Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEE 320
Steve Muench
HCM Components
Freeway I
3
3
Chapter9
Freeway I
StructureofHCM
4
4
Chapter9
Freeway I
StructureofHCM
5
5
Outline
HCM Chapters 13 and 23
Freeway I
6
Freeway A divided highway with full control of
access and egress and with 2 or more lanes with
for exclusive use in each direction.
Driver population
Non-commuters suck more at driving
They may affect capacity
Freeway I
Capacity
Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0
9
Interchange density
Geometric design
10
Definitions Level of Service
(LOS)
Chief measure of quality of service
Describes operational conditions within a
traffic stream.
Does not include safety
Different measures for different facilities
12
When to segment
Change in the number of lanes
Change in the right-shoulder lateral clearances
Grade change of 2 percent or more
Constant upgrade longer than 4,000 ft
Change in speed limit
Freeway I
13
14
TypesofAnalysis
Existingoperations
Measuredvalues
Goal whatisLOS?
Design
Forecastedvalues
UsuallygivendesiredLOS
Goal:Selectionofdesignrelatedinputstoobtain
LOS
Planning
Forecastedinputvaluesandlocaldefaultvalues
Manydesignrelatedvaluesunknown
Goal:Howwillsystemperforminfuture?
Density (k)
The number of vehicles (n)
occupying a given length (l)
of a lane or roadway at a
particular instant
l u
16
Free Flow Speed (FFS) The mean
speed of passenger cars under low to
moderate flow rates (less than 1300
pc/h/ln) on a uniform freeway section
under prevailing conditions
Freeway I
17
LOS A
Free Flow Operation. FFS speeds prevail.
Free maneuvering.
Freeway I
18
LOS B
Reasonably Free Flow. FFS speeds maintained, slightly
restricted maneuvering
Freeway I
19
LOS C
Flow with speeds at or near FFS. Noticeably
restricted maneuvering
Freeway I
20
LOS D
Speeds begin to decline with increasing flows.
Maneuverability more noticeably limited.
Freeway I
21
LOS E
Approaching or at capacity. Unstable flow.
Maneuverability extremely limited.
Freeway I
22
LOS F
Breakdown or Forced Flow. Queues forming
behind breakdown points
Freeway I
23
Levels of Service
LOS A
Free-flow operation
LOS B
Reasonably free flow
From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000
Ability to maneuver is
only slightly restricted
Effects of minor
incidents still easily
Freeway I
absorbed
24
Levels of Service
LOS C
Speeds at or near FFS
Freedom to maneuver is
noticeably restricted
Queues may form behind any
significant blockage.
Levels of Service
LOS E
Operation near or at capacity
No usable gaps in the traffic
stream
Operations extremely
volatile
Any disruption causes
From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000
queuing
LOS F
Breakdown in flow
Freeway I
27
A
70 B C
S (mi/h) D
E
F
0
vm= 2400
Freeway I
v (pc/h/ln)
28
Speed-Flow-Density
Freeway I
29 Page 4-3
Finding capacities
FFS 70, capacity = 2400 pc/h/ln
FFS 65, capacity = 2350 pc/h/ln
FFS 60, capacity = 2300 pc/h/ln
FFS 55, capacity = 2250 pc/h/ln
Other FFS, Interpolate
Freeway I
30
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments
Determine LOS
32
Freeway LOS
LOS Calculation
Does not consider
Special lanes reserved for a particular type of vehicle
(HOV, truck, climbing, etc.)
Extended bridge and tunnel segments
Segments near a toll plaza
Facilities with FFS < 55 mi/h or > 75 mi/h
Demand conditions in excess of capacity
Influence of downstream blockages or queuing
Posted speed limit
Extent of police enforcement
Freeway I
34
Freeway I Freeway I
36
35
Freeway I
37
FFS
Freeway Segment Methodology
1. Gather input data
2. Determine FFS
3. Determine passenger-car equivalent
flow rate/ln, vp
4. Compute Density (using the
fundamental theory of traffic flow)
5. State the LOS
Freeway I
43
44
Step 1. Gather input data
Freeway I
45
46
Step 2. Determine FFS
a) Conduct a Field Study to observe FFS
47
FFS = BFFS,
if these base conditions hold:
48
Step 2. Determine FFS
b) Estimate FFS dependent on certain factors
49
FFS Freeflowspeed(mph).
BFFS Basicfreeflowspeedunderbaseconditions.
fLW Lanewidthadjustment.
fLC Lateralclearanceadjustment,functionofN(lanes).
fN Numberoflanes,appliesonlytoURBANsections.
fID Interchangedensity,measuredovera6misection,
3miupstreamanddownstream.Needatleastone
onramptocount.
Freeway LOS
52
Freeway LOS
56
55
Freeway LOS
58
Freeway LOS
60
So to repeat, the factors that affect FFS are:
Lane width
Lateral clearance
Number of lanes
Interchange density
Level of enforcement
Lighting conditions
Weather
62
Freeway I
63
Traffic Definitions
Volume:
number of vehicles, pedestrians, etc.
passing a point during a specific
period of time
for vehicles, usually expressed as
veh/hour (vph) or veh/hour/lane
(vphpl)
Freeway I
64
Demand:
number of vehicles, pedestrians, etc. that
desire to travel between locations during a
specific period
Frequently higher than volume during
certain peak times
Trips are diverted or not made when there
are constraints in the system
difficult to measure actual demand because
capacity constrains the demand
Capacity:
maximum number of vehicles that can pass
a point during a specific period
Freeway I
65
Highly variable
Time of day
Day of week
Season
Road characteristics
Direction
Freeway I
66
Traffic Typically Peaks twice per day
7000
6000
Highway Capacity
Flow in vehicles per hour
5000
Highly Congested
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
12:30 p.m.
01:30 p.m.
02:30 p.m.
03:30 p.m.
04:30 p.m.
05:30 p.m.
06:30 p.m.
07:30 p.m.
08:30 p.m.
09:30 p.m.
10:30 p.m.
11:30 p.m.
Freeway I
12:30 a.m.
01:30 a.m.
02:30 a.m.
03:30 a.m.
04:30 a.m.
05:30 a.m.
06:30 a.m.
07:30 a.m.
08:30 a.m.
09:30 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:30 a.m.
Time of Day
67
Volume Studies
AADT: Annual average daily traffic
(counted for 365 days)
ADT: average daily traffic (counted
for > 1 day and < 365)
PHV: peak hour volume
Classification counts: fleet mix
Freeway I
68
68
Estimating AADT
Annual Average Daily Traffic
Use count station information
Extrapolate to non-count locations
Used to adjust ADT for
Seasons
Daily variation
Freeway I
69
69
70
70
Counting Program
To satisfy the traffic volume data
needs for all roads under a particular
jurisdiction, we establish a Counting
Program
71
71
72
72
Traffic Counts Maps
Freeway I
73
73
Design Volume
Usually hourly volume
Which hour?
Average hourly volume inadequate design
Maximum peak hour not economical
Hourly volume used for design should not be
exceeded very often or by very much
Usually use 30th highest hourly volume of the
year
On rural roads 30 HHV is ~ 15% of ADT
Percentage tends to be constant year to year
Freeway I
74
74
Traffic Demand
z Design Hourly Volume (DHV) future
hourly volume (both directions) used for
design - typically 30th HHV (highest
hourly volume) in the design year
z Why 30th HHV?
z Breakpoint of 2-28
z Compromise: too high is wasteful, too low
poor operation
z Approximately median weekly peak hour
volume
75
75
Source: A Policy on
Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets
Freeway I
Table 2
High Hours for the Year 1996
AADT - 24,067
AADT - 24,067
Percent
Ordinal Directional K
High Hour Date Day Hour Volume Distribution Factor
78
Freeway I Freeway I
80
79
Design Hourly Volume (Example)
3500
81
81
IfAADTis3500vpd,howwillthedesignhourvolumediffer
forKfactor=8%vs.12%?
DHV=KfactorxAADT
100
DHVk=8% =8x3500 =280vph
100
DHVk=12% =12x3500 =420vph (diffof140 veh)
Freeway I
82
82
What if the traffic is 10 times higher?
IfAADTis35000vpd,howwillthedesignhourvolumediffer
forKfactor=8%vs.12%?
DHV=KfactorxAADT
100
DHVk=8% =8x35000 =2800vph
100
DHVk=12% =12x35000 =4200vph (diffof1400 veh)
Freeway I
83
83
85
85
87
88
Step 3. Determine passenger-car
equivalent flow rate/ln, vp
If the segment doesnt have base conditions,
then adjustments must be made.
89
90
Freeway LOS
Freeway LOS
Two-step process
Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
Determine fHV
Freeway I
92
Passenger Car Equivalents
Specific Grade
If it is a uniform grade < 3% and longer than mile
If it is a uniform grade >= 3% and longer than mile
Extended Grade
If it is a changing grade < 3%
93
Freeway LOS
96
Freeway LOS
97
Freeway LOS
Equivalent
Single Grade
Composite
Grades
Speed
Composite Grade
Equivalent
Single Grade
Distance
2000 ft
2000 ft
Exercise
Exercise
1st grade = 2000 ft of 3 %
2nd grade = 2000 ft of 4 %
Initial speed =55 mph
Freeway LOS
Determine fHV
1
f HV =
1 + PT (ET 1) + PRV (ERV 1)
f HV =
1 + PT (ET 1) + PRV (ERV 1)
10
3
Freeway LOS
10
4
Note that for Planning, V60 would not be
measured.
10
5
Freeway I
10
6
Step 4. Compute Density (using the
fundamental theory of traffic flow)
10
7
Freeway LOS
10
8 From Highway Capacity Manual, 2000
Freeway LOS
S = FFS FFS
3 30 FFS 1000
For 55 < FFS 70 mph AND (3400 30FFS) < vp (1700 + 10FFS)
1 v p + 30 FFS 3400
2.6
Freeway LOS
1 v + 15FFS 3100
2.6
S = FFS
Freeway I
11
0
Freeway LOS
Determine Density
Calculate density using:
vp
D=
S
D = density (pc/km/ln)
vp = flow rate (pc/hr/ln)
S = average passenger-car speed
(km/h)
Freeway I
11
1
Freeway I
11
2 Page 4-12
Step 5. State the LOS
Freeway I
11
3
2. Design
N
vp
3. Planning
LOS
vp
Freeway I
N
11
4
Limitations of HCM Method
for Segments
Without modifications this methodology does not apply to:
Special lanes (e.g. HOV, truck lanes, climbing lanes)
Extended bridges or tunnels
Segments near a toll plaza
Demand conditions in excess of capacity
The influence of downstream blockages
Speed limit
Police enforcement
ITS
Freeway I
Ramp metering
11
5
Freeway I
11
6
Freeway I Freeway I
8
7
11
11
Freeway I
1
12
Freeway I
3
12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcOgiWlGDU
Tarea