Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Volker Schirrmeister
Varian History
Founded in 1959 & dedicated
to Oncology
Varian Medical Systems
created by Varian Associates
in April, 1999
Varian Medical Systems
Varian Oncology
Varian X-ray Tubes
Varian Security Inspection Products
Varian Biosynergy
Ginzton Research Center
History of the Proton Program at Varian
Identical Options
Dynamic Wedge
Single Photon Energy Asymmetric Jaws Dual Photon Energies
4 or 6 MV Multileaf Collimator 4 to 20 MV (25 MV)
PortalVision 5 or 6 Electron Energies
4D Treatment Console 4 to 22 MeV
Auto Field Sequencing
ARIA Oncology Info System
Varian Oncology Products Overview
Highest
Uptime Logbook 2004
King Faisal Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Why Varian?
ACCEL
Particle Therapy
Accelerator
Treatment Rooms with Gantry
Eye Treatment
Mechanical precision
requirements as verified in
production:
Beam axis within 0,5 mm
radius volume around
Isocenter
Gantry Treatment Room
Unique Proton Beam
Scanning Nozzle
PRECISE BEAM
LOWEST NEUTRON DOSE
Scanner-Magnet 1 (y)
Vacuum chamber
Monitor chambers
Scanner-Magnet 2 (x)
Scanning Nozzle
Scanning Magnets
Vacuum Chamber
Nozzle 3D-View
Patient Specific Devices
(Range Shifter, Ripple
Filter, Collimator, etc.)
y-View
30cm
30 cm
y-Scanner x-Scanner
x-View
40 cm
40cm
SADSC1 SADSC2
lSC1 d lSC2
20 cm behind 50 cm before
isocenter isocenter
Dose Distributions
measured at HMI, Berlin End-to-end test, RPTC Gantry-1
Test Cases Dose Results
1,000 1,007
0,030
1,010 1,007
0,000 doses [Gy]
- measured
- calculated
0,750
0,698
1,008
1,004
Deviations in
homogeneous
regions 1% !!!
according to the DIN 6875-1, Special radiotherapy equipments - Part 1: Percutaneous stereotactic
radiotherapy, basic performance characteristics and essential test methods
Demonstration of the overall system performance
specification of dose and dose distributions in a target volume, simulated in a phantom, for a simple
and sophisticated geometry
Focus on agreement between planned and measured doses
Test steps:
CT imaging
Therapy Planning System:
contouring of target volume
definition of irradiation fields
dose calculations
positioning of the phantoms at Gantry 1 using the X-ray based position verification system
Beam application
dose measurements
comparison between measured and calculated dose distributions.
Field 1
Field 2
RPTC :
Field 1: 30, table rotation 90
11 layers, 1000 spots
Field 2: 90, with 57 mm w.e. range shifter
10 layers, 800 spots
QA plan generated for homogeneous PMMA phantom
Test Case Results
Field 1
Measured vs. calculated doses [Gy]
Field 2
intensity
Courtesy of M. Schippers,PSI
Features
Field-of-view 20 28 cm
30 40 cm amorphous silicon
panels
Semi-automated image
matching and position
correction procedure
Only 2 X-ray axes needed
Position correction possible for
any treatment position
Total accuracy: 0.5 mm
User Interface Position Verification System
Partnership in R & D
1. University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center 26. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
2. Memorial Sloan - Kettering Cancer Center 27. University of Virginia Medical Center
3. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore 28. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 29. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
5. Dana - Farber Cancer Institute, Boston 30. City of Hope, Duarte, CA
6. University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 31. University Medical Center, Tucson, Ariz.
7. University of Chicago Hospitals 32. University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics
8. UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles 33. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago
9. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 34. Mayo Clinic Hospital Phoenix
10. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 35. University of Colorado Hospital, Denver
11. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia 36. Dartmouth - Hitchcock Medical Center
12. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center 37. Oregon Health and Science University Hosp.
13. Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, Calif. 38. William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.
14. University of California, San Francisco Medical 39. University of California, San Diego Medical Center
Center 40. University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill
15. Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital 41. New York - Presbyterian Univ. Hosp. of Columbia
16. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Inst and Cornell
17. Cleveland Clinic 42. Evanston, Northwestern Healthcare
18. University of Alabama Hospital at Birmingham 43. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN
19. Barnes - Jewish Hospital/Washington University 44. Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
20. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics 45. Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Fla.
21. University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 46. University of Kentucky Chandler Hospital
22. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville 47. Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
23. Yale - New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn. 48. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA
24. University of Minnesota Medical Center 49. Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA
25. University Hospitals Case Medical Center 50. Inova, Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA
Cleveland
Source: US News and World Report 2007
The unique Varian Oncology Solution
Cancer Treatment
IMRT & RapidArc
Radiosurgery
BrachyTherapy
Ground Floor RPTC Munich
A B
95.2
13.4 2.4 11.2 2.0 11.2 2.0 11.2 2.0 11.2 2.0 10.8 2.9 11.0 1.9
2.0
4.2
1.7
13.6
Cyclotron
Position
42.6
2.2
1.2 1.8
0.3
3.8
0.4
2.4
4.2
0.4
21.2
19.4
1.9
2.1
4.7
15.8
11.0
3.1
2.9
0.3
1.8
2.4
4.7
4.5
1.0
2.4
1.5
main entrance
reception
I
administration
facility varian/ varian/ staff recovery waiting area
management accel accel bed
technical delivery
techn. techn. techn.
rad.act.
devices + 0,00
control_1 immo. control_2 immo. control_3
(deflectors) dosimetry/
Building
devices devices
qs
E
Roof opening
cyclotron/
ess
fixed beam
B
installation
access
Beam Transport System (BTS) / Strahlengang
A
Clinical Workflow Increasing Challenges
t
g en
ni
n
g ion g em
g n n t a .
agin n Pl
a
n ni ifica Man A Mgt
st Tx a er Q
ion r atio r t Pl V p
tu ery g & age
t fo iz o n . e n
ul
ta
in g
obi
l
n gf m
e
Plan n t S eliv agi &
Im
s i t
n ag m ag ea st tie x D Im ta
Co Im Im Im T r P o P a T T x D a QA
, ,
. .
, ,
.
. .
.
,
.
.
. ,
,
.
.
,
,
.
. ,
.
Clinical Workflow Increasing Challenges
i n g, a py
t r
Ga T he
e r RPM ng to n
etry o ns
g , k i s T o & t i
an
a
n uch rac n lio m
C
, Pr er on osim ica
M sio o T io He a C g is i D p l
s e
nt Vi t C ical Vi s e ty eB ML Ima lV rtal Ap
atie m
a
x
c
a pt m
a
l ip
cui
on a
,
c rd or ta
P o I A g us
P So E O So E c A C in a P A R A r
Cl n-Bo
O
ARIA
Oncology Information System
featuring a single unified Data Base
What Matters Most?
Technology?
Innovation?
.
What Matters Most? Save 100,000 more
people.
Our Vision
PTS
LIS HIS Proton Therapy
Lab Information Hospital Information Control System
System System
PVS
HL7 Position
Verification
System Protons
EMR Scheduler Machine
Electronic
Medical Record Control
ARIA
Oncology Cone Beam
Information CT & Portal
System Imaging
Linac
Charge
RT-PACS Machine
Capture Control
Cone Beam
CT & Simulator
Imaging
DICOM 3.0
Simulator
DICOM-RT
ECLIPSE
VSIM VSIM
Treatment
Virtual Virtual
Planning System Simulation Simulation
CT MR
PET-CT
Varian at a Glance