Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Letters
Selective Wireless Power Transfer to Multiple Loads Using Receivers
of Different Resonant Frequencies
Yiming Zhang, Student Member, IEEE, Ting Lu, Member, IEEE, Zhengming Zhao, Senior Member, IEEE,
Fanbo He, Member, IEEE, Kainan Chen, and Liqiang Yuan, Member, IEEE
0885-8993 © 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
6002 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 30, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2015
ωL1 − 1
ωC1 ωL2 − 1
ωC2 The reflected impedance from the receiving loop 2 to the
FD 1 = , FD 2 = . (4)
R1 R2 sending loop is
With these factors, the efficiency can be rewritten by (ωM13 )2
Zref 2 =
TQ2 LM R3 + RL2 + jωL3 + jω1C 3
η= 1+S M
. (5)
(1 + SM )(1 + LM ) + 1+L M FD2 2 + TQ2 1 + LM (ωM13 )2 R3 + RL2 − jωL3 − 1
jω C 3
From aforementioned equation, we can see that the larger the = . (8)
(R3 + RL2 )2 + (ωL3 − 1
ωC3 )
2
TQ , the higher the efficiency. Larger TQ means tighter coupling
of the two coils. Therefore, power can be transferred more effi- The source matching factor SM is the same as that in the
ciently. The smaller the SM , the higher the efficiency. Smaller single-load transfer. The load matching factors for load 1 and
SM indicates that less power is consumed in the source, thus load 2 are LM 1 and LM 2 , respectively; the transfer quality factors
improving the efficiency. There is an optimal LM to achieve the are TQ12 and TQ13 , respectively; the frequency deviation factors
highest efficiency. As to FD2 , the efficiency is maximized only are FD2 and FD3 , respectively. They are defined by
when FD2 = 0, which means the driving frequency is set at the
RL1 ωM12 ωL2 − ω C1 2
resonant frequency of the receiving loop: f = f2 . LM 1 = , TQ12 = √ , FD 2 =
Therefore, the efficiency of the two-coil structure is maxi- R2 R1 R2 R2
mized when the driving frequency equals the resonant frequency RL2 ωM13 ωL3 − ω C1 3
of the receiving loop, regardless of the resonant frequency of the LM 2 = , TQ13 = √ , FD 3 = . (9)
R3 R1 R3 R3
sending loop. Normally, the sending loop is compensated with
capacitors to resonate at the same frequency as the receiving The efficiency of load 1 is
loop, aiming at obtaining large amount of output power.
TQ2 12 LM 1
III. SELECTIVE MULTIPLE-LOAD TRANSFER (1 + LM 1 )2 + FD2 2
η1 = 2 .
TQ 12 (1 + LM 1 ) TQ2 13 (1 + LM 2 )
In Section II, we prove that the efficiency is maximized when 1 + SM + +
the driving frequency equals the resonant frequency of the re- (1 + LM 1 )2 + FD2 2 (1 + LM 2 )2 + FD2 3
ceiving loop, regardless of the resonant frequency of the sending (10)
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 30, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2015 6003
coils have a small impact on the efficiency, contrary to the con- [8] Z. Pantic, B. Heacock, and S. Lukic, “Magnetic link optimization for
ventional multiple-load transfer. wireless power transfer applications: modeling and experimental valida-
tion for resonant tubular coils,” in Proc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr.
Expo., 2012, pp. 3825–3832.
REFERENCES [9] O. Jonah, S. V. Georgakopoulos, and M. M. Tentzeris, “Optimal design
parameters for wireless power transfer by resonance magnetic,” IEEE
[1] S. Y. R. Hui, W. Zhong, and C. K. Lee, “A critical review of recent progress Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 1390–1393, Nov. 2012.
in mid-range wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., [10] B. L. Cannon, J. F. Hoburg, D. D. Stancil, and S. C. Goldstein, “Magnetic
vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 4500–4511, Sep. 2014. resonant coupling as a potential means for wireless power transfer to
[2] T. Nguyen, S. Li, W. Li, and C. C. Mi., “Feasibility study on bipolar pads multiple small receivers,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 7,
for efficient wireless power chargers,” in Proc. Annu. IEEE Appl. Power pp. 1819–1825, Jul. 2009.
Electron. Conf. Expo., 2014, pp. 1676–1682. [11] J. J. Casanova, Z. N. Low, and J. Lin, “A loosely coupled planar wireless
[3] Y. Zhang, Z. Zhao, and K. Chen, “Frequency decrease analysis of resonant power system for multiple receivers,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56,
wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron, vol. 29, no. 3, no. 8, pp. 3060–3068, Aug. 2009.
pp. 1058–1063, Mar. 2014. [12] D. Ahn and S. Hong, “Effect of coupling between multiple transmitters or
[4] S. L. Ho, J. Wang, W. N. Fu, and M. Sun, “A comparative study between multiple receivers on wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.,
novel witricity and traditional inductive magnetic coupling in wireless vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 2602–2613, Jul. 2013.
charging,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1522–1525, May 2011. [13] H. H. Wu, G. A. Covic, J. T. Boys, and D. J. Robertson, “A series-tuned
[5] M. Kiani and M. Ghovanloo, “The circuit theory behind coupled-mode inductive-power-transfer pickup with a controllable ac-voltage output,”
magnetic resonance-based wireless power transmission,” IEEE Trans. Cir- IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 98–109, Jan. 2011.
cuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2065–2074, Sep. 2012. [14] K. E. Koh, T. C. Beh, T. Imura, and Y. Hori, “Impedance matching
[6] L. Chen, S. Liu, Y. C. Zhou, and T. J. Cui, “An optimizable circuit structure and power division using impedance inverter for wireless power transfer
for high-efficiency wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., via magnetic resonant coupling,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 50, no. 3,
vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 339–349, Jan. 2013. pp. 2061–2070, May/Jun. 2014.
[7] J. Huh, S. W. Lee, W. Y. Lee, G. H. Cho, and C. T. Rim, “Narrow- [15] Y. Zhang and Z. Zhao, “Frequency splitting analysis of two-coil resonant
width inductive power transfer system for online electrical vehicles,” IEEE wireless power transfer,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 13,
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3666–3679, Dec. 2011. pp. 400–402, Feb. 2014.