You are on page 1of 238

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)

For Accreditation of UG Engineering Programme


Department of Civil Engineering
Submitted to

NATIONAL BOARD OF
ACCREDITATION
by

SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING


AND TECHNOLOGY, CHENNAI

Chennai Bangalore Highway


Chembarambakkam, Chennai 600 123
(A.M. Kanniappa Mudaliar & A.M.K. Jambulinga Mudaliar
Educational Trust)
SAR CONTENTS
Serial Code &
Link to the Item Page No.
item
PART A Institutional Information 1

PART B Criteria Summary

Program Level Criteria


Vision, Mission and Program Educational
1 6
Objectives
Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning
2 16
Processes
3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 42

4 Students Performance 85

5 Faculty Information and Contributions 100

6 Facilities and Technical Support 116

7 Continuous Improvement 122

Institute Level Criteria

8 First Year Academics 142

9 Student Support Systems 166


Governance, Institutional Support and Financial
10 200
Resources
PART C Declaration by the Institution
Program Outcomes(POs) & Program Specific
Annexure-I 224
Outcomes (PSOs)
Annexure-II Faculty Information` 227
PART A: Institutional Information

1. Name and Address of the Institution:

Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology


Sree Sastha Nagar, Chennai-Bangalore Highway
Chembarambakkam, Chennai-600 123
Phone: 044-26810114, 26810115, 26810117
Web: www.sreesasthainstitutions.edu.in
E-mail: principal@sasthaenggcollege.com
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:
Anna University
Sardar Patel Road,
Guindy
Chennai 600025
Tamilnadu
3. Year of establishment of the Institution:
1999
4. Type of the Institution:
University
Deemed University

Government Aided

Autonomous

Affiliated

5. Ownership Status:

Central Government

State Government

Government Aided

Self financing

Trust

Society

1
Section 25 Company

Any Other (Please specify)

Provide Details:

6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:


Name of the Year of Programs of Study
Location
Institution(s) Establishment
B.E.-Computer Science
Engineering
B.E.-Electronics and
communications Engineering Sree Sastha Nagar,
Sree Sastha College of 2009 B.E.-Electronics and Electricals Chembarambakkam
Engineering
Engineering Chennai 600 123
B.E.-Mechanical Engineering
M.E.- Applied Electronics
Engineering
B.Sc. - Nursing Sree Sastha Nagar,
Sree Sastha College of
2009 Chembarambakkam
Nursing
Chennai 600 123
B.Ed.-Tamil
B.Ed. - English
B.Ed.- Mathematics Sree Sastha Nagar,
Sree Sastha College of 2005 B.Ed. - Physical Science Chembarambakkam
Education
B.Ed. Biological Science Chennai 600 123
B.Ed. History
M.Ed. Education
Diploma in Mechanical
Engineering (Machine tool
Maintenace & repair)
Diploma in Mechanical
Engineering (Foundry)
Diploma in Mechanical
Engineering (Refrigeration &
Air conditioning) (SF)
AMK Technological Diploma in Mechanical
Polytechnic College Engineering (Regular) (SF) Sree Sastha Nagar,
(Started as 2003 Diploma in Civil Engineering Chembarambakkam
C.M. Kothari Diploma in Electrical & Chennai 600 123
Polytechnic in 1973) Electronics Engineering
Diploma in Automobile
Engineering (SF)
Diploma in Civil Engineering
Diploma in Electronics and
Communication Engineering
Post Diploma of Advanced
technological Course in
Refrigeration & Air

2
conditioning
Sree Sastha Institute of M.B.A Sree Sastha Nagar,
Management & 2001 Chembarambakkam
MCA
Computer Studies Chennai 600 123

7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
Increase
Year Year of AICTE Visit Period/
in Accreditatio
S.No Program Name Of Intake increase Approval Accreditation
intake, n Status*
Start Period
if any
B.E.-Computer
Not 28th to 30th
1. Science 1999 60 120 2005 1999
accredited August 2015
Engineering
B.E.-Electricals
Not 28th to 30th
2. and Electronics 1999 60 90 2007 1999
accredited August 2015
Engineering
B.E.-Electronics
and Not 28th to 30th
3. 1999 40 120 2004 1999
communication accredited August 2015
Engineering
B.Tech.-
Eligible but
4. Information 1999 60 120 2007 1999
not applied
Technology
Granted
B.E. Civil
5. 2002 60 180 2011 2002 accreditation 2009-2012
Engineering
for 3 years
Eligible but
6. M.B.A 2002 60 120 2011 2002
not applied
Granted
B.Tech.- Bio
7. 2003 30 120 2006 2003 accreditation 2009-2012
Technology
for 3 years
M.E. Computer
Eligible but
8. Science 2005 18 0 2005
not applied
Engineering
M.E. Power
Eligible but
9. Electronic 2005 18 0 2005
not applied
andDrivers
M.E. VLSI Eligible but
10. 2005 18 0 2005
Design not applied
B.E.-Mechanical Not 28th to 30th
11. 2006 60 180 2014 2006
Engineering accredited August 2015
M.E. Eligible but
12. 2007 18 0 2007
Communication not applied
M.E.
Construction Eligible but
13. 2007 18 0 2007
Engineering and not applied
Management
B.E.-Automobile Applying
14. 2009 60 0 2009
Engineering first time

3
M.E. Structural Eligible but
15. 2011 18 0 2011
Engineering not applied
Not eligible
B.E. Aeronautical
16. 2014 60 0 2014 for
Engineering
accreditation
Not eligible
M.E. Thermal
17. 2014 18 0 2014 for
Engineering
accreditation
Not eligible
M.Tech Bio
18. 2014 18 0 2014 for
Technology
accreditation

8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:

S.No Level Discipline Program Name


1. Under Graduate Engineering & Technology B.E. Automobile Engineering
2. Under Graduate Engineering & Technology B.E. Civil Engineering
3. Under Graduate Engineering & Technology B.TECH. - Biotehnology

9. Total number of employees in the institution:


A. Regular* Employees (Faculty and Staff):
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Items
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 145 145 147 147 148 148
Faculty in Engineering
F 105 105 103 103 104 104
Faculty in Maths, Science & M 24 24 21 21 21 21
Humanities F 37 37 41 41 41 41
M 29 29 30 30 30 30
Non-teaching Staff
F 13 13 12 12 12 12
B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff): (Not covered in Table A):
Items 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Min Max Min Max Min Max
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Faculty in Engineering
F 0 0 0 0 0 0
Faculty in Maths, Science & M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Humanities F 0 0 0 0 0 0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-teaching Staff
F 0 0 0 0 0 0
10. Total number of Engineering Students:
Engineering and Technology UG Shift -I
Item 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Total No.of Boys 1554 1762 1936
Total No.of Girls 723 837 956
Total No.of Students 2277 2599 2892

4
Engineering and Technology PG Shift -I
Item 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
Total No.of Boys 35 51 64
Total No.of Girls 40 60 62
Total No.of Students 75 111 126
MBA Shift -I

Item 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014


Total No.of Boys 19 68 102
Total No.of Girls 17 45 52
Total No.of Students 36 113 154
11. Vision of the Institution:
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize, a vision of
"developing into a multidisciplinary, multi campus technological institution of excellence in
this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create engineers and
technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society".
12. Mission of the Institution:
The Management of Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology (SSIET) has taken on
the mission to
v Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence;
v Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the
student community;
v Motivate the students, the faculty and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities provided;
v Augment all available avenues to develop students for the changing needs of the
society, and
v Finally to develop SSIET into international institute of excellence.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
i. Name: Dr. V. R. Sampath
Designation: Principal
Mobile No: 7299905145
Email id: principal@sasthaenggcollege.com

ii. NBA coordinator, if designated: -

5
CRITERION 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60

1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)


1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5)
Vision of the Institute
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize.
A vision of developing into a multi-disciplinary, multi-campus technological institution
of excellence in this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create
engineers and technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society.
Mission of the Institute
The Management of SSIET has taken the mission to
v Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence;
v Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the student
community;
v Motivate the students, the faculty members and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities
provided;
v Augment all available avenues to develop students for the changing needs of the society;
and
v Finally to develop SSIET into an international institute of excellence.
Vision of the Department
To impart knowledge and excellence in Civil Engineering with global perspectives to
make our students, ethically strong engineers to construct our nation and to fulfill the demands of
Civil Engineering in society by playing responsible role with the sense of self-discipline, social
responsibility and co-operative work attitude.
Mission of the Department
v To develop the students with a broad and complete education in fundamentals,
applications, design and execution that equip them with necessary skills to become
successful professionals engineers
v To create congenial environment for interaction amongst students, faculty and technical
staff to facilitate open thinking and learning process.
v To produce wholesome civil engineers to provide service for the wealth improvement of
our nation
v To provide advanced skills and knowledge in the research field and design areas of civil
engineering with the state of the art technologies.

6
1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)
Program Educational Objectives of Civil Engineering Program are listed below.
Our graduates will,
PEO1: Become competent and engaged engineering professionals by applying their
technical and managerial skills.
PEO2: Adapt to any environment and succeed in higher positions in engineering practice
or research.
PEO3: Update the breadth of knowledge and engage themselves in the life-long learning
process to meet challenges of globalization.
PEO4: Make ethical decisions and demonstrate a commitment to serve the profession and
society by establishing their own organization.
1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
Table 1.1 shows the publication and dissemination of Civil Engineering Program Vision, Mission
and PEO.
Table 1.1. Adequacy in respect of publication & Dissemination
Disseminating
Detail Disseminated to Frequency
Tool
http://www.sreesasthainstitutions.e Year around
College Website Public
du.in/dept/civil-engineering/ display
Researchers, Industries,
FDP, Workshop and Placement Recruiters,
Brochure During the event
Brochure, Admission Campaign Academicians and
Parents
Notice boards, HOD room, Faculty
Students, Parents, Year around
Display room, class rooms, Laboratories,
Visitors and Alumni display
Newsletter and AV hall.
1. Parents Teacher
Once in the
Communication to all stakeholders semester.
during respective meetings like 2. Alumni
Meetings All Stakeholders Meeting Once
parents-teachers meeting, Alumni
in a Year
Meeting, Stake holders meeting. 3. Stakeholder
meeting - Once in
a Year.
Orientation Program for Students at Once in a
Orientation Students
the beginning of every semester semester
Card containing year calendar and
Pocket card Students Once in a year
vision, Mission and PEO

7
Process to ensure awareness of Vision/Mission/PEO

Figure 1.1 shows the process to ensure awareness of Vision, Mission and PEO of the program.

Identification of Stakeholders to whom


awareness of Vision/Mission/PEOs to be
created in Department Advisory Board Meeting

Deciding the tools of Communication to reach various


stakeholders in Department Advisory Board Meeting

Publishing in Website, Display in Class Rooms, Dissemination in Conducting orientation


Brochures, Pamphlets, Laboratory, HOD Room, Parents Teachers Program for Students by
Pocket Cards Notice Board Meet and Alumni the Program Coordinator at
Meet the beginning of every
semester

Feedback on Awareness of Vision, Mission and


PEO through Survey

Fig 1.1 Process to ensure awareness of Vision/Mission/PEO

1.4 State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the department, and PEOs of the
program (25)
Process of formulation of Vision and Mission
The Vision and Mission of the department is established in line with Vision and Mission
of the Institute, considering the new outcome based approach to education.

8
Initially a series of review meeting of the faculty were conducted to draft the Vision and
Mission statement of the department. The process of defining the vision and mission is given in
fig. 1.2.

Internal External
stakeholders Stakeholder
Institute Vision Governing
and Mission Council

Department Review Meeting

Formulation of Department Vision


and Mission

Review & Discussing the Vision and Mission in


modify the Stakeholder meeting

Finalizing the Vision and Mission of


the Department

Fig 1.2 Process of Formulation of Vision/Mission

Process of formulation of Program Educational Objective (PEO)

PEOs of the program will be finalized in the department advisory board. The process of defining
PEO is shown in fig.1.3.

9
Department Vision
Institute Vision and Mission Program
and Mission Outcomes

Receiving suggestions on Program Educational


Objectives in Stakeholders Meeting

Discussion in Program Assessment Committee


Meeting

Finalizing the PEOs in the Department


Advisory Board Meeting

Periodical Review of PEOs & Redefining PEO,


if Required

Table.1.2. Decision Authorities Involved in defining PEO of the program


Frequency of
Committee/Board Members
Meeting
Management Representative
Principal
HOD(Program Coordinator)
Academician
Once in an Year
Stakeholders Committee Senior Faculty
(May-June)
Industry Representatives
Alumni
Parent
Student Representatives
HOD(Program Coordinator) Twice in an Year
Program Assessment committee
All Faculty (June, August)
Principal
HOD(Program Coordinator)
Senior Faculty
Once in an Year
Department Advisory Board Management Representatives
(June)
Industry Representatives
Student Representatives
Parent Representatives

10
Table 1.3 List of Stakeholders of the programmes
Stakeholders Role of the Stakeholders
Interacts and maintains liaison with key stakeholders, students, faculty
and employer. Interacting with course coordinators towards attainment
Program
coordinator of POs and PSOs and review/update the changed required for
(HOD) curriculum gap. Conducts and interprets various surveys required to
assess POs and PSOs.
Students are the important constituents due to the fact that the major
Students investment (money and time) is envisaged in them. Students evaluation
and opinion are obtained in the stakeholders meeting and exit survey.
The corporate input from industry representatives is considered
Industry essential in assessing students performance. The feedback from the
employers is another milestone for the vision achievement.
The faculty is the backbone in providing an excellent teaching-learning
experience and the ultimate facilitator for engineering education. As a
Faculty real facilitator, the faculty has an excellent opportunity to evaluate
student deliverables. Evaluations of student performance in classes are
used as assessment tools.
Alumni of the programme represent a much broader spectrum of
individuals with a wide range of experience in their lives and careers. It
Alumni
is very important to include alumni and their feedback (through alumni
surveys), to evaluate POs and PSOs and formulate the PEOs.
Parents are the most important stakeholders for the academic
Parents programme. The parent constituency contributes valuable suggestions
and feedback.
The role of academicians is important to enhance the quality of
education. The qualities which are essential for a teacher is to create an
Academician everlasting impact in the minds of the student. All academic and subject
related activities are undertaken. Assess the content and scope of the
project to ensure it meets the subject's objectives.

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)


The following table 1.5 represents how program Educational Objectives are consistent
with Mission of the department. For example the PEO1 is consistent with Mission of our
11
department M1, M3 and M4.
Table 1.4 PEO and Mission of the Department
PEO PEO STATEMENT M MISSION STATEMENT
To develop the students with a broad and
Become competent and engaged
complete education in fundamentals,
engineering professionals by
PEO1 M1 applications, design and execution that equips
applying their technical and
them with necessary skills to become
managerial skills.
successful professionals engineers.
To create congenial environment for
Adapt to any environment and
interaction amongst students, faculty and
PEO2 succeed in higher positions in M2
technical staff to facilitate open thinking and
engineering practice or research.
learning process.
Update the breadth of knowledge
To produce wholesome civil engineers to
and engage themselves in the life-
PEO3 M3 provide service for the wealth improvement
long learning process to meet
of our nation.
challenges of globalization.
Make ethical decisions and
To provide advanced skills and knowledge in
demonstrate a commitment to
the research field and design areas of civil
PEO4 serve the profession and society by M4
engineering with the state of the art
establishing their own
technologies.
organization.

Table 1.5 Mapping of PEO with Mission of the Department


PEO Statements M1 M2 M3 M4
PEO 1 2 - 3 1
PEO 2 2 2 - 3
PEO 3 1 3 1 2
PEO 4 - 1 3 2
Note: Correlation details are 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) 4:
For no correlation -

12
Table 1.6 Justification of PEO with Mission of the Department
PEO Mission
Stateme Stateme Mapping Justification
nts nt
The Mapping Strength is Moderate
The Graduates become competent and successful in their
M1 2 profession by applying various skills provided by the
department. However, to become a complete engineering
professional, the focus should be laid on managerial skills.
The Mapping Strength is No-correlation
To become a competent civil engineering profession a graduate
M2 - is expected to widen his professional ambience in order to keep
pace with diverse opportunities in their discipline concerned.
PEO 1
The Mapping Strength is Substantial
The students become competent civil engineering professionals
M3 3
upholding the values of social responsibilities to be reflected
upon the productive development of the nation.
The Mapping Strength is Low
Besides applying the technical and managerial skills acquired
M4 1 through seminars, symposium, technical quizzes, projects and
competitions, more practising platforms would strongly
enhance their research quests in their discipline concerned.
The Mapping Strength is Moderate
The success of the graduates relies upon not only with the
M1 2
fundamentals but also their adoptability with their professional
front.
PEO 2 The Mapping Strength is Moderate
The congenial environment facilitates students to acquire
M2 2 essential inter-personal communication skills. However, the
success relies upon the appropriate applications of the
individual concerned.

13
The Mapping Strength is No-correlation
To become a full-pledged engineer, it is almost important to
M3 -
keep abreast of all latest technologies and its appropriate
applications to prove their abilities.
The Mapping Strength is Substantial
The graduates become adept at practising innovative technical
M4 3 ideas into research to obtain desired results which would
ultimately get reflected on his/her professional hierarchy in any
given environment.
The Mapping Strength is Low
The graduates are equipped with fundamentals. However, they
M1 1
have to develop their interest in latest advancements in order to
face the challenges of global needs.
The Mapping Strength is Substantial
The congenial environment enables a graduate to acquire
M2 3
essential inter personal skills in order to meet the challenges
globally.
PEO 3 The Mapping Strength is Low
It is almost important for graduates to keep abreast of all latest
M3 1
technologies and its appropriate applications in order to
establish themselves as full-pledged engineers.
The Mapping Strength is Moderate
The knowledge obtained in the area of research and design
M4 2 would engage the graduates with lifelong learning process.
However, the challenges of globalisation can be met only with
appropriate technical skills.
The Mapping Strength is No-correlation
Graduates can establish themselves as perspective engineers by
PEO 4 M1 - their ethical decisions, but their commitment towards the
welfare of the society solely rests upon them.

14
The Mapping Strength is No-correlation
A graduate with all his core fundamental knowledge can
establish an organisation but the success of the organisation is
M2 1
determined by various factors such as hands-on experience and
wide knowledge of latest technologies which would ultimately
get reflected upon the society and his profession as well.
The Mapping Strength is Substantial
M3 3 A full pledged civil engineer carries his commitment towards
profession and society as well.
The Mapping Strength is Moderate
The knowledge obtained from research and design areas would
M4 2 possibly pave a way for a graduate to become an entrepreneur.
However, the productive impact of the same on society rests
upon the entrepreneur himself.

15
CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching Learning Processes 120
2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120)
2.1. Program Curriculum (20)
2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum
for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned
in Annexure I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
v The institute is affiliated to Anna University.
v The program follows the curriculum provided by Anna University.
v The curriculum contains a good balance of mathematics, general and engineering
science related to technical and professional aspects, general educational, social
and environmental studies.
The following process is used to identify the compliance and curriculum gap

Anna University Curriculum Blooms Taxonomy

Faculty Writes Course Outcome, Identifies Knowledge Level and


performs CO-PO Mapping

Consolidation of Mapping by the Department and report to the


Program Coordinator

Program Coordinator Identifies the Curriculum Gap Weakly


supported Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes

Discuss and receive opinions from stakeholders in Stakeholders


Meeting

Propose additional Course/ New course that bridges the Gap

Discussing and Finalizing the conduct of additional course/new


course in the Department Advisory Board Meeting

Figure 2.1 Process to identify Compliance of Curriculum and Curriculum Gap

16
The list of GAP is given below
Table 2.1 List of curricular gaps

YEAR OF
S.NO SUBJECT GAP IDENTIFIED DURATION
STUDENTS
Bridge course-
Mathematics, Physics,
Chemistry, Bridging school to
1 5 days 1st year
Computer college level
fundamentals,&
Communication skill
Advancement in
2nd year
2 Construction Materials Concrete technology 1 day
students
Total Station and 2nd year
3 Surveying II 1 day
GPS students
Analysis by stiffness
3rd year
4 Structural analysis II & flexibility method 1 day
students
Soil stabilization
Soil mechanics and 3rd year
5 and soil 1 day
Foundation Engineering students
Reinforcement.
Environmental Waste Water 3rd year
6 1 day
Engineering II Treatment students
For all years
7 Soft skills Technical training Weekly 4 hours
students

v In Anna university curriculum, certain gaps are identified and necessary actions are taken
to bridge the gaps.
v Students will enrich their knowledge and improve their skills to get better placements and
lifelong learning.
v Letter was sent to the board of studies, Anna University stating the curricular gaps
identified from the syllabus

2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs
and PSOs (10)
Course Delivery Methods used in our department:
v Lectures
v Presentation (PPTs & Video)
v Experimental & Laboratory Work
v Group tasks (Projects)

17
Table 2.2 Curricular gaps in the attainment of POs/PSOs
CAY 2015-16

Date-
Resource Person % of Relevance to
S.No. Gap Action taken Month-
with designation students POs, PSOs
Year
Ms. Devi,AP,-Maths
Dr.Gnanam,AP-
Physics
Bridging 04.08.15 POs-1,2,3,10
Mr. Ekambaram.C, AP
1 school level to Bridge course 100 PSOs-1
- English
college level 11.08.15
Mr.Ashok kumar,AP-
Chemistry
SSIET
Construction Industrial POs -1,2
2 01.09.16 Mr.Natrajan 100
material Visit PSOs- 1
Dr.Shahul Hammed.M
Professor & Dean
Structural POs 1,2
3 Guest Lecture 04.09.15 NPR College Of 100
analysis-I PSOs- 1
Engineering And
Technology
Ms.R.J.Devi,AP-
Maths
Soft skills,
22.06.15 Mr.Venkatesh,AP
Aptitude and Soft Skill POs - 9,10
4 - Ms.Sherbanu,AP 100
Communicatio Training PSOs- 3
23.09.15 Mr.M.Sugan,AP
n skills
Mr.Nagamanickam,AP
Ms.Jinsa fathima AP
Basic Civil and
Mr.Gopinath POs - 1
5 Mechanical 100
(AP)-Civil PSOs- 1
Engineering
Concrete Mr.Krishnakumar POs 1,2
6 100
Technology (AP) -Civil PSOs- 1,2
Renewable
18.06.15 Mr.Ganansekaran POs 1,2,6,7
7 source of 100
Audit course - (AP) -Civil PSOs- 1,2
energy
27.10.15
Green building Mr.Aravindan POs 1,6,7
8 100
system (AP) -Civil PSOs- 1,2
Infrastructure
planning, Mrs.Mekala POs 1,2,11
9 100
management (AP) -Civil PSOs- 1
and evaluation
Guest Lecture
Environmental on Waste Grundfos Pumps India POs-1,2,6,7
10 21.07.15 100
Engineering II Water Pvt.Ltd PSOs-1,3
Treatment

18
CAY m1 2014-15
Date- % Of
Action Resource Person with Relevance To
S.No. Gap Month- Studen
Taken Designation POs, PSO
Year ts
Mrs.Devi, AP- Maths
Bridging school Dr. S. Suresh, AP- Physics
Bridge 04.08.14 POs-1,2,3,10
1. level to college Mr. Bobby, AP - English 100
course -13.08.14 PSOs-1
level Dr. Dulcy Evangelin, AP-
Chemistry
Soft skills
APT resources, Trainer
(Technical skills,
Technical 23.06.14 TIME institute, Trainer POs - 9,10
2 Aptitude and 100
Training -18.10.14 Manya education, PSOs- 3
Communication
Trainer
skills)
Training Program Value
22.07.14 SKIFI LAB PO s-5,1
3 On Hand Held added 100
-27.10.14 Bangalore PSO -2
GPS course
16.06.14 T.I.M.E (Triumphant Inst
Campus
Placement - Of Management POs-1,9,10
4 Residential 100
Training 22.06.14 Edu.Pvt.Ltd) PSOs-1,3
Programme
Risk And
Reliability POs-1,2,7
5 Kuttimarks M S-AP Civil 100 PSOs-1
Analysis of Civil
Infrastructure
Heavy
Construction POs-1,2,7
6 Chinnasamy M-AP Civil 100
Methods And PSOs-1,2
Machines
Audit 23.06.14
Green Building POs-1,6,7
7 course 100
Systems -18.10.14 Aiswaryadevi S-AP Civil PSOs-1,2

Renewable POs-1,2,6,7
8 Gnanasegaran R-AP Civil 100
Energy PSOs-1,2

POs-1,2,6
9 Building Services Vidya M-AP Civil 100
PSOs-1,2

Basics Of Remote POs-1,6


10 B Kannadasan-AP Civil 100
Sensing And GIS PSOs-1,2

Summer
Analysis and Training POs-1,5
17.06.14-
11 design software program CADD Centre, Chennai 100 PSOs-1,2
19.06.14
learning on REVIT

Environmental Guest Dr. Shaukat Mirza, POs-2,6,7


12 20.12.14 100
Awareness lecture Chairman, PSOs-1

19
CAY m2- 2013-14
Date-
Resource Person with % of Relevance to
S.No. Gap Action taken Month-
designation students POs, PSOs
Year
Mr. Kulothunga Prasad
AP- Maths
Dr. S. Suresh, AP-
Bridging 29.07.13 POs-1,2,3,10
Physics
1. school level to Bridge course - 100 PSOs-1
Mr. Bobby, AP -
college level 07.08.13
English
Dr. Dulcy Evangelin,
AP- Chemistry
Soft skills
(Technical
08.07.13
skills, Aptitude Technical Manya Education, POs - 9,10
2. - 100
and Training Trainer PSOs- 3
29.10.13
Communicatio
n skills)
Training
Analysis and 17.06.13
3 design software Program on E - CADD Centre, Chennai 100
POs-2,3, 5
Tabs PSOs-2
learning 22.06.13
Guest Lecture
Modern
on Modern Dr.R.V.Ranganath,
4 concrete the POs -1,6,7
Concrete-The 16.11.13 BMS College of 100
changing PSOs-1
Changing Engineering, Bangalore
paradigm
Paradigm
Campus 10.06.13
5 Placement TVS Training & Service POs-1,9,10
Residential - 100
Training Ltd. PSOs-1,3
Program me 15.06.13

2.2. Teaching - Learning Processes (100)


2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25)
Adherence to Academic Calendar
v The academic calendar contains the events plan according to Anna university calendar
and academic schedule is prepared and circulated to students every year on the
reopening day of odd semester

20
College Exam Cell Anna University Calendar
and Academic Schedule

IQAC
Opinion from Drafting Academic Calendar for One Year by the Opinion on
HODs /Class In Calendar Coordinator Department
charges Plans

Modification if necessary, in the Calendar

Approval by the Principal and Academic Advisory


Board

Circular of Schedule

Circulate the academic calendar to Students and Staff


reopening day of odd semester

Figure 2.2 Processes for Academic Calendar


Decision Authorities Involved
Table 2.3 Decision authority

Committee/Board Members Frequency of Meeting

Principal, HOD Representatives , Academician Once in an Year


Academic Advisory
Industry Representatives, Alumni, Parent,
Board (May-June)
Student Representatives

21
Management Representative, Administrative &
Technical Staff, Faculty Representatives, Two times an Year
IQAC
Community Representatives, Industry ( Once in a Semester)
Representative, Student Representative, Alumni

Table 2.4 Adherence to academic calendar


As per Reasons
Academic As per Actual Status of
Year/Sem Academic (if non-
calendar University Dates adherence
calendar compliance)
College
01-02-16 16-12-15 01-02-16 Yes -
reopen
04-01-16 08-02-16-
1st assessment 10-03-16- 09-01-16 13-02-16
No
period 17-03-16 19-01-16 22-02-16-
27-01-16 27-02-16 Due to
11-02-16 07-03-16- inclement
2nd
2015-16 04-04-16- 17-02-16 12-03-16 weather
assessment No
II,IV,VI 11-04-16 26-02-16 21-03-16- conditions,
period
04-03-16 26-03-16 academic
21-03-16- 04-04-16- schedule was
3rd
30-04-16- 26-03-16 09-04-16 not been
assessment No
05-05-16 12-04-16 30-04-16- adhered
period
21-04-16 06-05-16
Last working
07-05-16 07-05-16 07-05-16 No
day
College
30-01-16 16-12-16 09-12-16 Yes -
reopen
04-01-16
1st assessment 05-03-16- 09-01-16 18-01-16 &
Yes -
period 09-03-16 19-01-16 19-01-16
27-01-16
11-02-16
2nd
2015-16 28-03-16- 17-02-16
assessment 19-02-16 Yes -
VIII 31-03-16 26-02-16
period
04-03-16
21-03-16-
3rd
13-04-16- 26-03-16
assessment 19-03-16 Yes
18-04-16 12-04-16 -
period
21-04-16
Last working
18-04-16 18-04-16 18-04-16 Yes -
day

22
Process for course delivery
v Flow chart indicates the outline of methodology for delivery of courses
v Content of course delivery will be evaluated by HOD and Principal

Institutional Head

Academic schedule

Dept head + Timetable /


Common courses
Program coordinator

Course committee
Lecture Faculty meeting
PPT
CO PO
Video Lectures
Faculty PEO
Library Teaching Learning
Guest lecture Methodologies
Demonstration
Tutorial Syllabus T.L. Process
Feedback uniformity in delivery
Evaluation

T.L. activities planning

Documentation

Figure 2.3 Processes for course delivery

Table 2.5 Generalized mapping of Course delivery methods to the Pos.

Modes of PROGRAMME OUTCOMES


Delivery 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lectures
Group

Discussion
Tutorial hours
Project Based

Training
E-Leaning
Practical Class
Mini Projects
Seminar Class
Industrial Based
23
Training
Video Lectures

Methodology to Support Students


The student performance and overall development is regularly monitored by the mentor. The
students are classified into bright and weak students based on academic performance.
The process included in encouraging bright students and supporting weak students is given below.

Mentor

Classification of bright students and weak students


based on Academic and Overall Performance

General Strategies
Formulated By the
Applying Strategies for each classification Principal and
Academic
Advisory Board

Encouraging Bright Students Supporting Weak Students

Merit scholarship Effective Mentoring


Rewarding in College Day Coaching Classes
Encouraging for Higher Studies Simplified learning materials
Placement in Tier I companies
Peer learning
Internship in industries
Participation in co-curricular
activities
Participation in exchange
programme

Figure 2.4 Processes for Student Improvement


Table 2.6 Impact of student improvement process
Bright Students Weak Students
S.No.
Methodology Impact Methodology Impact
1. Rewarding in Students are motivated to Effective Students difficulties were
24
College Day receive prizes for university Mentoring identified and counseled to
rank holders and class toppers focus on studies
Implementation: Giving special
advice and materials for
preparing competitive exam
Coaching classes were
and higher studies to achieve
Encouraging for Coaching conducted and the
2. their goal of studying abroad
Higher Studies Classes academic performance was
and going for higher studies
gradually increased
Impact: Enabled a few students
to get through the competitive
exam.
Implementation: Trainers from
reputed training institutes
Allowing students to
appointed for giving placement
interact with other students
training along with academic
3. Placement Training Peer learning and faculties through
schedule facilitates students.
online course NPTEL to
Impact: To enhance and excel
attain educational goals
their abilities at times of
placement.
The simplified learning
These trainings will create
Simplified materials helped the
awareness on complicated
4. Inplant training learning candidate to understand the
theoretical aspects in Civil
material difficult topic clearly and
Engineering
to score better marks
Sending students to renowned
industries and R&D centers for
Internship in
5. internship programs assist them
industries
practical knowledge about real
time projects.
Students were guided to
participate in various technical
Participation in co-
6. and non technical events
curricular activities
conducted by universities and
affiliated colleges
Students with good marks were
encouraged by providing merit
7. Merit scholarship
scholarship for their tuition
fees
Participation in
enhanced Students are allowed to
8. engineering participate in various training
knowledge programmes organized by IIT.
programme

25
Laboratory Experiments
Developing List of experiments as approved by Anna
university curriculum

Preparing experiments procedure

Preparing manual for conducting experiments

Instruction to students and safety measures in lab

Conducting experiments

Recording the results in Observation Note by student

Evaluation of the results by the Course Faculty

Recording the results in Record Note

Evaluation of the Record and experimentation by


students in internal and external exams

Figure 2.5 Processes for lab experiments


Impact:
It will be useful to implement theoretical concept in practical experiments.
It is a lifelong learning process

Continuous Assessment in Lab Experiment


Continuous assessment system is also implemented for assessment of laboratory work. The
assessment is done on the basis of submission of laboratory records, understanding of the
experiment through oral viva voce questions and participation in performing the experiment.

26
Table 2.7 Continuous Assessment in Lab Course
Aim and Tabulation-
Procedure Calculation Result Viva Record
apparatus Observation Total (100)
(25) (15) (10) (10) (10)
(10) (20)

Feed back
Student feedback for teaching learning process and actions taken:
v The feedback will be taken after Unit-I completion and end of the semester, all the
students are required to fill a feedback-form appraising the faculty using a scale of 1 (low)
through 5 (high).
v Counseling and motivation are given by respective HOD for those faculty members who
have secured low scores and negative comments, if any, in the feedback. This motivates
them to improve their skills and abilities.
v If required, training - orientation programmes are conducted by professional experts to
master the skills of the faculty members in the nuances of teaching, thus improving the
efficiency of teaching-learning process.

TEACHING EVALUATION FORM


Table 2.8 Feedback of Teaching Learning Process

Name of the Teacher taking the class, ________________________________________


Designation _________________________ Subject handled - Topic: _______________
Branch, Class __________________________________________________________

S. No. Attributes 1 2 3 4 5
1. Introduction given, Topic of lecture
announced - written on the Board
2. Objectives stated - Teaching Points written
on the Board.
3. Subject matter knowledge
4. Voice (is it clear, and audible?)
5. Writing on the Board, Figures - Diagrams.
(Size, Legibility, Methodical)
6. Any Teaching Aid used
7. Posture
8. Eye contact with students

27
9. Confidence level exhibited
10. Monitoring Process (Checking whether
students have understood the points
covered)
11. Making students comfortable in class -
Encouraged Students to ask Questions.
12. Is the lecture interesting or not?
13. Communication (Language and Fluency)
14. Was there any element of creativity (by
way of certain examples) (Whats new?)

15. Class room management


16. Conclusion - summarization made; or
lecture abruptly ended?

Feedback analysis
Table 2.9 Feedback analysis

S.No. Feedback category Frequency Analysis Action taken


If faculty members If required, training -
secured low scores and orientation programmes are
Twice a
1 Teaching and learning negative comments, then conducted by professional
semester
counseling will be given experts to improve the skills of
by the respective HOD the faculty members

2.2.2. Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20)
Question Paper Setting
v The internal assessment question paper covering specified course outcomes are set
by the course faculty.
v Question paper audit is conducted to ensure the quality of question paper.
v The assignments are given to the students and are evaluated by the course faculty
The process of the setting question paper is given in the following table:

28
Subject handling faculty

Anna University question


paper format and instruction

Based on Unit coverage

Setting of Question Papers with mapping of questions with Course Outcomes


by the Course Faculty

Submit the question paper one week before the test/Exam


Set A& Set B

Submission of the Question Papers to the Department Exam Cell Coordinator

Question Paper Audit by HOD and


Department Exam cell coordinator

Acceptance of the Question Paper/ Recommending Modification,


if required

Figure 2.6 Processes for Question paper setting- -

Question paper validation


Two sets of internal exam question papers were prepared by the subject handling
faculty and it was validated by department exam cell coordinator
The department head ensures that the question paper prepared by the subject handling
faculty was attaining course outcomes and it has learning level of the student.
Among the two sets, one was selected by the HOD for internal examination.

29
Model answer-evaluation and its compliance
After each test, the faculty concerned for individual subject prepares answer key for
the question papers, which in turn get countersigned by the respective HOD for initiating the
evaluation process. Mark obtained by individual student is entered in the exam cell once the
evaluation is carried out.
Table 2.10 Format for CO Coverage

Allocated marks
Course
S.No Subject Unit Cycle Unit Cycle Unit
outcomes
Test-1 Test - 1 Test-2 Test - 2 Test-3
CO1
CO2
CO3
1
CO4
CO5
CO6

Result analysis procedure


The Exam cell Coordinator consolidates the mark statement by individual faculty
concerned for each subject and analysis the report for substantially and justifying the reasons
stated by them. Following that the final report submitted to the Exam Cell.

30
Assignments and Evaluation
The assignments were given periodically after the completion of the units and it is
evaluated.

Course Curriculum Course Outcomes

Course Faculty identifies the topics for assignments which


promotes self learning

Brief orientation to students about assignment writing and the


sources of information such as (E-book, NPTEL) by the Course
Faculty

Preparation of assignment and submission by the student within


the stipulated time

Evaluation of the Assignment by the Course Faculty and


Recording the Performance

Figure 2.7 Processes for Assignments and Evaluation


Table 2.11 Format for CO Coveraged

Allocated marks References


outcomes
Course

S.No. Subjects Book & page


Assign.1

Assign.2

Assign.3

No.
CO1
CO2
CO3
1
CO4
CO5
CO6

31
2.2.3. Quality of student projects (25)
As a part of final year, and in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements, undergraduate
students in the Civil Department do a Final Year Project (FYP).
v Purpose
To define the procedure for student project identification, allocation & evaluation
v Scope
To review the students project work progress and timely completion.

Figure 2.8 Process for students Project


Projects are evaluated through presentations periodically and suitable comments are given
by the project co-coordinator and the faculty members during every review to improve students
knowledge on their project. Suggestions are also given on modules (if necessary) to make the
project noteworthy. The supervisor verify whether the students have taken corrective actions for
the comments given below and then sign in the review form given for each batch.

32
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY
CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT REVIEW I
YEAR-SEMESTER: BATCH: DATE:
Aim &
S.N Batch Name of the Literature Work
Reg No Objective
O No Students Review (10) plan (10)
(10)

SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND


TECHNOLOGY
CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT REVIEW II
YEAR-SEMESTER: BATCH: DATE:
Work
S.N Batch Name of the Methodology Presentation
Reg No progress
O No Students (10) (10)
(10)

SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND


TECHNOLOGY
CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
EVALUATION FORM
PROJECT REVIEW III
YEAR-SEMESTER: BATCH: DATE:
Methodology Results &
S.N Batch Name of the Presentatio
Reg No & Execution Discussio
O No Students n (10)
(10) n (10)

33
SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY
CHEMBARAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600123
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
POOR GOOD VERY GOOD EXCELLENT
Not matching In accordance
Clear selection Innovative and
TITLE with course with the course
of topic research oriented
objective and novel idea
LITERATURE Not relevant to Moderate to Highly relevant to
to topic
REVIEW topic topic topic
Not yet
Approaching Fully meeting Exceeding
METHODOLOGY meeting the
expectations expectations expectations
expectations
Students have Students
Students are at
Students do limited demonstrate
ease and answer
not appear to understanding comprehensive
most questions
TECHNICAL understand of the subject, knowledge and
with
CONTENT subject, can't and have answer all
explanations
answer difficult questions with
and some
questions answering explanations and
elaboration
questions elaboration
Student present
Students lack Students
Students are with easy
confidence, do voices are low
confident, speak confidence, speak
not speak and unclear,
PRESENTATION well and are very well and
clearly, and difficult to keep
engaged with clearly, maintain
not engaged engagement
their audience excellent
with audience with audience.
engagement.

BEST PROJECT

Table 2.12 Denoting the Best three Projects by students (2015-16)


Relevance To
S No. Student Name Project Title Guide Name Pos &Psos
Raj Kumar.P POs-
Saranya.N Self healing bio 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
1. Gnanasegaran.R
Swetha.K concrete 0,11,12
Zeba Jalal PSOs- 1,2,3
Flexural
Magesh S POs-
Behaviour Of
Nandhakumar B 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
2. Cold Formed Kuttimarks.M.S
Lakshan.Rs 0,11,12
Stainless Steel
Prakash.U PSOs- 1,2,3
Member
Girishchandar.G
An Experimental POs-
Kikrokul Kikhi
investigation on 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
3. Sodhungen Limboo Ajith.J
concrete with 0,11,12
Yogesh Limboo
Nano silica PSOs- 1,2,3

34
Implementation
A project coordinator is appointed by the Head of the department who is responsible for planning,
scheduling and execution of all the activities related to the student project work.
Impact analysis
v The students develop innovative ideas of the project work
v The skills or abilities of students are improved.
v The knowledge on various aspects of project is widened.
v Confidence level of the students is boosted
v Improved teamwork spirit is found among the students
v Implementation and deployment of the project for social benefits reveals social
responsibilities as students
v Students gain knowledge in document preparation and presentation.
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction (15)
The industry interactions were conducted by industry personnel and the project work done
by students outside & inside the campus are shown in the below tables.
Table 2.13: Industry Attached Laboratory
S. No Laboratory Organization Title
CAY (2015-16)
Testing of soil samples, concrete
cubes and aggregate at Velacherry
Siva Constructions And
1 Soil Mechanics Lab site, Medavakkam site and
Builders
Tambaram site for Siva
Constructions

Testing and analysis of soil and


concrete samples for residential
Soil Mechanics, Concrete Siva Constructions And buildings at Adayar site,
2 Builders Nandambakkam site, Thiruverkadu
Lab
site and Chrompet site for Siva
Constructions and builders

CAYm1 (2014-2015)
Testing of soil samples, concrete
Soil Mechanics, Concrete SS Constructions cubes and aggregate at Porur site,
1 Valasaravakkam site and Mangadu
Lab
site for SS Constructions.

Testing and analysis of soil and


concrete samples for residential
Soil Mechanics, Concrete VASS Constructions buildings at Pammal site,
2 Anagaputhur site, Thirunermalai site
Lab
and Chrompet site for VASS
Constructions

35
CAYm2 (2013-2014)
Testing and analysis of soil and
Soil Mechanics, Concrete CC Builders concrete samples for construction of
3 Residential building at Pallavaram
Lab
site for CC Builders.

Testing of steel rods for Pammal


Strength Of Materials VASS Constructions
4 construction site for VAAS
Lab Constructions.

CAYm3 (2012-2013)
Strength Of Materials Testing of steel rods for Pallavaram
5 CC Builder
Lab construction site for CC Builders.

Testing of steel rods for Porur


Strength Of Materials SS Constructions construction site for SS
6
Lab Constructions.

Table 2.14: Details of project done by Students in research laboratories


Developed. Benefited
S No Title Coordinator
Organized By Students
CAY (2014-15)
Study on usage of dismantled
Surya prakash K
brick masonry and concrete
Joy aditiyan C
1 aggregate in precast products NLC Vinoth Kumar S
Vichu S
using bottom ash as fine
Vignesh V
aggregate in place of river sand
Raja Kumar S
Replacement of River sand with Kasiraja T
2 NLC Sivaprakasan S
bottom ash in concrete Anandh Raj S
Arul Pandiyan. P
Gowtham. B
Highway
3 Glowing Roads Thilakar Y C Joshi G
Research Station
Karupasamy
CAYm1 (2013-14)
Monica M
Study on internal curing of Highway Sareetha S
1 Murugan M
concrete using admixtures Research Station Sivaranjani A
Subhashini V R
Naresh V
Study on road junction Sangamita Nag
Highway
2 improvement Integral Coach Dr.Thenmozhi S Sowndara
Research Station
Factory Pandian A
Vijayalakshmi R

36
Naveenkumar N
Experimental study on corrosion
Rajeshwar C G
3 resistance using coated rebars in ONGC Dr.Thenmozhi S
Sudharson K
an effluent treatment plant
Visalan V
Murali J
De-Centralized Waste Water IITM Research
4 Aiswarya Devi S Srinivas S
Treatment Park
Sugadev S
Rajiv B
Utilization of Biopolymer in Highway Veeramani R
5 Thilakar Y C
Bituminous mix Research Station Sudharsan S
Vijay Palani P

Table 2.15 Guest lecture by Industrial experts

S Benefited
Title Resource person/Industry Co-ordinator
NO students
CAY (2015-16)
Waste Water Final Year
1 Chinnasamy M
Treatment Grundfos Pumps India Pvt.Ltd students

Senthil Kumar
Structural Third Year
2 Design Engineer Kuttymarks M S
analysis-I students
L&T Construction
Bhavana chandar dass
Second year
3 Soil Mechanics Regional Manager Kannadasan B
students
OC TEC
CAYm1 (2014-15)
Construction Third year
L &T Construction
1 Management Chinnasamy M students
Chennai
Techniques" (Batch2012-16)
Construction of Third year
2 Highways & BSCPL Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd Dinesh Babu ES students
Bridges" (Batch2012-16)
Recent trends Final year
Guntur HUSCON
3 on High Rise Kuttymarks M S students
Engineers Pvt. Ltd,
Buildings (Batch2011-2015)
Estimation Final year
4 using BEST CISTSO MAG Chinnasamy M students
Software (Batch2011-2015)
Introduction to Final year
5 Construction MSK group, Hyderabad Kannadasan B students
Planning (Batch2011-2015)
CAY m2 (2013-2014)

37
Dr. A.R.C.Murthy Final year
Fracture
1 Senior Scientist, Nagaraj.S students
Mechanics
Project Leader (Batch2010-2014)
Sri. A.C.Santosh
Special Third year
Sales Manager Krishnakumar.
2 Concrete & students
Construction System M
Case Studies (Batch2011-2015)
BASF

Table: 2.16 Short term courses

Any other
S. Module contributory Developed. Resource Target
Duration
No Description Inst. . Organized by Persons Audience
Industry
CAY (2015-16)
Technical
Department Of Trainers
Training On 10.02.16 - Third Year
1. Face TRG Civil From Face
Civil 26.03.16 Students
Engineering TRG
Engineering
CAYm1 (2014-2015)
Trainers
Transportation Skifi Lab Department Of
10.09.2014 From Skifi Third Year
1. Engineering Bangalore Civil
- 09.12.2014 Lab Students
Engineering
Bangalore
Trainers
Skifi Lab Department Of
Building 12.01.2015 - From Skifi Final Year
2. Bangalore Civil
Services 17.01.2015 Lab Students
Engineering
Bangalore
Application of
Trainers
GIS And Skifi Lab Department Of
30.07.2014 - From Skifi Third Year
3. Seismic Bangalore Civil
03.09.2014 Lab Students
Design Of Engineering
Bangalore
Buildings
Trainers
Building SNL Civil Department Of
02.03.2015 - From Skifi Third Year
4. Construction Wing Civil
05.03.2015 Lab Students
Management Engineering
Bangalore
CAY m2 (2013-2014)
Trainers
Department Of
Skifi Lab 30.01.2014 - From Skifi Third Year
5. GIS Civil
Bangalore 03.03.2014 Lab Students
Engineering
Bangalore
Skifi Lab Department Of 10.02.14- Trainers Third Year
6. Transportation
Bangalore Civil 09.03.14 From Skifi Students
38
Engineering Lab
Bangalore
Trainers
Department Of
Foundation Skifi Lab 20.01.14 From Skifi Third Year
7. Civil
Analysis Bangalore -27.01.14 Lab Students
Engineering
Bangalore

Impact Analysis
The department organizes special short term course for improving students technical
interest in their respective core areas to enable them to perform better in their academics,
professional as well.
2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship. Summer training (15)
In Plant Training
v Students are encouraged to undergo In Plant Training as it provides hands-on industrial
experience to them. It also equipments students with necessary technical knowledge even
before they enter the job scenario.
v The following table shows the list of internship training visits for the academic years 2015-
16, 2014-2015 and 2013-2014.
Table2.17: In Plant Training undertaken by the students.
S. No. of
Name of the Company Field Duration
No. students
CAY 2015-16
25.04.16 - 9.05.16
M/S Green Star Fertilizers
1 Site Execution & 20.06.16 - 3
(Spic)
15.07.16
28.03.16 -
2 M/S Salem Steel Plant Site Execution 5
02.04.16
M/S High-tech Concrete
3 Material Testing 29.03.16 -02.04.16 5
Solutions Pvt Ltd
21.03.16 -
4 M/S Salem Steel Plant Execution Work 3
26.03.16
M/S High-tech Concrete
5 Design Mix Work 16.03.16- 21.03.16 5
Solutions Pvt Ltd
M/S High-tech Concrete
6 Design Mix Work 02.03.16 -07.03.16 4
Solutions Pvt Ltd
Site Execution 16.03.16 -
7 M/S Preetha Constructions 5
20.03.16
Site Execution 15.03.16 -
8 M/S Harinee Constructions 4
20.03.16
Site Execution 29.02.16 -
9 M/S Aptsorbh 4
05.03.16
10 I 5 Housing And Properties Site Execution 10.02.16 -16.02.16 1

39
Site Execution 25.07.16 -
11 Chennai Port Trust 6
30.07.16
CAY m1 (2014-2015)
1 Larsen & Toubro Site Execution 18.06.14-23.06.14 1
Port Of Chennai,(Port Par Design Of RCC
2 02.01.15-08.01.15 4
Excellence) Structures
Pentagons Engineering
3 Site Execution 20.12.14- 24.12.14 4
Contractors
Dawn Engineers And
4 Design 21.06.14-26.06.14 4
Contractors
Pentagons Engineering
5 Site Execution 20.12.14 -24.12.14 5
Contractors
6 L&T Site Execution 14.12.14 -24.12.14 1
7 Chennai Port Trust Site Execution 15.12.14- 24.12.14 6
07.12.14-
8 Andaman & Nicobar PWD Design 30.12.14& 2
15.12.14 -25.12.14
CAY m2 (2013-2014)
East Coast Constructions &
1 Estimation Work 04.06.13-05.06.13 3
Industries Ltd
2 Shakthi Constructions Construction 07.06.13-11.06.13 3
Geo Foundations & Structures
3 Construction 19.06.13-20.06.13 4
Pvt Ltd
Dawn Engineers And
4 Design 21.06.13-26.06.13 3
Contractors
5 Unique Infra Construction 23.06.13-25.06.13 6

Impact Analysis of industrial training


v The students Gain knowledge about the Work Experience.
v The internship has transitioned into a job for few students.
v Students Gain Confidence.
v The students get exposure from the industries.
Industrial Visits
The following table shows the list of industrial visits for the academic years 2015-16, 2014-
2015, 2013-2014, and. 2012-2013.
Table 2.18 Details of Industrial Visits by Students.
S. No. Name of the Company No. of days Duration No. of students
CAY (2015-16)
Chennai Trade Centre Build
1 1 18.07.2015 132
Expo
2 Dakshina Chitra 1 02.09.2015 132
3 Mattupetty Dam 4 09.09.15 -13.09.15 63
4 Dream Land Construction 4 09.09.15 -13.09.15 67
5 Ultratech RMC plant 1 01.09.16 130
40
6 SERC 1 25.09.15 12
CAY m1 (2014-2015)
1 Munnar- Cochin Port 5 24.09.14- 28.09.14 44
2 Chennai Harbour 3 16.09.14- 18.09.14 159
3 Poondi Reservoir 1 04.03.15 49
4 Poondi Reservoir 1 05.03.15 67
5 Poondi Reservoir 1 06.03.15 43
P&C Construction(RMC
6 1 11.08.14 39
Plant)
P&C Construction(RMC
7 1 13.08.14 37
Plant)
P&C Construction(RMC
8 1 14.08.14 71
Plant)
CAY m2 (2013-2014)
1 Cochin Port Trust, Kerala 1 30.09.2013 50
Impact Analysis
v Industrial visits are arranged for students to provide more input for technical
seminar study, project work and practical oriented subjects.
v Students also get awareness about the corporate culture and the working
atmosphere of the industries.
v The visits motivate students to come out with more innovations and involve in
R&D work etc.

Feedback Report
Table 2.19 Feedback Analysis
Feedback
S.No Frequency Analysis Action taken
category
Based on the positive report given
After visiting the Analysis based on
by the students, the industrial
Industrial industry students Industrial visit
1 personals are contacted for signing
visit will give feed report given by
of MOU, training programme and
back students
campus recruitment drive.
The collected
reports were The finalized training centers-
Inplant
2 Every semester analyzed and R&D labs are contacted for
training
choose the better sending of next set of students.
training center.

41
CRITERION 3 COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES 120

3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20)
Program Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure I and Program Specific Outcomes as
defined by the Program
PROGRAM OUTCOMES:
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems
and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and
need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

42
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and
write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give
and receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member
and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES:
PSO 1: Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving,
design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various
issues in the core areas of civil engineering.
PSO 2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques.
PSO 3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in
civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced
areas & related field.
3.1.1 Course Outcomes(COs)(SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each
semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if
asked) (5)
Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.
Table 3.1.1 Course Outcomes

Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) Year of Study: 2013-14

Define the scope and importance of environment ecosystem and


C202.1 K1
biodiversity
C202.2 Explain about the causes and effects of environmental pollution K2

C202.3 Describe about the properties of natural sources K2

C202.4 Illustrate the social issues and environment problems K2

C202.5 State about human population and variation among nations K1

C202.6 Explain the importance of environment and its impacts K2

43
Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS) Year of Study: 2013-14

C211.1 Classify the soil based on index properties K2

C211.2 Compute the permeability characteristics of soil K3

C211.3 Explain about various methods of compaction and consolidation of soil K2

C211.4 Calculate shear strength of various types of soil. K3

C211.5 Analyze the stability of slopes using different methods. K3

C211.6 Determine the properties of soil K3

Course Name: C302(CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I) Year of Study: 2014-15

Determine the forces in the members of the statically indeterminate


C302.1 K3
structures.
Demonstrate the effect of moving loads and to construct influence line
C302.2 K3
diagram for determinate beams

C302.3 Analyze suspension cables, two hinged and three hinged arches K3

Analyze statically indeterminate structures by using slope deflection


C302.4 K3
methods.
Analyze statically indeterminate structures by using moment distribution
C302.5 K3
methods.

C302.6 Apply various classical methods in the analysis of structural elements. K3

Course Name: C312 (CE2352- DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES) Year of Study: 2014-15

C312.1 Enumerate the Design of steel connection using rivet, bolt and welding k2
C312.2 Prepare the design of tension member k3
C312.3 Prepare the design of compression member k3
C312.4 Prepare the design of laterally supported and unsupported beams k3
C312.5 Prepare the design of truss component members k3
C312.6 Apply the Codal provisions in the design of various steel structures. k3

Course Name: C402(CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING)

44
Year of Study: 2015-16
C402.1 Estimate the Quantity of various items of works involved in buildings. K2

Estimate the Quantity of various items of works involved in roads,


C402.2 K2
retaining walls , culverts ,water supply and sanitary works

C402.3 Prepare specification ,tenders, contract document and rate analysis K3

C402.4 Estimate valuation of buildings K2

C402.5 Prepare report on estimate of various civil engineering works K3

Estimate the quantities of works involved in various civil engineering


C402.6 K2
works

Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT) Year of Study: 2015-16

C413.1 Identify the real world problems K2

C413.1 Develop design methodologies & its implementation K3

C413.1 Utilize advanced software techniques / skills K3

Use various techniques, engineering knowledge and skill, and modern


C413.1 K3
engineering tools

C413.1 Prepare Technical reports K6

C413.1 Solve a specific problem K6

3.1.2 A CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1(Six matrices to be mentioned; one per
semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (5)
Note : correlation level s1, 2 or 3 as defined below :
1 : Slight(Low) 2 : Moderate(Medium) 3 : Substantial(High) If there is no correlation, put
Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING) Year of Study: 2013-14
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C202.1 1 0 - - - 0 1 - - - - -
C202.2 2 1 - - - 0 2 - - - - -
C202.3 2 1 - - - 0 2 - - - - -
C202.4 2 1 - - - 0 2 - - - - -
C202.5 1 0 - - - 0 1 - - - - -
C202.6 2 1 - - - 0 2 - - - - -
AVERAGE 1.7 0.7 - - - 0.0 1.7 - - - - -

Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS) Year of Study: 2013-14


45
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C211.1 2 1 - - - - - - - - - -
C211.2 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C211.3 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C211.4 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C211.5 3 3 - - - - - - - - - -
C211.6 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
AVERAGE 2.8 2.0 - - - - - - - - - -
Course Name: C302 (CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I) Year of Study: 2014-15

CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C302.1 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C302.2 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C302.3 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C302.4 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C302.5 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
C302.6 3 2 - - - - - - - - - -
AVERAGE 3.0 2.0 - - - - - - - - - -
Course Name: C312 (CE2352-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES) Year of Study: 2014-15

CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C312.1 2 1 0 - - - - 2 - - - -
C312.2 3 2 1 - - - - 3 - - - -
C312.3 3 2 1 - - - - 3 - - - -
C312.4 3 2 1 - - - - 3 - - - -
C312.5 3 2 1 - - - - 3 - - - -
C312.6 3 2 -1 - - - 3 - - - -
AVERAGE 2.8 1.8 0.8 - - - - 3.0 - - - -
Course Name: C402 (CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING) Year of Study: 2015-16

CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C402.1 2 1 0 - - - - - - - - -
C402.2 2 1 0 - - - - - - - - -
C402.3 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - -
C402.4 2 1 0 - - - - - - - - -
C402.5 3 2 1 - - - - - - - - -
C402.6 2 1 0 - - - - - - - - -
AVERAGE 2.3 1.3 0.33 - - - - - - - - -
Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT) Year of Study: 2015-16

CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C413.1 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0
C413.2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 0 0
C413.3 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 0 0
C413.4 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 0 0
C413.5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
C413.6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
AVERAGE 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0

46
3.1.2 B CO-PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1(Six matrices to be mentioned; one per
semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (5)
Table 3.1-2 CO PO Matrices

Course Name: C202 (GE2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING)


Year of Study: 2013-14

CO PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C202.1 0 - -
C202.2 1 - -
C202.3 1 - -
C202.4 1 - -
C202.5 0 - -
C202.6 1 - -
AVERAGE 0.7 - -
Course Name: C211 (CE2251- SOIL MECHANICS) Year of Study: 2013-14

CO PSO 1 PSO 2 PSO 3


C211.1 1 - 0
C211.2 2 - 1
C211.3 2 - 1
C211.4 2 - 1
C211.5 3 - 2
C211.6 2 - 1
AVERAGE 2.0 - 1.0
Course Name: C302 (CE2302-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I) Year of Study: 2014-15

CO PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C302.1 2 - -
C302.2 2 - -
C302.3 2 - -
C302.4 2 - -
C302.5 2 - -
C302.6 2 - -
AVERAGE 2.0 - -
Course Name: C312 (CE2352-DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURES) Year of Study: 2014-15

CO PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C312.1 1 - 0
C312.2 2 - 1
C312.3 2 - 1
C312.4 2 - 1
C312.5 2 - 1
C312.6 2 - 1
AVERAGE 1.8 - 0.8
Course Name: C402 (CE2402 ESTIMATION AND QUANTITY SURVEYING)

Year of Study: 2015-16

47
CO PSO 1 PSO 2 PSO 3
C402.1 1 2 0
C402.2 1 2 0
C402.3 2 3 1
C402.4 1 2 0
C402.5 2 3 1
C402.6 1 2 0
AVERAGE 1.3 2.3 0.33
Course Name: C413 (CE2453 FINAL PROJECT) Year of Study: 2015-16

CO PSO 1 PSO 2 PSO 3


C413.1 1 2 0
C413.2 2 3 0
C413.3 2 3 0
C413.4 2 3 0
C413.5 3 3 3
C413.6 3 3 3
AVERAGE 2.2 2.8 1.0
3.1.3 - A Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)

Table 3.1-3 CO PSO Matrices

Note : correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 as defined below :


1 : Slight(Low) 2 : Moderate(Medium) 3 : Substantial(High) If there is no correlation, put

COURSE NAME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C101 - - - - - - - - 2.0 1.5 1.5 -
C102 2.7 1.8 0.8 0.8 - - - - - - - -
C103 2.2 1.2 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C104 2.3 1.3 - - - - - - - - - -
C105 3.0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C106 2.8 - 0.8 - - - - - - - - -
C107 3.0 - - - 3.0 - - - - - - -
C108 3.0 2.2 - - 3.0 - - - - - - -
C109 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2.0 2.0 -
C110 2.27 1.67 0.7 0.7 - - - - - - - -
C111 2.2 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C112 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 2.5 - - - - - - - - - - -
C114 2.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 - - - - - - -
C115 3.0 - - - 1.0 - - - - - - -
C116 2.0 3.0 - 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
C117 2.2 - - - 0.7 - - - - - - -
C201 2.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 - - - - - - - -
C202 1.7 0.7 - - - - 1.7 - - - - -
C203 2.0 1.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C204 2.7 1.7 - - - - - - - - - -

48
C205 2.2 1.2 - - - - - - - - - -
C206 2.3 - 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C207 2.5 1.5 - - - - - - - - - -
C208 3.0 2.0 1.0 - 1.0 - - - 1.0 - - -
C209 2.8 1.8 0.8 - 2.8 - - - - - - -
C210 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - - -
C211 2.8 2.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C212 2.7 1.7 - - - - - - - - - -
C213 2.3 1.7 0.7 - - 0.7 - - - - - -
C214 2.2 1.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C215 2.3 1.3 0.3 - - 0.3 - - - - - -
C216 3.0 2.2 1.3 - 3.0 - - - 1.3 0.3 - -
C217 3.0 2.7 1.7 - 1.7 - - - 1.7 0.7 - -
C218 3.0 2.2 1.3 - 1.3 - - - 1.3 - - -
C301 2.8 1.8 0.8 - - 0.8 - - - - - -
C302 3.0 2.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C303 2.0 1.0 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C304 2.0 1.2 - - - 0.3 2.0 - - - - -
C305 2.8 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - -
C306 3.0 2.3 1.3 - - - - 3.0 - - - -
C307 - - - - - - - - 1.0 1.5 1.5 -
C308 3.0 2.2 1.2 - 3.0 - - - 1.2 0.2 - -
C309 2.8 1.8 0.8 - 2.8 - - - 0.8 - - -
C310 - - - - - - - - 0.5 - 0.0 -
C311 2.7 1.7 - - - - - - - - - -
C312 2.8 1.8 0.8 - - - - 3.0 - - - -
C313 2.8 1.8 - - - 0.8 - - - - - -
C314 2.3 1.3 - - - 0.3 2.3 - - - - -
C315 2.5 - - - - 0.5 - - - - - -
C316 2.5 1.5 - - - 0.5 - - - - - -
C317 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 - 3.0 - - - - -
C318 3.0 2.5 1.8 - 1.8 - 3.0 - - - - -
C319 2.8 1.8 - - 2.8 - - - 0.8 - - -
C401 3.0 2.0 1.0 - - - 3.0 - - - - -
C402 2.3 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C403 2.7 1.7 0.7 - - - - 3.0 - - - -
C404 2.3 1.3 0.3 - - - 2.0 - - - -
C405 2.7 1.7 0.7 - - 0.7 2.7 - - - - -
C406 2.5 - 0.5 - - - - - - - - -
C407 2.0 1.0 - - - - 2.0 - - - - -
C408 3.0 3.0 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - - - -
C409 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 -
C410 2.3 - 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C411 2.3 1.3 - - - - - - - - - -
C412 2.5 1.5 - - - 0.5 - - - - - -
C413 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0
SUM 162 91 32 7 39 8 25 16.6 16 9 6 2

49
No of Courses 63 53 35 8 19 12 10 6 13 8 5 1
PO TARGET 2.6 1.7 0.9 0.9 2.1 0.7 2.5 2.76 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.0

3.1.3 B Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)

Table 3.1-5 Program Level CO with PSO matrices

COURSE NAME PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C101 2.5 - 2.0
C102 1.5 - -
C103 1.2 - -
C104 1.3 - -
C105 2.0 - -
C106 1.8 - -
C107 1.8 - -
C108 2.2 3.0 -
C109 3.0 - -
C110 1.7 - -
C111 1.3 - -
C112 0.8 - -
C113 1.5 - -
C114 1.3 - 0.3
C115 - - 1.0
C116 3.0 - -
C117 2.0 3.0 -
C201 1.5 - -
C202 0.7 - -
C203 1.0 - -
C204 1.7 - -
C205 1.2 - -
C206 - 2.3 2.3
C207 1.5 - -
C208 2.0 3.0 1.0
C209 1.8 2.8 0.7
C210 2.0 - -
C211 2.0 - 1.0
C212 1.7 - 0.7
C213 1.7 - -
C214 1.2 - -
C215 1.3 2.3 -
C216 2.2 - 1.3
C217 3.0 - -
C218 2.2 3.0 1.3
C301 2.0 - -
C302 2.0 - -
C303 - 2.0 -
C304 1.2 - -
C305 1.8 - -
C306 2.3 - 1.3
C307 3.0 - -
C308 2.2 3.0 1.2
C309 1.8 - 0.8
C310 2.5 - -
C311 1.7 - 0.7

50
C312 1.8 - 0.8
C313 1.8 2.8 0.8
C314 1.3 - 0.3
C315 1.5 2.5
C316 1.5 - -
C317 3.0 - -
C318 2.3 - -
C319 1.8 2.8 0.8
C401 2.0 1.0
C402 1.3 2.3 0.3
C403 1.7
C404 1.3 0.0
C405 1.7 2.7
C406 1.5 2.5
C407 1.0 - -
C408 - 3.0 3.0
C409 2.2 3.0 0.5
C410 1.3 - -
C411 1.3 - 2.3
C412 1.5 2.5 -
C413 2.2 2.8 1.0
SUM 112.13 51.5 26.63
No of Courses 63 19 24
PSO TARGET 1.78 2.71 1.11

3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)


3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcome is based (10).
In the Outcome Based Education (OBE), assessment is done through one or more than one
processes, carried out by the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the
achievement of course outcomes (COs).

CO Assessment Processes:
Assessment tools are categorized into two methods to assess the course outcomes as:

Direct Methods: Direct methods display the students knowledge and skills from their
performance in the continuous internal assessment tests, semester examinations, and laboratory
Examination. These methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and
provide strong evidence of student learning.

51
Table 3.2-1 Direct Method
Direct assessment Methods
Sl.no Direct Assessment Method Description
The Internal Assessment marks in a theory paper shall be
based on six tests generally conducted as per schedule. It is a
Internal Assessment metric to continuously assess the attainment of course
1.
Test outcomes with respect to course objectives. The best marks
obtained from first two tests shall be the first Internal
Assessment Marks for the relevant subject.
In case of Practical, the Internal Assessment marks shall be
2. Lab Model Exam
based on the laboratory records and one practical test.
University theory Semester examination (theory or practical) are the metric to
3.
Examination assess whether all the course outcomes are attained or not
framed by the course owner. Semester Examination is more
University Practical
4. focused on attainment of course outcomes and uses a
Examination
descriptive exam.
Viva-voce examination of project work shall be conducted for
5. Project Work Viva-voce
each Student.

52
Data collection-Direct Attainment

Conducting CIA test by the Department

Evaluation by the Faculty within two days of the Exam

Data Feeding in TCS ION within a Week of the Exam

Consolidation of Marks by the Department Exam Cell


Coordinator in Excel Sheets

Uploading the Data in University Web Portal

Receiving the University Results from Exam Cell

Storing of Data for further processing by the Department


Exam Cell Coordinator

Fig.3.2.1.1. Process of collection of data for direct assessment

53
3.2.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcome of all courses with respect to set attainment
levels
Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses.
MEASURING CO ATTAINMENT THROUGH INTERNAL ASSESSMENTS:
Table 3.2.2.1.1 Evaluation of CO Attainment through Internal Assessment

54
55
56
MEASURING CO ATTAINMENT THROUGH EXTERNAL ASSESSMENTS
Table 3.2.2.1.2 Evaluation of CO Attainment through External Assessment

57
58
Attainment of Course Outcome for the Batch 2012-16
CO attainment has been calculated for the set attainment level as 50% of pass percentage
of the Internal Assessment.
Attainment Level 1: 50% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University
examinations.
Attainment Level 2: 60% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University
examinations.
Attainment Level 3: 70% students scoring more than 50% pass percentage of the University
examinations.

59
CO Attainment through Internal Assessment
Table 3.2.2.1.3 CO Attainment through Internal Assessment

COURSE CODE CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6


C101 3 3 3 3 3 3
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 3 3 3 3 3 3
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 3 3 3 3 3 3
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 3 3 3 3 3 3
C114 3 3 3 3 3 3
C115 3 3 3 3 3 3
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 3 3 3 3 3 3
C201 3 3 3 3 3 3
C202 3 3 3 3 3 3
C203 3 3 3 3 3 3
C204 3 3 3 3 3 3
C205 3 3 3 3 3 3
C206 3 3 3 3 3 3
C207 3 3 3 3 3 3
C208 3 3 3 3 3 3
C209 3 3 3 3 3 3
C210 3 3 3 3 3 3
C211 3 3 3 3 3 3
C212 3 3 3 3 3 3
C213 3 3 3 3 3 3
C214 3 3 3 3 3 3
C215 3 3 3 3 3 3
C216 3 3 3 3 3 3
C217 3 3 3 3 3 3
C218 3 3 3 3 3 3
C301 2 2 2 2 3 3
C302 2 2 3 3 3 3
60
C303 3 3 2 2 3 3
C304 3 3 1 1 3 3
C305 2 2 0 0 3 3
C306 1 1 3 3 3 3
C307 3 3 3 3 3 3
C308 3 3 3 3 3 3
C309 3 3 3 3 3 3
C310 3 3 3 3 3 3
C311 3 3 3 3 3 3
C312 3 3 3 3 3 3
C313 3 3 3 3 3 3
C314 3 3 3 3 3 3
C315 3 3 3 3 3 3
C316 3 3 3 3 3 3
C316 3 3 3 3 3 3
C317 3 3 3 3 3 3
C318 3 3 3 3 3 3
C401 2 2 3 3 3 3
C402 3 3 3 3 3 3
C403 3 3 3 3 3 3
C404 2 2 3 3 3 3
C405 2 2 3 3 3 3
C406 2 2 3 3 3 3
C407 3 3 2 2 3 3
C408 3 3 3 3 3 3
C409 3 3 3 3 3 3
C410 3 3 3 3 3 3
C411 3 3 3 3 3 3
C412 3 3 3 3 3 3
C413 3 3 3 3 3 3

CO Attainment through University Exam:


Table 3.2.2.1.4 CO Attainment through University Exam
COURSE CODE CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
C101 2 2 2 2 2 2
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 2 2 2 2 2 2
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
61
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 2 2 2 2 2 2
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 2 2 2 2 2 2
C114 3 3 3 3 3 3
C115 3 3 3 3 3 3
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 3 3 3 3 3 3
C201 2 2 2 2 2 2
C202 1 1 1 1 1 1
C203 0 0 0 0 0 0
C204 2 2 2 2 2 2
C205 2 2 2 2 2 2
C206 0 0 0 0 0 0
C207 1 1 1 1 1 1
C208 3 3 3 3 3 3
C209 3 3 3 3 3 3
C210 3 3 3 3 3 3
C211 3 3 3 3 3 3
C212 3 3 3 3 3 3
C213 3 3 3 3 3 3
C214 3 3 3 3 3 3
C215 2 2 2 2 2 2
C216 3 3 3 3 3 3
C217 3 3 3 3 3 3
C218 3 3 3 3 3 3
C301 3 3 3 3 3 3
C302 3 3 3 3 3 3
C303 3 3 3 3 3 3
C304 3 3 3 3 3 3
C305 1 1 1 1 1 1
C306 2 2 2 2 2 2
C307 3 3 3 3 3 3
C308 3 3 3 3 3 3
C309 3 3 3 3 3 3
C310 3 3 3 3 3 3
C311 2 2 2 2 2 2
62
C312 1 1 1 1 1 1
C313 3 3 3 3 3 3
C314 3 3 3 3 3 3
C315 0 0 0 0 0 0
C316 0 0 0 0 0 0
C317 3 3 3 3 3 3
C318 3 3 3 3 3 3
C319 3 3 3 3 3 3
C401 0 0 0 0 0 0
C402 1 1 1 1 1 1
C403 1 1 1 1 1 1
C404 0 0 0 0 0 0
C405 0 0 0 0 0 0
C406 3 3 3 3 3 3
C407 1 1 1 1 1 1
C408 3 3 3 3 3 3
C409 3 3 3 3 3 3
C410 3 3 3 3 3 3
C411 3 3 3 3 3 3
C412 3 3 3 3 3 3
C413 3 3 3 3 3 3

CO Attainment for the batch 2012-16:


CO attainment = 80% of Co attainment through university exam + 20% CO attainment
through Internal Assessment
Table 3.2.2.1.5 CO Attainment for batch 2012-16
COURSE
CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
CODE
C101 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3

63
C113 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C114 3 3 3 3 3 3
C115 3 3 3 3 3 3
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 3 3 3 3 3 3
C201 3 3 3 3 3 3
C202 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C203 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C204 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C205 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C206 0.6.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C207 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C208 3 3 3 3 3 3
C209 3 3 3 3 3 3
C210 3 3 3 3 3 3
C211 3 3 3 3 3 3
C212 3 3 3 3 3 3
C213 3 3 3 3 3 3
C214 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C215 3 3 3 3 3 3
C216 3 3 3 3 3 3
C217 3 3 3 3 3 3
C218 3 3 3 3 3 3
C301 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3 3
C302 2.8 2.8 3 3 3 3
C303 3 3 2.8 2.8 3 3
C304 3 3 2.6 2.6 3 3
C305 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 1.4 1.4
C306 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.4
C307 3 3 3 3 3 3
C308 3 3 3 3 3 3
C309 3 3 3 3 3 3
C310 3 3 3 3 3 3
C311 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C312 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C313 3 3 3 3 3 3
C314 3 3 3 3 3 3
C315 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C316 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

64
C317 3 3 3 3 3 3
C318 3 3 3 3 3 3
C319 3 3 3 3 3 3
C401 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C402 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C403 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C404 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C405 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
C406 2.8 2.8 3 3 3 3
C407 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4
C408 3 3 3 3 3 3
C409 3 3 3 3 3 3
C410 3 3 3 3 3 3
C411 3 3 3 3 3 3
C412 3 3 3 3 3 3
C413 3 3 3 3 3 3

3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50)


3.3.1 Describe the assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of
each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10)
(Describe the assessment tools and processes used together the data upon which the evaluation
of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes is based indicating the
frequency with which these processes are carried out. Describe the assessment processes that
demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes are
attained and document the attainment levels)

65
DATA COLLECTION PROCESS FOR PO EVALUATION

66
Consolidated Internal Marks Consolidated University
Marks

Internal Assessment: University Assessment:


Level 1 = 50% of the Level 1 = 50% of the students
students scoring above 50% scoring above 50%
Level 2= 60% of the Level 2 = 60% of the students
students scoring above 50% Developing an Excel Sheet for
scoring above 50%
Level 3=70% of the students calculating CO Attainment
Level3 = 70% of the students
scoring above 50% scoring above 50%

Finding the weighted average of


attainment of internal and University Weighted Average:
exam University Exam: 80%
Internal Exam : 20%

Course outcome attainment levels carried


forward to PO attainment based on
Mapping

Survey Results
(Indirect Calculating PO Attainment using Excel
Attainment)

Weighted Average:
Finding the weighted average of attainment Direct Attainment: 80%
through direct and indirect attainment Indirect Attainment: 20%

Match the attainment with target level fixed in


the Department Advisory Board Meeting

PO-CO ATTAINMENT MEASUREMENT

67
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40)
The expected level of attainment for each of the Program Outcomes;
The program outcomes are assessed with the help of course outcomes of the relevant
Courses through direct and indirect methods.

Direct Assessment Method:


Direct measures are provided through direct examinations or observations of student
knowledge or skills against measureable course outcomes. The knowledge and skills described by
the course outcomes are mapped to specific problems on internal exams/home assignment/group
task. Throughout the semester the faculty records the performance of each student on each course
outcome. At the end of the semester students receive grades from external exams.

Indirect Assessment Method:


Indirect assessment strategies are implemented by embedding them in the Exit survey,
Employer survey and Alumni Survey. Finally, program outcomes are assessed with above
mentioned data and Program Assessment Committee concludes the Po attainment level.
The evaluation POs is carried out with respect to student performance and surveys in both the
terms of direct and indirect assessment methods.
Direct method of assessment is based on assessment of PO on the achievements in the
contributing courses for that particular PO.
Indirect method of assessment is based on Exit survey.
The evaluation PSOs is carried out with respect to student performance and surveys in
both the terms of direct and indirect assessment methods for the contributing courses
mapped to the PSO.
Programme Outcome assessment Tools
Programme Outcome 1:
Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

68
C102
C103
C104
C105
C106
C107
C108
C109
C110 End of
Internal/Extern Evaluation the
C111 al Evaluation 80
Data Semester
C112
C113
C114
C115
C116
C117
C201
C202
C203
C204
C205
C206 & &
&
C207 &
C208
C209
C210
C211
C212
C213
C214 Exit 20
Survey Survey End of
C215

69
C216 Program Exit Report the Year
Survey
C217
Alumni
C218 Survey
C301
C302
C303
C304
C305
C306
C308
C309
C311
C312
C313
C314
C315
C316
C317
C318
C319
C401
C402
C403
C404
C405
C406
C407
C408
C409
C410
C411

70
C412
C413

Program Outcome 2:

Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C102
C103
C104
C108
C109
C110
C111
C112
End of
C114 Internal/Extern Evaluation 80
the
al Evaluation Data
C116 Semester
C201
C202
C203
C204
C205
C207
C208
C209
C210
C211

71
C212
& & &
C213
C214
&
C215
C216
C217
C218
C301
C302 20
C303 Exit
Survey
Survey End of
C304 Report
Program Exit the Year
C305 Survey
C306 Alumni
Survey
C308
C309
C311
C312
C313
C314
C316
C317
C318
C319
C401
C402
C403
C404
C405
C407
C408
C409

72
C411
C412
C413

Program Outcome 3:

Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and


design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C102
C103
C106
C109
C110
C111
C114
C201 End of
C206 Internal/Extern Evaluation 80 the
al Evaluation Data Semester
C208
C209
C210
C213
C215
C216
C217
C218
C301

73
C303
C305
C306
& & &
C308
&
C309
C312
C317
C318
C401
C402
C403
C404 Exit
Survey 20 End of
Survey
C405 Report the Year
Program Exit
C406 Survey
C408 Alumni
Survey
C409
C410
C413

Program Outcome 4:
Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected
C102 Internal/External Evaluation
C110 & 80 End of
C114 Exit the
C116 Survey Semester
C201 Program Exit End of
C210 Survey Survey the Year
20
C409 Alumni Survey Report
C413

74
Program Outcome 5:
Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with
an understanding of the limitations.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C107
C108
C114
C115
C116
C117 Internal/Extern
al Evaluation End of
C208
the
C209 & Evaluation Semester
Data 80
C216
&
C217 Exit & &
Survey
C218 Survey 20
Program Exit
C308 Report End of
Survey
C309 Alumni the Year
Survey
C317
C318
C319
C408
C409
C413

Program Outcome 6:
The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
75
Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJETS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C213
C215 Internal/Extern
al Evaluation End of
C301 the
Evaluation
C304 & Data Semester
80
C313 &
C314 Exit &
&
Survey
C315 Program Exit Survey 20 End of
C316 Survey Report the Year

C405 Alumni
Survey
C409
C413

Program Outcome 7:
Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected
C202
C304 Internal/Extern
al Evaluation Evaluation End of
C314 the
Data 80
C317 & Semester
&
C318 &
&
Exit
C401 20
Survey Survey
C404 End of
Program Exit Report
the Year
C405 Survey
Alumni
C407

76
C409 Survey

C413

Program Outcome 8:
Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
of the engineering practice.
Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected
C306
Internal/Extern
C312
al Evaluation
C401 & 80 End of
Exit Evaluation the
C403 Data & Semester
Survey
C404 & Survey &
Program Exit
Report 20 End of
C409 Survey
the Year
Alumni
C413 Survey

Program Outcome 9:
Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C101 End of
Internal/Extern
the
C109 al Evaluation Evaluation
Data Semester
C208 & 80
Exit & &
C216
Survey 20 &
C217 Survey
Program Exit
Report End of
C218 Survey
Alumni the Year
C307

77
C308 Survey
C309
C310
C319
C409
C413

Program Outcome 10:


Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive
clear instructions.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C101 Internal/Extern
al Evaluation
C102
& End of
C216 Evaluation
Exit the
Data & 80 &
C217 Survey Semester
Survey 20
Program Exit & End of
C308 Report
Survey the Year
C409 Alumni
C413 Survey

Program Outcome11:
Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering
and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and leader in a team,
to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected

C101 Internal/Extern Evaluation 80 & End of

78
C109 al Evaluation Data & 20 the
& Survey Semester
C310
Exit Report & End of
C405 Survey the Year
C409 Program Exit
Survey
C410
Alumni
C413 Survey

Program Outcome 12:


Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change

Source When
Method Of Target For
SUBJECTS For Data Data Is
Assessment Performance
Collection Collected
Internal/Extern
al Evaluation
& End of
Evaluation
Exit the
Data & 80 &
C413 Survey Semester
Survey 20
Program Exit & End of
Report
Survey the Year
Alumni
Survey

PO ATTAINMENT:

PO attainment = PO target* Percentage of CO attainment

Table 3.3.1 PO attainment


COURSE NAME PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C101 - - - - - - - - 1.6 1.5 1.5 -
C102 2.7 1.8 0.8 0.8 - - - - - - - -
C103 2.2 1.2 0.2 - - - - - - - - -

79
C104 1.7 1.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C105 3.0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C106 2.8 - 0.8 - - - - - - - - -
C107 3.0 - - - 3.0 - - - - - - -
C108 3.0 2.2 - - 3.0 - - - - - - -
C109 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2.0 2.0 -
C110 1.7 1.2 0.5 0.5 - - - - - - - -
C111 2.2 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C112 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 1.8 - - - - - - - - - - -
C114 2.3 1.3 0.3 0.3 - - - - - - - -
C115 3 - - - 1 - - - - - - -
C116 2.0 3.0 - 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
C117 2.2 - - - 0.7 - - - - - - -
C201 2.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 - - - - - - - -
C202 0.8 0.3 - - - - 0.8 - - - - -
C203 0.4 0.2 - - - - - - - - - -
C204 1.9 1.2 - - - - - - - - - -
C205 1.6 0.9 - - - - - - - - - -
C206 0.5 - 0.1 - - - - - - - - -
C207 1.0 0.7 - - - - - - - - - -
C208 3 3 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - -
C209 2.8 1.8 0.8 - 2.8 - - - - - - -
C210 3.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - - -
C211 2.8 2.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C212 2.7 1.7 - - - - - - - - - -
C213 2.3 1.7 0.7 - - 0.7 - - - - - -
C214 2.2 1.0 - - - - - - - - - -
C215 1.7 0.9 0.2 - - 0.2 - - - - - -
C216 3.0 2.2 1.3 - 3.0 - - - 1.3 0.3 - -
C217 3.0 2.7 1.7 - 1.7 - - - 1.7 0.7 - -
C218 3.0 2.2 1.3 - 1.3 - - - 1.3 - - -
C301 2.7 1.7 0.8 - - 0.8 - - - - - -
C302 2.1 1.4 - - - - - - - - - -
C303 1.9 1.0 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C304 1.4 0.8 - - - 0.2 1.4 - - - - -
C305 0.3 0.2 0.1 - - - - - - - - -
C306 1.3 1.0 0.5 - - - - 1.3 - - - -
C307 - - - - - - - - 1.0 1.5 1.5 -
C308 3.0 2.2 1.2 - 3.0 - - - 1.2 0.2 - -
C309 2.8 1.8 0.8 - 2.8 - - - 0.8 - - -
C310 - - - - - - - - 0.5 - 0.0 -
C311 2.2 1.4 - - - - - - - - - -
C312 1.3 0.8 0.4 - - - - 1.4 - - - -
80
C313 2.8 1.8 - - - 0.8 - - - - - -
C314 0.5 0.3 - - - 0.1 0.5 - - - - -
C315 0.2 - - - - 0.1 - - - - - -
C316 0.5 0.3 - - - 0.1 - - - - - -
C317 3.0 3.0 3.0 - 3.0 - 3.0 - - - - -
C318 3.0 2.5 1.8 - 1.8 - 3.0 - - - - -
C319 2.1 1.3 - - 2.1 - - - 0.6 - - -
C401 0.5 0.3 0.17 - - - 0.51 - - - - -
C402 1.8 0.61 0.14 - - - - - - - - -
C403 1.26 0.8 0.33 - - - - 1.41 - - - -
C404 0.4 0.23 0.1 - - - 0.0 0.36 - - - -
C405 0.5 0.3 0.1 - - 0.1 0.5 - - - - -
C406 2.4 - 0.5 - - - - - - - - -
C407 0.9 0.45 - - - - 0.9 - - - - -
C408 3.0 3.0 2.0 - 2.0 - - - - - - -
C409 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 -
C410 2.3 - 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C411 2.3 1.3 - - - - - - - - - -
C412 2.5 1.5 - - - 0.5 - - - - - -
C413 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 2.8 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0
SUM 132 76 28 7 36 7 18 11.8 15 8 7 1
No of Courses 63 53 35 8 19 12 10 6 13 8 5 1
Direct Attainment 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.9 0.6 1.8 1.96 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.0
Indirect Attainment 2.2 1.8 1.1 1.2 2.1 0.9 2.0 1.2 1.5 0.8 1.0 0.8
80% of
1.6 1.1 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.4 1.4 1.56 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.8
Direct Attainment
20% of
0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.24 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2
Indirect Attainment
PO ATTAINMENT 2.05 1.54 0.89 0.90 1.97 0.62 1.80 1.80 1.24 0.98 1.32 0.96

PSO attainment:
Table 3.3.2 PSO attainment
SUBJECT CODE PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C101 1.83 - 1.47
C102 1.50 - -
C103 1.20 - -
C104 0.95 - -
C105 2.00 - -
C106 1.83 - -
C107 1.83 - -
C108 2.17 3.00 -
C109 3.00 - -
C110 1.25 - -
81
C111 1.30 - -
C112 0.83 - -
C113 1.15 - -
C114 1.33 - 0.33
C115 - - 1.00
C116 3.00 - -
C117 2.00 3.00 -
C201 1.5 - -
C202 0.3 - -
C203 0.2 - -
C204 1.22 - -
C205 0.86 - -
C206 - 0.47 0.47
C207 0.7 - -
C208 2.00 3.00 1.00
C209 1.83 2.83 0.67
C210 2.00 - -
C211 2.00 - 1.00
C212 1.67 - 0.67
C213 1.67 - -
C214 1.17 - -
C215 0.98 1.57 -
C216 2.17 - 1.33
C217 3.00 - -
C218 2.17 3.00 1.33
C301 1.91 - -
C302 1.96 - -
C303 - 1.96 -
C304 1.17 - -
C305 0.68 - -
C306 1.48 - 0.84
C307 3.00 - -
C308 2.17 3.00 1.17
C309 1.83 - 0.83
C310 2.50 - -
C311 1.22 - 0.49
C312 0.86 - 0.39
C313 1.83 2.83 0.33
C314 1.33 - 0.07
C315 0.30 0.50 -
C316 0.3 - -
C317 3.00 - -
82
C318 2.33 - -
C319 1.83 2.83 0.83
C401 0.36 - 0.18
C402 0.62 1.09 0.15
C403 0.78 - -
C404 0.24 - -
C405 0.30 0.47 -
C406 1.47 2.44 -
C407 0.44 - -
C408 - 3.00 3.0
C409 2.17 3.00 0.50
C410 1.30 - -
C411 1.33 - 2.33
C412 1.50 2.50 -
C413 2.17 2.83 1.00
SUM 90.07333 37.71111 18.95926
No of Courses 63 19 24
Direct Attainment 1.429735 2.125 0.922
Indirect Attainment 1.5 2.1 1
80% of Direct
1.14 1.70 0.74
Attainment
20% of Direct
0.30 0.42 0.20
Attainment
PSO
1.44 2.12 0.94
ATTAINMENT

PO TARGET vs. PO ATTAINMENT

83
3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5 PO TARGET
PO ATTAINMENT

1.0

0.5

0.0
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

PSO TARGET vs PSO ATTAINMENT

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5 PSO TARGET


PSO ATTAINMENT

1.0

0.5

0.0
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3

84
CRITERION 4 Students Performance 150
4. Students Performance (150)
ITEM CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 CAYm4 CAYm5
(Information to be provided
cumulatively for all the shifts (2015- (2014- (2013- (2012- (2011- (2010-
with explicit headings, wherever 16) 15) 14) 13) 12) 11)
applicable)
Sanctioned intake of the program
180 180 180 180 180 120
(N)
Total number of students admitted
in first year minus number of
students migrated to other
43 134 140 131 161 119
programs/institutions plus no. of
students migrated to this program
(N1)
Number of students admitted in
2nd year in the same batch via 4 2 7 33 26 15
lateral entry (N2)

Separate division (N3) - - - - - -

Total number of students admitted


in the Program 47 136 147 164 187 134
(N1 + N2 + N3)

Number of students who have successfully graduated without backlogs in any semester/year of
study

Number of students who have successfully


N1 + N2 + N3 graduated without backlogs in any
Year of entry semester/year of study
(As defined above) I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY (2015-16) 47(43+4) 2
CAYm1 (2014-15) 136(134+2) 40 27
CAYm2 (2013-14) 147(140+7) 34 16
CAYm3 (LYG) 2012-13 164(131+33) 33 15 5 2
CAYm4 (LYGm1) 2011-12 187(161+26) 35 20 12 12
CAYm5 (LYGm2) 2010-11 134(119+15) 20 4 3 3
CAYm6(LYGm3) 133(107+26) 19 6 5 5
85
(2009-10)

Number of students who have successfully graduated (Students with backlog in stipulated period
of study)

Number of students who have


N1 + N2 + N3 successfully graduated (Students with
Year of entry
backlog in stipulated period of study)
(As defined above) I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY (2015-16) 47(43+4) 5
CAYm1 (2014-15) 136(134+2) 44 49
CAYm2 (2013-14) 147(140+7) 46 34
CAYm3 (LYG) 2012-13 164(131+33) 52 66 24 101
CAYm4 (LYGm1) 2011-12 187(161+26) 42 48 66 91
CAYm5 (LYGm2) 2010-11 134(119+15) 39 34 45 83
CAYm6(LYGm3)
133(107+26) 24 15 25 92
(2009-10)

4.1 Enrolment Ratio (20)


Enrolment Ratio= N1/N

Year N N1 Enrolment Ratio = (N1/N)*100


2015-2016 180 43 23.89
2014-2015 180 134 74.44
2013-2014 180 140 77.78
2012-2013 180 131 72.78
Average [(ER1+ER2+ER3) /3]:75

Assessment: 16
4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40)
4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25)
SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/(Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and
separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 Average SI

86
Latest Year of
Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of
Graduation
Graduation Graduation minus 1, Graduation minus 2,
Item CAYm3(LYG
(LYG) CAYm4(LYGm2) CAYm5(LYGm3)
m1)
2012-13 2010-11 2009-10
2011-12
Number of students
admitted in the
corresponding First
Year + admitted in 164 187 134 133
2nd year via lateral
entry and separate
division, if
applicable
Number of students
who have graduated
2 12 3 5
without backlogs in
the stipulated period
Success Index (SI) 0.01219512 0.064171 0.022388 0.037594

Average Success 0.041384389


Index
Average Success 0.032918102
Index
Average SI [(SI1+SI2+SI3)/3]: 0.0414
Assessment [25* Average SI]: 1.035
4.2.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study (15)
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course
duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via
lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 15 Average SI
Latest Year Latest Year of
Latest Year of Latest Year of
of Graduation
Graduation minus 1, Graduation minus 2,
Item Graduation CAYm3
CAYm4(LYGm2) CAYm5 (LYGm3)
(LYG) (LYGm1)
2010-11 2009-10
2015-16 2011-12
Number of
students admitted
in the
corresponding 164 187 134 133
First Year +
admitted in 2nd
year via lateral
entry and separate
87
division, if
applicable
Number of
students who have
graduated with 101 91 83 92
backlogs in the
stipulated period
Success Index (SI) 0.61585366 0.486631 0.619403 0.691729

0.599254441
Average SI

Average SI 0.573962553

Average SI [(SI1+SI2+SI3)/3]: 0.6


Assessment [15* Average SI]: 9
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point
scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number
of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are
those who are permitted to proceed to the Final year.
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
Academic Performance 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
2012-16 2011-15 2010-14 2009-13
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of 5.35
5.88 5.81 6.35
all successful students (X)
Total no. of successful students (Y) 159 173 127 124
Total no. of students appeared in the 159
173 127 124
examination (Z)
API = X* (Y/Z) 5.35 5.88 5.81 6.35
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 6.01
Average API [(AP1 + AP2 +AP3)/3]:6.01
Assessment [1.5*Average API]: 9.02

4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)


Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of

88
successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those
who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
Academic Performance 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
2013-17 2012-16 2011-15 2010-14
Mean of CGPA or Mean 5.28
Percentage of all successful 5.43 5.57 6.30
students (X)
Total no. of successful students 147 159
173 127
(Y)
Total no. of students appeared in 147 173
159 127
the examination (Z)
API = X* (Y/Z) 5.28 5.43 5.57 6.30
5.76
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 5.43
+AP3)/3
Average API [(AP1 + AP2 +AP3)/3] :5.76
Assessment [1.5*Average API] :8.65
4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)
Assessment Points = 40 average placement
ITEM 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Total No. of Final Year
159 173 127 124
Students(N)
No. of students placed in the
companies or government 110 153 86 98
sector (X)
No. of students admitted to
higher studies with valid
qualifying scores (GATE or
3 4 2 2
equivalent State or National
Level Tests, GRE, GMAT
etc.)(Y)
No. of students turned
entrepreneur in engineering - 3 1 3
technology(Z)
Placement Index[(X+Y+Z)]/N 0.711 0.925 0.701 0.831

Average 0.8188
Placement[(P1+P2+P3)/3]
Average 0.7788
Placement[(P1+P2+P3)/3]

89
Average placement= (P1 + P2 +P3)/3=0.8188
Assessment Points = 40 0.8188 = 32.751
4.6 Professional Activities (20)
4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5)
The Department of Civil Engineering has two students Chapter BAI Institute chapter, and
Sree Sastha Civil Engineering Association (SSCEA).The following are the various events
organized through these chapters and association
CAY (2015-16)
Name of the
Date of
S. No Professional Name of the Events
Programme
society
1 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Waste Water Treatment 21.07.2015
2 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Mechanics of fluids 29.07.2015
3 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Remote sensing and GIS 04.08.2015
4 SSCEA National Level Technical Symposium 09.08.2015
5 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Structural analysis-I 04.09.2015
Workshop on Emerging trends in
6 SSCEA 27.11.2015
Construction Industry
7 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Soil Mechanics 21.01.2016

CAY m1 (2014-15)
Guest Lecture on Introduction to
1 SSCEA 25.07.2014
Construction Planning
Guest Lecture on Construction of Highways
2 SSCEA 04.08.2014
& Bridges
3 SSCEA National Level Technical Symposium 09.08.2014
Guest Lecture on Recent trends on high rise
4 SSCEA 04.09.2014
buildings
Workshop on Modern Construction
5 SSCEA 29.09.2014
Materials
6 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Environmental Awareness 20.12.2014
Guest Lecture on Estimation Using BEST
7 SSCEA 07.01.2015
Software
Guest Lecture on Introduction to
8 SSCEA 11.02.2015
Construction Planning
Guest Lecture on Construction Management
9 SSCEA 23.04.2015
Techniques
10 SSCEA National Conference on Advancements in 29.04.2015

90
Civil Engineering (CACE15)
CAY m2 (2013-14)
1 SSCEA National Level Technical Symposium 10.08.2013
Group Discussion 15 teams participated and
2 Student Chapter 24.08.2013
the three teams were awarded certificates
ISTE Student Indra College ISTE Technical Competition
3 30.08.2013
Chapter Best Engineer
4 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Green Building 04.09.2013
Workshop on Modern Construction
5 SSCEA 19.09.2013
Materials
6 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Fracture Mechanics 12.10.2013
Guest Lecture on Modern Concrete-The
7 SSCEA 16.11.2013
Changing Paradigm
Workshop on Emerging Trends in
8 SSCEA 28.11.2013
Construction Industry
Quiz Completion 13 teams Participated and
9 Student Chapter 11.01.2014
the three teams were awarded certificates
National Conference on Advancements in
10 SSCEA 29.04.2014
Civil Engineering (CACE14)
Guest Lecture on Special Concrete & Case
11 SSCEA 20.02.2014
Studies
Guest Lecture on Construction Planning and
12 SSCEA 15.03.2014
scheduling
13 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Hydrology 04.03.2014
14 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Surveying-II 20.03.2014
15 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Soil Mechanics 29.03.2014
CAY m3 (2012-13)
ISTE Student Indra College ISTE Technical Competition
1 14.07.2012
Chapter Best Engineer
Guest Lecture on GIS Application in civil
2 SSCEA 28.07.2012
Engineering
3 SSCEA Personality development programme. 04.08.2012
Quiz Completion 13 teams Participated and the
4 Student Chapter 11.08.2012
three teams were awarded certificates
Group Discussion 15 teams participated and
5 Student Chapter 01.09.2012
the three teams were awarded certificates
6 SSCEA National Level Technical Symposium 20.09.2012
Guest Lecture on How to Choose the Final
7 SSCEA 06.10.2012
year Project
Workshop on Computer Application in
8 SSCEA 02.02.2013
construction Engineering
9 SSCEA Workshop on Modern trends in Civil 09.02.2013
91
engineering
National Conference on Advancements in
10 SSCEA 29.04.2013
Civil Engineering (CACE13)
CAY m4 (2011-12)
ISTE Student Indra College ISTE Technical Competition
1 09.07.2011
Chapter Value engineering
Workshop on Emerging Trends in Civil
2 SSCEA 31.08.2011
engineering
3 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Remote Sensing 10.09.2011
4 SSCEA Guest Lecture on Town Planning 15.09.2011
5 SSCEA National Level Technical Symposium 06.10.2011
6 SSCEA Workshop on CADD Software and its uses 15.10.2011
Student Treasure and Completion 10 teams participated
7 and the three teams were awarded certificates 29.10.2011
Chapter
the
Student CADD drawing Completion 13 teams
8 Participated and the three teams were awarded 17.11.2011
Chapter
certificates
Workshop on Emerging Trends in Construction
9 SSCEA 28.01.2012
Industry
National Conference on Advancements in Civil
10 SSCEA 13.04.2012
Engineering (CACE12)

4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (5)


(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors,
publishers, etc.)
The Department has taken an opportunity to publish newsletters that summarize events,
technical innovations and activities conducted and participated technical magazines stimulates
creativeness in students and faculty and helps for their profession development.

A. Department Newsletters and Souvenirs Organization of paper contest, design content, etc. and
achievements Civil department students organize various events through symposium the
details are as follows.
Month
Name of the Efforts &
S.No and Publishers Name of the editors
magazine achievements
Issue
CAY (2015-2016)
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi Students prize winning
10/2015
1 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD)-CE and technical
Issue 1
Engineering Lavanya (IVCE) contribution

92
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi Students participated in
4/2016
2 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD)-CE extracurricular
Issue 2
Engineering Lavanya (IV CE) activities
CAY m1 (2014-2015)
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi Students contributed
10/2014
1 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD)-CE recent news in civil
Issue 1
Engineering Manisha (III CE) Engineering
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi Students contributed
3/2015
2 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD)-CE technical news and
Issue 2
Engineering Lalith (II CE) drawings
CAY m2 (2013-14)
Department Dr.S.Thenmozhi Students contributed
08/2013
1. COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD CE) drawings using
Issue 1
Engineering Genga Chithra V (II CE) technical Softwares.
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Department (HOD CE)
10/2013 Students contributed
2. COGNIZANCE of Civil Keerthiga .K (IV CE)
Issue 2 technical articles
Engineering Madhumitha (IV CE)
Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE)
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Department (HOD CE)
03/2013 Students contributed
3. COGNIZANCE of Civil Keerthiga .K (IV CE)
Issue 3 Poems and Literature
Engineering Madhumitha (IV CE)
Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE)
Dr.S.Thenmozhi
Department (HOD CE) Students contributed
11/2013
4 COGNIZANCE of Civil Madhumitha (IV CE) conventional ideas in
Issue 5
Engineering Rajeshwar. C.G (IV CE) civil Engineering
Gopinath.R (AP/CE)
CAY m3 (2012-13)

Department Dr.B.Hemalatha Students contributed


07/2012
1 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD CE) drawings using
Issue 1
Engineering Naveen Raj. R (II CE) technical Softwares.
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Department
09/2012 (HOD CE) Students contributed
2 COGNIZANCE of Civil
Issue 3 Keerthiga .K (III CE) drawings
Engineering
Madhumitha (IIICE)
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Department Students contributed
10/2012 (HOD CE)
3 COGNIZANCE of Civil conventional ideas in
Issue 4 Rajeshwar. C.G (IV
Engineering civil Engineering
CE)Kavitha .R ( AP/CE)
Department Dr.B.Hemalatha Students contributed
11/2012
4 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD CE) recent news in the
Issue 5
Engineering Rajeshwar. C.G (III CE) civil Engineering
93
Shamla.D.S(AP/CE) field

CAY m4 (2011-2012)

Department Dr.B.Hemalatha Students contributed


07/2011
1 COGNIZANCE of Civil (HOD CE) drawings using
Issue 1
Engineering B.Arun (II CE) technical Softwares.
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Department (HOD CE)
08/2011 Students contributed
2 COGNIZANCE of Civil Karthiga (II CE)
Issue 2 technical articles
Engineering Madhumitha (II CE)
Genga Chithra (IV CE)
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Department (HOD CE)
09/2011 Students contributed
3 COGNIZANCE of Civil Karthiga (II CE)
Issue 3 drawings
Engineering Madhumitha (II CE)
Genga Chithra (IV CE)
Dr.B.Hemalatha
Department (HOD CE) Students contributed
10/2011
4 COGNIZANCE of Civil Karthiga (II CE) poems and
Issue 4
Engineering Madhumitha (II CE) literatures
Genga Chithra (IV CE)

4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study (10)


(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in the
events/conferences organized by other institutes.)

CAY 2015- CAYm1 2013- CAYm2 2012- CAYm1 2011-


Item CAY 2014-15
16 14 13 12
Participation Participation- Participation- Participation- Participation-
Symposium 125 110 100 120 140
Prizes -15 Prizes- 15 Prizes- 37 Prizes- 30 Prizes- 28
Workshop 15 20 25 22 19
National -
- 1 - -
conference
International -
- 2 - -
conference

a. Paper publications in International and National Journals have helped students to share their
innovative ideas to the outside world. The detailed list is:

94
Month and
Sl.No Name of the student Title of the Paper Journal Name
Year
Experimental Studies International Journal
on Replacement fine of Emerging
1 R.Shruthi May-14
aggregate with glass Engineering Research
and fly ash and Technology
International Journal
Study on internal of Innovative
A.Sivaranjani, M.Monica,
2 curing of concrete Research in Science, Jan-14
V.R. Subhashini, S.Sareetha
using Admixtures Engineering and
Technology

b. Details of prize winners and participants of various events in Inter college symposiums during the past
3 years

SYMPOSIUM- PRIZE WINNING


CAY ( 2015- 2016)
S.no Name Title College Prize
Artifex 2k15
M.S.Mani
1 Technical quiz Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, 1st
Manjari
Chennai
Artifex 2k15
2 Jeyanthi .K Cadd quiz Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, 2nd
Chennai
Artifex 2k15
3 Lavanya .V Model making Sri Venkateswara College Of Engineering, 1st
Chennai
Autocad Zaarvia 2k15 United Institute Of
4 Prakash Raj .A 3rd
modeling Technology, Coimbatore
Aptaz 2k15 T.J Institute Of Technology,
5 Arul Prakash K. Code cracking 3rd
Chennai
Wafes 2k16 , Meenakshi Sundararajan
6 Pravena .S.R Technical quiz 3rd
Engineering College
Wafes 2k16 , Meenakshi Sundararajan
7 Sivanesh C Model making 1st
Engineering College
Eptis 2k15
8 Anugraha .R Civil 1st
Dhanalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai
Poster Eptis 2k15
9 Manisha .M 2nd
presentation Dhanalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai
Civis 2k16 A.C.T College Of Engineering
10 Subash.C.A Cadd quiz 3rd
& Technology, Chennai
Bhagya Lakshmi Civilian 2k16
11 Cadd modeling 1st
.R B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai
Civiclan 2k16
12 Padmavathi.S Builders choice 2nd
B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai

95
Civiclan 2k16
13 Swetha .S Technical quiz 3rd
B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai
Vishnu Shankar Civiclan 2k16 3rd
14 Model making
.B B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai
Civiclan 2k16
15 Subashree .R Cadd drawing 1st
B.S.Abdur Rahman University. Chennai
CAYm1 ( 2014- 2015)

1. A.Prakashraj Xhenios14 (Paper


Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation)
2. J.Manibharathi Xhenios14 (Paper
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation)
Safrinsiahan
3. Xhenios14 (Code
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
M.R Cracking)

4. T.Nivetha Drestein14(Poster Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15


1st Prize
Presentation) And 16th Sep
5. N.Vinodha Drestein14(Poster Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15
1st Prize
Presentation) And 16th Sep
6. S.Vaanmathy Drestein14(Poster Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15
1st Prize
Presentation) And 16t H Sep
7. R.Gomathyi Drestein14(Poster Saveetha Engineering College & 14,15
1st Prize
Presentation) And 16t H Sep
8. S.Natesan Xhenios14 (Paper
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation)
9. S.Natesan Xhenios14 (Cadd
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Contest)
10. A.Sunil Kumar Xhenios14 (Cadd
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Contest)
11. Safrinsiahanm.R Xhenios14 (Cadd
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Contest)
12. S.Abirami Xhenios14 (Paper
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation)
13. S.Abirami Drestein14(Poster
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation)
14. S.Abirami Xhenios14 (Cadd
Peri Institute Of Technology & 15th Sep 2nd Prize
Contest)
CAYm2 ( 2013-2014 )
Ziggurat 2k13
Magna College Of Engineering &
1 N.Prabu (Paper 1st Prize
10th Sep.
Presentation)
Ziggurat 2k13
Magna College Of Engineering & 10th
2 N.Naveen Raj (Paper 1st Prize
Sep.
Presentation)
Kraciva13 Paper
3 G.Vijayakumar Ssn College Of Engineering & 11th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation

96
Kraciva13 Poster
4 G.Vijayakumar Ssn College Of Engineering &11th Sep 1st Prize
Presentation
Kraciva13 (Cadd Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
5 G.Vijayakumar 1st Prize
Contest) Technology& 12th Sep
Ascent13 (Quiz & Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
6 K.Swetha 1st Prize
Model Making) Technology& 12th Sep
A.Vijila Merlin Ascent13 (Quiz & Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
7 1st Prize
Rose Model Making) Technology& 12th Sep
Ascent13 (Quiz & Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
8 M.Sathishkumar 1st Prize
Model Making) Technology& 12th Sep
Ascent13 (Tech. Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
9 G.Vijaya Kumar 1st Prize
Quiz) Technology& 12th Sep
Ascent13 (Poster Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
10 S.Mahesh 1st Prize
Presentation) Technology& 12th Sep
Ascent13 (Poster Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
11 D.Karthi 1st Prize
Presentation) Technology& 12th Sep
Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
12 M.Poongundran Ascent13 (Quiz) 1st Prize
Technology& 12th Sep
Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
13 A.Vijayakumar Ascent13 (Quiz) 1st Prize
Technology& 12th Sep
Ganeshsanat Ascent13 (Cadd Sri Muthukumaran Institute Of
14 1st Prize
Kumar Contest) Technology& 12th Sep
Karigaala2k13
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
15 P.Archana (Paper 1st Prize
Sep
Presentation)
Karigaala2k13
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
16 B.Monisha (Paper 1st Prize
Sep
Presentation)
Karigaala2k13
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
17 P.Dinesh (Paper 1st Prize
Sep
Presentation)
Karigaala2k13
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
18 P.Dinesh (Paper 1st Prize
Sep
Presentation)
Karigaala2k13
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
19 P.Dinesh (Paper 1st Prize
Sep
Presentation)
Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
20 P.Dinesh (Code Cracking) 1st Prize
Sep
Karigaala2k13
R.Aravind Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
21 (Paper 1st Prize
Kumar Sep
Presentation)
G.V.Vinoth Karigaala2k13 Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
22 1st Prize
Kumar (Quiz) Sep
Karigaala2k13 Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
23 K. Swetha 1st Prize
(Quiz) Sep

97
Karigaala2k13 Chennai Institute Of Technology & 19th
24 Mr.Hari Vijay 2nd
(Cadd Quiz) Sep
Wafes V2.0 Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering
25 R.Aravindh 2nd Prize
(Surveying) College & 12th Aug
Wafes V2.0 Meenakshi Sundararajan Engineering
26 C. Joyadithyan 2nd Prize
(Surveying) College & 12th Aug
R.M.D Engineering College & 11th Aug
27 R.Kalaiselvan Generix13 1st Prize
Xiphias
28 B.Parsith Kumar 2k13(Paper Dmi College Of Engineering, 28th Aug 1st Prize
Presentation)
Xiphias
A.Jiaur
29 2k13(Paper Dmi College Of Engineering, 28th Aug 1st Prize
Rahuman
Presentation)
Xiphias
30 S.Magesh 2k13(Poster Dmi College Of Engineering, 28th Aug. 2nd Prize
Presentation)
Aakriti13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research
31 B.Parsith Kumar 2nd Prize
Presentation) Intitute University,8th & 9th Sep.
A.Jiaur Aakriti13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research
32 2nd Prize
Rahuman Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep.
Aakriti13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research
33 A.Ananadhavel 2nd Prize
Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep.
Aakriti13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research
34 M.Saravanan 2nd Prize
Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep.
A.Vettri Aakriti13 (Paper Dr.M.G.R. Educational & Research
35 2nd Prize
Vigneshwaran Presentation) Intitute University, 8th & 9th Sep.
Confluencia14
M.S.Mani Sakthi Mariamman Engineering College,
36 (Paper 2nd Prize
Manjari 27th March
Presentation)
M.S.Mani Confluencia14 Sakthi Mariamman Engineering College,
37 2nd Prize
Manjari (Quiz) 27th March
Jetinfratec 2k14
M.S.Mani Mamallan Institute Of Technology& 14th
38 (Paper 2nd Prize
Manjari Mar
Presentation/Quiz)
CAYm3 ( 2012-2013 )
Sparkgallo12 University College Of Engineering,
1 V.Naresh 2nd Prize
(Paper Presentation) Panruti & 11th Sep.
Sparkgallo12 University College Of Engineering,
2 V.Naresh 1st Prize
(Posterpresentation) Panruti & 11th Sep.
Instruofete13 Panimalar Engineering College &
3 N.Vinitha 2nd Prize
(Code Cracking) 25th Jan
Instruofete13 Panimalar Engineering College &
4 S.Abirami 1st Prize
(Code Cracking) 25th Jan
Instruofete13 Panimalar Engineering College &
5 S.Swathi 1st Prize
(Code Cracking) 25th Jan

98
Formaquest 2013 Shree Motilal Kanchaiyalal Forma
6 R.Naveen 1st Prize
(Model Making) Institute Of Technology &23,25th Jan
C.Santhdeep Formaquest 2013 Shree Motilal Kanchaiyalal Forma
7 1st Prize
Kumar (Model Making) Institute Of Technology &23,25th Jan
Symplix12 (Super Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain
8 G.Vijayakumar 1st Prize
Surveyor) Engineering College & 28 th Sep
Symplix12 (Super Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain
9 A.Vijayakumar 1st Prize
Surveyor) Engineering College & 28 th Sep
Symplix12 (Super Misrimal Navajee Munoth Jain
10 C.Joyadithyan 2nd Prize
Surveyor) Engineering College & 28 th Sep

99
CRITERION 5 FACULTY INFORMATION & CONTRIBUTIONS 200

5. FACULTY INFORMATION & CONTRIBUTIONS (200)

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)


S.F ratio = N/F; N = Number of Students= 3x where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral entry
intake+ separate division, if any)
F = No. of faculty = (a + b c) for every assessment year
a: Total number of full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of the this
program
b: Total number of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) serving
this program from other Program (s)
c: Total number of full time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) of this
program serving other program (s)
Regular Faculty means:
Full time on roll with prescribed pay scale. An employee on contract for a period of not
less than two years AND drawing consolidated salary not less than applicable gross salary shall
only be counted as a regular employee.
Prescribed pay scales means pay scales notified by the AICTE/Central Government and
implementation as prescribed by the State Government. In case State Government prescribes
lesser consolidated salary for a particular cadre then same will be considered as reference while
counting faculty as a regular faculty.
The following table shows the Student faculty ratio

Year x N F SFR=N/F
2015-1016 216 648 46 14.09
2014-2015 216 648 46 14.09
2013-2014 144+(216*2) 576 41 14.05
Average SFR for three assessment years 14.08

Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR


between 15:1 to 20:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1.

100
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 15:1
Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with
15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with
15:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
The following table shows the faculty cadre proportion for CAY,CAYm1,CAYm2

Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor


Year
Required Required Required
Available Available Available
F1 F2 F3
2015-2016 5 5 10 0 29 40
2014-2015 5 5 10 0 29 40
2013-2014 5 5 10 0 24 35
Average Numbers RF1=5 AF1=5 RF2=10 AF2=0 RF3=27.33 AF3=38
AF AF AF

Cadre Ratio Marks 1 + 2 * 0.6 + 3 * 0.4 *12.5
RF RF
3RF
1 2
If AF1 = AF2= 0 then zero marks
Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25
Assessment = 19.29
Example: Student No. = 180; Required number of Faculty: 12; RF1= 1, RF2=2 and RF3=9
Case 1: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 1; AF3/RF3 = 1; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.6+0.4) x12.5 =
25
Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/9; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3)
x12.5 = limited to 25
Case 3:AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=11/9; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.49)
x12.5 = 9.87

101
5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)
FQ =2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular
faculty with M.Tech. F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student
ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
The following table shows the Faculty Qualification for CAY, CAYm1, CAYm2

Year X Y F FQ=2.5 x [(10X +6Y)/F)]


2015-2016 5 40 44 16.47
2014-2015 5 40 44 16.47
2013-2014 5 35 39 16.67
Average Assessment 16.53

5.4. Faculty Retention (25)


No. of regular faculty members in, 2013-2014 = 39 2014-2015 = 44 2015-2016 = 44
The following table shows the Faculty retention for CAY, CAYm1, CAYm2.
Item Marks
>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping
25
CAYm2 as base year
>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping
20
CAYm2 as base year
>=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping
15
CAYm2 as base year
>=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping
10
CAYm2 as base year
<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of assessment keeping
0
CAYm2 as base year
27 Faculty members are working from academic year 2013-14 to 2015-16.
27
Faculty Retention *100 61.36%.
44
Assessment = 15.
5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20)
Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following
description.
Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student
learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery,
102
instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective and
efficient interaction between students and faculty. Any contributions to teaching and learning
should satisfy the following criteria:
v The work must be made available on Institute website
v The work must be available for peer review and critique
v The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars
The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions
available to the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include
statement of clear goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, and significance of
results, effective presentation and reflective critique

Course Faculty creates learning resource


such as videos

Evaluation of the learning resource by


program Assessment Committee

Providing Opportunity to present a topic in Publishing /uploading the content in the


Teachers day Celebrations conducted every year public domain

Awarding Best presentation after peer Receiving Comments and Reviews


evaluation

Fig .1.Process of Dissemination of Faculty Innovations

Table Innovations by Faculty in Teaching Learning Process


S No Method Course Name Semester
1.Surveying 3
2.Design of reinforced concrete elements 5
Experimental Teaching 3.Environmental Engineering 5
1
Methodology 4.Soil Mechanics 4
5.Construction Planning And Management 6
6.Railway ,Airport ,Harbor Engineering 6
103
Steps in Experimental Teaching Methodology
Step 1: Students team were formed, (Shuffling Advanced, Average and Slow learners)
Step 2: Teaching the syllabus content.(Board/PPT)
Step 3: After covering the important topics, it has been assigned to a team.
Step 4: The team has to prepare chart based on the topic with reference to the lecture given.
Step 5: Faculty along with Advanced learners help the slow learners in preparing chart and
presentation
Step 6: Slow learners were motivated to do presentation. Best performing team gets appreciation.
Step 7: Charts were pasted in class rooms for a week and the same will be used as a material for
revision during semester exams.
Salient Features of this Teaching Methodology
v Interactive learning
v Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learners all together benefitted
v Deep knowledge about the course content
v Promotes team work
v Enhances students communication skills
v Improves leadership skills
5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)
A faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days faculty development program: 3 Points
Participation > 5 days faculty development program: 5 points.
The following table shows the list of Faculty participation in Faculty development programs.
CAY (2015- CAYm1 (2014- CAYm2 (2013-
S.No Name of the faculty
2016) 2015) 2014)
1 Dr.B.Hemalatha - - 5
2 Dr.T.Muralikrishna - - 5
3 Dr.K. Saravanan - 5 5
4 Dr .R.Elangovan - - 5
5 Dr.Arumugam. P - - 5
6 Kannadasan.B 5 3 3
7 Sathishkumar.K - - 3
8 Dasarath - 3 3
9 Kayalvizhi.I - 3 3
10 N.S.Divia - 3 -
11 Vidhya.M - - 3
12 Aishwarya Devi.S 5 - -
104
13 Sivaprakasan.S - 3 -
14 Dr.S.Thenmozhi 5 5 5
15 Dr.Nandhni Devi.G - 5 5
16 Mr.M.Chinnasamy 5 5 3
17 Mr. M.Murugan 3 3 3
18 Mrs. B.Lavanya 5 3 3
19 Mr.S.Nagaraj - 3 3
20 Mr.S.Vinoth kumar 3 3 3
21 Mr.S.C.Jayakumar - 3 3
22 Mr.M.S.Kutti marks 5 3 3
23 Mr.R.Lenin - 3 3
24 Mrs.T.Diana joslin - 3 3
25 Mr.Y.C.Thilakar - 3 3
26 Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu 3 3 3
27 N.S.Divia - 3 3
28 Mr.T.Kannan - 3 3
29 Mr.S.Ramesh - 3 3
30 Mr.D.Karthik - 3 3
31 Mrs.S.Archana - - 3
32 Kiruthigaa Aishwarya.J.U - - 3
33 Dr.Saravanan - 3 -
34 Dr.Arunkumar - 3 -
35 Mr.S.C.Jayakumar - 3 -
36 Mrs.Sathya - 3 -
37 Mr.K.Manikandan - 3 -
38 Saranya.R - 3 -
39 Devi Priyadarshini.K - 3 -
40 Sivakumar.B - 3 -
41 Devarajan.V - 3 -
42 Meenalakshmi.D - 3 -
43 Sudha.V - 3 -
44 Kayalvizhi.I - 3 -
45 Panchasaram.K - 3 -
46 Lavanya.B - 3 -
47 Rajesh.S - 3 -
48 Mathu Latha.O - 3 -
49 Premkumar.K - 3 -
50 Jenisha.T - 3 -
51 Arumugam.M - 3 -
52 Uma Magheswari 3 - -
53 Megala 3 - -
54 S.Sangeetha 3 - -
55 D.S.Shamla 3 - -
56 Sastha Arumugapandi 3 - -
57 S.Aravindan 5 - -
58 S.Natarajan 5 - -
105
59 Ajith 3 - -
60 Arunthathi 5 - -
61 Silambarasan 5 - -
SUM 77 134 104
RF= Number of the faculty required
to comply with 15:1 Student- Faculty 44 44 39
ratio as per 5.1
Assessment=3(Sum/0.5RF)
10.5 18.27 15.53
(Marks limited to 15)
Average assessment not over three
14.90
years
5.7. Research and Development (30)
5.7.1. Academic Research (10)
Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving
Ph.D. during the assessment period.
1. Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book
Chapters etc. (6) {3*2=6}
BOOK PUBLISHED
S.No Faculty Name Book Published ISBN Number
Construction Techniques, Equipment
1 978-81-8472-221-5
and Practices
2 Estimation & Quantity Surveying 978-81-8472-243-7
Mr.M.Chinnasamy
3 Repair and Rehabilitation of Structures 978-81-8472-286-4
4 Surveying I 978-81-8472-268-0
5 Construction Materials 978-81-8472-276-5

RESEARCH PAPER PUBLICATIONS


S.No. Name of the Faculty No. of papers Published No. of Conferences attended
1 Dr.S.Thenmozhi 4 13
2 Dr.G.Nandini Devi - 1
3 Mr.M.Chinnasamy 2 7
4 Mr.E.S.Dinesh Babu 1 1
5 Ms.S.Aiswarya Devi 0 1
6 Mr.Y.C.Thilakar 0 1
7 Mr.T.Kannan 1 2
8 Mr.M.S.Kuttimarks 4 1
9 Mr.S.Natarajan 1 0
10 Mr.Kannadasan - 1
11 Mr.N.Silambarasan - 1

106
CAY (2015-2016)

S. No Title Authors Journal


Study on behavior of cold
Journal of Applied
formed steel built-up stiffener Dr.Thenmozhi.S,
1 Engineering Research,
compression member Mr.R.Krishnan,
ISS973-4562 Vol 10 No.38.
International
Dr.S.Thenmozhi.,
Performance study of bacterial ICCREST, June/2016
2 Dr.N.Unnamalai,
concrete 3(2349-7610)
Kishore
Experimental Study On
Reinforced Concrete Beams International conference
Dr.Thenmozhi,
3 Strengthened With Near June /2016 3(2349-7610)
Yogalakshmi.P
Surface Mounted (NSM) Fibre IJREST.
Reinforced Polypropylene
Experimental study on flexural
International conference
behavior of reinforced concrete S.Natarajan,
4 June/2016,, IJREST 3/issue-
beams strengthened with glass Shahul Mohammed
62349-7610
fibre reinforced polymer.
CAYm1 (2014-2015)

S. No Title Authors Journal


Journal Of Science
Performance of Quaternary Blended
M. Chinnasamy And Innovation
1 Cement Concrete With GGBS, MK and
J Annie Mary Engineering And
RHA
Technology
Journal Of Science
An Experimental investigation on artificial
M. Chinnasamy And Innovation
2 aggregate using recycle plastics and broken
A.Syed Ali Fathima Engineering And
bricks
Technology
International Journal
Change Detection and Health Assessment of Emerging
Modeling of Pichavaram Mangroves By Technology &
3 T.Kannan
the Application Of Remote Sensing And Advanced
Gis."Icccim-14 Engineering"4, Spl 4
S.R.M.University.
May 2014 Vol 2,
Experimental Studies on Replacement of Mr.M.S.Kutti Mark Issue 2, pp 205 -208
4
Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash R.Shruthi IJEERT International
Level 1.22 Journals.
May 2014 Vol-3 ,
Mr.M.S.Kutti Marks
Experimental Studies on Replacement of ISSUE-4 IJEEERD
5 A.Shivaranjani
Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash International Level
M.Monica
3.2294 Journal

107
May 2014 Vol 2,
Experimental Studies on Replacement of Issue 2, pp 205 -208
6 Mr.M.S.Kutti Marks
Fine aggregate with Glass & Fly Ash IJEERT International
Level 1.22 Journal
5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)
Funded research: (Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):
Amount > 20 Lacs 5 Marks
Amount >= 16 Lacs and <= 20 lacs 4 Marks
Amount >= 12 Lacs and < 16 lacs 3 Marks
Amount >= 8 Lacs and < 12 lacs 2 Marks
Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 8 lacs 1 Mark
Amount < 4 Lacs 0 Mark
NIL
5.7.3 Development activities (10)
The following products are developed by the students Civil engineering under the guidance of
faculty members.
A. Product development
CAY (2015- 2016)
Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are
listed below.
S.No Product (Model/Miniature)
1 Natural sand by M sand in high performance concrete with Nano Silica
2 Pervious concrete using flyash brick aggregate
3 Carbon footprint mapping and analysis using GIS
4 Green building technologies
5 Coconut shell as aggregate replacement in concrete
6 Strengthening of RC flexural element using hybrid FRPC
7 Self healing bio concrete
8 Cement concrete with rice husk ash
9 Ultrathin bituminous pavement
10 Plastic material for improving permeability of soil
11 Saline water stabilized soil

CAY m1 (2014- 2015)


Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are
listed below.
108
S.No Product (Model/Miniature)
1 Foam concrete in UPVC cubes
2 Sustainable concrete
3 Cold foam build up stiffeners
4 Pervious concrete
5 Polypropylene fibre in concrete
6 Reinforced gypsum with hollow slab
7 Prefabricated brick panel roofing
8 Alkali resistant concrete
9 Bamboo reinforced concrete
10 GGBFS (Ground granulated blast furnace slag)
11 Self compacting concrete

CAY m2 (2013- 2014)


Most of the projects done by the students are based on product development of which few are
listed below.
S.No Product (Model/Miniature)
1 Exposed acid in FRP concrete
2 Stabilization of soil
3 Litracon light transmitting concrete
4 Conplast Admixture with concrete
5 M-sand in concrete
6 Granite powder waste in concrete
7 Micro silica high performance concrete
8 Green concrete
9 GFRP - Glass Fibre Reinforced polymer concrete
10 Bio-polymer in bituminous mix
11 Industrial waste in marines clay

B. Instructional materials
Name of the
S.No. Specialization Course Developments
Faculty
Polymer Modified Steel Fibre Reinforced
1 Dr.T.Muralikrishna Civil Engineering
Concrete
Application of Intensification Approaches On
2 Dr.K. Saravanan Civil Engineering
Recycled Aggregate
Environmental
3 Dr .R.Elangovan Compressive Strength Of Recycled Concrete
Engineering
Geo Technical
4 Dr.S.Thenmozhi Soil Stabilization
Engineering

109
Environmental
5 Dr.B.Hemalatha Hazardous Waste Management
Engineering
Structural Mechanical Property of Hybrid Fiber
6 Dr.G.Nandini Devi
Engineering Reinforced Ferrocement
Environmental
7 Mr.Gnanasekaran Advanced Earthquake Resistant Design
Engineering
8 Mr.Kannadasan.B Geo Informatics Green Concrete
Construction
Geo Polymeric Building Materials Utilization
9 Mr.M.Chinnasamy Engineering
of Industrial Waste
Management
Ms.S.Aiswarya Engineering Self-Compacting Concrete Made With
10
Devi Environmental Recycled Aggregate

5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) (5)


(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):
Amount > 10 Lacs 5 Marks, Amount >= 8 Lacs and <= 10 lacs 4 Marks, Amount >= 6 Lacs
and < 8 lacs 3 Marks, Amount >= 4 Lacs and < 6 lacs 2 Marks
Amount >= 2 Lacs and < 4 lacs 1 Mark..Amount < 2 Lacs 0 Mark
The following tables shows the consultancy to be carried out in our department
S. No Year Faculty Organization Title Fund

Testing and analysis of soil and


concrete samples for construction of
Dr.S.Thenmozhi CC Builders 30000
residential building at pallavaram
1 2013-14 site for CC Builders.

Testing of steel rods for pammal


Dr.B.Hemalatha Vass Constructions construction site for VAAS 12000
Constructions.

Testing of soil samples, concrete


cubes and aggregate at porur site,
Dr.S.Thenmozhi SS Constructions 46000
valasaravakkam site and mangadu
site for SS Constructions.
2 2014-15
Testing and analysis of soil and
concrete samples for residential
Mr.Chinnasamy Vass Constructions buildings at pammal 62000
site,anagaputhursite,thirunermalai
site and chrompet site for VASS

110
Constructions

. Testing of soil samples, concrete


Siva Constructions cubes and aggregate at velacherry
Dr.S.Thenmozhi 40000
And Builders site, medavakkam site and tambaram
site for siva Constructions

3 2015-16 Testing and analysis of soil and


concrete samples for residential
Siva Constructions buildings at adayar site,
Mr.Kannadasan 36000
And Builders nandambakkamsite,thiruverkadu site
and chrompet site for siva
Constructions and builders

Total 226000

5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)


Faculty appraisal is conducted as a means to enhance the job performance of each individual
faculty member and as route to improvement of the organizational effectiveness and overall
operation of the college; the appraisal is also used as a basis for reward and corrective action.
Features of the faculty appraisal system:
1. The faculty appraisal system is the clearly communicated to all the faculty and also briefed
by the HOD
2. The feedback is obtained periodically which will be later consolidated by the HOD
3. The appraisal system consists of various elements viz academic activities, professional
development, research activities and administrative activities
The following table shows Elements of faculty appraisal system.
Appraisal % of Time of
S.No Evaluator Basics Of Evaluation
Criteria Marks Evolution
Student At the End Of
1 12.5 Students Feedback Is Consolidated
Feedback Semester
At the end of Feedback given based on the
2 Hod Feedback 12.5 HOD
year observation by HOD
At the end of Results for all courses is
3 Test Result 10 HOD
semester consolidated
At the End Of Data obtained from faculty by
4 Exam Results 10 HOD
Semester HOD
Professional At the end of Department research activity
5 20 HOD
Development Academic Year data is consolidated
111
Research At the end of No of roles assumed by the
6 27.5 HOD
Activities academic year faculty
Administrative At the end of
7 7.5 HOD
Activities academic year

Performance Metrics
The Appraisal forms are submitted to the Principal. The Principal recommends for actions to
Management based on the Performance Metrics.
Appraisal criteria Metrics Recommendation by the principal
Academic activities Minimum 60% Tenure of faculty extended/continued
Overall appraisal 60%-69% Recommended for one increment
Overall appraisal 70%-79% Recommended for two increment
>80% & years of
Overall appraisal Recommended for promotion
experience

SREE SASTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY


ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-2016
Faculty Appraisal
NAME OF THE FACULTY:
DEPARTMENT :
YEAR :2015-2016
Academic Activities
Max
Teaching Effectiveness Marks Obtained
Marks
Student Feedback
Punctuality of Faculty Member in Teaching-
1 5
Learning Sessions
2 Dress Code and Mannerism of Faculty Member 5
3 Well Preparedness of Subject Content 5
Encourages Student Participation in Learning
4 5
Activities
Provides Learning Rationale, Learning Objectives,
5 5
Learning Plan and Learning activities
I 6 Encourages Student Participation in Assessments 5
Solves answers for problems asked in Internal
7 5
Tests & Previous year question papers
Provides Answer Paper Evaluation Pattern before
8 5
Tests & Exams
Demonstrates experiments before asking students
9 5
to perform
10 Proves to be a 'Role-Model' to follow for students 5
TOTAL 50
HOD Feedback
Preparation of Course Rationale, Course Plan,
1 5
II Model Question Papers, Evaluation Pattern etc.,
2 Student Course Learning Material, Teacher Course 5

112
Teaching Materials, Models
Class Conduction Methodology followed as per
3 5
policy
4 Test Question papers as per policy for QP Setting 5
Assignments / Tutorials / Seminar as per policy of
5 5
Conduction
Field data collection / case studies as per policy of
6 5
Collection
No. of hours of learning conducted and assessment
7 5
of learning
8 Extra technical care for students/department 5
Indirect feedback from students through Tutor
9 5
Ward Meeting and Class Committee Meeting etc.,
Extent of syllabus completion (based on class notes
10 of students) / standard of Question paper (Auditor 5
/ HOD Report)
TOTAL 50
Max
Test Result Marks Obtained
Marks
Cumulative Weighted Average of Test Marks
1 20
III (Target >XY %)
Average Percentage of Students Securing less than
2 20
50% in the test (Target <XY %)
TOTAL 40
MAX MARKS
Exam Results
MARKS OBTAINED
Pass Percentage of Number of Students (Target
IV 1 20
>XY %)
2 Overall Average Marks in Exam (Target >XY %) 20
TOTAL 40
MAX MARKS
Professional Development
MARKS OBTAINED
1 International Conference/s approved in policy list 10
2 Industrial Training 10
3 Books International Publisher 10
4 Books National Publisher 10
STTP / FDP / Workshop / Seminar / Symposium
5 10
V per session
6 Papers International Conference 10
Papers Refereed National Journals as per policy
7 10
list
8 Papers International Journals as per policy list 10
TOTAL 80
Research Activities Max
Marks Obtained
Fund Generation: Marks
1 a) Proposal submitted to funding agencies 15
2 b) Proposal sanctioned 25
VI
c) International Conferences organized
3 (Organizing Secretary / Co- 10
ordinators) [whenever more than one faculty is

113
involved the credits will be shared equally by all
concerned]
Consultancy and Testing
1 Testing Activities 10
2 Consultancy Work 10
Product Development Activities/course module
1 Existing Product Improvement / Modification 10
2 New Product Development 10
Successful Guidance
ME/M. Phil / MS/Phd 10
Professional Society Activities
1 Activities in Professional Bodies 10
TOTAL 110
Administrative Activities Max
Marks Obtained
Roles & Responsibilities Assigned to Faculty Member Marks
1 Discipline Work Assigned to Faculty Member 10
2 Association Incharge 10
3 Time table In-charge 10
4 Quality Standards Maintenance(NBA Incharge) 10
5 Internal Exam In-charge 10
6 TCS ION incharge 10
7 Training and placement 10
VII Any Three Roles
8 Industrial Training 10
9 Class incharge 10
10 Lab / Center In-charge 10
11 STTP / FDP Organized 10
Placement / Competitive Exam Preparation
12 10
Support
TOTAL 30
MAX MIN MARKS
CONSOLIDATED
MARKS MARKS OBTAINED
1 Academic Activities 180
2 Professional Development 80
3 Research Activities 110
4 Administrative Activities 30
TOTAL 400
HOD CR :

SIGNATURE
PRINCIPAL REMARKS :

SIGNATURE
114
5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions
in teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the
assessment years:
v Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
v Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired
professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9
marks)
Course/Training Name of the Visiting
Course Name Duration Academic Year
Resource faculty
2013-14
Soil Mechanics Anna university 90 Hrs
II Yr/III Sem
Dr.Rajaraman
2013-14
Foundation Engineering Anna university 90 Hrs
II Yr/IV Sem
2014-15
Fluid Mechanics Anna university Dr.Karmegam 90 Hrs
II Yr/ III Sem
2014 15
Engineering Geology Anna university 90 Hrs
II Yr/III Sem
Prof.K.R.Dhandapani
Applied Hydraulic 2014 15
Anna university 90 Hrs
Engineering II Yr/IV Sem
2015 16
Surveying -II Anna university Prof .Kandasamy 90 Hrs
II Yr/IV Sem
Water Resources And 2015 16
Anna university Prof .Kandasamy 90 Hrs
Irrigation Engineering IV Yr/VII Sem

115
CRITERION 6 Facilities and Technical Support 80
6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)
6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories and technical manpower (30)
The Department has required number of laboratories for all the semester subjects according to
the curriculum.
The courses which have practical hours are provided with laboratory sessions every week.
Laboratories are equipped with necessary equipment, hardware and licensed software to run
experiments specified in the curriculum and beyond them.
Laboratories are assisted with well trained technical supporting staff.

No of Technical Manpower Support


Weekly
stude
utilization
S Name of nts
Name of the status
r. the Name of the per Name of
Important ( all the Designati Qualifica
N Laborator Lab Course setup technical
equipment courses for on tion
o. y (Batc staff
which lab
h
is utilized)
size)
Odd Semester
1. Plane Table,
Survey
2. Dumpy Level Lab
Practical I 60 8/48 Mr.S.Sathish DCE
3. Prismatic Assistant
(CE6311)
Compass
1 Survey lab
Semester
1. Dumpy Level
Survey Camp Summer Lab
60 2.Theodolites Mr.S.Sathish DCE
(CE6512) Vacation Assistant
3.Total Station
(70 hours )
Computer 1. Computer
Aided Building system of Pentium Lab
60 8/48 Mr.B.Rajesh ITI
Drawing IV Assistant
(CE6312) 2. AUTOCADD
Computer
2 Computer 1. Computers
lab
Aided Design Pentium IV,
Lab
and Drafting 60 2. AUTOCADD, 12/48 Mr.B.Rajesh ITI
Assistant
Laboratory 3. STADD PRO
(CE2405) Softwares
1. Direct Shear
Apparatus
Soil Ms.M.Nagala B.E.
Soil Mechanics 2. Triaxial Shear Lab
3 Mechanics 30 18/48 kshmi (Civil)
Laboratory Apparatus Assistant
Laboratory (CE6511) 3. Consolidation
Apparatus 116
Communic Communicatio Computer with
ation Skills n Skills - good System DCA
4 30 18/48 Mr.G.Prabhu
- Laboratory configuration ( HP Admin (BE)
Laboratory (GE6563) DX7380)
Even Semester
Survey 1. Theodolite
Lab
1 Survey lab Practical II 60 2. Total Station 8/48 Mr.S.Sathish DCE
Assistant
(CE6413) 3. Dumpy Level
Computer 1. Computer
Computer Aided Drafting System of Pentium Lab
2 60 4/48 Mr.B.Rajesh ITI
lab & Modeling IV Assistant
Lab (CE6261) 2. AUTOCADD
1.Universal
Testing Machine
of 1000KN
Strength of
Strength of capacity Lab B.Tech,
Materials
3 Materials 30 2. Torsion Testing 18/48 Mr.G.Sekar Superviso _______
Laboratory
Laboratory Machine for Steel r M.E
(CE6411)
Rods
3. Hardness
Testing Machine
1.Compression
Concrete Testing Machine
Concrete and
and 2. Aggregate
Highway
Highway Impact Testing Lab
4 Engineering 30 18/48 Mr.S.Sathish DCE
Engineerin Machine Assistant
Laboratory
g 3. Los - Angeles
(CE6612)
Laboratory Abrasion Testing
Machine
1.Pumps
Hydraulic Hydraulic
2.Turbines Lab
Engineerin Engineering
5 30 3. Pipe Fittings 18/48 Mr.B.Mohan Technicia DME
g Laboratory
4.Venturimeter n
Laboratory (CE6412)
5. Orifice Meter
1. Oxygen
Environme
Environmental Analyzer
ntal
Engineering 2. Ms.M.Nagala Lab B.E
6 Engineerin 30 18/48
Laboratory Spectrophotometer kshmi Assistant (Civil)
g
(CE6611) 3. Ion Selective
Laboratory
Electrode
Note:- Total working hour for a week is 48 hours

117
6.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in laboratories
(25)

Areas in Effective
which ness
Relev
Location students
Sr Reason(S) for ance
Facility Utilizati are
.N Details Creating To
Name on expected to
o. facility POs/P
have
SOs
enhanced
learning
Final
Opened
year
To determine througho PO-
students
Structural the strength of ut the 1,3,4,5
Loading Loading Structural used lab
1 Engineerin reinforced Semester ,7
Frame Frame 50 T Testing for
g Lab concrete for PSO-
Projects
elements Utilizatio 1,2
effectivel
n
y
Third
year
Students
Ultra sound PO-
Advanced NDT - used
Ultrasonic couplant, two To test quality 1,3,4,5
Concrete Hardened Concrete
2. pulse 3m cable of existing RC 18/48 ,7
Engineerin concrete &
velocity transducer- structure behavior PSO-
g Lab Highway
2nos 1,2
Lab
effectivel
y
Third
year
Students
Advanced Concrete test To test PO-
NDT - used
Constructi hammer compressive 1,3,4,5
Rebound Hardened Concrete
3. on normal pundit strength of 18/48 ,7
hammer concrete &
Engineerin with reference existing RC behavior PSO-
Highway
g Lab bar structure 1,2
Lab
effectivel
y
Third
year
V- Funnel Advanced PO-
To test flow Students
Constructi V- Funnel - Flow of 1,3,4,5
ability of the used
4. on MS 1.6 mm 18/48 concrete ,7
self compacting Concrete
Engineerin thick PSO-
concrete &
g Lab 1,2
Highway
Lab
118
effectivel
y
Third
year
To test
Students
Advanced confined flow PO-
used
Constructi U- Flow tube ability and the Flow of 1,3,4,5
U- Flow 18/48 Concrete
5 on MS 1.6 mm capacity of concrete ,7
tube &
Engineerin thick SCC concrete PSO-
Highway
g Lab to flow within 1,2
Lab
confined space
effectivel
y

Third
year
Students
Advanced To test flow used PO-
Constructi rate and Flow of 1,3,4,5
L- Box MS 2 Concrete
6 L- Box on passing ability 18/48 concrete. ,7
mm thick &
Engineerin of SCC in PSO-
g Lab confined space Highway 1,2
Lab
effectivel
y

Opened All the


To learn in
througho Years
Room 309 To give video ut the depth in all Students
Audio/Vid Civil
7 Main LCD Projector lecture to Semester used the
eo Room Engineering
Block students for Audio \
subjects
Utilizatio Video
n Room
6.3. Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)
Maintenance of Laboratory Equipments
1. All the labs are serviced before the commencement of the semester in addition to the periodic
maintenance done for all the machines.
2. Maintenance register is maintained in the laboratories.
3. As per the requirement minor repairs are carried out by the lab technical staff.
4. Immovable equipment is fixed with concrete bases.
5. Major repairs are outsourced by following the procedure of the institute.
6. Internal and external auditing will be conducted at regular interval.
7. Maintenance sheet for Equipment is maintained in the laboratories.
119
8. Sufficient consumables are kept in stock always.
9. Usage of consumable is monitored regularly
10. Stock register is maintained regularly.

Overall Ambiance
1. Department has enough labs that are used for all the years on timetable basis to meet
curriculum requirement.
2. Number of experiments to be conducted is listed in the display board.
3. Safety arrangements are provided in all the laboratories.
4. Lab instructors are instructed to wear their lab coats while demonstrating experiments.
5. Students are instructed to wear lab uniform and shoes, and observe other necessary safeguards.
6. Sufficient laboratory manual are distributed to students.
7. After completing each experiment, the equipment cleaning is done immediately.
8. Chemicals are kept in their respective racks for safety purposes.
9. All the laboratories are well equipped to meet the project needs of the final year students.
10. According to the size of the movable equipment, its kept in the safety box.
11. Experience and qualified Lab Assistants are recruited for laboratories.
12. First aid facilities are available in all the laboratories.
13. Drinking water facilities are available in all the laboratories.
14. Uninterrupted power supply is ensured for all labs.
15. Good ventilation and lighting facilities are ensured with all labs.
16. As per the curriculum all the labs are fully furnished and equipped with necessary instruments.

6.4 Project laboratory (5)


Name of
S.No. Utilization of Equipment Project Title Usage
equipment

Strengthening of RC
To determine the strength flexural elements using
Loading Final year students used
1 of reinforced concrete
Frame hybrid frpc for Project Work
elements
Self compacting concrete
To test flow ability of the
using ground granulated Final year students used
2 V- Funnel self compacting concrete
furnace slag for Project Work

120
To test confined flow Self compacting concrete
ability and the capacity of using ground granulated
U- Flow Final year students used
3 SCC concrete to flow furnace slag
tube for Project Work
within confined space

To test flow rate and Self compacting concrete


passing ability of SCC in using ground granulated Final year students used
4 L- Box
confined space furnace slag for Project Work

6.5 Safety measures in Laboratory (10)


The Code of conduct is displayed in all Laboratories - Survey Lab, Computer Lab,
Strength of Materials Lab, Concrete and Highway Engineering Laboratory, Hydraulic
Engineering Laboratory, Soil Mechanics Laboratory & Environmental Engineering Laboratory.
Sr.No. Safety Measures
1 Displaying general rules of Conduct in laboratories .
2 Displaying specific Safety Rules for students.
3 Appointing well trained technical supporting staff.
4 Avoiding the usage of damaged equipment and providing needful equipment and
components.
5 Maintaining First aid box and Fire Extinguisher are kept in the Laboratory.
6 Ensuring appropriate storage areas.

121
CRITERION 7 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 50

7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
POs & PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement Batch (2012-16)

Attainment
Pos Target Level Observations
Level
PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C202,
C203, C204, C205, C208, C304, C305, C308, C311, C313,
C405
PO1 2.6 2.05 1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics of
engineering mathematics.
2. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems.
Action:
1. Additional classes to be conducted to expose the students to basics of mathematics.
2. Additional assignments are to be given to introduce basics of civil engineering.
PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Attainment is low in the following subjects:
C201, C202, C203, C204, C205, C208, C214, C304, C305,
C311, C313, C314, C405
PO2 1.7 1.44 1. Basic knowledge of analysis is difficult for students to
understand.
2. Subject involves both analysis and design which is
complex.
Actions
1. More tutorial classes are to be conducted for analytical papers.
2. More problems will be given for practice.

122
PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration
for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects:

C201, C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405


PO3 0.9 0.84 1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems
2. Solving design problems found to be difficult.
Actions
1. More examples on design to be practiced by students in extra classes.
2. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C210
1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics of
PO4 0.9 0.89 engineering mathematics.
2. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems.
Actions
1. Additional classes to be conducted to expose the students to basics of mathematics.
2. Additional assignments are to be given to introduce basics of civil engineering.
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, C409
PO5 2.1 1.94 It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Actions
1.Modern labs like total station , STADD pro etc will be more utilized to fulfill the requirement in

123
engineering applications in new industrial era.
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C301, C304,
C313, C314, C405
PO6 0.7 0.62
It is observed that the students knowledge on assessing the
societal concerns is comparatively low.
Actions
1. Industrial Visits will be arranged to students to gain knowledge on societal concerns.
2.Webinars will be arranged for students to create more awareness on societal issues.
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C314, C404,
C405
PO7 2.5 1.80
The issues of global and environmental awareness among
the student should be improved.
Action 1. Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues are
improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources.
Action 2: Guest lecture from experienced staffs of the practical issues being faced in the life are brought
visible to the students
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306, C312
The students are doing better in improving the overall
PO8 2.76 1.8
expertise in field of engineering but lack in ethical moral
knowledge.
Actions
1. Corporate lectures and motivational talks will be arranged to overcome the above observations.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in

124
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208, C309,
C310, C319
PO9 1.3 1.24
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in
team.
Action
1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the
fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member.
2. The students will be motivated to work as a team in the programs conducted by the college.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216, C217,
C308, C409
PO10 1 0.98
The communication, presentation and report writing skills
are to be further improved among the students.
Actions:
1.Soft skills training will be imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical
talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
2. The communication lab provides students a place to learn language by reading, hearing and speaking in
English for a better communication. The students will be made to utlise communication lab.
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and leader
in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C409, C413

Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of Management


PO11 1.4 1.32 principle and applying managerial principles to his/her work
including financial implications and to manage the project
in multidisciplinary environments.
Actions:

125
1. The awareness is to be created among the student regarding the management principles and managing
projects.
2. The importance of Finance is to be taught to gain knowledge on the crucial role of money in finishing
the target without wastage through guest lectures.
PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216, C217,
C308, C409
PO12 1 0.96 The pre final year and final year courses of the program are
demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues and
lifelong learning.
Action 1: Students will be encouraged to use MOOCs and motivated to register for NPTEL.
Action 2.Making students updated with informations through net (e-learning), books & journals.
Attainment
PSOs Target Level Observations
Level
PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design
and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core
areas of civil engineering.
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource
fullness for contemporary issues.
PSO1 1.78 1.44
The project titles of the final year and pre-final year
students are addressing the real life problems.
Action
1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can design,
analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
PSO2 2.71 2.12
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action
1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of

126
conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in civil
engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related
field.
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability
PSO3 1.11 0.94
to communicate, leadership and project management.
Actions
1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field of
engineering.

POs & PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement Batch (2011-15)

Attainment
Pos Target Level Observations
Level
PO1 : Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201,
C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405
Civil engineering curriculum requires the strong
PO1 2.6 2.01 foundation of theoretical and practical knowledge of
science and mathematics, which the students study in
their first year, but students lags in correlating the
theoretical concepts with applications.
Action:
1. Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning process.
2. Students are encouraged to participate in technical events, other events where their basic knowledge
should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 1.7 1.51 Attainment is low in the following subjects :

127
C201, C202, C203, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313,
C314, C405
The students lack in problem solving and analyzing
skills gained through first and second year courses and
ability to apply in real time application.
Actions
1. More tutorial classes are to be conducted for analytical papers.
2. More problems will be given for practice.
3.Coaching classes will be conducted.
PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration
for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201,
C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405, C406,
C410
PO3 0.9 0.89
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems.
2. Students feel vague in theoretical subjects.
Actions
1. More examples on design are to be practiced by students in extra classes.
2. Theory subjects are to be made interesting with PPT, Videos and practical visits.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C210

1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basics


PO4 0.9 0.71 of engineering mathematics.
2. Students find it difficult to solve the
engineering problems.
Actions1. Basic problems are given as assignments to make students feel easy and interested with
problems.

128
Action 2: University exam question papers are made to be solved regularly.
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208,
C218, C408
PO5 2.1 1.96
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools is mandatory
for students to learn the measurement techniques.
Actions
1. Off campus survey is done for students to learn surveying in different topographical conditions.
2. The importance of design in construction is indulged in students by discussing the recent design failures
that caused massive fatal accidents.
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C213,
C215, C301, C304, C314, C315
PO6 0.7 0.631 The courses of civil Engineering are addressing the
needs of, health, safety and social concerns regarding
engineering practices in real life.
Actions
1. To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical
knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
2. Industrial visits are taken to make students know the various processes in real time concerning need and
safety.
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C202, C304
PO7 2.5 2.04 The issues of global and environmental awareness
among the student should be improved.

129
Actions
1.Environmental aspects are to be shown in videos of real time to create curiosity in students.
2. Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues are improved,
with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources.
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306
The students are doing better in improving the overall
PO8 2.76 1.96
expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of
knowledge in using code books efficiently
Actions
1. Special classes are arranged to overcome the above observations
2. Use of code book efficiently is taught by staffs and the students are made to use them regularly.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208,
C307, C308, C309, C310, C318, C408
PO9 1.3 1.26
The students are not able to work as individual as well
as in team.
Actions
1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the
fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member.
2.Group assignments are given to work as a team.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C216,
PO10 1.02 1 C217, C308, C408
The importance of lab is not understood by the students.
Actions:

130
1.Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks
by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and leader
in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C307, C408
Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of
Management principle and applying managerial
PO11 1.4 1.28
principles to his/her work including financial
implications and to manage the project in
multidisciplinary environments.
Actions1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and managing
projects.
PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C208,
C307, C308, C309, C310, C318, C408
PO12 1 0.96 The pre final year and final year courses of the program
are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues
and lifelong learning.
Action 1: The Subjects that are meant as lifelong learning are repeated several times through lectures,
presentations and videos.
Action 2.Making students updated with information through net (e- learning ), books & journals.

Target Attainment
PSOs Observations
Level Level

PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design
and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core
areas of civil engineering.

131
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource
fullness for contemporary issues.
PSO1 1.78 1.36
The project titles of the final year and pre-final year students
are addressing the real life problems.
Action
1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can
design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.

PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work


applying modern tools and techniques.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
PSO2 2.71 2.17
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action
1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in
civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas &
related field.
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to
PSO3 1.11 0.95
communicate, leadership and project management.

Actions
1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field of
engineering.

POs & PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement Batch (2010-14)

Target Attainment
Pos Observations
Level Level
PO1 : Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C201, C204,
PO1 2.6 2.279
C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405
132
1. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of
engineering mathematics
2. Students find it difficult to solve design subjects
Action:
1. Special classes to be conducted improve the mathematical fundamental basics.
2. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce civil engineering fundamental basics.
PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C201, C202,
C203, C204, C205, C305, C311, C313, C314, C405
PO2 1.7 1.612
1. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood
2. Subject involves both analysis and design which confuses
Actions
1. Tutorial classes for repeated analysis of problem learning
2. More problems will be given for practice.
PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design
system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the
public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects
C201, C206, C208, C303, C305, C312, C401, C405, C406,
C410
PO3 0.9 0.88
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems
2. Solving design problems found to be lengthy
Actions
1. More examples on design to be practiced by students in extra classes
2. More design classes to be taught in tutorial classes
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.

133
Attainment is low in the following subjects C201, C210
It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature
PO4 0.9 0.823
survey are addressing the research based approach but does
not end with valid conclusions.
Actions1. We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic knowledge
should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C218,
C408.
PO5 2.1 1.926
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Actions
1.Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like total station, stadd pro etc. to
specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications in new industrial era.
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects; C2013, C215,
C301, C304, C314, C315
PO6 0.7 0.676 The courses of civil Engineering are addressing the needs
of, health, safety and social concerns regarding engineering
practices in real life.
Actions
1. To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical
knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
PO7 2.5 1.83 Attainment is low in the following subjects: C202, C304

134
The issues of global and environmental awareness among
the student should be improved.
Action 1. Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues are
improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources.
Action 2: guest lecture from experienced staffs of the practical issues being faced in the life are brought
visible to the students
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.
Attainment is low in the following subjects: C306
The students are doing better in improving the overall
PO8 2.76 1.96 expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of
communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some
are lagging in real life situations.
Actions 1. . Corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to overcome the above observations.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C307,
C308, C309, C310, C318, C408
PO9 1.3 1.26
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in
team.
Action 1. Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group
in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member.
2. The students work as a team in the programme conducted by the college.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C216, C217,
C308, C408
PO10 1.02 0.998
The communication, presentation and report writing skills
are to be further improved among the students.

135
Actions:
1.Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks by
group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
2. The communication lab provides students a place to learn language by reading, hearing and speaking in
English for a better communication
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and leader
in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C307, C408
Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of Management
PO11 1.4 1.22 principle and applying managerial principles to his/her work
including financial implications and to manage the project
in multidisciplinary environments.
Actions:
1. The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and managing projects.
2. The importance of Finance are taught to know the crucial role of money in finishing the target without
wastage.
PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Attainment is low in the following subjects C208, C307,
C308, C309, C310, C318, C408
PO12 1 0.96 The pre final year and final year courses of the program are
demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues and
lifelong learning.
Action 1: The importance of the Subjects that are meant as life long learning are repeated several times
through lectures, presentations and videos.
Action 2.Making students updated with information through net (e-learning), books & journals.
Target Attainment
PSOs Observations
Level Level
PSO1 : Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving, design
and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various issues in the core

136
areas of civil engineering.
The courses of the program are demonstrating the resource
fullness for contemporary issues.
PSO1 1.78 1.416
The project titles of the final year and pre-final year students
are addressing the real life problems.
Action 1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so that they can
design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
PSO2 2.71 2.12
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms
of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in civil
engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced areas & related
field.
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to
PSO3 1.11 0.94
communicate, leadership and project management.
Actions1. Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise in field
of engineering.

7.2 Academic Audit and Actions Taken thereof during The Period of Assessment
7.2.1 Academic Audit System
The Academic Audit plan is prepared by the Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) every year
before the commencement of the semester classes. An Internal Auditing committee is formed to
carry out the various audits as per the scheduled plan .The process of Academic Audit is explained
in the chart below.

137
Preparation of Academic Audit Plan by
Class Committee
IQAC Course File Audit
Log Book Audit
Question Paper
Formulation of Internal Audit Committees Audit
Answer Script
Audit
Lab Experiment
Audit carried out by the Internal Audit Audit
Lab Equipment and
Committee as scheduled

Submitting the Audit Reports and actions


recommended to IQAC

Actions taken by IQAC

7.2.2 Implementation of Academic Audit System


The various Audits planned by Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) are presented here. The
Assessment criteria and the process involved in each audit are explained in the following table. The nature
of Actions taken and implementation of the audits are also described briefly here.

Audit & Frequency Action Taken &


S.No Process
Assessment Criteria Of Audit Implementation
The Chairperson nominated The action to be taken is
by IQAC with all subject decided based on the
Class Committee staffs of class is present for report which includes:
Meeting the meeting. 1.Advising the teacher to
Assessment Criteria: 5 students from the respective change method of
a. Quality of class are present. teaching
Two per
1. Teaching
Semester Feedback received from 2.Completion of syllabus
b. Syllabus
completion students and direct discussion by faculty
c. Quality of between faculty and student 3. Improvement in
Facilities is enabled. facilities by getting
Minutes will be prepared and approval from
filed. The report of the audit management.

138
is submitted to IQAC.
The action to be taken is
The Head of the department
decided based on the
evaluates every course file in
Course File Audit Beginning the beginning of the on-going audit includes:
Assessment Criteria: and end of semester. 1. An Opportunity to
2.
a. Contents every At the end of every semester, include the contents
b. Arrangement semester re-audit is carried out to 2.Creating strong
ensure the course file is awareness on importance
updated.
of Course file
Log Book Audit The action to be taken is
Assessment Criteria:
decided based on the
a. Attendance
b. Syllabus Periodic entry of assessment report
completion Three times and assignment marks are 1.Seeking Explanation
3.
c. Assessment Entry per semester monitored. The report of the letter
d. Content beyond audit is submitted to IQAC. 2. If explanation is not
syllabus satisfactory, Time will be
e. No.of Hours taken
given for completing it.
The action to be taken is
The Head of the Department decided based on the
Question Paper audits every question paper
Audit Before report
4. a. Quality every before it is submitted to exam 1.The question paper
b. Unit Coverage assessment cell. The quality and syllabus should be reframed if it
c.CO mapping coverage is verified does not meet the
standards
Senior Faculty along with the
Department Exam Cell If deviation is found , Re-
Answer Script Audit After every
5. Co-ordinator verifies the evaluation will be
assessment
evaluated answer scripts. conducted

The Lab Co-ordinator


Laboratory inspect the conduct of
Experiment experiments
Audit Special Classes will be
Twice in a The number of experiments
6. a. Experiment conducted for completing
semester completed, or scheduled for
Completion as per the experiments
Anna University completion in accordance
b. Observation Notes with the University syllabus

Laboratory The Lab Co-ordinator along If there is any


Equipment and with the team of senior malfunction found in any
7. Once a Year
Stock Audit faculty assess the instrument of the equipment in the
a. Stock Verification condition and perform stock laboratory, it will be
139
b. Equipment verification taken for service
Maintenance immediately.

The completion of record


note by the student and
Every Record correction by the
Counselling will be done
Laboratory Practical semester faculty will be verified by the
Head of the Department. for completion by the lab
Record Audit before co-ordinator along with
8. The total number of
a. Record University
Completion Practical experiment completed and its the team of senior
Exam relevancy to University faculties.
syllabus is also examined by
the Head of the Department.

7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entreprenuership


Assessment is based on improvement in
Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.
7.3.1 Placement Details

v Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier
institutions
v Entrepreneurs
S.No ITEM 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
No. of Students
1 159 173 127 124
Eligible
No of Students
2 110 153 86 98
placed
3 Quality Placement 40 30 18 14
4 Core Industry 36 123 68 84
Pay packages /
5 300000 240000 180000 144000
annum

7.3.2 Higher Studies

S.No ITEM 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013


No. of Students appeared
1 15 15 32 18
in GATE/TANCET
Admitted in Premier
2 3 4 2 2
Institutions

140
7.3.3 Entrepreneurs
ACADEMIC
S.No GRADUATE NAME COMPANY NAME
YEAR
1 M.Anand G.M.A.Foundations.
2 2014-2015 R.Naveenraj R.Naveenraj S Assocaites Pvt Ltd.
3 Jiaur Rahman A Puduvai Tiles Pvt Ltd
4 2013-2014 R.Vishnu Priya Janani Construction Pvt Ltd.
5 Goutham.R R K.C. Builders Pvt Ltd.
6 2012-2013 Christopher Shyam.F F R.K Associates Pvt Ltd.
7 B.Lakshmipathy D.L.S Interiors Pvt Ltd.

7.4 Improvement in The Quality of Students Admitted to the Program

Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/ score in qualifying state level/ national
level entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th Standard
and percentage marks of the lateral entry students

2015- 2014- 2013- 2012-


S.NO ITEM
2016 2015 2014 2013
No of Students
- - - -
National Level admitted
1 Entrance Opening Score/Rank - - - -
Examination
Closing Score/Rank - - - -
No of Students
State/ University/ - - - -
admitted
Level Entrance
2 Opening Score/Rank - - - -
Examination/
Others Closing Score/Rank - - - -
Entrance No of Students
2 7 33 26
Examination for admitted
3 Lateral Entry or Opening Score/Rank 73 88 89 91
Lateral entry
details Closing Score/Rank 67 65 60 61
Average CBSE/Any other board result of
admitted Students (Physics, Chemistry & 127 137 143 138
4
Maths)

141
CRITERION 8 FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS 50
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5)

Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5) Assessment = (515)/Average FYSFR (Limited to Max.5)

Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSFR

Number Of Students
Number of Faculty FYSFR
Year (approved intake members(considering fractional (N/F)
strength) N load)F
2013-2014 930 64 15

2014-2015 1050 71 15

2015-2016 990 67 15

Average FYSFR: 15.00


Assessment [(5 * 15) / Average FYSFR]: 5.00

8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)

Assessment of qualification = (5x + 3y)/RF

x = Number of Regular Faculty with PhD,

y = Number of Regular Faculty with Post-graduate qualification

RF = Number of faculty members required as per SFR of 15:1, Faculty definition as defined in 5.1

x (Number y (Number Of RF (Number Of Assessment Of


Of Regular Regular Faculty with Faculty Members Faculty
Year
Faculty with Post graduate required as per SFR Qualification [
PhD) Qualification) of 15:1) (5x + 3y) / RF]
2013-14 6 31 49 2.51

2014-15 8 34 54 2.63

2015-16 8 33 50 2.78

Average Assessment: 2.64

142
8.3. First Year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a
10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10)) x
(number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the second year.

2015- 2014- 2013-


Academic Performance
2016 2015 2014
Mean CGPA or mean percentage of all successful students(X) 4.705 5.29 4.83
Total number of Successful students (Y) 402 507 635
Total number of students appeared in the examination(Z) 402 507 635
API[X*(Y/Z)] 4.705 5.29 4.83
Average API [(AP1+AP2+AP3)/3]:4.94

Assessment = Average API: 4.94

2015-2016
Department Wise CGPA
7
5.6 5.75
6 5.43
5 4.49 4.63 4.47
3.74
4 3.53
3
2
1
0
AUTO BT CIVIL CSE ECE EEE IT MECH

2014-2015
Department Wise CGPA
7 6.26
5.84 5.83 5.66
6 5.13 5.08
5 4.65
3.9 3.65
4
3
2
1
0
Aero Auto Biotech Civil CSE ECE EEE IT Mech

143
2013-2014
Department Wise CGPA

7
5.75
6 5.23 5.29
5 4.62 4.69 4.47
3.84 4.02
4
3
2
1
0
Auto Biotech Civil CSE ECE EEE IT Mech

8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10)


8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation
of Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
(Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam
questions, laboratory tests, internally developed assessment exams, oral exams assignments,
presentations, tutorial sheets etc.)
Table 8.1 List of Assessment Tools

TOOL RELEVANCE FREQUENCY

Internal Exam Specific Course Outcomes


Test-I Test-I (Co1 And Co2)
Three Times Per Semester
Test-II Test-Ii(Co3 And Co4)
Test-III Test-Iii(Co5 And Co6)

Outcomes Of Laboratory
Laboratory Internal Exam One Time Per Semester
Courses

University Assessment For All First Year Courses(Equal One Time At The End Of The
All Courses Weightage) Semester

144
Conducting Internal Assessment Test

Evaluation by the Faculty within two days of the Exam

Data Feeding in TCS ION within a Week of the Exam

Consolidation of Marks by the Department Exam Cell Coordinator in


Excel Sheets

Uploading the Data in University Web Portal

Receiving the University Results from Exam Cell

Storing of Data for computing PO Attainment

Fig 8.1: Data Collection Process For CO Evaluation

145
Consolidated Internal Consolidated University
Marks Marks

Deciding the attainment levels for CO

University Assessment:
Level 1 = 60% of the
Computing the average of course students scoring above 50%
outcome attainment level for Internal Level 2= 70% of the
and University Assessment students scoring above 50%
Internal Assessment: Level3=80% of the students
Level 1 = 60% of the scoring above 50%
students scoring above
50% Finding the weighted average of Weighted Average:
Level 2= 70% of the Course attainment based on internal University Exam: 80%
students scoring above and University assessment Internal Exam: 20%
50%
Level 3=80% of the
students scoring above Fig 8.2: CO Attainment Measurement
50%

8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university
examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be
measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a
subject plus the performance in the University examination
Refer to 3.2.2 for further details

CO Attainment through Internal Assessment (2012-2016)


COURSE CODE CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
C101 3 3 3 3 3 3
146
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 3 3 3 3 3 3
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 3 3 3 3 3 3
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 3 3 3 3 3 3
C114 3 3 3 3 3 3
C115 3 3 3 3 3 3
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 3 3 3 3 3 3
CO Attainment through University Exam

COURSE CODE CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6


C101 2 2 2 2 2 2
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 2 2 2 2 2 2
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 3 3 3 3 3 3
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 3 3 3 3 3 3
C114 1 1 1 1 1 1
C115 1 1 1 1 1 1
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 2 2 2 2 2 2

CO Attainment for the batch 2012-16


COURSE CODE CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5 CO6
C101 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C102 3 3 3 3 3 3
147
C103 3 3 3 3 3 3
C104 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
C105 3 3 3 3 3 3
C106 3 3 3 3 3 3
C107 3 3 3 3 3 3
C108 3 3 3 3 3 3
C109 3 3 3 3 3 3
C110 3 3 3 3 3 3
C111 3 3 3 3 3 3
C112 3 3 3 3 3 3
C113 3 3 3 3 3 3
C114 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C115 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
C116 3 3 3 3 3 3
C117 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
8.5. Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20)
8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)
The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the
institution.
Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs through first
year courses.
(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes
are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include
information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each
Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)
Table 8.2: List of Assessment Tools

TOOL RELEVANCE FREQUENCY


Internal Exam Specific Course Outcomes
Test-I Test-I (Co1 And Co2)
Three Times Per Semester
Test-II Test-Ii(Co3 And Co4)
Test-III Test-Iii(Co5 And Co6)
Laboratory Internal Exam Outcomes Of Laboratory
One Time Per Semester
Courses
University Assessment For All First Year Courses(Equal One Time At The End Of The
All Courses Weightage) Semester
148
Consolidated Internal Consolidated University
Marks Marks

Internal Assessment: University Assessment:


Level 1 = 50% of the Level 1 = 50% of the
students scoring above Deciding the attainment level for CO
students scoring above
50% 50%
Level 2= 60% of the Level 2= 60% of the
students scoring above students scoring above
50% Computing the average of course 50%
Level 3=70% of the outcome attainment level for Internal Level 3=70% of the
students scoring above and University Assessment students scoring above
50% 50%

Finding the weighted average of


Course attainment based on internal Weighted Average:
and University assessment University Exam: 80%
Internal Exam: 20%

Mapping the Course Outcomes with


Program Outcomes

Carry forward the attainment levels


of Cos to PO mapping matrices and
compute the average of Course
Outcome attainment level for each

Fig 8.3: PO Attainment Measurement

PO ATTAINMENT (2012-2016):
PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO1 PO1 PO1
COURSE NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2
C101 - - - - - - - - 1.6 1.5 1.5 -
C102 2.7 1.8 0.8 0.8 - - - - - - - -

149
C103 2.2 1.2 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C104 1.7 1 - - - - - - - - - -
C105 3 - - - - - - - - - - -
C106 2.8 - 0.8 - - - - - - - - -
C107 3 - - - 3 - - - - - - -
C108 3 2.2 - - 3 - - - - - - -
C109 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2 2 -
C110 2.3 1.67 0.7 0.7 - - - - - - - -
C111 2.2 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C112 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 2.5 - - - - - - - - - - -
C114 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.1 - - - - - - -
C115 1.4 - - - 0.5 - - - - - - -
C116 2 3 - 1 1 - - - - - - -
C117 2.2 - - - 0.7 - - - - - - -
SUM 34 14 3 3 9 - - - 4 3 3 -
No of Courses 15 11 6 4 6 2 2 2 -
PO
2.2 1.2 0.5 0.7 1.5 0 0 0 2 1.5 1.5 0
ATTAINMENT

PSO Attainment

SUBJECT CODE PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C101 1.83 - 1.47
C102 1.5 - -
C103 0.67 - -
C104 0.57 - -
C105 - - -
C106 1.83 - -
C107 1.83 - -
C108 2.17 3 -
C109 3 - 2
C110 1.97 - -
C111 1 - -
C112 0.83 - -
C113 1.5 - -
C114 0.62 - 0.16
C115 - - 0.47
C116 3 - -
C117 1.47 2.2 -
150
SUM 23.79 5.2 4.1
No of Courses 15 3 5
PSO ATTAINMENT 1.58 1.73 0.82

8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
(The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through
Program level Course-PO matrix as indicated)
PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement - CAY Mention for relevant Pos

Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
PO1: 1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.54 2.266 Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Students are to be made, to read English books
to improve their technical English skills.
Action 2: Tamil Medium students feel the subject is difficult, extra classes for them are to be provided.
PO2:2.Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering
PO2 1.622 1.272 mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Mechanical Engineering fundamental
Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a
regular basis
PO3:3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.
Attainment achieved nearly, improvement actions will make us
PO3 0.516 0.5
achieve the target

151
Action 1:Ways to improve further are being analyzed
Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the
consideration of environment.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 0.7 0.7 Attainment Achieved
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.
Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models.
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources,
and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are
PO5 1.883 1.5
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Softwares that are of recent trends used in the civil field are to be taught
Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on softwares
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
PO6 0 0 NIL
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their
practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for a
smooth construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged)
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for
sustainable development.
PO7 0 0 NIL
Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved.
Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and

152
norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 0 0 NIL
Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but
due to lack of communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life
situations.
Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader
in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
The students are not able to work as individual as well as in
PO9 2.2 2
team.
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams
Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a
group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team
member.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear
instructions.
The communication, presentation and report writing skills are to
PO10 2.00 1.5
be further improved among the students.
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in
presentations, GD etc.
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and
leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
The knowledge of Management principle and applying
PO11 2.00 1.5 managerial principles to his/her to manage a work as a team to
achieve the target on time.
Action 1: Group assignments are to be given

153
Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings)
PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 0 0 NIL
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.
Action 2:Communication & problem solving skills are to be learnt for a life time to be an independent

PSOs Target Attainment Observations


Level Level
PSO1: Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil
engineering day to day practice

PSO1 1.726 1.586 Attainment is low in the few subjects.

Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects


Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted.

PSO2: Students will able to participate in critical thinking and problem solving of civil
engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering
Mathematics, Students find it difficult to solve the
PSO2 2 1.733
engineering problems, Basic knowledge of design is not well
understood
Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice
Action 2: Exposing students to participate in off campus programmes and in plant training

PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face
the challenging emerging needs of our society

PSO3 1.11 0.82 Practical problem solving skills

Action 1:Giving students group assignments and programmes to conduct


Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development

PO ATTAINMENT (2011-2015):

154
COURSE PO PO PO PO1 PO1 PO1
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO9
NAME 6 7 8 0 1 2
C101 - - - - - - - - 2.1 1.9 1.9 -
C102 2.0 1.3 0.6 0.6 - - - - - - - -
C103 2.1 1.1 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C104 0.4 0.2 - - - - - - - - - -
C105 0.4 - - - - - - - - - - -
C106 0.4 0.1 - - - - - - - - -
C107 3.0 3.0 - - - - - - -
C108 3.0 2.2 3.0 - - - - - - -
C109 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2.0 2.0 -
C110 1.7 1.2 0.5 0.5 - - - - - - - -
C111 2.2 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - -
C112 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 1.2 - - - - - - - - - - -
C114 1.7 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 - - - - - - -
C115 3.0 - - 0.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
C116 2.0 3.0 - 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
C117 3.0 - - 0.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
SUM 27.8 12.2 2.0 2.3 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.9 3.9 0.0
No of Courses 15 11 6 3 6 2 2 2 0
PO
1.85 1.10 0.32 0.78 1.78 2.11 1.95 1.95
ATTAINMEN - - - -
7 8 8 2 5 9 6 6
T

POs Target Attainment Observations


Level Level
PO1: Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering
problems.

PO1 2.54 1.857 Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110

Action 1: Special classes are conducted at evening for the students who are lacking behind

Action 2: Proper Motivation for the lateral entry and dull students are done to bring interest in
problem solving techniques.

PO2: Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of

155
mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of


PO2 1.622 1.108 engineering mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve
the engineering problems

Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted from resource person to impart exposure to


dimensional science learning.
Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a
regular basis

PO3: Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems


and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate
consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental
considerations.

Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems,


PO3 0.516 0.328
Basic knowledge of design is not well understood.

Action 1:Ways to improve further are being analyzed (example the mentor system is being
analyzed to be implemented)

Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the
consideration of environment.

PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and


research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and
synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.

It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature


PO4 0.7 0.782 survey are addressing the research based approach but does
not end with valid conclusions.

Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.

Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models.

PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques,
resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling
to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.

1.883 1.785 It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are


PO5
necessary to meet the industry standards and research.

156
Action 1: Softwares that are of recent trends used in the civil field are to be taught

Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on softwares

PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practice.

PO6 0 0 NIL

Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.

Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for
a smooth construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged)

PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering
solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need
for sustainable development.

PO7 0 0 NIL

Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be
improved.
Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice.

PO8 0 0 NIL

Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering
but due to lack of communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life
situations.

Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught.

PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.

2.2 2.119 The students are not able to work as individual as well as in
PO9 team.

157
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams

Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as
a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective
team member.

PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the


engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write
effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive
clear instructions.

The communication, presentation and report writing skills


PO10 2.00 1.956
are to be further improved among the students.
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.

Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in
presentations, GD etc.

PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and
leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

The knowledge of Management principle and applying


PO11 2.00 1.956 managerial principles to his/her to manage a work as a team
to achieve the target on time.

Action 1: Group assignments are to be given

Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings)

PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

PO12 0 0 NIL

Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.

Action 2:Communication & problem solving skills are to be learnt for a life time to be an
independent

PSO Attainment (2011-2015)


SUBJECT CODE PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
158
C101 2.39 - 1.91
C102 1.10 - -
C103 0.64 - -
C104 0.14 - -
C105 - - -
C106 0.29 - -
C107 1.83 - -
C108 2.17 3.00 -
C109 3.00 - 2.00
C110 1.08 - -
C111 1.00 - -
C112 0.83 - -
C113 0.70 - -
C114 0.98 - 0.24
C115 - - 1.00
C116 3.00 - -
C117 2.00 3.00 -
SUM 21.14 6.00 5.16
No of Courses 15 3 5
PSO
ATTAINMENT 1.409342 2 1.031111

Target Attainme
PSOs Observations
Level nt Level
PSO1:Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil
engineering day to day practice

PSO1 1.726 1.409 Attainment is low in very few subjects.

Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects

Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted using softwares (STADD)

PSO2: Students will able to participate in critical thinking and problem solving of civil
engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge

PSO2 2 2 Attainment achieved


Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice

159
Action 2: Exposing students to participate in out college programmes and in plant training

PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face
the challenging emerging needs of our society
PSO3 1.11 1.031 Practical problem solving skills

Action 1: Giving students group assignments and programmes to make them conduct as a team.

Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development

PO ATTAINMENT (2010-2014):

COURSE
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
NAME
C101 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2.0 2.0 -
C102 2.7 1.8 0.8 0.8 - - - - - - - -
C103 2.2 1.2 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C104 2.3 1.3 - - - - - - - - - -
C105 3.0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C106 2.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - -
C107 3.0 3.0 - - - - - - -
C108 3.0 2.2 3.0 - - - - - - -
C109 - - - - - - - - 2.2 2.0 2.0 -
C110 2.3 1.7 0.7 0.7 - - - - - - - -
C111 1.6 1.0 0.2 - - - - - - - - -
C112 1.8 0.8 - - - - - - - - - -
C113 2.5 - - - - - - - - - - -
C114 1.7 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 - - - - - - -
C115 3.0 - - 1.0 - - - - - - -
C116 2.0 3.0 - 1.0 1.0 - - - - - - -
C117 3.0 - - 1.0 - - - - - - -
SUM 37 14 3 3 11 0 0 0 4 4 4 0
No of Courses 15 9 6 4 6 2 2 2 0
Po attainment 2.460 1.545 0.500 0.687 1.785 - - - 2.167 2.000 2.000 -

Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
PO1: 1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals,
and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.54 2.460 Attainment is low in the following subjects C101,C110

160
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. Students are to be made, to read English books to improve
their technical English skills.
Action 2: Tamil Medium students feel the subject is difficult, extra classes for them are to be provided.
PO2:2.Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering
problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and
engineering sciences.
Attainment lacks in C102,C105,C110,C116
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering
PO2 1.622 1.545
mathematics ,Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Mechanical Engineering fundamental
Action 2: More problems will be given as part of assignment and the same will be monitored on a regular basis
PO3:3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design
system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public
health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Subject involves both analysis and design, Solving design problems
PO3 0.516 0.500
found to be lengthy
Action 1: Coaching class for the dull & lateral entry students
Action 2: Modern techniques and practices are to be updated and known to the students with the consideration of
environment.
PO4: Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods
including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to
provide valid conclusions.
It is observed that most of the project abstract and literature survey
PO4 0.7 0.687 are addressing the research based approach but does not end with
valid conclusions.
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.
Action 2: Conduction of Science Fest and motivating students to prepare/built prototype models.
PO5: Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering
and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the
limitations.
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources are necessary
PO5 1.883 1.785
to meet the industry standards and research.
Action 1: Softwares that are of recent trends used in the civil field are to be taught

161
Action N: Students should be given individual Systems to work on softwares
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal,
health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional
engineering practice.
PO6 0 0 NIL
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand their practical
knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
Action 2: Exposure to the site of construction for the students to learn and analyze in & around for a smooth
construction.(Industrial visits, In plant trainings are to be arranged)
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in
societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 0 0 NIL
Action 1: The issues of global and environmental awareness among the student should be improved.
Action 2: Projects based on sustainability are encouraged
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the
engineering practice.
PO8 0 0 NIL
Action 1: The students are doing better in improving the overall expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of
communications and other ethical moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life situations.
Action 2: Practical issues should be discussed and ethics, its role & importance should be taught.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse
teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.2 2.167 The students are not able to work as individual as well as in team.
Action 1: workshops, symposiums are conducted by the students as teams
Action 2: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as a group in the
fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective team member.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering
community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.00 2.00 Attainment achieved
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of communication/technical talks
by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
Action 2:The communication language lab gives students an opportunity to improve their skills in presentations,
GD etc.
162
PO11: Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and
management principles and apply these to ones own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage
projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.00 2.00 Attainment achieved
Action 1: Group assignments are to be given
Action 2:Real time projects are to be studied and presented as a group report (In plant trainings)
PO12: Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 0 0 NIL
Action 1: Practical approach of teaching to be adapted.
Action 2:Communication & problem solving skills are to be learnt for a life time to be an independent

Program level Course-PSO matrix-Target

SUBJECT
PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
CODE
C101 2.5 - 2
C102 1.5 - -
C103 0.7 - -
C104 0.8 - -
C105 - - -
C106 1.8 - -
C107 1.8 - -
C108 2.2 3 -
C109 3 - -
C110 2 - -
C111 1 - -
C112 0.8 - -
C113 1.5 - -
C114 1.3 - 0.3
C115 - - 1
C116 3 - -
C117 2 3 -
AVERAGE 1.726667 3 1.1

163
PSO Attainment (2010-2014)

SUBJECT CODE PSO1 PSO2 PSO3


C101 2.5 - 2
C102 1.5 - -
C103 0.7 - -
C104 0.8 - -
C105 0 - -
C106 1.8 - -
C107 1.8 - -
C108 2.2 3 -
C109 3 - -
C110 1.5 - -
C111 0.7 - -
C112 0.8 - -
C113 1.5 - -
C114 1 - 0.2
C115 - - 1
C116 3 - -
C117 2 3 -
SUM 24.8 6 5.2
No of Courses 15 2 4
PSO
1.653333 3 1.1
ATTAINMENT

PSOs Target Attainme Observations


Level nt
PSO1: Student will able to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools for civil
engineering day to day practice

PSO1 1.726 1.653 Attainment is low in very few subjects. With the following
actions the target can be achieved.
Action 1: Additional classes to be conducted to introduce design subjects

Action 2: Practical approach of teaching design to be adapted.

PSO2: Students will able to participate in critical thinking and problem solving of civil
engineering field that require analytical and design knowledge
Lateral entry Students are not exposed to basic of engineering
PSO2 3 2.12 Mathematics, Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems, Basic knowledge of design is not well understood

164
Action 1: More practical problems will be given for practice

Action 2: Exposing students to participate in out college programmes and in plant training

PSO3: Students will be able to pursue of lifelong learning and professional development to face
the challenging emerging needs of our society
PSO3 1.11 1.1 Practical problem solving skills

Action 1: Giving students group assignments and programmes to make them conduct as a team.

Action 2:Ethical learning for a sustainable development

165
CRITERION 9 Student Support Systems 50

9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50)


9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)
Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/career advancement/course work
specific/laboratory specific/all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of
students per mentor: Frequency of meeting:
(The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the
students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)
Mentoring System : Yes
: Professional guidance/career advancement/course work
Type of mentoring
specific/laboratory specific/all-round development
Number of students per mentor : 20
Frequency of meeting : Every Tuesday

Mentoring Process
Each Faculty is assigned for a batch of 15 to 20 students in a class. The Mentor Student Meeting is
conducted every week regularly in their respective venue (lab or classroom) after the college
working hours on every Tuesday between 3.30 p.m. to 4.30 p.m. The outcomes of the mentoring
process help students to develop their academic and career pursuits positively. The flowchart of
the mentoring process is shown as follows:

166
History Card

A history card is maintained for each student. It contains the following data

v Personal Information
v Previous Record
v Academic Performance
v Competitive Examination Details
v Details of Internship and Industrial Trainings
v Scholarships record
v Co-Curricular and Extra-Curricular activities

167
Monitoring and Counseling the students
The mentors:
v Make sure that the students understand not only the personal reflections of their
commitment to their studies, but also the value of the professional community and general
public as well.
v Keep track of students progress and achievements, setting milestones and acknowledging
their accomplishments.
v Observe students different cultural and ethnic background and find productive methods to
balance the level of students.
v Encourage students inquisitive quest for new techniques and discuss the concepts for
prospective outcomes.
v Provide support and encouragement at times of appreciation, accomplishments emotional
and physical distress.
v Categorize the students based on their academics, attendance, discipline and
extracurricular activities.
Efficiency of the mentoring system
Overall pass percentage of the institute has increased with effectiveness of the system.
The absenteeism among the students is reduced considerably.
The overall personality of the students is enhanced by imbibing positive attitude in them.

9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)

Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process;
Average Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis
of reward/ corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching &
learning and summary of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective
actions taken.
Feedback collected for all courses: Yes
Feedback collection process:
v Regular class committee meetings are conducted. Class committee consists of a chair
person who is a senior faculty but not handling that class, faculties of that class and
students representatives. The main aim of this is to improve the teaching process. The
168
performance of the students is analyzed and if necessary they are counseled for their
improvement.
v Besides the class committee meetings, a well-designed feedback form is given to the
students to assess the academic performance of the faculty who handled the subject at the
end of each semester. These online feedbacks will speak on the Faculty qualities
punctuality in coming to the class, sincerity in teaching, communication ability, honesty in
completing the portion, prompt in valuing, encouraging & motivating the students etc.

169
Execution of Feedback process:
v A centralized Intranet feedback system used for collecting feedback from the students.
v The Schedule for the course feedback is sent to the departments and students should
record their feedback during the scheduled time in the central computing centre.
v The entire feedback process is monitored by Course feedback coordinator.

Indices (Grading) used for measuring quality of teaching and learning


v In online feedback, questionnaire contains 7 parameters rated using 5 point scale to
measure faculty performance.
v The weighted average of the students response is calculated and consolidated
v The performance based on feedback is categorized in to
Category I (above 90%) Excellent
Category II (70% - 90%) Good
Category III (Below 70%) Suggestion for Improvement.

Basis of reward / corrective measures


Category Indices Remarks
I Above 90% Appreciation
II 70% - 90% Recommended for FDP, Workshop, Conference
II Below 70% Faculty has panel discussion with Principal/ HOD

9.3. Feedback on facilities (5)


Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken.
v Institute collects the Facility feedback from students for each semester.
v Facility feedback collected from student through class committee meeting
v IQAC consolidate the report and submit to the Principal/Management for corrective
measure.

170
Feedback Analysis, Corrective and Preventive Actions
v Consolidated statement prepared by IQAC Coordinator based on Teaching Learning and
facilities is taken note of them by the Principal and HOD.
v Where serious complaints are received from the students regarding general facilities like
Library, Hostel, Canteen, etc, then Management takes appropriate corrective measures
immediately and the same is promptly recorded.

9.4. Self-Learning (5)


(The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning
beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness)
Scope for self-learning
The institution helps students in many ways to inculcate and develop problem solving ability,
self-reliance, and initiative, spirit of inquiry, learning by observation and discussion and
developing lifelong learning skills by providing facilities like,

171
v Common Computing Centre with internet
v General Library
v Department Library
v Digital library
v Wi-Fi Connection
v Course Materials uploaded in TCS Ion.
v E-Books
All the above mentioned facilities are available even after working hours.
The institution provides an excellent academic environment with access on self-learning.
v The institution helps students to inculcate self-learning, one is by providing main library
with required study materials like reference books, text books and books related to
competitive exams like GRE, TOEFL, IELTS, GATE etc.
v Digital Library with DELNET data base, NPTEL video lectures, book CDs are available
where students can prepare their own Study material. Research journals are available.
v Wi-Fi Connectivity is available for student benefit.
v Study materials & question banks have been uploaded for individual subjects through
internal server in the Departments concerned where they can be easily accessed.

NPTEL:
v The institution has a NPTEL Local Chapter.
v NPTEL contents are being used by our institution as part of the teaching-learning
process.
v Faculty members are using these contents as part of their lesson plan to teach
university curriculum.
v Students are using NPTEL to prepare for technical jobs and competitive exams, and
also for constant learning and updating knowledge.
v Many students of our institution have taken-up the NPTEL online certification courses
and achieved certificates.

172
Implementation Process:

A faculty member is identified as


Single Point Contact (SPOC)

SPOC disseminates all NPTEL


initiatives among the students

SPOC encourages students to


enroll in courses

Students attend the courses, submit the


assignments and finally take-up the tests

Students get certificates from


NPTEL

NPTEL Local Chapter Started on: 25-07-2015


Course Status report for the Academic Year (2015 2016)

July September January May


S.No Particular
2015 2016
1 No. of Subjects Registered 12 24
2 No. of Students Registered 318 218
3 No. of Students Received Scholarship 225 156
No. of Students Received Participant
4 14 52
Certificates
5 No. of Students Received Merit Certificates 01 16

173
iON DIGITAL LEARNING
The institution is powered by iON Digital Learning, which is a collaborative learning
platform on the cloud that provides an interactive environment for improved learning outcomes.
Powered by a best-in-class Learning Management System (LMS), it offers a collaborative
pedagogical model to enrich participatory learning by enabling course delivery, assessment and
other learning opportunities in a community setting.

LEARNER INSTRUCTOR INSTITUTION

Collaborate with Create courses Create learning


peers Conduct tests communities
Access study
material
Give Aggregate
assignments content
Get feedback
Connect with
industry

TCS ion
Coordinator
Students Corner Parents Corner Faculty Corner
Responsibility
Login Login Login Timetable Upload
Timetable Timetable Subject Notes Enroll Students
Class Notes Attendance Attendance Faculty Allocation
Attendance Internal Entry Subject Allocation
Internal Marks marks Internal Mark Notes Upload
Events Entry SMS facilities
Feedback Activity/ Event

Digital Learning

v Students can access the study material at any time using their login.
v Study material has available to download in the format of Docx, PPT & PDF.

174
v Content beyond the syllabus, quiz methodology for self-practices and solved university papers
are also available on website for enhancing the students knowledge.
WEBINARS
The Institution is hosting many webinars to enrich the knowledge of faculty members on current
technologies.
v Balancing work and family as a career woman, organized by department of ECE

MOOCs- Student Orientation Programme:


MOOCs provide interactive user forums to support community interactions among students
and Professors. MOOCs is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via
the web. By using MOOCs source, faculty and students are benefited with Filmed lectures,
readings, and problem sets etc.

v MOOCs Orientation programme was conducted to faculty and students in the month of
August 2015.
v MOOCs Coordinator gave orientation to the students of all the departments
v The students were oriented towards the benefits of using free online course wares such as
edx, udacity, urserc.

9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (10)

(The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance
including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for
training/internship/placement, etc.)
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering & Technology holds an annual seminar on
"Employment Opportunities, Recruitment Dynamics and Employability Challenges" as part of
its Comprehensive Employability Enhancement Program for its final and pre-final students.
Institute invite leaders from core and non-core industries, to share their thoughts and vision
with regard to opportunities in their respective industries, recruitment best practices and
employability challenges that students need to address for their successful placement and
subsequent career advancement. Institution provides facilities like reference books, internet
connection, etc., for campus drive preparation.
175
Training and Placement
v Separate cells exist for Training and Placement activities.
v Campus drive starts in the month of June and continues up to early March and ends with
the Mega Job fair at the end of every year.

Institutions Infra Structure Facilities:


v Infra-Structure Facilities TPO
S.No Particulars Quantity
1 Room Size 15 X40
2 Visitors Waiting Sofa 3
3 Chair 8
4 Monitor 1
5 Table ( Big Size) 1
6 Computer Table 1
7 CPU 1
8 Key Board 1
9 Mouse 1
10 Steel Bureau 2
11 Steel Locker Cabinet 1
12 Printer 1
13 LCD Projector 1
14 White Board 1
15 Internet Facility 45 Mbps
v Infra-Structure Facilities For Conducting Campus Drives

S.No Particulars Quantity


1. Auditorium 1 ( 300 Seat Capacity)
2. Seminar Hall 2 ( 300 Seat Capacity)
3. Control Room HR 1
4. Training Hall ( AV Hall) 8
5. GD Hall 3

176
6. Interview Panel Rooms 10
7. VIP Visitors Hall 1
8. 1100 Client PC: Intel Core 2 Duo / I3
processors, 2GB Ram, XP, Office 2007
9. Optical Fiber Campus Connectivity 1
10. Internet Facility 45 Mbps

Placement Training
The Training and Placement office organizes several training programs for the students of
all semesters with the help of in-house experts and experts drawn from professional agencies.
The activities are proved exceptionally useful in shaping the career of the student. The Staff
members of the placement work together as a team in shaping the students to the requirements
of various industries. Several Career guidance program, reasoning tests, aptitude tests, Puzzle
Solving, Group Discussions, Mock Interviews, Brain Storming Sessions, Core Discussion, Pick
and Speak, Communication Skills and sharing their experiences etc., are organized on regular
basis in order to motivate and develop the personality of the students.

Training Module
Module Area of Training
Module I Communication Skill Enhancement
Module II Effective Placement Training (includes Personality Development Program)
Module III Model Aptitude Tests
Module IV Group Discussions
Module V Mock Interviews

177
Process Framework for Placement

178
Process Framework for Training and Career Guidance

179
Outsourced Training Vendors

S.No TITLE / THEME COMPANY


1. JAVA (Green Foot) Feducia InfoTech
2. MATLAB TVS Training and Services Ltd.
3. Motor Winding TVS Training and Services Ltd.
4. Design and Study of Ball Bearing TVS Training and Services Ltd.
5. Rivet Architecture KSM CAD Academy
Fluorescent Staining, Acid-Fast Staining,
6. NIRT in association with ICMR
and Grading Techniques
7. Cloud Computing EMC2 in association with ICTACT
8. Embedded Systems TVS Training and Services Ltd.
9. PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) TVS Training and Services Ltd.
10. Design and Analysis of CAM TVS Training and Services Ltd.
11. Essentials of ETABS KSM CAD Academy
12. Bio Informatics Armats Biotek
Fluorescent Staining, Acid-Fast Staining,
13. NIRT in association with ICMR
and Grading Techniques
14. JAVA / .NET NIIT
15. Embedded Systems RSR Technologies
16. . NET NIIT
Sri Ganga Paduka Engineering
17. Power Construction And Engineering
Consultancy PVT LTD.,
18. BIO PROCESS Armats Biotek

Campus Residential Programme

With a highly competitive and fast changing business environment, thinning of profit
margins and increased cost of hiring, Industry is left with no option but to be very selective with
recruitments in their organizations. Students have the best chances for being selected by an
employer when they are in the college. Once outside the college they need to compete with 7 Lac

180
other students. To be successful in job market, they need to perform well not only in their chosen
academic field but also need to succeed in the on/ off campus interviews. In a short window of
opportunity of 10 to 15 minutes they need to leave a lasting impression on the interviewer to be
selected in that company.

Success can be achieved only through a thorough preparation to face this challenge.
SSIET is arranging an intensive Campus Residential Placement Training Program for this
purpose to train students to industries expectations. In addition, guest lecturers are also being
arranged by experts from industries.

The training program is free of charge which includes boarding and lodging in the hostel
complex except for the Yoga mat which is essential for the program which will be purchased
from the Vendor who will be teaching the Yoga Classes.

CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING PROGRAM JUNE 2014


Beneficiary: Third Year Students
Duration: (16-06-2014 to 22-06-2014) 7 days
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE
8.40-10.10 10.30- 1.00- 2.50 4.30
DATE
A.M 20 12.00 P.M 2.30 P.M 15 4.20P.M 6.00 P.M
60
Mts Mts Mts
1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs
SWOT
Inauguration Quantitative Reasoning Analysis
Day 1 Extempore
Function Aptitude Ability / Industry
Analysis

Quantitative L Reasoning
Day 2 Verbal Ability
T Aptitude U Ability T
E N E
Quantitative Reasoning
Day 3 Verbal Ability A C A
Aptitude Ability
H
Quantitative Reasoning
Day 4 Verbal Ability
Aptitude Ability

Quantitative Reasoning Resume


Day 5 Verbal Ability
Aptitude Ability Writing /

181
Resume
Correction Interview
Quantitative
Day 6 Verbal Ability / Skills
Aptitude
Email (GD)
Etiquette
Personal
Assertiveness/ Wisdom Personal Interview
Day 7 Psychometric Zone / Prof. Interview (HR
Analysis Etiquette (HR Tips) Mock
up)
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening

SYLLABUS FOR THIRD YEAR STUDENTS


S.No SUBJECT DURATION
1. Quantitative Aptitude 9 Hrs

2. Reasoning Ability 7 Hrs 30 Mts

3. English Verbal Ability 7 Hrs 30 Mts


4. Resume Writing / Email Resume Correction 3 Hrs

5. Extempore 1 Hrs 30 Mts

6. SWOT Analysis &Industry Analysis 1 Hrs 30 Mts


7. Assertiveness /Psychometric Analysis 1 Hrs 30 Mts
8. Wisdom Zone/Prof. Etiquette 1 Hrs 30 Mts
9. Interview skills (GD)/Mock Up (GD) 1Hrs 30 Mts
10. Personal Interview (HR) /Mock Up HR 3 Hrs
TOTAL 37 Hrs 30 Mts

182
Beneficiary: Second Year Students
Duration: (9-06-2014 to 15-06-2014) 7 days
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE
8.40 -10.10 20 10.30- 60 1.00- 15 2.50 4.30 6.00
DATE A.M 12.00 P.M 2.30 P.M 4.20 P.M P.M
Min Min
Min
1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs
Inauguration Quantitative Reasoning Public
Day 1 Extempore
Function Aptitude Ability Speaking
Quantitative Reasoning Time
Day 2 Verbal Ability
Aptitude Ability Management
Quantitative Reasoning
Day 3 Verbal Ability
Aptitude L Ability

T Quantitative U Reasoning T
Day 4 Verbal Ability
E Aptitude N Ability E
A Quantitative C Reasoning A
Day 5 Verbal Ability
Aptitude H Ability
Creativity
Quantitative Reasoning
Day 6 Verbal Ability Thinking &
Aptitude Ability
Innovation
Attitude Presentation Personal Personal
Day 7 Building & Techniques / counseling counseling &
Leadership Practice & Feedback Feedback
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening

SYLLABUS FOR SECOND YEAR STUDENTS


S.No SUBJECT DURATION
1 Quantitative Aptitude 9 Hrs
2 Reasoning Ability 9 Hrs
3 English Verbal Ability 7 Hrs 30 Min
4 Public Speaking / Extempore 3 Hrs
5 Time Management 1 Hr 30 Min
6 Creativity Thinking & Innovation 1 Hr 30 Min
7 Attitude Building / Leadership 1 Hr 30 Min
8 Presentation Techniques / Practice 1 Hr 30 Min
9 Personal counseling & Feedback 3 Hrs
TOTAL 37 Hrs 30 Min

183
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING PROGRAM JUNE 2015
Beneficiary: Final Year Students
Duration: (8-06-2015 to 13-06-2015) 6 days
CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMME SCHEDULE
6.00 -
8.40 - 10.30- 1.00- 2.50
DATE 7.30 4.30 6.00 P.M
10.10 A.M 20 12.00 P.M 60 2.30 P.M 15 4.20P.M
A.M
Min Min Min
1.30
1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs
Hrs
Inauguration Quantitative Reasoning Public Guest Lecture
Day 1 Yoga
Function Aptitude Ability Speaking (E commerce)
Public
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning Guest Lecture
Day 2 Yoga Speaking /
Ability Aptitude Ability (Art of Living)
Extempore
Resume

L writing Guest Lecture


Verbal Quantitative Reasoning
Day 3 Yoga U Correction (Core Engg)
Ability T Aptitude Ability T
N / Email
E E Etiquette
C
A A
Verbal Quantitative H Reasoning Group Guest Lecture
Day 4 Yoga
Ability Aptitude Ability Discussion (Entrepreneurship)
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning Mock Up Guest Lecture
Day 5 Yoga
Ability Aptitude Ability GD (Software)
Personal
Personal Valedictory /
Verbal Quantitative Interview
Day 6 Yoga Interview Certificate
Ability Aptitude (HR Mock
(HR Tips) Distribution
up)
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening

SYLLABUS FOR FINAL YEAR STUDENTS

S.No SUBJECT DURATION


1 Quantitative Aptitude 9 Hrs
2 Reasoning Ability 7 Hrs 30 Min
3 English Verbal Ability 7 Hrs 30 Min
4 Public Speaking / Extempore 3 Hrs
184
5 Resume Writing / Email Resume Correction 1 Hr 30 Min
6 Group Discussion / Mock Up (GD) 3 Hrs
7 Personal Interview (HR) / Mock Up HR 3 Hrs
8 Guest Lecture (E commerce) 1 Hr 30 Min
9 Guest Lecture (Art of Living) 1 Hr 30 Min
10 Guest Lecture (Core Engg) 1 Hr 30 Min
11 Guest Lecture (Entrepreneurship) 1 Hr 30 Min
12 Guest Lecture (Software) 1 Hr 30 Min
Inauguration Function / Valedictory / Certificate
13 3 Hrs
Distribution
TOTAL 45 Hrs

CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL TRAINING PROGRAMME JUNE 2015


Beneficiary: Third Year Students
Duration: (2-06-2015 to 7-06-2015) 6 days

CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMMME SCHEDULE


6.00 -
8.40 -10.10 10.30- 1.00- 2.50 4.30 6.00
DATE 7.30
A.M 20 12.00 P.M 60 2.30 P.M 15 4.20 P.M P.M
A.M
Min Min Min
1.30
1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs 1.30 Hrs
Hrs
Inauguration Quantitative Reasoning Public
Day 1 Extempore
Function Aptitude Ability Speaking
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning Time Guest
Day 2 Yoga L
Ability Aptitude Ability Management Lecture
Self
Attitude
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning Motivation /
Day 3 Yoga T U T Building &
Ability Aptitude Ability Peer Group
Leadership
Learning
Creativity Presentation
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning
Day 4 Yoga E N E Thinking & Techniques /
Ability Aptitude Ability
Innovation Practice
Day 5 Yoga Verbal A Quantitative H Reasoning A Personal Guest

185
Ability Aptitude Ability counseling & Lecture
Feedback
Personal Valedictory /
Verbal Quantitative Reasoning
Day 6 Yoga counseling & Certificate
Ability Aptitude Ability
Feedback Distribution
Yoga / Medication in Morning / Art of Living Course in Evening

Syllabus for Third Year Students


S.No SUBJECT DURATION
1. Quantitative Aptitude 9 Hrs
2. Reasoning Ability 9 Hrs
3. English Verbal Ability 7 Hrs 30 Min
4. Public Speaking / Extempore 3 Hrs
5. Time Management 1 Hr 30 Min
6. Attitude Building / Leadership 1 Hr 30 Min
7. Self Motivation / Peer Group Learning 1 Hr 30 Min
8. Creativity Thinking & Innovation 1 Hr 30 Min
9. Presentation Techniques / Practice 1 Hr 30 Min
10. Personal counseling & Feedback 3 Hrs
11. Guest Lecture 3 Hrs
12. Inauguration Function / Valedictory / Certificate Distribution 3 Hrs
TOTAL 45 Hrs

PLACEMENT RECORD
No. of Students No. of students
Department Admitted for the placed based on Placement Percentage
Programme Admitted
2013 2014
Automobile 65 48 74%
Biotechnology 86 43 50%
Computer Science 83 65 78%
Civil 127 86 68%
ECE 77 38 49%
EEE 58 18 31%
IT 78 49 63%
Mechanical 90 58 64%

186
2014-2105
Automobile 59 36 61%
Biotechnology 36 19 52%
Computer Science 81 59 73%
Civil 173 153 88%
ECE 68 27 40%
EEE 30 10 33%
IT 69 23 33%
Mechanical 96 51 53%
2015-2016
Automobile 54 35 64.%
Biotechnology 61 40 65%
Computer Science 65 64 98%
Civil 159 110 69%
ECE 68 53 78%
EEE 17 14 82%
IT 51 35 69%
Mechanical 61 45 74%
Internship Training
Internship training is helpful to the students to gain practical knowledge.
The training cell arranges training to the students based on the skills of the students.
Institute has signed MOU with companies for Internship training
Students Internship training report maintained by the Institute Training Head
Internship/IPT for the Academic Year 2015-2016

No. of Students
eligible No. of Repeated
S.No Department year Attended
students companies Companies
Internship
1 ECE III 57 57 8 2
2 CSE III 36 36 8 0
3 IT III 17 17 6 1
4 MECH III 71 61 17 1

187
5 EEE III 61 31 8 0
6 AUTO III 27 48 8 0
7 BIO TECH III 26 82 8 7
8 CIVIL III 39 62 5 1
334 394 68 12
Career Guidance
Career Guidance for Higher Education
Date No. of
S.No Academic Year Name of the Event
Beneficiary
1. 2014-2015 12.02.2015 GATE Coaching Seminar 373
2. 2013-2014 02.04.2014 Career Guidance programme 2014 309

9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell (5)

(The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging
entrepreneurship and incubation) (Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be
mentioned)
v Entrepreneurship cell established in the year 2007.
v Entrepreneurship cell is a separate entity to produce a budding entrepreneur.
v Entrepreneurship cell motivates guides and encourages the students to prepare a business
plan.
v Entrepreneurship cell supports the students both in terms of financial and non-financial
requirements.
Infra-Structure Facilities
S.No Particulars Quantity
1. Room Size 10 X 30 Sq.Feet
2. Table 2
3. Chair 5
4. Monitor 1
5. CPU 1
6. Key Board 1

188
7. Mouse 1
8. Steel Locker Cabinet 1
9. Printer 1
10. LCD Projector 1
11. White Board 1
12. Internet Facility 45 Mbps

Enterpreneurship Cell Process Flow

Committee Members Frequency of Meeting


Principal, EDC Head, and Committee members meet once in every
EDC Coordinators quarter to review the plan of action.

189
Entrepreneurship Programmes

Academic Date of No of Student


SI.No. Name of Program
year Program Benefited
1. 2015-2016 23.04.16 Key Accounts Management 62
2. 2015-2016 30.04.16 Time Management 68
Financial Planning for young investors (In
3. 2015-2016 14.07.15 association with Securities and Exchange Board 59
of India)
Professionalism and positive work culture to
4. 2015-2016 11.09.15 65
enhance business
31.07.15 - Training in Innovative Health Care Pvt Ltd.,
5. 2015-2016 61
01.08.15
6. 2014-2015 19.03.15 Career Guidance Programme 36
Employment Opportunity, Recruitment
7. 2013-2014 02.03.14 75
Dynamics and Employability Challenges
10.10.13 Entrepreneurship Awareness
8. 2013-2014 86
&12.10.13 Camp

Entrepreneurship members were benefited and turn out as a Successful entrepreneur


details is given below:
Academic Year 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013 - 2014
No. of
1 4 3
Entrepreneur

INNOVATION CELL
Innovation cell is a part of Entrepreneurship Development Cell.
Innovation cell encourages and guides the students for developing the new concepts
Innovation cell financially supports the students for developing the new concepts
Innovation cell rewards the achievers in terms of appreciation.

190
LIST OF ACTIVITIES
Academic Department
Name of the Innovative Award/
S.No Year &
Students project Title Remarks
Month
Cash
2015-16
1. S.SivaPriyan CSE DARVENERG Award of
(August)
Rs 5,000
Cardiovascular
2015-15 Risk
2. Sudharsan.A Biotechnology -
(September) Calculator for
Indians
1. Dinesh.M
Design and
2. LokeshKumar.G
2015-16 Analysis of
3. 3. Prabhu Dinesh Automobile -
(January) Strapless
.J.S
helmet.
4. Ranjithkumar.R
Super charging
1. Ashokraj.A A Naturally
2015-16
4. 2. Ganesh.K Automobile aspirated Two -
(January)
3. Lokesh.G Wheeler SI
Engine.
2015-16 1. Zabeer Khan .A Poster Design 1st Place
5. CSE & IT
(January) 2. Mr.Saravanan Competition 2nd Place
Anti-Lag
System (ALS)
1. Praveen Kumar
in Turbo Cash
2014-15 Mishra
6. Mechanical Charger on Award of
(April) 2. R.Yogesh Kumar
Single Rs 10,000
3. R.RamPrasath
Cylinder
Engine

9.7 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)


(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities) (Quantify
activities such as NCC, NSS etc.)
Annual Students Activities
Annual Students activities are a part of career development for the students.
Institution has more responsibility to encourages the students to participate in all the
activity to gain knowledge and experience.

191
Annual Students Activities in 2015-2016
Name of the
S.No Date Remarks
Activities
Campus residential programme as a part of
Campus placement & training activities, external
June & July
1. Residential trainer gave lecture about career
2015
Programme advancement and special yoga classes
conducted to the students.
Orientation about the courses and the
2. 8th August 2015 Induction Day facilities of the college to the budding
engineers.
15th September Motivates the faculty members for the
3. Teachers Day
2015 betterment of students as well as institution.
Institution had conducted special
competition for faculty members on
15th September
4. Engineers Day Effective teaching learning methodology
2015
and cash award was given for first three
positions.
Organized Blood Donation camp and 25 tree
29th January
5. Founders Day saplings were planted inside the college
2016
campus.
Mrs.Madhumitha Rajaprakash , GM-
HR&IR JBM Auto System Pvt Ltd as
6. 8th March 2016 Womens Day special guest and gave a special note on the
importance of employment for women in all
levels.
65 companies recruited our students through
th
7. 8 April 2016 Placement Day on campus and pooled hiring. 605 students
placed in the year is celebrated.
Alumni Induction Day supports the
Alumni Induction
8. 8th April 2016 institution in terms of Industrial interaction
Day
and student welfare.
192
Best Outgoing Best outgoing students honored with
9. 8th April 2016 Students certificates and medal on the placement day
Programme celebration itself.
Alumni Association day conducted every
year for maintain good relationship with
th
Alumni
10. 9 April 2016 alumni and consider the area of development
Association Day
for the present students to shine in the
modern business world.
Awarded graduation certificate to 809
students, of them 725 are UG and 84 PG. 12
th
11. 11 April 2016 Graduation Day university Rank holders and 20 department
toppers were awarded with medals and
certificates.
Distributed appreciation certificates and
cash rewards for the outstanding students
th
12. 12 April 2016 Annual Day from each class and for the faculty members
who produced more than 90% results in
Anna University Examination.
Students who won prizes in zonal, district
and state level sports and athletic events
13. 12th April 2016 Sports Day
were honored with certificates and cash
awards.
14. 13th April 2016 Hostel Day Special cultural programmeon hostel day.

Co- curricular Activities


The students are encouraged to attend seminars, symposia, workshops, present papers to gain
additional exposure for his/her career advancement.
Students Achievement in 2015-2016
No. of Event No. of
Name of the
S.No Department participation Students Award/Remarks
Event
in a year Participated
1. Biotechnology Conference 2 6 Special Prize,

193
First and Second
prize.
First and Second
Bio-Quiz 2 4
prize.
Symposium 2 5 Second Prize
Journal 1 4 Participation
National
6 23 Participation
2. ECE Conference
International
2 10 Participation
Conference

EXTRA- CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES


Games and sports
Sports ground for athletics, Football, cricket and courts for volleyball and ball badminton are
available in the institute and students can avail these facilities after college hours any day of the
week. A qualified sports instructor is available to facilitate these activities. Physical Education
aims not only on the physical development but is also concerned with education of whole person
through physical activities.
Sports Facilities
Indoor and Outdoor
S.No Remarks
games
1. Football Field Length-100 mts minimum 110 mts maximum
Width-64 mts minimum 75 mts maximum
2. Kabaddi Court Length-13mts
Width-10mts
3. Volleyball Court Length-18mts Width-9mts
4. Badminton / Shuttle Singles
Length-13.40mts Width-5.18mts
Doubles
Length-13.40mts Width-6.10mts
5. Cricket Boundary 59.43mts to 64.00mts
6. Chess Available
7. Carom Available

194
LIST OF ACHIEVEMENTS
S.No Academic year Event Prize Participant
Chess III Place Thavapriya
Chess III Place Preethi
1. 2013-14
Chess III Place Kavibharathi
Chess III Place Sruthi
200 Min III Place S.Tamil Mani
2. 2014-15
4x400 Min Relay III Place S.Tamil Mani
Academic Year 2015-2016
Students Achievements in University Level Sports Competition
S. Dept/Y No.of. Venue/ Games/ Event Positi No of Name of
No ear Days Events on Student student
Civil / Anna University/ 4X100 S.Tamizh
1 2 First 1
IV 4X100 Relay Relay Mani
Civil / Anna University/ 4X100 J.Kingslin
2 2 First 1
II 4X100 Relay Relay Godwin
AUTO/ Anna University/ 4X100
3 2 First 1 G.Charan
I 4X100 Relay Relay
AUTO/ Anna University/ 4X100 M.Mohammed
4 2 First 1
IV 4X100 Relay Relay Suhail
Anna 100
5 BT/III 2 Third 1 B.Manaswini
University/100Mts Mts
Civil / Anna Badmi
6 1 Third 1 P.Pavithra
II University/Badminton nton
Anna Badmi
7 BT/III 1 Third 1 P.Vidya
University/Badminton nton
Anna Badmi
8 ECE 1 Third 1 R.Praneetha
University/Badminton nton
Anna Hamm
Seco
9 CSE 2 University/Hammer er 1 K.Akash
nd
Throw Throw

195
Students Achievements in Institution Level Sports Competition
S.No Event Department No. of Students Prize
Automobile, Civil, CSE,
1. 4X100 Relay 16 First & Third Place
Mechanical
4X200 Mts
2. Civil, Mechanical 8 First & Second Place
Relay
Automobile, Biotech, Civil, First, Second, &Third
3. 100 Mts 5
CSE, Place
First, Second, &
4. 200Mts Biotech, Civil, Mechanical 6
Third Place
Automobile, Biotech, Civil, First, Second, &
5. 400 Mts 14
CSE, Mechanical Third Place
First, Second, &
6. 1500 Mts Civil, Mechanical 3
Third Place
Automobile, Biotech, Civil, First, Second, &
7. Badminton 16
CSE,ECE, Mechanical Third Place
8. Foot Ball Civil, Mechanical 30 Winner & Runner
9. Volleyball Civil, Mechanical 20 Winner & Runner
10. Throw Ball Biotech, Civil 19 Winner & Runner
First, Second, &
11. Chess Civil, Auto 10
Third Place
Biotech, Civil, CSE, First, Second & Third
12. Disc Throw 6
Mechanical Place
First, Second & Third
13. Javelin Throw Mechanical, Civil 3
Place
First, Second & Third
14. Shot Put Civil, CSE 5
Place
15. Kabaddi Civil, Mechanical 20 Winner & Runner

196
NSS
The NSS programme aims to inculcate social welfare in students, and to provide service to
society without bias. NSS volunteers work to ensure that everyone who is needy gets help to
enhance their standard of living and lead a life of dignity. In doing so, volunteers learn from
people in villages how to lead a good life despite a scarcity of resources. Camps are held annually,
and are usually located in a rural village or a city suburb.
Volunteers may be involved in such activities as:
Cleaning
Afforestation
Stage shows or a procession creating awareness of such issues as social problems,
education and cleanliness.
Inviting doctors for health camps
There are no predefined tasks; it is left up to the volunteers to provide service in any way that is
feasible. Camps typically last between a week and 10 days, although camps for shorter periods are
also conducted.
LIST OF ACTIVITIES
No. of days
Academic Year Nature of Activity
(camp)
Blood Donation Camp
Awareness on usage of traditional food products and food
crops
2013-14 5
Kaddapah slab and green board donation for school
children&
Health awareness programme .
Health awareness programme,
2014-15 7 Global Hand washing day,
7 day special camp at Nemam etc.,
1 Blood Donation camp
2015-2016 1 International Yoga Day (21/06/2016)
1 Blood Donation Camp
1 Youth Renaissance Day (Tree Plantation)

197
1 Founders Day (Blood Donation Camp and Tree Plantation)
7 NSS Special Camp at Kuthampakkam Village

YRC
Youth Red Cross was started on 20th March 2004, to serve the needy people with number of
student volunteers. Youth Red Cross In our college one unit is functioning with 100 volunteers
who are really interested, enthusiastic and services minded who initiates and organize
programmes.

The programme focuses on the following areas:


v Promote life and health through training and education on safety, primary care and
health care and healthy living.
v Encourage community service through training and education.
v Disseminate the seven fundamental principles of Red Crescent movement through
activities that encourage the Red Cross ideals.
v Promote international friendships with that cultivate a humanitarian spirit.
Technical support in the development of youth programmes, fund raising, identification material
and resource.

List of Activities
S.N
Date Activities Nature of activities
o.
Youth Tamil i)Tamil Competition(TamizhoduVilayadu)
1 18/04/2015 Motivational ii)Special Speech (TamizhinVanappumValamum)
Programme iii)Prize Distribution for winners
i)To highlight the glory and greatness of India
Youth ii) To remind the sacrifices of unknown young freedom
2 8/8/2015 Motivation fighters
Programme iii) To instill values and patriotism in faith
iv) To identify the role of youth in nation building
3 7/4/2015 Blood Donation 400 units of blood were collected. The event was

198
Camp organized byNSS Unit, YRC Unit of SSIET, Indian
Bank &Madras Voluntary Blood Bureau.
Training was given by Asana Andiyappan College of
International
4 21/06/2015 Yoga and Research Centre, Anna Nagar, Chennai. 180
Yoga Day
hostel students got benefitted.
407 units of blood were collected. The event was
Blood Donation Organisedby NSS Unit, YRC Unit of SSIET, NSS Unit
5 23/09/2015
Camp of SSCE, IndianBank& Madras Voluntary Blood
Bureau
Tree plantation 30 saplings were planted. It was Jointly organized by
6 29/10/2015
programme NSSUnit& Department of Biotechnology, SSIET
Founders Day
Blood Donation 50 units of blood were collected, 25 saplings were
7 29/01/2016 Camp & Tree planted which was Organized byNSS Unit & Indian
Plantation Bank
Programme
NSS One Day Attended by NSS Volunteers. It was organized by NSS
8 23/02/2016
Orientation Cell,Anna University, Chennai.

199
CRITERION 10 Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 120

10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES


(120)
10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40)
10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5)
Vision of the Institute
Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology has a vision to realize.
A vision of developing into a multi-disciplinary, multi-campus technological institution
of excellence in this part of the globe, providing the right ambience and environment to create
engineers and technocrats who serve the needs and demands of society.
Mission of the Institute
The Management of SSIET has taken the mission to
v Provide the necessary infrastructure to support an institute of excellence;
v Foster and grow an academic team to cater to the ever increasing demands of the student
community;
v Motivate the students, the faculty members and the stakeholders to utilize the facilities
provided;
v Augment all available avenues to develop students for the changing needs of the society;
and
v Finally to develop SSIET into an international institute of excellence.
Availability of the Vision & Mission statements of the Institute
Availability of Vision & Mission
Availability of Vision & Mission Availability of Vision & Mission
In Institute in Department
College website Course plan
College Academic calendar Course Log book
Service rule Identity Card
Common facilities centre like Canteen, Packet card
Library , Seminar hall Laboratory Record and
College brochure Observation Note

200
Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements
v The Vision and mission of the institute is described through opinion and feedback from
stakeholders namely Student, Parent, Alumni, Employer and Governing council.
v Moreover vision and mission statement is derived to aspire the young engineers and
technocrats. It relates current scenario and augment all avenue of the needs of society.
v The department vision and mission is formulated based on the Institute vision and
mission

10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service


rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies (10)
The Institution has the following Academic and Administrative Bodies
1. Governing council
2. Institute development monitoring committee
3. Internal quality assurance
4. Academic Advisory Board
5. Anti Ragging Committee
6. Grievance Redressal Cell

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF GOVERNING COUNCIL


1. Determine the Organization's Mission and Purpose and Strategic Direction
2. Ensure Effective Organizational Planning
3. Ensure Adequate Resources
4. Monitor the Organization's Programs and Services
5. Enhance the Organization's Public Image
6. Develop Policies
7. Acts as an Appeal Panel
8. Grievance Resolution
9. Assess Its Own Performance Academic and Administrative Bodies

201
Governing Body Composition
Residential Address &
S.No Name Position Present Designation
Phone number
122, Gengu Reddy Road,
1 Prof. J. Karthikeyan Chairman Chairman of the trust Egmore, Chennai-8.
044-26810111
Action Director, CLRI, Adayar, Chennai.20
2 Dr. A. B. Mandal Member
CLRI 044-24910846
Member IIT-New Delhi.
3 Dr. D.P. Kothari Director
Secretary
Department of EEE,
4 Dr. Kincha Member Chairman/Professor
IISc Bangalore.
Former Chairman, 52/7, 13th cross road,
5 Dr. R. Natarajan Member
AICTE Maleeswaram, Bangalore.
Director, NITTTR, Chennai.
6 Dr. S. Mohan Member Director NITTTR
044-22541982
Nominee From 26, Haddows road,
7 Southern Regional Member Director Chennai-6.
Office, AICTE
Nominee From DOTE,
8 Commissioner Of Member Commissioner Guindy,
Tech. Education Chennai-25.
SSN College of Engineering
9 Dr. R. Salivahanan , Member Principal
Chennai
10 Dr.V.Ganesan Member Emeritus Professor IIT-Chennai
122, Gengu Reddy Road,
11 Ms.K.Nithyalakshmi Member Member-Trust Egmore, Chennai-8.
044-26810111
Member- SSIET, Chennai044-
12 Dr.V.R. Sampath , Principal,
Secretary 26810122
*Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the month of May

Institute development monitoring committee


Roles and Responsibilities of Institution Development and Monitoring Committee:
The board meets once in 6 months to discuss on progress of academic courses and starting of
new courses, selection and appointment of teaching and non-teaching staff in developing
infrastructural and laboratory facilities according to requirement focusing on financial
requirement and admission strategy

202
Institution Development and Monitoring Committee - composition
Present
Position
S professional Address&
Name (Chairman/ Category
No. position/ E-mail
Member)
Occupation
Principal of the SSIET, principal@
1 Dr.V.R.Sampath Chairman Principal
college sasthaenggcollege.com
Vice-Principal of Vice - SSIET, viceprincipal@
2 Dr.T.Sasilatha Member
the college Principal sasthaenggcollege.com
Senior faculty
member from
3 Dr.Baskar Member HOD SVECE, SRIP
University/other
college
Industrial expert 21, 13th East Cross Road,
in the field of 2nd East Main Road,
4 Mr.J.Natarajan Member Industrialist
engineering and Gamdjo Magar, Katpadi,
technology Vellore-6
Industrial expert 21, 13th East Cross Road,
in the field of 2nd East Main Road,
5 Mr.N.Saravanan Member Industrialist
engineering and Gamdjo Magar, Katpadi,
technology Vellore-6
26, Haddows Road,
Architect/Civil
6 Mr.Oskar Member Industrialist Nungambakkam,
Engineer
Chennai-6
Senior faculty
SSIET,civilhod@sasthae
7 Dr.S.Thenmozhi Member member of the HOD Civil
nggcollege.com
College
*Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the month of May

Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)


Roles and Responsibilities of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)
Facilitating the creation of a learner-centric environment conducive to quality education and
faculty maturation to adopt the required knowledge and technology for participatory
teaching and learning process
Arrangement for feedback response from students, parents and other stakeholders on
quality-related institutional processes
Documentation of the various programmes/activities leading to quality improvement.
Acting as a nodal agency of the Institution for coordinating quality-related activities,
including adoption and dissemination of best practices.
Development of Quality Culture in the institution.
203
Preparation of the Annual Quality Assurance Report (AQAR) as per guidelines and
parameters of NAAC, to be submitted to NAAC
IQAC Composition

Position
Present professional
S. Name (Chairman/ Category
position/
No. Member)
IQAC Principal of the
1 Dr.V.R. Sampath Principal
Chair person college
Senior Faculty
2. Mr.S.Hariharan IQAC Coordinator Faculty
Member
Administrative/
3. Mr.Ganesan Principal AO Principal AO
Technical staff
Department Department Senior Faculty
4 Faculty
Coordinators Coordinators Member
Nominee from Student
5 Student Member Student Member Student
representative
Nominee from alumni
6 Alumni member Alumni member Alumni
association
Nominee from Management Mgmt.
7. Mgmt. Representative
Management Representative Representative
Nominee from
Employers/ Employers/ Employers/
8 Employers/
Industrialists Industrialists Industrialists
Industrialists
Nominee from
9 External Experts External Experts External Experts
External Experts
Stakeholder and
community Community Community
10 community
representative Representative Representative
representatives
*Frequency of Meeting - Every year in the month of may and December

Academic Advisory Board


Roles and Responsibilities of Academic Advisory Board
The Academic Advisory Board identify the difficulty in the exiting Academic System
and the industry Expectation by getting Feedback and Suggestion from industry Experts
,Academic experts.

204
Academic Advisory Board Composition

Position (Chairman/ Present professional


S. Name Category
Member) position/
No.
Stake holder
Principal of the
1 Dr.V.R. Sampath committee Principal
college
Chair person
Nominee from Internal HOD and Senior HOD and Senior
2. Faculty
Academic experts Faculty members Faculty members
Nominee from External Professor from IIT External Academic
3. Professor
Academic experts and Anna university experts
HR,
Nominee from Industry Program specific HR, Program
4 Program specific
Experts Expert specific Expert
Expert
Nominee from current
5 Student Member Student Member Student
Student representative
Nominee from alumni
6 Alumni member Alumni member Alumni
/passed out student
7. Nominee from Parent Parent Parent Parent
All the above Academic bodies meet as per schedule and minutes recorded.
During meeting all the action taken reports are analyzed and committee will take suitable
decision.
Service rule (Year of publication - 2011)
Institute Service rule is uploaded in the institute website.
Institute Service rule is given to faculty as a booklet at the time of appointment and getting
the declaration- acknowledgment.
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism (10)
Decentralization in working
The Principal heads all administrative activities.
The Administration is decentralized by principal, to enhance the quality of education as
follows
The HODs are delegated and authorized to carry out the activities such as academic,
co-curricular,extra curricular, conduct of university examination and various other
function for efficient and effective execution
In turn, workload allotment, monitoring and supervising ,conduct of class effectively
,evaluation of students , organizing seminar , symposium etc., are taken care of by the
Head of the department with the help of faculty members for effective implementation
205
Librarian ,Physical Director and Training and Placement Officer are all delegated
with responsibilities by the principal for rendering effective service to students
The officers delegated with various responsibilities for the current academic year 2015-
2016 are given below
The details of the officers delegated with various responsibilities are given below
S. NO Position Name Name
Principal , IQAC Chair person& Chief
1 Dr. V. R. Sampath
Superintendent Examination
Dr. G. Sankaranarayanan
2 R&D Cell
Research Dean
Dr. G. Sankaranarayanan AUTO
Dr. S. Thenmozhi Civil
Mr. J. N. Rajesh kumar CSE
Dr. P. Sivachandran -EEE
3 HOD
Dr. T. Sasilatha-ECE
Dr. A. Shanmuga Sundaram -MECH
Mr. R. Premkumar-IT
Dr. C. Mathan Periyasamy-BT
4 Accreditation Coordinator Dr. R. Priyadharsini AP/MBA
5 Mentoring Cell Dr. Suganya Devi AP/EEE
6 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC ) Mr. S. Hariharan-AP/IT
7 Entrepreneurship Development cell (EDC) Mr. S. Dhachanamoorthy AP/MBA
8 Alumni Association Mr. R. Premkumar AP/IT
9 Internship and in plant Training Dr. S. Arun AP/ECE
10 Training and Placement Mr. S. Venkatesh

Grievance Redressal Mechanism


Anti Ragging Committee:
Factors enlisted by the committee:
Primary responsibility for curbing ragging rests with academic institutions themselves.
Ragging adversely impacts the standards of higher education.
Incentives should be available to institutions for curbing the menace and there should be
disincentives for failure to do so.
Enrollment in academic pursuits or a campus life should not immunize any adult citizen
from penal provisions of the laws of the land.
Ragging needs to be perceived as failure to inculcate human values from the schooling stage.
Behavioral patterns among students, particularly potential raggers, need to be Measures
against ragging must deter its recurrence.
206
Concerted action is required at the level of the school, higher educational institution, district
administration, university, State and Central Governments to make any curb effective.
Media and the Civil Society should be involved in this exercise.
Committee and Squad Members Details:
S. No Faculty Name Designation Position
1 Dr. A. Shanmuga Sundaram AP/Mech Committee Member
2 Dr. P. Sivachandran AP/EEE Committee Member
3 Dr. S. Thenmozhi AP/CIVIL Committee Member
4 Dr. R. Ganesan AP/AUTOMOBILE Committee Member
5 Mr. A. Thirumal Physical Director Squad Member
6 Mr. S. Hariharan AP/IT Squad Member
7 Mr. A. Mahadevan AP/ECE Squad Member
8 Mr. R. Alaexander AP/CSE Squad Member
9 Ms. M. Amutha AP/MECHANICAL Squad Member
10 Dr. R. Arun Kumar AP/CHEMISTRY Squad Member

Sexual Harassment commitee:


In pursuance of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and
Redressal) Act 2013 and the Rules framed there under, the Institute hereby adopts the
following procedure for determining complaints filed to the Internal Complaints
Committee (ICC) constituted under the Act. The procedure complies with the basic
principles of natural justice and fair play and has to be adhered to in all complaints,
though, in individual complaints, for reasons to be stated in writing, the ICC reserves the
right to make exceptions to the procedure stated hereunder.
Working Rules:
1. Any aggrieved woman may make, in writing, a complaint of sexual harassment at work
place to the ICC, within a period of three months from the date of incident and in case of a
series of incidents, within a period of three months from the date of last incident. 6 copies
of a written complaint should be submitted to the Committee or any of its members along
with list of witnesses and supporting documents. Additional documents and list of
witnesses can be submitted to ICC at a later stage during the proceeding.
Provided that where such complaint cannot be made in writing, the Presiding Officer or
any other member of the ICC shall render all reasonable assistance to the woman for
making the complaint in writing.

207
Provided further that the ICC for the reasons to be recorded in writing, can extend the time
limit not exceeding three months, if it is satisfied that the circumstances were such which
prevented the woman from filing a complaint within the said period.
2.1.1. Any complaint received by the members should be immediately forwarded to the
Presiding Officer, and this must be notified to other committee members at the earliest and
not later than 3 days and a meeting should be called for discussing the matter.
2.1.2. The Committee shall discuss and decide on its jurisdiction to deal with the case or
reject the complaint prima facie and recommend to the Institute that no action is required
to be taken in the matter.
2.1.3. Notice shall be issued to the respondent within 7 working days of receipt of the
complaint and 10 working days shall be given for submission of reply (along with the list
of witnesses and documents.)
2.1.4. The Committee will provide assistance to the aggrieved woman, if she so chooses,
to file a police complaint in relation to an offence under Indian Penal Code.
2.1.5. The Committee may, before initiating an inquiry, at the request of the aggrieved
woman, take steps to settle the matter between her and the respondent through
conciliation.
2.1.6. No monetary settlement shall be made as the basis of conciliation. Where a
settlement has been arrived at, the ICC shall record the settlement so arrived and forward
the same to the employer for necessary compliance.
2.1.7. The Committee shall provide the copies of the settlement as recorded under (7) to
the aggrieved woman and the respondent. Where a settlement is arrived at, no further
inquiry shall be conducted by the ICC.
2.1.8. If conciliation is found to be not feasible, notice will be issued to both parties for
hearing.
2.1.9. The Committee may direct the Registrar to ensure the safety and protection of the
aggrieved woman if and when required.
2.1.10. As an interim measure, ICC may recommend
a. The transfer of the aggrieved woman or the respondent to another section or
Department as deemed fit by the Committee.
b. Grant leave to the aggrieved woman upto a period of three months or :

208
c. Restrain the respondent from exercising any administrative authority or supervision or
academic evaluation of the aggrieved woman.
d. Grant such other relief to the aggrieved woman as the case may require.
2.2.5. The Committee shall proceed to make inquiry into the complaint in accordance
with the provisions of the service rules applicable to the respondent considering sexual
harassment as misconduct.
2.2.6. The Presiding Officer shall convene the first hearing of the enquiry. The
respondent, the aggrieved woman, and the witnesses shall be intimated at least 7 working
days in advance in writing of the date, time and venue of the enquiry proceedings. The
subsequent proceedings may be on a day to day basis, to be decided by ICC.
2.2.7. The Committee shall provide reasonable opportunity to the aggrieved woman and
the respondent for presenting and defending her/his case.
2.2.8. The Committee may at any time during the enquiry proceedings, preclude the face-
to-face examination of the respondent and the aggrieved woman and/or their witnesses
keeping in view the need to protect the aggrieved woman or the witnesses from facing any
serious health and/or safety problems.
2.2.9. The Committee may call any person to appear as a witness if it is of the opinion
that it shall be in the interest of justice. The aggrieved woman/respondent has to submit the
written reply before the committee within the specified time given.
2.2.10. The Committee shall have the right to summon, as many times as required, the
respondent, aggrieved woman and/or any witnesses for the purpose of supplementary
testimony and/or clarifications.
2.2.11. The Committee shall have the power to summon any official papers or documents
pertaining to the aggrieved woman as well as the respondent.
2.2.12. The past sexual history of the aggrieved woman shall not be probed into as such
information shall be deemed irrelevant to a complaint of sexual harassment.
2.2.13. The Committee shall have the right to terminate the enquiry proceedings and to
give an ex party decision on the complaint, should the respondent fail, without valid
ground, to be present for three consecutive hearings convened by the Presiding Officer.
2.2.14. The aggrieved woman and the respondent, or any one person on her/his behalf,
shall have the right to examine written transcripts of the recordings with the exclusion of
witnesses names and identities. Any person nominated by the aggrieved woman and/or
209
the respondent on her/his behalf shall be (only) either a student, or a member of the
academic or non-teaching staff. No person who has been found guilty of sexual harassment
shall be accepted as a nomineee. The aggrieved woman/respondent should inform the
Presiding Officer specifically if they wish to exercise this right. The Presiding Officer shall
allow access to such documents on a specific date to be intimated at least two days in
advance to each of the parties concerned. At no point in time, however, can the concerned
parties take these documents outside the office.
2.2.15. The aggrieved woman and the respondent shall be responsible for presenting their
witnesses before the Committee. However, if the Committee is convinced that the absence
of either of the parties to the disputes is on valid grounds, the Committee shall adjourn that
particular meeting of the Committee for a period not exceeding five days. The meeting so
adjourned shall be conducted thereafter, even if the person concerned fails to appear for
the said adjourned meeting without prior intimation/valid ground.
2.2.16. All proceedings of the ICC shall be recorded in writing. The record of the
proceedings and the statement of witnesses shall be endorsed by the persons concerned as
well as the committee members present in token of authenticity thereof. In case the
minutes cannot be reduced in writing the same day, as audio recording of the proceedings
may be made, and the written proceedings will be authenticated on a next available
opportunity.
2.2.17. If the aggrieved woman desires to tender any documents by way of evidence, the
Committee can supply true copies of such documents to the respondent. Similarly, if the
respondent desires to tender any documents in evidence, the Committee shall supply true
copies of such documents to the aggrieved woman.
2.2.18. In the event the Committee thinks that supplementary testimony is required, the
Presiding Officer shall forward to the persons concerned a summary of the proceedings
and allow for a time period of seven days to submit such testimony, in person or in
writing, to the Committee.
2.2.19. The aggrieved woman and the respondent shall have the right of cross-examination
of all witnesses. However such cross-examination shall be conducted in the form of
written questions and responses via the Committee only. The respondent shall have no
right to directly cross-examine the aggrieved woman or her witnesses.

210
2.2.20. The respondent/aggrieved woman may submit to the Committee, a written list of
questions that he/she desires to pose to the aggrieved woman/witness. The Committee
(ICC) shall retain the right to disallow any questions that it has reason to believe to be
irrelevant, mischievous, slanderous, derogatory or gender-insensitive.
2.2.21. Amicus Curie can be called for helping the committee if and when required.
2.2.22. After concluding its investigation, the Committee shall submit a detailed reasoned
report to the Institute.
2.2.23. If the Committee finds no merit in the allegations, it shall report to the Institute.
2.2.24. In the event the Committee finds that the allegation(s) against the respondent have
been proved, it shall recommend the nature of action to be taken by the Institute.
Committee Members:

S.No Faculty Name Designation Position


1 Ms.J,Parimala AP/ECE Presiding Member
2 Dr.S.Thenmozhi AP/Civil Member
3 Ms.R.Paneerselvi AP/CSE Member
4 Ms.T.Sarnita AP/Maths Member
5 Dr.Bhuvana Devi AP/MBA Social Member

The Institution has a Grievance Redressal Cell and the functions are:
i. To receive Grievances from the students orally or in writing other than the grievances
submitted to each department and examine the nature of the grievances.
ii. All the discussions related to academic pursuit such as attendance, awarding internal
assessment marks, practical, submission of records and assignment or project work will be
referred to the department concerned and the remarks of the HOD will be obtained. The
grievances in question will be redressed in such a way that the studies of the student are
not affected.
iii. Grievance related to infrastructural facilities such as Lab, Library, Bus and other basic
amenities like drinking water, sanitary provisions will be immediately redressed in
consultation with the management and the concerned authorized persons.
iv. Grievances from the students regarding the violent behavior of co-students will be sent to
the Disciplinary committee for appropriate action and redressal. The major grievances
redressed during the last two years are
a) Increasing the Internet Bandwidth
211
b) Additional Vehicle parking facility
c) Introduction of value added courses.
d) Providing Internet facility in Hostels
e) Ambulance Services
f) Additional Bus services

Grievance Redressal Cell composition


Present
Telephone
S No. Name Category Designation/ E-mail Address
numbers
Occupation
Sree Sastha Institute
72999 ssiet@ of Engineering &
1 Dr.V.R. Sampath Chairman Principal
05145 eth.net Technology,
Chennai
Sree Sastha Institute
HOD- 94443 ssiet@
2 Dr.S.Thenmozhi Member of Engineering &
(Civil) 16915 eth.net
Technology, Chennai
Sree Sastha Institute
Vice- 72999 ssiet@
3 Dr.T.Sasilatha Member of Engineering &
Principal 05153 eth.net
Technology, Chennai
Sree Sastha Institute
Dr.G.Sankaranaray Dean 94443 ssiet@
4 Member of Engineering &
anan (Research) 66717 eth.net
Technology, Chennai
Sree Sastha Institute
Mr.J.N.Rajesh HODi/c 98405 ssiet@
5 Member of Engineering &
Kumar (CSE) 36505 eth.net
Technology, Chennai

Action taken report

S.No Complaint Received Action Taken


1 Increasing the Internet Bandwidth Internet Bandwidth Increased
2 Additional Vehicle parking facility Additional Vehicle parking created
3 Introduction of value added courses Audit course introduced
4 Providing Internet facility in Hostels Internet facility provided in hostel

10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers (10)


Financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of Departments and relevant in-charges
The Delegated financial power as follows

212
Financial fund allotted Amount
S.No Mode of transfer Remarks
for allotted

1 Principal 25000 Cash Every Individual


maintain the separate
2 Head of the Department 10000 Cash imprest Cash register

The allotted amount is


3 Administrative Officer 15000 Cash revived after submitting
the imprest cash Register
4 Examination Cell 5000 Cash

5 TPO 10000 Cash

6 Training Division 10000 Cash

7 IQAC 2500 Cash

Utilization of financial powers for each of the assessment years


All the above mention delegated financial power authorities maintain the separate imprest
accounts register, The allotted amount is revived after submitting the imprest cash Register
10.1.5 Transparency & availability of correct/unambiguous information in public domain
(5)
Information on the policies, rules, processes is to be made available on web site
The College ensures transparency in the admission process by strictly adhering to the
guidelines issued by the AICTE, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Directorate of Technical Education
and Anna University.
Dissemination of the information about student, faculty and staff
Faculty and students achievements are made available in college website

213
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30)
Table 1 - CFY 2015-2016
Total Number
Actual expenditure (till):
Total Income : of Students
2531.14
:2388
Other Recurring Special
Non Expenditure per
Fee Govt Grants Sources including projects /Any
recurring student
(Specify) salaries other, specify
2626.8 0 0 0 2428.38 102.76 0 1.06

Note: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3.
Table 2 CFYm1 2014-2015
Total Number
Actual expenditure (till):
Total Income :2622.32 of Students :
2616.76
2710
Other Recurring Special
Non Expenditure per
Fee Govt Grants Sources including projects / Any
recurring student
(Specify) salaries other, specify
2622.32 0 0 0 2446.87 169.89 0 0.965

Table 3 CFYm2 2013-2014


Total Number
Actual expenditure (till):
Total Income :2561.93 of Students :
2555.17
3018
Other Recurring Special
Non Expenditure per
Fee Govt Grants Sources including projects /Any
recurring student
(Specify) salaries other, specify
2561.93 0 0 0 2418.23 136.94 0 0.847

214
Institute Budget Allocation, Utilization (Amount in Lakhs)

Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual Actual


Budgeted Budgeted Actual
in Expenses in Expenses Expenses
Items in in 2012- Expenses
2015- in 2015- 2014- in 2014- in 2013-
2013-2014 2013 in 2012-
2016 2016 till 2015 2015 till 2014 till
2013 till
Infra-structure
45 45.72 53 36.96 65 89 277.5 309.38
and Built-up
Library 5.00 3.13 2.00 1.61 5.00 4.52 7.50 6.31
Laboratory
74.25 57.04 36.75 18.04 25.50 18.45 57.50 54.92
equipment
Laboratory
15.00 9.33 15.25 13.16 10.25 7.45 9.25 8.70
consumable
Teaching and
non Teaching 1375.00 1346.25 1350.00 1328.14 1,300.00 1,289.46 1,250.00 1,205.10
Staff Salary
Maintenance
5.75 4.33 4.50 4.03 8.50 8.65 7.25 6.83
and spare
R&D 13.75 11.56 9.00 8.38 3.25 2.83 6.00 5.00
Training and
43.75 22.75 33.25 30.04 30.25 27.70 26.75 27.06
Travel
Miscellaneous
22.5 14.98 21.25 19.81 12.25 11.18 18.25 18.05
Expenses
others 1000.00 1016.05 1150.00 1156.59 1140.00 1095.93 1200.00 1194.31
Total 2600.00 2531.14 2675.00 2616.76 2600.00 2555.17 2860.00 2835.66

10.2.1 Adequacy of budget allocation (10)


Budget requirements under recurring and non-recurring heads are collected from every
departments and sections before the commencement of the financial year. Allocations are made as
per the availability of funds. Spending is monitored by the accounts section. Supplementary
allocations are made in special cases. The institution carefully monitors the expenses so that the
necessities are met without affecting the smooth working of the institution. The management has
been very efficiently doing this over the past several years that the institution never had any
serious budget crunch that affected the functioning of the college.

215
Adequacy of budget allocation
Justification
S.No Items
The funds allotted for the Infrastructure was lesser than
1 Infrastructure and Built-up
2014-2015, since majority of the constructions required
for academics is over.
The library books are updated continuously. Based on the
2 Library requirements of various departments, necessary amount is
allotted for library.
The required laboratory equipments are already provided
as per the requirement of the Curriculum. The amount
3 Laboratory equipment allotted in the budget is for additional facilities only. The
amount is allotted as per the requirements of the
department.
The laboratory consumables are allocated based on the
4 Laboratory consumable
student strength.
As the institute aims at high quality education, a major
Teaching and non Teaching
5 part of the budget about 50% is allocated for salary of
Staff Salary
teaching and non-teaching staff.
The maintenance expenses are allotted based on the
6 Maintenance and spare
annual maintenance requirements of all the departments.
The institute aims at improving the Research and
7 R&D Development activities. Hence a gradual increase in the
amount allotted for Research can be found.
1.5% of the total budget is allotted for training and travel
which includes the expenses to be incurred towards
training students for placement and also faculty
8 Training and Travel
development. The Institute motto is to make the students
employable. Hence a considerable amount is allotted for
the training.
The miscellaneous expenses head includes expenses
towards academic and professional activities of the
9 Miscellaneous Expenses
departments. It is allotted as per the academic plans
proposed by the department.
The Institution had allotted funds for general expenses
under this head. It also includes establishment expenses,
accreditation expenses and overall administrative
10 Others
expenses. The institution is offering many courses and is
big in terms of its size. Hence a huge amount of fund is
allotted for this head.

216
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15)
Funds are allocated by the Management of the College. Department Heads / Section-in-
charges are intimated of the extent of funds allocated against their budget proposals. Major works
like construction, up-gradation of existing infrastructure, procurement and maintenance of
common utilities, house-keeping, procurement of furniture etc. are controlled directly by the
Management. Actions for procurement of lab equipment, up-gradation of existing lab facilities,
purchase of consumables etc. are initiated from the respective departments and the funds are
released on a case by case basis from the accounts office of the college on approval by the
Management. During the last three years, the budget was utilized to meet expenses such as staff
salary, infrastructure development, purchase of equipment, expenses towards consumables and
contingencies, travel etc. Every year almost 50% of the budget is spent on staff salary, 10% on
infrastructure development, about 8% on purchase of equipment, about 5 % on library
development and the rest on other expenses. This has been the general pattern of utilization of
budget for the last 5 years

Utilization of budget allocation


Budgeted in Utilized in Justification
S.No Items
2015-2016 2015-2016
The amount was spent for
Infrastructure and
1 45 45.72 upgrading the AV hall and Mini
Built-up
Conference Room
The amount was spent for
2 Library 5.00 3.13 purchasing books as per
requirement.
The fund was allotted for New lab
3 Laboratory equipment 74.25 57.04 setting as per 2013 regulations for
ECE, Civil and EEE.
Laboratory The amount was spent by the
4 15.00 9.33
consumable respective departments.
Teaching and non The budgeted amount was spent
5 1375.00 1346.25
Teaching Staff Salary towards payment of salary.
Maintenance and The amount was spent by the
6 5.75 4.33
spare respective departments.
The department of EEE, ECE and
7 R&D 13.75 11.56 Bio Tech spent the money for
establishing research center.
The amount was spent through the
8 Training and Travel 43.75 22.75 Training and Placement Department
and respective departments.
217
Conferences, Symposiums and
Workshops were conducted by the
respective departments. The amount
Miscellaneous was also spent for student awards
9 22.5 14.98
Expenses granted for best innovative ideas.
Guest lecture sessions regularly
organized by all departments are
funded under this head.
The amount was spent towards
general expense, administration
expenses and accreditation
10 Others 1000.00 1016.05
expenses, transport, power,
stationery, travel expenses for
experts and annual events.
Total 2600.00 2531.14 -

10.2.3 Availability of the audited statements on the institutes website (5)


Every year the accounts are audited by an external agency and the audited statements are
made available in the web sites.
10.3 Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3 CFY: (Current
Financial Year), CFYm1: (Current Financial Year minus 1), CFYm2: (Current Financial Year
minus 2) and CFYm3: (Current Financial Year minus 3)
Table 1: CFY 2015-2016
Total No of
Total Budget: 13.5 Actual expenditure (till 2015-2016):10.54
Students :493

Expenditure
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring
per student

1.5 12.0 1.38 9.16 0.02

Table 2 :: CFYm1 2014-2015


Total No of
Total Budget: 12.53 Actual expenditure (till 2014-2015):10.45
Students : 624

Expenditure
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring
per student

0.28 12.25 0.04 10.41 0.017

218
Table 3: CFYm2 2013-2014
Total No of
Total Budget: 13.5 Actual expenditure (till 2013-2014): 9.58
Students : 561

Expenditure
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring
per student

2.00 11.50 0.10 9.48 0.017

Table 3: CFYm3 2012-2013


Total No of
Total Budget: 24.25 Actual expenditure (till 2012-2013):
Students : 614

Expenditure
Non Recurring Recurring Non Recurring Recurring
per student

0.04
15.00 9.25 14.65 8.05

Program Budget Allocation, Utilization


Actual
Actual Actual
Budgeted Actual Budgeted Budgeted Expense Budgeted
Expenses Expenses
Items in 2015- Expenses in in 2014- in 2013- s in in 2012-
in 2014- in 2012-
2016 2015-2016 till 2015 2014 2013- 2013
2015 till 2013 till
2014 till
Laboratory
150000 138162 28000 3550 200000 9970 1500000 1465189
equipment
Software 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laboratory
100000 26602 100000 23439 50000 32656 25000 19503
consumable
Maintenance
100000 53445 25000 11450 125000 43000 50000 25900
and spare
R&D 150000 100000 125000 100000 100000 75000 0.00 0.00
Training and
450000 373000 450000 386000 450000 382000 450000 382000
Travel
Miscellaneous 415000 378000
400000 363000 525000 521000 425000 400000
Expenses
Total 1350000 1054209 1253000 1045439 1350000 957626 2425000 2270592

219
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)

Yes. There is adequate budget to cover the day-to-day expenses.

v Principal sent a circular seeking budget proposals for the civil engineering department
v All the faculties and the lab in charges discussed in the review meeting regarding the civil
engineering department budget.
v A written intent is required from the faculty relating department plans and proposed
expenditure.
v Civil HOD will review the request and finalize the budget then the budget request is
forwarded to the principal.
v The budget will be approved by the principal and send to the management for sanction.

Adequacy of budget allocation

Budgeted Justification
Sl.No Items
in 2015-2016

The department already has major equipments.


The budgeted amount is required for Surveying
1 Laboratory equipment 150000 laboratory, Concrete laboratory & soil mechanics
laboratory. The amount is budgeted as per the
requirements of the civil department laboratories.

The existing Software satisfies the curriculum


2 Software 0 requirement of the university. Hence not
budgeted for the Software.

The laboratory consumables are budgeted for


3 Laboratory consumable 100000 Environmental Engineering laboratory, soil
mechanics laboratory and concrete laboratory.

Annual maintenance for all civil Engineering


laboratory budgeted .such as survey lab,
4 Maintenance and spare 100000
Environmental lab, soil mechanics lab, concrete
lab, highway lab & structural lab etc

The Civil Engineering department students


5 R&D 150000 research activities for project work required
financial assistance.

The Amount budgeted for training and travel


which includes the expenses to be incurred
6 Training and Travel 450000 towards training students for placement and also
faculty development programmes, conference,
workshop, guest lecture.

7 Miscellaneous Expenses 400000 The miscellaneous expenses Civil department


budgeted for students activities and faculty
220
activities of the civil Engineering department. For
Example conducting Workshop, conference,
symposium, industrial visit, seminar, FDPT,
Publications etc.

Total 1350000

10.3.2. Utilization of Allocated funds (20)


From the Tables, it can be seen that every year 90 % of the budgeted amount is effectively
utilized.
Budget will be utilized as per the requirement of the department
Utilization of budget allocation
Budgeted in Utilized in Justification
Sl.No Items
2015-2016 2015-2016
The programme had purchased equipments for
Laboratory 138162 Vane shear apparatus, Test Sieve 8 dia bars,
1 150000
equipment Systronics Dissolved Oxygen Meter, Vicat Needle
Apparatus,
The existing Soft ware satisfies the curriculum
2 Software 0 0
requirement of the university.
The programme had purchased Consumables
Laboratory utilized for conducting the experiments for
3 100000 26602
consumable Environmental laboratory and soil mechanics
laboratory.
The maintenance expenses the programme had
utilized for based on the annual maintenance
Maintenance and
4 100000 53445 requirements of the Civil Engineering
spares
laboratories.( Concrete laboratory and structural
laboratory.
The programme had utilized the amount for
5 R&D 150000 100000 research and developing students research
project.
The programme had utilized for training and
travel which includes the expenses to be incurred
6 Training and Travel 450000 373000 towards training students for placement and also
faculty development programmes, conference,
workshop, guest lecture.
The miscellaneous expenses the programme had
utilized for students activities and faculty
Miscellaneous activities of the civil Engineering department. For
7 400000 363000
Expenses Example conducting Workshop, conference,
symposium, industrial visit, seminar, FDPT,
Publications etc.
Total 1350000 1054209

221
10.4. Library and Internet (20)
Library Details
Carpet area of library (in m2) - 408
Reading Space (in m2) - 200
Number of seats in reading space - 100
Number of users (issue book) per day - 95
Number of users (reading space) per day - 227
Number of library staff - 3
Number of library staff with a degree in library - 3
Management Computerization for search, indexing, issue/ return - Yes
Records bar coding used - Yes
Library services on internet/ intranet INDEST -Yes, Delnet
Titles and volumes per title
Number of titles - 12228 Number of volumes 41000
Library Services -2015-2016
Existing Newly added Total
No No No Value
Text Books 39997 1003 41000
Reference
1010 ---- 1010 82,97,392
Books
e-Books 100 4538 4638 --
Journals 75 15 90 14,70,663
e-Journals 9985 295 10280 23,79,967
Digital
100 --- 100 --
Database
CD & Video 853 818 1671
Others (specify) Library Membership: CSIR- SERC, IAS- AU
Library Services -2014-2015
Existing Newly added Total
No No No Value
Text Books 39737 260 39997
Reference 80,06,522
1010 - 1010
Books
e-Books 100 - - 100
Journals 75 - 75 14,25,278
e-Journals 9985 - 9985 22,89,980
Digital
100 - 100
Database
222
CD & Video 542 311 853 -
Others (specify) Library Membership: CSIR- SERC, IAS- AU
Library Services -2013-2014
Existing Newly added Total
No No No Value
Text Books 39319 418 39737
Reference 79,67,522
1000 10 1010
Books
e-Books 100 - - 100
Journals 21 54 75 14,25,278
e-Journals 9984 01 9985 22,89,980
Digital
100 - 100 -
Database
CD & Video 542 - 542 -
Others (specify) Library Membership: CSIR- SERC, IAS- AU

10.4.1. Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) (10)


Digital Library
Availability of Digital Library content : yes
If available, Mention number of courses, number of e-books etc.:18 Courses, 4638 e-books
Availability of an exclusive server :2
Availability over Intranet/ Internet : yes
Availability of exclusive space/ room : yes
Number of users per day : 50 to 60
Accessibility to students
Timings: (during working day) - 8.00am to 6.00pm
Weekend - 8.00am to 6.00pm
Vacation -- 8.00am to 6.00pm
10.4.2. Internet (10)
Name of the Internet provider : Aircel
Available band width : 45 Mbps
Available band width : Yes
Internet access in labs, classrooms, library : Yes
And offices of all Departments
Security arrangements : Yes

223
ANNEXURE 1

224
Program Outcomes (PO)
On completion of B.E (Civil) Degree Programme, the Engineering graduates will be able to:
PO1: Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering in their specialization
involving complex engineering problems.
PO2: Analyze a problem, identify, formulate and solve engineering problems using basic
fundamental principles of mathematics and science.
PO3: Design a system component or process to meet the desired needs and standards
within realistic constraints such as public health and safety, social and environmental
considerations.
PO4: Design and conduct experiments, as well as do research, analyze and interpret data
and give clear solutions.
PO5: Use and learn the limitations involved in recent techniques, skills and modern
engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
PO6: Assess the local and global impact of engineering solutions on individuals,
organization and society and the consequent responsibilities relevant to their professional
engineering practice.
PO7: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and
environmental contexts and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
PO8: Understand the professional and ethical responsibilities and norms of engineering
practice.
PO9: Work with multi-disciplinary teams, involve in team activities and accomplish a
common goal.
PO10: Communicate effectively with engineering community for presentation,
documentation of reports adopting the design standards.
PO11: Understand engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own
work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multi-disciplinary
environments.
PO12: Meet contemporary issues and create advance technologies and will be engaged to
life long learning in the broadest scale.

225
PROGRAM SPECIFIC OUTCOMES:
PSO 1: Attain proficiency in mathematics, physical science and also excel in problem solving,
design and interpretation of experiments by operating as a team to find solution of various
issues in the core areas of civil engineering.
PSO 2: Operate effectively in a professional environment by executing quality construction work
applying modern tools and techniques.
PSO 3: Achieve excellence, managerial expertise, outstanding leadership to succeed in position in
civil engineering profession and passion for lifelong learning and research in advanced
areas & related field.

226
ANNEXURE II

FACULTY INFORMATION

List of Faculty: Exclusively for the program/Shared with other Programs

CAY (2015-16)
Academic Research
Distribution of teaching load
Qualification Consu
(%)
Designation(a Sponsore ltancy
Date of
ll the UG Faculty d &
Degree joining
S.N Name of faculty Year designation Receiving Research Produ
startin the Research Specialization
o Member of since joining Ph.D. Ph.D. (Funding ct
g from institutio 1st In Other P Paper
University grad the during Guidanc Research Devel
Highes n yr progra progra G Publication
u institution) the e ) opme
t m m s
ation assessmen nt
degree
t years
Anna
Geo Technical
1 Dr.S.Thenmozhi PhD university 2012 HOD 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 3 1
Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Structural
2 Dr.S.J.Mohan PhD university 2006 Professor 10.5.15 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Engineering
Chennai
Univrsity of 10
3 Dr.Ilayaraja PhD 2011 Professor 10.6.15 0 0 0 NO NO 0 GIS
Madras 0
10 Structural
4 Dr.Hariprasad PhD JNTU 2008 Professor 15.6.15 0 0 0 NO NO
0 Engineering
Bharath Structural
5 Dr.S.R.Suresh PhD 2010 Professor 20.6.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
University Engineering
Dr.S.Nandakuma Univrsity of 10
6 PhD 2011 Professor 10.7.14 0 0 0 NO NO 0 Environmental
r Madras 0
Anna
7 Dr.Saravanan PhD university 2010 Professor 15.02.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Civil engineering
Chennai
Anna
Environmental
8 Dr.B.Hemalatha PhD university 2008 Professor 09.06.08 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Engineering
Chennai
M.Tec Assistant Environmental
9 R.Gnanasekran IIT 1991 02.02.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
h Professor Engineering
Anna
Assistant Environmental
10 Ms.Vidhya.M ME university 2012 09.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Mr.Kannadasan. Anna Assistant
11 ME 2008 28.08.09 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 1 Geo informatics
B university Professor
240
Chennai
Anna Construction
Mr.M.Chinnasam Assistant
12 ME university 2008 3.06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Engineering&
y Professor
Chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Structural
13 Mr. M.Murugan ME university 2011 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Advanced
Pondicherr Assistant
14 Mrs. B.Lavanya ME 2007 12..06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Construction
y university Professor
Technology
Anna Construction
Mr.S.Vinoth Assistant
15 ME university 2013 1.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Engineering&
kumar Professor
Chennai Management
Asst. Structural
16 Ms.S.Sangeetha M.E 2013 3.6.15 0 50 0 50 No No 0
Professor Engineering
Anna
Mr.M.S.Kutti Assistant Structural
17 ME university 2013 3.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0
marks Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
18 Mr.R.Lenin ME university 2013 08.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Mr.E.S.Dinesh Assistant Transportation
19 ME university 2013 11.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
babu Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Mr.M.Krishna M.Tec Assistant
20 university 2012 30.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Remote Sensing
kumar h Professor
Chennai
Mr.Sastha Sathyabam Asst. Structural
21 M.E 2011 22.6.15 0 50 0 50 No No 0
Arumugapandi a university Professor Engineering
Anna Asst. Structural
22 Mr.S.Aravindan M.E 2010 28.12.15 0 50 0 50 No No 0
university Professor Engineering
Annamalai Asst. Structural
23 Mr.S.Natarajan M.E 2011 08.07.15 0 50 0 50 No No 1
university Professor Engineering
M.Tec Alagappa Asst.
24 Mr.Gopinath 2015 31`7`15 0 100 0 0 No No 0 Remote sensing
h university Professor
Mepco
Asst. Structural
25 Mr.Ajith M.E schlek engg 2013 26`6.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
Professor Engineering
college
Anna Asst. Soil Mechanics
26 Mr.Nallaiyan M.E 2015 08.06.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
university Professor And Foundations
Anna Asst. Environmental
27 Mr.Gokulraj M.E 2014 8.7.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
university Professor Engineering
Hydrology And
Ms.Subbulakshm Anna Asst.
28 M.E 2014 8.6.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0 Water resources
i unsityiver Professor
Engg
Mrs.Seethalaksh Popnjesly Asst. Structural
29 M.E 2015 22.7.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
mi college of Professor Engineering
241
engineering
Asst. Structural
30 Mrs.Arunthathi M.E 2014 12.1.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
Professor Engineering
Anna Asst. Irrigation water
31 Mr.Silambarasan M.E 2008 1.6.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
university Professor management
Mrs.Uma Annamalai Asst. Structural
32 M.E 2004 01.06.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0
Magheswari university Professor Engineering
CEG,Guind Asst.
33 Mr.Mekala M.E 2009 04.06.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0 Urban Engineering
y Professor
Environmental Geo
M.Tec Asst.
34 ,Mr..D.S.Shamla NIT 2011 15.6.15 0 100 0 0 No No 0 Technical
h Professor
Engineering
Anna
Assistant Irrigation and water
35 Mr.Rajesh.S ME university 2008 4.6.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor management
Chennai
Kumaragur Structral
36 Mr.K.Baskaran ME 2006 Asst.prof 4.7.15 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
u engg coll Engineering
Mr.N.Thiyagaraj Vel Tech Assistant Structral
37 ME 2015 4.7.15 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
an University Professor Engineering
Ms.S.JeyaBharat Assistant Structral
38 ME SSIET 2015 4.7.15 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
hi Professor Engineering
Anna Construction
Mr.Sivaprakasan. Assistant
39 ME university 2010 16.6.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 engineering and
S Professor
Chennai management
Mr.S.C.Jayakum BS Abdur Assistant Structural
40 ME 2013 3.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
ar Rahmn Professor Engineering
Anna
Assistant Structural
41 Ms.Kayalvizhi.I ME university 2011 04.06.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Trichy
Anna Assistant Transportation eng
42 Mr.Dasarathy.K ME 2000 07.04.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
university Professor ineering
M.Tec Assistant Transportation
43 Ms.N.S.Divia NIT 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 0 NO 0
h Professor Engineering
Anna
Mrs.T.Diana Assistant
44 ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Geotechnical
joslin Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
45 Mr.T.Kannan ME university 2013 16.7.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Geo informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
46 Mr.D.Karthik ME university 2008 04.09.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Ms.Aishwarya Anna Assistant Engineering
47 ME 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Devi.S university Professor Environmental
Anna
Assistant 29.07.201 10 Environmental
48 Mrs.Sathya M.E university 2013 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor 3 0 Management
Chennai
242
Anna Construction
Assistant
49 Ms.Vaidevi.C ME university 2011 01.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Transportation
50 Mr.Y.C.Thilakar ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
51 Mr.Prakash.M ME university 2008 15.6.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 engineering and
Professor
Chennai management
CAYm1 (2014-15)
Academi Con
Distribution of teaching load
Qualification c Sponsor sult
(%)
Designation( Research ed anc
Date of
all the UG Faculty Researc y&
joining
S.N Name of faculty Degree designation Receivin h Pro
Year the Research Specialization
o Member starting since joining g Ph.D. Ph.D. (Fundin duct
of institutio 1st In Other P Paper
from University the during Guidan g Dev
gradu n yr progra progra G Publicatio
Highest institution) the ce Researc elop
ation m m ns
degree assessme h) men
nt years t
Anna
Geo Technical
1 Dr.S.Thenmozhi PhD university 2012 HOD 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 1 NIL 1
Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Structural
2 Dr.Nandhni Devi.G PhD university 2010 Professor 29.05.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Engineering
Chennai
Anna
3 Dr.Saravanan PhD university 2010 Professor 15.02.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Civil engineering
Chennai
Anna
Environmental
4 Dr.B.Hemalatha PhD university 2008 Professor 09.06.08 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL 1
Engineering
Chennai
Bharath Structural
5 Dr.S.R.Suresh PhD 2010 Professor 20.6.14 0 100 0 0 No No 0 NIL
University Engineering
Univrsity 10
6 Dr.S.Nandakumar PhD 2011 Professor 10.7.14 0 0 0 No No 0 NIL Environmental
of Madras 0
Anna
Assistant
7 Mr.Kannadasan.B ME university 2008 28.08.09 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Geo informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Environmental
8 Mrs.S.Archana ME university 2010 06.09.10 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Management
Chennai
Anna Assistant Environmental
9 Ms.Aishwarya Devi.S ME 2012 09.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
university Professor Engineering
10 Ms.Vidhya.M ME Anna 2012 Assistant 09.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Environmental

243
university Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
11 Mr.M.Chinnasamy ME university 2008 3.06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 2 NIL 1 Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Structural
12 Mr. M.Murugan ME university 2011 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Advanced
Pondicherr Assistant
13 Mrs. B.Lavanya ME 2007 12..06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Construction
y university Professor
Technology
Anna
Assistant Water Resource
14 Mr.S.Nagaraj ME university 2013 01.7.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
15 Mr.S.Vinoth kumar ME university 2013 1.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
BS Abdur Assistant Structural
16 Mr.S.C.Jayakumar ME 2013 3.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0
Rahmn Professor Engineering
Anna
Assistant Structural
17 Mr.M.S.Kutti marks ME university 2013 3.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 3
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
18 Mr.R.Lenin ME university 2013 08.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
19 Mrs.T.Diana joslin ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Geotechnical
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
20 Mr.Y.C.Thilakar ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 1
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
21 Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu ME university 2013 11.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Assistant
22 Ms.N.S.Divia M.Tech NIT 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Transportation
Professor
Anna
Assistant
23 Mr.T.Kannan ME university 2013 16.7.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 1 Geo informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
24 Mr.M.Krishna kumar M.Tech university 2012 30.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Remote Sensing
Professor
Chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
25 Mr.S.Ramesh ME university 2008 26.08.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna Assistant Structural
26 Mr.D.Karthik ME 2008 04.09.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0
university Professor Engineering
244
Chennai
Anna
Assistant 10 Environmental
27 Mr.K.Karthik ME university 2013 19.02.14 0 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor 0 Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant 29.07.20 Environmental
28 Mrs.Sathya M.E university 2013 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor 13 Management
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Irrigation Water
29 Mr.K.Manikandan ME university 2013 26.09.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Management
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
30 Ms.Saranya.R ME university 2013 26.09.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Geo Informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Ms.Devi Assistant
31 ME university 2013 29.10.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Geo Informatics
Priyadarshini.K Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
32 Mr.Sivakumar.B ME university 2013 29.10.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai0
Anna
Assistant Environmental
33 Ms.Devarajan.V ME university 2013 29.10.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna Integrated Water
Assistant
34 Mr.Meenalakshmi.D ME university 2013 12.11.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 Resources
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Structural
35 Ms.Sudha.V M.Tech university 2013 12.11.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
36 Ms.Kayalvizhi.I ME university 2011 04.06.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Trichy
Anna
Assistant Transportation
37 Mr.Panchasaram.K ME university 2012 30.12.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Vinayaga Assistant Structural
38 Mrs.Banupriya.R ME 2010 4.07.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
mission Professor Engineering
Anna
Assistant Remote sensing
39 Mrs.Lavanya.B ME university 2012 5.03.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor and GIS
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Integrated water
40 Mr.Balasundaram.V ME university 2012 5.03.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor resources
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation eng
41 Mr.Dasarathy.K ME university 2000 7.4.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor ineering
Chennai
Anna Assistant Construction
42 Mr.Prakash.M ME 2008 15.6.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
university Professor engineering and
245
Chennai management
Anna Construction
Assistant
43 Ms.Vaidevi.C ME university 2011 01.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna Construction
Assistant
44 Mr.Sivaprakasan.S ME university 2010 16.6.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 engineering and
Professor
Chennai management
Anna Construction
Assistant
45 Mr.Jeya Aarthi.J ME university 2014 16.6.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 engineering and
Professor
Chennai management
Anna
Assistant Irrigation and
46 Mr.Rajesh.S ME university 2008 4.6.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor water management
Chennai
Andhra Assistant Structural
47 Mr.Mathu Latha.O ME 2012 23.7.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
university Professor engineering
Anna
Assistant Environmental
48 Mr.Premkumar.K ME university 2014 25.6.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor magnagement
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
49 Ms.Jenisha.T ME university 2014 18.6.14 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Professor engineering
Chennai
Mrs.Chandrakantham Andhra Assistant Structural
50 ME 2005 01.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
ma.. university Professor Engineering
Anna
Ms.Nandhitha Assistant Soil Mechanics &
51 ME university 2010 27.01.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0
Shinde.M Professor Foundation
Chennai

CAYm2 (2013-14)
Academi
Distribution of teaching load c
Qualification Sponsor
(%) Researc
Designation( ed Consult
Date of h
all the Researc ancy &
joining Faculty
S.N Name of faculty designation UG h Produc
Degree the Receivin Specialization
o Member Year since joining 1s Research (Fundin t
starting institutio t g Ph.D. Ph.D.
Universit of the Paper g Develo
from n In Other PG during Guidan
y gradu institution) y Publicatio Researc pment
Highest progra progra the ce
ation r ns h)
degree m m assessme
nt years
Anna
Geo Technical
1 Dr.S.Thenmozhi PhD university 2012 HOD 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL 1
Engineering
Chennai
Anna 0.00 Environmental
2 Dr.B.Hemalatha PhD 2008 pofessor 09.06.08 0 100 0 NO NO NIL 1
university - Engineering
246
Chennai

Anna
Civil
3 Dr.Muralikrishana PhD university 2010 Professor 24.06.10 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
engineering
Chennai
Anna
Civil
4 Dr.Saravanan PhD university 2010 Professor 15.02.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
engineering
Chennai
Anna
Civil
5 Dr.Elangovan PhD university 2010 Professor 14.02.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
engineering
Chennai
Anna
Structural
6 Dr.Nandhni Devi.G PhD university 2010 Professor 29.05.13 0 0 0 100 NO NO NIL
Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
7 Mr.Sathishkumar ME university 2009 30.06.10 0 50 0 50 NO NO NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Environmental
8 Mr.Mathiyazhagan.R ME university 2009 22.06.09 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
9 Mr.Kannadasan.B ME university 2008 28.08.09 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL Geo Informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
10 Mr.M.Chinnasamy ME university 2008 03.06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO NIL Engineering&
Professor
chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Structural
11 Mr. M.Murugan ME university 2011 12.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
Professor Engineering
chennai
Pondicher Advanced
Assistant
12 Mrs. B.Lavanya ME ry 2007 12.06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO NIL Construction
Professor
university Technology
Anna
Assistant Environmental
13 Mr.K.Karthik ME university 2013 19.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna Irrigation and
Assistant
14 Mr.Rajesh.S ME university 2008 04.06.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO NIL water
Professor
Chennai management
Andhra Assistant Structural
15 Mr.Mathu Latha.O ME 2012 23.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO NIL
university Professor Engineering
Anna Irrigation and
Assistant
16 Mrs.Sathya ME university 2008 29.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL water
Professor
Chennai management
Anna Construction
Assistant
17 Mr.Sivaprakasan.S ME university 2010 16.06.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 NIL engineering and
Professor
Chennai management

247
Anna
Assistant Water Resource
18 Mr.S.Nagaraj ME university 2013 01.7.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
19 Mr.S.Vinoth kumar ME university 2013 1.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 NIL Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
BS Abdur
Assistant Structural
20 Mr.S.C.Jayakumar ME Rahmn 2013 3.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
University
Anna
Assistant Structural
21 Mr.M.S.Kutti marks ME university 2013 3.07.13 0 50 0 50 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
22 Mr.R.Lenin ME university 2013 08.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
23 Mrs.T.Diana joslin ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Geotechnical
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
24 Mr.Y.C.Thilakar ME university 2013 10.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Transportation
25 Mr.E.S.Dinesh babu ME university 2013 11.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Assistant Transportation
26 Ms.N.S.Divia M.Tech NIT 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 0 NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Anna
Assistant
27 Mr.T.Kannan ME university 2013 16.7.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Geo informatics
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
28 Mr.M.Krishna kumar M.Tech university 2012 30.07.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Remote Sensing
Professor
chennai
Anna Construction
Assistant
29 Mr.S.Ramesh ME university 2008 26.08.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Engineering&
Professor
chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Structural
30 Mr.D.Karthik ME university 2008 04.09.13 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Ms.Nandhitha Assistant Soil Mechanics
31 ME university 2010 27.01.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Shinde.M Professor & Foundation
Chennai
Anna
Assistant
32 Mr.Dasarathy ME university 2000 07.04.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Transportation
Professor
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Enviromnmental
33 Mrs.S.Archana ME university 2010 06.09.10 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor management
Chennai
248
Anna
Assistant Structural
34 Mrs.Banupriya.R ME university 2010 04.07.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Ms.Kiruthigaa Assistant Transportation &
35 M.Tech NIT 2006 16.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Aishwarya.J.U Professor Management
Anna
Assistant Environmental
36 Ms.Vidhya.M ME university 2012 09.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Environmental
37 Ms.Kavitha.V ME university 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai
Anna
Assistant Structural
38 Ms.Kayalvizhi.I ME university 2011 04.06.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Trichy
Anna Assistant Engineering
39 Ms.Aishwarya Devi.S ME 2012 02.07.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
university Professor Environmental
Bharath Assistant Structural
40 Ms.Chitra.R M.Tech 2005 06.01.10 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
university Professor Engineering
Anna Integrated
Assistant
41 Ms.T.A.Latha ME university 2010 24.06.10 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Water Resources
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna Construction
Assistant
42 Mr.Prakash.M ME university 2011 15.06.11 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Managemet
Anna 1 Integrated
Assistant
43 Mr.Selvakumar.P ME university 2011 01.07.11 0 0 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Water Resources
Professor
Chennai 0 Management
Mrs.Chandrakantham Andhra Assistant Structural
44 ME 2005 01.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
ma.. university Professor Engineering
Anna Construction
Assistant
45 Ms.Krishna kumari.B ME university 2008 13.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL Engineering&
Professor
Chennai Management
Anna
Assistant Construction
46 Ms.Vaidevi.C ME university 2011 01.02.12 0 100 0 0 NO NO 0 NIL
Professor Engineering
Chennai

249

You might also like