Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annual Report
http://www.upsc.gov.in
The Union Public Service Commission have the privilege
to present before the President their Sixty Sixth Report
as required under Article 323(1)
of the Constitution
Contents
List of Appendices
List ofAbbreviations
Admn. Administration GM General Manager
AIS All India Services Govt. Government
AN Afternoon Gr. Group
APFC Assistant Provident Fund IAS Indian Administrative Service
Commissioner
IES Indian Economic Service
APR Applicants to Post Ratio
IFoS Indian Forest Service
B.E. Bachelor of Engineering
IFS Indian Foreign Service
B.Sc. (Engg) Bachelor of Science (Engineering)
IO Inquiry Officer
B.Tech. Bachelor of Technology
IPoS Indian Postal Service
CAT Central Administrative Tribunal
IPS Indian Police Service
CCS (CCA) Central Civil Services
ISS Indian Statistical Service
(Classification, Control and
Appeal) Rules ISTC Including Short Term Contract
CE Chief Engineer JS Joint Secretary
CPWD Central Public Works Department Lakh A cardinal number = 1,00,000
used as a unit of measurement
CSSS Central Secretariat Stenographers
Service M.A. Master of Arts
CVC Central Vigilance Commission M.C.D. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
D/o Department of M.Com. Master of Commerce
Deptt. Department M.E. Master of Engineering
DGE&T Directorate General of M.Sc.(Engg) Master of Science (Engineering)
Employment & Training
M.Tech. Master of Technology
DA Disciplinary Authority
M/o Ministry of
DoP&T Department of Personnel &
Training Misc. Miscellaneous
A brief write-up on the Profiles of the Chairman and Members is given at Appendix-1.
Chapter - 1
Highlights
I. Examination from the General Studies Paper-II (CSAT) an
additional attempt in CSE, 2015 was allowed
1. The Commission conducted a total of 13
to those candidates who were otherwise eligible
examinations under the method of Recruitment
for CSE, 2011 and had appeared in CSE, 2011
by Examinations. Of these, 09 examinations
irrespective of their age and number of attempts
for selection to Civil Services/Posts and 04 for
already availed. The General Studies Paper-II
Defence Services were conducted. For these
of the Civil Services Examination,also acts as
examinations, a total of 29,20,392 applications
a screening test for the Indian Forest Service
were received and processed and 9,064 candidates
Examination.
interviewed for Civil Services/Posts. The
interviews for Defence Services were conducted (Chapter- 3)
by Services Selection Board (SSB) of Ministry 5. An Expert Committee was constituted
of Defence. A total of 5,659 [5,350+309 to comprehensively examine the various issues
(Reserve list)] candidates were recommended for raised from time to time regarding the Civil
appointment to various posts. A total of 4,356 Services Examination, with respect to eligibility,
candidates (including 309 candidates through syllabus, scheme and pattern of the Examination.
Reserve List) were recommended for Civil The Committee is to submit its report by 11th
Services/ Posts and 1,303 for Defence Services/ August, 2016.
Posts (Appendix-4, Appendix-5 & Appendix-6).
(Chapter- 3)
(Chapter- 3)
6. The Nodal Ministry i.e. Ministry of
2. Of the 2,294 posts reserved for SC,ST Railways has decided with the approval of
and OBC candidates to be filled up under method the Competent authority that recruitment of
of Recruitment by Examination, the Commission candidates for induction into IRSME through the
recommended 1,977 SC, ST and OBC candidates. SCRA Examination should be discontinued forth
Furthermore, 47 reserved category candidates with i.e. from year 2016. The requirement of
were recommended against unreserved posts. IRSME officers will henceforth be met through
(Chapter-5) the annual Engineering Services Examination
(ESE).
3. The Commission recommended in-service
training to 11 candidates with disabilities (which (Chapter- 3)
includes 01 SC, 01 ST and 04 OBC candidates) 7. Under the method of Recruitment by
who were selected for appointment on the basis Examination, the offer of appointment is made
of relaxed standards so that they could come up by the Ministry/Department concerned. A delay
to the general standard. in issuing the offer of appointment was reported
(Chapter-5) in 349 cases by different Ministries/Departments.
4. The General Studies Paper-II (CSAT) (Chapter-10)
in the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 8. Thirteen cases of malpractices committed
was a qualifying Paper with minimum qualifying by the candidates were reported to the Commission
marks fixed at 33%. The English Language relating to suppression of information, submission
Comprehension Skill portion from General of false information/fabricated documents, using
Studies Paper-II of Civil Services (Preliminary) unfair means and copying etc. The Commission
Examination continues to remain excluded took serious note of such cases and, after
following due process, imposed penalties on the 13. Under this method, the process of
delinquent candidates, ranging from cancellation selection to 150 posts were rendered infructuous
of their candidature to their debarment from the due to non-availability of suitable candidates.
future Examination/Selections, conducted by the Most of these posts required specialized medical,
Commission, for periods varying from five years engineering or scientific qualifications.
to permanent debarment. (Chapter-4)
(Chapter-12) 14. A total of 145 SC, 80 ST and 305 OBC
II. Direct Recruitment by Selection candidates were recommended through Direct
Recruitment by Selection. Thus 87.9 percent
9. For Direct Recruitment by Selection, the
of the posts for reserved category were filled
Commission received 314 requisitions for 2,577
up. Furthermore, 20 SC, 02 ST and 92 OBC
posts from various Ministries/ Departments.
candidates were recommended for selection
After adding the cases carried forward from the
against the unreserved post.
previous year, a total of 502 requisitions for
3,952 posts were processed during the year. Of (Chapter-5)
these, 68 requisitions for 995 posts were deemed 15. The Commission recommended 30
as closed for want of clarifications from the candidates against 61 posts reserved for Persons
Ministries/Departments concerned, or withdrawn with Disabilities to be filled up through Direct
at the pre-advertisement stage by them. Recruitment by Selection.
(Chapter-4) (Chapter-5)
10. A total of 1,534 posts against 244 16. A delay was reported in the issuance of
requisitions were advertised during the year offer letters of appointment, by the Ministry/
and 4,85,535 applications were received. The Department concerned, to the candidates
recruitment process was cancelled in respect of 13 recommended by the Commission, in 57 cases of
requisitions for 56 posts and modified in respect Direct Recruitment by Selection. The delay was
of 04 requisitions, subsequent to the publications reported for a period of more than one year. In
of advertisement. certain cases, the Ministry/Department concerned
(Chapter-4) had not provided information regarding the
issuance of the offer letters of appointment to the
11. During the year, a total of 1,05,471
recommended candidates.
applications were finalized which includes
applications received in the preceding year; (Chapter-10)
6,323 candidates were called for interview and
Appointments
5,043 candidates were interviewed. The number
of candidates recommended for recruitment was 17. The Commission made recommendations
1,207, against 1,357 posts requisitioned in 245 regarding the suitability of candidates/officials for
cases. The applicants to Post Ratio was 78 and promotion, deputation, absorption etc. in respect
the Recommendation to Post Ratio was 0.89. of 8,572 officers/posts.
(Chapter-4) (Chapter 7)
12. Computer Based Recruitment Tests 18. The Commission considered the service
(CBRTs) were conducted in 16 cases of Direct records of 14,070 officers and recommended (a)
Recruitment by Selection, where the number of 8,396 officers for promotion in Central Services
applicants was disproportionately high vis--vis and (b) 176 officers for appointment on Deputa-
the number of vacancies. tion (ISTC)/Absorption.
(Chapter-4) (Chapter 7)
Chapter - 2
14. The number of Recruitment Rules cases is given in Table-3 and also represented in
received and advised upon by the Commission Diagram-2A and 2B.
Table-3: Recruitment Rules cases (1950-2016)
Year Recruitment Rules cases received Recruitment Rules cases advised upon
1950-51 -- --
1960-61 332 299
1970-71 934 907
1980-81 1241 1359
1990-91 1660 1659
2000-01 1209 1233
2010-11 1386 1372
2011-12 1306 1335
[Note :- The Single Window System was introduced w.e.f. 01.09.2011. Therefore, the analysis has been done in two stages i.e. prior
to the introduction of Single Window System (i.e. upto FY 2011-12) and post-introduction of Single Window System (i.e. from FY
2012-13 to FY 2015-16).]
15. The number of records processed for Table-4 and also represented in Diagram-3.
induction into the all India Services is given in
Table-4: Induction into All India Services
Number of records examined
Year
for induction into All India Services (Officers recommended)
1950-51 -
1960-61 2054
1970-71 1617
1980-81 2010 (499 officers)
1990-91 1488 (543 officers)
2000-01 840 (268 officers)
2010-11 1105 (418 officers)
2015-16 1429 (468 officers)
Chapter - 3
Recruitment by Examinations
1. The Commission conducted 13 Academy Examination (II), 2015
examinations 09 for recruitment to Civil [NDA&NA (II), 2015]
Services/ Posts and 04 for Defence Services
during 2015-16, as detailed below:- (iii) Combined Defence Services Examination
(II), 2015 [CDS (II), 2015]
For Civil Services/ Posts
(iv) Combined Defence Services Examination
(i) Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination, (I), 2016 [CDS (I), 2016]
2015 [CS(P)]
1.2 The Services covered by the Examinations
(ii) Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2015 conducted by the Commission during 2015-16 are
[CS(M)] given at Appendix-7.
Recommended to Post Ratio the Recommended to Post Ratio (RPR). RPR for
various Examinations is given in Table-5. The
8. The number of finally recommended details for Civil Services/Posts and Defence Posts
candidates divided by the number of posts gives are given in Appendix 4 and Appendix -5.
Table 5
Name of the Examination Number of Number of Number of APR RPR
Posts applicants Recommended
Candidates
Civil Services Examination, 2014 1364 947428* 1363 694.59 0.99
Indian Forest Service Examination, 2015 110 221705** 110 2015.50 1
Engineering Services Examination, 2015 481 250041 434 519.84 0.90
Central Armed Police Forces (Assistant 121 215790 120 1783.39 0.99
Commandants) Examination, 2014
Central Armed Police Forces (Assistant 259 238972 224 922.67 0.86
Commandants) Examination, 2015
Indian Economic Service/ Indian Statistical 70 17868 64 255.26 0.91
Service Examination, 2015
Geologists Examination, 2015 269 22484 230 83.58 0.86
Combined Medical Services Examination, 1402 31786 1201 22.67 0.86
2015
Special Class Railways Apprentices 54 317735 54 5883.98 1
Examination, 2015
Central Industrial Security Force Limited 13 924 13 71.08 1
Departmental Competitive Examination,
2015
Section Officers/Stenographers (Grade B/ 741 2038 234 2.74 0.32
Grade-I) Limited Departmental Competitive
Examination, 2014
Total 4884 2266771 4047 464.12 0.82
*No. of applicants in CS (P), 2014
**No. of applicants of IFoS (P), 2015 in CS (P), 2015
who were recommended in 2014-15, thereby (vi) Indian Languages in the Main
registering an increase of 19.92%. Examination
(iv) Persons with Disabilities 14. The number of candidates who opted for
the Literature of an Indian Language as one of
12. The number of Persons with Disabilities the optional subjects for the 2014 Examination
recommended for appointment on the basis of the was 1239. The number of candidates who opted
Civil Services Examination, 2014 was 54. for an Indian Language as a medium for answering
(v) Interviews other papers is given at Appendix-8.
13. For the Civil Services Examination, 2014, Engineering Services Examination 2015
six Personality Test Boards were constituted
Highlights
from April 27, 2015 to June 19, 2015, except
May 1, 2015 when five Personality Boards were 15. The Engineering Services Examination,
constituted. Seven Personality Test Boards were 2015 was notified on March 14, 2015. In
constituted from June 22, 2015 to June 30, 2015. response to the Notification, a total number of
Candidates were allowed to opt for either English 2,50,041 candidates applied for the Examination.
or any one of the Indian Languages as medium The written Examination was held from June 12
for Personality Test. Out of the 3,308 candidates to June 14, 2015 wherein 92,817 candidates had
qualified for the Personality Test 3,303 appeared appeared. The result of the written examination
for the Personality Test (04 candidates did not was declared on September 29, 2015. As against
appear for Personality Test and the candidature a total of 92,817 candidates, who had appeared in
of one candidate was cancelled). 2,825 candidates the written examination, a total number of 1,134
opted for English while 483 candidates opted for candidates qualified for the Personality Test,
an Indian Language as medium for interview. which included General-533, OBC-321, SC-
The details in this regard are given in Table-6. 187 and ST-93 candidates under the respective
categories. This figure also includes 58 Persons
Table-6 with Disabilities. Two Personality Test Boards
Medium for Personality Test from November 25, 2015 to November 27, 2015,
Name of Indian Number of Candidates Seven Personality Test Boards from November
Language 30, 2015 to December 14, 2015, were held to
Assamese 1 interview the candidates. The final result was
Bengali 1 declared on December 30, 2015. A total number
of 434 candidates were recommended, which
Gujarati 31
includes General-204, OBC-121, SC-73 and ST-
Hindi 370
36. This figure also includes 21 Persons with
Kannada 2 Disabilities. The proposal for operation of the
Marathi 37 Reserve List has not been received upto March
Oriya 1 31, 2016 from the Ministry of Railways.
Punjabi 11
Tamil 15
Changes implemented during the year
2015-16
Telugu 10
Urdu 3 (i) Civil Services Examination, 2015
Manipuri 1
a. The General Studies Paper-II
Total 483
(CSAT) in the Civil Services
Chapter - 4
3. Diagram-1 indicates that there has been requisitions for 56 posts and modified in respect
some increase in the number of fresh requisitions of 04 requisitions, subsequent to the publication
and posts received by the Commission from the of the advertisements due to various reasons viz.
Ministries/ Departments concerned during the Court orders, withdrawal of requisition, etc.
year 2015-16 as compared to the previous year
The Commission received 4,85,535 online
2014-15.
applications during 2015-16. A total of 1,05,471
Statistical Abstract of the Number of applications were finalized during the year, which
Applications Received, Candidates included applications received in the preceding
Interviewed and Recommended year. After shortlisting, the Commission
summoned 6,323 candidates for interview out of
4. During the year 2015-16, the Commission whom 5,043 candidates appeared for interview.
issued 22 advertisements inviting applications in A total of 245 requisitions for 1,357 posts were
244 requisitions for 1,534 posts. The number finalized by the Commission, recommending
of posts, advertised, Ministry-wise, during the 1,207 candidates for appointment to various
year 2015-16 are given at Appendix-12. The posts during the year 2015-16. The same is being
recruitment process was cancelled in respect of 13 depicted at Diagram-2.
5. During the year 2015-16, the number of 8. During the year 2015-16, CBRTs were
posts in respect of which recruitment process was held in 16 cases of recruitment for 604 posts
finalized, the number of candidates recommended, (including one Non-CBRT case for the post
applicants to post ratio and recommendation of assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
to post ratio, under four broad disciplines of Employees Provident Fund Organisation). Details
Engineering, Scientific & Technical (excluding of these cases are given in Appendix-17.
Engineering), Non-Technical and Medical, are
given in Table-1. Average Time Taken in Completion of
Recruitment Process
6. The number of posts, Discipline/
Specialization-wise and Community-wise, for 9. During the year 2015-16, the average time
which recruitment process was finalized under the taken for finalizing normal recruitment cases was
above four broad disciplines and the number of about 226 days from the date of receipt of complete
candidates recommended for appointment by the requisition to the date of recommendation.
Commission during the year 2015-16 are given Applicants to Post Ratio (APR)
at Appendices 13, 14, 15 and 16. A statement
showing the percentage variation (discipline-wise) 10. Applicants to Post Ratio (APR) is an
in 2015-16 vis--vis the corresponding figures of indicator of the average number of candidates
previous year is given at Appendix-2. who apply against one post. There were, on
an average, 78 applicants per post in cases of
Computer Based Recruitment Tests Direct Recruitment by Selection, which were
(CBRTs) finalized during the year 2015-16. Diagram-3
7. Recruitment Tests are held in those cases indicates that the APR in all disciplines, except
where the number of applications received is in the case of Scientific and Technical Discipline
large. CBRT method is resorted to for the purpose (Excluding Engg.), has decreased as compared to
of shortlisting the candidates to a reasonable the previous year.
number. The performance of the candidates in
the CBRT is assigned appropriate weightage on
a case to case basis. The Test is followed by
Interview for final selection.
Bulk Recruitment Cases to the practice of sending Call Letter for interview
and letter calling for documents from candidates
13. In cases where the number of applications through email. The same, besides being a faster
exceeds 500 are treated as Bulk Recruitment means of communication, also ensures minimum
cases. There were 54 such cases for 690 posts use of paper, through use of electronic means.
finalized during 2015-16, for which 84,693
applications were received. Details of such cases Online Recruitment Application Software
are given at Appendix-18.
16. Constant and concerted efforts were
Recruitment for Statutory Bodies/Local- made to bring about improvements in the Online
Authorities Recruitment Application (ORA) System to make
the system more efficient and candidate friendly.
14. No recruitment was made during the year
for Statutory Bodies/Local authorities by the Modification of format in which information
method of Direct Recruitment by Selection. pertaining to recruitment cases are
published on the website
Sending Call Letter for interview to
shortlisted candidates and letter calling 17. The format in which information in
for documents from candidates through respect of recruitment cases are published on the
e-mail. website of the Commission has been reviewed and
modifications were carried out to the same with
15. Keeping in pace with the technological a view to facilitate easy location of the required
advancements, the Commission decided to resort data.
Chapter - 5
Table-1
2014-15 2015-16
** This Includes 409 candidates recommended against unreserved posts in respect of Examinations having the Reserve List Rule. The
final status will be known after the allocation of service upon applying the reserve list rule in each of these examinations.
# The details are given in Table -2
Table-2
Exam. SC ST OBC
1. IES/ISS, 2015 -- 05 --
2. GEOL, 2015 07 02 07
3. SO/PS LDCE, 2014 179 117 --
TOTAL 186 124 07
The shortfall in recommendation of 05 ST candidates in Indian Economic Services/Indian Statistical Service Examination,
2015, is due to non-availability of suitable candidates. The shortfall of 07 SC, 02 ST and 07 OBC candidates in respect of
Combined Geo-Scientist and Geologists Examination, 2015 is due to the fact that those candidates applied & qualified for
both Cat. I as well as Cat. II posts. However, they will be appointed against one post either Cat. I or Cat.II, in accordance
with their respective merit position & preference given by them in their application. The shortfall in recommendation of 179
SC candidates, and 117 ST candidates in respect of Section Officers/Stenographer(Gd.B) /Gd. I) Limited Departmental
Competitive Examination, 2014 is due to the fact that suitable candidates were not found for the remaining posts.
(see Appendices 4 & 5)
4. The number of posts reserved for SC, 6. Further, a total of 114 candidates (20
ST and OBC categories and the candidates SC, 02 ST and 92 OBC) were recommended
recommended against these posts during 2015-16 against the unreserved posts. Details are given
are given in Table-3. at Appendix-28.
Table-3: Recruitment Finalized for the Posts Reserved for SC, ST and OBC categories
during 2015-16
Particulars SC ST OBC Total
1. Reserved Posts 158 91 354 603
2. Candidates applied against reserved vacancies 12,095 2,682 25,377 40,154
3. Candidates called for interview 874 408 2,014 3,296
4. Candidates appeared in interview 704 298 1,605 2,607
5. Candidates recommended 145 80 305 530
6. Shortfall 13 11 49 73
Out of item 6 above,
(ii) Posts for which no SC, ST and OBC candidate was found 9 9 49 67
suitable
Table-4: Number of Posts Reserved and Candidates Recommended against SC, ST and
OBC categories in Direct Recruitment by Selection
2014-15 2015-16
Reserved SC/ST/ OBC Shortfall SC/ST/ OBC Total SC/ST/ Reserved SC/ST/ OBC Shortfall SC/ST/OBC Total SC/ST/
Posts candidates candidates OBC candidates Posts candidates candidates OBC candidates
recommended recommended recommended recommended recommended recommended
against against against Reserved against
Reserved Unreserved Posts Unreserved
Posts Posts posts
Table-5: Distribution of SC, ST, OBC and PWD Candidates, Community-wise and
Duration-wise, to whom In-Service Training was recommended
Community-wise Candidates
Duration of In-service training
SC ST OBC PWD Total
3 months 21 8 5 1 35
6 months 12 23 14 4 53
9 months 3 4 8 2 17
One year 7 7 36 4 54
Total 43 42 63 11 159
Table-6: Number of posts reserved for Persons with Disabilities and candidates
recommended, Discipline-wise, during the year 2015-16
Sl. Discipline Number of posts reserved Number of such candidates
No. for Persons with Disabilities recommended
1 Engineering 8 4
2 Scientific and Technical 11 5
3 Non-Technical 18 10
4 Medical 24 11
Total 61 30
Chapter - 6
Single Window System: for the Officials nominated by the Ministries and
Departments concerned. The check-list has also
5. The proposals relating to amendment been uploaded on the website of the Commission
and framing of Recruitment Rules and for for ready reference by various stakeholders.
determination of one-time method of recruitment
are received in the Commission under the Single 7. The proposals for framing and amendment
Window System. This system provides for of Recruitment Rules are formulated by the
preliminary scrutiny of proposals received from Ministries/ Departments concerned and require
the Ministries/ Departments concerned based concurrence of the DoP&T, before seeking the
upon a pre-defined Check-list, which makes the Commissions approval. The average time taken
process of scrutiny faster. in the Commission for disposal of proposals in
the past five years is given in Table 3.
6. The Check-list in use for the Single Window
System, earlier incorporated 57 items against Table-3: Average Time for disposal of RR
which Ministries/Departments were required proposals
to furnish information. During the year, the Sl.No. Year Average time taken for
Checklist has been comprehensively streamlined, disposal(in days)
duly factoring in the inputs received from the 1 2011-12 31
representatives of the Ministries/Departments 2 2012-13 26
during the Single Window discussions. The 3 2013-14 24
revised Check-list now contains 29 items and,
4 2014-15 20
at the same time, is more informative, broad
based and is also in consonance with the extant 5 2015-16 18
Guidelines of the DoP&T. This revised Check 8. The Normal Disposal Time prescribed for
List was circulated to Ministries/Departments.
these proposals is 30 days. The disposal time has
Further, to emphasize upon the intricacies
been progressively brought down from 31 days to
involved in various point(s) thus incorporated in it,
18 days over the last five years, thus achieving a
a Workshop Series was organized over five-days
reduction of 40% as shown in Diagram-2.
9. The Commission, during 2015-16, also (a) It serves as an information base for inter
approved amendment to proposals of Service service comparison.
Rules as follows:-
(b) The compilation will also facilitate the CCA
(i) Delhi Health Service Rules of General to formulate future cadre restructuring
Duty Medical Officer (Indian System of proposals based on proposals of other
Medicine) similar services.
(ii) Delhi Health Service Rules of General 12. An e-document has been created w.r.t.
Duty Medical Officer (Homeopathy) various Civil Posts (Group A & B) under the
Government of India to serve as a database on
(iii) Indian Defence Service of Engineers Recruitment Rules. This compilation will serve as
(iv) Indian Statistical Service Rules reference material with regard to the Recruitment
Rules which have not been amended on a timely
(v) Indian Ordnance Factory Health Service basis as per the extant DoP&T guidelines. The
Rules Compendium includes information on a total of
3,00,087 posts.
(vi) Indian Postal Service Group A Rules
Chapter - 7
4. The comparative figures of Officers of requesting them to get the vacancies determined
various States, Service-wise, considered and and send the proposals for convening the Selection
recommended for induction into the all India Committee Meetings, as per the suggested dates
Services during the last two years are represented in the Model Calendar. The Commission also
in Diagram 2. held four Zonal Meetings on 19th, 21st, 25th
& 28th May with the representatives of all the
5. During 2015-16, Selection Committee State Governments and the Cadre Controlling
Meetings (SCMs) were held for preparation of Authorities in the Central Government to review
current Select List (Select List 2014 for SCS/ the status of determination of vacancies by the
SPS/SFS and Select List 2014 a for Non-SCS) Central Government and submission of proposals
in respect of 49 out of 120 Cadres/Sub-Cadres. In by the State Governments. The position of
one Sub-Cadre, the SCM for preparation of Select convening the Selection Committee Meetings was
List 2015 was held in 2015-16. In 24 Cadres/ again reviewed in July and the communications
Sub-Cadres, Nil vacancy was determined by were again sent by the Commission to the State
the Government of India and in 05 Cadres/Sub- Governments from whom the proposals were
Cadres, no State Service Officer was eligible. awaited.
The details are at Appendix-19. Thus, the overall
percentage of Cadres/Sub-Cadres covered during 6. In respect of the remaining Cadres/Sub-
2015-16 comes to 65%. The Commission, from the Cadres, Select Lists could not be prepared due
beginning of the year 2015, made earnest efforts to to various reasons such as vacancies not having
set the process of induction into all India Services been determined by the Government of India,
into motion so that there would be no delay in Court Orders/Directions, seniority disputes, non-
convening the Selection Committee Meetings for finalization of Select Lists of earlier years and
promotion of State Service Officers to respective non-receipt/delayed receipt of proposals from
all India Services. The communications were the State Governments, etc. The details in this
issued to all the State Governments/Cadres and regard are represented in Diagram-3 and given
the Cadre Controlling Authorities in the Central at Appendix- 22.
Government in the month of January itself
7. During 2015-16, in 43 SCMs, Select Lists Hence, a total of 62 SCMs were held during
for 43 Cadres/Sub-Cadres were prepared for the 2015-16 in which 77 Select Lists were prepared.
current year and in another 06 SCMs, 17 Select In addition, pursuant to the directions of the
Lists were prepared which included 06 Select Honble Supreme Court/High Court/CAT, 16
Lists for the current year and 11 Select Lists Review SCMs were held, wherein 21 Select Lists
for the previous years. In addition, in 12 other were reviewed. Thus, during 2015-16, a total of
SCMs, 16 Select Lists were prepared only for the 98 Select Lists have been prepared/ reviewed.
previous years and in 01 SCM, Select List for Details in this regard are given in Table-2 and
2015 was also prepared. shown at Appendix-20.
Promotion Cases
Total cases Accepted/ Re- Meeting held/ Member Reply/ Under
received turned after on Advice Letter Nominated/ Document(s) Examination
the spot scrutiny issued/ Disposed Meeting fixed awaited / Submission
of
561 (Accepted)
698 530* 21 33 34
137 (Returned)
Deputation Cases
Total cases Accepted/ Re- Meeting held/ Member Nomi- Reply/ Under Ex-
received turned after on Advice Letter nated/ Meeting Document(s) amination/
the spot scrutiny issued/ Dis- fixed/ Eligibility- awaited Submission
posed of Approved
225 (Accepted)
334 187# 10 7 21
109 (Returned)
* includes 57 meetings in respect of cases brought forward from previous year.
# includes 55 infructuous cases, where none was found eligible.
17. The Commission recommended 8396 for Deputation (ISTC)/Absorption were accepted
officers in 530 DPCs convened during 2015-16, under the Single Window System. SCMs/
as compared to 6,869 officers recommended in SCMs(PT) were held and advice letters were
492 DPC meetings convened during 2014-15. issued to the Ministries/Departments concerned
in 132 cases and 55 cases were rendered
18. Out of 8,396 officers recommended infructuous for various reasons. Further, in 10
for promotion during the year 2015-16, 1025 cases received during 2015-16, dates of SCMs
officers belonging to SC and ST categories were fixed or Members were nominated. The
were recommended against 1,282 vacancies remaining 28 cases were at various stages of
reserved for them. against the balance 257 processing as on March 31, 2016.
reserved vacancies, no SC/ST officer could be
recommended due to non-availability of eligible 20. The average Time taken for disposal of
officers. A total of 788 officers belonging Deputation (ISTC)/Absorption proposals that were
to SC and ST categories were recommended accepted during 2015-16 was 60 days as against
for promotion within Group A posts against the prescribed Normal Time of Disposal (NTD)
unreserved vacancies. Ministry/ Department-wise of 180 days. The details of deficient proposals
break up of such cases are given at Appendix-25. and the time taken to dispose off the proposals
which were accepted in the Commission during
Deputation (ISTC)/Absorption the last 5 years are given in Table-5.
19. During 2015-16, a total of 225 proposals
21. The Commission recommended 176 24. At the end of 2015-16, 09 cases of ad-
officers in the 132 SCMs/SCMs(PT) for hoc appointments were continuing for more than
Deputation (ISTC)/Absorption held during 2015- one year. The year wise breakup of such cases
16, as compared to 186 officers recommended in is given in Table-6 and Ministry-wise details are
123 SCMs/SCMs(PT) held during 2014-15. given at Appendix-24.
Ad-hoc Appointments reported by Table-6:Ad-hoc appointments continuing
Ministries/Departments for more than one year
22. The appointments made by the Government Sl. No. Years Group Group
to various Group A and Group B posts, A B
pending appointments/promotions of candidates 1. Between 1-2 0 0
through the Commission, are treated as ad-hoc Years
appointments. Such appointments/promotions
2. Between 2-3 0 0
are required to be reported to the Commission Years
by all the Ministries and Departments by way
3. Between 3-4 0 0
of monthly and half yearly returns. However,
Years
monthly/half yearly returns from 51 Ministries/
4. Between 4-5 0 0
Departments and Union Territories were not
Years
received during the year 2015-16. The details are
5. Between 5-10 7 0
at Appendix- 23.
Years
23. During the year 2015-16, 07 Ministries/ 6. More than 10 2 0
Departments/ including Union Territories Years
(Andaman & Nicobar Administration Secretariat) Total 09 0
reported fresh ad-hoc appointments to 01 Group
Note: The figures reflected above are those indicated by the Min-
A and 02 Group B posts. During the year 2014- istries/Departments in the half-yearly report for the period ending
15, 8 Ministries/ Departments/Union Territories December, 2015. In cases where the Ministries/Departments have
not submitted report for December, 2015, figures indicated in the
reported ad-hoc appointments to 5 Group A and half-yearly report for June, 2015 have been taken.
4 Group B posts.
Chapter - 8
Disciplinary Cases
1. Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution delay, the Single Window System was introduced
stipulates that the Union Public Service by the Commission in September, 2010 covering
Commission shall be consulted on all disciplinary five Ministries. This System was gradually
matters affecting a person serving under the extended to all Ministries and Departments.
Government of India or State Government in a With effect from January 1, 2013, all the State
Civil capacity, including memorials or petitions Governments are also covered under the Single
relating to such matters. Consultation with the Window System. The cases received from the
Commission is also required under the relevant Ministries/ Departments/ State Governments are
Pension Rules where the President proposes to initially scrutinized in accordance with the check
withhold or withdraw the pension of a retired list at Single Window itself. Only proposals
Government servant. Accordingly, the disciplinary complete in all respects are accepted for further
cases are referred by the Ministry/ Department examination and advice in the Commission.
and State Governments to the Commission for
advice. 3. The number of disciplinary cases received
and processed in the Commission during 2015-
2. For expeditious disposal of disciplinary 16 and the preceding five years are given in the
cases in the Commission and to reduce avoidable Table-1.
Table -1
Year No. of cases No. of cases No. of Advice No. of cases Balance left at
brought forward received Letters sent returned the end of the
at the commence- during the during the year during the year
ment of the year year year
2010-11 236 762 417 409 172
2011-12 172 655 424 255 148
2012-13 148 642 453 201 136
2013-14 136 619 455 122 178
2014-15 178 538 463 104 149
2015-16 149 546 492 91 112
4. During the year 2015-16, the Commission advice of the Commission was tendered in 492
received 546 disciplinary cases for tendering cases and 91 cases were returned on account of
advice. Considering the 149 cases brought forward procedural deficiencies. Thus, out of the total of
from the previous year i.e. 2014-15 which were 695 cases, 583 cases were disposed off during the
pending with the Commission as on April 1, 2015, year, leaving a balance of 112 cases at the close
the total number of cases with the Commission of the year.
during the year was 695. Out of these 695 cases,
5. Table-1 shows that there is a decline in pertained to doubtful integrity. Of these, the
the number of cases received and also the total Commission advised imposition of major penalty
number of cases processed during the year. in 256 cases, minor penalty in 24 cases and in 40
This trend is attributable to the fact that before cases, the Commission did not advise imposition
2010-11, the cases were received by post and of any penalty.
many documentary and procedural deficiencies
were observed. as a result, the Commission was 9. There were 169 cases relating to other
constrained to return a large number of cases categories of misconduct, including lack of
without tendering final advice. The introduction devotion to duty. In these cases, the Commission
of the Single Window System has resulted in the advised imposition of major penalty in 102 cases,
submission of proposals with greater compliance minor penalty in 54 cases and in 13 cases, the
of the documentary and procedural requirements Commission did not advise imposition of any
by the Ministries/Departments and State penalty.
Governments concerned, which has reduced the 10. In the remaining 03 cases, the advice
processing time, resulting thereby in the disposal of the Commission was of a miscellaneous
of cases in a time bound manner. nature. In one case, the Commission advised the
6. There has been a considerable reduction Government to consider holding further inquiry
in the number of cases returned, on account in order to determine guilt or otherwise of the
of non-fulfilment of procedural formalities and CO; in another case, the Commission observed
incomplete documentation, from 409 in 2010-11 that in the common proceedings initiated against
to 91 in 2015-16. A careful scrutiny of the case two officers, one of the charged officers was still
records by the Ministries/ Departments and the in service, as such, the orders could be issued by
State Governments concerned at the initial stage the Disciplinary Authority which is subordinate
would obviate delays in finalization of the cases. Authority to the President and, therefore, there was
no requirement of the advice of the Commission;
7. The details of misconduct, number of and in the third case, Commission observed that
Officers charged, Group-wise, and the details since the DA had held the charge against one of
of the Commissions advice are given at the charged officers in the common proceedings
Appendix-29. This appendix also depicts the as not proved, there was no requirement of advice
number of cases, which were returned to the of the Commission.
Ministries/Departments and State Governments
concerned on account of procedural/ documentary 11. During 2015-16, in 532 cases, the
deficiencies. Government issued orders in accordance with
the advice of the Commission. In 06 cases,
8. The details in respect of 492 cases, the orders passed by the Government were
Ministry/Department and State Government wise, in disagreement with the advice of the
in which the Commission tendered its advice is Commission. The details of these 06 cases are
given at Appendix-30. In 320 cases, the charges given in Chapter -9.
Chapter - 9
1.4 In March, 2012, the DA referred the case a bearing on the case. The Commission also
again to the Commission seeking reconsideration observed that the grounds and facts forwarded by
of the earlier advice on the grounds that perhaps the Ministry were already taken into consideration
the fact that no inquiry was held in the case, was and they did not see any merit to reconsider the
not brought to the notice of the Commission and case. Hence, the Commission reiterated their
a major penalty could not be imposed without earlier advice and the same was communicated to
conducting a full-fledged inquiry under the Rules. the DA on January 28, 2014.
1.5 The Commission, on reconsideration 1.8 On April 7, 2015 the DA issued final
of the case observed that in this case DA itself Order imposing the penalty of Censure on the
had held that the MOS had clearly admitted the MOS, in disagreement with the advice of the
charges and hence there was no need to hold an Commission. It was observed from the Order
inquiry in the matter. This fact had already been that the procedure for disagreeing with the
taken into consideration by the Commission while Commission has been followed by the DA before
tendering their earlier advice on January 17, passing the final Order.
2012. Further, the Commission observed that the
DA had not brought out any new fact/evidence 1.9 As the Order passed by the Government
which was not considered by the Commission was not in accordance with the advice of the
while tendering their advice earlier. Hence, the Commission, it has been treated as a case of non-
Commission reiterated their advice and the same acceptance of the advice of the Commission.
was communicated to the DA on April 23, 2012. Action Under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA)
1.6 On October 10, 2013 the DA once Rules, 1965 [Continued Under CCS
again referred the case to the Commission for (Pension) Rules, 1972] Against
reconsideration of advice. It was stated therein An Official of the Ministry of
that on receipt of the Commissions advice dated Finance, Department of
April 23, 2012, the DA sought the opinion of the Expenditure
Department of Legal Affairs and the Department
2 Major Penalty proceedings under Rule 14
of Personnel & Training (DoP&T) in the matter
of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 were initiated on June
and in the light of their comments, they came
4, 2007 against a Sr. Accountant in the Ministry
to the conclusion that the statement made by the
of Finance on the following articles of Charge:
MOS seeking apology could not be construed as
unconditional admission of Charge. The matter I. The Charged Officer, while working as Sr.
was thereafter placed before the Honble Prime Accountant(ACP) in Record-III Section of Office
Minister, through the DoP&T, as the case involved of Accountant General has absented himself from
disagreement with the Commissions advice. duty unauthorisedly since 02.01.2006 without
The DoP&T, in turn, opined that in view of the intimation to the proper authority or prior
comments of the Department of Legal Affairs, sanction of leave. Thus, by remaining absent
they had no objection in holding a regular inquiry from duty unauthorisedly since 02.01.2006, the
and the case be referred to UPSC for its advice CO has acted in a manner unbecoming of a Govt.
in the matter. Hence, the DA referred the case to Servant and so also failed to maintain devotion
the Commission in October 2013. to duty thereby violating Rule 3(1)(ii) & (iii) of
CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964.
1.7 The Commission, after taking into account
all the facts of the case observed that although the II. The CO, while working as Sr.
DA had sent the case again for reconsideration, Accountant(ACP) in Record-III Section of Office
they had not added any new fact/evidence having of accountant General (now remaining absent
unauthorisedly since 02.01.2006) has availed a 2.2 On detailed analysis of the case, the
personal loan amounting to Rs.1,00,000/- under Commission observed that with regard to Article
UBI Personal Loan Scheme, from UBI, Cuttack, of Charge (I), it was clear from the case records
on the basis of an undertaking given/issued by that the CO had remained absent from duty since
the Sr. Accounts Officer (retd.), in the capacity 02.01.2006. No reason for his unauthorized
of Drawing & Disbursing Officer (DDO). absence had been given by the CO till issue of
While verifying the authenticity/correctness of the Charge Sheet.
the undertaking, it came to light that no such
undertaking was given/issued by the then Sr. Further, he had not submitted any explanation in
Accounts Officer & DDO to the said Bank for his defence, despite being afforded with ample
deduction of the monthly installment and interest opportunities to do so. Only in his representation
thereto from the COs salary and remission of the to the Inquiry Report he had stated that he was
same to the said Bank. ill, without specifying the illness or producing
any medical certificate. Hence, this Charge was
Rather, the copy of the undertaking submitted by held as proved by the Commission.
the CO to the said Bank disclosed that the CO by
manipulating the signature of the Sr. Accounts 2.3 The article of Charge (II) related to
Officer & DDO, had submitted the undertaking to submitting forged undertaking to the Bank by
the said Bank, on the strength of which the Bank manipulating the signature of DDO and availing
had sanctioned an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- as loan on the basis of such forged undertaking. In
personal loan to the CO. this regard, the COs contentions were that he
had taken the bank loan without office permission
Thus, by submitting the aforesaid forged to save the life of his brother who was suffering
undertaking to the said Bank by manipulating the from liver cancer and also that his loan was
signature of DDO and availing loan on the basis arranged through a broker and he was unaware
of such forged undertaking, the CO has not only of the documents that were submitted for availing
acted in a manner which is unbecoming on the the loan. However, an examination of the said
part of a Government Servant, but also failed to documents by the Commission revealed that the
maintain absolute integrity, thereby transgressed signatures of the DDO on other documents signed
Rule 3(1)(i) & (iii) of CCS (Conduct) Rules, on the same day did not tally with those produced
1964. before the Bank authorities to avail the loan. It
thus became apparent that the DDOs signatures
2.1 As the CO retired on superannuation on were forged.
October 31, 2009, the disciplinary proceedings
were continued under Rule 9 of CCS(Pension) 2.4 The Commission observed that the CO
Rules, 1972. An inquiry was ordered in this case should have taken permission from his Office
and the same was held ex-parte, as the CO did before availing loan from the Bank as provided
not participate in the inquiry even though several in the CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964; instead,
notices were issued to him. The Inquiry Officer he had directly availed loan from the Bank by
held both the articles of Charge against the CO submitting a forged document. The Commission
as proved. The Disciplinary Authority accepted further observed that the submission of the CO
the inquiry findings and after following the that he was unaware of the documents produced
prescribed procedure, the case was referred to by the broker, could not be accepted because,
the Commission in April, 2011 with a tentative being a Government servant he ought to have
decision to impose the penalty of cut in pension knowledge of the financial transaction that he was
on the CO. entering into. Moreover, it was observed from
the relevant case records that on an inquiry from
the DDOs office regarding issue of any letter Department of Personnel & Training on the
to the Bank Authorities, it was found that no disciplinary proceedings initiated against an
correspondence had been made with the Bank in officer of Indian Administrative Service, under
respect of the CO. Hence, this Charge was also Rule 8 of AIS (D&A) Rules, 1969. The Member
held proved by the Commission. The Commission of Service was issued major penalty Charge Sheet
concluded that the COs unauthorized absence on November 15, 2000 on the following Articles
compounded by his act of taking a loan from the of Charge:
Bank without prior permission from his office by
presenting forged documents, characterized gross The MOS, while functioning as Collector,
misconduct. Hence, the Commission advised that Nowrangpur, during the period from 01.04.1997
the penalty of withholding of 100% of monthly to 30.04.1998 had committed serious irregularities
pension on permanent basis along with forfeiture by enhancing the BPL cards figure and quota
of gratuity might be imposed on the CO. Advice without proper scrutiny for which the following
of the Commission was communicated to the DA Charges were framed against him:
on July 19, 2011. I. He had undertaken a fresh survey of BPL
2.5 On March 30, 2015 the DA issued final category families in Nowrangpur District without
Order imposing the penalty of reduction of any approval from Panchayti Raj Department. He
pension by 50% for a period of 10 years and had submitted the proposals to increase the BPL
forfeiture of 50% of Death-cum-Retirement cards in contravention of the existing instructions
gratuity on the CO. This was in disagreement of the Government issued in Panchayti Raj
with the Commissions advice. It was stated in Department and had also acted in contravention
the Order that the DA decided to disagree with of instructions issued by the Government in Food
the Commissions advice as they found the Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department letter
penalty recommended by the Commission too No. 11522(30) dated 01.05.1995 and 13029(30)
harsh and not commensurate with the gravity of dated 17.05.1997. He is, therefore, charged for
misconduct. In view of the disagreement with the gross negligence in duty and carelessness.
Commissions advice, the DA referred the case to II. With an ulterior motive he had submitted
DoP&T and as advised by DoP&T, the quantum proposals to Government on different dates for
of penalty was reduced, in view of pecuniary enhancement of BPL cards. The inevitable conclusion
condition of the CO. of such submission of proposals is to misutilise the
2.6 As the Order passed by the Government highly subsidized BPL rice and promote them to
was not in accordance with the advice of the black marketing and thereby causing huge loss to the
Commission, it has been treated as a case of non- Government. The amount of loss is approximately
acceptance of the advice of the Commission. Rs.3,84,51,000/- incurred by the State Exchequer
in the shape of subsidy.
Action Under Rule 8 of AIS
III. A Special Rapporteur, on behalf of
(Discipline & Appeal) Rules,
National Human Rights Commission(NHRC) gave
1969 Read with Rule 6(1)(b)
a specific finding in his tour note dated 10.11.1998
(i) of AIS (DCRB) Rules, 1958
to 17.11.1998 that there are over 90000 more
Instituted Against An
BPL ghost cards and gave observations regarding
Officer of Indian Administrative the extent of misappropriation of an essential
Service: supply exclusively meant for BPL category of
3. Advice of the Commission was sought by population. The MOS had not taken any steps
the Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions, during his tenure as Collector, Nowrangpur for
cancellation of such ghost cards for which he responsibility to BDOs and Executive Officers for
is charged for committing fraud on the public proper enumeration was not found acceptable as
exchequer and dereliction of duty. the survey was neither done properly nor discussed
in Gramasabha or Gram Panchayat meetings. It
3.1 As the MOS denied the Charges, the case was established that there was not only abnormal
was remitted to Inquiry Officer for conducting increase in BPL families but also total non-
inquiry. The Inquiry Officer submitted his report adherence to the prescribed procedures by the
holding Article (I) of the Charges as partly MOS. The element of Charge that the MOS did
proved, Article (II) as not proved and Article (III) not take the approval of the concerned authority
as proved. A copy of the inquiry report was made for enumeration of BPL families, was held as not
available to the MOS and after considering the established. Thus, this article of Charge was held
representation submitted by him, the Disciplinary as partly proved by the Commission.
Authority referred the case to the Commission in
March, 2014 for advice in the matter. 3.4 Article of Charge (II) was held as not
proved by the Inquiry Officer and the DA had
3.2 The Commission, on detailed analysis of accepted the inquiry findings. Hence, this Charge
the case, observed that the first component of was not discussed by the Commission.
Article (I) refers to the instructions/guidelines
issued by the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Food 3.5 Regarding Article of Charge (III), the
Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department, Commission observed that after analyzing the
Government of Orissa to all Collectors wherein, report of the Special Rapporteur it has come to
concern was expressed over discrepancy between light that there had been liberal issue of BPL cards
population figures of district and the data of in Nowrangpur District during the incumbency of
enumerated BPL families furnished by the the MOS. It was further observed from the report
Collectors. The Collectors were instructed to that (i) door-to-door survey of BPL families was
organize the distribution drive carefully and take not undertaken (ii) resolution of Gram Panchayat/
all possible measures to eliminate ghost cards Gram Samiti was not there and (iii) whatever
and to take adequate steps for issue of Ration registers were found showed that those were
Cards only to genuine consumers. Further, the maintained leaving big gaps, giving scope for future
enquiry conducted in this regard as per directions manipulation. The successor of the MOS had stated
of NHRC Monitoring Committee revealed many that deletion of BPL families in Nowrangpur district
anomalies in the calculation of BPL families in 1999 was made after receiving complaints from
availing Government subsidy. various Collectors. The reduction in number of
BPL cards in the district was not due to revision
3.3 The Commission observed that the MOS in the BPL survey procedure but due to detection
did not ensure total transparency in door-to-door of the existence of ghost cards and deletion of the
enumeration in rural as well as urban areas. The same. The Commission held this article of Charge
MOS remained silent about the wrong addition as proved.
of about 50,000 BPL families communicated to
him by the FS & CW Department. He should 3.6 The Commission concluded that the
have objected to the bloated figure which, in charges established against the MOS constitute
turn, could have prevented excess allotment of grave misconduct and advised that the penalty of
food grains to the district. He had not followed withholding of 20% of monthly pension otherwise
the proper procedure as per guidelines issued admissible to him for a period of three years be
by the Department for correct identification of imposed on him. Advice of the Commission was
BPL families both in rural and urban areas. The communicated to the DA on July 15, 2014.
contention of the MOS that he had given the
3.7 On May 21, 2015, the Competent of bills i.e. approximately Rs. 30 lakhs for the
Authority passed the final Order imposing the above mentioned period. The CO had approved
penalty of withholding of 10% of monthly the financial bid of the contractor for the Tender
pension otherwise admissible for a period of of hiring of vehicle with malafide intention,
three years on the MOS. It was stated in the violating the provisions of P & T Manual Vol. II
penalty Order that a copy of the Commissions and General Financial Rules.
advice letter was forwarded to the MOS through
Government of Orissa. The representation II. The Charged Officer, while working
submitted by the MOS was considered by the as TDM, Latur during the year 1999-2000, in
Government of Orissa, who, in turn, observed collusion with four other officials, floated limited
that the penalty of 10% cut in pension for three Tenders at higher rates for OFC dropping work
years would be just and proper for the misconduct for two Telephone Exchanges by dividing them
of the MOS. The Competent Authority Accepted into Part I, Part II and Part III for favoring some
the recommendation of the State Government and contractors though there was no urgency.The CO
imposed the said penalty. had approved the said limited Tenders without
going for open Tender, for favoring some parties,
3.8 As the Order passed by the Government violated the provisions of P & T Manual Vol.
was not in accordance with the advice of the II, General Financial Rules and Financial Hand
Commission, it has been treated as a case of non- Book, Vol. I.
acceptance of the advice of the Commission.
III. The Charged Officer, while working
Action Under Rule 14 of as TDM, Latur during the year 1999-2000, in
CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 collusion with four other officials, floated limited
Instituted Against An Officer of Tenders at high rate for PVC flooring for the
Indian Telecom Service three Telephone Exchanges at Shirala, Lamjana
and Ujani and the same was applied for 11 other
4. Major Penalty proceedings under Rule Exchanges in Latur District without going for open
14 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 were initiated Tender for favouring a Construction Company.
against a Group A officer under the Ministry The CO thus violated the provisions of P & T
of Communications & IT, Department of Manual Vol. II, General Financial Rules and
Telecommunications on June 4, 2007, on the Financial Hand Book, Vol. I.
following articles of Charge:
By his aforesaid acts, the CO failed to
I The Charged Officer, while working as maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty
Telecom District Manager(TDM), Latur during and committed grave misconduct unbecoming
the year 2000-2001 and 2002 in collusion with of a Government servant thereby violating
four other officials (the Chief Accounts Officer/ the provisions of Rule 3(1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of
Internal Financial Adviser, Divisional Engineer, CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964.
Senior Accounts Officer and Sub Divisional
Engineer), had approved the financial bid of a 4.1 The CO denied the Charges and an oral
contractor for hiring of vehicle at exorbitant high inquiry was ordered by the Disciplinary Authority.
rates i.e. Rs. 15.50 per km. When compared to The Inquiry Officer submitted his report holding
reference rate of State Government published by Articles (I) and (III) proved and Article (II) not
RTO which works out at Rs. 7.80 per km with proved. The DA agreed with the inquiry findings
20% profit margin, the Department had suffered and after following the prescribed procedure, the
a loss of Rs. 15 lakhs towards actual payment case was referred to the Commission in March,
2011 for advice.
4.2. The Commission on detailed analysis of 4.5 The Commission further observed that the
the case observed with regard to Article (I) that, CO had tried to pass on the blame on the finance
before approving the Tender, the CO should wing by saying that rate reasonableness should
have satisfied himself about the reasonability of have been checked before the TEC meeting;
rate by comparing rates of other SSAs and rate whereas, the CO being the TDM in charge, should
approved in previous years. However, no such have got the tender examined as per prescribed
exercise was seen to have been undertaken by procedures and, therefore, could not escape
the CO before approving the Tender for hiring the responsibility in this regard. This article of
vehicle at the very exorbitantly high rates. The Charge was held as proved by the Commission.
COs contentions were that he had no alternative
but to agree with the recommendation of the 4.6 The Commission noted that the proven
Tender Evaluation Committee (TEC) and also charges against the CO had an element of
to the subsequent negotiations by the negotiating considerable financial loss to the Government
committee with the L1 tenderer. The CO had and also have bearing on the integrity of the
also mentioned that this was in consultation/ CO. Hence, it was concluded that the ends of
agreement and in concurrence with the Internal justice would be met in this case if the penalty of
Financial advisor who had approved the rates. Compulsory Retirement is imposed on the CO.
The Commission had observed that a total of 96 Advice of the Commission was communicated to
bills amounting to Rs. 29 lakhs(approx.) were the DA on July 08, 2011.
found to have been processed/approved by the 4.7 On June 30, 2015 the DA issued final
CO during the period of approximately one year. Order in disagreement with the Commissions
The Commission held this article of Charge Advice, imposing the penalty of reduction to
proved against the CO. a lower stage by three stages in the time-scale
4.3 The Commission noted that the article of of pay for a period of three years, with further
Charge (II) was held not proved by the Inquiry directions that he will not earn increments of pay
Officer and the DA has agreed with the IO. during the period of such reduction and on the
expiry of such period, the reduction will have
4.4 Regarding the Article of Charge (III), the the effect of postponing the future increments of
Commission observed that the limited Tender pay on the CO. It was stated in the final Order
evaluated by the TEC had been approved by the that the DA found advice of the Commission for
CO and the same was found to be applied for 11 imposition of Compulsory Retirement not in
other exchanges in Latur without going for open order, keeping in view the comparative milder
tender enquiry to favor a particular Construction penalties awarded to the other officials involved
Company. The amount paid for the work of 11 in this case (The other officials involved in this
exchanges was more than three lakhs and for case were BSNL employees and hence their cases
such an amount an open tender was necessary were not received in the Commission for advice).
as per departmental norms. The works were Hence, the DA proposed a lesser penalty and
not of urgent nature and it was mere dressing referred the case to Department of Personnel &
up of switch rooms in various exchanges. The Training as they had a different opinion about
reasonableness of the rate was not deliberated on the penalty advised by the Commission. The
record and it was found to be arbitrary. Besides DoP&T advised the DA to furnish a copy of
this, while passing the bill for payment, the CO the Commissions Advice letter to the CO for
had relied on the incomplete certificate given by his representation, if any. The CO submitted his
field unit. representation and the DA, after considering the
same, concluded that the CO had committed the
alleged misconduct but, the penalty advised by of the Charge i.e. the CO allegedly exceeded
the Commission was not in order. In view of his delegated financial powers in sanctioning
the disagreement with the Commissions Advice, deviation statement as proved and imposed
the case was again referred to DoP&T, and the the penalty of reduction to lower stage in the
DoP&T agreed with the decision of the DA. time-scale of pay by one stage for a period of three
years without cumulative effect on September
4.8 As the Order passed by the Government 20, 2013.
was not in accordance with the advice of the
Commission, it has been treated as a case of non- 5.2. Aggrieved by the said penalty, the CO
acceptance of the advice of the Commission. filed an appeal on November 08, 2013 under Rule
23 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 to the Appellate
Appeal Preferred Under Rule Authority/President which was referred to the
23 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 by An Commission for advice in September, 2014.
Assistant Engineer Against
Order Imposing Minor Penalty 5.3. The Commission on detailed analysis of
the case observed that all the elements of Charges
5. Advice of the Commission was sought including the one allegedly held as proved by the
by the Ministry of Urban Development on the DA, were technical in nature. The fact that the
appeal filed by an Assistant Engineer (Civil) in said work was necessitated by the pressing demand
the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) of a genuine nature i.e. missing or broken toilet
against the minor penalty of reduction to lower doors which had been long pending in most of the
stage in the time-scale of pay by one stage for a Quarters, which the Appellant redressed by his
period of three years without cumulative effect prompt action, should not be lost sight of. It was
imposed on him vide Director General, CPWD also seen that neither any malafide on the part of
Order dated September 20, 2013. the Appellant in execution of the said work nor
any monetary misappropriation had been made
5.1 Brief facts of the case were that the Charged
a part of the Charge against him. It was further
Officer was issued a minor penalty Charge Sheet
noted that the actions of the Appellant were in
under Rule 16 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 on
the interest of completing a sensitive work and in
March 25, 2013 on the Charges of irregularities
fact he had taken the initiative of expediting the
such as (i) splitting up of the work (ii) execution
completion of the work and in the process, has
of the work without Technical Sanction (iii)
overlooked certain Administrative procedures.
variance in the market rate of the PVC door
shutters used (iv) providing door shutters outside 5.4 The Commission further observed that
specifications and (v) exceeding financial powers the Appellant had claimed that while initiating
for sanctioning of deviations, committed in the the deviation statement he had followed the
execution of the work of (I) Special Repair to procedure as per standing instructions of the
Residential Quarters, AGMP Colony, Gwalior Superintending Engineer(SE) as no format for
SH: Replacing Toilet door shutters in Type IV sanction of deviation statement had been given in
Quarters and (II) Special Repair to Residential the CPWD Manual Volume II 2007 and also that
Quarters, AGMP Colony, Gwalior SH: Replacing all deviation statements and extra items statements
Toilet door shutters in Type II Quarters, thus were initiated before the preparation of the
violating provisions of CPWD Manual, 2007. In final bills and put up to the Executive Engineer
his reply to the Charge Sheet, the CO refuted the who cleared them without any objection. The
alleged irregularities and asserted his action as reference to the SEs instructions was not cited
justifiable. The Disciplinary Authority considered by the Appellant in his reply to the Charge Sheet
the COs submissions and held only one element
and hence this was a new fact brought up by him Action Taken on the Appeal
which indicated the confusion in his mind and Under Rule 23 of CCS (CCA) Rules,
was perhaps the reason for the misinterpretation 1965 Preferred by An Officer
of the Rules prescribed in this regard. The Belonging to General Central
Commission observed that though the Appellant Services
had lost sight of and transgressed the provisions
of the Works Manual, an overall appreciation of 6. Advice of the Commission was sought by
the case appeared to indicate that the mistakes the Ministry of Earth Sciences in July, 2013 on
were made in good faith and on account of a the Appeal preferred by a Group B Gazetted
misinterpretation of the extant rule provisions and Officer, in compliance of the judgement dated
not with any malafide intent. February 15, 2013 of Honble CAT, Ernakulum
Bench in OA No. 861/2011 filed by the Appellant.
5.5 The Commission observed that while
initiating any disciplinary proceedings it should The Appellant was issued charge sheet on June
also be borne in mind that disciplinary actions 20, 2007 on the following Articles of Charge:
should not reduce but enhance the level of
I. The Appellant, while working as Assistant
managerial efficiency and effectiveness in the
Meteorologist Grade II, submitted a request dated
organization; otherwise, it may lead to paralysis
21.05.2004 for voluntary retirement from service
in decision making. The Commission concluded
w.e.f. 20.08.2004 FN. His request for voluntary
that the penalty of reduction to lower stage in
retirement was duly considered by the competent
the time scale of pay by one stage for a period of
authority, and was rejected. The decision was
three years without cumulative effect imposed on
communicated to the Appellant at his residential
the Appellant was on the high side in proportion
address through OM dated 16.08.2004 issued by
to the technical lapse and it should be modified
the DDGM RMC, Chennai. His request dated
to that of Censure. Advice of the Commission
07.05.2004 for grant of leave from 24.05.2004
was communicated to the Ministry on January
was not granted. He joined duty on 19.08.2004
13, 2015.
but again abstained from work from 25.08.2004
5.6 On July 15, 2015, the Ministry issued without submitting any leave application and
the final Order, rejecting the Appeal preferred by proper grant of leave by appropriate authority.
the Appellant. It was stated in the Order that a Vide letter dated 14.09.2004 he was again asked
copy of the advice letter of the Commission was to report for duty. He did not respond to this office
forwarded to the Appellant and the representation communication showing total disregard to the
submitted by him was considered by the Competent official communication and continued to remain
Authority, who, decided to reject the same as absent willfully. Vide letters No. 14499/521V and
there were no new grounds. It was further stated 14500/521V dated 07.07.2005 he was to report
therein that in view of the disagreement with for duty but he did not do so. Thus he remained
the Commissions Advice, the case was referred absent unauthorisedly w.e.f. 25.08.2004 with
to DoP&T, who in turn, approved the penalty willful intention. His above action is quite
imposed by the Disciplinary Authority, as it was unbecoming of a Government servant violative of
appropriate for the act committed by the CO. Rule 3(1)(iii) of CCS(Conduct)Rules, 1964. Thus
he has committed a major misconduct.
5.7 As the Order passed by the Government
was not in accordance with the Advice of the II. The Appellant, while working as Assistant
Commission, it has been treated as a case of non- Meteorologist Grade II obtained NOC from DDGM
acceptance of the Advice of the Commission. RMC Chennai for taking an Indian Passport.
Later on, vide this office letter dated 14.09.2004
he was asked to submit his original passport to Order, the Appellate Authority referred the
the office. However, he did not obey the orders of case to the Commission for advice on July 18,
the competent authority. He was again reminded 2013. As the case had been submitted belatedly
on 07.07.2005 but no response. His action in not to the Commission, the Ministry was requested
complying with these instructions is violative of to seek appropriate extension of time from the
Rule 3(1)(iii) of CCS(Conduct) Rules, 1964. Honble Tribunal for finalization of the case.
While examining the case, it was observed that
6.1 The Appellant denied the charges and the the Ministry had simply forwarded the case to
case was remitted to inquiry. The inquiry was the Commission for advice, without furnishing
held ex-parte as the Appellant did not participate the comments of the Appellate Authority on the
in the proceedings. The Inquiry Officer held grounds/observations made by the Honble CAT
both the charges as proved and the Disciplinary in its order dated February 15, 2013. Hence, the
Authority agreed with the inquiry findings. case was returned to the Ministry on August 6,
After considering the Appellants representation 2013, with the request to furnish their comments
on the inquiry report as well as other relevant on the Honble CATs observations.
documents, the DA issued Order on March 24,
2009 imposing the penalty of dismissal from 6.4 When no further communication was
service on him. received from the Ministry, a reminder was
issued on June 6, 2014. In response, the Ministry
6.2 Aggrieved by the penalty order, the informed the Commission that with the approval
Appellant preferred an Appeal which was of the Competent Authority, the final Order in this
considered by the Appellate Authority on behalf case has already been issued on September 24,
of the President of India and was referred to the 2013, vide which the penalty of dismissal from
Commission for advice in November, 2009. The service imposed on the Appellant was modified
Commission after detailed analysis of the case, to that of Compulsory Retirement from service.
observed that there was no merit in the Appeal This was in disagreement with the Commissions
preferred by the Appellant and that the penalty advice. The Ministry had further intimated that
imposed on him was not excessive. The advice the Appellate Authority had reviewed the case
of the Commission for rejecting the Appeal was and approved the conversion of the penalty of
communicated to the DA on January 11, 2011. dismissal from service (imposed by the DA) to
Accepting the advice, the Appellate Authority that of Compulsory Retirement in the light of
issued Order on February 15, 2011, rejecting Honble CATs Order dated February 15, 2013.
the Appeal and confirming the penalty imposed Further, due to paucity of time and other factors
earlier on March 24, 2009. including merits of the case, it was not possible to
6.3 On receipt of the Order dated February refer the case back to UPSC again, before issuing
15, 2011, the Appellant filed an OA No. the final Order. According to the Ministry, the
861/2011 at the Honble CAT, Ernakulam Bench points which were considered for review of the
against the decision of the Appellate Authority. decision were: i) Honble CATs Order dated
The Honble CAT, on February 15, 2013, February 15, 2013 for lesser punishment; ii)
quashed the Order dated February 15, 2011 and extension of implementation time till September
directed the Appellate Authority to examine the 30, 2013 only; iii) fear of contempt of Honble
Appeal for the grounds therein and arrive at a CAT if Order not implemented in time; iv) two
judicious conclusion and for awarding a penalty meetings held with UPSC and reference already
commensurate with the gravity of misconduct, made to UPSC; v) UPSC intimation that they
within a period of four months of date of issue of take 3-4 months time for giving advice; and vi)
the Order. In compliance of the Honble CATs gravity of the offence.
6.5 The Commission observed that the procedure of consultation with the Commission
Honble CAT, in their Judgement dated February on the grounds of fear of contempt of Court and
15, 2013 had not specified any penalty to be not taking up this matter with the Department of
imposed on the Appellant, except expressing Personnel & Training (in the event of disagreeing
an opinion about the harshness or gravity of with the Commission) was not in order. This
the penalty. The Ministry, thereafter, submitted matter was brought to the notice of the Ministry
the case to UPSC on July 18, 2013 i.e. almost of Earth Sciences and also of DoP&T (being the
after five months for advice, that too without concerned authority in non-acceptance cases).
the comments of the Appellate Authority on DoP&T, in turn, took up the matter with the
the observations of the Honble CAT. The case Ministry of Earth Sciences for investigation of
was, therefore, returned by the Commission to non-compliance of procedure. Simultaneously, the
the Administrative Ministry on August 6, 2013, DoP&T, on March 2, 2016, issued instructions to
to first ensure compliance of the observations all the Ministries/Departments of Government of
of the Honble CAT made in their Order dated India emphasizing the need for compliance of the
February 15, 2013. The Ministry, however, prescribed procedure in disagreement cases.
did not refer the case back to UPSC and the
penalty was converted to Compulsory Retirement 6.6 As the final Order passed by the
from service without seeking the advice of the Government is not in accordance with the advice
Commission. The action of the Ministry in issuing of the Commission, it has been treated as a case of
the final Order without completing the prescribed non-acceptance of the advice of the Commission.
Chapter - 10
Delay in issuance of offers of appointment to be made even though period of more than one
to the candidates recommended by the year had elapsed [as compared to 24 cases of last
Commission on the basis of results of year] since the recommendations were made. Of
various Examinations the remaining 193 cases, 191 are where the offer
has been delayed by one year and above but less
2. There were a total of 349 cases, as on than two years, one case is where the offer has
March 31, 2016 where offers of appointment to been delayed by two years and above but less
the candidates recommended by the Commission than three years and in one case offer has been
on the basis of results of various Examinations delayed by three years and above but less than
were delayed by the Ministries/Departments for four years. The breakup of the 349 cases in terms
more than one year. Of these cases 156 cases of their pendency vis-a-vis the previous year, is
were such where offers of appointments were yet indicated in Table-2.
Sl. Period of No. of cases in which offers of No. of cases in which offers of
No. Delay appointment issued but delayed appointment not yet issued
Position as on Position as on Position as on Position as on
March 31, 2015 March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015 March 31, 2016
1. 4 years and 0 0 18 10
above
2. 3-4 years 0 0 2 4
3. 2-3 years 1 1 6 7
4. 1-2 years 6 13 18 22
Total 7 14 44 43
Chapter - 11
Budgetary position during 2015-16 charged on the Consolidated Fund of India. The
Budget provisions and utilization of funds during
5. Article 322 of the Constitution provides the last five years is given at Table-2.
that the expenses of the Commission shall be
Table - 2
(Rupees in lakh)
Chapter - 12
Miscellaneous
Right to Information Act, 2005 q) RTI Applications - First Appeals and their replies
1. The Commission is a Public Authority r) Previous Notifications - Orders of CPIOs
under Section 2 (h) of the Right to Information -Appellate Authority (July 2011 onward)
Act, 2005. Accordingly, 32 Central Public 3. The details of RTI Applications and Appeals
Information Officers (CPIOs) and 13 Appellate received and disposed off are given in Table 1.
Authorities were designated under the Act, as on
March 31, 2016. Table 1
S.No. Particular Number
2. To facilitate dissemination of information under
1 Total number of RTI 5630
the Act, as a proactive measure, the following
Applications received
information is available on the Commissions
during the year 2015-16
website:-
2 Total number of RTI 629
a) The Commission Appeals received during
b) Organization chart of the Secretariat of the the year 2015-16
Commission RTI Applications and appeals were disposed off
c) List of Subjects within the time limit prescribed under the RTI
d) List of Senior Officers of JS (Director) level and Act, 2005.
above in the office of UPSC
Foundation Day of the Commission
e) Channels of submission from JS and above
f) Statement of Committees consisting of two or 4. The Commission celebrated its 89th
more persons constituted for purpose of advice Foundation Day on October 1, 2015. The
g) Write up on the Complaints Committee for function was attended by the Chairman/ Members/
Prevention of Harassment of women at work place former Chairmen/ Members and the officers and
h) Liaison Officer for SC, ST, PWDs, ESM and staff of the Commission. A cultural programme
OBCs was also presented on the occasion by staff of the
Commission.
i) List of Appellate Authority & CPIOs in UPSC
j) Guidelines for CPIOs Workshop on ICT and Pre and Post-Exam-
k) Details of monthly receipt and disposal of RTI ination Aspects of Data Management
applications
l) RTI Quarterly Returns
5. Pursuant to the decision taken in the
fourth meeting of the Chiefs of Public Service
m) Record Retention Schedule, 2015 of UPSC
Commissions of SAARC Member States held
n) Details of Appropriation UPSC (Charged)
in Bangladesh, the Commission organized a
o) Information regarding domestic and foreign visits Workshop on ICT and Pre and Post-Examination
of Officers of UPSC Aspects of Data Management for delegates from
p) Pay Structure of Group A Officers of the Public Service Commission of SAARC Member
Commission States on November 1-2, 2015. Delegates from all
SAARC Member States and SAARC Secretariat, Visits by Representative of State Public
Kathmandu attended the Workshop. Service Commission
Visits of Foreign Delegates 11. Chairmen and Members from State Public
Service Commission of Bihar, Jammu & Kashmir
6. A delegation led by Honble Chairman, and Gujarat visited the Commission during the
Bangladesh Public Service Commission visited year and held discussion on issues of mutual
the Commission and held interaction/discussion interests. Secretary and Controller of Examination
on various issues of mutual interest. of Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission also
Meeting of the Secretaries of State Public visited the Commission.
Service Commission Publication of Half-yearly Newsletter of
7. The second meeting of the Secretaries of State Public Service Commissions
State Public Service Commission was held under 12. Two Half-yearly Newsletters of Public
the chairmanship of Secretary of the Commission Service Commissions (for the periods January to
on June 16, 2015. June and July to December) are being published
UPSC (Exemption from Consultation) Reg- every year after obtaining necessary inputs/
ulations, 1958 data from State Public Service Commissions
and various Branches in the Commission. The
8. During 2015-16, the Commission Newsletter contains information on the activities
considered and gave its observations in 08 of the Commission and all State Public Service
proposals received from the Government Commissions. The 67th, 68th and 69th issues of the
seeking exemption from consultation with the Newsletter were published during the year.
Commission. The list of posts/ Services exempted
from the purview of the Commission since the Progressive use of Hindi in official work
issue of the UPSC (Exemption from Consultation) 13. The Commission continued to make sincere
Regulations, 1958 as on March 31, 2016 is given and concerted efforts to ensure compliance of the
at Appendix-32. provisions of the Official Language Act/Rules as
Seniority and Service matters also the various orders/instructions issued by the
Department of Official Language from time to
9. The Commission tendered advice in 06 time regarding the progressive use of Hindi for
cases relating to inter-se-seniority and 02 cases official purposes.
relating to miscellaneous service matters. A
comparative statement showing the number of Implementation of Governments Lan-
seniority and service related matters on which the guage Policy and Programmes
advice was tendered by the Commission during 14. The Commission has a Hindi Branch
2014-15 and 2015-16 is given at Appendix-3. under the charge of a Director (Official language)
Orientation course for Staff/Officers of with two Deputy Director (Official Language),
State Public Service Commission four Assistant Directors (Official Language), and
other supporting staff. Apart from guiding and
10. One-day Orientation course for Officers/ monitoring the implementation of the Official
staff of State Public Service Commissions on language policy and programs of the Government,
Computer Based Recruitment Test (CBRT) was this Branch also performs the work relating to the
held in the Commission on November 11, 2015. translation of documents, which are required to
be issued in Hindi or bilingually.
The Official Language Implementation who have performed their maximum official
Committee work in Hindi.
15. During 2015-16, four meetings of the Hindi Divas and Hindi Pakhwara
Official Language Implementation Committee of
the Commission were held and necessary follow- 20. Hindi Pakhwara (Fortnight) was organized
up action was taken to implement its decisions. from September 01, 2015 to September 15, 2015.
The Pakhwara started with an appeal made by
Correspondence in Hindi the Chairman of the Commission, requesting the
officers/officials of the Commission to perform
16. In pursuance of Section 3(3) of the their maximum official work in Hindi. During
Official Language Act, 1963, general orders, this period, competitions on Noting and Drafting
resolutions, notifications, press communiqus, in Hindi, Essay writing and typing in Hindi were
administrative reports, tender notices, tender held. To conclude the Hindi Pakhwara, the main
forms, etc., were issued bilingually during 2015- function was organized on September 14, 2015
16. Correspondence with offices located in A under the Chairmanship of Honble Chairman of
and B regions were generally carried out in USPC, Shri Deepak Gupta wherein Prizes and
Hindi. Certificates were distributed.
Training in Hindi Inspections
17. During 2015-16, 06 stenographers 21. The use of Hindi is closely monitored
received stenography training and 29 officials through scrutiny and review of Quarterly Progress
received typing training under Hindi Teaching Reports received from the Sections and also
Scheme. through O&M meetings conducted by the Branch
Hindi Workshop Heads and inspections by Assistant Directors
of the Official Language Branch. During 2015-
18. In order to encourage the officers/ 16, a total of 40 Sections in the Commission
officials of the Commission to perform their were inspected for compliance with the Official
official work in Hindi, 04 workshops were Language Policy and Programmes.
organized during 2015-16.
Training Programme on Records
Cash Awards and Incentive Schemes Management
19. In accordance with the Incentive Scheme 22. Two days training programme on
of the Raj Bhasha Vibhag to encourage the Records Management was organised in UPSC
officers/officials for doing their official work on 7th and 8th December, 2015 with the help of
originally in Hindi, the Commission awarded National Archives of India (NAI). 34 Officers
02 first prizes of `2000/- each, 03 second prizes of the Commission participated in the Training
of `1200/- each, 05 third prizes of ` 600/- each Programme. The content of the training
and 16 consolation prizes of ` 400/- each to its programme is given below:
officers/officials. Similarly, 02 cash prizes of
`2000/- each and certificates were also given i) Records Management: Introduction,
under the Incentives Scheme for Officers for Definition & Scope
giving dictation in Hindi. In addition to these ii) Archival Legislation Public Records
incentives provided under the Official Language Act, 1993
Policy, the Commission is also implementing an iii) Archival Legislation Public Records
Incentive Scheme for rewarding those Sections Rules, 1997
iv) Records Creation (Filing System) efforts led to reduction in the examination cycle,
from receipt of application to declaration of
v) Records Retention Schedule & Role of results.
DRO
Examination Reforms
vi) Recording, Reviewing & Appraisal
26. Examination Reforms Branch of the
vii) Classified Records Management & Commission carries out detailed statistical analysis
Downgrading of different examinations on a regular basis to
viii) Challenges for Records Managers in view monitor the quality of question papers. This
of RTI Act, 2005 analysis is essential to ensure the effectiveness of
the tests administered and to carry out required
ix) Departmental Records Room Layout & changes and improvements in the scheme of
Setup testing.
23. In this training programme, participants 27. Detailed analysis of candidates community,
learned about records management, its need, age, gender, qualification and university in the
scope and definition, the Public Record Act, 1993 Civil Services (Main) Examination, Engineering
and the Public Record Rules, 1997, conventional Services Examination and Indian Forest Service
and functional file numbering systems, need of (Main) Examination is also carried out.
Records Retention Schedule (RRS), Classification
of files, role of DRO, files recording, periodic Penalties imposed on candidates for
reviewing, appraisal, weeding out and procedure misrepresentation and other malpractices.
to send files to NAI, Management of Classified (i) Examination
Records, RTI Act 2005, Challenges for Records
Manager in view of RTI Act, 2005. 28. During 2015-16, 13 cases of malpractices
committed by the candidates came to the
Technological Induction notice of the Commission. These malpractices
24. During the last few years, the Commission inter alia included suppression of information,
has inducted information and Communication submission of false information/fabricated
Technologies in the examination system. The documents by tampering the e-Admit Cards of
principal objective of this technological induction other candidates, using unfair means and copying
is to connect all the stakeholders and support the etc. The Commission took serious note of such
processes and activities to make the functioning cases and, after following the due process,
of the Commission more efficient, effective imposed penalties on the delinquent candidates,
and transparent within the candidate friendly ranging from cancellation of their candidature
environment. to their debarment from future Examinations/
Selections conducted by the Commission, for
25. ICT is used in the receipt of applications, periods varying from five years to permanent
distribution of admit cards and declaration of debarment.
results. Some examinations viz. Combined
Medical Service Exam. 2016 and 16 cases of (ii) Direct Recruitment by Selection
Recruitment Tests for direct recruitment by 29. During 2015-16, there is no case of
selection are conducted in computer based mode. debarment/disqualification of candidates in Direct
Use of new high end OMR machines has resulted Recruitment by Selection cases.
in quicker evaluation of answer Sheets. These
Acknowledgement
The Commission would like to place on record their sincere thanks to the Ministries and
Departments of Government of India, State Governments, the Administration of Union Territories, State
Public Service Commissions, Universities and other Institutions for the valuable help and co-operation
rendered by them, but for which it would not have been possible to discharge their Constitutional
functions.
The Commission also expresses its deep appreciation of the hard work and efficient performance
of duties by the officers and other members of the staff.
Appendix-1
Profiles of Honble Chairman and Members of the Commission
Development, where a number of systems were a Masters programme in History at the North-
devised for ensuring a high quality of rural roads, Eastern Hill University (1974-1976). In 1977 he
which were subsequently adopted in other states went back to teach under-graduates in his alma
also. mater before joining the Department of History,
NEHU in 1979. He rose to become Professor of
In the course of her career with the State History. Concurrent with this position, he held
Government, she took up a number of new at different times the offices of Dean Students
innovations in the field of health including the very Welfare, Proctor, Director, College Development
successful programme of universal immunization Council, and Head Department of History,
in her District in 1981 which aimed at coverage NEHU. He was Controller of Examinations,
of all children below 5 years of age, against five NEHU (2008-2010). He officiated as Registrar of
vaccine preventable diseases including polio. The the University (2010). Prof. Syiemlieh was Pro-
approach adopted was similar to that subsequently Vice-Chancellor, North-Eastern Hill University
adopted in the modern day national Pulse Polio (2010-2011).
Programme.
The President of India as Visitor, Rajiv Gandhi
In Government of India she has served in University, Itanagar, appointed Prof. David
the Department of Defence Production and Syiemlieh, Vice-Chancellor of the University in
subsequently as Additional Secretary in the September 2011. He assumed charge of the office
Department of Consumer Affairs, where she was on 5 October 2011. During his tenure at RGU,
closely associated with the designing of a multi Prof. Syiemlieh put the University on track. The
media campaign for consumer awareness titled Convocation was held after a period of three years;
Jago Grahak Jago. She has been Secretary, statutory meeting required by the University were
Department of Food and Public Distribution in put in place and the administration was geared up
Government of India from September, 2008 till to implement the XIth Plan and finalise the XIIth
October, 2010, and Secretary, Department of Plan document. Steps were also taken to initiate
Personnel and Training from November, 2010, academic and examination reforms. RGU was
which charge she held till January, 2012. During host to a number of seminars and conferences.
this period, she was closely associated with the The University received in its campus a number
drafting of several anti-corruption legislations. of dignitaries including the US Ambassador to
She studied at Loreto Degree College, Lucknow, India and a delegation of European Ambassadors
and the Lucknow University, from where she to India. Prof. Syiemlieh was given a warm send
completed her Post Graduation. She was awarded off by the students, staff and teachers of RGU.
six Gold Medals and the Parliament Prize by the Awarded an M.Phil in 1980 he continued research
University for all round excellence in academics. and was conferred the PhD in 1985. Prof.
She has a long experience of Personnel David Syiemlieh taught courses on capitalism
Management. and imperialism, modern Indian history and
the history of Christianity in North East India.
Smt. Alka Sirohi joined as Member, UPSC on He successfully guided 14 scholars through the
04.01.2012. M.Phil and 8 scholars for the Ph.D degrees and
has been mentor to many more scholars. He
Prof. DAVID R. SYIEMLIEH has received a number of prestigious academic
Prof. David R. Syiemlieh studied in St. Edmunds fellowships including a Senior Fulbright
College, Shillong, where he graduated with Fellowship to Notre Dame University, USA; a
Honours in History (1974). He then pursued Charles Wallace Grant for research in the UK
and an Indo-France Cultural Exchange grant for University Chandigarh (UT). Joined the Indian
research in Paris. Actively engaged in historical Foreign Service in 1976.
research he has published a number of books and
papers on the history of the region. His more Posted to Iran as Third Secretary in 1978 and
recent publications are On the Edge of Empire: promoted to Second Secretary in 1979. From
Four British Plans for North East India, (Sage 1982 to 1985, served as Deputy Consul General
Publications, 2014) and Layers of History: Essays in Toronto, Canada. From 1985-1989, served at
on the Khasi-Jaintias, (Regency Publications, Headquarters as Deputy Secretary in charge of
2015). His research has enabled him to travel Press Relations. Briefed foreign journalists on
extensively in India and abroad. He has given political developments in India, Indias foreign
lectures in different Universities in the US while relations and economic developments. From
on the Fulbright Fellowship. He has delivered 1989 1992, served as Counsellor (Commerce
lectures at the Centre for South Asian Studies, & Economics) in former USSR and later the
Cambridge University; Edinburgh University; Russian Republic. From 1992 1995, served as
Swansea University; Indira Gandhi National Minister at the Embassy of India in the United
Centre for the Arts, New Delhi; Jawaharlal Nehru Arab Emirates. Served from 1999 to 2002 as
University and in the Universities and research Chief of Protocol at Headquarters in New Delhi.
institutions in North East India. Organized all outgoing and incoming visits of the
Presidents, the Prime Ministers and the Foreign
Prof. David R. Syiemlieh was President of the Ministers during the period as well as looked
North East India History Association, 2010-2011, after the accreditation, privileges & facilitation
an association specializing on the history of North of the Diplomatic Corps in India. Served as
East India and built up with other long standing Ambassador of India to Hungary from 2002 to
members of the association. Former Honorary 2005 with concurrent accreditation to Bosnia &
Director of the ICSSR-NERC, Shillong, he was Herzegovina and Slovenia. Served as Ambassador
Council Member for two terms of the Indian of India to Iran from 2005 to 2008. Served as
Council of Historical Research, New Delhi. He Ambassador to Netherlands from 2008 to 2010.
was also Council Member of the Indian Council Also was Indias representative to Convention
of Social Science Research, New Delhi. Prof. on Prevention of Chemical Weapons and
Syiemlieh was elected President of the Modern the International Court of Justice. Served at
India Section, Indian History Congress and Headquarters from July 2010 to September 2011
delivered his address at the 73rd session - Mumbai as Secretary (Economic Relations) at the Ministry
University in December 2012. He attended of External Affairs. Looked after matters relating
and made a presentation at the international to BRICS, Indian Ocean Rim Counties, G15,
conference Enhancing the Efficiency of Civil OECD and other bi-lateral and multilateral
Servants through Capacity Development of economic issues.
Civil Servants, 11-12 September 2014 at Baku,
Azerbaijan. Appointed as Member, Union Public Service
Commission on 03.09.2012.
Prof. David R. Syiemlieh joined as Member, the
Union Public Service Commission on 25 June Vice Admiral (Retd.) D.K. DEWAN
2012. Vice Admiral D.K. Dewan, PVSM, AVSM
retired on 31 August 2011 as Vice Chief of
Shri Manbir Singh
Naval Staff (VCNS) after 38 years of glorious
Born on 13th September, 1951. M.A. Economics service.
from Department of Economics, Panjab
Vice Admiral D.K. Dewan, an alumnus of National Organization and 1 Premier Educational Institute
Defence Academy, Pune was commissioned in for training of Group A Officers. As Chairman,
the Indian Navy on 1st July 1973. During his Railway Board, Shri Mittal provided strategic
career Vice Admiral Dewan held numerous key leadership and direction in the running of the
appointments including the Chief of Personnel Indian Railway system professionally, policy
from July 2007 to July 2009 and the Vice Chief formulation and planning covering all aspects
of Naval Staff from 31 August 2009 to 31 August of Railway working, induction and assimilation
2011. of technologies, development of Railways vast
human resource of a work force of almost 1.4
His tenure as the VCNS is marked with some million, positioning of key senior level functionaries
special achievements viz. he ensured 100% and their teams to ensure accomplishment of
utilisation of naval budget in the last two Corporate objectives, goals and targets; as
fiscal years with over 80% increase in capital also presiding over Departmental Promotion
expenditure. He was instrumental in promulgation Committees for empanelment of incumbents
of the 15 year Maritime Capability Perspective to HAG level officers in the Railways. In the
Plan 2012-2027. capacity of Chairman, Railway Board Shri Mittal
Qualified as a Gunnery Officer in 1978, Vice was the interface with the higher bureaucracy
Admiral D.K. Dewan had distinguished himself of the Government of India, including PMO,
in various courses in India and abroad. He had Cabinet Secretariat and the Planning Commission.
done an advanced missile course in Russia, was He represented the Ministry of Railways in
a graduate of the Joint Staff Course, Paris and various Inter-Ministerial Groups, Committees
the Naval Higher Command Course at the Royal of Secretaries and other such high level forums.
College of Defence Studies, London. Shri Mittal also contributed significantly to the
effective fulfillment of sectoral requirements of
Vice Admiral (Retd.) D.K. Dewan was appointed various Ministries/ Departments.
as Member, UPSC on 01.07.2013.
As Chairman, Railway Board, Shri Mittal also
Shri VINAY MITTAL held the position of Ex-Officio Chairman of
the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of
Born on June 20, 1953 at Saharanpur (Uttar India Ltd (DFCCIL), which has been set up
Pradesh), Shri Vinay Mittal, was an alumnus for constructing the two iconic high technology
of Doon School, Dehradun and St. Stephens freight corridors of over 3000 kms on the
College, Delhi from where he did his B.A. (Hons.) Eastern and Western flanks of the country being
English Literature, and he also subsequently attempted on a scale of this magnitude for the
studied Law from Delhi University. first time in India. During Shri Mittals tenure the
Project witnessed significant progress including
A 1975 Batch Indian Railway Traffic Service
completion of over 90% Land acquisition, issue
(IRTS) officer, Shri Vinay Mittal, was the
of almost all the required environmental and
Chairman, Railway Board (CRB) and Ex-officio
forest clearances, as also award of the World
Principal Secretary to the Government of India till
Bank aided major civil construction contract for
June 30, 2013. During his long career spanning
the 343 kms portion from Khurja to Kanpur on
38 years, Shri Mittal held various key positions
the Eastern Corridor, and JICA aided 641 kms
in the Indian Railways. As CRB he was the
Rewari-Iqbalgarh Western Corridor.
Head of the apex level decision making body of
Indian Railways and his responsibilities entailed It was largely due to Shri Mittals efforts that all
overseeing the working and performance of 17 the PSUs, under the Ministry of Railways, except
Zonal Railways, 7 Production Units, 1 Research DFCCIL and IRFC, were granted full functional
autonomy with redesignation of their Heads of in 1973 from the same university. Later she
Office as Chairman-cum-Managing Directors completed her Ph.D in Education from the North
which facilitated substantial autonomy in these Eastern Hill University (NEHU) in 1992.
Organisations. Shri Mittal was the recipient of
the prestigious Railway Ministers Award (MR Dr. P. Kilemsungla began her career as a
Award) in 1981 for outstanding performance at Lecturer in the Kohima Arts College in 1974.
all India level. He was awarded Certificate in From there she joined the Nagaland College
Transport Management and Containerization by of Teachers Education in 1975. In 1992, she
University of Wales, College of Cardiff, UK became the Principal of the first District Institute
in 1992, and was also conferred Best Project of Educational Training (DIET) in Nagaland.
Award by Department of Maritime Studies While serving as the Principal of the DIET, she
and International Transport. When he was the pioneered in the training of community leaders
General Manager of the North Western Railway for ensuring qualitative elementary education in
during 2009-2011 the Zonal Railway was able the State. She later served as the Principal of the
to achieve significant improvements in all the Government Polytechnic in Kohima from 1996-
operational and infrastructural parameters and 2002. Here she facilitated the empowerment of the
was consequently awarded 5 inter-railway Shields youth outside the system of technical education
in the National Awards for outstanding services with technical skills through Community
2011, conferred on an all India Zonal Railway Polytechnic Scheme. From 2002-2007 she
basis, during the 56th Railway Week. served as the Principal of the Nagaland College
of Teachers Education (NCTE).
Shri Mittal visited USA, China and other
countries on several occasions as a part of the Dr. P. Kilemsungla, throughout her career, has
Indian delegations deputed to undertake various been a member on various national and state
high level studies on various aspects of railway committees and has made vital contributions in
technology and working. He has also undergone the educational and social arena of the State.
various trainings in USA, U.K and France. She was an Expert Member on the National
Committee on Capacity Building of Teacher
He was appointed Member, UPSC on 8th August Education. She was the State Co-ordinator on
2013. the project of Community Development through
Polytechnics. She served as a Member on the
Dr. (Mrs.) P. KILEMSUNGLA Nagaland State Women Empowerment Action
Dr. (Mrs.) P. Kilemsungla is a current Member of Committee for Womens Empowerment. She has
the Union Public Service Commission. She is the served as a Member of the Executive Council and
first to be appointed to the UPSC from the State of the Board of Undergraduate Studies, Nagaland
Nagaland. Prior to her present appointment, she University and also as a Member on the Advisory
served as a Member, and also Acting Chairman Board of the National Curriculum Framework.
of the Nagaland Public Service Commission. Dr. She has also served as a Team Member for a
Kilemsungla is widely recognised in the State World Bank Project on Technical Education in
of Nagaland for her contributions in the field of Nagaland. While she was in service, she went to
education. Denmark for the study of Danish Democracy in
2001. She also attended a programme of Special
Born and brought up in Mokokchung town. She Education in Harvard University, USA in 2003.
had her schooling in Mokokchung and College
in Shillong (Lady Keane College, Shillong). While a Member of the NPSC, Dr. Kilemsungla
She received her Bachelor of Arts from Gauhati initiated a common curriculum for the Nagaland
University in 1971, and M.A. in Education Civil Services Examinations. This has been
implemented from 2012 onwards and has been to November 2009; Principal Secretary to Chief
highly successful in delivering justice to all Minister and Chief Coordinator, Investment
candidates coming from different streams of Promotion Centre, Government of Haryana, New
studies and increase in the number of candidates. Delhi from November 2009 till August 2013.
She is a recipient of Padma Shree Award for the Appointed as Member, Union Public Service
year 2014 (Literature & Social Science). Commission on 2nd September 2013.
in Management of Students affairs beginning as consumer and employee survey for the postal
a warden and culminating as Dean of Students. services and inputs from experts on induction of
He also served as Vice Chancellor of Chaudhary technology and modern management practices
Charan Singh University, Meerut between July, in postal operations in India. He also underwent
2011 to September, 2011. He was also involved a program for trainers at the University of
in handling of confidential work in connection Manchester in U.K.
with GATE entrance as well as various State
Entrance Examinations. He joined the Research & Analysis Wing of the
Cabinet Secretariat in 1988 and specialised in
Appointed as Member, UPSC on 15.05.2014. study of strategic developments in neighbouring
countries. Served in five countries and Jammu
Shri Arvind Saxena & Kashmir, he travelled extensively, attaining
Shri Arvind Saxena studied Civil Engineering domain specialisation in developments relating
at the Delhi College of Engineering and did his to China, Pakistan and other regional countries
M.Tech. in Systems & Management from the as well as economic, military, international
Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi in terrorism and S&T issues. He took over as
1978. During the study programs, he worked Special Secretary in-charge of the Aviation
with Hindustan Photo Films in Ootacamund, Research Centre in 2014, where he continued till
Tamil Nadu, Operations Research Group, a he demitted charge in May 2015. Shri Arvind
Sarabhai Group company in Baroda, Gujarat and, Saxena joined as Member, UPSC on May 08,
Engineering Projects (India) Ltd. in New Delhi 2015.
gaining experience in management and control of Prof. (Dr.) Pradeep Kumar Joshi
large and complex projects.
Professor (Dr.) Pradeep Kumar Joshi is current
Selected for the Civil Services, he joined the Indian Member of Union Public Service Commission.
Postal Service in 1978. He worked as Divisional Prior to this, he served as Chairman, Chhattisgarh
Head of Postal Services at Bharatpur and Kota, Public Service Commission and also Chairman,
covering the districts of Bharatpur, Dhoulpur, Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission.
Kota, Jhalawar and Baran in Rajasthan. He was He also served as Director, National Institute
brought to Delhi in 1982 to take over as Officer of Educational Planning & Administration
on Special Duty, in-charge of arrangements for (NIEPA), [Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India]
postal services for the IX Asian Games and the (now the position of Director has been changed
7th Non-Aligned Summit Meet. After handling to Vice Chancellor & NIEPA has been changed
these assignments, he took over as Philately to NUEPA (National University of Educational
Officer at the Postal Directorate in New Delhi Planning & Administration). Prof. Joshi did his
and subsequently as OSD for modernisation of Post Graduate Degree in Commerce in 1977
the Stamps and Seals Factory in Aligarh. He was and Ph.D. Degree in Commerce in 1981 from
posted as Director, Mail Planning Operations Kanpur University, Kanpur. Professor Joshi has
at Bombay, looking after mail arrangements in been in the field of education for more than 28
the states of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Madhya years. He served as the Professor, Head & Dean,
Pradesh before being selected as Principal of the Faculty of Management Studies, Rani Durgavati
prestigious P&T Training Centre at Saharanpur, University, Jabalpur (MP) since May 2000 to 12th
U.P. During this assignment he worked with the June 2006. He also served as the Chairman, Board
Committee of Experts for Excellence in Postal of Studies and Chairman, R.D.C. in Business
Services. He drafted papers for this Committee, Administration, Rani Durgavati University,
which included reports on the largest ever Jabalpur (MP) during that period (till June 2006).
Prior to that, he served Department of Business Member, Central Advisory Board of Education
Administration, Rohilkhand University, Bareilly (CABE) this is the highest advisory body to
(UP) and Bareilly College, Bareilly (UP) as advise the Central and State Governments in
Reader. the field of education. Professor Joshi has been
an eminent researcher and educationist having
Professor Joshi has held several administrative more than 28 years of teaching experience. He
positions during his tenure as an Educator. He specialized in the field of Financial Management,
has been the Member of various National and Financial Control, Management Accounting,
State Level Committees under the Govt of India. Taxation, Rural Development Management,
He was the Member at State Level Committee for Management in Panchayati Raj Institution &
the Commemoration of 50th Anniversary of Indian Khadi Gramodyog etc. He has published and
Republic in Ministry of Culture, Government presented research papers in several national and
of India; Former Member, Steering Committee international conferences and seminars. Being
Commission for Reform in Education under an active educationist, he has delivered lectures
the Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India; Former and had academic interactions in various foreign
Member Steering Committee-cum-clearing countries like Belgium, Holland, England, Nepal
House for Distance Education under the Ministry and Japan. He has supervised 19 scholars for their
of HRD, Government of India; Former Member, Ph.D. Degree and around 24 Dissertations have
National Resource Group for Sarva Shiksha been submitted under his guidance. Professor
Abhiyan [SSA], Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India; Joshi, Joined as Member, UPSC on May 12,
Former Member, Teacher Education Approval 2015.
Board, Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India; Former
Appendix-2
(Vide Chapter 3, 4 & 7)
Appendix-3
(Vide Chapter 12)
Recommendations made by the Commission Relating to Exemption cases,
Service matters, Seniority etc.
S. Particulars No. of cases
No.
2015-16 2014-15 Percent variation
Examinations conducted by Union Public Service Commission in the year 2015 -16
Sl. Name of Examinations No. of Number of applicants Number of candidates who actually Number of candidates Interviewed/ Number of candidates recommended RPR
No. posts appeared whose service records were evaluated for appointment
Annual Report 2015-16
Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C.
2. Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2015 -- 14927 2229 1147 4048 14626 2169 1118 3965 - - - - - - - - -
4. Engineering Services Examination, 2015 481 250041 49061 16952 60802 92817 14036 5914 26272 1116 183 90 315 434 73 36 121 0.90
TOTAL 2966 2920392 568384 179783 823036 1527282 223767 79789 471202 11852 898 336 2775 2594 373 182 763 0.87
Examinations conducted by Union Public Service Commission in the year 2014-15 but completed/finalised in
the year 2015 -16
Sl. Name of Examinations No. of Number of applicants Number of candidates who actually Number of candidates Interviewed/ Number of candidates recommended RPR
No. posts appeared whose service records were evaluated for appointment
Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C. Total S.C. S.T. O.B.C.
1. Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2014 1364 16706* 2427* 1231* 3812* 16286* 2337* 1192* 3728* 3303 462 222 1071 1363a 196 98 369 0.99
4. Combined Defence Services Examination, 464 244911* 40091* 12243* 64844* 111464* 11024* 3908* 30582* 4802 133 61 1005 301 1 2 35 0.65
(II), 2014
TOTAL 3596 1444107* 260877* 73987* 450472* 119759 12937* 4354 35577 17112 888 378 3934 2756 236 118 500 0.77
77
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix-6
Number of candidates recommended during the year 2015-16 through reserve list
in respect of examinations in which reserve list rule is applicable
Appendix-7
(Vide Chapter-3)
1. Civil Services Examination, 2015 xvi) Indian Defence Estates Service, Group
A.
For recruitment to services and posts:
xvii) Indian Information Service (Junior Grade),
i) Indian Administrative Service. Group A.
ii) Indian Foreign Service. xviii) Indian Trade Service, Group A (Gr. III)
iii) Indian Police Service. xix) Indian Corporate Law Service, Group A
iv) Indian P & T Accounts & Finance Service, xx) Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service,
Group A. Group B (Section Officers Grade).
v) Indian Audit and Accounts Service, xxi) Delhi, Andaman & Nicobar Islands,
Group A. Lakshadweep, Daman & Diu and Dadra
vi) Indian Revenue Service (Customs and & Nagar Haveli Civil Service, Group B.
Central Excise) , Group A. xxii) Delhi, Andaman & Nicobar Islands,
vii) Indian Defence Accounts Service, Group Lakshadweep, Daman & Diu and Dadra
A. & Nagar Haveli Police Service, Group B
viii) Indian Revenue Service (I.T.), Group A. xxiii) Pondicherry Civil Service, Group B
ix) Indian Ordnance Factories Service xxiv) Pondicherry Police Service, Group B
Group A (Assistant Works Manager, 2. Engineering Services Examination, 2015
Administration).
Combined competitive examination for
x) Indian Postal Service, Group A. recruitment to services/ posts:
xi) Indian Civil Accounts Service, Group A. Category I - civil engineering:
xii) Indian Railway Traffic Service, Group Group A Services/Posts:
A.
i) Indian Railway Service of Engineers.
xiii) Indian Railway Accounts Service, Group
A. ii) Indian Railway Stores Services (Civil
Engineering Posts).
xiv) Indian Railway Personnel Service, Group
A. iii) Central Engineering Service.
xv) Post of Assistant Security Commissioner iv) Indian Defence Service of Engineers (Civil
in Railway Protection Force, Group A Engineering Posts).
vi) Central Engineering Service (Roads) iv) Indian Naval Armament Service (Electrical
Group A (Civil Engg. Posts). Engineering Posts).
vii) Asstt. Executive Engineer (Civil) P & T v) Indian Ordnance Factories Service. AWM/
Building Works Gr. A Service. JTS (Electrical Engineering Posts)
viii) Asstt. Executive Engineer (QS & C) in vi) Central Power Engineering Service
Military Engineer Service (MES) Surveyor (Electrical Engineering Posts).
Cadre
vii) Indian Defence Service of Engineers
Category II - Mechanical Engineering: (Electrical Engineering Posts).
5. Combined Defence Services Exami- iv) Indo- Tibetan Border Police. (ITBP)
nations (II), 2015 and Combined Defence v) Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)
Services Examinations (I),2016.
8.
Indian Economic Service/ Indian
For Admission To: Statistical Service Examination, 2015.
i) Indian Military Academy. Combined competitive examination for
ii) Indian Naval Academy. recruitment to the following services:
iv) Officers Training Academy, SSC Course ii) Indian Statistical Service
(for Men). 9. Combined Geo- Scientist and Geologist
vi) Officers Training Academy, SSC Women Examination, 2015.
(Non-Technical) Course. For Recruitment To Posts:
6. Combined Medical Services Category-I
Examination, 2015.
(Posts in the Geological Survey of India,
Combined examination for recruitment to Ministry of Mines).
services/ posts:
i) Geologist, Group A
i) Assistant Divisional Medical Officer in the
Railways. ii) Geophysicist, Group A
ii) Section Officers Grade (Integrated Grade vii) Grade `B of the Railway Board
II & III) of the General Cadre of the Indian Secretariat Stenographers Service.
Foreign Service, Branch `B.
Category VIII
Category III
viii) Section Officers Grade of the Intelligence
iii) Section Officers Grade of the Railway Bureau.
Board Secretariat Service.
Category IX
Category IV
ix) Private Secretary Grade in Employees
iv) Private Secretary Grade of the Central State Insurance Corporation.
Secretariat Stenographers Service.
Subject
Bengali
Gujarati
Hindi
Kannada
Kashmiri
Malayalam
Marathi
Oriya
Punjabi
Sanskrit
Sindhi (D)
Sindhi (A)
Tamil
Telugu
Urdu
Konkani
Manipuri
Nepali
Bodo
Dogri
Santhali
Maithili
English
Total no of candidates
Year
Assamesee
COMPULSORY PAPERS
83
84
Medium of
Examination
Subject
Bengali
Gujarati
Hindi
Kannada
Kashmiri
Malayalam
Marathi
Oriya
Punjabi
Sanskrit
Sindhi (D)
Sindhi (A)
Tamil
Telugu
Urdu
Konkani
Manipuri
Nepali
Bodo
Dogri
Santhali
Maithili
English
Total no of candidates
Year
Assamesee
2014 - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 56
Botany-II
Annual Report 2015-16
2015 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51 56
2014 - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 92 96
Chemistry-I
2015 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 91
2014 - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 92 96
Chemistry-II
2015 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 91
2014 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 89
Civil Engg.-I
2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 79
2014 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 88 89
Civil Engg.-II
2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78 78
2014 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 209 214
Comm &Acc-I
2015 - 1 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 150
2014 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 209 214
Comm &Acc-II
2015 - 1 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 150
2014 - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 193 212
Economics-I
2015 - - - 7 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 184
2014 - - - 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 193 212
Economics-II
2015 - - - 7 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 184
2014 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 189 191
Elect. Engg-I
2015 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 141 142
2014 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 187 189
Elect. Engg-II
2015 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 141 142
2014 - 1 2 410 - - - 18 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 3046 3478
Geography-I
2015 - 1 4 463 - - - 26 - 1 - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - 2880 3377
2014 - 1 2 410 - - - 18 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 3044 3476
Geography-II
2015 - 1 4 463 - - - 25 - 1 - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - 2877 3373
2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 28
Geology-I
2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 25
2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 28
Geology-II
2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 25
Subject
Bengali
Gujarati
Hindi
Kannada
Kashmiri
Malayalam
Marathi
Oriya
Punjabi
Sanskrit
Sindhi (D)
Sindhi (A)
Tamil
Telugu
Urdu
Konkani
Manipuri
Nepali
Bodo
Dogri
Santhali
Maithili
English
Total no of candidates
Year
Assamesee
2014 - 1 12 540 - - - 49 - - - - - 2 2 - - - - - - - - 945 1551
History-II
2015 - 2 20 732 1 - - 68 - - - - - 2 5 - - - - - - - - 972 1802
85
86
Medium of
Examination
Subject
Bengali
Gujarati
Hindi
Kannada
Kashmiri
Malayalam
Marathi
Oriya
Punjabi
Sanskrit
Sindhi (D)
Sindhi (A)
Tamil
Telugu
Urdu
Konkani
Manipuri
Nepali
Bodo
Dogri
Santhali
Maithili
English
Total no of candidates
Year
Assamesee
2014 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 145 148
Physics-I
Annual Report 2015-16
2014 - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - - - - - - 69 77
Zoology-II
2015 - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 62 69
Appendix-9
Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2014: Profile of Candidates
1. The Civil Services Examination is conducted in two successive stages viz. the Preliminary
Examination and the Main Examination. The Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination consists of two
compulsory objective type (multiple choice questions) papers. The marks obtained in the Preliminary
Examination by the candidates, who are declared qualified for admission to the Main Examination, will
not be counted for determining their final order of merit. The Main Examination consists of written
examination of nine conventional type papers and an Interview.
2. Out of 9,47,428 candidates who had applied for the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination-2014,
only 4,46,623 candidates appeared in this examination held on August 24, 2014. On the basis of results
of Civil Services (Preliminary) examination, 16,933 (3.8%) candidates were declared qualified for
taking the Main Examination. Community-wise and gender-wise details of these candidates are given
in Table-1.
Number of Candidates
Community Applied Appeared Qualified
Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
Scheduled
1,91,313 58,284 2,49,597 81,384 22,162 1,03,546 2,150 309 2,459
Castes
Scheduled
64,181 21,260 85,441 28,178 8,513 36,691 1,132 129 1,261
Tribes
Other Back-
1,52,569 56,808 2,09,377 89,278 24,395 1,13,673 3,922 399 4,321
ward Classes
General 2,58,162 1,44,851 4,03,013 1,38,323 54,390 1,92,713 7,668 1,224 8,892
Total 6,66,225 2,81,203 9,47,428 3,37,163 1,09,460 4,46,623 14,872 2,061 16,933
2.1 It may be seen from Table-1 that out of 9,47,428 candidates who had applied for the Civil
Services (Preliminary) Examination, 2014, only 4,46,623 or 47.1 percent candidates appeared for this
examination. In other words, 52.9 percent of the candidates had applied but did not turn up for the
examination. Further, the drop-out rate among the candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes category was higher compared to that of the Other Backward Classes and Unreserved
Category.
3. Out of 16,933 candidates, 16,286 (96.2%) had appeared in the written part of Civil Services
(Main) Examination, 2014 held in December, 2014. Based on the results of the written part of the
Main Examination, only 3,308(20.3%) candidates had qualified for the Interview and 3,303 candidates
had appeared in the interview and thereafter, a total of 1363 candidates have been recommended by
the Commission for appointment to the civil services against 1,364 vacancies till the end of the year
2015-16. Community and gender-wise number of candidates appeared, interviewed and recommended
in the Civil Services (Main) Examination, 2014 are given in Table-2.
4. A comparative statement, showing the number of vacancies (including those reserved for the
Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) filled up through the Civil Services
Examination during the years 2005 to 2014 is given in Table-3.
* Result declared 532 posts (candidature of one candidate whose result was withheld has been cancelled)
$ Result declared 1042 posts (candidature of one candidate whose result was withheld has been cancelled)
@ Result declared 1363 posts
5 The number of candidates appeared, interviewed and recommended during the last five
examinations are shown in Diagram-1.
6. The success rate of candidates in the Examination by broad stream of disciplines is given in Table-4.
6.1 Thus, in totality, the success rate of candidates having higher degrees was almost same w.r.t.
candidates having bachelor degrees.
6.2 As is seen from Table-4, a total of 1363 or 41.3 percent of the candidates interviewed, were
recommended for appointment to various civil services. Of them, 936(68.7%) were graduates and
427(31.3%) possessed post-graduate or higher qualifications.
7. The Optional Subject-wise distribution of candidates, who appeared in the Main Examination
and were recommended for appointment with their success rate, is given in Table-5.
(i) Geography was the most preferred subject among the optional subjects chosen by the candidates,
followed by Public Administration and Sociology.
(ii) Amongst the subjects opted by 100 or more candidates, the highest percentage of successful
candidates had opted for Medical Science (19.9 percent) followed by Law (17.0 percent) and
Psychology (15.8 percent).
(iii) As far as academic backgrounds of the recommended candidates are concerned, 51.3% were
from Engineering, followed by 28.4%, 13.4% and 6.9% from Humanities, Medical Science
and Sciences respectively. However, 87% of optional subjects opted by the recommended
candidates were related to Humanities (including literature of languages), followed by 5.5%,
5.4% and 2.1% related to Medical Science, Science and Engineering respectively. This shows
that most of the candidates have made a cross domain shift from their original stream (i.e.,
Engineering, Science and Medical Science) to humanities.
7.2 Distribution of optional subjects opted by the candidates recommended by broad streams of
optional subjects in the last five Civil Services (Main) Examinations are shown in Diagram-2.
* Note: Before 2013, candidates were required to opt for two optional subjects in Civil Services (Main) Examination. as such, the figures
shown against these years are double the number of qualified candidates. Since 2013, the candidates have to take only one optional
subject. The number has been shown accordingly in the Bar Diagram.
8.A disaggregated analysis of the candidates recommended for appointment shows that 196 candidates
or 14.4 percent belonged to the Scheduled Castes community, 98 candidates or 7.2 percent to the
Scheduled Tribes, 369 candidates or 27.1 percent to the Other Backward Classes and 700 candidates
or 51.3 percent to General category.
8.1 The community, age and gender-wise break-up of the candidates appeared in Civil Services
(Preliminary) Examination, Civil Services (Main) Examination and candidates finally recommended
are given in the Table 6-A, 6-B and 6-C respectively.
M F T M F M F M F M F M F
81384 22162 103546 20737 7592 17030 5129 13936 3614 10776 2382 18905 3445
SC
78.6% 21.4% 100% 25.5% 34.3% 20.9% 23.1% 17.1% 16.3% 13.2% 10.7% 23.2% 15.5%
28178 8513 36691 7599 2794 6314 2129 5057 1517 3642 980 5566 1093
ST
76.8% 23.2% 100% 27.0% 32.8% 22.4% 25.0% 17.9% 17.8% 12.9% 11.5% 19.8% 12.8%
89278 24395 113673 20585 9050 17643 5519 15840 3605 12926 2571 22284 3650
OBC
78.5% 21.5% 100% 23.1% 37.1% 19.8% 22.6% 17.7% 14.8% 14.5% 10.5% 25.0% 15.0%
138323 54390 192713 33498 19733 30479 13213 30538 9928 25382 7032 18426 4484
General
71.8% 28.2% 100% 24.2% 36.3% 22.0% 24.3% 22.1% 18.3% 18.3% 12.9% 13.3% 8.2%
337163 109460 446623 82419 39169 71466 25990 65371 18664 52726 12965 65181 12672
Total
75.5% 24.5% 100% 24.4% 35.8% 21.2% 23.7% 19.4% 17.1% 15.6% 11.8% 19.3% 11.6%
M F T M F M F M F M F M F
7754 1276 9030 1177 265 1947 405 2010 301 1540 205 1080 100
General
85.9% 14.1% 100% 15.2% 20.8% 25.1% 31.7% 25.9% 23.6% 19.9% 16.1% 13.9% 7.8%
14269 2017 16286 1928 407 3342 610 3417 475 2709 311 2873 214
Total
87.6% 12.4% 100% 13.5% 20.2% 23.4% 30.2% 23.9% 23.5% 19.0% 15.4% 20.1% 10.6%
M F T M F M F M F M F M F
SC 152 44 196 22 11 30 10 34 8 29 6 37 9
77.6% 22.4% 100% 14.5% 25.0% 19.7% 22.7% 22.4% 18.2% 19.1% 13.6% 24.3% 20.5%
80 18 98 10 2 20 5 19 2 15 8 16 1
ST
81.6% 18.4% 100% 12.5% 11.1% 25.0% 27.8% 23.8% 11.1% 18.8% 44.4% 20.0% 5.6%
303 66 369 36 13 59 20 86 16 55 6 67 11
OBC
82.1% 17.9% 100% 11.9% 19.7% 19.5% 30.3% 28.4% 24.2% 18.2% 9.1% 22.1% 16.7%
9. Diagram-3 shows the trend of male candidates who appeared in Civil Services Examination
2014. It may be seen that highest percentage (24.4%) amongst the appeared male candidates in Civil
Services (Preliminary) Examination 2014 were from the age group of 21-24 years. But, in Civil
Services (Main) Examination 2014, maximum 23.9% male candidates appeared from the age group of
26-28 years. However, among the recommended candidates, the highest percentage (25.5%) of males
recommended, were from the age group of 26-28 years.]
10. Diagram-4 shows the trend of female candidates who appeared in Civil Services Examination
2014. It may be seen that highest percentage (35.8%) amongst the appeared female candidates in
Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 2014, were from the age group of 21-24 years. But in Civil
Services (Main) Examination 2014, maximum 30.2% of the female candidates appeared from the age
group of 24-26 years and at recommendation stage, the highest percentage (29.4%) of the female
candidates recommended were from the age group of 24-26 years.
10.1 It is seen from Table 6-C that the highest percentage of candidates recommended belonged to
the age group of 24 - 26 years (25.6 percent), followed by 26 - 28 years (25.5 percent), 28 - 30 years
(17.4 percent), 21 - 24 years (15.9 percent) and 30 years & above (15.6 percent).
11. The community and age-wise distribution of the candidates who have been recommended for the
Indian Administrative Service (I.A.S.)/Indian Foreign Service (I.F.S.) is given in Table-7.
IAS IFS IAS IFS IAS IFS IAS IFS IAS IFS IAS IFS
SC 27 6 8 3 6 1 6 0 4 1 3 1
ST 13 3 2 1 3 0 2 2 4 0 2 0
OBC 63 8 9 1 18 0 15 1 11 3 10 3
General 77 15 14 1 32 6 19 5 7 3 5 0
Total 180 32 33 6 59 7 42 8 26 7 20 4
11.1 Community and age-wise distribution of candidates recommended for I.A.S./I.F.S. is shown
in Diagram-5.
12. Out of 2,017 female candidates who appeared in the Civil Services (Main) Examination,
2014, total 313 were recommended for appointment, registering a success rate at 15.5 percent. As
against this, 1,050 out of 14,269 male candidates were recommended which represents a success rate
at 7.4 percent. Thus, the success rate of female candidates was significantly higher than that of male
candidates.
13. The community and gender-wise success rate of candidates is given in Table-8.
13.1 It is seen from the Table-8 that the performance of female candidates belonging to various
communities viz. Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and General category
was better than that of male candidates of corresponding community.
14. Out of a total of 13,024 persons with disabilities who applied for the Civil Services (Preliminary)
Examination-2014, total 6,252 candidates appeared in Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination and
500 qualified. But only 460 candidates with disabilities appeared in Civil Services (Main) Examination
and 54 such candidates were recommended for appointment. Of them, two belonged to Scheduled
Castes, 12 candidates belonged to Other Backward Classes and 40 to General community. This
includes six female candidates recommended for appointment. Further, seven such candidates qualified
the examination in their first attempt and three candidates among them, belonged to the age-group of
21-24 years. Furthermore, among these 54 candidates, 27 candidates, who qualified the Examination,
belong to the age group of 30 years and above.
14.1 It is important to mention here that, in all the tables and diagrams given in this appendix, the
number of candidates with disabilities has been taken in their respective communities i.e. Scheduled
Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and General community.
15. The community and gender-wise number of attempts made by the candidates in Civil Services
(Preliminary), Civil Services (Main) and finally recommended are given in the Table 9-A, 9-B and
9-C and also shown in the Diagram-6.
Note 1: Only six chances are allowed for General Category candidates. However, additional three chances are allowed
for PWD candidates who belong to general category.
Note 1: Only six chances are allowed for General Category candidates. However, additional three chances are allowed
for PWD candidates who belong to general category.
Note 1: Only six chances are allowed for General Category candidates. However, additional three chances are allowed for
PWD candidates who belong to general category.
15.1 It follows from Table 9-A and 9-C that while 59.2 percent of candidates appeared in Civil
Services (Preliminary) Examination 2014 in their first attempt, only 10.4 percent of finally qualified
candidates could clear the Examination in their first attempt. Further, in the second, third and fourth
attempts, the percentage of recommended candidates was 22.3 percent, 24.3 percent and 19.6 percent
respectively.
Appendix - 10
Engineering Services Examination, 2015: Profile of Candidates
1. The Engineering Services Examination is conducted by the Commission in two stages the
written examination followed by the Personality Test. The written examination consists of three
objective type and two conventional type papers for each of the four disciplines and carries a total of
1,000 marks, whereas the Personality Test carries a maximum of 200 marks. Only those candidates
who qualify at the written examination are eligible to attend the Personality Test.
2. The number of vacancies reported by the Government for filling up the posts in four disciplines
of engineering through the Engineering Services Examination, 2015 are as follows:
Number of Candidates
Community Applied Appeared Drop-out Rate
Male Female Total Male Female Total (%)
Scheduled Castes 40,315 8,746 49,061 11,791 2,245 14,036 71.4%
3.1 It is seen from Table-1 that out of 2,50,041 candidates who applied for the Engineering Services
Examination, 2015, only 92,817 or 37.1% of the candidates appeared for the written examination. In
other words, 62.9% of the candidates did not turn up for the examination. Further, the drop-out rate
among the candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes was maximum as compared to the drop-out
rate of General Category, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes.
3.2 The number of candidates who appeared at the written examination, attended the Personality
Test and were recommended for appointment in the last five examinations are shown in Diagram-1.
4. The distribution of candidates by their academic qualifications (i.e. higher qualifications vis--
vis minimum prescribed qualifications) and division at College/University level in respect of candidates,
who attended the Personality Test and were recommended, is given in Table-2.
4.1 It follows from Table-2 that while 87.1 percent of the candidates recommended for appointment
were graduates, remaining 12.9 percent possessed Post-graduation or higher qualifications. Further,
the percentage of graduates and Post-graduates or higher degree holders among the candidates who
attended the Personality Test, were 86.1 percent and 13.9 percent respectively.
4.2 It is seen from Table-2 that out of 434 candidates recommended for appointment, 420 candidates
or 96.8 percent were having first division and 14 candidates or 3.2 percent were having second or
lower division at College/University level. Further, the percentage of first divisioner candidates among
the candidates who attended the Personality Test was 95.7 percent.
5. The distribution of candidates having regular degrees like M.E./ M.Sc./ B.Tech./ B.Sc.
(Engg.) etc. from the Universities on one hand and those having equivalent qualifications like associate
Membership/Graduate Membership awarded by the Institution of Engineers (India)/Institution of
Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers/Aeronautical Society of India etc. on the other hand is
given in Table-3.
(i) B.E./B.Tech./B.Sc.(Engineering) 40 12
(ii) M.E./M.Tech./M.Sc.(Engineering) 8 2
II Equivalent Qualifications
5.1 It is seen that out of 434 candidates recommended for appointment, 431 (99.3%) candidates
possess regular degrees from the Universities and only three (0.7%) candidates possess equivalent
qualifications awarded by the Institution of Engineers (India)/Institution of Electronics and
Telecommunication Engineering etc.
6. Discipline-wise and level of degrees of candidates who attended the Personality Test vis--vis
those recommended for appointment is given in Table-4.
Electronics and
200 51 251 80 18 98
Telecommunication
6.1 It follows from Table-4 that out of 434 candidates recommended for appointment, 151 candidates
or 34.8 percent were recommended for Civil engineering posts, 99 candidates or 22.8 percent for
Mechanical engineering posts, 86 candidates or 19.8 percent for Electrical engineering posts and 98
candidates or 22.6 percent for Electronics and Telecommunication engineering posts.
6.2 Out of the recommended candidates, the percentage of candidates having higher qualifications
in Civil, Mechanical, Electrical and Electronics & Telecommunication engineering was 11.9 percent,
11.1 percent, 10.5 percent and 18.4 percent respectively. Thus, as compared to other engineering
disciplines, percentage of post-graduates in Electronics & Telecommunication engineering was the
maximum.
6.3 The discipline and qualification-wise distribution of candidates who attended the Personality
Test vis--vis those recommended, is also exhibited in Diagram-2.
7. The community and gender-wise number of candidates who attended the Personality Test and were
recommended are given in Table-5.
7.1 It follows from Table 5 that the female candidates constituted 5.5 percent of the candidates
recommended as compared to 94.5 percent for the male candidates.
8. The community, age and gender-wise distribution of the candidates recommended is given in
Table-6.
8.1 It is seen from Table-6 that 73 candidates or 16.8 percent belonged to the Scheduled Castes,
36 candidates or 8.3 percent to the Scheduled Tribes, 121 candidates or 27.9 percent to the Other
Backward Classes and 204 candidates or 47 percent to General category.
9. The community and gender-wise average age of the candidates recommended is given in
Table-7.
9.1 It is seen from Table-7 that in each community except Scheduled Castes, the female candidates
who were recommended for appointment, were younger in age than the male candidates.
10. The discipline and age group-wise distribution of the candidates recommended for appointment is
given in Table-8.
Age group
Candidates
Discipline 21-24 24-26 26-28 28-30
Recommended 30 years and above
Years years years Years
Mechanical 99 51 34 9 3 2
Electrical 86 57 22 4 1 2
Electronics and 98 43 33 17 4 1
Telecommunication
10.1 It is seen from Table-8 that the highest percentage of the candidates recommended belonged to
the age group of 21 - 24 years (61.1 percent), followed by age groups of 24 - 26 years (27.2 percent),
26 - 28 years (8.5 percent), 28 - 30 years (1.8 percent) and 30 years and above (1.4 percent).
11. A total number of 21 reserved vacancies were reported by the Government for persons with disabilities
to be filled up on the basis of the Engineering Services Examination, 2015. Out of these 21 vacancies, eight
vacancies (seven for PH1 category and one for PH3 category) were reserved in Civil Engineering discipline;
six vacancies (five for PH1 category and one for PH3 category) were reserved in Mechanical Engineering
discipline; three vacancies (all three for PH1 category) were reserved in Electrical Engineering discipline;
four vacancies (all four for PH1 category) were reserved in Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering
discipline. [PH1: Orthopedically Challenged, PH2: Visually Impaired, PH3: Hearing Impaired].
11.1 Of the 2,430 candidates with disabilities who applied for Engineering Services Examination
2015, 849 candidates appeared in the written part of the Engineering Services Examination, 2015. 58
candidates qualified the Written Examination and 54 attended Personality Test. Out of 54 candidates
who attended the Personality Test 21 (eight in Civil Engineering, six in Mechanical Engineering,
three in Electrical Engineering and four in Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering discipline)
were recommended for appointment. Of these 21 recommended candidates 19 belonged to PH1 and
remaining two belonged to PH3.
11.2 Out of these 21 recommended candidates, two belonged to the Scheduled Castes, one belonged
to Scheduled Tribes, seven belonged to the Other Backward Classes and 11 belonged to the General
category. Further, out of these 21 candidates, 12 candidates belonged to the age-group of 21 24
years, six to the age-group of 24 26 years, one each to the age group of 26 28 years, 28- 30 years
and 30 years and above.
Appendix-11
Indian Forest Service Examination, 2015: Profile of Candidates
Every year Union Public Service Commission conducts Indian Forest Service Examination. The Indian
Forest Service Examination is conducted in two successive stages viz. the Civil Services (Preliminary)
Examination (Objective type) for screening and selection of candidates for Indian Forest Service
(Main) Examination and then Indian Forest Service (Main) Examination (Written and Interview) for
selection of candidates for the Indian Forest Service. The Preliminary Examination consists of two
objective type (Multiple choice questions) papers of 200 marks each. This examination is meant to
serve as a screening test only. The marks obtained in the Preliminary Examination are not reckoned
for determining the final order of merit of the candidates. The Main Examination consists of six
conventional (essay) type papers and carries a total of 1,400 marks whereas the interview carries 300
marks. Only those candidates who qualify the Main examination are eligible for interview (Personality
Test).
2. Out of 2,21,705 candidates who had applied for the Indian Forest Service through Civil Services
(Preliminary) Examination, 2015, only 1,01,404 (45.7%) candidates appeared in the Preliminary
Examination held on 23rd August 2015. On the basis of the results of the Preliminary Examination,
1,417 candidates qualified for Indian Forest Services (Main) Examination. However, 736 candidates
appeared in the Indian Forest Service (Main) Examination 2015 held from 21st November, 2015 to
2nd December 2015. Further, on the basis of result of Main Examination, 310 candidates qualified
for Personality Test. Of them, only 308 candidates attended the Personality Test. Subsequently, 110
candidates were finally recommended by the Commission for appointment to the Indian Forest Service.
The number of vacancies, candidates applied, appeared and qualified in Preliminary Examination as
well as in the Indian Forest Service (Main) Examination, the number of candidates who attended the
Personality Test and the number of candidates who were recommended in the Indian Forest Service
Examinations held during the last five years, are given in Table-1.
2015 110 2,21,705 1,01,404 1,417 991 736 310 308 110
2.1 Number of candidates appeared in the written examination, attended the Personality Test and
recommended during the last five Indian Forest Service Examinations are shown in Diagram-1.
3.1 It may be seen from Table 2 that out of 2,21,705 candidates who applied for the Indian
Forest Service Examination 2015, only 1,01,404 (45.7%) of the candidates appeared for the written
examination. In other words, 54.3% of the candidates did not turn up for the examination. Further,
the dropout rate in each community is very high and it was maximum in case of Scheduled Caste
community (59.2%). Out of the 1,01,404 candidates, who appeared in the Indian Forest Service
Examination 2015, total 22,485 (22.2%) candidates were female. Similarly, of the total 110 candidates
recommended in the Indian Forest Service Examination, 2015, Seven (6.4%) were female (vide
Table-7).
4. Community-wise number of candidates applied, appeared, qualified the written examination (both
Preliminary and Main Examination), attended the personality test and recommended in the Indian Forest Service
Examination, 2015 are given in Table-3.
5. Based on the information furnished by the candidates in the detailed application forms of Indian
Forest Service Examination, 2015, an analysis has been made in regard to their academic qualifications.
For this purpose, the highest qualifications acquired by the candidates have been taken into account.
The academic qualification-wise distribution of the candidates who attended the personality test and
were recommended is given in Table-4.
5.1 As seen from Table-4 above, 66.4 percent of the candidates recommended were graduates and
33.6 percent possessed post-graduate or higher qualifications.
5.2 It may be seen from Table-4, that 80% of the candidates recommended in the IFoS Examination
2015 were from engineering background.
6. The distribution of candidates who attended the Personality Test vis--vis those recommended
for appointment with their optional subjects is given in Table-5.
Table 5: Optional subject-wise Distribution of Candidates Attended the Personality Test vis--vis
Recommended - Indian Forest Service Examination, 2015
Number of Candidates*
S.No. Optional Subjects Attended the Personality
Recommended Pass Percentage
Test
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
1. Agricultural Engineering 18 8 44.4%
2. Agriculture 60 23 38.3%
3. Animal Husbandry and
14 5 35.7%
Veterinary Science
4. Botany 31 13 41.9%
5. Chemical Engineering 5 1 20.0%
6. Chemistry 14 7 50.0%
7. Civil Engineering 15 3 20.0%
8. Forestry 215 73 34.0%
9. Geology 145 41 28.3%
10. Mathematics 38 21 55.3%
11. Mechanical Engineering 19 4 21.1%
12. Physics 20 12 60.0%
13. Zoology 22 9 40.9%
6.1 From Table-5, it emerges that Forestry was the most preferred optional subject amongst the
optional subjects chosen by the candidates who attended the Personality Test, followed by Geology
and Agriculture, and in case of recommended candidates also, Forestry and Geology were found to be
most fruitful optional subjects.
6.2 It mayAlso be seen from Table-4 and Table-5 that as far as academic background of the
recommended candidates is concerned, 80.0% of the candidates were having Engineering background.
However, only 7.3 % of the optional subjects opted by the recommended candidates were related to
Engineering discipline. This shows that most of the candidates have made a cross domain shift from
their original stream i.e. Engineering to Non-Engineering subjects.
7. The community, age and gender-wise distribution of candidates who attended the Personality
Test is given in Table-6.
7.1 It may be seen from the above Table-6 that, of the 308 candidates who appeared for interview,
49 (15.9%) candidates belonged to Scheduled Castes, 24 (7.8%) belonged to Scheduled Tribes, 88
(28.6%) belonged to Other Backward Classes and 147 (47.7%) belonged to General community.
8. The community, age and gender-wise distribution of candidates recommended for appointment
is given in Table-7.
Table-7: Community,Age and Gender-wise Distribution of Candidates Recommended
Indian Forest Service Examination, 2015
(Age reckoned as on August 1, 2015)
Age-group (In years)
Total
Community 21-24 24-26 26-28 28-30 30 and above
T M F M F M F M F M F M F
SC 18 17 1 2 - 8 - 3 1 2 - 2 -
ST 8 8 - 2 - - - 2 - 1 - 3 -
OBC 35 34 1 5 - 8 1 8 - 4 - 9 -
General 49 44 5 2 3 15 1 16 1 8 - 3 -
Total 110 103 7 11 3 31 2 29 2 15 - 17 -
T : Total; M : Male ; F : Female
(i) Of the 110 recommended candidates, 18 (16.4%) belonged to Scheduled Castes, 8 (7.3%)
to Scheduled Tribes, 35 (31.8%) to Other Backward Classes and 49 (44.5%) to General
community.
(ii) Female candidates constituted 6.4 percent of the total candidates recommended.
(iii) Highest percentage of the candidates recommended belonged to the age group of 24-26 years
(30.0%) followed by 26-28 years (28.2%), 30 years and above (15.5%), 28-30 years (13.6%)
and 21-24 years (12.7%).
8.2 age-wise percentage of candidates recommended in the Indian Forest Service Examination,
2015, is shown in Diagram-2.
9. General and Other Backward Classes community candidates are permitted maximum six and
nine attempts respectively at the examination. However, there is no restriction on the number of
attempts for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes community. The community and gender-
wise number of attempts made by the recommended candidates for the examination are given in
Table-8.
9.1 It follows from Table-8 that 22.7 percent of the candidates qualified the examination in the first
attempt, 34.6 percent in the second attempt, 36.4 percent in the third attempt, 4.5 percent in fourth
attempt and rest 1.8 percent in the fifth attempt. It is important to mention here that no candidate who
qualified in the Indian Forest Service Examination availed more than five chances.
Appendix - 12
Number of Engineering, Medical, Scientific & Technical and Non-Technical posts,
Ministry-wise which were Advertised during the year 2015-16
Number of posts Advertised
S. Scientific &
Name of Ministry/ Department Technical Non- Total
No. Engineering Medical
(excluding Technical
engineering)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
1 Agriculture and Farmers Welfare 5 10 17 2 34
2 Andaman and Nicobar Administration - 14 1 - 15
3 AYUSH - 27 1 - 28
4 Chandigarh Administration 2 1 - 1 4
5 Civil Aviation 3 - 12 - 15
6 Commerce and Industry 8 - - 62 70
Communications and Information
7 8 - - - 8
Technology
Consumer Affairs, Food and Public
8 - - 5 - 5
Distribution
9 Corporate Affairs - - - 5 5
10 Culture - - 8 15 23
11 Daman and Diu Administration - - 1 2 3
12 Defence 30 49 14 42 135
13 Environment, Forest and Climate Change 1 - 5 - 6
14 Finance - - 10 26 36
Government of National Capital Territory
15 16 4 14 3 37
of Delhi
16 Government of Puducherry - - 75 104 179
17 Health and Family Welfare - 164 14 - 178
18 Home Affairs 9 - 50 59 118
19 Human Resource Development - - - 2 2
20 Information and Broadcasting - - - 6 6
21 Labour and Employment 1 4 1 171 177
22 Law and Justice - - 1 8 9
23 Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises 18 - 6 - 24
24 Mines 10 - 153 - 163
25 Railways - 148 - - 148
26 Road Transport & Highways - - - 2 2
27 Shipping 7 - 15 - 22
28 Skill Development and Entrepreneurship 5 - - - 5
29 Textiles 3 - - 3 6
30 Tourism - - - 2 2
31 Union Public Service Commission - - 4 2 6
32 Urban Development 13 - 22 6 41
Water Resources, River Development and
33 20 - 2 - 22
Ganga Rejuvenation
Total 159 421 431 523 1534
117
Appendix - 15
118
Non-Technical Posts, Discipline-wise, for which the Recruitment were finalized during the year 2015-16
Annual Report 2015-16
119
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix-17
Computer Based Recruitment Tests held during the year 2015-16
Candidates
Number Scale of Candidates
Sl. No. Name of Post appeared
of Posts Pay ( Rs.) applied
in the Test
Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) / 14 15600- 4588 1971
Assistant Welfare Commissioner (Central) 39100+
/Assistant Labour Welfare Commissioner
1 5400
(Central) /Assistant Director in Grade V in
Junior Time Scale of Central Labour Service,
Ministry of Labour and Employment
Senior Administrative Officer Grade-I, 5 15600- 2674 1578
Defence Research and Development 39100+
Organisation, Ministry of Defence 6600
2-3 and
Senior Administrative Officer Grade- 22 15600- 6172 3179
II, Defence Research and Development 39100+
Organisation, Ministry of Defence 5400
Candidates
Number Scale of Candidates
Sl. No. Name of Post appeared
of Posts Pay ( Rs.) applied
in the Test
Assistant Director (Cost) in the Office 12 15600-
of Chief Advisor Cost, Department of 39100+
1100 511
Expenditure, Ministry of Finance 5400
9-10 and
24 15600- 1773 991
Assistant Director (Cost) in the Office
39100+
of Chief Advisor Cost, Department of
5400
Expenditure, Ministry of Finance
Medical Officer/ Research Officer 10 15600- 5611 3096
11 (Homoeopathy) in Central Government 39100+
Health Scheme, Ministry of AYUSH 5400
Assistant Director (OL), in Grade-IV 50 15600- 1163 912
of Central Secretariat Official Language 39100+
12 Service, Department of Official Language, 5400
Ministry of Home Affairs
Deputy Architect, Central Public Works 13 15600- 2397 1846
Department, Ministry of Urban Development 39100+
and 5400
Appendix 18
Bulk Recruitment Cases finalised during the year 2015-16
Appendix-19
(Vide Chapter-7)
Statement showing Cadres where no Select List of 2014 in respect of IAS(SCS), IPS
& IFoS Cadre and 2014A in respect of IAS (NSCS) was required to be prepared - Nil
vacancy/None-eligible
Sl. No. Cadre/Sub-cadre Service
1. Assam IAS (Non-SCS)
2. Bihar IFoS
3. Chhattisgarh IAS (Non-SCS)
4. Chhattisgarh IFoS
5. Haryana IAS (Non-SCS)
6. Himachal Pradesh IAS (Non-SCS)
7. Himachal Pradesh IFoS
8. Kerala IAS*
9. Karnataka IAS*
10. Manipur IAS (Non-SCS)
11. Manipur IFoS*
12. Meghalaya IFoS
13. Nagaland IAS (Non-SCS)
14. Odisha IPS*
15. Rajasthan IAS (Non-SCS)
16. Sikkim IAS (Non-SCS)
17. Sikkim IFoS
18. Tamil Nadu IFoS*
19. Uttar Pradesh IAS (Non-SCS)
20. Uttarakhand IAS (Non-SCS)
21. Uttarakhand IPS
22. West Bengal IFoS
23. Arunachal Pradesh IAS
24. Arunachal Pradesh IPS
25. Mizoram IAS (Non-SCS)
26. Mizoram IPS
27. Goa IAS
28. Goa IAS (Non-SCS)
29. Goa IPS
30. UT IAS (Non-SCS)
*None eligible
Legend: IAS-Indian Administrative Service
IPS-Indian Police Service
IFoS-Indian Forest Service
SCS-State Civil Service
Appendix-20
(Vide Chapter-7)
Induction into the All India Services Meetings held during 2015-16
1. Meetings held:-
During the year 2015-16, the Commission convened 62 Selection Committee Meetings involving
1429 Officers for induction into IAS/IPS/IFoS from State Civil Services, Non-State Civil Services,
State Police Services and State Forest Services of different States/UTs.
(i) IAS (SCS):- The Commission received 23 proposals for preparation of the Select Lists for
the existing vacancies of 2014. The Selection Committee Meetings for induction of State Civil
Service Officers into the IAS were convened for 22 Cadres. One proposal was deficient and the
requisite documents/clarifications were not received from the State Governments concerned.
(ii) IAS(Non-SCS):- During the year, the Commission received 14 proposals for consideration
of the cases of Non-SCS Officers for appointment by selection to the IAS and Meetings in
respect of 13 Cadres were held. One proposal was received in the Commission at 5:00 PM on
31.12.2015, and hence, it was returned.
(iii) IPS:- The Commission received 18 proposals for preparation of the Select Lists for the existing
vacancies of 2014 and Selection Committee Meetings for induction into IPS from State Police
Service for all 18 Cadres were held.
(iv) IFoS:- The Commission received 11 proposals for preparation of Select Lists for the existing
vacancies of 2014. Selection Committee Meetings for induction into IFoS from State Forest
Service in respect of 09 Cadre/Sub-Cadres were held. Two proposals were deficient and the
requisite documents/clarifications were not received from the State Governments concerned.
2. Preparation of year-wise Select Lists:- During the year 2015-16, the Select Lists of previous
years were prepared in respect of the following Cadres/Sub-Cadres:-
130
(Vide Chapter-7)
RSCMs held in 2015-16
SI. State Name of Court OA/WP/CP In the matter Date of Date of No of Of- No of Offi- Service Select List
No. No. of Shri/Smt Judgement meeting ficers to be cers Recom- concerned
considered mended
Annual Report 2015-16
6 2
6 Haryana CAT, Chandigarh OA No 1200/ Surjeet Singh 13.11.14 12.5.15 1 1 IAS 2002(1)
CH/13
7 Haryana CAT, Chandigarh OA No 274/ Devender 29.10.13 18.8.15 9 9 IPS 2011(1)
& HC Punjab & HR/13 Yadav
Haryana
WP No UPSC
163/2014 Vs
Devender 09.12.14
Yadav
8 Maharashtra CAT, Mumbai RPNo 36/14 UPSC 10.10.14 18.6.2015 1 1 IPS 2010(1)
in OA No
408/13 Vs
A R Morale
9 Jharkhand CAT, Principal OA No. Dharamdra 06.02.15 20.8.15 1 Nil IAS 2010&
IAS Bench 4207/13 Pandey 11(1)
2010-2011
15 05 2011
16 Punjab HC Chandigarh CWP No. Praneet 30.06.15 03.12.15 1 1 IAS 2009-10
-IAS 211102/2014
Annual Report 2015-16
131
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix-22
(Vide Chapter-7)
All India Services-Selection Committee Meetings not held
during 2015-16 in respect of Select lists of 2014.
Appendix-23
Ministries/Departments/Union Territories who did not forward the half yearly returns
ofAd-hoc appointments made to Group A and Group B Posts/Services during the
year 2015-16
30.6.2015 31.12.2015
Gr. Gr. Gr. Gr.
A B A B
1 Ministry of
Commerce &
137
UPSC.
S. Name of Ministry/ Name of Post Whether RR Exist Mode of Pay Scale/ Year of adhoc No. of adhoc appointments
138
No. Department recruitment Pay Band appointment
30.6.2015 31.12.2015
Gr. Gr. Gr. Gr.
A B A B
Additional RR is yet to be PB-4, 2009 1 Nil
Annual Report 2015-16
30.6.2015 31.12.2015
Gr. Gr. Gr. Gr.
A B A B
2 Ministry of Science
& Technology
Department Nil Nil Nil Nil
of Science &
Technology
139
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix-25
Statement showing Ministry/Department wise break-up of vacancies reserved
for Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe Officers and the number of Scheduled
Caste/ Scheduled Tribe Officers recommended for appointment against reserved/
unreserved vacancies by the Departmental Promotion Committees for the year
2015-16.
S. Ministries/ No. of vacancies No. of Officers No. of Officers
No. Departments reserved recommended against recommended
reserved vacancies against unreserved
vacancies
SC ST Total SC ST Total SC ST Total
1 Agriculture 1 1 2 0 2 2 3 2 5
2 CAG 6 3 9 1 0 1 0 0 0
Chandigarh
3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Administration
4 Civil Aviation 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4
Commerce &
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Industry
6 Consumer Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
7 Culture 4 4 8 3 2 5 3 1 4
8 Defence 136 53 189 132 41 173 192 56 248
9 Delhi Jal Board 2 1 3 1 0 1 1 2 3
10 DoP&T 246 156 402 214 80 294 61 16 77
11 DoP&T(CBI) 2 0 2 2 0 2 1 1 2
12 E.S.I.C 0 7 7 0 0 0 6 2 8
13 Economic Affairs 2 1 3 2 1 3 7 4 11
Election
14 4 2 6 0 0 0 2 0 2
Commission
15 Expenditure 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
16 External Affairs 7 4 11 6 2 8 9 0 9
Health & Family
17 5 2 7 1 0 1 1 0 1
Welfare
18 Home Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 14
19 Home Affairs (CISF) 20 15 35 18 12 30 11 4 15
20 Home Affairs (OL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4
21 Home Affairs (DFS) 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1
142
Recruitment of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes/ Other Backward Classes Against
vacancies reserved for them on the results of the examination held/completed in 2015-16
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix - 27
List of posts reserved for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Other Backward Classes
for which no such candidate Applied during the Year 2015-16
Total 4 2 0 6
Appendix - 28
Number of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Class candidates
recommended Against unreserved vacancies under Direct Recruitment by Selection
during the year 2015-16
Sl. Name of Post and Pay-Scale Number of Candidates
No.
Scheduled Scheduled Other Total
Castes Tribes Backward
Classes
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
1 Assistant Engineer (Naval Quality Assurance)
(Metallurgical Engineering), Directorate of Quality
1 - 1 2
Assurance (Naval), Department of Defence Production,
Ministry of Defence (`9300-34800+4600)
2 Assistant Public Prosecutor in Directorate of
Prosecution, Department of Home, Government
1 - 1 2
of National Capital Territory of Delhi (`9300-
34800+4600)
3 Assistant Director (Quality Assurance) Grade-
II (Electrical), Directorate General of Supplies
and Disposals, Department of Commerce, Supply 1 - - 1
Division, Ministry of Commerce and Industry (`9300-
34800+4600)
4 Senior Economic Investigator, Central Institute of
Coastal Engineering for Fishery, Department of
- - 1 1
Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of
agriculture and Farmers Welfare (`9300-34800+4600)
5 Assistant Director Grade-II (Non-Technical), Office
of the Textile Commissioner, Ministry of Textiles - - 1 1
(`9300-34800+4600)
6 Assistant Engineer (Works), National Institute of
Fisheries Post Harvest Technology and Training,
Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and - - 1 1
Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers
Welfare (`9300-34800+4600)
7 Civil Hydrographic Officer, Integrated Headquarters
(Navy), Directorate of Civilian Personnel, Ministry of - - 1 1
Defence (`9300-34800+4600)
8 Stores Officer in Defence Research and Development
- - 1 1
Organisation, Ministry of Defence(`9300-34800+4600)
9 Assistant Director Grade-II (Economic Investigation),
Office of the Development Commissioner, Ministry
- - 5 5
of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (`9300-
34800+4600)
10 Assistant Public Prosecutor, Central Bureau of
Investigation, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances - - 1 1
and Pensions (`9300-34800+4600)
11 Assistant Director Grade-II (Electrical), Office of
Development Commissioner, Ministry of Micro, Small - - 2 2
and Medium Enterprises (`9300-34800+4600)
149
150
Appendix-30
(Vide Chapter-8)
Details of theAdvice tendered by the Commission, Ministry-wise, in disciplinary cases during the year 2015-16
Cases invloving charges affecting integ- Cases involving charges other than
rity those affecting integrity
Ad- Grand
Advice to
Annual Report 2015-16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 AGRICULTURE 3 1 2 6 2 1 0 3 0 0 9
2 CABINET SECRETARIAT 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2
4 DEFENCE 12 0 3 15 3 1 2 6 0 0 21
5 EXTERNAL AFFAIRS 4 0 0 4 3 3 0 6 0 0 10
6 FINANCE 33 1 4 38 9 2 1 12 0 1 51
8 HOME AFFAIRS 16 3 1 20 13 5 0 18 0 1 39
15 RAILWAYS 38 7 10 55 11 19 3 33 0 0 88
17 TEXTILES 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
18 URBAN DEVELOPMENT 9 1 2 12 3 4 1 8 0 0 20
19 WATER RESOURCES 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 4
21 MINES 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
22 ATOMIC ENERGY 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 4
23 CIVIL AVIATION 4 0 2 6 1 1 1 3 0 0 9
24 SPACE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
25 BIHAR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
26 GUJARAT 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 3
27 TAMIL NADU 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
28 UTTAR PRADESH 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
29 CHHATTISHGARH 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
151
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix 31
(Vide Chapter-10)
Statement showing the number of cases where the Recruitment Rules were not notified
by the Government and the period of delay (position as on March 31, 2016)
than 5
S.
More
years
years
years
years
years
Total
year
4-5
3-4
2-3
1-2
0-1
Ministry/Department
No.
1 Agriculture
Agriculture & Cooperation 0 0 0 1 2 6 9
Animal Husbandry & Dairying 0 0 0 0 2 6 8
2 Cabinet Secretariat
Cabinet Secretariat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Chemicals & Fertilizers
Chemicals & Petro-Chemicals 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fertilizers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Civil Supplies & Public Distribution
ConsumerAffairs 0 0 0 1 0 8 9
5 Commerce & Industry
Commerce 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
Industry Policies & Promotion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Communications
Posts 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tele-Communications 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
7 Defence
Defence Production 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Defence (D/Apptts.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Defence Research & Development 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Defence (C.A.O) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Defence 0 0 0 3 8 19 30
8 Power
Power 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
9 Environment & Forests
Environment, Forests & Wildlife 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
10 External Affairs
External Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
11 Finance
Expenditure 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Revenue 0 0 0 1 1 7 9
Economic Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Company Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Food Processing Industries
Food Processing Industries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Health & Family Welfare
Indian System of MED. & Homeopathy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
than 5
S.
More
years
years
years
years
years
Total
year
4-5
3-4
2-3
1-2
0-1
Ministry/Department
No.
than 5
S.
More
years
years
years
years
years
Total
year
4-5
3-4
2-3
1-2
0-1
Ministry/Department
No.
than 5
S.
More
years
years
years
years
years
Total
year
4-5
3-4
2-3
1-2
0-1
Ministry/Department
No.
Appendix 32
(Vide Chapter-12)
Posts/Services excluded from the purview of the Commission since the issue of the
U.P.S.C. (Exemption from Consultation) Regulations, 1958
Schedule I
(Posts excluded for the purposes of Article 320 (3) (a) & (b) of the Constitution)
Date from
S.
Designation of the posts/ services which
No.
excluded
1. All Civil and Criminal Judicial Posts in Union Territories under the control of High Courts or 1.9.1958
a Court of Judicial. Commissioner, Other than those included in Item (7).
2. Posts in the Secretariat and Personal staff of the President and the Vice-President. 26.3.1962
3. Posts in Government Hospitality Organisation under the Ministry of External Affairs. 26.3.1962
4. Posts of National Research Professor under the Ministry of Education. 25.3.1963
5. Posts of Consultant and Chief Consultant# in the Planning Commission. 25.4.1964
6. Posts of Private Secretary to the Solicitor General of India and the Additional Solicitor General 14.4.1965
of India.
7. Judicial Commissioners, Additional Judicial Commissioners, District Judges, Session Judges, 9.3.1966
Additional District Judges and Additional Sessions Judges in Union Territories.
8. All the Services and Posts under or connected with the Organization dealing with external 14.8.1970
intelligence in the Government of India vide the U.P.S.C. (Exemptions from Consultation)
Supplementary Regulations, 1970.
9. Group B Ministerial posts in the Intelligence Bureau other than the posts of Section Officer. 12.2.1973
10. All technical and Administrative posts in or under (a) the Department of Space and (b) Space 14.11.1974
Commission
11. All technical and Administrative posts in or under (a) the Department of Electronics and (b) 13.8.1975
Electronics Commission.
12. Recruitment/ Promotions of scientific and technical personnel in the Defence Research and 18.5.1985
Development Organisation (DRDO) under the Ministry of Defence.
13. All Group AAnd Group B posts in or under the Central Administrative Tribunal. 10.1.1986
14. Scientific posts in the Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Ocean Development, 6.5.1996
Department of Non-Conventional Energy Sources and the Department of Environment, Forests
and Wild-Life, as specified in the Annexure to the DOP&T Notification No.39018/2/86-Estt.B
dated 1.4.87 except in respect of Appointment to be made thereto by promotion through the
DPC (Amendment vide DOP&T Notification No.39018/1/96 Estt.B dated 6.5.96).
15. Group B (Non-Gazetted) posts of Assistants and Stenographers Grade C to be filled by direct 7.9.1989
recruitment through open competitive examination.
16. All posts of Advisers in the Planning Commission carrying the pay band-4 of ` 37,400-67,000/- 7.9.1989
with Grade Pay of ` 10000/- or HAG scale of ` 67,000/- (annual increment @ 3%) 79,000/-
or the Apex scale of ` 80,000/- other than those required to be filled under the Senior Staffing
Scheme or those included in Any organized service. **
17. Group B Non-gazetted posts in the Department of Telecommunications. 29.12.1989
Date from
S.
Designation of the posts/ services which
No.
excluded
18. Group B Non-gazetted posts under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep 18.9.1990
Administration.
19. Posts/ Services to the exclusion of which the Commission Agreed under Item (20) of the
Schedule to the U.P.S.C (Exemption from Consultation) Regulations:
1963-64
(i) Posts connected with the Special Border Security Scheme under the Ministry of External
Affairs.
(ii) Posts in the Central Reserve Police and the Indo-Tibetan Border Force. 22.7.1960
(iii) Posts in the High Commission of India, London and in other Indian Missions abroad to 4.8.1988
which recruitment is made locally by the respective Indian Missions.
20. Post of Examiner of Patents and Designs, Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, Deputy 6.7.1999
Controller of Patents and designs, Joint Controller of Patents and Design, Sr. Joint Controller
of Patents and Designs, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Senior Documentation Officer,
Senior Reprography Officer. Junior Documentation Officer, Reprography Officer and Senior
Programmer in the patent office under the Department of Industrial Development, Ministry of
Industry.
21. Post of Lt. General, Scientist H Major General, Scientist G, Secretary*, Addl. Secretary*, 31.1.2001
Joint Secretary, Director, Deputy Secretary, Under Secretary, Principal Private Secretary,
Senior System Analyst*, Research Officer, Private Secretary, Section Officer, Protocol
Officer,Assistant, Research Assistant, Personal Assistant, Protocol Assistant, Senior Library
and Information Assistant and Draftsman Grade I in the National Security Council Secretariat,
Cabinet Secretariat.
22. Professor of Law, Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, Mussorie. 31.1.2003
23. All posts under the National Technical Research Organisation 14.7.2005
24. Posts of Director Generals of the Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi, the National 30.04.2009
Archives of India, New Delhi, the National Museum, New Delhi, the National Gallery of
&
Modern Art, New Delhi, the National Library, Kolkata and the National Research Laboratory
for Conservation of Cultural Property, Lucknow, and the post of Director in the Anthropological 11.12.2013
Survey of India, Kolkata, and the post of Librarian in the Central Reference Library, Kolkata,
under the Ministry of Culture. $
25. Post of Chief Economic Adviser, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New 22.7.2009
Delhi.
26. All Group A and Group B Posts in the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT). 21.6.2011
27. Recruitment to the posts of Scientist D, E, F and G (Group A Posts) in the Office of the 15.07.2015
Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India. %
Schedule II
(Posts excluded for the purposes of Article 320 (3) (b) of the Constitution of India)
Date from
S.
Designation of the posts/services which
No.
excluded
1. Group B Non-gazetted posts under the Ministry of Water Resources. 13.11.1991
2. Direct recruitment to all Group B (Non-Gazetted) and Group C posts irrespective of the 21.5.1999
Grade pay attached to the post. @ &
24.7.2012
3. Direct Recruitment of all Non-gazetted posts in the Pay Band-2 of ` 9300- ` 34,800 with the 29.9.2005
Grade Pay of ` 4600. * &
28.9.2010
4. Post of Special Director of Enforcement in the Enforcement Directorate in the band-4 of `37,400 1.6.2006
- `67,000/- with grade pay of `8900/-. $
5. Post of Deputy Secretary in the pay band 3 of `15,600 `39,100 with grade pay of `7600/- 30.7.2008
and Director in the pay band 4 of `37,400 `67,000 in the grade pay of `8700/- of Central &
Secretariat Service (CSS). $ & # 3.2.2010
6. Appointment on deputation basis to the posts of Superintendent of Police (Non-IPS), 6.1.2010
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Programmer, Assistant &
Programmer,Administrative Officer, Inspectors, Sub-Inspectors, Section Officer, Senior Private 11.9.2013
Secretary, Stenographer Grade-C and assistant in the National Investigation agency under the
Ministry of Home Affairs, for a period upto 31st January, 2014. **
7. Recruitment of Non Indian Police Service Personnel on deputation basis to all Group A and 28.9.2010
Group B posts upto the rank of Joint Director in the Intelligence Bureau under the Ministry
of Home Affairs. *
8. Appointment on deputation basis to the posts of Deputy Inspector General (Non-IPS), Cyber 11.9.2013
Forensic Examiner, Crime Scene Assistant and Forensic Physiologist in the National Investigation
Agency under the Ministry of Home Affairs, for a period upto 31st January, 2014. ***
9. Recruitment as may be made at any time within a period of three years to the post of Deputy 10.10.2013
Superintendent of Police in the Central Bureau of Investigation under the Ministry of Personnel,
Grievances and Pensions, the Department of Personnel and Training.##
10. All Group B Posts carrying a Grade pay less than Rs. 4800/- in Pay Band-2 of Rs. 9300 to 03.06.2015
34800/- filled by the method of deputation (including Short Term Contract).^
11. Recruitment of Personnel from Intelligence Bureau on deputation basis for appointment to the 18.08.2015
post of Assistant Director in the Prime Ministers Office. $$
12. All Group B Posts carrying A Grade Pay less than Rs.4800/- in Pay Band-2 of Rs. 9300 to 22.12.2015
34800/- filled by absorption method and composite method. ###
13. Direct Recruitment to B (Gazatted) in the Pay Band 2, Rs. 9300-34800 and Grade Pay Rs. 17.02.2016
4800/- posts of Assistant Accounts Officer and Assistant Audit Officer in the Indian Audit and
Accounts Department, in the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. ^^
$ Substituted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 7th October, 2009.
# Substituted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 3rd February, 2010.
* Substituted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 28th September, 2010.
@ Substituted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 24th July, 2012.
** Substituted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 11th September, 2013.
*** Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 11th September, 2013.
## Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 10th October, 2013.
^ Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 3rd June, 2015.
$$ Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 18th August, 2015.
### Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 22nd December, 2015.
^^ Inserted vide DoP&Ts Notification dated 17th February, 2016.
Appendix-33
Cadre and Group-wise strength and detailed break-up of staff strength of posts of the
Commission
Table-1: Cadre-wise, Group-wise Staff Strength of the Commission
Group A Group B Group C Group D Total
Particulars Gazetted Non-Gazetted
31.3.15 31.3.16 31.3.15 31.3.16 31.3.15 31.3.16 31.3.15 31.3.16 31.3.15 31.3.16 31.3.15 31.3.16
Secretariat Cadres 129 129 196 196 418 418 301 290 -- -- 1044 1033
Cadres of other 3 3 7 7 9 9 8 8 -- -- 27 27
participating
ministries/
departments
Departmental 2 2 36 36 -- -- 38 38
Canteen
Total 188 188 243 256 539 525 1009 934 -- -- 1979 1903
Sanctioned
Sl. Sanctioned Strength as
Name of Post Strength as Difference
No. on 31-3-2016
on 31-3-2015
1 Linguistic Administrator 0 1 +1
2 Executive Director (ER) 1 0 -1
3 Director (ER) 0 2 +2
4 Joint Director (ER) 5 3 -2
5 Junior Research Officer (RS&A) 4 8 +4
6 Data Processing Assistant Grade A 0 21 +21
7 Data Entry Operator Grade E 0 14 +14
8 Data Processing Assistant - 16 +16
9 Data Processing & Programme Assistant 3 0 -3
10 Programme Asst.-cum- Console Operator 4 0 -4
11 Superintendent (Data Processing) 21 0 -21
12 Research Assistant (RS&A) 5 0 -5
13 Data Entry Operator Grade D 45 32 -13
14 Data Entry Operator Grade C 10 0 -10
15 Senior Secretariat Assistant (Erstwhile UDC) 185 177 -8
16 Junior Secretariat Assistant (Erstwhile LDC) 82 79 -3
17 Data Entry Operator Gr. B 25 0 -25
18 LDC (Ex Cadre) 38 0 -38
19 General Duty Clerk 3 2 -1
431 355 -(76)
Total Difference -(76)
As on
Sl.No. Particulars As on 31.03.2015
31.03.2016
35. Data Entry Operator Gr G - 3*
36. Research Officer (RS&A) 4 4
37. Programmer 10 -
38. Engineer 1 -
39. System Analyst - 11
40. Assistant Director (Confidential Security) 3 3
41. Deputy Director (Confidential) 1 1
42. Sr. EM&MO 1 1
43. Staff Officer to Chairman 1 1
44. Liaison and Protocol Officer 1 1
III Cadres of other participating Ministries/ Departments 3 3
45. Director (Official Language) 1 1
46. Deputy Director (OL) 2 2
B Group 'B' 780 779
Group 'B' Gazetted 243 256
I. Secretariat Cadres 196 196
47. Section Officer 141 141
48. Private Secretary 55 55
II. UPSC's Cadres 40 53
49. Junior Analyst 1 1
50. Junior Research Officer 4^ 8^
51. Accounts Officer 6 6
52. Superintendent (DP) 21* -
53. Data Entry Operator Gr. E - 14*
54. Data Processing &Programming Assistant 3 -
55. Data Processing Assistant - 16
56. Reception Officer 1 1
57. Estate Manager & Meeting Officer 2 2
58. Assistant Library & Information Officer 1 1
59. Security Officer 1 1
60. Assistant Administrative Officer 1 1
61. Staff Officer to Secretary 1 1
62. Assistant Superintendent (Telephones) 1 1
III. Cadres of other participating Ministries/Departments 7 7
63. Assistant Director (OL) 4 4
64. Pay &Accounts Officer 1 1
65. Assistant Accounts Officer/ JAO (P&AO) 2 2
Group 'B' Non-Gazetted 537 523
As on
Sl.No. Particulars As on 31.03.2015
31.03.2016
I. Secretariat Cadres 418 418
66. Assistant Section Officer 357 357
67. Personal Assistant(Gr. C of CSSS) 61 61
II. UPSC's Cadres 110 96
68. Data Processing & Programme Assistant 3 -
69. Sr. Machine Operator 1 1
70. Research Assistant (Work Study) 4 4
71. Junior Accounts Officer 9 9
72. Programme Asstt.-cum-Console Operator 4 -*
73. Data Processing Assistant Gr A - 21*
74. Vigilance Assistant 2 2
75. Supervisor (Confd.) 1 1
76. Estate Supervisor 2 2
77. Receptionist 1 1
78. House Keeper 1 1
79. Technical Assistant (Accounts) 15 15
80. Research Assistant (RS&A) 5^ -^
81. Motor Transport Supervisor 1 1
82. Security Assistant 1 1
83. Protocol Assistant 1 1
84. Head Typist (Hindi) 1 1
85. Data Entry Operator(Grade D) 45 32
86. Data Entry Operator (Grade C) 10 -
87. Library & Information Assistant 1 1
88. Confidential Assistant 1 1
89. Staff Car Driver (Special Grade) 1 1
III. Cadres of other participating Ministries/Departments 9 9
90. Senior Translator 5 5
91. Junior Translator 4 4
C. Group 'C' 973 898
I. Secretariat Cadres 301 290
92. Senior Secretariat Assistant 185 177
93. Stenographer (Grade D of CSSS) 18 18
94. Junior Secretariat Assistant 82 79
95. Staff Car Driver 16 16
II. UPSC's Cadres 664 600
96. Senior Typist (Hindi) 2 2
97. Care Taker 2 2
As on
Sl.No. Particulars As on 31.03.2015
31.03.2016
98. Junior Reception Officer 2 2
99. Carpenter 1 1
100. Data Entry Operator (GradeB) 25* -*
101. Asstt. Supervisor (Confd.) 1 1
102. Machine Operator 4 4
103. Lower Division Clerk(Ex-cadre) 38 -
104. General Duty Clerk 3 2
105. Despatch Rider 2 2
106. Jr. Machine Operator 2 2
107. Assistant Caretaker 1 1
108. Senior Record Keeper 13 13
109. Cook (Advisers Suite) 6 6
110. Bearer (Advisers Suite) 8 8
111. Wash Boy (Advisers Suit) 4 4
112. Assistant Cook (Advisers Suit) 3 3
113. Library Clerk 2 2
114. Typist (Hindi) 1 1
115. Linemen 1 1
116. Multi-Tasking Staff 537 537
117. Library Attendant 3 3
118. Franking Machine Operator 2 2
119. Nursing Orderly 1 1
I. Cadres of other participating Ministries/Departments 8 8
120. Senior Accountant/Accountant (P&AO unit) 8 8
E. CANTEEN STAFF 38 38
I. GROUP B 02 02
121. General Manager (Canteen) 1 1
122. Manager-cum-Accountant 1 1
II. GROUP C 36 36
123. Halwai 2 2
124. Asstt. Manager cum Store Keeper 2 2
125. Canteen Clerk 6 6
126. Cook 2 2
127. Assistant Halwai 2 2
128. Tea/ Coffee Maker 2 2
129. Bearer 14 14
130. Wash Boy 4 4
131. Safai Karamchari 2 2
*After Re-structuring of IS Wing of UPSC vide order No.A-11013/1/2015-Adm.I dated 14th May 2015
^After Re-structuring of RS&A Wing of UPSC vide order No.A-11013/2/2015-Adm.I dated 20th July, 2015
166
Representation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes & Other Backward Classes
employees and Persons with Disabilities
Table-1: Representation of SCs, STs and OBCs
Annual Report 2015-16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Group A 163 28 18 9 1 - - - 9 - - 2 - -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
167
Annual Report 2015-16
Appendix-36
Statement showing the receipts and expenditure of the Union Public Service Commission
during the year 2015-16
A-Receipts
B-Expenditure
* Receipts under Exam/Recruitment fee are accounted for in Govt. Account by the P&AO, UPSC/Controller
of Accounts, Ministry of PPG&P.
Appendix-37
LIST OF FORMER CHAIRMEN OF UPSC (SINCE 1926)