Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/260518660
CITATION READS
1 423
5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Nasser A. Al-Emadi
Qatar University
14 PUBLICATIONS 52 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Abstract The extensive use of Distributed Generators in passive techniques seems to be sufficient in detecting an
Electrical and power systems made it a must to explore its islanding case. However, when the mismatch is very small, it is
functionality and the issues related to their connection to the difficult to detect the islanding state because the variations in
grid. One of the main issues is unintentional islanding, which has voltage or frequency at the PCC are also very small. The area
been considered and studied for many years since it has serious where the mismatch percentage is small to reach a specific
consequences on electric systems and line workers safety. level islanding is not detectable by passive methods is called
Therefore, islanding detection methods is a motivating topic to be None Detection Zone (NDZ). The NDZ limits are defined
discussed by many scientists and engineers. Islanding detection according to particular values of voltages amplitude and
methods can be divided into two main categories, remote
frequency which are considered as the maximum/minimum
methods and local methods; the later method is classified into
allowable limits that voltages amplitude and frequency should
passive techniques and active techniques. This paper represents
two methods of the passive islanding techniques and a simple not exceed. The passive islanding detection methods are known
comparison between both of them. The selected two methods are to be inefficient in the NDZ. That is why they were replaced
the over/under voltage and over/under frequency detection with active methods which are based on injecting small
method and the wavelet based method. These two were disturbances to the network at the PCC and watching the
implemented and simulated using Matlab/Simulink toolboxes. response of the system accordingly. Even though most of
The simulation results proved that the two studied methods have active method has almost zero NDZ, they have the
a good performance for parallel RLC loads having quality factor disadvantage of being more complex and also they may affect
of 2.5. The simulated passive techniques have no negative impact the delivered power quality. While the passive methods are
on the power quality. usually simpler and do not disturb the network.
This paper presents and discusses two passive methods
Keywords- Distributed generator, Islanding detection, passive which are Over/Under voltage, over/ under frequency and
methods, over under voltage/frequency, Wavelet transform. wavelet based. The paper is organized as follows: section 2
I. INTRODUCTION presents the two algorithms, section 3 describes the
Matlab/Simulink modeling and simulation blocks, section 4
Distributed Generation (DG) is an electric power source presents and discusses the simulation results and finally
placed in the distribution network in a direct manner or in the section 5 concludes the paper.
customer side of the meter. It may be understood in simple
term as small-scale electricity generation. It can be defined also II. ALGORITHMS
as a generating resource, other than standalone generating Fig.1 shows the system model was used to test the
power plants. DG and load that consumes the power generated performance of the proposed islanding detection technique.
by them are usually connected close to each other. The increase The modeled circuit is the same as the anti-islanding testing
usage of DG in distribution systems has many advantages as circuit defined in UL 1741 (Standard for Inverters, Converters,
they can avoid transmission and distribution (T&D) capacity Controllers and Interconnection System Equipment for Use
upgrades, reduce transmission and distribution line losses, with Distributed Energy Resources) and IEEE 929 [3].The
improve power quality, improve voltage profile of the system, testing procedure requires that the active and reactive power
etc [1]. supplied from the DG match the power required by the test
Energy exhaustion and the recent environmental issues load. Because the load is very close to the DG compared with
forced many countries to introduce DG in different distribution the grid, almost all the power required by the load is taken
systems. There are some known types of distributed generation from the DG. Therefore, when islanding takes place, the
systems such as wind power generation, photovoltaic power detection is difficult.
generation, fuel cell power generation, and micro-turbine
power generation. Islanding detection is a key issue when a DG
works in connection with the power grid. A passive method 1. OUV/OUF passive islanding technique
which can be defined as monitoring the output parameters of The first discussed passive method is the Over/under voltage
the DG such as the variation of voltage and frequency at the and over/ under frequency (OUV/OUF), which is one of the
PCC (point of common connection) [2]. When the mismatch most used passive anti-islanding detection technique. These
between the generated power and the size of the load is large,
L Ipcc jQload
PPV + jQPV
P + jQ
Pload +
Grid
Vpv Vpcc
Figure 2: None- detection zone for UOV and UOF passive techniques
Wavelet based islanding technique directly proportional to the voltage. After the disconnection
of the grid, the active power of the load is forced to be the
Compare Calculate the same with the power generated by the distributed
with the Standard One cycle
normal
Wavelet generation; hence the grid voltage changes. The change in
deviation of the Transform window
operation details
reactive power corresponds to the change in frequency and
the amplitude of the voltage. The worst case for islanding
detection is represented by a condition of balance of the
Figure 1: Circuit diagram of designed circuit
active and reactive power in which there is no change in
Thresholds for UOV and UOF can be calculated as follows: amplitude and frequency, i.e. P=0 and Q=0 [5].
( )2 1 ( )2 1 (1)
As the islanding occurred the change in active power and
)2 )
)2 ) (2) reactive power leads to changes in voltage and frequency.
. (1 ( . (1 (
Considering the proportional relationship between the active
Where Vmax, Vmin, fmax and fmin are the UOV and UOF power and voltage and the reactive power and frequency
thresholds. Typically, Vmax=110% and Vmin=88% of the respectively; a large mismatch in power results a drift in
nominal voltage. fmax= 60.5 Hz and fmin=95.3 Hz voltage and frequency to exceed the limits of the NDZ and to
detect an islanding.
2. Wavelet based passive Islanding technique
Then for Qf= 2.5:
2.1 Wavelet transform
17.36% 23.46% (3) Wavelet transform (WT) is an effective mathematical tool
which has been widely used in many engineering applications
4.22% 4.12% (4) such as speech and image processing. WT has found many
numerous applications in the power systems field some of the
These limits define the non detection zone shown in Fig1. applications are power system protection, power quality, and
partial discharge.
321
2013 IEEE GCC Conference and exhibition, November 17-20, Doha, Qatar
extract the frequency components of the signal while 9]. In the this paper , db1 wavelet (with two filter coefficients)
preserving the time domain properties [6]. has been used as the mother wavelet to extract the standard
Similar to FT which breaks the signal into sinusoidal deviation of the detail coefficient of voltage waveforms. db1 is
waves of different frequencies; WT breaks the signal into a short wavelet and therefore it can efficiently detect
shifted and dilated version of a short term waveform called transients. The signal was decomposed for 12 wavelet levels.
mother wavelet. Mathematically, the continuous wavelet Table 1 gives the frequency band information of the wavelet
transform (CWT) of a signal can be represented by (5): analysis. The sampling frequency is 100 kHz.
The definition of CWT shows that the wavelet analysis is 6 D6 781.25-1562.5 12-D12 Dc- 24.4125
a measure of the resemblance between the wavelet and the
original signal. The calculated coefficient refers to the
correlation or similarity between the function and the wavelet The standard deviation of the details of the measured
at the current scale. If the coefficient is relatively large then voltage signal at the point of common coupling were used to
the signal is similar to the wavelet at this point in time-scale differentiate between the normal operation - the grid is
plane. In practical implementation of CWT there will be connected- and the islanded situation [10].
redundant information. Therefore, for the ease of III. MATLAB/SIMULINK MODELING
computational purposes the scale and translation variables are
discretized. The discrete wavelet transform is described in (7). The software design of the circuit implemented using
MATLAB/Simulink toolboxes as shown on Fig. 3.
( , )= ( ) ( )
, (7)
1 0 0
, ( )= (8)
0 0
Where ao > 1 and bo > 0 are fixed real values, m is the scale
and n is the translation are positive integers.
322
2013 IEEE GCC Conference and exhibition, November 17-20, Doha, Qatar
323
2013 IEEE GCC Conference and exhibition, November 17-20, Doha, Qatar
324
2013 IEEE GCC Conference and exhibition, November 17-20, Doha, Qatar
REFERENCES
[1] N. Acharya, P. Mahat, and N.Mithulananthan, An analytical
approach for DG allocation in primary distribution network,
International journal of Electrical power & Energy systems, Volume
28, Issue 10, December 2006, Pages 669678.
[2] Byung-Yeol Bae, Jong-Kyou Jeong Islanding Detection Method for
Inverter-based Distributed Generation Systems using a Signal Cross-
correlation Scheme, Journal of Power Electronics, Vol. 10, No. 6,
November 2010.
[3] W. Xu, K. Mauch, S. Martel An assessment of distributed generation
islanding detection methods and issues for Canada CANMET energy
technology center, 2004.
[4] H. Zeineldin, E. El-Saadany, M. Salama, Impact of DG Interface
Control on Islanding Detection and Nondetective Zones, IEEE Trans.
on Power Del., Vol. 21, Issue 3, July 2006, pp.1515 - 1523.
[5] R. Teodorescu , M. Liserre and P. Rodriguez Grid Converters for
Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems, 2011 :IEEE-Wiley
Figure 14: Standard deviation curve for both non-islanding [6] R. Kunte A wavelet transform-based islanding detection algorithm
and islanding operation for inverter assisted distributed generators Ms.c. thesis, Tennessee
Technological University, 2009.
[7] N. W. A. Lidula, N. Perera, Investigation of a Fast Islanding
Detection Methodology Using Transient Signals power and energy
society general meeting, 2009.
[8] W. Xu, K. Mauch, S. Martel An assessment of distributed generation
islanding detection methods and issues for Canada CANMET energy
technology center, 2004.
[9] I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures onWavelets. Montpelier, VT: Capital
City Press, 1992
[10] A.M. Gaoudam M. Salama, M. Sultan, A. Chikhani, Power Quality
Detection and Classification Using Wavelet-Multiresolution Signal
Decomposition IEEE Trans. on Power Del., Vol. 14, No. 4, October
1999, pp.1469 - 1476.
[11] Nandurkar, Miss Sangita R., and Mrs Mini Rajeev. "Design and
Simulation of three phase Inverter for grid connected Photovoltic
systems."
325