Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Better Dictator
If you have to live under an authoritarian regime, which kind is best?
It seems pretty obvious that democratic governments are less corrupt and provide better services to their citizens
than autocracies, right? Wrong. Well, at least not all the time. In fact, Transparency Internationals widely cited
Corruption Perceptions Index gave Cuba a better score than Mexico in 2011 and ranked monarchist Jordan above
democratic Italy.
Nor are all dictatorships the same when it comes to corruption and graft. Its clear that some authoritarian
governments Singapore being the classic example have been much better than others at providing clean,
ecient governance. So assuming youre unlucky enough to live under a dictators thumb, which kind of thumb is
the best?
Trending Articles
Maduro Tells State Employees to Vote in His Constitutional
As Venezuelas crisis deepens, the regime tries to leverage vulnerable state workers to support its agenda.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/23/a-better-dictator/ Page 1 of 4
A Better Dictator | Foreign Policy 7/11/17, 1&22 AM
Powered By
Political scientists Nicholas Charron and Victor Lapuente recently examined four types of authoritarian
governments: single-party states, military juntas, monarchies, and personalist regimes governments strongly tied
to the charisma of a single leader. They found that single-party states think China and Vietnam are the most
responsive to citizens demands, providing a higher quality of governance. "They have to spread out among the
population and search for consent," Charron says. "This forces them to be a little bit more responsive." Chances are
the Chinese Communist Party has not lasted through the use of force alone, but also by making popular investments
If single-party governments really are more responsive, governance should improve as a country gets richer and
citizens demand still more economic development. And indeed, a sample of 70 authoritarian countries between
1983 and 2003 found that in single-party states, good-governance indicators, such as lack of corruption and
Military regimes, on the other hand, are "inherently susceptible to internal splits within the ruling military elite"
and are therefore "less likely to undertake encompassing administrative reforms," according to the study. Charron
points to Syria, whose government dominated by an elite class of military ocers from President Bashar al-
Assads Alawite clan has proved far less open to reform than Jordans monarchy or Egypt under President Hosni
Mubarak.
As the world has seen this past year, it often takes bloodshed to pressure such regimes to commit to political reform
perhaps as good a reason as any for Egypts post-revolution junta to exit the scene as quickly as possible.
Like this article? Read an unlimited amount of articles, plus access to our entire 46-year printed archive, the FP App,
and the FP Insights Tool when you subscribe to FP Premium for 20% o!
http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/23/a-better-dictator/ Page 2 of 4
A Better Dictator | Foreign Policy 7/11/17, 1&22 AM
THE OUSTER OF MATTIS: SOME FOLLOW-UP DETAILS AND A WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE
TO THE YOUTH IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA: AN UNEXPECTED OPEN LETTER FROM IRANS SUPREME
LEADER
http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/23/a-better-dictator/ Page 3 of 4
A Better Dictator | Foreign Policy 7/11/17, 1&22 AM
http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/04/23/a-better-dictator/ Page 4 of 4