Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPTICAL MICRO-ELECTRO-
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
(O-MEMS)
J. S. Harris, Jr.
Stanford University
Outline
STANFORD
l Overview
l Advantages
l Fundamentals
l Mechanical O-MEMS
l Optical Communications Network Switches
l Optical Bench
l Displays
l Torsional Mirror
l Grating Light Valve
l Semiconductor Optical Device O-MEMS
l Tunable Laser
l Tunable Detector
l Modeling
l MEMS Systems Examples
l Summary
Page #
What is O-MEMS
STANFORD
Optical Table
Page #
The New Millenium
STANFORD
4.3 m
Semiconductor
Active Edge-Emitting Laser
Laser Stripe
Pre-aligned
Micro-Fresnel
Lens
Optical
Table
3D Structures
Pre-aligned to the Lens
Integration
System on a chip
STANFORD
Laser-to-fiber coupling
Page #
The Major Driving Force:
Communications Link Capacity
STANFORD
Advantages of O-MEMS
A Marriage of Technologies
STANFORD
Page #
O-MEMS: an Enabling Technology
STANFORD
Guiding
Page #
Active Device Functions
STANFORD
Page #
Technologically Available
Optoelectronic Materials
STANFORD
AlN
6.0 (.21 m)
4.0 (.31 m)
ZnS
Bandgap energy (eV)
GaN MgSe
(.41 m)
Visible ZnSe
3.0 Spectrum
SiC AlP CdS ZnTe
AlAs
2.0 (.62 m) GaP CdSeAlSb
InN CdTe
GaAs InP
1.0 (1.24 m)
Si
SLE BULK
Ge GaSb
(Ge) InAs InSb
Optical Communications
Material Choices
STANFORD
2.5
AlAs
2
InxAl1-xAs
AlxGa1-xAs
Bandgap (eV)
1.5
GaAs InP
980nm
InxGa1-xAs
1 InxGa1-xAsyP1-y
1300nm
1550nm
0.5 GaNyAs1-y
GaxIn1-xNyAs1-y InAs
on GaAs InNyAs1-y
0
5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6 6.1 6.2
Lattice Parameter ()
GaNAs and GaInNAs have large bandgap bowing
Long wavelength material lattice matched to GaAs
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-14 14
Page #
Page #
Surface Micromachining
STANFORD
PolySi
Nitride
Oxide
Principle of Operation
STANFORD
d
d0 d V
2
W 1 2 0AV
F= = CV =
z z 2 2d 2
Page #
Design Issues: Mechanical
Actuation Limit
STANFORD
V =V
3 crit
V
4
Electrostatic V
2 V
Force 1
(dotted)
Force
Increasing
Elastic
Voltage restoring
force
(solid)
0 Membrane Displacement d d0
MIRRORS
STANFORD
Page #
Electrostatic-combdrive
STANFORD
actuators Electrostatic
Combdrives
STANFORD
Springs
Fiber grooves or
channels
manipulator
comb drives
Bryant Hichwa etal, OCLI/JDS Uniphase, A Unique Latching 2x2 MEMS Fiber
Optics Switch, Optical MEMS 2000, Kauai, August 21-24 th, 2000.
Page #
Wavelength Switching Speed
STANFORD
Wafer 3976R2.1: 20 m Square Membrane
l Bias conditions:
-10V DC / 5
0V DC l Constant 10mA Diode Current
10 s l Membrane driven by square
5 s
pulse, 500ns to 10 s variable
Intensity (a.u.)
2 s l Time-averaged Spectrum:
1 s l 90% of average shift in 1 s
500 ns
Micromirror Reliability
STANFORD
Angle (degrees)
measurement # 2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
-0.50%
Page #
Outline
STANFORD
l Overview
l Advantages
l Fundamentals
l Mechanical O-MEMS
Optical Communications Network Switches
l
Optical Bench
l
l Displays
l Torsional Mirror
l Grating Light Valve
l Semiconductor Optical Device O-MEMS
l Tunable Laser
l Tunable Detector
l Modeling
l MEMS Systems Examples
l Summary
1
2
OXC
M Output
N Ports
Optical 1
DMUX 2
N
Optical
MUX
Architecture of WDM Switch
The optical input signals are demultiplexed, and each wavelength
is routed to an independent NxN spatial cross-connect
Page #
O-MEMS Modulation Means
STANFORD
Properties of Light:
l Intensity, Wavelength, Polarization, and Phase
Each of these can be modulated, although intensity is the
most common mode
Modulation Means:
l Linear Motion
l Deflection
l Reflection
l Diffraction
l Interference
2 x 2 fiber-optic switch
STANFORD
Page #
1 x 2 Matrix Switch
STANFORD
Some issues:
Switch scalability with minimum insertion loss
Large device count
Non-standard fabrication processes
Actuator reliability problems
1 C. Marxer, N.F. de Rooij, Jrnl of Lightwave Tech., Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan 1999
2 L.Y. Lin, E.L. Goldstein, R.W. Tkach, Jrnl of selected topics in Quantum Electronics, Vol. 5, No. 1, Jan 1999
Page #
NxN Matrix OXC
STANFORD
Simple 1 by 2
cross-points
Digital mirrors
N2 scaling
Large motion
Reliability??
OMM, Onix,
AT&T, Agilent.....
Analog mirrors
s = N ?k 2 l 2N scaling
Accuracy?
Output Lucent, C-speed,
fiber Xros(NT),.....
array
Input
fiber
array
Page #
2x2 Beam Steering Switch*
STANFORD
Input
M1 Mirror
Input A
Array
Input B M2
Output A
M4
Output Output B
Mirror M3
Array
*P.M. Hagelin, U. Krishnamoorthy, et. al, paper published in Photonics Technology Letters, July 2000.
Switching Characteristics
STANFORD
0
Power at 1550 nm [dB]
Transmitted Optical
-20
-40
Output A
-60 Output B
M1 M1 M1 M1
M2 M2 M2 M2
B B B B
M4 M4 M4
A A A M4 A
M3 M3
M3 M3
M1: 21.65V to 0V M1: 0V M1: 0 V M1: 0V to 22.24V
M3: 25.52V M3: 25.52Vto 0V M3: 0Vto 25.52V M3: 25.52V
Page #
DMD Light Switches
Mirror 10 deg
Mirror +10 deg
Hinge
CMOS
Yoke Substrate
Landing
Tip
1
SEM Photomicrographs of DMD Chips
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Silicon Substrate
Silicon
Dioxide Substrate electrode
Cross section
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-40 40
2
Grating Light Valve Projector
STANFORD
Micromachined Free-Space
Micro-Optical Bench (FS-MOB)
Semiconductor
Active Edge-Emitting Laser
Laser
Stripe Pre-aligned
Micro-Fresnel
Lens
3D Structures
Pre-aligned to the Lens
Micromachined FS-MOB
3
Out-of-Plane micro-Fresnel lens
l Low cost, batch processing technique to
fabricate free-space micro-optical system.
l All optical elements fabricated at the
same time by photolithography.
The optical system can be pre-aligned.
l Greatly reduce the size, weight, and
volume of free-space micro-optical
systems
Fabrication Processes :
Poly-1 Poly-2
PSG-2
PSG-1
Si or GaAs
Ref: Lin, Lee, Pister, and Wu, Electronics Letters, v.30, p.448, March 1994.
Micro-Fresnel Lens
Translation Stage
Spring
4
Outline
STANFORD
l Overview
l Advantages
l Fundamentals
l Mechanical O-MEMS
l Optical Communications Network Switches
l Optical Bench
l Displays
l Torsional Mirror
l Grating Light Valve
Page #
Ar Ion Pumped Ti:Sapphire
Tunable Laser
STANFORD
Laser Background
STANFORD
l Resonance condition
2nL/c = 2m or nL = m/2
Page #
Laser Background
STANFORD
cavity l Resonance
ax
I circ c
m , where m = 1, 2, ...
nL
I inc
l Axial Mode Spacing
c
axial
nL
l Cavity Finesse
g rt axial
F
1 g rt cavity
Semiconductor Lasers:
In-Plane vs. Vertical-Cavity
STANFORD
Page #
Why Vertical Cavity Devices?
STANFORD
gain/transmission
Cavity Mode Cavity Mode
axial ~ a few axial ~ 100 nm
Wide axial mode spacing in vertical cavities possibility for broad and
continuous wavelength tuning ( < axial, ~100 nm or ~10%)
R I
r1 Mirror 1
r2
GaAs substrate Mirror 2
T
Conventional VCSEL Tunable VCSEL
nL = m/2 nL + Ladj = m/2
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-52 52
Page #
Hybrid Dielectric DBR
Tunable VCSEL Structure
STANFORD
Membrane
Contact Pad
Spacer Layer
Deformable
Membrane
Top Mirror
p-contact
p-Contact Layer
n-Distributed
Bragg Reflector
Page #
Top Mirror Formation
STANFORD
Intracavity Contact
STANFORD
l Evaporate/Liftoff Ti-Au
intracavity contact
Page #
Membrane Release
STANFORD
SEM Images of
Tunable Structure
STANFORD
20-40 m diameter
membrane central reflector
Oxidized current
aperture
Page #
Semiconductor Coupled Cavity:
1.5 Pair Dielectric DBR
STANFORD
5 5
Structure
1500 Au
1.5 pairs dielectric mirror 4 4
/4 GaAs
Air Gap
Power (W)
Voltage (V)
~3/4 + 3 3
GaAs 2 Cavity
Oxidized AlAs current aperture
2-60 InGaAs QWs 2 2
22.5 Period 1 1
GaAs/AlAs
/4 DBR
0 0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Current (mA)
0.1 950
17.8V
0 945
9500 9550 9600 9650 9700 0 4 8 12 16
Wavelength () Voltage (V)
Page #
VCSEL Wavelength Tuning
Transient Response
STANFORD
2
Tuning Voltage
0
-2
Signal (a.u.)
Voltage (V)
-4
977.6 nm -6
-8
-10
977.0 nm -12
-14
-4 -2 0 2 4 6
Time (sec)
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-61 61
h
Top DBR 1
(R1) R 1 = 0.8 R 1 = 0.2
p contact
R 2 = 0.99
0.8
Quantum Efficiency ( )
R 1 = 0.4
QW absorbing
layers 0.6
Circulating 0.4
wave R 1 = 0.8
Bottom DBR
(R2) 0.2
R 2 = 0.9
n contact
0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Absorption ( d)
l Quantum Efficiency
(1+ R2 e d ) d
=
d 2 (1 R1 )(1 e )
max
(1 R R
1 2 e )
(Kishino, 1991)
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-62 62
Page #
Tunable PIN Photodiode
STANFORD
5 10 -6
1.5 Volt
0
920 930 940 950 960 970 980 990
Wavelength (nm)
Mirror Curvature
STANFORD
MUMPS Poly2
l 2-D Interferometry
l Optical far-field
measurements
Page #
New AlOx/GaAs
Top Membrane Structure
STANFORD
GaAs/AlOx DBR
Si3N4/Gold/Ti/GaAs
Supporting Legs
Silicon nitride
Gold
One-Dimensional Model of
Movable Membrane
STANFORD
Page #
Optical Properties of the cavity
STANFORD
Modeling of O-MEMS
devices is virtually non-
existant: serious design
limitation
Surface deformation
scatters light out of the
cavity
Cavity loss increases
linewidth
Two top membrane
designs compared using
Fox & Li method
mirrors. 0.8
Examples 0.7
0.6
Tilted but flat surface 0.5
0.4
Symmetrically bent surface 0.3
Result: 0.2
0.1
-10 -5 0 5 10
Tilted: the mode shifts
Radial Distance (mm)
Symmetrical: the mode
intensity decreases in center,
but increases at edges--leads
to multi-mode lasing
Page #
Outline
STANFORD
l Overview
l Advantages
l Fundamentals
l Mechanical O-MEMS
l Optical Communications Network Switches
l Optical Bench
l Displays
l Torsional Mirror
l Grating Light Valve
Integrated Raised
3D Optics Microlens
Actuator
Emitting
Spot
VCSEL
Si Free-Space
Micro-Optical Bench Hybrid-Integrated
Vertical Cavity
Surface-Emitting Laser
Page #
Integrated Michelson
Interferometer
Measure displacement and
Movement direction of external
Object with high resolution
Integrated Interferometer
Page #
Displacement Sensor Performance
Page #
Micro Bio-Assay System
STANFORD
Tunable Coupling
Laser Optics
Detector Sample
Ring-down Cavity
Iout B
A
A
B
Time
O-MEMS APS Short Course 3/11/01 JSH-76 76
Page #
O-MEMS is an Enabling
Technology for the New Millennium
STANFORD
Page #