Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LOCAL 320
August 2017 Edition Volume XX - Issue #3
STANDING STRONG
AT ST. PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
By Sami Gabriel
When we buy American, your hard earned dollar stays
The BUY AMERICAN slogan here to provide jobs for our neighbors. When we buy
has been heard for many years. American, you are making a commitment to America!
It started in 1933 when the Buy
American Act was passed by The following is a short list of Minnesota and union
Congress and then signed into made products.
law by President Hoover. Ameri-
cans and government were
urged to buy USA made products as often as possible MINNESOTA-MADE PRODUCTS:
to keep Americans employed in good jobs.
1. Angies Popcorn
Over the years, as goods that have been made in 2. Bimbo Bakery products
other countries have been more available here, peo- 3. Duluth Pack
ple have forgotten why the push to buy local started. 4. Gedney Pickles
Buying American has many other reasons why we 5. Igloo Coolers
should all be aware of where our products are made. 6. JW Hulme
7. Nordic Ware
Companies that make goods here have to provide 8. Pearsons Candy
safe conditions for their employees. OSHA mandates 9. Redwing Boots
certain safe conditions and protects employees at 10. Tervis Drinkware
the workplace. With their oversight, companies have
strived to have conditions that provide workers with a UNION-MADE PRODUCTS:
work site that has been proven to prevent accidents
and injuries. 1. Alpo Pet Food
2. Anheuser-Busch
Companies that make goods here have to abide by 3. B. F. Goodrich Tires
the minimum wage laws. Most Union employees make 4. Bridgestone/Firestone Tires
even more than the minimum wage through their con- 5. Budweiser
tracts. As most of us know, companies in some other 6. Cooper Tires
countries pride themselves in paying their employees 7. Coors
at terribly low rates. Some other countries also do not 8. Hasbro Brand Toys
have children labor laws. Young children often are the 9. Hersheys Chocolate
ones producing items such as electronics. 10. Goodyear Tires
11. Miller
Companies that make goods here have to abide by 12. Milk-Bones
strict environmental protection laws. The EPA (En- 13. Purina Pet Food
vironmental Protection Agency) is responsible for 14. Titan Tires
keeping companies obeying the task of protecting the
area a company is in and is responsible for producing
goods in a way that protects people in and around a For a more for a more extensive list of American
company. Without the tightly governed environmental products, go to either of these sites visit Labor411.org
laws, we would go back to dirty water, polluted ground and Americansworking.com.
and polluted skies.
Page 3
LOCAL 320 VICE PRESIDENTS REPORT
Teamsters Local 320 Secretary Treasurer Brian Aldes with Local 320 member Nasser Nur, Oromo Sports Federation
(OSFNA) Secretary Treasurer Fuad Ibrahim, OFSNA President and Local 320 member Ejero Usuu and Local 320 Vice
President Curt Swenson
Page 4
LOCAL 320 RECORDING SECRETARYS REPORT
Teamster pride is
something that is
necessary in todays
anti-union environ-
ment.
Page 5
STANDING STRONG IN ST. PAUL
BY JOSH LOAHR, LOCAL 320 BUSINESS AGENT
The bargaining unit is also seeking some minor changes to language in the contract. For example, currently
Nutrition Service employees are allowed to use 4 of their accumulated sick days as personal days, and we are
seeking to add 1 additional day, which is no cost item to the employer. The bargaining group is also seeking to
increase their longevity pay by $0.15 per hour, with adding a 10-year longevity step. The unit is also looking to
increase a benefit to those members who place a value on continuing their food service education. Currently,
the school district pays employees $0.40 per hour if they hold a level 2 certification, which hasnt changed in
over 10 years. The group is seeking to increase the premium pay to $0.75 per hour. Along with some small
increases to severance and deferred compensation, the only other request the group is seeking is to add lan-
guage to the discipline article which would remove a written reprimand after 1 year and a suspension after 3
years.
Saint Paul Public Schools is not placing a high value on retaining their employees or keeping morale strong as
they rejected every single request from this group without explanation. Teamster Business Agent Joshua Loahr
knew that there were budget constraints facing Saint Paul Public Schools before going into negotiations and,
rather than be unprepared, he obtained a copy of the budget and revenue of the nutrition services unit and
utilized the resources of the IBT to have them cost out the groups proposal. Even though the general fund of
Saint Paul Public Schools is strained, their food services budget is very healthy, to the tune of $2.5 million. The
total cost of the unions proposal is $700,000 versus the districts 3-year offer of $77,648.
It is quite clear to me that this school district does not believe in helping those at the bottom of the wage scales
to move up. They are willing to pay a new superintendent $18,974 (9%) more per year than their last superin-
tendent, but offer nothing substantial to someone making between $11.66 - $16.82 per hour. This is absolutely
shameful and Teamsters Local 320 along with the negotiating committee for Saint Paul Public Schools Nutrition
Services has made it very clear to the school district that they will not settle for the subpar contract offer. This
group has attended two school board meetings and plan on attending the August 15th and September 19th
school board meetings as well. Together we will stand strong for a living wage!
Page 6
LEGAL UPDATE
BY PAULA JOHNSTON, LOCAL 320 GENERAL COUNSEL
During the last Supreme Court term, when all eyes were focused on what the outcome of Friedrichs would
be, the Court issued another decision that is extremely important for public employees. In Heffernan v. City of
Paterson, 136 S.Ct. 1412 (2016), the Court held that when a public employer demotes an employee to try to
prevent them from engaging in free speech (in this case protected political activity), the employee is entitled to
challenge the demotion in court even if the employer was mistaken about whether any protected political activ-
ity took place.
Heffernan worked as a police officer for the Paterson, New Jersey police department. The current mayor, Jose
Torrez, had appointed the incumbent police chief. Torrez was being opposed in his reelection campaign by
Lawrence Spagnola. Heffernan was not involved in either mans campaign, but his mother was for the rival
candidate Spagnola.
As a favor to his mother, who was bedridden, he agreed to pick up a Spagnola lawn sign and bring it to her.
Other officers saw him holding the sign and speaking to volunteers at Spagnolas campaign headquarters. The
next day, Heffernan was demoted for his overt involvement in the Spagnola campaign.
Heffernan filed suit, claiming that the demotion was based on the Citys mistaken belief that he was engaging
in protected political activity (i.e., free speech under the First Amendment). The district court denied the claim,
finding that he had not engaged in any protected conduct. The decision was affirmed by the Third Circuit, which
concluded that his claim would only be actionable if the employers action was prompted by actual, rather than
perceived, exercise of free speech.
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that it is the motive of the employer that is controlling. The constitutional
harm the attempt to prevent or discourage public employees from exercising their right to free speech is the
same whether the employer is mistaken in its assessment or not. The language of the First Amendment focus-
es on the governments activity, not the citizens, or, in this case, the employees.
Page 7