Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
PETER J. WESTERVELT
B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(1947)
M.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(1949)
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
(1951)
Certified by.....
Thesis Supervisor
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
i. Introduction.................................. 1
2. The Objects .................................. 1
3. The Phenomena ................. .............. . 2
4. The Experimental Conditions................... 4
5. The Theory........ . .......................... 6
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title
Numbers
1. Orifice in Tube
2. Coefficient of Discharge
3. Orifice Harmonics
Power
4. One-half Dependence of Fundamental
A
5-8. Ingard and Labate's Phase Diagrams
9-11. Ingard and Labate's Resistance Measurements
13.. Ingard and Labate's Kinetic Mass Measurements
14. Waveform with Square Root Moment
15. Resistance Defined
1. Introduction
2. The Objects
-1-
-2-
3. The Phenomena
5. The Theory
~El=Z~1~-~--------
.- r-:-----;;;;--- ---
-7-
This suggests that the dependence of the average drag
coefficient might properly be expressed as a function of the
Reynold's number, and the reduced frequency. This is
standard procedure, in the limit of zero frequency, as is
illustrated in Figs.30, and 31. Our experimental results
in Chapter VI can be considered to yield this functional
dependence, for which there does not yet appear to be
an adequate theoretical development.
CHAPTER II
A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE ORIFICE PROBLEM
1. Introduction
Q = Cd2 (6)
0.90
0.80
c 0.70
.. 0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
10 20 40 60 80 10' 103 104 10s
Reynolds Number R
Variattion of (iischlrge coefficieCit with IReypohs numillbIVr fol shar:llp-edg(ed orifices a:lnd rota:iletrjs;.
FIG. Z
-13-
RF ,2 (7)
= = 2(Cd)2
It is not engineering practice to present orifice data
in terms familiar to the acoustician. We shall not be inter-
ested in the exact value of the more widely used coefficient
of discharge as long as our experiments yield values which
form reasonable extrapolations of previously existing data.
From Eq.(7) it is seen that. measurements of RF as a function
of the volume velocity through the orifice, enables the
coefficient of discharge to be evaluated. In addition to
the experimentally determined values of RF presented in the
Figs. 20 and 21 in Chapter IV, there is plotted (in heavy
solid line) the value of RF obtained from Eq.(7) by choosing
for the coefficient of discharge. It is fairly evi-
dent that the coefficient of discharge varies among orifices
of equal area but differing thickness, and the reason for this
is discussed next.
The effects of thickness and finite width on orifices
may be discussed in terms of the behavior of a nozzle. A
4. Non-Linear Reactance
o
z
0
r 1
in
(n
0n
J.
w
cr
FIG. 3
I I
LL
LL
0
w
e 1000 FNMN-
CONST*o1/
(n
w
I-. X
J
w FUNDAMENTAL
1r
I
100
10 100 1000
1000
e, RELATIVE DRIVING VOLTAGE
FIG. 4
-20-
250 lj5=t
V)
REGION 4
200
I
I- --
I
150 I___ REGION 3
- I --------- _______
-I
/00
IL . - . .
REGION I .
50
-I . . . .
* .
t. i l l
,
s I tf i l
.
Ii l I'I
0 .5 10 15 2.0
FIG. 5
d= /.o LM
-= 224- CPS
- I
300
REGION 4
250
200
-
- /1-7
I
/50
REGION 2
50 qT
SREGIO .
REGION 4
350
t4 d=/I 4- -M
300 "
5I..REGION 3
200 i
.l-7
50
S . . ' . . REGION I
r I .. i I I L L 1 I -
2,O
0 .5 I 1.5 2.0
FIG. 7
306 cl= 2. o Cm
V = 238 CPS
- REGION 4
250 -- -------- --
I
i __~
I-
200 --
r REGION 3
--
I
r
I --
I _-
/50 i
r
!
- I - -_
-I __
/00-
E b
I~~ 9 1 . .
1.0 1.5 20
FIG. 8
0
-r
O
U
ul
2I
1-
Z
0
OO
ANL d=O 5 CM
d t =0.05 CM 0 /
IC
8
6
4 + - 229 CPS
S- 346 SI
i/ II
* - 523
2 t - 698
a - 924
1I
V.2 I 4
I
6
I
8 1.0 4 6 8 10
FIG. 10
-23-
TABLE II
Fig. llb 9 10 12 Ila
dia(cm)
diam. .36 .5 .5 1 1 1.4 1.4 2 2
(cm)
thick- .09 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05
1.0O
8
6
4 10
8
6
2
4
C.I
8
4 )I
v.,
4
2 4 6 8 0 2 4 80.1 4 6 8 6 8 10
FIG. II
4.
d = 1.0 CM /
f = 0.05 CM
I ,0
10
8
6
1.0
8
E + - 229 CPS
If
0- 346
* - 523
S- 698
0 - 924
0.1
I.5 2 4 6 8 1.0 2 4 6 8 10
FIG. 12
i
d=1.4 CM I I I I I - I I .I
d = 0.36 CM d=O.5 C,.
d t =0.05 " t O.I 'I
0. 1 vt 234..Ci S
-
d I
"L
o
d
S(_NL
d
0
- -
1+
/II I
L..
/
0.1r
/,; /
F-
A
0o.0 ,: /
1i
i + - 229 CPS SIl /r - - 229 CPS.
o -346 "
A 0 - 346 91 II
a - 69.8 o" * - 523
-698
/I
U 924 '
!
0. 01- -- 0.01 I-
1/t t
Sb' UM
I0 o00 1000
C
FIG. 13
reasonably well.
Ingard and Labate determined the kinetic energy carried
by the vortices issuing from the orifice by measuring the
momentum and velocity of the vortex stream. They obtained
the momentum by finding the force caused by the vortices in
striking a torsion balance. They claim to have obtained a
surprisingly dose agreement between their measured values
of resistance and the value expected, assuming the loss of
energy to be that carried away by the vortices. Unfortun-
ately, we find that their measured value of momentum is
twice as great as the maximum value it could possibly have
from the momentum conservation principle. In order to
justify their force measurements it is necessary to postulate
that the vortex element rebounds elastically from aflat
surface; if this is true, the power carried by the vor-
tices is one-half the value they calculate.
Ingard has also measured the variation of the kinetic
mass of the orifice with amplitude. These stremely inter-
esting results are plotted in Fig. 13, in terms of an equi-
valent rd correction for the orifice. We shall present a
theory in the following chapter which interprets the reduction
in kinetic mass in terms of the destruction in the coherence
of the mass associated with the near field of the orifice.
CHAPTER III
THE THEORY OF NON-STEADY FLOW THROUGH AN ORIFICE
1. Introduction
RNL = 12 (2)
2S
where Q is the peak volume velocity. Eq.(2) may be ex-
pressed in terms of urms the rms average particle velocity
through the orifice
RNL . 6 RF (6)
X 4 jwILAvQ=1(7)
If all boundaries are rigid, LAV can be expressed in terms
of volume integrals of the average kinetic and potential
energy densities tar and vav
RP2 (10)
RD = 2 RF (11)
2Pf 2 4
Qav = d 16P20 I
(12)
P2
o o
RDF = Po
QAV
which is, from (12) and remembering that P4jPo:
0
RDF =
DF 2(S 1+ 1/8(-P ) 2 +1 11P po(13)
2 2
2(SCd)
P0
p = P sin wt,
2K-1/P o 2K-1CP
(sin t) 3/2d t = 0 /(5/4)
a o0 d T 7 (7/4)
and
2K- J1P 8K-14P (9/ )
b= sin 3wt(sin ct) 1/2dt = 3a - o0 (11/4
So Isin(11/n)
b = 1/7 (14)
(15)
From Eq.(15) it is evident that the second harmonic term
is greater than the third by a factor of at least Pac/Pdc'
This effect is easily observed experimentally.
Finally we consider the effect of driving the orifice
with an asymmetric wave form such as that depicted in
Fig. (14a). While this wave form has a zero average
value, its square root moment p)pj/2 differs from zero
as is demonstrated in Fig.(14b). The average volume
velocity is proportional to pjp /2 so that the orifice
is seen to behave as a pump. Experimentally it has
been possible to derive enough power from this action to
drive a mechanical wet-test flow meter. Details are given
in the next chapter.
(a) (b)
FIG. 14 - A WAVE FORM WITH A SQUARE ROOT TYPE MOMENT
-36-
ORIFICE. AREA S
(pl -2)
PRESSURE P + 8p,
P,
DIFFERENCE
ACROSS ORIFICE P2 = Po + 8P2
2
8 P2 < <
IP << P0
PQ
PI- P2 2 HENCE
S 2S 2 d
P1 - P2 =
1
P 2
* * TREAT AS INCOMPRESSIBLE
FLUID
P PQ
ANALOGOUS FLOW RESISTANCE = RF = 2
Q 2S Cd
= RD " RD
ap'
-- PQ
DIFFERENTIAL RESISTANCE 2
RF
S Cdd
I.IpQ
NON LINEAR RESISTANCE = RNL =- e2 2
2S C
d
FIG. 15
-37-
100 H
/
80 x
x
60 DIRECT MEASUREMENT
(AFTER INGARD)
40 0
x
/
/x
20 ,
/ 0
FROM MEASURED
.7 RNL AND EQ.(17)
1. Introduction
-38-
-39-
PRESSt
TAP
W.E. D173246
35-55 WATT
BLAST AND
WATERPROOF
DIAPHRAGM -
TO BALI
VOLTMETER SOUND CELLS ANALYSER
FIG. 17
1*'
*
(m
I ~c4c. .
FIG. 18
-40-
3. Flow Resistance
0
u)
w
S.1
0. 5 CM DIA.
0.32 CM THICK
TABIRE III
diameter thickness n
cm cm
.5 .32 2.10
.5 .64 2.00
.5 1.25 1.96
.5 1.9 1.92
.5 2.54 1.88
For flow velocities less than 150 cm/sec the log p - log Q
relation appears to fluctuate appreciably from a straight
line characteristic, a definite tendency to. break up being
noticed at about 100 cm/sec.
The data have been correlated and expressed in terms
of the d-c flow resistance by obtaining the ratio of the
pressure to the volume velocity from curves similar to
those shown in Fig. 19. The data are given in acoustic
ohms which have the dimensions of dyne-sec/cm 5 or gm-sec/cm 4 .
The measured values of flow resistance are given in
Figs. 20 and 21. Plotted for comparison is the value of
flow resistance computed from formula (3) of Chapter III.
A discharge coefficient I = .74 was chosen. This value
of the coefficient is roughly consistent with values given
in the literature (see Fig. 2) and it enables the flow re-
sistance to be written in a simple way
U)
r
I:
0
- IO
O
I--
U)
0
0
z
O
O
0
Z
01
o
U)
0n
0
Arl
FIG. 20
100
I
O01
-o 10
I.--
O
w
Z
z
I.-
n-
w
I-
0
o
Alo..
For C =4 RF =
2(SC d)
= (1)
(RF)meas = 1-.PQ
2(SC d)
hence
C 1.pQ .74 pV/S
d (2S2RFF) meae..
(I )meases
These values agree almost exactly with the value .07 ob-
tained from Fig. 2 for an orifice whose diameter is .2
times the pipe diameter.
A similar computation carried out at 500 cm/sec leads
to a value of .87 for both the orifices which are. 0.64 cm
thick. Theselarger values of the coefficient obtained for
thick orifices result from a decrease in the contraction as
-43-
IIO
100
90
325rf 1555
80
150r
70
90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
INCIDENT S.P.L., DECIBELS
FIG. 22
-44-
placement mplitude.
The values of the non-linear resistance obtained by
ithe transmission loss measurement technique are plotted in
Fig. 24 and 25. The data are given in acoustic ohms which
have the dimensions dyne-sec/cm 5 or gm-sec/cm . The data
were obtained over a frequency range extending from 150
cps to 800 cps. For comparison, the flow resistance has
been plotted at zero cps. The non-linear resistance was
measured at particle velocity amplitudes between 2000 and
- IV
140
130
120
]
I
110 15
15
0 200 300 500 800
FREQUENCY, CPS
FIG. 23
NON- LINEAR RESISTANCE OF 0.5 CM DIA.
ORIFICE AT 500 CM/SEC PEAK VELOCITY
6
IFICE
ICKNESS (CM)
5
c, .05
.32
0 4 .64
1.25
cf)
03 ,
ORIFICE
THICKNESS (CM)
* .09
o .32
x .64
FREQUENCY, CPS
FIG. 25
extrapolated to a particle velocity amplitude of 500 cm/sec.
The resistance appears to increase to its d-c value.
It was not possible to determine whether this increase
was monotonic as measurements were not obtained at
frequencies below the cut-off of the pc termination.
It is important to emphasize the fact that the
values of resistance given in Fig. 24 were not measured
at the peak velocity of 500 cm/sec. These data will
agree with measurements obtained at 500 cm/sec provided
the frequency of low measurement is enough to insure that
the orifice is in Ingard's jet region.
It is evident that a high degree of correlation exists
betteen the measurments of non-linear and flow resistance.
This correlation is even more evident when the two kinds
of resistance are' plotted for various values of the orifice
thickness as is done in Fig. 26. It is particularly clear
that the effects of reduced contraction influence the
non-limar resistance. According to Eq. (5) of Chapter III,
the non-linear resistance should be 10 per cent greater than
the flow resistance provided the same coefficient of dis-
charge is applicable in both cases. It is evident that
the non-linear resistance for thin orifices is considerably
less than Eq. (5) predicts. This implies that the coef-
ficient of contraction is greater for alternating flow (by
about 30 per cent) than it is for steady flow. For thicker
(V, ,X,N) NON LINEAR RESISTANCE AND
(O) DC FLOW RESISTANCE FOR 500 CM/SEC AVERAGE
PARTICLE VELOCITY
RD = (SCd)
pd2 2 - 2U (2)
DIFFERENTIAL RESISTANCE
20 DIAMETER = 0.5 CM
ORIFICE THICKNESS = 0.05 CM
0.
10 0/ or
0
00 /
RD (MEASURED)
2
10(0
I I I
6 8 1000 2000
DIFFERENTIAL RESISTANCE X
30
DIAMETER = 0.357 CM e
ORIFICE THICKNESS = 0.09
c 20
I-
03
0
1%4
RD (MEASURED)
FIG. 28
-47~-
I
O
0
I-
(I
FIG. 29
-49-
Figs. 61 to 7T.
A simple addition of the power carried away in each
of the first few harmonics would show how little acoustic
power is radiated compared with the power conferred to the
jet.
The author(2) has previously noted that increasing the
particle velocity amplitude causes the second harmonic to
increase with the square of the fundamental low levels;
then the second harmonic suffers a sharp minimum which is
followed by an approximate fourth power recovery finally
going into a third power rise. This behavior is illustrated
in Figs. 3 and 72.
It has now been ascertained that this sharp dip in
the second harmonic occurs when the particle displacement is
approximately equal to the radius of the orifice. This
is evident from a glance at Fig. 73 where the second
harmnnic relative to the fundamental level is plotted
for orifices from .25 cm to 1 cm in diameter. Fig. 73 was
platted from values taken from Figs. 61 to 71. The in-
dependent variable N is the fundamental particle displace-
ment amplitude of a spherical source(having the radius
of the orifice)divided by the orifice radius.
The decay rate of the first few odd harmonics is given
in Fig. 74 in terms of the number of decibels decrease per
odd harmonic. In examining these results it is important
to realize the orifice behaves like a point source; hence
-53-
where the symbols have their usual meaning and Prms is the
pressure incident on the orifice. Using as an a-c coefficient
one that is 30 per cent greater than the d-c coefficient (the
d-c coefficient we found to be .66 in Section 3) we compute
that 3 watts is dissipated in the orifice.
-53b-
1. Introduction
-54-
-55-
Dw= I= dn
n
gives:
p(u.i
* )u + lu (pu)= -.VpE. (1)
If this. development is to be carried out to second order
in u, the solutions u and p0 to the first order wave
equation may be utilized. Thus Eq.(l) becomes:
,Vuu = u V u + u IV u,
in connection with Gauss's theorem
f Jf (uu) dv = dA uu,
4 This equation called by Eckart the conservation law of acoustic
"momentum" is A -+ o~ou. *o+
v.) - P ( =o
where J is the acoustic energy flow (instantaneous intensity).
-60-
- aA + po-# A * uu = o, (5)
establishing the second relation required.
The force on the object can be obtained from the pressure
evaluated in the coordinates of the boundary of the object,
which are fixed only if the object is rigid. (Continuity
of pressure and velocity is assumed at the fluid-object
interface; penetration of fluid into the object is ruled
out). The average pressure on the boundary pB may be ob-
tained .by applying the inverse stationary coordinate trans-
formf to the instantaneous pressure, in fixed coordinates,
and subsequently performing the time average. This leads
to the average boundary pressure:
L PE + d (PE) (6)
in which dB is the boundary displacement.
Next, if the simplifying restriction is made that the
boundary moves only perpendicular to itself, the following
relation holds on the boundary:
po dA uu . (9)
R
Since, by Eq.(5) the sum of (8) and (9) must be zero we find
F = -Po j dAr u'u,
R
-62-
-J
s
7 sin 9 dA.
0 8 4
.8(ka) 0
52 (ka)3 ka
Cylinder 3 )
0 8(ka) 0
-64-
SY (16)
2 ca ca
where Y indicates the ratio of specific heats which has
been assumed to be 1.4 for air. We now see that d2 will be
smaller than the d1 of Eq.(15) and that, subject to the
-66-
where the first term is the well known Stokes law, and
the second term involves a constant k that is usually
determined experimentally. In steady flow, k is given
approximately by Oseen's second approximation to the re-
lation for the drag on a sphere. The relation (17) is
usually expressed by giving the hydrodynamic drag coef-
ficient which is defined to be the ratio of the force
divided by the projected area of the sphere and the kinetic
I0 "
0.1 1.0 10
R
VIG. 530 - DRAG COEFFICIENT VS. REYNOLDSI
NUMBER FOR SPHERE.
100
10
1.0
0.1 D.o 10to 10
R - '
FORCE ON SPHERE
+3
o [I+klvll
7"
at +sin(2wt
2
+2 2
IrpokVo
vI
Vo
-I
-2
O .57 r 1.5w7 27
wt, RADIANS
WAVE FORM WITH OSEEN-TYPE MOMENT
FIG. 32
69-
= -G(f)sin
Here G(f) is a function of f alone and 4 is a function
only of the phase angle. The function G is plotted in Fig. 33.
G
FIG. 33
-70-
d3 = S GO = -4 .5 G sin0 (21)
D G21 2
2
1+f 1+f
for a plane progressive wave.
The factor (1 + f2) in the denominator is proportional
to the energy density in the wave. The function G is shown
in Appendix III to be given by the following expression:
where x = cos y
G 1 X.318 as f--wo
F/a= -47rU
Ua
(24)
In 1 - - 0.0772
R0 d3
1 3.78
0.4 2.14
0.04 4.08
0.004 17.3
0.000ooo4 94.2
0.00004 596
Finally we investigate the wave drag coefficient d3
for a sphere in a moving stream of gas or liquid. In Appen-
dix III the Oseen-type moments have been evaluated for a
velocity wave consisting of a constant d-c term in addition
to a sinusoidal component. In the event the amplitude of
the alternating component is less than the d-c term the
velocity may be written
u= o[ 1 + f'sin at] f' 1 (25)
where f' here indicated the modulation index. The Oseen-
type moment of such a wave can be expressed as
u \ul= (1+ f'2/2)u2 (26)
In the event f' >'1 we may write for the velocity
u = u 0 [ sin t + f, f 1 (27)
Pd = P- f2 (29)
from which we can obtain the wave drag coefficient per-
taining to a sinusoidal wave in the presence of steady
flow:
d3 = COd = 4.5Pd for f < 1
and (30)
d =C= 2.25 for f (1
3 2
Thus a d3 has been found which represents the interaction
force per unit project area divided by the acoustic (not in-
cluding the steady flow kinetic energy) energy density. From
Eqs.(30 ) it is seen that d3 depends through 0d on the steady
flow fraction f provided this fraction is less than unity.
1.4
1.2
1.0
P 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
O
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1
STEADY FLOW FRACTION,f
NORMALIZED OSEEN MOMENT VS. STEADY FLOW FRACTION
FIG. 34
-75-
LL -..-
87
(D
0 9
_J
I
10
II
12
13
14
16
17
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
LOG r, r IN MICRONS
THE PARTIAL DRAG COEFFICIENTS COMPARED
FIG. 35
U =0
2
= 0.33
U
ulul
u u2
U 1
0 -I -
-I
FIG. 36
CHAPTER VI
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Technique
WESTE
ELECT
35-55 V
HORN
L
FIG. 37
-79-
T5
Iu
TU tl P- .S M DUAL LINEAR POT. CONN. AS RHEOSTAT
500
500
A-27
S7 LA-24
HIGH IMR IN. Ii fAL5
7 zZ
C Ik ] LOW IMP OUT.
10i
4
(C ) ELECTRONIC DOUBLER
c? /d0
/0
SOUND PRESSU~
pR LE'EL-/N DEC/SELS
/= -J 39
-81-
C,
-~J
.0
nnr
-30 -20 -10 0
f = - DB
EARLY MEASUREMENT OF OSEEN TYPE FORCE
FIG. 40
-83-
O
0
-I
-2
-3
-4 DEFLECTION OF PENDULUM
-5
-6 RMINATION
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
DISTANCE FROM HARD TERMINATION (CM)
FIG. 41 -DISPLACEMENT OF PENDULUM IN A 375 C.RS.
STATIONARY WAVE.
-84-
(x) +7r/2
40 m, 136 DB
(o) - T/2
40N,129DB (A)-7r/2
FIG. 42
THE OSEEN WAVE DRAG COEFFICIENT
0 ''
D =ld,3 1
G , D= 4.5
PREVIOUS MEASUREMENT- (.= -I D +f2
137 MICRON ON NYLON 2
(131 DB,400C)
0.4
0.8
o 105 MICRON "
ON WOLLASTON
(30
o (134 DB, 340 u)
0 = 10 - 1" I 2 MICRON
-J ON NYLON
I.3 1.2 (131 DB,340 )
THEORY (- LOGId 3 I)
EXPERIMENT
(+,a) .p= - 7T/2
(o,v) ~ = + 7T/2
2.C
o= io0-2
FIG. 43
-85-
0.8
0
9 1.2
1.6
2.0
24
O 0.17T 0.27r 0.37T 0.47T 0. 5T7 0.67T 0.7T7
IN RADIANS
FIG. 44
-86-
0.8
0
0 0Zo 600 CPS
J
1.2
(
105 MICRON SPHERE
ON WOLLASTON WIRE
1.6
/
2.0
IIc) 120 130 140 150 160
FUNDAMENTAL SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL IN DECIBELS
FIG. 45
-88-
0
0.8
-J
1.2
1.6
2.0
IH 0
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL IN DECIBELS
FIG. 46
-0.4
0.4
O
0. 8
I
1.2
1.6
2.0
100 I10 120 130 140 150 160
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL -DB.
FIG. 47 - D,
Iry
IN STANDING WAVE AT 340 C.P S.
-89-
-0.4
0.4
0
0.8
1.2
1.6
APPROXIMATE
THEORY
-0
-0
V
200
340
c 600
I0 (a) 340 ' RUN
I
0
Xe
xe
x A
x Ao
I
,,,
0.6
0.4
0.2
O
I0 0 200 400 1000 2000
FREQUENCY, CPS
FIG. 50
U. t
0.4
0.2
FIG. 51
CHAPTER VII
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS
TTo
9V
vs
l}. # -iE
2
6P
FO
tAIO
COFFGIN
. - A COPONO TNt)L AN
Fl(-. sz- A CONP/4R/SON OP THtE /NCIAEMENrAI. IEEACTANCE rOO Oje/F/CE,5 AND T7 4E D~eAG
COCFFIC/5NT RATO FOiR 6PAHEREJ
-92-
sNL
--, the ratio of the reduction in the orifice
X - XL
X. , the ratio of the reduction in the ori-
Ace reactance, from its linear value X , divided by XL;
2
(2 DW)meas.
W)theo.,
the ratio of twice the measured
wave drag coefficient for the sphere divided by the
theoretical value for this quantity obtained in Chapter V.
For the rough comparison we wish to, make, it
is justifiable to consider d L and X -XL XL as being
d a XL
a measure of the same quantity.
From the results plotted in Fig. 52 we see that the
fractional reduction of the orifice reactance and quantity
2(D )meas for the sphere, vary in a similar way with the
2(Dw theo
+ (u V)u - v v(. u) +F
(1)
where v is the kinematic viscosity assumed to be constant, p
is the density, and u the velocity. We assume all body
forces, F are zero and we assume that the fluid is in-
compressible;hence
V.u 0
and Eq.(l) becomes
Oseen force, is
6 NL = 9a2 uo/c (3)
2 Udc/C (4)
6 D = 14.1 r
6
5
4
-
-
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL
REQUIRED TO FLOAT SPHERE
OF GIVEN RADIUS IN AIR
F
=
-
3 (PS DENSITY OF SPHERE
7T
f =I , =+ ,
2
UNCORRECTED FOR
SPHERE MOTION)
0
z 100
co 8
I
0
5
4
D 3
0
w2
Cr
W
2
Ps
f*5 I '2 4 8
I
I 10
(n 8
6
5
~ 1
4
3 iiz
2
1 7:
120 130 140 150 160 170
TOTAL SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL IN DECIBELS
FIG. 53
1,0
8
6
5
4
3
2
0
-.
w
.J
Il
t
0.01
8
6
5 TERMINAL VELOCITY RATIO
4 FOR SPHERES IN AIR
3 (UNCORRECTED FOR SPHERE
MOTION) I
2 -1 1 1 1 7-
0.001
12(0 130 140 150 160 170 180
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL IN DECIBELS
FIG. 54
1.0
0.9 V
TERMINAL VELOCITY RATIO VS.
PEAK REYNOLDS NUMBER R Vo
0.8
.(VALID ONLY WHEN AVERAGE VELOCITY
IS MUCH SMALLER THAN OSCILLATING
>1>
o 0.7 VELOCITY AMPLITUDE)
0
0.6
I- i - --
0.5
0_J 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
FIG. 55
1000
6
5
CONNECTION BETWEEN RADIUS r,
4 SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND
3 PEAK REYNOLDS NUMBER, R o FOR
A SIMPLE HARMONIC WAVE IN AIR
2 NOTE: R =2rUo
LOTED FOR .50
PLOTTED FOR V0 0.150 1
100
8
6
5
4
3
I
100 120 130 140 150 160 170
SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL - 20 LOG Ro
FIG. 56
-98-
0 B(5/4' 1/2)
The same result would have been obtained had one computed the
fundamental component of Q and then divided by p.
-100-
1 00
APPENDIX II
ACOUSTICAL IMPEDANCE IN TERMS OF ENERGY FUNCTIONS
Similarly 2
Tav = 1/4 i LskI s k
s,k=l1
-102-
-103-
fj/p/ 2 d
Pav(surf) = 1/2Re
av 16r 0
Obviuosly if all space outside the source is included, R -co
in the integration and T and V become infinite, although the
difference T-V does-not. Pav may be obtained from the first Eq.(5)
I
evaluated over any fixed surface enclosing the source; this
yields the radiated power.
If Eqs.(9) are introduced into Eq.(3) and R -y , there
results an expression for the rpactance, X, of a spherical
wave emitted by a source of radius ro:
X = (jwp)/(47r 0 ) (10)
In considering the radiation from a small piston (r << X) in
an infinite baffle, X will have twice the value given by Eq.(10)
plus an additional term due to the kinetic energy of the fluid in
the hemispherical cap covering the piston. This additional
energy will be 2
1/2p2/3rr3(U, ) 2 1/4p 2/3 (11)
where (U')2 is the space and time average of the square of
the velocity with which the particles in the hemisphere move.
-The weighting constant b can be obtained approximately by
averaging the square of the velocity of the piston with that
at the surface of the hemisphere. This leads to b = (1 + 1/4)/2=5/8.
Hence the extra kinetic energy becomes (5pQo2)/(48)rro) which,
inserted into Eq.(3), leads to the correction to the impedance
(5jwop)/(12rro). The approximate end correction is obtained by
adding the above to twice the value given by Eq.(10):
X 11/12 = 0.29 jm --
0Tr
o ro
-107-
This approximate value is 7.4 per cent higher than the classical
value.
The approximate correction factor (7), 6, for the radiation
mass in a circular tube of radius Rt is obtained by letting
R = Rt in Eqs.(9). The ratio of (Tav - Vav)R=Rt to
Wt I = 1 cos- L +82 - 1)
Wt2 = 7r - t1
demonstrated analytically.
-108-
Fund. 01 + 2nd { 0 to +1350
100oo%
+;na<15% to
A= 5% A=5% 5%
-- A:5%
A=30% A=:30% A= A: 0%
FIGr. 57
Fund. 0O0 + +2nd180
2nd 5%o -450
100% 100%
F/. 58
03o to +1350
Fund. 100%
00 + 3rd 5% to 100%
cNVr 'VA
V VK A7v
A--15% A-15% AK-15% A"15 %
ill
I I
I
ill
I
II
i I I
A: IOO% A 1OO% A=100% A=tOO%
PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE
Fund. 00 100% Fund. 00 100% Fund. 00 100% Fund. 00 100%
3rd 00 see A 3rd 4450 see A 3rd +900 see A 3rd +1350 see A
F/G.
Fund. 00 + 3rd {80 to
to
-450
100/o
I I I I
I I I
1 ill
A= 100% A 100% A:O
100% A=too%
PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE PHASE AMPLITUDE
Fund. 00 100% Fund. 00 100% Fund. 00 100% Fund. 0o 100%
3rd 1800 see A 3rd -1350 see A 3rd -900 see A 3rd -450 see A
/G . 6 0
APPENDIX IV
MAXIMIZING THE OSEEN-TYPE MOMENT
(by Dr. H.G. Baerwald)*
f for eIxI ar
0o
u(x) =o .r 11 Q = -28
-109-
-110-
4 + -lN i u 2 dx = max.
N(PNn ) +d- P=1- xL
2
with
o = PN +(2pN-1)p2 + p (4p2 -3)pN3N + * -FP +1)p4N + .
the case N = 2:
sin 2
Here simply u = sinf - cos 2_2 cos 2/;
_21sin 4 2 2 2
2 2 (1+-cos 2) - 2
sin2 2 + cos 2 2 2
sin * 2 2 0 = - for 0 <=p=
As P22 cos 2 2 2 6 1
or:
2 sin *
a3 ) = whence:
(3) opt = 687 , ( opt .752'
(+)
(3)opt = 541; then (3)max .487
(P2)opt = 804
-113-
OR/F/CE 0D/M4ETEe 0. 2
z CA4
OI/F/GE TH/CKVNESS O. 0508 &AM
O&IDER O /1/ARARON/CV
ODD
/I
lr_
SODD
E VeNN
0 RD R OP .0o MON/
JO
/ /0 / 8'
ORDEV OF HA0/,4AON/C
PG. 6;
OI/F/ICE DIAMETEIR 0.357 CMA
OR/FICE THICHNESS 0.09 CM
-4 OeoDE O, /,YiARMON/C
rO
Lk,
CA
/
OlOER OF AARMAOYVI/C
ORDER OF HARMPON/C
9O
80
70
ODD
Co
EVEN
/o fI
OIRDE)? OF A'14?MONI/C
F/ r. 63
OR/F/CE /A4ME7Ece 0.357Cm7
OR/F/ICE TH/C/CYESS -
90
,.-ODD
7o
CO
\. oDD
40
EVENI Ev5/V
.?A
/ J /0 /5
OIRDE, OF HA R4, OIV/C
90
70
ODD
500
EVieN ARE
LESS LESS
L-.._ r- ,
__ I_
Hr.aNv R3
I 7W4M Z 0
/,I- /
ORO '~Ff OF A//AfAMONI/C
F/G. 6 4
OR/F/CE D/I/VMETER 0.57 CM
A _
OR F/C E 7rH /CVNESS o. Of- CI%
ao
OOOD
coo
EVIEN
40-
-- v
4
v
%.10 A' Ro Zs-
ORDEER OF /-/ARMON/C
ORODER OF HA-,'4,NA/c.
SA
/V
/6 /
Of~/2~p OF ~A4jMOM/C
5dU6OND PRESS/RRE LEVEL 7 CM FIROM OR/F/CE
/ST HA MONa//C /S /80 CPS
OR/01F/C O/4MET"/, 0..f CM
OR/F/ce THICv/VESS' /8"
v
,1 /0 /5
OloDER OF AARMON/C
ODO
E VE,
I ,
/
ORDE4 OF 4eA1NoA//C
-000
kot~ (UMSTABLE)
.- n
d . O /0
ORDEpf OPf H4-MON/C
~R E OF HAR ON/IC
ORDER OF HARMON/c
F/G. G 7
OR/F/CE D/ cMET/ , O.,CE
OR/,/CE' T7H//C/<NESS / t
r
o.e1pE,, o.= A%1/,AeMo-,Vc
80o
ODD 000
Jo
I _.__ _I__ _ _ I
O/DE , OF HA ,MOM/C
F/IG. 69
olR//ce D/A7Ere 0.5- CAM
OR,/F/CE T7-/C/6ESS /
OiDE&> OF HARMON/C
F/. 7o
O/F/CIE D/A4MErER. /.0 C,
OR/IF/CE TH/CYCNESS O. 06-08 C
9o
8o
000
a~
',-
0 A.DE
E O& HA0/ MRdaV/
/a /- /
ODE' OF //~,dMolvN/C
P/G. 7/
IOO(
CONST* P,
THIRD HARMONIC
10
CONST* p,
I0
ONSET OF
RUSHING
SOUND /
FREE FIELD RELATIVE SOUND
PRESSURE RADIATED BY ORI-
X FICE 2/3 MASKED
220 CPS FUNDAMENTAL
I
100 1000 10,000
Pi, RELATIVE LEVEL OF FUNDAMENTAL PRESSURE
FIG.72
-a0
-50
-~J
rI3
Q~
I-
-I
,A,~ VIT vrP v~y r~v
Al --
l 4.d COMIPO/NEN
RAT/0o 7-/ ,5 ECOPND HAR/IONIC 7V TH~ E FUA/'DAlANT,
e
OF TH SOUND GENERATEOD SY AN Or/F/CE
=I/G. 73
SYi7O4L ,RAD1ou5 /H I-C /(NE 5.S
(C M)
V o. 5ZS 0.0 J7 CA?
0.09 Clv
a 0. 3S7
Xe', c
o 0.5-
0.
14
Io
/Z
4 /2
La4 I0
'JJ
cQ 8
ze 2)
F/G. 74
BIBLI OGRAPHY