a mass or as a weight.
Using the same unis for mass and force is not coherent. There are two variants of the
British system that try to solve this problem, either redefining the unit of mass (slug) or
redefining the unit of force (poundal, abbreviated pdl). The 3 existing subsystems are
summarized in the next table:
System British English Absolute
Gravitational Engineering English
(BG) (EE) (AE)
Mass unit slug lb (lbm) lb
Force unit lb lb (lbf) pdl
Relation 1 lb = 1 slug 1 ft/s2 Equal (lbm=lbf) 1 pdl = 1 lb 1 ft/s2
but not coherent
The gravity constant is g = 32.174 ft/s2 in British units. Thus, in a 1g gravitational field:
In BG subsystem: the weight exerted by a mass of 1 slug is 32.174 lb.
In AE subsystem: the weight exerted by a mass of 1 lb is 32.174 pdl.
In the aerospace industry (mainly in the USA) the common practice is to use lb indistinctly
for mass and weight. The slug is occasionally used as mass unit, but the poundal is rarely
used as a force unit.
1.1.3 Conversions
LENGTH
Multiply By To Obtain
Foot (ft) 0.3048 Metres
12 Inches
1.894 E-4 Miles
1.646 E-4 Nautical miles
Inch (in) 2.54 Centimetres
0.0254 Metres
1/12 Feet
Nautical mile (nm) 6076 Feet
1852 Metres
1.15078 Miles
Statute mile (mi) 5280 Feet
1609 Metres
0.86897 Nautical miles
VELOCITY
Multiply By To Obtain
Knot (kt or kn) 1.852 km / h
0.514444 m/s
1 Nautical miles / h
1.689 Feet per second
1.151 Miles per hour
Mile per hour (mph) 1.609 km / h
0.447 Metres per second
1.467 Feet per second
0.8684 Knots
MASS
Multiply By To Obtain
Slug 14.594 Kilograms
32.174 Pounds
Pound (lb) 0.4536 Kilograms
0.03108 Slugs
Kilogram (kg) 2.2046 Pounds
0.06852 Slugs
Short ton 2000 Pounds
907.185 Kilograms
Ton (Metric tonne) 2204.6 Pounds
1000 Kilograms
FORCE
Multiply By To Obtain
Pound (lb) 4.448 Newtons
32.174 Poundals
Poundal 0.1383 Newtons
0.03108 Pounds
PRESSURE
Multiply By To Obtain
Atmosphere (atm) 1.01325 Bars
1.01325 E5 N/m2 or Pa
14.696 lb/inch2 or psi
2116.2 lb/ft2 or psf
PRESSURE (contd)
Multiply By To Obtain
Bar 0.98692 atm
1 E5 N/m2 or Pa
14.504 lb/inch2 or psi
2088.5 lb/ft2 or psf
Newton per square 9.8692 E-6 atm
metre (pascal) 1 E-5 Bars
(N/m2 or Pa) 1.4504 E-4 lb/inch2 or psi
0.02089 lb/ft2 or psf
Pounds per square 0.068047 atm
inch (psi) 0.068948 Bars
6894.8 N/m2 or Pa
144 lb/ft2 or psf
Pounds per square 4.7255 E-4 atm
foot (psf) 4.7881 E-4 Bars
47.881 N/m2 or Pa
WORK / ENERGY
Multiply By To Obtain
British termal unit 2.530 E2 Calories
(BTU) 7.783 E2 Foot pounds
3.927 E-4 Horsepower hours
1.055 E3 Joules or Nm
2.930 E-4 Kilowatt hours
Foot pound (ft.lb) 1.285 E-3 BTU's
5.050 E-7 Horsepower hours
1.356 Joules or Nm
3.766 E-7 Kilowatt hours
Horsepower hour 2.545 E3 BTU's
(hp.h) 1.980 E6 Foot pounds
2.684 E6 Joules or Nm
7.457 E-1 Kilowatt hours
POWER
Multiply By To Obtain
British termal unit 3.969 E6 Calories per second
per minute 12.97 Foot-pounds / s
(BTU / min) 2.357 E-2 Horsepower
17.58 Watts
Foot pound 7.713 E-2 BTU / min
per second (ft.lb/s) 3.239 E-1 Calories per second
1.818 E-3 Horsepower
1.356 Watts
Horsepower (hp) 42.42 BTU / min
550 Foot-pounds / s
7.457 E2 Watts
g(h 11000)
tpp exp
RTtpp
0.22336 exp 1.57688 10 4 (h 11000) (1.8)
1.33001 (1.9)
tpp
Sound speed changes with temperature, being:
a RT , with =1.4 (ratio of specific heats cp/cv) (1.10)
a a0 340.29 m / s (1.11)
Although equations (1.4) to (1.9) have the altitude (h) expressed in m, it is more usual to
manage the altitude in ft. To do that, we only need to transform from ft to m and then use
the equations directly. In fact the equations (1.4) and (1.8) can be expressed as:
Troposphere: 1 6.87535 106 h ft (1.4b)
Stratosphere:
0.22336 exp 4.80634 105 (h ft 36089) (1.8b)
Next figure 1-2 and table provide ISA values up to 50000 ft of:
and T (K)
and p (N/m2)
and (kg/m3)
Sound speed, a (m/s)
Note that the tropopause was defined at a rounded number in SI (11000 m) and then it
looks like a rare number in ft (36089). It is essential to recognize 36089 ft, because it is
an altitude in the zone of typical jet cruises. In fact, keeping this number in mind is a good
way to recover the conversion from ft to m, since 11000 / 36089 = 0.3048.
Troposphere Stratosphere
0.6
/0
0.4
p/p0
0.2
0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Altitude (ft)
Figure 1-2
1
ISA-40
0.8
0.6
0.4
ISA+40
0.2
0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Altitude (ft)
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4 represents an altimeter, which is a pressure gauge calibrated in altitude instead
of pressure according to the way the pressure varies in the standard atmosphere. It is
adjustable to correct reference pressure for non-standard conditions, for instance near the
airport.
1.3 Airspeeds
1 1
0 VE2 V 2 (1.12)
2 2
VE V V (1.13)
0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000
Altitude (ft)
Figure 1-5
2p T p
V (1.15)
Figure 1-6
Schematic of an Airspeed Indicating System (from Brandt [1R2])
But the equation (1.15) is not valid for compressible flow, being necessary to replace it by
other more sophisticated relations between V and (pTp). On the other hand, the
position of the instrument in disturbed flow makes it not to capture exactly the total
pressure pT and the static pressure p.
The airspeed measured by the pitot-static tube or anemometer is called the indicated
airspeed (IAS), being a first approximation to the equivalent airspeed (EAS). To obtain the
true airspeed (TAS) it is needed to apply several corrections to the indicated airspeed:
1st correction (due to position error)
It transforms indicated into calibrated airspeed
IAS CAS
2nd correction (due to compressibility effects)
It transforms calibrated into equivalent airspeed
CAS EAS
3rd correction (due to density variation with altitude)
It transforms equivalent into true airspeed
EAS TAS
a function of airspeed and configuration. Adding the position error to the indicated airspeed
yields the calibrated airspeed:
VC VI VP (1.16)
p 2
( 1) /
p T p
V 1 1 (1.17)
1 p
But this equation is not easy to be installed into a mechanical device; and values of are
difficult to be measured accurately in flight. Due to these reasons, the correction is split in
2 steps (CASEAS and EASTAS).
For supersonic flow there is other more complex equation, which is obtained assuming
adiabatic flow with a normal shock located just forward of the total pressure pickup (it is
out of the scope of this course).
To avoid the complexity of (1.17), airspeed indicators are built with gears calibrated to use
sea-level standard values of pressure and density (p0 and 0), instead of actual pressure
and density ones (p and ). Thus the calibrated airspeed in subsonic flow is:
p 0 2
( 1) /
p T p
VC 1 1 (1.18)
0 1 p 0
In absence of position error this is the airspeed indicated by the anemometer.
In supersonic flow there is other expression (similar but more complex).
To obtain true airspeed (TAS) from calibrated airspeed (CAS) two corrections must be
made:
One for the actual existing pressure (2nd correction in the process).
Other for the actual existing density (3rd correction in the process). This correction is
inversely proportional to the square root of the density ratio and provides the TAS,
like in equation (1.13). It means that the result of the 2nd correction is necessarily
the equivalent airspeed (EAS).
p 2
( 1) /
p T p
VE 1 1 (1.19)
0 1 p
The ratio between EAS and CAS, that is, the result of dividing equation (1.19) by (1.18), is
generally called the compressibility correction factor (f) and constitutes the 2 nd correction.
In subsonic flow:
( 1) /
pT p
1 1
VE p p
f ( 1) /
(1.20)
VC p0 p p
T
1 1
p0
In supersonic flow there is other expression (more complex).
Note that f in equation (1.20) varies only with (pTp) and p. All other variables in the
equation (1.20) are constant. Then:
p is a function of altitude, in ISA pressure-altitude definition.
(pTp) can be obtained from equation (1.18) knowing CAS.
A table of factors (f) can be produced, as a function of altitude and CAS. It applies for any
aircraft; shaded cells indicate supersonic flow; given for interpolation:
h Calibrated Airspeed knots)
ft 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5000 0.9994 0.9991 0.9987 0.9983 0.9978 0.9972 0.9966 0.9959 0.9952 0.9944 0.9936
10000 0.9987 0.9980 0.9971 0.9961 0.9950 0.9938 0.9924 0.9909 0.9893 0.9876 0.9859
15000 0.9978 0.9966 0.9952 0.9935 0.9916 0.9895 0.9872 0.9848 0.9822 0.9794 0.9766
20000 0.9967 0.9949 0.9927 0.9902 0.9874 0.9842 0.9809 0.9773 0.9735 0.9695 0.9654
25000 0.9953 0.9927 0.9896 0.9860 0.9820 0.9777 0.9730 0.9681 0.9629 0.9575 0.9520
30000 0.9934 0.9898 0.9856 0.9807 0.9754 0.9695 0.9633 0.9568 0.9500 0.9430 0.9359
35000 0.9910 0.9862 0.9805 0.9741 0.9670 0.9594 0.9513 0.9429 0.9343 0.9256 0.9167
36089 0.9904 0.9852 0.9792 0.9724 0.9649 0.9568 0.9483 0.9395 0.9305 0.9213 0.9121
40000 0.9879 0.9815 0.9740 0.9657 0.9565 0.9468 0.9367 0.9263 0.9157 0.9051
45000 0.9840 0.9757 0.9661 0.9555 0.9441 0.9321 0.9197 0.9071 0.8947
50000 0.9793 0.9686 0.9565 0.9433 0.9293 0.9148 0.9001 0.8858
It is also possible to compute the compressibility correction factor (f) as a function of EAS
and altitude, since (pTp) can be obtained from equation (1.19) knowing EAS and p.
h Equivalent Airspeed (knots)
ft 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5000 0.9994 0.9991 0.9987 0.9983 0.9978 0.9972 0.9966 0.9959 0.9952 0.9944 0.9936
10000 0.9987 0.9980 0.9971 0.9961 0.9950 0.9937 0.9923 0.9908 0.9892 0.9875 0.9857
15000 0.9978 0.9966 0.9951 0.9935 0.9915 0.9894 0.9870 0.9845 0.9818 0.9790 0.9760
20000 0.9967 0.9948 0.9926 0.9901 0.9872 0.9839 0.9804 0.9766 0.9726 0.9684 0.9640
25000 0.9952 0.9926 0.9894 0.9857 0.9816 0.9770 0.9720 0.9667 0.9611 0.9551 0.9490
30000 0.9933 0.9897 0.9853 0.9802 0.9745 0.9682 0.9614 0.9542 0.9465 0.9386 0.9303
35000 0.9909 0.9859 0.9799 0.9731 0.9654 0.9570 0.9479 0.9383 0.9282 0.9178 0.9071
36089 0.9902 0.9848 0.9784 0.9709 0.9626 0.9534 0.9434 0.9328 0.9217 0.9101
40000 0.9877 0.9810 0.9730 0.9638 0.9536 0.9424 0.9305 0.9179 0.9047
45000 0.9837 0.9748 0.9644 0.9525 0.9394 0.9251 0.9100 0.8943
50000 0.9786 0.9671 0.9537 0.9384 0.9217 0.9038 0.8849
Next figure 1-7 shows the correction from CAS to EAS, as a function of CAS and altitude.
-10 30000 ft
40000 ft
-20
50000 ft
-30
100 150 200 250 300 350
CAS (knots)
Figure 1-7
Figure 1-8
Tailwind: Vg V VW (1.23)
Rest of wind orientations are intermediate cases in terms of Vg and they are
discussed in the next subsection.
Figure 1-9
Note that:
- Motion relative to the air mass (true airspeed V) is most important in terms of
aerodynamic and propulsive evaluation of the flight vehicle. That is, for generating
sufficient aerodynamic forces to sustain flight, which usually depends on Mach and
dynamic pressure.
- But motion relative to the Earth (Vg) allows an aircraft to fulfil its mission. Sometimes
the headwind or tailwind airspeed is significant for Vg.
Vw sin
Vg Vw sin
Vg to be cancelled
by yaw angle
Vw Vw cos
Vg + Vw cos
Figure 1-10
In first approach, we can retain only the wind component in the direction of the ground
speed Vg, that is (VW cos). It can be justified changing (1.24) to the form shown in (1.25)
and then, when (VW/V) is sufficiently small, discarding the non-dominant terms in a series
development, as indicated by equation (1.26):
2
Vg V V
1 w sin w cos (1.25)
V V V
Vw
If 1: Vg V Vw cos (1.26)
V
Vw V
Next figures 1-11(a) and (b) show, for two specific cases at 0.1 and w 0.2 , the
V V
small difference between the exact equation (1.25) and the approximation (1.26).
Vw / V = 0.1
Exact Approx
1.1
1.05
Vg / V
0.95
0.9
-180 -90 0 90 180
Wind orientation (deg)
Figure 1-11(a)
Vw / V = 0.2
Exact Approx
1.2
1.1
Vg / V
1
0.9
0.8
-180 -90 0 90 180
Wind orientation (deg)
Figure 1-11(b)
Altitude Altitude
Altitude limit
Altitude limit
Mach Mach
limit CLmax limit
CLmax limit
limit
CAS
limit EAS
limit
EAS Mach
Figure 1-12(a) Figure 1-12(b)
In the next subsections we will solve some problems of interest regarding the management
of the typical flight envelopes:
Intersection between lines of constant Mach and constant EAS.
Intersection between lines of constant Mach and constant CAS.
Transition from subsonic to supersonic regime.
VE
VT VE (1.28)
Equating (1.27) with (1.28) yields the pressure ratio :
2
V
E (1.29)
Ma0
Finally the altitude is obtained through ISA relations.
p 2 p
( 1) / 7p 1 p 1/ 3.5
VE2
1 1 0 1 1 (1.32)
0 1 p 0 p 0
From (1.29), (VE)2 depends on and M equation (1.33):
VE2 VT2 M2a02 M2a02 (1.33)
Equating (1.32) with (1.33), solving in and substituting p/p0 by (1.31), the final
result is as a function of VC and M equation (1.34):
3.5
p 2 0
VC 1 1
p0
7p 0 (1.34)
3. 5 3. 5
2 2 0 2 2 0
M a 0 1 1 M a 0 1 1
7p 0 7p 0
Notes:
At sea level this expression yields =1 as expected, since VC = Ma0 (at sea level it is
CAS=EAS=TAS).
This expression is only valid in subsonic flow.
MACH = 1
50000
45000
40000
EAS CAS
35000
Altitude (ft)
30000
TAS
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Airspeed (kts)
Figure 1-13
1.6 Bibliography
References for chapter 1:
1R1. D. P. Raymer.
Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach.
AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) Education Series.
1st edition 1989 5th edition 2012.
1R2. S. A. Brandt, R. J. Stiles, J. J. Bertin, R. Whitford.
Introduction to Aeronautics: A Design Perspective.
AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) Education Series.
1st edition 1997 2nd edition 2004.