Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defendants.
Pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the City of Miami
Beach, and Mayor Philip Levine, move this Court to enter a Protective Order prohibiting the
video depositions of Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami
Beach, and the City of Miami Beach also moves this Court for an order imposing sanctions,
including attorney's fees, against Plaintiff and his counsel with regard to the video depositions
scheduled in this cause for Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. and Wednesday, August
30, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. The grounds for this Motion are as follows:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The Florida Public Records Act, as specifically set forth in Section 119.11(1) of the
Whenever an action is filed to enforce the provisions of this chapter, the court
shall set an immediate hearing, giving the case priority over other pending cases.
The requirement for an immediate hearing surrounding these matters {public records
lawsuits), obviates any need or requirement to conduct discovery pursuant to the Florida Rules
of Civil Procedure. It should be without dispute that a determination by the Circuit Court in this
OFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 - TELIPHONE; 305.673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
matter would be deemed to be an issue of law... not an issue of fact. See News-Press Pub. Co.
The Plaintiff is seeking the video depositions of Mayor Levine and the City of Miami
embarrassment...which is textbook harassment through litigation. The Plaintiff set forth his
motive for seeking the video deposition of Mayor Levine through his Medium.com blog post,
The Mayor has so many social media posts that I need crowdsourced
help to ask about all the instances where he discusses public business on
social media that I created this form.
Anyone can find one of Mayor Levine's social media posts and submit it
along with a question about that post.
Any question.
Any and all questions relevant to Mayor Levine's social media accounts
are fair game and while we won't ask every question that's submitted, we
promise that we will review each and every question submitted for use at
next months' sworn, video recorded deposition of the Mayor.
And to further support the clear purpose of annoyance and embarrassment surrounding
these video depositions, Plaintiff's Counsel issued the Notice of Taking Video Deposition of the
City's Corporate Representative on August 9, 2017. The Notice of Taking Video Deposition for
the Corporate Representative clearly illustrates that this litigation is being utilized for the
purpose of annoying and embarrassing the City. Specifically, the Notice of Taking Video
Deposition delineates the obvious annoyance and embarrassment of the City, based upon
2
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. ftORIDA 33139 - TELfPHONE: 305,673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
The following ordinances: Miami Beach, Florida Code of Ordinances Sec. 1.01,
2.01, 2.06, 2.05, Miami Beach, Florida Code of Ordinances Sec. 82-503.
City of Miami Beach Resolutions 2016-29575 and 2016-2957.
All consideration paid by City of Miami Beach to any social media entity including
but not limited to Facebook, twitter, Linkedin, Instagram.
All ads purchased by the City of Miami Beach which has been posted on any
social media entity's website, including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter,
Linkedin, and Instagram.
These areas of examination, coupled with the Plaintiffs blog post, clearly show the intent
of the video depositions in this litigation is to annoy Mayor Levine and the City. And while the
Plaintiff was not required by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to specify with reasonable
particularity the matters on which examination is requested, it is clear the Plaintiff seeks to ask
The City strongly urges this Court to enter a Protective Order, precluding: (a) Mayor
Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami Beach's Video Depositions
in their entirety or, in the alternative, (b) postponing the video depositions until this Court has
determined whether deposition testimony of Mayor Levine and the Corporate Representative of
The pleadings clearly identify that this is a straight forward Public Records action, which
merely requires this Court to determine the applicability of those provisions set forth within
Regrettably, it is evident that the Plaintiff is injecting issues into this case, which are
entirely irrelevant to the legal determination that is necessary by this Court. The Plaintiffs
pursuit of the video depositions of Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. RORIDA 33139 - TELf PHONE: 305.673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
City of Miami Beach is further evidence of such improper conduct of injecting issues that have
The Florida Public Records Act is unambiguous and, as a result, does not require any
testimony, as a condition precedent, to this Court's construing of those requirements under the
Public Records law and making a legal determination as to whether the requested records are
public records.
Again, this action calls upon the Court to merely determine compliance with Chapter
119, and the testimony of Mayor Levine or the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami
Beach cannot alter the meaning of that unambiguous provision of Florida Law. It should be
without dispute that the deposition seeks discovery which is irrelevant to this case, and is not
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence... since this is an issue of
On August 9, 2017, the Plaintiff served a Notice of Taking Video Deposition of Mayor
Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami Beach, which serves no
other purpose but to annoy, embarrass, oppress, and unduly burden the City and the Mayor
regarding this matter. The Plaintiff insists on proceeding with the video depositions of Mayor
Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami Beach, knowing that this is being
done to harass the City and the Mayor which results in annoyance and embarrassment.
The Rules of Civil Procedure are designed "to secure the just, speedy, and
determination of every action." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.010 (emphasis added). Florida courts
frequently stay Notices for Depositions pending a potentially dispositive motion. See Feigin v.
Hospital Staffing Servs.. Inc.. 569 So. 2d 941, 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (affirming trial court order
staying depositions pending the motion to dismiss); see also Patterson v. U.S. Postal Serv.. 901
F. 2d 927, 929 (11th Cir. 1990) (affirming district court order in staying the Notices for deposition
pending outcome of defendant's motion to dismiss); Vargas v. Peitz, 901 F. Supp. 1572, 1573 n.
4
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 - TEIiPHONE: 305.673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
1 (S.D. Fla. 1995) (district court stayed all the Notices for deposition pending resolution of
motion to dismiss); McKenzie v. Doctors' Hosp. of Hollywood, Inc.. 765 F. Supp. 1504, 1505
(S.D. Fla. 1991){same), aff'd. 974 F. 2d 1347 (11th Cir. 1992). Moreover, because the video
depositions of Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami Beach
are not needed in order for the Court to rule on the pending matter, Plaintiff would not be
prejudiced. Again, the Circuit Court's determination is an issue of law... not an issue of fact.
It is well settled that the depositions of Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate
Representative of the City of Miami Beach should be quashed where it is annoying, unduly
burdensome, and oppressive. Rule 1.280(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. See also Brandsmart and FCCI v.
Schaffer. 855 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Jerry's South. Inc. v. Morran. 582 So. 2d 803
(Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Greyhound Lines. Inc. v. Jackson. 445 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984);
Slatnick v. Leadership Housing Systems of Florida, Inc.. 368 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979);
Harry A. v. Duncan, 223 F.R.D. 536 (D. Mont. 2004). Mayor Levine and the Corporate
Representative of the City of Miami Beach do not have any testimony to give which is necessary
or relevant to the Court's legal determination as to whether the records sought are public
records. Because these video depositions are annoying, unduly burdensome, and oppressive,
a protective order must be entered to avoid a departure from the essential requirements of law.
Rule 1.280(c) Fla. R. Civ. P.; see also Brandsmart. supra: Jerry's South, supra; Greyhound
Further, City official deponents are protected from deposition by a privilege. Even if the
Plaintiff raises cognizable factual claims, instead of legal issues, the Notices of Taking Video
Deposition should be quashed because Mayor Levine and the Corporate Representative of the
City of Miami Beach enjoy a privilege from being compelled by the Notices of Taking Video
Deposition relating to the performance of their official duties which the plaintiff may not
overcome.
5
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 - TElfPHONE: 305.673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
The law is clear that administrative agency heads, as well as high ranking agency
officials, should not be deposed unless the party taking the deposition has shown that the
testimony is "necessary, relevant, and unavailable from other sources." Home v. School Board
of Miami-Dade County. 901 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (failure to quash subpoenas for
depositions of administrative agency heads and former heads, as well as other high-ranking
agency officials, must be reversed as departure from essential requirements of law where party
seeking deposition has not shown testimony is "necessary, relevant, and unavailable from other
sources"). In this case, the deponents are agency heads and high-rank agency officials.
Legislative and quasi-judicial officers are protected from depositions regarding their
legislative and quasi judicial functions, See Dept of Highway Safety v. Marks. 898 So. 2d 1063
(Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (order denying motion to quash deposition on administrative hearing officer
only in quasi-judicial capacity reversed as departure from essential requirements of law because
Village of North Hills. 575 F. Supp. 1295 (E.D. NY 1981) (Village Mayor and board members
immune from the Subpoena and other depositions that would delve into their thought process,
motivations and deliberations relating to zoning decisions). Accordingly, the video depositions
of the Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami Beach must
Florida Courts have recognized that where misconduct rises to the level of bad faith
contributing to unnecessary legal expenses, costs, and delay, and the trial court makes specific
findings to support the sanctions, courts have inherent authority to access attorney's fees for the
misconduct of an attorney in the course of litigation. Moakley v. Smallwood. 826 So. 2d 221
(Fla. 2002); Sumlar v. Sumlar, 827 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Sanctions can also be
imposed for bad faith conduct against a party, id In this case, the conduct of the Plaintiff and
his counsel have resulted in the unnecessary incurrence of legal expenses and costs relative to
6
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 - TELEPHONE: 305.673.7470
CASE NO. 16-26031 CA 02
the instant Motion. Therefore, an award of attorney's fees to the City of Miami Beach is
As set forth above, these video depositions are improper and unnecessary, and the
actions of the Plaintiff and his counsel warrant the imposition of sanctions and an award of
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, this Court should enter a protective order that prohibits the
video depositions of Mayor Philip Levine and the Corporate Representative of the City of Miami
Beach, and enter an Order that sanctions be imposed upon Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel for
forcing the City to expend its legal resources and costs relative to this Motion.
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT a true and correct copy of the foregoing was remitted via E-
Service on this 28th day of August, 2017 to: Faudlin Pierre, Esquire, 18900 N.E. 1st Court,
Miami, Florida 33179, at fplawQ8@yahoo.com and fparaleqal@qmail.com.
7
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY -1700 CONVENTION CENTER DRIVE - MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 33139 - TEH PHONE: 305.673.7470
MEDIUM.COM
Grant Stern
Miami based columnist and radio broadcaster, and
professional mortgage broker.
Aug9 (2017)
The Mayor has so many social media posts that I need crowdsourced
help to ask about all the instances where he discusses public business
on social media that I created this form.
Anyone can find one of Mayor Levine's social media posts and submit it
along with a question about that post.
Any question.
Because I don't have unfettered access to his social media accounts anymore, I need your help.
1 can ask Mayor Levine a question about any tweet or FB post on his official accounts, under oath.
Please submit sample questions about the City of Miami Beach's official business for us to ask at Mayor Levine's
deposition, along with a link to the social media post where he referenced that subject.
* Required __^_^__^^________^__^_______^___________^__^_____
What is your question for Mayor Philip Levine?
Your answer
a
What is the link to a Mayor Levine social media post?
Your answer
Are you also blocked by Mayor Levine on FB or Twitter?
Yes
No
Your answer
Your Email (optional)
Your answer
Comments?
Your answer
a
SUBMIT
Page 1 of 1
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terrrig of Service - Additional Terms
F- rt rs~yi
E Ui 11 oib
Click here to submit a question for Mayor Levine to answer about the official business he's
posting on social media. Example: Mayor tweets about a train to nowhere on Miami Beach.
You can ask any question like: Why did he posted about that topic? Is the topic of the post
informing the public? Was that post about official business? What was the Mayor's role in
that business? Did he hear an item about that post at the Commission, discuss with City
Manager or employees or staff? etc.
That's because today at Miami-Dade's Courthouse, we had a hearing
which cleared up all preliminary matters related to getting the media
hungry Miami Beach Mayor to give sworn testimony.
https://soundcloud.com/grantstem/miami-beach--attomeys-tose-fight~to-
keep-mayor-ievine-from-being-deposed
Florida Senate Candidate Slams Miami Beach for Fouling Biscayne Bay, Sunshine
Law Failures
"Nobody should be charged $73,000 to find out how government works." Michael Gongora
should know. He's a former Miami Beach city commissioner...
hLiffingtonpost.com
12 12 Retweets
And with exclusive reporting with the FIU scientist who discovered that the
Beach's "progressive" Mayor was dumping sewage into Biscayne Bay.
After that Mayor Levine refused to comply with Florida's public records
laws.
So I sued.
The case has taken on national importance, and major media outlets want to
know who's on Mayor Levine's block list.
Mayor Levine's block lists represent a list of enemies, and he's officially
discriminating against them in his public discussion forums, while
promoting accounts that are friendly to him in a quest to maintain the
appearance of correctness.
The law is funny, and the City's lawyers decided to play games.
If Mayor Levine's lawyers try to stall again, our motion to compel the
deposition will be instantly resurrected, quickly heard as the magistrate
indicated and we'll have the Mayor sitting for our questions shortly
thereafter.
Any and all questions relevant to Mayor Levine's social media accounts
are fair game and while we won't ask every question that's submitted,
we promise that we will review each and every question submitted for use at
next month's sworn, video recorded deposition of the Mayor.
Because I don't have unfettered access to his social media accounts anymore, 1 need your help.
I can ask Mayor Levine a question about any tweet or FB post on his official accounts, under oath.
Please submit sample questions about the City of Miami Beach's official business for us to ask at Mayor
Levine's deposition, along with a link to the social media post where he referenced that subject.
* Required
What is your question for Mayor Philip Levine? *
Your answer
i
What is the link to a Mayor Levine social media post?
Your answer
Are you also blocked by Mayor Levine on FB or Twitter?
Yes
No
Your answer
Your Email (optional)
Your answer
Comments?
Your answer
a
SUBMIT
Page 1 of 1
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms ^Service - Additional Terms
Grant Stern
Christine King
Aug 10