You are on page 1of 13

Hydrobiologia 527: 3547, 2004.

 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 35

Ecosystem processes performed by unionid mussels in stream mesocosms:


species roles and eects of abundance

Caryn C. Vaughn1,*, Keith B. Gido1,2 & Daniel E. Spooner1


1
Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
2
Present address: Kansas State University, Division of Biology, Ackert Hall Manhatten, KS 66506, USA
(*Author for correspondence: Tel.:+1-405-325-4034, Fax:+1-405-325-7702, E-mail:cvaughn@ou.edu)

Received 3 February 2003; in revised form 3 February 2004; accepted 9 February 2004

Key words: ecosystem processes, unionidae, species roles, biomass, clearance rates, nutrient excretion, biodeposition,
stream mesocosms, stream, mussels, bivales, nutrient cycling, functional redundancy

Abstract
Unionid mussels are a guild of freshwater, sedentary lter-feeders experiencing a global decline in both
species richness and abundance. To predict how these losses may impact stream ecosystems we need to
quantify the eects of both overall mussel biomass and individual species on ecosystem processes. In this
study we begin addressing these fundamental questions by comparing rates of ecosystem processes for two
common mussel species, Amblema plicata and Actinonaias ligamentina, across a range of abundance levels
and at two trophic states (low and high productivity) in stream mesocosms. At both low and high pro-
ductivity, community respiration, water column ammonia, nitrate, and phosphorus concentrations, and
algal clearance rates were all linearly related to overall mussel biomass. After removing the eects of
biomass with ANCOVA, we found few dierences between species. In a separate series of experiments,
nutrient excretion (phosphorus, ammonia, and molar N:P) and biodeposition rates were only marginally
dierent between species. For the species studied here, functional eects of unionids in streams were similar
between species and linearly related to biomass, indicating the potential for strong eects when overall
mussel biomass is high and hydrologic residence times are long.

Introduction

In marine and estuarine systems bivalve mollusks organisms by an order of magnitude (Negus, 1966;
have large inuences on ecosystem processes where Layzer et al., 1993), and production by mussels
they dominate benthic biomass and couple benthic (range from 1 to 20 g dry mass m)2y)1) can equal
and pelagic energy and material cycling (Dame, that by all other macrobenthos in many streams
1996). In freshwater systems, a large body of re- (Strayer et al., 1994). Thus, in rivers where they are
cent research has focused on the functional eects abundant, mussels should play an important role
of invasive, epifaunal zebra mussels (Dreissena in ecosystem functioning.
polymorpha) that impact lakes and streams via Despite the potential importance of unionids to
high rates of lter feeding (Mellina et al., 1995; stream ecosystems, we have very little quantitative
MacIsaac, 1996; Caraco et al., 1997; Strayer et al., information on the overall importance of mussels
1999). Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) to stream function. Although it may seem intuitive
are a guild of benthic, burrowing, lter-feeding that mussel eects on ecosystem processes should
bivalves. The biomass of healthy unionid assem- increase with overall mussel abundance/biomass,
blages can exceed the biomass of all other benthic this has not been demonstrated for unionids
36

(Vaughn & Hakenkamp, 2001). Historically, proportion to their availability (Bronmark


unionids dominated the benthic biomass of eastern & Malmqvist, 1982; Paterson, 1984; Nichols
North American rivers (Parmalee & Bogan, 1998), & Garling, 2000; Raikow & Hamilton, 2000).
especially in undisturbed systems. In recent years, However, there is also evidence pointing to-
many North American mussel populations have wards unique ecological roles for mussel species,
undergone a drastic decline (Bogan, 1993; Neves and that species roles may vary with environ-
et al., 1997). In most cases it is not only the rare mental context. DiDonato (1998) used growth
mussel species that are declining, but common measurements to demonstrate competition be-
species are in decline as well (Vaughn & Taylor, tween two unionids in a food-limited lake, and
1999). For example, 42% of North Carolinas linked this to dierences in ltering abilities bet-
historically abundant unionid populations are in ween the two species. Water temperature, particle
poor condition and only 31% may remain viable size and concentration, ow regime, and bivalve
over the next 30 years (Neves et al., 1997). Such a size and gill morphology all have been found to
decline represents a signicant loss of benthic, l- inuence mussel ltration rate (Vaughn & Ha-
ter-feeding biomass. Thus, it is important to kenkamp, 2001). Both the size of the gill (Payne
understand the relationship between mussel bio- et al., 1995; Lei et al., 1996) and the number and
mass and ecosystem processes to predict how structural complexity of cirri on the gill (Silverman
biomass losses will impact stream function. et al., 1995, 1997) inuence ltering abilities.
It is equally important to document the roles of Excretion rate varies between species of bivalves,
individual mussel species in streams. Mussels are as well as with individual size, temperature, stage
one of the most imperilled groups globally, with in reproductive cycle and food availability (Dietz,
70% of species considered threatened (Bogan, 1985; James, 1987; Lauritsen & Mozley, 1989;
1993). If mussel species perform similar roles in Nalepa et al., 1991; Baker & Hornbach, 2001).
ecosystems, the loss of some species may have little To predict how the loss of both mussel species
impact on stream function. However, if species and overall mussel biomass will impact stream
play distinct roles, multi-species assemblages must ecosystems, we must quantify the eects of both
be maintained to protect ecosystem health and overall mussel abundance and individual species
services (Vaughn & Hakenkamp, 2001). on ecosystem processes. In this study we begin
The potential for redundancy in ecological addressing these fundamental questions by com-
roles among mussel species should be high for the paring rates of ecosystem processes for two com-
following reasons: (1) Mussels have similar life mon mussel species across a range of abundance
histories. Riverine species are very long-lived levels in stream mesocosms. Because species roles
(usually >25 years) and slow-growing, adults are may vary under dierent environmental condi-
relatively sedentary, and most larvae are obligate tions, we examine these questions under two sets
ectoparasites on shes (Kat, 1984; Vaughn & of environmental conditions (low and high food
Taylor, 2000). (2) Mussels are a highly speciose availability). Finally, we extrapolate our results to
group that typically occur as dense, multi-species the level of a stream reach to postulate mussel ef-
assemblages (Vaughn, 1997). For example, in the fects on stream ecosystems and the potential im-
Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, a typical mussel bed pact of their decline.
contains 1317 co-occurring unionid species
(Vaughn et al., 1996) at mean densities of
21 individuals m)2 (Vaughn et al., 1997). (3) There Methods
is little evidence for dierences in microhabitat
preference between mussel species within stream Study organisms and eld site
reaches and within actual mussel beds or patches
(Strayer, 1981; Holland-Bartels, 1990; Strayer & The Kiamichi River, in the Ouachita Uplands of
Ralley, 1993; Vaughn & Pyron, 1995). (4) Most southeastern Oklahoma, is a comparatively
studies have found that mussels feed non-selec- undisturbed, medium-sized river (180 km in
tively and have high diet overlap, ingesting phy- length, watershed area is 4800 km2) that was re-
toplankton, bacteria and organic material in cently selected by The Nature Conservancy as one
37

of the most critical watersheds in the US for pro- articial streams or in a natural stream. Meso-
tecting biodiversity (Master & Flack, 1998) based cosms were lined with clean, dry sand and lled
largely on its healthy mussel populations (Vaughn with 70 l of water from a local reservoir. Water
& Pyron, 1995). The Kiamichi River contains an was circulated at a rate of 2527 l h)1 with 47 w
intact mussel fauna (no species extinctions), with pumps. Mesocosms were illuminated with 15 w,
high mussel abundance and richness (30 species; wide spectrum uorescent lights on a 12:12 h light-
Vaughn et al., 1996). dark cycle. Water temperature was maintained at
We selected two unionid species that occur to- 21 C.
gether in the Kiamichi River and are common We would expect ecosystem eects of mussels
throughout the Mississippi River drainage, Am- to vary with stream trophic state because of dif-
blema plicata (Say) (subfamily Ambleminae) and fering food availability for mussels and diering
Actinonaias ligamentina (Lamarck) (subfamily nutrient regeneration by algae. To simulate these
Lampsilinae) (Parmalee & Bogan, 1998). These varied eld conditions, the experiment was con-
two species are the most dominant in the Kiamichi ducted under both low and high productivity
system in terms of overall abundance and inci- conditions. Prior to the experiment, each meso-
dence (Vaughn & Pyron, 1995). We expected that cosm was lled with water from a local reservoir
these species might dier in their ecological roles. (Lake Thunderbird, Cleveland Co., OK). In the
In addition to dierent phylogeny, the species use low productivity treatments beginning mean
dierent reproductive strategies (Parmalee & Bo- chlorophyll a concentration was 10 lg l )1 and
gan, 1998) and have dierences in physiology and mesocosms were not supplemented with algae for
biochemical composition (Baker & Hornbach, the remainder of the experiments. In the high
2001). In the Kiamichi system, A.ligamentina tends productivity experiment beginning mean chloro-
to be larger and more active than A. plicata phyll a concentration was 20 lg 1)1 and meso-
(Spooner, 2002). cosms were spiked daily with a mixed-culture algal
slurry to maintain high algal concentrations in the
Mesocosm experiment water column. The dominant form in the slurry
was the green alga Ankistrodesmus sp. Preliminary
A mesocosm experiment was conducted in Feb- observations and gut analyses conrmed that both
ruary, 2000. Individuals of A. plicata and A. liga- mussel species readily fed on the algal slurry.
mentina were collected from the Kiamichi River Because we were interested in eects of both
and held in the laboratory in sediment-free Frigid mussel abundance and individual species on eco-
Units Living Streams at 10 C for 3 weeks. Indi- system processes, we designed the experiment
viduals were inactive at this cold temperature and using a regression approach (e.g., Scheiner &
were not fed during the holding period. One week Gurevitch, 1993; Gido & Matthews, 2000),
before beginning the experiment, water tempera- whereby mussel densities were manipulated across
ture in the Living Streams was gradually brought their natural range rather than at just two or three
up to 21 C, also the temperature of the stream values. Our design consisted of two productivity
mesocosms (see below). Immediately prior to the treatments (low and high) two species (A. plicata
experiment, each mussel was scrubbed gently to and A. ligamentina), with each species stocked at
remove any attached algae and microbial material eight densities (3, 7, 10, 14, 20, 27, and 34 mus-
and its wet weight was recorded. sels m2 and a no mussel control), resulting in a
The experiment was conducted in recirculating total of 32 mesocosm experimental units, with
stream mesocosms (122 48 28 cm). The use of each mesocosm containing only a single species of
recirculating mesocosms is common in ecological mussel. The selected mussel densities represent a
studies of stream invertebrates (Lamberti & range of natural densities within mussel beds in the
Steinman, 1993; Cardinale et al., 2002) and al- Kiamichi River (mean density is 21 m)2; Vaughn
lowed us to obtain much more precise estimates of et al., 1997). Within a species we attempted to use
what mussels were putting into and taking out of equivalent sized individuals, but any size dier-
the water and sediment than would have been ences were corrected later by presenting data on a
possible in a similar experiment in ow-through per biomass basis. The experiment ran for 6 days.
38

This time span was long enough to allow us to We used a repeated measures analysis of
examine nutrient contributions by the mussels, but covariance (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995) to test for the
short enough that we avoided potential negative eects of mussel biomass (the covariate), species
eects of nutrient accumulations. and time on various ecosystem properties in the
Mussels should lter phytoplankton and other stream mesocosms. Each mesocosm unit was
suspended material from the water column, excrete considered a single variate. Measurements from all
nutrients back to the water column, and biode- response variables were examined for normal-
posit organic material to the sediment as feces and ity prior to analyses; no transformations were
pseudofeces (Vaughn & Hakenkamp, 2001). The necessary.
ecosystem variables we examined were chosen to
encompass these fundamental processes. All of Individual excretion rates
these variables were measured for whole meso-
cosms, not individual mussels. Response variables Individual nutrient excretion rates were estimated
included phosphate, ammonia, and nitrate mea- using methodology similar to that used for shes
sured on days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 and whole-stream (Schaus et al., 1997). At the completion of the
respiration rates on days 1, 2, 4, and 6. We mea- mesocosm experiment, a subsample of mussels was
sured chlorophyll a concentrations after 0, 6 and removed from the sediment and all biolm was
24 h, and 2 and 4 days in the high productivity gently scrubbed from the shells. Individual mussels
treatments to allow estimation of clearance rates. were placed in a ZipLock bag with 0.5 l pre-l-
Chlorophyll a concentrations in the low produc- tered water from the mesocosm. An initial water
tivity treatments, which were not supplemented, sample was taken from the pre-ltered water and
were too low for accurate estimation of clearance immediately placed on ice. The bag was then
rates. placed in the mesocosm for one hour after which a
Water samples for soluble reactive phosphorus second water sample was removed and placed on
(SRP), ammonia (NH3N), and nitrate (NO3N) ice. Water samples were analyzed for ammonia
were ltered through Gelman A/E lters and and SRP as described above. Water temperature
immediately placed on ice and analyzed within was 21 C in each mesocosm during the excretion
12 h of collection. Nutrient concentrations were measurements.
determined colorimetrically using a Beckman DU At the end of the excretion experiment wet
520 spectrophotometer. A detailed description of weight was recorded for all individuals. Mussels
nutrient and chlorophyll a analysis is given in used to measure excretion rates were dissected
APHA (1995). In short, phosphate was determined from their shell and dried at 60 C for 2 days;
with the Ascorbic Acid method, ammonia with the other individuals were returned to the river. Total
Phenate method, and nitrate was estimated using wet weight (including shell) tissue dry weight
cadmium reduction. Water samples for chloro- regression models were used to estimate dry weight
phyll a (from 0.5 to 2 l) were ltered through a for individuals that were not sacriced (A. liga-
Gelman A/E lter and lters were frozen to lyse mentina tissue dry weight 0.039 (total wet
cells. Chlorophyll a was extracted with acetone weight) ) 2.943, r2 0.569, p 0.001; A. plicata
and samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically tissue dry weight 0.016 (total wet
with a correction for pheophytin (APHA, 1995). weight) + 0.168, r2 0.525, p 0.005). Using
Community respiration was measured on days these models, all rates are presented on a dry
1, 2, 4 and 6 during mid-day. Here we dene weight basis. Individual excretion rates were
community as everything living in the mesocosms. examined with linear regression and species were
The pumps were turned o and each mesocosm compared using analysis of covariance with bio-
was covered with a tarp. Initial oxygen concen- mass as the covariate (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).
trations were measured, the mesocosms were left
for 1 h, and a nal oxygen reading was taken. Biodeposition experiment
Community respiration was then estimated as
oxygen consumption of each stream mesocosm in We conducted a separate experiment to estimate
the dark over a 1 h period (Wetzel & Likens, 1991). biodeposition rates. Here we dene biodeposition
39

as feces and pseudofeces produced by mussels and Kiamichi River under three known hydrologic
deposited onto the sediment (Dame, 1996; Iglesias states and three natural mussel densities (following
et al., 1998). We conducted this experiment under Strayer et al., 1999). Our model was based on an
no-ow conditions to obtain a baseline estimate of actual reach in the Kiamichi River that is 1300 m2
biodeposition not confounded by potential with an average mussel density of 21 in-
downstream transport in the current. There were dividuals m)2 (Vaughn et al., 1997, unpublished
three mussel treatments (A. ligamentina, A. plicata data). Although this particular stream reach con-
and a shell control) and three food concentrations tains 17 species of mussels, over 80% of individuals
(3, 6 and 10 mg AFDM l)1), each replicated eight are either A. ligamentina or A. plicata (Vaughn,
times. Mussels were collected from the Kiamichi unpublished data), thus by examining the eect of
River as in the previous experiment, held at 21 C, these species we should get a good indication of the
and starved for 1 week prior to initiating the potential eects of the entire mussel assemblage. We
experiment. Individual mussels were then placed in used the mean 12 h clearance rate for both species
plastic beakers that were lled with 500 ml of clean combined. Hydrologic residence times in days were
sand. Beakers were enclosed within 4, 48 l glass estimated from eld measurements of depth and
aquaria lled with ltered water from a local res- discharge collected from this site in August (low
ervoir. Each aquarium contained two beakers with ow), May, and January (peak ow) 2000.
A. ligamentina, two beakers with A. plicata, and
two beakers with either an A. ligamentina or
A. plicata shell. Each aquarium was aerated with Results
an airstone suspended in the water column so that
biodeposits within the beakers were not disturbed. Mesocosm experiment
Mussels were fed the same algal slurry used in the
previous experiment. Experiments ran for 48 h, Strong biomass eects, and no signicant species
after which all biodeposits were carefully pipetted eects, were observed for most response variables
from the sediments. Biodeposits were dried at in the mesocosm experiment, in both low and high
60 C for 24 h and then combusted at 550 C for productivity treatments (Table 1). Water column
1 h to determine ash free dry mass (APHA, 1995). chlorophyll a concentrations in the high produc-
Water temperature was maintained at 21 C tivity treatments illustrate this trend. The amount
throughout the experiments. We used a one-way of chlorophyll in the water column decreases with
ANOVA to test for dierences in biodeposits increasing mussel biomass, reecting increased
(mg AFDM g mussel dry mass)1 h)1) among the clearance of chlorophyll from the water column by
three treatments (A. plicata, A. ligamentina, and mussels. This trend holds for both species and
control). We then compared biodeposition rates across days (food was added daily to the high
for the two species across three food concentra- productivity treatments) (Fig. 1). While A. liga-
tions using a repeated measures ANOVA with mentina remove more chlorophyll from the water
food concentration as the repeated factor. than A. plicata, this dierence is non-signicant
once data are standardized for biomass (Table 1).
Field extrapolation The only variable not signicantly aected by
biomass was phosphate in the high productivity
The rate at which mussels lter food from the water treatment.
column is often measured as clearance of chloro- In general, biomass eects increased over the
phyll from the water column (Coughlan, 1969; duration of the experiment, resulting in signicant
Kryger & Riisgard, 1988). Clearance rates were interactions between time and biomass for most
determined by comparing chlorophyll a concen- variables (Table 1). This trend is nicely illustrated
trations in treatment mesocosms with control (i.e., by water column nitrate concentrations. Nitrate
no mussels added) mesocosms in the high produc- concentrations increase over time regardless of
tivity treatments. We then extrapolated our labo- species or productivity treatment, and increases
ratory-measured clearance rates to estimate are greater in treatments with higher mussel bio-
clearance time in days for a stream reach in the mass (Fig. 2).
40

Table 1. F-statistics and associated p-values (in parentheses) derived from repeated measures ANCOVAs that tested for the eects of
biomass (covariate) and species on the various ecosystem properties of experimental mesocosms

Respiration NH3-N NO3-N PO4-P Chlorophyll a

Eect low productivity


Biomass 59.83 (<0.001) 181.42 (<0.001) 100.14 (<0.001) 17.60 (0.001)
Species 0.54 (0.480) 1.42 (0.259) 0.27 (0.613) 0.32 (0.581)
Time 0.23 (0.798) 1.32 (0.289) 7.61 (0.003) 7.56 (0.001)
Time biomass 9.81 (0.001) 9.86 (0.001) 75.72 (<0.001) 4.31 (0.026)
Time species 0.73 (0.494) 0.13 (0.879) 0.20 (0.818) 0.07 (0.930)

Eect high productivity


Biomass 9.11 (0.012) 58.52 (<0.001) 37.47 (<0.001) 0.44 (0.520) 12.93 (0.004)
Species 0.09 (0.773) 0.05 (0.828) 0.23 (0.642) 0.65 (0.435) 1.72 (0.216)
Time 3.68 (0.022) 0.64 (0.595) 6.97 (0.001) 0.46 (0.713) 9.83 (<0.001)
Time biomass 2.77 (0.057) 11.79 (<0.001) 43.83 (<0.001) 3.57 (0.024) 2.58 (0.019)
Time species 0.77 (0.515) 0.37 (0.775) 0.32 (0.810) 0.91 (0.449) 0.26 (0.966)

Bold-face font highlights signicant relationships.

Individual excretion rates r2 0.05, p 0.57), log ammonia (A. ligamentina,


r2 0.11, p 0.32; A. plicata, r2 0.005,
Within a species, there were no signicant associ- p 0.85), or N:P molar ratios (A. ligamentina,
ations between individual excretion rates and r2 0.012, p 0.746; A. plicata, r2 0.008,
individual biomass for either log phosphorus p 0.817) (Fig. 3). ANCOVA using body mass as
(A. ligamentina, r2 0.01, p 0.77; A. plicata, the covariate revealed no signicant dierences

35 35
30 6 hours 30 1 day
25 25
20 20
15 15
Chlorophyll a (g l )

10 10
-1

5 5
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
30 30

25 2 days 25 4 days
20 20

15 15

10 10
5 5
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Mussel dry mass (g)


Figure 1. Chlorophyll concentrations in the high productivity experiment at 6 h, 1 , 2, and 4 days. Squares represent A. ligamentina,
circles represent A. plicata, and the controls are shown as triangles.
41

Low productivity High productivity

A. plicata A. plicata
1000 1000

100 100
Log NO3 (ug l )
-1

10 10
10 100 10 100

A. ligamentina A. ligamentina
1000 1000

100 100

10 10
10 100 10 100
Mussel dry mass (g)
Figure 2. Relationship between log mussel dry mass and log water column nitrate concentration on days 2, 4 and 6. Points represent
day 2 (d), Day 4 (s), and Day 6 (.).

between the two species for either log ammonia dierent between species (F 3.38, p 0.087)
excretion (F 1.357, p 0.26) or for molar N:P (Fig. 4).
ratio (F 1.2, p 0.289). However, there was a
marginally signicant dierence between species in
log phosphorus excretion (F 4.015, p 0.06). Discussion
With both species combined log excretion rates for
phosphorus (r2 0.46, p < 0.001) and ammonia Both mussel species had strong eects on ecosys-
(r2 0.39, p 0.004) signicantly increased with tem processes in our experiments. We were able to
biomass (Fig. 3). The slope of the relationship quantify rates of algal removal, nutrient excretion,
between log phosphate excretion rate and log dry and biodeposition of organic material. Mussel ef-
mass is <1, suggesting a declining per capita fects on these processes usually were linearly re-
excretion rate in larger individuals. lated to biomass, regardless of species, and mussels
inuenced these processes even at low biomass.
Biodeposition experiment These eects were observed in both low and high
productivity treatments, suggesting that mussels
The amount of organic material deposited on the have the potential to inuence ecosystem processes
sediment in the biodeposition experiment was across a range of stream trophic states. Our results
signicantly higher in the mussel treatments than corroborate and expand on other studies that re-
the control (F 38.65, p < 0.001; mean AFDM port substantial eects of high bivalve abundance
for A. plicata treatments 2.15 mg, A. ligamenti- on ecosystem processes (Cohen et al., 1984; Phelps,
na treatments 6.81 mg, and control 0.35 mg). 1994; Welker & Walz, 1998; Strayer et al., 1999).
Biomass-corrected biodeposition signicantly in- For example, Welker & Walz (1998) reported that
creased with increasing food concentration a very dense bed of unionid mussels caused bio-
(F 50.01, p < 0.001), but was only marginally logical oligotrophication of the River Spree,
42

(mg AFDM g mussel dry mass-1 h-1)


10
0.10
PO4-P (log mol mussel-1 h-1)

(A) A. plicata
0.08 A. ligamentina

Biodeposition rate
1
0.06

0.1 0.04

0.02
0.01
10 0.00
NH3-N (log mol mussel-1 h-1)

3 6 10
(B) Suspended organic matter (mg AFDM l-1)
Figure 4. Mean biodeposition by A. ligamentina and A. plicata
at three food concentrations.
1

Kiamichi River supports this prediction. In Au-


gust, water volume in this reach is reduced and
0.1 ows are very low, thus it takes almost a day for
100
water to move through the reach and across the
mussel bed (Fig. 5). Under these conditions,
(C) mussels can turn over a substantial proportion of
the water column at even relatively low densities.
N:P ratio (molar)

Consequently, at low ows mussels should aect


10 most ecosystem processes in the reach, and the
magnitude of these eects will increase with in-
creased biomass. At higher ows and water vol-
umes during May and January, only a small
fraction of the water column is ltered by mussels
1
1 0 1 before it ows through the reach (Fig. 5). Under
Mussel dry mass (g) these conditions, small-scale eects of mussel
Figure 3. Nutrient excretion by individual mussels. (A) phos- activity are likely overridden by advective forces
phate, (B) nitrate, (C) N:P ratios. Squares represent A. liga- (Strayer et al., 1999).
mentina and circles represent A. plicata. There are obvious limitations in extrapolating
laboratory data based on a short-term, closed-
system study of two species to a natural stream
Germany, but did not test this experimentally or with vagaries in ow and other processes (Hart &
examine eects at lower unionid densities. Finelli, 1999). A recirculating stream mesocosm
Marine bivalves (Dame, 1996) and zebra mus- design allowed us to examine the contributions of
sels (Strayer et al., 1999) signicantly aect pri- mussels uncoupled from downstream transport
mary production when ltration rates are large eects. This closed-system design closely parallels
compared to food supply. In streams, the amount conditions in the Kiamichi River in late summer
of food that bivalves lter from the water column and fall, where mussel beds are contained in
is greatly inuenced by hydrologic residence time shallow, isolated reaches with long hydrologic
(Strayer et al., 1999). Thus, unionid mussels residence times. Thus, our data should be a good
should be most likely to inuence production and approximation of contributions by mussels to the
other ecosystem processes when biomass is high stream at low ows. In addition, our extrapolation
relative to water volume and current velocity. The is for a mussel bed contained in one stream reach.
extrapolation of our data to a stream reach in the The degree to which mussels may impact ecosys-
43

Mussels turn over 10%


of water as moves through

100
Jan. Water turned over 10 times
by mussels as moves through
10
Clearance time (d)

May Aug.
1

0.1

0.01

0.001

0.0001
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Hydrologic residence time (d)


Figure 5. Relationship between hydrologic residence time (time in days required for all water to move through a stream reach) and
clearance time (time in days required for the mussel community to lter a volume of water equal to the entire volume of water in the
stream reach) for a mussel bed in the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, during January, May, and August. Points represent mussel densities
of 54 m)2 (h), 20 m)2 (n) and 7 m)2 (s). Below the solid diagonal line mussels theoretically lter the entire water volume before it
ows across the mussel bed. Above the solid diagonal line water ows across the bed before being completely turned over by mussel
ltration.

tem processes in an entire stream will depend on mussel)1 h)1). Other studies also have found that
the number and spatial distribution of mussel nutrient excretion varies between species of mus-
beds, the biomass of mussels in those beds, overall sels, as well as with individual size, temperature,
stream hydrologic state, and interactions with the stage in the reproductive cycle and food avail-
rest of the stream community. ability (Potts, 1954; Dietz, 1985; James, 1987;
Excretion of ammonia and dissolved organic Williams & McMahon, 1989; Davis et al., 2000;
nitrogen by bivalves controls primary production Baker & Hornbach, 2001). Such species-specic
in nitrogen-limited marine systems (Dame, 1996). dierences in nutrient excretion may inuence the
Following the invasion of epifaunal zebra mussels composition of the algal community. For example,
(Dreissena polymorpha ) in the Hudson River, SRP based on our results, A. ligamentina and A. plicata
nearly doubled (Strayer et al., 1999). Excretion by would have equivalent mass-specic eects in a
zebra mussels also has been linked to blooms of nitrogen-limited system, so mussel species com-
nitrogen-limited cyanobacteria in several lakes position would not be predicted to change the al-
(Arnott & Vanni, 1996; MacIsaac, 1996; Vander- gal community. However, in a phosphorus-limited
ploeg et al., 2001). Our data indicate that unionid system the dominance of one species or the other
mussels can play an important role in nutrient could have large eects on the algal community,
processing in stream ecosystems by removing algae depending on mussel biomass and hydrologic
and particulate organic matter from the water conditions.
column and converting it to dissolved nutrients Unionid eects on nutrient processing should
that can be taken up directly by the algae. vary for dierent nutrients and with stream tro-
The two species diered in nutrient excretion phic and hydrologic conditions. Under high pro-
rates. A. ligamentina were about twice as big on ductivity conditions we would predict that
average than A. plicata and their excretion of increased algal densities would lead to more food
ammonia was about twice as much (3.64 0.4 for unionids which would lead to more nutrient
compared to 1.78 0.21 lmol mussel)1 h)1). excretion. This is the pattern we observed for
However, phosphorus excretion rates were three nitrogen. Nitrogen concentrations increased with
times higher for A. ligamentina than A. plicata unionid biomass in both the low and high pro-
(0.49 0.08 compared to 0.16 0.05 lmol - ductivity treatments, but were much greater in the
44

high productivity treatments. However, higher al- et al., 1990; Jaramillo et al., 1992; Navarro &
gal densities also might result in faster nutrient Thompson, 1997). Similar eects have been dem-
uptake and thus a lower water column nutrient onstrated for zebra mussels (Roditi et al., 1997;
concentration. We think this phenomenon ex- Stewart et al., 1998) and Asian clams (Hakenkamp
plains why phosphorus concentrations increased & Palmer, 1999; Hakenkamp et al., 2001) in
with mussel biomass in the low productivity freshwater. In this study, mussels biodeposited a
treatment but not in the high productivity treat- large amount of organic material, and the amount
ment, where phosphorus likely was immediately increased with food concentration. For example,
taken up by the algae. Unionid eects should be at the high food concentration of 10 mg
strongest in streams with long hydrologic residence AFDM l)1, an average A. ligamentina individual
times, particularly in nutrient-limited reaches be- (7.7 g tissue dry mass) biodeposited 0.6 mg or 6%
low dense mussel beds. For example, both nitrogen of the seston in the water column within an hour.
and phosphorus were limiting in the Kiamichi Thus, an entire assemblage of mussels should have
River in late summer (Spooner & Vaughn, the potential to remove substantial amounts of
unpublished data), thus mussels have the potential organic material from the water column and de-
to substantially impact algal growth in this system. posit it to the sediment where it can be used by
Mussels can sequester nutrients in their tissues other benthic organisms.
and shell (Vaughn & Hakenkamp, 2001), making We found few dierences in ecosystem pro-
nutrients less available to algae. However, bur- cesses performed by A. ligamentina and A. plicata.
rowing activities of mussels have been shown to There were no signicant dierences between
enhance the rate of nutrient release from the sed- species in whole-stream respiration rates or
iments (Matiso et al., 1985). Thus, mussels ammonia concentrations after accounting for
should have both negative (through consumption biomass. Other studies have reported few mass-
and sequestration) and positive (through direct specic dierences in Q10 values between bivalve
nutrient excretion and release from the sediments) species (McMahon & Bogan, 2001), although
eects on algae. Spooner (2002) measured algal metabolic rate generally decreases with increasing
growth on live mussels compared to empty shells body mass (Alimov, 1975; Heubner, 1982;
in eld enclosures in the Kiamichi River. Algal McMahon & Bogan, 2001). There also were no
growth was signicantly higher on live mussels, dierences in algal clearance rates between the two
most likely as a direct result of increased nutrient mussel species. Few other studies have demon-
availability to algae through mussel excretion. The strated dierences in ltering abilities or particle
direction and magnitude of mussel eects on the selection among mussel species (Vaughn & Ha-
algae and nutrient cycling will depend on the ratio kenkamp, 2001), and where dierences have been
of algal abundance to mussel biomass (Strayer et found they have been for species from very dif-
al., 1999), nutrient limitation, physical conditions ferent habitats (i.e. pond species vs. riverine spe-
in the stream, and characteristics of mussel species. cies; Silverman et al., 1997). Mussels in our
For example, in our experiment A. ligamentina experiment were exposed to the same environ-
individuals were much more active than A. plicata, mental conditions and fed the same algal food
moving around in the mesocosms and bioturbat- source. Thus, any dierences in ltering rates
ing the sediment, whereas A. plicata tended to stay should have been a result of inherent species dif-
in one location for the duration of experiment. ferences.
These behavior patterns have also been observed While we found only a few, relatively subtle
in the eld (Spooner, 2002). Thus, A. ligamentina dierences in the ecological roles of the two mussel
should be more likely than A. plicata to facilitate species we examined, it is important to remember
nutrient release from the sediments. that these two species, although dominant both
In marine and estuarine systems, biodeposition numerically and in terms of biomass (Vaughn
of feces and pseudofeces conveys high-quality pe- et al., 1997), are part of a large, multi-species
lagic resources to the sediment and inuences assemblage. The functional roles of other species
benthic microbial, algal, and invertebrate com- in the assemblage may be more variable. In addi-
munity structure (Carlton et al., 1990; Nichols tion, our experimental design used single-species
45

treatments, but the function of multi-species Carlton, J. T., J. K. Thompson, L. E. Schemel & F. H. Nichols,
assemblages may not be additive (Jonsson & 1990. Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (Califor-
Malmqvist, 2000; Cardinale et al., 2002). Finally, nia, USA) by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis . I.
Introduction and dispersal. Marine Ecology Progress Series
species roles often change with environmental 66: 8194.
context (Cardinale et al., 2000; Wellnitz & Po, Cohen, R. R. H., P. V. Dresler, E. P. J. Phillips & R. L. Cory,
2001). Future studies need to examine the func- 1984. The eect of the Asiatic clam, Corbicula uminea, on
tional role of both additional mussel species and phytoplankton of the Potomac River, Maryland. Limnology
entire, multi-species mussel assemblages under and Oceanography 29: 170180.
Coughlan, J., 1969. The estimation of ltering rate from the
various, realistic environmental scenarios. clearance of suspension. Marine Biology 2: 356358.
Dame, R. F., 1996. Ecology of Marine Bivalves: An Ecosystem
Acknowledgements Approach. CRC Press, New York.
Davis, W. R., A. D. Christian & D. J. Berg, 2000. Nitrogen and
phosphorus cycling by freshwater mussels in a headwater
We thank the University of Oklahoma Biological
stream ecosystem. In Tankersley, R. A., D. I. Warmolts, G.
Station for the use of some equipment, Elizabeth T. Watters, B. J. Armitage, P. D. Johnson & R. S. Butler
Bergey for identifying algae, and Christine Ha- (eds), Freshwater Mollusk Symposium Proceedings: Part II,
kenkamp, Chad Hargrave, David Kesler and Da- Musseling in on Biodiversity. Ohio Biological Survey Special
vid Strayer for commenting on the manuscript. Publication, Columbus, Ohio: 141151.
DiDonato, G. T., 1998. An experimental investigation of
Ken Roberts and David Autery generously al-
interactions between two freshwater mussels, Elliptio wa-
lowed access to mussel beds on the Kiamichi River ccamawensis and Leptodea ochracea, in Lake Waccamaw,
adjoining their property. This work was supported North Carolina: eects of scale and environment. Ph.D.
by NSF grants DEB9870092 and DEB0211010 to Dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
Vaughn. North Carolina.
Dietz, T. H., 1985. Ionic regulation in freshwater mussels: a brief
review. American Malacological Bulletin 2: 233242.
References Gido, K. B. & W. J. Matthews, 2000. Ecosystem eects of water
column minnows in experimental streams. Oecologia 126:
Alimov, A. F., 1975. The rate of metabolism of freshwater bi- 247253.
valve molluscs. Soviet Journal of Ecology 6: 613. Hakenkamp, C. C. & M. A. Palmer, 1999. Introduced bival-
American Public Health Association, 1995. Standard Methods ves in freshwater ecosystems: the impact of Corbicula on
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn. organic matter cycling in a sandy stream. Oecologia 119:
American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 445451.
Arnott, D. L. & M. J. Vanni, 1996. Nitrogen and phosphorus Hakenkamp, C. C., S. G. Ribblett, M. A. Palmer, C. M. Swan,
recycling by the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the J. W. Reid & M. R. Goodison, 2001. The impact of an
western basin of Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries introduced bivalve (Corbicula uminea) on the benthos of a
and Aquatic Sciences 53: 646659. sandy stream. Freshwater Biology 46: 491501.
Baker, S. M. & D. J. Hornbach, 2001. Seasonal metabolism and Hart, D. D. & C. M. Finelli, 1999. Physicalbiological coupling
biochemical composition of two unionid mussels, Actinona- in streams: the pervasive eects of ow on benthic organisms.
ias ligamentina and Amblema plicata. Journal of Molluscan Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 363395.
Studies 67: 407416. Heubner, J. D., 1982. Seasonal variation in two species of
Bogan, A. E., 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: unionid clams from Manitoba, Canada: Respiration. Cana-
Unionidae): a search for causes. American Zoologist 33: dian Journal of Zoology 60: 650654.
599609. Holland-Bartels, L. E., 1990. Physical factors and their inu-
Bronmark, C. & B. Malmqvist, 1982. Resource partitioning ence on the mussel fauna of a main channel border habitat of
between unionid mussels in a Swedish lake outlet. Holarctic the upper Mississippi River. Journal of the North American
Ecology 5: 389395. Benthological Society 9: 327335.
Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole, P. A. Raymond, D. L. Strayer, M. L. Iglesias, J. I. P., M. B. Urrutia, E. Navarro & I. Ibarrola, 1998.
Pace, S. E. G. Findlay & D. T. Fischer, 1997. Zebra mussel Measuring feeding and absorption in suspension-feeding
invasion in a large, turbid river: phytoplankton response to bivalves: an appraisal of the biodeposition method. Journal
increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588602. of Marine Biology and Ecology 219: 7186.
Cardinale, J. B., K. Nelson & M. A. Palmer, 2000. Linking James, M. R., 1987. Ecology of the freshwater mussel Hydrid-
species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems: on the ella mensiesi (Gray) in a small oligotrophic lake. Archiv fur
importance of environmental context. Oikos 91: 175183. Hydrobiologie 108: 337348.
Cardinale, B. J., M. A. Palmer & S. L. Collins, 2002. Species Jaramillo, E., C. Bertran & A. Bravo, 1992. Mussel biodepo-
diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspe- sition in an estuary in southern Chile. Marine Ecology
cic facilitation. Nature 415: 426429. Progress Series 82: 8594.
46

Jonsson, M. & B. Malmqvist, 2000. Ecosystem process rate USA) by the Asian clam Potamocorbula amurensis. II. Dis-
increases with animal species richness. Oikos 89: 519523. placement of a former community. Marine Ecology Progress
Kat, P. W., 1984. Parasitism and the Unionaceae (Bivalvia). Series 66: 95101.
Biological Review 59: 189207. Parmalee, P. W. & A. E. Bogan, 1998. The Freshwater Mussels
Kryger, J. & H. H. Riisgard, 1988. Filtration rate capacities in of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
six species of European freshwater bivalves. Oecologia 77: Paterson, C. G., 1984. A technique for determining apparent
3438. selective ltration in the freshwater bivalve Elliptio compla-
Lamberti, G. A. & A. D. Steinman, 1993. Research in articial nata (Lightfoot). Veliger 27: 238241.
streams: applications, uses and abuses. Journal of the North Payne, B. S., J. Lei, A. C. Miller & E. D. Hubertz, 1995.
American Benthological Society 12: 313384. Adaptive variation in palp and gill size of the zebra mussel
Lauritsen, D. D. & S. C. Mozley, 1989. Nutrient excretion by (Dreissena polymorpha) and Asian clam (Corbicula uminea).
the Asiatic clam Corbicula uminea. Journal of the North Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:
American Benthological Society 8: 134139. 11301134.
Layzer, J. B., M. E. Gordon & R. M. Anderson, 1993. Mussels: Phelps, H. L., 1994. The Asiatic clam (Corbicula uminea):
the forgotten fauna of regulated rivers: a case study of the invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac
Caney Fork River. Regulated Rivers: Research and Man- River estuary near Washington, DC. Estuaries 17: 614621.
agement 8: 6371. Potts, W. T. W., 1954. The rate of urine production of Anod-
Lei, J., B. S. Payne & S. Y. Wang, 1996. Filtration dynamics of onta cygnaea. Journal of Experimental Biology 31: 614617.
the zebra mussel, Dreissen polymorpha. Canadian Journal of Raikow, D. F. & S. K. Hamilton, 2000. Bivalve diets in a
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 2937. midwestern US stream: a stable isotope enrichment study.
MacIsaac, H. J., 1996. Potential abiotic and biotic impacts of Limnology and Oceanography 46: 514522.
zebra mussels on the inland waters of North America. Roditi, H. A., D. L. Strayer & S. E. G. Findlay, 1997. Char-
American Zoologist 36: 287299. acteristics of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) biode-
Master, L. L. & S. R. Flack (eds), 1998. Rivers of Life: Critical posits in a tidal freshwater estuary. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie
Watersheds for Protecting Freshwater Biodiversity. The 140: 207219.
Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. Scheiner, S. M. & J. Gurevitch, 1993. Design and Analysis of
Matiso, G., Fisher, J. G. & S. Matis, 1985. Eect of Micro- Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
invertebrates on the Exchange of Solutes between Sediments Schaus, M. H., M. J. Vanni, T. E. Wissing, M. T. Bremigan, J.
and Freshwater. Hydrobiologia 122: 1933. E. Garvey & R. A. Stein, 1997. Nitrogen and phosphorous
McMahon, R. F. & A. E. Bogan, 2001. Mollusca: Bivalvia. In excretion by detritivorous gizzard shad in a reservoir eco-
Thorp, J. H. & A. P. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classica- system. Limnology and Oceanography 42: 13861397.
tion of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd edn. Silverman, H., E. C. Achberger, J. W. Lynn & T. H. Dietz,
Academic Press, New York: 331429. 1995. Filtration and utilization of laboratory-cultured bac-
Mellina, E., J. B. Rasmussen & E. L. Mills, 1995. Impact of teria by Dreissena polymorpha, Corbicula uminea, and
zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on phosphorus cycling Carunculina texasensis. Biological Bulletin 189: 308319.
and chlorophyll in lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Silverman, H., S. J. Nichols, J. S. Cherry, E. Archberger, J. W.
Aquatic Sciences 52: 25532573. Lynn & T. H. Dietz, 1997. Clearance of laboratory-cultured
Nalepa, T. F., W. S. Gardner & J. M. Malczyk, 1991. Phos- bacteria by freshwater bivalves: dierences between lentic and
phorus cycling by mussels (Unionidae: Bivalvia) in Lake St. lotic unionids. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 18571866.
Clair. Hydrobiologia 219: 230250. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H.
Navarro, J. M. & R. J. Thompson, 1997. Biodeposition by the Freeman Co.
horse mussel Modiolus modiolus (Dillwyn) during the spring Spooner, D. E., 2002. A eld experiment examining the eects
diatom bloom. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) on sediment ecosystem
Ecology 209: 113. function. M.S. Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
Negus, C., 1966. A quantitative study of the growth and pro- Stewart, T. W., J. G. Miner & R. L. Lowe. 1998. Quantifying
duction of unionid mussels in the River Thames at Reading. mechanisms for zebra mussel eects on benthic macroin-
Journal of Animal Ecology 35: 513532. vertebrates: organic matter production and shell-generated
Neves, R. J., A. E. Bogan, J. Williams, S. A. Ahlstedt & P. W. habitat. Journal of the North American Benthological
Harteld, 1997. Status of the aquatic mollusks in the Society 17: 8194.
southeastern United States: a downward spiral of diversity. Strayer, D. L., 1981. Notes on the microhabitats of unionid
In Benz, G. W. & D. E. Collins (eds), Aquatic Fauna in mussels in some Michigan streams.American Midland Nat-
Peril: The Southeastern Perspective. Special Publication 1, uralist 106: 411415.
Southeast Aquatic Research Institute: 4386. Strayer, D. L., 1999. Eects of alien species on freshwater
Nichols, F. H. & D. Garling. 2000. Food-web dynamics and mollusks in North America. Journal of the North American
trophic-level interactions in a multispecies community of Benthological Society 18: 7498.
freshwater unionids. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 871 Strayer, D. L. & J. Ralley, 1993. Microhabitat use by an
882. assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia),
Nichols, F. H., J. K. Thompson & L. E. Schemel, 1990. including two rare species of Alasmidonta. Journal of the
Remarkable invasion of San Francisco Bay (California, North American Benthological Society 12: 247258.
47

Strayer, D. L., D. C. Hunter, L. C. Smith & C. K. Borg, 1994. Vaughn, C. C., C. M. Mather, M. Pyron, P. Mehlhop & E. K.
Distribution, abundance, and roles of freshwater clams Miller, 1996. The current and historical mussel fauna of the
(Bivalvia, Unionidae) in the freshwater tidal Hudson River. Kiamichi River, Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 41:
Freshwater Biology 31: 239248. 325328.
Strayer, D. L., N. F. Caraco, J. F. Cole, S. Findlay & M. L. Vaughn, C. C., C. M. Taylor & K. J. Eberhard, 1997. A
Pace, 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by comparison of the eectiveness of timed searches vs. quadrat
bivalves. BioScience 49: 1927. sampling in mussel surveys. In Cummings, K. S., A. C.
Vanderploeg, H., L. Liebig, W. Carmichael, M. Agy, T. Joh- Buchanan, C. A. Mayer & T. J. Naimo (eds), Conservation
engen, G. Fahnenstiel & T. Nalepa, 2001. Zebra mussel and Management of Freshwater Mussels II: Initiatives
(Dreissena polymorpha) selective ltration promoted toxic for the Future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, 16
Microcystis blooms in Saginaw Bary (Lake Huron) and 18 October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi
Lake Erie. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sci- River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois: 157
ences 58: 12081221. 162.
Vaughn, C. C., 1997. Regional patterns of mussel species dis- Welker, M. & N. Walz, 1998. Can mussels control the plankton
tributions in North American rivers. Ecography 20: 107115. in rivers? a planktological approach applying a Lagrangian
Vaughn, C. C. & C. C. Hakenkamp, 2001. The functional role sampling strategy. Limnology and Oceanography 43: 753
of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater 762.
Biology 46: 14311446. Wellnitz, T. & N. L. Po, 2001. Functional redundancy in
Vaughn, C. C. & M. Pyron, 1995. Population ecology of the heterogenous environments: implications for conservation.
endangered Ouachita Rock Pocketbook Mussel, Arkansia Ecology Letters 4: 177179.
wheeleri (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in the Kiamichi River, Wetzel, R. G. & G. E. Likens, 1991. Limnological Analyses.
Oklahoma. American Malacological Bulletin 11: 145151. Springer, New York.
Vaughn, C. C. & C. M. Taylor, 1999. Impoundments and the Williams, C. J. & R. F. McMahon, 1989. Annual variation
decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction of tissue biomass and carbon and nitrogen content in
gradient. Conservation Biology 13: 912920. the freshwater bivalve, Corbicula uminea, relative to
Vaughn, C. C. & C. M. Taylor, 2000. Macroecology of a host- downstream dispersal. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67:
parasite relationship. Ecography 23: 1120. 8290.

You might also like