Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Devang Patel
Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road, Kama Koti Marg, Sector 6, R.K. Puram
New Delhi - 110 011 New Delhi - 110 022
Tel : Secretary General: +91 (11) 2338 4543 Tel : Secretary General : +91 (11) 2618 5303
Sectt. : (11) 2338 7140, 2338 6274 Sectt. : (11) 2618 5273, 2617 1548, 2671 6778,
Fax : +91 (11) 2338 1649 2618 5315, 2618 5319, Fax : +91 (11) 2618 3669
No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Secretary General, IRC.
Edited and Published by Shri S.S. Nahar on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress (IRC), New Delhi. The responsibility of the contents
and the opinions expressed in Indian Highways is exclusively of the author/s concerned. IRC and the Editor disclaim responsibility and
liability for any statement or opinion, originality of contents and of any copyright violations by the authors. The opinions expressed in
the papers and contents published in the Indian Highways do not necessarily represent the views of the Editor or IRC.
From the Editors Desk
S.S. Nahar
Dear Readers,
Govt. of India with the objective of saving two lakh lives in the first five years and to increase national GDP by 4% by improving
safety and efficiency of road transport has introduced the Road Transport and Safety Bill, 2014 in the Parliament in amendment to The
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. Following are some key initiatives proposed (gist only) in the Bill:
Provision(s)
*The Motor Vehicle Act,
Offence
S. No. Regulation(s) 1988 (existing) Penalty
(Violation)
**The Road Transport and
Safety Bill, 2014(proposed)
Safer Road User
By Notification and traffic Excessive speed
Fine upto Rs 1,000/-
signs (Sec.* 112) (Sec.* 183)
LMV: Fine Rs5,000/- to Rs12,500/- (on 1st offence - varying
ranges);
Nominations (in three hard copies alongwith a soft copy on secygen.irc@gov.in) are invited in the
prescribed proforma (Annex-1) for the IRC Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Award for the year
2012. The last date for receipt of nominations is 30.09.2015.
1. PREAMBLE
The award has been instituted by the IRC during Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Year to
encourage young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2013) and upcoming outstanding professionals
engaged in the field of Road Transportation/Highway/Bridge Engineering and related applied/
fundamental fields thereof (herein after, the said field).
2. NATURE OF AWARD
The Award will be in the form of Medal/Citation certificate and will be made for significant and
outstanding contribution in the said field.
(i) Any young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2013) Engineer/Scientist or any citizen of India
engaged in the said field and a Life Member/Ordinary Member/Student Member/Individual
Associate Member/Associate Member of IRC, who has made conspicuously significant
and outstanding contribution in the said field in India during the preceding 5 years of the
nomination for the award i.e. between 31.5.2008 and 31.5.2013.
(ii) The basis of selection criteria will comprise the significant contribution by way of new innovative
approach or methodology for utilization of indigenously developed new technology/techniques
in resolving statutory issues like environmental related/non-renewable reserve of construction
material(s) and or present day knowledge of physical phenomenon or behaviour of relevance
to the professional approach and or addition, modification or improvement to extant design
made in either of the fields (a) Investigation Methods (b) R&D Management (c) Standardization
(d) Software Development (e) Planning (f) Maintenance (g) Repairs & Rehabilitation
(h) Environment (i) Highway Safety (j) Construction & Management (k) Protective Works
and (l) Traffic Engineering.
4. NOMINATIONS
Nominations shall be proposed duly filled in the prescribed proforma by either of the IRC Council
Member during the year 2015.
ANNEX - 1
PROFORMA FOR PT. NEHRU AWARD
(NOMINATION FOR THE YEAR 2012)
Nominations (in three hard copies alongwith a soft copy on secygen.irc@gov.in) are invited in the
prescribed proforma (Annex-1) for the IRC Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Award for the year
2013. The last date for receipt of nominations is 30.09.2015.
1. PREAMBLE
The award has been instituted by the IRC during Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Year to
encourage young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2014) and upcoming outstanding professionals
engaged in the field of Road Transportation/Highway/Bridge Engineering and related applied/
fundamental fields thereof (herein after, the said field).
2. NATURE OF AWARD
The Award will be in the form of Medal/Citation certificate and will be made for significant and
outstanding contribution in the said field.
(i) Any young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2014) Engineer/Scientist or any citizen of India
engaged in the said field and a Life Member/Ordinary Member/Student Member/Individual
Associate Member/Associate Member of IRC, who has made conspicuously significant
and outstanding contribution in the said field in India during the preceding 5 years of the
nomination for the award i.e. between 31.5.2009 and 31.5.2014.
(ii) The basis of selection criteria will comprise the significant contribution by way of new innovative
approach or methodology for utilization of indigenously developed new technology/techniques
in resolving statutory issues like environmental related/non-renewable reserve of construction
material(s) and or present day knowledge of physical phenomenon or behaviour of relevance
to the professional approach and or addition, modification or improvement to extant design
made in either of the fields (a) Investigation Methods (b) R&D Management (c) Standardization
(d) Software Development (e) Planning (f) Maintenance (g) Repairs & Rehabilitation
(h) Environment (i) Highway Safety (j) Construction & Management (k) Protective Works
and (l) Traffic Engineering.
4. NOMINATIONS
Nominations shall be proposed duly filled in the prescribed proforma by either of the IRC Council
Member during the year 2015.
ANNEX - 1
PROFORMA FOR PT. NEHRU AWARD
(NOMINATION FOR THE YEAR 2013)
1. Name of the Nominee:
2. Roll. No. as member of IRC and the year since she/he is member of IRC:
3. Discipline under which to be considered:
4. Date of Birth (Attach authenticated Proof):
5. Academic qualifications beginning with Bachelors Degree:
6. Upto date Employment details including positions:
7. (a) Outstanding achievements of the nominee (in about 500 words) during the last 5 years
(i.e. between 31.5.2009 and 31.5.2014) (Attach separate sheet)
(b) Benefit derived/anticipated or measurable impact of the outstanding work/contribution/
achievement.
(c) Assessment by the sponsor about the importance of the contribution (not more than 100
words)
(i) Whether these achievements/contributions have already been recognized for awards by
any other Body. If so, the name of the Body, the name of award and the year of award
may be given.
(ii) Other awards/honours already received including fellowships of professional bodies.
8. Papers published, if any (reprints to be enclosed)/any work worthy to be mentioned in support of
claimed contribution(s).
9. Names & address of three renowned Indian experts in the areas of contribution:
(a)
(b)
(c)
10. Remarks (critical) of sponsoring Council Member in justification of her/his contribution of the
nominee (in about 100 words)
Nominations (in three hard copies alongwith a soft copy on secygen.irc@gov.in) are invited in the
prescribed proforma (Annex-1) for the IRC Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Award for the year
2014. The last date for receipt of nominations is 30.09.2015.
1. PREAMBLE
The award has been instituted by the IRC during Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Birth Centenary Year to
encourage young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2015) and upcoming outstanding professionals
engaged in the field of Road Transportation/Highway/Bridge Engineering and related applied/
fundamental fields thereof (herein after, the said field).
2. NATURE OF AWARD
The Award will be in the form of Medal/Citation certificate and will be made for significant and
outstanding contribution in the said field.
(i) Any young (age less than 45 years as on 31.05.2015) Engineer/Scientist or any citizen of India
engaged in the said field and a Life Member/Ordinary Member/Student Member/Individual
Associate Member/Associate Member of IRC, who has made conspicuously significant
and outstanding contribution in the said field in India during the preceding 5 years of the
nomination for the award i.e. between 31.5.2010 and 31.5.2015.
(ii) The basis of selection criteria will comprise the significant contribution by way of new innovative
approach or methodology for utilization of indigenously developed new technology/techniques
in resolving statutory issues like environmental related/non-renewable reserve of construction
material(s) and or present day knowledge of physical phenomenon or behaviour of relevance
to the professional approach and or addition, modification or improvement to extant design
made in either of the fields (a) Investigation Methods (b) R&D Management (c) Standardization
(d) Software Development (e) Planning (f) Maintenance (g) Repairs & Rehabilitation
(h) Environment (i) Highway Safety (j) Construction & Management (k) Protective Works
and (l) Traffic Engineering.
4. NOMINATIONS
Nominations shall be proposed duly filled in the prescribed proforma by either of the IRC Council
Member during the year 2015.
ANNEX - 1
PROFORMA FOR PT. NEHRU AWARD
(NOMINATION FOR THE YEAR 2014)
1. Name of the Nominee:
2. Roll. No. as member of IRC and the year since she/he is member of IRC:
3. Discipline under which to be considered:
4. Date of Birth (Attach authenticated Proof):
5. Academic qualifications beginning with Bachelors Degree:
6. Upto date Employment details including positions:
7. (a) Outstanding achievements of the nominee (in about 500 words) during the last 5 years
(i.e. between 31.5.2010 and 31.5.2015) (Attach separate sheet)
(b) Benefit derived/anticipated or measurable impact of the outstanding work/contribution/
achievement.
(c) Assessment by the sponsor about the importance of the contribution (not more than 100
words)
(i) Whether these achievements/contributions have already been recognized for awards by
any other Body. If so, the name of the Body, the name of award and the year of award
may be given.
(ii) Other awards/honours already received including fellowships of professional bodies.
8. Papers published, if any (reprints to be enclosed)/any work worthy to be mentioned in support of
claimed contribution(s).
9. Names & address of three renowned Indian experts in the areas of contribution:
(a)
(b)
(c)
10. Remarks (critical) of sponsoring Council Member in justification of her/his contribution of the
nominee (in about 100 words)
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an international review of urban transportation policies and identifies the gap in the supply system planning.
Demand management, supply system enhancement and system integration are the three core strategies to tackle urban mobility
problems and address functionality issues. An approach to supply system development has been developed from the concept of
demand deconcentration/decentralization.
1 INTRODUCTION scientific approach in the design and of areas for housing, jobs and services.
The problems which arise in planning of road network to improve The policy intention for the National
attempting to meet a given demand the operational performance and Traffic and Transportation Plan
with sustainable transport facility promote functional and hierarchal published in 2000 [NTTP 20001,
indicate that transport policy and connectivity. Ministry of Transport, Public Works
planning are the two principal issues Policy decisions and strategies to and Water Management (TPWWM)]
which need to be addressed. In order solve the urban transport problems are holds similar views on the relationship
to tackle ongoing transport problems not adaptable to the economy and the between urban planning/urban form
- both at the urban and inter - urban existing system. These decisions are and travel and transportation. The
level - such as delay in travel, lack crucial for an economy as they change focus is no longer on the reduction of
of coordinated capacity, demand the urban structure. Since transportation mobility, but on mobility management;
policies seek to encourage the fullest in other words, on finding ways to
concentration, congestion, pollution,
use of existing infrastructure before accommodate the need for travel and
road accidents etc, a great deal of
committing substantial additional transportation while reducing their
attention has recently been paid to
capital investments, an approach to negative impacts, such as pollution
new issues emerging in transport
design the supply system with optimal and risk. Basically, these policies
system analysis. As a consequence,
utilization is attempted. can be divided into two categories:
innovative models/methodologies policies that aim at controlling the
have been geared to create new tools 2 INTERNATIONAL Policy location of activities and policies that
and technologies to cope with these Background aim at improving connections between
spatio - temporal transport changes in An overview of the current activities by different transport modes
transportation system analysis (from International urban transport issues (multi modal transport systems).
both the demand and supply side). and policies are presented below. The
2.2 Singapore Transport Policy
The causes for these problems review offers a critical assessment
of the contemporary efforts made Singapore is one of the successful
are multifold ranging from low
at different scales and in different cities in Asian cities on urban land
operational performance of networks
countries in trying to produce transport transport management. It has vibrant
to irregular land use planning. Major
policies which are politically, socially economy, small land area, large
urban problems consist of large
and environmentally acceptable. population, high demand on peak
number of non conforming land uses
hours and about 31% modal share
and structures resulting from the lag 2.1 Dutch Urban Transport Policy of cars. The review of urban policy
in control of urban design behind Dutch physical and transportation indicates an integrated approach
economic development. Structural planning practice is aimed at reducing based on economic issues (Lim Lan
policies such as well planned transport the growth in car mobility. The Yuan 19972). The solutions suggested
infrastructure expansion, planned spatial mobility policy (1960 - 1990) include supply system enhancement,
deconcentration and comprehensive was aimed to result in shorter travel demand management linking demand
management of land use structure can distances, and an increase in the use utility over a space, alternative urban
help in providing long term solution of public transport and non-motorized structures with decentralization of land
to the urban transport problems but transport modes. The role for spatial use and inter modal coordination.
they require careful coordination of planning in policy from Transportation
Planning Perspective 1979-1995 was 2.3 China Transport Policy
transport policies within a broader
city development strategy. This to reduce the need for travel through The technological advancements in
work focuses on development of a adequate coordination and integration developing country like China resulted
* Professor and Head, Department of Civil Engineering, JNTU College of Engineering, Hyderabad
** Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad
8 Conclusion are obtained from the study. These Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 2,
An approach for spatial planning efficient leads can produce urban pp. 201-8.
and development of urban policy areas with a sustainable transport 2. National Transportation Policy
for addressing urban transportation environment by revitalizing the Project NTTP 2009. Report on
Performance Driven: A New Vision
problems is attempted in the study existing supply system to meet the for US Transport Policy. Bipartisan
from system wide perspective taking demand. The research provides a Policy Centre.
account static network topology, urban new dimension for the urban 3. UK Transport Department Policy
form and dynamic travel demand. transport policies, the strategies for and Planning, 2004. The Future of
A lead to the urban policy on achieving the objectives and the Transport - a Network for 2030.
demand - supply equilibrium ,
implementation techniques at field 4. Eco-Logica Ltd, 2009. World
fractal form of supply system for Transport Policy and Practise.
level.
demand deconcentration, land use 5. European Transport Policy 1994,
dissemination, integration of REFERENCES European Commission. National
network neighborhoods, immediate 1. Graham Curie 2009. Austra- Transport Policy for 2006 - 2025,
improvement of operational lian Urban Transport and Social Ministry of Infrastructure, European
performance of the supply system Disadvantage. The Australian Union, 2006.
Synopsis
The Latest Code for Bridge Design, IRC:112-2011 has introduced the Limit State Method of design. Accordingly the member is to be
checked for crack width under serviceability condition. The paper represents the basic theory and phenomenon of the crack width in
the RCC flexural member. The various clauses of the IRC:112-2011 pertaining to Crack width are also discussed. Two approaches for
crack control: 1) Crack width calculations and 2) Crack control without direct calculations are discussed at length. Numerical example
for use of those approaches is also presented.
Eq... 12.3,
IRC:112-2011
k = is the co-efficient which allows
for the effect of non-uniform
self-equilibrating stresses, which
lead to a reduction of restraint
forces.
= 1.0 for webs with h < 300 mm
or flanges with widths less than
300 mm
= 0.65 for webs with h > 800 mm
or flanges with widths greater
than 800 mm
Intermediate values may be
interpolated. Fig. 3 RCC Rectangular Section
Fig. 5 Bar Diameter as a Function of Maximum Steel Stress Fig. 6 Maximum Steel Stress as a Function of Bar Spacing
(Table 12.2, IRC:112-2011) (Table 12.3, IRC:112-2011)
8 CONCLUSION serviceability limit state of crack with as Design, Published by Centre for
The design provisions for the crack per requirements laid in IRC:112-2011 Construction Technology Research,
width given in IRC:112-2011 are with direct calculation or without direct Uni. of Western Sydney (August 2000).
more elaborate and needs to be well calculations. 2. Code of Practice for Concrete Bridges
understand in order to design more REFERENCES IRC:112-2011.
serviceable structures. The content of 1. One Steel Reinforcing Guide to 3. Designers Guide to EN-1992-2,
this paper will help to understand the Reinforced Concrete Design: Crack Part 2: Concrete Bridges by C.R. Hendy
basic theory and procedure to design the Control of Slabs: Part 1: AS 3600 and D.A. Smith.
ABSTRACT
The prime objective of this research is to investigate the effect of variation of sand and cement content on the porous concrete
properties. Four aggregate gradations are selected by varying the percentage of sand (by volume) in total aggregate. Eleven types of
mixes are used by varying the cement content for these four aggregate gradations. Dry unit weight, porosity, compressive strength,
flexural strength, coefficient of permeability, clogging and abrasion resistance of the porous concrete are tested. The relationships
among the engineering properties of the porous concrete are also discussed. With the increase of sand and cement content in porous
concrete mixes the compressive strength, flexural strength and dry unit weight increases where as the porosity and coefficient of
permeability decreases. The study indicates that clogging of porous concrete mixes resulted in the reduction of permeability. Abrasion
values obtained from the tests are less than the specified values for heavy duty floor tiles.
1 Introduction low strength and durability properties The present study is carried out to
Porous concrete is generally described which limit use of porous concrete determine the effect of variation
as an open-graded material with zero in normal roadways. According of sand and cement content on the
slump value and is composed of to Tennis et al. (2004), the typical porosity, permeability, abrasion
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), compressive strength of porous may resistance, effect of clogging and
single sized coarse aggregates, little be in the range 3.5 to 28 N/mm2 with strength of porous concrete mixes.
or no fine aggregates, admixtures and an average value of 17 N/mm2. With The relationships between porosity,
water. Such a hardened composite proper proportioning and compaction, permeability, and strength in porous
consists of interconnected pores of size compressive strength greater than concrete mixes are also discussed.
in the range 2 - 8 mm which facilitates 20 N/mm2 may be achieved (Ghafoori 2 Experimental Investi-
the water to pass through it. The void and Dutta. 1995). gation
content of porous concrete may vary Since the concrete pavements are 2.1 Materials
between 18% to 35% and may achieve designed for a long service life,
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)
compressive strengths in the range the durability properties of porous
43 grade tested as per IS:8112-1989
2.8 to 28 N/mm2 (ACI 522R 2006). concrete need to be considered to
specification was used in the present
The use of porous concrete in ensure long term performance. Very investigation. The OPC with a fineness
pavements is associated with certain few research works on the durability 0010 m2/kg and specific gravity of
advantages such as reduction of the properties of porous concrete have 3.11 achieved a compressive strength
volume of direct water runoff from been investigated till date. The of 48.54 MPa when tested.
pavements and enhancement of clogging of the pores is another Single-sized crushed granite coarse
quality of storm water. Several problem associated with porous aggregate of maximum size 12 mm
other advantages of porous concrete concrete. The functionality of the from locally available quarries and
include reduction in the noise, porous concrete is lowered due locally available river sand fine
hydroplaning, improvement of skid to the clogging of dirt and debris aggregate were used in this study.
resistance, preservation of eco- particles which fill the pore network. Coarse aggregate and fine aggregates
system, minimisation of heat island The permeability of the concrete is were tested as per the relevant IS
effect in large cities etc (Tennis et al. severely affected due to clogging. specification IS:2386 (part III, IV)-
2004). However, the porous concrete However, studies conducted by Tennis 1963 and the results are tabulated in
has several disadvantages such as et al. (2004) have indicated that Table 1. The sieve analysis results
frequent maintenance in order to the porosity of the clogged porous of coarse and fine aggregates are
remove the clogged material in the concrete can be restored with use tabulated along with the requirement
voids to restore the permeability and of pressure washing nearly to new of IS codes (IS:383-1970) in Table 2.
also possible contamination of ground conditions. The main objective of The Conplast SP430 super-plasticizers
water depending on soil conditions the study is to evaluate and improve was used to obtain good workability
(Wang et al. 2006). One of the main the strength of porous concrete by due to low water-cement ratios of
drawbacks of porous concrete is the varying sand and cement content. mixes.
* Professor, E-mail: aurshankar@gmail.com, ** Research Scholar, E-mail: nitendrapalankar@gmail.com, Dept. of Civil Engineering,
National Institute of Technology, Surathkal, Srinivasnagar, Karnataka
into the collar of the test specimen J 11.53 20.75 9.5 16.7 2.69 0.0105
up to its brim, and was then allowed K 10.88 21.06 11.1 18.2 2.93 0.0063
to drain off completely to allow the
3 Results and Discussions strength, the 28-day compressive
clogging material to settle in the pores.
3.1 Engineering Properties of strength increases from 56% to
The procedure was repeated 5 times
Porous Concrete 72% which is almost same as the
in order to ensure proper clogging
The porous concrete test results are conventional concrete. As the
in porous concrete cylinder. Sand percentage of sand by volume in
clogged sample was set in falling- shown in Table 4. Compressive
strength in porous concrete is in total aggregate and cement content
head permeameter and time duration increased the compressive strength,
general lower than conventional
for water level to fall from initial
concrete due to the high porosity. The flexural strength and dry unit weight
level to final level while draining was mix I had the maximum compressive of porous concrete increased where
measured. strength of 20.83 N/mm2 and flexural as the coefficient of permeability and
2.6 Abrasion Resistance Test strength of 3.18 N/mm2 corresponding porosity decreased. The increase in
to the porosity of 11.87%. The mix A sand content in mixes led to increased
The abrasion test was conducted packing within the composite resulting
had the lowest compressive strength
according to the procedure suggested
of 10.17 N/mm2 and flexural strength improvement in the strength of the
in IS:1237-2012, which is used for of 1.64 N/mm2 corresponding to the mixes. The increase in cement content
determination of abrasion resistance highest porosity of 22.23%. The test resulted in stronger bond between
of concrete flooring tiles. Eight results indicate a range of permeability the paste and the aggregates; thus
different porous concrete mixes (A, B, values between 0.2189 cm/s and leading to higher strength. With
C, D, E, F, G and H) were investigated 0.0063 cm/s. While comparing increase in sand content from 20% to
in this study. The specimens were the 7-day and 28-day compressive 25% of total aggregate, no significant