You are on page 1of 1

CASTILLO VS ESCUTIN Summit Realty, and even threatened her that the owners of

Summit Realty, the Leviste family, was too powerful and


FACTS: influential for petitioner to tangle with.
Petitioner is a judgment creditor of a certain Raquel K.
Moratilla (Raquel), married to Roel Buenaventura. In the ISSUE:
course of her search for properties to satisfy the judgment in WHETHER THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS PATENTLY
her favor, petitioner discovered that Raquel, her mother ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE CANCELLATION OF THE TAX
Urbana Kalaw (Urbana), and sister Perla K. Moratilla (Perla), DECLARATION 00942 OF PETITIONER IN VIOLATION OF
co-owned Lot 13713, a parcel of land consisting of 15,000 SECTION 109 OF PRESIDENTIAL DECREE 1529, OTHERWISE
square meters, situated at Brgy. Bugtongnapulo, Lipa City, KNOWN AS THE PROPERTY REGISTRATION ACT
Batangas, and covered by Tax Declaration No. 00449.
RULING:
Petitioner set about verifying the ownership of Lot 13713. From the very beginning, petitioner was unable to identify
She was able to secure an Order dated 4 March 1999 issued correctly the positions held by respondents Mistas and
by Secretary Horacio R. Morales, Jr. of the Department of Linatoc at the Office of the City Assessor. How then could she
Agrarian Reform (DAR) approving the application of Summit even assert that a particular action was within or without
Point Golf & Country Club, Inc. for conversion of several their jurisdiction to perform? While it may be true that
agricultural landholdings, including Lot 13713 owned by Perla petitioner should have at least been notified that her Tax
K. Mortilla, et al. and covered by Tax Declaration No. 00449, Declaration No. 00942-A was being cancelled, she was not
to residential, commercial, and recreational uses. She was able to establish that such would be the responsibility of
also able to get from the Office of the City Assessor, Lipa respondents Mistas or Linatoc. Moreover, petitioner did not
City, a Certification[if stating that Lot 13713, covered by Tax present statutory, regulatory, or procedural basis for her
Declaration No. 00554-A, was in the name of co-owners insistence that respondents should have done or not done a
Raquel, Urbana, and Perla; and a certified true copy of Tax particular act. A perfect example was her assertion that
Declaration No. 00554-A itself. Lastly, the Register of Deeds respondents Mistas and Linatoc should have annotated her
of Lipa City issued a Certificationattesting that Lot 13713 in interest on Tax Declaration No. 00949-A in the name of
the name of co-owners Raquel, Urbana, and Perla, was not Catigbac. However, she failed to cite any law or rule which
covered by a certificate of title, whether judicial or patent, or authorizes or recognizes the annotation of an adverse
subject to the issuance of a Certificate of Land Ownership interest on a tax declaration. Finally, absent any reliable
Award or patent under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform evidence, petitioners charge that respondents conspired with
Program. one another and with corporate officers of Summit Realty is
nothing more than speculation, surmise, or conjecture. Just
Only thereafter did petitioner proceed to levy on execution because the acts of respondents were consistently favorable
Lot 13713, and the public auction sale of the same was to Summit Realty does not mean that there was a concerted
scheduled on 14 May 2002. Sometime in May 2002, before effort to cause petitioner prejudice. Respondents actions
the scheduled public auction sale, petitioner learned that Lot were only consistent with the recognition of the title of
13713 was inside the Summit Point Golf and Country Club Catigbac over Lot 1-B, transferred by sale to Summit Realty,
Subdivision owned by Summit Point Realty and Development registered under the Torrens system, and accordingly
Corporation (Summit Realty). She immediately went to the evidenced by certificates of title.
Makati City office of Summit Realty to meet with its Vice
President, Orense. However, she claimed that Orense did not
show her any document to prove ownership of Lot 13713 by

You might also like