Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol.03,Issue.12
June-2014,
Pages:2621-2630
www.semargroup.org,
www.ijsetr.com
Abstract: In this study, the main structural elements of the football stadium are presented, with particular emphasis on the steel
roof and its interaction with the underlying reinforced concrete structures. The proposed scheme comprised an ellipse shape
plan composed of twelve portions with expansion joints. The building is composed of special moment resisting framed. Dead
loads, live loads, impact loads, wind and seismic loadings data are considered based on UBC 97 (Uniform Building Code). ACI
318-99 code is used for R.C grandstand structure and AISC-LRFD 93 code is used for steel structures which is upper part as
elliptical steel roof. Wind velocity is taken as 80 mph in this study. In analysing the frames, 28 load combinations are used for
all steel members. The grandstand structure is made of reinforced concrete and the roof of structural steel using wide-flanged
W-sections and double angles. Structural steel used in the building is A572 Grade 65 steel. Necessary stability checks are
carried out.
Figure4. 3D view of football stadium (portion 3= one In Figure 3, 4 and 5, three-dimensional view of portion 1,
twelfth of all). portion 3 and VIP 1 portion are described. Figure 6, 7 and
8show main cantilever truss of portion 1, portion 3 and VIP
1 portion. Sample roof trusses of portion1, portion 3 and
VIP 1 portion are described in figure 9, 10 and 11.
Figure 14.Comparison of Storey Drift in X- direction in Figure 17.Comparasion of Storey Drift in Y- direction in
VIP 1 portion. VIP 1 portion.
In Figure 13, maximum storey drift ratio is found in
SPECY of storey 1 and minimum storey drift ratio is seen in It can be seen that storey drift ratio was considered much
SPECX of storey 4. less about 5 times for SPECX than the SPECY in all stories.
B. Comparison of Storey Drift in Y direction According to Figure 16, storey drift ratio due to SPECY is
This section also discusses the relative storey drift greater than absolutely 10 times that of SPECX in storey 2,
value for response spectrum analysis and all these values are 3 and 4. However, in storey 1, storey drift ratio in SPECX is
shown in figure 15, 16 and 17. less than about 6 times of SPECY. Figure 17 can be seen
that the storey drift ratio of SPECY is increased over 70% of
that of SPECX in all stories.
Figure26. Comparison of Storey Moment in X- direction Figure28. Comparison of Storey Moment in Y- direction
in VIP 1 portion. in portion 3.
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research
Volume.03, IssueNo.12, June-2014, Pages: 2620-2621
THIN NWE AYE, ZAW MIN HTUN
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Firstly, the author thanks her parents for educating her
from her childhood till now. The author is very thankful to,
Dr. Myint Thein, Rector, Mandalay Technological
University and Dr. Kyaw Moe Aung, Associate Professor
and Head of Civil Engineering Department, Mandalay
Technological University, for her kind advice and
permission to carry out this paper. The author would like to
express her special appreciation to her supervisor, Dr. Zaw
Min Htun, Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering,
Mandalay Technological University. The author also wishes
to reveal her thanks to all teachers from Civil Engineering
department at Mandalay Technological University who
guided and helped during the preparation of the study.
Moreover, the author thanks to Max Myanmar Construction
Group which helped in collecting data required for this
study. The author also wishes to thank all her friends for
their helps and advices on her studying. Finally, the author
Figure29. Comparison of Storey Moment in Y- direction would like to express grateful thanks to all teachers for their
in VIP 1 portion. supports, kindness and unconditional love.