Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Mining Process, when considered in its full context, The traditional focus of blasting has been the
consists of many separate stages or sub-processes such minimization of costs immediately related to the process,
as drilling, blasting, loading, hauling, crushing, grinding, including drilling and explosives/accessories. Summarized,
flotation, etc. These sub-processes make up the Production this means:
Chain, and each one of the stages of a chain is needed for Produce a workable muckpile.
the creation of the final product. Each one of these stages Control environmental impacts.
must contribute VALUE to the business. Optimization Minimize blasting cost.
has to consider the value and profitability of the total Avoid collateral damage.
business, and not a focus on each operating unit in an
individualized way. This realization leads us to the Value Under this style of blast management, the bottom line
Chain, and requires a greater knowledge of how the various is/was to minimize the budget without causing operational
sub-processes react to various changes in the nature of the disruptions such as boulders for the shovels, fly-rock, toxic
material being processed. It also requires that we define gases and excessive over-break. This style of
and quantify Value, consistent with the strategic objectives management was perhaps appropriate before we had
of the business and in terms of dollars, at every stage in the available the on-line monitoring systems (e.g. Dispatch)
Production Chain. Each stage of the process must be which now allow us to measure and track in real time the
optimized not for itself, but rather to maximize its instantaneous performance of almost every piece of
contribution of value to the Global Process. machinery in the mine.
Generally in the mining industry, the objective of Often the Drill and Blast responsibilities in a mine are
Operational Management is oriented towards the assigned to engineers recently graduated from
maximization of value, coinciding with maximization of university, and from this convenient position they can
production capacity, based on the optimization of the learn how the mine operates. It has been considered
resources available. It is in the moment of defining the Mine unnecessary to know why or how the rock is broken, or
Plan when it is possible to revise and integrate the external how to achieve a product which has been specifically
parameters with the direct production process. From this tailored to suit the next step in the Process Chain. That
point of view, all that we produce in the various stages of the is, it often appears unimportant that the young blasting
Production Chain are the intermediate products, whose engineer cater to the needs of his down-stream
optimum characteristics and properties must be defined in a customers. The sole interest is to minimize the cost of
clear and quantitative form. To achieve this, the Key the Unit Operation. Likewise, it hasnt been considered
Performance Indicators (KPIs) must be defined. These must that the blast is a client of the drilling, and that the
allow measurement of the grade of success achieved in the quality of the blasting is frequently controlled more by
defined objectives for each stage, identifying the deviations the quality of drilling than by the quality of the
and learning from the errors and defects to achieve explosives. How many mines in our countries (Latin
consistency in the final product. The application of rigorous America) have a quantitative quality control program
methods and up-to-date technologies is an absolute for drilling? How many mines yield, in an appropriate
necessity for the success of these objectives, in particular for form, the geo-technical information of the rock, for
the transfer and the analysis of the information. further knowledge of the rock to be fragmented?
Rather than striving to achieve the cheapest tonne Fragmentation and breakage are the obvious, and designed
broken, one can focus on the tonne that is the most outcomes of blasting. But breakage is not restricted to the zone
economical, or the fastest tonne (i.e. the tonne of material of rock in front of a blasthole. The same process which causes
that is most quickly loaded, most quickly hauled, most fragmentation also causes damage behind the last row of
quickly crushed and most quickly passes through the blastholes, and this can impact on the stability of pit walls, and
grinding circuit), Figure 3. This will be the tonne that the safety of personnel and equipment working in the pit. Even
complies with all the requirements of the Global Process, single bench rock falls and failures can cause equipment
since it will produce higher productivity for the same capital damage, or injury and death to workers.
expenditure. The qualities of this tonne of broken rock will Using practical engineering tools and models, it is
be different for waste and for mineral, and as we are possible to quantify the negative impact of the blast, and in
seeing, for different types of mineral as well. A process doing so quantify the success of the blast in terms of
model combining blasting, loading, hauling and crushing geotechnical stability and safety. Today there exists a wide
operations (Figure 3) highlights two important issues. range of instruments that permit the accurate assessment
Firstly, the average powder factor required to maximize of changes in rock quality and slope stability, thereby
Value is significantly higher than that required to minimize allowing confirmation of, or adjustment to, the slope design
costs. Secondly, the slope of both curves is steeper before criteria or Risk Assessment programs.
the turning points than after, highlighting that the penalties
associated with under-blasting are greater than those
associated with over-blasting. But how many mine
operators and mine managers prefer to err on the side of
over-blasting than on the side of under-blasting?
After only a preliminary analysis, it is clear that delivering
the optimum feed to the grinding mills requires close liaison
and communication between blasting engineers and
primary crusher operators. Figure 4 shows the effect of the
primary crusher on changing the size distribution of blasted
material presented to the SAG mill for a soft ore, and a hard
ore. Significant size reduction (and value adding) occurs
with hard ore, but little size reduction (and value adding)
occurs in the crusher when processing soft ore. Blasting
may be the only opportunity to effectively pre-condition soft
ores, whereas the crusher can complement the blasting for
hard ores. It becomes immediately apparent that blasting
and crushing need to be coordinated, and it may be
difficult for a crusher to simultaneously process two Figure 5: Excellent quality smooth walls in Chilean copper
completely different ore types. mine, in heavily structured material.
The Blast, as the first stage of the rock comminution Eloranta, J., 2001. Improve Milling Through Better
process, has the mission of pre-conditioning, or Powder Distribution, Proc 27th Annual Conf. ISEE,
preparing, the rock for its subsequent processing, in Orlando, USA Jan 28-31, pp 55-63.
order to obtain a commercial product in the most Fribla, M., Orlandi, C., 2000. Effects on Economics in the
economic way possible. process of optimization of the specific load of explosive
It is necessary to know (=quantify) the impact of blasting and its relation with the micro-fractures generated
on the processes of loading, hauling, crushing, and through Blasting, 2nd Jornadas de Tronadura ASIEX
grinding, as well as in the movement of waste material 2000.
(productivity of extraction equipment and transport). Fribla, M., Navea, D., Orlandi, C., 2001. Micro-fracturing
Today, we know too, that we can impact on aspects such Produced by the Explosive and the Increase of the
as the efficiency of leaching, using appropriate Dissolution of Metal in an Oxidized Copper Ore, 3rd
explosives and systems of high precision initiation Jornadas de Tronadura ASIEX 2001.
It is necessary to define the relevant Key Performance Katsabanis, P.D, Gregersen, S., Pelley, C, and Kelebec,
Indicators of the mining process: fragmentation (size S., 2003. Small Scale Study of Damage Due to Blasting
distribution), pre-conditioning (reduction of the Work and Implications on Crushing and Grinding, Proc 29th
Index), swell of the muckpile, damage to the walls, Annual Conf. ISEE, Nashville, USA, Feb 02-05, pp 355-
dilution, energy consumption, and impact on the 364.
environment and personnel, e.g. dust) McKenzie, C.K., 2005. Blasting A Focus on Value,
A system of measurement should be implanted to ASIEX Conference 2005, Via del Mar, Chile, May 25-27.
continually assess these parameters: that which cannot McKenzie, C. and Holley, K., 2004. A study of damage
be measured, can not be controlled. profiles behind blasts, 30th Annual Conf. ISEE, New
It must be linked with the Mining Plan and correctly Orleans, USA, Feb 01-04, pp 203-214.
implanted for the value creation of the business Nielsen, K., and Kristiansen, J., 1996. Blasting-Crushing-
throughout the Production Chain. Grinding Optimisation of an Integrated Comminution
A missing link in the Value Chain is our ability to quantify System, Proc Fragblast 5, Montreal, Canada, pp 269-277.
the VALUE of improved pit wall stability, and reduced Orlandi, C.P., 2001. Precise Initiation, Blasting for Open Cut
probability of failure, in dollar terms. Until we can do that, Mining Conference, ASIEX, Iquique, November 28-29.
we can not make properly informed decisions regarding Paley, N. & Kojovic, T., 2001. Adjusting Blasting to Increase
wall control blasting. Further development in Quantitative SAG Mill Throughput at the Red Dog Mine, Proc 27th
Risk Assessment would appear to be a high priority. Annual Conf. ISEE, Orlando, USA, Jan 28-31, pp 65-81.