Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David S.; DeRiemer, all rights reserved address used without prejudice to rights
Care of, - 1624 Savannah Road
Lewes, Non-Domestic is in real Delaware land
Not Federal Regional District or fiction military Venue "DE")
No military fiction Venue zip Code
Enclosed herewith, returned, rejected and refused for fraud are legal
documents, postmarked (date) which were delivered fraudulently "without
prejudice", opened by "Mistake", and they are "Returned to Sender".
Any mail or other (legal) papers intended for my attention may be directed as
shown: David S.; DeRiemer, all rights reserved
address used without prejudice to rights
Care of, - 1624 Savannah Road
Lewes, Non-Domestic is in real
Delaware No zip Code
Sincerely yours,
David S. DeRiemer, real natural man
not Corporate Fiction Person subject
Article - Testimonial
I said "I have this 'In Forma Pauperis' Form here and I'd
like to talk to him about it."
She said "O.K., but how will we notify you when the
HEARING on this In Forma Pauperis is scheduled, as
you don't get your mail."
That has been almost one (1) year ago, and we have
not heard anything about either the "Contempt of
Court" or the "In Forma Pauperis" since.
CONCLUSIONS: The Judge had been put into a"catch
22" situation.
The main issue is that you are nor the fiction Defendant of a
Legislature. You are real flesh & blood natural of GOD.
If you are a Flesh and Blood Man or Woman (of GOD) - DO NOT steal
mail which is intended for a corporate fiction. It is against the law
to keep mail which does not belong to you.
The Courts have jurisdiction over all fiction entities and all
"Commerce".
The "It Ain't Me" letter denies and challenges "Personam", "Venue",
and "Subject Matter" Primary elements of primary jurisdiction, -
which destroys their "Presumption", is "Rebuttable Presumption",
and they must reveal their FRAUD in order to refute the Written
DENIAL which is what the "It Ain't Me" letter is. They would rather
"Drop" or "dismiss" their case against you.
A professional Over-the-road (18 wheeler) Tractor-
Trailer Truck Driver, got a ticket for some rincky-dink
thing, (dirt on the license plate, or cracked Lens)When he
got home, he mailed CERTIFIED MAIL, the Ticket back to the
Arresting officer, at his Barracks address with the Neutral
Response #1 cover letter.
When the Trooper got his Ticket back, he went crying to the
"Court Clerk", who told him, "Never Mind,We'll take care of
this from here on in .
Our Truck Driver, this time Bent CERTIFIED MAIL the "Ticket
with the"Neutral Response #1" cover letter, back to the Court
Clerk. (because it came from them this time)
Neutral response:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Singular response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
____________________________________________________
I do not know what this is all about. I do not understand or
recognize these document(s).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instructions
Sincerely yours,
David S. DeRiemer, real natural man
not Corporate Fiction Person subject
11. WHAT CONSTITUTES APPEARANCE
18. In General
An appearance may he expressly made by formal written or oral
declaration. or record entry,. to the. effect that -(he defendant
appears, or It may lie Implied from some act done with the
Intention of appearing and submitting to the court's jurisdiction.
Research Note:
Appearance by or for one defendant or person involved us
constituting appearance for others is considered supra 1 13.
Any act the defendant which recognizes tile can* as let court
constitutes a general appearance. but. If an act does not do this or
seek to Invoke affirmative action from t he court. It Is not an
appearance.
Quoted In: Ark.-Sinclair Refining Co. v. Bounds,
127 S.W.2d 629 032. 198 Ark. 149.
Library References
As used In the law of rape "consent'* means consent of the will, and
submission under the Influence of fear or ter, for cannot amount to real
consent. Hallmark v. State. 722 212 P. 322 328. There must be an
exercise of Intelligence based on knowledge or Its significance and moral
quality and there must be a choice between resistance and assent. State
v. Schwab. 109 Ohipp St. 532. 143 N. E. 29. 31 And If woman resists In
the point where resistance would be unless or until her resistance to
over force or violence. submission thereafter Is not "consent fit". People
v. Mclivain 130 P 2d 131 135 55 Cal. App.2d 322
ACCEPT. To receive with approval or satisfaction to receive with intent to retain. See
Morris v. State, 102 Ark. 513, 145 S.W. 2 1-1. Also, In the capacity of drawee of a bill, to
recognize the draft, and engage to pay It when due. It Is not equivalent to "acquiesce."
Applett v. Empire Inv 4"), 99 Or, 533, 197 11. 461, Admit and agrees Ito, accede Ito or
consent lit; receive with approval; adopt ; agree to to. Rocha v. Hulen, 6 Cal.App.2d 2-15.
44 P.2d .178, 482, 483. Street committee's and city engineer's reports. City of Morehead v.
Blair, 243 Ky. 84, 47 S.W.2d 741, 742. Means something more than to receive, meaning to
adopt, to agree to carry out provisions. Assignee of lease, Pickier v. Mershon. 212 Iowa.
447. 236 N.W. 382, 385: Central State Bank v. Herrick, 214 Iowa 379, 240 N.W. 242, 246.
Renewal health and accident policy premiums, Prescott v. Mutual Ben. Health and
Accident Ass'n, Fla., 193 So. 311, 314, 119 A.L.R. 525.
Bills of Exchange
An engagement to pay the bill in money when due. 4 East 72; Hunt v.
Security State Bank, 91 Or. 362, 179 P. 248, 251.
The act by which the person on whom a bill of exchange Is drawn (called the "drawee") assents
to the request of the drawer to pay it, or. In other words. engages or makes himself liable. to pay
It when due. Bell-Wayland Co. v Bank of Sugden. 95 Oki. 67, 218 P, 705. It may be by parol or In
writing, and either general or special. absolute or conditional: and It may be Impliedly as well as
expressly given. 3 Kent. Comm. 93, 85; Story. Bills. 11 238, 251 Telegram directing drawer to
draw draft. 140 ffer v. Eastland Nat. Bank, Tex.Clv.App.. 169 S.W.2d M. 278. Certification at
request of the payee or holder. Welch v. Bank of Manhattan Co.. 35 N.Y.S.2d SN. 895, 264
App.Div, 906 But the usual and regular mode of acceptance Is by the drawee's writing across the
face of the bill the word "accepted." and subscribing his name; after which he is termed
the acceptor.
Thus, to Invalidate a deed on the ground that the grantor did not
understand the nature of the act. the grantor
must be Incapable of comprehending that the effect of the act would
divest him of the title to the land set forth In the deed. Miller v. Folsom, 49
Okl. 74, 149 P. 1 185. 1188. As used in connection with the execution of wills and
other Instruments, the term Includes the realization of the practical
effects and consequences of the proposed act. Tillman V. Ogren. 99 Misc.
539. 166 N.Y.& 39, 40.
'The term may also import simply a wish or hope, as in a will bequeathing
property to another with the -understandIngthat at the legatee's death,
all property derived under the will should be riven to Vie
testatrtx's sister. Vincent v. Rix. 127 Misc. 639, 217 N.Y.S. 393, 399.
"Apprehend" - 1a: to take hold of. 1b: arrest, seize. 3: to grasp with
the understanding; be fully aware of; understand, grasp.
FICTION OF LAW
Fiction of law. An assumption or supposition of law that something
which Is or may be false Is true, or that a state of facts exists which
has never really taken place. An assumption. for purposes of
justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist. A rule of law
which assumes as true. and will not allow to
be disproved something which is false, but not impossible. Ryan v.
Motor Credit Co.. 30 N.I.Eq. 531. 23 A 2d 607, 621
"I did NOT "understand", - if and when I did sign anything, and you have to prove I
did understand". (See Garrett v. Moore McCormack Co.)
per Court Rule 12 (b) (1) "MOTION TO DISMISS due to lack of jurisdiction. (Do
NOT touch the issue)
4. MIRANDA vs. ARIZONA 384 U.S. 436 "You have the right to remain silent (and
NOT make "Appearance" by a statement) or the court will appoint a Lawyer for
you, who will make an "Appearance" for you and grant the Court "Jurisdiction" for
you.
signed,
Accused/Detainee
real live flesh and blood Natural Man
Private Party Foreign State
Dear Sir,
c/o 7055 Mtn Rd.
Oxford North Carolina
I read your Review and Outlook article in the Nov. 21. 1997
Wall Street Journal. I Find it very hard to believe you don't
know much about the IMF. We do and expert witness
testimony was given in a case in Nevada in 1995 Here is a
short history and you can take it from there. The real United
States Treasury was created in 1841 because the private
banks were raping the states and United States
governments. The Whigs came into power and repealed the
Act. When they lost power in 1845 the governments re-
instituted the real bank of the United States and it dealt in
SPECIE as required by their constitution. Now this caused
much concern for the private banks using inflation paper
(scrip if you will). So it took until 1913 for the private banks,
making out of thin air federal reserve notes, to become
powerful enough in the corrupt circles of government to
create the Federal Reserve Act. This private concern
operated parallel with the real bank. Then in the year 1921,
by the Act of 1920, the Congress abolished the United
States Independent Treasury and turned all money and
banking over to this private concern as Fiscal agents only.
for the government. The Act was worded in such a way that
no government representative could sit on the board after
(fie first term. Now in the Federal Reserve Act of 1916 the
Feds created the International Monetary Fund. Well, it really
wasn't called that at the time but it evolved into its present
day status.
Now we all know the lender controls the debtor. Here is what
happened. Between the years 1921 and 1929, the Feds took
all the people's money and heavily invested it in Europe.
When people got wind of this they started pulling their
money out of the banks in specie. The Feds, having
exhausted its real money supply, immediately asked
President Hoover to institute the Trading With the Enemy Act
of 1917 with a rewritten part making the American people
the " enemy" so they would not cause the collapse that did
occur. But it was a controlled collapse. We know who the
players are so don't fret and no you are smart enough
to figure it out being so close to Wall street. Well In the
Hoover Papers he states it is unconstitutional and there is no
need for this legislation. In the Hoover Papers there exists
the exact communication from the Fed. Res. Board with
the legislative words already drawn up. We all know what
happened next'. President Roosevelt to protect his buddy
banker (Rockefeller) who would lose so much; implemented on
March 401. 1933. Executive Order 2039 and on March 5th instituted it
under the Emergency Powers part of the Constitution. Then on March 9.
1933 he called Congress together and forced Congress under the Emergency
Powers Act to pass 48 Stat 1, which closed (]own the banks so they could be
licensed to trade with the "enemy'. That is us, the American People Mr.
Editor. We are in a state of war with the private banking cartel as the
creditor and we are the debtors after they stole all the people's money in
those years I mentioned. Just Read P.L. 93-549 to see what I mean. You
might think that all this was repealed but it wasn't. On repeal they left one
small key to keep it going. That key is section 5 (b) of the trading With the
Enemy Act. Today you will find it in 12 USC 95 (a) & (b). So the bottom
line is that the private IMF that you think is so mysterious really is not.
Secretive they have to be because they float out of thin air funny little
pieces of paper that you so wrongly call money. It is the bane of all mankind
through out history because it steals the wealth (labor) of people in
exchange for military scrip. Yes, I said military scrip because we. as the
enemy. are living in a conquested country run by the creditors, the IMF
AKA the Federal Reserve AKA private men in a banking cartel that control
your life and mine. That is why the real Treasurer of the United States is
Mary Ellen Withrow and her signature appears on all the things called
federal reserve notes. Now to make it a commercial note, international bills
of credit. you have to have a second party signature on it and that is Robert
Rubin the secretary of the FED/IMF. Most people do not wonder why the
Treasurer of the United States would have her Secretary sign off on the
same thing called a "note" to give it credit- ability. Did you ever see the
phrase The Secretary of the Treasury of the United States on the note'? Of
course no(. It is an impossibility. You see in commercial law that would be
redundant, and, as a true "note" it lacks the elements found in the U.C.C.,
wouldn't you say'? How can your secretary's signature on something that
you signed give it any more weight'? No. in the merchant-law that we
operate, two separate signatures are required from separate parties on a
"note. " Since the PRIVATE Feds were made agents and they created the
IMF guess who controls this country" That's right not the people at all, for
we are the "enemy. " Since the Reconstruction Act of March 2, 1867 put us
under military control by a de facto Congress, who by the way is still a de
facto Congress, which vetoed President Johnson's veto of Lincoln's decree
making us the enemy. See 12 Stat 319, which lies now in War at Title 50
Sections 212. 213, and 215. Plus 28 USC 2461 to 2465 and then Roosevelt's
decree making us the "enemy" of the private banking cartel, do you now
understand why they have to operate in secrete'? It is a creation that
Congress allows since it is bankrupt and has been since the civil war. Why
do you think there his been so many Reorganizations under the
Bankruptcy'? Oh, I could go into a brief that would take a thousand pages
but that is not necessary as it is all recorded in the Federal case of The
People of the State of Nevada EX Rel. citizen Robert Kahre v. The
International Monetary Fund, (The Fund). The International Bank
for Reconstruction and Development (The Bank), as Principal, CV-S-93-
1054 (Clark County case # A323777). That is why the private collection
agency of the Feds exist to sop up the purchasing power of their funny
monopoly money, otherwise the faith the people have in FRAUD (Federal
Reserve Accounting Unit Devices) will cause every man and woman to
probably hang every banker and politician from what ever they could
find. Of course the United States has over used their Special Drawing
Rights from the IMF so it too is bankrupt to even that which compounds
it. And the slaves of Amerika will happily agree to have more worthless
pieces of paper given to them so they can 'discharge (they never have
payed) their debts under limited liability as a conquered people.
eMail: notaxman@dmv.com
Toll free: 1- 877-544-4718 (24hrs.)
Money back guarantee providing that student follows through to completion with Course
process as taught !
We do not give or sell legal advice. For that one must retain a lawyer