Return Activated Sludge Pumping Basis of Design Report

Return Activated Sludge Pumping
Basis of Design Report
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
DRAFT FINAL
June 2013
Draft Final Basis of Design Report
Contents
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose ...............................................................................................................................................................1
2.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Plant Flows and Loads ........................................................................................................................................4
2.2 Existing Facilities ...............................................................................................................................................6
3.0 Project Elements ................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1.1 Overall Program Site Plan ...........................................................................................................................8
3.1.2 Project Site Plan ..........................................................................................................................................8
3.2 Basis of Design ................................................................................................................................................. 11
3.2.1 BioWin Model RAS Flows ....................................................................................................................... 11
3.2.2 State Point Analyses Requirements ........................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Design Criteria .................................................................................................................................................. 14
3.3.1 Pumping Station Design Criteria............................................................................................................... 14
3.3.2 Pump Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.3.3 RAS Pump Turndown Range .................................................................................................................... 15
3.4 BCE Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 16
3.4.1 Advantages, Disadvantages, and Risks ..................................................................................................... 16
3.4.2 Recommendation: ..................................................................................................................................... 17
3.5 Features ............................................................................................................................................................. 17
4.0 Condition Assessment ......................................................................................................................... 18
4.1 RAS Pipe Condition.......................................................................................................................................... 19
4.2 Rehabilitation and Replacement (R&R) of RAS Pipes..................................................................................... 19
5.0 Construction Sequencing.................................................................................................................... 19
5.1 Startup and Transitioning.................................................................................................................................. 20
6.0 Site Work ............................................................................................................................................. 20
7.0 Site Utilities .......................................................................................................................................... 20
8.0 Control Strategy .................................................................................................................................. 20
8.1 Existing Control Strategy.................................................................................................................................. 20
8.2 Future Control Strategy .................................................................................................................................... 21
9.0 Site Electrical....................................................................................................................................... 21
10.0 Contractor Support Facilities and Laydown Area ........................................................................ 22
11.0 Project Coordination ........................................................................................................................ 22
11.1 RAS Piping Coordination with BNR Project .................................................................................................. 22
List of Figures
Figure 1. Process Schematic of Existing Facility ..........................................................................................................3
Figure 2. Plant Process Schematic .................................................................................................................................7
Figure 3. Overall Program Site Plan ..............................................................................................................................9
Figure 4. Overall Project Facility Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 10
Figure 5. State Point Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 13

EchoWater Project
i
Z:\15. RAS (Return Activated Sludge System)\B. Planning\BODR - RAS Pump Station\DRAFT Final RAS Basis of Design Report 2013-06-27.docx June 28, 2013
List of Tables
Table 1. BODR Reference Documents ..........................................................................................................................2
Table 2. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for Year 2020...................................................................................5
Table 3. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for 181 mgd ADWF ........................................................................5
Table 4. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for 206 mgd ADWF ........................................................................5
Table 5. RAS Pumping Station Design Flow Criteria ................................................................................................. 11
Table 6. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 2020 ADWF............................... 12
Table 7. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 181 mgd ADWF......................... 12
Table 8. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 330 mgd EMDF ......................... 12
Table 9. Summary of Life Cycle Costs Analysis ......................................................................................................... 16
Table 10. RAS Alternatives Findings .......................................................................................................................... 17
Attachments
Attachment A. Return Activated Sludge Business Case Evaluation
Attachment B. Alternatives Development
Attachment C. RAS Can Drawings

EchoWater Project
ii
Abbreviations
Acronym Description
AAF Average Annual Flow
ACC Area Control Center
ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow
AOR Acceptable Operating Range
ATTP Advanced Treatment Technologies Pilot
BCE Business Case Evaluation
BEP Best Efficiency Point
BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand
BODR Basis of Design Report
BNR Biological Nutrient Removal
BRF Biosolids Reclamation Facility
DLDs Dedicated Land Disposal
CEP1 Phase 1 Capacity Expansion Project
CO Carbonaceous Oxygen
EMDF Equalized Maximum Daily Flow
ESBs Emergency Storage Basins
LS Lump Sum
mgd Million Gallons per Day
MM Maximum Monthly Flow
MLSS Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPSH Net Positive Suction Head at 3 percent loss of head at BEP, feet of
water
NPSHmargin Net Positive Suction Head Margin Ratio
NPSHA Net Positive Suction Head Available, feet of water
NPSH3 Net Positive Suction Head at 3 percent loss of head, feet of water
Nss Suction Specific Speed
PEPS Primary Effluent Pumping Station
PCCS Process Computer Control System
PDR Preliminary Design Report
PHWWF2 Peak Hourly Wet Weather Flow For A 2-Year Storm
PMO Program Management Office
POR Preferred Operating Range
PST Primary Sedimentation Tanks
Qbep Flow at best efficiency point
RAS Return Activated Sludge

EchoWater Project
iii
RWQCB Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

SF Square Foot
SRCSD Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
SSBs Solids Storage Basins
SST Secondary Sedimentation Tanks
SVI Sludge Volume Index
GTs Pre-aeration Grit Tanks
TDH Total Dynamic Head
TM Technical Memorandum
TSS Total Suspended Solids
VFD Variable Frequency Drive
VSD Variable Speed Drive
WRF Water Reclamation Facility

EchoWater Project
iv
1.0 Introduction
The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB, Regional Board) adopted
new waste discharge requirements for the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant
(SRWTP) on December 9, 2010. These new discharge requirements are included in Order
No. R5-2010-0114, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
No. CA0077682 (as amended by Order R5-2011-0083). The new permit does not increase
SRWTP treatment capacity, and incorporates stricter discharge requirements that the existing
process is not capable of meeting. To comply with the permit discharge requirements and the
maximum schedule of 10 years established by the Regional Board, Sacramento Regional
County Sanitation District (SRCSD) has established the EchoWater Project Program. The
Return Activated Sludge (RAS) pumping is one of the required projects of the EchoWater
Project Program.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Basis of Design Report (BODR) is to provide the RAS pumping system
Designer with the basic process design and preliminary equipment selection of the RAS pumps
for the project. It also provides links to key documents and information necessary for a more
complete understanding of the project.
There are several steps needed to finalize this BODR including:
1. BODR confirmation will be conducted in a series of meetings where the selected

designer, District, and Program Management Office (PMO) staff review the
information contained in the BODR and Business Case Evaluation (BCE) and arrive at
an initial agreement for moving forward. Finalization of the BODR process will be
documented by the PMO and will be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report
(PDR) documentation. District staff will be heavily involved in the finalization of the
BODR and agreement to moving forward with the PDR phase.
2. The production of the PDR includes the production of several technical memoranda
(TMs) for each discipline associated with RAS pumping. During that process, focused
meetings will include District staff to continuously define the project leading to the
design submittal phases.
3. The design submittal phases will include review by PMO and District staff to confirm
that the design is following the BODR intent and updated developments regarding
Regional Board permit requirements.
The basis of design, design criteria (as distinct from the Districts Design Guidelines), the
features, and discipline-specific information has been provided. In addition, a BCE has been
developed to evaluate the number and type of pumps; the results are contained in
Attachment A.

EchoWater Project
1
2.0 Background
The PMO staff have developed and compiled several key documents as shown in Table 1. Note
that the NPDES limits are in review and several of the documents are in draft condition. This
BODR is based on the permit limits established by the December 2011 Central Valley Regional
Water Control Board Hearing.
Table 1. BODR Reference Documents

Document Name Description
NPDES Permit No. CA0077682 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) adopted
Order No. R5-2010-0114. The permit is currently in review and some limits
(NH3-N and NO3-N) may change.
SRCSD Facility Plan 2nd Draft Describes existing treatment system, and multiple optional technologies for
achieving NPDES limits. Document will be finalized when the tertiary treatment
technology has been selected, based on the pilot plant operation and testing.
An additional update will be made following winter wastewater characterization
and pilot testing results.
Flows and Loads Technical Evaluated historical flows and loads and projected future flows and loads based
Memorandum Final on population growth estimates and incorporating water conservation. This
document is final.
Peak Flow Equalization Technical Evaluated options and developed solutions for storage of peak flows to limit the
Memorandum Draft equalized maximum day flow through the biological nutrient removal (BNR) and
tertiary systems to 330 mgd. This document is final draft.
Process Model and Mass Balance BioWinTM based model and mass balance outputs identifying process recycles
Technical Memorandum Draft and constraints. Document will be finalized once pilot data is available for
confirming influent wastewater characterization and key model kinetic and
stoichiometric parameters.
SRWTP Advanced Treatment The pilot plant has provided some information to the BioWinTM modeling, but
Technology Pilot (ATTP) Project On- finalization of the model will not be made until after winter wastewater
going (Operating under a separate characterization is complete and the BioWin modeling effort is finalized.
contract with Brown and Caldwell)
Drawings associated with project Initial draft site plans and facility plans and sections for each major treatment
elements process.
A process schematic of the existing treatment plant is shown on Figure 1. The plant includes
the following:
Liquid Stream:
Headworks (mechanical screens and influent pumping)
Emergency Storage Basins (ESBs)
Pre-aeration Grit Tanks (GTs)
Primary Sedimentation Tanks (PSTs)

EchoWater Project
2
EmergencyStorage
A B Basins C D SO2
PlantWaste Caustic
Ferric
Cl2
Secondary Chlorine Sacramento
Grit Primary COTanks
Screen Clarifiers Cl Contact River
R
Removal l Cl ifi
Clarifier
Influent 2
Grit Legend
Diversion
ScreenGrit
Septage Scum RAS Scum Sludge
l d
ProcessFlow
WAS Scum
Sidestream
Disposal Polymer Chemical
Coagulant/
PS
DAFT GBT Polymer Cl2

Filters
GBT/DAFTReturnedas DCB
PlantWasteto
Headworks ORtothe Reclaimed
PrimaryInfluent Anaerobic
TWAS
Water
Digesters
T
Surge MS DS SSBs DLDs Washwater

BasinE
FOGReceiving Sludge
MixingTanks
RF
BRF BeneficialUse
SD/SN
SN SD
FM SD
FlowMetering RASPumpingBODR
Structure
Figure1.
Z:\15.RAS(ReturnActivatedSludgeSystem)\B.Planning\BODR RASPumpStation\Figures\Figures1and2ProcessSchematicofexisting
anddesign ExistingPlantProcessSchematic
Carbonaceous Oxygen (CO) tanks and Secondary Sedimentation Tanks (SSTs) that
remove biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS)
Chlorine gas for disinfection
Sulfur dioxide gas for dechlorination prior to river discharge
Water Reclamation Facility (WRF)
Solids Stream:
Thickeners for waste activated sludge(gravity belt thickeners and dissolved air
flotation)
Anaerobic Digestion
Biosolids Reclamation Facility (BRF) (dewatering, drying and pelletizing facility)
Solids Storage Basins (SSBs) for further stabilization of digested sludge
Dedicated Land Disposal (DLDs) for disposal of sludge harvested solids from SSBs
Refer to the PMO Facilities Plan on the Districts web site (http://srcsd.com/business-
opportunites.php) for a more detailed description of the process units and current operations. 1
2.1 Plant Flows and Loads

Three design conditions were considered:
The year 2020 was evaluated as it is the year that the EchoWater Project will come on-
line at SRWTP.
181-mgd average dry weather flow (ADWF) was evaluated as this is the design capacity
for the adopted NPDES permit.
206-mgd ADWF was evaluated as this is the projected flow approximately 20 years
after which 181-mgd ADWF is reached.
All the listed averaging periods (e.g., AAF, MMF, etc.) were considered for each design
condition. The raw influent flows and loads for each of the above-listed design conditions are
listed in Tables 2, 3 and 4. The loads identified for the maximum day are the result from high
sewer flows scouring solids that have settled during previously dry periods.
1
SRCSD Program Management Office (2012) Facility Plan: Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Program. Program Management Office, SRWTP, Elk Grove, CA.

EchoWater Project
4
Table 2. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for Year 2020
Annual Max Max Peak
Item Unit ADWF** Average Month Week Max Day Hour
Flow mgd* 148 157 211 266 313 398
TSS lb/d 326,000 335,000 398,000 483,000 880,000 --
BOD lb/d 343,000 345,000 387,000 445,000 686,000 --
NH4 lb N/d 31,000 32,000 36,000 41,000 48,000 --
TKN lb N/d 52,000 54,000 68,000 77,000 77,000 --
* Includes water conservation
**ADWF: Average Dry Weather Flow
Table 3. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for 181 mgd ADWF
Annual Max Max Peak
Item Unit ADWF Average Month Week Max Day Hour
Flow mgd* 181 195 272 351 418 541
TSS lb/d 468,000 480,000 570,000 692,000 1,262,000 --
BOD lb/d 493,000 496,000 557,000 640,000 987,000 --
NH4 lb N/d 45,000 46,000 51,000 59,000 69,000 --
TKN lb N/d 74,000 76,000 95,000 110,000 110,000 --
Table 4. SRWTP Raw Influent Flows and Loads for 206 mgd ADWF
Annual Max Max Peak
Item Unit ADWF Average Month Week Max Day Hour
Flow mgd* 206 223 318 414 497 648
TSS lb/d 574,000 589,000 699,000 850,000 1,548,000 --
BOD lb/d 604,000 608,000 683,000 785,000 1,209,000 --
NH4 lb N/d 55,000 56,000 63,000 72,000 84,000 --
TKN lb N/d 91,000 94,000 118,000 135,000 135,000 --

EchoWater Project
5
2.2 Existing Facilities
The RAS system currently includes of two vertical pumps per Secondary Sedimentation Tank
(SSTs). Each RAS pump has a variable speed drive. RAS flow from the existing SSTs is
conveyed to the RAS channels in the carbonaceous oxidation (CO) tanks. The original SSTs
(Batteries I and II) utilize propeller (axial flow) pumps while the Battery III SSTs, constructed
during Phase 1 Capacity Expansion Project (CEP1), utilize mixed flow pumps. RAS is removed
from the bottom of the SSTs via suction type collectors. The collectors rotate around each SST
and draw the RAS into a 30-inch pipe leading to a pair of vertical pumps installed in 24-inch-
diameter pump cans. The two pumps work in duty-standby strategy. On the discharge side, the
flow passes through a 12-inch-diameter magnetic flow meter before flowing to the main RAS
pipeline. Each battery (eight SSTs each) combines its RAS flows into one 42-inch pipeline
before discharging into the RAS channels.
At the peak hourly wet weather flow for a 2-year storm (PHWWF2) of 332 mgd, per the CEP1
design criteria, the plant has the capacity of achieving a RAS return rate of 69 percent with all
SSTs and all RAS pumps on. At average dry weather flow (ADWF) of 181 mgd, the plant has
the capacity of achieving a RAS return rate of 126 percent with all SSTs and all RAS pumps
on. Existing operations protocol of the plant during PHWWF2 calls for a minimum of 20 SSTs
to be running at any one time with two SSTs serving as standby. PHWWF2 operations protocol
provides for each SST to have one pump operating and one as standby. In typical operation of
the plant during ADWF, a minimum of 16 SSTs are running at any one time with three SSTs
serving as standby. Each SST would have one pump operating and one as standby. The flow
rate for RAS pumps on Batteries I and II are controlled with eddy current variable speed drives
and flow rate for Battery III RAS pumps are controlled with variable frequency drives (VFDs)
for each pump. For all SSTs in service, the variable speed pumps are ramped up and down in
unison to help maintain an even sludge blanket. However, uneven flow distribution into the
SSTs does create a non-uniform sludge blanket across the existing SSTS.
SST Batteries I and II were constructed under Contract 767 in 1976 while Battery III was
constructed under Contract 2000 in 1989. Due to this difference, the SST batteries will vary in
mechanical design and electrical motor control center (MCC) location. The main difference in
the mechanical design is the difference in the RAS discharge piping. Batteries I and II
discharge piping does not prevent air entrainment in the flow meters while Battery III is
designed to remove that air entrainment by way of a U loop and an air relief valve.
Regarding the existing electrical system, Battery I RAS pumps are powered from MCCs
located in the Secondary Treatment Control Center South Building 6. Batteries II and III RAS
pumps are powered from MCCs located in the West Secondary Substation Building 12.
3.0 Project Elements

A process schematic of the proposed RAS pumping, BNR, and existing treatment processes is
shown on Figure 2. As part of the alternatives development, a detailed description of project
alternative, related hydraulic analysis, and associated drawings are contained in Attachment B.

EchoWater Project
6
Emergency Storage Basins
A B C1 C2 C3 D
Grit Primary Secondary Sacramento River

Screen CO Tanks
Removal Clarifier Not used Clarifiers
Ferric
Influent
Filtration &
RAS Disinfection
Alkalinity Feed Filter Influent
Pump Station
Septage (FIPS)
SST
Classifying Splitter
Selector
To WAS WAS P/S

Thickening
Legend
PE Pump Diversion
Station Screen Grit
(PEPS)
Sludge
Process Flow
Scum
Sidestream
Chemical
Anoxic Aerobic Swing
Zones Zone Zones
Drain P/S
BNR Tanks
RASS BODR
Figure 2.
Z:\15. RAS (Return Activated Sludge System)\B. Planning\BODR - RAS Pump Station\Figures\Figures 1 and 2 Process Schematic of existing
and design Plant Process Schematic
3.1.1 Overall Program Site Plan
An overall site plan for the program is shown on Figure 3. The drawing shows the RAS
facilities along with the other facilities included in the program as follows:
Primary effluent pumping station

BNR facilities
CO tank conversion
Flow equalization
Filter influent pumping station
Filtration (including clearwell, backwash waste handling, pre-ozone, and miscellaneous
facilities)
Disinfection (UV or chlorine)
Dwight Road
Electrical feed (main feed)
Grit landfill removal
Site improvements (including utility extensions, contractor workforce parking, storm
drainage improvements, new roads)
Bufferlands building
Harvest Crew building
PMO/CMID building
3.1.2 Project Site Plan

A site plan of the RAS is shown on Figure 4. The dashed line shows the limits of the RAS
project. The RAS project includes the replacement of one RAS pump at each SST. The RAS
project includes the following major components:
Review recent condition assessment (anticipated summer 2013) and perform

supplemental condition assessment to manage outstanding unknowns and risk not
adequately explored in the recent condition assessment.
Replace existing RAS pumps with 24 new pumps at SSTs, one per SST.
Possibly rehabilitate cans and duct banks if condition assessment recommends
rehabilitation.
Replace conductors for all RAS pumps.

EchoWater Project
8
NOT USED
RAS BODR
Figure 4
Replace electrical components in Batteries II & III RAS MCCs in the West Secondary
Substation Building 12.
Replace MCC 4K and MCC 4H in the Secondary Treatment Control Center South
Building 6 feeding Battery I RAS pumps.
Remove above grade piping and flow meters and replace piping to create a
configuration similar to Battery III installation. Modify below grade piping where
needed.
Add an additional isolation valve downstream of each flowmeter.
Modify the RAS pump control wiring in ACC4/11 and the West Secondary Substation
Building 12.
3.2 Basis of Design

The EMDF is 330 mgd. The ADWF to the plant will be 181 mgd, which is the same as the
plant permit capacity. Table 5 contains the list of flow design criteria. Based on these flow
values, the following sections describe the RAS pumping requirements.
Table 5. RAS Pumping Station Design Flow Criteria

Item Flow, mgd
1
EMDF 330
1
ADWF 181
Minimum flow2 78
Historical PHWWF2 from (CEP1) 332
1
Final flows may be slightly larger because of return flow from the sludge
storage basins and other residual processes.
2
99.9 percent of all existing instantaneous influent flow values are greater than 78 mgd.
Value is based on influent flow data from January 1, 2010 through December 30, 2011.
3.2.1 BioWin Model RAS Flows

The aerobic SRT and total MLSS were predicted using the pilot data and BioWin Model. Based
on the requirements of the BioWin model, and a preliminary state point analysis, the low and
maximum RAS return rate to achieve reliable settling without expansion of the SSTs capacity
was determined. The preliminary state point analysis established the low and maximum RAS
flow of 30 percent of ADWF and 63 percent of EMDF, respectively. These flows represent the
lowest and highest anticipated RAS flows for the biological processes to function properly.
During prolonged periods of low flows, the number of SSTs in service may need to be reduced
to avoid unnecessary RAS pumping. Excessive RAS pumping will not adversely impact the
process, but will represent an inefficient use of energy.
The relationship for flow rate per SST as a function of RAS rate at 2020 (148 mgd) and
181 mgd ADWF is shown in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. As an example, to achieve the
low conditions established by BioWin, with the plant at ADWF and the RAS low flow
condition of a 30 percent return rate, there would be 20 SSTs in operation with a RAS flow of
approximately 2.7 mgd per SST. The tradeoff between number of clarifiers in service and RAS

EchoWater Project
11
flow rate will be impacted by the minimum flow range of the selected RAS pump. The
relationship for flow rate per SSTs as a function of RAS flow at EMDF and number of SSTs in
service is shown in Table 8. As an example, to achieve the maximum conditions established by
BioWin, with the plant at EMDF and the RAS high flow condition of a 63 percent return rate,
there would be 22 SSTs in operation with a flow of approximately 9.5 mgd per SST. During
EMDF pumping events, two additional SSTs will be required when compared to the existing
SST operations strategy. As a result, all major maintenance on SSTs must be completed during
the dry season so that 22 SSTs can be in service with two in standby during the wet season.
Table 6. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 2020 ADWF
Number Percent Return Flow Overflow
of SSTs in Rate,
service 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% gpd/sqft
16 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.1 5.6 6.0 6.5 697
17 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.9 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.7 6.1 656
18 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3 5.8 619
19 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.1 5.5 587
20 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.4 4.8 5.2 558
21 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.2 4.6 4.9 531
22 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.4 4.7 507
* Hatched numbers indicate flow below the SST RAS design low flow rate
Table 7. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 181 mgd ADWF
of SSTs Rate,
in service 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% gpd/sqft
20 1.8 2.3 2.7 3.2 3.6 4.1 4.5 5.0 5.4 5.9 6.3 680
21 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.2 5.6 6.0 650
22 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3 5.8 620
23 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.1 5.5 590
24 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3 570
*Hatched numbers indicate flow below the SST RAS design low flow rate
Table 8. Required RAS Flow Rate (MGD) per SST as a Function of RAS Rate at 330 mgd EMDF
of SSTs in Rate,
service 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 63% 65% 70% gpd/sqft
18 4.6 5.6 6.5 7.4 8.3 9.3 10.2 11.1 11.6 12.0 13.0 1380
19 4.4 5.3 6.1 7.0 7.9 8.8 9.6 10.5 11.0 11.4 12.3 1310
20 4.2 5.0 5.8 6.7 7.5 8.3 9.2 10.0 10.4 10.8 11.7 1240
21 4.0 4.8 5.6 6.3 7.1 7.9 8.7 9.5 9.9 10.3 11.1 1180
22 3.8 4.5 5.3 6.1 6.8 7.6 8.3 9.1 9.5 9.8 10.6 1130
23 3.6 4.3 5.1 5.8 6.5 7.2 8.0 8.7 9.1 9.4 10.1 1080
24 3.5 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.2 6.9 7.6 8.3 8.7 9.0 9.7 1040
*Grayed numbers indicate flow is greater than SST RAS design flow rate.

EchoWater Project
12
3.2.2 State Point Analysis Requirements
A state point analysis was performed to determine SRWTPs SST capacity. This is a graphical
method in determining the SSTs ability to meet treatment requirements. This analysis is based
on the RAS underflow rate, surface overflow rate and sludge volume index (SVI).The graph is
generated by calculating a limiting flux curve (based on experiments from the ATTP) and
incorporating the SSTs RAS underflow and surface overflow rates. The intersection of the
under and overflow rates is the state point.
This assesses SST performance and determines the maximum MLSS concentration by locating
the state point and underflow rate line to be lower than the flux curve. If the state point or
underflow rate is higher than the flux curve then the SST is overloaded. For this analysis, a
sustained peak flow of 330 mgd (EMDF) was assumed at a SVI of 150 mL/g. The SVI of
150 mL/g represents the design assumption for the 90th percentile value. The analysis assumed
that 22 SSTs are in service and that each SST has 9.5 mgd of RAS capacity. Figure 5 presents
the results of the state point analysis.
50
RAS Underfow (ft/ft/d)
45
Derated RAS Underflow (ft/ft/d)
40
Solids Flux, lb/sf-d
Surface Overflow Rate (ft/ft/d)

35
30
State Point
25
20
15
Limiting Flux
10
0
0 5 10 15
Design
MLSS Solids Concentration (g/L)
Figure 5. State Point Analysis

EchoWater Project
13
When using a state point analysis, it is important to account for non-idealities associated with
full-scale clarifiers. The state point analysis is a one-dimensional, steady-state analysis that
does not consider clarifier hydraulics and design features. Therefore, the state point analysis
result is typically derated by 20 percent to account for these non-idealities based on work
performed by Ekama and Marais (2004). This is shown by the dashed line in Figure 5. With the
20-percent derating, the indicated maximum MLSS concentration would be approximately
2,300 mg/L.
3.3 Design Criteria

This section describes key pump selection and pumping station design criteria.
3.3.1 Pumping Station Design Criteria

Pumping station design criteria shall conform to the revised SRCSD Engineering Design
Guidelines, Chapter 6: Mechanical Design.
3.3.2 Pump Selection Criteria

There are a number of critical constraints and criteria for selecting pumps for this project. One
criterion unique to this project is that the RAS pumps must fit in a 24-inch-diameter can.
Structural drawings for the RAS pump location and can are provided in Attachment C. In
addition, other selection criteria constituting good practice should include the following:
1. Suction specific speed (Nss) preferred value should be 8,500 and the acceptable
value should be no greater than 10,000 where:

Nss =
(3)0.75
Nss = Suction Specific Speed, (U.S. Units)

= Speed at rated condition, rpm
Qbep = Flow, gpm at best efficiency point (BEP)
NPSH3bep = Net Positive Suction Head at 3 percent loss of head at BEP, feet
H2O
2. At no point should the pump operate outside of the allowable operating region
(AOR) for the flow rate and total dynamic head (TDH) range required. Per the
Hydraulic Institute (HI), the extent of the AOR is established by the pump
manufacturer.
3. During the most common flow conditions, the pump should operate well within the
preferred operating region (POR) for the flow rate and TDH range required. The
most common flow conditions should be developed by taking influent flow
frequency histogram and scaling the flow down for a 50 percent RAS return rate.
Per HI, for pumps with specific speeds greater than 4500, the POR extends from
80 percent of QBEP to 115 percent of QBEP. As the pump approaches peak flow

EchoWater Project
14
conditions, the pump can operate outside of the POR, but must remain within the
AOR.
4. To prevent cavitation damage of the pump impeller and other low suction head
related problems, adequate net positive suction head (NPSH) must be available by
providing an NPSH margin that is appropriate for the application. Specifically,
NPSH margin for low energy pumps should be at a minimum 1.3 when flow is
within +/- 15 percent of the BEP. NPSH margins for flows outside of this range, for
high energy pumps, or for column pumps, the margin will be higher. Care should be
taken to not select too high of an NPSH margin which could result in the following:
a. Additional costs for pumping equipment (larger/slower pumps),
b. Reduced pump efficiency,
c. Reduced operating range due to selection of a higher suction specific speed
pump.
NPSHmargin is defined as follows:

NPSHA
NPSHmargin =
NPSH3
NPSHmargin = Net Positive Suction Head Margin Ratio, unitless

NPSHA = Net Positive Suction Head Available, feet H2O
NPSH3 = Net Positive Suction Head at 3 percent loss of head, feet H2O
(also known as NPSH required)
5. Maximum motor speed is 1800 RPM; 2-pole motors (3600 RPM) are not allowed
for pumping.
3.3.3 RAS Pump Turndown Range

Individual RAS pump turndown range should be sufficient to ramp flow up and down to meet
different design flows during for different seasons. The RAS return rate is a BNR process
criteria and ranges from a maximum of 63 percent to a minimum of 30 percent. As shown in
Table 8, for the high flow condition of EMDF and a RAS return rate of 63 percent there would
be 22 clarifiers on line each with a RAS flow rate of 9.5 mgd (6,600 gpm). The maximum flow
rate of 9.5 mgd per SST and a RAS return rate of 63 percent is based on the state point analysis.
The maximum flow rate is consistent with the original plant design and the design for CEP1.
As shown in Table 7, for the low flow condition ADWF and a RAS return rate of 30 percent
there would be 20 SSTs on line each with a RAS flow rate of 2.7 mgd (1,900 gpm). The
minimum of 20 SSTs in service at ADWF is required because the overflow rates for BNR
should be between 400 to 700 gal/day/sqft for average conditions and between 1,000 to
1,600 gal/day/sqft under peak conditions (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003).

EchoWater Project
15
For reference, the minimum flow that must be withdrawn from the Batteries I, II, and III SST
suction manifold (or collector) to maintain even withdrawal of sludge is 2.0 mgd (1,400 gpm)
based on the manufacturer original submittals and shop drawings. This minimum flow rate is
also assumed for Batteries I and II. At higher MLSS concentrations, low suction manifold
sludge withdrawal rates could lead to rising sludge in the SSTs.
To provide sufficient flexibility to respond to influent flow changes, the RAS pumps should
have the capability to range from to 2.7 mgd (1,900 gpm) during low flow conditions and
9.5 mgd (6,600 gpm) during high flow conditions. This flow range would allow the RAS
pumping system to have a flow turn down ratio of 3.5.
3.4 BCE Results

The RAS pumping BCE provides a summary of capital, operations, and maintenance cost
considerations for the RAS pumping system. Attachment A contains the BCE evaluation. See
Attachment B for information regarding the development of each alternative. The BCE
alternatives analysis focused on the strategy of using one pump versus two pumps per SST. The
following three alternatives were analyzed:
Alternative 1a small duty- small duty (no standby)

Alternative 2a large duty- large standby
Alternative 3 large duty only (no standby)
Table 9 contains a summary of the capital, annual, and present value (life cycle) costs for the
three alternatives.
Table 9. Summary of Life Cycle Costs Analysis

Annual
Annual Maintenance,
Operating Non-Recurring Life-Cycle Cost at
Alternative Capital Cost Costs Risk Costs 5% Discount Rate
Alternative 1a: Two small $20,000,000 $276,000 $394,000 $39,000,000
pumps
Alternative 2a: Two large $29,000,000 $289,000 $273,000 $47,000,000
pumps
Alternative 3: One large pump $17,000,000 $280,000 $174,000 $30,000,000
Note: Values are rounded.
3.4.1 Advantages, Disadvantages, and Risks

For Alternatives 1a and 3, if three pumps fail simultaneously, there is a risk that the SSTs may
not be able to return the sludge quick enough under high flows and solids may be passed to the
tertiary facilities. To manage this risk, the District may want to have a rapid response strategy.
This strategy may include purchasing a shelf standby pump that could be rotated into service
during repairs. The shelf standby pump could be purchased as part of the project or delayed
until either the flows increase and/or when the pumps have aged 5 or 10 years. No such risks

EchoWater Project
16
are considered in Alternative 2a due to the standby pump redundancy at each SST. Table 10
summarizes the advantages, disadvantages, and risks to each alternative.
Table 10. RAS Alternatives Findings

Alternative Strategy Type Advantages Disadvantages Risks
1a Small Duty- Mixed flow Potential for high degree If one pump fails, SST In the event of pump
Small Duty of flow control must be taken out of failure must have a
Most efficient service until the pump is rapid response
back in service strategy to fix the
One pump on may pump
operate outside of the
acceptable pump
operating range
2a Large Duty- Mixed flow Redundant pump Highest capital and life Marginally meets
Large Greatest flow range cycle cost suction specific speed
Standby operating within the POR criteria.
Pump never operates Increased risk of
outside the AOR for flows suction recirculation
from 1,950 gpm to cavitation and pump
6,600 gpm clogging because
marginally meets
suction specific speed
criteria.
3 Large Duty Mixed flow Lowest capital and life If one pump fails, SST In the event of pump
Only cycle cost must be taken out of failure, must have a
Flexibility to install service until the pump is rapid response
standby at each SST in the back in service strategy to fix
future Marginally meets
Greatest flow range suction specific speed
operating within the POR criteria.
Pump never operates Increased risk of
outside the AOR for flows suction recirculation
from 1,950 gpm to cavitation and pump
6,600 gpm clogging because
marginally meets
suction specific speed
criteria.
3.4.2 Recommendation
Alternative 3 is recommended due to low life cycle costs. This alternative has the lowest cost
due to the fewest number of pumps to purchase and maintain. In addition, these pumps have
flow capabilities ranging from 1,900 gpm to 6,600 gpm while allowing the pump to remain in
the AOR with the majority of the operating range in the POR.
During the preliminary design process, the design consultant shall perform a BCE that
compares the life cycle cost of VSDs such as magnetic drives versus VFDs.
3.5 Features
The following is a list of RAS pumping features.
Number of pumps: one per SST.
Number of pumps total: 24.

EchoWater Project
17
The pumps will be able to range in capacity from 2.7 mgd to 9.5 mgd by utilizing
variable speed drives (VSDs).
Design should allow for easy access for predictive maintenances where possible.
Prospective pump and motor features: 100 HP at 900 RPM
Pumps should have an interlock lube feature to allow automatic lubrication of the lower
bearing prior to starting up the pumps.
The packing or seal should be accessible by maintenance staff without removal of the
pump from the pump can.
For Batteries I and II, replace piping and flowmeters to create a configuration similar to
Battery III installation. Work on Batteries I and II will involve new connections to the
buried RAS header. For Battery III, replace above grade piping and flow meter if
required by the condition assessment.
Modify the existing discharge piping from all RAS pumps to incorporate an additional
isolation valve downstream of the magnetic flowmeters. Currently, there is no isolation
valve downstream of the flowmeter, during maintenance an entire battery needs to be
shut down because all pumps convey RAS into a common force main.
If condition assessment recommends rehabilitation, provide necessary refurbishment for
cans duct banks. New wiring for each pump will be required.
Provide space for future motor starters in the secondary treatment electrical distribution
building and in the Battery III electrical distribution building. If VFDs are installed,
locate new VFDs on site near the individual pumps only if space in the MCC is limited.
Replace flow meters and associated piping per design guidelines.
Provide accessibility for all valves, pumps, VSDs and flow meters.
Both cans should be rehabilitated (if recommended in the condition assessment) so that
the second can will serve as a standby can. This will allow the installation of the shelf
standby pump without having to remove the failed pump first. The standby can pump
pad should be reconfigured to receive the standby pump soleplate and should be capped.
Discharge piping to the standby can should be replaced and capped with a blind flange
to allow for quick installation.
4.0 Condition Assessment

A condition assessment will be performed under a separate project to determine whether repairs
are required for the existing SST pump cans or the electrical equipment, ducting, and wiring.
The flow meters and discharge piping shall also be evaluated and, if needed, rehabilitated. In
addition to corrosion and structural evaluations, the condition assessment will include a drift
survey to determine if the can is plumb and will provide an effective diameter that is available.
The effective diameter value accounts for offsets and out of roundness that would limit a
vertical column from passing into the can. This condition assessment will analyze three pump

EchoWater Project
18
cans at Battery I, three pump cans at Battery II, and two pump cans at Battery III. If there are
any gaps in the available condition assessment, the design consultant shall identify the risk and
recommend an additional condition assessment accordingly.
4.1 RAS Pipe Condition

The RAS piping system includes buried lines that range from 14 inches to 42 inches. A review
of the original design specifications suggests that all buried piping 14 inches and greater may
be bar wrapped concrete cylinder pipe (AWWA C303) and the above grade RAS piping near
the pumps is described as steel pipe (AWWA 200) with enamel lining. Bar wrapped concrete
cylinder pipe typically has a life span of 50 to 75 years. In 2020, Batteries I and II will be
43 years old.
The condition assessment should include confirmation of the type of material physically
exposing portions of the pipe and chiseling into the pipe (and spot repair sample areas). Based
on the type of pipe and the condition of the lining an estimate of useful life must be developed.
4.2 Rehabilitation and Replacement (R&R) of RAS Pipes

Portions of the system cross under MLSS/SE channels and will be difficult to replace should
replacement be required. Regardless of the findings of the condition assessment, the design
consultant will investigate and describe in a technical memorandum the layout of RAS pipe
system and determine what steps would be required to replace the entire RAS piping system.
If any physical improvements are reasonably provided under this project to facilitate future pipe
replacement then the required improvements should be incorporated into this project. If the
condition assessment recommends relining or in-place rehabilitation of the RAS pipe, those
improvements will be described in the contract documents.
5.0 Construction Sequencing

Contractor must coordinate with SRWTP to minimize the impact to plant operations when
accessing each RAS pump for demolition, rehabilitation, or construction. In general, the plant
would like 16 SSTs in service during the dry season and 20 SSTs during the wet season. In
addition, two SSTs should be in standby mode at all times. A short term reduction in standby or
in-service SSTs may be possible with coordination from SRWTP.
The BODR recommends rehabilitating the SSTs during the dry season when up to an entire
battery (8 SSTs) may be temporarily taken offline for access to the pump cans. Access to the
24-inch to 42-inch discharge pipes will require shutdown of associated RAS pumps. This can
be done in conjunction with the SST shutdown for pump can access.
Replacing the electrical wiring, MCC, and VSDs do not require shutdown and draining of the
SSTs and can be done anytime during the year.

EchoWater Project
19
5.1 Startup and Transitioning
The project test plans will be developed by the design engineer. The startup project test plans
will include an approach that allows for continued RAS pumping to the CO tanks with the new
higher head pumps. Special design features may be required to facilitate pumping to the CO
tanks and later transition to the BNR facility. On an interim basis the design engineer may
require RAS discharge valves be throttled and/or require limitations on the VSD range.
6.0 Site Work

In general, no site work is required because the project does not change the existing site. If the
condition assessment reveals major rehabilitation requirements for the cans or duct banks,
additional site work may be required to restore the site back to existing conditions.
7.0 Site Utilities

In general, no utility work (other than electrical and control upgrades) is required because the
project uses existing utilities. The electrical and controls in ACC 4 will require upgrading.
Example modifications to ACC 4 are shown in Attachment C.
8.0 Control Strategy

This section provides information regarding the RAS pump control strategy for the existing and
a possible future condition.
8.1 Existing Control Strategy

These RAS pumps are controlled by a flow-paced control strategy to maintain a sludge level of
less than 30 inches off the tank flow. There is a control loop that will automatically shut off the
service pump and prevent the back-up pump from coming on line when the water surface level
in an SST falls to about a foot below the effluent launders. An exception is when the tank is
being drained.
Each tank constitutes its own strategy loop, and may have sludge removed from it
automatically at a rate set independently from the other tank pumping rates. Normally, only one
pump per tank is operating and the other pump serves as a standby, but both pumps can be
manually put in service at the same time if desired.
The return sludge from each tank flows through a magnetic flow meter which can be used to
manually adjust the return from each tank or insure that the return rate is balanced between
tanks. The RAS is pumped to the RAS mixing box located at the west end of the RAS channel
above the central tunnel.
The total secondary influent flow is divided by the number of tanks in service to calculate a
flow setpoint for all tanks. Each tank has an individual operator entered ratio value. This ratio
value is then multiplied by the calculated flow setpoint value to get a flow setpoint for a given
tank. The strategy will then modulate the RAS pump speed to maintain the flow setpoint.

EchoWater Project
20
For Battery III, the two pumps operate in a lead-lag configuration and are rotated weekly.
8.2 Future Control Strategy

As with the existing control strategy, the RAS return rate will be established by the PCCS and
the RAS pumping rate will ramp up and down proportionally (30 percent to 63 percent) based
on the totalized flows from the PE flow meters upstream of the BNR basins. To compensate for
uneven flow distribution between SSTs, there will continue to be an operator-entered ratio to
achieve a slightly different scaling factor unique to each SST. The operators will adjust the
multiplier for each SST based on the relative depth of the sludge blanket in each SST. Over
time, operators may find that different multipliers should be used when different combinations
of SSTs are in-service. An alternative control will involve automatically controlling the RAS
flow based on each SSTs sludge blanket level. At other plants, automated control based on
sludge blanket level monitoring has not been reliable; however, the District in investigating
new approaches.
New control strategies will be required to maintain control of the secondary treatment process.
The following features may be required for process controls.
Provisions for potential polymer addition.

Sludge level monitors for automating sludge blanket control.
Retaining RAS TSS probes for automatic SRT control strategy.
Addition of these process controls are not included in the scope of this project, but may be
added.
9.0 Site Electrical

The electrical system shall be designed based on the current SRCSD Electrical Design
Guidelines. Battery I RAS pumps are powered from MCC 4K and MCC 4H located in the
Secondary Treatment Control Center South Building 6. Battery II and III RAS pumps are
powered from MCCs located in the West Secondary Substation Building 12. The RAS pumps
shall be fed from the existing electrical rooms. The design consultant shall perform a BCE that
compares the life cycle cost of VSDs such as magnetic drives in place of VFDs.
If recommended and approved, VFDs shall be located in the field per the Electrical Design
Guidelines. The existing 480V breaker buckets that feed the RAS pumps in the West Secondary
Substation shall be modified to accommodate the increased pump motor size for Battery II and
Battery III. MCC 4K and MCC 4H feeding Battery I RAS pumps shall be replaced. The RAS
pump field located VFDs shall include 3 percent line reactors and through the enclosure heat
sinks integral to the drive. Active harmonic filters shall be added to the existing switchgear
sized appropriately to reduce the harmonics to levels specified in the electrical design
guidelines.

EchoWater Project
21
10.0 Contractor Support Facilities and Laydown Area
The size and coordination of the contractors area for support facilities and laydown area have
not been finalized. Tentatively, contractor support facilities will be in the same area as the
BNR, primary effluent pumping station (PEPS), and equalization basin contractors. In addition,
contractor laydown areas will be provided near each construction site. The RAS pumping
contractor laydown is anticipated to be to the west of the RAS pumping construction site. Site
utilities for power, water, sewer, and storm drainage have been identified for these areas.
Basis of design for contractor support facilities and laydown area include the following:
The size of the laydown area needs to be evaluated based on construction phasing and
materials delivery.
Utilities extended to the trailer area will be sized to be shared with the BNR, PEPS
pumps, and equalization basin contractor.
The trailer area will be sized to accommodate the contractor, resident engineer, field
engineer (designer), and PMO staff.
11.0 Project Coordination

The RAS Pumping project requires interface with several other AWTP projects for scheduling,
testing, and utility piping purposes. The major treatment project is the BNR project. Site-related
projects will be completed prior to the start of the RAS Pumping projects.
After the site preparation is complete, the general completion sequence of construction is the
RAS Pumping project first, followed in turn by the PEPS project and then the BNR project.
This sequence permits orderly testing and commissioning of these projects.
The site utilities requirements for RAS piping must also be coordinated with the BNR area
projects and with the decommissioning/repurposing of the CO Tanks
11.1 RAS Piping Coordination with BNR Project
Design consultant shall coordinate with BNR regarding the diameter of the extension of the
RAS lines to the BNR project. If the RAS pumping discharge point into the BNR reaeration
tanks is more than a 350-foot extension, transitioning to a larger diameter pipe should be
considered. The designer should consider potential savings of lower velocities in the
discharge pipe versus increased energy for pumping at the current velocities. Current
velocities range from 1 ft/s to 12.2 ft/s in the RAS system.
,

EchoWater Project
22
Attachment A
Return Activated Sludge

Business Case Evaluation
RAS Pumping
Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant
DRAFT
April 2013
RAS Pumping
Contents
1.0 Project Background .............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Problem Statement................................................................................................................................ 1
3.0 Functional Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 1
4.0 Alternatives............................................................................................................................................ 2
5.0 Findings.................................................................................................................................................. 4
6.0 Recommendation................................................................................................................................... 5
Tables
Table 1. Summary of Life Cycle Costs..........................................................................................................................4
Table 2. Advantages, Disadvantages, Risks of Preferred Alternatives ..........................................................................4
Appendices
Appendix A. Life Cycle Cost Analysis

i
Z:\15. RAS (Return Activated Sludge System)\B. Planning\RAS BCE\Formatted Attachment A RAS BCE 2013-04-18.docx April 18, 2013
1.0 Project Background
The return activated sludge (RAS) system currently consists of two vertical pumps per
secondary settling tank (SST). Flow from the existing SSTs is conveyed to the RAS channels in
the carbonaceous oxidation (CO) tanks. The original SSTs (Batteries I and II) utilize propeller
(axial) pumps while the Battery III SSTs, constructed during Phase 1 Capacity Expansion
Project (CEP1), utilize mixed flow pumps. RAS is removed from the bottom of the SST via
suction type collectors. The collectors draw the RAS into a 30-inch pipe leading to a pair of
24-inch-diameter vertical pump cans. These two cans hold pumps that work in duty-standby
strategy. On the discharge side, the flow passes through a 12-inch-diameter magnetic flow
meter before flowing to the main RAS pipeline. Each battery (eight SSTs each) combines their
RAS flows into one 42-inch pipeline before discharging into the RAS channels.
At the peak hourly wet weather flow for a 2-year storm (PHWWF2) of 332 mgd, per the CEP1
design criteria, the plant has the capacity of achieving a RAS return rate of 69 percent with all
SSTs and all 48 RAS pumps operating. At average dry weather flow (ADWF) of 181 mgd, the
plant has the capacity of achieving a RAS return rate of 126 percent with all SSTs and all RAS
pumps on. Existing operations protocol of the plant during PHWWF2 calls for a minimum of
20 SSTs to be running at any one time with two SSTs serving as standby. PHWWF2 operations
protocol provides for each SST to have one pump operating and one as standby. In typical
operation of the plant during ADWF, a minimum of 16 SSTs are on line at any one time with
three SSTs serving as standby. Each SST would have one pump operating and one as standby.
The flow rate for RAS pumps on Batteries I and II are controlled with eddy current variable
speed drives and flow rate for Battery III RAS pumps are controlled with variable frequency
drives (VFDs) for each pump. For all SSTs in service, the variable speed pumps are ramped up
and down in unison to help maintain an even sludge blanket. However, uneven flow
distribution into the SSTs does create a non-uniform sludge blanket across the existing SSTs.
The purpose of this business case evaluation (BCE) is to evaluate RAS pump alternatives from
the existing SST to the new biological nutrient removal (BNR) structure, and provide
recommended solutions.
2.0 Problem Statement

The existing RAS pumps will not meet the design flows for RAS conveyance to the BNR
structure. The BNR RAS discharge location will be farther away and will be approximately
2.8 to 3.1 feet higher than the static head at the RAS channel in the CO tanks. Because of the
higher head requirements experienced by the RAS pumps, the pumps will not deliver sufficient
flow to the BNR process.
3.0 Functional Requirements

The RAS pumps must be able to convey RAS from the SST to the BNR structure at the
required flow rates.

1
4.0 Alternatives
The pumping station alternatives considered were:
0. Existing pumps-status quo (Pumping strategy: duty-duty; Pump type: propeller/

mixed flow; Manufacturers: Goulds/Fairbanks Morse)
1. Pumping strategy: small duty- small duty
a. Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Cascade
b. Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Fairbanks Morse
c. Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Patterson
d. Pump type: multi-purpose vertical turbine; Manufacturers: Patterson
2. Pumping strategy: large duty-large standby
a. Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Cascade
b. Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Fairbanks Morse
3. Pumping strategy: large duty only
a. Pump type: mixed flow and existing pumps; Manufacturer: Cascade
Below is a summary of each alternative and an explanation of whether the option was
considered viable:
Alternative 0 (Existing pumps-status quo) was not considered further because of the
higher head requirements experienced at the RAS pumps would cause the pumps to
deliver insufficient flow to the BNR process. The existing pumps are also unable to
meet the discharge requirements because 16 of the 32 Fairbanks Morse propeller pumps
in Batteries I and II are currently unavailable. As of March 2013, five of the 16
unavailable pumps would require being rebuilt before being placed back into service.
(Alternative eliminated.)
Alternative 1a (Small duty- small duty; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer:
Cascade) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans. Pump capacity
would match the existing pumps, but the pumps would be capable of pumping the same
flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Cascade does make a mixed
flow pump that can meet the space, head and flow requirements.
Alternative 1b (Small duty- small duty; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer:
Fairbanks Morse) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans. Pump
capacity would match the existing pumps, but the pumps would be capable of pumping
the same flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Fairbanks Morse may

2
make a mixed flow pump that can meet these space, head and flow requirements. This
alternative was not considered further because the manufacturer did not provide
sufficient information to fully evaluate the acceptable operating range of the pump.
Alternative 1a will be used to represent the viability of this style and size of pump.
(Alternative 1b eliminated; however, designer may perform further analysis if
Alternative 1a were selected to carry into detailed design.)
Alternative 1c (Small duty- small duty; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer:
Patterson) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans. Pump capacity
would match the existing pumps, but the pumps would be capable of pumping the same
flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Patterson makes a mixed flow
pump that can meet these space, head and flow requirements. This alternative was not
considered further because the manufacturer budgetary estimate was more than double
comparable budgetary estimate of Alternative 1a. Alternative 1a will be used to
represent the viability of this style and size of pump. (Alternative 1c eliminated;
however, designer could evaluate this pump during detailed design.)
Alternative 1d (Small duty- small duty; Pump type: multi-purpose vertical turbine;
Manufacturer: Patterson) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans.
Pump capacity would match the existing pumps, but the pumps would be capable of
pumping the same flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Patterson
makes a multi-purpose, solids handling, vertical turbine pump that can meet these space,
head and flow requirements. This alternative was not considered further because the
budgetary estimate was more than double comparable budgetary estimate of
Alternative 1a and because solids handling capabilities is not required based on existing
pump maintenance data. Alternative 1a will be used to represent the viability of this
style and size of pump. (Alternative 1d eliminated; however, designer could evaluate
this pump during detailed design.)
Alternative 2a (Large duty- large standby; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer:
Cascade) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans. Pump capacity
would be double the existing pumps. A single pump will be capable of pumping the
total flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Cascade does make a
mixed flow pump that can meet these space, head and flow requirements.
Alternative 2b (Large duty- large standby; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer:
Fairbanks Morse) two column pumps would be installed in the existing cans. Pump
capacity would be double the existing pumps. A single pump will be capable of
pumping the total flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Fairbanks
Morse may make a mixed flow pump that can meet these space, head and flow
requirements. This alternative was not considered further because the manufacturer did
not provide sufficient information to fully evaluate the acceptable operating range of the
pump. Alternative 2a will be used to represent the viability of this style and size of
pump. (Alternative 2b eliminated; however, designer may perform further analysis if
Alternative 2a were selected to carry into detailed design.)

3
Alternative 3 (Large duty only; Pump type: mixed flow; Manufacturer: Cascade) a
single column pump would be installed in one existing can per SST. Pump capacity
would be double the existing pumps. A single pump will be capable of pumping the
total flow rate against a greater head. The pump manufacturer Cascade does make a
mixed flow pump that can meet these space, head and flow requirements. Under this
strategy, redundancy would be provided by shutting down an SST with a faulty pump
and bringing on line a standby SST to meet the process needs.
5.0 Findings
This BCE provides a summary of cost, operations, and maintenance considerations for three
basic types of operation strategies (small duty-small duty, large duty- large standby, and large
duty only). Table 1 contains a summary of the capital, annual, and present value (life cycle)
costs for the preferred alternatives. The life cycle cost analysis can be found in Appendix A.
Table 1. Summary of Life Cycle Costs
Annual
Annual Maintenance,
Operating Non-Recurring, Life-Cycle Cost at
Alternative Capital Cost Costs Risk Costs 5% Discount Rate
Alternative 1a $20,000,000 $276,000 $394,000 $39,000,000
Alternative 2a $29,000,000 $289,000 $273,000 $47,000,000
Alternative 3 $17,000,000 $280,000 $174,000 $30,000,000
Each alternative has their own advantages, disadvantages, and risks associated. Table 2
summarizes the advantages, disadvantages, and risks to each preferred alternative.
Table 2. Advantages, Disadvantages, Risks of Preferred Alternatives

1a Small Duty- Mixed flow - Potential for high degree of - If one pump fails, SST - In the event of pump
Small Duty flow control must be taken out of service failure must have a rapid
until the pump is back in response strategy to fix
service the pump
- One pump on may operate

outside of the acceptable
pump operating range
2a Large Duty- Mixed flow - Redundant pump - Highest capital and life - Increased risk of
Large Standby cycle cost suction recirculation
- Greatest flow range cavitation and pump
operating within the POR clogging because
marginally meets suction
- Pump never operates outs specific speed criteria.
side of the AOR for flows
from 2,750 gpm to 6,600 gpm

4
3 Large Duty Mixed flow - Lowest capital and life cycle - If one pump fails, SST - In the event of pump
Only cost must be taken out of service failure, must have a rapid
until the pump is back in response strategy to fix
- Flexibility to install standby service - Marginally meets
at each SST in the future suction specific speed
criteria.
-Greatest flow range operating - Increased risk of
within the POR suction recirculation
cavitation and pump
-Pump never operates outs clogging because
side of the AOR for flows marginally meets suction
from 2,750 gpm to 6,600 gpm specific speed criteria.
The primary BCE findings are as follows:
1. Alternative 1a requires two 4.75-mgd pumps per SST to be functioning to keep the
SST in service and also requires all 48 pumps to be maintained. The large number
of duty pumps in Alternative 1a could allow for a high degree of RAS flow process
control. However, with one pump on, portions of the flow range would result in the
pump operating outside of the acceptable operating range (AOR).
2. Alternative 2a is fundamentally different from the other alternatives because two
9.5-mgd pumps are provided per SST (48 pumps total). If a pump fails, the
impacted SST may remain in service while repairs are made.
3. Alternative 3 requires installation of only 24 pumps each with a capacity of
9.5 mgd.
4. For Alternatives 1a and 3, if three pumps fail simultaneously, there is a risk that the
SSTs may not be able to return the sludge quick enough under high flows and solids
may be passed to the tertiary facilities. To manage this risk, the District may want to
have a rapid response strategy. This strategy may include purchasing a shelf standby
pump that could be rotated into service during repairs. The shelf standby pump
could be purchased as part of the project or delayed until either the flows increase
and/or when the pumps have aged 5 or 10 years.
6.0 Recommendation
Alternative 3 is recommended because of the low life-cycle costs and the lower costs of
maintaining 24 pumps instead of 48 pumps. In addition, pumps would always operate within
the AOR and the majority of the operating range would be within the pumps preferred
operating range (POR). The selection of an alternative with only 24 pumps is consistent with
selected alternative of the District BCE on RAS Unit Maintenance Strategy, February 18, 2010.

5
Appendix A
Life Cycle Cost Analysis

RAS BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION SUMMARY
Financial Factors
Inflation Rate 3.0%
Discount Rate 5.0% Select an inflation rate to use in the evaluation, the starting year of
Starting Year 2020 the analysis, and the number of years in the life-cycle period.
Number of Years 60
Financial Impact Table

Annual Annual Maintenance, Non- Life-Cycle Cost at
Alternative Base Cost Operation Recurring, Risk Costs 5% Discount Rate
Two Small Pumps $ 20,283,801 $ 276,052 $ 393,811 $ 38,822,642
Two Large Pumps $ 28,746,265 $ 289,026 $ 372,290 $ 47,048,544
One Large Pump $ 17,366,565 $ 280,209 $ 173,797 $ 29,931,455
Appendix A RAS BCE Cost Analysis 20130412 Page 1 of 17 4/12/2013

Alternative 1a
Annual Operational Costs Support (chemical, energy, operational oversight, etc.)
Energy
Pump Motor Efficiency, Flow Rate, Pumps in
Item and Description Efficiency, % % gpm/pump Service Energy, kW-hr Comment
Assume ADWF of 181 mgd with a 50% RAS rate
Energy Operations Costs (/yr) 84% 95% 3,144.88 20 2,211,000 and zero sidestream. Alternative 1 has two pumps
on per SST.
Daily Operations
Hours for all
Item and Description Batteries Days per Year Labor, $/hr Total Comment
Three times day an operator walks the SSTS. Each
walk takes approximately 40 minutes. Operators are
Daily operations check on
0.4 365 93 $ 13,578 looking for bad sounds and may observe oil
equipment and facility
reservoirs. Allocate get 45 minutes for attention to
RAS pumps
Annual Maintenance Costs Support

Item and Description Units Quantity Cost Total, $ Comment
Labor Costs-Regular Pump Standard practice is to start every pump once per
hours/month 9 $ 288 $ 2,595
Runs month. Effort takes 9 hours per month.
Check for sound, vibration and Assume 5 minutes per pump per week to check for
hrs/yr/pump 4.3 $ 288 $ 1,249
general performance. sound and vibration and general performance.
Annual PMS to oil the lower Annual PMS include 2 hours per year for each pump
hrs/yr/pump 2 $ 288 $ 577
bearings to oil the lower bearings
Electricians check motors and 3 hour per pump per year for electricians to check
hrs/yr/pump 3 $ 288 $ 865
oil the motors. motors and oil the motors.
Breaker maintenance: 2.5 hours for each pump
Breaker maintenance hrs/yr/pump 1.3 $ 288 $ 360
breaker every 2 years
Annual Risk Costs Support (per pump)

Item and Description Units Quantity cost Total, $/pump Comment
Clogging with plastics or rags Probabilty of clogging 5% $ 28,540 $ 1,427 Each year 5% chance of clogging
Non-Recurring Costs (per pump replacement)
Item and Description Units Quantity Total Comment

After 10 years plan on 1 pumps per year need to be
rebuilt due to mechanical failure. After 20 years plan
Overhaul of RAS Pump
$ LS 22,800 $ 22,800 on 2 pumps per year need to be rebuilt due to
Material mechanical failure. Per the February 18, 2012 BCE:
RAS Unit Maintenance Strategy for Batteries I and II
SST, pumps expereince 3 to 4 unit failures per year.
After 10 years plan on 1 VFD per year need to be
VFD material $/ HP 100 $ 5,000 repalced . After 20 years plan on 2 VFDs per year
need to be replaced.
After 10 years plan on 1 pump per year need to be
Labor to replacement RAS
Pump mechanical failure. Per the February 18, 2012 BCE:
Labor to replacement RAS VFD HRs 8 $ 2,306 repalced . After 20 years plan on 2 VFDs per year
Total $ 35,846

Alternative 1a - Two 3,300 gpm pumps (Small Duty Now - Small Duty Later)
Quantifiable Base and Annual Costs
Item and Description Reference Units Quantity Cost/Unit Total Cost
Base Costs (unescalated)

Cascade Model 12MFC Mixed Flow Quote dated 06/01/2012 pumps 48 $ 38,750 $ 1,860,000
Pumps
Pump Installation and pipe 20% based on meeting with D pumps 48 $ 7,750 $ 372,000
realignment Orsinelli on 7/9/01
Electrical and Instrumentation Based on D Orsinelli email on pumps 48 $ 40,000 $ 1,920,000

(including vsd/mcc/etc/wire) 7/31/2012
Can rehab on all 48 cans Based on meeting with D SF 7841 $ 40 $ 313,657

Orsinelli on 7/9/2012
Three new RAS MCC Substation Based on meeting with D SF 7500 $ 190 $ 1,425,000
(one per battery) Orsinelli on 7/9/2012
Sub Total Capital Costs $ 5,890,657

Markup 3.44 $ 20,283,801
Total Capital Costs $ 20,283,801
Annual Operational Costs (chemical, energy, operational oversight, etc.)

Energy Costs
kWhr 2211000 $ 0.09 $ 198,990
Daily Checks
LS 1 $ 13,578 $ 13,578
Total Annual Operation $ 212,568
Annual Maintenance Costs (Note: Enter non-recurring costs on LCC worksheet.)

Labor Costs-Regular Pump Runs months 9 $ 2,595 $ 23,352
Check for sound, vibration and
general performance. pumps 48 $ 1,249 $ 59,966
Annual PMS to oil the lower
bearings pumps 48 $ 577 $ 27,677
Electricians check motors and oil
the motors. pumps 48 $ 865 $ 41,515
Breaker maintenance
pumps 48 $ 360 $ 17,298
0
pumps 48 $ - $ -
Total Annual Maintenance $ 169,809
Annual Risk Costs (Note: Enter non-recurring costs on LCC worksheet.)

Clogging with plastics or rags
pumps 48 $ 1,427 $ 68,496
Total Annual Risk $ 68,496

Alternative 1a - Two 3,300 gpm pumps (Small Duty-Small Duty)
Quantifiable Non-Recurring Costs
Starting Year 2020
No. of Years 60
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038
Capital Costs (including soft costs and contractor costs)
Capital Costs (including contingency) $ 20,283,801
Recurring Costs - Operation, Maintenance and Risk (from worksheet)

Annual Operation $ 212,568 $ 218,945 $ 225,513 $ 232,279 $ 239,247 $ 246,425 $ 253,817 $ 261,432 $ 269,275 $ 277,353 $ 285,674 $ 294,244 $ 303,071 $ 312,163 $ 321,528 $ 331,174 $ 341,109 $ 351,343 $ 361,883
Annual Maintenance $ 169,809 $ 174,903 $ 180,150 $ 185,555 $ 191,121 $ 196,855 $ 202,760 $ 208,843 $ 215,109 $ 221,562 $ 228,209 $ 235,055 $ 242,107 $ 249,370 $ 256,851 $ 264,556 $ 272,493 $ 280,668 $ 289,088
Annual Risk $ 68,496 $ 70,551 $ 72,668 $ 74,848 $ 77,093 $ 79,406 $ 81,788 $ 84,242 $ 86,769 $ 89,372 $ 92,053 $ 94,815 $ 97,659 $ 100,589 $ 103,607 $ 106,715 $ 109,916 $ 113,214 $ 116,610
Non-Recurring Costs Enter description, then enter the cost(s) under the appropriate year(s).
After 10 years after installation, plan on 1 pump per year to rebuild due to mechanical failure. $ 48,175 $ 49,620 $ 51,108 $ 52,642 $ 54,221 $ 55,848 $ 57,523 $ 59,249 $ 61,026
After 20 years after installation, plan on an additional 2 pumps per year to rebuild due to mechanical failure.
Projected Inflation Rate 3.0%
Annual Expense (including inflation) $ 20,734,674 $ 464,399 $ 478,331 $ 492,681 $ 507,461 $ 522,685 $ 538,366 $ 554,517 $ 571,152 $ 588,287 $ 654,110 $ 673,733 $ 693,945 $ 714,764 $ 736,207 $ 758,293 $ 781,042 $ 804,473 $ 828,607
Life Cycle Cost

Projected Discount Rate
3% $ 20,734,674 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 450,873 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719 $ 486,719
5% $ 20,734,674 $ 442,285 $ 433,860 $ 425,596 $ 417,490 $ 409,538 $ 401,737 $ 394,085 $ 386,578 $ 379,215 $ 401,567 $ 393,918 $ 386,415 $ 379,054 $ 371,834 $ 364,752 $ 357,804 $ 350,989 $ 344,303
7% $ 20,734,674 $ 434,018 $ 417,793 $ 402,174 $ 387,140 $ 372,667 $ 358,736 $ 345,325 $ 332,416 $ 319,989 $ 332,516 $ 320,086 $ 308,120 $ 296,602 $ 285,514 $ 274,840 $ 264,566 $ 254,676 $ 245,155
Total Life Cycle Cost

3% Discount Rate $ 51,996,201
Annualized Operations
Life Cycle Cost $ 212,568 $ 208,519 $ 204,547 $ 200,651 $ 196,829 $ 193,080 $ 189,402 $ 185,795 $ 182,256 $ 178,784 $ 175,379 $ 172,038 $ 168,761 $ 165,547 $ 162,394 $ 159,300 $ 156,266 $ 153,290 $ 150,370
Net Present Value $ 7,639,897
Annualized Payments $276,052
Annualized Maintenance and Risk

Annual Expense (including inflation) $ 238,305 $ 245,454 $ 252,818 $ 260,402 $ 268,214 $ 276,261 $ 284,548 $ 293,085 $ 301,877 $ 310,934 $ 368,436 $ 379,490 $ 390,874 $ 402,600 $ 414,678 $ 427,119 $ 439,932 $ 453,130 $ 466,724
Life Cycle cost (5% discount) $ 238,305 $ 233,766 $ 229,313 $ 224,945 $ 220,660 $ 216,457 $ 212,334 $ 208,290 $ 204,323 $ 200,431 $ 226,188 $ 221,880 $ 217,653 $ 213,508 $ 209,441 $ 205,451 $ 201,538 $ 197,699 $ 193,934
Net Present Value (5% discount) $ 10,898,939
Appendix A RAS BCE Cost Analysis 20130412

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059
$ 372,739 $ 383,921 $ 395,439 $ 407,302 $ 419,521 $ 432,107 $ 445,070 $ 458,422 $ 472,175 $ 486,340 $ 500,930 $ 515,958 $ 531,437 $ 547,380 $ 563,802 $ 580,716 $ 598,137 $ 616,081 $ 634,564 $ 653,601 $ 673,209
$ 297,761 $ 306,693 $ 315,894 $ 325,371 $ 335,132 $ 345,186 $ 355,542 $ 366,208 $ 377,194 $ 388,510 $ 400,165 $ 412,170 $ 424,535 $ 437,271 $ 450,390 $ 463,901 $ 477,818 $ 492,153 $ 506,917 $ 522,125 $ 537,789
$ 120,108 $ 123,712 $ 127,423 $ 131,246 $ 135,183 $ 139,239 $ 143,416 $ 147,718 $ 152,150 $ 156,714 $ 161,416 $ 166,258 $ 171,246 $ 176,383 $ 181,675 $ 187,125 $ 192,739 $ 198,521 $ 204,477 $ 210,611 $ 216,929
$ 62,857 $ 64,743 $ 66,685 $ 68,686 $ 70,746 $ 72,868 $ 75,055 $ 77,306 $ 79,625 $ 82,014 $ 84,475 $ 87,009 $ 89,619 $ 92,308 $ 95,077 $ 97,929 $ 100,867 $ 103,893 $ 107,010 $ 110,220 $ 113,527
$ 129,485 $ 133,370 $ 137,371 $ 141,492 $ 145,737 $ 150,109 $ 154,612 $ 159,251 $ 164,028 $ 168,949 $ 174,018 $ 179,238 $ 184,615 $ 190,154 $ 195,858 $ 201,734 $ 207,786 $ 214,020 $ 220,440 $ 227,053
$ 853,465 $ 1,008,555 $ 1,038,811 $ 1,069,976 $ 1,102,075 $ 1,135,137 $ 1,169,191 $ 1,204,267 $ 1,240,395 $ 1,277,607 $ 1,315,935 $ 1,355,413 $ 1,396,075 $ 1,437,958 $ 1,481,096 $ 1,525,529 $ 1,571,295 $ 1,618,434 $ 1,666,987 $ 1,716,997 $ 1,768,507
$ 486,719 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412
$ 337,745 $ 380,114 $ 372,873 $ 365,771 $ 358,804 $ 351,970 $ 345,265 $ 338,689 $ 332,238 $ 325,909 $ 319,702 $ 313,612 $ 307,638 $ 301,779 $ 296,031 $ 290,392 $ 284,861 $ 279,435 $ 274,112 $ 268,891 $ 263,769
$ 235,990 $ 260,630 $ 250,887 $ 241,508 $ 232,479 $ 223,788 $ 215,423 $ 207,369 $ 199,617 $ 192,155 $ 184,972 $ 178,057 $ 171,400 $ 164,993 $ 158,825 $ 152,888 $ 147,172 $ 141,670 $ 136,374 $ 131,276 $ 126,369
$ 147,506 $ 144,696 $ 141,940 $ 139,236 $ 136,584 $ 133,983 $ 131,430 $ 128,927 $ 126,471 $ 124,062 $ 121,699 $ 119,381 $ 117,107 $ 114,877 $ 112,688 $ 110,542 $ 108,436 $ 106,371 $ 104,345 $ 102,357 $ 100,408
$ 480,726 $ 624,633 $ 643,372 $ 662,673 $ 682,553 $ 703,030 $ 724,121 $ 745,845 $ 768,220 $ 791,267 $ 815,005 $ 839,455 $ 864,638 $ 890,577 $ 917,295 $ 944,814 $ 973,158 $ 1,002,353 $ 1,032,423 $ 1,063,396 $ 1,095,298
$ 190,240 $ 235,418 $ 230,934 $ 226,535 $ 222,220 $ 217,987 $ 213,835 $ 209,762 $ 205,766 $ 201,847 $ 198,002 $ 194,231 $ 190,531 $ 186,902 $ 183,342 $ 179,850 $ 176,424 $ 173,064 $ 169,767 $ 166,534 $ 163,361

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079
$ 693,405 $ 714,207 $ 735,633 $ 757,702 $ 780,433 $ 803,846 $ 827,962 $ 852,801 $ 878,385 $ 904,736 $ 931,878 $ 959,834 $ 988,630 $ 1,018,288 $ 1,048,837 $ 1,080,302 $ 1,112,711 $ 1,146,093 $ 1,180,475 $ 1,215,890
$ 553,922 $ 570,540 $ 587,656 $ 605,286 $ 623,445 $ 642,148 $ 661,412 $ 681,255 $ 701,692 $ 722,743 $ 744,425 $ 766,758 $ 789,761 $ 813,454 $ 837,857 $ 862,993 $ 888,883 $ 915,549 $ 943,016 $ 971,306
$ 223,437 $ 230,140 $ 237,044 $ 244,156 $ 251,480 $ 259,025 $ 266,795 $ 274,799 $ 283,043 $ 291,535 $ 300,281 $ 309,289 $ 318,568 $ 328,125 $ 337,969 $ 348,108 $ 358,551 $ 369,307 $ 380,387 $ 391,798
$ 116,933 $ 120,440 $ 124,054 $ 127,775 $ 131,609 $ 135,557 $ 139,624 $ 143,812 $ 148,127 $ 152,570 $ 157,148 $ 161,862 $ 166,718 $ 171,719 $ 176,871 $ 182,177 $ 187,642 $ 193,272 $ 199,070 $ 205,042
$ 233,865 $ 240,881 $ 248,107 $ 255,551 $ 263,217 $ 271,114 $ 279,247 $ 287,624 $ 296,253 $ 305,141 $ 314,295 $ 323,724 $ 333,436 $ 343,439 $ 353,742 $ 364,354 $ 375,285 $ 386,543 $ 398,140 $ 410,084
$ 1,821,562 $ 1,876,209 $ 1,932,495 $ 1,990,470 $ 2,050,184 $ 2,111,689 $ 2,175,040 $ 2,240,291 $ 2,307,500 $ 2,376,725 $ 2,448,027 $ 2,521,468 $ 2,597,112 $ 2,675,025 $ 2,755,276 $ 2,837,934 $ 2,923,072 $ 3,010,764 $ 3,101,087 $ 3,194,120
$ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412 $ 558,412
$ 258,745 $ 253,817 $ 248,982 $ 244,239 $ 239,587 $ 235,024 $ 230,547 $ 226,156 $ 221,848 $ 217,622 $ 213,477 $ 209,411 $ 205,422 $ 201,509 $ 197,671 $ 193,906 $ 190,212 $ 186,589 $ 183,035 $ 179,549
$ 121,645 $ 117,097 $ 112,720 $ 108,506 $ 104,450 $ 100,545 $ 96,786 $ 93,168 $ 89,685 $ 86,332 $ 83,105 $ 79,998 $ 77,008 $ 74,129 $ 71,358 $ 68,690 $ 66,122 $ 63,650 $ 61,271 $ 58,980
$ 98,495 $ 96,619 $ 94,779 $ 92,973 $ 91,202 $ 89,465 $ 87,761 $ 86,090 $ 84,450 $ 82,841 $ 81,263 $ 79,715 $ 78,197 $ 76,708 $ 75,246 $ 73,813 $ 72,407 $ 71,028 $ 69,675 $ 68,348
$ 1,128,157 $ 1,162,002 $ 1,196,862 $ 1,232,768 $ 1,269,751 $ 1,307,843 $ 1,347,078 $ 1,387,491 $ 1,429,115 $ 1,471,989 $ 1,516,149 $ 1,561,633 $ 1,608,482 $ 1,656,736 $ 1,706,439 $ 1,757,632 $ 1,810,361 $ 1,864,672 $ 1,920,612 $ 1,978,230
$ 160,250 $ 157,197 $ 154,203 $ 151,266 $ 148,385 $ 145,558 $ 142,786 $ 140,066 $ 137,398 $ 134,781 $ 132,214 $ 129,695 $ 127,225 $ 124,802 $ 122,425 $ 120,093 $ 117,805 $ 115,561 $ 113,360 $ 111,201

Alternative 2a
Energy
Pump Motor Efficiency, Flow Rate, Pumps in
Item and Description Efficiency, % % gpm/pump Service Energy, kW-hr Comment
Energy Operations Costs (/yr) 80% 95% 3144.875 20 2,322,000 and zero sidestream. Alternative 1 has on pump per
SST.
Daily Operations
Hours for all
RAS pumps

Item and Description Units Quantity cost Total, $ Comment
Labor Costs-Regular Pump Standard practice is to start every pump once per
hours/month 9 $ 288 $ 2,595
Runs month. Effort takes 9 hours per month.
hrs/yr/pump 4.3 $ 288 $ 1,249
hrs/yr/pump 2 $ 288 $ 577
hrs/yr/pump 3 $ 288 $ 865

Clogging with plastics or rags Probabilty of clogging 0.05 $ 28,540 $ 1,427 Each year 5% chance of clogging

Overhaul of RAS Pump
After 10 years plan on 1 pump per year need to be
Labor to replacement RAS
Labor to replacement RAS VFD HRs 8 $ 2,306 repalced . After 20 years plan on 2 VFDs per year
Total $ 40,846
3%
Labor cost, $/hr = 93
Maintenance Cost Multiplier** 3.1
Loaded labor, $/hr = 288.3

Alternative 2a - Two 6,600 GPM Pumps (Large Duty- Large Standby)

Cascade 16MF Mixed Flow Pumps Quote dated 06/01/2012 pumps 48 $ 72,500 $ 3,480,000


Three new RAS MCC Substation Based on meeting with D SF 7500 $ 190 $ 1,425,000
(one per battery) Orsinelli on 7/9/2012

Markup 3.44 $ 28,746,265

Energy Costs
kWhr 2322000 $ 0.09 $ 208,980
Daily Checks
LS 1 $ 13,578 $ 13,578

Labor Costs-Regular Pump Runs
Months 12 $ 2,595 $ 31,136
Annual PMS to oil the lower
bearings pumps 48 $ 577 $ 27,677
Electricians check motors and oil
the motors. pumps 48 $ 865 $ 41,515
Breaker maintenance
pumps 48 $ 360 $ 17,298
0
pumps 48 $ - $ -

pumps 48 $ 1,427 $ 68,496

Alternative 2a - Two 6,600 GPM Pumps (Large Duty- Large Standby)
Starting Year 2020
No. of Years 60
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038

Annual Risk $ 68,496 $ 70,551 $ 72,668 $ 74,848 $ 77,093 $ 79,406 $ 81,788 $ 84,242 $ 86,769 $ 89,372 $ 92,053 $ 94,815 $ 97,659 $ 100,589 $ 103,607 $ 106,715 $ 109,916 $ 113,214 $ 116,610
After 15 years plan on 1 pump per year to rebuild due to mechanical failure. $ 63,637 $ 65,547 $ 67,513 $ 69,538
After 30 years plan on an additional pump per year to rebuild due to mechanical failure.
Annual Expense (including inflation) $ 29,214,911 $482,706 $497,188 $512,103 $527,466 $543,290 $559,589 $576,377 $593,668 $611,478 $629,822 $648,717 $668,178 $688,224 $708,871 $793,774 $817,587 $842,115 $867,378
Life Cycle Cost

3% $ 29,214,911 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 468,647 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493
5% $ 29,214,911 $ 459,720 $ 450,964 $ 442,374 $ 433,948 $ 425,682 $ 417,574 $ 409,620 $ 401,818 $ 394,164 $ 386,656 $ 379,291 $ 372,067 $ 364,980 $ 358,028 $ 381,819 $ 374,546 $ 367,412 $ 360,414
7% $ 29,214,911 $ 451,127 $ 434,263 $ 418,029 $ 402,401 $ 387,358 $ 372,878 $ 358,938 $ 345,520 $ 332,603 $ 320,170 $ 308,201 $ 296,679 $ 285,588 $ 274,912 $ 287,700 $ 276,945 $ 266,592 $ 256,626

Life Cycle Cost $ 222,558 $ 218,319 $ 214,160 $ 210,081 $ 206,080 $ 202,154 $ 198,304 $ 194,526 $ 190,821 $ 187,187 $ 183,621 $ 180,124 $ 176,693 $ 173,327 $ 170,026 $ 166,787 $ 163,610 $ 160,494 $ 157,437


20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060
$ 390,257 $ 401,965 $ 414,023 $ 426,444 $ 439,237 $ 452,415 $ 465,987 $ 479,967 $ 494,366 $ 509,197 $ 524,473 $ 540,207 $ 556,413 $ 573,105 $ 590,298 $ 608,007 $ 626,248 $ 645,035 $ 664,386 $ 684,318 $ 704,847 $ 725,993
$ 311,410 $ 320,752 $ 330,375 $ 340,286 $ 350,495 $ 361,010 $ 371,840 $ 382,995 $ 394,485 $ 406,319 $ 418,509 $ 431,064 $ 443,996 $ 457,316 $ 471,036 $ 485,167 $ 499,722 $ 514,713 $ 530,155 $ 546,059 $ 562,441 $ 579,314
$ 120,108 $ 123,712 $ 127,423 $ 131,246 $ 135,183 $ 139,239 $ 143,416 $ 147,718 $ 152,150 $ 156,714 $ 161,416 $ 166,258 $ 171,246 $ 176,383 $ 181,675 $ 187,125 $ 192,739 $ 198,521 $ 204,477 $ 210,611 $ 216,929 $ 223,437
$ 71,625 $ 73,773 $ 75,986 $ 78,266 $ 80,614 $ 83,032 $ 85,523 $ 88,089 $ 90,732 $ 93,454 $ 96,257 $ 99,145 $ 102,119 $ 105,183 $ 108,339 $ 111,589 $ 114,936 $ 118,384 $ 121,936 $ 125,594 $ 129,362 $ 133,243
$ 99,145 $ 102,119 $ 105,183 $ 108,339 $ 111,589 $ 114,936 $ 118,384 $ 121,936 $ 125,594 $ 129,362 $ 133,243
$893,400 $920,202 $947,808 $976,242 $1,005,529 $1,035,695 $1,066,766 $1,098,769 $1,131,732 $1,165,684 $1,200,655 $1,335,819 $1,375,894 $1,417,171 $1,459,686 $1,503,476 $1,548,581 $1,595,038 $1,642,889 $1,692,176 $1,742,941 $1,795,229
$ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 509,493 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340
$ 353,549 $ 346,814 $ 340,208 $ 333,728 $ 327,371 $ 321,136 $ 315,019 $ 309,019 $ 303,133 $ 297,359 $ 291,695 $ 309,078 $ 303,191 $ 297,416 $ 291,751 $ 286,194 $ 280,743 $ 275,395 $ 270,150 $ 265,004 $ 259,956 $ 255,005
$ 247,032 $ 237,798 $ 228,908 $ 220,351 $ 212,113 $ 204,184 $ 196,551 $ 189,203 $ 182,130 $ 175,321 $ 168,767 $ 175,483 $ 168,923 $ 162,608 $ 156,529 $ 150,677 $ 145,045 $ 139,622 $ 134,403 $ 129,378 $ 124,542 $ 119,886
$ 154,438 $ 151,496 $ 148,611 $ 145,780 $ 143,003 $ 140,279 $ 137,607 $ 134,986 $ 132,415 $ 129,893 $ 127,419 $ 124,992 $ 122,611 $ 120,275 $ 117,984 $ 115,737 $ 113,533 $ 111,370 $ 109,249 $ 107,168 $ 105,127 $ 103,124
$ 503,143 $ 518,237 $ 533,784 $ 549,798 $ 566,292 $ 583,281 $ 600,779 $ 618,802 $ 637,366 $ 656,487 $ 676,182 $ 795,613 $ 819,481 $ 844,065 $ 869,387 $ 895,469 $ 922,333 $ 950,003 $ 978,503 $ 1,007,858 $ 1,038,094 $ 1,069,237
$ 199,111 $ 195,318 $ 191,598 $ 187,948 $ 184,368 $ 180,857 $ 177,412 $ 174,032 $ 170,718 $ 167,466 $ 164,276 $ 184,087 $ 180,580 $ 177,141 $ 173,767 $ 170,457 $ 167,210 $ 164,025 $ 160,901 $ 157,836 $ 154,830 $ 151,880

42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079
$ 747,772 $ 770,206 $ 793,312 $ 817,111 $ 841,624 $ 866,873 $ 892,879 $ 919,666 $ 947,256 $ 975,673 $ 1,004,944 $ 1,035,092 $ 1,066,145 $ 1,098,129 $ 1,131,073 $ 1,165,005 $ 1,199,955 $ 1,235,954 $ 1,273,032
$ 596,694 $ 614,595 $ 633,033 $ 652,023 $ 671,584 $ 691,732 $ 712,484 $ 733,858 $ 755,874 $ 778,550 $ 801,907 $ 825,964 $ 850,743 $ 876,265 $ 902,553 $ 929,630 $ 957,518 $ 986,244 $ 1,015,831
$ 230,140 $ 237,044 $ 244,156 $ 251,480 $ 259,025 $ 266,795 $ 274,799 $ 283,043 $ 291,535 $ 300,281 $ 309,289 $ 318,568 $ 328,125 $ 337,969 $ 348,108 $ 358,551 $ 369,307 $ 380,387 $ 391,798
$ 137,240 $ 141,357 $ 145,598 $ 149,966 $ 154,465 $ 159,099 $ 163,872 $ 168,788 $ 173,851 $ 179,067 $ 184,439 $ 189,972 $ 195,671 $ 201,542 $ 207,588 $ 213,815 $ 220,230 $ 226,837 $ 233,642
$ 137,240 $ 141,357 $ 145,598 $ 149,966 $ 154,465 $ 159,099 $ 163,872 $ 168,788 $ 173,851 $ 179,067 $ 184,439 $ 189,972 $ 195,671 $ 201,542 $ 207,588 $ 213,815 $ 220,230 $ 226,837 $ 233,642
$1,849,086 $1,904,559 $1,961,696 $2,020,547 $2,081,163 $2,143,598 $2,207,906 $2,274,143 $2,342,367 $2,412,638 $2,485,017 $2,559,568 $2,636,355 $2,715,446 $2,796,909 $2,880,816 $2,967,241 $3,056,258 $3,147,946
$ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340 $ 550,340
$ 250,147 $ 245,383 $ 240,709 $ 236,124 $ 231,626 $ 227,214 $ 222,886 $ 218,641 $ 214,476 $ 210,391 $ 206,384 $ 202,452 $ 198,596 $ 194,813 $ 191,103 $ 187,463 $ 183,892 $ 180,389 $ 176,953
$ 115,404 $ 111,090 $ 106,937 $ 102,940 $ 99,091 $ 95,387 $ 91,821 $ 88,389 $ 85,084 $ 81,904 $ 78,842 $ 75,894 $ 73,057 $ 70,326 $ 67,697 $ 65,166 $ 62,730 $ 60,385 $ 58,128
$ 101,160 $ 99,233 $ 97,343 $ 95,489 $ 93,670 $ 91,886 $ 90,135 $ 88,419 $ 86,734 $ 85,082 $ 83,462 $ 81,872 $ 80,313 $ 78,783 $ 77,282 $ 75,810 $ 74,366 $ 72,950 $ 71,560
$ 1,101,314 $ 1,134,353 $ 1,168,384 $ 1,203,435 $ 1,239,539 $ 1,276,725 $ 1,315,026 $ 1,354,477 $ 1,395,112 $ 1,436,965 $ 1,480,074 $ 1,524,476 $ 1,570,210 $ 1,617,317 $ 1,665,836 $ 1,715,811 $ 1,767,286 $ 1,820,304 $ 1,874,913
$ 148,988 $ 146,150 $ 143,366 $ 140,635 $ 137,956 $ 135,329 $ 132,751 $ 130,222 $ 127,742 $ 125,309 $ 122,922 $ 120,580 $ 118,284 $ 116,031 $ 113,821 $ 111,653 $ 109,526 $ 107,440 $ 105,393

Alternative 3
Energy
Pump Efficiency, Motor Efficiency, Flow Rate, Pumps in
Item and Description % % gpm/pump Service Energy, kW-hr Comment
Energy Operations Costs (/yr) 80% 95% 3,144.88 20 2,322,000 and zero sidestream. Alternative 1 has on pump per
SST.
Daily Operations
Hours for all
RAS pumps

Item and Description Units Quantity cost Total, $ Comment
hrs/yr/pump 4.3 $ 288 $ 1,249
hrs/yr/pump 2 $ 288 $ 577
hrs/yr/pump 3 $ 288 $ 865

Clogging with plastics or rags Probabilty of clogging 5% $ 28,540 $ 1,427 Each year 5% chance of clogging

Overhaul of RAS Pump on 2 pumps per year need to be rebuilt due to
$ LS 22,800 $ 22,800
After 10 years plan on 1 VFD per 2 years need to be
After 10 years plan on s pumps per 2 yeasr need to
be rebuilt due to mechanical failure. After 20 years
Labor to replacement RAS plan on 4 pumps per year need to be rebuilt due to
$ LS 5,740 $ 5,740
After 10 years plan on 1 VFD per 2 yeasr need to be
Labor to replacement RAS VFD HRs 8 $ 2,306 repalced . After 20 years plan on 1 VFD per year
Total $ 40,846

Alternative 3 - One 6,600 GPM Pump (Large-No Standby)

Cascade 16MF Mixed Flow Pumps Quote dated 06/01/2012 pumps 24 $ 72,500 $ 1,740,000


Three new RAS MCC Substation (one Based on meeting with D SF 7500 $ 190 $ 1,425,000
per battery) Orsinelli on 7/9/2012

Markup 3.44 $ 17,366,565

Energy Costs
kWhr 2322000 $ 0.09 $ 208,980
Daily Checks
LS 1 $ 6,789 $ 6,789

Annual PMS to oil the lower bearings

pumps 24 $ 577 $ 13,838
Electricians check motors and oil the
motors. pumps 24 $ 865 $ 20,758
Breaker maintenance
pumps 24 $ 360 $ 8,649
0
pumps 24 $ - $ -

pumps 24 $ 1,427 $ 34,248

Alternative 3 - One 6,600 GPM Pump (Large-No Standby)
Starting Year 2020
No. of Years 60
Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038

Annual Risk $ 34,248 $ 35,276 $ 36,334 $ 37,424 $ 38,547 $ 39,703 $ 40,894 $ 42,121 $ 43,384 $ 44,686 $ 46,027 $ 47,407 $ 48,830 $ 50,294 $ 51,803 $ 53,357 $ 54,958 $ 56,607 $ 58,305
After 10 years after installation, plan on 1 pump per 2 years need to be rebuilt due to mechanical failure. $ 54,894 $ 58,237 $ 61,784 $ 65,547 $ 69,538
After 20 years after installation, plan on 1 additional pump per 2 years need to be rebuilt due to mechanical failure.
Annual Expense (including inflation) $ 17,689,810 $ 332,943 $ 342,931 $ 353,219 $ 363,815 $ 374,730 $ 385,972 $ 397,551 $ 409,477 $ 421,762 $ 489,309 $ 447,447 $ 519,108 $ 474,697 $ 550,721 $ 503,606 $ 584,260 $ 534,275 $ 619,842
Life Cycle Cost

3% $ 17,689,810 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 323,245 $ 364,092 $ 323,245 $ 364,092 $ 323,245 $ 364,092 $ 323,245 $ 364,092 $ 323,245 $ 364,092
5% $ 17,689,810 $ 317,088 $ 311,048 $ 305,124 $ 299,312 $ 293,611 $ 288,018 $ 282,532 $ 277,150 $ 271,871 $ 300,393 $ 261,613 $ 289,059 $ 251,742 $ 278,152 $ 242,243 $ 267,656 $ 233,102 $ 257,557
7% $ 17,689,810 $ 311,161 $ 299,529 $ 288,332 $ 277,553 $ 267,177 $ 257,189 $ 247,575 $ 238,320 $ 229,410 $ 248,740 $ 212,579 $ 230,490 $ 196,982 $ 213,579 $ 182,530 $ 197,909 $ 169,138 $ 183,389

Life Cycle Cost $ 215,769 $ 211,659 $ 207,628 $ 203,673 $ 199,793 $ 195,988 $ 192,255 $ 188,593 $ 185,000 $ 181,476 $ 178,020 $ 174,629 $ 171,303 $ 168,040 $ 164,839 $ 161,699 $ 158,619 $ 155,598 $ 152,634


20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059
$ 378,352 $ 389,703 $ 401,394 $ 413,436 $ 425,839 $ 438,614 $ 451,772 $ 465,326 $ 479,285 $ 493,664 $ 508,474 $ 523,728 $ 539,440 $ 555,623 $ 572,292 $ 589,460 $ 607,144 $ 625,359 $ 644,119 $ 663,443 $ 683,346
$ 128,406 $ 132,258 $ 136,226 $ 140,313 $ 144,522 $ 148,858 $ 153,324 $ 157,923 $ 162,661 $ 167,541 $ 172,567 $ 177,744 $ 183,076 $ 188,569 $ 194,226 $ 200,053 $ 206,054 $ 212,236 $ 218,603 $ 225,161 $ 231,916
$ 60,054 $ 61,856 $ 63,712 $ 65,623 $ 67,592 $ 69,619 $ 71,708 $ 73,859 $ 76,075 $ 78,357 $ 80,708 $ 83,129 $ 85,623 $ 88,192 $ 90,837 $ 93,562 $ 96,369 $ 99,260 $ 102,238 $ 105,305 $ 108,465
$ 73,773 $ 78,266 $ 83,032 $ 88,089 $ 93,454 $ 99,145 $ 105,183 $ 111,589 $ 118,384 $ 125,594
$ 73,773 $ 78,266 $ 83,032 $ 88,089 $ 93,454 $ 99,145 $ 105,183 $ 111,589 $ 118,384 $ 125,594
$ 566,813 $ 731,363 $ 601,331 $ 775,903 $ 637,953 $ 823,156 $ 676,804 $ 873,286 $ 718,021 $ 926,469 $ 761,749 $ 982,891 $ 808,139 $ 1,042,749 $ 857,355 $ 1,106,253 $ 909,568 $ 1,173,624 $ 964,960 $ 1,245,097 $ 1,023,726
$ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245
$ 224,307 $ 275,643 $ 215,843 $ 265,242 $ 207,699 $ 255,234 $ 199,862 $ 245,604 $ 192,321 $ 236,336 $ 185,064 $ 227,419 $ 178,081 $ 218,838 $ 171,362 $ 210,581 $ 164,896 $ 202,635 $ 158,674 $ 194,989 $ 152,687
$ 156,728 $ 188,998 $ 145,229 $ 175,132 $ 134,574 $ 162,282 $ 124,701 $ 150,376 $ 115,551 $ 139,343 $ 107,074 $ 129,120 $ 99,218 $ 119,646 $ 91,938 $ 110,868 $ 85,193 $ 102,734 $ 78,942 $ 95,196 $ 73,150
$ 149,727 $ 146,875 $ 144,077 $ 141,333 $ 138,641 $ 136,000 $ 133,410 $ 130,868 $ 128,376 $ 125,931 $ 123,532 $ 121,179 $ 118,871 $ 116,606 $ 114,385 $ 112,207 $ 110,069 $ 107,973 $ 105,916 $ 103,899 $ 101,920
$ 188,460 $ 341,661 $ 199,938 $ 362,468 $ 212,114 $ 384,542 $ 225,031 $ 407,961 $ 238,736 $ 432,805 $ 253,275 $ 459,163 $ 268,699 $ 487,126 $ 285,063 $ 516,792 $ 302,423 $ 548,265 $ 320,841 $ 581,654 $ 340,380
$ 74,580 $ 128,768 $ 71,766 $ 123,910 $ 69,058 $ 119,234 $ 66,452 $ 114,735 $ 63,945 $ 110,406 $ 61,532 $ 106,240 $ 59,210 $ 102,231 $ 56,976 $ 98,374 $ 54,826 $ 94,662 $ 52,758 $ 91,090 $ 50,767

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079
$ 703,847 $ 724,962 $ 746,711 $ 769,112 $ 792,186 $ 815,951 $ 840,430 $ 865,643 $ 891,612 $ 918,360 $ 945,911 $ 974,288 $ 1,003,517 $ 1,033,623 $ 1,064,631 $ 1,096,570 $ 1,129,467 $ 1,163,351 $ 1,198,252 $ 1,234,199
$ 238,873 $ 246,039 $ 253,421 $ 261,023 $ 268,854 $ 276,919 $ 285,227 $ 293,784 $ 302,597 $ 311,675 $ 321,026 $ 330,656 $ 340,576 $ 350,793 $ 361,317 $ 372,157 $ 383,321 $ 394,821 $ 406,666 $ 418,866
$ 111,719 $ 115,070 $ 118,522 $ 122,078 $ 125,740 $ 129,512 $ 133,398 $ 137,400 $ 141,522 $ 145,767 $ 150,140 $ 154,645 $ 159,284 $ 164,062 $ 168,984 $ 174,054 $ 179,275 $ 184,654 $ 190,193 $ 195,899
$ 133,243 $ 141,357 $ 149,966 $ 159,099 $ 168,788 $ 179,067 $ 189,972 $ 201,542 $ 213,815 $ 226,837
$ 133,243 $ 141,357 $ 149,966 $ 159,099 $ 168,788 $ 179,067 $ 189,972 $ 201,542 $ 213,815 $ 226,837
$ 1,320,924 $ 1,086,071 $ 1,401,368 $ 1,152,213 $ 1,486,711 $ 1,222,383 $ 1,577,252 $ 1,296,826 $ 1,673,307 $ 1,375,803 $ 1,775,211 $ 1,459,589 $ 1,883,321 $ 1,548,478 $ 1,998,016 $ 1,642,781 $ 2,119,695 $ 1,742,826 $ 2,248,784 $ 1,848,964
$ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245 $ 404,938 $ 323,245
$ 187,632 $ 146,925 $ 180,552 $ 141,382 $ 173,739 $ 136,047 $ 167,183 $ 130,914 $ 160,875 $ 125,974 $ 154,805 $ 121,221 $ 148,964 $ 116,647 $ 143,343 $ 112,245 $ 137,934 $ 108,010 $ 132,730 $ 103,935
$ 88,212 $ 67,783 $ 81,740 $ 62,810 $ 75,743 $ 58,202 $ 70,185 $ 53,932 $ 65,036 $ 49,975 $ 60,264 $ 46,308 $ 55,843 $ 42,911 $ 51,746 $ 39,762 $ 47,949 $ 36,845 $ 44,431 $ 34,142
$ 99,978 $ 98,074 $ 96,206 $ 94,373 $ 92,576 $ 90,813 $ 89,083 $ 87,386 $ 85,721 $ 84,089 $ 82,487 $ 80,916 $ 79,375 $ 77,863 $ 76,380 $ 74,925 $ 73,498 $ 72,098 $ 70,724 $ 69,377
$ 617,077 $ 361,109 $ 654,657 $ 383,101 $ 694,526 $ 406,432 $ 736,822 $ 431,184 $ 781,695 $ 457,443 $ 829,300 $ 485,301 $ 879,804 $ 514,856 $ 933,384 $ 546,210 $ 990,228 $ 579,475 $ 1,050,532 $ 614,765
$ 87,653 $ 48,851 $ 84,346 $ 47,008 $ 81,163 $ 45,234 $ 78,101 $ 43,528 $ 75,154 $ 41,885 $ 72,318 $ 40,305 $ 69,589 $ 38,784 $ 66,964 $ 37,321 $ 64,437 $ 35,912 $ 62,005 $ 34,557

Markups Defined
Markup Type Item Value

Gross Markups (compound)
Net markup 1.1975
General Conditions 15% 1.15
Start up And Training 8% 1.08
Estimating and Bidding Contingency 30% 1.3
Insurance 2% 1.02
Bonds 1.5% 1.015
Escalation 22 1.22
Total gross markups 2.44
Note: Values are compounding or multiplicative rather than simple
Soft Costs
Engineering Services Through Bid 9% 9.00%
Engineering Services During Construction 4% 4.00%
PMO Support (JV) 5% 5.00%
District Staff 3% 3.00%
Construction Management 8% 8.00%
Change Order Contingency 5% 5.00%
Project Contingency 7% 7.00%
Program Contingency 0% 0.00%
Total soft cost markups 41%
Note: Values are compounding or multiplicative rather than simple
Total Markup
Goss markup 2.44
Soft Cost markups 1.41
Total markup of construction costs 3.44
Attachment B
Alternatives Development
Return Activated Sludge Business Case Evaluation Development
This attachment provides the basis regarding how each alternative in the RAS BCE was
selected. There are several options in determining how many pumps should be used and how
large each pump should be. There are several types of pump operation strategies and a wide
selection of available pumps that will work with RAS. In this document, four pump operation
strategies are paired with three pump options to develop a list of three viable alternatives.
Pump Operation Strategies

This section investigates the strategies of using of the existing pumps and explores installing
new pumps. The existing pumps are operated together in duty-duty configuration. The existing
pumps will be considered as the status quo alternative. For installation of new pumps, three
pump strategies are developed in this section.
Existing Pumps (Status Quo Alternative)

The status quo alternative would involve relying on the existing pumps to meet future BNR
requirements. The existing RAS pumps can be used to convey RAS to the new reaeration tank,
but both pumps will be required to operate and they will operate a maximum of 9 percent less
than the required flow rate of 3,300 gpm (4.75 mgd) per pump. Under this strategy, redundancy
would be provided by shutting down an SST with a faulty pump and bringing on line a standby
SST to meet the process needs.
If the 32 Fairbanks Morse propeller pumps in Batteries I and II were used with all pumps on,
the maximum flow rate would be 3,000 gpm (4.3 mgd) at 39 feet TDH per pump. The
16 Goulds mixed flow pumps in Battery III will operate at a maximum 3,100 gpm (4.5 mgd) at
40 feet TDH per pump. Both the existing Fairbanks Morse and Goulds pumps will not meet the
design flow requirements and larger pumps will be required. The existing RAS system curve
was modeled and overlaid with the existing pumps. The existing piping system trace is shown
in Appendix B along with the existing pipe system curve and pipe segment detail report. This
graphic is provided in Appendix B.
The existing pumps are unable to meet the discharge requirements because 16 of the
32 Fairbanks Morse propeller pumps in Batteries I and II are currently unavailable. As of
March 2013, five of the 16 unavailable pumps would require being rebuilt or replaced before
being placed back into service.
Existing pump curves for Batteries I and II are overlaid against the proposed system curve is
shown on Figure 1. The Battery III existing pump curves are overlaid against the proposed
system curve and are shown on Figure 2. The system curve was developed based on a detailed
analysis of each pipe segment in the existing system.
The model considers all pipes and fittings as found on the design drawings. Modeling of the
major losses is based on DarcyWeisbach equation. All piping is modeled based on DIP,
cement mortar-lined with a roughness coefficient of 0.000417 0.001083 foot. The roughness
coefficient is adapted from Pumping Station Design Manual (Garr Jones et al, 2008) and the
B-1
high value of 0.001083 foot approximates aged pipe with cement mortar lining. However,
subsequent review of original design specifications suggests that all buried piping 14 inches
and greater may be bar wrapped concrete cylinder pipe (AWWA C303). In the original design
specifications, the above grade RAS piping near the pumps is described as steel pipe
(AWWA 200) with enamel lining. Pending confirmation during the condition assessment,
coefficients should be revised based on the roughness values described in Design Guidelines.
Table 1 contains values for minor loss coefficients that are used in the model.
Table 1. Minor Loss Coefficients for Common Fittings and Valves

Type of Minor Loss High Loss Low Loss
90 Elbow, standard 0.3 0.25
45 Elbow 0.3 0.1
Branch Tee 1 0.75
Passing Tee 0.5 0.3
Concentric Expander 0.25 0.1
Concentric Reducer 0.075 0.01
Cross, Branch Flow 0.75 0.75
Cross, Line Flow 0.5 0.5
Sharp Edged Exit/Entrance 0.5 0.5
Butterfly 0.35 0.3
Note: Adapted from Pumping Station Design Manual; Garr Jones et al, 2008
The maximum static lift of 6.4 feet (119.0 feet 112.6 feet) for the proposed RAS pumping
system curve is based on an assumed water surface elevation in the BNR RAS reaeration tank.
This maximum is from the provisional hydraulic profile in Appendix A and is estimated from
losses for the existing treatment train and for the future BNR treatment train. The future system
curve and segment detail report is shown in Appendix B. For reference, existing pump
documentation is contained in Appendix C.
2) Use the corrected head to establish the flow per 1) To determine the flow for each pump
pump. Use the flow per pump with the uncorrected when two pumps are running use the
pump curve to determine the head experienced by intersection of the system curve and the
the pump when two pumps are on. summed corrected pumps
Figure 1. Batteries I and II Existing Fairbanks Morse Pump Curves Overlaid

against the Proposed System Curve
B-2
Figure 2. Battery III Existing Goulds Pump Curves Overlaid against the Proposed System Curve
Strategies for New Pumps

There are three basic types of operation strategies for replacing the existing pumps: large
duty-large standby, small duty-small duty, and large duty only. The large duty-large standby
operation strategy is similar to the existing system, but would require replacement of the pumps
with larger capacity pumps. The small duty-small duty operation strategy refers to two smaller
capacity pumps operating at the same time to provide the required flow rate.
New Pumps: Large Duty-Large Standby

In the large duty-large standby strategy, each pump would be sized to provide up to 9.5 mgd
and will utilize VFDs to turn down the pumps to a desired flow rate. The pumps in this scenario
would operate at a flow of 9.5 mgd at a preliminary 42 ft TDH. The preliminary TDH is highly
dependent on the location of the new RAS reaeration basin.
The large duty-large standby strategy requires the flow per can to be double the original design
requirements. However, with the increased flows, the open bottom can to horizontal header still
conforms to the requirements of the Hydraulic Institute (HI) standards 9.8.2.6, as shown in
Table 2. Because the cans conform to the requirements of HI 9.8.2.6, the design consultant will
not require a physical model; however, during design the design consultant will require the
pump manufacturers to confirm that prospective pumps are compatible with the existing cans.
B-3
Table 2. Summary of Eliminated Alternatives
Duty-
HI Requirement Standby HI Value
Value
Velocity in Can Below 4.7 5.0
Suction Bell, ft/s
Depth from header to 12 9 (3 X Suction
Suction Bell, ft Bell Diameter)
Depth of Suction Bell 11.5 2.5
Below Water Surface
Elevation, ft
New Pumps: Small Duty-Small Duty

In the small duty-small duty strategy, each pump would be sized to run simultaneously and
provide up to 4.75 mgd per pump. The pumps would utilize VFDs to turn down the pumps to a
desired flow rate. The pumps in this strategy will operate at a flow of 4.75 mgd at a preliminary
42-foot TDH. When compared to the duty-standby strategy, working together this strategy has
the potential to provide greater flexibility for turndown at each SST. In this approach,
redundancy would not come from a standby pump, but would be provided by redundant SSTs.
Therefore, if there are no available redundant SSTs and a pump fails on one SST, solids would
likely accumulate in the SST until the sludge blanket reaches the launders or until the SST was
taken off line.
Large Duty Only

The large duty only operation strategy will involve removing both existing pumps for each SST
and installing one new 9.5- mgd (6,600-gpm) pump per SST to handle the PWWF flow. While
both existing pumps are being removed, both cans would be reconditioned so a future pump
could be installed. Under this strategy, redundancy would be provided by shutting down an
SST with a faulty pump and bring online a standby SST to meet the process needs.
A variant of this strategy would be to simply leave the existing pump in place next to the new
large pump. Depending on the large pump selection, there is a potential to extend the low flow
range of the SST by leaving the existing pump in service. This extended range could be helpful
for meeting process needs during startup.
Construction Sequencing
Construction sequencing will be a challenge for both small and large pumps. Higher head
pumps are required to supply RAS to the BNR. However, the pumps are planned to be installed
prior to cutting over from the CO tanks to the BNR tanks. Both large and small pumps can be
kept operating within their allowable operating region (AOR). At start up (to the CO tanks) the
discharge valve can be throttled and the higher end of the pump speed can be restricted. The
design engineer will have to develop the optimal strategy and sequencing plan.
B-4
Pump Selection Options
This section investigates optional pump types to be considered for replacement of the existing
pumps. Pump selection is an iterative process that is dependent on pump operating levels,
dimensions and characteristics. The process starts by developing the high and low system
curves assuming static lift conditions and then selecting a pump that matches those conditions.
Once in the detail design stage, the pumps dimensions are then used to verify that the pump
meets the standards set by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Hydraulic
Institute Standards (HI). The intent of this section is to perform an initial vetting of three
classes of pumps: propeller pumps, mixed flow pumps, and vertical turbine solids handling
pumps.
Propeller Pumps
A propeller pump (i.e., axial flow pump) is a common type of pump that is essentially a
propeller in a pipe. The propeller blades push the liquid parallel to the pipe and work best under
low head and higher flow conditions. These pumps are currently being used in Batteries I
and II. While propeller pumps may be viable for the increased head of this application, they
would be operating at the edge of what this type of pump can achieve.
Manufacturers of propeller pumps include Patterson, Fairbanks Morse, and others; however,
neither manufacturer recommended using propeller pumps. Specifically, Patterson cited the fact
that their propeller pumps are more appropriate for TDH conditions lower than 20 feet and
Fairbanks Morse does not have a propeller pump that can meet these flow and head
requirements.
Mixed Flow Pumps

Mixed flow pumps borrow characteristics from both radial flow (vertical turbine) and axial
flow (propeller) pumps. As liquid flows through the impeller of a mixed flow pump, it
experiences both radial acceleration and lift. As a result, mixed flow pumps typically perform
better under higher head conditions than propeller pumps. Battery III utilizes this type of pump.
Mixed flow pumps are provided by all three of the contacted manufacturers (Cascade,
Fairbanks Morse, and Patterson) and were found to be the most efficient type of pumps
considered. Cascade and Fairbanks Morse each provided one mixed flow pump selection for
each strategy. Patterson provided one mixed flow pump selection for the duty-duty strategy.
Vertical Turbine Solids Handling Pumps

Vertical turbine solids handling (VTSH) pumps are mixed flow pumps. These pumps are
generally more resistant to clogging and stringy materials; however, for a given flow rate, their
bowl diameter is larger than the mixed flow and propeller pumps. Neither Cascade nor
Fairbanks Morse manufacture a VTSH pump that can meet the specified duty points and fit
within the existing 24-inch-diameter can.
B-5
Patterson Pumps does have one VTSH type pump, the Multi-Purpose Vertical Turbine Pumps
(12MPVT), that will fit in the 24-inch-diameter can. This model would only apply for the small
duty-small duty pumping strategy.
For applications that have a risk or a history of solids or stringy materials fouling pumps,
VTSH pumps are well suited. However, at SRCSD both propeller and mixed flow pumps have
performed well for approximately three decades on the RAS system. There may be limited
value to using VTSH pumps on the existing RAS system. Considering mixed flow pumps in
addition to VTSH pumps may provide access to a wider variety of pumping solutions that
provide a greater benefit for performance at a lower cost.
List of Alternatives
The list of the alternatives considered is summarized in Table 3. The table represents a
matching up of operational strategies with the list of available pump options that meet the
design requirements. The three manufacturers contacted are not the only manufacturers
providing propeller, mixed flow, or VTSH pumps. Although a complete search for all
manufacturers was not conducted, the reviewed pumps are considered representative of each
type of pump and are acceptable for the preliminary nature of this document.
Table 3. Summary of Viable Alternatives

Alterna Costs /
Brand1 Strategy Type Efficiency Comments
tive pump
0 Goulds/Fair Designed for Propeller/ Mixed 48%-81% / Status quo

banks Morse Duty-Duty Flow 45%-77%
1a Cascade Small Duty - Mixed Flow 72%-85% $38,750
Small Duty (low to high flow)
1b Fairbanks Small Duty - Mixed Flow 83.2% $45,000
Morse Small Duty @ high flow
1c Patterson Small Duty - Mixed Flow 85.5% - 84.1% $93,000
Small Duty (low to high flow)
1d Patterson Small Duty - Multi-purpose 68% - 78.9 % $83,000 VTSH Equivalent
Small Duty vertical turbine (low to high flow)
2a Cascade Large Duty - Mixed Flow 71%-85% $72,500 Intake bell requires
Large (low to high flow) shaving
Standby
2b Fairbanks Large Duty - Mixed Flow 80.1% $50,000
Morse Large @ high flow
Standby
3 Cascade Large Duty Mixed Flow and 71%-85% $72,500 Intake bell requires
Only existing pumps (low to high flow) shaving
1. Pumps listed in this table are a sample of pumps available. An exhaustive search for appropriate pumps was not conducted;
only these three manufacturers were contacted.
B-6
Appendix A
Determination of Static Head Based on Hydraulic Profiles

APPENDIX A
DETERMINATION OF STATIC HEAD BASED ON

HYDRAULIC PROFILES
Hydraulic Profile
This appendix estimates the liquid train hydraulic profile through the biological process to the
SSTs. The purpose of this section is to establish the estimated water surface elevation in the
RAS reaeration tank to compute the static head loss that the RAS pumps must overcome. This
Appendix is for planning level purposes only. Once the BNR design team develops a hydraulic
profile for the Preliminary Design Report this Appendix will either be deleted or significantly
revised. The difference in water surface elevations in the SSTs and the upstream RAS
connection point determines the static head required for the RAS pumping system. In the next
section, the static head for the existing and future conditions are combined with the dynamic
losses to develop system curves. Table 1 contains the design flow criteria
Table 1. Design Flow Criteria
Item Flow, mgd

EMDF 330
ADWF 181
Minimum flow1 78
Historical PHWWF2 from (CEP1) 332
1
99.9% of all existing instantaneous influent flow values are greater than 78 mgd.
Value is based on influent flow data from January 1, 2010 through December 30, 2011.
Existing Conditions Hydraulic Profile

The hydraulic profile for the existing conditions (from the SSTs to settled sewage channel) is
based on the Oxidation Tank Expansion Project 1994 hydraulic profile. The PHWWF2 of
332 MGD is similar for this system and the ADWF of 175 MGD will generate similar water
surface elevations to the permitted flow of 181 MGD. As shown in Table 2, the effluent leaves
the settled sewage channel with a water surface elevation of 116.44 at PHWWF2 and at
115.48 at ADWF. The water surface elevations at the SSTs are 112.61 at PHWWF2 and 112.59
at ADWF.
A-1
Table 2. Hydraulic Losses from the Existing Settled Sewage Channel to the SSTs
Loss, ft Elevation, ft
Item PHWWF2 ADWF PHWWF2 ADWF Basis
A SSTs 112.61 112.59 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
Tank Expansion Project
B Mixed Liquor Dist. Channel 0.46 0.13 113.07 112.72 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
C Mixed Liquor Channel 0.13 0.03 113.20 112.75 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
D Oxidation Influent Channel 2.96 2.65 116.16 115.40 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
E Settled Sewage Channels/ 0.28 0.08 116.44 115.48 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
Junction upstream of CO Tanks Tank Expansion Project
Total 3.83 2.89
Note: PHWWF2 approximately equals EMDF of 330 mgd and ADWF approximately equals
181 mgd.
Hydraulic Profile of BNR with Existing CO Tanks for Swing Zones

For this preliminary document, the hydraulic profile developed for existing structures is
combined with typical loss values used in the industry to represent future flow structure losses.
As an example, the flow splitting structure upstream of the BNR has not been designed, but a
maximum head loss of 1 foot is used. The hydraulic profile for the proposed option (new BNR
with existing carbonaceous oxidation tanks used for swing zones) is based on the Carbonaceous
Oxidation Tank Expansion Project 1994 hydraulic profile and typical values used in the
industry to represent losses at future flow structures. The PHWWF2 of 330 MGD is similar for
this system and the ADWF of 175 MGD will generate similar water surface elevations to the
permitted flow of 181 MGD. As shown in Table 3, the water surface elevation in the reaeration
splitter box may be as high as 119.14 at PHWWF2. With an efficient hydraulic design, at
ADWF, the water surface elevation in the reaeration tank may be as low at 116.50. Under both
existing and proposed conditions, the water surface elevation at the SSTs is 112.61 at
PHWWF2 and 112.59 at ADWF.
A-2
Table 3. Hydraulic Losses from the Reaeration Tanks to the SSTs
Loss, ft Elevation, ft
Item PHWWF2 ADWF PHWWF2 ADWF Basis
A SSTs 112.61 112.59 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
B Mixed Liquor Dist. Channel 0.46 0.13 113.07 112.72 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
C Mixed Liquor Channel 0.13 0.03 113.20 112.75 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
D Oxidation Influent Channel 2.96 2.65 116.16 115.40 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
E Settled Sewage Channels/ Junction 0.28 0.08 116.44 115.48 From Carbonaceous Oxidation
upstream of CO Tanks Tank Expansion Project
F Effluent Channel at End of BNR 0.10 0.02 116.54 115.50 Two pipes each 120-inches in
Tanks diameter 400 ft from junction with
CO Tanks
G Upstream End of BNR Tanks 0.30 0.20 116.84 115.70 Submerged weir calculation from
(Through BNR Tanks Over Weir at Pilot Plant (7/14/2011)
End of BNR Tanks)
H Channel Upstream of Flow Splitting 1.00 0.30 117.84 116.00 Loss for Cut through Flume
to BNR Tanks (Cut throat flumes) (Assume 40:1 Ratio of head loss in
distribution channel)
I Channel Upstream of RAS Mixing 0.50 0.20 118.34 116.20 Use 0.5 feet for sufficient mixing
energy
J Reaeration Collector Channel 0.20 0.10 118.54 116.30 Use 0.2 ft for sufficient loss in
channel
K Reaeration tank 0.10 0.00 118.64 116.30 Use 0.1 ft for sufficient loss in tank
L Splitter Box (Cut throat flumes 0.50 0.20 119.14 116.50 Use 0.5 ft for flow splitting
upstream of Reaeration)
Total 6.53 3.91
Note: PHWWF2 approximately equals EMDF of 330 mgd and ADWF approximately equals 181 mgd.
A-3
Appendix B
RAS Piping Calculations and Segments

8521 Laguna Station Road
Elk Grove, CA 95758
Phone: 916 875-9000
Fax 916 875-9068
SRCSD AWTP EXISTING Mail Code: 99-003
RAS SYSTEM
Created by: Gary Lin Date: 4/25/2012
Reviewed by: A. Graham Calciano Date: 5/14/2012
This packet contains the existing RAS system curve model and associated calculations. The
following is a list of notes and assumptions regarding RAS calculations.
1. There are 24 secondary clarifiers separated into three batteries at SRWTP. Each battery of 8
clarifiers share one 42-inch pipeline to the RAS Channel.
2. Secondary clarifier 4 is used to generate the high system curves in BC Pump Plots.
Secondary clarifier 4 is in Battery I (south east corner) and is the furthest from the RAS
Channelthus has the highest head loss. Secondary clarifier 13 is used to generate the low
system curves in BC Pump Plots. Secondary clarifier 13 is in Battery II (center North), and is
directly adjacent to the 42-inch pipelineclosest to the RAS Channel with the lowest head
loss. The main difference between these two curves is that the low curve uses the lower pipe
and minor loss coefficients and a reduce pipe length due to a different clarifier location.
3. A current condition RAS flow of 9.5 MGD (6,600 gpm) is assumed per secondary clarifier.
4. The RAS Channel water surface elevations during high and low flows are 116.2 ft and 115.4
ft (respectively). The clarifier water surface elevations during high and low flows are 112.61
ft and 112.59 ft. The water surface elevations are taken from Carollos hydraulic profile that
was done under contract 2745 in 1994.
5. The headloss due to the collectors in the clarifier is calculated based on a 1.43 ft headloss at
the manifold at 9.5 MGD. This known value was based on the submittal for the Tow Bro type
collectors in SST Battery III. This headloss was used to back calculate a reasonable minor
loss coefficient for the collector mechanism. Batteries I and II were manufactured by Walker
Process and were assumed to use similar collectors with a similar headloss.
6. The collector discharge manifold (to 30 RAS) is rectangular. An equivalent diameter analysis
was completed and found the rectangular discharge manifold to be 26 inches.
SRCSD RAS Piping Existing
Goulds - Duty
Name No Of Pump Stages Position Operating Speed(rpm) Impeller Dia(in)

Goulds Lead (1990) 1 1 1780 14
Goulds Lag (1990) 1 2 1780 14

SRCSD RAS Piping Existing
Fairbanks - Duty
Fairbanks Lead(1977) 1 1 1720 14
Fairbanks Lag (1977) 1 2 1720 14

Segment Detail Report
Project Name: SRCSD RAS Piping Existing
Last Update Date: April 18, 2013

Report Date: April 18, 2013
Engineer: Gary Lin
Pump Station Flow Rate: 9.5 mgd

System Loss: (Hi / Lo): 27.5 / 15 ft
Viscosity: 0.0000189 lbf-sec/ft2
Density: 1.94 slug/ft3
Segment Description: Clarifier tank(N1 - N3 ; N2 NOT USED)

Upstream Elevation: 0
:
Upstream EGL (Hi / Lo): 112.6 / 112.6 ft
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 0 / 0 psf
Upstream Flow Increment: 0 mgd
Flow in Segment: 9.5 mgd
Total Loss Through Segment (Hi / Lo): 1.5432 / 1.3682 ft
Segment Detail List
Roughness / K Length Friction Factor Loss HGL EGL

Category Loss Description Diameter Velocity
Hi Lo Hi Lo Hi Lo Hi Lo Hi Lo Hi Lo
in ft ft ft ft ft/sec ft ft ft ft ft ft
Minor Loss User Defined Tow-Bro 16 0.8500 0.7500 0 0 NA NA 10.54 1.5 1.3 109.4 109.6 111.1 111.3
Collec
Pipe Loss User Defined Manifold 26 0.0011 0.00092 4 4 0.0173 0.0167 3.9901 0 0 110.9 111 111.1 111.3
26"
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 30.7 0.0011 0.00092 78 78 0.0168 0.0164 2.8619 0.1 0.1 110.9 111.1 111.1 111.2
Cyl. Pipe 30"
# value less than the range.

* value greater than the range. Page 1 of 6
NU not used
Project Name: SRCSD RAS Piping Existing Last Update Date: 4/18/13 Guidance Name:Guidance_Data_September2008.gud Guidance Ver:September 2008 Report Date: 4/18/13
Segment Description: 6,600 flow from 1 tank(N3 - N6 in corr losses)
:
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 2276.3 / 1510.5 psf
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Con. Rdcr. (use 12 0.0750 0.0100 0 0 NA NA 18.73 0.4 0.1 132.7 120.7 138.1 126.2
dsmall, dsmall/dlarge
>.5
Pipe Loss User Defined Steel, 12.3 0.0011 0.00092 3.5 3.5 0.0201 0.0193 17.83 0.3 0.3 132.9 120.9 137.8 125.9
Epoxy lined 12"
Minor Loss User Defined Magnetic 12 0 0 0 0 NA NA 18.73 0 0 132.3 120.4 137.8 125.9
Flowmeter
Minor Loss Fittings Con. Expndr. 12 0.2500 0.1000 0 0 NA NA 18.73 1.4 0.5 131 119.9 136.4 125.3
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Minor Loss Fittings 90 Elbow, 18 0.3000 0.2500 0 0 NA NA 8.3250 0.3 0.3 135 124 136.1 125.1
standard
Pipe Loss User Defined Steel, 18.4 0.0011 0.00092 3.5 3.5 0.0184 0.0178 7.9670 0 0 135.1 124 136.1 125
Epoxy lined 18"
Minor Loss Fittings 90 Elbow, 18 0.3000 0.2500 0 0 NA NA 8.3250 0.3 0.3 134.7 123.7 135.7 124.7
standard
Pipe Loss User Defined Steel, 18.4 0.0011 0.00092 2.5 2.5 0.0184 0.0178 7.9670 0 0 134.7 123.7 135.7 124.7
Epoxy lined 18"
Minor Loss Fittings 45 Elbow 18 0.3000 0.1000 0 0 NA NA 8.3250 0.3 0.1 134.3 123.5 135.4 124.6

NU not used
Segment Description: 13,200 flow from 2 tanks (N6 - N7)
:
:
Upstream Flow Increment: 9.5 mgd
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Cross, branch 30 0.7500* 0.7500* 0 0 NA NA 5.9940 0.4 0.4 134.4 123.6 135 124.2
flow
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 30.7 0.0011 NU 260 NU 0.0165 NU 5.7238 0.9 NU 133.6 NU 134.1 NU
Cyl. Pipe 30"
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 24.7 NU 0.00092 NU 28 NU 0.0166 8.8423 NU 0.3 NU 122.7 NU 123.9
Cyl. Pipe 24"

NU not used
Segment Description: 26,400 flow from 4 tanks (N7 - N8)
Upstream Elevation: 105.4
:
:
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Cross, line flow 30 0.5000* NU 0 NU NA NU 11.99 1.1 NU 130.8 NU 133 NU
Cyl. Pipe 30"
Minor Loss Fittings Con. Expndr. 30 0.2500 NU 0 NU NA NU 11.99 0.6 NU 127.3 NU 129.6 NU
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Cyl. Pipe 36"
Minor Loss Fittings 90 Elbow, 36 0.3000 NU 0 NU NA NU 8.3250 0.3 NU 127.4 NU 128.5 NU
standard
Cyl. Pipe 36"
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 NU 12 NU 0.0153 NU 5.8352 0 NU 126.3 NU 126.9 NU
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Fittings Branch Tee 42 NU 0.7500 NU 0 NU NA 6.1163 NU 0.4 NU 122.9 NU 123.5

NU not used
Segment Description: 52,800 flow from 8 tanks (N8-N9)
:
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 1299 / 1088.6 psf
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Passing Tee 42 0.5000 NU 0 NU NA NU 12.23 1.2 NU 123.4 NU 125.7 NU
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 0.00092 405 405 0.0151 0.0147 11.67 3.6 3.5 119.9 117.8 122.1 120
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Fittings 90 Elbow, 42 0.3000 0.2500 0 0 NA NA 12.23 0.7 0.6 119 117.1 121.4 119.4
standard
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 0.00092 114 114 0.0151 0.0147 11.67 1 1 118.2 116.3 120.3 118.4
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Fittings Con. Rdcr. (use 36 0.0750 0.0100 0 0 NA NA 16.65 0.3 0 115.7 114 120 118.4
>.5
Minor Loss Valves Butterfly 36 0.3500 0.3000 0 0 NA NA 16.65 1.5 1.3 114.2 112.7 118.5 117.1
Minor Loss Fittings Con. Expndr. 36 0.2500 0.1000 0 0 NA NA 16.65 1.1 0.4 113.1 112.3 117.4 116.6
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 0.00092 7 7 0.0151 0.0147 11.67 0.1 0.1 115.2 114.4 117.4 116.6
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Entrance/Exit 42 0.5000 0.5000 0 0 NA NA 12.23 1.2 1.2 113.9 113.1 116.2 115.4
Sharp-edged

NU not used
System Loss Summary
EGL Pressure
Node Description Elevation Flow into Node Flow Increament Flow out of Node
Hi Lo Hi Lo
ft ft ft psf psf mgd mgd mgd
N1 Secondary Clarifiers 112.6 112.6 0 0 0 0 0 9.5
N4 Vertical Propeller Pump 111.1 111.2 102 564 574.9 9.5 0 9.5
N4 Vertical Propeller Pump 138.6 126.3 102 2276.3 1510.5 9.5 0 9.5
N6 Add Tank 3, (2 pumps) 135.4 124.6 105 1892.9 1221.3 9.5 9.5 19.01
N7 Adds tanks 7, 8, (4 pumps) 134.1 123.9 105.4 1788.6 1153.2 19.01 19.01 38.01
N8 Adds tanks 1, 2, 5, 6 (8 126.9 123.5 106 1299 1088.6 38.01 38.01 76.03
N9 RAS Channels 116.2 115.4 0 0 0 76.03 0 0
Static Lift Energy Required (Hi / Lo): 3.6 / 2.8 ft

NU not used
SRCSD RAS Piping Proposed
Goulds - Duty

Goulds Lead (1990) 1 1 1780 14
Goulds Lag (1990) 1 2 1780 14

SRCSD RAS Piping Proposed
Fairbanks - Duty
Fairbanks Lead(1977) 1 1 1720 14
Fairbanks Lag (1977) 1 2 1720 14

Segment Detail Report
Project Name: SRCSD RAS Piping Proposed
Last Update Date: April 11, 2013

Report Date: April 11, 2013
Engineer: Gary Lin
Pump Station Flow Rate: 9.5 mgd

System Loss: (Hi / Lo): 41.8 / 24.6 ft
Viscosity: 0.0000189 lbf-sec/ft2
Density: 1.94 slug/ft3
Segment Description: Clarifier tank(N1 - N3 ; N2 NOT USED)

:
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 0 / 0 psf
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss User Defined Tow-Bro 16 0.8500 0.7500 0 0 NA NA 10.54 1.5 1.3 109.4 109.6 111.1 111.3
Collec
Pipe Loss User Defined Manifold 26 0.0011 0.00092 4 4 0.0173 0.0167 3.9901 0 0 110.9 111 111.1 111.3
26"
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 30.7 0.0011 0.00092 78 78 0.0168 0.0164 2.8619 0.1 0.1 110.9 111.1 111.1 111.2
Cyl. Pipe 30"

NU not used
Project Name: SRCSD RAS Piping Proposed Last Update Date: 4/11/13 Guidance Name:Guidance_Data_September2008.gud Guidance Ver:September 2008 Report Date: 4/11/13
Segment Description: 6,600 gpm from 1 tank(N3 - N6 in corr. Losses)
:
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 3169.7 / 2105 psf
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Con. Rdcr. (use 12 0.0750 0.0100 0 0 NA NA 18.73 0.4 0.1 147 130.3 152.5 135.7
>.5
Pipe Loss User Defined Steel, 12.3 0.0011 0.00092 3.5 3.5 0.0201 0.0193 17.83 0.3 0.3 147.2 130.5 152.2 135.4
Epoxy lined 12"
Minor Loss User Defined Magnetic 12 0 0 0 0 NA NA 18.73 0 0 146.7 130 152.2 135.4
Flowmeter
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
standard
Epoxy lined 18"
Minor Loss Fittings 90 Elbow, 18 0.3000 0.2500 0 0 NA NA 8.3250 0.3 0.3 149 133.2 150.1 134.3
standard
Epoxy lined 18"
Minor Loss Fittings 45 Elbow 18 0.3000 0.1000 0 0 NA NA 8.3250 0.3 0.1 148.7 133.1 149.7 134.2

NU not used
Segment Description: 13,200 gpm from 2 tanks (N6 - N7)
:
:
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Cross, branch 30 0.7500* 0.7500* 0 0 NA NA 5.9940 0.4 0.4 148.8 133.2 149.3 133.7
flow
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 30.7 0.0011 NU 260 NU 0.0165 NU 5.7238 0.9 NU 148 NU 148.5 NU
Cyl. Pipe 30"
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 24.7 NU 0.00092 NU 28 NU 0.0166 8.8423 NU 0.3 NU 132.2 NU 133.5
Cyl. Pipe 24"

NU not used
Segment Description: 26,400 gpm from 4 tanks (N7 - N8)
Upstream Elevation: 105.4
:
:
Upstream Pressure(Hi / Lo): 2682 / 1747.7 psf
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Cross, line flow 30 0.5000* NU 0 NU NA NU 11.99 1.1 NU 145.1 NU 147.3 NU
Cyl. Pipe 30"
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Cyl. Pipe 36"
standard
Cyl. Pipe 36"
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 NU 12 NU 0.0153 NU 5.8352 0 NU 140.7 NU 141.2 NU
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Fittings Branch Tee 42 NU 0.7500 NU 0 NU NA 6.1163 NU 0.4 NU 132.4 NU 133

NU not used
Segment Description: 52,800 gpm from 8 tanks (N8-N9)
:
Upstream EGL (Hi / Lo): 141.2 / 133 ft
:
Segment Detail List

Minor Loss Fittings Passing Tee 42 0.5000 NU 0 NU NA NU 12.23 1.2 NU 137.7 NU 140 NU
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Cyl. Pipe 42"
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
Minor Loss Fittings Con. Rdcr. (use 36 0.0750 0.0100 0 0 NA NA 16.65 0.3 0 118.5 117.1 122.8 121.5
>.5
Minor Loss Valves Butterfly 36 0.3500 0.3000 0 0 NA NA 16.65 1.5 1.3 117 115.8 121.3 120.2
(use dsmall,
dsmall/dlarge >
Pipe Loss User Defined Conc. 43 0.0011 0.00092 7 7 0.0151 0.0147 11.67 0.1 0.1 118 117.5 120.2 119.7
Cyl. Pipe 42"
Minor Loss Entrance/Exit 42 0.5000 0.5000 0 0 NA NA 12.23 1.2 1.2 116.7 116.2 119 118.5
Sharp-edged

NU not used
System Loss Summary
EGL Pressure
Node Description Elevation Flow into Node Flow Increament Flow out of Node
Hi Lo Hi Lo
ft ft ft psf psf mgd mgd mgd
N1 Secondary Clarifiers 112.6 112.6 0 0 0 0 0 9.5
N4 Vertical Propeller Pump 111.1 111.2 102 564 574.9 9.5 0 9.5
N4 Vertical Propeller Pump 152.9 135.8 102 3169.7 2105 9.5 0 9.5
N6 Add Tank 3, (2 pumps) 149.7 134.2 105 2786.3 1815.8 9.5 9.5 19.01
N7 Adds tanks 7, 8, (4 pumps) 148.5 133.5 105.4 2682 1747.7 19.01 19.01 38.01
N8 Adds tanks 1, 2, 5, 6 (8 141.2 133 106 2192.5 1683.1 38.01 38.01 76.03
N9 RAS Channels 119 118.5 0 0 0 76.03 0 0
Static Lift Energy Required (Hi / Lo): 6.4 / 5.9 ft

NU not used
Appendix C
Existing RAS Pump Specifications and Details

Attachment C
RAS Can Drawings

SRCSD
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PUMPING -

BASIS OF DESIGN
JULY 2013
[CONSULTANT/DESIGNER ORGANIZATION]
ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT [XXXX]

CONTRACT NUMBER
J. Bruins D. Fong P. Hume D. Nottoli P. Serna A. Warren
BOARD OF S. Cohn S. Hansen R. MacGlashan B. Pannell D. Skoglund J. Yee
DIRECTORS J. Cooper K. Howell M. McGowan S. Peters O. Villegas
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF

SACRAMENTO REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE PUMPING -

BASIS OF DESIGN
SRCSD
[DESIGN DRAWINGS INCLUDED IN THIS VOLUME]

Volume [X] of [X]
OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2013
[CONSULTANT/DESIGNER ORGANIZATION]
SUBMITTED: DATE SUBMITTAL APPROVED: DATE

[DESIGNER] [PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE]
PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT MANAGER
SUBMITTAL APPROVED: DATE APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: DATE APPROVED: DATE

V. KYOTANI, PE R. ROBLES, PE S.R. DEAN, PE
PROGRAM MANAGER PLANT MANAGER DISTRICT ENGINEER
APPROVALS
[XXXX]
ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CONTRACT NUMBER
1 2 3 4 5
DESIGN FIRM
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE
PHONE:
CONTACT:
WWW.
REDDING
AVE
VD
D D
AVE
AME
80 S
BL
RICA
BU
N R ARDEN WAY
SUB CONSULTANT
IVE
HOWE
R
WATT
KS
OA VD
ER
SACRAMENTO BL
CITY
RIV
FAIR
CAN
OF AM
ERI
50 PRELIMINARY
SAN FRANCISCO SACRAMENTO OM
LS
FO THIS DRAWING IS NOT VALID FOR
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
FRESNO BEARS THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A
MONTEREY DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ST
OC
KT
99
CO
JAC
KSO
ON
N
RD
FRUITRIDGE RD
LO
BRADSHAW RD
C
LOS ANGELOS YO C
101
INN RD
BLV
5 99
RD
D
GRASS FLORIN RD SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
SA
VALLEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
POWER
FLORIN
CR
PROJECT LOCATION
RETURN ACTIVATED
AM
Sacramento Regional
SLUDGE PUMPING -
EN
GERBER RD
Wastewater MARYSVILLE
TO
BASIS OF DESIGN
Treatment Plant
80
ELK GROVE -
PATH AND FILENAME: Z:\15. RAS (Return Activated Sludge System)\B. Planning\CAD Graphics\B.20 CAD\1-MODELS\1.0 Revit\2012-AWTP-RASP-15.09-RVT-Admin.rvt
MEADOWVIEW RD
MACK RD
PROJECT LOCATION
PLACERVILLE Sacramento Regional
505 SACRAMENTO 50 Wastewater
80 CALVINE RD
Treatment Plant
BLVD
1 SANTA FREEPORT
DWIGHT RD
ROSA DAVIS
99
SHELDON RD
FAIRFIELD
101 5
B LAGUNA BLVD BOND RD
B
99
N
ST
CONCORD
FRANKLI
AT
CITY OF
ER
680
ELK GROVE
OU
SAN ELK GROVE BLVD
TE
FRANCISCO STOCKTON
RD
E
205
IN
580
TL
5 THIS IS THE ONLY MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
AN
5 ALLOWABLE PLANT ISSUE BLOCK
GR
580 ACCESS FOR DESIGNED
MODESTO CONTRACTORS PMO ENGINEERING
DRAWN
BILBY RD PMO CAD
RD
CAD User: PMO ENGINEERING
CHECKED
KLIN
160
A.G. CALCIANO
RAN
RIVE
SAN
UNION PACIFIC
D-F
HOO
APPROVED
JOSE
BRUCEVILLE RD
1 R. WILLIAMS
R
17 FILENAME
DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER

99 [XXXX]
SANTA 680 CONTRACT NUMBER
RAILROAD
CRUZ
5 CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
A DISCIPLINE
A
SALINAS GENERAL
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:12:40 AM
101 LOCATION AND AREA MAPS
VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP

DRAWING NUMBER
4
GI001 OF
34
1 2 3 4 SCALE IN INCHES 0 1/2 1 2 4 (IF SCALE BAR IS NOT 4", SCALE ACCORDINGLY)
1 2 3 4 5
KEYNOTES:
1 EMERGENCY STORAGE BASIN A
ROCKS
ROCKS
DESIGN FIRM
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
2 EMERGENCY STORAGE BASIN B

ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
3 EMERGENCY STORAGE BASIN E PHONE:
GATE
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS
GATE
CONTACT:
4 SEPTAGE DISPOSAL AREA WWW.
ROCKS
6
CONC.
CONC.
DI
TC H
ROCKS
CONC. DI TCH
CONC. DI TCH
ROCKS
CONC. DI TCH
PI LES
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
5 RESIDENT ENGINEER BUILDING

GATE
ASPH.
EMERGENCY STORAGE
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS
BASIN C 2 CONC.
1 4
D 6 INFLUENT JUNCTION STRUCTURE D
ROCKS
CONC.
CONC. DI TCH
ROCKS
ASPH.
3
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
7 TUNNEL VENTILATION BUILDING SUB CONSULTANT

ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC. ASPH.
ASPH. CONC. ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
GATE
GATE
CONC. ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS CONC.
8 BATTERY I DIGESTERS
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
PI LES
22
ROCKS
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
TRAI LER
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS CONC.
TRAI LER
CONC. ASPH.
TRAI LER
TRAI LER
DECK
UNKNOW N SUR FACE CONC.
TRAI LER TRAI LER
11
ASPH.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE ASPH.
5
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
TRAI LER
DECK
TRAI LER
ASPH.
12 9 BATTERY II DIGESTERS
CONC. ROCKS
ASPH.
7
GATE
ROCKS
EMERGENCY
CONC.
ASPH.
10 10 BATTERY III DIGESTERS

14
ASPH.
WA
LL
ROCKS
STORAGE 47
TANK
21
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ASPH. ASPH.
9
PRELIMINARY
CONC. CONC.
OVERHANG
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
ROCKS
CONC.
FOUNDATI ON
OVERHANG
BASIN D
TANK
CONC.
TANK
ASPH. W
11 MIXED SLUDGE BUILDING

ALL
OVERHANG
CONC.
TANK TANK
ASPH. ASPH.
FOUNDATI ON
PI LES ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK
TANK
19 27 20
ASPH. GATE CONC.
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
ROCKS
OVERHANG OVERHANG
ASPH.
8
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC. ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH.
CONC.
OVERHANG
ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH.
CONC. TANK
ASPH.
WA LL
TANK TANK
ASPH.
TANK TANK
GATE
TANK
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
18
CONC.
OVERHANG
12 GRAVITY BELT THICKENER BUILDING

ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
GATE CONC. CONC.

CONC.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
THIS DRAWING IS NOT VALID FOR

CONC.
ASPH.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
TANK
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
CONC. CONC. CONC.
CONC.
16
TANK WALL
ASPH.
ASPH.
TANK CONC.
ASPH. TANK TANK

ASPH. ASPH.
WALL
CONC. TANK CONC. CONC.
ASPH. TANK
ASPH.
ASPH.
GATE GATE CONC.
CONC.
GATE CONC. TRAI LER
CONC. TANK
TANK TANK

TANK TANK
CONC.
TANK
CONC.
TANK
ASPH. CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. TANK
CONC. OVERHANG
CONC.
15
ASPH. ASPH. CONC. TRAI LER
TANK TANK TANK
ASPH.
GATE ASPH.
GATE
CONC. ASPH.
CONC. OVERHANG
CONC.
ASPH. TANK
CONC.
13 SOLIDS CONTROL BUILDING

CONC.
ASPH. OVERHANG
ROCKS
BEARS THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A

TANK
TANK
CONC. TANK
CONC.
PI LES
CONC.
TANK
TANK
TANK
TRAI LER CONC.

PI LES
CONC.
CONC. CONC. ASPH.

CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL

ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
GATE ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
PH.
AS ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. OVERHANG
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK
23
CONC.
ASPH. ASPH. CONC.
GATE CONC. CONC.
GATE GATE
ASPH.
TANK ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. GATE ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
14 WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE THICKENERS

PI LES
ASPH. ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH. CONC. GATE
GATE
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
17
TANK
BASIN BASIN BASIN BASIN

ASPH. GATE
WA LL
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC. ASPH.
CONC. ASPH.
ASPH. PI LES
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. CONC. ROCKS
CONC.
ASPH.
24 26
CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC. CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
PI LES
CONC.
ASPH.
I-4 I-3 I-2 I-1

ASPH.
CONC. CONC. CONC.
STOR AGE ASPH.
CONC. CONC. ASPH. ASPH. CONC. ASPH.
ASPH.
30
ASPH. CONC.
ROCKS
15 MSG GAS STORAGE SPHERES

ASPH.
CONC. ASPH.
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
CONC. ASPH.
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
ASPH. TANK
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
TANK
TANK
TANK TANK GATE
TANK
TANK
TANK
CONC. CONC.
TANKS
TANK
WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY CONC. WALK WAY CONC.
ASPH. TANK CONC. TANK
CONC. ASPH.
CONC.
TANK
TANK
GATE
CONC.
STOR AGE TANK
TANK
GATE
CONC.
TANK ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
STOR AGE
CONC. ASPH.
SOLIDS
GATE
CONC.
CONC. ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
CONC. CONC. CONC.
32
CONC.
13
CONC.
PI LES
CONC. PI LES
CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH. ASPH.
PI LES PI LES
CONC. ASPH.
PI LES GATE CONC. CONC.
ASPH. TANK CONC.
ASPH. CONC. CONC. GATE
CONC.
16 MSG COMPRESSOR BUILDING

PI LES ASPH.
TANK
PI LES GATE
GATE
STOR AGE
GATE
WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY
STORAGE
WALK WAY
GATE
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
46
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH. CONC. ASPH.
CONC. ASPH.
BERM
ASPH. GATE
GATE
CONC.
CONC. ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
CONC. CONC. ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
TRAI LER
LL
PI LES
TRAI LER
WA
TANK ASPH.
25 29
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
OVERHANG
38
ASPH. WALK WAY CONC.
WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
GATE
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
GATE
CONC.
17 LSG GAS HOLDER TANKS
ASPH.
GATE
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
WALL
PI LES
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH. TANK CONC. TANK TANK

CONC. CONC.
ASPH. CONC. GATE
PI LES
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
WALL
PI LES
CONC.

ASPH.
PI LES WALK WAY WALK WAY ASPH.
WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY WALK WAY TANK
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK
TANK
CONC.
CONC.
36
TANK
TANK
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
18 GROUND FLARES
CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC.
ASPH. GATE GATE

ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH. GATE
ASPH.
I-8 I-7 I-6 I-5

ASPH. GATE CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC. ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
WA LL
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC. CONC. CONC.
CONC.
GATE
PI LES
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
PI LES CONC. CONC.

ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
39
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
19 CARBONEOUS OXIDATION STRUCTURE

GATE
ASPH.
ASPH.
TANK
TANK ASPH.
CONC. ASPH.
ROCKS
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
C C
TANK
CONC.
40 33
CONC.
TANK
ASPH. CONC. ROCKS
ASPH.
ROCKS
TANK
CONC.
CONC.
WA LL
51
TANK
CONC.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
GATE
GATE
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
CONC. CONC. GATE

CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
GATE GATE
20 PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANKS

GATE
CONC. ROCKS
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
49
ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS GATE
ROCKS
GATE
CONC.
TANK GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
GATE
GATE GATE
48
CONC.
GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH. ASPH.
OVERHANG
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS
GATE GATE
GATE ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
CONC. ASPH. ASPH.

ASPH.
WA LL
21 INFLUENT/EFFLUENT BUILDING
ASPH.
GATE
CONC.
TANK
TANK CONC. CONC. TANK
CONC.
TANK ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
ROCKS
TANK
ASPH. TANK
TANK CONC.
ASPH.
41 28 42 34
TANK
TANK TANK
CONC. CONC.
CONC. TANK
TANK
TANK CONC.
ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
ASPH.
TANK
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
TANK
ASPH.
ROCKS
22 CHEMICAL CONTROL BUILDING

TANK
TANK TANK ASPH.

OVERHANG
ASPH.
TANK
GATE PI LES
CONC.
ASPH.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ASPH.
OVERHANG PI LES
OVERHANG
ROCKS
GATE
WA LL
ROCKS
DECK ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH. PI LES
PI LES
ROCKS
GATE
TRAI LER
ASPH.
43 50
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. GATE
ASPH. GATE
ASPH. OVERHANG
STOR AGE
OVERHANG
STOR AGE
23 STORM WATER PUMP STATION

DECK
RETURN ACTIVATED
ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
GATE
ASPH. ASPH.
WALL
GATE
ASPH.
TANK
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
CONC. ASPH. ASPH.
GATE
CONC. ASPH.
SLUDGE PUMPING -
STO P STO P
ROCKS
TRAI LER
GATE
24 FLOW METERING STRUCTURE

CONC.
PI LES
ASPH.
GATE
TANK
DLD 2 DLD 1 PI LES
GATE
TANK
37 31 45 ASPH.
BASIS OF DESIGN
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
GATE
GATE
25 SSB1 DEWATERING AREA
LAGUNA ST
ROCKS
44 35
ASPH.
STO P STO P ASPH.
GATE
26 BONE YARD
52
AH EA D AH EA D
ASPH.
ROCKS 27 BATTERY I SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANKS

CONC.
ASPH.
ATION ROAD
CONC.
ASPH.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE

UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ASPH.
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
28 BATTERY II SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANKS

ROCKS
GATE
GATE
ROCKS
ASPH.
CONC.
GATE
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS CONC. CONC. CONC.
ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
29 BATTERY III SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANKS

CONC.
ROCKS
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ROCKS
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
DWIGHT ROAD EXTENSION

ROCKS
30 CHEMICAL STORAGE
CONC.
CONC.
BASIN ROCKS
BASIN BASIN CONC.
BASIN
II-4 II-3 II-2 II-1
ROCKS ROCKS
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ASPH.
31 MAINTENANCE STORAGE BUILDING

ROCKS
ROCKS
ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
SIMS ROAD
32 MAIN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION

DLD 4 DLD 3
CONC. CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
B B
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
CONC. CONC. CONC.
ROCKS
BERM
CONC.
ASPH.
33 OXYGEN GENERATION BUILDING

EXISTING CONTRACTOR
CONC. ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ACCESS ROAD 34 OXYGEN PLANT SUBSTATION BUILDING

ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS BASIN CONC.
BASIN BASIN BASIN ASPH.
GATE
ASPH.
II-8 II-7 II-6 II-5

ROCKS
CONC. CONC. CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
PI LES
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS
GATE
GATE
35 MAINTENANCE BUILDING
ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
A SPH.
36 LABORATORY BUILDING
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC. UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE
CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. ROCKS
GATE
ROCKS
GATE
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS CONC.
ROCKS ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
GATE
CONC.
SIMS ROAD
GATE
37 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS CONC.
CONC.
GATE
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

GATE
ROCKS
TRA I L
TRA I L
ASPH.
ASPH.
STO P
SOLIDS
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH. GATE ASPH.

CONC.
STO P
TRAI L
ROCKS
ROCKS GATE
TANK CONC.
ASPH.
ISSUE BLOCK
L
TRA I
EXISTING CONTRACTOR ACCESS

GATE
STORAGE 38 69kV MAIN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION BUILDING

TRAI L
ASPH.
A IL
R
T
BASIN BASIN
CONC.
IL
TRA
ROCKS
ROCKS
GATE WITH GUARD SHACK
TRAI L
DESIGNED
III-2 III-1
UNION PACI
ROCKS
PMO ENGINEERING
CONC. CONC.
39 UV DISINFECTION FACILITY
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
DRAWN
CONC.
ROCKS
ASPH.
40 EFFLUENT OBSERVATION STRUCTURE PMO CAD
CONC.
CHECKED
DLD 5
TRA
ROCKS
IL
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
GATE
41 WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY A.G. CALCIANO

TRA I L
FIC RAILROA
CONC.
ROCKS
TRA
IL
APPROVED
R. WILLIAMS
TRA I L
42 HEAVY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STORAGE

TRA I
L
TRA
IL
TRA I L
IL
TR A GATE
TRA I L
IL
TRA
BASIN BASIN
TRA I L
ROCKS
TRA I L
FILENAME
III-4 III-3
ROCKS
GATE
43 LANDFILL CLOSURE AREA

CONC. ROCKS
TRA I L
DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER

LI
TRA
TRA
LI
CONC.
DWIGHT ROAD
A IL
R
T
[XXXX]
IL
TRA
TRA I L
TRA I L
44 BUFFERLAND OFFICE
GATE
TRA I L
TRA I L
D
ASPH. ASPH.
STO P
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
STO P
CONC.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE

ROCKS
GATE
GATE
CONC.
WA LL
CONTRACT NUMBER
WA LL
UNKNOW N SUR FACE UNKNOW N SUR FACE
CONC. POOL
IL
TR A
ROCKS
45 SMUD COGEN AND ICE PLANT

GATE
CONC.
GATE GATE GATE GATE
CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER

ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
WA LL
ROCKS ROCKS
ROCKS
ASPH.
CONC.
TR A
IL
TRA IL
TRA I L
CONC.
A 46 ACTIVATED CARBON STORAGE DISCIPLINE

A
WA LL
TRAI L
TR
AI
L
CONC.
GENERAL
WA LL
WALL
TANK
CONC.
WA LL
CONC.
TRA I L
CONC.
47 SOIL DISPOSAL AREA (TEMP), TYPE B, C, AND K MATERIAL

PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:04 AM
EXISTING SRWTP SITE PLAN

OLD CONC
CONC.
OLD CONC
POOL
OLD CONC
OLD CONC OLD CONC

OLD CONC
POOL
TRA
I
L
OLD CONC
OLD CONC ROCKS
POOL
WALL
48 MAIN GATE - SECURED

WALL
OLD CONC
CONC.
OLD CONC
L
TR AI
TR A
IL
OLD CONC
49 CENTRAL ST. GATE - SECURED

SITE PLAN
TR AI
L
WA LL
GATE
BERM
ASPH.
PI LES
ASPH.
TANK
TANK
TANK
BERM
50 LAGUNA STATION RD GATE - SECURED

ASPH.
ASPH.
TANK
TANK
ASPH.
OVERHANG
0 250' 500' 1000' OVERHANG
BERM
CONC.
OVERHANG
TANK
OVERHANG
WA LL
CONC. DI TC H
51 EAST ACCESS RD GATE - SECURED DRAWING NUMBER
5
SCALE: 1" = 500'
A SPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
GI002
GATE
ROCKS
WALL ASPH.
ASPH. TANK
CONC.
ROCKS CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. DI
CONC.
OF
TC H
CONC.
A SPH.
CONC.
OVERHANG
52 OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING BUILDING

34
1 2 3 4 5
ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ABBREVIATION DEFINITION ABBREVIATION DEFINITION
A________ CREJ CORRUGATED RUBBER EXPANSION JOINT FMH FLEXIBLE METAL HOSE L________
A AMPERE CRF CHEMICAL FEEDER FO FAIL OPEN L LENGTH DESIGN FIRM
A/C AIR CONDITIONING CRN CRANE FPC FLEXIBLE PIPE COUPLING LAM LAMINATED ADDRESS
AA ATOMIC ABSORPTION UNIT CSD CEILING SUPPLY DIFFUSER FPC-T FLEXIBLE PIPE COUPLING TO TAKE TENSION LAT LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE, LATERAL, LATITUDE CITY, STATE
PHONE:
AB ANCHOR BOLT, AGGREGATE BASE CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE FPM FEET PER MINUTE LB POUND CONTACT:
AC ASPHALT CONCRETE, ALTERNATING CURRENT, AIR CTF CENTRIFUGE FPS FEET PER SECOND LEV LEVEL WWW.
CONDITIONER CTR CONTRACTOR, CENTER FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PIPE LG LONG
ACC AREA CONTROL CENTER CTS CORROSION TEST STATION FRS FREEZESTAT LOS LOCKOUT STOP
ACP ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE CU CONTROL UNIT, COPPER, CUBIC FS FLOW SWITCH, FAR SIDE LP LOW PRESSURE, LIGHTING PANEL
D ACST ACOUSTIC CV CONTROL VALVE FSH FLOW SWITCH HIGH LS LEVEL SWITCH D
ADWF AVERAGE DRY WEATHER FLOW FSL FACULTATIVE SLUDGE LAGOON, FLOW SWITCH LOW LSH LEVEL SWITCH HIGH
AF AIR FILTER D________ FT FEET LSL LEVEL SWITCH LOW SUB CONSULTANT
AHU AIR HANDLING UNIT D DRAIN FTG FOOTING LTG LIGHTING
AL ALUMINUM DB DUCT BANK FTGS FITTINGS LVR LOUVER
ALT ALTERNATE DE DENSITY METER FUT FUTURE LWR LOWER
ALUM ALUMINUM SULPHATE DET DETAIL FZT FREEZESTAT
AMD AIR MONITORING DEVICE DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN M________
ANC ANCHOR DFD DUCT FIRE DAMPER G________ MAN MANUAL(LY)
APPROX APPROXIMATE(LY) DG DOOR GRILLE G POWER ACTUATED GATE MAX MAXIMUM
AR
AS
ALARM RELAY
AIR SUPPLY
DI
DIA
DUCTILE IRON
DIAMETER
GA
GALV
GAGE
GALVANIZED
MBH
MCC
THOUSAND BTU'S PER HOUR
MOTOR CONTROL CENTER
PRELIMINARY
ASSY ASSEMBLY DIAG DIAGRAM GB GRADE BREAK MCM THOUSAND CIRCULAR MILLS
ATM ATMOSPHERE DIFF DIFFERENTIAL GBV GLOBE VALVE MD MOTORIZED DAMPER CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
ATS ANODE TEST STATION DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE GD GUARD MECH MECHANICAL BEARS THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A
AV ANGLE VALVE DLD DEDICATED LAND DISPOSAL GDR GRINDER MEE MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
AVG AVERAGE DM DAMPER MOTOR GEN GENERAL, GENERATOR MFR MANUFACTURE(R)
DN DOWN GL GLASS MG/L MILLIGRAMS PER LITER
B________ DO DISSOLVED OXYGEN GPD GALLONS PER DAY MGD MILLION GALLONS PER DAY
B BLOWER DPR DAMPER GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE MH MANHOLE
BC BEGINNING OF CURVE DR DRAIN ROCK, DOOR GR GRADE MIE MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT
BCOP BARE COPPER DT DRAIN TRAP, DRIP TRAP GRD GROUND MILSPEC MILITARY SPECIFICATION
BCR BEGINNING OF CURVE RETURN DWG DRAWING GRT GROUT MIN MINIMUM, MINUTE
BF BLIND FLANGE DWLS DOWELS GRTG GRATING MISC MISCELLANEOUS
BFV BUTTERFLY VALVE GSKT GASKET MJ MECHANICAL JOINT
BHP BRAKE HORSEPOWER E________ GSP GALVANIZED STEEL PLATE ML MILLILITER
BLDG BUILDING EA EXHAUST AIR, EACH GV GATE VALVE MME MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
C BLK BLOCK EAT ENTERING AIR TEMPERATURE MOP MOTOR OPERATOR C
BM BEAM, BENCHMARK EAU ENGINE ALTERNATOR UNIT H________ MTR, M MOTOR
BOD BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND EC END OF CURVE, EVAPORATIVE COOLER HC HEATING COIL MUL/DIV MULTIPLY/DIVIDE
BOT BOTTOM ECC ECCENTRIC HD HEAVY DUTY MV MUD VALVE, MILLIVOLT
BSN BAR SCREEN ED EXTRACTOR DAMPER, EQUIPMENT DRAIN HDG HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED MVU MOBILE VENTILATION UNIT
BTS BAND TEST STATION EE EACH END HDOT HEAVY DUTY OILTIGHT MW MONITORING WELL SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
BTU BRITISH THERMAL UNIT EF EACH FACE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MX MIXER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
BV BALL VALVE EFF EFFLUENT HER HEADER
BVC BEGINNING OF VERTICAL CURVE EG EXHAUST GRILLE HEX HEAT EXCHANGER N________ RETURN ACTIVATED
EJ EXPANSION JOINT HH HANDHOLE N NEUTRAL, NORTH SLUDGE PUMPING -
C________ EL ELEVATION HOA HAND-OFF-AUTO NA NONAUTOMATIC
CAB DIRECT BURIAL CABLE ELEC ELECTRICAL HOR HORIZONTAL NAOH SODIUM HYDROXIDE BASIS OF DESIGN
CAP CAPACITY ELL ELBOW HP HIGH PRESSURE, HIGH POINT, HORSEPOWER NC NORMALLY CLOSED
CB CATCH BASIN EMBD EMBEDDED HR HANDRAIL, HEAT RESERVOIR, HOUR NEG NEGATIVE
CC COOLING COIL EMT ELECTRICAL METALIC TUBING HST HOIST NIC NOT IN CONTRACT
C-C CENTER TO CENTER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT, ELECTRIC/PNEUMATIC CONVERTER HT HEIGHT, HIGH NO NORMALLY OPEN, NUMBER
CCP CONCRETE CYLINDER PIPE EPR EVAPORATOR HTR HEATER NOX NITRATES AND NITRITES
CCSP CONCRETE LINED AND COATED STEEL PIPE EPWWF EQUALIZED PEAK WET WEATHER FLOW HTV HIGH TEMPERATURE VENT NPSH NET POSITIVE SUCTION HEAD
CD CEILING DIFFUSER EQ EQUAL HV HOSE VALVE, HEATING AND VENTILATING UNIT NRS NONRISING STEM
CDR CONDUCTOR, CONDENSER EQUIP EQUIPMENT HVAC HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING NS NEAR SIDE
CDU CONDENSING UNIT ES EXISTING SURFACE HWTR HIGH WATER NTS NOT TO SCALE
CED CEILING EXHAUST DIFFUSER EVC END OF VERTICAL CURVE HYD HYDRAULIC
CER CEILING EXHAUST REGISTER EW EACH WAY HYDT HYDRANT O________
CF CUBIC FEET EW T&B EACH WAY, TOP AND BOTTOM OA OUTSIDE AIR, OVERALL
CFH CUBIC FEET PER HOUR EWEF EACH WAY EACH FACE I________ OAI OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE
CFM CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE EWT ENTERING WATER TEMPERATURE I INTEGRAL CONTROL OC ON CENTER
CFR CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS EX EXTRA IA INSTRUMENT AIR OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER
B CFS CUBIC FEET PER SECOND EXG EXHAUST GRILLE ICN INCINERATOR OF OUTSIDE FACE B
CHR CHILLER EXIST EXISTING ID INSIDE DIAMETER OL OVERLOAD
CI CAST IRON EXP EXPANSION IF INSIDE FACE OPNG OPENING
CIP CAST IRON PIPE EXT EXTERIOR IJTS INSULATED JOINT TEST STATION OPP OPPOSITE
CIRC CIRCUMFERENCE IL INDICATING LAMP ORF ODOR REMOVAL FILTER
CJ CONSTRUCTION JOINT F________ IN INCH ORP OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL
CKPL CHECKER PLATE F FAHRENHEIT, FACE, FUSE(D), FAN INF INFLUENT ORT ODOR REMOVAL TOWER
CL CLEARANCE FAB FABRICATE(D)(TION) INJ INJECTOR ORU ODOR REDUCTION UNIT
CL2 CHLORINE FAI FRESH AIR INTAKE INS INSULATE(D)(ION) OSA OUTSIDE AIR MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
CLR CLEAR, CHLORINATOR FB FLAT BAR, FLOOR BEAM INSTR INSTRUMENTATION
CM MANUAL CONTROL STATION FC FAIL CLOSED INT INTERIOR ISSUE BLOCK
CMA MANUAL-AUTO CONTROL STATION FCO FLOOR CLEANOUT INTER INTERMEDIATE (STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS P-Z ARE DESIGNED
CMC CEMENT MORTAR COATED FCR FINE CRUSHED ROCK INV INVERT LOCATED ON DRAWING GI004). PMO ENGINEERING
CML CEMENT MORTAR LINED FD FLOOR DRAIN, FIRE DAMPER IT INSTRUMENT TAP DRAWN
CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE FE FLOWMETER PMO CAD
CMP-AC CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ASPHALT COATED FF FAR FACE J________
CHECKED
CNTL CONTROL F-F FACE TO FACE JB JUNCTION BOX A.G. CALCIANO
CO CLEANOUT FG FLAP GATE JST JOIST APPROVED
CO2 CARBON DIOXIDE FH FIRE HYDRANT, FLATHEAD JT JOINT R. WILLIAMS
COD CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND FHD FLATHEAD FILENAME
COF COOLING AIR FIN FINISHED K________
COL COLUMN FL FLOW LINE K KIP (1000 POUNDS) DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER
COM COMMINUTOR FLEX FLEXIBLE KO KNOCK OUT [XXXX]
CONTRACT NUMBER
CONC CONCRETE FLG FLANGE(D) KV KILOVOLT
COND CONDUCTIVITY, CONDUCTOR, CONDENSATE FLP FLUID POWER UNIT KVA KILOVOLT AMPERE
CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
CONN CONNECTION FLR FLOOR KW KILOWATT
A CONT CONTINUED(OUS) FLT FILTER A
DISCIPLINE
CP COMPRESSOR FM FORCE MAIN GENERAL
CPLG COUPLING
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:11 AM
CPVC CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS 1

CR CONTROL RELAY
DRAWING NUMBER
6
GI003 OF
34
1 2 3 4 5
(STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS A-O ARE SIM SIMILAR W________

LOCATED ON DRAWING GI003). SL SLOPE W WIDTH DESIGN FIRM
SLG SLIDE GATE W/ WITH ADDRESS
P________ SN SCREEN W/O WITHOUT CITY, STATE
PHONE:
P PUMP, PHASE, PROCESS SO2 SULFUR DIOXIDE WC WATER CLOSET, WATER COLUMN CONTACT:
P&ID PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM SP SPACE, SET POINT, STATIC PRESSURE, STOP WCO WALL CLEANOUT WWW.
PAR PARALLEL SPEC SPECIFICATION(S) WD WOOD
PC PLAIN CONCRETE, PIPE COUPLING SPG SPACING WEG WALL EXHAUST GRILLE
PCC PLANT CONTROL CENTER SPL SPLICE WER WALL EXHAUST REGISTER
D PCHV PINCH VALVE SQ SQUARE WF WIDE FLANGE D
PCP PLAIN CONCRETE PIPE SR SPEED REDUCER WI WROUGHT IRON
PC-T PIPE COUPLING TO TAKE TENSION SRV SAFETY RELIEF VALVE WS WATER SURFACE SUB CONSULTANT
PCU PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL UNIT SS STAINLESS STEEL WSR WALL SUPPLY REGISTER
PE PNEUMATIC/ELECTRICAL CONVERTER SSFH STAINLESS STEEL FLAT HEAD WSTP WATERSTOP
PERC PERCOLATION SSK SERVICE SINK WT WATERTIGHT
PF POWER FACTOR, PRESSURIZED FLOW ST START WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC
PG PRESSURE GAGE STA STATION
PI PRESSURE INDICATOR, POINT OF INTERSECTION STD STANDARD, STORM DRAIN X________
PIVC POINT OF INTERSECTION ON VERTICAL CURVE STIFF STIFFENER X SPARE CONDUIT
PL
PLYWD
PROPERTY LINE, PIPELINE, PLATE
PLYWOOD
STL
STRUCT
STEEL
STRUCTURE
XFMR
XLP
TRANSFORMER
CROSS LINKED POLYETHYLENE
PRELIMINARY
PNL PANEL, PANELBOARD SUB SUBSTITUTE, SUBSTATION XP EXPLOSION PROOF
POC POINT OF CURVE, POINT OF CONNECTION SUPT SUPPORT XSW TRANSFER SWITCH CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
POP PNEUMATIC OPERATOR SURF SURFACE BEARS THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A
PP POWER POLE SV SOLENOID VALVE Y________ DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
PRD PRESSURE RELIEF DAMPER SWB SWITCHBOARD YCO YARD CLEANOUT
PRES PRESSURE SWR SWITCHGEAR
PRS PRESSURE REDUCING STATION SYM SYMMETRICAL Z________
PRV PRESSURE REGULATING (REDUCING) VALVE, PRESSURE ZS POSITION SWITCH, (LIMIT) SWITCH
RELIEF VALVE T________
PS PRESSURE SWITCH, PRESSURE SENSOR T TANK, TRAP
PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT T&B TOP AND BOTTOM
PSH PRESSURE SWITCH HIGH T/B TOP OF BANK
PSIA POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH ABSOLUTE TB TERMINAL BOX
PSIG POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH GAGE TC TOP OF CURB
PSL PIPE SLEEVE, PRESSURE SWITCH LOW TCL TOTALLY CLOSED
C PSV POP SAFETY VALVE TCP TEMPERATURE CONTROL PANEL C
PV PLUG VALVE, PROCESS VARIABLE TD TIME DELAY RELAY, TANK DRAIN, TEMPERATURE
PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE DIFFERENCE
PVL PRESSURE VESSEL TE TOTALLY ENCLOSED, THICKENER EFFLUENT
PVT PAVEMENT TI TEMPERATURE INDICATOR
TOA TEST-OFF-AUTO SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
Q________ TP TANGENT POINT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Q RATE OF FLOW TPG TOPPING
QCPLG QUICK COUPLING TPLX TRIPLEXED RETURN ACTIVATED
TR STAIR TREAD SLUDGE PUMPING -
R________ TRM TRANSMITTER
R RADIUS, RISER TRN TRANSDUCER BASIS OF DESIGN
R/C REINFORCED CONCRETE TS TEMPERATURE SWITCH
RA RETURN AIR TSH TEMPERATURE SWITCH HIGH

RAF ROLL TYPE AIR FILTER TSL TEMPERATURE SWITCH LOW
RCDR RECORDER TST THERMOSTAT
RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE TV THERMOSTATIC VALVE
RD ROOF DRAIN TYP TYPICAL
RDWY ROADWAY
REC RECEIVER U________
RECD RECEIVED UB UTILITY BOX
RECP RECEPTACLE UG UNDER GROUND
RED REDUCE(R) UH UNIT HEADER
REG REGULATOR UL ULTIMATE LOAD
REINF REINFORCE, REINFORCING UN UNION
REL RELAY UP UTILITY POLE
REM REMOVE, REMOVABLE US UTILITY STATION
B REQ'D REQUIRED USS UNIT SUBSTATION B
RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL
RL REDUCED LEVEL V________
RM ROOM V VALVE, VOLTS, VENT
RP REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER VAC VOLTS ALTERNATING CURRENT
RPM REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE VAR VARIES, VARIABLE
RR RAILROAD VB VALVE BOX
RT RIGHT VC VERTICAL CURVE
RTP REINFORCED THERMOSET POLYESTER VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
RTU REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT VD VOLUME DAMPER
RWL RAINWATER LEADER VDC VOLTS DIRECT CURRENT ISSUE BLOCK
RWP RAINWATER PIPE VERT VERTICAL DESIGNED
VFC VARIABLE FREQUENCY CONTROLLER PMO ENGINEERING
S________ VP VAPOR PRESSURE, VACUUM PUMP DRAWN
S SOUTH, SILENCER VSC VARIABLE SPEED COUPLING, VARIABLE SPEED PMO CAD
SB SIGNAL BOX CONTROLLER
CHECKED
SCD SCUPPER DRAIN VSD VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE A.G. CALCIANO
SCH SCHEDULE VTR VENT THROUGH ROOF APPROVED
SCR SCRUBBER R. WILLIAMS
SD SPLITTER DAMPER, SMOKE DETECTOR FILENAME
SECT SECTION
SEP SEPARATOR DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER
SG SUPPLY GRILLE, SLUICE GATE-MANUAL [XXXX]
CONTRACT NUMBER
SHT SHEET
SI SPEED INCREASER CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
A DISCIPLINE
A
GENERAL
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:12 AM
STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS 2
DRAWING NUMBER
7
GI004 OF
34
1 2 3 4 5
GENERAL SYMBOLS MATERIALS CROSS REFERENCING SYSTEM MISCELLANEOUS
1/8" ARIAL
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS TO PLAN TITLE 3/16" ARIAL DESIGN FIRM
MATCH LINE MATCH LINE 'A' ADDRESS
MATCH LINE BE REMOVED UNDER THIS CONTRACT
SEE DWG XX/XXX CITY, STATE
2
TOP PLAN SEE DWG XX/XXXX PHONE:
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" CONTACT:
CENTER LINE REINFORCEMENT, IN SECTION
MATCH LINE WATER SURFACE WWW.
CL CENTER LINE
1/8" ARIAL
SECTION OUTLINE, BOUNDARY REINFORCEMENT , IN PLAN OR ELEVATION
1/8" ARIAL WITH 3/16" DIA CIRCLE
D PIPING
D
NOTE:
CONCRETE ALL ADDITIONAL PLANS, SECTIONS, LARGE SCALE PLANS, DETAILS, INTERIORS, SUB CONSULTANT
EXISTING PIPING TO BE ABANDONED OR ELEVATIONS SHALL BE SEQUECIALLY INDEXED NUMBERED FROM REFERENCED PLAN.
REMOVED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
ABANDONED WHEN NOT IN CONFLICT WITH PRECAST CONCRETE
NEW CONSTRUCTION WORK SECTION CUTS
X X X X X FENCE
MORTAR, GROUT, OR PLASTER SECTION NUMBER, SEQUENTIALLY
2.1 2.1
HANDRAIL M-103 M-103 NUMBERED THROUGHT OUT THE
CONCRETE BLOCK FULL SECTION
REFERENCED PLAN PRELIMINARY
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DRAWING WHERE SECTION IS SHOWN
NORTH ARROW THIS DRAWING IS NOT VALID FOR
2.1 SECTION NUMBER, SEQUENTIALLY CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
FUTURE EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS OR PIPING BRICK OR CAST IRON NUMBERED THROUGHT OUT THE BEARS THE SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF A
M-103
REFERENCED PLAN
BURIED FACILITIES SHORT SECTION
GRATING, SPAN DRAWING WHERE SECTION IS SHOWN
BARRIER WALL
SECTION TITLE
CHECKER PLATE 3/16" ARIAL
DAYLIGHT LINE FOR GRADING REVISION CLOUD
SWALE OR DITCH 2.1

SECTION
STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 1
TOP OF SLOPE
EMBANKMENT 1/8" ARIAL
ALUMINUM REVISION TAG
C TOE OF SLOPE 1/8" ARIAL WITH 3/16" DIA CIRCLE C
EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE PAVEMENT OPENING OR DEPRESSION DETAIL CALLOUT
IN SLAB OR WALL DRAWING NUMBER SYSTEM
DUMMY CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONCRETE 2.B DETAIL NUMERIC AND ALPHA,
PAVEMENT M-103 SEQUENTIALLY LETTERED THROUGHT OUT DISCIPLINE SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
OPENING WITH GRATING COVER THE REFERENCED PLAN D-101-51 G GENERAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
SLOPE PIPING SLOPE DRAWING WHERE DETAIL IS SHOWN C CIVIL
(0.1 FT VERTICAL TO 1 FT HORIZONTAL)
AREA/FACILITY NUMBER L LANDSCAPE RETURN ACTIVATED
OPENING WITH CHECKER PLATE COVER
30 GRADE CONTOUR SEQUENTIAL NUMBER
S STRUCTURAL SLUDGE PUMPING -
A ARCHITECTURAL
AC PAVEMMENT SHEET TYPE F FIRE PROTECTION BASIS OF DESIGN
RAILROAD (SINGLE TRACK) AREA TO BE DETAILED IS CIRCLED WITH P PLUMBING
DISCIPLINE
LEADER TO DETAIL CALLOUT D PROCESS

NEW GRAVEL M MECHANICAL/HVAC
RAILROAD (DOUBLE TRACK) (MAY BE SCREENED FOR CLARITY) E ELECTRICAL
BY CALLOUT X INSTRUMENTATION AND CONNTROLS
PNEUMATIC PIPING WOOD SHEET TYPE
0 GENERAL (SYMBOLS LEGENDS, NOTES)
CONCRETE MOWING STRIP '2.B' IS THE DETAIL NUMERIC AND ALPHA 1 PLANS
TERRAZZO OR ARTIFICIAL STONE SEQUENTIALLY LETTERED THROUGHT OUT 2 ELEVATIONS
SEE DETAIL 2.B/M-103 THE REFERENCED PLAN
RETAINING WALL 3 SECTIONS
4 LARGE SCLAE VIEWS
'M-103' IS THE DRAWING WHERE DETAIL IS (PARTIAL PLANS, SECTIONS)
TILE
HANDRAIL SHOWN 5 DETAILS
BY NOTE
6 SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS
TO BE BUILT FOR FUTURE REMOVAL 7 DEMOLITION
B DETAIL TITLE B
3/16" ARIAL 8 USER DEFINED
HVAC EXHAUST VENT
9 3D MODEL (ISOMETRICS, PHOTOGRAPHS)
RIGID INSULATION
2.B
CENTER WELL DETAIL
SOIL BORING AND DESCRIPTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" GENERAL NOTES
EL NEOPRENE
CAD User: PMO ENGINEERING CURRENT REVISION: 1
1/8" ARIAL 1. FOR ADDITONAL SYMBOLS, SEE DRAWINGS GI006, GM001, GE001, GE002, D-001,
EL MONUMENT OR BENCH MARK
1/8" ARIAL WITH 3/16" DIA CIRCLE D- 002, D-003, AND X-001.
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
X 10.50 SPOT ELEVATION
2. SYMBOLS ARE FOR REFEERENCE ONLY, NOT ALL SYMBOLS ARE USED IN THESE ISSUE BLOCK
PLASTIC LINING
ELEVATION STANDARD DETAIL CALLOUT CONTRACT DRAWINGS. DESIGNED
PMO ENGINEERING
S41 NOTE: 3. ITEMS SHOWN AS SCREENED ARE EXISTING. WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT, IS DRAWN
F FIRE EXTINGUISHER AC PAVEMENT (EL) DEPICTED WITH BOLD LINES.
112 (NUMBER INDICATES EXTINGUISHER NUMBER) ALL LEADERS ARE 30 OR 60 DEGREES PMO CAD
CHECKED
4. THE NOTE IN THE TITLEBLOCK OF THIS DRAWING WHICH READS "TWO INCHES AT A.G. CALCIANO
UTILITY STATION FULL SCALE" APPEARS ON DRAWINGS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SCALE APPROVED
NATURAL GROUND OR GRADE DISTORTIONS ON HALF SIZE DRAWINGS AND DRAWING REPRODUCTIONS. IT R. WILLIAMS
HOSE RACK STANDARD DETAIL TITLE SHALL MEAN THAT THE DRAWING IS FULL SIZE AND THE DRAWING SCALES FILENAME
ACCURATE WHEN THE LENGTH OF THIS LINE IS TWO INCHES. IF THE LENGTH IS
P51001 EQUIPMENT NUMBER ROCK S41 BOLTED COVER PLATE AND SUPPORTS OTHER THAN TWO INCHES, DRAWING SCALES MUST BE ADJUSTED DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER
ACCORDINGLY. [XXXX]
CONTRACT NUMBER
101 DOOR NUMBER
5. EXISTING PIPING IS DESIGNATED BY SERVICE RATHER THAN MATERIAL TYPE.
JOINT FILLER KEYNOTES CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
ROOM NAME MATERIAL TYPES, IF KNOWN, APPEAR OUTSIDE THE PIPING CALLOUT BUBBLE,
A 101 ROOM NUMBER 4 AND MAY NOT BE THE SAME MATERIAL TYPES SPECIFIED FOR NEW PIPING. A
NOTE: DISCIPLINE
ALL LEADERS ARE 30 OR 60 DEGREES 6. ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS CONTRACT DOCUMENT CONFORM TO ANSI Y1.1, GENERAL
@ AT
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:13 AM
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS. SEE SPEC. SECTION 01071 FOR GENERAL SYMBOLS,
ADDITIONAL ABBREVIATIONS.
& AND MATERIALS, CROSS
7. ALL STANDARD DETAILS APPLY TO ALL THE CONTRACTORS WORK WHETHER REFERENCING SYSTEM,
ROUND OR DIAMETER
SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED OR NOT. DRAWING NUMBER SYSTEM,
PL PLATE OR PROPERTY LINE AND MISCELLANEOUS
8. SEE FRONT END SHEETS FOR EACH DISCIPLINES STANDARD SYMBOLS, ETC. SYMBOLS
ANGLE DRAWING NUMBER
9. SEE ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES THROUGHOUT DRAWING SET. 8
GI005 OF
34
1 2 3 4 5
PIPING SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PREFIXES PIPING DESIGNATIONS
NEW PIPING DESIGN FIRM
ADDRESS
A________ A________ PIPE SIZE CITY, STATE
A AERATION AIR PCR PROCESS CONDENSATE RETURN AF AIR FILTER MEE MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL PHONE:
AA AGITATION AIR PD PUMPED DRAINAGE AHU AIR HANDLING UNIT EQUIPMENT PIPING SYSTEM CONTACT:
WWW.
ASH ASH PNEUMATIC PE PRIMARY EFFLUENT MH MANHOLE
PF PRESSURIZED FLOW B________ MIE MISCELLANEOUS INSTRUMENTATION
B________ POL POLYELECTROLYTE B BLOWER EQUIPMENT 4" SA
BD BOILER BLOWDOWN PRS PROCESS SAMPLING BE FLAME ELEMENT MME MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL S= .005
D BF BOILER FEEDWATER PS PRIMARY SLUDGE BLR BOILER EQUIPMENT D
PSC PRIMARY SCUM BRN BURNER MOP MOTOR OPERATOR
SUB CONSULTANT
C________ PSCS PRIMARY SLUDGE/CIRCULATING SLUDGE BSN BAR SCREEN MVU MOBILE VENTILATION UNIT
CAA CHANNEL AERATION AIR PSG PRIMARY SLUDGE AND GRIT PIPE SLOPE
MX MIXER
CC CENTRIFUGE CAKE PSO POLYMER SOLUTION C________
CD CHEMICAL DRAIN PSR PRIMARY SLUDGE RECIRCULATION C CRANE O________ EXISTING PIPING
CEN CENTRATE PSS PROCESS STEAM SUPPLY CAF COMBUSTION AIR FAN ORF ODOR REMOVAL FILTER
CF CENTRIFUGE FEED CC COOLING COIL ORT ODOR REMOVAL TOWER
4" SA
CFE CHLORINATED FINAL EFFLUENT R________ CDU CONDENSING UNIT OSC ODOR SCRUBBER
CL LOW PRESSURE CONDENSATE RAS RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE CDU CONDENSING UNIT S= .005
CLG CHLORINE GAS RD ROOF DRAIN CFR CHEMICAL FEEDER P________ PRELIMINARY
CLL CHLORINE LIQUID RG REFRIGERANT GAS CHR CHILLER P PUMP
CLS CHLORINE SOLUTION RL REFRIGERANT LIQUID COF COOLING AIR FAN PB PULL BOX (ELECT) FUTURE PIPING THIS DRAWING IS NOT VALID FOR
CLV CHLORINE VACUUM RS RAW SEWAGE COM COMMINUTOR PLC PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
CM MEDIUM PRESSURE CONDENSATE RWL RAIN WATER LEADER CON CONVEYOR CONTROLLER DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
CPA CHEMICAL PADDING AIR RWP RAIN WATER PIPE CP COMPRESSOR PNL PANEL 4" SA
CS CIRCULATING SLUDGE CR CONTACTOR POP PNEUMATIC OPERATOR S= .005
CSO CAUSTIC SODA S________ CSN COMMINUTING SCREEN PRV PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE
CV CHEMICAL VENT S STEAM CTF CENTRIFUGE PS PRESSURE SWITCH
CWR CHILLED WATER RETURN SA SERVICE AIR CV CONTROL VALVE PSH PRESSURE SWITCH HIGH
CWS CHILLED WATER SUPPLY SCD SCUM DECANT CYL CYLINDER PSL PRESSURE SWITCH LOW NOTE:
SCLS SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION PSV POP SAFETY VALVE 1. SEE PIPING SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIPING MATERIALS LIST, VALVES, AND FITTINGS.
D________ SCO SCUM OVERFLOW D________ PTR PRINTER
D DRAIN SCR STEAM CLEAN RINSE DE DENSITY METER PVL PRESSURE VESSEL
DFE
DIZ
DECHLORINATED FINAL EFFLUENT
DEIONIZED WATER
SCS
SD
STEAM CLEAN SUPPLY
SANITARY DRAIN
DPR DAMPER PVU PANELVIEW DISPLAY EQUIPMENT DESIGNATIONS
DS DISCONNECT SWITCH
DS DIGESTED SLUDGE SE SECONDARY EFFLUENT DU DRIVE UNIT S________
C DSSG DIGESTED SLUDGE/SLUDGE GAS SG SLUDGE GAS DX DIRECT EXPANSION COIL S SILENCER
C
SME SAMPLE-EFFLUENT SBR SCRUBBER MOP90486A EQUIPMENT NO. EXAMPLE
E________ SMI SAMPLE-INFLUENT E________ SC SCREEN
ED EQUIPMENT DRAIN SMML SAMPLE MIXED LIQUOR E ENGINE SD SMOKE DETECTOR
SMO SAMPLE OXYGEN EG ENGINE ALTERNATIVE UNIT SEP SEPARATOR SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
LETTER SUFFIX
F________ SMP SAMPLE-PRIMARY EFFLUENT SG SLUICE GATE MANUAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
FBW FILTERED BACKWASH WATER SMS SLUDGE SAMPLE-SLUDGE F________ SI SPEED INCREASER FOURTH AND FIFTH DIGITS INDICATE EQUIPMENT
FC FERRIC CHLORIDE SN SUPERNATANT FA FLAME ARRESTOR SLG SLIDE GATE NUMBER RETURN ACTIVATED
FE FINAL EFFLUENT SOG SULFUR DIOXIDE GAS FB FIRE (ALARM) BELL SMX SLURRY MIXER
FMSC FOAM SUPPRESSING CHEMICAL SOL SULFUR DIOXIDE LIQUID FC FLAME CHECK SR SPEED REDUCER THIRD DIGIT INDICATES SPECIFIC AREA IN WHICH SLUDGE PUMPING -
EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED
FOR FUEL OIL RETURN SOS SULFUR DIOXIDE SOLUTION FD FIRE DAMPER SS SPEED SELECTOR SWITCH BASIS OF DESIGN
FOS FUEL OIL SUPPLY SOV SULFUR DIOXIDE VACUUM FE FLOW METER ST STEAM TRAP SECOND DIGIT INDICATES STRUCTURE SUBDIVISION
FTE FILTERED EFFLUENT SR SCREENINGS FG FLAP GATE SUB SUBSTATION IN WHICH EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED
SRA SCUM REMOVAL AIR FLC FLOCCULATOR SV SOLENOID VALVE
G________ SRF SCREENINGS FEED FLP FLUID POWER UNIT SW SWITCH FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PLANT AREA STRUCTURE IN
GC GAS CIRCULATION SRO SCREENINGS OVERFLOW FLT FILTER SWB SWITCHBOARD WHICH EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED (SEE SCHEDULE)
GLY GLYCON/WATER COOLANT SSC SECONDARY SCUM FMX FLASH MIXER SWR SWITCHGEAR LETTER PREFIX INDICATES TYPE OF EQUIPMENT
GR GRIT STD STORM DRAIN FN FAN (SEE SCHEDULE)
GRC GAS RECIRCULATION COMPRESSOR SWAS SAMPLE-WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE FP FILTER PRESS T________
GRO GRIT OVERFLOW FRS FREEZESTAT T TANK
T________ FS FLOW SWITCH TB TERMINAL BOX (ELECT)
H________ TA THICKENER AIR FSH FLOW SWITCH HIGH TBN TURBINE
HNG HIGH PRESSURE NATURAL GAS TD TANK DRAIN FSL FLOW SWITCH LOW TCP TEMPERATURE CONTROL POINT
HOH HIGH PRESSURE HYDRAULIC OIL TE THICKENER EFFLUENT FT FREEZE TANK TFR TRANSFORMER VALVE DESIGNATIONS
HOL LOW PRESSURE HYDRAULIC OIL THS THICKENED SLUDGE TS TEMPERATURE SWITCH
HRR HEAT RESERVOIR RETURN TO THICKENED OVERFLOW G________ TSH TEMPERATURE SWITCH HIGH
B HRS HEAT RESERVOIR SUPPLY TS TRANSFER SLUDGE G POWER ACTUATED GATE TSL TEMPERATURE SWITCH LOW
39WRL03
B
HS HARVESTED SLUDGE TSC THICKENED SCUM GDR GRINDER TST THERMOSTAT
HSG HIGH PRESSURE SLUDGE GAS TWAS THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE GEN GENERATOR
HSO SULFURIC ACID GRV GRAVITY RELIEF VENT U________
HTV HIGH TEMPERATURE VENT U________ UH UNIT HEATER
HWR DOMESTIC HOT WATER RETURN UA UTILITY AIR H________
HWS DOMESTIC HOT WATER SUPPLY H HOIST V________ INDICATES ARBITRARY NUMBER
V________ HC HEATING COIL V POWER ACTUATED VALVE ISOLATING
I_________ V VENT HEX HEAT EXCHANGER OR MANUAL OPERATED WITH LIMIT INDICATES PIPING SYSTEM
IA INSTRUMENT AIR VA VACUUM HH HANDHOLE (ELECT) SWITCH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
LSG LOW PRESSURE SLUDGE GAS VS STEAM VENT HRB HEAT RECOVERY BOILER VAF VENTILATION AIR FILTER SECOND DIGIT INDICATES STRUCTURE ISSUE BLOCK
HS HAND SWITCH VDS DIGESTER SLUDGE VALVE SUBDIVISION IN WHICH VALVE IS LOCATED
DESIGNED
M________ W________ HTR HEATER VFC VARIABLE FREQUENCY CONTROLLER PMO ENGINEERING
MG MIXED GAS WAS WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE VFT VACUUM FILTER FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PLANT AREA
STRUCTURE IN WHICH VALVE IS LOCATED DRAWN
ML MIXED LIQUOR WFBW FILTERED BACKWASH WATER I________ VHS HARVESTED SLUDGE VALVE PMO CAD
MS MIXED SLUDGE WFP RECLAIMED WATER FIRE ICN INCINERATOR VP VACUUM PUMP
CHECKED
MSCS MIXED SLUDGE/CIRCULATING SLUDGE WFSW FILTERED SURFACE WASH WATER IND LEAK DETECTOR VSC VARIABLE SPEED COUPLING (ECC) A.G. CALCIANO
MSDS MIXED SLUDGE/DIGESTER SLUDGE WHWC WASTE HEAT COOLING WATER IR INLET RELIEF VSN SUPERNATANT VALVE
APPROVED
MSG MEDIUM PRESSURE SLUDGE GAS RETURN-COGENERATION VV VARIABLE VOLUME BOX R. WILLIAMS
WHWR WASTE HEAT COOLING WATER RETURN J________ FILENAME
N________ WHWS WASTE HEAT COOLING WATER SUPPLY JB JUNCTION BOX (ELECT) W________
NG NATURAL GAS WI WETLANDS INFLUENT WHR WASHER DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER
WML WASTE MIXED LIQUOR L________ WKS WORKSTATION [XXXX]
O________ WN NON-POTABLE WATER LI LEVEL INDICATOR WW WIREWAY CONTRACT NUMBER
OCA ODOR CONTROL AIR WNI LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION NON-POTABLE LS LEVEL SWITCH
ODG OXYGEN DRY GAS WATER LSH LEVEL SWITCH HIGH X________ CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
OF OVERFLOW WNS NON-POTABLE WATER SOFT LSL LEVEL SWITCH LOW XSW TRANSFER SWITCH
A OFSG OVERFLOW/SLUDGE GAS WP POTABLE WATER A
OHP OXYGEN HIGH PRESSURE WPS POTABLE WATER SOFT
LV LOUVER
Z________
GENERAL NOTES DISCIPLINE
GENERAL
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:14 AM
OLPD OXYGEN LOW PRESSURE DISCHARGE WR RECLAIMED WATER M________ ZS POSITION SWITCH
1. FOR INSTRUMENTATION SYMBOLS AND IDENTIFICATION, SEE DRAWING XX-XXX. PIPING, EQUIPMENT, VALVE,
OLPS OXYGEN LOW PRESSURE SUCTION WRH RECLAIMED WATER HIGH PRESSURE M MOTOR
WRL RECLAIMED WATER LOW PRESSURE MC MAGNETIC CLUTCH 2. NOT ALL PIPING SYSTEMS SHOWN ARE USED IN THIS DESIGN. AND EQUIPMENT PREFIXES
P________ WRS FOAM SUPPRESSING SPRAY WATER MCC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER
PA PREAERATION AIR MD MOTORIZED DAMPER
PAS PRIMARY AND ACTIVATED SLUDGE MDM MODEM
PCH HIGH PRESSURE PROCESS
CONDENSATE
PCL LOW PRESSURE PROCESS DRAWING NUMBER
9
CONDENSATE GI006 OF
34
1 2 3 4 5
SCHEDULE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT NUMBERS
STRUCTURES
ADMINISTRATION/ENGR.-OPS/COMMONS/
CARBONACEOUS OXIDATION STRUCTURE (CENTRAL AND
SOUTH TUNNELS, MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS)
SOLIDS PROCESSING STRUCTURES CONTINUED
WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE THICKENERS
DESIGN FIRM
ADDRESS
MAIN SUB/MAINT/LAB CENTRAL TUNNEL 42100-42199 THICKENER 1 86100-86199 CITY, STATE
ADMIN AREA @ EL. 108.00 11000-11099 SOUTH TUNNEL 42200-42299 THICKENER 2 86200-86299 PHONE:
ADMIN AREA @ EL. 120.00/134.50 12001-12219 SOUTH TUNNEL MEZZANINE 42300-42399 THICKENER 3 86300-86399 CONTACT:
WWW.
ENGR/OPS AREA 12300-12499 CONTROL BUILDING 42400-42499 THICKENER 4 86400-86499
COMMONS AREA 13500-13599 COMPRESSOR BUILDING 42500-42599 THICKENER GALLERY 86500-86599
MAIN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION 13000-13099 DEWATERING PUMPING STATION 42600-42699 GRAVITY BELT THICKENER 86600-86999
MAINTENANCE AREA @ EL. 104.75 14101-14199 RECLAIMED WATER PUMPING STATION 42700-42789 MSG/LSG SYSTEM 87000-87999
D MAINTENANCE AREA @ EL. 120.00 15000-15099 RECLAIMED WATER SUBSTATION 42790-42799 SOLIDS PROCESSING CONTROL BUILDINGS D
ROOF AREA "MAINTENANCE" @ EL. 134.50 16020-16050 CHANNELS - ML, PE, RAS, INF 42800-42899 BASEMENT 88120-88139
SUB CONSULTANT
LAB 15100-15199 GROUND FLOOR 88220-88239
MAINTENANCE STORAGE 18000-18999 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION STRUCTURE MANHOLE SUMPS 89100-89149
BATTERY I DIGESTER BATTERY S 89150-89399
INFLUENT-EFFLUENT PUMP BUILDING SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 1 43100-43199
BELOW ELEVATION 98.0 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 2 43200-43299 SOLIDS STORAGE BASINS
SCREEN ROOM 21100-21199 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 3 43300-43399 LEVEE CLOSURE 90000-90010
INFLUENT PUMP ROOM 21200-21299 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 4 43400-43499 METERING STRUCTURE 90011-90049
EFFLUENT PUMP ROOM 21300-21399 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 5 43500-43599 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS 90050-90099
BETWEEN ELEVATION 98.0 AND 117.0 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 6 43600-43699 BATTERY I 90100-90199 PRELIMINARY
SCREEN ROOM 22100-22199 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 7 43700-43799 BATTERY II 90200-90299
INFLUENT PUMP ROOM 22200-22299 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 8 43800-43899 BATTERY III 90300-90399 THIS DRAWING IS NOT VALID FOR
EFFLUENT PUMP ROOM 22300-22399 BATTERY I MIXED LIQUOR DISTRIBUTION AND 43900-43999 BATTERY IV (FUTURE) 90400-90499 CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS IT
BOILER ROOM 22400-22499 EFFLUENT CHANNELS DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
EQUIPMENT ROOM NO. 2 22500-22599 BATTERY II EMERGENCY STORAGE BASINS AND WETLANDS
MISCELLANEOUS 22600-22699 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 9 44100-44199 EMERGENCY STORAGE BASINS A, B & C 91000-91099
UTILITY ROOMS 22700-22799 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 10 44200-44299 WETLANDS (FISH HEAD LAKE) 91100-91199
BETWEEN ELEVATION 117.0 AND 133.0 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 11 44300-44399 EMERGENCY STORAGE BASIN-D 91200-91269
SCREEN ROOM 23100-23199 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 12 44400-44499
INFLUENT PUMP ROOM 23200-23299 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 13 44500-44599 TUNNELS
EFFLUENT PUMP ROOM 22300-22399 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 14 44600-44699 SOLIDS HANDLING TUNNEL 92000-92299
BOILER ROOM 22400-22499 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 15 44700-44799 MAINTENANCE TUNNEL 92300-92499
MISCELLANEOUS 23600-23699 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 16 44800-44899 CENTRAL TUNNEL 92500-92999
INCINERATOR AREA BATTERY II MIXED LIQUOR DISTRIBUTION 44900-44999
INCINERATOR NO. 1 25100-25199 EFFLUENT CHANNELS AND FILTER FEED PUMP STATION CHEMICAL HANDLING AREA
GRIT SCREENINGS SCUM DEWATERING AREAS 25500-25599 BATTERY III CHEMICAL CONTROL BUILDING 93100-93299
C ASH HANDLING AREA 25600-25699 MANHOLES 45000-45050 CHEMICAL STORAGE AND SCRUBBER AREA 93300-93399
C
ODOR REMOVAL TOWER AREA 25700-25799 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 17 45100-45199 CHEMICAL PUMP AREA 93400-93499
CONTROL AND MCC ROOMS 25800-25899 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 18 45200-45299 CAUSTIC STORAGE AREA 93500-93510
EQUIPMENT ROOM NO. 1 AND MISCELLANEOUS 25900-25999 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 19 45300-45399 POLYMER AND FERRIC CHLORIDE STORAGE AREA 93511-93529
SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 20 45400-45499 FUEL STORAGE AREA 93530-93549 SACRAMENTO REGIONAL
PRIMARY TREATMENT STRUCTURE SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 21 45500-45599 SULFUR DIOXIDE STORAGE AREA 93550-93559 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
BATTERY I SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 22 45600-45699 ACTIVATED CARBON AREA 93561-93599
GRIT REMOVAL TANK 31100-31199 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 23 45700-45799 RETURN ACTIVATED
PRIMARY EQUIPMENT GALLERY 31200-31299 SECONDARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 24 45800-45899 MISCELLANEOUS
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 1 31300-31399 BATTERY III MIXED LIQUOR DISTRIBUTION AND 45900-45999 DECHLORINATION BUILDING 94000-94999 SLUDGE PUMPING -
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 2 31400-31499 EFFLUENT CHANNELS BACKFLOW STRUCTURE 95000-95199 BASIS OF DESIGN
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 3 31500-31599 X09 CLEAN ROOM 95200-95249
BATTERY II CARBONACEOUS OXIDATION STRUCTURE INFLUENT JUNCTION STRUCTURE 96000-96199

GRIT REMOVAL TANK 32100-32199 (MISCELLANEOUS BUILDINGS) SEPTAGE DISPOSAL AREA 96200-96299
PRIMARY EQUIPMENT GALLERY 32200-32299 WEST SECONDARY SUBSTATION 46100-46199 STORM DRAINAGE 96300-96399
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 4 32300-32399 NORTH TUNNEL 46200-46299 BUFFERLANDS AND TEMPORARY STORAGE 98000-98999
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 5 32400-32499 NORTH TUNNEL MEZZANINE 46300-46399
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 6 32500-32599 CONTROL BUILDING 46400-46499 DEDICATED LAND DISPOSAL
BATTERY III CHANNELS - ML, INF 46800-46899 GENERAL 97000-97099
GRIT REMOVAL TANK 33100-33199 FOUL AIR TREATMENT AREA 46900-46999 DLD 1 97100-97199
PRIMARY EQUIPMENT GALLERY 33200-33299 DLD 2 97200-97299
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 7 33300-33399 CRYO PLANT DLD 3 97300-97399
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 8 33400-33499 CRYO PLANT STRUCTURE 48000-48499 DLD 4 97400-97499
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 9 33500-33599 CRYO SUBSTATION 48900-48999 DLD 5 97500-97599
BATTERY IV LANDFILL 97700-97799
GRIT REMOVAL TANK 34100-34199 EFFLUENT FILTRATION HEAVY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BUILDING 97800-97899
B PRIMARY EQUIPMENT GALLERY 34200-34299 UV PROCESS 70000-70050 B
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 10 34300-34399 CHEMICAL STORAGE 70151-70199
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 11 34400-34499 FILTER STRUCTURE 70201-70269
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION TANK 12 34500-34599 CHLORINE CONTACT TANK 70271-70299
CENTRAL TUNNEL ELEVATION 94.0 TO 107.0 39100-39199 RECLAIMED WATER STORAGE AND PUMPING 70301-70359
EQUIPMENT GALLERY ELEVATION 107.0 TO 120.0 39200-39299 WP BOOSTER PUMP SYSTEM 70360-70369
CONTROL BUILDING AND TRANSFORMER AREA 39300-39399 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER BUILDING 70371-70399
FOUL AIR TREATMENT AREA 39400-39499
INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT CHANNELS (BATTERIES I-IV) 39500-39599 SOLIDS PROCESSING STRUCTURES
DIGESTER GAS STORAGE 80101-80199 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
CARBONACEOUS OXIDATION STRUCTURE (TANKS 1-12) WASTE GAS BURNERS 80201-80299 ISSUE BLOCK
OXIDATION TANK 1 41100-41149 DIGESTER BATTERY I
DESIGNED
OXIDATION TANK 2 41200-41249 DIGESTER 1 81100-81199 PMO ENGINEERING
OXIDATION TANK 3 41300-41349 DIGESTER 2 81200-81299
DRAWN
OXIDATION TANK 4 41400-41449 DIGESTER 3 81300-81399 PMO CAD
OXIDATION TANK 5 41500-41549 EQUIPMENT GALLERY AND EQUIPMENT BUILDING 81400-81499
CHECKED
OXIDATION TANK 6 41600-41649 DIGESTER BATTERY II A.G. CALCIANO
APPROVED
OXIDATION TANK 8 41800-41849 DIGESTER 5 82200-82299 R. WILLIAMS
FILENAME
OXIDATION TANK 11 41350-41399 EQUIPMENT GALLERY 82500-82599 DESIGNER PROJECT NUMBER
OXIDATION TANK 12 41450-41499 DIGESTER BATTERY III [XXXX]
DIGESTER 8 83100-83199 CONTRACT NUMBER
AHU'S AT NORTH CO DECK DIGESTER 9 83200-83299
DIGESTER 10 83300-83399 CONTRACT SEQUENCE NUMBER
DIGESTER 11 83400-83499
A EQUIPMENT GALLERY 83500-83599 DISCIPLINE
A
COMPRESSOR ROOM BATTERY III 83600-83649 GENERAL
PLOT DATE: 7/2/2013 10:13:15 AM
MIXED SLUDGE BUILDING 83900-83999

SCHEDULE OF EXISTING
EQUIPMENT NUMBERS
GENERAL NOTES
1. SEE DRAWING GI006 FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NUMBERING SYSTEM.
DRAWING NUMBER
10
GI601 OF
34
1 2 3 4 5
EMERGENCY
STORAGE BASIN B GENERAL NOTES:
DESIGN FIRM
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS ROCKS
* THIS DRAWING SHOWS PLANT AREAS RESERVED FOR

ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
EMERGENCY
ROCKS
THE USE OF CONTRACTORS ON CURRENT PROJECTS,

ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ADDRESS
STORAGE BASIN A CITY, STATE
ROCKS
AND FOR THIS PROJECT. PHONE:

CONTACT:
ROCKS
ROCKS
EMERGENCY
GATE
ROCKS ROCKS ROCKS

ROCKS
ROCKS
GATE
WWW.
STORAGE BASIN E
ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
LEGEND:
DI
TC H
ROCKS
CONC. DI TCH
CONC. DI TCH
ROCKS
CONC. DI TCH
PI LES
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
GATE
ASPH.
EMERGENCY STORAGE
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
CONTRACTOR LAYDOWN
D BASIN C CONC.
CONC.
ROCKS
D
CONC. DI TCH
ROCKS
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS
PROJECT AREA SUB CONSULTANT
GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS
ROCKS
ROCKS
ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC. CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH. CONC. ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
GATE
GATE
CONC. ASPH.
ROCKS
ROCKS
CONC.
ROCKS CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
GATE
ASPH.
CONC.
PI LES
ROCKS
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
TRAI LER
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
ROCKS
CONC.
TRAI LER
CONC. ASPH.
TRAI LER
TRAI LER
DECK
UNKNOW N SUR FACE CONC.
TRAI LER TRAI LER
ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
TRAI LER
DECK
ASPH.
ASPH. TRAI LER
CONC.
CONC. ROCKS
ASPH.
GATE
ROCKS
EMERGENCY
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
WA
LL
ROCKS
STORAGE
TANK
PRELIMINARY
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
OVERHANG
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
ROCKS
CONC.
FOUNDATI ON
OVERHANG
BASIN D
TANK
CONC.
TANK
ASPH. W
ALL
OVERHANG
CONC.
TANK TANK
ASPH.
ASPH.
FOUNDATI ON
PI LES ROCKS
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK
TANK
ASPH. GATE CONC.
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
OVERHANG
ROCKS
OVERHANG OVERHANG
ASPH. CONC.
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC. ASPH.
OVERHANG
CONC. ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH.
OVERHANG
ASPH.
CONC. TANK
ASPH.
WA LL
TANK TANK
ASPH.
TANK TANK
GATE
TANK
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
CONC.
OVERHANG

ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
GATE CONC. CONC.

CONC.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH.
CONC.
ASPH.
UNKNOW N SUR FACE
TANK

CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
CONC. CONC. CONC.
CONC. WALL
TANK
ASPH.
ASPH.
TANK CONC.
ASPH. TANK TANK

ASPH.
WALL
ASPH. CONC.
CONC. TANK CONC.
ASPH. TANK
ASPH.
GATE GATE ASPH. CONC.

CONC.
GATE TRAI LER
CONC.
CONC. TANK
TANK TANK TANK
TANK
CONC.
TANK
CONC.

TANK ASPH. CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. TANK
CONC. OVERHANG
CONC.
CONC. TRAI LER

ASPH. ASPH.
TANK TANK TANK
ASPH.
GATE ASPH.
GATE
CONC. ASPH.
CONC. OVERHANG
CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
TANK
CONC.
ASPH. OVERHANG
ROCKS
TANK
TANK
CONC. TANK

CONC.
PI LES
CONC.
TANK
TANK
TANK
TRAI LER CONC.

PI LES
CONC.
CONC. CONC. ASPH.

CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
ASPH.
ASPH. CONC.
GATE ASPH.
ASPH. ASPH.
ASPH.
PH.
AS ASPH.
ASPH.
ASPH. OVERHANG
CONC.
CONC.
PI LES
CONC. CONC.
ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK
CONC.
ASPH. ASPH. CONC. CONC.
GATE CONC. GATE
GATE
ASPH.
TANK ASPH.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC. CONC.
CONC. CONC.
ASPH. ASPH.
CONC. GATE
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
PI LES
ASPH. ASPH.
OVERHANG
CONC. GATE
ASPH.
GATE
CONC.
CONC.
UNION PACI
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
CONC.
TANK

ASPH. GATE
WA LL
CONC.
ASPH.
CONC. CONC.
CONC.
ASPH. CONC.
CONC.

Return Activated Sludge Pumping Basis of Design Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Return Activated Sludge Pumping Basis of Design Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Return Activated Sludge Pumping

Basis of Design Report

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

RWQCB Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

There are several steps needed to finalize this BODR including:

1. BODR confirmation will be conducted in a series of meetings where the selected

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Table 1. BODR Reference Documents

Emergency Storage Basins (ESBs)

Pre-aeration Grit Tanks (GTs)

Primary Sedimentation Tanks (PSTs)

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

DAFT GBT Polymer Cl2

Surge MS DS SSBs DLDs Washwater

Chlorine gas for disinfection

Sulfur dioxide gas for dechlorination prior to river discharge

Water Reclamation Facility (WRF)

Biosolids Reclamation Facility (BRF) (dewatering, drying and pelletizing facility)

Solids Storage Basins (SSBs) for further stabilization of digested sludge

2.1 Plant Flows and Loads

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Flow mgd* 181 195 272 351 418 541

TSS lb/d 468,000 480,000 570,000 692,000 1,262,000 --

BOD lb/d 493,000 496,000 557,000 640,000 987,000 --

NH4 lb N/d 45,000 46,000 51,000 59,000 69,000 --

TKN lb N/d 74,000 76,000 95,000 110,000 110,000 --

* Includes water conservation

Flow mgd* 206 223 318 414 497 648

TSS lb/d 574,000 589,000 699,000 850,000 1,548,000 --

BOD lb/d 604,000 608,000 683,000 785,000 1,209,000 --

NH4 lb N/d 55,000 56,000 63,000 72,000 84,000 --

TKN lb N/d 91,000 94,000 118,000 135,000 135,000 --

* Includes water conservation

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

3.0 Project Elements

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Grit Primary Secondary Sacramento River

To WAS WAS P/S

Primary effluent pumping station

3.1.2 Project Site Plan

Review recent condition assessment (anticipated summer 2013) and perform

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

3.2 Basis of Design

Table 5. RAS Pumping Station Design Flow Criteria

3.2.1 BioWin Model RAS Flows

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

Surface Overflow Rate (ft/ft/d)

Figure 5. State Point Analysis

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

3.3 Design Criteria

3.3.1 Pumping Station Design Criteria

3.3.2 Pump Selection Criteria

Nss = Suction Specific Speed, (U.S. Units)

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District

NPSHmargin is defined as follows:

NPSHmargin = Net Positive Suction Head Margin Ratio, unitless

3.3.3 RAS Pump Turndown Range

Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District